#Rapid vs Blitz
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
rapid
rapid
i agree
more time to think
Rapid
blitz
whats the difference
improves you faster
blitz because my opponents dont take forever
I ONLY PLAY RAPID 15|10 FIGHT ME
rapid improves more
AHAHAHAHAH
It sounds dumb but whats the difference
rapid all the way
RAPID
blitz
blitz
hh

Blitz is better because I don’t like it when my opponents think
Blitz, because you actually get to learn how to premove.
blitz improves u better
blitz for skill and time mangament
Blitz makes u a fast thinker
Rapid let’s you practice the essentials of chess that blitz doesn’t allow as much such as careful planning and calculation. The core skills that every chess player should have
wth
absolutely rapid
rapido
literally ^^
I hate blitz so much
blitz is too fast
i've lost so many blitz and bullet games to time
Rapid I guess
Blitz = 3-10 min
Rapid=10 min and above
10 min used to be called blitz on chess.com
Plus rapid technically contains the classical time controls that are used at the world championship level for a reason
rapid, just give each other time odds for blitz
in blitz you make stupid mistakes
real
its real
I like not having to worry too much about time when I play
rapid because I would like to think longer
but fast doesnt neccesarily mean good
🦍
Blitz bcause more games in shorter time
like rapid players are slow but accurate and blitz players are fast but innacurate
just checkmate in less moves then 
Hmmm
I would go with instant gratification
What about varients?
that's a whole different thing
Thinking quick on your feet just can’t compare to the skills you should be able to develop by playing rapid such as calculation. Fast on your feet is only good when you are either playing blitz in general or under time constraints at the end, but even then calculation will get you wins before you get into those scenarios
isn't there a reason people usually have a higher rapid rating than blitz...
The poll is only refering to time, so any varient should be included in that
rapid is better because it helps in fast thinking and slow thinking
because the more you do slow thinking the faster it gets
if i put a person who only plays blitz against a person who only plays rapid, the rapid player would take longer to make moves but they'd be better moves, and the blitz player would play moves a lot faster while making dumb mistakes and losing pieces
nothing against blitz, its a great way to practice quick movement in chess
but rapid is just so much better because you get time to plan out moves (cough cough hikaru) and make the best moves in the position after thinking about it for a bit
simple as that
when you say rapid vs blitz people are probably not thinking about variants
exactly
Ironically Hikaru is one of the best bullet players because of this, something even harsher than blitz
I must be the only one then 
thats the funny part
Just play rapid but faster if you want to improve speed
but he is also The 2nd best in classical iirc
Not really in-accurate, but not as accurate
Exactly
yeah
tbf those guys also consider 5 seconds plenty of time to think of a move 
correct me if im wrong but isnt hikaru the highest rated bullet player in the world?
no
magnus is
10 minutes is already too little for me
I think this refers to people who play only that, if they play both then using Hikaru as an example, it could be proven false
So rapid
Thats what she said
On chess.Com
hikaru plays classical too tho
he plays bullet online
hikaru's a bit of an outlier, no? 
Hikaru is the world speed champion
Exactly, proving you can do accurate moves on bullet. That’s why I say he is the person who can show that it may be false
I don’t think Hikaru is even top 5 world wide rn actually
Probably top 10, but still
but i also said that the more you think slow the faster you get in thinking
Magnus is blitz champion
Blitz is the best
Fair enough
rapid cus better chess is played
i got much better at puzzles doing them slowly than spamming them
also got way better at calculation
rapid for sure, because you get more time to think and this is more true to the actual point of chess than blitz
Mhm
in blitz winning on time is a common way to win
he's still in the top 1% of like the top 1% though
thats why i dont play blitz lol
but not in rapid
Don’t even get started on mating patterns
Yeah, if you are like 500 Elo
hot take: blitz isnt chess
All though rapid is stil better
im 1000 blitz but 1350 rapid
People at the 1600 level of chess.com are considered 1%, it’s much easier to get there the higher you are
its a variant
then what about bullet
hikaru is #2 in blitz, #4 in bullet, and #11 in rapid
i lose winning endgames on time in blitz and it gets annoying
also a variant
Cold take: bullet should be a variant, not a time control 
because sometimes the situation is not premovable
Just play higher tc blitz
Checks out
agree
5 min 💀

He is still the world speed chess champion and won against Magnus 14.5 - 13.5
or 9 min 59 and see if anyone accepts
I play blitz because I have more fun with it :D
wrong thing to reply to?
rapid players who wants to increase their blitz
That ain’t a joke btw
thats basically rapid
instant gratification player
10 min rapid is basically blitz
yeah
Ok?
