#networking
1 messages · Page 393 of 1
Its ok, I fired a laptop at work the other day. Spilled water on it. Dried it off, thought it was ok, then a couple minutes later it just died, sigh.
I have hopes of resurecting it I think it's just the linear regulator that I popped
anyway the one I have has 32GB ram a 1tb msata drive
and has proxmox with pfsense virtualised with pci passthrough (this works great) and a couple of lxc containers
pci passthrough means the host gives the physical memory address of the pci device to the guest which then uses it's drivers for the hardware.
https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Firewall-Mini-PC-Ce-leron-N5105_1600464492523.html?spm=a2700.shop_plgr.41413.13.2410165dqDD3nT is way more hardware
Firewall Mini Pc Ce-leron N5105 N5095 Quad Core 4* 2.5g Lans 2*ddr4 Nvme Aes-ni Pfsense Router Pc Network Security Appliance - Buy Network Security Appliance,Router,Firewall Mini Pc Product on Alibaba.com
(it's got 30% more performance than the protectli) and 2.5 gbe intel nic's
Yeah, am looking at it now. I don't have infrastructure to support the 2.5 gbe network.
futureproofing 😉
also if you get a wifi6 ap you need it to support AX3600 you could just hang it off an interface directly
that does take nvme ssd's not msata
it wasn't out when I ordered mine 😦
so this is my house 'compute' virtualiser.
things like freeswitch, maybe some logging
the current lxc is running the controller for tplink omada (like unifi but cheaper :D)
Wish they let you customize it a little more. I have an NVME drive already, don't really need to get one with another.
I have two Ip's available to me, not a block of them.
how do you set those 2 IPs
Because the UDMP won't request 2 DHCP IPs on the same interface.
and it shouldn't.
but if you had static info, you can set your IPs with "additional IPs" https://i.ryois.me/lV2gjmxQcI
and then in each network, you can set the IP it should use via "Internet Source IP"
Right now? I run two different firewalls. Since it is beyond my technical knowledge to configure the json scripts to get a USG-3AP to handle two IPs. I just split the connection coming in, one goes to a PFSENSE box for my weather network and one through the USG for my main network.
the usg has config.gateway.json, new UniFiOS stuff (UDMP included) don't.
Yeah, I don't have the new stuff, that is what I am debating on getting, or just dropping Unifi all together and doing with PFsense
And after my internet speed boost, I can't even get this USG to talk to the Controlelr software, I dunno whats going on. I didn't make any configure changes, but it just shows disconnected
I'm sticking with UDMP at parents house because UniFi and it's easy lol.
It became 'disconnected' right after they boosted my speed to 1Gb
I do like the interface of Unifi stuff
I do like the configure on the pfsense and that I can use whatever hardware I want.
But I do have all the other Unifi stuff already as well
And I just found out you can get Sopho's XG software for free for home use, so I might try that since I use that at work.
idk what this is but.... blob for mod
Kek.
Is there a way to setup a Windows Hosts File for only a specific Interfacce (Or Maybe even Wifi?)
I would like to be able to seemlessly access my local NAS from outside my local Network, so I setup a VPS for Tunneling the connection. The problem now is, that even in the local network, all the traffic is routed through the VPS, which limits the Speed to my local Upload Speed.
The Idea Was to tell my PC to instead of resolving the domain via DNS, it should just use the local (LAN-IP) address to connect to the NAS.
lol
Use routes
Idk how to do it in windows but basically it will tell windows to use the normal interface for 0.0.0.0/0 aka internet
And vpn for 192.168.0.1/24 or whatever your lan is
No, I want to tell windows to only use the VPS routing, when outside the local network
Oh I see
The vps is acting as a reverse proxy?
Use split horizon DNS
Hmm.... Basically I setup my own DNS for my local Network? Which intercept DNS requests for my domain and returns the local IP instead? Doesn't Windows do DNS Caching?
well yes, you set up a dns server. Many routers already have that as an option
caching may be an issue, but you can set a lower TTL
But hey, at least we got some good memes from the video!
Watch the full WAN Show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E75mtGjDRRI
► GET MERCH: https://lttstore.com
► AFFILIATES, SPONSORS & REFERRALS: https://lmg.gg/lcsponsors
► PODCAST GEAR: https://lmg.gg/podcastgear
► SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: https://www.floatplane.com/
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL
--...
who would have guessed
Its prolly still faster than buying internet, atleast for their local servers...
Mine doesnt, but since I have a server running anyway, I can just setup pihole or something like it on there, and either manually set the dns server on a per netork basis, or maybe I can use arp poisoning to override the default dns (why tf cant I just change it in the router, lol)
Is it not an option in DHCP
you can setup something like coredns
Which part if that? And I thought if I run my own DNS anyways, I could do adblocking at the same time...
That is why I planned on using pihole.
dhcp allows you to tell clients what DNS server to use
I guess yeah, I'm not a fan of DNS level adblock
nor pihole, which I find meh
Its not great, but something...
adguard home is another option
But I cant change that setting in my router for some reason... Thats why I wanted to use ARP poisoning, to replace the routers internal DNS, or Ill just ignore DHCP and configure a static Ip and dns for my main machine....
never really done anything with ARP, so idk.
You can change DNS server while letting IP be set by DHCP
which is what I'd reccomend, I avoid static
Looking for a way to view all traffic that goes threw my network aka visited websites and searches. Not looking to install software on every device. With the push to Https its a pain in the butt to monitor now. any ideas ?
the only way is probably dpi but you can't really see much stuff
I was looking at a possible hardware firewall between the modem and routor that implements SSL Inspection via a Proxy server
because searches would be in tls and you can't break that without ssl inspection
ssl inspection seams the only way to go. any thoughts as to the best way to implement it ? I did find a Sonicwall NSA 240 which looks like it might do what i need.
Sophos XG seems to be able to do it last time I checked
SonicWALL is also a good option
DPI really, at work we use sophos
Besides setting up a basic ass Squid proxy which is going to be a pain in the ass.
yeah proxies with https are a PITA
Yea so going that route i would need to manually install the Proxy Cert on all devices so they dont get a warning.. wonder how much of a pain that might end up being.. I have such a mix of devices. Androids, MS, Iphones.
That's what a MDM or group policies in AD is for.
a big pita without what blob said
Otherwise you are going to have to do that process.
with MDM or policies it's not as bad
MDM ?
mobile device managment
Tbh, buy a SonicWALL or Sophos. Those are pretty easy and will operate in bridge mode.
Throw it between your router and a switch with everything else.
if you have a switch with port mirror, you can mirror a port to a box to do DPI
found this one on craigslist.. seems to be a decent price https://vancouver.craigslist.org/van/sop/d/vancouver-sonicwall-nsa-240/7461335812.html
I don't know much about this unit. It was given to me and I never used it, as I didn't know enough about firewalls and such. It worked perfectly when it was being used though.
a SW or Sophos will be able to do blocking if you wanted as well
$100
my connection is 700 down - 300 up
Then it'll bottleneck
sob
What about something like this then. https://www.ebay.com/itm/234480237365
Install this Free Home Firewall on a Second Computer and Secure Your Home Network with Web Filtering, Dual Antivirus Scanning, VPN Access and More.
Yea
oh they have a free one, didn't know that
lol has a vga port
well kinda
depends on what sort of stats you want, since router would be doing NAT
Well, not modem and router.
so everything would seem to go from one IP
Between router and switch like I said before.
yeah, that'll make more sense
Thought they said something else. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
hmm i do have a windows server soo https://www.sophos.com/en-us/products/free-tools/sophos-xg-firewall-home-edition might be an option
Install this Free Home Firewall on a Second Computer and Secure Your Home Network with Web Filtering, Dual Antivirus Scanning, VPN Access and More.
that'll have to run in a VM and you'd need to configure bridging.
network setup with it virtualized may be an issue
how so..
depends on hardware
The appliances out of the box will either be in bridge mode or receive port mirroring.
if you have dedicated NICs for the vm it'll be no issue
You need at least 2 physical NICs and give each NIC to the VM.
yeah, unless you use VLANs
If it were me, I'd spend the $100 to get it preconfigured and a dedicated box.
which with 1gig will bottleneck with router on a stick
Since if this goes down, so will everything else.
yep
Its a AMD A10-7800 With 16GB DDR3 ram... its Lukes old PC from Season 7 scrapyard wars lol
why I don't virtualize any of my network stuff
if it's dedicated to only firewall I guess?
not very efficent tho
nothing i do is efficient
doesn't that rely heavily on hw acceleration
Plus it'll consume a lot of power compared to that little box too.
yea your right about that
Ok well thanks, I have a few options to look at.. Thanks for the help
can I vote blob for mod, please?
