#Ruy Lopez vs Italian Opening
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
ruy lopez period
what is that
ruy mid
ITalian
better tactics
Good
first
cause its cool
Not learning allat!
yes
Scotch!!!!!
Ruy mid
btw
fried livering noobs
italian got better tactics
evan gambit
best
superior nation
lol
good
Italian is better
RUY LOPEZ
scam
Kyz
fried liver
e4 e5 โน๏ธ๐ซ
Nimzowitch larsen
Ruy Lopez vs Italian Opening
Ruy pin and ruins pawn structure
Ruy Lopez Superior because i studied it more
Lopez is good
Lopez without a doubt
bruh wut. Ruy Lopez is negative elo chess
italian has better tactics, more chances, and ruy lopez is for old ppl
objectively ruy there's a reason it's more popular lol
Option 3: d4
ITALIAN IS BS
look at the top
Litaly
i am italian but i like the ruy lopez
RUY MID 
i choose ruy and italian idk why xD
Italian has Fried Liver, and it's a really good beginner opening. It's pretty easy to waste moves trying to save the bishop in the Spanish versus the Italian. Plus the Italian is a bit easier to play since you don't need to know quite as much theory to have a good position.
italian by far
Fried liver+gambits+not boring+easy to learn
Italian because I know it the most 
ITALIAN TRASH
Anitta was first though
I bet people that like ruy lopez here don't know how to play it though
Italian 10x better its not stupid like ruy lopez where they play a6 and you trade bishop for knight just to double their pawns
Ruy lopez
italian easier to understand
same but shh 
e4 e5 โน๏ธ๐ซ
Ruy Lopez
But only for those above like 1700
aka not us
e4 e5 โน๏ธ๐ซ
on my screen it prints as im first but k
ITALIAN IS STUPID
ruy lopez - strategic (boring)
italian - funny with c3
London System
are there any ruy experts here
discord bug prob
MAMMA MIA
dor is ruy expert
You can do evans gambit
Also italian is great because it could lead to attacking the center with c3 d4
Italia mamaa
The only ppl who'll choose ruy lopez either are really good or have some secret prep
I wonder if anyone that likes the ruy lopez actually knows how to play it
RUY LOPEZZZZZ
the fried liver has 438578347538477534856 counters
dammnnn
ruy ๐คฎ
italian better
Ruy Lopez just fun too play
I don't recommend both, way too predictable
doesnt ruy lopez also do that ๐
wtf
ruy is infinitely better no contest
nah guys
Italian ez
Bro Italian is shit Polish opening ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฑ
yes

I prefer e4 e5 d4
bongcloud is where its at
we do not care
fried liver is good if you're beginner. however I find hard to imply for advance level.
Italian is italian, and their pizza is pizza. So Italian
do you?
I don't use the fried liver
no because people arent stupid to play the berlin
cringujesz
Italian
stop saying period js bc u think ur correct
mama mia
i've tricked so many toddlers with the italian lmao
welp then idk ๐
I play Ruy Lopez and can say successefully
forky forky
mrozi 
rel
Italian way too overplayed
if we aren't talking about the fried liver then the italian is indeed good ig but imo ruy lopez is better
the point of c3 d4 is because their are 3 of blacks peices having eyes on the d4 square the bishop c6 knight and e5 pawn
i am correct, i dont "think" i am correct

Fried liver not even good
yes so....?
Pizza opening better cuz I said so
e4 e5 โน๏ธ๐ซ
mamma mia
that's what i asid
jebaฤ morzenie kiedy promujฤ ojczyzne Polska GUROM ๐ฆ
yes
d4 >>>>>>

obviously the reti is superior
e4 e5 โน๏ธ๐ซ
berlin isn't good at low level because if you play the berlin you're trying to get a draw while white has an advantage without risk, and that's not what black should be trying for at lower levels
i mean ur usually correct
d4
always* :)
i havent see u be wrong yet
Yes, of course, we all should play the reti
Oh yeah, you said "aren't", mb mb
but u r only 600
italian has better tactics and allows you to take control of the center, if you like playing intense italian is for you but if you like trading for no reason than ruy lopez is for you
so ur gonna be wrong eventually
italy my beloved https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cl4q4jIGc78
๐
you can easily break towards the center with italian and a lot of people fall for some guocio piano game
only 600times better than you*
if the poll was spanish vs italian then it would be closer. biased naming cause country name is power
here is the solution, dont play e5
ur lower rated stfu
question: have you ever tried the ruy lopez before? ๐
bs
ruy lopez has too many variations to learn, italian is really simple and itโs better on a beginner level
will adopt you rn
none of the abo ev
send link
Italian is easier
no
yeah and its stupid theyll just play a6 and you trade bishop for knight for literally no reason
ur a waste of my time
Imma head out this chat worse than general on a bad day
scared?
