#networking
1 messages · Page 181 of 1
Yeah, and I've liked the look of it in their content. I just wasn't sure if that was overkill or not.
I would look into Proxmox, its very powerful or ESXi with VMUG, that is a starship and last you have oVirt but you need 2-3 servers for that
I'd like to parse out resources to different VMs, yeah. I mainly want to run a VPN but not over Plex so it can be port forwarded and use my full bandwidth. So only 2-3 VMs ideally, if I'm understanding the approach correctly. I'm very new to the concept, been on Windows most of my tech life.
Hmm do you run stuff like Sonarr, Radarr, qBitTorrent ?
Yeah things along those lines. Deluge instead of qBitTorrent if it matters.
nah, all is preference tbh
now
do you have any data on your drives ?
and what is your drive configuration
I have data spread across a few drives, some internal some external. One NVMe OS drive separate from all other content. I basically grabbed what I could as I learned.
hmm that is gonna be a bit tricky
what drives do you have ?
you could use NTFS for storing in Linux but
there is no redundancy which means if one drive is knocked out, data on that drive is out
with something like RAID 1 / 5 / 6 you could handle drive loss
Overkill depends on what you want it for
Here's a better question why do you think you need virtualization anyhow
I just throw things on raspberry Pi and freenas server. And keep my desktop working as just a desktop
do raid 15 😛
is that even possible ?
That is something I would consider in mission critical system /s
fuckin finally, I got passthrough working on FreeNAS
Q35 is a such nightmare for FreeNAS
Well I want to run Plex on a system with enough resources to do some on the fly transcodes as there are a handful of remote users. So I was thinking I'd run a VM for Plex/Usenet and a VM with minimal resources for things to run behind a VPN. But if there's a smarter approach I'm up for it.
you could use container for VPN
it saves you from virtualizing whole OS
I would recommend Plex in VM in case you want to slap Quadro GPU into server and give it more transcoding power
So a container for VPN/Deluge and VM for the rest, essentially?
actually create a VM and install Docker in it, run all of stuff in it; Plex, VPN, Deluge, its really neat
first install Proxmox as hypervisor
and then in that VM (any distro of choice) for Docker
Gotcha. So traditionally I've used a VPN provider and their Windows application to activate/deactivate the VPN. Is it possible to run both Deluge and the VPN application inside of one container? I thought Docker was made for single app containers but that's just after cursory research.
Docker is just a way to run whole servers with low overhead. It's almost a mini hypervisor
You can run as many docker containers as your host will allow
whole servers o.O
Okay, that makes sense. Seems like that's the way to go then, thanks! Gotta buy a new CPU/Mobo that will support virtualization first, but now I have a plan for how to set it up once bought. Then I'll have to get more drives so I can RAID them properly.
they're not fully functional but just think of it as just what ever service you intend on exposing
but certainly if you were to open a shell to one of them you couldn't just expect normal things to necessarily exist
Docker is kinda a headache imo
I mean there's people who use lxc
They are full operating systems. Just paired down to not include the unneeded features.
I think more to the point you can't just compare a docker container vs a vm is my point
its not full. a container doesnt include a kernel
kernel kinda important in OS

also since when is server discussion allowed in my #networking
@clear igloo heathens
Those demons!
@clear igloo you know those network issues you have to packet capture and its not obvious?
im having the plumber equalivant of that right now
Did you turn it off and on again?
we've done so much stuff
@waxen scroll I think we should have a #server channel
because it doesn't really get noticed in general channel
ive been saying that for a year now. mods ignore
delete useless crypto channel, add server
😄
Anyone in here Savy with Cisco vlan setup? I am working on setting up a guest vlan for my ubiquity aps but need to figure out how to link the ap that is on a certain vlan to a new vlan on my dhcp server without removing the existing vlan so that there are two ssids giving access to different vlans. I have been told ip helpers are what I need but I don’t exactly understand how I need those setup. I have about 15 switches on my network that have about 15 aps spread out. Do I need the ip helper on each one and how do I decide what address to give that ip helper, is that my dhcp servers address?
Which device is router in your network?
The one that does L3 in your network needs to do the ip helper/relay stuff, as it's the one that has connectivity to the both vlan's. Else a fast work around would be to add another network interface in your dhcp-server and have that on the guest vlan
Then you wont need any ip helpers as the dhcp-server will have one leg in each network it supplies dhcp for
Ahh, so I have so many switches and didn’t set this up how can I figure out where the routing is taking place? Is it possible for that to be on my core switch? I have a virtual server running so I don’t think I can do that without another network card being added.
The ip you specifiy when configuring ip helpers is the ip of the dhcp-server(s), basically the device that does ip helpers/relay is a proxy for dhcp
The routing is where your gateway is, often a router or firewall
If you have a virtual server it likely takes vlan's, you could reconfigure the hypervisor (virtual host) to take trunk and add both vlan's on the trunk
Right now my dhcp server gives addresses in multiple vlans depending on which switch they are located. I have ports on each switch dedicated to my wireless vlan which is giving out addresses in that wireless vlan. I just want to also give out up addresses to a separate ssid on those aps. So I created a new vlan and have it setup on dhcp server I just need to get that so it receives requests from that ssid. I think this is all going to be switch side routing. Would an ip helper be able to do that for me?
If your dhcp-server already now gives out addresses on different vlan's i either has multiple network interfaces (physical or virtual) or you have ip helpers/relay configured somewhere in your network (likely same device which is gateway for all the VLAN's)
So I just need to add up helpers for the new vlan?
indeed and configure a dhcp-pool in your dhcp-server
Ok are those helpers needed on each switch?
Awesome I think I understand a lot more now. Thanks for your help.
anytime!
I’ll let you know how it works l.
Anyone have a recommended wifi 6 card?
Yes an Intel ax wireless card
It's for a desktop or laptop?
The ax card I said was laptop
@clear igloo
meantime, you can view your cancellation details below.
