#networking
1 messages ยท Page 332 of 1
I think reliance on proprietary is stupid anyways.
For communication
All the airspace should have transports standardized
and if they want something extra, then add it to the standard
the allocation chart is work in progress basically
Instead of literally showing your ass as static to everythign
and its just difficult to reallocate everything
they have the authority to do it
I mean... IPv4... Force revoking to push change
Yeah but that' don't work on public broadcasting
AT&T is betting on their legacy infra holding out while they deploy their entire new Open Source infra
can't exepect everyone to switch their transmitters over night
So... changing everything
RTL-SDR
if you want to reallocate everything
More like their filters are set to one frequency
but drum filters are expensive
Everything is SDN now on those towers
They can overnight change the transmitter target
and the antennas?
tiny SoCs with built in radios, yeah not gonna happen.
They are using drive coils to have a huge wide dynamic range
What do you think is in those antennas on those towers?
THE SAME CHIPS BY TI
LITERALLY
or whatever OEM
Also used in your Wi Fi AP
Making many diff chips expensive
Making one modular one then shaping what its able to hear...
Cheaaaaaaaap
They also run SNMP over VLAN 500 Normally to the Master Plane Control to change their configs
the same VLAN for ONTs.... (not a coincidence)
The same OMCI is used for their entire core to edge broadband in a single control plane on 99.99999% of modern hardware
SEPA, VOLTHA are parts of these projects
To the control plane, the subscribers method of connection was all the same,
vlans is all higher level
it has nothing to do with layer 1
and you cannot expect everyone to change frequencies
its just not gonna happen.
Uh... I never said it was layer 1
but the controller on all of these use VLAN 500 and run SNMP to send comands
???????????
and all the old chipsets that are still in use?
forget it.
not gonna happen
This is a 1996 protocol
and it has worked well enough thus far.
Yeah, but im saying: Yeah they can make that vast that quick of a change on the fly
If they wanted
Nah they can't
because it would make a lot of devices incompatible with eachother
Not gonna happen ^^
IPv4 isnt going to be revoked... itll remove compatability!
HAHAHA
AHHAHAAHAH
Here we go
ALL OVER AGAIN
We;re talking about wireless allocation, not logical addressing
The industry prefers to make these logistical changes and say fuck the devices cuz they save money
over 7 Million Wireless Mics used for like conventions/theatre/whatever had to be tossed
When the 5G allocations were made
Landfill fodder
Guess whos running FCC right now?
Guess who leads these standardization committies?
Those that are gonna make those changes without a care anyways
Because its the way forward logically
It will when they start saying in 6 months, this aint gonna work
I would seriously go look at 2022 Goals set by the joint WGU of the ITU Members (Telecom) and FCC...
Theres alot of this right there on the calendar
OEMs and Providers either keep up.. or die
Heres the whole data model btw. Kinda cool: you can literally make a global change in a second to your entire Data Provider Offerings core configs from the same place
This further reduces the weight of cost change on the providers. So they have even more of a reason if there is some gain to be had to do it
@tame carbon But heres what you didnt want to hear: They dont care, you will fork the cost, they wont listen
Nah
They said this in a PR manner in an Open Letter to the Community from the ITU
Its still up
it boils down to: don't change a running a system.
If you start messing with consumer space wireless allocations
you only get anger.
They are changing it. In fact, change logs as recent as today are posted
The problem is
The system aint working
Towers are oversubscribed and running at peak broadcast way too long
Means of airspace isolation is getting trickier
The platform isnt working for the growth.
COVID killed it
We saw entire regions die for periods of time
And IPv6 actually CANT Be deployed on many networks currently due to bunk workarounds. Oh and we also ran out of something while we were not prepared... IPV4
These telecoms are not about to get caught with their pants down again
Welcome to the time of change.
However, we know what we need to do so we dont have to do it again like this later on
If the system is designed right, you wont be playing janga with it
now or never
Ill take the future
AGAIN
wtf.
You are talking about airspace allocation
and then talk about ipv6
Those two have nothing to do with eachother.
But if you run out of either one, the result was the same
If your Airspace is shit, your shit cant talk
If your IP Layer is shit
Your shit cant talk
Right now
ALL THE LAYERS got problems
The whole point of the OCI was to merge the logistical problems they all provided into one solution.
The problem is bigger than just antennas
Change a transmitter... change a router..... how you connect doesnt matter
How it talks didnt matter
@tender hazel anything you'd recommend for PoE distribution ?
The fact is, it was starting to all fall apart at various points
Looking at mikrotik offerings, and I Am just looking for a rackmountable PoE injector array
and they don't have any of those
Their RB260GS has atheros chipsets, and I don't trust those to do VLAN filtering at gigabit speeds
https://opennetworking.org/onf-broadband-projects/ <alright here since you dont understand it from me. Take it from the people who run the thing themselves
The calendar for literal "Damaging" switchovers on all layers and forms of transport is marked. Its all public.
One way or another, theres alot of changes that will break shit.
