#♡ i am still building my first pc ever ♡
1 messages · Page 14 of 1
Can we talk about something other than usbs
Bc if you’re gonna buy a mobo just for usbs then that’s a waste of money on another level.
lmao fr bro
the mobo i got was cuz it was cheap
nothing else
110 for a b450 and 5 1600
It was once not related to USB at all, but found in USB-C now
It was once an independent port, up til TB3 when it became integrated with USB-C
the tech was codeveloped by Apple and Intel
hence why it’s only found on Intel machines be it laptop or desktop, now that apple ditched their CPUs
Thunderbolt 1/2 are long obsolete
Thunderbolt 4 should be out now yes
yes
Became standard when 11th Gen Intel processors rolled out
TB5 isn’t a thing yet
I suppose you can think of Thunderbolt as a speed/bandwidth buff to regular USB-C
yeah you have
TB3? allows a max bandwidth of 40Gb iirc compared to 20Gbps max reg USB-C
probably wrong, likely a bit faster or slower
so thunderbolt 4 is the best one
.-.
Well you don’t have the others no more
unless it’s second hand stuff
or older models
Again, verification recommended
well i didnt realize thunderbokt was a usb
so what is it tho
cause ik thunderbolt isnt a type c connector. it just uses the connector
is thunderbolt like a spec? like how usb 3.2 1x1 is a spec or how usb 2.0 is a spec??
It isn’t lmao
@spare sedge look at this
Probably added hardware to a USB-C port
And u do need specialised cables to attain Thunderbolt speeds
its the same connector as usb, and has usb capabilities, but it is not usb
yes thunderbolt has a spec. we are on thunderbolt 4, for example
No you’re not, content vastly differs in a real one
I suppose you mean graduating from the theory part of a computer hardware/electronics engineering degree
yeah so thunderbolt 4 is the spec. but the connector is usbc
as opposed to others that use usbc with specs like USB 3.2 gen 2x2 etc
so it would seem its just a spec maybe
but its a good spec
and it seems to be always better than same gen usb
so its a lot like dp vs hdmi
kind of just premium usb now
it looks like tb1 and tb2 use mini dp. i had never even heard about mini dp until tb. and honestly it just looks like a type b
and then tb3 and tb4 use usbc
so it would seem usb4 is actually more confusing than it would have wanted to be
usb 1, usb 2, usb 3.2 10gbps = usb 3.2 1x1, 1x2 and 2x1 are all supported 100%
however, usb 3.2 20gbps = usb 3.2 2x2 is optional so the backward support is optional but the base 20gbps speed is supported 100%
40gbps speed on usb4 is also optional. so it wont always be 40gbps
dp and dp alt mode are both 100% guaranteed.
all those old host problems and communication stuff with that are all fixed 100%
but pcie is optional
thunderbolt is optional
and idk what usbc alt mode is
a big reason im also confused is
if thunderbolt isnt a usb. then why does usb4 want to support thunderbolt when thunderbolt uses a usbc connector
its so strange
its almost as if thunderbolt is trying to phase out dp
and that thunderbolt is just a new vga, dvi, hdmi, dp cable
but the difference with those is that
vga uses vga connector
dvi uses dvi connector
hdmi uses hdmi connector
dp uses dp connector
tb uses usbc lmao
which makes sense cause usbc wants to phase out all usb connectors
which would be nice
so its like the naming with usb4 is simple but its cause all the different usb4 options are literally hidden to you as a consumer
so nothing like usb4 2x2 or 3x2. to explain 20 gbps or 40 gbps to the end user.
so then
would it be better to have tb4? or usb4?
and then if usb4 supports tb3 and tb4 then whats the difference
when tb is supposed to be a pcie + dp cable
its as if the usb4 and thunderbolt specs are trying to merge
and so far this gen. it is not successful tbh. only partially merged tbh
so tb3 = 40gbps
tb4 = 40gbps
but tb4 has 32gbps pcie whereas tb3 has 16gbps
USB and thunderbolt is a fucking giant rabbit hole
It's awful and I don't understand it and I don't want to understand the mess that is the 'standard'
i understand all the stupid usb stuff.
