#red-dead-singleplayer
1 messages · Page 334 of 1
revenge occurs a shitton in RDR 1 and RDR 2
yes... and thats the point
rdr1 is that you can't outrun your past
and it isn't revenge
in rdr1
john isn't doing it to get back at bill, dutch and javier
he has too
and in rdr2, thats literally the whole point
revenge causes everything bad
that happens to them
Ok but you are using a game as an example, you can even say that revenge was bad in the case of this game, but there are several other cases in which it was good
revenge is never glorified
and bad for who? only if you are the protagonist, do you think that the average citizen of the old west likes bandits that torment their city? seeing them dead can be a relief
im just saying it's the point of the game
oh
it depends
also i still want to clarify that at minimum in RDR the government is super corrupt
by itself revenge sucks
you really don't understand
I had said that before
they literally kidnap the marston family
I just understood, I thought you were comparing revenge in the game, with real life
Dutch takes revenge on Bronte for Jack yet it's not glorified (remember, it was even for Jack). Dutchs murder of Bronte made him look evil
john was a fucking bad piece of shit
since when is kidnapping not breaking the law
v for vendetta is an example that shows that revenge can be "goodl
and they arrested them
"
LOL
not kidnapping
I don't even know what movie this is
what did jack do in 1911 that was deserving of getting arrested?
also they weren't arrested, they were explicitly abducted
they try to glorify the lady being kidnapped and tortured, and make her fall in love with v acting as if the love was real
john*
and he was an outlaw
who escaped
12 yrs before
no not at all, v was a maniac vigilante
Depends on what the player does? if he goes around killing all the citizens ...
jack was abducted too
waiting 12 years doesn't fix anything
wait i see what you mean, they were affiliates of the VDL Gang
that's abduction
v just played the game
plus they were only using them as blackmail
blackmail is illegal dude
Jack got taken by Bronte and Dutch drowned him, are we gonna justify dutchs killing because it was 'revenge'?
can someone explain to me what happened in V vendeta?
it's extortion
thats the whole point
@hidden moss
revenge is a fools game
yeah that's my point lol
stop copy-pasting the same thing
I'm with you here
you're blatantly ignoring it and making the same 'revenge' point
not how you win an arguement I'm afraid
it is serious? I thought the movie was like: a hero comes and kills all the bad guys in your town like a hero
@honest drum also, statute of limitations does say that certain crimes can't be tried against eachother after a specific amount of time
lol nah 50% of the plot is V kidnapping and torturing the lady acting like it was for her good, the rest is him blowing stuff up
the point of the game is that you can't outrun your past
jack literally can
I don't WANT to get involved in this government bid to be "corrupt" or not. because this is my own ideological question
he wouldn't be america's most wanted for one murder that he was loosely tied to
TFW camora tells me to stop copy pasting and then goes on to repeat the same point which I disproved: 😐
oh but they were bad people oh dear me!
two people
a person that matches the description that the wife gave
lives on john's ranch
wears johns hat
and has a motive
what else do you need?
we have no idea if jack stayed on that ranch after he killed him
yes and i don't believe he did
he probably would've fled, he's not dumb
yes ik i agree
if you see Arthur or jack as good people by any means you're missing the entire point of any of these games
this is what i think happened
and hopping a state pretty much guarantees you won't get caught in 1914
they weren't good ppl
same people probably think Walter White was a good person and skyler was a bad one
I can't believe I have to argue this point at all
as well as help
people who kill, no matter their intent are by definition bad, immoral people
my arthur only ever stole from the rich and stuck it to the man
morality doesn't have a definition @verbal prairie
no your Arthur killed Pinkertons and robbed from the working class (the train robberies for example)
grays
pinkertons
cornwalls men
he did redeem himself morally in a way, but he still wasn't a good dude
he saw that
at the end
and he was sorry
but still
you're not seriously gonna justify the killin of the Pinkertons are you?
