#King's Knight vs Vienna
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Nf3
Vienna
/J never
nf3
vienna is for losers
Nf3
Nf3
Vienna Supremacy
To play Italian!!!
Idk chess but Knights look good in white
Vienna Gambit
nf3 :>
Both are good but i prefer nf3
vienna players are gigachads
I don't play either of these lamo
f4 not making the poll is a travesty
i like ponziani
Vienna my beloved
same
but Nf3 is the superior knight move
Knight!!
nf3
chill sornio
sornio stfu
Vienna cause it sounds cool
G
Kings knight supremacy
Nf3 because I prefer the openings it permits
Whatâs up hamsters
Nf3
Both
as a person who cant pay either vienna
stop, sornio!!!!!!!
@pale berry @pale berry @pale berry @pale berry
bro stop
No.
h
No
i agree
hi
nf3 is the classical and sophisticated way to go, people know how to counter the vienna at higher levels of play
kings knight all the fkin way
ur either getting muted or banned
omg why
Nf3 all the way
Ok
hi
u know that right?
vienna because its sounds cool
đ
bruh i play the spanish
Nf3 develps the knight for king's side castling attacks the black pawn on e5
me too
Lol
so nf3 on top
Nc3 because it's premovable
but i used to play the vienna tho lol
e4 Nf3 premove you blunder the e4 pawn to the Scandi
but e4 Nc3 premove still works against the Scandi
nobdy cares
thanks who ever was that
what
he's banned
Nf3 because it feels more open and dynamic
was crossposting in the community club
ohk
I guess
I like that explanation
but also it leaves a lot of option for black
As a Ruy Lopez player, I see this as an absolute win
+1
same
I dont know I play the sicilian
italian >>
do you play the italian?
if you play e4 and opponent goes e5
đ„¶ right
and you had to choose
kings gambit
ye
đ„¶
and you had to choose between these two
but you're down a tempo and sad
italian is sad
ok but probably kings knight
italian is goated
King's knight becuase Vienna has a bunch of cheap counters
Italian is probably easier to understand for beginners
vienna solos
I dont really know the advantages and disadvantages of them so I play kings knight because it advances a piece that is in the way of castling and it threatens a pawn
Neither! 2.Bc4 and then grab a bite to eat and go to the bathroom while the opponent is thinking 
Is it bad that ive never played the ruy lopez or italian game?
Would you say bishops opening is underrated
Yes, absolutely! Objectively not the best opening but playable.
You can transpose into Italian, Vienna, or play unique lines. Many people randomly assume you're going to do 1 out of those 3.
Yes, you got the role! Feel free to host! I'll send you more detailed instructions via DM.
Vienna is much more rare than 2.Nf3 at higher levels.
I don't see it much but I consider it to be a good option
Few opponents know it. Even if they know it, it's very rare so they don't have experience in it.
Many opponents think it's just a transposition trick.
I like the lines.
About 60% of people who play it play for transposition trickery into the Italian, about 20% for transposition trickery into the Vienna. Very few people play the unique Bishop's Opening lines.
What do you think of 1. e4 e5 2. f4?
đ
Objectively dubious but a lot of fun to play!
VIENNA EZ
King's Gambit is rare for 1.âŠe5 players, so you'll have more experience. However there are a number of good lines against it, so at FM+ level not that great in classical.
wait, uh king's gambit is listed as nf3??
king's gambt>vienna
nvm, im half asleep đ
im gonna go back to nap
Doesn't Fischer Defense refute it completely?
That's one of the good choices black has.
But refuted? Maybe at engine or grandmaster level. Below that, totally playable. People tend to overestimate how much theory they know. In my last tournament, against opponents averaging ~2000 FIDE, somebody was out of book before move 5 in four out of five games.
VIENNA SUPREMACY
nah imma play bishop to G12 forking every single piece
Nf3 my beloved â€ïž
Nc3
Nf3 simply superior
vienna is good only for begginers
Vienna is good as long as your opponents don't know how to equalize against it.
If I knew all of my opponents are gonna play the Vienna against me, I would play 1...e5 for the rest of my life.
So, 2.Nf3 is the obvious answer for me.
(Waiting for @hasty kite to come here and say something like "2.f4 >>>> 2.Nf3 & 2.Nc3")

I did play Italian in the past when I started chess but it's not my style. Never tried Spanish, Scotch or Ponziani ever. I would prefer Vienna every day if I had to move my knight after e4 e5 :)
It's a common mistake to think that. GMs know it is not true
kings gambit is hardly refuted
but yeah at GM level black doesnt have much trouble equalizing
however if black tries to play for an advantage positions can get really dank
weâre all sleeping on 2. Ke2
that's actually kinda crazy
I usually play Nf3 for the Italian, which I am far more comfortable and familiar with in principles and general lines, but I would like to hear someone's rationale for choosing the Vienna
(And also @hasty kite 's Bc4 opening)
I don't play the Bishop's Opening
Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant. You said that Bc4 was a good opening for e4 e5?
When did I ever mention Bc4?
Sorry, my bad
Mixed you up with @proper pier
Everybody who plays 1.e4 e5 knows 2.Nf3.
Most people who play 1.e4 e5 know 2.Nc3.
Few people who play 1.e4 e5 know 2.Bc4.
So the immediate answer is that Bc4 is objectively the worst of those moves, but fewer players are familiar with it, and if they know it, they don't know it that deep.
Bc4 specifically also allows a lot of transposition tricks, which makes it even harder for black to handle this opening.
me playing 1.d4 be like:đż
Vienna's too complicated if you're starting out.
And no one prepares for Nf3 at a more advanced level.
