#4k 32" or 2k 27"

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

silk tendon
#

I have been considering buying a new monitor for a long time as I have been a 1080p 24" gamer for the longest while. I finally saved up a good amount of money and bought a 4k 32" 240hz QD-OLED monitor. I did do a little bit of research beforehand but was excited and heard that 4k was really amazing. Now, as soon as I bought it, I started seeing hundreds of posts about why 1440p 360hz 27" is better. Stuff like 27" is better for competitive gaming. 1440p results in much more frames, etc.

I have a decent pc, 7900xt, i5 13600kf with 32gb of ddr5. I don't want to become a 60fps gamer though. The thing is, I don't know what games I will play. I will definetely use it more for souls games and rpgs than for competetive, but I will use it for competetive gaming as well. I am also going to watch movies on it (probably not 4k movies though). The monitor I bought is coming tomorrow and I am debating if I should even try it or just send it back and buy the 1440p version of it. It's the philips evnia 8000. It has a 1440p 27" 360hz OLED monitor for 1700sek less (~180USD). I know that I got the 4k monitor at a good deal, so is returning it for the 1440p at 6660sek (~700USD) worth it? Help me decide, as I said it is coming tomorrow from amazon and I feel immense buyers remorse.

topaz stream
silk tendon
#

I really want oled though for the colors, I have the money to spend on it, and I would spend even less than I was expecting to now if I am getting a 1440p instead. The thing is all the 1440p 240hz OLEDs are as much as the 4k 240hz one at the moment except the 360hz from philis evnia, which is on sale.