#next-move-discussion
1 messages · Page 12 of 1
should i avoid putting goofy options like that in polls just because they show up in my databases?
Depends on the situation.
wdym
The options aren't necessarily goofy. Some moves(like 5.Nc3) have their own ideas.
no
im not talking about goofy moves that white might play
im talking about goofy options on the polls
like 5.O-O d5
that actually has a name tho
i forgor what it is
oh... Yeah, generally. People have this tendency of voting for the goofy option instead of the actual good move. Like If I make a poll after e4.
e5
c5
e6
c6
d5
g5💔
Trolls are likely to vote for the bad move. And trolls can sometimes outnumber real votes. Which can mess things up
Yeah... So goofy options can stay(if it's true)
As long as people aren't actually voting for the goofy options because they think it's a good move, it's fine
What about a5? Also goofy
I would not play b5 after Nc3. There's a risk of sacrificing light piece for 2 pawns and breaking our defence. I hope that such situation won't take place.
wont happen
No way is that a good idea
If we made an opening mistake before move 9 i will wear cat ears to class
nya
Nvm studying statistics rn
just search online
Hell naw
this got me muted on another server
Guess either i dont have to or i make a set out of cardboard
HELL NAH (is that a girl)
idk
Nonbinary furries 🥀
uwu
Why r u doing this to me i have exam this month i need to revise 
go revise
OK, I played a game with the computer recently, where I captured his 2 pawns sacrificing one minor piece, on the king-side with devastating attack. Sometimes it's good.
I defeated all free-plan bots on each level with 3 crowns (no help).
Except Francis, although got winning position against him recently. Even that I had advantage, I would have to find Knight sacrifice to grab his Rook. It was pointed by analysis after the game. I did not found it in move ~50.
Just an addition to my comment. Look how he pursued me to exchange my Queen with his Rook. 🙂 I had much advantage two moves earlier (Sorry for off-topic).
6.Re1 is rare
?
6.d4 is way more common
yes
you're thinking of 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.O-O Nxe4 5.Re1
this is different
Why is Re1 now unplayable
6.Re1 Nc5
7..Nxe5 8.Rxe5+ Be7
Duh my brain aint braining
This, she skewers the pond, wait cant we jst play f5! Defending the knight?
no
6.Re1 f5 7.d3 Nc5 8.Bxc6 dxc6 9.Nxe5 and 10.Qh5+ is coming
we are cooked
this is all pointless
because she's not going to play 6.Re1
just because you beat a 600 bot by sacrificing a piece for 2 pawns wont mean judit beats us by sacrificing a piece for 2 pawns on the completeyl opposite side of the board than where our king will end up
It was not 600 ELO bot, it was Francis 2300 (or Nora which is 2200). I made a slight mistake in that match, and didn't win it eventually.
According to our match with Judit, I just wanted to point the possibility of such sacrifice after Nc3, which might be devastating in some circumstances.
I'm also sure, like you, that Judit won't go into it if we play b5 after Nc3. That was not my point.
Nevertheless, 5. O-O is most probable. Nf6 is winning by 2100+ votes, but b5 is also massively considered.
if there was ever a time for black to play f5, it was on move 3 or 4 going into the Jaenisch gambit
f5 will not be a good move for some time now
is there a way to set c.com or discord up to get a notification of some sort when Judit makes a move ?
I'm not sure why 5. O-O Be7 has no realistic chance of winning. This variant is described thoroughly in my book. I hope that young voters just study chess. There was some person that said to study Ruy Lopez. I like chess theory very much, unlike my Father. 🙂
Just going based on how people voted in Divis game. Lot of people want to put the bishop on a very active diagonal and esp pointing towards white king. It’s almost as if 0-0 attracts the bishop to c5
Low elo ppl used to italian which means bishop there by default
Idk if that just me
I think it does have a decent chance, but all depends on low elo folk
Uggh
the only real difference is some vote shifting from Bc5 to Be7, about 3%
I'm calling it
% not really changing 😥
5..Bc5 will win just like in the ElDivis game
B5 go go go go
I like Nxe4 in my daily games but I gotta agree with Lily it’s too dangerous here
Bc5 is fine
Neo-Arkhangelsk
I remember I had put it in an engine after Divis game. It was not bad
I don’t think it’s popular in the master database
Cuz I’ve never heard of it
Not really and I also doubt people are voting for it because they know theory
Honestly we might transpose anyway
b5 is about to take over Mxe4
In lichess masters’ database it’s 4th most popular move behind Be7, b5 and Nxe4
Be7 is out already
yeah, so are the other moves
No chance of winning
And percentages are
27% white win
50% draw
22% black win
share the results again
I need more 600s to attack the bishop
there is one saving grace
i have no doubt that 5..Bc5 6.d3 O-O would win
except when ElDivis played 6.d3, that's a rare move
6.c3 is much more common
keep sharing the move totals
I'm not so sure
the ElDivis game had about the same number of voters as have already voted
it's not a well-known game
We could technically try to make b5 overtake Bc5
IMO not worth it, Bc5 is fine
not even close
I will be voting Be7 in protest because Bc5 will win
Have any dummies mentioned Eldivis in the public chat?
nobody except me
wait
i thought you meant the private chat
no
nobody knows about that game
Ok thats good
Yh thats true
It’s totally worth it
We should do it
Why? It’s not that much better. Only as a test to see how much they see the chat
Not that much better 
It’s not, look at the stats
even if we did it wouldn't be enough
yh Id take 50% draw man ...
I'm voting Be7
I would too, but I really doubt we’ll make it
Do the master database. I don’t look at players
This is the master database
Wait really
I'm voting Be7
perhaps we can influence a close vote later, but this isn't it
Oh yeah that’s the master database
Still b5 is better
But I agree that we might transpose
I voted Be7 I see that the current vote results are pretty even. I hope Bc5 is not bad.
Wdym pretty even
The structure is still a bit different which is why I’m a bit pissed off
31% 21% 19% 13% which means 362, 245, 218, 148 is pretty even (uniform) distribution.
Honestly I might have done Bc5 in some casual bullet or blitz games but I’ve never played it in a serious game
Just drop the bishop back
Yh but then why put it there in the first place
You also need to drop the bishop back in archangel
Unless we drop to b6, idk if thats decent
Your supposed to
Bc5 is gonna win then
Yh I just try avoid those positions cause i always seem to get squashed, but i guess thats a me-problem
Bc5 is a leader now, but I think that the distribution can still change a little.
This move looks OK to me too, we're developing remaining piece on king-side. Honestly I like it.