more people play ba4 smh
and probably a cheater
I agree, I play Ruy Lopez and I know about 10 variations
exchange ruy isn't bad
learning ruy lopez theory is fun when you get higher rated you should try that
if you are a 400 that is
lol thatโs dedication!
my username says a lot
500-999 ah yes
ok which one is superior?
more masters play ruy lopez therefore its better at master level
boom now there is 2x italian as there is ruy lopez
I wouldn't recommend it though
I like the Italian because it was like the first thing I learned and I know the most Italian theory, plus I just like most Italian middlegames
i like the evans gambit also and i canโt get that out of ruy lopez
also the question itself is misleading
you can play both the italian and spanish with black or white
Most chess players aren't masters so it shouldn't matter to the rest of the chess players what the masters play
I think ruy lopez at master level has some problems because of the berlin and marshall
so actually italian has been played a lot at top level recently
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
hm interesting
here is the solution, play kings gambit and have no fear
id rather play d4 then getting into spanish or italian lines ๐ altho ill play nf3 and c4 before getting to d4 ๐ ๐
it doesnt matter at what level
but I'm a ruy lopez enjoyer so I have to vote ruy lopez
ruy lopez is the higher level opening and superior
EXACTLY
Kings Indian Defense ๐ฎ๐ณ
and thats why ur father left
bruh what
or just stop being a 200 and playing e5 as the first move for black and play something real like the french or caro kann
the only correct answer
the question is why e5
Marshall Attack, Chigorin, Averbakh, Trajkovic Counter Attack, Cozio, Bird, Steinitz, Arkhangelsk, Neo-Arkhangelsk, Breyer, Flohr, Zaitsev, Zaitsev Variations, it is about 15 variations what I play
๐
or even better, siclian ๐
average caro enjoyer
italian amazing
yeah iโve only heard of like 3 of those LOL
no i like french more
evans gambit giucco
i hate caro enjoyers they are all stupid (except me)
I like the London
even worse
evans gambit is w
most stupid opening
when u play the french ur just accepting to play a game where ur worse
I always play 4 knights
nah\
average 500
play sicilian ๐คท
no because every time someone plays the sicilian on me they just play something stupid like b3 and just cant play it correctly because they only play it because hikaru played it that one time
London >>>>
The Italian opening interests me and I prefer it since at least for me it gives me a solid position, and to be able to troll my rival
YEAH BOYY

i hate playing against the london
i donโt think thatโs a controversial take though
@wicked girder add a third option for London or I cancel my premium and demand a refund
grand prix = scary
actually no kings indian defense
i hate playing chess
vote shouldve been kings gambit or queens gambit, and why kings gambit is the answer
i hab question
why e5
real as heck
I hate london
that's a pretty good amount
I learned how to play against marshall, (chigorin, breyer, zaitsev)/(I go 8. a4 and becomes anti-classical) open, berlin, arkhangelsk, averbakh, classical, bird, schliemann, cozio, cozio deferred, smyslov, steinitz, steinitz deferred, norweigan
same, but play KID setup against London and , you'll be fine
cancel it 
i need to learn this
average scholar's mate player
both are mid
Oh... Actually I don't know why but London system is confusing me all the time.