Oops replied to wrong comment 💀
thats why I play 15+10
no not really
than the not rapid side of rapid
Yeah FOA considers it blitz
real
What’s this
You can see that most people are at essentially the 1% at the 1600 level
cuz OTB u need time to move pieces, but on Chess.com tey changed it to rapid in 2020
Rapid rating graph
https://www.chess.com/clubs/forum/view/new-poll-rapid-or-blitz vote here too while you're at it
also rapid is betteer
idc

just play the bongcloud and it doesnt matter if you play bullet, blitz, or rapid
you're losing anyway
Show the blitz one I’m curious
fax!!
Idk where to find it, sorry
average rapid enjoyer 
rapid has more cheaters
Aw :(
In my 30 minute games I once lost on time
losing at the start but if ur opponent is bad you can defeat them
average blitz fan 
I'm above the peak 
You can look it up probably
that has nothing to do with the time control being better, it's just that people cannot git gud
true, but that is the point of the moderators
Rapid cause its easier to cheat
bruh
RAPID SUPREMACY
Who even plays bullet
I’m just barely at the floor 
how is this useful to u
💀
why do most titled players play blitz then
they play both modes
rapid because its a good place to start youre chess grinding experience and build up confidence.
Because why not, they aren’t there to improve 💀
cause they need fast games
I would choose blitz for the rest of my life because it’s the only kind of chess match that I have enough time for and I don’t want to experience 3 minute or 1 minute hell
they play blitz when they dont have time or are tired
Unless they are at a tournament, at that point it’s mainly for fun
like I play blitz if I am tired or on a time crunch
That’s like saying why is the Sicilian better than the French because more masters play it
rapid when I want to learn and play well + when I have time
Many GM’s play the French anyways 
yeah its dependent on the player
rapid has the best balance to bring out best of all aspects of chess
anyways if u play blitz the rest of ur life, the improvement isnt gonna be as good as rapid and ur accuracy may suffer (+ ur dopamine receptors will be fried just like how they would if u watched short form content all day)
@cold linden

rapidist
The only problem of rapid is because when I play chess in school and my teacher goes to the back of the class so I have to close out of the tab and lose some time because a rapid game takes a while
Do you have any evidence supporting that last claim?
if u play blitz doesnt mean u cant slowly analyse on the analysis board
ok chill out @young leaf not a funny joke
Sorry lol
bro wants me to cite a study in a chess.com discord poll 💀
Mad cause bad moment
Hello
rapid is better for improvement
blitz is more convenient, i can play three games of blitz the same time as playing one game on rapid.
but both are ok
i wonder if i should write a 10 page essay about this one
mhm
zax do it
ong
Yeah, no.
Of course 
do it
if its a 10 page essay I bet it'd support rapid tho lol
The fact that rapid uses more aspects of chess while blitz is just fast chess should say enough about the improvement capabilities
rapid is better for your chess. source: it was revealed to me in a dream
Blitz is better because it has cooler name
u get more time to think and it helps you discover more different possible moves and the reasons you would play them
Instant gratification vs better results
Just think faster
it can also build pattern recognition like puzzles
Blitz is so much fun but rapid is superior.
you can't think as much tho
there has to be a human limit
The thing is if you wanna play rapid 10 minutes is stupid so I play 60 and normally those games actually end in 30 for me because the other side spends 2 seconds on moves so I mate them so fast but sometimes they are actually careful
Nuh uh
This 100%
rapid ^^^^^^^
my dad plays 30 and I play 15|10
8 minute 59 + 1 is blitz
I'm afraid to inform you that's classical
blitz is fun if you want your brain to rot out your ears
^^
Not in chess.Com
How does a five minute difference kill chess ideas
thinking blitz is better for ur chess is just sad
isnt classical 90+30
9+0 is blitz, whats 1 minute going to hurt
…If they never existed
Lichess is better for classical due to them having an actual section, so people are genuinely meaning to play a slow classical game
15|10 is basically 25
10 min is borderline blitz
It’s 30 at the minimum
Yeah but nobody wants to play 30|20 so it takes a whole minute to start a game
30 minutes is the time control of my tournament next month 💀
Nice
For me it’s 60|30 which is amazing 🤩
2 minutes and under is bullet, no?
