#Strategy vs Tactics
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
strategy
i love estonia
start
I like weinor
same
Strategic
Tactics
hey
🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪
tacticssss
Tactics
Strategy
just sound cooler
fr
I broke up with one of my girlfriends :D
the real thing to master is being dumb well
whats the difference between them?
Startegy I am biased I have 2 books on it
yes
how many do you have?
Bro got 6 gfs
i had 2 now i have one as it should be normal
Wait if I give a good reason I get diamond?
name of those books?
can I borrow one
i dont think they do that anymore, havent in a while
dunno u like bri'ish girls ?
lol
for sure
Amateurs Mind and how to reassess ur chess
she flat btw
I mean tactics is what gives me random games where I can just go forwards like everythign while racking up brilliancys but strategy is fun to employ to demolish ppl with
as long as they dont laugh at your accent
Alright I am out of here
idc
😂 😂
you bought them online?
k come romania bucharest if u interested
tec dec
alr gimme 5 minutes
I barely do either - ultimate chad move 😏
Ofc there are no libraries here for chess books
i surrender
im minor 🤔
In India yes. your parents agreed to those books? My parents would say"You can't even study ur school books"
so...
I'm saying tactics for lower elo players, because it can completely change the course of a game, as with strategy you can play solidly but if you don't do tactics then you can blunder a draw or a complete loss
I said both
yeah both is also good
in a game like chess: tactics
def tactics how are you seeing checkmate without tactics
whats the difference?
strategy is ur overall plan to win
tactics is where u go into detail about one part of the plan
u need both
my strategy is following an opening until my opponent doesn't do what i expect (850 btw
)
Ya after hell lot of begging
Lol good
strategy
literally what's the difference lmao
i just want to be loved man
strategy is more inportant because those tactics won't just come to you (unless ur U1500) you need to have a strategy that can make way for thoese tactics to happen.
Strategy is important to make progress in positons and develope plans and ideas.
Tactics are important to win material or gain a positional advantage through a clear weakness.
Both are very important but tactics win you most of the games. Strategy can be a big factor why you lost, but going for the clear win when you have it seems to be more important.
I do understand however when people say you can't find tactics without a strategy
“Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.” — Sun Tzu
Both are equally important.
You can say tactics is a subset of strategy; tactics is more flexible than a long-term strategy because your opponent can found what moves you've missed in your strategy (if it's not sound enough or they understood your motives) and take advantage of it.
"Tactics and strategy should always complement each other, and are two sides of the same coin." - Sun Tzu "The Art of War"
tactics
"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory . Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat"- Sun Tzu
Hence the idiots who say chess is 99percent tactics are wrong
Woah I was about to say that too
Damn we all know about the art of war
strategy tells us what are we going to do if all goes well
tactics tell us what to do in any situation no matter what
in chess terms as well tactics on the spot can help us modify our overall strategy
for eg. if any opponent has a counter to our strategy say a prepared 5-10 move opening then we can alter ours using tactics and counter his and gain the advantage in the long run
While they are both needed, strategy would be the better to have if you couldn't have the other
Tactics are neat tricks to gain a quick advantage whereas strategy is an overall direction for achieving your goal that you can work toward the whole game
all i can say is, I neither used strategies nor tactics. I play hope chess
Tactics always best strategy

without strategy chess is boneless
Without tactics chess is senseless
As someone who's rated 2800 in puzzles but 1100 rapid I can confirm that tactics are overrated
not overrated, just useless without strategy
That's the reason they are overrated
lol
Strategy is better than tactics
No matter how much chess puzzles you do, you need to have a strategy to get there.
Tactics because tactics mean something like scholar's mate and it can lead you win the game in 4 move
your pfp reflects you quite well
strategy is a grander scope and understanding of the game
Strategy is more important, but in a game between equal players better tactics can decide the win
taticts
but you can't get to a place where tactics are that helpful without a stategy. Tactics build off of strategy meaning that while strategy is weak without tactics, tactics are useless without strategy
Yep, strategy is used to set up your pieces and you may be able to get a nice tactic
Ask anyone over 1800 strategy or tactics it’s always tactics there is no debate
Notice that team strategy is all <1600
With majority 600-1200
agreed
You might wanna do some fact checking
Multiple people on this thread alone are 1800+ rated and there are more <500s saying tactics than strategy
Btw I love how you tried to elevate yourself by saying everyone with a lower rating than you is inferior and just happening to make your rating the baseline. It was a poor attempt to feed your ego.
I bet u can’t find 1 high rated chess player to say that strategy is more important than tactics
Tactics are way more important at the <1000 level than at higher levels, where strategy has a bigger significance.
You have to understand this or you won’t improve
Honestly who came up with this poll it’s common knowledge that tactics beat strategy
What’s more surprising is that a quarter of voters chose strategy
are yes, scholars mate, the classic... tactic
Strategy for bullet game
Tactics can be used in any game especially (for me) Rapid 10min games
The reason you say this is because people above 1000 already have most of the strategy down and they can then build off of the strategies with tactics.
I believe you are going off of the question "Is strategy or tactics more important to learn in chess?" in which case that depends on your level because if you are a high rating you already have the strategy down.
The thing that separates people between roughly 1200 and 2100 is tactics but without strategy they are all <1000s
I will again quote Sun Tzu in saying "Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory," meaning that strictly using strategy without tactics will get you to victory but in a slow and inefficient manner, while "Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat," meaning strictly tactics makes you feel like you are doing something but your failure is still imminent.
Entirely false
Bro sun tzu didn’t even play chess he’s talking about actual wars with real people
lol
Also false
It's sad that that's the best response that you can come up with
I do feel bad for you
Confirmation bias is a real thing
Now you’re not even arguing about the topic dumbo
That’s the 2nd time u went off topic bc you can’t find evidence that related to the topic
So you instead try to insult the actual person
Am I?
So the topic is about confirmation bias?
Do you know what confirmation bias is?
Your question is not related to the topic.
It originated from a simple comment as I was trying to share my sympathies
A simple comment too huh?
When I first brought it up, it was a simple comment, then you made an accusation that I was somehow "arguing"
Helps your argument and definitely doesn’t target the other person
Would you like this to be an argument?
And I am sorry, I meant no offense
Yea that’s why this chat exists
You let your emotions blind you
I have not shown my emotions once
And even if I did, blind me from what?
You have a good day sir
You too, you’ll find the truth eventually.
😆
Wait, isn't it's the same?!
I say strategy, because tactics alone gets me nowhere
Most of the tactics I get happen because of strategy (particular opening lines, or setting up peices to make tactics happen)
There are way more instances where I have to place my peices right to exploit weaknesses where strategy alone helps, than when my opponent hangs backrank mate or runs his king across the board without any cover
both
I say strategy, because tactics alone gets me nowhere
Most of the tactics I get happen because of strategy (particular opening lines, or setting up peices to make tactics happen)
There are way more instances where I have to place my peices right to exploit weaknesses where strategy alone helps, than when my opponent hangs backrank mate or runs his king across the board without any cover
Strategy is a long term plan whereas tactics are shorter yet effective advantage bringers I’d say strategy with tactics. A strategy with use of tactics whenever can
if you master strategy, you master chess
if you're good at tactics but not strategy then you don't have the strategy to put tactics on the board, if you're good at strategy but not tactics you can win just fine even if there were chances to gain material advantages earlier on, at least some strategy is needed to make any other skill able to help you when you play, which is why i believe strategy is more important
strategy\
strategy supreme
