#Knights vs Bishops
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
@hexed summit (sorry for pin)
What's up what can I help you with
Oh no they were asking who you were
Ahh okay (:
😂
I am team knights though
Alr we change it
Bishops>knights
Like
Lb>scipio 
@hexed summit r u team bishop tho?
If no il change it again
Man stop lol
💀
If lb says no
Then
Lb<literally any mod
😂
Ok what was that
Keep this thread clean NK
You vanished
Congrats knights, you've gained 0.1% per day since I last checked in! If this keeps going you'll have won in less than a hundred days.
Meanwhile bishops haven't gained anything
A bishop supporter is insulting you, I think you should ban everyone who choose bishops
LES GO
I mean, no. I'm quite sure bishops have gained more votes than nights, it's just the percentage that is evening out a bit.
it depends upon the game coz if you have open board bishop is alot better than knight as it controls more squares
Bishops> knights
Now their harassing me help
I ain't readin allat
But if it evening out then that means knights are getting more votes right now
Bishop's controls more squares
Case closed
ChatGPT much
Knights can go to both colors Case Closed
Bishops can only go to 32 squares while knights can go to all 64
Case closed
Yay Knights win
Ninja kiwi
Na at one time bishop sees all the board but the knight only sees 6
Aio cat boy you shut
Knights are less useful in an endgame case closed
The knight can see 8 squares not 6
A single bishop can never see the whole board
Whatever same thing
no nerd
Bru
go learn math then come back
Didn't you just call me a nerd?
your trying to act like a nerd but cant do math
Bruu why would I but math i do math 2+2 - 22
huh I guess you can do math
I told you
but you cant count
Eh a knight controls 8 square on an outpost
And knights can only win against bishops when placed on an outpost
bru
bishops are just pawns in closed positions
Knights are just a puppet in an opened position
Still better than a pawn in a closed position
I wrote anything i was trying to do something but it didn't work
-300iq moment
Na i ain't letting your knight move in an opened position
the mods are never gonna make a choice at this rate
Bishops won tho so
CASE CLOSED
The mods hate honesty ig
Idk bishops won because PPL voted for them
Ok, lets simplify the numbers so you might get the example.
1:4 20%:80%
2:6 25%:75%
Even if the right option gained more points, they lost percentage.
if u dont hv a lead of atleast 100 people, it means u did not win the arguement
and if u hv to explain why knight is bad in ur opinion more than the person sayiong bishop is bad has to, u r kinda losing
The fact that I could write a paper on the bishops superiority doesn't mean a paper is required to understand it.
A shorter explenation might be: "Speed!!!" Which, if that is too much, could be shortened further to: ">>>"
I did, and hes totally right, thats why horses are better
controls squares of only one type of color square diagonally
no, theyre actually better, what is u have a black bishop versus 3 white pawns, ure dead, while with a horsey u have more chance because u can switch colors
cuz they say what stockfish says
I know that knights are better
Good
Ik this doesnt count but im bored of ppl saying bishop is better
KNIGHTS ARE SO FUN TO USE, bishops are really boring
the fact that bishop has "hop" in it, but it cant really do so
Damn ure right
Even the bishop tried to be a knight cause he knew the knight was better
He tried to hop like horsey
exactly
Also guys, its a lot easier for ur opponent to see where the bishop can go next, but when ur opponent moves the knight close to the king or a valuable piece, they take more time looking because the knight is far more dangerous and u might miss a move that the horsey could do and lose
Also knights are better in atomic
In atomic knights are very dangerous explosive horseys
the trojan horse 🐴
Bro, without hop, theyre bish..
Ngl no point in arguing we all are doing this for a diamond membership 💀
when u hv no comeback 😂
Not me, idga* about diamond, im just here to prove my point
Like guys
Cmon
Prove point?
That's a thing i can agree on
Knights are cool
Then why are u saying bishops are better lmao
Being cool and being useful is 2 different things
So in a battle u think guy on the right is more useful than the guy on the left?
Yes
Also bro stop lying to urself
The guys on the left seem mlre useful than the ones on the right?
No lmao
The own name says it
Bishop
Knight
Knight better
That's a closed position BRO
Knight should be 3.5
Bro you are judging things by their appearance and names?
Bruuuuu
No bishops should be bishops are useful in more positions
Ima head out now
No I already sent u my entire message
Cya it's late night here
Ok
I told you there are some exceptions
It's a closed position but blacks bishops is better
There are many pawns here
still the bishop is dominating
Bruu

