#networking
1 messages Β· Page 342 of 1
those are shit
if you have to crimp 100s of jacks
takes gonna take days
or rather
it took me 3-5 mins for 1 of them
with the new ones I can do it in like a minute
I know, but the real issue for me is the cable order, because it's not standardized. I only have to crimp one so it's not a big deal
just easier getting the insulation inside it
@potent shuttle just write down the order
:P
as long as its the same on other side, doesnt matter what color the wires are
but I look at that picture of yours
that looks like https://i.imgur.com/wBvL9f0.png
waiiit
did this come from a factory?
or was this done by hand??
As you can see, the orange and blue wires are together so it doesn't match the standard. Also the brown wire is not the last one left to right either
I bought it, so it was probably made in a factory
So, since it doesn't match the pattern, would this cause issues even if I replicated the order in the other end?
You should look at the underside of it, not the top.. it is too hard to see the top, you usually use the underside to make sure you have the wires in the correct places
Was wondering if I could set up a switch that's connected directly to the modem, and have another cable connect to the router from the that switch
Depends, if the router is the ONLY device connected and the switch is unmanaged and doesn't grab an IP then yes
@icy oxide you should be able to, with vlans
It would be a TL-SG105 connecting to a Tp 1500x
Would experiment myself, but I'd have an angry family with no internet lol
you'd set up a vlan between the modem and the router through the switch
If something else plugs in then it won't get an IP or it will steal it from the router causing everything else to drop
Ingress protection :P
You'd have to do a lot of tagging and trunking to make it work so it goes through the router and not touch the modem causing issues
So I'd be better off connecting the Modem to Router to Switch?
yes
Aight
connecting the modem to the switch then to the router is a fairly common setup, "router-on-a-stick" it is often called, but if you do not know what you are doing, it is going to be a lot trickier to set it up properly than simply connecting the modem to the router
@tender hazel@clear igloolol my friend was asking how to do multi wan multi router and I suggested just plugging both wans into a switch...blew their mind
Since their customer has a biz fiber connection with multiple statics, so they wanted both of their routers to use the same connection
Then starlink failover
@tender hazel I was helping someone with their Telus fiber optic connection, and we got the Alcatel Lucent functional on the SFP+ port
However only at 1G
It does not work with auto negotiate, and there is no way to me to set ethernet to 2.5G when I manually assign a speed
Any idea on what to do?
on the SFP+ port on what device?
@tender hazel currently an RB4011, soon to be CRS309 (once they have all the cables)
We've got it functional @ 1G
but they have 1.5G fiber service, so it needs to run at higher rate
is that a GPON ONT SFP?
After speaking with someone over in the r/Apple server, I think a much simpler solution would be to get a new router, set it up in the second floor of the house at the most central point and bridge mode the BBox, connecting it to the bridge mode BBox and get everything set up, I guess?
@tender hazel yes. https://i.imgur.com/OSNcUtu.png
I interpreted it to mean:
The BBox in bridge mode will pass stuff to the new router, who will do all the work.
@vestal lotus in bridge mode, it will only act as a modem. It sets up an ethernet network
PPPoE is PPP, a tunnel for IP packets, over ethernet
PPP = Point to Point Protocol
this is how you "login" to your ISP network
https://eu.store.ui.com/products/unifi-dream-machine
I currently have some interest in Ubiquiti's Dream Machine.
All-in-one device with access point, 4-port switch, and security gateway. Everything you need for a small-scale wired and Wi-Fi network.
UniFi Dream Machine (UDM) is the easiest way to introduce UniFi to homes and businesses. The UDM includes everything you need for a small-scale wired or Wi-Fi network. It's easy to use and still offers all th...
the issue is that it is an RB4011.. the SFP+ port on the RB4011 doesn't work with GPON SFP modules at 2.5G
yes, the module would work in any mikrotik device except the RB4011
If I got it right, the WAN port could likely be used and connected to the Dream Machine.
...don't ask why Ubiquiti named it that.
probably it is to imply "this is the all-in-one Uni-Fi device that you have been dreaming of"
@tender hazel for me, that would be an RB4011
@tender hazel one interesting point, the CRS305 I have, has same kind of switching chip, just a smaller model
and it doesn't have the 2.5G option either
Lmao wasup
yeah nothing will have the 2.5G option, it will probably work on auto though
@tender hazel so wait, that would mean it would work on auto negotiate with 1G
and it didn't.
it didnt auto negotiate at all
you mean you tried it in something other than an RB4011 on auto?
Why not just grab another eth card?
@tender hazel is this a flake with the RB4011?
Wants both wans on both routers
Oh yea okay.
The RB4011 is based on Annapurna Labs chipset AL21400
any device based on that chipset will have that issue
@tall grotto I do the same at home lol, its super nice....anything on VLAN 69 is directly connected to WAN
And since my ISP just gives out DHCP to anything on the network
I can have multiple devices on WAN
back when mikrotik used to sell their own GPON ONU SFP module, they had a warning on the RB4011 page that the SFPONU was not compatible with it
they removed the warning when they discontinued the SFPONU
brb gonna port scan that IP
I already moved my computer back over to another port on the switch π
Nothing's on that IP anymore
Ohhhhh. so thats why they removed it. I thought they somehow patched it
Because I could remember reading this warning
Ill scan the whole range then lmao
Thats cool though, I have two modems running from the same ISP.