Prepare to suck it up
because if we dont do this soon, were gonna have some serious problems with every form of capacity limitation and management issue
And then you got nothing
and heres your leaders
https://opennetworking.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ccr.pdf < Here is the plan in writing currently being acted
They addressed your issue, and said "oh well"
@tame carbon https://www.vivit-worldwide.org/blogpost/701724/347717/COVID-19-A-Booster-for-Digital-Transformation And heres a good article by a major provider that basically explains why the immediate changes are a need
With paperwork and all
And how COVID-19 basically threw the old "Dont touch if works" rule out the door
https://www.microfocus.com/en-us/digital-transformation/overview And heres the guys basically running the show as contractors.
Even our public emergency broadcast system is up for change with a reband + entire workover of data arch
Lol what. That's not at all how radio works
Well, not entirely
Your budget just cant afford getting around it 
@tame carbon you could use RB260GSP yeah
You would need to figure out how to mount it though
Which one u using
aren't you going to need switches anyway?
@tender hazel yeah but the location of the wiring going to some APs is very specific, so I was going to use powerbox pros for those
then what are the DIN's for?
@tender hazel yeah there's no other way
Which OEM did you go with for the rails @tame carbon ?
@plain siren lol the local hardware store
YUS!
germans kinda invented DIN
would be weird if they didnt have them
@tender hazel do you know what is up with those mANT boxes, they come with an injector and a 48V supply
meanwhile, those RB960PGS'es only have a 24V supply
not sure
@tender hazel I made a diagram, of a rough sketch of the network layout
but the specs show that 24V should work
@tender hazel Most of their outgoing lines are actually at the front desk
so I am replacing their two 8-port unmanaged netgear switches
with a CRS326
ahh ok - good
@tender hazel the Kiosk they have outside, has another PowerBox Pro
better to have visibility over everything than to have random unmanaged switches hanging around
thats where another POS system is
I plan on putting a cAP ac inside there
and two outgoing lines
that go up the hill, to two of the Wireless poles (that isnt using ptp)
I wanted to have managed switches throughout
so I can seperate the POS system from the LAN
currently, all of that is on their LAN
The POS 'controller' is a program running on their server (which I installed for them a couple years ago)
@tender hazel am I to be worried about those Atheros switching chips?
someone here said, that if you enable VLAN filtering on those, they shit themselves
with the powerbox pro you mean?
it really depends on the device
enabling bridge vlan filtering disables hardware switching on all devices except CRS3xx models
so what about the PowerBox Pro then?
well the powerbox pro similarly will not have hardware switching with bridge vlan filtering on
okay, but does that mean I cannot use access ports and trunking on it?
or at reduced speed?
I wish to have the full gigabit
whereas hardware switching allows you to go above that
so not a real issue then
no
There's at most only going 1G through that device
@tender hazel is there anything you'd recommend for omni directional antennas?
yup - that's why I said the powerbox pro and not the regular powerbox - the regular powerbox has a much weaker CPU and can only handle like 200Mbps bridging
or should I just put up one of those metal52 ac's ?
@tender hazel powerbox is only fast ethernet too. so that's a given then.
yeah so basically the rule of thumb is when you use a function that cannot be handled by the hardware switch chip and it disables hardware switching, it uses the CPU for bridging and then performance depends entirely on how powerful the device is
and in the case of the RB4011 and powerbox pro the CPU is quite powerful
so you can use bridge vlan filtering without having to worry about the limit with either
Cool
I don't really particularly know about outdoor omni antennas, we have been getting rid of any omnis that we have left
we have them at some towers but they will be going away the next time we go there to upgrade
I got a couple more questions xD
Those wireless wire cubes, if I was to put more than three on a single pole, transmitting
if I have them facing in opposite directions, can I use the same frequency twice?
or do I need an RF shield inbetween?
yes if you have them facing in diffferent ways you should be able to use the same frequency twice
and there are 5 different frequency choices on 60ghz
no, there are 5
unless maybe only 3 in germany
frequency (58320 | 60480 | 62640 | 64800 | 66000 | auto; Default: auto) Frequency used in communication (Only active on master device)
ahh, there you might have more choices
the higher you go in the 60ghz spectrum the longer the distance it can go, the less impacted by oxygen attenuation
I haven't seen that channel 6 as an option on the mikrotik 60ghz but maybe it is there in the newer ones
those advertised 800meters, is that still full bandwidth?
its not an issue, since we run at most 100 meters
I would prefer to run those at shorter distances than that
one link is only 25 meters lol
yeah at 100 meters you'll get gigabit full duplex no problem
but we have no option to run cables
@tender hazel okay, so one last question. This goes back to the CPU and vlan filtering from earlier
the longer the distance the harder it is to aim them and the more important that the aim is precise
I plan on daisy chaining two sector antennas together
but wish to be able to have a management and data vlan
are those CPU bottlenecked by that?
they have quadcore CPUs
which i think is quite beastly for such an AP
it should be ok - I mean you don't have to use bridge vlan filtering on those either
you can just use vlan interfaces
it keeps things simpler
I would only use bridge vlan filtering on your switches
so a management vlan
yeah
if I register a CAP, and create a datapath, on a specific vlan
do I have to create an interface for that?
or does it tag it silently in bg?
what we do is on the trunk coming into the switch, we have the customer vlan and mangement vlan tagged from/to the router, but then on the port going to the AP, the customer vlan is untagged and only the management vlan is tagged
ahh
it tags it silently in the background, you don't have to create a vlan interface
but what would you configure as the datapath vlan then?
