#Knights vs Bishops

1 messages · Page 3 of 1

finite creek
#

whos/whats lb?

primal plume
hexed summit
primal plume
hexed summit
#

Ahh okay (:

finite creek
#

😂

fervent sequoia
#

I am team knights though

brazen steeple
#

Bishops>knights
Like
Lb>scipio KEKW

finite creek
#

@hexed summit r u team bishop tho?

brazen steeple
#

If no il change it again

fervent sequoia
finite creek
#

__>lb&scipio??

brazen steeple
#

If lb says no
Then
Lb<literally any mod

finite creek
#

😂

brazen steeple
#

Ok what was that

hexed summit
#

Keep this thread clean NK

brazen steeple
#

You vanished

teal halo
#

Congrats knights, you've gained 0.1% per day since I last checked in! If this keeps going you'll have won in less than a hundred days.

bronze yew
bronze yew
next tulip
teal halo
ruby kelp
#

it depends upon the game coz if you have open board bishop is alot better than knight as it controls more squares

bronze yew
obsidian mauve
#

I ain't readin allat

bronze yew
brazen steeple
#

Bishop's controls more squares
Case closed

bronze yew
bronze yew
obsidian mauve
#

Case closed

bronze yew
#

Yay Knights win

obsidian mauve
#

Ninja kiwi

brazen steeple
#

Na at one time bishop sees all the board but the knight only sees 6

#

Aio cat boy you shut

brazen steeple
obsidian mauve
bronze yew
brazen steeple
bronze yew
brazen steeple
bronze yew
brazen steeple
bronze yew
brazen steeple
brazen steeple
bronze yew
brazen steeple
#

I told you

bronze yew
#

but you cant count

brazen steeple
#

Eh a knight controls 8 square on an outpost

#

And knights can only win against bishops when placed on an outpost

#

bru

bronze yew
#

bishops are just pawns in closed positions

brazen steeple
bronze yew
#

why you skull reacting yourself

#

exactly

bronze yew
brazen steeple
brazen steeple
bronze yew
#

wait

#

why are we even arguing

brazen steeple
#

I am waiting

#

Ya bishops won already

bronze yew
#

the mods are never gonna make a choice at this rate

brazen steeple
bronze yew
brazen steeple
#

Idk bishops won because PPL voted for them

teal halo
finite creek
#

if u dont hv a lead of atleast 100 people, it means u did not win the arguement

#

and if u hv to explain why knight is bad in ur opinion more than the person sayiong bishop is bad has to, u r kinda losing

teal halo
#

The fact that I could write a paper on the bishops superiority doesn't mean a paper is required to understand it.

A shorter explenation might be: "Speed!!!" Which, if that is too much, could be shortened further to: ">>>"

next tulip
next tulip
next tulip
next tulip
obsidian mauve
next tulip
#

Ik this doesnt count but im bored of ppl saying bishop is better

#

KNIGHTS ARE SO FUN TO USE, bishops are really boring

finite creek
#

the fact that bishop has "hop" in it, but it cant really do so

next tulip
#

Damn ure right

#

Even the bishop tried to be a knight cause he knew the knight was better

#

He tried to hop like horsey

finite creek
#

exactly

next tulip
#

Also guys, its a lot easier for ur opponent to see where the bishop can go next, but when ur opponent moves the knight close to the king or a valuable piece, they take more time looking because the knight is far more dangerous and u might miss a move that the horsey could do and lose

#

Also knights are better in atomic

#

In atomic knights are very dangerous explosive horseys

finite creek
next tulip
finite creek
#

i shouldnt hv read that msg while eating 😂

brazen steeple
#

Ngl no point in arguing we all are doing this for a diamond membership 💀

finite creek
#

when u hv no comeback 😂

next tulip
#

Like guys

#

Cmon

brazen steeple
#

Prove point?

next tulip
#

Who looks more badass

#

Who looks more dangerous and menacing

brazen steeple
next tulip
brazen steeple
next tulip
next tulip
#

Bruh, like nah

#

I dont believe u

brazen steeple
#

Ok wait a min

#

Read this also the thing i pinged

next tulip
#

Also bro stop lying to urself

#

The guys on the left seem mlre useful than the ones on the right?

#

No lmao

#

The own name says it

#

Bishop

#

Knight

#

Knight better

brazen steeple
next tulip
#

Knight should be 3.5

brazen steeple
#

Bro you are judging things by their appearance and names?

brazen steeple
brazen steeple
#

Ima head out now

next tulip
brazen steeple
#

Cya it's late night here

next tulip
brazen steeple
#

Ok

next tulip
#

Thats open

#

Knights destroying there

brazen steeple
#

I told you there are some exceptions

#

It's a closed position but blacks bishops is better

#

There are many pawns herebbb still the bishop is dominating

next tulip
#

Kf1

#

Ke3

#

Knight is winning

brazen steeple
#

?

