#๐ i am still building my first pc ๐ part ii
1 messages ยท Page 3 of 1
in terms of my personal budget
modest?? it's like one of the highest end ssds
thats good
Modest option is more a sn570
๐
if you want the best just get one of the gen 5 gigabyte ones if you have money to burn
you better be constantly editing 8k video or youre burning money 
Not really not in what you plan to do
๐ค
0 real world performance improvements for most people for 5x the price of a cheaper ssd with same capacity
Mp33 would be super budgeting
true
theres also some lesser known brands on amazon that are cheaper
or a crucial p2
Never a qlc nand drive
Or plc
nah but fr how long has this build taken , i dont know
yall seem a bit irratable at the choosing
Since july
alr so whats better
a m.2 nvme ssd slot with pcie gen 5x4 speed off the chipset? (ik 5x4 isnt made for the chipset usually)
vs.
a m.2 nvme ssd slot with pcie gen 4x4 speed off the CPU?
same thing
kekwwait
5x4 is faster
Mhm July 26th
No difference in the end
If directly via cpu, less so when via chipset
no offense , but this would be a better recommendation 
ig my question is
whats more important
cpu or 5x4
cpu as in m.2 slots off the cpu
Scissors is the goat
paper might be the winner too ngl
Heck maybe even rock
it quite literally doesnt matter
i thought m.2s off the cpu were better
on paper sure but you'd never actually realize that difference
though cpu for you anyway cause you arent even using a gen 5 ssd
arent most ssds gonna be off the gpu
cause it's pcie
no?
no
hmm
wtf r u on about
gumball
i thought you knew better than this
i was thinking of something else
and where do those pcie lanes come from
direct storage ๐
usually they are
ure still wrong
Lol
so i should be happier about m.2s off the cpu more so than gen 5 m.2s
yes
yup
okayy
gen 5 m.2s are never a reason to be happy mostly
i probably thought that cause the top ssd is like just under where the gpu plugs in

i would also say cpu m.2s are more important than how many sizes it supports
so like a 2-size (2260 / 2280) m.2 off the cpu is still better than a 4 size m.2 off the chipset.
But 90% of ssds are 2280, so theyโre not at all important
this isnt a netflix show, you dont need variety in the m.2 slots
it's more like it's better when it's connected directly to the cpu than going via chipset, not the amount of physical sizes tthat the socket and standoffs can handle
Also there's definitely ways you can put "unsupported" sizes
which is why primarily the m.2 nvme that is connected to the cpu is used as the boot drive
The only thing that means is if there's a screw for ot
Doesn't mean you can't use smaller ssds
yep im aware of the stand off screw thing
i was confused at first awhile back but got this answered here
hey quick question
i just wanted to ask for clarification
this is the 2nd time ive seen this
but its reworded
im guessing this means raid 0 1 and 10 work for nvme
but no raid works for sata
and im guessing sata6g_e1, sata6g_e2 etc would just be the names of the sata ports
it means hardware raid wouldn't work on the sata ports, but software based raid can still
ohh okay
still not something you'd ever need to deal with
because of what it requires
does raid 5 and 6 require more
requires more drives, and they all need to be the same size
raid 0 + 1 only requires 2 drives
raid 10 requires 4 at minimum
oh i know those requirements
again, raid is something you don't need to concern yourself with at all
so when they list the raid support at the end of each mb storage spec list its always just based off the number of slots
not necasserily so
sometimes they can list it to have certain raid types still due to compatability with certain cards
but though it's based on hardware raid which in itself is kinda dead as a use
and software based raid can be set up the same way
still though, raid specifically in your use case, not needed, not warranted, not a concern at all
(Donโt worry about it, and donโt ask anymore questions about it here)
how is software raid different from hardware raid
hardware raid is directly set up via bios and also uses a HBA raid card alongside it
software raid is setup from inside an OS
so setup is different
and doesn't require a HBA raid card
still though in the end it's something you will not need to deal with at all
is setuo the only difference
setup and the use of a hba is the main difference
so they function the exact same
and i'll still have to re-iterate that it's not something you'll ever need to do with your setup
yes
what is hba
Host bus adapter
is it a card that goes into one of the pcie slots
yes, primarily needs a pcie x8 slot
you're not building a nas/das to back up data to nor for remote storage access, there for totally not needed for you
whats a das
same as a nas but using a desktop pc for it
which essentially is what my nas build comes under
i thought nas used a desktop pc for it
or are those just hub things
nope, jellyfin/synology have a built unit which you just add drives to which are nas's
ones that use a desktop are home made nas's, which can also be called das's
direct attatched storage is what it means i believe
are those brands
2 brands that do nas systems yes
what is ASMedia ASM1061?
it says 4 of the sata3 connectors are off this thing
instead of the chipset or the CPU
legit just google it
its basically a sata controller
but why the fuck do you need to know this?