U know there the bishop aint dominating
While he takes a pawn
No other pawns can move
Bro it's superior to the knight
U can just make ur way from Ng3 to Nb3 and take a pawn or at least get to the other side and win with knight, there the bishop cant take any other pawn other than that one
Or actually
Nf5 and boom
Not that easy
Ya so there are some rare positions
Totally and the position you send?
And because of those rare positions bishop is better?
Pretty common, endgame with 3 pawns
Yep
I don't think so

Ngl a knight is only and only better than a bishop in an outpost and as gm said- if you don't let the knight jump around it's useless
As a opened position knight is useless
I don't see the knights and the bishops
Also buddy opening a position is easy but locking down one is not that easy
Oh no these are pawn endgames lemme search for bishop and knight endgames
Go ahead
Also it should be wining for the knight
And if you are gona search
BISHOPS KNIGHTS ENDGAMES WHERE KNIGHTS ARE BETTER
you are a bozo
Nah this was the search
Bruu
I will refuse to choose between them because they are both good in their own scenarios. In pawn endgames, a bishop is generally better due to it's long range, but a knight is better when all the pawns are on one side because it can cover both light and dark squares. In the middlegame, bishops are better on an open board, and knights are better on a closed board.
This is the correct answer
I was expecting "Both are shit. I will choose the rook" ngl
nah the pawn is the best piece
well now the king is left to be chosen, where r people whod not castle run the king to the center of the board by middlegame to fight 😂
bongcloud
All three are shit.
I will choose the queen.
Yes but because I have to choose between one well I choose knight
Even better
she gonna be real mad cause of all the work u made her do
and thats the best case scenario
bongcloud isnt really running to thecenter tho
One sad horsey 🐴 

Knights can be better in closed positions but in more open positions or with less pieces, bishops are usually better