I studied it bunch of times but I don't feel comfortable playing with it ๐
yes and Anti Marshall I play too sometimes
king's gambit reigns supreme
scholars mate players when they dont go e5:
@wicked girder ๐
Depending on a level
At most levels Italian is much more practical and easy to play
Objectively, I would say, Ruy Lopez is slightly better
There're much more options for both sides
If we're talking about specific variations, then I can compare Giucco Pianissimo (with c3 d3) and Closed Ruy Lopez. In both openings the idea for white is to prepare d4. And in most cases in Ruy Lopez white does it in one move (d2-d4 instead of d2-d3+d3-d4)
But, if you're a beginner or an intermediate player, please, don't play the Ruy Lopez
You're gonna quit chess before you get to enjoy the game
no queens gambit is better idc that kings gambit is for no fear queens gambit is just superior second best thing to do in d4 behind kings indian defense
me too what you mentioned
against marshall I go 8. a4 anti marshall because I don't want to allow that kingside counterplay
that's why sometimes against 7... d6 I also go 8. a4 because it can transpose into the anti-marshall
why not ruy sad
๐
Come one ! enough with the scholars mate already ๐
i dont like either italian or ruy tbh
a person who knows reasoning pls pin this
play d4 instead ๐
i personally find it really easy to decline the queens gambit
doesnt matter, for me id rather play english lines before queensgambit
here is my solution, play the vIEnnA
I LOVE THE VIENNA
ruy lopez I think was my main opening since I started playing chess ๐
๐
Best opening
correct, but I enjoy to play against Marshall, I played Marshall Spassky Variation and it went well
works for me, kings gambit and vienna r basically siblings
Vienna gambit ! ๐
Personally I experiment with both nowdays...
yeah ok settled, vienna wins
vienna is what im currently playing in e4 mostly ๐ค
black just gets too much counterplay for me
even tho i dont know much about it ๐ ๐
i wanna learn some lines of ruy lopez just bc i feel in general more people know how to play the italian
i actually have no opinion on this as i am low rated
dor
yeah all ik is vienna gambit
hi
vienna
check my profile on site , and you'll see my way to play Ruy Lopez
what do u think
iโm 800 elo is that low rated
idk
probably?
which ruy variation is the best for white
chessly sample users be like ๐
if you are under 1500 dont play ruy lopez
why not
says the person under 1500 ๐
I don't know how to answer this because it's usually black that chooses the variation
fr tho
tbh its matter of preference
I'm a d4 player, but if I would play e4, I would choose Ruy Lopez over Italian
just don't play ruy lopez
Why??! ๐ถ
it doesnt matter how good an opening is as long as its decent
Im supposed to be 1400 but im 800
what do u [play in d4?
and you're not playing at master level
real
this is making me think back to when i was 100 bullet elo and somebody played the scandinavian on me but i thought because its bullet they would fall for scholars mate so i would play Qh5 but the thing is the square is already open for them so you cant even play it
people tend to play more inaccuracies and all that stuff so a more imbalanced game would be better in that elo
Queen's Gambit and other lines with d4 c4
yes but like which variation would you prefer
ok instead of argueing over which is better i should just go play some chess ๐
bye people
like do you mean which variation would I rather black plays against me?
yes
no just play c4, BOOM
imo, people can be really good at chess in lower elos and just be hardstuck in them
Flohr-Zaitsev
I used to avoid ruby Lopez after a point because most people respond with the Berlin defence. But I'm trying to find response to it... So... As said before experimenting... I'm more confident with the Italian but I feel I can easily be surprised or make a mistake.
just learn the berlin
or the anti berlin
tbh I don't have any that I really want to see, since I'm in the process of getting to really know these different variations I kind of want to see them all
you are hardstuck because of the lack of consistency in your games
ahhh gochu gochu
yeah learn ber lin but still italian is better
it's not like a multiplayer game where teamates can decide your elo so it's your skill and consistency
i just realized
that makes sense
anitta you said italian opening its italian game
and you put a french dank memer instead of an italian
spanish game and opening are allso the same thing
ruy lopez the spanish same thing
Trust me, players below master level usually have no idea how to play the Berlin (unless they've studied some sort of course)
They just play Nf6, because they've been taught to develop knights before bishops
italian is far more beginner friendly
that's the italian flag
spanish or vanish
yep but its also called the spanish soooo
oh crap i thought it was french it looks blue
hmmm, im probably never getting into queensgambit, but i like english now, i can get behind catalan
nah lol it's green
bro this aint duolingo
I like Italian cause its easier to play
Petrov's defence vs Russian defence (/joke)
i agree
yeah I personally think berlin at lower levels is just not good
it's basically an opening where black gets a slightly worse position and tries to hold
white gets to keep the pressure and there's not much risk
as black I would always think you should be trying to play for a win
i personally like to resign
learning ruy lopez isnt worth it if so much has been analyzed
Ruy Lopez vs Spanish 
ikr
And it's easier to counter
english vs englund gambit vs london ๐
๐ฎ๐น
london
am i crazy or aer those the exact same thing
The spanish is much more advanced and difficult if you don't know it that well. Overall tho, it is much better then the italian.