Thatโs actually the most basic google question
But thatโs actually like the simplest copy paste to find the answer
Some of the others arenโt as easy to find
sata controller via chipset, nothing new
i already got the feeling we'll parrot each others answers in different ways
new to me
Thatโs a firstโฆโฆ
oh boy
cartman stfu
@trail kayak still working through mobo's
yeah
How are yall still talking about the exact same things as when I last looked.. which was about 30k messages ago ๐
switched to storage, and then psus, and then storage again, and then motherboards again
Ight, see yall in another 30k messages ๐
We are close to choosing one
or she is I think
oh please ๐ฅบ
would be a miracle
I need a pink pc now xD
girl same
You can get pink 4090
stop giving her ideas
then we gotta explain more shit
WHATT SHOW ME
oh boy
all the gpus are ugly af
Lemme find the link
please girl i beg
rude
๐ญ
stop being mean to the poor 4090s
Do GPU makers think women have more money?
It was a 4070 not a 4090 buthttps://www.amazon.co.uk/Galax-GeForce-GDDR6X-192-bit-Graphics/dp/B0C4F51XMC/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=2HEY6FD1JUXPR&keywords=pink+rtx+4090&qid=1694138230&sprefix=pink+4090%2Caps%2C124&sr=8-1
Powered by NVIDIA DLSS 3, ultra-efficient Ada Lovelace architecture, and full ray tracing, the triple fans GeForce RTX 4070 Extreme Gamer features 5,888 CUDA cores and the hyper speed 21Gbps 12GB 192-bit GDDR6X memory, as well as the exclusive 1-Click OC clock of 2550MHz through its dedicated sof...
damnnn its so cute tho
i just saw fan cards. whats the point of them
Mryeester merch now available! https://crowdmade.com/collections/mryeester
All my socials: https://www.mryeester.com
Recommended Thermal Paste: https://amzn.to/3i3HK83
Ryzen 5 3600: https://amzn.to/3eYfQsc
B450 Tomahawk Max: https://amzn.to/3iSSGoa
Red Devil 5700xt: https://amzn.to/3rz6tEq
Dell 1440p 165hz monitor: https://amzn.to/2VfUDTx
As ...
cooling obviously
it looks strong
is it strong enough to replace all of the other fans
its a ridicuolus pc accesory
you dont need one
and dont get one.
its for agps and pci gpus btw
ancient technology
@median quail she found more off topic shit to ask about smh
getting more cooling for some pcie card
definitely not
agps and pci cards
thats what the actual product description of THAT specific one
ahhheemmmmm
exactly
soooooooo:
you don't need it
dont ask about it
if you want to know more, google it on your own time, and dont post about it here
everyone will get very annoyed
just get a whit case, spray paint it pink, it's cheaper than getting a pink case and you can have a decent case rather than being limited
for extra airflow over some components, and tbh you can make your own for cheaper
nope it only helps
less so when it's usable to put infront of raid nvme cards
@trail kayak@magic hemlock way better a card in comparison, and with it, you just take the shroud of, disconnect the fans, lightly sand the shroud and spray paint the shroud whatever colour you wanted
why sand it
so the paint has a texture it can grab on to and not peel off
okay
after all that you just reattach the fans and screw the shroud back down
the fans them self are ARGB so you can set the colouring to pink
similar to what you would do to a case to make it pink
If thatโs the powercolor hellhound the fans are only rgb
Non addressable. They only change the white and blue. Biggest reason I went with the asrock Taichi over the powercolor
booo
yes, though they show it doing purple also in a fe pics
Every post and review I see says blue and white
Tbf tho the blue does look almost purple
Theirs a led switch I believe to switch on/off/and colors
Yea only 2 colors
hmm, well even if left white the led's would make the pink colouring pop
True
Iโd get the asrock Taichi white tbh tho. Itโs fully addressable gradient rgb
Cause just change the color to pink with a white card
well, 4090 anyway
Meh
i honestly might go the t700
that would be a bad choice
you're not doing anything that will gain nor use it's performance
the intel optane is better
nope
but the intel optane drives use u.2
neither of them are a good choice for what you plan on doing
and are discontinued so i probably won't be able to buy them unless i get used
quite literally
tldr of the thread
if this thread gets forced closed by mods and you start another one
i'mma treat it as a troll
kc3000 is the max thats reasonable honestly
how can you make the right conclusion that the 13900ks is overpriced for what you need then you want to get intel optane or a t700
all logic is out the window
they want a 4090, which will be no good for a van life scenario
basically none of the use cases you given even warrent a mega fast ssd
the iops qd1 is the best way to gauge your real world performance
qd32 is the potential max
๐ญ
and yet still in your case and being realistic to it all buying the fastest drive will not help you
If you guys are talking about van life gaming why not go with a laptop with an egpu or even just a laptop it'll be more efficent
or like ROG ally or the deck
egpu would be a poor option, it reduces the performance of any decent gpu
Yeah I was mainly thinking the laptop part and then the egpu popped in my head
and several gaming laptops that have upgradability really are worth going for
i.e. asus tuf a15, a17, rog strix g15,g17
not worth it if you're gaming
How is the framework 16 not worth it for gaming? just interested
i could get a decent 7#40 + 4070 laptop for under 2k and i can upgrade the ram on it + add extra storage
I mean your paying for repairability and upgradability for me it's worth it
but once you need a new cpu/gpu you gotta get a whole new laptop
lol, you'd be doing that on the laptops i just suggested already
You act like other laptops are impossible to repaur
Screen replacement, ram, ssd are easy on most laptops ngl
it has the highest performance for day to day use.