1 ?
since you are tagging it at the switch
you would leave it unset
like this
except you would turn off client to client forwarding most likely
Yep
Okay, so this would forward that traffic to the switch
and then the switch can tag it afterwards?
yes
the switch will apply the tag on the customer traffic when it arrives from the AP
and everything is tagged on the trunk back to the router
interesting
I may have to do some tagging with those powerboxes too
the line between switch and powerbox would be a trunk
one of the ports on it would be an access port for the single POS system
and the other three lines are going to APs
I figured, a cable can do whatever I want it to, as long as I can plug a tik on it
yeah
excellent.
Cool, so I'm heading back home tomorrow
then I'm going to actually make a plan and list of parts
rough sketch, goes to actual network diagram
with addressing
ok
only annoying thin is, I don't really know what kind of accessories I will need lol
there's lots of little doo dads that I might need
@tender hazel and according to my dad. the existing wireless network they had, had failed on numerous occassions, because the powerbricks feeding the injectors would fail
so I think I might end up putting labels on all them, numbering them, and then having them stock up on some spares.
so they can replace them if need be
so if a powerbrick fails, they look at it "oh its a number 2" and they just grab one of the spares they have
not all will be fed by a powerbox
so I am just worried, that this kind of thing will happen in the future
I don't think the adapters generally have a tendency to fail, but yes you can get extras
most likely the source of any such failure would be from a power surge after a power outage
so as long as you have decent surge protection it ought to minimize those risks
not all of those wireless posts will have that
you'll probably want some kind of surge protecting power bar at minimum
at each post
just so you have something
rather than plugging everything directly into the mains
Outlets, breakers, and kWh meters
thats what those boxes that exist rn have
@plain siren they didnt even bother with that lol ^
Honestly, you should protect the feed on the outside
THere's no way for us to do that
These posts feed off the supply that is used by the camping itself
There's 3 80A phases on the entire area.
You cant just cut the cable and add one inline?
@plain siren I will, once the old ISP has removed all this garbage
those posts are on our property
the plan for now, is getting Fiber optics running , getting the main switch up and running
and providing indoor wireless
once that works, they will cancel their existing internet service
and once all the equipment has been taken down, will we start on building out our wireless network
@plain siren also the roof mounted antenna is scary as fuck
I had a look in the attic, how it is wired up
and the pole just goes through the roof
they drilled holes in asbestos plates.

So I would use a MARS 83905
and for every ethernet cable that runs PoE and is at any point exposed, will also need one
For any RF Devices like... an Antenna you should use a Gas Discharge tube
@plain siren mikrotik sells those now
Would this do?
Yeah if I cant see the protection rating on it, I aint gonna touch it personally
This is really important
Key 1: Thermal MOVs
Key 2: Short Circuit Protection (A diff rating)
And then the L-N dumps
those mikrotik surges are more meant for protecting the equipment from lightning strikes
but I think you are in a situation where the surrounding trees will be taller than those poles
Yeah thats MCOV
Its a valley
literally, if lightning strikes
itll strike the windmills on the hill
Any antenna within 10 miles will gain 100V from the residual EM
My HAM antenna during storms makes spark noises at the shack connection (I unplug it and stick the connectors in a glass container)
Thats kinda even worse for strikes, Thats mean the "Static" from the strike can travel
Yup
with our telecom towers of course surge protection is a must for us because there is a danger of a direct strike
Its because the ground becomes a "field carrier" with ground saturated dumps
The striked area could only absorb so much of the strike so it actually starts to kinda "slide" like ice
we did an install back in 2017 or so where we upgraded an entire site and there was one undocumented radio and becuase it wasn't documented it didn't receive lightning protection
and it went boom?
just days after all the new equipment was installed, lightning struck the tower directly, blowing that radio, travelling to the equipment, the mikrotik router exploded etc
all of the radios fried
Lucky no one was right next to it holy shit
F
of course we had just started moving to mikrotik recently at that time so I was getting a lot of "if this were a cisco it wouldn't have exploded" which was frustrating
no, cisco catches fire
it's like we've never had a direct lightning strike on one of our towers like that before
Literally
Fresh kindling
so of course they started getting paranoid about grounding, because they thought the mikrotiks were suspectible to exploding from surges etc
but since then we have had 0 exploded mikrotiks
Inb4 they just grounded every point
so they are more calm about that now
@tender hazel do you have pictures of the aftermath?
please tell me they dont have multiple ground points for each device in the line
@plain siren ground is ground no?
should they each be grounded seperately?
I saw a picture before but I'm not sure where it was
so no daisy chaining?
Ground loops will destroy an antennas SWR
You touch the shielded pieces during a Tx and suddenly RF Burn?
