#💬〡chess-talk
1 messages · Page 168 of 1
nah
let me show you an example
No I don’t need an example
😭 Why bro
But both the italian, ruy lopez, caro kann, sicilian, french, modern, kings gambit r mostly theory heavy openings
cuz peaksitting means no playing
Unrated
If u wanna play the game its bad
And this isnt even close to all
The modern is not theory heavy
man unrated dont feel the same
Which player would you feel more confident is strong at chess: a guy with a chessboard, a gorilla with a chessboard, or a superhero with a chessboard?
Scandi vienna, etc
True
Nor is the scandi or Vienna
Those r just openings im listing
Thats clerarly Batman
And id pick him
All of them
so black has a bind here dont they? and its because white plays a3 yielding the tempo taking away options and making it just as likely for black
e4 most likely has more theory imo
@simple lark lets play bullet
No it’s not a maroczy because there’s a pawn on the d file
It's not an exact science, but you know what I mean - my point is that deviating a main move with something like h3 gives black much more flexibility and allows them to take on the mindset of white on move 1 with some subtle differences due to h3 being there already
Yeah, but can black achieve that if white challenges it immediately?
Im not sure, actually. But I know its much more common for white to get a marcozy bind
What do you mean by this
Like, how does black get a bind if white plays against it as they are given the first move
Also yes white almost always is the one with a maroczy except in some reverse Sicilian lines
btw did you actually count out each ecos to know c4 is more than e4?
I always assumed its more likely for white to get this because they have the first move, and if you gave black the first move, it'd be the opposite
What kind of rabbit hole is thid
No I Just looked at the total at the bottom of all the opening names
I’m not even sure how this conversation came to reverse openings on the topical of theoreticality
Too much man i just push pawn or counter
Hey guys
Easy
Yeah - ive heard gms say this point tho, if white plays a move like a3, c3, e3, h3, they yield black 'white' basically
Its how the reverse sicilian and the sicilian are compared
that same logic
Well, I wrote a program, and including transpostions (so e4 or c4 is played at any time), there are more e4 openings than c4 openings
Hola vk
did you include all the transpositions or just the english lines
with 2363 vs 1678
Wanted to know if anyone wants coaching lol
read the message bro, it says including transpositons
Js keep hopping in here cuz Dobyvatel refers students to me
how many ubers you got?
as long as either c4 or e4 is in the line
My bad. Wow, thats shocking. Can you send me a dm of the list - what database did you use?
Ty for that @small jungle
Why is that shocking
???
Some e4 openings (or can transpose): italian, spanish, caro, french, scandi, modern, kg, QID, petrov, sicilian, vienna, central game, pirc, scotch, alekhine, the 1. e4 f5 gambit, four knights, etc
e4 def has more theory
Alright trash
I just wouldnt think 1. e4 would compromise every other move in how many choices there are
e4 has been developed for centuries before c4 was ever considered a serious opening choice
im using lichesses openings database which can be acess via the named files in https://github.com/lichess-org/chess-openings
c4 d4 and all the flank openings which transpose from c4 - thats a ton of stuff, versus just 1. e4
ok arugument over, right?
Another deadass mf
sure, im just curious i wanna read the list
give me a sec, its gonna take a while to write it to a txt
Code nitpick combine lines 46/47 into one
thats a ton of effort btw, you rock for doing that
that requires me to have commas and I hate those
and thanks for teaching me, if theres no hidden nuances
You used commas like 5 lines up
(Its not) but still ty
I still hate those
Lol
when the average person here doesnt even want to put in the effort to read a sentence, coding that is alot of work
i know ur saying it from a pov like u know coding and its easy
Or think through what he wants to say and say it correctly
I get it
Yes, as if youve never done that, never had a misunderstanding
idk
Its just that u said it like 5 times with such clear confidence and now u r saying ppl dont read what u say
And thats low effort
well, in general, no, people dont put in effort here
and you turned that into a dig on me when it wasnt a dig at you
just like the channel mentality as a whole
who here believes in horoscopes
Thats just not true
Omg god save us all
you, and like, 2-3 other people were being rational compared to the noise of what? 7-8 being irrational
or just saying WTF IS GOING ON AYAYAYAY
Not me
I played some chess for the first time in awhile
like Its also hard to have discussions because of the random people that come in and give their input, or just talk about what they dont know is happening. and the chat gets flooded, and it just degresses in quality. Thats always the case here.
Lost first 11 games and proceeded to lock in and win a bunch (bullet)
Most ppl werent here for most of the convo and wanted to join in without having to read all the history when it can be summed up in 2 sentences, also u said that generally lazyness is true for the channel which is just not true, ppl do a ton of opening research when i ask them and answer clearly
It's the nature of discord
Yea fair
Are we talking about openings?
I just did that rn
I appreciate those types of people, they are rare. @pallid ice
Multiple convos can go on at the sametime thats what replies and pings r for
They r the reason im here
We were
@pallid ice Yes but you were on the other end, you were not on the receiving end with 1 person calling you autistic, 2 people spamming wtf is going on, 3 people talking about you without @ing you, and having 2 full blown discussions with logic
Try to see the difference lol
Its not the same experience for me
I remember a few years ago when the reply feature didn't exist and you had to quote the message you wanted to reply to, which made things so messy
Like 5% of my total chess study has gone to openings and I'll say I've done fine
Yo
Yo vk
Openings shouldn't take too much of your study time anyways, no?