I had to upgrade to the newer ones they were using. But they never asked for the old one back and left it enabled on there network. So i run them both on a gateway group on PFsense get double the speeds for the same price lmao
wow....they didn't disassociate the old mac...
the mac on the old modem isnt linked to my account anymore either but its still connects and receives new packages lmao
Usually you have to activate your new modem's MAC
I taught they at least allowed one PPPoE thing to work at a single time
A lot of coaxial/fiber connections in the US don't use PPPoE
Its just DHCP over Ethernet
to the customer
Ah we have fiber here and use PPPoE actually
I didnt even know PPPoE was a thing for a long time
It basically dosent exist in the US
my ISP doesn't seem to give a shit what I've done so far lol
it exists wherever DSL exists
Including when I asked for 5 IPs π
Handy when I can't rely on SNI for web servers/etc π
I have DHCP over Ethernet here as well
Yeah, PPPoE is common for DSL
Most ISPs are already using VLANs if they're doing other IP services
Usually the ONT/modem/etc. handles them
the guy I helped out today
he got a GPON module from Telus
and I expected them to use two vlans
Some may do VOIP to POTS conversion
but they don't use any at all
its straight DHCP on vlan1, and IPTV is on same network interface
Oh yea, funny thing about that. I got a new mikrotik switch after I virtualized my firewall. went to connect to the default IP and didn't see my device. Come to find out I can view there entire network
Yeah, DOCSIS is shared lol
untested firewall rules are the best ones
you'll see other customers too
@rocky badge loool yes
I can SSH onto my neighbors modem
Lol
lmao still fun tho
or your ISPs
My ISP doesn't do any isolation between IPs but you don't directly see it
why would you?
just MACs in the same domain
I'm on DOCSIS cable and I certainly do not see other customers traffic
ARP'n'go
you don't see the traffic, but you can see others
Oh yea I can see the traffic
define what you mean by "see others"
I can get to the login page of the gateway
yeah, I can't
Belkin router lol https://blob.rocks/jmqv2nyPIN.png
ASUS router https://blob.rocks/efW70kHxnc.png
Adtran gpon shit https://blob.rocks/g5eEhxfkd2.png
A Synology MAC...
so there must be a way of doing it if my ISP is doing it
I had 25mbit coaxial internet in 2008,
Then I moved to a place with 8mbit dsl.
Moved again, in 2013 to a place with 4mbit dsl.
Finally got fiber optics,
Then I had to move again
and now I have singlemode fiber optics. as much bandwidth as I want
Either someone has their Synology NAS on the Internet or hopefully its the Synology router
i.e. somehow my ISP at home is doing layer 2 isolation on DOCSIS
Did i mention telnets open on a lot of there infrastructure as well
filters on the cmts side?
why would you do filtering lol
if you just treat all addresses as WAN
then there's no need?
finrod's isp
I am after a modem... which means I can't peek onto the neighbors traffic or what
warscript loading...
@rocky badge yes but they were just saying that that isn't possible with DOCSIS
but it must be because as I said, my ISP is doing it

and they are also doing local-proxy-arp
both are good practice
I'm surprised that I'm hearing here that what my ISP is doing is not possible somehow
because I've always thought it made a lot of sense
the combination of isolation and local proxy ARP solves a lot of security issues that you would have with DHCP on big shared subnets
Paying for 1 150x15 connection lmao
for security reasons, there is a need
Its a speed test shot but its relevant
lmao, my ISP isn't filtering 445
My isp dosent filter anything lmao
Mine does 80,8080,443 so far
this guy in the same /24 as me: https://blob.rocks/7WC9dFoL4V.png
lets hope the fun police isn't active.
https://i.imgur.com/qfvepa5.png
Me too, 260 tbh, but yeha
I usually get exactly 250x25
you can see that here https://i.imgur.com/ssZBBxH.png
It goes to 800mbit and then back down
Although Gigabit Pro....
2Gbps/2Gbps and 1Gbps/1Gbps connection
you get 3Gbps worth of service for $300/mo
With a static v4 and /48
Just use https://ipv6.he.net/ lmao
host ipv6 only but
currency adjusted, I pay around $150 month for 250/250M and a public /29, and TV plan
$65/mo USD for Gig/500
but yeah if it is possible to do client isolation on DOCSIS I'm really surprised that the cable providers you are all on are not doing it
I pay $60 for 150x10 
I think 200$, for 250/100, and TV
seems pretty bad
I quite like having more IPs, first ISP that I've used that offers this
this guy in another server said $90/mo for 100/100 was good 
all my virtual machines have their own public IP
Actually 100$ but yea
when I said seems pretty bad, I meant the lack of client isolation
you should not see other customer's MAC addresses, and certainly not be able to ssh into their modems
I could get multiple IPS but each one is $5 a month so if i need a new IP I throw another virtual adapter on one of the wan nics connected to pfsense on my virtualizer and it gets a new DHCP address
yeah here its like 2 euros/ip/month
and you can either get a vlan with a publicly addressed IP
or they route the entire subnet
I have the latter
I basically treat that entire subnet as a 'DMZ', I have vlans on it for some other devices
two tennants in other building rent 50/50mbit from me
I could very easliy do that tbh
I have IPv6 through my cable provider since I upgraded my modem early this year
my ISP dosent support v6 yet
I have a /56 and it hasn't changed yet, and it has been a few months at least
Same here, I got a new modem in 2019 and got v6 working fully
@tender hazel btw, I couldn't figure out how to get local-forwarding working across different bridges with capsman
But everything would be DHCP so
yeah
A /64 here but changes the prefix of it every reboot π
Finally found it lmao
I created a master interface, and a slave interface with a 2nd SSID and configuration
Spectrum?