And all sorts of other fun shit
This is why ethernet is usually isolated
Googling RF burn has led me here
Pain Ray
Shoots high intensity beams of 95GHz
intended to be less-than-lethal
against personell
I remember a few years ago ground loops caused a massive RF leak into someones HAM Transceiver here locally and it killed them
Not sure if this counts as a basic tech support question but I thought I'd ask here if anyone has experience with 66 Blocks. I just moved into an apartment and all the data cabling terminates on a 66 block in the closet, which I find weird because more than half of the cables end with 8P8C/RJ45 outlets (not 6P6C phone outlets). I want to just re-terminate all the cabling to a patch panel but I'm a little concerned about liability in the very slim chances my landlord finds out and cares. So instead, first, I'm thinking about tearing out the voice patching and then attempting to punch down one end of a patch cord to the secondary contacts and just seeing if I can get half-decent speeds through the punchdown block like that.
But before that, I wanted to see if there was anyone I could talk to who's familiar punching down voice jumpers so I can make sure I'm not about to do something catastrophically stupid in tearing them out
It's strangely difficult finding people who've done this stuff before, I would imagine there's tens of thousands of people with residential service technician experience
@ornate salmon you are in the right channel for this
Usually such a termination block is a handover from the service provider to the residence
you only change the leads on the outer terminals
the inner terminals go to a trunk line which goes into the ground
You need an LSA punchdown tool to put those wires in
I have one actually, I did some time as commercial telecom technician before moving into estimating
I'll send a picture of this block though it's a little weird
And punchdown for twisted pair isnt unheard of
Best to post the block as there are many configurations of them
@ornate salmon what are those blue lines feeding to?
I'm struggling to figure out how this is supposed to be being used in this context
The blue pairs?
I believe those are all running to locations around my apartment unit
@ornate salmon yeah so one side is service, the other client
But I don't know if one of them might be leading back to an IDF
they are just straight through
I assume/think the blue patching pairs are daisy chained along, that's how voice usually works right?
Not sure how they do that all over the world
But then you're saying basically that the cat5 cable terminated in the top right is probably incoming voice?
I can't tell
@ornate salmon I think both incoming and outgoing are terminated on those blocks
and the blue-white lines are just to bridge the connections, and close the circuit
It looks like the blue and orange pairs of every single category cable are all daisy chained together with the blue and white mess of strands
This is how I think this is all connected
Yeah I've seen some crazy ones too, usually for like PA/Bell systems in schools
but I've never had to work with one myself
I feel about 53% confident in myself just pulling out the patching wires here, and then I'll probably just tone out the category cables from the outlet end, and then whichever one is left is presumeably the incoming voice line if there is one
66 blocks terminals a split into a left/right half with the outer/inner punchdown connected. I guarantee the outer pins are incoming voice and inner are to the jacks. If you are going to daisy chain or splice, there are better ways. Coming from someone who's done 1,000s of punch downs
I'm pretty sure the outer edges are primarily the cables running to the outlets inside my unit
I see 7 Cables terminated to the 66 block
and I count 7 Jacks in my apartment (although there's a mystery faceplate that could potentially contain 2 more terminations
I think potentially the way this is set up is for the voice outlets on the back of my modem to be patched into one of the rj45 outlets, and then for any other outlet to be able to patch to a phone
its barely got anything hooked up
I know in oldschool homes here in the netherlands, it wasn't uncommon for all the oulets in the house to be chained together
I guess I'm lucky then at least that these seem to be homeruns with the daisy chaining being operator choice
actually i guess it's not daisy chaining in that case, it's like, trunk-offshoot
but are those 7 blue utp cables the only thing feeding into it?
from what I can see, I think so
odd
very odd
those ISRA points here, have a cable coming in from below which terminates on such a block
and then customer equipment is just patched in through the middle row
That would seem pretty logical
My service here though comes through coax
So I already sorted out the coax nightmare earlier tofay
My last apartment just had two strands of fiber to an ONT, that was beautiful
Well the actually way to do it is outer pins are only used for runs and middle pins are connected with a bridge clip
@ornate salmon I just have a single mode fiber directly plugged into my router :)
two lines come into the house
one is in use, the other is backup
Interesting, two individual strands but using just one at a time?
@ornate salmon they run the fiber in a big circle
Line 1 goes clockwise
line 2 counterclockwise
both ends are terminated at the exchange
Oh ok so then do you have 4 strands total?
no, two fibers
maybe I'm confused what you mean by backup
@ornate salmon the fiber path itself is a circle
on both sides of the circle its spliced
you'd think I would be less confused about all this stuff, my day job is estimating colocation projects
@ornate salmon Its basically just if there's a fiber cut somewhere
they can send the light down the other fiber
which takes a different direction
ah ok ok I see
its like T connection
wait so let me rephrase to see if I better understand
fiber goes left, and right
I've just never seen a single stranded fiber that's what my brain is hung up on
the minimum I've ever used was 2ST
its all singlemode
That's a good way to do it
@ornate salmon yeah the subsidies that made this possible made one thing very clear
One time I worked on a jobsite where we had to pull multiple 2-strand fibers to every desk in an office
the company that runs the fiber, is independent from the actual service provider
so you can get 10G if you wanted to :D
each desk had 3 cat6A and 3 duplex LC
Very interesting!
it all depends on the ISP you are connecting to
what kind of gear they have in the exchange
but its basically dark-fiber to the home
So then I assume all the ISPs come into a demarc point that's like, your community center or something and that's where they patch in to you?
