#networking
1 messages Β· Page 383 of 1
I don't mind
Excluding raw downloads our heaviest users struggle to burst~120mbps for more than a polling period.
^^^ Yup, exactly
lots of people think they need way more bandwidth than they actually need.. having 1Gbps doesn't really make the internet any faster in general than if you have 200-300Mbps.. it is only when you are doing a big download that you notice this
the high speed you are getting is only being used when you are downloading really large files that would take a long time in general.. for normal traffic it is no faster than if you had a 50Mbps connection.. or a 200Mbps connection
anybody who thinks that their 1Gbps service is "snappier" loading a webpage than their 200Mbps or 50Mbps connection is most likely experiencing the placebo effect
A person with 100x100 COAX upgrading to 100x100 fiber will have a better experience than gig COAX.
Latency is underrated and since most gig services being offered are fiber, this is more likely the reason its "snappier".
People fail to realize that the internet has been pushing optimization for years, especially during the rise of smart phones where bandwidth was minimal. The whole goal is to use as little bandwidth as possible. Hell even the 4k requiring 50mbps is outdated.
I have been called a liar by customers with 10g dia when I show them how much bandwidth they actually use.
yes, exactly, because super low latency means that TCP gets to ramp up really quickly
so I agree completely, it is the decreased latency of the service instead of the higher total bandwidth that makes it feel snappier to customers
lol "already"
That and TCP bandwidth delay product, where latency determines your throughput no matter what bandwidth you have
yeah, that's what I meant
TCP ramping up quickly = low latency for bandwidth delay product
i have this tts ai that runs locally
and i go to this ip
is there a way to open this up for wan?
Why be a god when you can be a King? Atleast the King is a real thing.
thats not yes or no
I wasnt responding to the question, just responding to the pic's question
Port forwarding is the answer you are looking for
IF and only IF you are not behind a CG-NAT.
yep i figured, but how would i let it like that
what thta
so port forwarding works like this:
You got one Public IP which you have to share with many Machines.
Each machine has a Private IP.
Your application runs on a Machine with Private IP:Port
Port forwarding says: All Incoming Traffic on public IP:port gets redirected to Private IP:Port
that way you can have something like
Public IP:Port A > Machine X:Port
Public IP:Port B > Machine Y:Port
etc
You would login to your ISP Router or Gateway and set this up
Basically, Your ISP treats all its customers like your Home LAN Treats all its Machines
So you share a public IP with many people
tracert 1.1.1.1
in cmd
if one of the IP's in the Tracert is like 10.100.X.X or 100.64.X.X, you are behind CG-NAT
yes and no
I had a public IP once, but in all traceroutes there would be a 10.x.x.x IP
These kinds of network setups make me wanna bash the Metro Network Engineer
it was atlice/optimum
I already got a golf club with their name on it, so were good.
@snow lance Basically you have an internal IP address(most likely in the range 192.168.1.1-192.168.1.253) that you can see by typing ipconfig in command prompt. This is the range your router uses to assign ip addresses to all the connected devices. Then the router also has a public ip like 76.138.56.134 it will use to talk to the internet. So if you're away from home and you want to talk with your home network you would use 76.138.56.134, but it wouldn't know what to do with that request. So inside the router settings we put an ip forward such as port 8050 is assigned to ip address 192.168.1.1. Now if we type 76.138.56.134:8050 in the browser it will know to use the local service on 192.168.1.1 with port 8050.
by typing ipconfig in command prompt it will also show the default gateway, if you put that in your browser the router settings will come up
yep, now this gets all different with ipv6
if anyone has fixes, addins please do
Yeah this will be a lot of crying
how
subnetting
it's easier
just add firewall rule, done
and use DNS, I ain't gonna remember those ips
Ipv6 is the best thing to happen to NAT.... Its destruction.
technically, you don't need firewall in the first place... but that's like super bad to do
Each Machine with Ipv6 is Publicly routable with that IPv6 which makes it great
All the ports or avail... meaning standard port use across multiple host
No NAT
No NAT
did I mention No NAT?
And you dont have to have DHCP
Oh yeah, and No NAT
now there is NPT
which is kinda needed if you don't own and adveritse your own prefixes and need dual WAN or something like that
And Virtual Sub-Networks like Docker Networks
The nice thing about it is, its easy to read tho
Your Host portion of the IPv6 remains the same
ye i have done port forwarding before
but how would i do port forwarding for this
just open port 8050 and give ppl my public ip?
with port 8050
yes
@peak cloak Would you say the Link Local is a form of NPT?
oh well thats simple lmao
yes, but then they would need to do http:1.2.3.4:8050
yeye i do that with my media server
aight now i just need to make port forwarding work
it died a week ago
if you don't want to provide the port every time, you have to make it port 80 and/or setup SSL certs and port 443
Could setup a Reverse Proxy to utilize 443/80 and let the Reverse Proxy handle internal routing to the right machine
that too
so you can have multiple machines utlize port 80
best really is to see WAN IP, well first 2 octets really are needed
you have a mtik right from what I remember?
They really need to stop exposing their vLAN Tags in their DNS Names publicly
lol
"Yeah we the ISP people, we make the internet 'whole' for everyone.... also were trash at it and insecure at times too.... but were the most important link of the internet"
These people are supposed to be the best at what they do
yes
lmao
what's that
I have a URL thing
ddns
that I use for my ip then I'll just add :8050
yeah that works
what danger would that pose?
zero
Abstraction Reversal
idk if this counts as networking but j got my new pc not too long ago and iβm using a wifi dongle for wifi, my other devices like my xbox and my phone get fast connection in my room but my pc has high latency and slow downloads. does anyone know what i can try do to fix it? ik ethernets better but itβs not rly possible for me right now. ty
I use a 150ft cable 
Also your dongle might not be that good
Or location
Or things in-between the router and PC
loll
i donβt think the dongle is the problem but it might be the other two
idk how to fix that tho especially when it works with other things
I remember when I had a dongle too
one of those shitty usb ones
3 mbps internet, my phone got 30
got a cable and instantly went to a stable 95 all the time
what WiFi dongle do you have
if you rly can't get a cable you should get a proper WiFi pcie adapter
39 years ago the Internet switched to TCP/IP protocol
I gotta say udp/mac is definitely the way to go 
Or you could get a fiber adapter and hook that shit up run it 20kilomrtors kek
and then a new era has started
Anybody does content delivery networks?
this is my favorite channel to look at whenever i want to feel clueless
Is there a fiber optic internet to coaxial converter?