#

What's kf1

#

Bro

next tulip
#

Knight to f1

#

But no

#

That actually sucks

#

Lemme see

brazen steeple
#

Bruu

next tulip
#

Og wair

#

Its with n

#

Not k

#

Nf1

#

Nf3

#

Anyway

#

Lemme see

brazen steeple
next tulip
#

U know there the bishop aint dominating

#

While he takes a pawn

#

No other pawns can move

brazen steeple
next tulip
#

U can just make ur way from Ng3 to Nb3 and take a pawn or at least get to the other side and win with knight, there the bishop cant take any other pawn other than that one

#

Or actually

#

Nf5 and boom

next tulip
#

Ok yea in that case blacks winning

#

But thats a very special position

brazen steeple
brazen steeple
next tulip
next tulip
brazen steeple
#

Yep

next tulip
#

But Nf5

#

Takes u to the other side

brazen steeple
#

Ngl a knight is only and only better than a bishop in an outpost and as gm said- if you don't let the knight jump around it's useless

#

As a opened position knight is useless

next tulip
#

Searched pawn endgames

brazen steeple
next tulip
brazen steeple
#

Also buddy opening a position is easy but locking down one is not that easy

next tulip
brazen steeple
#

Also it should be wining for the knight

#

And if you are gona search
BISHOPS KNIGHTS ENDGAMES WHERE KNIGHTS ARE BETTER
you are a bozo

next tulip
#

Nah this was the search

brazen steeple
#

Bruu

next tulip
#

There are 2 to 4 pawns

brazen steeple
#

Ye and?

#

I don't think it's better anyways ima go it's 11:15 pm here so ya gn

strong rampart
#

I will refuse to choose between them because they are both good in their own scenarios. In pawn endgames, a bishop is generally better due to it's long range, but a knight is better when all the pawns are on one side because it can cover both light and dark squares. In the middlegame, bishops are better on an open board, and knights are better on a closed board.

bronze yew
#

This is the correct answer

fervent sequoia
#

I was expecting "Both are shit. I will choose the rook" ngl

bronze yew
finite creek
#

well now the king is left to be chosen, where r people whod not castle run the king to the center of the board by middlegame to fight 😂

agile saffron
next tulip
finite creek
finite creek
fervent sequoia
#

One sad horsey 🐴 Sadge

gloomy peak
kindred gale
#

Knights can be better in closed positions but in more open positions or with less pieces, bishops are usually better

brazen steeple
brazen steeple
amber musk
#

It's probably too late, but anyway

#

First, culturally, the Knight is way more representative of the chess game across countries and history. Indeed, whereas the Bishop has been added to chess around the 13th century, the Knight was already in the oldest version of chess we know: The Chatrang (which is dated around 670 AD). Another example is the Chinese version of chess: The Xiangqi. Indeed, in this version the Bishop is replaced by the elephant when the Knight I still there. In fact, representing the Bishop as an ecclesiastic figure may be discriminatory for non-Catholic people.

Moreover, the Knight is the only piece in traditional chess with unique movements, therefore, they don’t need protections to attack strong pieces like Queens because it makes them difficult to target. Furthermore, Knights a have a strong ability to fork piece, which makes it one of strongest piece at the beginner level. On their side, Bishop are just weak versions of Queens and cannot be very useful against them. Also, the Knight can also jump over other pieces, like no other piece, that makes it a strategic weapon in closed positions where all other pieces failed to target something.

Then, they're just pure originality by their movements but also by their design. In fact, it's the most sophisticated piece to make in a Championship chess set, therefore, their manufacture is based on a traditional know-how.

To conclude, all parts of the Knight’s characteristics (History, movements, strategical strongness and design) make the Knight a better piece than the Bishop, and maybe, the better piece of chess.

obsidian mauve
#

But I'm happy for you tho

#

Or sorry that happened

teal halo
#

I mean, bishops do exist outside catholicism, and even though they aren't in completely different religions, I think both king and queen, being monarchy, or anything being called a pawn, is arguably worse. Also, the term knight is also obviously European, chaturanga had a horse.

Only piece with unique moveset? No. However, it is true that no other piece moves like the knight. That doesn't automaticly make it usefull for reasons we'll get to.

Knights are good at forking, but in turn they have no way to pin.

Bishops may be a weaker version of the queen, but that doesn't mean anything when the queen is the strongest piece. It can't attack the queen withouth defence and pinning, but in turn, it also halves the directions from which the queen can attack it back.