but the thunderbolt stuff is also kind of dumb
And it's not like the bandwidth matters to the end user if all they're going to do is use a USB3 stick which will never come close to saturating the bandwidth availability
And DisplayPort usage through Thunderbolt, well, cards that use USB-C as an output are automatically thunderbolt cause no other protocol allows for display over USB-C
why are usb sticks / flash drives worse. ive heard that before growing up
i thought usb4 does now
and i know now that thunderbolt isnt really new. but before during tbunderbolt 1/2 it was just not as well known because of the shitty mini dp connector.
usbc was huge for thunderbolt 3/4
They're limited to USB 3.0 speeds
Which isn't exactly slow lol
But they're still limited
There are no USB 4.0 or thunderbolt flash drives
thats definitely true
how do i know a motherboard has a thunderbolt port? i dont understand how it can just say its thunderbolt when its just a usbc. and when i was scouring it never popped up
cause a thunderbolt port is just gonna be a usbc port
but we have a few different types of usbc now.
It will be stated in the spec sheet, as well as having a little symbol next to the port
ik thunderbolt symbol is nice. but how do you know if it is tb3 or tb4
and then tb1 or tb2 are basically phased out now?
ive never even heard of mini dp ports being a thing
and if they are, like why dont we see more of them if its just dp but smaller.
maybe one day we will get micro dp lmao
We do. It’s on laptops and workstation cards mostly.
Don't need a smaller connector when you don't need a lot of display outs ig 🤷
Motherboard spec sheet
Not sure why it’s not on consumer cards but i’m guessing since there’s space, they use regular DP for compatibility.
Also miniDP is kinda redundant now anyways when USB-C DP exists
It would not be surprising to see miniDP being phased out soon, especially on laptops
so tbh i never actually saw it in the spec sheet either
and buildzoid mentions something about how its never in the spec sheet or something
which is also something im confused about
because i analyzed the usb to the bone.
ik all the usb on those motherboards
but if tb is on any of them (which they should be) it wasnt mentioned at all
can we find a mb together for some examples so i know what phrasing to look for. its just so unclear to me
Oh if buildzoid states that they don't mention it then I believe him
The only way you'd find out then is by looking through motherboard manuals, or knowing what controllers imply which standards are used
In any case, just remember
You're likely never actually going to use the thunderbolt port anyway lol
do you know what the controllers are called
im guessing its probably listed normally on intel mbs
and idk why amd does this
or maybe just am5
It's listed just as badly don't you worry
lol oof
they do well with dp. like it'll just be usb 3.2 gen 2 with dp. simple.
why cant they just be like. usb 3.2 gen 2x2 with thunderbolt 3
a friend showed me this just now
That has some really weird storage choices
Ok wtf are we still fricking at usb for 3 week
thunderbolt is different
the ram for the monstrous tier is funnier
5200 kek
13900ks with with 5200
then spending $500 on a case
lel
should just buy a lancool 3
its the perfect case
because the method of connection is much slower than sata or whatever
absolutely not
tell me 1 flaw
u need a v3000 plus
it supports 420mm aios
ok thats a sick case
how much is one
like 450
if i was gonna use all internal rads id get one prob
but external too optimal
hm
Depends
I have a couple Samsung flash drives that have usb 10Gb
I mean, it was faster in a 10Gb port than a 5Gb port
Theoretical bandwidth capabilities almost never reflect real world numbers
yeah, i just copied a video, and it was 60MB/s
so is thunderbolt 4 better than dp 2.1a?
and is thunderbolt 4 better than pcie gen 5?