You call them Media Converters AFAIK
Which fiber interface? I know for sure normal Ethernet to coaxial exists
I might switch to another internet provider
My previous uses coaxial
I dont want to break my whole house for the cables
Since the cables are in a mansory wall
the other providers will be using fiber optic
They probably will only use fiber till your modem, or router. It's normal Ethernet after that
(basically you could use your existing stuff in your home)
Well it's complicated
They don't do fiber around the house
It's fiber to the home
So you would have an ONT somewhere where fiber will terminate and be converted to Ethernet
From there you can use moca adapters to do ethernet over coax
In the end tho, it can be cheaper and in the end easier to run Ethernet
Thinking of investing in a NAS. Would be my first venture into these. End goal is to build a private cloud of sorts.
Looking at having virtual machines on the NAS, with remote access capability using VPN.
What do you guys think? Any recommendations or advice?
I would advise NAS and VM hosting to be seperate if possible
Just don't reload your NAS if it's hosting VMs without powering them off first π
Any issue that will arise?
like it's nice to have bare metal truenas for example, and then for VMs something like proxmox
NAS software isn't great for VMs
Ah
Lemme search up proxmox
Other than rack unit servers, from what i understand, PC could be used for VM yeah?
I was thinking of starting off by using NAS only first, then scaling up if necessary.
I mean my servers are just 2 business desktops
Business desktops?
Ahh
I'm trying to get it to where I can access the files on any of my computers from any of my computers. I feel like I'm pretty close to the finish line. But I got to the point where I'm trying to access the harddrive and I get this error and I don't know what to do.
On the host machine do you have the share permissions set correctly?
I meant the folder you're sharing
Yeah
Sharring an individual folder didn't fix things.
Don't know what I did, but it's working now
That's good to hear
hello how i can get my NAT type ?
I don't understand what those even mean lol
NAT type is some garbage made up by console makers to say you either have UPNP enabled/disabled or are behind CGNAT or not from what I can tell
guys can i somehow check if my isp is supporting ipv6 ?
IPv6-test.com is a free service that checks your IPv6 and IPv4 connectivity and speed. Diagnose connection problems, discover which address(es) you are currently using to browse the Internet, and what is your browser's protocol of choice when both v6 and v4 are available.
do i need to enable this in my router ?
on both routers i have ?
Well yes
okay thanks
I hope you're not doing router >> router though
unless you disabled DHCP and other services so it's not handing out addresses or doing NAT
iam
i have wan > router > router > my pc
is that very bad ?
Then you need to disable DHCP/NAT on the router to your PC
will the first router give me one ? and devices on wireless
Leave the first router alone, that will hand out addresses fine
okay
jo just disabe dhcp server on second one
like this.. and that is all do i need to restart it ? it didnt need it
You shouldn't need to restart anything, just disable should be it
okay
The biggest issue is doing NAT from router 1 to router 2 because that puts you behind double nat which can cause issues with some services, if you're not plugged into the WAN port on the second router (the one to your PC) then it's not doing NAT and you're fine
i ment like strict NAT, moderate NAT..
NAT isn't strict/moderate/etc. it's just NAT, consoles for some absurd reason try to use it instead of just telling you the issues with the connection
oh okay
read something on forums but yeah there were consoles implemented too
so if i don't now have double NAT what is the result
i should be able to connect to lets say minecraft server right ? on this pc i can connect on it wia ::1
If you don't have double NAT now then nothing, if you're behind double nat now then removing it (so just single NAT) would probably make things work better (voice and whatnot usually) on console and multiplayer games
great that is kind of useful
okay so i went with this tutorial https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/l35612/ipv6_support_for_minecraft/
The good thing about IPv6 though is there isn't (SHOULD NEVER BE) NAT in a default setting π
stuck on 4. on my laptop connected wired to same router as this pc i can connect with 192.168.0.77(my ip)
yeah that is why iam trying to do this
Ok, so you can connect to your local IPv4 address but not with the IPv6 address locally at least?
nono i need to send the ipv6 on my discord π
from the laptop to the PC that is
give me like 1minute
sure
Ah, that's a link local address
Yah, link local always starts with FE, so you don't have any public IPv6 addresses
oh in adapter settings something ?
oh okay right
well scam
A public IPv6 address would be somwhere in the 2000: to 2ffff: range (I think that's the current usable range right now for public I can't remember if 3000 to 3fff is open yet)
my ISP on their web wrote its okay for wired connections(without public ip)
IP doesn't care wired or wireless so long as you get a prefix (block) from your ISP, the router should hand them out to all clients
there "In what situation do I get an IPv6 address at Vodafone?
The IPv6 address is used by most Wired Internet customers over a wired network (unless the customer has a public IP address). For other types of connections, it is ending."
uh google trans..
I think they're saying IPv4 (public address) connections on cellular are ending
but wireline (fiber/copper/coax/etc) and wireless (cell) should all have IPv6 on Vodafone now
uh i use DSL is that one of them ?
Yup, copper
i use phone lines yet my speed is terrible
Yah, that's about right for DSL π
oh okay great so should i call my ISP ?
or could it be xDSL too ?