@ornate salmon and this path you spoke of:
Telcos are pretty much all single strand with BiDi. Duplex for drops are not common at all outside specific scenarios
Yes I've estimated a few projects with campus fiber-rings
@hollow marlin Yeah service is BiDi
two lines are spliced in, both are functional just not operational at same time
That's really interesting
Result is a single fiber that goes to my gear
(the one on the left)
that other spooled up fiber is 10G for LAN
my job all day long every blueprint is nothing but 12+ strands of fiber going to duplex connectors
is that LC?
I guess duplex is really just for density
Drops are still 12 strands at minimum, but usually 2 spliced as its cheaper to just use another fiber than repair a drop
which is why I see it all the time
@hollow marlin Lol those junction boxes they use for the fibers, are big metal boxes like 2x1 meters
they put about 20 cm of topsoil on them
Duplex is not for density, bidi is
What is duplex for
when they do maintenance like splicing a fiber
they just remove the topsoil
open the box
and pull out the big block of spooled up fibers
Duplex - rx/tx fibers - same frequency
BiDi - rx/tx over single fiber - difference frequency
@ornate salmon BiDi uses two wavelengths on same fiber
you need two different modules
with RX/TX flipped
Duplex burns 2 fibers each connection. Fine for the CO/DC, not for last mile
Is duplex faster?
no
has no bearing on speed
You can use WDM with duplex
something you cannot do with simplex
Duplex is still the only option with higher speeds such as 100g+. At least I have no seen any SFPs for such
WDM is probably how corning lets you split 1 outlet to 32 ONTs yeah?
@hollow marlin Highest I've seen with BiDi is SFP28
with a passive splitter
@ornate salmon its just a box with prisms
WDM uses much more narrow bands
You need special transceivers for those
This is a BiDi transceiver ^
1270nm-TX and 1330nm-RX
the other side, would need to be reversed
They use a simplex fiber
GPON is not WDM but TDM, same wavelength is used for all ONTs. NGPON is a mix of WDM/TDM
PON is garbage
Its treating fiber like a coaxial network
Its a cost saving measure for residential deployments
The savings is night and day though
Yeah but its not at all future proof
GPON is fine in most cases
I mean, my last apartment was GPON and I always got a solid 1GB connection
which was still an excessive amount for what I actually use as an individual
@ornate salmon sure, you can get like 2.488G down and 1.244G up
GPON->NGPON->XGPON, same fiber and splitters, different equipment
@ornate salmon but its not as flexible, because everyone in the area shares the same wavelength of fiber
WDM actually multiplexes multiple wavelengths of light
so you can have 96 'colors' on a single fiber
each color, can be whatever speed you want it to be
interesting
@ornate salmon this is used for long-haul mostly
Wavelength division multiplexing
TDM = Time division multiplexing
with TDM, the ONTs take turn when signalling
with WDM, all can signal indepdendently on different wavelengths
So is WDM like, way more expensive or something?
More density.
The best that we can do right now, is 96 wavelengths on a single pair of fibers
There is an MSA for 400G bidis and there are 100g bidi for mm fiber pairs but I haven't seen anything for 400g yet
PAM4 I believe
I think it was NRZ/PAM2
Ye, so on/off
yah
flicking the switch at highspeed
@ornate salmon https://i.imgur.com/M0IBG1Q.png
@ornate salmon WDM muxer basically has a line, and a bunch of channels
The Line goes to another muxer
I would have guessed they existed. Never looked as I don't really look at MM
@ornate salmon it basically allows you to combine multiple fiber links onto a single pair
Yah, they don't have really long length or anything, mostly for like sub 50 or 30 meters or so
Pair or strand?
@ornate salmon if you have a very long fiber path, this makes a lot of sense. It would allow a cross-connect between two datacenters, to use a single pair of fiber for multiple services
@ornate salmon Its all duplex
so you have two fibers, RX and TX
Oh ok I see
Its just a box of prisms
Line goes in, splits it up into however many channels it supports
that makes sense, also I just tore out all the phone jumpers in my 66 block
imagine, 100G
on a DWDM (Dense WDM)
that's 9.6Tbit/s
96x 100G
on a fiber pair (duplex)
is MPO WDM or is it some other trickery?
Other trickery
oh MPO is just 12 individual strands but theyre lined up precisely
MPO is just a composite connector
with a bunch of fibers
but this is multimode stuffs I believe
I don't mess with that
MPO very expensive also
@clear igloo send me samples
I just bid a 3m$ project with like 600+ pre-terminated MPO fibers going to splitter cassettes
nou!
And you can break it up into many 10g
I built my bid with some breakout cables and some 48 strand MPO-MPO running to cassettes
I think the 48ST MPOs though had 4 MPO-12 connectors on them
each end
gold plated fiber cables go in the cable stretcher to be extended
lmao
Multimode I think
lol, those cores are so big
you point it at the sun, and light comes out the other side
i think toslink just uses an elf with a flashlight at the transceiver
@ornate salmon I use that for my hifi setup at my desk
its easiest way to get 5.1 going
I think that standard allows for 125mbit/s
which is peanuts
that's actually better than i expected
Also, those BiDi interfaces are generally more expensive
10G SFP+ BiDi (LR 10km) costs ~ 35 bucks
and the duplex 10G variant is like 20 bucks
do you think my apartment complex will notice on move-out if I reterminated all my 6P6C to 8P8C
do they still use the phones? 