doesn't make him a hero
@verbal prairie robbed the working class? you mean when you do those train robberies on rich folks going on vacations to cuba? those dudes definitely weren't working class in 1799
*1899
you literally steal from people with about 10$ on hand
I wouldn't call those rich people
Thomas downes is a good example
Arthur knows at the end of the day. He's a shitbag.
yeah
ye
in the end he sees it
and tries to do the best he can with the time he has left
he does everything he can in chapter 6 to redeem himself (hence, the name) but it doesn't change his actions
but he still wasn't a good guy
redemption won't bring back the dead
ah yes the pinkerton detective agency, people who never did anything wrong in the slightest
no lol
so? ik they weren't that great ppl
you're completely misreading it
but he still killed them
the average Pinkerton worker wasn't bad
yes
the agency as a whole was bad
they weren't
but the average workers doin their job?
did they deserve to die just so Arthur can rob a train?
don't forget the US army
just because their leaders are shitbags to the indians
doesn't mean all of them were
they literally talk about individual soldiers harming native americans IN THE GAME
ye he does
they shouldn't worry about the soldiers
you don't know history do you
like at all
i DO, you don't
so far to me you've been trying to justify murderers and thieves
ah yes because im sure the 16 year old from colarado arthur loots in that tar mission gone wrong was a raping shitbag
like you seem to believe
they weren't all good ppl
the soldiers
but most were
Imagine a dlc where you play as other gang members
Or even more in the past
like yes there were soldiers who killed innocent native americans
but most didn't do that
what about the debt missions? are we gonna sit here and say Arthur was innocent just because it wasn't his idea? in the end, sure he did kick out Strauss but he still needed a lot to reach that point. what about the kid who's father he killed and robbed? I mean seriously there's absolutely no way we can justify that
I'd say Hosea while still being a lying, robbing degenerate atleast had schemes that really didn't harm anyone. He was a flimflam man.
On my second i play through i found out why bill didnt like going with the indians
@muted jetty I really wanna see you justify the debting of the man and his son
even that action alone makes him a bad person if we ignore every other thing he's done
ye
on the boat
about to raid bronte
I don't like collecting depts lol, do you think i think of these people as all good or something
Arthur Loathed being a debt collector but in terms of legality, Strauss was right on the money with that, It was the most legal 'work' he was doing
viridian is correct
I think the debting was evil, and therefore Arthur was evil as he had every power to stop it earlier
even if he hated it, he never stopped it
'them indians were savages'
'you better watch your mouth boy'
'dutch.. i saw thing-'
'i dont doubt you saw things, but your tiny little mind was to small to comprehend what you saw. What you saw were people who lost everything to savagery'
he had all the power to
so loan sharks are good ppl?
this entire argument hinges on nuace being dead and everything breaking into nice little moral boxes
no.. your defending them killing innocent people
No, There isn't exactly, but a loan is a like an investment, in a person.
this entire arguement hinges on not defending a murderer and thief
I'm sorry, but as far as Arthur had good intentions, it changes absolutely nothing
it's an idea even touched in superhero films
tell me this, with a yes or no answer, was arthur a good person? @muted jetty @crimson bronze
they save the day, but at the end they leave a destroyed city and overall there's people dying because of them
@honest drum morality is subjective, nuance exists, and in a game where you can chose to kill entire towns, i don't think it's really a good question to ask
literally i just explained why it isn't a yes/no question
in terms of canons, not player decisions, Arthur is still a bad person
robbing the innocent on a train for a quick example
doing the debting for another
killing Pinkerton's and soldier
these are all mandatory actions in the game
not choosing to shoot up a town
these are things Arthur has to do in every playthrough
and all undeniably evil things
Generally? No, At the end of the day, his only redeeming moments were in his final days with the absolving of the last debts, ensuring the financial securities of Londonderry's Widow, J. J. Weathers and his wife, and Edith and Archie Downes along with ensuring that the Marston family were able to attempt going straight.
so you wouldn't say hitler was a bad person then? because someone being good or bad isn't a yes or no question to you
i mean like you wouldn't say 'hitler was a bad guy'
you literally cannot comprehend nuance can you
you literally cannot comprehend that they killed and robbed innocent people
and if you think thats what good people do
then the world is fucked
what's the nuance in Hitler being good or bad?
it's a simple yes or no answer to most people
you factor in the nuance of hitler and he still ends up being bad because it's not like he did good things
Hitler's soldiers? that's a different question
exactly
you take a character who does BOTH BAD AND GOOD THINGS and you have nuance
tell me how hitler didn't do good things as well?