Nc3 would be a pretty weak move by her
It would not be the most positionally accurate move
probably not going to happen
I expect 6.c3
80% of games
6.d3 is possible and if that happens we are cooked
start the campaign for 6.d3 b5!
we can't let 6.d3 O-O win
I expect 6.c3 tho
I’d just do 6…b5 and transpose
we should play 6..b5 against basically everything
no
it's in the message
Bishop on c5 is on very active position IMO and also can hide in case.
The drawback of our move order is that white can put the bishop on c2 in one move if she wants
My bad
With archangel, white’s bishop needs to make a pit stop on b3
Then we have to strike with 7..d5!
We also need to play 6.c3 b5 7.Bb3 d6
A lot of low Elo players will try to vote for 7..O-O
This would just be archangel, we would be back in 100% good shape
And then after 8.d4 exd4? 9.cxd4 Be7 10.e5 we are cooked no matter where we move our knight
Because 8.d4 Ba7 is never winning
d4 square will be protected by ours 3 pieces: pawn, knight and bishop. I see no breaktrough yet. Bb6 is also option for hiding.
it's also defended 3 times
low elo database
there is absolutely no way we stop exd4
OK, I see. After c3 it's defended also by White's pawn (apart Knight and Queen).
IMO white's minor pieces on queen-side lack in development in this position.
white can deal with that after pushing black all the way back with the center pawns
black is cooked
How tf did we manage to get a6 with these folk
i have no idea
look
Bc5 isn't bad
but I know we're going to screw up soon when d4 comes
and that's when I'll leave
what's the point in making recommendations if no one follows them
Sometimes Idk why we do them now
😭😭😭
Ah well
Ill stop moaning
And see tomorrow how it all is
I already know exactly how we're going to screw up
c3-d4 and we'll take on d4 and lose
any decent player knows you're not supposed to do that
I think that c3 preparation for d4 wastes a tempo and disables Knight development etc. But this is only my point of view. I don't analyze the game database at this point.
Only 2 games btw with exd4 in Masters’ database
because it's ass
1 draw 1 white win
you're not even supposed to play O-O one move earlier either
It is, we’re just giving up the center for nothing lol
yeah, this is exactly how we will lose
That’s not that bad, provided you don’t follow up with exd4 and instead find Ba7
which is never going to happen
we need to play b5, d6, and O-O in that order
and not take on d4 at any point
hmm
there is actually one line where it's safe to take on d4 eventually
Our d-file pawn is still there - and yes I would suggest d6 in such position.
I see that exd4 is not good, because we lose the center and allow pushing of e4 pawn.
the important thing is playing b5 right away
If it takes u that long to think of it the world will never figure it out though😥
we cannot screw up like in the ElDivis game and allow Bxc6 dxc6 Nxe5
If Be7 and Nxe4 votes combine it would win the voting. But as I said, the Bc5 looks quite OK for me and don't lose at this point (IMO).
I think it’s unlikely she plays d3 instead of c3
I actually think Bc5 is best from a practical standpoint
ain't nobody understanding Nb8/Bf8 in the Closed variations
the open is just asking to blunder our knight
and the Marshall Attack, i mean I don't think I even need to explain why
yeah 5..Bc5 6.c3 O-O 7.d4 Ba7 is actually fine for us
except there's no way we play 7..Ba7
5..Bc5 6.c3 b5 7.Bb3 d6 is the only reasonable line
but then 8.d4 Bb6 9.a4 requires us to find either 9..Bb7 or 9..Rb8
and that's not happening
I will stay until the first obvious mistake
and 5..Bc5 is not one
9…Bg4 had nice stats too
OK, so hiding this Bishop is a good option for us in such case. I also see it. We have so many good responses still in the following moves.
I'm actually quite surprised that such good move wins the voting at this stage and the other good moves are high too. It could be worse, probably.
I wonder how we deal with that d4 square problem.
i guess
Main issue for me in this line is that we’ll most likely play 8… exd4
that's going to happen no matter which line we pick
i don't even care
But better than the other one
when we play 8..exd4 despite the entire chat begging to retreat the bishop, I will quit
Fair
see that's the best part about looking at databases
you know not just what she's going to play, but how we're going to screw up
6.d3 O-O? is the most common move at low Elo
mainly because white almost never plays 7.Bxc6
exd4 is a strategy mistake in my opinion. I think that it won't be played. Ours Nf6 and Bc5 are both strategy moves so I'm optimistic.
Main issue is, nobody in the chat advocated for Bc5
And I doubt people want to play the Arkhangelsk
They just see a move they like and vote
We’ll see but I’m pessimistic too
exactly, that's why i have no hope
remember, we're at virtually the same vote percentages as the ElDivis game
Be7 is much higher though, that's good
looks like chat can swing the vote by about 6-8 percent
we can influence a close vote
I see. Be7, b5 and Nxe4 all got similar amount of votes. Bc5 is still a developing move in this position. I understand that it wasn't recommended. Good move options divided voters. These are common variations.
Ah, people should explain their vote. This is second rule of this game.
but when exd4 is an option it will win by a huge margin and we will then get steamrolled
Keep in mind discord was recommending Nxe4 in Divis game
So it’s not that different
Yeah it’s like you said, chat influences about 5-7%.
that could make a difference
it will be interesting to see how this game progresses
so far we've been using the ElDivis game as a benchmark for vote percentages
but when Judit Polgar plays 6.c3, we won't have that
In my book about openings the 5. d4 move option has some theory. But here we have 5. O-O and in next move we protect d4 square with our bishop. I'm not that experienced, but I can't see that losing move-sequence yet. I think that our Bc5 won't trap a bishop or make us lose. Need to check more.
I would play Be7, like I voted. Bc5 is "confident" move, putting it on very active place but with some dangers, that can be avoided fortunately.
we're going to screw up in some obvious way no matter what we play
Bc5 is a dubious line and the low elo players clearly didn't listen to the people who wanted Nxe4
I don't care whether b5 or Nxe4 wins, but I don't want the vote to be split and allow Bc5 to win
no it isn't
I completed all the polls for next move. I voted b5 only when Judit plays dangerous c3.
we should probably play it right away
that way we don't have it as an option later to split the vote
Chess.com should introduce ranked choice voting for vote chess
The first move to get an absolute majority (>50% of the total vote) will be played after the votes are counted
This way, we don't get a situation where two moves are preferred by a group of players over one other move but that undesirable move gets played because of a vote split
exactly
chess.com says they have things they'll implement in future vote chess games
also im not sure that would help that much
there are just too many low elo players who don't read the chat
It would help if there are 3-4 competitive moves at the top, though more would negate the effect of ranked choice
It's unlikely that more than 4 moves are competitive though
2 step voting is interesting. Also b5 is getting 2nd rank now.
