#networking
1 messages · Page 99 of 1
then the lite gets the poe injector
they are trying to expand more in to the business segment where its industry standard to use poe switches or order per ap psus
oh i completely missed the lite, i thought the cgf didn't have any poe and that was just for a single u7 pro, interesting
Guys, I'm lost.
How do connect my TrueNAS to Wireguard I have running on VPS somewhere else?
Everything I can find is about setting up the TrueNAS to be the wireguard server.
Essentially what I want to do is to be able to connect from outside like I can with Tailscale, but faster. Since that option uses some free relays or something and can barely stream my linux.iso via Jellyfin
Assuming you can open a port you can do that - you'd want a VM running the wireguard server (unsure if this can be within truenas) or a physical machine running it. Alternatively - you could run your own headscale on a rented VPS and point your tailscale clients to it. Though do be aware of data limits on the VPS.
The issue is, I can't open any ports. I mean, I technically can, but my ISP is absolutely useless, even if I pay for static public IP. So any kind of hosting at my house is out of the question.
I already have set up Wireguard on a VPS in some datacenter somewhere, it works perfectly. As a VPN exit node. My main objective is to connect my TrueNAS to it
So I should use that instead of Wireguard?
(Apologies, but networking is black magic to me and I freshly ran out of sacrificial goats, hence my lack of success)
I am not sure if you can use the headscale as an exit node. It replaces the free public servers you were talking about and runs on your own hardware (or virtual server) instead. Then your NAS and clients would join your privately run tailscale.
That's reasonable. I suppose I can still have the Wireguard running parallel, having a VPN is nice
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction!
yeah it is possbile that you can install headscale along next to the wireguard - or if you can use the headscale as an exit node, you may not even need wireguard, just put it on the tailscale network and set it to use the exit node.
It may be worth spinning up a temporary VPS to test with depending on how critical your VPN is.
ugh...tryuing to do a topo diagram with openai and its using this live canvas thing. its good to do this live but doing it this way isnt like 'moving objects around in space' like lucid or visio..its all code
It should be the same, wireguard isn't a server client type thing. You just have peers that talk to each other
I'm struggling, ngl. Damn networking.
Thanks for the ping, reminded me to get a break 😄
The "sacrifice a goat" requirement reminded me of this 9 year old gem.
https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/4l7kjd/found_a_text_file_at_work_titled_why_should_i/
the time and dedication is admirable
anybody play with eve-ng and get something robust into their own siem stack?
i haven't done this since GNS3 and realizing how much I've missed out over the years
anyone has experience with a RTL8127AT nic? i need a preferably SFP+ nic supporting at least 10G while using pcie 4.0 x1. found this one and it seems solid, but does anyone have any experience using it? is it stable? it's a realtek chip but i don't really see anything negative about it
i mean i've used realtek before, not sure of that one. but i would always try to get an hp or intel one first if you can. for my pc i have a gtek 10gbit one and it's fine lol but in my server its an intel. what hardware you looking t put this in?
i believe @silent flax has it
from what i last heard linux drivers only supported rj45 version
.
its not just linux though. my sfp dacs have always worked just fine at least in debian
10gbit and 1gbit
just this specific nic chip is really new
for regular ass connectx cards they dont care as they are well supported
as i answered in the other chat - Windows drivers work fine, Linux side for SFP version was merged in Kernel 7.0
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=fef0f545511f72223481aab1fd24d5f8f1c9d774 for Linux (as i mentioned, it was merged in Kernel 7.0), Windows worked straight out of the box. The only weird thing is that due how SFP works, it always reports a 10Gbe Link, even if it is connected to just 2.5Gbe link
(the original pull request https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260211173015.327542-1-pabeni@redhat.com/ )
(RTL8127AT is RJ45 btw, RTL8127ATF is the SFP version)
hmmm, so you're saying a 10gb sfp on a less than 10gbit sfp link still reads as 10gb...