englund gambit is just attempting to make your opponent blunder
Yes, it is the same thing
oh
I voted ruy lopez but I would recommend the italian lol
Anyone else here always plays 4 knights?
i think the most important thing is italian and spanish shouldnt be the only openings you are playing
๐
I only play the ruy lopez
โ ๏ธ
what's your elo?
Don't judge I'm a 900
gahdamn how many lines do you know ๐ ?
sorry lol
4 knight is easy for me to play
anti-marshall, The next two are alternatives > (chigorin, breyer, zaitsev)/(I go 8. a4 and becomes anti-classical) open, berlin, arkhangelsk, averbakh, classical, bird, schliemann, cozio, cozio deferred, smyslov, steinitz, steinitz deferred, norweigan
That's why I always play it
I haven't fully mastered these yet but I'm in the process of doing so
Same
For most players Ruy Lopez is just unnecessary complex
It doesn't make sense to learn lines of Closed and Open Spanish and study the Berlin Endgame if you're gonna hang your queen on move 5
I do not understand a word 
why do you love ruy lopez so much that you dont want to play anything else im curious
Looks like I need to study a lot more chess
ruy lopez has been my main opening for years and I've always thought that I should learn one opening to everything, and not have various alternatives, as it allows me to get better at what I'm currently playing
fair
You forgor Schliemann Deffered
i do that with vienna
italian is easier to play for many players
yeah I did not learn that one but I think it's objectively really bad for black
and it's also very rare
I might learn it one day
Yep
I mainly learned the more common ones
I want to learn to play e4 and I'd like to play Ruy Lopez
Do you think it is a good idea? (I'm almost 2k rapid)
Whats a good opening to learn for a 900 rapid
caro
if you are willing to learn a bunch of theory then I think it should be fine
within variations there's some slight nuances that can get complicated but overall I don't think it should be that difficult
I would recommend Scotch or Vienna
It's pretty easy to play
vienna gambit
that thing has got me from 900 to 1050
Yeah, I'm fine with learning theory
Alr thanks
Imma look into learning them, thanks
scotch is very easy to play
the source I used for learning the ruy lopez was a book called "fabiano caruana's ruy lopez" or something like that
I'm not sure about other ruy lopez books but this one was pretty good
ruy lopez aka spanish is the best opening(according to stockfish)
Thanks, I'll take a look at it
when studying openings I also like to pair it with engine analysis too, but you don't have to do that
King's Gambit or Vienna where? I never played the Spanish with white and the Italian was my first opening. Easy vote for me
I'm waiting for London vs Queen's Gambit
I would prefer Queen's Gambit vs King's Gambit
Scotch Game is better
I don't think there's anything to discuss 
It's about what we as community prefer and not what is objectively best
I don't think it is even reasonable to compare those openings
They're like completely different
im waiting for reti vs van geet poll

KG obviously better no discussion
The question about spanish vs italian opening depends on the level . So the Italian is much easier to learn and to understand because you dont have to learn so many responses like in the spanish . But in the spanish is studied everywhere and if you put in the work drawble from all variations if the opponent respnds with the best moves so you will endup with atleast a better positon . For beginners is the italian better because its not as hard to understand as the spanish and you have you bishop on C4 staring at the vulnarable f7 pawn and you have a target you can hold onto like in the fried liver. The spanish is better which is shown by the strong computers but you need to learn alot theory and its very drawish due to it beaing heavily studied also it is very complex withall its diffrent gameplans.