really wonder how you came to either of those conclusions
those are questions
not conclusions
thunderbolt carries dp and pcie
i already know how it stacks up against usb
40gbps its basically just better than usb4
if the cable has display port 2.1
when i say worse i mean its bandwidth
compared to a direct connection
Thunderbolt can carry DisplayPort and PCIe signals
But only pcie x4
Thunderbolt 4 is just the top spec of usb 4
i thought usb4 was 40gbps? its actually worse cause the spec standards are sometimes not as strict on companies to get the cert so usb4 is one of those. meaning yoi can actually get a 20gbps usb4 since that is the minimum rated.
despite this. ik usb4 is dual lane
thunderbolt tho im p sure can go to 8 lanes.
and thunderbolt 3 has weird royalty fees which i remember being a thing pre covid
thunderbolt 4 is more strict on their minimum ratings and is royalty free
so most thunderbolt is x4? i heard some could do x8?
It’s 40 or 80
Or maybe 120
Not that I know of
if thats the case its definitely queen of usb but still not good enough to be top in pcie
usb 4 v2
Actually it is, it’s the top spec of usb 4
that makes sense im reading an article on that now
thunderbolt really is just the dp of usb
since dp is just premium hdmi
it even daisy chains like dp does
except hdmi can do ethernet, and dp cant. also, dp uses an extra pair of wires for data transfer instead of a clockcycle (like hdmi)
Ok dream, what part is next
but anyway, you probably wont get thunderbolt because its an intel thing
but yes, whats next
amd boards can have thunderbolt/tb controlers
^
she 100% has 0 use for thunderbolt though
but probably will end up wanting anyway
...
unless she specifically looks for a mb with it, but we need to keep her from doing that
She like usb so much lol
optimizing usb choices just to end up only plugging in a keyboard and mouse
i use more usb than my motherboard has
If she doesn’t switch anything/need to troubleshoot within a decade this’ll need to happen all over again lmao
This knowledge probably won’t help anyone by then aside from retro fanatics
Rear IO included?
well, i basically only use my rear io
but i got a usb card and most of them are plugged into that, because i wanna keep my 10gb ports just in case
Which leads me to ask, any (theoretical) performance differences between rear and front IO?
maybe some miniscule latency, but you get that anyway with any usb hub. realistically, theyre identical
Hmm is your airflow setup reverse flow or smth
???
Because if I dedicated myself to rear IO I’d be blushing from the exhaust
Probably cuz im stupid enough to have it facing me 💀
oh, my rear io isnt facing me
I mean a mirror on the wall behind it would really help with placement
if it isn’t facing u
i have a usb hub on my desk that i use for quick plugging usb devices
provided you realise shit is backwards
if you want low latency, thats what the ps2 port is for!
One of the useless things I remember about it
And don’t you have to restart PC when you plug something in
Or when the peripheral is disconnected
when you plug ps2 in?
Yes something along those lines
“For security reasons”
wait wdym
Wikipedia had some words on how it was for device security back in the day
or maybe that was it’s predecessor
IBM 5-pin and all that
Ahm not really, HDMI can do audio and Ethernet too with a single port and cable
pretty sure dp can do audio too
lemme check for sure tho
Doesn’t seem to have much support from what I see
even in Linux there’s an option for HDMI audio but not DisplayPort (Linux mint 21.12)
it can do audio
Ic
HDMI Ethernet is dead tbh
yeah lol
last I heard it was supposedly for Nintendo switch and the lot
tvs have wifi now so ppl just use that
Yep
well consider it’s full acronym
High Definition Media Interface
Didn’t state what media specifically 🤷
i mean how do you "inject" ethernet into hdmi
its doable
You unplug it and lost display at the same time (manually)
well obviously
Can’t say how for the cable, but it has to do with the TV being compatible with HEC (HDMI Ethernet Channel)
which has either its own separate processor or baked into the TVs primary one
from what I’m seeing
Not sure which it is
it doesnt really matter anyway, so i dont wanna discuss it here anymore
this doesnt matter at all
its open source
It's allso not open source
Fact
i didnt think so
It is “open source”
But devices that choose to be won’t be termed “Thunderbolt”
So if they aren’t released with the certification (usually PCIe but connected via USB devices like an eGPU) they never get it
for thunderbolt 4, all it means is that intel has validated that the usb 4 port(s) on the device have all the optional capabilities available
Right
it depends per port / per header. theres 4 types of headers
we're obviously comparing identical speced port/headers
whats ps2
mice and keyboards used it before usb
Actually creeper I see a use for Thunderbolt in dreams case
ps2 port
It can do power delivery minimum 15W and up to 100W
has the lowest delay out of all input types i think
why would that be useful
She plans on van life
probably least belongings best solution
is it noticeable? no
is it cool? yeah
otherwise no different to living in a cramped mini home
van life seem trash
she'll need some big battery anyway, which will have high power usb/power outlets anyway
Yea
so its still useless
eh
rather than run a 10m cable
speaking of vanlife, is that confirmed
So her phone doesn’t slip behind it and she loses it
@spare sedge
How much lower :p
0.1ms vs 1ms?
