#networking

1 messages · Page 315 of 1

waxen scroll
#

@tame carbon no business reason, thus no funding allocated

tender hazel
#

yes, they had the -EM devices with extra memory for BGP in routeros 6.. the extra memory is probably not necessary anymore with v7

tame carbon
#

I bet unifi would do the opposite

#

they would add more ram, and have a 300% profit margin on the modules

#

their high end gear so expensive

hollow marlin
tame carbon
tender hazel
#

thanks.. I was checking nanog yesterday and didn't see anything

tame carbon
#

AMX-IX hit new record

#

9.935Tbit/s

#

I compared some other exchanges

#

and turns out

#

this is actually the best one to be on

hollow marlin
tame carbon
#

Its connected to everything

#

This complex

#

is the heart of european internet

#

@hollow marlin these are all within 5-30 mins driving

#

I guess 1 atom bomb

#

and rip europe

#

@hollow marlin whats the most extreme bandwidth in a single unit you've seen deployed?

#

like, how does an IX

#

do the actual peering, is that just a patch in the exchange?

#

between two switches ?

#

most of these buildings

#

do up to ~1tbit/s

#

except the national institute for particle physics

#

they were sucking 2tbit/s

tender hazel
#

you all get an assigned IP on a common subnet

#

sometimes you may peer directly with others, but often you get the peering by peering with a single route server at the IX and everybody who peers with the route server exchanges routes

#

route servers are helpful because if you want to peer with all 100 people at an IX or however many there are, you don't have to contact them individually

tame carbon
#

thats what AMS-IX says they do

#

they have a single route server

#

and provide their services through that

#

but how was just beyond me

tender hazel
#

yeah but even when they have a route server, people don't always have to use it - some companies have a direct peering policy where they will only peer directly and not through the route server

tame carbon
#

and what is that then?

#

you get a direct fiber link between your gear and the other peer?

tender hazel
#

no, you still peer with them over the shared subnet, but you create the peering link with their IP directly, not the IP of the route server

tame carbon
#

or do they do some kind of switching with vlans on the endpoint?

#

@tender hazel so this subnet

#

that's a public range ?

tender hazel
#

yes, it is generally a public range

tame carbon
#

what if you had two ISPs that wanted to directly exchange routes?

#

would they still use that common gateway from the exchange?

#

or is that what it literally means

#

one big giant street

#

and everyone sets up shop

hollow marlin
tender hazel
#

the exchange doesn't really provide a common "gateway", it is a shared network where people can peer over, and the route server will be used by most to automate that

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel but what if I was to say, build a building with servers in it

#

and you get multiple x-connects with a fiber to different exchanges

#

you announce that route, to all three of those exchange points then?

tender hazel
#

AMS-IX is looking at RFC5549 to help conserve public IPv4 space btw

#

mikrotik supports that in routeros v7

tame carbon
#

So the BGP is over v6

#

but the routes can be dual ?

tender hazel
#

you can do BGP over either v4 or v6 and advertise both v4 and v6 but it is generally advised to peer over v4 for sharing v4 routes and over v6 for v6 routes

#

so you would set up two peerings with each, one for all of the v4 stuff with the ipv4 peering address and one for all of the v6 stuff over the v6 peering address

hollow marlin
#

Much more than dual, there are tons of AFI/SAFI

#

Yes, v4/v6 are typically separate just for ease of management. Having them in the same peer can have some odd limitations

tame carbon
tender hazel
#

I don't think RFC5549 has any specific dependencies on BGP.. but I don't think they are using it yet in production

#

they are just preparing for eventually going to that

hollow marlin
#

It does, its based on a modified NLRI. Not sure I have seen OSPF/inter-as-inter-as allow v6 next-hop for v4

#

Im sure it exist in the latter

#

All our IX peers are /31. But at their scale it makes more sense to move to v6 next-hops

tender hazel
#

ok

#

ahh yes, it's been a while since I read the presentation

#

slide 24 covers the behavior

tame carbon
#

is v7 ready for production?

#

or does it not run on all devices yet?

tender hazel
#

it runs on all devices, but it is not yet ready for production no

#

it is stable enough to use at home

#

but I certainly wouldn't put it in any sort of important role

thick minnow
#

@tame carbon Just wondering do u know if its possible to watch blu ray disk copies on vlc on ur phone? (via that network sharing) The ones that u open on vlc by clicking 'open disk > blu ray', I'm thinking no rn because they have javascript menus and stuff but wondering if u know.

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel So I'll do that fiber 1000/500 setup on v6 :P

#

@thick minnow you need a network stream for something like that

thick minnow
#

oh so its in this case that streaming through vlc would actually be useful>

tame carbon
#

well if you have a blueray

#

might just be easier to use handbrake or something

#

You can use this to turn DVDs and BluRays into files

tender hazel
hollow marlin
tender hazel
#

I'm running v7 at home on my rb4011 wifi

#

it's the first version that hasnt' been rebooting like crazy on me

#

it's stable with my config and I have a fairly kitchen sink config running on it

hollow marlin
#

AC2 is reporting at least the last 2 betas causing reboots/freezes

tender hazel
#

@hollow marlin most of the reboots/freezes in my experience are due to the config

#

routeros 7 doesn't properly update the config syntax when going from one version to the next like routeros 6 would

tame carbon
#

the stable v6 on the rb4011

tender hazel
#

so you can have a syntax that is invalid that gets loaded and it causes instability

tame carbon
#

I've never had any issues with

#

the ac2 had issues with wireless once

#

after 120 days

#

reboot fixed it

tender hazel
#

to upgrade with stability you need to export the config, upgrade, reset to no defaults and paste the config back in

#

that way it will be validated by the parser for that version

#

I don't really believe the people who stay it is not stable with the hap ac2

#

they probably did not reset to no defaults and paste the config back in like you should

#

you can always use partitions to test v7 on your hap ac2 safely

hollow marlin
#

Yeah, Id recommend that regardless since v7 is almost built from the ground up. I know routing config not updating was a big problem for many.

hollow marlin
#

That said, I have 2 more AC2s on standby and I could test with one

tender hazel
#

oh only 16MB.. I thought it was a bit more for some reason

#

yeah for partitioning you need one with 64MB at least I think

hollow marlin
#

Ill give it shot on a spare. If only Mikrotik will cut it out with the 16mb flashes

peak cloak
#

microsoft is having dns issues

#

fun

vale reef
#

NOO minecraft too

tame carbon
#

@peak cloak soon discord will be down then too

#

you drop the a bomb on microsoft

#

and poof, no more fortnite

peak cloak
tame carbon
#

hahaha.