i'm only in a 10gbit port so i'll have to check later
but i am just saying 'work wise' it was plug in play for me on proxmox
i also did direct pass through to opnsense, so opn sees it as an IXL
yes, because link is handled by the SFP module itself and the chip probably doesn't report the real link speed. ConnectX was obviously plug&play too, this Realtek not so much, but that is only because the most 8127 functionality dropped only in 6.16 and SFP 8127 support came in 7.0
i get it, that makes sense
there is a huge difference tho when it comes to lanes (x1 4.0 is important for some) or power consumption (8127 uses only 1.5W or so)
whats sfunny is this was kinda related to a small issue that sent me down a rabbit hole and eventually a whole infra upgrade 😄
i had a copper 1gbit sfp and felt how HOT they got
im like i dont like that, boom, 2 weeks later i'm 10gbit across the house, new nics, new switch etc lol. told wife was essential
any sfp to rj45 is very power hungry
yep, i guess i just hadn't really handled one in awhile outside a datacenter environment. and it wasn't copper
i mean it was physically harm you hot
soon it will be 3 month anniversary of my TAC case being open
are you a problem child case?
you know in hindsight i kinda thought it woudl be good to do a cisco or juniper tac route. yes it'd be like 10 miles deep 10 inches wide but good salary and you can still 'check in check out' with handovers.
cisco c9200l being bugged af
i decided against vendor evanglism
do you have a 'it took us too long to figure out here's a new one' issue? or is it ios itself
we escalated it like 3-5 times to our KAM
here you go our initial TAC message:
we're experiencing constant flapping of uplink port on our C9200L switch stacks installed at our location in xxxxxxx Device mentioned in this case is one 12 stacks of switches that are having exactly the same issue. What we recognized is common to all those switches is that they're connecting to same aggregation switch (Cisco C9500) using same type of SFP modules - GLC-LH-SMD (SPF SN used in this case are ACWxxxxxxxx and ACWxxxxxxxx).
We can see that uplink ports are reporting high number of CRCs which relates to error reports from our users saying that devices connected to those switches are from time to time losing connectivity with their respective server. As we're talking about switches in our 24/7 production area, unstable network connectivity poses a risk for high quality production process.
So far, we've tried following:
- cleaning L1 (fiber ports) on both sides
- using different fiber ports (all ports are with positive OTDR result)
- using different uplink ports on switch
- replacing SFPs (always the same type)
Interestingly, we also have in use same type of switches with exactly the same uplink port configuration, but connecting with 1G MM SFP (GLC-SX-MMD) or 10G SM SFP (SFP-10G-SR-S). There we have no issues at all.
Likewise if same SFP's are used on C9200 they have no flap
so far TAC has replaced two out of 24 affected SFP's with ones with diffrent 3 letter starting SN and that fixed this for that stack
ah interesting
so you pending any more sfp? or is case open because you're still doing qa/qc after replacement?
today we had a call with them and their response was "we are still getting aproval for bulk replacement of sfp's"
oof
and them not being able to reproduce the problem becouse they werent using same switch hardware LOL
its a chronic issue they should be prioritizing especially if this is your prod eivonrment
today we said do ya want us to send you a whole switch so you can test it
I’ll likely be getting 1 first for my main windows machine, and possibly a 2nd for my proxmox server. I already have a X540 in there fully working so me swapping would only be to reduce heat and efficiency
Yall how are VPS bandwidth caps billed/counted? Just outbound traffic or both inbound and outbound?
Pretty sure it's both unless otherwise specified.
depends on your provider
Eugh thatll suck. Ive got a pretty affordable local VPS and it'd be neat if I could proxy everything through them, but their data caps are tiny.
i know that azure does not bill for inbound
https://www.serverhunter.com/
use this to compare vps providers easily
Neither does hetzner or vultr
well according to the filters, the ones I was looking at are metered both ways
Well, I found ITLDC, which offers 1 xeon core and 1GB RAM for 4 EUR (double the money and double the specs) with unlimited bandwidth on a shared 1gbps port
with a fair use policy. if you peg the port you get the boot
make sure it has ip that you need
ipv4 or ipv6
some just come with NAT IPV4 address which is prety much useless for anything productive
my ISP doesnt even support ipv6 soo..
fair
Ehhhh, I might be tiptoeing the "fair use" on ITLDC.
define tiny data caps ?
