#š¬ć”general-off-topic
1 messages Ā· Page 3607 of 1
wait wat
psylocke or luna snow
Did y'all see the new tame Impala song
hi french ppl, my dad brought an souvenir from paris..oui ouiii baguette
Morning coffee>>>>>>>>
guy's wat do u think who like my comment
cool what is your username?
dayum
Perfect for summer frfr
Ohh it's iced?
Yeah
Who's gonna tell him
true
my playlist rn because of what happened yesterday
https://youtu.be/vYW-SVNTEIw?si=P5tAuBLRJjTK0v8P
Subscribe and press (š) to join the Notification Squad and stay updated with new uploads
Follow Air Supply:
https://www.facebook.com/AirSupplyMus...
https://airsupplymusic.com
https://open.spotify.com/artist/4xXCR...
š· Wallpaper: https://unsplash.com
Lyrics:
[Verse 1]
I'm lyin' alone with my head on the phone
Thinkin' of you till it h...
š§ - Alone | By: Heart (Lyrics Video)
⤠- Heart
https://twitter.com/officialheart
https://www.facebook.com/heart/
https://www.instagram.com/heartofficial/
š - World of L e t t e r s
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp81V3RdtYMLxzSLvb0ztnA
Credits to:
Lyrics
The Ownership of Song and Background
#LyricsVideo #Alone #Heart #Worldoflett...
Vegeta
šµ Follow the official 7clouds playlist on Spotify : http://spoti.fi/2SJsUcZ
āš§ Air Supply - Making Love Out Of Nothing At All (Lyrics)
⬠Download / Stream: https://open.spotify.com/track/1qQkXsvHcyenlqtPlGL9kn
š Turn on notifications to stay updated with new uploads!
ā¤ļø Follow our Spotify playlists: http://bit.ly/7cloudsSpotify...
AHHHHH
were gender wars made to colonize the other gender
looking for someone to start a chess discord server with, dm me
play meš
go for a run or smt š
Slaughterhouse is such a banger of a level
Also the song is fire
The song is not fire
:/
Beat slh rn
Aaaaah haaaa
im just trolling
just go for a run thats how ill try to get out of listining to some shit music š
im currently listening to https://youtu.be/NmEyGiaqm7k?si=1asvjyRdCu44MuIA
Music video by Player performing Baby Come Back. Ā© 1977 Polydor Records, a division of Universal Music Operations Limited
what happened
im just trolling dont mind it
oh i see
ok?
what is coded among us
Among us with new roles
Anyone up for among us
hi
š§
That's a puzzle , how many penguins you see??
Hello chat
1
Wrong!!
What if i dm you word "penguin" instead of crab?
Crabs are tasty but expensive
Ye, you prefer baby penguins or already adult penguins meat?
Hai
oh yeah metamorphosis kafka and ovid, most of virgil's works, tacitus counts as well surely @halcyon kraken
i'm sending it here bc can't have another tiem out
I'm thinking of getting into kafka
Been wanting to be a bug all my life
š„
I've heard sm abt thay book, all that's left if for me to read it
don't get me wrong, but there are better books to read
Fairz
also metamorphosis is really underwhelming if you've heard so much about it the first time you read it
it's a book you really gotta read multiple times to appreciate
I like books like that gng
have you read old man and the sea
Not yet no
Well ig I'm adding it to the reading list
the way it holds such a simple plotline so elegantly for 100 pages
you should defo add camus to that list as well
i'm sorry i have class
not as in school but as in
classy
Yea , this is on online server you're not allowed to have culture
exactly
Wheres the AI brainrot memes
flowers for algernon is also a great read
Jokes aside thanks for the recs gang
no worries man, happy to share my passion for great literature
and hey if you're really up for the challenge, try ulysses, but don't be surprised if you give up after 10 pages the first time around
postmodernistic literature is weird
I'll try to get to 11š
Ur actually crazy for not using general
How many countries my grandma knos in africa in January 2025 VS August 2025
I have itās decent
also yes the seas are colored but i dont care enough to color them
decent? gang it's literally part of the american canon
Uhhh yeah all of Hemingway is
Have u read hills like white elephants
Ive read it in 7th grade
why am i listening to bastman, the frenchman will surrender before our battle is fought, like any true frenchman
Thatās a good Hemingway book that goes forlorn
āI had no intentions of being in your office 20 minutes agoā ahh
not yet
My ap lit teacher made us read it without knowing the contdxt
i'll get to it, gotta get through ulysses first
And I genuinely couldnāt guess
which i'm not looking forward to
Why read books u donāt like
i am looking forward to it but i'd rather read it if i have a few weeks of actual vacation
it's not a book you can easily read
Ik Ulysses was stupid
postmodern literature, as you know, is very weird and especially james joyce
since i've been so busy with school i'm mostly reading thinner classics
I also fail to see how Homer is postmodern
Yea ancient
ye
Idk what postmodern book ur talking ab then
to the lighthouse and ulysses
Uhhh I havenāt read much but I like Dostoyevsky I like Vonnegut I like Camus I like Sartre Iāve read a lot of great American classics as well
you would love the book germinal if you like dostoyevsky
it's french naturalism instead of russian realism but it's still quite similar as far as literary movements go
also freule julie
check out kierkegaard as well, it seems you're quite interested in existentialism
Talking forever and lots of hard to memorize names?
1v1 anyone?
