#London Vs French: which one is the worst to face?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
london boring
first
Cause its ewww
cause london bad
Because it’s boring as shit
hi
i cant stand playing the lodnon
Sucks aff
london
L london
London because theory to 20 moves
French suck
london garbage
ll
london brehhhhhh
mega boring
its not lmao
late game

london sucks
london boring af imo
I like the french
Here we go agian
LLLL london
l in london
I don't even know the difference between the two LMAO
fr🤢 nch
I love london system so ...
London lame
cause we're tired to see the london
london can collapse easily but also can be very powerful
i am french
LONDON

italian
Because it's boring as shit and you want to murder your opponent for it
Me block bishop (french)
i got a book with 300 pages that is full of london bruh
french is a pain
All london games are virtually the same
london
i can't master both openings
not the poll being 150 vs 48 
the only answer
sad
lol

i hate facing the french
👍

I have London
I don't know the french 💀
French is anoyying

qg is best after d4 why play london
I choose 1️⃣ and 2️⃣
hi anitta
london iis better
racist
lol
french can be hard to face
FRENCH AND LONDON BOTH ARE ANOYYING TO FACE
both bad
at my rating it literally doesn't matter what opening you start with so yeah idc
play the sicilian
i don't know any of those but i don't like france
e4!!
LONDON
it depends on what you consider "worse" if you mean what's more dangerous then obviously it's the french, if you mean what takes the fun out of your game, and will be boring it's the london
frence took the L here. At least London just sucks but not that really bad
e4
169 vs 64
esc be like
d4!!
The london can lead to interesting middlegames and the French always leads me to a closed position which I dont like
both openings suck
ITS HARD TO FACE
susilian defence moment
nf6
both are reallly dumb
1.e4 g6 !!
Both are trash
what
pov london player explaining why london is good
the anti london gang won lol
agianst french just wing gambit
London is easily refuted d5 and c5
Susiluon 💀
learn the modern defense
yea
But the french has many variations
Ancient attack 🥶
OH just nevermind
What you trippin on?
Its honestly fine, but the Italian better
Just nevermind xD
Botez Live explaining to Gotham why London is better
If it’s a joke ya but it’s spelt Sicilian
the Deez defense 
Yaaa
its trash. i lost against a dude a few times and drew first time as he played modern bruh
there are moves that can bring them down in a instant
🤓
Whoever makes these pictures, great job
These look really good
yea
true
the poll should have 'both' option
i hate facing the french
what da
Easy to make tho
so it's good if you lost against it !?
1.b4, e5
2.Bb2, bxb4
3.Bxe5
i drew against it bruh
they should have bishop opening vs reti
I think it would be helpful to post what they look like compared...
yay
I hate facing both
yes, bold of them to assume their playerbase can diffrentiate between openings
hi team nepo
sup
I hate playing chess
then why are you here
Against the French you have many options, London is mostly boring
true
shut,up im playing setarra
because I love playing chess
it's a love hate relationship
kinda the same with me
If i feel like the opening is annoying that opening would be hard to face that means, french thats why
personally I prefer the bongcloud
wipes my opponents off the board
Insane opening imo
bongcloud cuz if you lose against it it would be rather humiliating
yes it's an underrated gem
Fun and deranged opening > Boring, yet strong opening
rating is temporary, bongcloud is eternal

Still going💀

french is annoying it strikes in the center with d5 making it aggresive as shit
i love london personally as long as you play off theory at move 10
advance variation go brrr i guess
just play c5 then knight out andf queen to b6
if a french turns into a london its.... i actually dont know
eh i guess thats true too
french is very good until you get to 2.4k +
london is easy to counter just strike back at the centre with c5 after the whole steup is done
positional london is so fun to play
🤓
london player coping
i mainly play queens gambit but i sometimes play london loll
fr*nch & l**on 🤮 👎 