I do not want to be a mod lmao
we need you to kick out the speedtest people xD
@clear igloo @waxen scroll remember how my ISP gives me as many dhcp IPs I ask for? 😂
because of new mac address>
Today they must’ve noticed and asked me to “fix router wiring because we are seeing multiple IPs on a single ONT” 😂
Yeah lol
oof
Idk why they don’t limit it on their end either
Lol i dont make staffing decisions.. Those come from the big man generally
10% to the big man upstairs
well i think hes a man.. Honestly i think they are 50% robot..
i cant work all week like that
Just a dumb question: Is the Di Query Time the "Client Side" time it took to resolve the query, or the Server self reporting?
99.99% sure it's the time difference between when the request was sent and then received
since I can't find anything in the DNS protocol for server time
At a bare minimum they should be limiting it to 2 MACs (tshooting, replacing router, etc). Not limiting at all means they probably have next to no basic SP best practices in place
you have to wonder how they caught it
homie must have made them run out of ranges
😛
my comcast locks to a mac address
the only way to get a new lease with another address is to reboot the modem
is there a way to make QoS limit bandwith for everything EXCEPT specified devices on ASUS routers
when im gaming, if someone uses an apple product to stream anything, it completely destroys my network
even simple things, it will just suck up internet
Probably getting calls from other customers who couldn't get an IP lol
Blob causing small scale outages 
hey. when i don't stream, i get about 60ms on a select minecraft server. when i stream, i range 150ms-300ms. i have 20 upload (spectrum for residential. we pay for 400.) and ive streamed in 144fps perfectly in the past. even when i stream in 60fps, it drops even more and makes my ping even worse. i have a rtx 2060, r5 2600, 16gb ddr4 memory 3000mhz if that helps. and yes my PC does have antennas on the back 🤣 if anyone can help that'd be greatly appreciated. again, my ping is perfect and low for me when im not live, but when i go live, it spikes up and stays there.
(im on windows 11)
1: my phone speeds on the wifi
2: my PC speeds on the wifi
Do you mean stream in from yout pc to your phone, or from the pc to a streaming service?
If its the first, id guess your ping includes stream decode time, which might be quite a lot if your phone is not that fast...
ok so, I use streamelements OBS to stream with my PC. im comparing my phone to my PC's speedtest (at the same exact location). would this be a network adapter issue, antennas?
also ive gotten ddossed in the past and I asked my ISP to change my IP (since spectrum residential internet is advertised as a dynamic IP) and they said its against company policy to do it. my friend was on call with them and they kept saying that. pretty horrible customer service so my ISP wont do anything about it
I want to, but do you think a 12900k could do more than 5gbps of networking routing?
with the new w680 chipset, I'd like to take the leap, but the edgerouter is just so efficient as it is.... idk if it even makes sense
but there is no edgerouter with 2.5gbps ports, only the expensive 10g ones, which is why i want to move away from it to a w680 system
can anyone here offer some help with odd network traffic coming in through my network, its been happeneing for a few months now and my ISP is...well.....useless
I don't dabble in software routing but just what Ive read in threads, 5gbps is supposed to simple to achieve for even low end CPUs.
I could never justify the power draw though
If you're talking about traffic making it into your network, that not the responsibility of your provider to troubleshoot
The last time I did software routing was on PFsense with a Intel Celeron Processor N4100 and it could barely crack over 200 mbps. I wasn't using an Intel NIC, tho, idk if that played a part in it
Maybe not that low end of a cpu
oh no, as in they wont provide any information what so ever, for months now iv been seeing logged intrusions and UDP port scan attacks, the intrustions are logged correctly, and are coming from all over the placem byt being stopped as far as i can see
the UDP port scan attacks though, there all going for my IP obviously, but all the logs are from way back in 2010 but there showing up right now, i have no idea about this stuff so im clueless
Thats just internet noise and normal to see. Internet is full of bots.
ah ok, was gonna say kinda odd im getting logs from way back in 2010 xD
Hey can anyone help me setup adguard for my home network on my server. I'm having trouble making it thru the whole network
I have adguard up and running but now is the setup for my router and I'm stuck there
Is it safe to say that in the OSI model the data layer is what's responsible from getting packets from one end to another?
all of the first 3 are
technically 4 as well
Someone in the network area changed out their cubicle name tag with “Layer 8 engineer”.
human layer
Lol. Loved the terminology though.
Ya I realize that, i'm learning about the main difference between the 3 and so far i've understood this: that the physical layer is as the name says the physical connection, the data layer then moves the data in and out of the physical layer, the network layer is what routes the data from point a to b, please feel free to correct me if I got anything wrong
yeah in a way. I think of it in like "domains" L2 domain is a whole network with just switches. You can have communication between devices on just L2. L3 introduces IP addresses
L2 issues are the worst
Which layer handles error detection and retransmits?
Uhh idk actually
It’s been a long time since I’ve dived in to this, but if it’s not layer 2, then the responsibility is shared between the different layers
Could be some overlap
oh so l2 is like say my house has fiber cable internet, so through then it communicates to my router?
or a switch
Ethernet aka l2 has error detection, idk about correction tho
Uhh what? I don't really understand
But yea. I like to imagine mailing a package, but it gets smashed along the way and it’s not like the mail can just… re-deliver it. I have to uhh.. re transmit. Therefore, I’m part of the responsibility chain to get the packet intact to the person
Important thing, routers work on l3 and connect together l2 domains. Switches are just l2
I'm asking if layer 2 is just communication between network devices, like you said, with switches
Yeah basically
So like your router to ISP router
That's one l2 domain
Your lan is one l2 domain
sorry for the weird analogy
There could be other clients on the same domain, there could be not, depends on ISP design
what i dont get is, what does the network layer do differently? doesn't it just give the devices in the network ip's?
or L3
Then what does L3 do different in comparison to L2?
Completely different technologies
L2 works with MACs and stuff like that
Ethernet is a protocol itself
Don't need to use ips
I think I know now, thanks 👍
Ethernet is IEEE 802.3
If you want to look at the technical standard of Ethernet
You kind of lost me there, but i'll add it to the list of stuff to look up
Really it's a bunch of standards on top of standards
Present, have you looked in to or heard of Bundle protocol?
Nope
Yeah, I started learning about computer networking a few days ago, and all of these standards on top of standards are kind of crazy, lol
What helped me is looking at how a packet is structured
How inside the Ethernet frame you have the IP data, Port data, etc.
So pretty
And thinking at a packet level
Basically, imagine it sitting around layer 4 with a store-and-forward time of hours/days/weeks/whatever. End-to-end connection is not assumed
Structures 😍
Sounds like something for space use
NASA is experimenting with it for planetary communications networks. Basically at least doubles the throughout
Bingo. Might be good for military use too
I have found a computer networking enjoyer in the wild, hello! 😃
Do you have more info on this
That sounds interesting, will do that as it sounds interesting 👍
NASA has a few public resources. But googling “nasa DTN” will get you in the right direction.
DTN = delay tolerant networking
Found this rfc https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5050
Bundle Protocol Specification (RFC )
Yup. RFC 5050 is the latest version of the protocol that I’m aware of
Basically, I see it mostly beneficial for disaster scenarios when public infrastructure might be overwhelmed or offline
Lol rfcs are the only instruction manuals I need
It’s also independent of the underlying protocols, so… Bundle protocol over Bluetooth, ham radio, carrier pidgin… all valid transports
Very useful for IP over avian
Lol. Glad you’re familiar with it.