i dont know
miliseconds so few that its just fractions of human reaction speed xD
all i know about it is that it bypasses some stuff and gets the input instantly
Are there any drawbacks aside from general obscurity using PS/2
Seems maybe macros won’t work
there arent any devices made in the last 5 years
Do adapters exist 🙂
then whats the point
And you will get probably a delay from it
thats just buying ewaste for a stupid connector
great
whether you buy one for a ps2 keyboard to plug into usb, or a usb keyboard to plug into ps2
oh right, also, no more rollover
Nowadays
tbf only like really cheap keyboards have rollover but still
so you can press every key and its recognized?
If you mean the keyboard itself
Yes
That’s the one decent feature on “gaming keyboards”
Logitech has 26-key rollover
perfect for spamming
i mashed my face in my $30 keyboard and all of the keys worked
Despite a USB connection
lol
I just drop the keyboard packaging on the board itself to test
Or rather, smack the keys with it
fair
genius
because the packaging is large enough to press all of ‘em
Another way to test basic rollover is to use a website key tester
yeah
press two or more keys and see if they simultaneously register onscreen
thats what i did
Most valid result = combine both strategies
yeah lol
To see if mine even works 
probably tape some dumbbells on top too so there’s enough force applied
and use both arms to smack with the packaging
so violent
Just another CoD noob raging
Says the woopyman who can probably woop my ass
im like only bones
yep
low polling rate
maxes out around 250hz
usb can run 8khz+
okay i remember these
in this case there shouldnt be any difference between a usba 2.0 header and a usba 2.0 port on the rear io in terms of performance.
@spare sedge thoughts?
nope
its been confirmed
alrighty then
youre making me want to play it
i like racing
looks kind of like retro analog gaming tho which i also like
get on
eh kinda true
dude i tried forza once before and hit every wall imaginable
it looks realistic af when u look at details though
forza physics are shit
play a real racing game
euro truck
idk whats better though for drivign realistically, euro truck or city car driving
it takes practice (and a good handling car)
cause like the entire point of city car driving is for the most realistic driving learning experience
?
assetto server
custom cars on it arent super realistic
i dont have assetto corsa
is there a point in going for the ultimate edition or nah
u need it for a lot of servers
so much..
No
jak x
so real
i think im nearing the end of thunderbolt research
not only is thunderbolt better.
but it has been for a long long time
tb2 was almost on par with usb4 and tb3 and tb4 are better
but usb4 carries tb3 so its weird
thunderbolt 4 is just the top spec of usb 4 so.....
what?
so they are virtually the same except usb4 can have a lower spec for approval
yes
cause usb4 doesnt do audio video but the tb3 in it allows it to.