Kierkegaard is dtupid I am interested in existentialism
not like that
but yes
Rambling is Dostoevsky premium
emile zola was quite an interesting figure tho
only french man i respect
well no albert camus but he was algerian
They have good artists and writers and beautiful language
Camus was a French author
Yeah but his books are supported by the language french
what language do you think people speak in algeria
Arabic
also french
I mean to say it more as the importance of his work is highlighted in the monotone work of the stranger specifically as his most popular the first page is famously untranslated to correction but also in short stories like LāHote which is about a hotel and LāHote means āthe visitorā and āthe guestā (two ppl talking)
what do yall think
yeah i mean the stranger might be his most popular but ngl i found the plague to be a bit better
It was okay
however nothing will be as iconic as that first sentence of the stranger
The stranger seems fuller in terms of raw natural illusion
Like the sun on the beach being too bright
Why does that matter just shoot the dude you donāt care about anything who cares if the sun is too bright
The plague was good but I found the first 50 or so pages to be making visits like normal
About?
Which bores me a bit
yeah i get what you mean
I know in literature how itās supposed to build up but damn
it's a slower start defo
yeah you should NEVER read moby dick
you wouldn't enjoy it one bit
I liked moby dick
so you didn't think moby dick was too slow of a burn but the plague is?
I read it young but the difference is in his chase for the whale just like The Old Man and the Sea is powered by the natural function of human willingness and desire more than a doctor taking notes
fair enough
well yeah that's very fair actually
Iāve read a decent bit and ones like Grapes of Wrath kinda do it a lot
Itās not necessarily bad but when thereās no drive I get bored reading
though i really liked camus' exploration of humanity and the absurd more in the plague
but eh everyone likes different thigns
Yeah
I guess I liked the intrinsic nature of the stranger a lot more
Very intrinsic guy
I genuinely enjoy reading them
gang i studied literature and linguistics what did you expect
At Uni?
ye
Bruh ok then tell me smthing to hop on
Im a beginner though
Breakfast of champions by Vonnegut and ESPECIALLY curious incident of a dog in nighttime (written by autistic man, books mc is autistic) are books id recommend to any man
well what kind of books have you read before and liked
flowers for algernon as well!
Lets just say ive never liked a book that i read
Try animal farm by George Orwell
Bruh
What
Ok ok
Itās a great shorter book thatās very visual and has a lot of underlying themes
Itās probably the most Iāve been able to visualize a book while reading ever
i had that with old man and the sea
Dude DM me all your suggestions
Finna start reading cuh
Imagining that must have felt like og sky block before cell phones existed
bro i'm not gonna lie, you should find out what books you like on your own, don't read classics because they're classics
Aaah ive read i have no mouth and i must scream
Kinda liked it but it was un polished it seems
Idk just above all search up great classic literature and find one that genuinely interests you
Ye tried harry potter not bad either
harry potter is NOT a classic
Ehhhh
if you question me further i will go on rant
Just joking
lord of the rings
gothic novels in general
0/10 ragebait
quality of writing matters more than sales
But compared to gothic stuff like necromancer harry potter is definitely la magica clasico
It was more fantasy ngl
Quality of writing furthers sales
I wouldāve said Willy wonka next
have you heard about colleen hoover?
Yep but what I said isnāt wrong
There can be bad stuff with lots of sales and good stuff with no sales thatās called relativism
Harry Potter is the relative magic book
Actually you can if itās direct at a different viewership
But itās still relativism because of how both parties try to go about it
Whatās his name James Patterson everyone knew that dude didnāt write his own books
- harry potter is not in any literary canon, except maybe children's/ young adult.
- classics are quality books, harry potter is not a quality book, quite shit actually.
So dr. Sues might be a better writer than both of them under your logic of sales
batter you're a smart guy but you're making my brain hurt with this take
I remember liking eragon
Fantasy and New York Times best book sellers seem to further my opinion well
I think itās engrained in culture but classic may be the wrong word
What i was gonna say was the younger the audience the less you need to highlight
You just need a hook and youll get sales ex dr.sues uses rhymes
Bruh i cant explain it English aint my first language
Dude your still typing
Iāve been reading my entire life and Iāve only just recently spent the time to find what my favorite genre is
you have now triggered the rant on why harry potter was never good, first of all, the worldbuilding sucks balls and more in comparison to lord of the rings, the only part of that world which was planned from the beginning was hogwarts, all the other stuff was made up at a later date, which is not inherently a bad thing but it is a bad thing when it is so obvious. The characters are written very lazily, they have barely any complexity or emotional depth, don't get me started on the lack of emotional arc. The only real reason it lived on is because jk rowling is such a shit writer everything became open to interpretation and people started making headcannons and fanfics, that's a sign your book is shit. Furthermore, it promotes harmful stereotypes and jk didn't even try to hide it, she is so blatant with her antisemetic views when portraying jews as goblins it ain't even funny anymore. and if all that wasn't bad enough, there is little to no real diversity in the story, i'm not saying every story needs diversity but if you're gonna write an asian character into the story couldn't you at least make her name something different than CHO GOD DAMN CHANG
I donāt think itās well written I just donāt think u could name a more canon book for wizardry and magic
Sad lil boi
bro the witch hammer
tbh
More relevant than Harry Potter?
infinitely more so
Never heard of it
Ye i dont know that soo it proves the other guys point
gang just bc you don't know something doesn't mean it wasn't very important at some point in history
True
Yea but I think u could contribute more of it towards Macbeth than the witch hammer
Or the wizard of oz
magic doesn't have to be 'look at me casting a spell' most gothic novels embrace some type of magic, well at least a supernatural power
it's kinda a prerequesite
Iām talking about cultural relevancy doe
are you trying to say frankenstein hasn't had more cultural relevancy than harry potter?