Ah nah in the UAE xD not US
the slave was on a different bridge, and wouldn't work without encapsulation
lol, well we've got providers here who do that too π
different bridges? why would you have the slave on a different bridge?
yeah put the slave on a VLAN, it is much easier
Damn I wish lmao
I wanna know who they expect to buy that
@tender hazel so what even is the point of creating a 2nd bridge?
They have quite a few customers
because I've got 5 xD
Its basically business at "consumer prices"
there is not much point in creating a second bridge in most cases
Its a consumer product?
its active ethernet, and that juniper is to vlans and monitoring
why not use a 10Gig Pon?
They do have GPON some new developments
For them anyway
$500 install and $500 equip fee
damn
Isn't it $299 a month?
Yes
so lol?
yea ik I wasnt saying it was
yeah
Its insanely expensive
need lots of tubes and fibers
lucky me
And all of your nodes need power
π€£
But still expensive
What's the most expensive thing on that list
this network I am using was built using taxpayer's money
Probably the MX10003 linecards
Too bad it isn't an Excel lol
what does it cost if I want a DWDM to an IXP?
The big ISPS here get money form the government pocket 60% of it and then service 15% of the Tax area
@tall grotto the switch is crazy overkill too
Comcast is only using 3 ports
XE in, XE out, GE out
Depends on distance
35km
just a single WL or the whole spectrum
what do you think? whole spectrum
I hope your kidding
no I am curious lol
My ISP got funding for rural internet and municipal isps
basically dark fiber at that point
They cover all prices for install
So far it's a $15m license π
Yea, I have lots of experience with those rural funding programs
piece of paper
they always go the same way
Theyβll rate your area on a 5 star scale, the higher the better. Depending on your area you may be βchargedβ for install, but that becomes credit on your bill
Mmmmniceee π
@tall grotto idk, they were forced here to open the network, so its a neutral thing. I could choose between like 8 different ISPs
So if you pay $100 for install, that can cover a month or two depending on your plan
But its still dark fiber if your after the whole thing.
For fiber, I have this ISP or AT&T. Cable I can get Spectrum.
and you basically need a splice from PTP
yeah, but I was just saying, that is what I've got right now
you have ptp splice?
I can get 10G if I wanted
Best page on Spectrum's website
So your fiber runs from the IX to your location without anything in between
@clear igloo you still on AT&T? 
so they are both DS an UP?
oh god at school we have to have one router to send and one to receive
Its just a patch box, with 1 and 2, line 1 goes directly to my router
and then another for Spectrum enterprise
I am using their SFP module
where does the other one go
not connected
oh strange
they told me that its in case theres a local fibercut
they can move all the lines over to the 2nd one
and the physical light goes other way on the circle
So your on a patly lit ring?
@tall grotto oh also with gigabit pro https://blob.rocks/EtWAu5UbGe.png
Hey
there's a hefty cancellation fee
@tall grotto lit ring? is that what they call it?
I saw their maps
and it was bunch of circles
because they're not going to run fiber all the way to your house and for you to cancel it lol
with loops that go through the strees
is it a residential connection?
yes, but rural
farmland
I just have a business ISP
fiber carrier is another party
then its technically a biz connection lol
I just have no way to sleep π€
its just too much imagery and js bullcrap
webdevs have gone collectively insane
I see it all over the web
ttfb was 1.6s 
ttfb?
time til first byte
ahh
ew ew ew its going over cogentco
lol
lol nice iframe
I think we're overseas now https://blob.rocks/FQz4vJDkXw.png
ccr there stands for cloud core router?
@tender hazel yes
I wouldn't expect cogent to use CCR's
yes I know
but I didn't think ccr22 in the cogent trace route meant it was a cloud core router
probably not
agr tho, aggregate?
crystal said it was so that is why I was surprised
juan said those are ccr's
the CCR1072 would not be nearly enough for cogent I would think
when we had a lengthy talk on voice about ISP peerings
hmm.. interesting
I'm used to stuff like this π https://blob.rocks/5giJCxKAqI.png
the best way to optimize routing performance with a CCR1072 would be to get rid of all firewall rules and use IP range limits on the services to control who can winbox or ssh in
XE 10 gig and AE aggregate
@tender hazel they might just have a beefy edge machine, and then a bunch of CCR's for their peer links
bunch of 10G's
So, looking by any angle it is very clear that the cable I bought is wrongly sorted (at least it doesn't match the T-568A or T-568B standards). I saw a pic that shows that there is a "patch" and a "crossover" wire layout. Is my cable an example of a crossover cable? And if it is, how should I proceed? This is the order looking from the bottom of my connector, left to right: green, white and green, orange, blue, white and blue, white and orange, brown and white and brown
This is the image for reference
@clear igloo Wait, Cisco's bundle ethernet = be, right?
depends on the platform, but some it's bundle-ether, yah
because my friend is saying be in that is bundle ethernet
then whatever
then airport codes & number
yeah somebody wired that strangely @potent shuttle
the funny thing is they wired it almost with the white/color and color reversed, except for pair 1
if they reversed everything it would probably be fine, even though it would still be wrong
but they reversed all pairs except for pair 1
that's the only thing that might be a bit of a red flag for getting higher rates
if you only need it to work at 1Gbps and it is working it will probably be ok
but if it only comes up at 100Mbps and you are expecting 1Gbps you'll probably want to replace it or redo the ends yourself
So the cable order only matters for speed?
@potent shuttle you need 2 pairs for 100M, and 4 pairs for 1000M/1G
I see
It's a cat 5e cable so I want it to go full speed for futureproofing and using it for a home network
thats not ideal for permanent installation
So I should recrimp both ends right?