Sup
Anyone can get a good rating without openings
Ok im used to being a member of fast chats and in my experience its not that hard to pay attention even if multiple convos r going on and a lot of ppl r arguing with u, but i can agree that it might not be the same for u
I have a tournament in 30 mins
Sacrafice the Bishop!
When people pile up against you, it makes replying perfectly and keeping your composure difficult. All im tryig to say. Not arguing you.
man you've been discussing for 1 hour straight, mind taking a break and actually doing something? don't waste time discussing with fake ficticious people on the internet.
I replied to this already
Nice
But ok
Ya, I just read what you said and said that to further reinforce what I mean
No worries, im already developing a program dealing with ecos so im able to just reuse the code. I only needed to write about 10 unique lines
Is pointing that out to me of any benefit to you?
Anyways why do u know so much opening theory?
I lowkey stopped playing chess for like 2-3 weeks and now I am going to some chess club tomorrow, unsure how I'll do
ok writing it out to a file was more annoying lol
chessable
took another 10 lines but now I had to make the files
What elo r u rn?
Guys my chess clubs gonna ban me if I dont win a tournament for them 😭
sub 2k
no, but it is to you, take a damn break, don't get bothered over people on the internet
@north ocean wait maybe this is the wrong thing give me a sec lol
Thats a very wide category
When people aren’t shit posting there’s a lot of serious stuff going on
Win it and leave, they don't deserve you.
Its not your business though. Im here doing what this channel is for, unlike what youre doing rn. We're arguing and discussing chess, not how to spend your time.
Dont tell people on the internet to go do something else lol that's very uncalled for
alright man just keep digging a trench
nah im right, it turns out those moves are played there. Honestly some of those shouldnt even be opennigs @north ocean
damn man i was siding with you this whole comvo, now i see why people say you're an ass
What is the arguing about?
Im not digging any trench. Im replying to you in a civil way.
Youre welcome to disagree
no you aint you bein condecending and insulting
😮💨
Alright.. well.. guess Im just insulting for being honest and replying civilly.
Sorry for calling you the ***** word
Truly a constructive discussion yeah?
Stop sticking ur nose in others business when they asked u not to
This channel got my head on a swivel
man you too, why you even arguing in the chess chat
the hell's a swivel
only constructive when im there 🙂
We r talking abt chess?
Isn't this a public chat if you have business to discuss do it somewhere else, right or no?
go get a damn room or go to a private chat to discuss stuff you don want people gettin into
I will not comment on this
Yeah I enjoy those discussions
Bro’s telling people to log off when he needs to go school
what the castle guy said
Haha yes
Thank you
man it's 9PM
I can tell you're a g
You can still side with me, are you upset that I told you that how I spend my time isnt your business? Because it isnt. Sorry for saying that?
Can I argue too yall
as in guy or as in gangster
It is a public chat, but repeatedly telling someone to go do something else when they told u they dont care abt ur opinion is harassment
Where does bro live brazil
gay
argentina
Don’t even catch me up tell me a side and ill oppose it immediately
Its mostly over
DALE PIVE
nah fam go eat a lime
There is no side
I just kidding lol 😂
pibe is written with a b
ya se boludo
G means like your cool
The question was which has more theory 1.e4 or 1.c4
bobo
'know fam, just jokin
Look who’s being condescending now
e4 by far what are we talking about
e4
You all need to learn that something can be said without it being a direct attack on you. Like, I dont have to be your enemy because I am being honest about a reply.
If I call you names, this is entirely different
The argument for c4 was that it transposes to a lot of d4 lines
lcdtm
lcqtrphdugpylcdth
What language is that?
🤝
spanish (argentina)
I wasnt arguing that, thats just a fact. The claim was that c4 and all of its transposition had more theory than e4
:peacesimbolhand
@tranquil basin classical tournament today can you help?
I would argue that e4 will still have more theory, even if you consider that
L mindset
Well, apparently it does, according to the program the guy wrote.
Im gonna believe it, if he used the lichess api opening explorer.
E4 but im sure an equally infinite amount of positions can occur
And if i only say this then the comparison sounds pointless and stupid which they did thought cus they replied e4 immediately, so i have to show them why its not so obvious to u who made the claim
Bro come on it should be common sense
e4 was crowned winner by statistics
But e4 doesnt transpose to as much as c4 does, thats why I was shocked. e4 just has more bulk to it because the replies apparently have more depth to them. It's probably alot to do with e4 being the most played move for history.
I think of ruy lopez, italian, scotch, caro-kann, and so much more like e4 has a lot to it
That’s literally what I said 20 minutes ago
U should ask for help a month before
Holy shit
Thats why It wasnt common sense to me
Honestly why does it matter
You say "It should be common sense" And I reply with why I didnt think it was common sense. Why are you putting your voice out there if you dont want anyone to input?