#

good joke

half holly
#

Cloudflare is still fine tho

#

unless Telus uses Microsoft

plain siren
dusky flame
#

anyone here familiar with IIS URL Rewrite?|
I would like to add a site into IIS (fake directory since the app doesn't use IIS)
Then create a rule so that I can access this web app from the internet. myapp.mysite.com should point back to localhost:8080

peak cloak
#

so reverse proxy basically?

plain siren
thick minnow
#

I am trying to configure my Unifi Security Gateway for the first time. I am able to get through the configuration process to set it up with the Controller software, but when I click finish, it gives me this error.

"{Mac}" is not a valid Target.

#

And I know that the USG does not have wifi capabilities, but the setup process for the controller has me entering in a SSID and password for a wifi network. How could that be?

dusky flame
#

@plain siren great, I'll try that. thanks

sturdy knoll
#

can someone help me with a vm it keeps deciding to stop working

copper ginkgo
#

i got this base station for a home security system and discovered it seems to function like a mesh router; i still don't quite understand how wireless mesh networks work, and i'm worried about it potentially impacting internet bandwidth

thick minnow
peak cloak
#

you may have to reset it to release it

dusky flame
#

😩 http error 404

tribal ferry
#

Present, would you know anything about setting up VLANs between Unifi and MicroTik?

#

Just got my switch setup but my VLAN WLANS and wired VLAN connections are not getting connection.

thick minnow
#

Yes but I couldn't get passed that last error I was getting

peak cloak
tribal ferry
#

done it at all between unifi and mk?

peak cloak
#

nope

#

what does your network look like

tribal ferry
#

don't you use mk a lot or am i thinking of someone else?

peak cloak
#

crystal

tribal ferry
#

ah

peak cloak
#

but vlans are standertized

tribal ferry
#

yeah, it was 12 am for him so he wasn't able to help atm lol

#

it's just a sfp+ link from udmp to crs326

peak cloak
#

so in the controller I would just make the link be trunked

tribal ferry
#

i have all of my vlans untagged to all of my in-use ports

#

how do i trunk a port?

peak cloak
#

in the controller it's the all option

tribal ferry
#

ah

peak cloak
#

make sure in your networks tab you have the correct vlan id setup

tribal ferry
#

i've done this

#

i'll change it to all though

tribal ferry
#

i've been using the gui

peak cloak
#

huh idk then

#

I'm getting a mikrotik device though

#

HEX S

tribal ferry
#

oh cool

#

do i need to set up subnets or something for the vlans?

peak cloak
#

no

#

all that's on the router

tribal ferry
#

i assumed, yeah

peak cloak
#

I can show my d-link config

tribal ferry
#

sure

#

do you think anything looks wrong with this?

peak cloak
peak cloak
#

is that your trunk port?

#

oh it's by vlans like that

#

@tribal ferry there is nothing tagged

tribal ferry
#

what do i need to tag?

peak cloak
#

your trunk port should be tagged

tribal ferry
#

my uplink is sfp-sfpplus1

peak cloak
#

trunk basically means all tagged

peak cloak
tribal ferry
#

on all vlans?

peak cloak
#

yes

tribal ferry
#

and i guess i need to un-untag it

peak cloak
sturdy knoll
#

can someone help me with a vm it keeps deciding to stop working if u can help please dm or @ me

tribal ferry
#

remove it from being untagged to make it tagged

peak cloak
tribal ferry
#

this is it now

elder hazel
peak cloak
# tribal ferry

and two, you can only have a port be tagged or untagged per vlan, not have it be vlan 12 untagged and vlan 13 untagged

#

but you can gave vlan 12 tagged and vlan 13 tagged

#

on one port

tribal ferry
#

well i need vlan traffic to be able to pass through all ports

peak cloak
#

oh your connecting a vlan supported switch to distribute to the end devices?

tribal ferry
#

yep

peak cloak
#

ah ok

tribal ferry
#

well

peak cloak
#

then everything should be tagged

tribal ferry
#

some of these are going to switches

#

one is going to an ap

#

another goes to my cable that goes upstairs

peak cloak
#

yeah so any port that is going to another device that supports vlans needs to be tagged

plain siren
#

Oh fun VLAN Trunks

peak cloak
tribal ferry
#

so what should i change in this config?

peak cloak
#

because this is all a vlan is

peak cloak
tribal ferry
#

and remove all untags?

peak cloak
#

yes

#

the reasoning behind this is that it needs to be tagged so the final switch or ap will know what packet is on what vlan and untag it on the right port

#

or ssid

tribal ferry
#

so what should i use untags for then?

peak cloak
#

so for example

#

I have my AP on a port that is tagged both vlan 20 (trusted) and 30 (guest). The AP untags the packets that come in and sends it out to the clients, and tags packets coming back

#

but I also have a roku connected to my core switch, and that is untagged on IOT, since it's a client device

tribal ferry
#

so, tagging every port in use besides the trunk will allow vlans to flow freely?

peak cloak
plain siren
thick minnow
plain siren
#

good diagram to wrap around for brain chewing:

peak cloak
#

many people confuse vlans with subnets

#

it's more that a subnet is carried over a vlan

plain siren
#

^

tribal ferry
#

still got to wrap my head around this lol

plain siren
#

a VLAN Trunk basically means you dont have to run 3 cables to another switch just to have 3 networks (subnets) sent to that switch

#

in this case, those 3 VLAN's cant talk.

#

not on same networks, but you could use the router, static routes for example to allow... VLAN 1 to talk down to 2 and 3 but only allow 3 to talk back up

#

It keeps the "Vision" clients have on your network limited to your walled garden... the vLAN

#

ofc there is more to it and it has more uses

peak cloak
#

yeah unless you use a Layer 3 switch, if you want to go from subnet on a vlan to another you need to go through the router

plain siren
#

Get 3 straws of diff colors, wrap them in something. The wrap is the trunk and each vlan is a straw. Your data can only pass through 1 straw despite being in the same wrap

#

A router would allow you to control mixing at what would be a "smart" junction/combine valve as needed (L3 would just be a junction valve without advanced reaching control like a router has)

thick minnow
#

if i have a friend

#

and i wanna send him like a 200gb file

#

over the internet. what is the best way for me to go around this?

#

for free

peak cloak
thick minnow
#

at reasonable speeds?