When I was bored at work, I started attempting to write bundle protocol with… Powershell
A stupid endeavor I’m well aware of. But thought it would be fun anyway to see how far I could go
Sounds like a deep rabbit hole to me lol
Believe me, I did not get far at all. Only implemented 2 … parts? Aspects? Out of like 50. And those were the super easy parts
Ugghh do i have to set seperate folders for movies and tv in plex? Ive gotten by just fine having my media in its emalgamation of folders and "downloaded from xyz" files
Itll take me hours to clean all this up
been thinking is it good to know both about tcp/ip and the osi model?
Anyone here know the difference between a Unmanaged and a managed network switch?
One is managed; the other is unmanaged. 😄 Ha-ha. I'm not funny. More seriously, unmanaged switches are like power strips in that you plug one into your router, modem, or other DHCP server to essentially receive more physical ethernet ports. Managed switches can function the same way, but also provide the ability to control how the ethernet ports route packets. Most home users want unmanaged switches.
https://homenetworkgeek.com/managed-vs-unmanaged-network-switches/
Many switches will look exactly the same as one another, so there is an assumption that they perform exactly the same functions as well. This isn’t actually the case as all switches fall into one of two categories: managed or unmanaged. Let’s take a look at both and explain some of the differences to help you decide which is best for you.
Oh thats a great description thanks :D
Soo.... I just set up my local dns (bc my Routers one is trash), and wanted to see if it works. So I used dig a.domain.I.own @lan.ip.of.dns, but that got me a result even after stopping the dns-server, with query time stillat 0 ms. Is that dig ignoring the supplied nameserver, bc jts unreachable?
that being said.. out of the box... a managed switch will work just like an unmanaged switch.
they can just do.. more if you need tend to have bigger memory for mac tables
@gray knoll what was in the result section?
does anyone know of a poe (802.1af) powered ATA? I find references online to a planetvoip unit that used to exist..
but the grandstreams and ciscos in my local market seem to need a wall wart.
If I broadcast n/ac rather than just ac will performance on ac be theoretically worse?
Not 100% sure if you mean Answer section, but that was
my.domain.com. TTL IN A MyIp
Where TTL always was a number between 60 and 1, so it was propably cahed, but after the minute, it just reset back to 60. my.domain.com and MyIP were obviously changed, dont want ddos attacks on my vps or similar stuff...
not the answer section 😉 the server section 😉
Ohh.... Seems to be my standard DHCP-DNS... Why does this work? Please, dig, dont just silently fallback to a different DNS on connection fail...
That does explain, why it takes ~1 second to run dig, if the first connection has to be refused first...
i want to setup an ssl cert on my server but my i have forwarded ports 80 and 443 to 2280 and 2443 instead. Can i still use an ssl?

how do i go about setting it up? Does it cover everything under the domain name?
an SSL certificate just verifies that you own a particular domain
beyond that you can configure it however you want
But hey, at least we got some good memes from the video!
Watch the full WAN Show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E75mtGjDRRI
► GET MERCH: https://lttstore.com
► AFFILIATES, SPONSORS & REFERRALS: https://lmg.gg/lcsponsors
► PODCAST GEAR: https://lmg.gg/podcastgear
► SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: https://www.floatplane.com/
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL
--...
🤔
yeah i mean to be fair, it wasn't an issue with the wireless part

yay stupid 10 gig sfp+ to rj45 adapters
Probably the reason for the instability of the speed test. I assume they just went with the 30m SFP+'s
They have replaced it already, and from the way he phrased it, I'd say its still 3G/S up und 1G/s down, even after the "Fix"... But maybe Frimware will fix it... Who tf knows... Or maybe one of the dishes picks up interference, the other doesnt... we will propably find out at some time... Once the ZFS-Pool is repaired...
im trying to login to my generic wifi extender hoping to get root access
however im not very successfull
Trying 192.168.10.1...
Connected to 192.168.10.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
login
HTTP/1.0 501 Not Implemented
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:27:41 GMT
Server: Boa/0.94.14rc21
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>501 Not Implemented</TITLE></HEAD>
<BODY><H1>501 Not Implemented</H1>
POST to non-script is not supported in Boa.
</BODY></HTML>
Connection closed by foreign host.
tryzen@femboywerewolves:~```
anything i type
seems to result in this error
Have you tried GET /?
ill try
no permission
this is what would happen in a browser
Have you tried just googling "root on wifi extender xy"? Because stuff like that would prpably be hard if not impossible to just figure out on your own without any real exploitation knowledge...
root is root
password is admin
i figured that out already
https://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/list_messages/1586466
(dutch website)
wait
i can set password to nothing
it will disable protection
Maybe? You can at least try
I recall from listening to the live stream they just ordered the SFP but have no replaced it. Id have to rewatch it. Either way, that should have never been an option for his use case.
just looks like that the wifi extender doesn't accept telnet connections
@gray knoll
Trying 192.168.10.1...
Connected to 192.168.10.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET /
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache">
<meta HTTP-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache">
<meta HTTP-EQUIV="Expires" CONTENT="Mon, 01 Jan 1990 00:00:01 GMT">
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=index.htm">
<title>Wireless Router </title>
</head>
</html>
Connection closed by foreign host.
tryzen@femboywerewolves:~$ ```
Soo... I just noticed you try to connect to port 80 (the webpage you saw earlier in the browser) but telnet has its own default port (23 I believe) Have you checked that one?
yes
connection refused
theres 2 open ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
52881/tcp open unknown
Tried the 52881?
yes.. however nothing seems to happen no matter what i type
theres a file called config.dat which can be pulled from the ip tho
Yk.... Without much knowledge about it, itll be hard to exploit (especially since I only know a tiny bit about exploitation....)
I would try to connect via Ethernet (if you are on wifi)
Or maybe try to open BusyBox (the shell used) via a URL?
But ill look at the other config...
oki
Also the Webserver (Boa) seems to have an arbitrary file read exploit, maybe that can help you as well...
logs (on built in settings page)
say the following
Jun 26 10:03:34 [peth0] added, mapping to [eth1]...
Jun 26 10:03:34 Realtek FastPath:v1.03
Jun 26 10:03:34 DO 8192E IQK !!!!
Jun 26 10:03:34 Done 8192E IQK !!!!
this thing is using a REALTEK 8192E
found some firmware
reverse engineer it
binwalk shows nothing :/
its a goddamn 16 bit chip
i have no clue what architecture
Black magic with a bit of Necromancy.
Oh and a bag of holding, since the Windows Driver is like 16 times larger than that binary xD
ye
its crazy yknow 2MB busybox based linux
@gray knoll btw once the thing is set up it no longer allows setup
? You cana only set it up once? Ypu cant factory-reset it?
no
youll have to hold a button to reset
but once its setup u cant go back to settings unless u reset
Wut?
You can only change the settings once? Maybe because the IP changes? Or is it actually telling you its not possible?
yep
it quite literally unreachable as it instantly redirects to my own router when going to 192.168.178.1
i havent figured out what IP it would be using honestly
Just throw nmap at it and tell it to only scan port 80 on every ip?
neither do I... I would just use the ip address of the machine im working on, and nmap 192.168.0.* (or whateer your equivalent ip is...) and port 80 is in default scanning....
found it
192.168.178.108
im scanning ports rn
Starting Nmap 7.80 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2022-03-25 21:30 CET
Nmap scan report for 192.168.178.108
Host is up (0.098s latency).
Not shown: 65532 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
52869/tcp open unknown
52881/tcp open unknown
Well, its different...
Im gonna go sleep now tho, have fun!
It's 192.168.0.0/24
Maybe that wildcard syntax works as well, never used it
I use it all the time
I'm used to CIDR format
Im not, I dont do THAT much networing... CIDR is Black magic to me...
