#need help picking a monitor
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
ultragear
ah ok does the nano ips make a diffrence or is it irelevant comapared to normal ips?
Nano-ips is better
newer, and refresh rate are crisper
nano ips is lgs technology
hmm both are Ultagear monitors so ill go with the 27GP850-B.AED then alright ty
yeah after doing some research I hreaed that it has issues with activities outside of gaming hmm migh get the cheaper on then
I am considering LG UltraGear 27GP850P myself. Will probably end up geting 4k version of it.
I looked into some reviews and decided to order the 27GR75Q-B the other one had some interesting thisgs said about it im sure its good too but pepolesaid ouside of gaming the monitor has issues with video playback
outside of gaming 1440p is underwhelming as all content defaults to 1080p.
hmm now im unsure lol it is tecnically an older model though than the other one
inovation in monitor technology is just for us, plebs that don't want to spend over $1000, to get old but still good stuff for cheap.
so basically its older but better? hmm
companies figure out ways to make same stuff cheaper over time. dont really mind the age as long as reviews are good.
main reason I chose the cheaper one over this one is beacuse the reviews said it had contrast issues and cant show black very well
ips glow... yea. technology limitation. I will still take IPS over VA.
yeah both are ips just one is nano ips and
my new monitor needs: 120Hz, 1440p/4k, IPS, true 8bit color panel, alright backlight uniformity, sub 3 delta E average, reasonable gamut coverage, 300 nits
and good OSD
so no acer or samsung
yeah the one I chose 27GR75Q-B has it even if the pannel usses slighly worse tec
alright ty was the first time I had heared about nano ips that why I was unsure
every monitor today, besides OLED, works in a way where there is a white(all colors)LED backlight that passes trough panel and that panel filters out unwanted colors
TN is old tech, we can do 480Hz with it, its cheap but has terrible viewing angles.
VA is evolution of TN - better contrast slightly better angles
I looked at those but I noticed 90% of VA panels seem to be curved wich is interresting
oh well makes sense also saw in reviwes that they have bad ghosting
the technology itself can handle it.. but at that point its better to go IPS.
IPS/PLS/anything PS has wide view angles, great colors but has issues blocking light - cant turn screen black - there is always some backlight visible. we call that backlight bleed
manufacturers work around it by dimming backlight where it is supposed to be black - dimming zones
ah that explains why my laptop has a bit of backbleed then
current monitor meta is having millions of tiny white LEDs as a backlight shining trough an IPS/VA panel.
you can have thousands of individually dimmable areas that way and keep the IPS properties.
interresting my current monitor is a shitty 2018 acer predetor that is limited to 60hz due to the dvi connector not existing on my new gpu and its blurry dont want to make that mistake again
regarding the dimming. you can see that monitors have 2 contrast ratings. dynamic and static. static one is maximum contrast within that one dimming zone. dynamic is pitch black screen(dimming backlight at minimum) vs full brightness
and reason why there are variations of IPS like PLS is coz LG owns IPS branding.
tech is about the same
hmm so im wondering can oled pannels turn of unneded pixels completly in an image when true black is needed?
yes
true black is only achievable by OLED or miniLED backlight.
hmm so thats what makes them special then
expensive aswell. unless you are a hardcore movie nerd anything hdr400 or even decent color gamut and pleasant backlight will do you plenty good.