#

do you know any such sites?

peak cloak
#

best is to self host

tender hazel
#

@hollow marlin have you done any QoS at fairly high rates? like close to 1Gbps or so?

waxen scroll
#

@hollow marlin lets talk about graceful failover again

hollow marlin
waxen scroll
#

do you know if BFD over BGP kills GF?

plain siren
#

I couldnt think of another way

thick minnow
hollow marlin
plain siren
hollow marlin
waxen scroll
#

i do but this is not the same thing

thick minnow
waxen scroll
#

@clear igloo I found a bug in NX-OS 9x that exists in 7x but they had no clue 9x did it. no code upgrade path

#

its rare to trigger it. I triggered it by flapping a VPC port channel multiple times using the interface range VS one interface at a time

tender hazel
#

@hollow marlin we've been running into issues with mikrotik doing queueing for connections nearing 1Gbps.. we have one large site with hundreds of customers and 1Gbps coming in, and the best effort queue is only able to hit about 850Mbps at the highest.. if I disable the qos, the usage immediately increases to like 950Mbps

hollow marlin
waxen scroll
#

we're not seeing GF work 😦

#

we get packet loss the second BGP goes down

#

oh i should mention the links go down too

#

its complicated

tender hazel
#

there is no individual CPU core that is even close to maxing out when the clients are hitting that maximum

waxen scroll
#

FW A <> FW B, then to the switches. FW A has full link failure so FW B with the same peer IP turns up all its interfaces and tries to resume

#

we get like 30sec packet loss

#

this is how Palo failover works

#

standby FW keeps all links hard down

hollow marlin
#

I'd get a PCAP, but if it's the same IP, FWB is going to be using a different sec/dst port and the session will have to time out.
Unless the FWs are clustered

waxen scroll
#

clustered

#

i was not able to see what BGP was doing because the second I started to try that I hit that bug and OOPS

#

"quite timing relative and very hard to hit."

#

FU cisco

hollow marlin
#

Hmmm... DM me a sketch with some dummy IPs

waxen scroll
#

damnit where did my visio template file go

hollow marlin
tender hazel
#

yes we are using RED

hollow marlin
#

Let me see if Mikrotik has the thresholds or if they're configurable.

tender hazel
#
/queue type
add kind=red name=red-queue red-avg-packet=1000 red-burst=20 red-limit=60 red-max-threshold=50 red-min-threshold=10
/queue tree
add bucket-size=0.01 max-limit=980M name=Splitlake parent=MHT_347_SPL queue=red-queue
add bucket-size=0.01 limit-at=10M max-limit=10M name=7_monitoring_and_routing_splitlake packet-mark=\
    monitoring-and-routing parent=Splitlake priority=1 queue=red-queue
add bucket-size=0.01 name=0_best_effort_splitlake packet-mark=no-mark parent=Splitlake priority=6 queue=red-queue
add bucket-size=0.01 limit-at=5M max-limit=5M name=6_mgmt_traffic_splitlake packet-mark=mgmt parent=Splitlake priority=2 queue=red-queue
add bucket-size=0.01 name=5_ent_priority_splitlake packet-mark=ent-priority parent=Splitlake priority=3 queue=red-queue
add bucket-size=0.01 name=4_ent_splitlake packet-mark=ent parent=Splitlake priority=4 queue=red-queue
add bucket-size=0.01 name=3_retail_priority_splitlake packet-mark=retail-priority parent=Splitlake priority=5 queue=red-queue
add bucket-size=0.01 name=2_background_splitlake packet-mark=background parent=Splitlake priority=7 queue=red-queue
add bucket-size=0.01 name=1_scavenger_splitlake packet-mark=scavenger parent=Splitlake queue=red-queue
#

about 78,000 PPS going through the queue

#

mikrotik for the most part just uses the queue types and HTB support that is built into linux already, although they added their own in a few cases like pcq

#

I can change the queue type but I get the best performance from RED in general

#

we mark the packets by using bridge filters which are set from the MPLS experimental bits

thick minnow
# plain siren Yus

Are you able to walk me through the process on both the USG and Linksys to set the static IP?

plain siren
#

The USG I know you just punch in https://192.168.1.1/ On first connect and the WebUI will ask you to set it a an IP

thick minnow
peak cloak
thick minnow
#

What do those stand for

#

Is there any way I can just send someone a file with utorrent?

thick minnow
peak cloak
#

I guess you can use torrent

#

just create a torrent

#

idk how torrent works

sturdy knoll
#

can someone help me with a vm it keeps deciding to stop working if u can help please dm or @ me

thorny vector
#

@sturdy knoll What's up with it?

#

And what are you running it in?

sturdy knoll
#

I am using unraid the graphics card is a gigabyte rx590 and what’s happening is when I send it to the gpu it works for a couple min then black screens and is I try and start it again it freezes at the tianocore screen

#

@thorny vector I’ve also tried routing the vbios, booting in legacy, using Q35, using SeaBIOS instead of OVFM

thorny vector
#

Any errors kicked back? @sturdy knoll

sturdy knoll
#

The logs don’t show any errors

low kayak
#

so i was tryna setup zerotier and i have 2 devices on a network rn both show tha status as ok but when they try to ping each other all packages end up as lost

#

did i miss something

#

also both show up as online in the website panel

#

anyone got any ideas?

honest wind
#

@thick minnow no matter how you twist it, the initial transfer is limited by your internet upload speed, so self hosting is best. Look into a few options like sftp, scp or even a web server. If your upload speed is super slow, it might even be faster to just overnight ship a flash drive

#

I guess that last option isn’t really free

thick minnow
tame carbon
#

it doesnt

#

your service speed will be limited to your upload.

tender hazel
#

@thick minnow sending something via torrent requires an online tracker managing the torrent connections (seeders and peers) in order to coordinate the flow of data

thick minnow
#

Ohh ripriprip

#

Oh wait r u saying be my own tracker

#

This seems complicated

tender hazel
#

If you are just trying to send a file to one person, torrent probably would not make sense - you would have to register the torrent with some kind of tracker and have the other person get the magnet link to get the seeders and peers from the tracker

thick minnow
#

Oh ok

#

What do you recommend then?

tender hazel
#

torrenting is only faster if you can potentially have a bunch of different people serving the file to one person

thick minnow
#

Nah that won't be the casw

#

Just need to send a single big file

#

Well, it won't really be quick in that case, but from my experience it'll probably be a lot more reliable

#

So which method do you recommend?

tender hazel
#

how big?

thick minnow
#

330gb max

#

I'd say torrent for that size

tender hazel
#

that's really big

thick minnow
#

But how do I make the tracker?

tender hazel
#

I haven't done it before myself

#

and that's a really old link

#

the idea should still work as long as you use a current tracker

thick minnow
#

It just says if your using a private tracker set it to private otherwise public like wtf?

tender hazel
#

yeah so with torrents you probably need to use a public tracker which means someone else could download the file too as long as you are offering it

#

nothing to protect it

#

it may not be suitable for what you need

#

sending a file that huge is not a normal thing

#

may I ask what it is that you are trying to send that is so huge? you don't have to answer if you aren't comfortable answering

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel summer beach photos of your mom

#

@thick minnow Torrents are for peer to peer sharing

#

eg: thousands of computers and users

tender hazel
#

I need a way now to disable the quick setup feature in the mikrotik app for our users

#

I'm hoping that mikrotik will be able to add some kind of feature to allow control for that

tame carbon
#

Already been requested

#

9 years ago

tender hazel
#

yeah this is different though

#

I don't care about winbox, and we already remove it via webfig

#

this is just about the mikrotik phone app

tame carbon
#

mh

#

@tender hazel ssh proxy? with commandlet filtering?

tender hazel
#

the mikrotik phone app uses the winbox port so I don't think any sort of filtering will work

tame carbon
#

attacking this from a developer's perspective xD

tender hazel
#

the issue for me is that we can't have our users going into quick setup on the phone app

#

because here's what happens

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel give them a presentation, with the threat of sodomization by baton

tender hazel
#

if I go into quick setup on the phone app with one of our routers and just next next next next finish

#

it disables the PPPoE interface and changes all wireless interfaces to open authentication

tame carbon
#

I always tell tik users to NOT TOUCH quickset after configs have been done xD

#

@tender hazel wait what about user groups?