I know, but 1gbps is enough for me
Yeah, I've been in their COLO and they do indeed have quite a bit of em
interesting.. I wouldn't think that their routing performance would be high enough for their needs
I had imagined like 100Gbps links all over the place
Maybe at peering & colo
but I doubt at their core backbone network, which that traceroute shows
Since its transatlantic
100G is not all the common still
40G is kinda what you see a lot
we are mid refresh and still only have 10g and very few 40G
it is also a case of why get it if you are not using it
100G is big ask if you are not working with large data
I could see why 100G to a peering point would be nice
also in Aus so yer we are tiny compared to the USA or euro
you can use the existing hardware and scale up easily
i have multi 10G peerings but we hardly get over 1G
I'm talking about backhaul connections - the core, not the edge
and giant providers like cogent can easily push through a lot of data
you will a big router for that
@tender hazel yeah but isnt that just tunnelled then?
or somehow it doesnt show up in the trace
because of some other kind of routing protocol
the trace above with the "ccrXX" hostnames showed incrementing latency for each hop
do you think cogent just dynamically allocates these?
so that suggests that MPLS is not in use there
they just add capacity in the form of smaller units
because the naming alone suggests 100s of them
i think i missed part of this conversation as i had a bit of a read up
what is the issue?>
if cogent was using MPLS you should see the same latency for a bunch of hops
cogent running high end mikrotiks
that is not really true
and instead the latency is gradually incrementing from hop to hop across their core
@tender hazel what if lol, its just a bunch of stacked 10G's on a fiber? xD
what isn't really true?
if it is mpls it would be the same latency at a load of hope
could just be a cost saving measure
if could take different paths
MPLS everything appears next to each other
if you put one of those next to a big juniper
@rocky badge I've not had any issues with them
cognet would be a better name for them.. a network of cogs
Compared to Level3 & others
they could also be using bgp multipathing
My friend has worked with them before at DigitalOcean....they are bad
the biggest issue with cogent is how their actions and policies have resulted in us having two separate IPv6 internets
and they show no sign of changing that
i am not up with ipv6 how is that?
i always feel dumper talking to other network people
well, a lot of the early IPv6 internet was dominated by Hurricane Electric, who are not considered a tier 1 provider
so many businesses and people got connected to the IPv6 internet through HE, either by buying transit or peering or getting a tunnel
they wanted to peer with cogent but cogent said "you aren't a Tier 1 - our policy is to peer only with other tier 1's. You will have to buy transit from us instead."
and cogent did the same thing to Google
they told google "you are not a tier 1 - you have to buy transit from us"
so hurricane electric, which has probably way more IPv6 customers and subnets advertised than cogent does, does not have connectivity to cogent on the IPv6 internet
and google is not reachable via cogent IPv6
wow
that is a bit fucked up
yeah, basically like Cogent was like "screw you google, you puny worthless company, we are a big tier 1, and you have to buy transit from us!"
The internet, where everyone works together....
so if you only have ipv6 from cogent, google takes longer to load, because it will try connecting to it over ipv6 first, fail, and then fail over to ipv4
so you rely entirely on happy eyeballs for google to load
yeah
it causes a delay though
Cogent is one of the world's largest Internet Service Providers, delivering high-quality Internet, Ethernet and Colocation services.
no route to google 
they should redistribute IPv6 blocks into a blockchain
where ownership is just passed on
although, it would make it rigid and stale
breakfast time
yup
so we have this stupid double IPv6 internet.. so if you are unlucky enough to have Cogent as your only IPv6 feed then there are a bunch of things you can't get
and I think there is hardly anything on the IPv6 internet that is only available on Cogent and not elsewhere
I deal with how happy eyeballs works on a regular basis.. my home computer has an IPv4-only VPN connection into work.. when I resolve DNS names at the office I often get an AAAA record for something but it can't load because blocked by firewall (because that traffic isn't going through the VPN). It takes about 10-15 seconds for it to decide IPv6 isn't responding and load the page over IPv4
the delay is.. annoying
I know with happy eyeballs it is supposed to be fast to move to v4 but my experience is that it doesn't always work as designed
once the site has loaded it responds quickly after that
it is only when I try going to it the first time on a given day or whatever that I get that delay
I want my ISP to do v6 
HE timers are meant to be subsec?
hmm?
A /28 is 1 million /48s
or 256 million /56s

I don't know what you are asking
oh happy eyeball timers
HE is an acronym for Hurricane Electric
so I thought you were saying Hurricane Electric timers are supposed to be subsecond
well, it doesn't work so well for me
at least not in windows 10 with firefox
if I disable ipv6 when I am on the vpn everything loads instantly
I know what it is supposed to do, but in my experience it doesn't always work that great, it is possibly that in certain situations other factors impact it and prevent it from failing over as quickly as intended
based on that I wouldn't really comfortable being in a situation where you were dual stack and your only Ipv6 feed was cogent
there is an online happy eyeballs test that says my happy eyeballs is fine
yet on the VPN it doesn't seem to work
Futurama Season 6 Episode 3 : Attack of the Killer App
Comedy Central
this one was pretty spot on though
is 10 gigabit worth it? ive been thinking of getting it
it costs 70 dollars per month and my gigabit plan rn costs 40
@thick minnow entry is quite expensive you need a fast router, new network cards, cables everything
ofcourse you can still use 1G clients
Same with fios, but seeing how they cannot fix their ICMP replies, I have no hope we are getting v6 anytime soon
they just will be bottlenecked
lol
@tender hazel this one would be quite nice for 10G, https://mikrotik.com/product/ccr2004_1g_12s_2xs#fndtn-specifications
right?