Services being disconnected: XFINITY Internet```
went to the customer center and they gave 0 resistance to canceling like i assumed
What are you switching too?
lol, nice 😛
cox gigablast makes it possible to 3d print food tho
You're going to need to 3d print food since that's all you can afford at those prices 😛
i got gigablast for barely under 100 usd
they cancel it, you internet still works for 2 weeks, then when it finally dies you just sign up again right away and the internet is back in 2min
oh, I can't read, thought it was comcrap for some reason
@waxen scroll Nice, if I'm ever in an area with Xfinity I'll keep that in mind
@waxen scroll real cool
@waxen scroll man what a deal
That should be regular price here
I'm still in contract but I can try it too
After it's done
i cant try it for like 2 weeks, i have to wait for the connection to die
@waxen scroll here in the uk thats a bad price i have 700mbps down for £70 a month
i can get 1gb down for £69 tho
ok i did forget to mention that includes 2 tv boxes telephone modem rent and no installation fee
so idk how much for just the fibre connection
yeah but i dont pay BBC TV tax, whats that cost?
£40 a month
no sorry £140
your millennials who dont want TV must be salty
😄
yeah we have to pay for the BBC i do not remember the last time i opened iplayer
or a bbc channel
does BBC only air BBC created material?
yes to a certain degree
they will do things like the queens speech and stuff
i just checked for the 700mbps just broadband is £52 a month
but it is extremely difficult to get gigabit in the area i live
we have fiber around the perimeter of the neighborhood, they are supposed to run it into here but are taking their time
yeah we only just got the road work done to put it in
yeah the only places in the uk that i can find that isnt if your house is next to a internet exchange is Manchester, Southhampton and Reading (200+ miles away)
this is the only one i can find but for that price unless its for a buisness why bother
CityFibre UltraBEAM FTTP 1Gb/s: £249/month with £0 install (after using £2,500 voucher) - usual price is £299/month
we have 20$ for Gb fiber :)))
I have that included in my apartment cost (which is 120$/m) :D
In the United States, I pay $70 a month for gigabit fiber.
The speeds are about what you would expect. 940 Mbps down, 940 Mbps up. The ping to the closest city within the same ISP is 1 -3 ms. There's about an 8 ms ping to the 'gateway' server.
The gateway server is located 250 Miles from where I live.
Huh, it's not letting me convert it to jpg
hi guys, recently upgraded to fiber (to home with dedicated ONT), but when I try to configure my edgerouter PoE I get very low speeds compared to the router provided by my isp (14 mbps vs over 500), how can I debug?
do you have switch with that router @dawn forge ?
thanks, now the difficult bit, making my VOIP phones work... I have always used ISP-autoconfigured routers for those, but somehow having ONT -> ISP Router -> EdgeRouter (with PPPoE) no longer works and I removed the ISP Router...
can you just do ONT --> (ISP Router and EdgeRouter)
lol
at least that's what some people do when they have trouble with stuff like IPTV
assuming the ONT has multiple ports
it doesn't, and the ISP doesn't publish requirements
I think in that case you'd have to google it and hope someone has figured it out
otherwise you might need to add a switch
assuming you can get multiple public IPs
@clear igloo @little schooner lmao comcast shut me off next day. that never happens. i usually get 2 weeks free
@dawn forge If you require PPPoE than you should be able to take the ISP router out of the equation. What exactly are you running into with VOIP though?
@waxen scroll LUL
i signed up again, the online system realized it was me, and it gave me the new customer discount anyway
Haha, welp, there you go
@hollow marlin I did, current setup is ONT -> EdgeRouter (via PPPoE) -> EdgeSwitch and all the rest, my issue with VOIP is that I have no idea how it works or how to set it up, I always used my ISP's router which only requires me to plug in the phone jack... I'm trying to find something online
@dawn forge Well if you typically used the phone jack off the ONT that is not VOIP. Those are typical POTS lines. If you go VOIP you will need to use SIP
setup with the ISP router is ONT -> ISP Router -> phone, everything goes through the ISP router
which I guess has some software and configuration to make the phone work
Yeah it acts a SIP gateway. If you are able to reach out to them and have a VOIP phone you can probably get the credentials and just throw it behind your edgerouter
do I need another PC or something to act as SIP gateway?
when i put my internet interface to bridge mode it did not affect the voip interface
maybe it's the same for you
You dont need the gateway. The reasons there is a SIP gateway on the ONT is to convert its from SIP to analog. If you have VOIP its SIP all the way
@subtle glen ISP router doesn't have Bridge mode accessible unfortunately
mh, I'll double check, and I'd need something like Cisco SPA112 in case they're analog, right?
@dawn forge Yeah that will work just fine. Ive seen some of our customers use that model for SIP with no problems
thanks
Can I expect a Cisco sfp+ module to work fine in a QNAP NAS?
its not a guarantee but most likely
those SFPs are programmed for compatibility and allows manufacturers to know if its not one of their supported ones
that programming is very weak which is why you can buy $20 "cisco compatible" SFPs
if the device does 0 checks on the SFP then it will probably work
I recommend optcore or FS.com SFP modules
you can get cheap ones that are cisco compatible from either of those that work quite well with cisco or anything else
I have a cisco 3750G that I factory reset. The console never outputs, it doesn't respond to pings or telnet. It properly switches and does it job. Any ideas?
well, it is not supposed to respond to pings unless it has a switch virtual interface
also did you try a different console cable?
verify console settings?
is the console port broken or loose?
I'll try switching console cables, and examining the console port then
Hey Im trying to find out if a switch would solve an issue I am having. Anyone good at networks willing to hop into a call with me for a second? Im more confident in my ability to talk through it than I am in my ability to type it out intelligably
I guess in short I am trying to figure out if you can put a switch between an ONT and a router
and what consequences that might have for network speed
I am making some assumptions here, that you are looking at using a non-managed switch to allow you to connect other devices directly to your ONT that shouldn't be behind your router, and that you are not passing vlan, it should be the same, the speed bump shouldn't be enough to notice unless the non-managed switch is low quality
ok and that should work?