Journey to the West has the most cultural influence
Yea but thatās science not magic
bro h.p. don't look up his cat's name lovecraft has had more relevancy
it's about the supernatural, same thing as harry potter
The holy Bibble
well yeah that depends on if you're atheist or not
Chaaaat why tf is the donkey talking to the man ab an Angel on the road
Iām just nitpicking
No I think out of all magic relevancy u gotta look more towards fantasy and not gothic
Most popular work of fiction ever sold
Depends on how u read it
Hm?
harry potter is more closely related to horror than fantasy if you're looking at specific genre requirements
Iād rather not believe in the angry sky person that commands multiple genocides and hates women and gay people
Boyyy and lovecraft and Frankenstein are more magic relatd
Ehhh he only commands genocides the rest he accepts as his own creation
boy it's about the supernatural, magic is too niche

and again, lotr would be much higher on the list
Ok then rank them in terms of most horrifying greatest to least if ur point is HP is a horror book
Canāt sugarcoat it he killed first born animals of villages in Egypt. Wtf did the animals do they canāt sin and plus all they did was be born first
Read numbers 31
my point isn't that harry potter is a horror book, my point is that harry potter shouldn't be considered a classic on account of it sucking
I asked my rly Christian ex that as a Christian because I was genuinely curious and we got in an argument
I assume itās the war on sodom
Tells moses to kill all the women and boys, and ākeep every girl that has not known man by sleeping with him for yourselvesā
The genocide of the midianites
Well think about it from a historical standpoint
the bible do be kinda funny tho
I donāt agree with genocide of gays but you have to view it as such
the amount of misstranslations is crazy
Their morality is shit and their book shouldnāt be used as a guide for morality 
you shouldn't need eternal punishment hanging over your head like the sword of damokles to be a good person in the first place
Moses wrote most of the Old Testament and the Old Testament is generally disregarded as purely laughable at some parts in the Bible
Thereās no evidence moses even existed
If u disobey ur parents you should be cast into the middle of town and thrown rocks at
Who wrote the Old Testament then
Paupers?
Iām sure u donāt know much cuz thatās not true
how tf did moses spend 40 years in that desert
it ain't that big
Ok. Which books have known authors, and how can you demonstrate authorship?
There wasnāt shit else to do bro
oh he's almost at the same point alexandrian scholar's were at discussing Homeros
The Torah was written by moses and changed over time by different translations
could've gone and made some more commandments
Where am I wrong here
There was way more than ten bro
yeah bro so like why are there only 10 now
There isnāt any evidence that moses existed
Cuz the Old Testament is irrelevant
There isnāt any evidence dinosaurs existed and werenāt just big birds and animals instead of reptiles
both are the word of god, can't disregard half of it
We have fossilsā¦
We have Moses
bro is succesfully ragebaiting me so well
Yeah he is just ragebaiting
Uhhhh are u christian
I donāt think itās possible for a human being to actually be that stupid, so I just have to assume itās for the memes
not anymore, i don't want my life to be dictated by some insecure virgin rapist
I just think ur ignorant towards what im trying to convey to u cuz ur a dumb annoying atheist
no no batter is quite smart
What tha hell Bible did u read
same shit you did
Didnāt he forcibly impregnate mary
alright let me edit my message
Ion even go to church

The road to atheism is littered with bibles read cover to cover
How would that work
Idk, I think itās all fiction
bro has such a huge stick in his ass i'm pretty sure it's not possible he's had sex
I donāt have to justify it. Itās just a story
I doubt u have
But I agree itās not all nonfiction
Thereās a lot of nonfiction especially in the New Testament again you just donāt understand that cuz ur ignorant
The Old Testament is where u have the fables
Like what Jonah being in a whales stomach for days
Skull emoji
Iām literally correct
Who was at the tomb when it opened?
Roman soldiers
They reported it did u read the Bible or are u just being ignorant again
Thatās not the answer in any of the gospels
like what, jesus waking up from his 3 day heaven bender just to do an irish goodbye?
He was just committing life insurance fraud
bro knows so much about literature yet doesn't know what an unreliable narrator is
3 day heaven bender just to do an Irish goodbye
IM SPEAKING WITH PPL WHO DONT KNOW MARY MAGDELINE
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
can't use the bible to verify the bible, that's just circular reasoning
gang ofc i know her, i watched the da vinci code
But if you take away circular reasoning, they donāt have anything left :(
What else u want me to use gang mary Magdalene was like one of the only real close associates of Jesus Christ
is there any historical record besides the bible
Alr said I donāt think all of the Bible is nonfiction but a lot of is even irrelevant to what is taught now to a point where u can read it and understand the underlying concepts
Itās very self referential
Of Christianity?
Yes
nah bro, mary magdalene, jesus, all that jazz
So did the romans have records of this stuff?
which comes in very handy when you gotta use the book to verify the book
Yes
Oh neat. Like what?
Even in Muslim teachings they consider Jesus Christ a scholar and believe he will come back to earth for the rapture
A lot happens when u give up ignorance i promise but tactius and josephus for Roman scholars mentioning Jesus
Why do I care if one cult believes in parts of another cult
actually they did keep records
but many have been lost to time
Probably because itās two entirely different civilizations
Are u an idiot
both are abrahamic religions bro
they basically believe the same shit
Thatās not what I said
doesn't make it less true
And thatās not what abrahamic religions believe in itās the Old Testament
Jews are abrahamic and donāt believe in the New Testament
which is also not my point?
Wasnāt tacitus born after all the events of the bible
yes
Josephus was also not a contemporary
Bruh theyāre early Roman scholars
Do u not understand history or do u just search everything up
early roman scholars?
that's not early by any means
Well I mean
Neither of them were alive when jesus was supposed to be around
Compared right to the death of Jesus Christ???