They're getting harder and harder not sayingg impossible
the case of all laptops, and the framework ones are super limited for choice whithoput it costing 1-2k more than what i just said
GPU, CPU, Batteray, motherboard traces, that break ports are known to break on anything
Just buy a laptop now and in 3 years when you wanna upgrade buying another new one would be better than upgrading a framework again
im not getting a laptop right now.
Battery is also really easy to break
dell g15, asus tuf a15/strix g15, lenovo ideapad 3 gaming/legion 5, all with amd cpu's in and with easy upgradability tbf instead, possibly second hand for certain gens, these laptops can be gotten with medium to high specs at reasonable prices, while also have suitable cooling for the pairings, and when bought with an amd cpu inside, they have a longer battery life in comparison to ones that have an intel cpu inside
Gpu and cpu are basically never the failure points or a laptop
for upgrades tho
Again upgrading framework gpu/cpu would cost as much as buying a new laptop
So at that point why not buy a new laptop
there's a couple more, but these are the main ones you can upgrade and repair/replace parts yourself
because that's E-Waste and you lose some repairablity I understand they're pretty close but to me it's a no brainer
Framework still needs to come down in price until it's a viable option for most consumers
It's not ewaste?
Give someone the old laptop?
Use it for something else?
no, but also at the same time, you're selecting some parts that pretty much will be doing what the image woopy showed
It's only ewaste if you throw it away
Sorry I meant it's a worse option cause in the long run it creates more waste
Which framework would still pretty much have that problem if you're throwing away old working cpu/gpus
I appoligize I worded that wrong
It creates less waste imo
It's a lot easier to have a laptop be reused than old framework parts
No because now when the laptop breaks you can't reuse the screen the gpu and cpu it all goes in the trash (or most of it)
Donate it to a tech shop for repairs
You're the one deciding it's ewaste
Also unrepairable laptop you gotta fuck up pretty hard for that to happen
I mean that is partly true it depends on the laptop
You keep saying when it breaks but shit doesn't just randomly break most the time
I just think in the long run there is alot more waste made when you pick a normal laptop over a repairable one. And that doesn't mean the normal one sucks. I personally just think it's worth the investment fort the upgradeable/repairable one.
and I mean stuff does break my sisters laptop wouldn't power on cause the charging port broke
You haven't even listed any good reason or even a source to hack it up
You can definitely get a charging port fixed
You can but it's more expensive and more complex then just swapping in a new port
At the end of the day it's the user who decides if it ends up as ewaste or not
I agree
More complex sure more expensive doubt
The only reason I've seen that I agree with to not get a framework. is that it's not a huge company so who knows how long they will last. and like sure great reason to be sus, but I would be surpised if framework dies
Again it's a decent idea just too expensive to make sense for regular consumers
Right now you're paying extra for a lot less performance and repairability you might not even ever need
if you value your time as anything near min wage which is $7 in the us then yeah it iis more expensive
the USB C port is $9
can we say alot less performance we haven't seen it in action
I thought we only knew the CPU and not the GPU
Oh we do know the GPU's now
Forget what I dsaid I was mistaken
So I know the Laptop is expensive
Is the GPU that expensive
$400 for a RX 7700S
I'm looking for some performance benchmarks
unless it was a thin 'n light then the charging port is not directly soldered to the mainboard
it was a thin and light
I mean again not the perfect comparison
If the RX 7700S is close to a 4060 laptop performance
lower spec cpu version only 16gb of ram and only 500gb of storage
thats 2.4k usd btw
with or without gpu?
with
How did you get that
you can literally get laptopsm with 4080s for that price
tbf a 4070 laptop can be bought for around 1500 tbf
Mine is $2337 with the 7940HS 2x16gbs and 1tb storage
let me check something maybe I forgot to select something
could possibly be cheaper on the us store as well, mind you that is still ridicously overpriced for the performance you get
oh i didnt even pick ports
Yeah I'm like for me with ports that are reasonable
Ethernet
usb C a couple A and a displayport
it's still 2500 which is expensive don't get me wrong
Let me change mine to your parts
and matching your parts with PowerAdapter is 2121
idk I see where your coming from and I'm not denying it's expesive
btw the problem is nothing youre doing day to day can take advanage of the speeds
I just think for alot of people it's worth the cost
And also as tech people at least for me it's just got that extra cool factor
of it being repairable upgradeable and stuff like that
then what benefits from the speeds?
video editors and data centers pretty much frankly
only people who are dealing with 4k+ footage often
if direct storage was good their would be more of an argument for gaming but its garbage currently soo
anything purchased yet?