Since with wildcard syntax you aren't able to a specify specific networks
Like anything that isn't a /24, /16, /8
Hi, I have this Sky wifi booster that they gave me before I moved ISP to Virgin Media, and I was trying to get it working with ethernet but it hasn't been working. It seems it might be software 'locked' for use with only its's own ISP's router. Is there anyway to get it to work?
what's wrong with it?
yeah I'm pretty sure those are only gonna work with a sky gateway
not sure what the hardware is off the top of my head but ours are an almost identical design and need the matching gateway to be able to pick up the configuration
what would be my best option for getting wireless connection outside of a brick house? would putting a router near a window work? It would basically just be for a wireless security camera nothing crazy.
Hey all, been having trouble with my Plex server that's running on TrueNAS. I can't seem to update it. It spits back this error code "Error: Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(128) cmdline: git clone -v https://github.com/freenas/iocage-plugin-plexmediaserver.git /mnt/Epsilon/iocage/jails/Plex/plugin stderr: 'Cloning into '/mnt/Epsilon/iocage/jails/Plex/plugin'... fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/freenas/iocage-plugin-plexmediaserver.git/': SSL certificate problem: certificate is not yet valid '"
@charred sundial sorry i kinda slept after asking for help..
Basically I have a 50Mbps internet subscription
With wired I get full 50Mbps
Before this I used to have 25Mbps subscription
And I used to get full 25Mbps over 2.4Ghz band and 5Ghz band and over Ethernet
Now on 2.4Ghz band, I am not getting more than 30-35Mbps and on 5G band im not getting more than 40-45Mbps.. on wired I'm getting 50Mbps±2Mbps no issues
I have tried resetting my router back to factory settings.. didn't help
I have kept my 2.4G band to work in only 802.11n mode only and 5G band to work only in 802.11ac mode
And it's not even a question of signal strength i think.. I don't get more than 33-35Mbps on 2.4G band, even when I'm sitting right next to the router
so i'm getting fiber so i'm looking a building out a new home wireless network using pfsense
i was wondering about hardware you would recommend i would like to add cameras in the future
my budget is less than 1000$ usd of pfsense hardware, switch, and two ap's
my house is wired with CAT5e
my internet speed will be 1 Gbps
my uses are plex streaming, twitch streaming, and gaming
Seperate router and nvr
unfortunately that's pretty much working as expected. that means the ceiling that your router's built in wifi can handle is around 30-35 mbps and a little faster with 5ghz. you'll probably want to upgrade to a standalone AP or use ethernet when speed matters
how old/what model is your router?
It's a Cisco Linksys EA1700 or something
Used to be top of the line when it come out
1.7Gbps router
Yes I know 1.7Gbps is not single band speed
But the 2.4G band should be doing okay till 150Mbps right?
I bought it like 4-4½ years ago
that's the theoretical max speed but unfortunately with all-in-one router+wifi units you probably won't reach that
depends a lot on the actual transmit power, MIMO, antenna configuration and tuning done by the manufacturer
Yeah and I'm having just a 50 Meg line
It's ⅓the theoretical max speed I'm talking about
yeah that's unusually low for 802.11n but still possible
So any other reason other than that's how it is?
Because switching to 5G band for me means automatically I can't go outside the room If i want good signal
This is not one of those thiojoe ways right?
yeah 5ghz has a lot more attenuation from walls/floors
i don't know what that means but that's pretty standard for wifi deployments
that's why you see APs in offices or commercial buildings on the walls or ceilings
Bro u don't know thiojoe ?
i can't say i do
U livin under the rock or what
Hold on
Do you want some of the creature comforts of a business internet line, but don't want to pay the ridiculous price most cable companies offer? There may be another way...
iTel affiliate link: http://itel.com/ltt-bonded/
Freshbooks link: For your unrestricted 30 day free trial, just go to https://www.freshbooks.com/techtips and enter “Linus Tech...
@sudden kayak watch the beginning of this video you will understand what I meant
lol gotcha
nope thats totally legit, you wanna make sure all the radio signals are bouncing off the materials in the wall and spreading out in the right directions
placing APs is kinda black magic and there's no one rule to it but
getting the antennas high up and against the wall or ceiling definitely helps
So 30-35Mbps is practically the limit of 2.4G band then? Damn that's too slow
it's not necessarily the limit but you'll rarely see the full 150 or 300mbps theoretical rating
i use a ubiquiti AP AC lite which i think is rated for 300 in the 2.4ghz band and i get like 80-100 through a wall
I had a D-Link router before this, which used to max out at 6-7Mbps, and back then I had a 10Mbps subscription
but generally manufacturers of combo router/wifi boxes aren't able to do quite the same level of tuning and antenna design as in a device like a ubiquiti AP
Okay so what do u suggest if I have to buy new equipment?
Like I have a new house that's gon get Reddy in like 2 months
I haven't gotten ethernet wired
Thinking good wifi router will do the job
i mean yeah ethernet is the only way to be sure
but yeah a good separate AP like ubiquiti will also help a lot
Ethernet and a couple good APs
if you can find them in stock
Omadas good too
Damn it cost so much more now to rewire the whole building
The buildings paintjob is 95% done
@sudden kayak okay so I have a house that's 2 floors(ground and first floor), each floor spanning around 1500ft²
Let's say I keep an AP in one of the corner(i know it should be in the centre, not in the corner)
Which AP should I buy and which router should I buy? AP coverage should be at least 50 feet radius
i would say the easiest is probably one AP AC pro on each floor, or maybe one long range on the top floor
but the best thing would be to use their room planning tool
it'll do a decent job of figuring out a layout for your specific rooms
I'm actually about to log off and go sleep but there are other people who hang around this channel who can help you with that planner
sorry it's called "design center" i think
if you're two stories and 1500sqft then I'd be looking at unifi or tplink omada
I love my omada setup
@plucky wraith multiple ap's for whole house 😉
@frigid sphinx I'm planning to give wired internet to all the 7 rooms, but I'm not able to find a good router for that
I found a workaround for not being able to rewire the house again
at 1500 sqft and 2 stories you should be considering a wired backhaul sdn wireless (unifi, omada) or a mesh option (google nest, tp-link deco, maxwell)
Well I'm relly not familiar with networking equipment types and where they are used
It's 1500sqft per floor
I just looked at the tp link omada
It says that it's a gigabit vpn router
Looks like it has only 4 ports, sed story
I'm looking for something that has at least 8
Wait a minute it's not
I saw something else
So omada looks like an outdoor ap
try looking at the unifi stuff and come back to omada.. it'll make more sense then 😉
@plucky wraith
I only use 2 ports on my router
One goes to switch
Other to ISP
You would want a switch either way for POE
Then the bandwidth from that 1 port gets distributed..
Across all devices connected to the switch
I mean yeah
It's not like you need more than gig?
It's the same with a router, most consumer have an internal switch
You can even run a router on a stick
With only 1 port
But that limits speed
so router (manages internet connection) switch (provides power to ap's and distributes wired networking) (access points) and (managment node/controller)
unify/omada have these components ^^
yeah you don't want to be bringing multiple ports on a router just to use as a switch
my router only has 2 physical interfaces (but has 4 or so vlans on one of them)
I'm with virgin and get 1gbps on ethernet but on wifi i only get around 400mbps. I'm looking for an AP where i can get 1gbps on wifi. and I'll use my virgin router on modem mode. I'm guessing the AP that i get will have to be WiFi 6. Any suggestions?
I really really like the EAP-620 I'm using from tp-link
has a built in web interface and can be upgraded to be centrally managed if you need additional ap's
the model is a Arris’s Touchstone TG3492, model: TG3492LG-VMB
does it have enough gigabit ethernet ports?
yes
do you get 1gb through wifi?
I can push a gigabit over wifi.. australia's still in the slow lane for internet 😦
my connection is only 100/40
but to local wired services sure
Yeah
The part that I dislike about unifi is lack of web ui
you must run a controller.. I like that the omada stuff will let you use it without a controller but if you want to go there eventually it'll do it.
if you do you can get stuff like this:
sorry i meant i need a main router
you said you needed a wifi6 access point 🙂
and were going to use your existing router
this modem manual is a blast 🙂 Note: To connect more than four computers to the TG3492LG-LIB through the Ethernetports, you need an Ethernet hub (available at computer retailers).
a hub you say grandpa modem vendor...