what makes usb4 so good is literally the thunderbolt in it lol
it depends. usb 4 can do a lot of things, or it can do none of them
which is really ass imo
this means if you get usb4 and its rated for 40gbps its basically the same as thunderbolt 3 and you shouldnt really care at that point
thunderbolt 4 is just a safe buy cause its even more strict with protocols
its not the same as thunderbolt 3, unless it has all the other special capabilities thunderbolt 3 has
again, it depends
not really
yes really
even if usb4 is 40gbps its not better
not only this but they did it sooner than usb4
usb4 is really just catching up
like microsoft edge lmao
when it got chromium
catching up to what
best browser
um
anyway tho
argue against it all you want, its the truth
well, with bing search, yes
only browser enthusiasts know
idk why u would use edge without bing
lol
should have seen my web browser research compared to thjs
so in the end. dp is still the best
sure
weve established that already
dp vs hdmi is easy. learned that one already
dont ask about dvi
i just didnt even know tb was in the running until now
i already know everything about dvi vga
i was using a dual monitor set up on my purple laptop in 2009 with vga.
so.. when is the motherboard getting picked
itx, matx or atx
and edit the post
itx will prob be the best for vans
cause its usually the cheapest
lmao
what?
and easier to build in
dream if you get an itx board will you go itx case?
cause itx is a bitch to build in
yea
+harder to fit large sized gpus
yo first you said itx is the best becaause its easier to build in, and then said its a bitch to build in
what
when
start here
I think he meant atx is easier
the best for vans
cause its the smallest
so it doesnt occupy space
and easier but a bitch to build in?
ATX is easier to build in
wait wont dream have to air cool if she goes itx case
it depends on the case
and anyway, the 7950x3d is only 130w, so itll be pretty easy to cool
idk about the liquid suprim 4090 tho
did she decide on that
axp120 should be enough if LP is needed
gpu
yeah
yes
but yeah, gl making a 4090 fit in itx cases
does it though?
Yes
matx might be the play
it doesn’t really matter though because most 4080s and 4090s are overbuilt
hows this mb
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/cRQcCJ/msi-pro-b650m-a-wifi-micro-atx-am5-motherboard-pro-b650m-a-wifi
😭
what
it’s not a bad board for what dream wants as of what I know
I missed like 5k messages 😅
why that emoji
i refuse to elaborate
im just looking at pcpartpicker.
why
going from an x670e to the msi pro b650m
x670e is better for atx
matx is only b650
the only x670e is like $570
and whats wrong with that
Ngl display ports 2.0 is pretty dank glad the 7900 xtx has it
Think the 4090 is stuck on 1.4 but that May just be the reference model
Really no need for it yet tho. No gpu can really utilize DP 2.0 fully so
Weird take
Isn’t there less features on the itx x670e rather than the atx?
Well, yes
I mean more of a weird word to use
It's not necessarily any better than B650, just depends on the features the user needs on the board for whatever form factor they pick
She wants to know a little too much about everything
Yeah…way too much
ill check it out at 10pm
Must I point out that’s not a 4090 and there isn’t custom looping in there
If you’re looking at the picture in the original post, that’s not the pc being built. That’s the esthetic example
Ah okay
thats if you want matx instead of itx, which may be better for van life, because it has slightly more expansion, and the cases are bigger (making it easier to build in)
it literally just depends on the feature set
if an atx board has 1 extra usb. then i dont care lmao
Well mATX is nothing compared to ITX in terms of size reduction
literally slice the bottom 1/4 off and you get mATX, at least the slightly bigger ones
first thing i will say about msi mbs is that they are usually overpriced
wait msi stands for micro star international?
kind of odd
that ones not
it doesnt even have an attached io shield
yeah this looks like a fairly priced board
but idk somethings off
maybe not
it just doesnt seem to have header support unless its mentioned in the manual
it has a decent amount of 2x1
and even the rare 2x1 front header
i found it
manual only
so a 2x1 header no support. which is normal
1x 1x1 header with +2 support which is above average
and then +4 usb2 support for 2 usb2 headers is normal
oh ik what i did wrong.
i forgot to subtract from pcpp
Doesn’t matter
its too late lmao
Wdym
you always read the first message and then reply before reading the rest. but thats fine. i do the same thing too sometimes
but basically, i already found the header support in the manual after making that comment
this
Ohhh yeah
you are right usb doesnt matter tho. cause the bare minimum mbs have a decent usb spread. so the entry level usb is already not far from the top tier boards.
its still a good thing to compare for mb enthusiasts
The headers don’t matter
the amount of usb2 header support is actually slightly above average on this board
they matter for front io
It has usb 3 a and usb c so basically any case will have all the front io working
yeah but its rear io is atrocious if im being honest. i was already being generous before to try to give it a chance.