Yea thats why it was so obvious to us, cuz a lot of e4 openings r deep and there is a lot of them too, even if we consider c4 transpositions
Well, I doubt anyone knew it was the number his program spit out
Sicilian
a4 is pretty complicated 
Why would i know? Its just the logical answer using my knowledge
How can it be obvious how many lines are in all of c4 and their transpositions? I doubt anyone here knows more than 2 openings for each side as main theory, and thats being generous. So to know all of c4 and e4 and transpositions isnt very obvious.

Guys it’s chess there are so many possibilities bru
Ofc i dont know exact numbers
Is it more complicated than h4 tho? I heard it transposes to a lot of e4 openings
What does it matter enough for u to spend the last 4 hours arguing on discord for
There r millions of outcomes
Anyone down to 1v1 and vc
Right, should've said h4 I was just tryna think of something stupid but I think you're right
You got it bro
4 hours is a stretch, and to answer your question, this matters just as much (what ur replying to me about)
Huh?
I’ve done something and come back to see u arguing here still
Its good to know the real answer
Went for dinner
It says in your bio you're less then 500 elo, I hope that isn't true 😭
Cant vc down for a few blitz games tho 😄
Yeah I think youre confusing what im saying. I didnt say u spent all ur time here reading what I was saying.
I think it’s just infinite and it’s too much energy spent arguing with ppl who’s opinions never change
4 hour long dinner?
yes, it does say that thank you
Chess players are geeks bro they would rather die before admitting they are wrong
Not wrong
Ask yo momma how it went boy
no, i admitted it earlier twice actually
yes that is true
This isnt tuff 😭
In my opinion you should be 2000,
i like ur opinion
R ur tactics bad? Clearly the problem isnt with openings
this is an unfounded opinion
bones you just say stuff to get under peoples skin, its not cool lol
can we just stick to the facts
Bro did not read the "discussion" above
🤦
no I complimented you on your opening knowledge earlier already
Fill me in
I'm just saying you don't talk like a 2000
you said him thinking i should be 2k is unfounded
yes
i.e no1 else thinks that
2k is bad
Or am i misunderstanding
Idk what elo u r but by not blundering anything u can get to like 1200+ cus in most of ur games ur opponents will blunder a piece atleast eventually and then u just convert
if someone is talking about transposing lines of C4 They should be rated higher then 500
I mean how does a 2000 talk😭
I think it's an alt
not good either lmfao
Actually hate people who dont give draws after obvious misclicks in equal positions
Like me
well considering there's 50 million elo points which are refunded by fair play monthly, saying u can get to high elo just by doing puzzles is a bit of an oversimplification
Your 2k rapid 1.8k blitz your not a real 2k
I agree with you, But a Win is A Win, No matter how you got your hands on it.
divided 50 million elo by ur avg gain/loss per game, and see how many games that is where ur not going against a fair match
Probably
bro needs the win or else his family will die in a horrific car crash
I didnt even mention puzzles, and u said ppl dont put in the effort to read things
ehats up kiddos
I have enough integrity that I dont value a win that comes from a misclick because I realize it isnt indicative of skill
Does anyone even do that?
Theres actually no way this dude is still yapping in here
well, that type of mindset. just tactics, just this. it's much more than that
Hi peole
I always give draws
What's considered a "real 2k"
Anything not bullet and not lichess
One whom is 2k in more then on format?
Bruh
Again, I knew what u weer saying but i repeated it in the way I understood it, and then i calrfieid when u said u meant it strictly 1 way. these are called misunderstandings
anyone below 2k are filthy casuals who are bad at the game and should quit and anyone above 2k are filthy tryhards who have no life and should quit
I would do that as well, but others seem to just seek their own good
Its really not, even at my level 60% of games r decided by who blunders a piece or crucial pawn first
Lose - Lose situation
Technically all chess games are decided by who blunders first
You should start doing it
Eh I consider myself a real 2k so 🤷♂️
Not all of them
I identify as 2500 blitz so 🤷♂️
hold your horses buddy you're only 2025
I don't think I'll ever reach 2000 with my 1400 opponents playing like an engine
But the blunders r usually 1 move captures and its easy to find and at high level its less of a blunder harder to find and harder to convert
Yes I hear you, its likely primarily tactics. Im just sharing my input and pov
Some are just draws

Yeah but I feel bad for my opponents so I usually let them win, if I wasn't so handsome and humble I would probably be 2200
Chess is decided by who blunders last
Still decided by who blundered first, as no one did it was a draw
damn you right
Its 1 move captures most of the times, no need for puzzle training, the harder part is the conversion and u not blundering
ehhhhhhhhhh
So like missing a hanging knight can take you from 1.6-2k
Nah I blundered last and they resigned because they though I played a winning move
Mostly
yay I got 5 elo from stalemating abhigher player
Idk I don’t agree with that
Missing?
2ks still blunder a lot as well but the positional chess has improved a lot
I kinda do a lot of people sub 2000 blunder a lot
Well you said 1 move captures
Is that what you meant? Missing a hanging piece?
This sentence does not ever begin to make sense
bro's got the whole chat with question marks above their head
And above 2k
I am just asking for clarification on 1 move captures if he meants missing a blundered piece
Its not that deep
Sure
that pfp looks like my poop when I was 5 no offense
Then say that
I blunder/make a serious mistake at least twice per game, that’s a lot
I did
If u DONT blunder and u convert after the opponent blundered a piece to a 1 move capture u can go to like 1500 elo, just beacuse till that level ppl blunder a lot of one move captures and forks
I never make mistakes
Never blundered
That's why I lost a couple million brain cells trying to understand what you meant
Your him
Anyone here around 2000 and plays the english?