Switch
I'll be using my existing router as a modem but need another to give out the wifi so yeah i think that's what an ap is. so would a EAP-620 work and put out wifi to my whole home
so it's a ap.. not a router.
yeah sorry i got confused for a second
perhaps... this will help : https://youtu.be/am7xT-zU1Q0?t=17
watch the next minute of that 😉
A dedicated wifi6 access point.. is going to perform better than the builtin.. "2.4 GHz radio and 5 GHz radio for wireless 802.11a/b/g/n/ac connectivity" the EAP-620 is ax1800 which is wifi6 ac was imo a bit of a mess and rather confusing. that said.. deploying wifi is not as simple as bigger better.. where it's placed and the geometry of the building etc will have a huge impact on where and how wifi propagates through a space.
@charred sundial
sorry i was watching that video
did that help?
yes a lot
so for example my home network.. has a pfsense router, a switch, and 2 access points
but the access points have the same 'wireless network' and allow devices to roam between them. without re-authenticating.
oh so you set the ssid and password the same on all of them?
no
I manage them from a central controller.
which does something much smarter
the ap's (and the switches) are 'adopted' by the controller which then gives a single management interface for all the seperate devices
so from a web ui pov it looks kinda like an all in one router.. but it's way more powerful and let's you add access points for more coverage
oh so it's like my unifi protect system kinda
but it's annoying because you have to get a controller to manage the aps and can't without it
if you have unifi protect does that need a cloud key?
no I've got a unvr connected which has the protect application controller baked in
how big is the house? can you realistically get wifi everywhere required from a single access point?
it's a 3 story terraced home (3 story including the ground) and I'll be putting the ap on the ground floor. ig if i need to I'll just put another ap in the loft (4th bedroom)
or the 2nd floor
3 stories is asking a lot of one ap
I'd suggest middle of the house second story initially
the downside to the omada ap's much as I like them is that they are rather.... ugly beasties
the ubiquiti nano's are way prettier.
which one functions better though
jury's out... some say the ubiquiti stuff is better than omada some say the other way around
honestly I think either is a good choice..tplink is definitely cheaper.
but are the specifications alike?
so the EAP-620 is huge (it's nearly 40cm across) something like a nano-6 from ubiquiti is far less in every dimension pretty much way easier to hide and much better WAF
WAF: (Wife Acceptance Factor)
😂 not me trying to figure out what that means
so for a single ap you could run the controller software on a pc.. configure it.. and turn it off.
or if you have somewhere to run vm's make a tiny vm/container and run the controller on it.
right okay
lol
Lol I was testing my ubiquity dishes before I hang them up
Kek
I was thinking about getting a fiber setup the next town over
I'm still amazed that I can't find a 802.1af PD voip fxs ATA
my best option seems to be a poe -> mini_usb + ethernet dongle + a fxs that's powered by miniusb
which just seems nuts.
I wonder if these dishes can push 10 miles
isn't curvature a problem at something like that distance
I think you end up with enough earth inside the Fresnel zone that it interferes
Texas is flat as heck
It why so many flat earthers live here
I don’t think land interference is a problem
it depends a bit how high you can get the dishes 😉
but at 10' the dirt is a problem 😉
Not when you got concrete
Any antenna needs to be ground mounted with concrete
They literally have 5 gig available in the next town over

Maybe one day when im rich ill go with the cat 10 gig dish
There is a cell tower next to my house

telco's tend to take a dim view of unauthorised equipment on their towers 😉
You can pay them to use their towers
i'm surprised they're even their towers. Usually companies like outsourcing instead of owning anything real estate these days
hey guys, i have a question about RAID stuff that has left me confused af...
Question: In your speed critical disk system you have to increase both the reliability and the capacity. Which RAID technology will you prefer? why?
My thoughts: i wanted to say RAID 5, since it's reliable, speedy, and we only lose 1 disk to parity.
but some people argued that RAID 10 is better... it is reliable, but half of the data in raid 10 is mirrored, right...? then how does it have better capacity than raid 5?
It doesn't
R10 basically takes 50% away
@low pond lets say cost (number of total drives) wasn't a deciding factor.. then RAID 10 ? or RAID 01?
yup, one is a stripe of mirrors and the other is a mirror of stripes or something but basically the same
Oh wow :P I mean in all cases I've ever seen I only see 10 being deployed, never ever darn 01
Godddd.... i hate my professor xD
he didnt explain this shit in the class and expects us to answer this on the exam xD
There are just... endless amount of resources explaining stuff like this online. Which can be way less tedious or stressful than textbooks
lol for the last hour, i've been doing that. every other source has conflicting info
They just have different ways of explanation really...
@clear igloo looking at cisco live sessions. So much 5G. What is this, a telco conference?
5G all the private networks!!!
cellular anything seems like a terrible primary solution
Compared to things like T1 it can be much cheaper though
i was trying to buy one of them but they are either way over msrp or out of stock. I'm interested in this: https://store.netgear.co.uk/product/wax204-100eus?utm_source=Google Shopping&utm_campaign=Netgear PLA Feed&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=4178&cid=uk-orbi-srch-cpc&utm_source=shopping&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=uk-orbi-shopping-cpc&gclid=Cj0KCQjw8_qRBhCXARIsAE2AtRbGVdlr2K-k8HyeXxtLGCV-T7R6ugFZi7BmAqBXyEyvj_WuxzOmyMwaAmtYEALw_wcB . is it anygood?
WAX204 delivers high-speed WiFi 6 that is affordable and easy to install, without added infrastructure and deployment costs. It’s the most cost-effective WiFi solution for small businesses, home offices, dorm rooms, cafes, retail, small offices, and more. Engineered with the latest in WiFi technology, WAX204 provides performance, coverage and se...
if all you do is go to "the cloud" for HTTP, it might be fine
anything sensitive? naaaah
latency be like 📈
when it's things like ATMs, branches, etc. that don't use much bandwidth it's not a big issue. Private 4G/5G networks also have QoS too for some traffic, it's not that bad
wow finally a good use for that graphic. As someone who trades it annoys me that the going up version is red
And then there are banks in the US moving a bunch of workloads to the cloud from what I hear 😄
it's like magic right? dump it into someone else's computer, super secure
Only hybrid w/ on prem
yah, it's more hybrid but I've heard people say 30% to 50% of workloads in the cloud
The really important loads are staying on site. The cloud is doing client facing stuff like HTTP
Fair
Honestly if I was C-level I would not permit my money making loads anywhere near a 3rd party company
we've seen cloud providers violate their contracts and shut people off with little warning
100% going cloud 😄
cloud all the things!!
and you think "hybrid" dont you? but need I remind you there are also cases when they seemingly collude and shut someone off around the same time
I think NASDAQ is going AWS Outposts for some and AWS for most.
you NEED on prem to reduce the risk
Mainly so "on prem" can be managed and deployed like AWS.
yah, need to make sure a competitor doesn't crop up as the owner of what you're doing
yep
regarding aws outposts, since they're managed with amazon.com (I think anyway) its the same risk
they kill your account, bye bye
I dont recall there being a local admin option
I never said they were independent of AWS lol.
Oh, almost never, especially if you do something like go dual cloud vendor
Yeah, I think my place is sticking with onprem + hybrid cloud cause we're discussing brand new cable plants for 400G support in the future
At least when most places talk about that they want to replicate everything to both providers which is $$$$
Outposts are cool tho. 
I honestly wonder how the hardware looks like
local connectivity to AWS service
@low pond
its the closest you're going to see AWS hardware (in the public) lol
Dang, whole rack from AWS?
they have rack or server option. A rack only comes in a 42U.
How the hell did you get that.
green is the server BMC and orange is Nitro card.
google?
I like how its a rack in the middle of nowhere with all these connections in it, but theres no under floor or tray with cable in it... lol.