Im used to traditional modem- router setups where switches have to be post router I think
I have to route wired internet to 2 places in my house and the only place all my wiring meets in at the ont outside
as long as the hand off you are getting from the ONT is meant for the router a switch shouldn't change that, just adds a hope
So i was hoping to plug my pc into the switch and move my router down to my entertainment center also plugged into the switch
well thats another issue all together
I am assuming your PC should also sit behind your router
something needs to handle your public IP address and translate that to your home network devices
yeah the plan is to drop a switch inside the ONT housing and run my pc off one port and my router off another
if your ISP doesn't limit your IP to one, that will isolate your PC from your network and possible give your PC a public IP, which is not a good thing
So my isp says they can handle routing an ip to my pc straight from the ONT
yes they can
but I dont know how much I trust their tech support, I had a micorargument when they insisted I had gigabyte internet
but think of it like this, a router acts as a gate keeper and take one public IP and let your private devices access the internet and protects them from getting accessed in ways they shouldn't be
Ah i see the issue
and anything sitting behind the router can talk directly with one another on private IP space
What would it take to upgrade 3 of my machines to be on a 10 gig ethernet?
I assume 3 10gbe cards, a 10gbe switch and cables, right?
@hard pasture more or less, cable selection could be a rats nest though
So how do I do this without isolating my pc. I use it for steamlink to my tv downstairs etc. It needs to be part of the network
Do they all need to be SFP+?
ideally you would put the router in the place you were thinking of putting the switch or run more copper
@hard pasture if you want 10gb you want SFP+ ports
running copper in a townhouse is a little difficult and destructive.
damn... I dont have a plan anymore
maybe you can pull a new copper line following your existing line going to your router out to the junction box and then either splice there or run it though replacing the line up to your pc?
Why is this thing so cheap? https://www.ebay.com/itm/192871963699
40 gb is a thing replacing all 10gb
So this one's fine?
The 10gbe cables on Amazon are more expensive than these cards. lol
@hard pasture like how much more expensive?
$17 for a 6 foot cable
What CAT?
You can't even use that
With the adapter your buying
You need copper cable rj45
The ebay picture shows the HP adapter with rj45 port
Unless that isn't what your getting?
Just shopping around.
This one looks right: https://www.ebay.com/itm/143338082823
That one looks more like sfp+ ports yeah
@chrome hound, is there a way if my pc is on a separate network to make that IP artifically a part of the main network?
Do any of you know if it's worth losing 5 more TB of space to get RAID 6?
Or stick with raid 5
5 can only tolerate 1 failure, I would do 6 to be somewhat safer but depending on what you're storing it might be fine
@clear igloo well, it will house some AD backups and mostly virtual machine templates that we created
And anything that was Administrative data like diagrams or step guides
Right now we are only using like 2TB
Hmmm, 6 might be better for a little more redundancy in that case but hard to say. Kind of a coin flip between the two almost for that use case
@clear igloo hmm
I mean on one hand, I fear the odds that we have two drives fail at the same time
Or if one fails maybe, during a rebuild
I think I'm gonna tell him to err to raid 6 then
Because it takes a long time to buy replacements
Yah, if they all come from the same batch and order then you have a higher chance of multiple going at once. If you build it over time then chances are usually lower but best to be safe
I gave up 4TB to use raid-z2 and it saved me when I had two drives that failed.
Yes
@rocky badge Comcast throttled my upload speed to 4mbps because I've been uploading for 28 days straight about 2TB worth of data so far
I was getting 9 mbps before
ouch
Lol
This is internally
In your case, that is still not bad
Way faster than what I'm going it externally. Lol
I would love to transfer over at gigabit
Omg it make me want to use the cloud like more than normal
Lol
If I had a faster upload
@clear igloo I'd love to have an entire lab at school lol
College has labs (usually)
Maybe some Cisco catalyst switches, ASA, some SANs and servers lol
I'm not in college lol
Not with that attitude you're not! 😛
Oof
anything thats used to make money should be raid 6
@little schooner
@spare bay yes. I will push that to him when we get the NAS and it will be raid 6
The NAS is arriving next week
Our new storage server is zfs lol
is there a way to hava a computer not connected through a router be treated as part of that routers network?
@slim trail yes a switch
the computer cant be after the router
So connect it directly to the router
do you mean something thats not in the subnet?
That works too
I am under the impression that the router you speak of would have switch ports in it too
It's not technically after the router, but with it
i mean i am plugging the ont directly into the computer and separately directly to the router
ont?
the ISP gives each an ip address
instead of a modem i have an ONT
it tranfers fiber to copper
cant plug the computer into the router?
regardless, the answer is yes, you can vpn into the routers network
not with the new setup im trying to run
not without backtracking a second cable through all my walls
@slim trail transfers fiber to copper? Like a media converter such as Coax to copper?
Those should already be bridged mode
I think
Unless it has built in router features
Then it gets complicated
Like add vlan to the line
what are the IP addresses?
@slim trail the only real way to make it work is for the switch to be a smart switch and use a Vlan to handle your PC traffic and place that Vlan on the private side of your router, but I think you would then need two managed switches to make that happen
after using apache for a while i decided to try nginx but its pooop
public ip's or a 10.x.x.x/192.168.x.x ?
@little schooner The ONT is usually a glorified media converter and dot1x authentication box
how large though I think space is a constrant
so if I put it in the ONT enclosure I have like 6 by 5 by 1 inches of space
I could mount another enclosure though
I'm worried that your PC will need to authenticate with the ONT and the ISP isn't likely to give you credentials to do so
I asked, they agreed to that
Ah, ok, was about to ask that
the issue is his PC becomes isolated as it would be on a public IP where the rest of his home network would be behind the router
@clear igloo good to know.
I've always seen the term thrown around but never had chance to ask about it
Like I didn't think I needed to know at the time
Yah, a VPN would be added latency and whatnot but would put the PC on the same logical network to get around what @chrome hound mentioned
my other options all seem to mean running wire through external walls
if you had two switches capable of Vlans you could make it work with a single copper run
Well if the router supports sub-interfaces you could dot1q trunk from a single switch
can you describe the 2 switch setup in short so I have an idea what we are talking about?
