#Which expertise should beginners prioritize?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Tactics without question
they are the reason why most games below the 2000 level are won or lost
exactly.
I make drawss
Not hanging pieces in one move
what is the point of learning openings if your opponent crushes you in the midgame/endgame
any advice for me im 450 and this is my second month
A opening is a tactic
nah just keep practicing/tactics etc.
no not rly
especially since these options are split so
Get better
ok thanks someone convinced me to learn some openings like kings indian i think that helped me win a lot of games
i love how its almost 100 voters and already have most saying tactics
you too
ye thats cool
learn a few openings still
whats the point of learning about the middlegame if your getting destroyed in the opening
you need to know how to start the game and basic trasp
or else your gonna get cooked by one trick players
even then its still tactics since book moves end so quick
ive a basic opening, e4 kf3, then its reactionary
on lower end games
if you practice tactics you should be able to spot them
you need to know opening principles
yeah def
instead you should look for attacking opportunities and tactics
no point in memorizing theory, pawns in center knights before bishops, castle and then attack
at least till like 1200
Opening theory is not worth time
yes
Endgames are the most useless thing for a beginner
when i learned one singular opening i doubled my elo from 400 to 800
I studied the bishop knight endgame but never ever used it in a game ever
i learned the bishop's opening for white, and i have a 70% win rate with it
definately openings is most important
Just know like 2 openings for white and black each
Openings are not to be completely ignored
Just learn King's Indian and Caro Khan for black
And like Italian game or something like that for white
Scandinavian was my go to opening
no time like beginning to play the bong cloud
What is the point of learning how to pin pieces and create attacks when you can’t develop them in an opening. The opening always stays same. In game the board is always different and it’s hard to see through all the hidden possibilities
When you master an opening below 700 elo. You already can’t lose with the simplest of moves
1000 is somewhere advanced imo
hell no
1000 is near intermediate i say
or just intermediate
Like you can honestly learn opening principles and endgames is kind of common sense, but tactics are where the game changes, if you don't find it you will lose.
You would be surprised how many games go to the endgame at 500-1000 level where one player gets crushed because they don't know the endgame. Of course, tactics should be prioritized, but having a somewhat decent endgame will really help you out (you could even just do a few endgame puzzles on chesscom until you somewhat understand endgame principles.
Also, having a decent understanding of 1 or 2 openings (one for each color) will help you dramatically. Don't need to study the opeining deep, just know the basic principles.
I go into the endgames and I also suck at it, I get your point. But we're talking beginners level here, if it was anything above 1000 I would say prioritize learning endgames. At this stage most of them miss really simple tactics that would've either win them the game or got them into a really comfortable and easy endgame. Of course since a lot of them don't find the tactics, they go into an equal endgame and it's a coin toss.
bro you just need to know the basics theres no use in memorizing theory
Opening principles instead of opening theory