@honest drum dude i'm german, nothing he did was good for us.
you have nuance in the idea that he did good things but I say again, will those good things save the lives of the innocent?
so your telling me, in his 45 or smth years on the planet, he never did ONE good thing?
I mean you genuinely massacre Pinkertons man
I think most people agree that Arthur had his moments, he did good things and had good intentions
but still killed, and nothing changes that
bad people do good things
good people do bad things
arthur was a bad person
but he did some good things
even when the gang were in their prime
he freed slaves, donated to the poor, beat up the klan, absolved people's debts, and saved a good dozens of people's lives
buttt he also killed thousands of lawmen and people tryna do their jobs
and killed downses
THOUSANDS? definitely not
he killed the bad guys though
bruh lmao
deffo thousands
he did 20 years
of robbing
and killing
we kill like 100 people a mission
you know the number of enemies are inflated for gameplay, right?
game roll has a good point
thats not our point lmao
he still killed
BECAUSE he was robbing the bank in the first place
let's say your mother was the wife of an innocent killed by arthur, now think, would him giving you some money redeem him?
btw gameplay kills dont count
would him absolving your debt you happen to owe redeem him?
to a certain extent they do
Edith downes surely wasn't happy with her money
im thinking main mission kills
free roam obviously not
if it counted I could massacre all of the map and argue he's a bad person for that
my john has a 1k bounty in each state but canon wise he gets concerned over a 50 dollar one
yeah 50$ in 1899 is alot
thats not my point lmao#
also btw a lot of that is free roam like killing KKK lol
the most based approach
donating to the poor, free roam
the slaves are a stranger mission, full cannon ending is doing all of the stranger missions
source?
because by default, main missions are the only official canon
unless the devs say different
absolving debts? lol? what about the other debts he didn't, what about the father he killed over a debt
and also he only really absolves 1 debt, Jameson you can choose to take from
as far as I remember
we know that the true ending of rdr2 is high honor help john
so that means that in canon arthur would've been high honor
thus, high honor choices are going to be canon
thus, high honour Arthur also killed and robbed the innocent
you're completely ignoring what we're saying, we've clearly acknowledged his good actions
side missions are canon lol
again.. source?
but you're struggling to acknowledge that he's a murderer
because like i said
side missions aren't canon
by default
if rockstar said they are
then fe
if they were, side missions wouldn't be side missions
they'd be main
that's not how game design works when it comes to story
what are you discussing guys
they don't think that arthur was a bad guy
despite him killing thousands of people
he did good shit yes
If we're considering 100% completion as canon
thousands is impossible dude
Then yes, the side missions have to be canon
20 years? one man?
of robbing and killing
well arthur definetly was a bad man during his life but i think that's mainly because of dutch and his philosophies
i mean it kinda had to do
despite doing good
i think the man who raised arthur does
because he raised them
yes
from the young age
and teached them everything about the life
he still killed people....
yes he did mate
and so do people in the army
im not saying he wasn't a bad man
are they bad people?
thats the stupidest argument i've ever heard lmao
nuance exists
the army was for a good cause
not for fucking robbing
no literally it does, in the criminal courts, intent matters
that's why we have like 5 different forms of murder
intent makes him have good intentions that's all
however in the game i don't think arthur ever kills innocent people unless you make him to
so game wants you to choose
he does lol
whether you want arthur to be good or bad guy
yes and arthur killed to get money
Pinkertons, us soldiers
i dont remember
excuse me what
you know who pinketons were
Pinkertons weren't good people?