Oh.
must just be marketing pics
Haha, yes, it's wifi
wireless to the rack is the new trend 😄
If you don't want an Outpost, you can do Direct Connect 
we do
many of them
don't they settlement free peer too?
idk, im not on that side of the fence. I just enable the peering and links
They have a 100 prefix limit too
you send 101 and they kill the link. so dumb
netgear 🤢
yeah 100 is a little difficult if your network is large and across multiple cities
Like City A should be preferred to enter/exit AWS near City A, but you also have to advertise City B out that same link with poor metrics so it can be a backup path
you basically have to try to summarize as much as you can
sending just a default route is not an option
so..... it's a no?
@clear igloo Upgrading this site's networking is going to be out of their budget 
yeah I have to tell my bosses about [BIG NUMBER] that was not budgeted for and we need it now
they're gonna cry
ok
speaking of budget, how much do you guys think I should charge for wordpress site design update/cleanup, like to make website look nice
like 30 an hour?
+$20 for wordpress fee
charge what the market charges unless you're offering something unique
otherwise customers will find cheaper
clean up is one thing, art from scratch is another
yeah
@clear igloo
https://i.ryois.me/esN9Pb59iG
The PTZ camera is plugged into this switch and it can see the switch.
@charred sundial it's... probably ok.. but.. it depends where you are aiming to get to.
Use a pulse Doppler dish to remove ground clutter
Shit I came here from a DCS video sorry
would it at least give off 1gbps if I'm right next to it
@charred sundial what's the goal a gigabit of wireless 1 foot away.. sure pretty much anything will do that. 😉
well my current topps off at 400mbps
currently it's a: Arris’s Touchstone TG3492, model: TG3492LG-VMB
I know I pulled the manual down last night and read it.
can you send me that manual I can't seem to find it
@clear igloo this sg300 switch is pissing me off
@clear igloo seeing a lot more neteng jobs listed as "on-site" now lol.... looking at one that says you can be located near one of three locations. bruhhhh 
lol
might as well be remote?
YoU nEeD tO cOmMuNiCaTe!!
need to be in the office for your webex
yup
Noob question, pic for attention
If I put a switch between the modem and the wifi router, and then connect a MoCA to that switch for running internet to the other side of the house and another connection to the switch for a pc in the same room as the modem and router, do I just put the wifi router in AP mode, or do I need to have the wifi router before the switch and leave it set as it is now?
Unless modem badly configured by ISP that won't work
Since you get one public ipv4 IP, and you only want one router
So you want modem - > router -> whatever (AP, switch, devices)
@clear igloo https://dlidirect.com/products/new-pro-switch 😩 out of stock
Reliable Reboot and Power Control • Easy to use. Easy to set up. Clean web interface.• Secured WiFi and wired Ethernet.• Multi-target AutoPing reboots routers & modems.• HTTPS, SNMP, Rest API, SSH, SSL, Echo/Alexa, MODBUS & more.• Lua scripting language for customizing.• Powerful 32bit CPU with watchdog adds re
psh, get a robot to power things off instead 😄
nope
soon as I saw 10/100 I knew the company doesn't know what they're doing
thats going to get phased out
Spend the extra $1 and get the gig chipset
@clear igloo maybe I should apply to that caterpillar IoT job so I can 🤌

Safe rebooting by just cutting power to the Device? Better hope nothing important is still in RAM...
It looked too "industrial" for home use to me... I expected to find this in a Serverrack, as a replacement for those LAN management ports (forgot what they are called)
this isn't for home
IPMI, iLO, iDRAC
It doesn't replace those at all since those do so much more than power control
Like blob said it's more for simple stuff like AV equipment
Yeah... I know... I meant like cheap mans IPMI, you can reset it, if your server doesnt respond. I know thse Mangement systems do more than power cicle...
Yeah, I've been looking at pikvm for my "dumb" computers
I have idrac servers at work at it's so useful
I have a ticket system at work that summons a human with a brain that does more than iLOs
🤩
What's it called, remote hands..
I heard they are expensive
yes. I am not required to do any physical work at all. I open tickets
no, its internal people. its the datacenter department
My "KVM" rn, is a raspberry pi 2, that has internet access, serial access to the system its controlling, and restart is just shorting VCC with GROUND, which in the case of this server force-restartes it xD
they do all rack, cables, shipping, etc. the people who arent them configure the gear remote
I try to find jobs with that setup because not having it sucks too much

Although for home power control I have a script that just calls Redfish API on my servers. Lol
So my UPS management can shutdown servers and boot them back up.
https://www.manualslib.com/manual/1740538/Arris-Touchstone-Tg3492lg-Lib.html it's a different submodel tho...
you need remote power cutoff for some types of clustering (particularly STONITH) but it's dum friends don't let friends deploy STONITH clusters
What's a better choice buying mesh wifi nodes or buy asus routers and use aimesh?
I know someone who's super happy with their tp-link deco's
I went the sdn route (wifi with wired backhaul)
@twilit garnet it depends what your uplink is and how much you want to manage it
Hello there I am trying to allow OpenVPN to access a hetzner VLAN that I created on ip 192.168.100.[1-5]. I am not able to access any external server only being able to access 192.168.100.5 which is the vlan ip of the machine the vpn is hosted on
That's not sdn
The lineup is called omada
I know that's what I have 😉
or ubiquity..
That said.. the deco stuff still does managed wifi with 802.1k/r aiui between units
so it does 5gig backhaul mesh with a 5/2.4 frontend for clients then does similar central auth things but I havn't looked closely at the detail
tplink is kinda crazy in their offerings to be honest because they have 3 Different and incompatible mesh solutions. (onemesh, deco and omada)
Omada is the business lineup
Can anyone here help me troubleshoot my wireguard connection? I think its an issue with DuckDns but i dont know enough about all this. Wireguard in unraid using a docker container of DuckDns. Got it up and running using an online guide and it worked for about 3 days
I tried to manually update my IP in the duckdns web ui but it said it didnt need to
While in home i have full access to the unraid server as normal, its specifically a tunnel issue of some kind AFAIK
I manually turned it on in my unraid vpn settings and now it works. Autostart seems to have been off. Idk if i missed enabling it or what, but seems to me like something that should be on by default
I'm using a VPN on my android, some apps on my phone won't let me use them properly if I'm on a VPN Connection cause it detects that I am on a VPN (some apps prompts: you are using a Datacenter IP or a VPN and cannot connect)
Is there any way to not let these apps know that I'm on a VPN and think I'm using a normal home network while on a VPN connection? I mean that's the whole reason I'm using a VPN only to some apps not letting me connect using a VPN
generally speaking no there's no definite way around that if the app is detecting your IP and blocking known VPNs
but you can definitely try different locations/VPN servers and try to find one that isn't blocked
also you can run your own vpn and then it probably won't detect that
the only way the apps can detect that you're on a vpn is by looking for addresses that have already been associated with a VPN or have previously been the source of suspicious/malicious traffic
yeah if the source IP is from a datacenter, etc.
you don't do it on client device
you need to setup your own service on a VPS somewhere, and even that may not work
Check your vpn app settings. You can do something called "split tunneling" meaning the service or app will bypass the vpn, while everything else on your device uses it as normal
More of a local networking question but I'm going to be setting up a nas soon. I'd like to set specific folders to only be access by certain people on my home network. How would anyone recommend going about this
Hi ! ..
Can i use wd purple for a starter small home NAS server ... I looked for wd red and didn't find it in my country a and i don't know how to get it ... My main goal for NAS is network storage across devices and reid 1 mirror to secure my data ... I don't imagine a huge read write on it .. Thanks for reading ✨
Hi,
I'm looking for a good vpn to do random things (mainly bypass my school's wifi restrictions) but since I wouldn't use it much I don't want something expensive. Are there any good ones where I can pay by how much I use it instead of monthly?
host your own
any tutorials?
ty
@supple hare you can also try eblocker, has build in openvpn/dnscrypt/tor etc https://eblocker.org/
PiHole and PiVPN can be used together and are well vetted.
eBlocker was a Kickstarter
THey were originally a commercial product
but went into insolvency
now its an open source project
huh
wherever there's a bunch of like "certified", and popups it's a red flag
It was basically an attempt to make a plug and play commercial pihole
Well, that pihole is shut for good..
is there any ethernet load balancing free software for Windows 10? trying to get more speed from my router but I'm thinking now it's my old SATA ssd bottlenecking the whole thing
Ethernet load balancing??