Dont think so
๐คฃ no
Itโs so sad itโs funny
But itโs also so much more sad, that it wraps around back to sad again
i thought this was for seq r/w
yeah youre thinking of sequential
the t700 has one of the highest random r/w speeds
and you need randoms for?
Itโs the highest, because itโs just straight up faster
not only this but its actually not overpriced. its accurately priced for what it is. its just expensive for some people.
And ssd randoms will be pretty fast anyway
Itโs not worth the price, because you get nothing out of it for gaming
Unless youโre the most enthusiastic file copier
And even then, itโs not really worth it, because gen 4 is already super fast
What even is this
apparently best price to performance
Why do I see at least 4 hdds on there
Also what the fuck Is their rating??? Itโs literally just a number
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
You could make up any bullshit number and say โoh this is the best because I put the biggest number on itโ
userbenchmark type of shit

passmark
again sequential speeds
Fr
Why are you looking at drive benchmarks
Until after 37k messages and 50 off-topic discussions
probably at this point
Please no
i meannnnnn
Tbh if I was trolling I wouldnโt spend so much time on it
like
itโs just a waste of time
to troll this long if she is
so she probably isnโt
so shes just dense
how do you plug in a u.2
did you at least google it?
i dont really understand the adapter
if i ask about what i saw on google. we will be here for awhile.
alr
i just know u.2 is an enterprise connector
we know the same
the u stands for something i forget
its nvme like m.2s but its not an m.2. they are 2.5 form factor ssds
Why do you need to know if itโs an enterprise connector
fr ^
thats just what google told me
plus you dont really need a u.2
i just want to know how its even plugged in
you dont need to know
its better to just tell me. instead of fearing what ill do with the info
im never gonna go
"oh yeah that thing i wanna know? just forget about it"
im not fearing what youll do with the info
its just fucking pointless
you dont need an enterprise ssd
like if im not told here. i will find out one way or another
^^
so you dont know
Yea, because itโs useless information
no really
So what parts do we have now
no fucking idea
I thought weโd done this already in the old thread
im not trying to learn about u.2s again
i just want to see how impractical an optane is
These parts have been picked
sounds like you are
so then how does it plug in then
optane?
the u.2 at least
not all of them, not even close
optane is like a gpu right?
what?
there are pcie cards, and regular m.2s
though the pcie cards may just be carriers for them
yeah like a gpu
(to explain to dream)
oh mb
yeah
storage aic
whats aic?
add in card
ohhh yeah
its just the proper name or whatever
but its just a storage expansion card off the pcie
aic along with msata on laptops together with enterprise technologies influenced how we use m.2 today
depends on how you define it tbh
yeah ig
although, as i said, the intel pcie optanes may just be in m.2 expansion cards
why do we need to talk about enterprise storage again?
yeah they are pcie cards
she wants to know why optane is a bad idea
bro
im p sure the ###p are older and worse than the p####x
they are not as fast, take up more space, and, since theyre no longer being produced, are wildly overpriced
huh?
also, if you do end up getting an ATX x670e, youll have far more m.2 slots than pcie slots, and they will be faster
the ###p
the what?
like 900p here
ohhh
yeah i was confused too
nah, theyre not
1760 MB/s vs 2600MB/s
but the (example, p1600x) is for storage pool caching, not a boot drive
whats that
optane is more like dram than nand, so they can be overwritten many more times than traditional nand, making them perfect caching drives for something like ZFS
if you know what caching is, and you know what storage pools are, it should be easy
knowing dream
wait
is that the right thing?
ive explained pools to her before
still
yeah, using an ssd to speed up hdds or something
ah i see
or using an nvme ssd to speed up sata, but that doesnt usually happen (sata is not worth it for storage servers. its usually either hdds with ssd/ram caching, or high speed nvme without caching because theyre so fast)
yep
but......we're not doing anything with pools so optane is a waste
yeah
why tf cant we just get something like a crucial p5 plus (500GB), and an SN850x (4TB) and call it a day
since she clearly doesnt want gen 3
im p sure you havent
dram is the storage cache right.
im p sure optane is still slower than dram even with 3d xpoint
but maybe the 3d xpoint functions like a dram and maybe its similar to 3d vcache on cpus.