did I hear correct
you dont know whether they were bad or good people
the higher ups in the Pinkertons were obviously bad
they literally wanted to murder
do your fucking research mate, the pinkertons as a whole were bad
their captain
but regular pinkerton workers?
it's like german soldier
in WW2
@humble coral i suggest you read through this entire discussion
am german, all german soldiers in ww2 were nazis, we left, they could've
we've covered this
bro
u don't even know the history of your own country
yes the fucking could
germans were allowed to leave the country you dumbass
pinkertons were scums
you can't just go 'aight im going home'
bruh
and army, we can't really tell who's bad guy or who isn't
i mean SOLDIERS
yeah and there were innocents in the army, no?
the pinkertons were used to prevent the WORKERS from getting FAIR WAGES
if i cant argue they were bad people then you cant argue they were good poeple
because guess what? no1 fucking knows
so you think every pinkerton goon does this?
@verbal prairie in the rule of war, no armed combattant is an innocent, only those who are civilians are
well we do know that most soldiers weren't bad people
every last one of them
who's saying they deserved it
??????
I'm saying they didnt
how do you know they were bad?
who's saying they deserved
in the story he says to that he feels terribly sorry and suffers for it everyday, he was a bad man, yes he killed people, but in the end he changed, he found redemption and died as a good man. Arthur is redeemed. k bye
i literally said
and that Arthur is evil for killing them
if i cant argue they were bad
how are you arguing they were good
how the fuck do you know mate
bro you make no sense
because what makes them innocent?
that's the touchy part, redemption is definitely good but in the end you killed and redemption is more about knowing you're a bad person, and doing everything you can to help others
which soldier did arthur kill
that was innocent
?
because you get to fight us army twice in game i think
redemption is never about making yourself a good person
once is when you try to save that captain
@verbal prairie guess every soldier needs redemption huh
?
and 2nd time is when you want to save rain fall's kid
they've killed
so if they were innocent
you fight the us army more than twice
BECAUSE EAGLE FLIES FUCKING TRIED TO KILL SOLDIERS
who said they did?
the soldiers in question were either good or bad, we can't say for them individually but we know 100% there were good people there who didn't have to die
for fuck sake
just because the ;eaders were bad doesn't make them bad
eagle flies had his land and home torn away from him by the US government
instantly
yes i know
they acted on the will of their leaders
mate you are responsible for your actions
the government as a whole
if they are excused for killing natives
not those soldiers
soldiers act on the will of their orders
because their leaders told them to
then arthur is excused
because dutch told him to
????
if soldiers kill natives because their orders say so, they're still bad people
@humble coral no no, man, you've gotta be a GOVERNMENT of course /s
there's a big difference between the army and a bunch of killing, thieving outlaws
are you 12 if you belive army is just bunch of saints
no...
the whole point of Red dead is that there isn't much difference between the government and outlaws
i literally said that if soldiers are excused because they're forced into doing it
what are the soldiers apart of
🍿 
then arthur is excused too
because he's forced into it too
what is so hard to understand
you're trying soo hard to make arthur look like a total piece of shit who enjoyed murdering people and robbing them
i can't believe this is even a discussion
from the start of the game he keeps saying how he doesn't like loan sharking
^^
he still did it
and how he's forced into doing it
he's not forced too
yeah and us troops didn't like killing civilians in vietnam, they still did it
not all of them
yes some did
im not saying that
there are pieces of shit soliders
but it's unfair to call them all pieces of shit who deserved death
loan sharking wasn't dutch's orders
@honest drum do you think arthur deserved death?
dutch doesn't even like it
how do you know
in a way
he literally allowed
deserved to swing?