Intuition will take you a lot farther in the Italian
The Ruy Lopez: Spanish Grandeur
The Ruy Lopez, also known as the Spanish Opening, takes its name from the 16th-century Spanish bishop Ruy Lรณpez de Segura, who analyzed and popularized the opening.
The main idea behind the Ruy Lopez is to pressure Black's knight on c6, indirectly controlling the center, and preparing to develop the bishop to an active square on b5. Opening aims to create a solid pawn structure, prompt quick piece development, and exert pressure on Black's position, which often leads to a complex and tactical middlegame.
Italian Opening: Artful Precision
The Italian Opening, sometimes called the Italian Game, is equally rich in history. Its origins can be traced back to the 16th century in Italy.
The Italian Opening focuses on quick piece development, with the bishop on c4 aiming at the f7-square, an area often targeted for an early checkmate or tactical threats. The Italian Opening emphasizes control of the center and efficient piece play, allowing players to potentially launch aggressive attacks or transition into different pawn structures.
Comparing the Openings
Complexity vs. Flexibility:
The Ruy Lopez is known for its depth and complexity. The positions that arise from this opening can lead to deep strategic plans, and various pawn structures. On the other hand, the Italian Opening, though less intricate, offers a more flexible approach, allowing players to adjust their plans based on the opponent's responses.
Aggressive vs. Harmonious:
The Ruy Lopez often leads to sharp and aggressive middlegame positions, creating tension on the board. It demands precise calculations and deep understanding of positions, making it a favorite of many attacking players. In contrast, the Italian Opening promotes harmonious development and maintains a balance between control and strategic maneuvering.
Conclusion
In the eternal debate of Ruy Lopez vs. Italian Opening, there is no definitive answer, Otherwise I In my opinion Italian is much better. Limit ๐ฆ
I can say Italian because the more people who play it, the more people I get to use the Rousseau Gambit against so we'll just go with that. (Yes the Rousseau is my main opening in rapid atm but I'm changing it soon)
<@&745328830649991179>
โ
italian but mostly the gucci piano
the rousseau gambit is kinda mid (I used to play it too)
I like the Italian personally
No
Also no
neither are good, we should all play the London and caro-kann
Giuocco Piano
close enough
Ruy Lopez is for nerds
giuoco piano
Exactly i just double clicked c mb
Ruy Lopez, Italian is more symmetrical and therefore more BORING
Mid is a bit of an understatement. It dies if they know d4 and the right line
Is Ruy Lopez that much more forcing than Italian games? Black still has a variety of easy ways to vary the opening I feel.
some specific lines are more forcing -- e.g. the riga variation -- but there's plenty of offbeat responses, I personally play 3...f5 and opponents at 1200-1400 level tend to fall apart
or at least, they aren't booked up on it, which I find tends to give me an advantage
learning the traps to the ruy lopez sucks balls
like u
cope
Seems trappy for my tastes but I could see it being viable at least.
I personally like the Improved Steinitz defense (play D6 after opponent castles). Breaks mainline theory but comes very naturally to me, especially if white takes on C6 instead of me making them.
How do yโall play Italian games as white? Iโm yet to find myself attracted to any variation for such in particular.
it's maybe not as good as main lines, but I generally get out of the opening not down more than a pawn, even if my opponent does know what they're doing, and I personally will take that

Which is worse to go up against as black then?
From a practical standpoint of playing for the win as white I really struggle to understand why GM's play the ruy lopez when black can play a Berlin and most likely just draw
I donโt see why white has to allow black to go for the Berlin defense when they can defend the pawn with D3 or NC3. Thatโs what happens often at the highest levels I would presumeโฆ wouldnโt be surprised if thereโs a more bizarre but equally valid variation I donโt see there
anti berlins are still super drawish
the ruy lopez as a whole has a low winrate for white at the master level due to the high draw rate
โฆAnd I was under the impression it was popular at that level
It is popular
It's the most popular after E4 E5
But I can't understand why
The simple answer is that the Ruy Lopez has one of the highest win rates for white, or at least highest expected scores (win rate + draw rate * 0.5).