Yah, the steam link is the tough part, chromecast doesn't worry me
it would only be a couple of hops still
the first ISP router should send the traffic back to the router
What router do you have on the other side of the ONT? ISP one or your own? If it's your own what model?
well the quaitly of the switch is a factor we are not talking production level switches here
yeah id like to maintain most or all of my gigabit speed
tbh you don't really need gigabit speeds its more about latency with the apps you are talking about
agreed
I might have an idea how it can work
two of this might be best
I had no idea netgear even made a managed 5 port switch
ONT > Switch > Switch > Router should work with:
Trunk port between switches, Vlan 10 for the ONT, Vlan 20 for the PC. Vlan 20 plugs into the LAN port on the router and VLAN 10 into the WAN port on the router
Or if you want to ensure full gigabit throughput you could do CRS305-1G-4S+IN and some 10G copper SFPs, provided the run isn't too long and decent quality cable
and your PC plugs into the first switch
Yah
you are going to have to be able to set the right ports to deliver untagged vlan traffic
Exactly, trunk only between switches and access port on the edge
yep
ok so one switch goes in the ont enclosure, run the line from my pc to that, the next switch is inside right behind my router?
but remeber you are still only using one network cable to transfer the full amount for your pipe will be limited
Yah, that's why I'm thinking 10Gb would be best to allow the least constraint
@clear igloo oof
@slim trail it will look like this in the end
Switch <<>> Switch is a trunk so both VLANs are allowed
and you could put other runs on vlan 20 at switch 1 as well
With the Mikrotik 10G switch you could do gigabit from PC + a couple other devices to router and gigabit from router to ONT without issues. Vlan 20 would be limited to 1Gbit going into the LAN on the router but still sufficient if you added more than the PC
oh hey @rocky badge I finally was able to get a 8/8 speed test, but it was for a comcast speed test server
so another idea i wanted to run by you
@chrome hound lol nice
what about installing a wired router in the ONT enclosure and using my wireless router as just a transciever
@clear igloo I need more smartcard /s
@slim trail That could work too
err centry link I mean https://www.speedtest.net/result/d/0d6c17ab-ae23-47cb-b4c1-e4c45a996160.png
good lord, and I thought my speeds were nice
You would still use a couple switches across the single link but it would simplify some things a bit since you could use unmanaged switches
are there any downsides to doing the dual router thing?
If the second router is in AP only mode, nothing comes to mind
I think htat might be cheaper if less fun sounding
tbh I would look at a dedicated AP that is not a router
Yah
my wife will murder me. I spent a lot on the router..
and asus has Mess tech so as long as the AP was compatable both wifi points could work together
Oof
If I dont use it she wont be happy
no you still use it
put the asus AC3100 next to the ONT use it's 4 network port to make your connections and put an asus AP on where the router was
@chrome hound blob did something. https://blob.pcmr.rocks/375110b7.png
IPv6 is of the devil
Gossamer, thatd put the Asus router outside..
the choices we ahve to make
lol yeh you have a point
@clear igloo moment of truth
@rocky badge I do get 9.2 to my speed test server I was excited about that 😄 https://www.speedtest.net/result/d/0784698a-5ef1-4a6d-be67-4ac06c74e298.png
LUL @rocky badge
errr 9.3
Only one cron job ran
@clear igloo had to manually run the job lol https://blob.pcmr.rocks/159c25e4.png
What am I looking at? @rocky badge
My badge check in/out system for school sending automated reports to teachers
Ah
@clear igloo School: Spotify is a VPN
School: Nah your SSH tunnel is fine.
That's some 10/10 logic there
Look for Utopia there are three providers on that network that offer 10gb to the home Fiber
Utopia is in like 15 cities in Utah currently
nice
you can check your address on there web site utopiafiber.com
how much is it
200 to 250 pending the provider you pick
oh ok
oh and pending on how the fiber is installed there is rental for the fiber its self
that sucks its not in my area
@clear igloo 👀 https://blob.pcmr.rocks/966b09eb.png
Nice @rocky badge
hi
@hallow nimbus pretty much, and since when did this become the "speed peen" channel

@hallow nimbus I had to do two SMB copies lol
I could do more but I cba to copy from more servers
Since like forever lol
/slapp
/denied
Also, I had to turn off the UniFi LED lol
Why lol
it's so bright
really lol
I have slept in a room with my 1080 ti @ 100% usage 😂
Founders edition
And with my rackmount on
That was a bloody nightmare
lol
@hallow nimbus Delta fans would like to know your location LUL
There allready are delta fans in that server Lul
@clear igloo no server talk
is 10 gig possible over copper cables or would I have to get something like sfp cables for it?
@waxen scroll Some people here could post much higher speeds if they could be bothered, kinda lame to post internal/local speeds though
I was just testing the link between my PC and server ¯_(ツ)_/¯
can it really? awesome, I'll actually start looking at that upgrade
“Consumer” devices are even starting to get 10gig lan ports @fallow frost
It’s an option for Mac minis
A fair number of motherboards have it
The new Mac Pro
Obviously all fairly high end stuff but it’s cool nonetheless
@fallow frost You can do 10Gb over Cat6a or Twinax DAC SFP+ (copper)
Or Cat5e up to 30m
Don’t need cat6a, but it’s definitely better than cat6
oh right 55m 6
We have 4 30m Cat5e runs at 10g
okay, so stupid question, the hell is sfp+'s purpose? I thought it was solely for like 100 gig.
@spare bay all of my devices only have gigabit lan ports, and I transfer large files between devices quite frequently, one of the main reasons I'm looking at it
SFP+ is so you can put different modules in to the port for different purposes
like SFP+ short range multi mode fibre
or SFP+ long range single mode 40km
@spare bay it’s standard cat5e
there isn't a lot of difference between 5e and 6, just a tighter spec on twist/cm
That should be impossible but alright
that's why 5e does 30m and 6 does 55m, not that I can remember that shit off hand easily (wikipedia ftw lol)
What do you mean there’s a huge difference with 6
It has the plastic divider
That’s what allows it to do 10gig
that divider is to achieve the tighter spec on twist/cm, that's all it is for
That’s not what allows it for 10g
^
Larger gauge, twist, divider and staggered pins allow for less interference at distance
Short runs are not really benefited by that
I want to see the wikipedia page you read cat5e doing 10gig at 30m
It actually makes little difference because the NICs will try and neg at the highest rate they support and if it works it works, there's no "is this Cat6" check at all.
You'll just hit errors after a certain distance based on environmental factors
I agree that a NIC doesnt know what the cable is and if the signal works it works, but, 30m is a long distance for cat5e to do 10gig
Sure but it doesn’t mean it doesn’t work
Recommended references =/= real world in a lot of situations.