PPL who say Knights are better than bishops in endgame

It's probably too late, but anyway
First, culturally, the Knight is way more representative of the chess game across countries and history. Indeed, whereas the Bishop has been added to chess around the 13th century, the Knight was already in the oldest version of chess we know: The Chatrang (which is dated around 670 AD). Another example is the Chinese version of chess: The Xiangqi. Indeed, in this version the Bishop is replaced by the elephant when the Knight I still there. In fact, representing the Bishop as an ecclesiastic figure may be discriminatory for non-Catholic people.
Moreover, the Knight is the only piece in traditional chess with unique movements, therefore, they don’t need protections to attack strong pieces like Queens because it makes them difficult to target. Furthermore, Knights a have a strong ability to fork piece, which makes it one of strongest piece at the beginner level. On their side, Bishop are just weak versions of Queens and cannot be very useful against them. Also, the Knight can also jump over other pieces, like no other piece, that makes it a strategic weapon in closed positions where all other pieces failed to target something.
Then, they're just pure originality by their movements but also by their design. In fact, it's the most sophisticated piece to make in a Championship chess set, therefore, their manufacture is based on a traditional know-how.
To conclude, all parts of the Knight’s characteristics (History, movements, strategical strongness and design) make the Knight a better piece than the Bishop, and maybe, the better piece of chess.
I ain't readin allat
But I'm happy for you tho
Or sorry that happened
I mean, bishops do exist outside catholicism, and even though they aren't in completely different religions, I think both king and queen, being monarchy, or anything being called a pawn, is arguably worse. Also, the term knight is also obviously European, chaturanga had a horse.
Only piece with unique moveset? No. However, it is true that no other piece moves like the knight. That doesn't automaticly make it usefull for reasons we'll get to.
Knights are good at forking, but in turn they have no way to pin.
Bishops may be a weaker version of the queen, but that doesn't mean anything when the queen is the strongest piece. It can't attack the queen withouth defence and pinning, but in turn, it also halves the directions from which the queen can attack it back.
For every possition where the knight is the only piece with freedom of movement, there is one where the knight is the one that's stuck. It can be a strenght that opening just one square allows either queen and bishop, or queen and rook a way through.
💯💯
The Knight is also called the Horse all over the world (including in Europe). In fact, the Knight and the Horse are exactly the same piece, when the Bishop only has the elephant that looks like him (They are totally different).
Oh maybe I missed something, can you tell me the name of even one other piece with unique moveset in traditional chess?
Pinning is a more common ability, Rook and Queen can also pin
I agree with you, once they're protected Bishop can counter attack, but bishop can't protect themselves (Knights can btw), so more material is needed
That's pretty unfair to compare a protected Bishop to an unprotected Knight
Finally, I would say that bishops, in opening, have a major problem
Where both Knights can try to develop themselves and get active, in many positions like in the French defense, there is one Bishop which is pretty bad and difficult to develop, therefore Knight can be more versatile
the fact that u r using a position where there is a knight-bishop imbalance between the players for the example 😂
also this position shouldnt be allowed by the players 😂
Well, every piece has a unique moveset, it is just the individual moves that overlap. Unique moves include en passant, castleing, and promoting. Admittedly, non of these are done by the bishop.
Rook and queen can also fork.
Well, yeah, bishops need protection to pin queen, that is true, but there are still other situations where it doesn't need it. Knights are arguably even more defense dependent. This wouldn't even be a discussion if knight with an outpost wasn't a thing.
The worse knight is indeed better than the worse bishop in openings, however, if you start with either of the center pawns, as soon as you do, your strong bishop is better than either knight.
Even on the theoretical side, the knights opening strength isn't enough to make them more valuable. Evaluate the start position where one side is missing knights and the other is missing bishops, and the side that has bishops is better even that early, about half a pawn if they are black, or about a full pawn if they're white.
Oh, right I forgot about "conditional" moves, you're right
However, I'm sorry but I don't see how a rook can fork, maybe you were talking about a skewer?
Yeah, that's true, sometimes there is good Bishop sacrifice, like when you pin the Queen with the Bishop and if it's taken by the Queen you can fork with a Knight
In fact, pieces are made to play together so compare two pieces alone is not very constructive
Yes, but does it makes two knight weaker than both weak and strong bishop, I don't think so
Actually, an AI, AlphaZero, has rated the bishop a bit higher than the knight on average. However, the protocol you used can be discussed
As I said before Knight are better compared to other pieces mostly in closed position, and removing pieces from the board let the game tend more easily towards an open position
However, I admit that the main reason why I prefer the Knight is because it's more representative of chess across the world and the ages
Strategically, in my opinion, both are almost equal
There are no good or bad pieces, just good and bad players
Fr, started a game with material odds down 2 rooks, won anyways
Maybe a different term is used, but I meant a scenario where the rook is between two pieces.
Oh yes that's a fork but usually you fork poor pieces like pawns because the rook is more developed in the endgame
However, a rook can pin in the middle game with open files
Exactly
And well played btw
f||or||k you
when does this end
ig it has ended
It hasnt u can still vote
Even if it ends everyone knows the knights better right guys
exactly
nope it has ended the winners were announced in #server-announcements
Bishop is better because it covers more squares
bishops can't do knight forks
As Hikaru would put it, the double op combo is usually better than deez knights, unless deez knights can coordinate and the double op combo is stuck behind pawns. Bishops better in endgames and open positions, Knights better in closed position. Ultimately, my vote goes to the bishops.

Bishop > Knight because it is far more maneuverable in most positions, for eg a knight needs to make several moves to rotate to attack a square, whereas a bishop can just attack it immediately. A bishop also moves across the entire board, whereas a knight can only move a few spaces back and forth.
Bishops can get blocked easily 💀
easier to trap knights imo
since they can only move to a very limited amount of squares and all within a short range
whereas a bishop can just attack it immediately
Bishops are locked to one color
And as Renivier said they can get very easily get blocked so they cant really go across the entire board much
True, in locked positions knights are better, but in open positions and endgames, I would prefer bishops because they do retain great scope across the board
Is the debate not over yet
I think the chats stay open indefinitely. Don't know about the poll though. No reason to close it really. This way anyone joining later can still get their word in.