#

can;t you restrict PPPoE setings and such?

tender hazel
#

there is no group for controlling quickset access

tame carbon
#

yeah but doesnt quickset do that through commands.

#

?>

tender hazel
#

and the issue is that we actually want our users to have full control of their routers

#

even the ability to lock us out, if they wish, and if that helps them to avoid wanting to buy their own third party router

tame carbon
#

you just want to protect them from themselves

tender hazel
#

yes

tame carbon
#

whelp

#

xD

tender hazel
#

the problem is that in the phone app the quick setup is this enticing big icon with a magic wand and sparkles

#

displayed very prominently

#

practically screaming "click me" at the user

tame carbon
#

I was looking for a click me meme

#

couldnt find one

tacit leaf
#

I am not sure if this is the perfect channel, But I was trying to port forward on my router and it dosent seem to work. Any ideas please?

tame carbon
#

@tacit leaf have you had any port forward on this network before?

#

You might want to check if you are not behind a CG-NAT, and have your own public IP

tacit leaf
#

Never, I had them on previous network and it worked all fine

tame carbon
#

@tacit leaf open commandline and run a tracert 1.1.1.1

#

you can look at the path it takes through the routers, if you are on a CG-NAT or not

tame carbon
#

ok screenshot?

tacit leaf
tender hazel
#

not CGNAT

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel that ISP does have some shitty backbone lol

tacit leaf
#

It probably does lol.

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel you certain?

tender hazel
tame carbon
#

@tender hazel what about the 10.0.0.0/8 ?

tender hazel
#

that's not any concern - we use RFC1918 for point to point links inside our network since they aren't used for any customers and the only thing they show up in is traceroute

#

so if our own customers traceroute to 1.1.1.1 they will hop over a few RFC1918 links in the 10.0.0.0/8 space

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel the other points break traceroute lol

tender hazel
#

if there was CGNAT here you would see something in the 100.64.0.0/10 space and you don't

tender hazel
tacit leaf
#

I am soo confused xD

tender hazel
#

when the upstream provider uses RFC1918 internally to save on IPv4 public space you will see timeouts for a few hops that are addressed via RFC1918

#

it is the only downside of using RFC1918 for point to point is that people who aren't on your network will see timeouts for those hops and think something is wrong

tame carbon
#

@tacit leaf go to your router config

tender hazel
#

but in actuality it is good practice for conserving public IPv4 space

tame carbon
#

@tacit leaf find that port forward config, and have a look

#

send us screenshot if you can

#

@tender hazel I was always under the impression that they use 10.0.0.0/8 internally, but thought they use some kind of encapsulation to make it appear as though it is a direct link between two routers

tacit leaf
tame carbon
#

looks right

#

@tacit leaf does the router WAN IP correspond to the public IP you get if you search online for your own IP?

tacit leaf
#

It’s different

tame carbon
#

@tacit leaf what does the WAN on the router report?

tender hazel
tame carbon
#

those 40 bytes too much? xD

tacit leaf
#

172.16.15.89

#

Ip is way different

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel well look at that? isnt that CG-NAT then?

#

172.16.0.0/16

tacit leaf
#

Oh, is there anything I can do about it

tender hazel
#

that's RFC1918, CG-NAT shouldn't use that range

#

where are you seeing that 172.16.15.89?

tacit leaf
#

Status page of my router

#

Under WAN

tender hazel
#

ugh

tame carbon
#

So I was right?

#

Shitty ISP

#

@tacit leaf are you from india?

tender hazel
#

then your ISP is using RFC1918 space as CG-NAT instead of the actual CG-NAT space

tacit leaf
tame carbon
#

Developing world has got the wrong end of the stick in ipv4

#

they started using internet widely after we already ran out of IP addresses

tender hazel
#

india has better IPv6 deployment than most of the world

tame carbon
#

yeah, v6 xD but not v4

#

@tacit leaf your public IP is shared amongst other users from your ISP

tacit leaf
#

Is there anything I can do about it tho?

tame carbon
#

thus, you cannot port forward.

tacit leaf
#

Ohhh, bruh thats shit

tender hazel
tame carbon
#

@tender hazel I didnt think they would have a public range on their PPPoE servers

tacit leaf
#

Can I ask them to give a personal IP address?

tame carbon
#

@tacit leaf usually a business plan would give you your own static public IP

#

Like, sometimes feels like here in europe its so easy to get your own public IP, even as a household consumer

#

and that everywhere else, its utter shit

tacit leaf
#

Ohh, but getting one will fix my issue?

tame carbon
#

South Africa still has a bunch of IPv4's

#

@tacit leaf the problem is that we are out of IPv4 addresses.

#

and getting your hands on one is a combination of the right ISP & some luck

tacit leaf
#

Hmm, soo it’s worth a try atleast

tender hazel
#

which is actually strange

#

afaik, there's no point in using a public IPv4 as the ISP address on a PPPoE tunnel

tame carbon
tender hazel
#

I mean we do it but we only do it because we have a ton of addresses and it is just one of those

#

and it is already routed to the device

#

we could change it to an RFC1918 in a few seconds and it wouldn't do anything

tame carbon
#

except it would free up some addresses

#

Meanwhile, I'm sitting on a /29

#

and not even using two of those addresses

tender hazel
#

yup in the case of the provider in this case it makes sense to use RFC1918

tame carbon
#

The ISP originally set me up with a /30

#

and that was such a stupid move xD

tender hazel
#

every last address they can give to a customer is valuable

#

I think we have finally convinced mikrotik to add /31 support

tame carbon
#

lol wat?

#

is there even space for ..

#

wat

#

how does that even work

tender hazel
#

yeah.. /31 is a special thing

#

it was designed to conserve IPv4 address space

#

no network or broadcast address

tame carbon
#

by adding more bogus broadcast?