So i donāt really care what they said
gang it's fine you don't have to continue ragebaiting
I think heās stuck
This makes most human history inaccurate
Is my point
A huge portion of human history IS inaccurate
i'm not willing to debate someone who thinks circular reasoning is a valid argument
Bro
yes and no
Let me get on my computer
bro it's 2 am, i have exams in 11 days i don't have more time for ts today imma go to bed
Look bud historical documentation from thousands of years ago from multiple civilizations and independent sources is enough in most common history to believe that the "circular reasoning" argument is silly
i can self referentiate the bible cause yall cant prove it didnt happen either
which is another fallacy, WOW
This is an argument of faith used by Christians but the way yall are slowly not understanding and purposely ignoring stuff makes me thik that you dont see it how i do
i wish you good luck boring endgame grinder
Thereās a teapot in space between the earth and the sun too small to be seen by telescopes. It exists because you canāt prove it doesnāt
well theres more proof than u the discord user has to show me
Really
Yep
Who made the teapot
Russell
blud you're the only one using logical fallacies over here
How did he know what tea was
is bro making the tomas of aquinas argument
that's just sad
āMy apologetics arenāt working so I have to call it dumbā
at least we're not using fallacies
these are answers to ur apolegetics
that's you and only you bucko
Evidence that moses existed
Do you have any?
historic scholars and articles
besides the bible, or any other dogmatic documents
which ones
Iām happy to read some
well i cant say the main one
which makes it a little hard but ill GOOGLE some of the other ones
The bible is the claim, not the evidence
because that would be circular reasoning
just so i can be on yalls level and make yall happy
wb muslim ppl believing in jesus
u said it was because they were abrahamic but u clearly didnt know what u were talking about
They also believe the moon was split in half. Not interested
settle that one over while i google
they believe in essentialy the same god christians do
not jesus
God had been around for years before Jesus by then
I wonder if jesus was a furry
prolly
What would his fursona be?
you just know he liked it dirty
or a fish
that shows ur not interested in reasoning just being weird
that's just like a joke
OK i cant help what you think of when u hear the word furries i guess
but i can help u understand other stuff
how you look whenever you use circular reasoning, and then try to justify said circular reasoning
go on boy, find us proof moses existed
Explain how regionally different Asians would've known Christ
Missionaries and genocide
silk road, word travels fast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus bang i can google like yall now
The historicity of Jesus is the debate "on the fringes of scholarship" and in popular culture whether Jesus historically existed or was a purely mythological figure. Mainstream New Testament scholarship ignores the non-existence hypothesis and its arguments, as the question of historicity was generally settled in scholarship in the early 20th ce...
Weāre looking for evidence of moses, not jesus
we didn't ask for jesus, we asked for moses
argument debunked except not really because it will still be vague and up to interpretation like most religion
yeah almost as if you're not supposed to be able to prove it because that kinda defeats the point of faith
who is smarter then my grandma
Well the first thing i thought is who wouldve written the torah instead of Moses
wow who knew
yea durr but i dont have to act ignorant about whats in it
wait until bro finds out homer might've not written the odyssey and illiad
Literally anyone
Then wouldnt they just be who moses was
HAHAHAHAHA
if moses only serves the function of being the one who wrote it, yes, someone else having written it does not equate to them doing the same shi moses did
S+ tier ragebait
you can't honestly believe bro wandered around a relatively small desert for like 40 years, split a sea in half and talked to a burning bush
if i would say i did that
you'd call me crazy
well idk who wouldve freed israelites from slavery but im sure he didnt hit a rock twice and water flowed out
i would leave that kind of stuff to maybe delirium
They were never enslaved by egyptians
so he is fallable, so he is an unreliable narrator
damn, crazy
so not only is it very likely he didn't exist in the first place but if he did he wouldn't be reliable
Yea and u believed in the talking snake?
I think that theres more to it than fables
no but i'm not taking the position of pro christian here
Itās more realistic than making a blind person able to see by putting mud on his eyes
I think its lined with fables in extent of mostly the old testament which is what Moses wrote and is innacurate and older and hwat u guys are talking about
gang the new testament ain't much better
Do you believe in miraclessssss
Absolutely not
where you from
Miracles magically stopped happening around the same time cameras were invented
its a song jesus performed miracles idk if he actually did thats part of faith
āLet me believe a bunch of unsubstantiated garbage because people told me toā
how am i supposed to tell it to you most of those stories are innacurate and he also rid people of demons which was just disease
Well i can believe in the gospel and interpret the bible how i want no?
you can believe it, but you shouldn't state it as being a fact
Whatās your methodology for determining whatās true vs whatās a fable?
only to use the bible to prove your point
I never stated it as fact really you guys are just being ignorant
im using the bible to make points about christianity
whats yours
bro thinks he's socrates, we have no use for your bullshittery and with this last message i bid ye gentlemen goodnight
logic heh.