Even runoff is better than plurality voting
the raw margin between Bc5 and b5 is not increasing
It's currently a 1:1 ratio
This isn't helping
If Bc5 and b5 were the only two moves offered, I think b5 would win 60-40
I'd rather have Bc5 than b5 if those were my only two options and I was in control of the game
but given who the other players are, b5 is clearly more practical
We're probably not in control of the game
If I was in control of the game, I would play Nxe4, knowing that there would be no blundering
Be7 even that on 4th place, still gets 500 votes. Same for Nxe4 - 3rd place. I'm wondering what people will play when there's a hard choice to be made, like after c3. But I'm almost sure they will vote for something OK. Given Judit Polgar continues to play friendly.
honestly i would rather play this move order
avoids 5..b5 6.Bb3 Bc5 7.a4
because you know we would play 7..bxa4?
What kind of voting system can stop braindead idiots from voting anyways? Unless you limit the Elo or somehow prune off people who dont read the chat
Unless its goes like the gothamchess game and she baits us, we will definitely take cuz knowing 500s too well they cant seem to understand the concept of undermining / deflection
bruh that wasn't bait by GothamChess
that was just a good move
bait was what Magnus Carlsen did
right near the beginning of the game
Position? I havent checked that
Ok actually never mind it wasn’t a trap
The format of Kasparov vs. The World was probably the most successful. All I know about it is that MSN recruited several young masters to help with recommending moves.
We can’t even get out of theory without screwing up
Against Kasparov, the World played a sharp exchange sacrifice novelty
You’re not going to find a novelty like that in 2026
Even Topalov Lite isn’t a novelty
I mean maybe there’s something in the Anti-Moscow
Or the Poisoned Pawn
But good luck
Bigners dont know theory in the first place, "bishop to c file" is purely instinctive (i do it all the time)
Yea
The main problem which needs to be solved is communicating to the voters what the most promising moves are.
Which is impossble currently, unless the most upvoted comment is displayed prominently and not the chess board alone
Yea
But most importantly, you need to require people to read the chat
We all know that
Honestly I think the simplest solution to at the least maintain a minimum quality of play is to display on the board a move recommended by each of the world team coaches, visible before voting
I noticed that the Be7 move is not shown with the arrow on the chess-board, despite it's on 4th place! d6 and d5 are shown. This must be a bug/error.
what did you vote for?
cause I'm not seeing the arrow either due to the bishop already being on the square
I voted for Be7, but the Bishop was on initial Bf8 square. But maybe you're right, that's because I voted for Be7.
so we apparently played Bc5
Yeah that’s never happening
b5 won the poll and I'm going to vote this move. But as I can see we can ignore c3 as it's not immediate threat and just do castling.
Some people voted O-O in the poll too.
b5 has better stats
O-O is fine if, after she plays d4 next move, we respond with Ba7
Which, I must agree with Lily, is very unlikely
Equal result 305 305 at this time. I voted for b5.
312-306 in favor of castling
So Judit played c3. This move does a few things:
- Opens up her Queen's vision
- Provides a get-away square for the Bishop (stopping the threat of trapping it)
- She may be preparing to break in the center with d4 or attack our bishop on c5 with b4
There may be other ideas I cannot see, these are just my observations.
Castling is probably the most logical follow-up to our previous move, something that will likely be top voted.
Let’s be real here, we’re just putting off the inevitable
There’s no way 6.c3 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.d4 Bb6 has any better of a chance of winning than 6.c3 O-O 7.d4 Ba7
I think 8… exd4 in the first line is at least slightly better than 7… exd4 in the 2nd one
Maybe
But both are terrible for black
Castling is bad because we have to find 6.c3 O-O 7.d4 Ba7!
Yeah they’re not good
But also if we play 6..b5, then we have to find 7.Bb3 d6! 8.d4 Bb6!
Either way, we have to avoid taking a center pawn and there is no way that is happening
b5 is the official recommendation on discord and it can only realistically lose to O-O, see current totals below:
O-O = 523
b5 = 516
🆒
it's continually 5-10 votes behind
but the margin isn't increasing
542-539 with b5 leading
you have got to be kidding me
it's going to be a shitshow like this on the next move too
winning now
because 6..b5 7.Bb3 we once again have to avoid 7..O-O and vote for 7..d6
wtf it levelled up now we are 7 down again 😭
no
ooooh b5 winning again
601-592
largest lead yet
I think soon we will see one of the moves start to form a clear lead
that's what happened in the GothamChess game when the early votes were close
this isn't going to matter at all when we play 6.c3 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.d4 exd4 and lose in pretty much the exact same way
or 6.c3 b5 7.Bb3 O-O 8.d4 exd4
b5 is really nice move that allows our Bishop to retreat on better square and behind the Pawn which is much better.
If people decided to play Bc5 in previous move, they should understand that it's on active, but dangerous square, especially now, after c3.
I have put the recommended next moves after b5 and O-O on the game chat.
On the other hand O-O almost ends our development (except c8 Bishop) and this way of thinking has much sense. But then we have to deal with the threat on our Bishop and much stronger b4 and d4 squares. I think that people will vote for retreat if there's a need.
master games haha, we got the world messing us up as much as possible
I mean none of the moves played in those games seem too hard to find
Yeah, let's do our best is what I say. Voted b5 btw
Not harder than the moves in b5 anyway
Yeah I also just vote b5
676-664
but O-O doesn't look bad at all
somehow? I know exactly how they'll mess up
oh 6..O-O is fine
but only if you play 7.d4 Ba7
and do you really think we could resist 7..exd4?
That's why we're going for 6..b5, because we know all the low elo players can't be trusted
but yeah
no, it would be 30-40% margin
like we're talking 60%-20%
at least d5 only has 5% vote share now
695-685
In my opinion both b5 and O-O moves are strategic and it's OK that these moves fight. Some novice players would choose to introduce major pieces or break the center at this point.
If b5 will win, I'll be happy, since we have 1 tempo for other move (for example d6) and then Bishop retreat on good square.
But I won't be sad if the O-O option win, though it may be harder to play.
this is just getting annoying now
watching those numbers torturously follow each other
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh
😭 😭 😭
b5 has above +10 vote advantage versus O-O. There are 22 hours of vote time remaining. I would rather not repeat recommendations all the time please, as they are visible. The chat can become unreadable.
806-806
no, we spam b5
if O-O wins, after 7.d4 I will spam 7..Ba7 but I know 7..exd4 will win. When that happens, I will resign from my position as poll leader
there's no way we can hold this for another 22 hours
I agree that there is an issue with getting d6 played after b5. A lot of lobbying may be needed.