You shouldn't need to, enabling IPv6 on the first router should get an IPv6 block just fine
yah, that's still a wire
oh i forgot to enble it on first one
π that helps
in which settings it could be ?
idk if it supports ipv6 but on box i think its there
if you are doing double nat, v6 won't work
if it's just doing basic layer2 stuff, you shouldn't need any additional settings
good question, nothing says WAN that I see which is what I'd look for first
ipv6 wan host ?
Yah
Yah, check there first
ok, 1 sec
there all about ipv6
BUT wait i have one switch and this one router i could be able to replace first router with second one and second one with that switch
BezdrΓ‘tovΓ½ modemovΓ½ router N USB 300 Mbit/s VDSL/ADSL (Annex B)
thanks π
in cz but parameters are in en
btw @thick minnow mention me i dont have notifications on only sounds.. ill be back in 1min
@thick minnow Check under IPv6 LAN
Need to step away for a bit, be back in about 30 mins
okay so just checked that switch and its just fine even taking data trough it(by that i mean i can connect to my server(ipv4))
Nice!
oh u back
So what's the end goal, I forgot to ask, host a minecraft server on IPv6 network?
right
but i didnt put server-ip so it listens on localhost and ::1 too
Yup, that's correct
So now to get IPv6 enabled on your router π
I don't think java has offical v6 support btw
but people say it works
never tested it myself
idk but it works for me too
Yah, that's what I saw too
Yah but ::1 is just 127.0.0.1 for IPv6
yeah
was gonna test to my self but it's on a different vlan and would require more work so meh
lol, yah
Doh, I see where to go now
so in first place i need to get my ipv6 adress now
Network > WAN Settings > Enable IPv6 > DHCPv6
oh okay
DHCPv6?
oh dhcp-pd
Yah
yes
Now go there and set it as pictured π
Interesting, you should have IPv6 now π
Check that before setting IPv6 LAN, might not need to mess with it
ipv6-test.com
This should work if you have IPv6 now
i see you used ADSL is there diff. if i use VDSL ?
Nope, just a generic picture online π
oh okayis there difference anyways ?
There is, ADSL and VDSL are different technologies
one supports faster speeds, I just don't remember which off hand
VDSL is usually closer to the node ADSL is usually the last mile
Sounds about right
not my router tho π
okay so ipconfig in cmd right ?
or may i restart router ?
yah, or you can check ipv6-test.com and see if it says IPv6 is working
it did restart connection
I would check that website first before restarting the router, it might already be working
right still no IPv6 results i will restart router asap other users are online π
No worries, I would check and set the IPv6 LAN stuff too before rebooting
oh okay lets do that π
Network > IPv6 LAN Settings
RADVD
Delegated
and there should only be one option for Prefix Delegation WAN connection
perfect, already setup π
π
Yah, so once you're able to reboot the router and you should, if it's working right, give you a public IPv6 after this
okay ill just wait as users disconnect
could take a while
Yah, no worries, DM or tag me here if you don't get an IPv6 address after the reboot
yah
Yah, that one doesn't worry me as much, it should pass right through there
then its fine π
Yah, main router is the focus and once that's rebooted and we (hopefully) have an address it should work
thanks. I am 15 and only one who does networking in house π
network go brrrrr
π
yah
not so much with my snail int. speed π
btw as soon as we got on VDSL its much more stable + as we switched an engineer had to come and test cables and the problem was in pole like 5houses far and he had to reconnect our cable to diff. line π it was broken most prob.
Stable is really good, that's key
Speed helps though
π true
- when there is no internet i have simple solution enable LTE on my phone use USB and go with 100Mb/s down and 55Mb/s up π
Nice! LTE is good too, helps when you don't have good wired connection
although usually has data caps π¦
i used it on my phone but we don't want LTE we have great speeds but well stability+ping in winter snow ? that could end badly with massive lags(not in these days technology but anyways cable is more stable)
Yah, cable is good for games but LTE for downloads if you don't have the speed
well not a problem for me its 5* faster than my current speed π its something about 6.1MB/s and my current is 2.3MB/s
Nice! data caps are evil!
yeah but then its fair for everyone
It depends, usually they do it just because $$$$
yah, could be much worse
example. no internet at all π
dial-up noises play in the background
Haha, yes, stepping away from it all is good too, can't forget the outside from time to time
i tried more than 10 times pointlessly port forward ipv4 minecraft server when knowing iam under cgnat π
yah, CGNAT is no good for forwarding
well its impossible to do so ..
but i think ipv6 is different right ?
i shouldnt be limited anywhere
Not exactly, you CAN but the ISP has to be willing to forward the port too
Correct, IPv6 has NAT but it shouldn't be used in like 99% of cases
I've done it and seen it done in limited scenarios
and if not i still could call my ISP for some information.
That is correct
on their web they say its working on wired connections so i hope it works for me as well π
i live next to city with 1gbit π
Yah, it should but cross fingers just to be safe
so my brother is playing and its 23o'clock here so iam going sleep tomorrow ill @mention you and ill se if you up and in same time ill reboot okay ? π
haha, sounds good, later!
later! cya!
hey Lurick i turned off pc and suddenly internet crashed too ;D any reson to that ?
Not that I can think of, nope
i think my router has problems with dhcp server
Hmmm, it shouldn't
have to enable real quick
ok
my phone tells /cant get ip xd
How is the second router (the one that goes to your PC) connected to the first?