For example, according the chess.com database (pictured) you'd expect to score out of a 100 games,
Ruy Lopez / Spanish โฆ 56.5
Italian โฆ 53.5
Scotch โฆ 53.0
Pretty good argument for the Ruy Lopez!
what database is this
are you sure this is a masters database and not just any player
amongst amature players who dont know reems of theory it seems like a decent opening
on the lichess masters database white wins 25%, draw 59%, black wins 16%
This is the chess.com masters database.
We're on the chess.com server here, so using the lichess database is a bit weird; but same result: On lichess Ruy Lopez / Italian / Scotch all win about 30% of the time, but black has the least winning chances by far in the Ruy Lopez.
Italian is my fave because of Guioco Piano (my favorite opening) and Fried Liver. This is an 1100 speaking tho
You see, contrary to your belief, chess is NOT rock paper scissors. There is still chess to be played even from the position of the Berlin endgame, and if one really wants to avoid the Berlin mainline they can just play the anti berlin systems with d3
I never made the statement that isn't guaranteed to be a draw
There's chess to be played, but statistically the winning chances are far lower than other openings
You made it seem like playing the Ruy Lopez was a dubious choice lol
So if you are trying to play for a win with white, you will have far better chances not going into that
It's probably the most sound opening there is
But practically the high amount of theory gives it low winning chances at the top level
In terms of playing not-to-lose it might be the best choice as blacks winrate is extremely low
Of course winrate isn't everything but it definitely demonstrates that the practical winning chances are low in the berlin endgame for example
This is only at the very top level obviously
The answer is neither because the Caro is a better response to e4 anyways
First of all, Ruy lopez is known from people all over the world and studied, which basically means that it is countered by more players then you'd expect. While the Italian is more easy to counter, it can spread into different types of openings and can lead to a lot of positional advvantages, so I think the answer is Italian Opening.
Your*
Ruy Lopez is the best e4 opening
I agree with you
Italian 2 knights defense
In The 2 knights defense Ng5 is the intercontinental ballistic missile
finally people realize that the ruy lopez is the worst most boring opening ever

bro i built my entire repertiore to avoid ruy\
both sides are the most painstaking battle of move orders man
yeah move orders matter a lot in ruy lopez but it doesn't make it boring
in my opinion - both openings are very great, but: italian is to 1000 elo, ruy lopez is over 1200 elo
Guiocco 4 knights
Spelling goes hard
Why italy
Bro what are you talking about I love the ruy Lopez and I also love playing exciting dynamic chess
Saying the ruy lopez is boring is a sin
saying otherwise is incorrect lol
The Italian is also boring
The Italian is literally more symmetrical than the ruy Lopez
exactly ๐
abandono italian,spanish,scotch
good for beginners but it gets so old
I apologize for advertizing.
Both are perfect
Italian becouse "1.E4 E5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 C6 4.Nc3 Bg4 5.Nxf5 Bd1 6.Bf7+ Kd7 7.Nd5#"
- e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 c6 4. Nc3 Bg4 5. Nxf1 Bd1 6. Bf7+ Kd7 7. Nd5# lore in a nutshell
I kind of got confused i played the moves in my head it didnt go well
ruy lopez better
Nah Ruy Lopez too complicated
Basically any move works for Black in the Ruy Lopez I think even h6 is fine
Also if I liked the Ruy Lopez I wouldn't make four Italian Game videos lol
ruy lopez >>>
Stockfish likes ruy lopez more
I think that both are good, its just that the Italian is a little boring since its always the same moves at every game.
Italian is way better
not true at all
This post is so old bro
Stockfish says ruy lopez ๐๐ค
theyre basically the same in terms of objective strength
ruy lopez is definitely way better
If you play italian the opponent has alot of counterplay
ruy lopez is complicated and rare to come across, thus your opponent has little to no traps
it isnt "rare to come across" by any means
It is rare
Out of the 200 games I played none of my opponents played Ruy Lopez
thtats crazy
Another one is In lichess database Ruy Lopez was only played 17million times September 2023 to September 2024.
That's very little especially when lichess literally have 150k+ active users everyday.
With an average of 85 million games a month ( everything is according to lichess website)


ngl play anything else