Close but there is a lot of variance
Like it's a bad idea to use it on a new run or try it in a cable trunk of 40+, but nothing wrong with trying it when situation requires
@hallow nimbus you must have a smart card plugged into any laptop in my domain now lol
@strange silo exactly. If our runs were anywhere near power they might just drop altogether
It was a temp solution that just stayed in production....
@rocky badge I'd slap you from here if I could, smartcard auth is a pain
Love the idea of it, hate it in reality lol
Desktops don't need smartcards
but they can be used
Just the laptops
And since it's a yubikey, it works in anything with a USB port
Just wait till Windows decides to reset the USB bus cos of what ever reason it comes up with, "oh you were working, ha get F'd"
Lol
And since I force devices to use win hello or smartcard, my dad's Surface pro 6 is fine
Since he uses Windows hello IR
Finally finished adding 12 disks to the ceph cluster, took like 3 days to rebalance 😩
Wonder if anyone can figure out this shit, the used space efficiency is like really far off what it should be and I can't figure out why
objects: 66.70M objects, 196 TiB
usage: 327 TiB used, 590 TiB / 917 TiB avail
EC profile is k=3 m=2 failure domain host
should be 40% overhead... it's not... wtf
I measured the run in the lab I help support a while back and we got 313 feet
Can't use cat5e for 10g for this room
And of course IT/maintenance doesn't want to help run new fiber
So we almost bought parts for no reason... Until that detail was brought up before the NAS purchase order was submitted
Minus 2 sfp+ to copper modules
313 feet? ugh freedom units grabs calculator
freedom units!
I'm doing 10 gig over 23m for my PC right now, it's not a long run lol
change it to metric, ours is anyway
I know 30m is like 98 feet
23m = 75ft
313 = 95m
Yeah too far
For copper sfp+
Now we need to ask for money to hire someone to run fiber
fiber too expensive
If we want to connect to the datacenter room
How expensive is a 313 feet run
how easy is it to pull through a new cable while taking out the old, is it all secure and going through walls etc?
I've been trying to get my work to upgrade to some sort of solution so I can access my files from a different computer, because I'm tired of having to be logged into two computers at once
https://blob.pcmr.rocks/49db00b1.png yeah, we had to migrate lmao
They have this super long tray of many copper cables the spread across the whole floor, in the ceiling
a 500GB HDD in a server wasn't working
@strange silo yeah that too
So we got four 2TB WD Red Pros
I'm sure it's going to be easy because I looked and everything is super neat
And it's a straight room to datacenter, no curving needed
5TB is enough for now 😄
Like literally straight straight straight
I wish any of the computers at work had 500gb hdds, they all are like hp nucs with the cheapest storage they could possibly get
And we're at datacenter
@rocky badge our workstations have 1TB hdd and 500gb ssd
lel nice
well if you pay for it I don't see what the problem would be, not like IT would actually have to do anything at all
Ours are Precision 3630 Towers
My personal computer has more storage than all like 7 computers in the building combined
@strange silo well we were hoping not to have to use our grant money to fund it
But it looks that way
@fallow frost Student laptops have 64GB of eMMC
Our Precision mobile workstations (laptops) have 2TB NVME
@rocky badge the fiber cable itself may be cheap, but the cost for the work wouldn't be cheap for me, I'd have to tear walls up to run cable again
Well it'll be in low hundred area
@fallow frost rip
@strange silo which is nice because cheap is what my prof likes to hear
my fiber is ran up the wall from the basement
The current cable run around the house is 5e I believe, it was put in when the extension of the house was being built by the previous owners
This summer we're supposed to move all of our equipment out of there into our own dedicated room
That will be a big job
The racks don't got wheels
I mean maybe they will let us borrow their carts
I just ran Cat6 in some rooms, and my room was the only one that got fiber
Yeah, I do eventually want to re-run everything, and do a few new runs, but just can't right now
I want our Dell Precision 7920 though. 😦 Dual Xeon Gold 6152s (22 core 3.7GHz each), 384GB of DDR4 ECC, Quadro RTX 6000.
The thing's a beast
I cabled my parents house when it got built, I hate cabling now
I did way to many, most never get used
Yeah, it's the opposite way for my house, too few runs, we need way more than we have
bascially every wall as dual + coax f-type
👀
The day I get true control over cabling is the day that either cat6 or fiber goes in.
from memory there's only 3 active connections out of the 20-30
I did 2x Cat6 to the office and living room
One Cat6 and one fiber to my room.
The Cat6s in the office are being used by a desktop and laptop, only one of the Cat6 in the living room is being used and that's from the AP.
The Cat6 in my room goes to my 8 port switch, and the fiber ofc goes to my PC
I'm lucky to have gigabit on the few connections that are around, but it got to the point where I have a 5 port switch in my room, and an 8 port to the room that all my spare tech goes in.
the 8 port in my room is also powering an AP, and then port 2-4 are tagged for guest VLAN
I've gotta find some way to put access points around the house for all the alexas that are now here
just don't use Alexa's..... 😉
I was against them, but the siblings and parents wanted them
@fallow frost Yeah, the Google Homes have decent connection
Nest Hub in kitchen connects to the downstairs AP, the Home Mini in my room connects to the AP in my room, and the Home Mini in the living room connects to the living room AP
I have a home mini, and also am the closest to the router, so I don't have connection issues, but the closest alexa is 3 walls away
bleh, mixed Alexa and Google Home
I'm into googles ecosystem, grandparents gave amazon gift cards and they saw alexas on sale.
Oh, rip
wish they weren't
I'm glad my parents don't want to switch lol
Yeah, I've had my home for about 2 years, took them two years to get on board the smart home idea and then they went amazon
I want more smart home sensors in my house
Specifically more carbon monoxide ones
buy em from china
But they have to be z wave
I'm using homeseer
i'm using homeassistant
@little schooner i have like 50 sensors
the dongle is not cheap 😦
they sell those things for like $60
hmm seems to be on sale for $44 today
@little schooner i have 9 smoke/co attached
none of them z-wave. none of them wireless what-so-ever
Yeah my system isn't wired
so wire it
😄
@little schooner wiring smokes and co is pretty much building code these days
@waxen scroll I saw an apartment with wired ones and yep, I guess it is building code
Yesterday
you attach one of those to the bus that the smoke detector communicates to, and then put it on an alarm or something that can talk to home assistant (or homeseer)
of course you're not "supposed to", but i hacked a way to make it safer
no and dont are only words
xD
i introduced a delay circuit between that alarm relay and the alarm panel which tells home assistant. https://www.elkproducts.com/products/elk-960-delay-timer-module
Elk manufacturers networkable smart control systems and accessories providing security, home automation, business automation, access control, remote control, energy savings, and task management for residential and commercial customers.