I am not claiming anything in the bible is true. I donāt need one
If youāre done, Iām also leaving. Adios
reddit asf
You should google what an argument from ignorance is btw
I believe in things I can make educated opinions about
So can u i dont have to agree with urs u dont have to agree with mine
im just talking to you about mine and yall are being reddit armchair doctors
if it has supernatural bs, it's probably a fable, if it doesn't and it's well documented like hm for example, pompei, it may just be true
My beliefs arenāt being used to strip civil rights in the US
if i were to ask you if you believe in god, would you answer my question with the question 'what do you mean believe'
because you're sounding like jordan peterson rn
Ughhhh prometheus was cast into the bowels of earth to have his liver pecked at by a raven tho
theres no other way i could possibly interpret what happened there
he wasn't cast into the bowels, he was in the caucasus mountains
I believe in God because of intelligent design
More ragebait
What have you looked at that isnāt designed to be able to detect design?
his design was so intelligent he made sure to let us know taking it up the bum is okay as he put our g-spots there
without intellegent design how do ur eyes work with just cellular reproduction
u can do whatever man i think thats just biology tho
rephrase too needlessly complicated
looked at that isnāt designed to be able to detect design?
i asked u just to rephrase it plz
i promise i can understand what ur talking about u just said that particular sentence in a stupid ass way
Ok. How do you know things were designed?
i have them
Inb4 āirreducible complexity, like the human eyeā
i hope that when i die, god does exist, so i could at least be in hell knowing i didn't bow down to the guy who invented a god complex
next question
Something existing is not evidence it was designed
thats not what a god complex is
why not
i believe it is tho, that should be valid enough
how else did it get there what function does it serve thats things i think about when i think about things
hasnt stopped u before
Let me put it this way. We go outside and look at a tree. You say āthis is designedā
I say āno it isnātā
How do we resolve this?
seed
?
okay but if everything is designed, who designed god
who put seeds on earth to make trees
Your mom
so that means i'm god?
we have no proof we exist except for the fact me and you are conscious and can speak to each other
Thereās no evidence anyone put seeds on earth, unless youāre talking about who planted the tree
Which is usually another tree
that's not true, you should really read something else besides existentialsm
if so what produced seeds
A slightly different plant before it
i mean its another athiest reasoning u should probably know
howd that plant get there
The plant before it
what plant how can u prove to me those plants existed
what was the first plant to make seeds
Pause: my answer to this question doesnāt make a difference
im just using ur logic
answer plz or ur wrong immediately
how did the first plant get there with no seeds
if his design is so intelligent, why do we have tailbones but no tail, why are our backs so criminally badly designed, why do we have wisdom teeth that need to be removed because our mouths have become smaller, why is there a tendon in our hand we never use, why are all of these things disappearing in people
if adam and eve existed, why isn't everyone a clone of one another
evolution
Mitotic reproduction
why should you be able to move the goalposts this much in favour of your argument on the sole basis of getting to pick and choose what parts of the bible you believe
why should you be able to self referentiate the bible as some sort of cosmic proof but deem it to be untrustworthy the next second
cuz i can use reasoning to determine things instead of believing whats in front of me a bit
evolution seems pretty naturalistic
idk what else to tell u
Quick question: if you ask a question and the answer is āI donāt know,ā is that evidence that your beliefs are true?
to u it is
Nope!
to me it depends on the question
how can you prove that to me
This is basic logic
lol cannonball right
Here ya go kiddo
An argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam or appeal to ignorance, is a logical fallacy where a proposition is claimed to be true because it has not been proven false, or false because it has not been proven true. It essentially argues that a lack of evidence against a claim is evidence for the claim, or that the lack of evidence for a claim is evidence against it
i mean u can google stuff but im not believing u prob didnt even read that
how would you prove to me that the answer is always no and not i dont know
answer me and ill ask u the same question again
The answer to this is always no
how can u prove it to me
Buddy have you not learned basic logic
sure so prove it to me
Positive assertions need to be demonstrated independently
prove it
u can go in circles doing an i dont know contest with anyone
u couldnt prove that to me if u tried cuz i could just act ignorant about it all day and not let you
The problem is, youāre claiming that you know things were created, and that you know specifically who created it
i never claimed that i claimed i believe in it
Why tf would you believe that without evidence instead of saying āi donāt knowā
Intelligent design (ID) is a pseudoscientific argument for the existence of God, presented by its proponents as "an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins". Proponents claim that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." ...
Buddy your own link calls it pseudoscientific
its about the existence of god
what am i supposed to be arguing with u about here
i could die tomorrow and see black for all i know doesnt change what i believe in
Iām not interested in pseudoscience. This is useless to me
ok well if u wanna listen to my argument instead of pretending u know what ur talking ab and using google thats a good scientific backing for an evidence of a God
that me personally a Christian would believe moreso towards in the existence of creationism and supernatural design rather than Christianity itself
It's really good stuff and the way biologists and scientists have discovered evolution they still fully havent figured it out lol
Why believe this without evidence
the evidence is intelligent design
uhhh
no you being able to look at your screen and process what im saying is the evidence
There are no peer reviewed papers indicating that intelligent design is plausible
It is not scientific
explain how cells evolved to understand this and other stuff like urinary systems
ur body is 75% water bro and electric and maintains heat and homeostasis
lilke
if u cant understand it i just cant explain it to you
I donāt answer fallacious requests
cells do not know science
cells do not know how to create a urinary system from scratch because they arent conscious enough
you couldnt ever do it and i know u couldnt
but im saying this is the claim
u dont have to be so staunch about everything man
Iām not a biologist
biologists havent done it
So if biologists are able to perfectly create them in a lab, does that now mean intelligent design is false, or are you going to shift to something else we donāt know about
create what
imagine hypothetically these hypothetical scientists created hypothetical eyeballs
they would probably use the same mirrors and cones system ur cells divised by just knowing about it somehow thousands of years ago
Buddy Iām asking if youāre going to shift the goalposts
im just answering ur question
Here let me make this really easy for you
how do your cells understand how to maintain electricity and water within the same vessel intertwined with blood a filtering system and a pure conscious brain without any intelligent design
You: āBiologists canāt do X, so intelligent design makes the most sense to meā
Me: āIf biologists are able to do X in the future, does that make intelligent design less reasonable to you?ā
thats what i dont understand cells arent that smart
ur fading away from my argument and yours tho
Why do you keep using the same fallacy over and over
i alr answered ur question with the hypothetical
cuz how are u GONNA PROVE ME WRONG BRO
im telling u what i believe in ?????