I genuinely think sheโs trolling at this point
Fr I got 970 evo pluses and there amazing
i have
its slower than dram, but still way faster than hdds
the only time i remember talking about "pools" was when i asked about raid support
but you never got into raid 0 or raid 1 or anything
that cant be what you are talking about now
caching storage pools?
no one even talks about them using the word pools.
yes, yes it is
now thats just wrong
and idk what tf "cashing" is
nope
thats not how its spelled
you are the only one i ever heard talk about raid with pools
who have you heard talk about raid
it makes way more sense the way i learned it
rather than it being some vague understanding of storage pools lmao
this hasnt helped me at all
just left me with more questions
idek why tf you are bringing up raid rn
how, actually how
that was you, not me
nope
yes it fucking was
Have you consider the concept that you may be beyond anyones help
i said optane is used for caching of storage pools
you
I mean you did get infatuated with USB for like 2.5 weeks so
and you refuse to tell what that is lmao
and you said the only time i brought up pools was when you asked about raid
Probably cause its irrelevant
do you know how long it takes to look up "cach definition" on google?
....
whats even the point
also, im so tired of everyone thinking they know my use case so well.
Well your gonna be in a van not a data center so
we are all incredibly tired of explaining useless things to you. if you tell me to leave because i wont look up a word for you....
Don't think you need enterprise drives lol
Google be hitting different tho
then leave. i dont get it lmao
?
joke
you are the one using the word tf? you dont have the common decency to explain what you are saying because you get off to some power kick
fine, here you go. are you happy now?
Well then your beyond anybodies help
If it helps, the word is underlined in the definition. Meaning that if you click it, it'll explain what those adjectives mean too
im literally just asking wtf he means by caching lmao
high speed data storage that makes retrieval of frequently accessed data much faster
Maybe lookup the definition of caching lol
memory caching yano
thats just cache you dumbass
๐ค
cache and caching is the same you dumbass
i already know what cache is
what the fuck
then why are you asking lol
you didnt even explain it to me
Cache is the noun, caching is the verb. They are the same thing, don't worry
cause the mf was saying some shit about how caching and pools and raid are all the same thing
ffs
No no this is too complicated dumb it down a bit more please
๐ญ
and its like
i never ever said that, wtf
dont use optane, end of story. dont ask about it anymore
you dont get it
im literally not going to stop
Why don't you google it
or youtube it
im not handing every to you on a silver platter
and neither does anyone else want to
๐
Noone with a reasonably sized brain anyway
Okay genuine question
"whats caching"
hmmm maybe i should google it, because itll give the most direct answer
If you knew what cache was, what was unknown about caching?
what they meant
^
caching is another form of cache
i dont want to seem rude, but did you even learn parts of speech?
just dont even bother "helping"
-ing is used for verbs, so caching is just the action of what a cache does. Does that make sense or?
How can I clarify it
tbh probably not
Help me help you
what the actual fuck
Was stuck on usb terminology for 2 weeks
Never in my life have I seen someone so incapable of grasping knowledge right infront of them
Dream, please answer the question. I'm not mocking you, it was a legit question ๐ญ
yeah
Wait so.. you don't know or do you know
I'm not trying to mock but at this point like how did you make it through public school curriculum
๐ญ now I'm confused
Honestly
I'm confused how that's a thumbs down ๐ญ I asked if you knew, you said yes, I asked if you could define it, you said no. So do you know it or do you not know it?
I am asking a legit question
why are you mad that, after 37k messages, people are understandably tired of your either useless, or painfully googleable questions (like "whats caching", even though you should know its the same as cache)
also the fact that we're either half, or less than half through the part selection
Has anything been bought lol
not that i know of
Not sure theirs actually a pc being built at the point
There hasn't been ๐
Most unfortunate of oofs
did you read the link i sent?
that would maybe help
this bullshit ngl
as you want to
1: game
2: folding
3: boinc
4: ai
5: video edit (hobbiest level not professional production based level)
A) anything over a gen 3 drive will literally be pointless as you will see no performance enhancements for any of it
B) the cpu's IPC will be mattering the most
C) the COMPUTE POWER of the gpu will matter for the last 3 options
D) the CUDA cores for rendering if you're using adobe software and streaming it
E)if using davinci resolve for video editing then any NVIDIA gpu is pointless as it gives no advantage over any AMD gpu especially if you're going for AV1 instead of H.264 as nvidia cards are only good for h.264 meanwhile amd cards are good at h.265 (primarily) and av1 (7000 series only) meanwhile intel's offering of gpu's also excel at AV1 and are much cheaper compared to both, but at the same time isn't that great for gaming with (yet, next gen may change that)
mobo is not be sorted out, nor has ssd properly
it's one style, STOREmi is amd's own way of storage caching, there is also another program that works the same way though it's only worth using if, and only if you're using hdd's and in dreams own case that's a really big NO
that's because there's nothing much needed to say about them, raid 0 = stripping or otherwise known as spreading data chunks over several drives, raid 1 = mirroring or otherwise known duplicating what one drive has to another drive
and unless you're building a NAS there is no need to use any kind of raid
not even JBOD
hell with AI alone you will need more than just the compute power, the amount of ram for compiling with the cpu, as well as the amount of cores, realistically you should be going intel not amd
@noble maple think you might of missed it when i compared a pc to the human brain, as that is the most accurate analogy for them
im pretty sure this is mostly about sequential speeds for better video editing
the t700 and the optane have some of the highest random r/w on the market
at first i thought the t700 was just a sequential horse
but that's not the case
..