Basically
I would have to lose elo to reach your level bro
What do you mean by convert after the opponent blundered a piece to a 1 move capture?
Whose
(I still dont understand what he meant by missing a hanging piece increases ur elo)
Yours
hi
.. guess I didn't say missing a hanging piece
Wow maybe that's how elo works
Then what
💀
I'm trying to prep a line against the english for a tournament
🤫
Ok 1.8k blitz
I don't play as much as you
what line
Thats literally what I asked him as clarification for, then you said 'then say that' and I showed you I did say exactly that
Nah your just worse
I have a life
I'm prepping the Halibut Gambit, b5 after c4
I just want a little practice and simulation
Bro you literally said missing hanging pieces will improve your rating
wtf is this
Its a gambit line but its not terrible
And now just cut that shit in half
I assumed you said that you can get to high rating by simply seeing when a free piece can be taken, versus sitautions like this being missed and it costing you teh game.
Nah
The opponent blunders a piece (this happens a lot and some of it is after 3 move tactics but most of it is by a 1 move capture below 1500)->u see the move that captures their knight->u payed attention to all of ur moves so u didnt blunder so far->u convert to a endgame where u have the material advantage they blundered->u win
Nah
the engine gives +0.9 that seems quite terrible to me
what is the goal, to get an accelerated benko ?
U can get to 1500 (not 2k) by not blundering so ur opponent blunders first, u can just wait for it
Your opponent is not the engine
The goal is to get the opponent out of prep
Accelerated kings pawn
hello
Goodbye
Im playing an older guy who's around 2000 uscf but he doesn't know offbeat openings and if i get him low on time i typically do quite good
Imo, basing things on th the difference of plus or minus 1 centipawn isnt the best way to analyze. The level you have to be to punish opening nuances, even Hikaru says this all the time, is at least 2600. He made it a point to say that guys who are 2600 cannot punishing opening subtleties in the same way a 2800 can
they are not, no, but the engine can often be a great indication for what side has easier play
plus 0.9 isnt even that bad
ok thank you einstein
just lmk if you can help
If you dont want other people to give feedback, you can DM it to the person you want to hear.
i dont need a full game, just want to practice the opening rather than just scroll through engine lines
nice
I'm not sure how much help I would be quite frankly
I win at 900 elo lichess constantly
Rating inflation
given that I've never faced b5 in my life
0.9 is winning
thats kind of the point
what does that mean? More people plays on Chess.com?
he never faces b5 either i want to see what they would play
I get it now.
Accelerated benko is just a free pawn with no validation, i think thats not hard to maintain
i'm just testing waters and seeing how an english player would react
On gambits it's usually the opposite, until the gambiting side has a clear advantage
so basically play like the engine 👍
Or punish
Lichess players start at a higher provisional rating and have a different rating system I think
I know, that's why I said often
Basically dont blunder ur pieces in one move
Thats fair. If the opening is actually illogical, I was just referring to basing the logic of it around the engine saying 0.9 and thinking thats the end all be all
if you guys wanna play out of theory then js play some weird gambit
aka play good moves
Yea but there was context
No, aka dont play terrible moves
I understand. I was bringing up a sepearte point. A separate but related point about analysis, as its something alot of people get lost in.
Bro is probably reading the chat rn just saying
doubtful
Well if you want to help just lmk
not terrible moves is like good or excellent moves
what tc
@kindred crypt plz any last wishes? Starting at 9 am its 6 am rn.
b5 is good 👍🏼👍
b5 is bad 👎
golly
b5 is probably ass
A terrible move is hanging a knight for free
Kings indian then transpose to improved benko in some lines:D
the plan is c4 b5 cxb5 then a6
yea a6 I think would be the only way to justify the play
so what wld a not terrible move be
im about to lose my mind
Not hanging a piece?
I would look for something similar on chessable there is no way no one has made a small course on it
I play 1. Na3
paragraph warning only read if u care ||I think as long as you're within 1.5 plus or minus out of the opening you still have plenty of room to turn things around. 0.0 to 1.0 is pretty meaningless, 1.5 is approaching a bad position but still very playable, and anything more is likely too much of a blunder to recover from unless the opponent blunders themselves. Flat engine analysis number isnt productive to focus on though because you wont know this in real games. It's a good skill to practice w/o the engine, but making a conclusion that 1.1 = good, and 0.3 = terrible isnt the idea of plans in chess.||
yes but that would be like good or excellent on chess.com engine
I should try that, thanks
Not necessarily it can be a bad move
1.5???