bongcloud 


fianchetto is more boring than london and french
would disagree
as an anti boring player i tend to go for a queenside castle and positional attack on kingside
makes chess 100% more fun
In my opinion London is one of the most (if not the most) annoying openings to face
You can't really avoid it, unless you play something really stupid, like Englund Gambit
It's hard to create play against the London due to it being very solid
And you can't really sit there and do nothing, because a good London player will launch a kingside attack at you at some point (I used to play the London, so I kinda know what I'm talking about)
I don't play against the French that often (sometimes after 1.d4 e6 I play e4 and go for it), so personally I don't find it annoying at all
But you always have a lot of ways of avoiding the French (just don't play 1.e4 and you don't have to ever face it)
But the only two ways to avoid the London - 1.d4 e5 which is refuted and 1.d4 c5 which is playable, but not very impressive either
So the London is a clear winner here
benoni defense is great
i wanna play like that, what openings do you play where you castle queenside?
do it in catalon or english
its not openings it's just intuition
hyper modern setup not bad tho
d4 c5 is not quite the Benoni
It might transpose, but white doesn't have to play c4
london mega gae
the center game for example
london and french also not bad
lemme set up a lichess and show you
i mean king fianchetto is more fun than london or french
for low elo like me
well if someone fianchettos just take full center