@river prawn vro what do you mean "our last chance" are we already cooked
no
but we have to somehow ram through a move that is almost never played at low elo
and that's among players that actually play this as black
Surely it's good
I'm gonna have a look at the position
and 7..Ba7 has a snowball's chance in Hell of winning
we'll play 7..exd4? and lose, basically on the spot
d4 doesn't look too comfortable for us
After d4, would Bd6 be better
1015-1049
they could at least implement a reminder for people that there is a chat or make it more obvious it exists
I just not quite sure if spamming the chat is a good method to influent the better move. For me it's very hard to read. Just put a recommendation once maybe twice a hour?
no
because anyone decent is already voting for b5
you need a way to influence the brainrotted kids
one page of chat goes by in 10 minutes
look
we have one last chance here
7.d4 Ba7
and there is no way in hell that wins
vote chess isn't for everyone
all the 500 Elo brainrot kids should not be allowed to participate
a rating minimum would actually be fantastic
I called this coming a mile away
i predicted Bc5 would win because of the ElDivis game
i predicted there is no way we would be able to resist taking on d4 based on Lichess statistics
also O-O leads over b5 at low level on lichess
I understand - yet still prefer for the chat cleaner. One page goes in 10 minutes for intense discussion.
U1000 lichess database for move 6
the percentages are basically that
look
even if b5 had won
we still would have played exd4 later when d4 was played
the dumbest part is we're still fine from an objective standpoint
6..O-O has 356 games in the Masters database
but I know 7.d4 exd4 will get played and then the game is over
everyone in the chat knows that
now I will still stick around just to see how much 7..exd4 wins by
but once we play that move, I know Judit Polgar will know she's playing against a bunch of 1000 elo players
didn't even make it out of theory smh
Look that if chat is readable, people will ... actually read it! There are still 21 hours left. O-O is getting slight advantage of 30+ votes but it's not anyone's fault. I repeat - if chat is readable people tend to read it.
The time zones are also important. Still much people going to vote. And decent players still have chance to vote.
hopefully everyone in the middle east is rated 1500+
or more of them read the chat
I can't post any more in the chat i hit the comment limit
other people spam b5
how long does that last?
Lwk, we should start a dm whipping process for this
If everyone dm's 5-10 people saying that they should vote for the move we want, we can flood the vote
1171 - 1190. It's a slight advantage of 19 votes!
1335-1290
45 votes
do you think we'd be allowed to ask people in main chat here?
like tell them that this is important maybe
The margin is increasing, unfortunately. More people want to play the 6. ... O-O. If this move is sensible, there's no need to worry much.
The advantages are:
- we've got king castled, protected,
- Rook can enter the game in just next move.
Ba7 may look a little passive though and limits our Bishop to just 1 diagonal (but the b8 square is available too), but keeps it active.
I mentioned already, that people who voted for Bc5 should understand that exd4 must not be played, and this Bishop must retreat.
If O-O move seems to win, we should just inform people on what play next. Describe the plan. Before the next voting.
it is a sensible move, but it will be very hard to convince anyone to vote for the correct moves after compared to b5
are we cooked
yes
because there is no way in hell Ba7 wins over exd4
it's a weird situation to be in
we lost the vote on this move but the move that was played is perfectly fine
except it relies on a move that will never get played
so we know we're cooked
dw i can post now
nvm lol
well that was two weeks wasted
margin has increased but is still very very close
I give up, I'm leaving the role
it's actually decreased
look at #next-move-polls
it went from 85 to 64 in a 58 minute span
I was gone for a couple of days, what’s happening?
we're cooked
there are two good moves in the position
one of them requires us to vote for two moves with a low chance of winning
one of them requires us to vote for one move with a near zero chance of winning
Low Elo players that don't read the chat picked the second, narrowly
Why was Bc5 played?
low elo players not reading the chat
and they're about to doom us
literally no way to stop 6..O-O 7.d4 exd4?
Cause it seems like a good idea for someone who doesn’t know theory
And it kinda is a good idea
(Read: someone who plays the italian 99/100 games and doesnt know any other openings beside traps)
Tell them exd4 is a blunder
Spam the question mark
Say after Re1 we lose
Let's create a team that will flood the forum with comments read Ba7 for 48 hours.
ok imma span the chat with this next time
dw @river prawn, im in no hurry to do the votes, just wanna try the experience
(would be great to do it if chess.com would actually implement any of the recommendations that folk suggested here😭 )
Lichess and ICCF databases are the same
7..Bb6 is probably just as good as 7..Ba7
But 7..Ba7 has way more support in high level games
It’s a Hail Mary shot
makes more sense
I’m questioning that
But I think lying is necessary
The low Elo players are brain dead
I'm looking at it as being truthful (just as it happens not showing the whole truth)
Also you could probably get this pic just by playing with the filters to remove a couple of theBb6 games
idk
Once again
WE ARE COOKED
I agree with such promotion. This illustration shows the strength of Ba7, the weakness of exd4. I would add some brief description on what these white, grey and black rectangles represent on the diagram. But please, don't spam. Allow maybe some normal discussion on the chat.
I wonder if this is how politicians think
The median voter is the most incompetent, braindead individual imaginable
It’s true in this vote chess game and it’s true in politics
I’m predicting exd4 will win 70% of the vote
how about this?
yes. For example, google "drug scares". Politicians take advantage of them when they're trying to win elections.
e.g., blaming fentanyl issues on immigrants to pass harsher border policies, when in fact the deeper reasons have nothing to do with fentanyl
I'm taking a sociology class right now and that was literally in my last lecture
So, our options are: 7. d4 Ba7 or 7. d4 Bb6 as a backup against this likely move.
If I don't vote within the first 2 minutes of our turn, then I am voting for whichever one has the highest chance of us NOT getting "steam-rolled" by the 7... exd4 voters.
Hopefully 7... Ba7 will be in first or a very close second place when I vote on chess.com, since that is the one I think we are pushing for the most in the team chat.
I couldn't post this image to the chess.com team chat, so I will try and post here.
If anyone likes one or both of them, feel free to post to the team chat on chess.com
. Please only use the Bb6 one, if it is well out in front of Ba7 but still fighting it out with a good chance against the terrible exd4.
. https://imgflip.com/i/akbi2c to be used first and/or when Ba7 is our best chance of beating exd4.
. https://imgflip.com/i/akbivg backup image, if Bb6 ends' up being our best chance of beating exd4.