I’m sorry?
no usbc off the back and only 1 usbc off the front
its only the 2nd board ive reviewed with this bad of a rear io
im comparing it to this $80 board right now
Link
in which case, its still definitely better
but thats why i made that comment about how entry level usb spreads are already p good
if the focus is budget, then everyone is always going to be happy with usb is what im saying because usb does scale with the price of the board but there are really good budget options tbh
especially if usb quantity is more of a concern rather than speed
Link plz
im kind of impressed with its front io tho
10 usb front 8 usb rear
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/Mh3NnQ/gigabyte-a620m-s2h-micro-atx-am5-motherboard-a620m-s2h
https://www.google.com/search?q=Gigabyte+A620M+S2H+Micro+ATX+AM5+Motherboard&ie=UTF-8
GIGABYTE UD series motherboards use a 5+2+2 phases digital PWM + Low RDS(on) MOSFETs design to support AMD's new generation CPU by offering incredible precision in delivering power to the motherboard's most power-hungry and energy-sensitive components as well as delivering enhanced system performance and ultimate hardware scalability.
cheapest board am5 has to offer
Don’t buy an a620
Yeah I wanted to know what you were comparing it to
hey tho, any more good board recommendations you got?
i gotchu
what form factor
yeah obviously
heres a pretty cheap atx b650
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/LwNxFT/msi-mag-b650-tomahawk-wifi-atx-am5-motherboard-mag-b650-tomahawk-wifi
i finished all of buildzoids recommendations
probably wont do hdv since it has no wifi
p sure livemixer has no wifi as well
you really like msi
lol
yeah
this has......a color scheme
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/ckhFf7/asrock-b650-livemixer-atx-am5-motherboard-b650-livemixer
i think its because they make a lot of motherboards
or it seems like it
this board has a much better rear io
i mean, if you need 8 usb 2 connections
for only $60 more
oh this doesnt have wifi
or does it
this
oh yeah
someonehas bought that because that is their color scheme
its a great board tho
livemixer is one of those good bang for your buck mbs
i would love to see it irl but thats it
i was actually talking about the tomahawk here tho
this also looks pretty solid. its another esthetic choice
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/CtPQzy/asrock-x670e-steel-legend-atx-am5-motherboard-x670e-steel-legend
asrock is a lot nicer than i thought they would be
lol
they used to be the underdog, but have come a long way
they make amazing cheap boards
yeah i like them
like the x670e pg lightning
although, that also doesnt have wifi
the itx choices are like nothing
dang, asrock
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/qcbRsY/asrock-b650m-pro-rs-wifi-micro-atx-am5-motherboard-b650m-pro-rs-wifi
Is this a good one? Im deciding between that one or b650m-hdv/m.2
yeah its good
the hdv has no wifi
i think the itx choices are very stand out
dont need 10 if almost all 6 are really that good
On pcpartpicker, there’s like 5
theres 6
and they are all very good
dont need 10 or 20 itx boards
plenty of options here
ok but 1 issue
what case can you buy that fits a 4090 confidently
Except the a620
a620 is fine
But it’s not “very good”
Im using lan anyways, the pro rs im choosing also doesn't have wifi
in that case get the hdv not the pro rs
Was thinking similar
depends on the person
maybe 2 m.2
or like 2
Yeah I’d say 2 m.2
so cpu lanes are literally faster than chipset lanes
do motherboards come with windows sometimes or no
No you need to install windows yourself
Ye it say it support it it not installed
so then this is just the os that the mb supports not what it comes with
Ye
what are certifications?