Speed from router??
what speed are you paying for lol. That's a crap ton of speed, not sure what you're doing that requires more
For what service level are you paying for? What are the interfaces on the devices, link speeds, etc.
5gigabit but my modem has
1x 2,5gbit Lan port
2x 1gbit Lan port
WiFi 2,4/5ghz

Your ISP really out here trolling you. Find out if you can bring your own modem and do 5gbit. That’s BS that they don’t allow a port for it.
With that said, I believe it’s designed as a way of not saturating the network from a single device.
You might be able to bond the connection, although you’d only get the connection speed of one of the connections on a single thread.
This is just my 10 cents though. Someone is likely smarter than I.
exactly. hate that. but no, it's not connection limit because I can speedtest at the same time or start a download from different computers and I get like 4,2 4,4gigabit combined
just realized my bottleneck is sata SSD write speed of 450mb/s.. exactly those 3600megabit
so I need a new pc or... raid of data SSD to increase write speed?
nothing special, chose this connection because it's cheap
Is there a good reason, why Samba would work on one Interface, but not on the other?
No, samba is not limited to one interface, yes, I can access both ip addresses.
Google throws out a firewall problem on the Serverside (I donnt have a Serverside firewall)...
Huh... SOMETHING on the way out of my LAN, is filtering port 445... I cant access anything via that port... Strange... That seems to be the solution for all my problems with only one interface working, that Interface was vpn-like, and didn't connect to 445 directly...
Is there ANY reason for outgoing port 445 requests to get blocked on a residetial connection?
Do other ports work?
Would 1gb networking be enough for recording to a NAS and editing off of it. 1080p 60fps?
it also depends on color space, depth and other stuff lol
but yea if you're not using red cameras 69-bit stuff you're finee
Also. Is there a way to limit who can access folders on a nas? would i have to set up a active directory? or is there something I could do before that
hm im not sure i've never had to do that before, but i assume it depends on what you're using for your nas
I havent tested all yet, but my ssh port works (its not the default ssh port tho)
that has nothing to do with it. speedtest.net is checking your network speed, that's not really related to your disk speed
it will affect a sufficiently large file download but your disk can't bottleneck your actual connection
but anyway yeah to get the full 5gb/s speeds you're paying for, you'll need to upgrade to a 10gbe router
Yes sometimes
SMB is a massive vuln if someone is using SMB v1 or insecure authentication and can result in some catastrophic situations
Some Residential ISPs block it
But it worked a week ago? And I use SMBv3... Also why dont they just refuse the connection instead of not sending a TCP acknowledgement?
to prevent bot scanners from even knowing that its an active service
If you respond with a Refuse, you know something is on the port
OHH... No, the Server is not at home, its in a Datacenter... I cant have a Client at home accessing a SMB share in a Datacenter... And it works over my Phones Data plan, just not through the wifi.
Ohhh.
Check with your Host Provider, they may have some form of filtering to block residential connections potentially
Although, I have seen residential ISPs block SMB both ways too
Well, it actually is at home, but its tunneled out through a VPN, so I can access it from outside my LAN (cant open ports on my router) but connection out of my LAN works...
And My hosting provider explicitly warned me the wouldn't block anything without me telling them to.
just be it laziness in the rule or CYZ (Cover your ass)
I still dont get why it worked last week tho lol
Well then hold up
its prob due to the fact it may not like you exiting then coming back in to connect
you would instead expose the SMB directly to LAN
But connecting directly to LAN is boring... Besides the main point was that I wanted to try access from outside, but it never worked...
Also Noone in the Chain, besides my VPS should know that the SMB is just tunneled back...
Now, how to do this cleanly? You would need an Internal and External DNS setup. Internal DNS points smb.blah.tld to Internal LAN IP and External DNS points smb.blah.tld to external endpoint
Well, it does, but I was deliberately avoiding DNS by entering the IP to test the outside access. I already set up the DNS setup, because LAN is way faster, why not use free speed, right?
did anyone have an encounter with Huawei EG8247H5?
i have been trying to attach a storage device to the ONT but its of no use. i have referenced to the manual and whatnot but it simply wont work
Hey, so I have been using OpenVPN recently routed to my home to bypass restrictions at school. I am wondering if there's a way to have the OpenVPN client travel to my server first then to another VPN, if that makes sense. Basically I want to do the following: OpenVPN Client -> My OpenVPN server -> ProtonVPN. Reason I want to do this is that ProtonVPN is blocked natively on the network.
it's possible
Do you have any clue on how I would set this up? I've tried googling it, but I can't seem to get my words right lol
How exactly would I go about doing that though?
I'm not telling it's madness but looks like madness to me. in order to test speeds you have to download and/or upload sample data.. can you explain why it is not related to disk speed? does it use system ram?
It doesn't need to use disk
if you think speedtest.net is downloading hundreds of gigabytes of data to your hard drive i don't know what to tell you
if any random website could do that it would be a security nightmare
it's just putting a bunch of meaningless data through your internet connection, it's not saving it anywhere
if you don't know how a piece of technology works, don't assume the explanation is madness 😆
If you think you need hundreds of gigs to measure a speedtest I don't know what to tell you
drive by downloads are a thing that 100% exist
i mean if you're doing a 30 second test on a 5 gigabit connection, that's already tens of GB
hundreds is an example but it's not implausible
also yes i realize drive by file downloads exist but it's a security issue, and you would notice
random websites are not writing 10s or hundreds of GB to your disk to test speed
It generates a few chunks of data and uses those over and over, it doesn't make new data constantly
that's my point
I'm trying to explain this to someone who thinks that the website is actually downloading data to disk and so a slow disk would change the speed test result
looks like you have to download something so disk is used at internet speed
how can write at lower speed without caching?
random data or not the file needs to be big enough to test during those seconds
that ~3600 limit just at drive write speed is suspicious
you're not writing anything
you're downloading a stream of garbage data which is stored in memory and then immediately deleted
the only place that data is going is through the internet connection, none of it ever hits the disk
maybe it's a language thing, but "downloading" doesn't necessarily mean "writing to disk" - it's just data coming into the computer to saturate the connection
"garbage data stored in memory" looks like something in the disk drive, so it has to be written
unless you are talking about ram
yes, memory means ram
ok so my bottleneck is ram, thanks
nope that is also not the bottleneck
your RAM bandwidth is like 20-40 GB/s even on an older computer
i think that's the page he was already looking at, but the confusion is about the terminology
the bandwidth bottleneck is the actual router's capacity and/or its ethernet ports
i wanna be clear here that you totally should still upgrade your disk from a SATA SSD to something faster because that will totally impact the speed of downloading a large file in the real world
but disk speed has no impact on the speed measured in a network speed test because they're designed with avoiding bottlenecks in mind, so they can actually measure the network speed
yes, we already had this conversation. the point is that random file downloads are undesirable and a security issue, and you would notice if speedtest.net was putting 10s or hundreds of GB in your downloads folder
I mean cookies exist
local storage
also not the same thing
ik, but it can download to PC
local storage is also limited to 5MB
Not always
yes there are workarounds and sketchy things you can do. i have no idea why you are so dedicated to picking out minor exceptions to a side statement i made like 10 minutes ago when I'm trying to actually help someone with a legitimate question about how speedtests work in the real world
you are telling me when speedtesting drive usage is slower than the actual speedtest? I feel really discombobulated
Hey Yall,
I am looking for a piece of software (FOSS preferred) to connect several REST-Based endpoints with contact information (Name, Email etc.) to a central point where those can be syncronized and pushed back. Either I have yet to find something like that or I am completely missing the search terms for that. (Alsoalso, not really sure if this even fits this channel..)
yeah just to be clear - when you're downloading an actual file that you want saved to your disk, you're still gonna be limited to your disk write speed. but websites like speedtest.net are designed to avoid all those bottlenecks and just test the maximum speed that can make it through the internet connection
probably what you're describing would be easiest if you just write a short python or nodejs script honestly. but you could also look for something like a "no-code" tool to set that up without actually writing a script
There is also the really interesting way, MEGA does its downloads. It seems as though they also cache it someplace and only upon completing the download, the file actually touches disk. (At least that is how it seems to me, since no temp file is created in the usual spots..)
almost 0% disk activity during speedtest. I feel robbed of my brain cells
no, it uses https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/FileSystem apparently
Welp, I was hoping for something that utilizes CardDAV and already has a few connectors ready. How is this not a solved problem...