yeah all of that is fractions of seconds when comparing a gen 3 drive to a gen 5
okay but im looking at almost all of these motherboards, and they all come with gen 5
i havent seen a 3x2 m.2 slot
unless it was paired with sata3
why not put a gen 5 or even a gen 4 in there
you guys will literally see that my build is high budget, and just decide, nah we arent doing that
theres a couple other options besides the t700
but some of them dont make sense to me
ffs, YOU ARE NOT DOING PRODUCTION BASED VIDEO editing at all
again that is seq not rnd
just go for a fast gen 4 ๐
and this results in not even Needing a single gen 4 drive ever
i get a gen 4 drive, gen 5 is silly though ๐
no we see it as someone being more troll like and burning money for a build that'll never happen
also no as file editing tends to be large files not small ones
another reason i like the t700 is cause it doesnt seem to perform worse than it's 2tb version
and idc about the heatsink cause it comes with the heatsink just like ram
and a completely pointlessly stupid purchase as you're not in a company doing a big production video edit for something like a movie
where the speed of that drive will be used and needed because of the video being shot in 4-8K
even in AI, it would not be able to make use of 1/4 the performance of the drive
again that is only the sequential speed
no it fucking isn't
it is not small files at all
so random r/w determines the video editing performance?
sequential for small files
randoms for large files
for the transfering of it, yes
i was told the opposite
that seq isnt really helpful unless you are doing a lot of video editing
which is for the likes of video editing in a production setting
literally looking for any drive above gen 3 in your specific case will be a false purchase for the performance
some gen 4's might be ok just due to their price, but you will not be using even half their speed for their performance
resulting in REAL WORLD USAGE of the system as 0 performance gains
you could pick out the best of everything and end up with using only 1% of it's total performance with the other 99% sitting there doing sweet fuck all
does the 990 pro come in 4tb?
search on pcpp
though wasted performance for the drive with what you want to do
yeah im p sure the 990 pro hasnt released the 4tb yet
NVMe Samsung SSD 990 PRO with Heatsink 2TB it looks like this 990 pro has the best performance of them
still would be half the performance used at best
a lot of ssds of the same model usually perform worse at higher capacities even if they are both tlc
but the t700 4tb seems to retain it's performance and capacity
as if the gen 5 speed allows it to contend with gen 4 ssds that are 2tb
for this reason i will probably move away from the 990 pro + heatsink
because it only comes in 2tb
the t700 isnt the only ssd to achieve this tho
but XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 4TB is also able to perform similar to gen 4 2 tb ssds
except that it is also gen 4 and it is 4tb
capacity performance differences are usually just because of data density, but that doesnt seem to be the case since they are both tlc
so whatever performance difference there is must be relatively minor and due to innate higher capacities having more overhead
and pretty much for cooling purposes all gen 3 drives laugh, half the gen 4 drives laugh, and gen5 drives act like that avergae snowflake trying to find a safe space
yeah but they come with a heatsink and its actually not a big deal
perfomance wise doe not mean a larger capacity drive performs the samy as a smaller capacity drive
there's multiple other variables like type of cache and size
yeah but im talking about differences within the same drives
so like 990 pro heatsink vs no heatsink
990 pro 1tb vs 2tb
also if i do a boot drive the t700 1tb is still a good option too
i can rule out the sabrent rocket 4
but i might do the sabrent rocket 4 1 tb for the boot drive
no, no it is not
a t700 is wasted as a boot drive
literally will be no faster than a sn570 for loading up your OS
it's not like a v8 vs straight 6 in a drag race for speed
you will have no gains, the speed will not be used
you will see no real world performance from it in a boot drive
is this cars
idk anything about cars
again throwing money away because "oh it's fast, it must be the best to use"
yes
when the v8 = gen 4 and the straight 6 = gen 5
the way your pc will be like 90% of the time
im already aware of this
this will be what your storage be like as well
in performance especially when it comes to the os loading up
which tbh also proves my point of, no real world performance gains
i can already give you a straight up setup that would match to what you're wanting from the system just as easily as any one else on here, the thing is, you're treating it as "got to have the fastest of everything for my system to be able to do what i want"
which totally is not the case
nothing traditional about it tbh
for an OS drive, anything over a gen 3 nvme is a waste of a drive
this one is pointless considering what you want to do with your system
also that sn570 is 2tb
and i use a 500gb version of it
ffs stop looking at optane
๐
^^^
But likeโฆโฆ..does it matter?
because how they asked previously, though in the long run, b650/650e still the better mobo
What are we looking at rn
no idea bro
the picture above hurts my brain
yes
The x670e one is so confusing
should i get qlc ssd for anything?