If it's via cable does it connect via the WAN port on the second router? If it does then that's why
no its wan>first router>second router> pc + most wireless devices
I meant on the second router, does the cable go into the WAN port
and i think as soon as dhcp clients list changed it crashed
from first router ? yes
but i think about it
So WAN > first router > (cable) > (WAN port) second router
its dumb idea a bit
Yah, if you move it off the WAN port to a LAN port then it should work fine afterwards. In this case the DHCP server was turned off and that second router wasn't sending DHCP requests to the first router to give out IPs for clients
wan(wanport of router) > cable (wanpott of router) > pc
yeah
Yup, change the cable on the second router to a LAN port instead and it should be fine π
noww i realise ...for now its on shcp and ill so it tomorrow
That's fine π
Yup, so long as it's working for now can deal with the rest later, lol
my brother has abstination for pc i had to rq fix it xd
fun
Yup, get it fixed quick and then go back and fix it better later π
exactly
and that forever loop resulting in half way fix being permanent
That's about right
xd
well iam going to take quick snack then sleep and write you tmrw most probably DM
Sounds good, later!
or you preffer this chat ?
DM is fine
okay
You're braver than I
does anyone know why battle.net downloads are so slow?
centralized servers. everyone goes to the same place.
guys is switch better than router working like switch ?
no, it should be the same unless the routers hardware is really crappy
@waxen scroll @clear igloo
wat is dis?
lmao
some stupid guy trying to use a blackmagic sdi video converter for internet @clear igloo
HA, wow
I didn't see the blackmagic so thought someone was just trying to convert coax to fiber or something but yah, that's hilarious
it will be black magic if they get it working
my understanding is its some other protocol, not ethernet
its ethernet-like but needs to be PTP
i dont even think the question as presented makes sense without details on how they're attempting to set it up
Probably smpte
like, iirc SDI video uses a completely different connector and cable from anything we use in the cable industry
it's BNC for video almost exclusively
blackmagic loves smpte with their own stuff injected into it
BNC vs F Type
Different resistance on the cabling too
yeah
it would not even get a signal through, even if you had some crazy custom modem
that said i kinda wish there was something like this
i would kill for like. low-cost and low complexity point to point modern ethernet over coax
my whole apartment is wired up with coax for cable.. but i dont own a single tv or cable box
moca adapters are crazy expensive for no good reason
I mean, that's MoCA lol.
well
i guess what i really want is literally just "moca but open standard"
arguably it could be a lot simpler if it was just point to point
I don't wonder if a PTP connection between two wifi cards would work. Would need a 10-20dB attenuator at least in there but.. yeah
Like a physical cable with a 20dB attenuator directly connecting two wifi cards
ooh i kinda love that idea lmao .... that would be fun to try out
If you do, would need to make sure the power handling of the attenuator would be in the 50W range to be safe
I should measure the output power of a b/g antenna. My power meter is old though so I can only get a rough average peak value
i don't think so
Xiber isn't the ISP anyway, just the server but I looked at it, and it seems bad
marketing fixed wireless as better than fiber
lol
How much do all of the cables of traditional Internet companies weigh? And how much do they cost to install? Well, a lot. And your signal has to travel through all of it. We chucked out all the unnecessary cable when we built our hybrid fiber and fixed wireless nationwide network. So, the Internet gets to you at close to lightspeed with single-digit latency and 99.99% uptime
still i have better upload

ah hello fellow Polish person
so many polish people
hi
I heard poland had pretty good internet
but only fiber
unless you live in city center
then you can get 200 Mbps LTE
but
it sucks
20 ms ping? no thanks
idc too much about mobile data
as long as it's good enough for voice, text, messaging, etc.
max. 20 Mbps ping 40
I mean it's no different in rural america either
not even my real internet anyway
that's running off of microsofts servers
I have an azure vm
my real internet is at least gigabit
U can run 3g-sdi over fiber
yes but you can't run internet over SDI
Of course
There are application with 3g-sdi for studio interconnect or content delivery
yes
mind you, you can just run an ethernet cable between two machines and with a bit of manual network config, you have a PTP connection between the two.
This is a weird question but I need a VPN that I can use infinitely on all my devices for free
Infinitely?
Theres open source vpn like openvpn
VPN as in access remotely a single network securely, or VPN as in access the internet in a "somewhat-ish" anonymous way?
well that's a protocol
people's defentition of vpn is pretty different, thanks to misleading marketing
um im not sure (im no expert in networking) but i am basically trying to bypass Netgear Circle parental control and using a vpn like psiphon or hotspot shield works, but their slow or not infinite
what is the best pcie wifi card?
I was wondering if someone would be able to help me with a PFSense issue that i've got...
It's not the sort of story that needs to fill this chat. If someone were to put their hand up, i'd PM them. That seems like the best practice way to handle it don't you think? Or is being a dolt the better option?
No one will "put their hand up" this is a moving chat, people will dump their questions, the people who want to answer it will do it.
Good luck having anyone DM you first for your issues (maybe DM'ing them first can help, but not always anyway)
perhaps you should read my comments a little clearer, if they were to put their hand up, i'd PM them. Take a walk, you're clearly not here to help.
Okay then, good luck :D learn it with experience if not from other's experience, no issues with that anyway
Dealing with a new router, slightly new to this, don't care if I get another "https://dontasktoask.com/" prompt from anyone, but Bridge Mode or Wireless Bridge Mode?
If you respond, please ping or mention me. I want to get immediate notifications. Please and thank you.
hai
im setting up my own nextcloud instance on rockylinux, but i cant figure out how to use add an additional hardrive to nextcloud on the same machine, can anyone help?
@mystic hull @keen haven
This sort of garbage shouldn't need to be prefaced with a genuine question. Linus was always wanting a genuine place where users could get proper advice and help. The trolls should be booted straight away on a no tolerance policy... just my two cents. EOD
I think you missed the point of the message here
It's a help us help you kind of thing
It further divulges into how to actually ask a good question.
The whole point of the comment is to educate not to actually be in jest.
So let's just all calm down lol
Bridge if hooked up with physical link between them, wireless bridge if without if im not wrong
Yes, you are totally correct.