strauss
to start loan sharking busniess
it's his decision
he's leader of the gang
i mean lawfully yes
arthur is just enforcer
i don't want him too
dude you have a giant hate boner on arthur
no
like it's pointless to argue
no you dont
@honest drum you don't want arthur to die and yet he deserves to die
he was a bad dude
lmao
dont pretend you like him when it's pretty obvious
nuance here
you dont
that you can't fucking understand
bruh please jusr piss off, you've joined this discussion late and have no idea what my point is
you're excusing all the shit that people who were doing even worse things than him because they were ''forced into it''
read it from start to finish
arthur wasn't forced at all
yes he was
yes he was
dutch literally says arthur can run away]
i already explained it
where's he gonna go?
what's he gonna do?
then later on
he wasn't forced into anything
and was being sarcastic
that dutch literally didnt give a fuck about john
after arthur told him they want to leave
he left him to die after he got shot at train
you guys really dont understand me
he also left abigail to die
after pinkertons got her
to finish
i've been here, dumbass
how has this turned into a dutch discusison
gameroll, you just can't accept shit
i dont want to discuss anymore
lmao
arthur a good person pfff
he did good
yes
im not denying that
also, given the fact you said you had thousand dollar bounties, i get the feeling you intentionally play him as bad as possible
no i aint
but ignore everything we say

you clearly just don't get me
you literally aren't acknoledging a word he says
like at all
mate your just fucking agreeing with everything he says
I PREDATE HIM BEING HERE
we proved you wrong at the start
might be because im making a good points
which are u trying to disprove by repeating exact same shit
you are yes
you already said 100 times
im not denying what your saying isn't true
how am i repeating what he's saying when i was here first
but
making the same points
because he was forced to do smth
doesn't make him a good guy
and he rlly wasn't
forced
especially before 1899
my take: the characters are so well written and complex that its not possible to put them at categories so easily as "good" or "bad". thats what makes a "character". both arthur and dutch. thanks for coming to my ted talk.
i once kicked a snake while chasing a small animal
@hidden moss this is just what i've been saying lol
like, i've been playing my arthur as good as i can be
lol snake got rekt
that doesn't make him good
why is there snakes in this game
beating up eugenecists, hunting down the lemoyne raiders and killing the klan and shit
again
not canon
yes ik
what clan
so? whats your point
KKK
i mean, what's the point of including something in the game if it's not canon?
never seen them ingame
answer the fucking question dumbass
bruh
side content
cannon is canon
player choice
at one point, devs have to decide what choice is the correct one
you could choose to help a guy who's been bitten by a snake or shoot him
why didnt john do that to the dog
if you can provide a solid source that side content is canon i'll say fe
wtf this is still going on
we're going around in circles lmao
oh btw Arthur can pick up his lantern and join the kkk rather than killing him player choice
we're back at the side missions canon part
exactly
im worried about his sanity
next game should have a giant snake boss fight because theres a giant snake easter egg
or online
coming from a game dev, series HAVE to have canon choices if you want to be logically consistent
Ok
unless you hate continuity
im gonna make a game then make a sequel but make everything non canon
also what game did you make im curious
NDA
whats that
I can't talk about that
whats that
i cannot talk about the games i work on
its like releasing a game but delete it because you cant let other players play it
ahahhah ok
I am not going to do this again
dont
nobody ever fucking believes that a dev for a company exists
what
and uses discord
nothing you said made sense, majority of the good points came from @humble coral
why am i talking here i stopped playing the game long before rdr2 got released for pc
because it was boring
guys, I realized something, rockstar games is slightly dying, gta online is to blame for that, I don't think I need to explain it
why is everyone in the pc role starting with ! noone cares if you are in this discord server
mmm sure lmao
it's not that, it's just you have no shred of proof
im an astronaut
@honest drum i don't need to give you proof of my employment
not saying you do
@honest drum ok cool, hope you have a fun job
"Don't take damage" Sounds easy enough, hide behind cover right. Not so easy when you're surrounded everywhere with lots of enemies
if you talk about your games you are working on you can increase fans and money if you make the game cost money
i'm not... indie?
and amnesia rebirth made people very hyped and it got many players at release idk if its indie or not
i mean
isn't indie just a small dev team
like among us they made tons of money when popular youtubers played it
yeah and that game's released
its indie game btw
Me, reading wondering how this chat isn't in general, as it doesn't seem to be about storymode.
i can't talk about a game that's not released when i am a single dev in a massive dev team
oh fuck
there should be a arguing channel
or idk
i once kicked a snake while chasing racoon or rabbit
or squirrel
idk
are you ok
what
wait are u a human 
probably some staff reading this then entered some command to make it talk
thing is general is just a shit show
general in every big servers seems to suck
they do
really general should be called off topic on here
as this server is a rdr server
- Beep.