ik how it works and its for more capacity but like is it better for anything or just always worse lol
If you get a game drive, that could be qlc
okay and why is that
QLC tends to have slower endurance than TLC but for those interested in gaming, unlikely they'll accumulate enough data to need a TLC. There are good QLC SSDs though like Intel 660p
If you're interested in matching speed with TLC but don't want to pay as much, you could match SLC and QLC
Cause games can't take advantage of it
i already know about psuedo slc drives that act like dram
^^
dram is still better than slc
You can go higher up if you want to, but you could also buy a QLC for storage and use a TLC as a boot drive
how large is the pseudo slc usually?
like whats the cap on that part of the drive
PCIe 4.0 x4 interface, NVMe 1.3 compliant. APST/ASPM/L1.2 support. Supports SMART and TRIM functions. Works in an enclosure. Wide flash compatibility. Uses TLC with DRAM. Advanced endurance features for a long drive lifespan. Upgradeable firmware and software support. 4.0-capable motherboard and M.2 heatsink are recomm
might do this for a boot drive
Wdym
Thatโs fine. Iโd recommend the 500gb version
wait this is only for the PS5 isnt it
500 as in 512?
and are 512gb boot drives better than 1tb boot drives?
Itโs compatible with the ps5. You can also use it for your pc
Thereโs no difference other than size. Most people get a 500gb one because they donโt need any bigger
You can get either, it doesnโt really matter.
oh my god not u.2 again
no it means you'd need an adapter, and also would be a dumb thing to get
stop trying to go for server stuff in a pc that isn't a server
does the adapter come with the mb or with the u.2 ssd?
neither, it's optional and should not be touched
at this point it'll never be built and it'll have parts that will never work together
so intel optane doesnt provide you with the adapter for their ssds?
duh
and intel optane is not a drive for you to use
so get it out of your little head
doesn't matter, it's not a drive for you to use
wtf do you think a sas connector is?
u.2 is part of sas
and you have no need for any kind of sas drive
ik that
you are not running a server
but this doesnt look like sas to me
so there would be no storage on the kit tho
like whats the point of shaping it like a real m.2
because it's an adapter you have to add a cable to ffs
and yet again, you are not doing a server
simply put you have no need for this
i dont see why the cable cant just plug into the mkey slot
you're researching into the wrong area
or why there isnt a cable thats just mkey to u.2
why mount the adapter to an action replay looking dumby card
because it's not directly compatible and you need some circuitry to convert it, hence the fucking adapter
its really. mkey to whatever this connector is and then this to u.2
and still, you have no need for this
that makes sense
sas and u.2 that ive seen dont look like the square connector on the u.2 kits im seeing
sas and u.2 that ive seen dont look like the square connector on the u.2 kits im seeing
FUCK OFF WITH THE SAS
my 4 year old niece would of picked out parts by now for a pc
so you dont know what that connector is personally?
i do, it fucking tells you on the board
if you dont know, that's fine. i will keep searching.
i already am using it in my nas build
not for van life, you would need that remotely stored somewhere else
i have a HBA card, it's essentially the same thing while using full sized sas connectors not mini ones
so you are saying this square connector is called mini sas
read what it says on the fucking picture, it directly says that ffs
im guessing that is a yes . . . ?
found it ๐
๐ thank you~
so now for my next question, does the u.2 adapter throttle speeds and act like a bottleneck?
fucking says it duh, you have the reading comprehension of a toddler
i just feel like using an adapter on a u.2 ssd will slow it down, but im not sure
and dont quite get all the in depth research on building a PC
ps im coming from a much friendlier place than the above...
๐ซถ
this is the third one they've done in build a pc with no actual pc designed nor built
i know ive been following for a lil bit
i just want to see their POV to all the depth
so now for my next question, does the u.2 adapter throttle speeds and act like a bottleneck?
and discussing irrelevant storage options for a build that will be going in a van
coz in some sense it is a bit unnecessary but also maybe they just wanna learn i guess
and we wonder why the threads kept getting locked
i agree with you to an extent. there is no need to search all this for a normal gaming PC but we dont need to be a dick. we can simply just move on
its not a gaming pc
what is it for?
i initially put gaming as the #1 use case just cause i had a different batch of people back then and i was on cpu
it's primary roll is gaming, anything else is secondary
so to mitigate the people i had back then, i had to put gaming as #1
it is not
which is why i mostly ignore the use case statements
@toxic apex summarised it way earlier
poor take, use case matters, what i listed is the use's it will be for
partially
anyway tho, lets get back to topic please.
the rest of it is secondary functions and features as all of it can be done on any gaming machine
and again, no sas drives
such a shitty topic though
i just want to know if the u.2 kit will bottleneck a u.2 ssd
and the topic needs to be put as part iii not part ii
or if the adapter will slow down the u.2 ssd
it will be going a sas speed/nvme speed depending on what drive is use
and even still, you are not needing it nor will ever be using it
so it does limit the speeds of the u.2 ssd?
so plugging the u.2 ssd into a proper u.2 port is always better then?
depends on the drive, and still not something you need or will ever use
i tried asking google days ago. but i couldnt find anything.