✍️
Just not free material
+1.5 is borderline winning
eh maybe
yes 1.5 is a bad position approaching the non-recoverable mark, for black
but its still turn-aroundable
maybe like 1.1 at most
I kinda agree that’s like triple muzio territory where is black does not know theory for is just gg
I saw so many 800 trying their best to play like fish
this isnt even true at magnus' level, and it depends on the time control
its hard to say an exact number, but definitely not 100 centipawn
I think this thought process is more accurate when the position is more complex, such as many benoni/benko/KID positions. On move 1 though it's just flat out bad
+1.0 is a position that white is usually comfortable and black is struggling to make moves(due to lack of space or king safety)
last wishes? where am i going?
why are we calculating in lichess centipawns
yes you have a very good point here
Cus dude wants to sound smart
Of course, you cannot have an accurate grasp of the position by just that number
well, honestly, black starts between 0.0 and 0.6 on move 1 right? So 0.4 isnt that crazy
unless white plays something abysmal like g4
Hikaru got beaten from a4 e5 Ra3 Bxa3 opening which is like -2.9
yeah cuz he’s trolling
0.4 certainly is not crazy
1.0 is getting in the crazy realm
This is the Chess.com profile of powercatfly. Take a look!
Premium Member: False
Moderator or Staff: False
Streamer: False
Rapid: 1810 (peak)
Blitz: 1353 (peak)
Bullet: 1643 (peak)
Danya got beaten from this repeatedly
is danya still 3k tho
The guy who was cheating?
yes, when ur looking at an engine, and an eval bar. you probably come to that conclusion. but even at 2800, hikaru isnt always able to win if he gets +1.0 or more. its not as stone cold as people make it out to be, because humans dont have access to stockfish
Danya is a GM
hikarus way better than danya
Most likely wasnt
Yes ik?
who is even comparing k\hikaru to danya
yea so it’d be normal for danya to lose more
does anyone argue with that 😭
Most obvious statement ever
huh? yes it is chess talk lol was this directed at someone else
last wishes for me 💀 because otb is gonna start at 9 am and its 6 am. So either wish me or gimme tipz
😭
But the argument was if 1.1 was losing at gm level, im saying that -2.9 had a positive score against a gm
Gobble every free piece you see
It's a link to a message that I sent
ohhhh im derp
idk what last wishes means...
eh
a4 is a scary opening 🤷♂️
play confidently! win your games
ok yes 100% glad u agree
i think its the wishes that we give to a dead person? RIP?
and also in blitz anything can happen
In Magnus Arsenal,
🥰🥺😉
I think most ppl here never played otb
good luck how are you doing
Ofc in otb thats dead lost
sone nhi he tumko
yeah facts
i saw on a youtube thread last night ppl thought hikaru wasnt one of the best of all time. Guy is #10 highest rated fide player in the history of chess, #2 to magnus in the past 10 years and beaten every world champion to live.. def sucks
Otb can also be blitz or rapid btw
im doing great unity :) today i have a rapid rated otb hehe
good luck kiddo
wait unity returned
hikaru isn't even top 20 all time
He was never close to magnus
nah bruh i woke up! Its 6 am something rn. i woke up at 5 am...
bruh magnus sucks
he is, its on wiki. search classical fide ranking history. hikaru is #10, and hes #2 in fide on their official website rn
crazy
im not talking about rating
Ik but usually ppl refer to classical with it
its peak ratings @fleet dove
2/10 ragebait
L
oh ok @fleet dove
I'm talking about actual greatness
did he leave before?
Hikaru himself literally said the ratings r wrong
but lowkey he never fails his majestic mewing streak
Exactly
He hasn't beaten me once
real
greatness isnt measured by highest peak overall and highest rating in the recent 10 years against all the sgms?
he got banned for cheating
the bot is ass
thats a pretty fair metric imo
who are your top 20?
what the 💀 real??
oh what are they
share screenshot or send his username i will see
Lmao
? What is what?
no because rating has naturally gone up over time. I think someone like smyslov is over hikaru despite having nowhere near his peak rating
the real top 10
im on mobile's chrome discord so its very hard to chat
Just download discord 🥀
Why would i know?
wow soo unemployment
damn he should teach me howntoncheat in 30 sec ultrabullet games
(Or leave the server while you still can)
Guys
yea ik about that, and computers play a big role in the discussion too. but when looking at both overall history peak and fide classical in the past 10 years, hikaru being #10 and #2 is pretty good for a greatest of all time
newbie
Am I goated or what
pc is goated
its not my mobile 😶🌫️
- c4 b5 $2 2. cxb5 a6 3. e3 axb5 4. Qb3 $2 c6 5. f4 $2 Nf6 6. Nc3 e6 $6 7. a4 $2 Bb7 8.
Qc2 Be7 9. Be2 $6 d5 10. b3 Nbd7 $2 11. Bb2 c5 $2 12. axb5 $4 Rxa1+ $1 13. Bxa1 d4 $1 14.
exd4 cxd4 15. Bf3 $6 Bxf3 16. Nxf3 dxc3 17. f5 cxd2+ 18. Qxd2 Qa8 19. Qc3 O-O 20.