so pcie is basically just hardcore internal usb.
probably doesnt matter
i think i need to learn about storage before picking a mb
buying a m.2 sata is basically trolling
yeah
I got a 2 990 pro and 2 980 pro in my case
m.2 2280 nvme ssd
TeamGroup mp44L 🤌🏻😮💨
..ok
Cause they good...
just so you know, those provide no benefit over a normal sata 2.5 ssd lol
Overpriced*
but you spend 5x more
🤌🏻
name doesnt matter.
price / gb doesnt matter
rating doesnt matter
price doesnt matter
what is capacity?
what is type?
what is cache?
what is form factor? how does a storage device have a form factor lmao
and what is interface?
i just want answers in your own words. i have a p good idea about capacity i just dont really know whats a lot or if it is important or whats the difference from cache is or the difference from ram really or whatever.
capacity? how much storage it has
type? either HDD, SSHD or SSD
M.2 nvme
i also want a synopsis of the market.
like with cpus is it a battle like intel and amd?? or is there no competition etc
..those r SSD
Still a other type of ssd
Still
woopy seems to be correct
cache? honestly not too sure but its kinda useless in the modern day
i knew m.2 was ssd, but i didnt understand that.
form factor? basically 2280, or 3.5", or 2.5"
it seems like its a form factor of ssd but i dont understand that either
Nvme and sata ssd are not the same speed nvme is just faster
interface? the pcie version
its still ssd
i understand m.2 sizing
idk wtf 3.5 or 2.5 is
2.5 or 3.5 are for sata ssds or hdds
what is form factor tho
the size of it
like with mb its just the size of the case
how does the size of a storage device matter lmao
they are like so small
HDDs are big
shouldnt impact case tho
uhhh, for example on laptops where you can only fit 2230
anything before hdds?
on some ig
when i first started learning about pcs when i was a kid so not really
hdds were king and in a heated debate. "Are ssds better than hdds?"
HDDs go back to the 1950s
from my research back then. i basically figured ssds were the best type of storage
yup
Mcm (magnetic core memory)
but now theres new ones and i dont get what happened
like how did we get m.2s how long ago and where did they come from
that seems to be ram
wtf is mcm
theyre pretty new
this isnt a laptop tho lmao
Google lol
m.2 was introduced in 2013
so nvme used to be faster but is no longer faster than sata??
it is
sata is slow
in comparison
alexou
choose your words better
lol
The fact that it’s before hdds means you don’t need to worry about it
its ram
Lol it not my fault if he don't understand
you said use to be faster
if ure gonna be spouting bullshit go to another channel lol
lmao why are we talking about ram from the 50s
Nvme is way faster
cause were talking about storage, and youre giving an example of ram
You asked what storage was before hdds
he wanted to be a smartass but was wrong anyway lol
No shit
nah
Well, yeah it was
Can we focus on modern hardware cause we not building a fricking 50 years old pc
Yes
so it appears that before hdds yeah, people only used ram cause everything was so small i think
any other questions about the storage shit dream
tho im p sure they used chat gpt for the answer
Na i used my mind lol
I dont have chat gpt
It’s free, but ok
It free personal information data for it owner ye you right
cache in nvme drives doesnt really matter all that much cause theyre very fuckin fast
what are optical drives?
cd
all im saying is ram is faster than ssds
They pull system memory over the pcie bus
Optical drive is what reads those
holy shit it looks so fuckin coooool
mb
it might not end up looking like that
i heard a couple years ago, people were trying to use ram for their OS
as a side note
All I’m gonna say is, idiots
this color palette reminds me of her
i love your profile ❤️
Any more storage questions?
i love kuromi
opinions on this case for your pc btw im a fractal pop shill
based af
is optical drive a storage type?
like hdds and ssds?
no u
aren't optical drives basically CD, DVD and Blu Ray discs?
ooo i love this actually
Optical discs. The optical drive reads them
its a big large-ish
Kinda
its the mini version
it's the
there isnt a mini pink version
Yes, but not for a pc
oh then it isnt 
what are they for
have u never used a cd
Removable media
movies, music
damn why did fractal only give the colours to only the black version and only atx
😂
like a flash drive?
nvm the o11 mini might be able to fit a 4090 
@spare sedge
i knew there would be options. why i wasnt too worried
can you even remove data off a cd?