Ba7 will be our best chance but it won't make a difference
👍
i mean i know how this games gonna go
because i literally play this as white
and know the lines
we are going to go Ba7 Bg5 exd4 c3 b5 Bb3 d6 Bd5 Bb7 h6 Bh4
and have a tough game
if we vote for 'good moves' 😹
oh yeah yikes....
we're gonna play exd4 after d4
the problem is all these lines are extremely theoretical for black
yeah like beginners just snap take 😭
and beginners are like 50%+ the voting pool
im gonna become a furry and say nya every 5 seconds if at any point exd4 gets played at an INCORRECT moment
Welcome to the soon to be furry clan 😭
(Im in there)
Repeat of my post on chess.com -
" "GG" everyone.
I voted for Ba7, but it is already 130 behind exd4, : ( "
By the time I posted this here, it is now closer to 200 behind exd4
🙁 That was quick move by Judit. I think that voters are afraid of d5 and dxe5.
NOOOO I NOW NEED TO WEAR CAT EARS TO CLASS
I am now a furry 🥀
, unless you secretly want to , then
.
. Class should be funny, at least.
Hell nah
All good.
It should still be a bit funny, just make sure you laugh with the rest of the class - even if you are crying / upset on the inside.
🥀
We'll need to retreat this Bishop in next move, after cxd4. This move will win of course. The material is even.
Nope, no one reading chat
Exd4 is going to be played
Whoever bets on we winning this game is going to lose
Ggs
Anyway, since this is next move discussion and exd4 will win - : ( , I think we should aim for one of these:
. 7. d4 exd4 8. cxd4 Ba7 9. e5 Nd5 (9... Ne4)
or
. 7. d4 exd4 8. e5 Ne8 (8... Nd5)
OC we can try and take the "easy way out" and push for resign, but i doubt that would even get close to winning for another 10-20 moves at least.
is Ba7 the only move?
Probably
I mean the next move, 8th. The Bishop will be forced to flee eventually, and the voters will play it. We didn't lose material yet.
Bb6 was also a "slightly inferior looking" retreat, but still way better than exd4.
Yes, butt ceding the center to a gm is equivalent to losing
what move is in second place rn
Ba7 is in 2nd and already a whopping 450+ votes behind exd4, : (
Rip
Agreed. The center is lost. Judit has no mercy. She's a GM and knows the mean rating of her opponents.
How to win
Exd4 in a bigner game? Yea we can blundet worse in the middlegame . exd4 vs a gm ? Were cooked
This was worse than levy game
exd4 looks innocent at first sight. I'm still following this match. Some person on the chat said it's not a tragic yet.
Either she sacs the rook to mate us or we get smoked in the endgame
Yeah, I know this comment / joke has been made before in other "v The World" games, but the Average Rating: 0 on the chess.com members' area seems about right, after this move.
500s aint using the opening book lol
"Do not do unnecessary trades" - igor Smirnov
👍 to the above comments.
Sorry I can't emoji any comments directly, but I can still post the emoji like this (?)
Try `/connect'?
You might need to connect
Your account
👍
I tried this earlier but only once, this is the message I got last time: "This account is already connected to another chess.com account"
Theres no effective way to communicate with bigners on what move is best
Bruh I don’t even care
It might as well be +1 or +2 or anything else
This won’t even be our first obvious mistake
+173 even
at this point i am jst waiting for polgars brilliant move
I doubt she’ll even get to play one
The last time someone played exd4, it didn’t take a brilliant move to win
This sucks ngl
goes to show how the average player is extremely shit at chess
well if the game ends so quick maybe it'll push them to make some changes
ideally they want a cool battle like the others
Some blud was winning and then proceeded to hang his queen for no reason
Even two-step voting won't help. It's 57% of voters. Looks like 18% of people communicate and read the chat.
Yea
He resigned btw
Now that exd4 will win this turn barring a miracle, I wouldn't be surprised if "the World" plays this or something about as bad looking for us:
. 7. d4 exd4 8. e5 Ne4 9. cxd4 Nxd4 10. Nxd4 d6 11. Nf3 Bxf2+ 12. Rxf2 Nxf2 13. Kxf2 dxe5
In this level(500-999), blundering and then regaining minor pieces is completely normal
CCA isnt even a thing
We struggle to follow opening principles
Fried liver is everywhere
Hack chess.com and add 5000 votes to Ba7
Probably our only chance for Ba7 to win now- 😜 .
Too bad, IDK how to do that , 
exd4 literally increases in popularity as rating increases
70% at low Elo, 90% at 2000
At 2200-2300 it’s about even, you have to get all the way to 2500+ before Ba7 is played 90% of the time
See the thing is in the GothamChess game we at least got out of book before blundering
In this case we don’t even make it 8 moves
Granted, it’s 2 more than against ElDivis, where 6.d3 was played instead of 6.c3, and the World played 6..O-O? and lost the e5 pawn
I guarantee you if Judit Polgar had played 6.d3 we would have hung that pawn in the exact same way
Of course 6.c3 is way more common at all levels
And even if 6..b5 had won, we would have made the exact same mistake after 7.Bb3 d6 8.d4 exd4
Or 7.Bb3 O-O 8.d4 exd4
d4 was going to be played eventually, and we were always going to blunder by taking
This way it happens a move earlier
Who else wants to quit
I was expecting something worse like Scholar mate, fast Queen introduction. My father likes to play like this. He plays casually. Me also, but I like and follow some theory, studied some books. This game still has some theory-backup. But eventually it may end as a blunder against GM. The proposed changes to format were not introduced. I really don't know what I would play without reading the chat. exd4 would look like standard move to me. I would need much calculations.
I would also likely play exd4 in this position, at least if there was no access to a DB and / or team chat.
… yeah those two pawns in the center are not going to help black’s case
Judit Polgar has honor
She played something logical and objectively strong against a worthy opponent
She totally could have wrecked us with an opening trap but that’s not like her
This isn’t even an opening trap
White didn’t play any dubious moves
Just c3-d4 to control the center
Absolute mockery of a game, even worse than the GothamChess game
I hope this makes chess.com change their public vote chess rules
But I’m not hopeful
Good night
Perhaps, in GothamChess game we began the disadvantage with second capturing in move 13-14.
But I've been enjoying the Judit Polgar game to this point. I will follow for some time. (I followed GothamChess game to the ending).
"6.d3 was played instead of 6.d3" what?, wait what?
Apologies if folk think ive disappeared, but the margin is too big for me to try to change the vote for this move
Hack chess.com 🥀
Also @river prawn i don't have access to post in the poll channel
❓ Which ones are you thinking of?