That ready as though its a "file system object" so its a file system in memory?
ah hmm. yeah that might be something else very specific but I'm not aware of any particular names or pieces of software for that
so where is the real bottleneck? I can test 4,4 gigabit combined with multiple computers at the same time, only 3.6 on one connecting 3 ethernet cards and a wireless dongle
my guess is that it's either QoS somehow recognizing that it's a single client and limiting your speeds, or some overhead involved in bonding multiple connections, or perhaps just that speedtest.net doesn't handle multiple connections well
bonding overhead is a good guess but can't find anyone testing something similar to compare results
looks oddly specific and a little out of my knowledge, what that iperf3 is testing between local pcs?
yeah that will narrow down the problem
It reality, yeah, disk should have no involvement on speed test. BUT, there are actually writes going on when running a speed test. This is usage during a run on speedtest.net. 1gbps test with 105MB/s writes during the test. Even I was not aware of this going on during a test
it basically allows you to test between 2 PCs on your local network. This way you are mostly eliminating the router, and eliminating your internet connection as potential issues. This is how you troubleshoot, narrowing down the scope
we've been through this, but all i can say is that it's probably unrelated because the speedtest.net docs do actually say that it's not putting anything on your disk
Im not disagreeing. But there is caching of some sort going on during these test. What level of impact this has on results, I don't know as its not documented nor any post I can find of others questioning it
with a single 2.5 ethernet card I get little less than 2400mbps and almost 90MB/s of disk usage. too low to be the bottleneck. maybe the result is worse when combining all those cables together
yeah there probably is some caching in the browser but it's definitely not going to make your disk the bottleneck
Im not saying its the bottleneck, Im suggesting its just skewing the results
Similar to fast.com using caching to skew things where you get over 1Gbps on a gigabit link
Yeah don't they attempt to account for overhead?
Something like that, yah
I will say I did have a similar issue where one direction was great and the other was crap, turned out to be a bad SFP in the mix, I doubt that's the issue here but it could be somewhere there is a bad optic
hard to try because only one pc at time can have all those connections. I mean I only have 1gigabit port computers around and the main one is equipped with on board 1+ PCI 2.5 + usb 2.5 + wifi
Yah, it's probably mucking with crap trying to aggregate like that with so many things
Although it SHOULD pin to a single faster path I wouldn't be surprised if Windows did something stupid
maybe I can set a pc with WiFi+gigabit+usb2.5 and the other with the same but I don't think the result with overhead can't surpass 3600mbps
what do even need this much bandwidth for
like I stopped messing with speedtests a while back
exactly! there is nothing epon to buy with a simple 5gbit ethernet port at the moment
aggregation like that doesn't work well
maybe speedtest marginally works, since it uses multiple connections
esp with wifi
mostly big speedtest, 90% of the internet is not sharing files at those speeds, steam is a decompressing hell for my i7 4770k 4,4ghz (4c8t). only direct downloads, torrents and FTPs work well enough
Yeah there are too many mediums in play to even bother putting time into tshooting. WIFI should not be part of the equation either. Aggregation at the host is already a mess on it's own
I know it looks silly but I like tech in general
and getting that 5gigabit speedtest is something I want to get if it's cheap enough :D
just like rich people like big expensive cars
Iliad(called "free" in France) is indeed trolling us with slow ethernet ports
Just get a vps, there you go
that's cheating 😁
If it works it works
do i need to call my isp to have my ipv4 stay the same after i reboot my router or can i do it myself?
depends on ISP
my IP doesn't change after 5 min downtime with current ISP, but it used to change with every restart with older ISP
for static IP, it usually costs more
not going to lie, if i hit the lotto, I would'nt buy a sports car (well I'm tall af and wouldn't fit in any of them anyway) but you damn well better believe I'd have 10gb fiber internet in my house
id proly just buy a house
well I'd buy a new one, not mansion huge, but a bit of land and some out buildings
here in Italy max speed is 10/2 for 45usd or cheapest 5/0,7 for 15usd (all before tax) but a house isn't cheap at all
and I thought 75usd/mo for my 200/10 was rough
I pay $75/mo for 940/940 😂
both not cheap but I assume you get more money from your jobs
that's lower than the average price here for internet actually
that's why Ryan Reynolds is spamming so much about mint
Used to pay 165 for 300/30, tv, and phone
Now just for fiber 300/300 it's like 50 or something
165 a month is a real benchmark
that's not fttc for sure so you get ftth download speed but super lazy upload?
you can get 400 download over dociss
a lot is not fiber or cable, but just the tech the telco is using and the design of the network
yea its dociss
its an xfinity bundle so im guessing its super cheap (for my area) because of lazy upload speeds
most ISPs provision more download than upload on dociss
ya
and that's better for copyright holders
what

it's simily a technical limitation
less seeding
you only have a certain amount of bandwidth on dociss
do you mean like mobile internet? data cap?
no
bandwidth
that's the maximum ofc
which most don't utilize
because of other factors
nice to know
Moar piracy
I'm looking to get a new network switch for my room as well as a WiFi access point as there's a lot of interference between the router downstairs and my room that makes the higher not worth using currently. Was wondering if there was perhaps a combined switch and access point out there somewhere? Would need at least five ports with an access point capable of WiFi 6 if possible.
UniFi 6 In Wall
Keep in mind it's in early access meaning there's limited quantity of them and you have to become an early access member
Thx will look that up. Wouldn't have thought such a product would be uncommon. Seems like an obvious combo device.
or omada wall mount
no need for controller like unifi, which I find annoying for a single device
for a whole deployment unifi is great
a single device, not so much
these have webui's like your router to control them
I have the Omada EAP-615 on my desk
it's pretty legit
they make them by the truckload for hotels. EAP-615-wall
@icy bone only 3 downlinks.. and it requires 802.1at/af power
it's not really a technical limitation per se, it's just a decision made in how you provision the network and how you allocate spectrum
you can easily do 10Gbps symmetric with copper if you designed your network that way
ye
it's kinda a technical limitation in that way that there's only so many channels
and most favor download
i mean, there are plenty of channels to do symmetric up and down, it's just that in a shared data/traditional TV network you've gotta allocate most of them to download because that's what customers are actually using
that is gradually changing as more and more becomes OTT though
give me at least 100mbps upload and I will be happy, but not fully satisfied
tp Link Omada In walls are another option too
Again. Thx all!
I feel the need for speed!
anyone know wireguard stuff? Is it possible to have like a linode that has a tunnel into my lan, and then another wireguard instance running on the linode that I would connect to and the items on the LAN would be accessible?
I have it configured where I can connect to my external IP and achieve LAN access via wireguard but I would like to do that but using the linode ip
yes
my dns query time did seem to improve btw, now it's 0 msec for querying local dns and 11 msec for google dns
not sure what I changed that made it improve
KEK
First it was their copyright lawsuit despite being GPL Code...
Now this?
Ubiquiti is just a vexatious litigant through and through.
I have a love hate with this. They better be right that they acted as fast as they can. On the other hand modern journalism is out of control and needs to have consequences for deliberately presenting lies and unverified information as truth.
They need to get their ass handed to them once and for all
Krebs complaints were actually very valid and cited
If it was a clickbait article, that wouldve been one that
very cool, I need something like this too but 299 is way too much for my ethernet switch budget