Kinda. They’re way slower and smaller. Just generally worse
what does an optical drive look like
Yes
huh, why did i think you couldnt
Google » optical drive » images
worse than a flash drive?
to install games

Yes
Prepare to wait for 30 minutes to install windows 10
when was the era
The 2000s
were they better than hdds
no
No
again, it was mostly used for music and movies and operating systems
cause theyre easy to ship
look guys
It’s main purpose is removable media
they are all used for music and movies lmao
yeah but how the fuck do u ship a hard drive
or a ssd
with just a movie in it
but thats just a flash drive lol
10 pounds of bubble rap
20 pounds
CD's were easy to ship, compact, did the job
Yes, but a disc will automatically play any movie on it (if it’s formatted right)
with a ssd xx. theyll look cute together
Have you ever used a cd
x3
ssd x hdd otp
Me i did a lot lol
no they were not LMAO
Ok, I was asking dream
what
a flash drive is way better than a cd
yeah but they didnt exist back then, did they
Yes they were lol. Netflix started as a dvd service
and yeah, most stuff had a cd player, not a usb port
@spare sedge have you ever used a cd
yeah ik that. doesnt mean cds are better than flash drives

I literally said they were worse
wait what
yeah theyre worse, but back then, CDs were enough
….
so hdds have the cd built in
and optical had removeable cds
huh
Hdds are digital too
And so are cd’s for that matter
so why isnt a flash drive better than a hdd if its better than optical?
cause its slower
ive always heard flash drives are ass
Less reliable, lower capacities
is it really slower? i have heard that hdds are slower even when i did research 13 years ago
For a gaming pc yes. But try putting 22TB of ssd into your pc with 1 drive
but i thought ssds were separate
wait so why r we talking about flash drives
do they have 22tb flash drives
They are
no
No, I was talking about hdds
oh
You can get 22TB hdds, not 22TB ssds
oh
For now
i mean
(There is a 100tb ssd that’s like $15k)

yea, gl affording a 22tb ssd
^
Ikr but in the futur maybe we could
Iirc its slower than a HDD
Nvm it’s like 40k
this is just a dvd player lmao
people used dvd players as storage back then lmao
Yeah, it’s sata
yes
did it play movies or did it just play your storage lmao

,,
did u own a cd
ever
yeah
And what did you do with it
They’re the most basic ass questions, and we’re trying to find out what you do know

ik what a cd is
and you used them, right
Then why are you asking about it
idk wtf an optical drive is besides being an external glorified dvd player lmao
No they’re the same
optical drive is just the politically correct name
the same as what
Optical drive is just the “correct way” to call it
i mean thats what i said tho
Some optical drives are cd only, some are dvd capable, and some can read 4K bluerays
alr
Not necessarily external
so why does that matter for storage tho
Yeah, but no one stores things on cds and leaves them in their optical drive
i guess. but i would like to know.
i know that dvd players were used for dvds lmao
i just wanna know how dvd players were used as an alternative to hdds back then
They weren’t
they were more of an alternative to usb sticks
Hdds existed before cds
not hard drives
When usb wasn’t an option, cds were used
so you would put the data on the cd and the cd would carry around with you like a flash drive but worse
floppy -> cds -> usb
yes
and then you would plug the cd into your optical drive because obviously you can just plug in the cd into your usb
cds were more based, i liked spinning it on my finger
so whats a memory card
Sd and micro sd cards