@ripe cloud please give @potent cedar permission to create and manage polls
Asking @ripe cloud to give you that permission
Your dad sounds like nelson
Woops
Should be 6.d3 instead of 6.c3
Well, didn't play with my father for a very long time. He tells me he plays sometimes on-line with some people. He used to play Scandinavian and just feel only the strength of the major pieces like Queen and the Rook. 🙂 But it was much time ago. I must play with my father once again, didn't have occasion. He asked me if I want to play a game with him, on-line. I always played on wooden chess-board, with the timer. I marked the moves, as I'm more "professional" player, my dad is more casual.
Other games we kind of put up a fight and the game was in the balance for pretty long. For example vs Gotham we held ok until c5 and the epic rook sac
iirc vs magnus we also had some clutch moves
Can someone explain to me why 7..exd4 is a bad move. I voted for 7..Ba7 per the reccomendation, but I just wanna understand things better.
exd4 then cxd4 kicking the bishop, we lose control of the center
Good question, deserves a good answer. Losing the center is essentially correct, but how?
Is opening book legal in this?
My opinion is: connected d4 and e4 pawns on the White side without countering e5 pawn, will have much strength, our Bishop will be forced to retreat, and then our Knights can be attacked in the center. Too much retreats needed, and tempos wasted.
Also I'm wondering if some counterattack is possible, like b5 at this point, so we can hide the Bishop behind the b-file pawn for example.
We still have d-file pawn, which can be useful.
- d4 exd4 8. cxd4 Ba7 (8... Be7) 9. e5 Ne8 10. Nc3 and she wins probably
10... b5 is but an inconvenience
She just gonna bring out the queen and wreck our castle
Our queen is trapped
IMO it's very far fetched conclusions. We need still to develop our queen-side bishop. White will control c5, d5, e5 and f5 with the pawns. Black will control d4, e4, d5 and e5 with the knights. But pawns wall seem stronger.
Yea , but with whites pawns like this our queen and light square bishop seems very restricted
I agree, and also I think that the Knights are restricted here. However once b or d-file pawn moves, we can free the light square Bishop. Queen will be blocked for some time though.
Thank you for this answer
Blocked, not public?
should be fixed
@potent cedar do you even want to run polls?
holy shit i look at this and it got cooked faster than the gotham chess one
It's not lost yet. Am I optimistic , not in the least. In the Magnus game almost losing a piece on move 5 and the criticism of opening up the kings castled position, combined with a lot if strong player discussions and discord recommendations seem to magically take hold and secure a draw, just barely.
I hope we can continue doing the polls
I do recognize that the game is probably lost, but it would be interesting to at least learn from it
I am happy to, I know the majority opinions is to vote resign but I am going to wait a little
currently only 3 people want to carry on doing votes
will see if this goes up, if not then kinda no point 😢
Sorry for throwing this on you but I warned this would happen
Yh i know, must admit didnt think it would be quite a big dropout after exd4 but i can totally see why
Nah ty for doing that, stops me wasting time if no one s interested
Admittedly I only had 3 reasons for being interested in doing polls:
- try to understand the minds of the world (how did we manage a6)
- more chess experience in general
- possibility of leading next world match if chess.com do alter something
Ok @everyone
I know I havent been in charge of polls for 10 hours yet but I too am also resigning
Obviously the main reason is that there is a clear majority who support voting to resign for all future moves (so any future polls are essentially pointless). However I believe that there is another important reason which is that by stopping recommendations at move 8 instead of ~26 as for Gotham chess we have a much more persuasive argument that the whole affair has been a joke.
I really hope we can persuade chess.com to change the format of world chess since it is a format that has so much potential but is clearly being implementd awfully
You said you were interested
Yes I was, but I dont see how I can even do a poll if we already know there will be a majority for resign
And I can't just override the peoples opinion
It’s not just “resign this move” but “resign on each and every future move”
Yes
We’re getting 3-4x more votes on those polls than any of the recommendation polls
Also this is before the votes for not resigning get split by the potential variations
2/3 of our team either plans to quit or has already quit
I asked a simple question, do you want to vote to resign or not
It’s not just that we have a terrible position, it’s that we have absolutely no control over the game
All that spamming 6..b5 did basically nothing
Okay that’s not entirely true
The issue is that it did do something as long as people kept doing it
6..O-O only started winning by more than 1% after people stopped spamming
I think we have about a 5% impact, nowher near enough
Might be more than that
But there needs to be veto power
High Elo players should be able to veto obvious blunders
Hopefully, but Ba7 only has 16% so its defo less than that. And some people would probably have found that move anyway
Doubt it
Maybe 10% found that legit
Even that’s high, when you consider some voted for Bb6
so we have a 6% impact lol
At best
I joined this game because I wanted to give public vote chess a second chance
This was the second chance
also Idk how long it was gonna take for someone to give me access to the poll channel
another case of chess.com being painful
No, that’s the discord server, not chess.com
elo floor def
Or several games with different elo levels.
thing is, we basically need the power to force a move on some occasions, which means we are basically back to playing club chess vs 1 opponent
which maybe isnt bad
Would be fun if we could get a GM to play against this server
We need titled player recommendations
We also need a time period for suggesting moves before voting opens
Also back to this, I think the more that resign now, the more likely we are to influence c.com
You won’t be able to get enough people to actually vote to resign to end the game
But it will hopefully send a message
Fix your game
yh 🙁
How did you quit before starting 
Im not sure, though personally I would like to just use discord server and ignore chess.com
That’s how cooked we are
because Lily did a vote and majority wanted to resign before I had done a single vote
Not only that, but we’re getting more votes in that poll than any recommendation poll this entire game
that shows we are reallllly cooked
Okay not quite
We had 36 votes for 3.Bb5 poll
Currently 30 votes in the vote to resign poll
51 votes in the “do you plan to quit” poll
ok we are only getting so many votes for this cause it doesnt require actual analysis, but still it shows...
Yeah
The polls with a ton of votes were also opinion polls
Several good options
No analysis needed to determine between 3..a6 and 3..Nf6, that’s a personal decision
Analysis will tell you they’re both good
yh but u need to analyze (or know the theory) to know they are both good in the first place
Everyone on this server cares enough about chess to know the theory
Okay maybe not this entire server but definitely the world team
my theory is shit lol
but like it doesnt matter cos it takes 1 s to work it out
like ive seen the position we are in now and it doesnt take theory or any thought to see that exd4 is bad but 😭😭 😭 😭 😭 😭
IT's OVER
can i be leader of polls (its meaningless but wanna feel powerful)
yes you are welcome to do that, though I dont know if you will be able to get access to the poll channel to post polls
I guess lol
We might not actually do polls tho
Depending on the result of the poll to not make any more recommendations
I dont think that matters
Though idk what we'll do if we don't get a majority for stopping recommendation polls but do get a majority for voting resign for all future moves
Perhaps we could just say that the polls are simply for those who do not want to resign
Anway I guess thats now for @hollow holly to decide 😂
ooooh i k its only been 10 hrs but can I put this role on my CV ?