- Still not related to story mode
when micah is sus
guys guess what
what
the AI is gaining conciousness!!
ofc
why is his name dutch
yes in my eyes this is the main channel. general chat and general media is cringe
is micah micah
yep
discord mods commanding their bot to send a message be like:😎🔧 🤖
Lmao
talking about rocky sabotender theseus and some others but i find some actually fine mods
- i have no girlfriend
- this is my life now i dont make friends but i make warns and bot messages
Not the wrong command, but we'll say it is to keep your ego up high. 😄
thanks :)
!messagewithbot i farted
out of curiosity what is the command
say it
!sendbotmessage big chungus
we can't use it anyway but i was just wondering
%message
probably
lol
%message insert attempt to be funny
is what they say
lol
I don't know, ask Hosea, he knows it
Man this game takes foreshadowing to a whole new level
During the valentine train robbery, Sean says “I’ve got a lump on me head” and Arthur says “At least you ain’t got a hole in it”
They also forshawdow Kierans death as well
“You’ll die boy, but you’ll lose your balls first”
Lost his eyeballs
I just accidentally shot at Charlotte lol
she ran away
mission comes back right?
nnope
Load an old save lol
bully 2 when
hey guys how many health cures can you carry by default?
i think my satchels might not be working
Like 10
I think
Once you make a satchel you don’t have to equip it to get the effects
i can only carry 5
i know the normal ones double it
the materials satchel seems to work
you can carry different kinds of tonics
Alright so I was wondering
Since the French guy kinda kissed/pretended to kiss Arthur
Will he get TB too? Lmao
Is there a limit on how many newspapers I can have
Cause for some reason I cant buy newspapers
which chapter are you in?
no limit to how many you can buy. Depends on the chapter though
huh?
i'm trying to hunt rabbits
i never kill them in one shot, always damage pelt
even though i'm supposed to use VARMINT RIFLES
"Kill all wolves and take no damage"
For the john wolf eaten quest, the damage part, ez, but all wolves? Im confused. I killed all the wolves, yet I don't get this check to gold the mission. Anger
aim for the head
you have no clue how hard it is to aim for the head when i still don't have manual selection yet
That shouldn’t be happening
Strange
i still have paint-style deadeye
good luck with that one
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
I bought some newspapers but when I tried to buy I dont have the choice
did you do the missions?
I did some
you have to do all
Ok
My brother also had the problem of not being able to buy newspapers
And he finished the game
idk about that one
Probably a bug
Y’all ever have the problem of after finishing the game and never being able to milk the cows anymore neither sell the produce it just disappeared after awhile
How the fuck can I complete "Exit pursued by a bruised ego" in 12 minutes
I skip all cutscenes and rush every part of gameplay I can but it still takes too long
what
run faster
What mission is that again
Wait Ik
Bear hunting
Hosea
Ye that’s tough
skip cutscenes
The epitome of not listening to anything I say right here
Lmao
Probably like do shortcuts when riding
Like directly go straight to the stables
Etc
sorry what? wasn't listening
an easy way is to not use eagle eye, just track without it if you know where the clues are, saves time
I wish Sadie didn’t kill Cleet in American venom
Man sounded so genuine when he said he’s one of the goodguys
Lmao imagine being named cleet
He was still lying to defend micah until they threatened to kill him
You have to use eagle eye so it lets you inspect the stuff because in that mission it just doesnt let you
I didn't want to say that because I know that VARIOUS of you are going to hate me for it but ... aren't we supposed to be the villains in red dead? because like, we kill innocents, steal people, destroy cities. and even if you avoid killing innocents as much as possible, at some point you are forced to kill, after all in the blackwater massacre we are somehow guilty of the people who died, an example: The pinkertons, not all of them were bad, many just wanted to win money, while others were bad and others thought they were doing the world good by killing criminals. we destroy the families of innocents, and even though history makes us look good, look at ourselves, what are we? a gang in which members sometimes kill each other.
