#Running help thread

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

boreal flint
#

So I'm not sure if this is allowed, please correct if not, but instead of having a bunch of help threads for the same project I figured to just make one and add to it any time I had a question/concern.

#

First up, I plan on routing out a channel along the length of the desk for wiring to be tucked into, and then covered up with a plastic sheet or some other material. However, I was wondering if leaving such a skinny sliver of material would lead to cupping or stability issues.

Critical dimensions that may be relevant, feel free to ask for more:

Original dimensions of material: 6' x 5" x 1.25"
Dimensions of channel: 6' x 1 7/8" x 1"
Material thickness left on "top" side of channel: 1/4"

worldly haven
#

Yeah that’s gonna snap

boreal flint
#

Well shucks. Is there a rule of thumb about how much of a board you can route out before you're risking adverse effects?

native coyote
#

I don't think it would necessarily snap

#

but I sure think it will warp

#

you can help that by just bridging supports on the bottom or keeping the channel away from the edge and as narrow as possible

boreal flint
#

When you say narrow do you mean in the yellow or blue dimension? Away from the edge in this case isnt really possible as I will hit the metal frame the desk top sits on.

worldly haven
#

Ah I just noticed that rabbet you have on the bottom. Team Varnish means to support the gap, presumably with those

boreal flint
#

That rabbet is currently meant to accept a sheet of 1/16" plastic so that the wires that go into the channel have something to rest on. Would something more substantial than that plastic be an appropriate bridge?

boreal flint
#

Oh interesting, I was prepared for the other one. Cool.

native coyote
#

if it needs to be wide it would be better as a rabbet

#

the little...donger there will be weak

boreal flint
#

Yellow dimension is currently slated for 1 7/8", I think lowest I could go is 1 1/4"

native coyote
#

The acrylic is probably sufficient

boreal flint
native coyote
#

I'd get thicker if that's still an option, but probably ok

boreal flint
#

1/8"? I was not prepared for this to be a structural part of my build so I went with thinnest possible as to not take up needed wiring space

native coyote
#

if you notice 1/16" of wiring space you're a supreme nerd

#

it's mostly just adding resistence for the short grain of the donger from getting stressed

#

even at 1/16 it's doing that job

boreal flint
#

Gotcha. At some point I'll figure out what I actually need, as all of this is speculative so far, hence planning for the largest channel I can make and compromising from there.

#

My biggest worry was cupping

native coyote
#

yea, attaching the plastic securely addresses both

boreal flint
#

Oh I didn't know that, thank you. Plan for securing was wood screws so it can be removed and re-installed easily.

boreal flint
#

updated plan, 1/8" rebate(?) for acrylic, channel is 1 1/4" x 13/16", headroom of material (the thickness of remaining material on top) 5/16", left edge of channel to left edge of material 1 3/8"

boreal flint
#

Hi friends. Its me again. This time, we are looking up at the bottom of my desk. This time, I'm wondering if threaded inserts are a good idea for a mechanical fastening to join the metal frame of the desk and the wood. My main concern is expansion ripping that all apart. Material (if it matters) will be walnut, about an inch thick, but I'm unsure of the milling type that will be used. If there are any other dimensions you need to be able to help out, please let me know. 🙂

native coyote
#

The metal should be slotted perpendicular to the grain, but the threaded insert is not really a problem

#

it's also probably no better than just like....a screw

#

but you get to feel fancier

boreal flint
native coyote
#

I have no counterargument

boreal flint
#

Ok, so when you say slotted, is hogging out the metal by abusing a drill bit an acceptable form of achieving that

steady elbow
#

a file or jigsaw with metal blade might be better?

boreal flint
#

Ok, I have both of those things, just need a metal blade. Cool cool, tt

#

Ty*

boreal flint
#

Next up are finish recommendations. I do not plan on using a mouse pad, so I'll just be dragging my mouse around whatever my finish happens to be. I don't mind occasionally repairing the finish, however I would much prefer that process to be "local" to the damage, rather than having to strip and refinish the whole desk. Also I really do not love the glossy look of a french polish.
Reading through the finishing info section, it seems like that leaves me with drying oils or hardwax oils, and I have questions about each:

Drying Oils: when they say that tung oil takes longer to cure, is this a situation where I will be unable to use the desk for a long time any time I want to repair my finish?

Hardwax Oil: all the pictures I'm seeing of these on my material (walnut) seem to be flooring, and they are commonly quite glossy, something I'd rather avoid. Is the glossiness something that I can avoid while still using this method, or is that part of the package?

vocal reef
boreal flint
#

Oh nice, thank you! Do you know what the repair/refresh process is like for that?

#

In my case time is less of a constraint, and more protection of the wood since itll be used and abused as a desk. Stuff will be spilled on it, hot stuff might get set on it, that kinda thing

vocal reef
#

I don’t have direct experience with repairs so this is secondhand information and you might want to wait for someone with more experience to chime in, but it is my understanding that you can sand out issues and reapply the wax in place and it will all blend together. It will bond to any exposed wood and everything excess will just wipe off.

boreal flint
#

Ok nice, thank you for the input!

native coyote
#

Have you considered the church of shellac

boreal flint
#

Somewhat, yeah. Although I will say, Pastor QP, the tithings required for repair of the Holy Finish somewhat confuse/concern me. In wear areas like under my mouse, do I just give it a little sand and throw some more on? Or do I need to do blending/redo the whole desk?

native coyote
#

You don’t even need to sand, just clean and it’s dry in 45 minutes

boreal flint
#

I’m also curious between the Holy Finish and Waterlox what the differences are

native coyote
#

One is bug poop and one isn’t

boreal flint
#

Oh thanks well that settles it

native coyote
#

Both are varnish so you’re good in the eyes of God

boreal flint
#

Will I be considered a heretic if I use shellac from the yellow can

#

Shit what’s the brand

#

Something with a Z?

native coyote
#

No

#

Zinsser

#

I think both are perfectly viable

boreal flint
#

Ok. And while waterlox has multiple surface finish gloss levels, is shellac equally flexible in that regard

native coyote
#

Waterloo a little more resilient to modern chemicals, shellac easier to repair

#

You control shellac sheen independently the product remains the same

boreal flint
#

Gotcha. What’s the process for doing that, if I wanted a non glossy finish?

native coyote
#

Steel wool or scotchbrite to knock it back

boreal flint
#

Ok nice

#

In that case I might go for shellac

#

Bonus points because I already have it lying around

#

But I need to see if the milk is old, so to say

#

Oh, and if I wanted to pore fill for a smoother feel, is that a separate product or a difference in application technique of shellac?

native coyote
#

Shellac actually can pore fill

#

Waterlox doesn’t really do that but I want tired of arguing yesterday

#

It kind of does

boreal flint
#

Oh sorry I wasn’t meaning to be argumentative if that was the case

native coyote
#

No just I didn’t feel like arguing with tbe claim

boreal flint
#

Well that’s convenient

native coyote
#

You need to keep alcohol and ammonia off the desk, otherwise it will be great