both are boring
propably except KID
Like this?
what
French cause London has easy counter play
hows that even possible?
london is confusing
he propably mean e5, d5, c5 etc.
You just summon pawns from 4th dimension
fr
I know, I'm kidding
As someone who is not very high rated, I odn't think I'd like playing against the french.
Um WE TALKIN BOUT THE COUNTRIES?
Both of them suck in chess and ....YA NOTHING
In my opinion the London isn’t a hard opening to face but it’s really annoying to play to win against it.
London isn't that bad, French is a disaster
2000 here
Yeah ngl idk who I'd want to face in a 1600s war though
Here's my win percentages against both. So yeah, London is easier lol
No
no ?
No
what "no" ?
Just "no"
"no" for what ?
What's the poll about 😂
but the answer can't be "no" !
Yet it is
If I say you : Roblox or Minecraft ?
The answer can't be "no" !!
If roblox or mc, probably mc
If London or French, then no
I give up
I don't dislike London and I am a Caro player. Easy vote for me
Both are easy to play against but probably french cus London is so bad and as black its ok to get a draw.
London so bad
I don't mind losing against the london... I definitely mind getting thrashed by some kid mouseslipping e6 instead of e5
But if an opening is hard to face doesn't mean that it's bad
It's likely the opposite
French is not hard to face. I just don't like it in general
london🗿
Depends on opponent and player skill
Recently in a 25+10 OTB tournamenet I was so afraid of playing against a prepared French player that I fell back onto the exchange variation, and tried squeezing a very intense queen and pawn endgame, which ended in a draw.
But I do think the London is worse to face because it is solid and good. Pain.
The London system is a far more annoying opening to play against, considering you only have a handful of responses against it, and they all usually just transpose to a common "anti-London" position. White enjoys the pawn pyramid-like stricture from f2-d4 and d4-b2. While black undermines that centre with the c5 pawn-break, played either in gambit style without e6, or play with a more solid style after e6. Another extremely common thing about the London is how blacks' queen is on b6. Whites' queen goes to b3 and both sides want the other side to take, so that the a file can be used by the rook on a1 or a8. The London is far too solid and very much the definition of a system - the ideas are carried over too heavily into similar lines.
If you wish to avoid mainline London theory or confuse your opponent, then you either have to resort to strange move orders, or play dubious lines! Not at all preferable as black. Black will struggle to create any counter-play as white stays solid for the entire game.
The french, however 1. e4, e6 - allows white to respond in many ways - d4, Nf3, Nc3, and even moves such as b3 and f4, there's even c4, g3 against the French. These are only the second moves that white can choose, not all might be as sharp or as effective when compared to the more popular ones, but there are many reputable things that white can choose to play.
On the third move, there are even more responses by white against the French. I prefer the Schlechter variation myself - a strange variation - 1. e4, e6 2. d4, d5 3. Bd3!
The idea here is for me to recapture 3... dxe4 4. Bxe4 and drop the bishop back to f3 after 4... Nf6 - Putting pressure on the b7 pawn. My knight will develop to Ne7 and I will castle short, from there the game is just chess. Black can respond with c5 and after c3 or another move, white is totally fine and both sides can enjoy the feeling of playing chess without going into deep theoretical lines when compared to something like the advanced French. In which there are strange and sometimes non-intuitive moves, sometimes even giving up the d4 pawn! Sounds crazy right? That's why I just prefer to avoid theory all together by playing this off-beat but reasonable response to the French Defense.
The French allows for both sides to enjoy different ideas, closed structures, open games, kingside attacks, relentless pawn pushes on the queenside, tactics such as the Greek gift in the Schlechter, and much much more! Compared to the London System, it's a far richer opening and allows for imbalances - crazy ideas spring out of nowhere.
P.S Caro Kann > French Defense
wow
Dude wrote a whole book
copy pasta
he's onto something
damn
i think french makes developpment pretty hard
ngl the french is pretty annoying to face
i myself am not an 1.e4 player, but I was a london player some while ago and thus know the ins and outs and how to deal with positions. having this knowledge allows me to be theoretically accurate against the london and they just get out of the usual development rlly fast so id say french is worse
Absolutely the london. If you are facing the french you have a plethora of options to choose from and very flexible game plans. Where as the london I feel like you are more of less forced to play into it as there are not that many options.
Also the QDG is my favorite opening to play as an against, so it's always a bit sad to think i'm gonna play against it only to see a london 😅
I just hate the london, why playing the noble 1.d4 to play the London, when there's king's indian, queen's indian, QGA, QGD slav, QGD 2.e6...
However the French is far more interesting, with lot of sharp variations like the poisoned pawn of the Winaver (Qg4) but also some more closed variations like the advance. However, when you play the French, you have the choice (Nc3, e5, exd5), whereas against the London you just can't prevent Bf4 lol
(I don't say that cuz I'm french)
I actually am unsure
it would probably be london cause you would have to play certain setups as black and know how to play actively with ideas like c5, qb6, b6 and then play for some type of advantage long term. the downside however to this is that once you have a ton of experience with the active setups then it becomes easy to counteract against the london and have good chances of winning. this makes me say the french is more annoying cause its never going to be not complicated long term
in that case i wanna say its even but french more cause it usually leads to more complicated chess and theoretical understanding rather than just simple based positions which focus on endgames
so french wins but on a slight aspect
i have rarely played versus it cause i dont play much e4 but its definitely a weapon ive encountered and try to avoid nowadays
French is better

Personally I hate facing the french because I don't know any openings or the pawn breaks within them, london is just.. the london - i can manage playing against 1.d4 much more than 1...e6
french is super fun to play against, adavance variation is basically a chokehold. the london does have some interesting positional possibilities (especially with Qb6 first, before Nc6 to avoid theory, or e6 instead of d5). but the london is much more of a brick wall than the french. the french will almost always be a decisive game (unless its the exchange) which is rarer in the london.
London makes me want to tear my opponents flesh apart and eat it with a wooden fork
a used wooden fork to be exact
London is more positional and closed, in the French, especially the Tarrasch, I find there to be a lot of great attacking chances
Thus London
i will kill the next person that plays a french on my
I have no clue, which is worse for me but I'm guessing the London primarily because it is less common and more stable than the french (with my experience) and the french is very easy to stay equalized if it is a classical or 15 + 10 game, the french is just annoying because it's played like every other game
the french is too boring to play against, at least the london is fun
It's better to compare two white s opening system for example : which one is the worst to face london or KIA
something no one has said ever
i just said it
LONDON
london needs to follow a system which is very boring and can get quite old.
just the fact that it is a system is annoying, however, we have to admit it's playable at low AND high level, which makes it so popular...
we have a goated media department