#

oh

tender hazel
#

the device has to be designed to support /31

tame carbon
#

ok but a downstream client can use a /32

tender hazel
#

when there are only two devices there is really no need for a network or broadcast address

tame carbon
#

and not care ?

tender hazel
#

yes, a /32 works too, but the problem is that /31 is so standardized, mikrotik seems like they are doing something weird by not supporting /31 and supporting /32 only

#

mikrotik and linux in general allow you to do /32's on both sides which in some ways is even better than a /31

#

because you can have point to multipoint with a /32 - one /32 address on the "hub" with multiple /32 addresses for each "spoke"

#

the issue is that /31 is considered so normal that to not support it, you seem to be strange

tame carbon
#

I thought /31 was a gimmick

tender hazel
#

in north america, the fact that mikrotik doesn't support /31 just makes them seem more like some tinkertoy router vendor

tame carbon
#

and that /32 and /30 are the only ones that make sense

#

either you have full broadcast domain & network, or none at all

tender hazel
#

every other major router vendor supports /31

tame carbon
#

time for routerOS to step up to the challenge

#

they been struggling because of the old kernel

tender hazel
#

the /31 support shouldn't really matter because they support /32 and it can do the same thing theoretically but it is just the optics of the situation

#

we had techs waste hours and hours and hours trying to figure out how to get one of our mikrotiks to connect to an upstream ISP that was giving us a /31

tame carbon
#

F

tender hazel
#

all they had to do was configure it for a /32 instead but that isn't exactly clear if you don't know what you are doing and the upstream says "assign this address with /31"

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel that was me with 0 experience about vlans and subnets

#

setting up fiber on my RB4011, called my ISP like 5x

#

I think they are glad its all working now lol

#

IPTV was even worse

#

All they gave me was a tutorial for a draytek

tacit leaf
#

@tame carbon what should i exactly ask my isp?

tame carbon
#

@tacit leaf ask them if they provide public IPs to customers

#

probably not... but never know

#

its probably going to cost extra

tacit leaf
#

Aight will ask

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel lol shared IPs are so annoying when IP banning. On that minecraft server we had lots of issues with people from Comcast

#

you ban 1 person

#

and 1 week later ,you get another user complaining

#

"I am banned"

tender hazel
#

IPv6 is the only solution to all this

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel It got so bad to the point, that I started logging IPv4 <--> User

tender hazel
#

the thing is that people are still asking what do we need IPv6 for? nat is great!

tame carbon
#

So I could get a picture of who would be using what, and if I could ban without a problem..

#

and you sometimes find 1 public IP

tender hazel
#

it is insane if you can't explain to someone what the problem is with NAT

tame carbon
#

used by 20 different users over 1 year's worth of time

tender hazel
#

why it is bad, always, always

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel lol "please can you unban me, my brother was being an idiot"

#

nice NAT you have there.

tender hazel
#

IPv6 is the solution

#

if two people have the same IPv6 address exactly, they are the same person 🙂

tame carbon
#

Our mc server doesn't support v6

#

protocol might these days, but my own database doesnt lol.

#

It stores 32 bit unsigned integers

tender hazel
#

well the thinking has to change to make things better

#

it is changing now - PS5 now actually uses IPv6

tame carbon
#
DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS proc_ban_ip;
CREATE PROCEDURE proc_ban_ip(
  IN addr     INTEGER UNSIGNED,
  IN reason   VARCHAR(128),
  IN duration BIGINT
)
  BEGIN
    INSERT INTO ip_address VALUES (addr, NULL, NOW(), NOW(), duration, reason)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
      banreason = reason, banned = duration;
  END;
#

^ :D

tender hazel
#

PS4 could get an IPv6 address but didn't use it for anything - you could ping it but it did squat

#

@tame carbon yeah so you will have to adjust that code to be more protocol neutral

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel the problem is the internal code that calls this procedure

#

it uses InetAddress

#

which on minecraft only applies to v4

#

stupid stupid stupid

#

@tender hazel ^ lol my schema

#

it logs who was the first user to use an IP

#

and any other users that might have used it

#

first time, and last use

#

and also tracks how often an address is used

tender hazel
#

java?

tame carbon
#

database is MySQL with PL-SQL Procedures

#

the application is java yes

tender hazel
#

ok right, I just mean the InetAddress

tame carbon
#

lemme find the calling code

#

@tender hazel yeah but the server only listens on v4.

#

OVH doesnt support v6 KEKW

tender hazel
#

what's OVH?

tame carbon
#

idk

#

it burned down

#

@tender hazel see the problem is here

#
    @Override
    protected KnockturnPlayer login(UUID uuid, InetAddress address, String username) {
        try (Connection connection = KnockturnCore.getMySQLConnection()) {
            PreparedStatement ps = connection.prepareStatement(
                    "CALL proc_player_login(?, UNHEX(?), ?);"
            );
            ps.setString(1, address.getHostAddress());
            ps.setString(2, uuid.toString().replace("-", ""));
            ps.setString(3, username);
            ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
            rs.next();
            Long discordid = rs.getLong("discordid");
            if (rs.wasNull()) {
                discordid = null;
            }
            return new KnockturnPlayerImpl(
                    rs.getString("username"), rs.getLong("firstlogin"),
                    rs.getLong("lastlogin"), uuid, connection, server, rs.getBoolean("banned"),
                    rs.getString("banreason"), discordid);
        } catch (SQLException e) {
            logger.error("failed to login", e);
            return null;
        }
    }
#

getHostAddress() always returns v4

#

interface is the same for v4 and 6

tacit leaf
#

50$ yearly for a public ip KEKW

tame carbon
#

@tacit leaf wow.

#

wait

#

no

#

that's not so bad

tacit leaf
#

It is yes

tame carbon
#

@tacit leaf I pay 16 euros/month extra for 8 extra public IPs

#

2 bucks/month/ip

tacit leaf
#

I can get another isp and pay 2-3$ extra to get a public ip by default

tender hazel
tame carbon
#

@tender hazel its an interface that is subclassed based on the type

#

But that is moot

#

if the server only listens on v4.

tender hazel
#

then you can't connect via v6 yeah

tame carbon
#

any incoming connections will always be of Inetv4

tacit leaf
#

Thanks a lot for helping yall 🙂

tame carbon
tender hazel
#

either way it is incredibly frustrating to see so many people having to set up these crazy workarounds like doing a VPN to a VPS

tame carbon
#

if (address instanceof Inet4Address) { //foo }

tender hazel
#

to get a public IPv4 address when they most likely already have a public IPv6

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel I wrote this code in 2014

#

and it still works :D

#

just needs to be dusted off for the eventual move to a new hoster

tender hazel
tame carbon
#

@tender hazel could my ISP in theory use my FttH to provide a vlan which I can peer with in an exchange?

#

The fiber operator here can support 10G as well

tender hazel
#

in theory, but you need an AS number to peer

tame carbon
#

yeah, but I need to be on a special block don't I ?

#

I can't just announce a route through my WAN

#

lol advertise 127.0.0.0/8

tender hazel
#

BGP works over TCP so you can be several hops away from who you are peering with

#

like you can peer with someone halfway across the world separated from you by a dozen routers

tame carbon
#

oh really?

tender hazel
#

yeah

tame carbon
#

SO THAT. is what my african friend wanted to do

#

he asked me if i wanted to peer

#

cus he sits on a pile of v4's

#

I thought I couldnt

tacit leaf
#

Might be a super stupid question, I guess theres no work arounds for this?

tame carbon
#

Pretoria Wireless Users Group is a South African wireless users group. It is non-profit community organisation providing a wireless community network in Pretoria, the capital of South Africa.
PTAWUG has been created as the community’s answer to South Africa’s restrictive telecommunications environment. The South African telecommunications indust...