I was considering getting random stuff from china
like maybe a gps module for time lol
but I'm not sure it's worth it
Can anyone help clarify some questions regarding 802.11b/g/n
I have a Huawei B315 home router, looking at the specs sheet reveals it has no support for multiple spatial streams, so how can they claim speeds of up to 150Mbps when the only frequency band I can select is 20MHz
Wouldn't I need 40MHz for 150Mbps
Also how can it claim 802.11n support when it (to my knowledge) operates at best at 802.11g limitations
I'm confused by these standards. pls help
I checked my Comcast data usage for December and it says I used 2222GB of data. If there were any data caps, I would really be in trouble
There should be
@little schooner do you pay for the unlimited add-on? Also, what state?
No unlimited add-on. The state is Connecticut
I haven't seen them mention data cap anywhere in their terms and conditions for this contract I'm in
@rocky badge
@little schooner Connecticut isn't a part of the 1TB cap
@dire flare most network bandwidth claims are made in a theoretical enviornment that doesn't exist outside of a RF clean environment.
I've been inside an Arris RF clean room, modern routers can in fact delivery 1 Gbps wireless connectivity to multiple clients in a RF clean environment.
but take 802.11ac for example. The theoretical maximum in a RF clean environment is 1 Gbps but the real world speeds max out at 420 Mbps
@hallow nimbus unless you have a cool 20k per 20 square feet to dump
you don't want it
I dont
And my cable network can do and does 10Gbit sooooo
Not fast enough for me
only multi-node fiber can delivery 10 Gigabit for WAN connectivity
one has to wonder how much you pay for internetz
unless you're just specifying your LAN speeds
in which case I'm sure there are people in here with dual 100 Gbps networks in this chat somewhere
@topaz quarry I mean, I'm not complaining over not having theoretical maximum speeds, you miss the point.
I'm complaining about not even having the option to achieve those theoretical maximums
Even in a lab enviroment with perfect signal the settings limit me to ~65Mbps maximum, that is the MCS index of 7 at 20MHz with an 800 ns guard interval
The 150Mbps rating is a "maximum" for 802.11n, but my router is limited in settings from getting that far, not conditions
if you had an actual lab environment you would see the numbers
@hollow marlin works at an ISP and hates using multimode too
RF clean environments are almost entirely isolated from the outside world
No I wouldnt because I cant bond two 20MHz channels into a 40MHz channels
refer to the MCS chart, to achieve 150Mbps throughput I need to be operating on a 40MHz channel
How dare you tag me to force me to look at MM lol @waxen scroll
he did it
lul
go get em coach
the way 40 MHz channels work is by consuming the same width as two 20 MHz channels
it's the same width
if you're saying you want to use two 20 MHz channels at the same time
that's referred to as switching
Soo you're saying that with 64-QAM modulation, on a single spatial stream with a coding rate of 5/6 on a 20MHz channel with an 800 ns Guard interval in lab conditions I could achieve 150Mbps?
the numbers on the bottom of the chart
that seem made up
do actually occur in a RF clean environment
you should see how much work is needed to make a RF clean environment though
there's literally nothing in them
and the material padding is nonsenscial
But I cant phyically cram multiple spatial streams into my router
RF free or not
The argument I'm making is that my router despite advertising a 150Mbps in an RF clean environment can't possibly achieve those speeds as it lacks the featureset to achieve them
I believe based on that chart 1 stream refers has a cap at 65 Mbps
sometimes they also advertise the speed at which the stream is being switched
in other words the overall bandwidth
each single stream having a base of 65 Mbps, and serving 4 clients in some kind of fashion. Sometimes round robin, sometimes LRU
the claims behind routers are very tricky
Marketing teams sure love having field days I suppose
Gigabit switches also claim to have 1 Gbps * number of ports total throughput
I think we've all come to the conclusion that just means you can have 1 Gigabit out of each port
I'm not even complaining in the end as my LTE based connection cant saturate even the shitty wifi but yeah
It'd be nice to have data that doesnt mislead
that would require the marketing teams to listen to the engineering teams
anyone remember the 970 problem?
anyone? anyone?
😂
@topaz quarry the switches I use really do have 1gbps both ways
the non-blocking throughput
Yes lan ofc @topaz quarry Wan would be great but i cant even get 1Gbit atm so let alone 10Gbit
anyone run their own NTP server?
Like a local NTP server?
Not one exposed to the internet right? Just one that peers with another server
Yah, I have two Raspberry pi boxes acting as NTP servers that peer with NIST
Protective of the server? XD
yes
hes one of those people who believes that by locking people out of his stuff and not training, hes safe from layoffs
truth is exec who doesnt understand IT doesnt care and will mass layoff
@waxen scroll I am getting constant junk emails now, even with whitelisting, with outlook.com
what in the world is microsoft doing???
touching things without testing??
idk, i get constant junk email with gmail. at least it goes to the spam folder
also you should know theres a gmail calendar spam scam going too
spammers send calendar invites and due to the nature of gmail and google calendar it gets added automatically to your calendar and sends your phone notification spam with the spammers message
yep. i had to lock that down, but now it means google isnt reading my emails and remembering things
for example, if i bought a flight, google would remember the details from the confirmation email
wont now
Hi! If you had to choose between the Netgear R6700 and the Deco M5, what would you choose?
My house isn't that big so the R6700 should be enough for me but if I get the Deco M5 that means I can get rid of my MoCA adapters and use the main Deco as a router and move it to the PC room and connect it directly to the Deco, removing the extra latency the MoCA adds.
However, it's also more expensive so I'm not sure if it's worth it.
@little schooner They test in prod 😛
so does blob

What "prod"
@rocky badge you mean to tell me that master branch isn't where I put new features in?