im asking you
Me not being able to prove you wrong doesnāt make your beliefs true
sure
but im telling u my claim and ur being annoying about it
so might as well outreason u for it
imagine hypothetically these hypothetical scientists created hypothetical eyeballs
they would probably use the same mirrors and cones system ur cells divised by just knowing about it somehow thousands of years ago
now my question is
Iām asking how you know your beliefs are true, and you either make arguments from ignorance or from incredulity
how do your cells understand how to maintain electricity and water within the same vessel intertwined with blood a filtering system and a pure conscious brain without any intelligent design
im telling you i believe in God bro
Can you rephrase this to not use an argument from incredulity
how do your cells understand how eyeballs work before they are developed
by your cells
Dunno
ya exactly no one does
Iām not claiming I do
either theres alterior reasoning or everyone is just stupid
i choose to believe in alterior reasoning until i see that everyone is just stupid
Why is the answer āwe donāt knowā insufficient
it supports intelligent design
It⦠doesnāt
begs the question How did this come to fruition?
We donāt know
We donāt know
ya
So it stays as that
sooooo that supports my foundation of believing in god
āWe donāt know, so let me throw in magic as the most likely explanationā
idk what the problem is here anymore
well im waiting for scientists to explain it to me and they cant and google cant explain it to you either
i just think its wayyy too complicated to be naturally occuring
like childbirth
millions of things have to go right for childbirth to happen and it does every day
If everything can eventually be explained, will you stop believing in your god?
Wont happen
If it did
hmmmmm idk id definitely be dead by then but if somehow they found out the million year question then i'd maybe rebuke intelligent design but i would still wonder how i was alive then
cuz they couldnt be able to prove it to me<-- (how i am made of electricity and water and blood and flesh and bones and consciousness and how my cells were smart enough to create that of themselves)
glad to be open and talk with u im sorry that u have to be so sheltered ab stuff
im a very emotional person but i hate when i try to talk intelligently and its just a dude spitting equal fallacies about RELIGION an openly debatable topic as if we both couldnt be equally wrong
the ability to not be an open person to ideas in life and rather argue towards ur insolence confuses me that is what i will leave from all this
if we both have different arguments that cant be explained towards one logical way then the only thing we can argue about is the foundation of our reasoning
my foundation of reasoning comes from life and the pursuits around the sheer complexity of it (as a healthcare professional) and urs comes from whatever google tells u i guess
Burn the witch
People have been substituting God in places where there is a lack of scientific explanation for millennia
Back then it was claiming Gods existence to try to reason why seasons, stars, human life, ect exists
We now have scientific explanations for those previously unexplained phenomena but for some people the goalposts just shift to the next things we don't understand scientifically
If itās near impossible for cells to naturally do on their own then it makes u think if anything has to interact with the cell for it to behave this way (evolution) and if it does where does that other thing come from (origin of life)
Itās something u just canāt find out
š¦
What do you mean by "do in their own" and what do you mean by "other thing"
This doesn't read coherently to me
Did u read the argument? The foundation of the argument ur replying to is in the pseudoscientific concept of intelligent design as proof of God
WHY ARE PEOPLE STILL DEBATING HIM
I didn't read the whole argument no
Itās not bad to have conversation
stfu
Is the fact that there are phenomena unexplained by science not apart of your reasoning
Iām friends with an Arabic scholar he doesnāt listen to music because it distracts them from memorizing the quran I donāt agree with it but it interests me all day
Religion is definitely interesting
I think human design is too intelligent to be devised by cellular organisms that donāt understand stuff like electricity as a function of neurons and cardiovascular systems and water filtering and digestion
you're the discord equivalent of colin robinson
Cuz I talk to ppl I donāt agree with ab things in a calm manner?
Idk who Colin Robinson is
Who dat
because you use logical fallacies the whole time, you move the goalposts at any opportunity yet you present yourself to be the wise one
So you don't think that the process evolution, without the interference of a devine being, could every produce something has complex as us, even given any amount of time
just watch what we do in the shadows
I alr said either of us can be equally wrong
Read this plz
gang i wasn't reading anymore atp
Iām not arguing towards Christianity trying to get yall to convert to it im not that type of person just telling u what i know and understand and believe
Well what caused it to happen
What causes evolution to happen?
intelligent design, according to batter
So why do some species get discovered only recently did we just not discover it
How do they know how to use mirrors and cones to reflect light through ur eyes so it transfers to your conscious brain
well how bout we split the difference and we agree that we're all just in a simulation
Sure but this is 20 million years down the line or something Iām talking about origin of life
What do you mean by "they"
Are we splitting the check
Cellular organisms credited to the origin of life
Cos I only ordered fries bro
tfym i didn't even order anything
To me this reads like you think the opposing position is that cellular organisms consciously created life?
i ain't paying for your fries bro
That's not what evolution is
Ill just leave the check to one of them
Unless we arenāt real
they won't notice us dine 'n dashing anyways, lemme order some truffle fries
Fr
should get some caviar while we're here
What causes an action in a barely developed cell to grow eyes and how does it understand the function of sight. U can try to answer but biologists donāt even fully rly understand the basis behind it besides saying itās attributed to evolution like u are
Good idea we dine like kings today
Which can be true but how did it happen initially if humans are smartest
are you perchance a woman, australian or black
Evolution happens through mutations in offspring which cause those offspring to become more successful in surviving and breeding than the none-mutated version, eventually leading to the mutated version being more successful and taking over the population?
Where is the cellular organisms consciously deciding characteristics in that?