😂😂😂😂😂😂
haha ok
Ah well, Its been nice to chat here for the past week or two but I dont think I can add anything constructive now
will leave you all for a (potentially very long) while
I love how we're already loosing on move 7
As of recommendations, I would like to hear them for the further moves. Otherwise some of the players may seem lost/confused on what to play next, including me.
When exd4 is played, with cxd4 response from Judit, people will see that they must retreat bishop. From pros: We have e-file opened for our Rook. The c-file pawn will not exist, thus White will have some gap in defence, not protecting b4 and d4.
These 2 pawns are - from what I know - called hanging pawns. The f-file pawn can't connect with them as Knight is blocking it.
My recommendation is offer draw or resign.
a "hanging" pawn structure is when theres an isolated pawn chain that is completely blockaded. Most commonly this occurs in the Modern Benoni and Benko Gambit, with black's d6-c5 pawn chain with a white pawn on d5. On the other hand, an advanced pawn chain like d4-e5 for white or d5-e5 for black is generally favorable to the attacking side, since the e-pawn controls key squares while also restricting the opponent's mobility.
exd4 just concedes the center and loses a tempo at the same time, not to mention the numerous other reasons why its a bad move
I understand why everyone is frustrated, truly, I do. Although it is disheartening that so many are voting for such bad moves, I will keep participating. Since I am low-rated, I could use some help, so I'd love for the recommendations to continue (if it's not too much of a hassle). Ultimately, it is just a game, and we would probably lose anyway, the world stands no chance against the genius of Judit. We might as well play it out, have fun, and learn something new. I hope chesscom will implement some changes that will improve our chances in future games.
Not hanging if there is a pawn on either side that can support even if temporarily blocked by a piece.
We actually did not make any poor moves yet, but we are about to. exd4 gives Judit a clear advantage, but we are not lost if we play very well or she makes a poor move too. Don't give up. Will we probably lose, of course. When we signed up for this game that was the most probable result, especially given chess.com poor support for public vote chess game team work.
If we continue to play poorly, we will lose ofc.
Yes, we are about to play a sub-optimal move (to put it mildly). But it is premature for us to resign the game because of a few poor moves. Judit will likely sieze the advantage, but it is no reason to give up just yet (not that I ever would anyway).
Again, Judit is a strong player, so the chances of us even drawing the game are low, but I do enjoy a good game, so let's keep going. We can still make a come-back (if we can somehow get the voters to listen).
bruh we're just going to make some other blunder in the near future
im not sticking around to find out
uh i cant make any polls?
hopefully the people read chat before voting
Which is near impossible because i doubt people even know chat exists
can people take back their votes?
Yes, but unlikely tho
okay im do my best
im sending this copy paste message to every person who voted for ed
Please take back your vote and go Ba7, exd4 gives white free advantage and the center.
No
crap... okay
i resign from my position
@river prawn 💀
i thought i had a chance
because we are literally theoretically lost
because I play this exact line with white
You do if you don't throw in the towel. The odds are not exactly in our favor, but too early to quit imo
We are not theoretically lost.
@compact gale you wanna be poll master like the GothamChess game?
If we reversed the colors, she would very likely win.
Okay but this won’t be the last mistake
No, I did 3 World games. That's enough for me until chess.com fixes public vote chess.
yeah lol
maybe make it mandatory to connect account to discord and have World team
This might be a teachable moment?!
so you know, we know all people who voted are actually looking at the chat
idk how someone could implement that
some tech guy idk
Even Discord can't handle that many posts well. And it isn't just chat that needs fixing.
maybe like a rating cap?
but then that would be opressive
if we are hell bent on winning thats mandatory
The Kasparov game by MSN was so much better designed. The world narrowly lost after 60+ moves but it was a great game. Kasparov wrote a book about it. He was quite proud of the game.
Maybe an idea could be to run two games in parallel? A <1000 game and a >1000 game.
but i dont assume everyone is trying that hard
Though for the <1000 game maybe the opponent would need to give odds or something so that both games have similar chances
Hi guys! Sorry, I last featured in the Magnus game, but went offline due to other things. I can start my advertising again, if you guys like!
Okay, I've posted an ad in the chat, let us see how many people join!
I voted for Ba7. And I see It's leading now. 🙂 Bb6 and Be7 on second and third place. So our Bishop is safe.
Also thanks for the description of hanging pawns. Actually I knew that such pawns must be isolated from the other pawns.
Too late
Black is already cooked
Ba7 should have happened the last turn
Now people only play it because the piece is getting attacked, and Ba7 “makes sense”
74 people voted Bxd4. I have lost hope.
what should i vote
In my opinion just move Bishop from c5 to safe place. I suggest Ba7 or Be7, which both look good to me.
Thats trolls btw
You have hope to begin with because you played a good game against Magnus. We’ve had two failed games since that
You can check the openings in the top right and still everyone voted exd4, it’s over
At least ba7 is going to be next, which should’ve been played last move
i think Be7 is probably better than Ba7 but Ba7 is not much worse, we're not in a great position anyways
The issue with these games is that they don’t even play whoever the strongest player is. They just play somebody with the average rating of the group
and the average is unfortunately low, i suppose
exd4 is literally just “ooh we are trading”
so
how bad is it after Ba7?
judit is def gonna roll down the center but like do we have drawing chances
Could be worse
Not getting 5…Be7, 6…b5 or 7…Ba7 is very unfortunate
She’s just going to bully our knights now
why the hell does 8...b5 have more votes than 8...Bb4
It's also very close to 8...Be7 in votes, and it really shouldn't be
If Judit plays 9. d5 in the next move, we can go Ne7. If Judit plays 9. e5, we can go Nd5, and our Knights are safe (after 10. Bb3 we have 10. .. Nce7). I would go Nc3 on Judit's place.
If Judit plays 9. d5 Ne7 10. e5 we have Ng4 and our Knights should be safe too (I'm unsure here).
Sorry, if Judit plays 9. d5 Ne7 10. e5 we can just capture 10. .. Nfxd5. 🙂
- .. Ba7 is on the board. Thank God we have good responses for both Knight threats.