@little schooner Code repo? What's that?
@strange silo I use ours at work
It's not technically meant for it, but I push my python scripts to it
Muh jira, muh bitbucket
Lmao
wait what
ikr
Anybody able to see any reason not to pick up a half-depth 1u server, buy a chinese mATX or Mini-ITX x79 motherboard, a Xeon, & a nice network card, and turn it into a PFSense box. Seems like you could make a nice little professional router for <$200. I've been debating it as a project, and apart from the height issues in a 1u it seems better than all the random Atom boxes you see online.
I personally don't see an issue with it
just checking because 2 rj45 10gb would be cheaper than the 4-1gb ports if you buy from ebay
or at least, that is what someone listed the other day here
they sell some small all in ones that can be used for routers too
Yeah, but most of what I see is over $200 and only 1gb ports
not this one but stuff like this one: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32891699351.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.0.0.2b582e4eOBLnIH&
Yeah, but I'm saying why not buy something like this https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000571583738.html & throw it in this https://www.amazon.com/MITXPC-M1U04-Mini-ITX-Rackmount-80PLUS/dp/B01IAJVA4W
(one that supports matx, not the ITX like I linked)
just an example but some of them are like super cheap shipping
$200 + a network card, and then you've got a xeon processor, ecc ram, which helps if you want to do things like snort/bro/firewall/etc
Seems better than the $115 DHL $200 mini 4 port 1gb things
I mean it depends if you need it
I'm using an edgerouter lite
it's enough for my place lol
I like my all in one unit the edgerouter
I don't nearly have enough traffic to warrant a beefy router
the power draw is very low too
I mostly want to play I bought a simliar case and Chinese mobo and was going to use it for my ESX-I server, but realized a lot of these have room for 1 PCI-E card and it got me thinking
I mean it might be better no to put it all into the same server
so you want to use it more for virtualization
its going to have 2 xeon procs so why not
Well, the original idea was a test esx-i server, but I'm saying, why not the same idea for a PFSense router
well it works yeah
just uses more power
and noise
is it going to be a virtual pfsense?
I mean I was thinking bare metal
sure thats fine
basically I bought the stuff to be a server, but realized I'm one network card away from it being a pfSense box instead, and I'm just trying to see if there's any reason not to given that it seems 'better' than anything else out there at that price point
i read the listing wrong. it says 2pcs for ram sticks not cpus
i thought it was a 2 proc system
Nah, those don't seem to be in mATX
it works.
I don't think you're gonna find dual socket mATX boards
nah I was going to stick with 1 socket
Ah, okay
8 core, 16 thread is enough for just playing around with VMs,
I need to get a xeon and a board, I'm tired of this old server already and I don't even truly have it running
I know that in his video Linus compared a Ryzen to a Xeon for gaming, but for a home lab, I would assume Xeon's would be better for running Hypervisors/etc over a ryzen system
without actually have one to test with, hard to say
by next year I will test that
@vapid dune yeah i remember paying almost 189 for mine
meanwhile my xeons use FB DDR2
@waxen scroll I was joking 😉
not sure where else to put this:
Trying to make a custom vpn using pritunl as outlined in https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/1145041-should-you-make-your-own-vpn/. I've got it connecting to my chromebook through an installed onc file i converted from ovpn but it's not routing any of my internet traffic through the vpn even though it's got the tunnel connected, what should I do?
Linus explores the world of creating your own VPN, with the help of an open source project called Pritunl. Rent a VPS for this project from Vultr (affiliate link): https://lmg.gg/cO2Wd Forum Tutorial: https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/1140511-diy-vpn-pritunl-setup-tutorial/
didn't he say that this method has it's own client?
@little schooner Still getting tons of spam?
@clear igloo it has stopped for now. I had to silent it last night
Yah, haven't seen much in the past few hours
Still, that should be a lesson to the intern, to not test with production systems
Yeah me too
@oblique aurora yes however the pritunl client is not available for chromebooks so i am have added a manual openvpn connection which opens the tunnel fine. I'm just unsure as to why it's not routing all traffic over the tunnel when the openvpn server is pushing the "redirect-gateway def0" to all clients
@sand orchid chromebook doesn't have good OpenVPN support
Chances are it won't work
Look in setting up l2tp instead
is there a way to use pritunl l2tp?
On LTT network, relpy to a thread saying it's against the rules, thread get locked, banned from posting because backseat moderation...lol...what...
wat
Think it's time to avoid the forums from now on
i have bad news for you
they do it here too.... they ban words like d-a-d-dy
lazy af, the bot just does it
Well it's more civilized (mostly) here anyway
dunno, i only watch this room
Same
There are other rooms?!?
Anyone know anything about connecting to a specific BSSID (mac address) instead of a specific ESSID on android?
tis is rooted if that helps
@clear igloo you ever think ltt is getting too woke?
is watchguard firebox x20e friewall good?
@here
Edit: double checked and looks like I mixed manufacturer names
My Internet connection is dropping packets since 30th December, 2019, I have complained about it many times to the local cable operator and he wasn't able to fix it and he advised me that opting for Fibre is the only way. The issue is towards local gateway, I have heard that malfunctioning Load Balancer Routers can cause this issue.
couldn't fix it???
nope
@thick minnow that has nothing to do with load balancers nor a cable issue. Are you noticing the packet loss outside of ping?
But are you noticing actual performance issues because of it?
@hollow marlin Sorry I am replying late, didn't expected a reply soon 😅
Yes, I am noticing packet loss in CSGO as well, the network would lag for 2 seconds and then after that it will update the new position of the players in CSGO with new data because of the "request timed out" issue. One thing I have noticed that, this happens majority of the time during evening when most of the people return home from the office while at late night say after 12 AM, the packet loss issue subsides as the night creeps in.
I am thinking it's the issue on the local cable operator side because my friend have same Broadband Connection, 10 KM away and he doesn't have this issue.
This started happening since 30th December
try sending pings out to a local server, then pigs out to a remote server
or tracert
tracert runs fine.
@thick minnow it sounds like you are just capping out your bandwidth at times. That packet loss that you are seeing is basically moot when it comes to real packet loss.