Granted that may aswell be a variant instead of a time control, so I’ll give you that
Yea

Rapid because I'm not young anymore and it takes me a little bit assess the board
Nuh uh
I'm on my phone right now just to say that is this probably one of the stupidest chess takes I've read
blitz my beloved
Not bad, I just hate playing against it so so much
It's not actually bad, it's just boring as hell
its good for lower time controls because you dont have to respond to the opponent
Wdym, you absolutely have to respond 💀
45 ish
cause you like the london?
@flat olive out here to win it with quotes 😂
u get good at blitz based on ur experience, best to way to get good at blitz is to get the experience from rapid 😂
thats why rapid is just better
Rapid at most a 20 min game, its a good place to start learning chess and improving, people bring the argument that blitz is better because more pros play it but in reality they arent there to improve but to mostly have fun, in rapid chess you gain more time allowing you to devolop your ideas and the more you play rapid the more you can devolop ideas you may have thought of playing in old games its most revelent in rapid since the more time you have the more likely you are of coming up with a good idea, the rapid growth of people is seen in the statstics of chess where most people have a higher rating in rapid then in blitz thats mostly because people prioritze rapid over blitz. another reason for why rapid is better is because the rapid pool of players in rapid is more balanced, i said before that the rapid to blitz rating of people is very shifting, in that meaning that rapid is more likely to be matching with youre skill level. Blitz also has some negativity to it, quite the lot actually the most notable one is the time of 3 min for each player which is the standard and most played version of blitz a shorter time frame makes a player more likely to blunder since they dont get the time to think and the shorter the time gets the more stress it puts on the player to find a move which is more and more likely to be a worse move, on the other hand the experience of rapid tends to be smoother as long as you dont rush your moves and tread carefully. for example here are stats to prove my point A 1700 rating in barrage places you in the main 130,000 players, however a 1500 in fast places you in the best 50,000. More individuals play it; in addition to with less chance to think, your example acknowledgment and instinct.
alright here is my 10 page essay i need nitro for more words lol
😂 😂
Here it comes
i decided to spend whatever time i spent since this place opened to write all that lmao
what quotes i wrote all that chief
then u just play rapid like 5 min blitz most of the time 😂
thats what i do as an impatient person most of the time 😂
i cant control the pic size lol
woah....
you actually did it...
good job
Yes, it just takes some time. That being said I do play some 5 min games once in a while to see where I'm at.
impatient? more like stimulation addicted
getting there, but not consistent yet
1300-1500 vice 773
practice practice practice
IDK why people play blitz
Never heard of that opening. I always play queens gambit, caro or czech Benoni
thats not the point
the point is you resort to dubiousness
Not really. Most of the time we end up in checkmate or someone resigns because the other dude has a winning endgame
in blitz it is harder to spot tactics, my accuracy in blitz is like 30-70% while I have 60-90% on rapid
blitz is fun and all but
in order to improve you'll have to play rapid more
studying is fine when I have the time just have to make time.
Puzzles are where the real studying is at
So it’s impossible to improve when I play blitz?
harder to improve
you can improve faster if you play rapid
like
don't play that much blitz if your rating is below 1500
cuz your gonna blunder your rook or queen with 5 seconds on the clock
I miss OTB mostly, but online is great for games you can get anytime, just have to carve out time
rapid better
Good night, headed that way too
lol
rapid, better to improve at chess - blitz is fun yeah but I find very little instructional/improvement value in comparison
… besides that, blitz is objectively better
im just shit at rapid
Blitz [for me] cause it can help you make decisions faster what good move to play, it's good if you want to practice for bullets games. But I don't recommend blitz for beginners because you need time to think about your moves.
For me I pick Rapid, I choose rapid since it will help you think more and improve your calculation skills also it gets gir-- uhhh --your middlegame and endgame practice on, which is a fundemental of chess knowledge, it will also help you not to have multiple inaccuracies, mistakes, misses, blunders in your games and help you get more gir--- uhhh --- good moves like brilliants (which you can use for bragging rights) and it will also improve your chess vision not as much as puzzles but it will still improve your chess vision also with rapid you can envision the board in your mind more than blitz can. But we can all agree that Blitz and Rapid is better than Bullet right.. Right?? Anyways, thats my opinion on Rapid Vs Blitz.