when it stabilizes.. and it only has around the overall performance of a CCR1016
the main thing it has is that the individual cores are faster than those of a 1016 even though it has fewer of them
so any single core tasks will be much faster than on a CCR1016
yea just realized im gonna need a new motherboard for 10 gbps, a new cpu cable and m.2 nvme ssd
the CCR1036 and CCR1072 both have multiple SFP+ ports
@thick minnow do you have a router?
but the CCR2004 has more than either and has two 25G ports as well
@tender hazel yes
I'm more excited about the CCR2016
but have you seen the pricetag on those? xD
supposed to be out later this year
The CCR2004 is only $595
yea ofc
@thick minnow which one?
idk some shit from vodafone which does gigabit
yes, it is a good cost, if only it was more stable
only I think they have almost finished getting the bugs fixed
its not really shit lol
@thick minnow but not fast enough for 10G
tru
they are getting closer to getting the bugs fixed, people are now reporting that their CCR2004's are no longer spontaneously rebooting once a week
so that is progress
some of the early adopters swapped them out for CCR1036's due to the stability issues
@thick minnow so the stable option with mikrotik, $1000 
the newer one they have which is still being fixed, CCR2004 is only $600
it has all the connectivity you need
this is one issue that people are starting to report fixed in the latest 6.49beta
one user reported the reboots are all fixed in 6.48.2, another reported that they are still getting watchdog reboots.. but the person who is still getting the reboots might not have updated their routerboot firmware
not enough varied feedback to be sure that everything is fixed, but it is promising at least
mh interesting
wish they would really give us more access to source
it would make their already awesome system even more awesome
they only give access to the GPL code that they modified
but a lot of their stuff is proprietary
their platform support for TILE, their routing engine and routing protocols, and the OpenVPN client are all proprietary and not based on open source code
oh I like my new profile avatar way more than the old one
I didn't like the old one but I picked it in a hurry.. I was going to get kicked off a server b/c I only had the default game icon picture
dose anyone know if alexa devices can be used as a hotspot because my wifi at home dislike my pc because it is over 10 years old and has a i5-4590T and hotspot works better than wifi and i need to to work done and my Chromebook (i am in 8th grade i'm 14) and it is controlled by my my school so stuff is disabled and i was wondering if my alexa devices can be used as a hot spot i have 2 i have a kindal fire hd 10 5th gen and a alexa dot clock 4th gen the WiFi on bot is always on so if anyone can help please dm me if you can thank you.
and a add to it i also have a echo show 8
no it doesn't
you can have your phone as a hotspot though
using wifi on it and not your data
thank you
Typical behavior for windows:
- Turn on Machine
- Windows installs updates
- Machine turns itself off.
- ??? Why is it off?
.
5. Turns it on again
6. Login screen
@low pond Is that for 21H1?
I am on 20H2 now
ah yes same
I was on 1909 until yesterday
I've been on 21H1 for a couple months, no issues so far π
how to upgrade xD
i installed dis like 15 days ago fresh (ye i migrated from archleenux)
"Install"
Ah, it's installed, just need to reboot to finish then
Yah and your pc reboots
kden bye
I like beta testing π
windows is 2nd grade citizen
@clear igloo and I am afraid whenever windows updates
I've got a bad track record with windows & updates
Ah, I've never had issues
If you run windows as only EFI image on a disk, and you have no esoteric hardware, then you'll likely never encounter these issues
except with Asus Aura and updates
but the moment, you run some kind of dual boot, with a modified bootloader and EFI installation
or armoury crate or whatever it's called
windows just breaks with updates
Ah, yah, I don't dual boot
I'm sure
It works
but you have to sometimes, change settings for windows updates to propegate
like that feature update
bugfixes and patches are installed without problem
ah, good to know
@clear igloo windows in chainload configuration = trouble
windows bootloader has to be your primary
@clear igloo for the longest time it was possible to use the Metro bootloader instead of grub
but since the 1909 version of windows, I have been unable to turn it on, on home versions of windows
ah, I use pro or enterprise everywhere
Yeah, I dont have that kind of money.. for a fucking operating system xD
only Pro Install I run is at my dad's camping
Their POS server software (for restaurant, and receptionist) runs only on windows
ah
And they use RDP to login
yup, need pro for that
its just on a VMWare server in their office
@clear igloo oh the fun, with hardware keys for licenses xD
passthrough the license key to the virtual machine
so annoying
@clear igloo is there not a way to do RDP on Home versions of windows?
I saw some kind of registry hack that would enable it
Not sure, I've never tried
oh during initial setup where you only have the vmware console, yah
Nahh, the software their POS system uses
the manufacturer has a hardware key for their propietary software
Ah
its in the form of a USB stick
and they just installed this on the receptionists' computer
kinda dumb.
so I contacted the installer
and over the phone, had them reinstall it on a Windows Pro VM
There were/are some versions of windows where you had to put in the key before continuing install so you have to manually type in the key because the console won't let you copy paste
and then just recently, everything broke
when windows updated itself without prompting
and RDP broke
Ah, you have a backup server?
I'd look into Nakivo for VM backups, $99 per physical CPU in the server (not CPU in the VM)
the server program there basically just talks to all the cash registers in the building
it prints the "jobs" for the kitchen
on little labels
ah, I know that stuff
so they know what food to prepare
Kassensysteme und LΓΆsungen von Vectron β Γber 225.000 Installationen β Erfahrung seit 1990 β MarktfΓΌhrer in Gastronomie, BΓ€ckereien und Hotel-Schnittstellen
@clear igloo I am still not happy with it though
they put the entire cash registration system on the LAN
and I had a look around with wireshark
yeah.. not encrypted
I will be re-doing their entire network soon anyways, upgrading their gear to 802.1q-capable switches
lol, wow
vlan all the things!