Although I'm figuring stuff out with someone right now, I'm gonna try to come back here if nothing comes clear my way.
Looking for some help with port-forwarding a minecraft server.
I've gone in and allocated both TCP/UDP to 25565 which is the standard for that.
I've set it to my personal desktop as the device and yet the port doesn't appear open.
Is there some other step I am missing here?
pretty much what the settings are. I don't have a TCP/UDP option so had to set it twice.
Why
Is the server actually powered on and listening on that port?
sorry - canyouseeme*
Do you have another pc to check if it's accessible even internal network
Seen some people with their MC server off and checking if the ports were open
Legend
Also check your firewall. I assume you're using windows
I'll check it out. Yeah my firewall for windows is actually disabled
just for now for testing purposes
But I'll run the server and see if it connects
So the server currently isn't running?
Sorry I meant it was running
but I turned it off a moment ago, the server as active in the background
but it wasn't being detected
Detected by what
by the port check tool. and also i couldn't even load into it for some reason.
i will post more information
Can you post like the status that the server is actually listening
How are you trying to load into it? With another machine locally using the local IP?
I'm loading into it just through my personal PC. Only have the one
yep via my local IP
127.x ip or 192.x
Yah, I would check local connectivity first, if that's having issues then try to fix that first
But anyways, need to show the proof that it is actually listening
@clear igloo @unborn sluice okay rebooted and remade. Just to confirm I'm using my local visible IP address?
Yes
Okay. Now it's actually working!
I just rebooted because I didn't know if that would fix things after installing the server program
But I guess it did... >.> <.<
Haha, well glad it's working π

Pretty awesome thanks to both of you. One last question in regards to this
Let's say I'm offline and a friend wanted to hop into the server.
Do I need to leave it running in the background for them to join?
Yes, your pc and the server needs to be running 24/7 or atleast when someone needs to play
Yup
Oh okay. Makes sense
Electricity bill go brrrr
can i use DHCP function on my router to assign a private ip on my local machine and make it so that it doesnt change the private ip
like it changed from 192.168.0.101 to 102 or 103 sometimes, can i just have 1
yes, you can
Yes. Dont forget the colons
got it, thanks
@plain siren architect said hell no
he said later on they're gonna launch something but not right now
Lol
they have a team built to research v6 but nothing actionable right now
gonna get added to it
its a large business so I have to get some approvals and it has to be recorded in our systems as a project I can bill time against
we also have a change control process so if I did none of that it would get caught up in there
I find that often times IPv6 gets caught up in an architect who doesnt really want to do it or the security team who doesnt want to deal with it
@clear igloo firewall people. 
Imagine being on a huge change call with a bunch of IT people and dropping "Oh yeah, i'm turning on ipv6"
hard is change
block none of the things? π
Just do it on a Friday of a holiday weekend and leave. It'll be fine.
what kinda cable should i get for short range 10 gbps like 20 meter
Should be
aight ill order thanks
Cat6 or Cat6a would be fine
ye i got a cat6a
That's perfect then π
@clear igloo iptables is a pain in my ass
yup
I FINALLY FIXED MY INTERNET
ended up buying a 20 metre ethernet cable all the way across my house.
c:
i want to access sftp server online, is it possible
I want to do this. My switch manual says it can be accessed at 192.168.1.3. And I can access its web gui when only the switch is connected. But when I connect my router cable. My PC starts to access the router bypassing the switch and I can not access it anymore.
What kinda settings I should look for in my switch web gui.
what switch
zyxel gs1200-5
what is the subnet the router is using for LAN?
mask 255.255.255.0
ips 192.168.0.2-192.168.0.254
well that makes sense
you are trying to access an IP that isn't in the IP range when connected
go into the switch settings and make it get an IP from DHCP or set a static IP in your LAN subnet which isn't being used for anything else. I reccomend going the DHCP route
then go into router, find the list of devices connected, and you should see the switch there, and connect to it's IP
enabled DHCP
is it ok now?
192.168.0.1 is my routers ip
switch ip is 192.168.0.203 but 169.254.14.148 is ip of connected to the switch computer.
Anyway it works now, so Thank You.
but I still do not understand whats going on
and traceroute does not work on 192.168.0.203
Wdym
A switch does no routing, that should be what you get from router
If you do a traceroute to router ofc you won't see 192.168.0.203 because it's not getting routed through the switch. For all the router and pc sees, they are directly connected
In need of some help. I have a router that has a cat6 running to a switch. The switch then has multiple cables that run up a wall through several floors connecting multiple devices for different people. We've recently had an extension and someone is moving out into a room. I'm wanting to run a cable from the switch out into that room and then hooking up a switch. The second switch in the new room would have multiple connections but also allow me to run my own through the wall and down the garden to my "shed" where I work. Would I have any issues with doing this?
I should mention that I'd want to transfer files from indoors down to my work space and vice versa.
As long as you have the route there it should be fine
Iβm also presuming youβd be running your network at 1Gb?
If I understand you correctly the answer would be yes. My motherboards run at 1gbit and the current switch I have supports gigabit too so as far as I know that along with the cable should allow gigabit, no?
yes it would work as long as the second switch is also 1gb ports. well it would work if the second switch was slower - you would just get slower speeds in the shed.
Any advice on how to get windstream to send out another tech?
I've isolated the problem down to somewhere between the tap and the modem(new modem, neighbor on same tap getting correct speeds)
yep. pull the power on their device call it in and "yeah the building has power"
basically had to do that
except for I left the device plugged in and kept saying, yes I am connected directly to the modem through an ethernet cable
I can't believe a T1 tech cannot create a ticket to dispatch a tech
they had to spend an hour talking with their internal team
I have a question
I am thinking about hosting a server in USA to watch Netflix and game using WireGuard, the problem with this is that I live in Argentina and to get the closest distance I choose to host it in Florida. My question here is if its going to be possible to game with good speeds?