I'ma lose internet for a second here but hopefully i will brb quickly with speed test results through a 66 block
๐
Gross
bunch of wildlife in the box
spiders jumping out
and the other box I opened had signs of rodents taking refuge
Yeah this is the first time I've opened a wall outlet to find spider webs
I've lived a privileged technician life
use Belden cable
@lean pebble this is for wireless service on the area
the ISP does both internet and wireless service
with the new fiber optics we're getting
all of this gear is gonna be removed
and replaced by new 60GHz ptp links and sector antennas
instead of the crappy omni antennas they use now (on 2.4GHz with 40MHz channels xD)
and they use 5Ghz for backhaul right now
omg swapping out the wallplate f-connector gave me speed test gains of .2 mbps
yeehaw
So um
It looks bad I know
but the tone goes through just fine....
....I don't think it works ๐ญ
so this much
Is good
Does anyone know what the S means
I wish this little tester could give me any other diagnostics
ugh does anyone make a pre-terminated 66-block patch cable or something dumb like that
Oh I'm an idiot I think
I terminated all the white conductors on the wrong things
maybe not
Yes, S is the shielded cable jacket
wait that order is not TIA 568A or B
the way they punched it down in the 66 block
yeah I did it completely wrong
I dont even get why that block is being used
Its like.... not even properly being used
un-set it up
No I mean... that 66 block > Trash
basically they were all sharing a voice
yeah I mean I want to replace it with a patch panel
This
but I'm in an apartment
that never stopped me
Then you invoice the apt later
For the "upgrade"
They would prob blindly pay it too 
I need to find my real punchdown tool because right now I'm doing this science with a screwdriver
but I just moved and i packed it somewhere dumb
the 66 block is greater than trash?
LOL
whoever decided to standardize punching anything down probably is an agent of satan
everything should be pre-terminated in chinese factories
AT&T (Bell) did sooooo yeah they are
ugh - port isolation is broken in SwOS 2.12
and I only discovered because a customer plugged their router in backwards
well my last apartment had fiber service from AT&T so ill give them a pass
I had to temporarily create a mac acl to block them
this one, spectrum,
friendship with spectrum ended
They plugged in their router backwards?
yeah
it's a common issue for certain types of ISPs unfortunately
customer plugs in LAN port to the internet uplink
in our case this led us to discover that port isolation wasn't working on the switch
OOooohhhhh
b/c they were handing out IPs to other customers
who would then not get online b/c they were getting IPs from the backwards plugged in router instead of from us
that sounds messy
sometimes when the customer has a backwards plugged in router they don't even realize
because what happens is sometimes they have this stupidly long cable
and they have the WAN port on the router plugged into one of the LAN ports with that long cable
because it is not obvious when the cable is that long that it is the same cable
because it runs from their router down to the floor and up again
so they plug in backwards and they still can have service, because the LAN port switching causes them to be bridged properly on the WAN port so even plugged in backwards things still sorta work
is it worth me plugging in my router backwards to see what happens
actually I doubt it would do anything in my case, not cause chaos
no - any ISP that delivers an ethernet handoff is going to use port isolation to prevent you from handing out IPs to others
we do, but at this one site only, the function isn't working in the switch, it is configured properly but isn't working
I only discovered now b/c this happened
I reported it to the vendor, hopefully they can fix it soon
makes me wonder how many problems are lurking out there malignant because they haven't caused noticeable issues yet
Modern ISP's with the whole "new" infra management systems actually use VLANs per customer now 
there's no need for a VLAN per customer if port isolation is working
we do VLANs per customer for enterprise customers only, not for retail
my cable ISP at home here does a single shared subnet for many customers (and so obviously a shared VLAN), but a combination of port isolation and Local Proxy ARP to separate customers
it works as well as separating them into VLANs but it is a lot easier to manage and less wasteful of IP space
assuming the port isolation works, that's a pretty critical feature to be broken
I may have to downgrade the software to try to fix it
If you're doing VLAN per customer, you're doing networking completely wrong and should pack your bags and try a new hobby.
VLAN per customer makes sense when the customer is buying an enterprise grade service, like DIA or VPLS, but otherwise, no
I remember going onto a Cisco chat and they were trying to tell me that I should be using a VLAN per customer for retail customers
I was incredulous.. sure, that sounds great, I love making tons of extra work for myself for no reason
what are you trying to do with it anyway?
two ideas
one, if I could just bridge one UTP to the other so I can link something in another part of my unit to my router over LAN
the other, if I just jumped every cable to a 8P8C connector so I could throw a little switch in the closet and give internet access to every outlet in my unit
but alas, the idiots who built this place wired it with a boat-load of cat5e but failed to make it compatible with data
I really should just rip out the 66 block and put a patch panel in there
are you sure it is wired correctly on both ends
like the picture you showed should be working.. maybe not at 1Gbps but you should get something
your cabling has to be pretty terrible not to come up at 10Mbps even
to be fair my testing methodology sucks
I'm sure the jacks are terminated correctly
how are you testing?
well
I have two coupled patch cables that run from the little thing punched down to the 66 block all the way back to my computer
so i have like
way too many potential points of failure
the netcat seems useless at everything except telling me how long the cable is
and I don't have any other devices with an rj45 to just plug in in my closet and easily see if they're connected
So who here uses pfsense?
pfft pfsense ๐
pfsense is great, what are you talking about?