I feel like the way Vectron installed their software on the computer that is "always on"
its like a mom&pap shop, except one crypto attack, and you are fucked.
yah
i came back π
did you break your install? :P
Oh, I was greeted by T E A M S on logon
but everything is alright π
I dont kno, i am still on 20h2
that wasnt an update, just that .NET patch probably
Why don't you turn it off then?
teams enables itself
ik, I am asking why don't you turn it off
its another stupid thing brought to your by: microshit
I just installed office suite today too so probably forgot and even disabling from the starting stuff it anyways starts on boot
cortana
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mbV-YIV9Uc amazing quality AD tho
Why it no embed?
i used < and >
I dont want it to embed on purpsoe xD
you can use it too to stop embeding
useful for rickrolls etc
Interesting
SDD or HDD preferred when using pfSense?
doesnt really matter
@short condor it loads the OS from disk, and all runtime stuff, routing, is all done from memory
@tame carbonA HDD should then be "safer" right?
Hi guys , I'm configuring my Tenda D151 Router as a extender via wireless connection and use it as a ethernet port , but im not able to connect to the old router though
can someone help me on how to connect to it?
edit : now im able to connect to it via ethernet thanks!
so what is the term for using your old router connected wirelessly to the main router and using the old router to connect other devices via ethernet? Bridge or Repeater or Extender?a
@zenith kettle access point, wireless bridge
bridge AP
various names
but the point is, its a bridge, with an ethernet interface and a wireless ethernet interface
no dhcp server, no firewall, no routing
okie
can you tell me a good video to set up my router : Tenda D151
okay any general video regrdless of the model will do
but basic things you can do on your too
@zenith kettle usually there's only two parts to it
your WAN and LAN configuration
WAN is the connection to your ISP
and your LAN is your local network
most of the settings are usually under those categories
okay so can WAN Be configured from different ISP's?
WAN is just an interface you designate
cuz my old router uses a phone cable named DSP , and my newer ones uses fibre connection
and you define a method for it to obtain an addreses
the idea is that, anything that isn't on your lan, gets routed out to wan
local area network, wider area network
your local network is a private range, 192.168.0.0/24 most likely
and your wan is a public IP address
your router just exchanges the packets of data between those two networks
it "routes"
the consumer market has ruined the word "router"
okay
to most people, router just means: box that gives internet and wifi
anyways, I'd love to chat about this
but I just got called for dinner
okay thanks for helping!
@zenith kettle Thing for you to look at are NAT, and DHCP
NAT is important for port forwarding, if you wish to host your own services
and DHCP is the protocol responsible for handing out IP addresses to connected devices
both of these are handled by the router
Is there no MTR for windows with v6
I just can't seem to find a way
WinMTR only does v4, WSL with the stuff doesnt do v6 either

Aw comeon man
Hey guys, I have a question concerning my network switch. I have a 1gb/s that arrives to the switch. Then the switch is split up into 2 cables that go on 2 different computers. Do I get 1gb/s on both computer or 500 mb/s or does it depends on if the computers ask a lot of bandwith?
it should split... equally
even if 1 of the 2 computers do not ask for any bandwith?
All ports get 1gb speed.
but it can't at all time right
It can, all the time. But if 2 computers are talking to a 3rd at max speed, they will each get half of the 3rdβs port speed
Cause imagine I have 1gb/s that arrives at my house which is sent to the router. Then both computers want to download. Then they will both download at 500mb/s each
The connection is split 500b/s per PC if they're simultaneously downloading
Exactly
and if one is just cruising the internet and the other downloading? 10mb/s and 990mb/s for the other?
Yes
For this very reason, QoS is a factor in ensuring gaming and VOIP traffic maintains low latency on a saturated WAN connection.
No, split up all the time is Token Ring. That doesn't exist π
Note: Works on upload only. Which helpful, but only half the equation.
Token Ring is a computer networking technology used to build local area networks. It was introduced by IBM in 1984, and standardized in 1989 as IEEE 802.5.
It uses a special three-byte frame called a token that is passed around a logical ring of workstations or servers. This token passing is a channel access method providing fair access for all ...
Emphasis on fair access. Again, that's no longer applicable with Ethernet.
Trivia: there was an obsolete 100BaseVG standard that was similar
100BaseVG is a 100 Mbit/s Ethernet standard specified to run over four pairs of category 3 cable (cable also known as voice grade, hence the "VG"). It is also called 100VG-AnyLAN because it was defined to carry both Ethernet and Token Ring frame types.
100BaseVG was originally proposed by Hewlett-Packard, ratified by the IEEE in 1995 and was pra...
Your probably confusing him >.>
Probably.
And do yβall recommend me to test my speed between 2 Ethernet ports in my house?
I meant what app or software should I use to test my speed
iperf3
ye between computers or servers within a local or public too iperf works best
So I need 2 computers with gigabit ethernet
Well technically yes, in this case you'd be testing your switch
Is anyone using Netgate TNSR? I don't know if it's actually worth learning if nobody uses it
π¦
what are these metal thing in front of the ethernet connectors lmao
SFP
only the top one is an Ethernet cable
the others are DACs
The small form-factor pluggable (SFP) is a compact, hot-pluggable network interface module used for both telecommunication and data communications applications. An SFP interface on networking hardware is a modular slot for a media-specific transceiver in order to connect a fiber-optic cable or sometimes a copper cable. The advantage of using SFP...