Do i need to have DNS records set up on cloudflare if i want only one single page redirect to work?
Probably better to do it in the webserver not dns level
Since you said it was a page.
Out of scooe for a dns
Yeah i was going to do that eventually but i donβt have a web server atm, wanted to have a simple /discord redirect on cf but it doesnβt seem to be working
So you own a domain and you want to redirect a host like say
discord.example.com to something?
Or a page like
example.com/discord
I own a domain and want to set up a page rule with cf so domain.com/discord redirects them to an invite for my discord server but it doesnβt work
What server runs on domain.com
Donβt have an actual web server set up right now, only using the domain to have lavalink linked to a sub domain and port so i donβt have e to use the IP every single time
Thatβs the only dns record i have ^
Ok. Cloudflare can handle that
This is how i had set up the redirect but it isnβt working for me atm
Looked up the link matching stuff with asterisk and read that having * before the domain would match several types of the url so i put it there
Traffic must pass through Cloudflare for Page Rules to work. If you only use Cloudflare for DNS, Page Rules are not active. think ur right
Donβt know what to do about it tho
Show your dns record
i set up the default apache2 server on my linux machine and added both cname and A records to cloudflare but now its saying that the web server is down
the lavalink and src records are not being proxied through cf since they dont need to be, its the first A record and CNAME i need looking over
BTW blurring that wouldn't help, we can do a DNS lookup and get the IP anyways. just sayin
good to know
and besides, it's not his IP. it's cloudflare's
No? He is using an VPS from an provider
so what happens now
anyone know how to fix this? im trying to set up an apache2 web server and im encountering so many issues
i follow digital ocean's guide, domain.com wont resolve
it would actually help if you show us your config
my headless ubuntu machine has all of its port closed after reboot. Help needed. π«
I got ssh server running on that machine and it was working. Then I decided to switch to dhcp instead of static ip today. After changing the setting and reboot, my router can still see it, ping it, but Nmap tells me all ports are closed
I scan from 0 to 6xxxx, which includes all possible ports
Your trying with the same IP?
Are you that sshd js working though
Need to go to router DHCP leases and see the new IP
Oh yeah, did you enable the sshd servicd or just start it
Yes, I can ping it. So confused right now. How the hell does the machine end up in such implausible state? The bad thing is that it is under a heavy cover so no kvm for me
Well it doesn't happen randomly
User error
The sshd was working for a long time and I only updated the /etc/networks today
The sshd was there running perfectly for every reboot before today
and it is daily reboot
I tried plugging in USB ethernet adapter, then attempted both βme as dhcp serverβ and βme waiting for dhcp leaseβ and βme brute force a static ip for myselfβ, then Nmap scan the network and cannot see the node
If it is an extra ethernet adapter, then currently broken network configuration should not cause it to fail as well, right?
Me as dhcp server.... Why
The me is my laptop, used for debugging the node
Just so out of idea to fix the node that I start brute forcing all possibilities
The three attempted directions should cover the cases where the node
- waits for dhcp lease from new network interface
- tries to give out dhcp lease to the new interface
- expect the other side to have an ip despite not accepting dhcp lease nor giving out any lease
@clear igloo Apparently IT upgraded APs at all of the schools. And nobody has Internet access since their devices won't connect to the new APs.
That sounds like a upgrade to me
lol, 10/10 upgrade
Local man reduced bandwidth consumption with this simple trick.
network engineers hate him

Most secure network is one with all ports shutdown!
Local man protects network with this one simple trick
Hackers HATE him!
How to avoid hackers from your servers (for ever!, every single service)
drop 0.0.0.0/0
drop ::/0
Hey
I Wana host a sftp server online, so I can connect to it remotely, from someone else's internet
Do I need to add my internal IP for port forwarding or my external ip
If anyone knows anything just @ me
Yea you need to put your local IP of your machine in the router and forward TCP 22
Show a screenshot if still confused
@sweet pawn
Not on my PC right now, but I did that, I still wasn't able to connect to it externally
Hm, are you sure it is open locally? (you could use a another device, put the local IP of your system and try to SFTP/SSH to it to see if it'd respond)
I also setup IP reservation so IP on my PC will not change
Yup, worked locally
While you are inside your network, try your public IP and the same settings to see if it'd work
Do I need to add my external ip in sftp client to connect after all that,m
Wait, you do, if your on a different network you should put your public IP and port 22
Don't remember if I tried that, I'II try it when iam back on the pc
this is ok right
seems ok, if the PC/system is on .101 then yea
hmmm, doesnt seem to be working, is there anything else i need to do, the .101 is working when i try it in the sftp client
Are you sure port forwarding is even allowed by your ISP? that;s the only other thing I can think of
or wait for someone else to help; I'm dumb at this stuff xD
do they need to allow you? the router does seem to have that option
Are you behind CGNAT?
not sure
Does the WAN IP on your router fall within the range of 100.64.x.x to 100.127.x.x
Or 10.x.x.x
it does, its 100.96.xxx.xxx
That's CG-NAT so you won't be able to access it from the public IP that shows up on like "what is my ip" sites
Nope
Not unless you can convince your ISP to port forward that port to you from their side
or if they'll sell you a static public IP
gotcha, aight thanks alot for the help
Well you can rely on services to basically create a tunnel to them. And then you will be to access it publicy, like ngrok. You can also use something like zerotier, which allows you to create a virtual network. So if 2 computers on the same virtual network, and have internet access, they will be able to communicate. Downside is that the client and server need to have the zerotier client installed.
Yah, setup a tunnel between you and a service/VM with a public IP is an option or using zerotier or similar
hmmm is there some alternative to sftp for file sharing outside of your network
Cloud services?
i could use onedrive or something for that, but hosting own server would be cool if not then i might just use cloud service
Could do something like owncloud
Anyone have any decent affordable wifi router suggestions
And also if you got like an amplifi mesh point is it possible to use it with another router or does it need to be an amplifi
owncloud and Nextcloud are great
Is it normal for an ISP to run the coaxial cable on the pole directly into your house?