how so
3x4 for example sounds like a bottleneck
(i already know gen 3 is fast)
it's not ffs
how so
gen 3 = pcie 3.0
ik that
and the x4 means 4 lanes
ik that
means it will be running at pcie 3.0 x4 at most
yeah that doesnt sound great but thats okay
nothing else needed to be said about it
you know what also doesn't sound great, using a u.2/sas drive as your os drive
well ig i just want to know if adapters / the u.2 kit forwards the speeds of the u.2 ssd and doesnt impact speed at all
OR
if it slows down the speed of the u.2 ssd.
not selecting your mobo before selecting anything else after the ram and cpu
so yeah i actually can't access my mb notes atm as i am away, and i dont want to stray away from the current topic though.
๐
with out that, you will never know what you can get to work with it
i would have picked a mb much earlier but i didnt know what everything on the mb was
It doesnโt matter what everything is
i disagree. lets just leave it at that
back to topic tho.
well ig i just want to know if adapters / the u.2 kit forwards the speeds of the u.2 ssd and doesnt impact speed at all
OR
if it slows down the speed of the u.2 ssd.
Why are you still talking about u.2?
cause im trying to figure something out. i am willing to go as fast or as slow as i am being helped.
i pretty much wont be satisfied until i figure it out. and im trying to look around. i can't find anything.
Do you think you could go fast enough to where you can pick a motherboard before 3000 messages
after i get an answer, i can proceed.
A U.2 SSD port is a type of interface that allows for the connection of Solid State Drives to a computer or server. It was primarily designed for enterprise and high-performance computing environments. U.2 ports use the 2.5-inch form factor, similar to traditional hard drives, but they are specifically designed to accommodate SSDs, which are much faster and more reliable than mechanical hard drives.
Compatibility: U.2 ports are commonly found on enterprise-grade motherboards, server boards, and some high-end consumer motherboards. They provide backward compatibility with SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) and SATA (Serial ATA) drives, making it easier to upgrade storage solutions without requiring a complete overhaul of existing hardware.
Performance: U.2 SSDs support high-speed data transfer rates, often utilizing the NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express) protocol. This results in significantly faster read and write speeds compared to traditional SATA SSDs.
Hot-Swappability: Some U.2 drive bays and enclosures support hot-swapping, allowing you to replace or upgrade SSDs without powering down the entire system. This feature is particularly important in mission-critical server environments.
Power Delivery: U.2 ports typically provide more power to the connected SSDs compared to M.2 slots, ensuring that the drives receive the necessary power for optimal performance.
Enterprise Applications: U.2 SSDs are commonly used in enterprise servers, data centers, and high-performance workstations where reliability, speed, and data integrity are crucial.
Physical Compatibility: U.2 drives come in a 2.5-inch form factor, which makes them compatible with the standard 2.5-inch drive bays found in many server and storage enclosures.
While U.2 SSDs are less common in consumer-grade systems due to their enterprise focus, they offer impressive performance and durability for applications that demand high-speed, high-capacity storage solutions.
And google.com will give you that answer
the message count is because of everyone else
nope
Did you copy and paste that from google?
i already know what a u.2 is
what is it you want to know then
chatGPT lol
the difference between the speeds?
Then you should not itโs not for consumers
i want to specifically know,
if the u.2 kit / adapter that must be used (if the mb doesnt have a u.2 port) slows down the speed of the u.2 ssd SINCE it must go through an u.2 adapter instead of going directly through a u.2 port
okay fair. now i wanna ask what type and how big are the files hypothetically going to be?
i dont know the answer to this question.
but essentially the adapter does not affect the speed you are limited to the ports speed
so if you are connecting via SATA then you are limited to the SATA ports speed
which is still not slow
well depending on the use case
so do you know this for sure? or are you just assuming?
like do you have a source (since googling it is so easy)
just a simple source to verify that information.
if you cant find the answer on google, then you should know its a shitty question
rule of thumb. anything that is NOT connected via external ports (I/O ports on the back of your motherboard or case) is not limited to cable speed (UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE ON PACKAGING)
what i am saying is USB cables and ethernet cables etc have speed ratings on them. internally it is all technology based. like is it using SATA or NVME or U.2
U.2 uses NVMe based technology
but because you dont have a port for it
ik this already
u.2 doesnt use sata tho
FOR EXAMPLE: if you connect a U.2 SSD to a motherboard via a SATA adapter, you'll be limited by the SATA interface's speed, which is slower than PCIe.
i dont think it can plug in via a sata adapter
the u.2 connector is very similar tho
so then are most optane drives 3x4 then? by this logic
If you're using a PCIe adapter for your U.2 SSD, make sure you connect it to a PCIe slot that provides enough lanes for your needed performance. For the maximum speed use x4 or x8
this idk
i dont think ive seen many x8 ssds
if any
x8 is for more than 1
i only mean m.2 slots not pcie slots. (ik m.2 uses pcie tho)