They make fun of me
The gang was basically like, killing and robbing people who weren't exactly innocent themselves, helped innocent people, stuff like that, but then they fell from grace and turned into killers.
Don't say the pinkertons and cornwall are innocent either lol.
The law are just doing their job though, except the grays they're corrupt.
As for other gangs, well, no argument here, like the odriscolls deserve their fates.
Plus the story is put in the eyes of the gang so they view the "disagreeable men" as evil in their story.
what i said about the pinkertons is that some people should go there not because they are exclusively bad, just because they want to earn "easy money", and others because they think they are doing it right, that's all
and of course some were psychopaths and wanted to kill people
what do you mean "disagreeable men"?
Generally anyone who wants to hunt the van der linde gang
Like the pinkertons
Or the odriscolls
I understand, but did you understand what I said about the pinkertons? I know the history of the group, and even though it doesn’t make any sense at all in rdr 2, since the old west full of criminals didn’t even exist in real life. many got together for money, and did the usual bad things
Yeah
is it just me or should rockstar have developed javier into turning on arthur? honestly i thought he was pretty cool and was hit blind sided when javier chose to side with micah in the end
They are nowhere near good people.
Though, in some peoples eyes, they're heroes.
Some, the exact opposite.
thanks for answers
np
cutscenes dont count in the time limit. I played that mission without skipping any cutscene and still got gold medal
I got it already
I tried 3 times, each time I rushed the fuck out of everthing you could do, literally. All shortcuts, no mistakes. It is very very narrow to get that gold. I shouldn't have to take away from the enjoyment and beauty of the game for the challenge tho
time limit requirement sucks. i hate it
i want to get the gold rush achievement but im afraid its gonna cause me to hate the game
Time limit on killing enemies I get. By anything else you can go fuck yourself
the fact that gold rush achievement has a lower percentage than It's art achievement speaks volumes. gold medals are bull**** to get.
It's art is easier though
You just hunt a few animals
That particularly don't spawn 😏
I love the game, but time limits rly should be removed from gold medals. It gives me practically no time to enjoy the ride, or take things slow
Everything has to be rushed😄
I really hope I don't get the "don't take damage" requirement on a mission like the saint denis bank job, fleeting joy, that skinner brother mission, etc.
Cuz you know thats sum bullshit
I can’t remember, but that would prob not happen
They still have some logic at r*😄
Saint denis bank is impossible to not get hit
It’s prob just “don’t take health items”
he didn't turn on arthur
he has his gun up in the air
and him and bill ditch dutch as soon as they had the chance
in the little scene where dutch, micah, cleet and joe can be seen riding shooting at arthur and john javier and bill aren't there
javier still considered them his brothers
Hey
Guys
So when i fistfight with somebody
I just can't block
it don't allow me
....
A good alternative to fist fighting is vehicular manslaughter
you gotta hold the button not press if that helps
Oh thank you
I got 100% 2 time
Woah
Man every time l play a game l just star to mis rdr2
Cause damn this game is just perfect
Like in a way we dont deserve it
I only played it once
I never even finished GTA lol
it compares right?
from what I've played it does compare to me if we consider when it was made
Guys
I don't know man
Imagine if Rockstar add mechanic to hang....peoples.....
GTA really seems to compare, I mean it's clear most of rdr2 is better
there's a mod for this
the story of gta 5 is for a child
it's unrealistic
woah
and
lol
very fast paced
i mean some people could prefer it
just for me
it feels like a childrens game
well it's not really a story of change that's not the idea of it
it's fun to play