Added: Some dangerous pins may occur after 10. ... Nce7 11. Bg5. So we should play 10. ... Nb6 and then unlock our pieces with d6.
I found some ways to avoid the dangerous pins, and still got active pieces.
OK, so after:
- e5 I suggest Ne8. Protects squares essential for our defence: d6 and f6.
- d5 I suggest Na5. This knight can't be threaten and also protects b3 and has some nice move options (c4, then b6). [Someone proposed also Ne7.]
Nd5 is going to win. It's not a bad move, but I fear the Pins.
Now I probably understand, why Be7 may be crucial in Ruy Lopez.
Thank you for the move suggestions!
People also found that Ne4 is a good response. At the moment both moves lead.
Ne8 is probably the best move but it likely will not get many votes
WHY DOES Ng4 HAVE MORE VOTES THAN Ne8
Come on, it's not actually lost yet. Bad position, yes. I prefer 9... Ne8 here.
It’s… a valuable enough lesson. At GM level it’s almost lost.
Whatever we play, she’ll slowly take more and more space
I see that after 9. ... Nd5 which will be played by Black, and 10. Bb3 we have also Nde7. Our second knight, if threated can go to Na5 and force her bishop to leave the b3..g8 diagonal.
After Nce7 and Bg5 there are pins on diagonals b3..g8 and g5..d8 and additionally one pinned Knight must protect other pinned Knight!
Like they say "if one piece is poor, entire position is poor". Judit took an inititiatve with the center. The "pin-line" has been chosen, instead of Ne8 and I will rather vote for Nde7 in next move, which gives us relatively some breath. Other option, Nce7 pins us to the ground.
We have so much poorly placed pieces versus Judit's bishops. I'm sad, that one move could make a disaster in the opening.
whoever said that must hate the french
It's a citation from some book. I just searched and it was Tarrasch.
Sorry, Nce7 is probably better. That was my initial idea. I think that putting the knights back all the time leads to worse position each time.
Ne8 isn't even close to getting played 🙁
Don't get me wrong, I am not optimistic. More inaccuracies from the world incoming. King side attack incoming unless we start playing better.
I know.
Why exactly is Ne8 better than Nd5 in the current position? I know someone said it defends the d6 and f6 squares but are there any other reasons? It just instinctively looks like a very ugly move, blocking the rook and everything.
You can't hold d5 if you play Nd5
If Judit plays 10. Bb3, we can do Nde7 and then either:
-
- d5 Na5
-
- Bg5 d5
So we will be able to hold d5 after Nde7.
- Bg5 d5
i think you meant to type 11. d5 Na5
Yes, of course. thanks for correction.
Na5 loses a piece or we don't get d6 in time
- Bc2 d6 13. b4 Nc4 14. Qd3
- Bc2 Ng6 13. Bg5 Qe8 14. Nbd2 b5 and our position still looks absolutely ridiculous
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if there is some random sacrifice that wins on the spot for white in 5-10 moves' time
I predict we will lose before move 20
I made some analysis for 10. Bb3 and 10. Nc3 (upto move 13.) and put it on game's chat. I responded to the major threats: pawn pushing and Bg5.
I can't see Na5 losing a piece. I will most likely vote for Nde7 in next move as answer for mentioned moves. Then Judit can't play Bg5 as we have d5. If she pushes the pawn to d5 we have d6. If she pushes the pawn further to d6, we exchange the pawns and move our Knight on defensive g6 square.
She can't do Bg5 and pawn pushing simultaneously. So we always do d6 in time, or the pawn exchange and Ng6.
If we play d5, she can capture with en-passant, so we recapture with queen. Our Na5 knight has good position, from what I checked, restricting Judit's bishop.
Either way, we will lose very quickly
why not d6 instead of d5? it pressures the e5 pawn and white is more likely to take it
Judit has played 10. Bb3
Is 10...Nce7 a viable candidate, to defend the knight on d5?
It's a tough decision, but I voted for Nce7. We block the pawns, which is important and block the Bishop. Nde7 might be good as well, but the pawns may be devastating. I'm only worried about Bg5 but c6 should defend us. The votes are splitted.
Obviously we're worse in any line, but I'm kinda tempted by Nb6, and then if d5 just going back to Nb8. We're cramped for space, but we have d6 and some open lines for our bishops.
Nce7 visually looks like it's giving up less space, but after the pin all our pieces are tied down, and I don't know what our next move is supposed to be.
We lost all hope after Exd4
i hope we'll be able to play c6 if it comes down to it
the board is starting to get a little confusing so we actually may get a little control of the moves back
Nce7 with a slight lead to Nde7 2983-2768
We have so little space, compared to Judit. As of mentioned poor piece in French defense, I guessed it was reference to in-famous French Bishop in this defense, which is locked by 1. e4 e6. This defence strengthens the f7 square though, which usually is a weak point.
People say that the pins will be temporary. For now we stopped central pawn march, but I have no idea how to develop our other pieces.
If - as was mentioned by someone - computer engine gives +1 points, I can't believe - since Black's pieces are blocked and White are active.
black is already lost. You're only delaying the inevitable
checking engine eval is cheating BTW.
Yes, I know. I'm not checking myself. I read message mentioning this on the game chat.
If Judit continues to use our inaccuracies it will be lost. And from her move Bb3 it seems so.
bro, she's a strong GM
I mean, duh?
She can still give some handicap. She's not going to lose advantage, and the moves are precise. As opposed to World's moves. What I meant is that the pins will occur, and Judit Polgar will utilize advantage without giving at least a small chance for her inaccuracy. I called the Judit's first moves as "friendly play" earlier.
Thus also GMs play with people simultaneous exhibition on many boards with less-skilled players.
You’re not supposed to give the eval, even if someone else did, but I’m not the one who cares the most
Regardless, what was the logic behind 11.c6 after Bg5 ? Qe8 seems less bad to me as it allows the d6 pawn break eventually, which is imperative to play in order to break the center and activate our dark-squared bishop. Maybe I missed something
I’m also afraid of a kingside attack, which seems highly probable in this position considering Judit’s style of play. Did anyone see something dangerous?
I paste what I said in the chat: We have so unfortunate piece arrangement! White pieces are so active. And all this because of one or two moves in the opening!?
However after c6 maybe situation won't be so poor for us and we can unlock our potential.
- Bg5 c6
- Nc3 Nxc3
- bxc3 d5
why would white play Nc3 before taking on d5
I'm not sure what Judit will play after c6, just an example. But I think that she wouldn't exchange her strong bishop(s).
she wouldn’t without a good reason but doubling and isolating those pawns on the d file seems like a pretty good reason to me
defending d5 is pretty tricky