For every possition where the knight is the only piece with freedom of movement, there is one where the knight is the one that's stuck. It can be a strenght that opening just one square allows either queen and bishop, or queen and rook a way through.

amber musk
#

The Knight is also called the Horse all over the world (including in Europe). In fact, the Knight and the Horse are exactly the same piece, when the Bishop only has the elephant that looks like him (They are totally different).

Oh maybe I missed something, can you tell me the name of even one other piece with unique moveset in traditional chess?

Pinning is a more common ability, Rook and Queen can also pin

I agree with you, once they're protected Bishop can counter attack, but bishop can't protect themselves (Knights can btw), so more material is needed
That's pretty unfair to compare a protected Bishop to an unprotected Knight

Finally, I would say that bishops, in opening, have a major problem
Where both Knights can try to develop themselves and get active, in many positions like in the French defense, there is one Bishop which is pretty bad and difficult to develop, therefore Knight can be more versatile

fervent sequoia
finite creek
# fervent sequoia

the fact that u r using a position where there is a knight-bishop imbalance between the players for the example 😂

fervent sequoia
#

Chess.com posted this on YouTube. Probably is the daily puzzle of today

finite creek
#

also this position shouldnt be allowed by the players 😂

teal halo
# amber musk The Knight is also called the Horse all over the world (including in Europe). In...

Well, every piece has a unique moveset, it is just the individual moves that overlap. Unique moves include en passant, castleing, and promoting. Admittedly, non of these are done by the bishop.

Rook and queen can also fork.

Well, yeah, bishops need protection to pin queen, that is true, but there are still other situations where it doesn't need it. Knights are arguably even more defense dependent. This wouldn't even be a discussion if knight with an outpost wasn't a thing.

The worse knight is indeed better than the worse bishop in openings, however, if you start with either of the center pawns, as soon as you do, your strong bishop is better than either knight.

Even on the theoretical side, the knights opening strength isn't enough to make them more valuable. Evaluate the start position where one side is missing knights and the other is missing bishops, and the side that has bishops is better even that early, about half a pawn if they are black, or about a full pawn if they're white.

amber musk
# teal halo Well, every piece has a unique moveset, it is just the individual moves that ove...

Oh, right I forgot about "conditional" moves, you're right

However, I'm sorry but I don't see how a rook can fork, maybe you were talking about a skewer?

Yeah, that's true, sometimes there is good Bishop sacrifice, like when you pin the Queen with the Bishop and if it's taken by the Queen you can fork with a Knight
In fact, pieces are made to play together so compare two pieces alone is not very constructive

Yes, but does it makes two knight weaker than both weak and strong bishop, I don't think so

Actually, an AI, AlphaZero, has rated the bishop a bit higher than the knight on average. However, the protocol you used can be discussed
As I said before Knight are better compared to other pieces mostly in closed position, and removing pieces from the board let the game tend more easily towards an open position

However, I admit that the main reason why I prefer the Knight is because it's more representative of chess across the world and the ages
Strategically, in my opinion, both are almost equal

amber musk
primal plume
teal halo
amber musk
#

Oh yes that's a fork but usually you fork poor pieces like pawns because the rook is more developed in the endgame
However, a rook can pin in the middle game with open files

amber musk
soft current
#

Fork you beach

#

Lol

austere shadow
#

f||or||k you

tiny venture
#

Kasparov

#

Likes early game knight and mid-late game bishop

wanton salmon
#

when does this end

slender haven
next tulip
#

Even if it ends everyone knows the knights better right guys

slender haven
tropic crater
#

Bishop is better because it covers more squares

fluid garden
#

bishops can't do knight forks

earnest ore
#

As Hikaru would put it, the double op combo is usually better than deez knights, unless deez knights can coordinate and the double op combo is stuck behind pawns. Bishops better in endgames and open positions, Knights better in closed position. Ultimately, my vote goes to the bishops.

solar tapir
#

Bishop > Knight because it is far more maneuverable in most positions, for eg a knight needs to make several moves to rotate to attack a square, whereas a bishop can just attack it immediately. A bishop also moves across the entire board, whereas a knight can only move a few spaces back and forth.

hushed lodge
solar tapir
#

easier to trap knights imo

#

since they can only move to a very limited amount of squares and all within a short range

next tulip
#

And as Renivier said they can get very easily get blocked so they cant really go across the entire board much

solar tapir
limpid gull
#

Is the debate not over yet

teal halo
#

I think the chats stay open indefinitely. Don't know about the poll though. No reason to close it really. This way anyone joining later can still get their word in.

plain marsh