#

@tender hazel he wanted to peer with this ^ xD

#

he's the operator for them

tender hazel
#

but just peering won't actually give you connectivity to that, you need to have routes installed outside BGP that will allow you to direct traffic there

tame carbon
#

right

#

@tender hazel lol some of the crazy stories I've heard from them

#

like getting hijacked while on the job to fix a tower

#

by a guy with a BB-Gun

tender hazel
#

christ

tame carbon
#

they were in the car

#

@tender hazel yeah unlucky for the guy with the BB-gun

#

they had a real 9mm

#

I think they shot him in the leg and drove off

#

Pretoria is quite a rough neighborhood

#

@tender hazel opiate infested regions makes people do some bad things :/

plain siren
#

That happens to AT&T dudes in Chicago too lol

tame carbon
#

pfffft

#

@plain siren sounds like someone been playing Watch_Dogs

plain siren
#

im not even joking

tame carbon
#

taking down ctOS

tender hazel
plain siren
#

I actually just had a guy tell me a story how someone was shooting at him cuz he was trying to upgrade their internet but it turns out they were trying to rob him

plain siren
#

chicago

tame carbon
#

"Im the wireless guy come to fix your internet"

#

"PUT EM UP"

tender hazel
#

@tacit leaf and minecraft doesn't have full support for IPv6 yet, and it is something that is more their problem I would say, than your ISP's

plain siren
tame carbon
#

@plain siren behind CG-NAT?

plain siren
#

Does it matter? Its point to point

tame carbon
#

I thought you had to enter your remote IP into the link

tender hazel
#

yes you can use tunnelbroker over nat

#

you have to enter the remote IP but it doesn't have to be the remote IP that you actually have

#

it can be the remote IP you are NAT-ted to

plain siren
#

^

tame carbon
#

and if it changes?

tender hazel
#

if it changes you have to change it, or you can automate it with scripts

plain siren
#

Or their heads

tender hazel
#

everybody seems to treat lack of support for IPv6 as no big deal.. super frustrating

tame carbon
#

I'll use it once tunnelbroker allows me to set GeoIP

#

I cant watch american netflix, library is terrible

tender hazel
#

your ISP should give you v6

tame carbon
#

yet they don't

#

none of them do

#

they say they are "ipv6 ready" whatever that means

tender hazel
#

you're in germany right?

tame carbon
#

Netherlands

tender hazel
#

I thought that was supposed to have pretty good IPv6 deployment

#

on the map anyway

tame carbon
#

that AS13335 I believe is Serverius

tender hazel
#

the traceroute there is fine

tame carbon
tame carbon
#

@plain siren ooh btw, I called my soon to be employer again, and I agreed to take the job

tender hazel
tame carbon
#

They gave me a week to decide, but I jumped the gun this morning

tender hazel
#

we've been hit in the last few days by this stupid call of duty update

tame carbon
#

akamai KEKW

#

I saw the mail chain

tender hazel
#

we have hospitals not getting their required service because of call of duty

tame carbon
#

I wonder why these ISPs dont upgrade their gear

#

Its only gonna get worse

tender hazel
#

here's the problem in our case

#

our upstream requested a second bell cross connect one year ago

#

due to covid bell hasn't delivered yet

#

a cross connect in the same building they are in where they have facilities

tame carbon
#

lol

#

oof

tender hazel
#

so the call of duty update took them down

#

because they knew they would be running out of bandwidth over a year ago and it's taken over a year for bell to deliver

#

which is insane considering that it is a colo in the biggest facility in toronto

tame carbon
#

and doing rate limits on akamai?

#

You are in the states

tender hazel
#

and if bell takes over a year to deliver a simple service to a colo in the biggest colo facility in toronto

tame carbon
#

net neutrality? lel.

tender hazel
#

canada

tame carbon
#

oh

tender hazel
#

we have net neutrality

tame carbon
#

also

#

why the fuck is a CoD update 50GB

tender hazel
#

but bell says they could not install because they have to get this part that is out of stock

#

some like part worth a few dollars

#

out of stock for the past year due to COVID

tame carbon
#

do they not do incremental patches?

tender hazel
#

people are reporting anywhere between 50GB and 80GB for the update

#

50GB is the low end

#

I'm not sure why there is the 30GB difference between some users and others

tame carbon
#

yeah but what is so big lol

#

like, are they reinstalling the game entirely?

tender hazel
#

probably

#

they have updated most of the assets in the game

#

it is likely easiest to just update the entire thing

#

this is our third night dealing with those issues

#

it isn't as bad tonight but it is still impacting us

tame carbon
#

right.

#

My 25 page report on comparison between Relational and Graph databases is FINALLY FINISHED.

#

omfg. I hate this course so fucking much

tender hazel
# tame carbon right.

There are a few services online that you can peer with for BGP monitoring purposes - you don't actually use them for routing but for monitoring

#

QRator is one

#

they are this monitoring service in russia

tame carbon
#

I dont need russian service

tender hazel
#

we aren't peering with them ourselves yet but I've signed up for an account there because they've picked up a few open ports in our network that we didn't notice

tame carbon
#

all the russian blocks are on my drop list

#

who needs russians on their network

#

same is for the chinese.

#

they have no business on this network

#

@tender hazel doesn't HE support some kind of BGP monitor too?

tender hazel
#

we don't really need to peer with them, and we don't, currently

#

no, not the same type

#

and the qrator service has alerted us to ports we have had opened that we should not

tame carbon
#

My ISP did that for me

tender hazel
#

we had a BGP port open on one router to the world and we only found out because of the qrator alert

tame carbon
#

they werent happy with the exposed port 53

#

on my public subnet

#

so much so that they emailed me, and immediately dropped the route

tender hazel
#

that's fine, except we are the ISP in this case

tame carbon
#

I forgot to configure the FW on my mikrotik

#

to only allow 53 from the DMZ itself

#

not WAN

plain siren
tame carbon
#

something a bout DNS servers used for DDoS >_>

plain siren
#

DNS Reflection

tame carbon
#

@plain siren I had some junior positions at two other companies, and I am also self-employed (I have VAT number)

tender hazel
#

we wanted to do a scan of our network for ports that could be used for DDoS amplification

plain siren
#

I know im being an asshole

tame carbon
#

<3

tender hazel
#

but one of our employees was against it

plain siren
#

your an asshole too so doesnt work I guess

tame carbon
#

No, I just suck at detecting sarcasm lol

plain siren
#

Same difference

tender hazel
#

he was saying that if we started scanning for open ports that we would start calling our customers every day about open ports and that eventually we would be doing nothing except calling customers about open ports and go out of business as a result