-CountryBall 2023
can always just blitz in a rapid game but can't play slower in a blitz game
Rapid is a much better game mode, this is because when you have more time you can get a more in-depth thinking process, a more diverse position, and much more to learn rather than a quick and simple game, where positions from beginner and sometimes even Grandmaster games are stale and bland.
rapid is much more fun than blitz
plus i suck at blitz
(kind of out of practice in rapid too… maybe im gonna play a few unrated matches tomorrow)
Lately I enjoy rapid again but for the rest of my life? Blitz is shorter, more exciting and more fun imo. I often need motivation to start a rapid game so playing it all my life sounds kinda bad
rapid; cause in blitz i frequently see hanging pieces and cant see enough mid-end game but only random moves. Maybe its different in high tier elo.
blitz because rapid takes ages and most the time i don't have time to play for 20 mins cos my opponent takes 8 mins to move
start quoting other members of this server 😂
Rapid involves more skills and the game is more beautiful because there is no time pressure and the players can make better decisions.
rapid gives more time
I already only care about rapid so it's easy for me. 15 | 10 all da wayyy
This will be interesting
Idk about for the rest of my life, but I enjoy rapid more. But not being able to play either blitz or rapid for the rest of my life would be painful. Because I play rapid when I have a lot of time and I want to play my best chess. And I only play blitz for fun. Like, for example, if I want to play with friends, I would choose blitz for that. But overall I would prefer rapid.
there should be a "RAPID SUPREMACY" sticker on the server
Also my time management sucks
I was expecting "overall I would prefer bullet" at the end ngl 

rapid
@naive tide Don't you love blitz? 
I reached a new blitz peak yesterday
Then lost it
I'm fine with blitz now though
I only hate it when I'm tilted
But it's still way worse than my rapid
You don't tilt all the time like me? 
I don't lose as much as you
rapid is better because i said so
Blitz is on more of the reaction time and rapid is more trying to be accurate.
Nobody is playing 9+0 blitz unironically
Blitz is fast paced and for low attention rate is great but it doesn’t help your growth more then rapid does
Sure blitz is more fun, but if you’re trying to improve…
rapid is just better
Twice the time, can help with time management, helps you learn more and gives you time to formulate ideas.
So just chill jeez
Rapid. Having more time is better for actually learning the game of chess. Plus I'm only okay at chess so I don't really like playing faster than 5 minutes.
Rapid is superior in every aspect
agreed
Rapid cuz im noob i have to think alot
I think a 30sec bullet game is the best 😃
EZ
If you play 30 sec bullet you belong in a mental asylum
😂💯😂
Rapid
pawn go take take take
Noobs can't think properly that's why they stay noobs
400 bullet and 400 rapid barely change in quality of gameplay
But 1400 bullet and 1400 rapid has a massive difference
Rapid all the way cuz when it’s mate in 2 I don’t miss it bc time pressure
My rapid📈 while my blitz 📉
Pawn go brrrr
rapid because I suck at thinking fast'
funny because rapid makes you think faster faster than blitz
definitely blitz its all fun and speed which is really me cause i love the adrenaline. fun fact is my classical rating is literally 200 pts lower than my blitz. i am currently 2159 which is my peak in OTB blitz while classical is 1973 and i was peaked at 2041 so yea definitely a speed player
I would choose Rapid. Because many people like a long and fair game, and it can prevent mistakes. Going and thinking too fast can cause a mistake, and thinking longer means a fun game!
another dopamine player
you have no opinion if ur a dopamine player
💯 😂 😂 😂
if i am a representative of the average fat american then let me welcome you to McDonalds my greatest strength which will make you lazy!
💯
Lasagna casually calling 90% of the server low elo
90% is being generous 😂😂
Obv rapid
AMERICA
See 500-999
Chess was made with the intention to stimulate the mind
Not play 50 moves in 5 mins
You need to spend time on each move
for some reason i make more mistakes in rapid :3
and play worse on blitz
but less mistakes
Premoves is bullet
rapid atleast gives you some time to think and you can actaully smart sacrifices instead of playing a 40 move game that ends either because of check mate or just time.
nice joke 😂
Rapid
people who play rapid are cheaters
10+0 i don't see a lot of em
I play blitz in between activities but my love for rapid is exceptional 😁
The difference is that you have time to think in rapid.
bro rapid is literally what chess was designed to be, and out of my 1000+ rapid games, I have come across 2 cheaters.
you pinged me to see this one i cannot with you sometimes