Evidently since we're having speed issues they're going to just bypass the electronic tap
so they pretty much said fuck it, then connected it directly
I think so
they said that they were taking out the digital management controller tomorow when they could get a pole truck out
I guess they're willing to do that since I'm at the end of the line
Hi there, my mother is looking for a simple signal extender/repeater. For very basic residential use case, just allowing her to get a signal from the lounge room.
Any recommendations?
Can power outage damage router
does the power outage have a knife
Can someone explain to me the different situations in which you would want to get an AP vs getting a wifi antenna (example Ubiquiti Uma-D Dual-Band Directional Mesh Antenna)?
2 different things
will it help with speeds?
It possibly could
I have a problem I was helping people might be able to help with itβs my WIFI and Ethernet from my isp I am supposed to be getting 650mb download and 40 up but in both etherbet and Wi-Fi have get around 100 I have reset it and contacted support and they just make me do a speed test right after a reset and the it breaks like ten mins later I am with virgin media and can leave y til august I can spend lots of money but I did run abo it 4 eathernet cable and that doesnβt help either I only have about 10-15 devices both Ethernet and Wi-Fi at once
If it's capping at exactly 100 I suspect it's the ethernet cable
Itβs not exactly 100 but not much more than 150 but the same in Wi-Fi too with the same cable I have got 1gb at work
Just to check cat6A can do 1000 mbps
Ah ok, but there's no cable from modem to router?
Or is it an all in one
All in one it is a coaxial cable to the all in one router thingy I can send a photo if you need
I need help with networking
Can someone come in a vc and help with ip and subnet and dns
@clear igloo my project has a distance issue with MM
just barely too
so now what? 100G SM? thats significant
doing 50/50 taps ontop lol
single mode all the stuff!
2km sm optics (short reach single mode) are same price as mm 100g optics last I checked
lmao no way, go check. pretty sure its not
100G SM cost like a car at MSRP
are you serious?! I cant access the quote tool as a non-partner until I take a training?
lol
Eh, price is a little different, 2500 vs 5000 MSRP but still not near as bad as the LR optics which are MSRP 35k. Maybe it was the 40/100 bidi and 100g mpo optics I was thinking of which are the same price.
if I have 4 interface port on a router/firewall and I want to use port1 and port2.
i have 5 subnets for the vlans
10.0.0.0/24 - 10.0.5.0/24
what should the actual physical interface IP be? and the subinterface IP?
should all the vlans be subinterface and the physical interface be something different?
there would be no physical interface IP
so each vif would be the vlan
and the IP of the router on that vlan
so basically 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 and all the configuration are just done for the subinterface?
there is. i think it's unconfigured which shows up empty (or 0.0.0.0 if you manually it)
technically the physical interface is vlan 1 btw iirc
ok. so what you're saying is leave physical port1 and port2 unconfigured and just configured the virtual interfaces
and they should be able to communicate regardless
what? If you are using vlans, you only need to use one port
let me build it out so i can better explain it
@plain siren juniper would never make a corporate customer take an ethics training before accessing the pricing tool
port2 comes from a central switch that has all the vlans trunked
so my question was, what do I do with the physical interface setup
from a network management perspective, what's the right thing to do
have a true out of band network with a firewall infront of it
that's some weird UI
looks like fortinet
yeah, it is
ah, never used them
i spun one up in a vm
yeah, I have all vlans on eth4 on my router and it shows up as this eth4 - u/u Local
weird how it makes it 0.0.0.0 imo
ah, so if i don't have a direct need for it, it can be left blank
yeah, im not even sure it will let you put an IP on it anyway
what?
forti is what you use when you want power for cheap. it seems to be decent. I worked around them but not really on them. Cant afford Palo? Forti. Cisco is not even an option.
ASAs should not exist
we use sonicwall, something even worse than fortigate 
I'm sorry for your pain π¦
https://www.androidpolice.com/wi-fi-6-release-2-announced-to-further-confuse-you-about-wi-fi-standards/
Who's ready for features becoming new releases of WiFi now π
becoming USB lol
WiFi 6 already has or was supposed to have low energy features and target wake times built in so why they have to call it Release 2 is perplexing to say the least
There is HDMI mess - USB mess and now WiFi
Should follow HDMI and make WiFi 6 Release 2 called WiFi 7.1 gen 1x1 rev A
isn't wifi6 range limited
6E is range limited on the 6GHz band
those AP have to switch to different band when a device go out of range
but 6 uses 2.4 and 5GHz normally, 6E adds 6GHz to the mix
Does 802.11ax spec include both 6 and 6E
I have a question
can you plug a modem into a switch and then from the switch go to the router
I have been planning on hosting my own VPN
so I met a guy that is willing to host it for me
I don't believe so, 6E was an addition late to the party
But I am a bit scared because at the end of the day all the information goes through is server
and I don't want some random person seeing my internet activity
if its a managed switch that you can set routing on you can. BUT otherwise no, every port of the switch would be trying to pass out your Private IP address to what ever devices were connected. you might get lucky and the router would be the first thing to grab the lease but that would be a random thing.
That's what I do.
with he be able to see all my internet trafic?
uhh yes and no
yes
he will be able to see it but won't it be encrypted?