#

so therefore due to the slippery slope we shouldn't ever scan for open ports

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel you want to portscan my network? :P

tender hazel
#

which of course doesn't make sense at all

#

no.. I wouldn't portscan anybody else's network unless they asked.. our own network is different, I think it is good practice to see if our customers are vulnerable

tame carbon
#

That's why I am asking lol

#

I have no idea. I did an NMAP scan when I first finished the config

tacit leaf
#

how do i check if I have ipv6?

tame carbon
#

didnt turn up anything

#

@tacit leaf ipconfig /all

tender hazel
tame carbon
#

or that

tender hazel
#

if you get 10/10 you have ipv6

tame carbon
tacit leaf
#

I am soo sad lmao 0/10

#

Ig theres no way for me 😦

tame carbon
tender hazel
#

unless you can switch ISPs your only workaround is to get a VPS somewhere and set up a VPN tunnel to that

tame carbon
#

See, I can do v6 just fine

#

but i dont want to set up a mailserver to finish the certification

#

I am too lazy

#

so I am limited to ~60mbit

tender hazel
#

you can do v6 just fine over an HE tunnel yes but that won't solve the netflix issue

tame carbon
tender hazel
#

that's the same reason we couldn't use netflix on HE

#

we actually get blocked

#

we can't use netflix at all

#

if we are on HE

#

so I would have to turn HE tunnel on and off every night before being able to use netflix

#

I got sick of it and just left it off

tame carbon
#

Trending in NL ^

tender hazel
#

I assume those aren't trending in NL and are instead just trending in US and you are getting them because of that

tame carbon
#

whole library changes

#

subtitles not available

#

etc

tender hazel
#

in our case it is blocked entirely

tame carbon
#

within europe there's no difference to netflix content

tender hazel
#

netflix won't even load

tame carbon
#

because single market EU

tender hazel
#

if I turn up an HE tunnel

#

and go online with it

#

I can get to everything except netflix

#

netflix says sorry you are blocked because you are on a VPN

tame carbon
#

ye it doesnt for me

#

I can just toggle this entry ^

tender hazel
#

yeah probably due to netflix not tracking everything

tame carbon
#

to enable/disable v6

tender hazel
#

I am in canada so netflix seems to have created special programming for that

tame carbon
#

I hate going to germany and watching youtube

tender hazel
#

if you are in canada and connecting to HE, netflix is blocked entirely

tame carbon
#

because when I return home

#

all the ads on youtube are german

#

for couple weeks

#

my HE tunnel is somewhere in New Jersey

tender hazel
#

our server administrator is from russia originally

#

sometimes he does updates for software

tame carbon
#

but I get 7ms to 1.1.1.1 even on v6

tender hazel
#

and our software changes to russian language

tame carbon
#

my ISP Peers directly with HE

#

so I dont understand

#

why I dont get v6 from them

tender hazel
#

it detects his preferred language on his computer and tries to be helpful and chooses that as the language

tame carbon
#

helpful

tender hazel
#

so suddenly we go into the calendar and the months are in russian

#

or other crazy things like that

tender hazel
#

and the problem is that a lot of ISPs don't really see a benefit for them

#

they see it as just extra work for nothing, so they ignore it

tame carbon
#

because everyone wants a v4 at least

#

because if they are v6 only, they will cri

tender hazel
#

yes

tame carbon
#

the curse of IPvX

tender hazel
#

I had to push to get IPv6 rolled out at our ISP

#

we are completely dual stack now

#

but I had to push for it

tame carbon
#

I remember that time, when it took 8 months to convince my coworkers that git was better than svn

tender hazel
#

even in an ISP there are people saying "but we don't need IPv6 for years and years, IPv4 is fine"

tame carbon
#

"merges" were an all-day ordeal.

#

and while in progress, nobody could push code

#

@tender hazel how are the IPv4 reserved addresses handled in v6?

tender hazel
#

yeah it is really that, you get so stuck on what you know well (Ipv4 or svn) that you are totally oblivious to what can be done better

#

sorry?

tame carbon
#

Like, isnt there a range in v6

#

that maps the v4 addresses?

thick minnow
#

If my ethernet cable is damaged can it affect my ping

#

I've been getting really high ping lately.

tender hazel
#

@tame carbon yes, but I only know it because I've seen a few things online that reference it.. but it isn't automatic

#

I think it is designed for 464XLAT

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel an ideal dual-stack would be a NAT'ed v4 locally, and a public V6
The outgoing v4 would prefer v6 addressing

#

both addresses can be reached on v6

#

v4 only on v4

tender hazel
#

dual stack and 464XLAT are two different solutions

#

dual stack means the client has IPv4 and IPv6 at the same time, usually CGNAT on v4 and public v6

tame carbon
#

then...

thick minnow
#

@thick minnow

tame carbon
#

what are those v4 mapped v6 addresses even for

#

if nobody uses them

#

@thick minnow wifi?

thick minnow
#

im using ethernet

#

the cables damaged

tender hazel
#

464XLAT is a way for the client to only have IPv6 but be able to access ipv4 resources without having an ipv4 address to begin with

tame carbon
#

@thick minnow I see nothing wrong

thick minnow
#

my ping has been high lately

tender hazel
thick minnow
#

ever since it was damaged

tender hazel
#

you don't need an IPv4 address you can just have an IPv6 address, you can make a request to that IP with a system that has Ipv6 only and it will respond

tame carbon
#

@tender hazel I'd imagine that the ISP would have some kind box that did this for you then?

tender hazel
#

yes

tame carbon
#

so you can connect to v4 from a v6 network

#

sounds neat

#

why arent we using this?

#

or is that the million dollar question xD

tender hazel
#

we actually are using this for cell phones in many cases

#

most cell phones in the US get only IPv6 addresses

#

tmobile for instance

plain siren
tender hazel
#

they are using 464XLAT to get to all IPv4

plain siren
#

It was a waste of space for a small point in what couldve been replaced with many other things that are avail now

#

The fact the assignment table is tainted with a transitional block just looks bad on the paper 😦

tender hazel
#

but one issue is that 464XLAT works great for all websites but doesn't always work with VPN's.. that is what is starting to impact meraki, when tmobile moved their cellular to 464XLAT, the meraki customers could no longer connect to their corporate VPNs which were IPv4 only

steep kettle
#

Every time I look at this I get conversation I get more confused, people do realize networks don't work solely on just getting sent out over what standard protocol for IP addresses they're using right?

#

I'm about to break out my cisco textbook and do some explaining lol

plain siren
#

ffs

tame carbon
#

someone needs to worm the v4 protocol

#

so we can ditch it

tender hazel
#

yeah that's exactly what I was saying @plain siren

#

it's too slow

tame carbon
#

OUT

tender hazel
#

we are this small-medium ISP and we moved to v6 dual stack a long time ago

plain siren
#

The longer some are without IPv4 and some are without IPv6....