@clear igloo I don't have a 10 gig link between my server and PC π

Damn you need that huge SFP switch itself blob
if I had $900 + tax to drop on a switch
https://blob.rocks/fCOYpfy9TV.png
seriously ubiqituti?
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
Works
My friend has one and its super nice lol
Then I can go 25 Gig to my PC
/s
god im getting too jealous for a day
@clear igloo Have you looked at replacing your amcrest any time recently?
I have not
oof
All the options that are good don't seem to have what I need and everything that does have a cohesive set of cameras that do what I need are on par or worse than my current setup
rip
I wanna see if I can convince my parents to rip out our nest hello lol
for a g4 doorbell
lol
So we don't have to pay Google to store footage
Plus, Protect opens so much faster than Nest app
not stealing your data π
Nest sucks after Google purchased them. Though I do like Ring doorbell regardless of the controversy with Amazon.
Oop
The neighborhood is basically a collective Watch for stuff
It help police nail thieves
lol
You(american) should totally buy this 50 feet Cat7 SFTP(28awg?..) cable for 5$(-5$ coupon) & give it a review.
https://www.amazon.com/Ethernet-QGeeM-Internet-Computer-Connector/dp/B0888BFQS9
Buy Cat7 Ethernet Cable, QGeeM 10ft Cat7 RJ45 LAN Network Cable High Speed Professional Gold Plated Plug Ethernet Patch Internet Cable for Switch/Router/Modem/Patch Panel: Cat 7 Cables - Amazon.com β FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases
You even get free usb 2-usb c cable together with it?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07DZQ4T48
Buy QGeeM USB C Cable, Type C Charging Cable 3A Fast Charging, USB-A 2.0 to USB-C Fast USB C Charger, Compatible with Samsung Galaxy S8 S20 Plus, Moto Z: USB Cables - Amazon.com β FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases
Will I need 2 wifi AP's for a guest network and employee network for maximum security
And what would I do to make guests sign a TOS whenever they login to the wifi
guest wifi
Just assign a different VLAN to the WiFi networks and set up a captive portal on the guest WiFi with whatever ToS you want. Ubiquiti Unifi handles this quite nicely I might add.
1 AP can easily handle at least 2 SSIDβs
Alright, how do I setup a captive portal?
Not sure. Iβm only familiar with Ubiquitiβs implementation.
Alright
there are a bunch of captive portal solutions that can run on linux servers
mikrotik also has a captive portal
In need of some guidance. I'm trying to figure out how to set up networking in Virtualbox so that when the host connects through Pritunl or any VPN for that matter, all the of the guest vms automatically get routed through as well.
Use case - I have multiple users running game servers on guests but I dont want them to individually have to be responsible for connecting through to a VPS that has active ddos protection plus domains resolving to it. No game servers have conflicting ports.
Thank you very much in advance if anyone can walk me through it, or at least point me in the right direction. Please ping or DM, again thank you!
Ok, can somebody help me. Im setting up PFsense with an DHCP ipv4 of 192.52.255.48 (testing purposes) and it asks me to enter the start adress of the IPv4 client adress. give him 192.52.255.40 and then it says This ip adress must be in the interface's subnet
If anybody know, please dm me, cuz im heading to bed, cuz its 4.26 am, and my head is exploded by all these ip's
@thick minnow I would explain it but you need to enter 192.52.255.1/24 is the easy answer. This simply means that from 192.52.255.1 to 192.52.255.255 addresses will be assigned from pfsense.
^
if you put 192.52.1.1/16 this means 192.52.1.1 to 192.52.255.255 can be assigned from a router
Are those chains or iptables? ...:Or chains used for iptables?
you shouldn't use 192.52.x.x
it is theoretically unused as a public range but it is hard to say if that will be the case forever
I am wondering if I will ever see IPv6 in my lifetime.
hmm?
I should say where IPv4 is no longer used due to its limitations for IPv4 of address.
You'll never see v4 go away in our lifetime
I'm a bit more optimistic than that, only because v6 has been growing steadily over the past 5 or 6 years
Majority of growth is due to carriers and really screws with the numbers. The chicken and egg situation with devs/sysadmins and SP as well as the number of people legit intimidated by v6 will mean it's here for the long haul
The best hope is the end of next year when the US gov has a mandate for 80% of the network be v6 only. Whether or not they actually follow through, hopefully 3rd times the charm and will force a big push forward
for a lot of residential users who want public IPv4, it is mostly for gaming.. but if most online gaming supports ipv6 (and PS5 finally has IPv6 support) there will be less of a need for residential users to have public IPv4
if ISPs hit a point where 80-90% of traffic is IPv6 there is less of a downside to only offering CG-NAT to home users
potentially involving 464XLAT or DS-Lite
the pressure for companies to move will come from the home users, who want to be able to do things like VPN in without issue
it is exactly what has been happening with meraki and the cellular providers moving to v6 only, notably T-Mobile in the US and Rogers in canada, and using 464XLAT for v4 access which breaks IPv4 VPN access
T-Mobile and Rogers aren't getting blamed, instead Meraki is getting blamed for not being quicker to implement IPv6 support
I'd disagree. Pressure comes from the businesses. Residential can make noise but in reality, they are not the ones paying a majority of the bills for the big players. Even if residential complains to their workplace and it becomes a NOC time sink, many of the times they don't push and just find work arounds.