Not gonna make it anything that does SERIOUS routing, but for most stuff outside of the ISP space? yup.
I'm somewhat kidding, hence the wink.. but it depends on whether someone really needs a next gen firewall or a router that also has firewall features
Also, TOTALLY not a fan of it being freebsd, and their drama surrounding wireguard
OPNSense is a thing too
I can see the use case for pfsense for businesses that want to block their employees from being able to access certain types of content
i.e. as a fortigate substitute if you are on a budget
I've seen it more it use cases where you need people that aren't hugely technical to be able to manage a router/firewall too. That's the reason my team uses it as the wan for our kits
https://suricata-ids.org/ Also this
Ugh, suricata
Currently in a protracted war with my team about snort3 being better
Also, HARD no on anything routing packets doing any sniffing
Also http://www.squidguard.org/ this too
I just joke about pfsense because it is frequently denigrated by mikrotik enthusiasts
I haven't used it before myself, other than booting it up to have a quick look at it
Ah. Still haven't gotten around to getting a mikrotik device. Been planning a 10gbe upgrade for my lab, but even doing just the backbone network is cost prohibitive
if i have to use a vpn do i put I turn it on inside my virtual machine or on the host machine
The server?
no as a client like connecting
I've got mullvad VPN working on my mikrotik now at home
but I have to disable it to get the full netflix library
i want to connect tot he vpn but i only want to use it inside a virtual machine
and it is only working with ipv4 at the moment
@thick minnow Then the VPN just inside the VM
Okay well i've got the vpn working inside the VM but it wont connect 
I was trying to figure out how to say this without being so... blunt
that's why I ask
I've actually disable ipv6 inside my actually lab. I hates it
I also am very triggered by the RFC deciding that the smallest routable subnet is HALF OF THE ADDRESS SPACE
mfw I disabled IPv4 in mine
it's not "smallest routable subnet"
how would I troubleshoot why it wont work
but for dynamic addressing (DHCPv6 IA_NA, SLAAC) you can't use anything other than a /64
I mean, there is a good reason
if you use static addressing, you can use any subnet size you want
I know I can make smaller subnets statically, but I don't want to do things static as I build and destroy stuff in my lab
Why do you want them smaller?
the idea of using 64 bits for the host was that you could take the mac and use it to build the host address.. and not only that but a 48 bit mac has the potential for exhaustion, so increasing it to 64 bits means room for growth in the future
when you have such a big address space it doesn't matter to be a bit wasteful
Because if the whole point of a new IP standard is so we don't overuse and overallocate, then being so wasteful bothers me
organize the address space in the way that makes the most sense even if it seems to waste a ton of addresses
It's the same reason I go on a warpath whenever I see a 10.0.0.0/8 network without a REEEEEAL good justification
It was literally stated "overkill" in the first 4 sentences of the standard
take your OCD and tuck it away this time
it only bothers you from perspective of comparing with IPv4 where you have to be very conservative
IPv4 isnt even a comparison at this point.
The fact you YEET NAT alone basically makes it a joke
when we designed our IPv6 space, we actually designed it from the perspective of making our firewall simpler
ex. all monitoring software goes into a /40.. so if we add any new monitoring tools later, we can put them in there and not have to deploy firewall changes to our fleet of devices
lol
I know its coming, it just offends my ipv4 sensabilites
IPv4 should offend the IPv6 greatness sense
Iโm trying to determine if I should ditch my UDM and build a router.
define "build a router"
If your UDM is working, why ditch it?
HP ProLiant with pfsense, an AP or two around the house.
I think you are going to find that isnt as great as it seems
Cuz ubiquiti hack and pr nightmare
I think "build a router" is from the LTT video where he built a router running pfsense
Sometimes I am bad at choosing words.
I haven't been following the ubiquiti GPL thing
but people have made the same complaints about mikrotik too
I didnโt even know about it
They are facing nearly 1M per violation + 10M for each "failure to deliver asks from court"
They are currently at.... 9.5 BILLION
mikrotik only offers access to the source code if you pay like $25 for shipping and they will send you a floppy disk or CD of the source code changes
I feel like no one ever reports these GPL violations like they should
Honestly, though, 25 for shipping and source ain't bad
I think the issue is that the GPL was created before it was conceived that you could just download everything
so it has some verbage that says that you can provide access to the source code via fixed physical media but have a suitable charge for shipping
so it is technically not a GPL violation in that regard
at least as I understand it
it is more that people are upset b/c these days there is no reason not to offer the source code changes online for free to everybody
there is no need to restrict it to physical media and charge shipping
so it is more that the "spirit" of the GPL that it violates, rather than the letter
yup - as that says both physical media and distribution via the internet count
so mikrotik distributing only via physical media and not via the internet doesn't technically violate the GPL
although mind you I don't think they've made very many changes to GPL code to begin with
I know with GRE they added keepalives
with PPP they added BCP
They added priority stuff to ebtables and iptables
most of the other features they have developed are part of their own routing engine and are not GPL
so when you buy the GPL code from them it doesn't really include most of the stuff that makes a mikrotik router work
it only includes the features where, instead of developing it themselves, they extended an existing linux feature to add new capabilities to it
I canโt find anything about a recent Ubiquiti GPL violation court case
Cambium had software the replaced the Ubi firmware to Cambiums on UBI's WISP routers
It was GPL
Well..... Ubi sued Cambium saying COOOOPYYRIGHT
Ehehehehe
No
Cambium turned around and wants payback
Despite the "Settlement" there is 2 tag-ons currently going on by ... Hehehehe Mikrotik and Microsoft
Aha. I was wondering why your link seemed to be referencing a case back in 2019. But if itโs Cambium going after Ubiquiti this time, that makes sense. Weird how Google does not seem to know about this 2021 case at all...