We have a problem

#

that leaves regions becoming inaccessible and growing

thick minnow
#

whats v4 and v6

tender hazel
#

a lot of people think that there is no point in IPv6 that we are fine with IPv4 forever with NAT

#

it is horrible

plain siren
#

192.168.0.1
4 Octects in the Address. The IP Address. IPv4

tame carbon
#

IPv6 is 128 bits, 4x as large address space as v4

#

@thick minnow what do you mean more complex? KEKW

#

no NAT

plain siren
#

the largest address you can have is 255.255.255.255
If you were to check the largest number in binary (11111111) for a Byte (in base8)... its 255.

4 Bytes makes up your IP Address

tame carbon
#

... that's a non-issue

#

upgrade your brain ram

#

and use dns

steep kettle
#

Ok I don't understand the problem? Is the problem scalability or security?

tame carbon
#

Sounds more like a you problem, than a protocol problem

steep kettle
#

Because they solved the scalability problem all the way back in the 90's for IPv4

#

But the protocol works just fine?

tame carbon
#

pretty sure you can configure your firewall to filter invalid packets

tender hazel
#

the extension headers are often ignored because there are issues with the idea

#

but here's really where the problem is

#

they came up with an improvement for IPv4 like 30 years ago

#

we still don't have it rolled out

steep kettle
#

Gooooot it

tender hazel
#

if you want to make a new better protocol to replace it, we wait another 40 years?

#

not going to happen

#

they can't

#

IPv6 is it

#

and the longer that people fight against it, the longer it will take to get there

tame carbon
clear igloo
#

IPv8, it's 1024 bit addresses!
You have extensions for days!

steep kettle
#

ok I thought your problem with IPv4 was scalability.

plain siren
#

The fact that IPv6 is actually easier to work with but its apparently hard for engineers to grasp and roll out is frankly pathetic.

tame carbon
tender hazel
#

so you're happy with people having to buy VPS's to be able to play online games?

steep kettle
#

Honestly I can subnet all day, but for some reason I can't figure out hexadecimal so I'm part of the problem lmao

plain siren
#

Im happy with IPv4
Except any new website or server that is currently acquired doesnt have an IPv4 address.... So how are you going to access it?

#

Fade away

tame carbon
tender hazel
#

yup, we have a bingo

plain siren
#

What if Discord moved to a new host when Microsoft Purchases it and you dont have IPv6

plain siren
#

Were out of IPv4

#

There is no more

tame carbon
#

yet internet is still growing.

plain siren
#

So anything new is out of your reach

tame carbon
#

The internet is growing. FAST.

#

and the amount of people behind a NAT is already annoying enough

#

every single user who is behind a CG-NAT cannot port forward.

#

or host services

#

And its even worse

#

because they only do NAT444 and no v6 support.

steep kettle
plain siren
#

IPv6 has proven to be in both terms of Management, Reliability, and an actual reduction on a switch stack thanks to the lack of NAT, an improvement. There is 0, and not a damn single one, excuses to not want to push and implement IPv6 other than pure laziness or complacency.

steep kettle
#

So that really really shouldn't be a part of your argument lol

plain siren
#

Each regional IP Numbers authority recently hit P3 Ending.

#

They are Revoking addresses to force the change.

tame carbon
#

lol

#

awesome

steep kettle
#

This is some mental gymnastics lol I'm goin' to bed.

plain siren
#

Mental Gymnastics
Documented by the horses mouth on said website

#

yeah you are

#

Yeah like Ubiquiti and they dont even support IPv6

#

Point?

#

@tender hazel sometimes...

tame carbon
#

Those are all excuses

plain siren
#

No there isnt. They are nullfied by the fact we have no choice.

tame carbon
#

v6 is current. v4 is old.

plain siren
#

We are OUT of IPv4. time is UP

tame carbon
#

@thick minnow lol I dont think you know who you're talking to

plain siren
#

The IP Authorities have made their statements

#

You follow or you fade

tame carbon
#

Rouing is anything but pretentious

plain siren
#

No I am pretentious,

tame carbon
#

👍

plain siren
#

Im also an asshole and a douchebag

#

The problem is, what are you going to do about it and I dont care.

tame carbon
#

Yeah but that is irrelevant

#

Vendors have had enough time to adapt.

#

more than 10 years

plain siren
#

Vendors already have adopted it. Its not vendors

#

its implementations

#

They are adapting to adopting as thats the goal but either way

tame carbon
#

Semantics

#

yawn I'll just wait for my ISP to provide v6

plain siren
#

Find me an enterprise device that hasnt meant industry standards of all points (Security, Reliability, etc etc) by any one of the big 17 out there that hasnt already implemented and even begun focusing on IPv6

#

2017 was 4 years ago

#

I said enterprise, not ubiquiti tier

tame carbon
tender hazel
#

some customers were forced to abandon meraki because of the lack of proper Ipv6 support and the mobile networks moving to 464XLAT

#

entire teams of salespeople prevented from connecting to the corporate VPN because the meraki didn't support IPv6 and tmobile on 464XLAT

plain siren
#

Not the mobile networks faults that terrestrial providers are fucking idiots.

#

They were faster now they have to compensate for the other sides lack of ability

#

Well someone just gave away their eyes.

tame carbon
tender hazel
#

the issue is that no single person or company has the ability to phase IPv4 out

tame carbon
#

officials in Massachusetts later said that the Oldsmar facility used an unsupported version of Windows with no firewall and shared the same TeamViewer password among its employees.

tender hazel
#

if there was someone with that control we would have been on ipv6 by now

tame carbon
#

FUCKING, Brilliant.

clear igloo
#

Rakutan is fully IPv6 only, management infra included

tender hazel
#

but if people don't have to do something, they won't feel like they have to do something

#

yes, but they would be risking people abandoning their own platforms for ones that still supported IPv4

plain siren
#

uhhh does no one know about the. you know what never mind, this ones mine.

tame carbon
#

even more reasons to use v6.

clear igloo
#

Google, Amazon, and Facebook are full dual stack already

tender hazel
#

and its not worth the risk for them

plain siren
#

You will soon enough anyways

#

Network Acceleration Alliance? There is a cutover agreement already?

#

Its this year?

#

Like guys?

#

Anyone?

#

no

#

ok

#

Its signed under the ONF

#

Although AT&T is tarded, they wont make it

tame carbon
#

just start dropping all v4 traffic

plain siren
#

Neither will comcast

tame carbon
#

you'd be surprised how fast people would switch

tender hazel
#

we are paying a fortune for public IPv4 right now

plain siren
#

ouch I feel that

tender hazel
#

if we actually didn't have to pay that, we would be able to expand our network so much more quickly

#

faster service for customers, higher packages

plain siren
#

how big of a block

#

~~ ~ ~ Doesnt matter on IPv6

#

So amazing

tame carbon
#

can I have a /4 ?