Offspring
I am not
can you pretend to be
Who was the first parent of offspring
Kangaroo
Are you asking what the first living organism was
Nuh uh it's my lore
i'll give you new lore
Asking why itās there
Letās see the answer
It's a pretty interesting question, the general consensus is that the first life appeared deep in the ocean under very specific chemical conditions
your name is chase, you're very tall and very handsome and you always agree with @halcyon kraken
Specific chemical conditions is very broad
Here I will assume u mean like zooplankton
Yeah because I'm not familiar with specifics to any level
gang it's already 5 am
Well evolution is very specific
Yeah
yeah otherwise how would you get a gyarados
When I think of something deep in water I think of no use for eyes until it swims up and no use for electricity impulses because ur tiny organisms underwater and itāll fry u
You can like, research yourself what the academic consensus is on the specifics of the first life emerging yourself
I have a lot and im here arguing with ppl about a question no one has ever answered correctly
Yeah it would be an incredibly simple single-cellular organism
Iirc eyes didn't evolve until significantly later on
Which started as extremely basic light-dedictors
ate thai food for the first time in a while ts was so good šš»
Then other millions of years became adapt to processing more detailed patterns of light
I think itās just confusing cuz zooplankton are filter feeders and stuff and would have no reason to go upwards
No species has other animals going upwards that much it messes up their atmospheric pressure really badly
I'm not taking about zooplankton necessarily
Again, we can look up what the academic consensus on the nature of the life lifeform is
I might do it now it's a pretty interesting subject
just some unknown organism yea I know that is the basis of life on a scientific level but the reasoning for it is less than there scientifically
If not phyto or zooplankton like I said then idrk what other cells would be deep in the ocean
What do you mean by "reasoning for it"
The reason for why the lifeform emerged in the first place?
itās a bit contradictory to how evolution is promoted in organisms
The way it would evolve
Especially fish
What about it is contradictory
For one organisms in water feed on the dead life or plant matter around it and it would take a miracle more than God for a zooplankton to wander up the oceans channel even enough to develop eyes as a result
It would die immediately off
Who says it was the zooplankton that developed eyes
Well if itās the first form of life then we had to have developed eyes or thereās more forms of life
Yeah it developed eyes at some point in it's evolutionary track
I donāt see a reason for zooplankton to do it or even survive by trying
Iirc eyes didn't develop until organisms had progressed well beyond single cellular life
They donāt need more food they donāt have predators they were literally bound to the floor like thousands of other organisms today
I think you need to lose this idea of zooplankton directly receiving eyes
Organisms didn't evolve eyes until they were massive
Iām saying zooplankton donāt travel upwards at the bottom of the ocean at all
In comparison to zooplankton
At all is hyperbole
Sure
Thousands of yards upwards?
But it wasn't the Zooplankton that evolved eyes
So u assume they adjusted to pressure first and then light which would make more sense but they would have no reason to care about it
Wdym by "care about it"
Swimming upwards
I feel like you are using God to try to explain something that you just have no researched nearly enough to know about, if you have questions about early life and evolution you can explore this topic yourself
Lol I have
Instead of thinking "it doesn't make sense to me based on the minimal knowledge that I have prior to researching therefore God did it"
LMFAO
But you thought zooplankton evolved eyes
ur hilarious dude I STUDY THE HUMAN BODY!!!!
Iām saying over the course of evolution zooplankton would stay on the dark ocean floor
Yeah I'm not taking about the human body, I'm taking about early life
Bruh I promise you my interest in the biology of these things and life itself is insurmountable and thereās no correct answer only you acting like a reddit armchair atheist about something u canāt prove either
Scientifically it doesnāt even make sense
Thatās why it stumps scientists
Do you think I'm trying to make the point that you know nothing about biology I was talking extremely specially about early life
Thereās nothing I would care more to talk to you about than the processes of human life
Itās so complex and intricate
But you didn't seem to know much about what the academic consensus is on early lifeforms, I'm just saying that many of the questions you have about early life which leads you to suppose that God must have been the explanation, could likely be answered through research
Iām saying I know it and Iāve heard everything ur saying before and zooplankton wouldnāt swim up to the surface to develop eyes or even try to get light because they would have no use for that
If you research the subject of the very first life and still find it illogical and think that God needs to be used to justify it, then sure
Theyāve researched it for thousands of years
Idk how ur the only one whoās figured it out
When did I say I have
Apparently im wrong so u have got it figured out
Otherwise why are u arguing like that about something u have yet to disprove
No I'm just saying that jumping to the conclusion that God did it seems premature
I agree
Do u have a better idea
Iām not gonna disagree with the fact itās pseudoscience but ur not gonna sit here and disprove it to me otherwise ur brains ability to see color is pseudoscience
If I say "early life was created by the Spaghetti Man because he wanted life to come about to eventually make more spaghetti, and he used spaghetti-magic to conjure up single cellular lifeforms, you would also probably disagree"
Scientists donāt even know how ur body correctly feels pain
I'm not trying to disprove it, I'm agnostic not atheist
But it has not yet been proven to me
Iām not arguing for Christianity just a creator
This is an agnostic view of a christian I said that as well
In reality I donāt know whatās right or wrong I hope everyone whoās a good person goes to heaven above anything else Christianity wise
I was just trying to use an example to demonstrate that you can still disagree with something that sounds absurd even if you don't know everything about the subject
I tried to use an example different from God but it didn't quite land that wat
Way*
Yes cuz u said the spaghetti man in serious conversation and my brain immediately just stopped reading it because it was atheism argument towards a specific creator
Yeah I wasn't trying to go for a specific creator angle
I agree itās premature to jump to conclusions but I promise u Iāve done the math and many smart people have done the math and they donāt get it either
I was just trying to suggest a non-God cause of life that you would disagree with
But I just accidentally created another God kind of concept
About why early life rose up from the deep sea?