We can make this another poll: 2.c4 vs 2. Nf3 vs 2. Bf4 vs 2.Nc3 after 1.d4 d5?
good idea 
first time four choices in a poll
so much variety
They basiclly got all italian players, all ruy players, all scotch players and all four knights players and decided to get them agaisnt veinna players
approved 
Nf3
Considering that Vienna is doing great with 1/3 of all votes
vienna
vienna because i'm low elo so often times i get to play the gambit (3. f4 exf4 4. e5)
thats all the d4 players that side with veinna
That is the most backwards bs I ever done heard
from your local d4 enjoyer â€ïž
People still play the vienna?
Both of them yeah
im 1450 and id say maybe 30% of the time i get 1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. f4 on the board, they still take the pawn lol
and literally nobody knows to play d5 there
vienna on top
the Vienna is for people who donât actually know how to play chess
Reasoning?
Because youâre just following what Gotham tells you In hopes of getting good
If you learned it yourself then itâs not as bad
Bruh gotham didn't invented that opening
But still kings knight is for the ogs
Yes, but how many 700s do you think just stumbled upon it? Theyâre probably learning it from the biggest chess creator
Yeah so what's the issue in that?
Iâm not saying itâs a huge crime Iâm saying that itâs likely those who play the Vienna often have less experience
I mean kings knight is played at all levels
But you never see the Vienna or London in gm tournaments
??
Both are seen many times on top level
Who plays vienna often have less experience of what?
The game, as in lower rating
Often, not always
Can you explain reasoning behind that
The Vienna, at least to me, is more common at lower ratings, hence my opinion
Yeah so what's the issue in it
Kings gambit is much popular at lower level and it's completely đ„đ„
Kings gambit is almost refuted opening
You need almost perfect play to benefit from kings gambit
But you can play it at lower levels because neither player plays consistent high accuracy
Yeah so?
Even stockfish lost to kings gambit
Against another chess bot are you kidding me
Thatâs not a fair comparison to players
Kings gambit is very good at lower level it forces you to calculate and get better at using intiative, tactics, attacking
The ideas of the kings gambit are difficult to play because you weaken your king
It makes for hard to play games
Bots donât have to deal with that as much and also, theyâre bots
Idk how black will exploit it can you play a game against me and show?
Game for black is much harder because white is ahead in devlopment and have potential to attack
Literally every game leads to a different position, that can be said for anything bc youâre presented with something new each game
Itâs difficult to play for both yeah
But that doesnât change the fact that whatâs king is weak, so if a player knows how to target that, play is hard for white
Essentially itâs a less common opening now because itâs very complicated and sharp which can lead to quite intense games
Can you show?
I personally wouldnât play it because itâs tough
Do you know what the kings gambit is
I don't know how it get exploited
White have the intiative not black
The gambit of the pawn makes the king weak on the dark diagonal
It's only weak if king can be targeted
Whether or not black gets the chance to exploit it depends on the game
Qh4+ move 2?
??
I don't understand what you want to say
White have the intiative, devlopment, potential to attack
Itâs possible to use the diagonal the moment the move is played
G3 and white totaly safe
So black just has no pieces and no counter play in any situation ever?
Like I said it depends on the game
What white has doesnât take into account what white doesnât have or risks
Black develops the queen and can take the f pawn next move, threatening the e pawn
Every player don't want to play safe game someone want to play sharp attacking agressive games
Where they can improve thier calculation, tactics, attacking skills which is of the best way to improve
D4 takes whole center
Why are you speaking for every player
Why not?
If you are in a tournament who needs to draw or win, are you going to play safe or aggressive? You can play aggressive, but if you make a mistake you throw it
Because you arenât every player
This is wrong, but looking at analysis itâs evaluation is better for black
??
Just giving a random situation?
And I can make it completely like you have to play for win only
Nope
- F4 is -0.4
E4 e5 F5 qh5+ g3 then?
Oh so stockfish is just wrong is your opinion
I just said I was wrong
But that the kings gambit gives black advantage
Yeah so you are not facing stockfish
Because that random situation could happen to somebody, and in that case that player might not want to do what you said
You canât speak for everyone
But if Iâm facing a good player Iâm not going to play something that gives them advantage and just hope I donât lose
If it was against an 800 I would play it without worrying maybe
But against someone of higher rating I wouldnât risk it
Because I donât have perfect play
In that situation best chance of winning is by playing agressive chess doesn't matter if player is 800 or 2400 defending is the harder task
I would argue it does matter
Usually highly raited will outplay in long-term positional game
YEA
BECAUSE THEYRE HIGHER RATED?
LMAO
If an 800 plays kings gambit against me Iâd probably attack the king and win
The reason they higher raited they are better at game they will be having better knowledge of certain aspects of game
Whereas if I did the same they likely wouldnât win
Just because they played a certain opening that doesnât refute a rating discrepancy of 800 and instantly make me struggle because I have to defend
Yeah thatâs kinda how rating works buddy
Bro kings gambit make black defend not white
Qh5+ is nothing more then a check it's like when 800 sees a check he give it
Big shock but you can play openings which Levy likes without watching Levy
Iâm assuming you didnât read on because I then said if you learned it yourself itâs not as bad
But often newer players more commonly learn the Vienna due to Gotham and his influence
What is wrong with that? Let people play what they want to play
I never said there was anything wrong with it ffs
Iâm just saying itâs more common at lower levels
Fair
I already said that was wrong
But are you gonna tell stockfish heâs wrong
Cause In the end itâs complicated but the evaluation is in blacks favour
Because the ideas can favour white
But often donât

đ
You have no say in this
Not that you have a side to support anyways
Scotch Gambit and Evans Gambit >>>
vienna
Vienna
Vienna. It's easier to learn, has some neat traps, and the Vienna Gambit is crushing if accepted.
I play the ponziani but vienna is also good