It doesn't matter which server I send ping to, local or remote, it will timeout because the local gateway is the one which is acting problematic.
@hollow marlin I also think that's the issue, because my connection is limited to 60 Mbps Download & Upload.
the gateway in your house?
The gateway is not in my house
It's at local cable operator office.
Like what you call an exchange in older telephone line issue.
That's where the gateway is located.
My ISP uses NAT type Networking to distribute connection since public IP Addresses are expensive and gateway uses Class B Private IP Address.
I mean if anyone have done networking before, I hope I don't have to explain Class A, B, C Public and Private IP Address Range 😅
What router do you have and is it able to see bandwidth usage?
Also classes don't exist anymore, pretend they never existed
My Router can say about how many packets were sent and received in bytes.
Also classes don't exist anymore, pretend they never existed
What does it mean?
If that's all just tally it every 5 mins during the times you notice it and average it out. Im sure you're just having congestion
Classes haven't been a thing for 15+ years but see still taught.
So the Router at my local cable operator is getting congested and can't maintain the bandwidth evenly without going into packet loss. Also I ran speedtest and saw that my upload was halved to in between 15 Mbps - 35 Mbps but my upload was consistent 60 Mbps with 2ms ping on my ISP Speedtest server.
So if it is congestion issue then the upload should also be disturbed but it isn't.
Upload is constant 60.
Classes haven't been a thing for 15+ years but see still taught.
Why is that so?
Classes were the original design of IPv4 until they were like"shit, we done fucked up" as it wasn't enough space. Subneting was designed to fix it and became the defacto standard.
They don't exist anymore except in ancient code and backwards compatibility and should never be used.
Plus most people will incorrectly say a class
So is IPv4 classes doesn't exist, so it means NATting also doesn't exist?
Subnetting and NATting doesn't go hand in hand?
Aren't both objectives is to use one Public IP Addresses for more than one computer?
NAT is, subneting is what range or addresses are within a network. One is a protocol, the other is just informational
So let's say if my IP Address is 172.19.36.xxx and my Subnet is 255.255.255.0?
Is that a Subnet?
Yep
It just means your network ranges from 172.19.36.0-172.19.36.255
Any device in that range is in the same network.
NAT is also different than what you use at home, which is PAT
NAT is 1:1 address translation
PAT (NAT Overload) is many:1 address translation
It's a type of NAT technically but different 😄
Yes, that too
I see. But when I Google for what's my IP it shows different IP Address, so it means it is a NAT?
Overload NAT?
Yeah, your network is being translated to your public IP when it leaves the router
Overload means different between NAT and PAT but in PAT, yes
So my network is both Subnetted and NATted, right? Gotta give salute to those ISP motherfuckers 😂
Yep. Subneting is ALWAYS used, NAT usually only on the customers end
And I'm one of the ISP motherfckers
Oops
Lol
@hollow marlin Here it's increasingly common to use CGN on non-business connections, while ALSO using NAT in the CPEs
We are looking into it
@hollow marlin What ISP?
@thick minnow in NY
Ohh...
I got our network almost entirely IPv6
@dire flare I keep dreaming of that switch, every single day, when troubleshooting customers VoIP connection, and the related NAT nightmare.
😄
My ISP is still on IPv4 lol
It will be for at least another decade
There are a lot we are still waiting for other than just the ISPs
why are isps sticking with ipv4 when we know we're gonna run out?
My ISP does IPv6....poorly 😦
@hollow marlin Yeah, well, they've only planned IPv6 since the mid '90es... So why not wait another decade or two for implementation. Too what? 30 years for IPv4 to get to where it is today?
Because time + energy + application dependencies + other misc stuff
So @hollow marlin can you tell me what would be the problem for the packet loss that's happening on my side.
Sure you could just do NAT46 but that's just masking the issue in most cases where they are problems
@thick minnow Packet loss can be ANYTHING. Also if you ping the local gateway, the loss can simply be the gateway being busy routing traffic, and ignoring your pings. Try pinging 8.8.8.8, and see of the loss is the same. That way the packets would be treated like any other traffic, and google will answer instead. Never had packetloss to that IP.
Well it will do the usual packet loss thing even at that IP Address. Pinging the local gateway itself is a packet loss lol
Also I saw TTL, it's 63, for a region TTL is 64, so a Router is in between there.
@clear igloo For most parts dual-stack would work. Give CGN IPv4, and full public IPv6. If you have applications that don't like NAT, simply use the IPv6 for those, and for services that can only be reached on IPv4, like every freaking thing hosted on AZure and AWS, last I checked, you have a CGN infected IPv4 connection, that should do the job just fine.
Hush with that logic @craggy parcel
@thick minnow Ehh... TTL means Time To Live, it's a loop prevention mechanism. It's usually high on the first hop and for every router it's decremented by 1, unless the packet is traveling through a tunnel, that way it can pass multiple routers inside the tunnel, but it still counts as only one hop. So how you get to that conclusion is something I don't understand...
@clear igloo Oh, why? 😛
LoGiC iz DeViL 😄
Oh.. Yeah.. I might give the ISP's good ideas.. They might give you IPv6 connectivity, for 50% extra, or force you behind CGN with no way to avoid it. 😛
@clear igloo Spectrum gave me a /56 😐
@craggy parcel I get to that conclusion that Router have decremented it by 1, since for a region IP, default TTL is 64. My ping shows 63, so it means a Router is there in the place which have decremented it by 1.
@rocky badge I have a /32, which I can route as many subnets of to my home, as I please.. (Unfortunately it's tunneled, so not exactly native...)
BTW, I wil be right back in 30 minutes.
@thick minnow Yeah, your own router is between whatever you ping, and the computer you ping from...
Your computer -> Your Router -> ISP Router
For each step TTL is decreased.. On your computer it might start as 65, your router then set it to 64 when sending the packet towards the ISP, and the ISP replies with TTL set to 64 (Has no relation to the TTL of the received echo request) then your router set it to 63 when forwarding it to your computer.
However, I don't think TTL is set that high by default.. I never see much more than 30 on whatever I've looked at.
Hmm. Then again, when pinging 8.8.8.8 from my computer, it gets back with TTL 56, and a trace shows 7 hops..
@rocky badge Better than AT&T 🙂
rip