fxe6 Qe4+ 21. Kd1 fxe6 22. Rf1 Nc5 23. Rg1 Rd8+ 24. Nd4 Nxb3 $3 25. Qxb3 Rxd4+ - Bxd4 Qxd4+ 27. Ke2 Qxg1 28. Qxe6+ Kf8 29. Qf5 Qc5 30. Qxc5 Bxc5 31. Kd3 Ke7
- Kc2 Kd6 33. Kd2 Nd5 34. b6 Bxb6 35. g4 Ke5 36. h3 g5 37. Kc2 Kd4 38. Kb2 Bc5
- Ka2 $6 Kc3 40. Ka1 Kb3 41. Kb1 Be3 42. Ka1 Nc3 43. h4 Nb5 44. hxg5 Na3 45. g6
Bd4# 0-1
horrible
halibut
Might as well pack it up
oh idk you just said they were wrong - didnt know if u had an official list
hell nah
oki
Nah bcs I checkmated him w a pawn
not rare
sigma
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Finished with bishop and knight mate
sybau
It wasnt me who said it it was hikaru
sybau
Sybaunyal
What is this
yes, are you disagreeing with him?
vhat what does sybau means? Plz tell
you're not tuff
ikr
And obviously the ratings arent a clear metric of ones capabilities
sybau 🥀
1...b5 is an alpha move
halibut gambit
real
Meaning plz
sybau
you should checkmate with king instead of pawn
Ban
i agree
Ask him I don't remember
idk abt that one
Yes, at high levels there arent enough tournaments and high rated players to farm
unity u were banned from cc?
kg7##
if u agree, then by extension you believe theyre wrong too.. but if u dont agree /w what hikaru said, then that'd be something different. you dont have to be this pedantic ((unless u truly dont understand what Im asking then its fine @pallid ice
who’s unity bro
slay your balls all ultra
The fk i forgot u are a chess coach
Idk
what
i thought ur name was unity
i am a coach
my name is not unity 💀🙏
@north ocean
ur old user
bros jealous because there there better coach
it isn’t
L cheater
isnt this an issue for all of them at that elo though the top 10 atleast
lmao
i forgot that im the one who is using unitys logo or pfp 💀
That doesn’t work tho.
like, hasnt that always been an issue for the top 0.001% no matter what top 10 we're referring to? In kasparovs reign or magnus'
2838 will have a hard time becoming 2839 if nobody is 2838+
kasparov
No its an issue for those whose rating isnt correct, if u could farm high rated bots anytime magnus would have been way ahead of #2 at his peak
me
gary kasparov?
i mean not very very gud but he was a great player
No one is good at chess tbh
He is like you bro
me
nuh uh
True
no
What? If u r 2837 and a 2838 beats u he gains elo?
i will tell you why
am I gud?
well yes but how is this different from the #2 player in 1980 who couldnt progress elo because of the #1 being capped
even I ain't gud
Is this supposed to be philosophical
Nah got banned for cheating earlier
Not necessarily because maybe the #2 player is fairly rated
It didn’t reply for some reason but is this supposed to be philosophical or sum shi
-_- he had a beef w me also
A 2838 will have a hard time gaining elo, if nobody is 2838 or above. -- is what was said
just becuz i pinged mods when he was abusing me eeeeew
He wont tho
ya i cant gain elo at 2000000000000000000000000000, it hurts being at the top
isnt that magnus problem rn? @pallid ice
I mean if u mean it in a way that it will take long then yes
when are yall gonna come to an agreement
lol
It’s chess talk cmon now
When its not a discussion channel
Yeah I know you are are not one these insta CMs but still massive fall off
What's that?
Down for another b6 blitz game
coach bro do u know gng means
and sybau meaning
yeah why
I dont know what ur trying to say but it probably makes sense, its just hard to follow. It's irrelevant anyway let's talk about actual chess if you want
top 10 best or top 10 greatest?
how old are u bro
no
Im 14
?
how do u know 💀
what’s his rating
Grow up
Top 10 of all time, i think thats quite clear
u also know my personal infos like unity? Eew
well, according to peak fide rankings in the history of chess he is(but you said theyre wrong) - so if theyre right, then yes. if theyre wrong, then no
js a guess
aight
Does not surprise me tbh
How you 14 in 2025
siga sigma boy
someone's 15
im also 14
Bro was 10 years old during the lockdown
Bit older
noice so can u tell me their meanings if incase someone will use theseterms in my chess tournament
i’m okay
Chess used to be a old man's game 🙃
being younger than couting brilliants in big wild 2025 is crazy gng
how many of you would remove computers/engines from chses if u could press a magic button?
huh
He is like 2000 fide
how is he cm bro
I would
Im trying to say that maybe hikaru is top 10 by fide cuz all the WCs before couldnt gain elo because of how elo works so their strength wasnt fairly represented in their elo (they play at 3000 elo level but because of how elo changes work he is 2500) but hikaru is fairly rated as he is rn, but if the ratings would be correct they would overtake hikaru
2.2k - CM??
I wouldn't
OR THERES NORMS
Used to be 2.2k
He was 2200 before but went to China tournaments bro
Seems way easier to improve with the advancement of engines
how does he drop sm that’s crazy 🥀
Ah. Now this makes sense. I see, yes, this is a logical take. I dont know how much it contributes. But I can see that being a big factor.