Well I think if chemical reactions produced life which makes sense then it could make zooplankton which makes sense but zooplankton would not want to travel otherwise they would die there
See this is what I was trying to get at when I was taking about you putting God in the place of concepts you do not and understand and have not researched
You don't understand why life would travel upwards? Sure, neither do I specifically. But have you tried to research and understand the current academic explanation of why life did this? I'm also curious to know so we could try to both find out
(This might read as condescending in some way but I promise I'm not trying to be)
Itās anti evolution anti science
If u show me anti evolution I either see a god or a miracle that canāt happen in this context
No there could be a very reasonable explanation that you just haven't researched yet
I'll try find what they say on the subject academically
Thatās true but tell me what it is
The issue is u wonāt be able to do it past theorizing
Ur knowledgeable on the subject u just are lacking some of the natural concepts of lifeās ideas for survival here through points of barometric pressure they would have to periodically evolve over
And zooplankton donāt do that
They eat plants
Sure, but I wouldn't put God as an explanation in place of something I don't understand
U donāt have to
When there almost certainly are explanations in line with our current proven understanding of the world
Iāve studied the entire human body and I think itās more than divine
Then tell me them
Iāll talk to u all day about it
When did I say I knew what they were, I'm curious to know though
What do you think I should search for try to find out
Hmmm maybe history lesson 1
Natural occurring presences of early life and how evolution furthered the processes of changing how zooplankton act to float upwards
Is what u should study to try and interest me about the argument at hand
Idk if it's weird to go back to this, but do you see in this screenshot how I was saying that you specifically don't know about the subject of early life, and wasn't trying to say you didn't know about life and biology in general
Wait the ss doesn't really show the convo but u remember it
Yeah just wondering what to search to get to that point
Youāre thinking of it more literal but im thinking of this more emotionally because years worth of my work have gone into studying the human body and biology and histology and chemistry and physiology and and anatomy and I still havenāt figured out why this happens
I understand how ur bones cells work to a doctors level dude
Iāve done the math I just want the answers if anything cuz itās one of the most knowledgeable topics i can talk to you about
Sure but I'm specifically asking if you think the fact that I was pointing out that you don't know much about the first lifeforms, ans not saying you didn't know about biology, is clear in hindsight or not
This is separate from the debate
Yes but the upbringing was to boast my years worth of education in the subject of life and its processes of which u said I didnāt know anything about
It offends me because Iāve looked at it farther than most ppl here can even begin to understand
No no no, I wasn't saying you didn't know anything about the processes of life
Where did u get this from
Early human life but those things are so interesting to me that denying my curiosity in stuff like biology is rude to me
I was just saying u didn't know, very specifically, about the first lifeforms / lifeforms
Iāve been sitting here talking in depth about it to multiple ppl calmly all calling me an idiot for something I have more research on religious and scientific wise
I do know about the first life forms
I donāt believe in its elasticity
Unless it was a prompt of survival brought upon by a different chemical reaction that could create a predator to zooplankton that would cause zooplankton to run away from it youāve lost me
And the way that those chemical reactions happened wouldāve only produced filter feeding single cell organisms as far as I know
But zooplankton are not single cellular lifeforms, right?
Im begging and pleading for someone to tell me whatās right about all this itās lifeās unanswered question to me
Yes but we assume zooplankton in this context are unicellular and not somehow shrimps babies already
Because u couldnāt zap that to life
Show me a chemical reaction that does that and Iāll show u what Iāll call god after you do
Yeah I'm curious about this as well, it's not easy to find the answer through a Google search as it's too specific
Might be worth trying AI to see what the academic consensus on that question is, I might do it tmmr but for now I'll sleep
Ai will prob take both sides itās known to do that especially since this is a pseudoscientific theory on both arguments (just unproven no hate) but for sure study it
No. Even things like jellyfish and crab larvae and baby fish are plankton
Itās just vague with the science we have now and im sure I could be wrong especially on the creators foundation of it but itās so contrastingly vague to science and what ive studied as a passionately educated nurse that the answer goes generally unspoken as true
Technically even giants like the mola mola are considered plankton
They're at the mercy of the water currents for the most part, that's part of what makes things plankton and not just like, fish
Once I swam in the sea and the plankton started biting me
happens sometimes lole
I thought I was in wrong server for a second

can we just have a group goon sesh
š«„
The Council is watching you closely. You are on our radar.
Big Brother is watching
idk what too say to that
but the questions still stands
Can WE just have a group goon sesh
in case nobody heard me the first time
hai guys
For the cause of turgor pressure between the vacuole and the entire cell, is it cos of diffusion, osmosis or active transport
cos there is a permeable membrane
its the high water potential to low water potential right?
.
The secret agents are going to you already
Don't dare to eat them...
Wait
Where are you from
Seems on your pfp i would say either Africa or South America
But only Russian brain dead guy could make that username
Piano ahh vids
Should I cop
Anyone wanna play with me?????????
sure
no sry its rated
lemme make it unrated
Hi
Exactly i am not russian i am ukrainian
I will give you all penguins from my basement,, you can send you agents
Buy 16-17
what happened here
watchu mean by that
o i thought this was chess-talk
.
you want to buy iphone 13? buy 16 or wait for 17
idk vro 17 seems like an excessive amount of phones 
Hello, why can't I talk in the improvement-talk chanel? I conected my chess.com account and all too...
Nevermind, I can do it now
Look
just use YouTube music
Trust me no other subscription is better