london is just annoying
Personally I like the London less, but both are anoyying to play against. While the London has basically no variations, the French still have some which can turn the game into something new.
But there is something, which makes the London compared to the French not so bad.
The thing is that in the London you still can transpose into other openings beforehand and if the enemy doesn't respond properly they are in trouble. For example you can play Nf6 , which makes the London setup not as desired. Or you can play the Dutch (d4, f5). This is basically the same as playing the Scandinavian, since you force the enemy into your area.This is less likely to happen in the French, since you can do barely anything to prevent playing the French, but probably also still possible.
Also another reason is that I hate it when the Scandinavian transpose into the French when I'm black. It's just annoying >:(
London. I just feel like French positions (excluding exchange French) are more fun to play
advance variation holds French users in a chokehold
thing abt London is it doesn't have many counters and I experience it alot at the 1200 levels bc players don't want to grow up
Maybe it's because I have studied my prep against the London System so much, that I find it pretty simple to play against vs playing against the French, which I haven't done much studies against. While the French isn't considered to be great at the highest levels, 1800 and under, it's still pretty solid if you know your theory.
My mother when she beats me
oh god
the french is still completely fine at 2000 and above
this msg really needs context 😂
london is so fun 🙂
are u being held at gunpoint
fr
it’s my favorite opening
it’s makes for such a fun and exciting game
neither of them are boring
personally i dislike playing the queens gambit
but thatss probably just me
london is garbage guys sorry
i studied cuz in some variotion in my repertoire happens the london system
Ok ngl, I don't like if people want to play french defense advance, cause I can put it into the exchange variation(only thing i know about french)
if u face the london u know your opponent is ontologically evil
yeah, same for englund, tenninson, wayward and other trap openings
london
how do you play the london?
d4 Bf4, whatever opponent does :/
I guess both openings are quite boring, but on the French without both playing exd5 is more imbalanced...
london 💀
I hate London I lost 25 times for this opening I can’t beat someone teach me 😭😭
hmmm, first, don't play symmetricaly: if you play Bf5, there will be c4, then Qb3
then, don't try quick attacks (like Nb4) until you didn't finished to develop you pieces and castled
Finally, put pressure on your opponent, playing c5 and THEN playing Nc6: if you have the reflex to play early Nc6 like in most e4-e5 openings, ur c-pawn will get blocked, and you will loose counterplay, which consists at pushing c5 (not c4!) or e5
BOTH
me as a london opening player
I play both the openings... i love them both
London
I have no idea what I am doing when I face the London. I know a little theory in the French defense.
The French exchange variation is just anti-French
London is playable for both, but the French can be ripped apart into a Queen’s Gambit which is a very aggressive opening, the French player will just be lost in 15 moves.
I am always happy to see the French after e4
are you talking about the monte carlo?
Yes I am it’s the Monte Carlo gambit
gambit??
- d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Bf4 Bf5 4. e3 e6 5. c4 Bxb1!?
Does anyone know this?
In the London. It forces White to keep the king in the center without castling
it says worst to face
id say french because i don't know theory
london i could even copy and still be fine lol
wait.... 3. ... Bf5 is inaccurate due to Qb3 coming soon after c4 (in omri_st line)
the engine won't agree with this, even at 16 depth
oh ok
I think french is harder to face coz it is more tactical and aggresive, while london is defensive. While with london it is harder to break through, French leads to tactical, offensive games for the opponent and for you it leads to defensive gameplay.
white isnt passive at all in the french
black attacks on the queenside and white attacks on the kingside
That’s in the Sicilian
Yes this commonly happens in the open Sicilian as well
Surprisingly 2 different openings can have similar dynamics
The French is more of a positional opening
French = POSITIONAL

If both ply exd5 it’s a queen’s gambit with c4