Depends on what your traffic is.
how?
yeah thats what i thought its unmanaged
http and other similar unencrypted traffic they can see 100% of it
https and other similar encrypted traffic they cannot see it without breaking the security
if they are hosting the VPN, the encrypted connection will be between you and them, from there they are the gateway and can see everything your ISP would be able to see anyway. Any traffic that is already encrypted they can't see, but anything uncrypted they can
anything your ISP normally sees, they will see
as long as it's only the one router it would work
unless your ISP is stupid and lets you have multiple IPs
imagine your ISP only handing out one IP /s
is there a solution to this?
what's your goal
to have a VPN in the usa so I can watch Netflix and stuff
and I want to host it my self for fun
so that's like encrypted anyway pretty sure
yes
soo what's the concern?
I don't want the person who is hosting it for me
can see what I do
I'm hosting a vpn in that server
exactly
soo will they be able to see it?
ofc
see it yes but encrypted?
let me make a diagram
ok
yes
so the vpn server will be able to see everything right?
is there a solution for this?
No
The vpn server is the endpoint ofc they can see everything coming out
You would need another vpn
Netflix is encrypted anyway
However I think Netflix blocks traffic from vps providers
Not sure
yes some
but that is why this person offered me to host it for me in the usa
and at the end of the day is just a resident ip
how do I make the vlans on S4 communicate with the rest of the network?
can I bridge port1 and port2? or is there no other way beside connecting S4 to S1
Im not familiar with Fortinet but I am sure you can bridge the interfaces
if you want it to be like a router pretty sure you need to add routes. If just a switch then yeah just bridge
Is it possible for an internet connection to lose download speed but keep full speed on the upload because of a signal issue? Wouldnβt a signal issue cause both to be slow? Been trying to get the ISP to come fix my internet since December 17th but theyβre giving me the run around. Initially saying it was on there end and signal was fine but now saying itβs a signal issue a technician has to come out to fix.
My download speed is almost non existent. 0.10Mbps. (I pay for 1000mbps) upload is full speed as if there are no issues.
Going to cross post to tech support in case I got the posting wrong.
Yes. it is possible
no sir. fortinet is layer 3 device
I did BGP with them just fine
I thought even the Fortigates could do basic switching as well?
its a routing question tho
"how do I make the vlans on S4 communicate with the rest of the network?"
homie needs to route

ah I had to zoom in, he duplicated vlans
yeah no, F no. do a trunk switch to switch
Well just with VLAN 70. Thats why I thought he was looking for a L2 option
am i able to connect a printer that doesn't have a ethernet port to the usb port to the modem intended for a external hard drive and use the printer over the network
My ISP is saying that my my modem(arris touchstone CM8200a) is having trouble with keeping the right channel
When I reset the modem I get full speeds, but only for around 1-2 minutes
everything except the cable drop(brand new drop) and coaxial cables have been replaced
Any ideas?
My ISP seems to think that it's on my end
I don't think that my router is the issue, but could that be causing the modem to changing modes?
I think the tech said that my modem keeps 2a mode rather than 3d
try a reset of the modem
or something similar
When I reset the modem I get full speeds for about 1-2 minutes
Then it goes back to half speed
even with using a paperclip on the back of the modem
After they replaced the tap, my speeds improved, but they still aren't what I'm supposed to be getting on my service
My neighbor is able to get full speeds
from the same tap(gigabit over docsis 3.1)
what speed are you paying for and what speed are you getting
I pay for a gig and I'm getting around 500
are you using a gigabit cable
I am
I'm using cat6a
What's weird and is causing the techs to be confused is that I can get a gig for around a minute after I reset the modem, but after that I'm only pulling around 500 down
Before they replaced the tap I was getting around 300 consistantly
try testing speed on 2 computer at the same time
It's probably the modem
They already replaced that
maybe the modem throttles the connation to 500mbits/s per device
I know it doesn't
so you get a max of 500mbit/s total
My neighbor has the exact same model and it's working flawlessly at the same speed
maybe go ask them if it worked right away
Here's the compilation of my speedtest results
Everything from 12/4 is on my new service
So when I reset the modem, I get around 900, but after around a minute it goes back to around 500
have you checked the settings in the modem
The modems web page won't load
open cmd
I can only get to the spectrum analyser
That's my router
maybe the ip is on the back if not try 192.168.1.1 or 192.168.0.1
I know that the modem's IP is 192.168.100.1
log into that then
try the ip for defat gate way see if that loads
try 192.168.0.1
that's my router
try 139.55.176.1
I'm just trying to troubleshoot this since my dad thinks it's my fault since the Windstream tech says it's something on our end until proven otherwise
what modem do you have
Arris Touchstone CM8200a
Although monday(my isp will only activate a customers modem by going to the store, you can't call them with the HFC MAC) I can get access to a Netgear Nighthawk CM1200 temporalily
my aunt bought one for use on the same network to avoid the modem rental fee
although the company just waives ours, so my dad won't buy our own modem
We do have our own router because we thought we were going to have to pay the rental fee
I wish that my dad would stop blaming me for this and just let us switch to fiber
try plugin in directly to the modem
tried that earlier
then try log in
I'll have to try plugging directly into the modem tomorow
well $80 get me 50mbit/s
Well if my dad would listen to me $40/month would get us symettrical gigabit fiber
but this is evidently too good of a deal with our first three months free
What's funny is that I have three different ISP's I can get gigabit service from
Windstream/Spectrum/Northstate
ew modem rental charges
Yeah but $10/m total charges
I'm having a bunch of issues trying to create a datastore on a NVME drive in ESXi 7 on a dell r710. It was working fine in Proxmox, but now throws the error "Error, Timeout" under status in the disks page. When trying to use partedUtil, I just get "Error: Error opening <device_id>: no such device" despite entering it's correct ID. Did the SSD suddenly die or something?
It appears fine in Windows
I also don't have any of my vds from the perc 6/i showing in ESXi, but that's probably because it's not supported in ESXi 7.
Found the issue, looks like the driver doesn't support my drive specifically. Ugh.
They're waiving them
because they promised fiber in the original sales call and they don't charge equipment fees unless you want wifi