Cambium is straight up in their SEC filings they gonna jack all the other OEM's devices too
@elfin wraith
wait ubnt uses mikrotik software too?
no
is this just generic gpl stuff now
Yes
dude is there like, any way to tell my internet to stop being an idiot
dude, like no lie, im too lazy for ethernet
and wifi isnt as bad as is right now normally
like its to the point where spotify is kinda shiz
Wired is the ultimate laziness
Wired is just so much better and you have basically no issues compared to wireless
If the wifi is where the issue is
plug and done. As for the wifi, you can check to see if its your access point or just your ISP connection by seeing if you have any latency issues to your router
A ping test can sometimes indicate
That's the thing with wireless
It randomly works and doesn't
especially with a bad all-in-one router/access-point/switch/modem combo
My Wake On WAN command in Pulseway doesn't seem to work....are both the port numbers supposed to be 9?
[@ or reply to me so I can the message]
Hi. Is it possible and ok to use 2 default routes on one router, one of them being a floating route?
Basically this the network architecture. And I need to use the links to R3 with redundancy. One of the R3 links is acting as the main link always.
We call this VRRP
hmm I am still to learn VRRP and HSRP. Will have a look at this.
But is it not possible with floating default routes if that's a thing?
Also to mention, the routers R2, R3 and R4 are all Mikrotiks and I do not have any control over R1.
Anyone around that can help me sort out hairpin nat on a mikrotik?
Depends on your question. Just put it here some1 will help if they can.
I have several apps running on a NAS, each in their own container and each with their own local IP. I have a reverse proxy (NPM) to access them from outside of the network but when putting the domain in form inside the network it doesn't route me. Someone told me hairpin nat is a good solution so I would like help setting up one that works with my network layout. Im very new with mikrotik routers and still not comfortable in the interface
would that be more convenient?
Yeah, and easier to setup
Any pointers on how its done? Got a pihole acting as DNS server right now
from what I understand I just go in the UI and under "local DNS record" I can add the domain / IP combo. But I do not understand since I can't add ports to the IP.
Why add ports? Just set the local dns record. If you're trying to do stuff with ports, you need a reverse proxy
ok so for example I want to access pictures.mydomain.com and files.mydomain.com and they both run on the ip 192.168.1.10 for example just on different ports. if I go to set the local dns record to pictures.mydomain.com and files.mydomain.com both pointing at 192.168.1.10 it wont work right?
It'll work. You just append the port at the end
Having multiple dns records point to the same target doesn't cause any conflicts
I cant append anything to either the domain and the IP
Not in the dns record, in the browser when you go to the page
Yes, setting up a reverse proxy for the hosts
Then you point the DNS records at the reverse proxy, and depending on the url that gets requested, it passes the correct site
so if I have npm on .19 I can just add a new DNS record for images.mydomain.com to .19?
Yep
that doesn't seem to work
Why not?
not sure if I did something wrong, let me send screens one moment
so I have the local record pointing at npm and in npm I have set up for example images.mydomain.com is on 192.168.1.16:8080
when you say npm you mean node package manager?
And what do you get when you try to visit it?
ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED
is port 443 open?
gimme a docker ps
Alright, so that's fine. And you can visit the pages directly without being refused?
via the local ip?
Yeah
and via the domain from outside of the network
both are fine
Alright, then just see what the nginx logs say. They'll have a reason why its being refused
know the location of the log files?
/var/log/nginx
Unless the proxy manager dumps to host, you'll probably have to exec into the container
It just randomly started working now
Didn't change anything
maybe it just takes time from when I add the dns record to when it goes live?
thanks for the help
i don't exactly know if this is the right place to ask but, my house uses about 12 WiFi connected devices basically all the time, 3 of them are connected using an Ethernet cable, and the rest just regular WiFi, the problem is, we don't have a router, just the modem provided by our ISP, we bought the 250Mb/s plan, but im consistently getting less than 40Mb/s on my laptop which is connected with an Ethernet cable, can a router solve this problem? And would a TP link archer ax1500 be enough, because that's the router im currently considering to buy.
ok to clear things up, you do have a router, it's just a modem/router combo unit
as for recommendations idk, all I would reccomend is mikrotik
yeah, I have a combo unit sorry
@leaden quail Mikrotik might be very complicated for someone who doesn't have a lot of experience with networking