Coach bro whats ur title goal? Im or Gm
And it certainly increases the overall skill level of humans
Hikaru would mop the floor with all the old school world champs he’s better then them🥱
idk rn bro
i’ve been hard stuck 2200 for 4 years 💀
oh
kramnik almost prevented magnus from ever being famous - it was 1 game from ruining everything - and magnus still lost, but he won overall bc the tournament favored the result even though kramnik punished him
u arw also a cm?
no i don’t have cm
Yea
i’m not gonna buy it
Oh
How much is cm lmao
buying it? Tff its not arena fide titles
p sure it’s like
Kramnik before seeing the report button on chess.com would destroy hikaru
50+ euros
i just faced racism
Bruh that’s light
50 euro for Cm? Tf
why wld i get it
whats cm
He won because kramnik played agressive and lost, both of them lost in the last round, if kramnik would have played for a draw he would have won
He already has NM tho so it matters way way less
before kramnik went cheater gattlingun he was actually one of the most revered players in history
2200 sounds mightier than cm anyway 💪
cantidate master?
chief minister
magnus still respects kramnik greatly afaik
Yeah that’s what I was gonna say, for a normal person like me tho I’m snatching that up
Thats why i said peak kramnik
oh
50 euro is like 2 hours of work
femboy chessplayer goated
u need 2200 fide asw
I thought that magnus lost, and the next game he needed to win, and didnt, but because ivanchuk(or someone else) didnt get the expected result for magnus' loss to matter, magnus ended up coming ahead. Something like this. I watched the video, but forget the exact details.
Ik
Femboy?
Where
Australia
More like 6 hours
Whoever was known as the 'god killer' in chess. Was it ivanchuk? Someone else.. idk
Will you get FM when you can
There's way too much chess History lol
bro realized
Magnus was tied with kramnik but due to tiebreaker rules he would have won if they had ended with equal scores thats why in the last round where magnus was with white he played aggressively against his opponent to win the tournament 100% because the draw was uncertain, but he lost because of a mistake, on the adjacent board kramnik played with black also for a win beacuse he thought magnus gets atleast a draw and then he needs a win but he also lost to similar reasons, even tho he looked at magnus’ game the position was unclear and it seemed like its a draw atleast so he played dangerously and lost too
yea
when IM norm number 1
I remember now bc of this, thank you for explaining it out
Lol you agree?
Its cool but alot of it happened when we didnt exist and its like well
its not as impactful but still interesting
pretty cool checkmate personally
Wish we knew more of fischer when he was sane and at his peak
yes thats not what I mean like, magnus and kasparov today versus fischer if he were still alive
its just a different vibe
real
magnus and kasparov are very active, we know everything about them, kasparov still coaches and commentates, etc., fischer was a mystery and a bit unhinged
W HA
Tyler1 #1 oat
screenshoted
so is gukesh
fischer was good looking he turned into a crazy old hobo with a beard ranting about how engines killed us all
Exactly
gukesh is hot
he has a point tho
fischer went off the grid or something
even if he did go crazy over it
bro lowkey all 5 top GMs look hot
hahaha
smthn like that
he always had been
why is Bobby not on the list
judit is the hottest top gm
on cc bots
probably for his controversy
im not gay but like yeah
saying women belong in the kitchen etc
almost all wgms are babes as well
Played match in spite of embargo or something
they didnt wanna assosciate with that (i assume)
wtf he said that
Bro took that back after a while tho
frkin kitchen looksblike the chessboard
not exactly but he did say women werent smart enough or better than men at chess and he took the mysogny back
he mightve said the kithen thing
ewi hate bobby
no, he said women cant cook
There was a clip
ya something related
😭
im offended
Bobby Fischer just said women made awful chess players
Because he thought they weren’t as smart because it was the 1960s
ya thats insane tbh judit proved him wrong and they knew eachother apparently well
this is hilarious
He probably thought really highly of Judit
magnus 🥰
judit is the only female to ever win magnus otb afaik
The argument on his interview was women make worse chess players on average
ya u could tell he was a bit sexist back then tho he rlly thought they sucked at chess
yeah true
glad he took it back
Yea im saying directly that he is sexist
But it was the 60s as well where stuff like that was just not that bad to say at the time
idk if it was straight up sexism tho or lack of evidence
it was the 1960s, who wasnt sexist back then 💀
cause no females did break chess at the time until Judit
Bruh everyone was sexist back then in America
yeah
true
Sorry, i stop talk here
comparing a 17 year old's opinion from the 1960s to today's standard is crazy
even in the early 00's ppl still talked like that
To be fair Bobby thought everyone sucked at chess
sexism was kind of cute back then because women couldn’t stand up to it yet
bro felt like magnus
guys I know why magnus rages
omg stop
Name: CM Jesse Zafirakos (icy)
Title: Candidate Master
Premium Member: True
Moderator or Staff: False
Streamer: False
Rapid: 2486 (peak)
Blitz: 2650 (2666 peak)
Bullet: 3207 (peak)
hi
thats too dark humor for here lol @waxen wraith
Chat, is this real?
this guy also has standing issues
dont deport me 😟
LMAO
haven’t heard that one before
hi jeeza
i thought that said "sexism was cute black guy"
hi dor
are CMs really 3200? Jesus christ, is it impossible to progress in titled chess these days?