We'll see though, but I'd stand firm though that v4 will be around until I croak
Especially if the new buzz word of the month "zero trust" gains steam where it doesn't matter about transit and VPNs are the past.
right, but if CEO's or other higher-ups find they can't do something because their company is running the older IPv4 only and it isn't working because their home service is IPv6 and does v4 only through transition technologies
then you begin to have top-down pressure on the IT department to do something about the situation
That's my point, when I mean businesses, typically I just mean the ones who make the decisions. It's only when it affects the business in some way either financial or the top in their day to day work is when something is done. Most the time it's pressure on the engineers and either they're reasonable and listen which they push their providers or sadly and more common, engineers need to make it work or get the boot
yeah - like what I suspect is going to start happening is CEO's are going to start saying "this isn't working for me from home/mobile", is the IT team really going to be like "oh yeah, it is because we are running old IPv4, all of the home/mobile providers are on IPv6 now, but it is too much work to upgrade, so you'll just have to live without it"?
they might come up with workarounds, but how many CEO's want to be told that they are using ancient networking technology and are behind the times and that that is why they are having to come up with workarounds?
it's kinda like if they said "sorry sir, we are having a huge number of problems, our fleet of 80486 computers is failing.."
Too many don't know nor care. All they know is it's working and the the business is still making money. They'll end up getting another provider, a mobile hotspot or they're engineers will incorporate a legacy system to make them happy.
Unfortunately it's the mindset of most businesses corporates. Just make it work!+IPv4 still works will stagnate so much of the progress
Out of all the large enterprise customers we have, the amount of them that get escalated to me about v6 in someway shape or form can be counted on no hands. Even the problem child ones that we end up getting dragged into doing thinga for them
I mean look at the number or enterprises still relying on AS400 for billing. Devs and support is becoming scarce and this can/will have a major impact on finances, but decades later...
welllll
the answer should be to just forecebilly "yeet" the ip's as a RIR or so
I heard that they are doing it, slowly taking IP's away or so
but I don't think that is the type of taking-IPs-away that will impact enterprise
I'm guessing that not many enterprise customers actually have lots of internal systems on public IPv4
aside from government and universities
government and university clients typically put all internal systems on public IPv4 and do not use NAT
We have a big government customer and they are running into big problems because they are being forced to use public IPv4 for everything and cannot use NAT, and they are out of addresses
Having internal systems having public IP addresses is a real quick way for any hole to immediately be exploited. Think of all the vsphere boxes people just left connected to the internet, and just this year an exploit came out that just let you auth as admin
No - internal systems on public IP addresses by itself doesn't cause any issues, if your firewall is configured properly
As the person that responds to incidents like that - they're not
well, that's the problem of whoever did that and didn't put a firewall in place
It's a consistent trend of firewalls that are rendered useless because a test port was open, or a sysadmin left a backdoor in, etc
doing NAT is not a good solution for that because it introduces more problems than it fixes
Or just exploits that are just a few special characters in a tcp connection away from root, where firewalls just don't matter
we need to get better firewalls, not remove public IP addresses
with IPv6 everything is global.. except for some businesses who might run ULA but ULA is only recommended in certain cases
We need a lot. The past 6 months has demonstrably shown that security needs to be rethought from the ground up
Can't just rely on people taking care of keeping everything secure after the fact.
I think that's what juan was bringing up in terms of zero trust
you can't treat everything inside the perimeter as being completely trusted, because otherwise once you have access to anything inside the perimeter you get into everything
The trick (other than forcing dev's to focus more on security when they make stuff) is high fidelity monitoring, with heuristic models, and a modicum of machine learning
As an aside, about 10-15% of our network traffic now is IPv6.. given that only about 20% of our customers have routers that work properly with IPv6, that's actually quite good
@void shell your ISP has to provide IPv6 - otherwise you'll have to get a tunnel through a provider like Hurricane Electric
it is best of your ISP provides it
since if you are going through Hurricane Electric, it can impact your ability to watch netflix
Hi so is it normal for a memory test on a NAS taking up to 75 hours....... for just two stick 2x2gb 4gb in total
Hello!
I just made an update install for TrueNAS from 12.0 U1 to U3.1. It worked out so far, the pools are back online and the shares seem to be set right. But when I want to access my files now from windows it says my credentials are false. The webinterface works but i can't access the server through the explorer / total commander etc. Is there something I have to change?
Already restarted the SMB service but that didn't help
Ok. Thank you
It's out of stock now
Who bought it?
I demand a review. :triumph:
@lurker
So i have the lan interface soot up. When i ping it it replys
But i still ain getting any ethernet thru
Seems good?
Although that isn't a private ip range
Why are you using it
This is not the finished build, im just doing some testing in vm
Yeah but why the not private range
Well im kinda new to pfsense. But ive pretty much used 192 in most instances
That's not exclusive to pfsense
Its just routing
192.x.x.x is not a private range
192.168.x.x is tho
But 192.52 isn't
If you want a bit address space use 10.0.0.0/8
Ah.... now it makes sense
Aka 10.x.x.x
You can subnet that of course
At home for example my trusted lan is 10.0.20.0/24
And management is 10.10.10.0/24
So trusted lan static on the Lan side right
Cuz this is current interface config
Dont know how i got static on the wan end
it is static
just you have a dhcp6 client listening on that interface
for v6 addresses
Well now i managed to change it to dhcp4 wich is equal ipv4 right
yeah
Yes cuz im using ipv4 adresses
then for it to get a address you need to have a dhcp server somewhere on the subnet that the wan interface is connected to
So now WAN is 192.168.222.105/24
what's WAN connected to?
Its connected to another laptop briging two connections briged and passing it thru
yeah, so I assume that's your main router subnet