That is some tough competition
no bro I actually thought you were the ic
no we're all bad
wait guys are alt accounts that play rated games allowed?
it’s all about aura
bro thats so cringe
ur banned forever
If a CM is 3200 in bullet and 2666 in blitz, how in gods name do you ever progress in classical chess against ppl who are +800 CM in OTB classical
wdym +800
does magnus ever tilt
Like the top sgms
yes, but you have to take permission from chess.com
200 more elo
yeah if he loses he tilts bad
but if he wins he doesn’t go up much
how is that related to a cm playing blitz or bullet
for gm I guess yeah and norms
wdym take permission??
not that kind of tilt
top sigmas?
wait really
wdym 😭
i am not sure about the whole process either. ask a mod
what is gulping on
yeah
Because the scale, think about ur otb fide versus someone like hikaru, and then u being 3200 in bullet, and hikaru being +800 in otb classical but being around there in bullet too. It's just a skewed thing
It makes me believe that ranking up is impossible otb in classical
never explain anything else ever
i’m 500 points overrated in bullet and 150 underrated in classical if that changes something
wait isn’t there a channel for that
is it the higher rated the more elo drop offs
like asking about chess com support? ion see it
so the scale of classical+500= bullet makes sense there
yeah you drop more the higher elo you have
and gain less
insane
if you want to be good at bullet then you have to stop being a 🐌 🫵
like rn i gain about 7-9 if I win and lose 10 if I lose
Now I'm lost.
i think I’m still 8/8
C6?
i’m at 30k rn
Okay, so you have two ratios, OTB Classical Rating to Online Bullet Rating. You then make a fraction, 1:1. The CM is 2000OTB:3200Bullet. Then you get a ratio. This is 0.6:1. Now, do this for hikaru, 2800OTB:3200Bullet. You get a ratio of 0.875:1. In a perfect world, these wouldnt be so far apart because your classical chess skill will translate to how much you know, you just get faster and better at it in bullet.
ratings can’t be compared as ratios, only rating differences
Its almost like, theres no difference between someone of hikarus caliber in otb classical and a cm in otb classical when it comes to bullet, youd expect there to be a much larger gap.
glicko/elo treats the difference between 400-800 the same as 2400-2800
aint reading allat
Okay, nevermind. I'm stupid.
I know. But the gap is what im talking about. Shouldnt someone of hikarus level be much better than a cm at bullet if his classical fide rating is so much higher?
SGMs always say that your understanding of slow chess is priority before getting high in bullet
he is much better, i got to 3200 by putting up 100 win streaks against slow 2600s in 10 second games
Oh ok. I thought he was around 3200 bullet which it says u are too
lol
3200 bullet?
my 1 min bullet level is like 2700-2750
yes
is hikaru near that or no
yes
so my point lies there
Youd expect someone with 1k elo of more classical knowledge to translate that experience to bullet
but apparently it doesnt matter
I just always thought how good u were at slower chess directly translated to faster chess, given u practice faster chess alot
his level is 600 points above mine in bullet, his rating is not 600 points higher though because the system is very goofy
if we played a 1 min bullet match he’d be the favourite to win 20 before i win a single game
lol
of course
Its cus custom tc exists
Can I ask how hes so much better if ur able to survive at that high of an elo
obviously 10 second games shouldn’t be rated the same as 60 sec games
because i watch 2600s play 1 min chess and challenge them to 10 sec after
none of these players log on to play 10 sec chess and most have never played it before lol
And 0|0.1 shouldnt exist idk why its even possible to set decimals as bonus time
so you specialize in it
yes
do you think if you were 2800 classical ur bullet would stay 3200
cc removed it then added it back so uh yeah
if i were 2800 classical i wouldn’t need to play 10sec to maintain 3200 now would i lmao
Not just a bit
lol
But its not icys fault tho
i have work now bye
Bye
lol bye ty for the clarification
They should either delete 10s chess or make a different rating for it
wtf can someone have 3 accounts 💀
I was told only 2 according to cc rules
so you can have 2 alt accounts
are we fr
No 1 main and 1 alt
yeah ok
1+1=2 👍🏻
Who cares if they don't ch
dms rq
So many people cares apparently
cheeser mindset
fair play is beeping!
nah im jk lol
People here will snitch 0.01 seconds if u have 2+ acc just for the sake of snitching
Only people who need 3 accounts are pros anyway
They loves pinging them blue name
chess has a cheating epidemic, i could care less about that. i just pray one day that there arent millions of cheater games per month
If they're cheaters, then u snitch ofc
well. having extra accounts is not worth snitching for
using an engine during a match is
Yes
Cheating ≠ 2 accounts
Like, touch some grass. Why do you care so much
Hello i have one question but im french
But im bad in english
Someone talk with me in french for my question ?

umm u can google translate then put it here
then translate it back, unless someone is fluent in french
Lets be homest here how many cheaters do u face a week?
I faced like 2 maximum in 1k games
dont think anyone knows
Who knows at the end of the day
Its highly improbable
but you can get a rough guess from data tracked by players, refunded elo points on a personal level, and the stats fair play publish. There's 55,000,000 average elo refunded per month. Divide that by average elo gain or loss. Thats how many games youre likely to encounter a cheater.
If they cheat and i dont notice then that means the engine they used wasnt that strong and i had a chance to win
I dont think im below 2k because of cheaters
💀
I dont think u should conflate being bad w a cheater cheating. Thats not what im saying. But you cant deny how rampant cheating is in chess online
There was like 1 guy last week who found every move but that was rapid and not impossible moves