4tb that's metered on ingress and egress.
If that is small for you you deserve to pay per gig
you're one to talk
i was going to say Vultr has a relatively nice 1TB for $5/mo or 2TB for $10/mo for outbound traffic (they do not count incoming traffic), but obviously that would be too low for you
Biblical greed.
Maybe a vps isn't even the right thing to be lookin at but what else do you look at. Go higher and they start throwing cores ram and storage at you.
Maybe I just skip the VPS and host from home
afaik im not.
and neither does my IP change
So I switched ISPs and now my VPN isn't working, could my ISP be blocking my VPN or do I need to reconfigure the server for the new ISP, I am using tailscale
Likely the latter
Anyone else here atm?
Can anyone smart answer me this?
Why didn't we simply make IPv5 that would be x.x.x.x.x? That could have slightly above a trillion addresses and would be much simpler to work with (for a human) than IPv6. Even though that one has essentially (for us) Infinite addresses.
Expectation is that general users dont touch ip address, instead use mDNS
If you are typing in v6 address in your browser you are doing it wrong
the real issue with IPv6 is not the address format - it is that they thrown out many useful things (hi local private DNS server) plus the ISPs completely butchered the implementation (oh, your router gets a /56, but on the LAN side we only give out /64 and never anything bigger, and /64 can't be suvdivided, so no own router behind the ISP router)
Is that the reason why my ubiquiti reported /56 on my wan connection but only 1 LAN network has ipv6 from prefix delegation

"Nah, I just need a simple NAS. Think it's time, nothing complicated, nice and easy. I'll add an app or two on my TrueNAS and call it a day."
-5 days later-
You're about a week late for this topic 🤣
IPv6 having a large address space is an objectively good thing. The intent is that the public portion is much smaller and easy to summarise into a more compact form.
Also - IP addresses are not for humans, they are for machines. Humans can and should use DNS/mDNS.
A lot of the decisions in IPv6 were intended to be a "return to form" of sorts - everthing is publicly addressible, security's handled by firewalls, large enough IP address space that exhaustion won't happen again because migration is practically impossible (we're on year what of the migration to IPv6 again?)
The other trick is any device with a MAC address can be predictably addressed in a /64 with zero collisions
That has a small prerequisite.
I need to setup reverse proxy locally and I'm nowhere near learned enough to do that 😄
I'm happy I managed to set up a DNS record for my domain so it points as a VPS for my headscale
There's lots of learning to be done, which I'm down for.
It's just, IPv4 isn't that bad and I got used to using it, so I had this random question in the middle of the night
Yeah I get that, but there's a lot of bad habits and inefficiency that have cropped up around NAT and it's an increasingly large pain in the neck to even get an IPv4 address
Thinking about network admin in terms of IPv4 teaches you to think in public+private IPs and it's never really been that simple
Yeah, the "never been that simple" part hits home. Should've just used a normal albeit longer string of numbers, bring back the good old yellow pages and call it a day 😄
~~Does anyone know the answer to why is this borked?
My router has it's DNS pointed at my pihole, and it works~~
Turns out magicDNS screwed me over, all works now. I hope.
machine with the pihole is on the same tailscale network as the PC I'm trying to ping it from
this would probably annoy you...there was a time and possibly still even, Verizon had entire /16s just for internal printers.
basically no desire to audit/overhaul it to private addresing
No that's probably just you didn't set up multiple networks to have prefix delegation, they're talking about the ISP router not using an entire /56 and only giving you a /64 for a single network (and most consumers wouldn't have VLANs anyways)
Lads, anyone knows what's up with my Nginx proxy manager and why doesn't it work?
I have set up the DNS record to point at the proxy server, which has the manager running and supposedly redirecting to the correct port that should've brought me to the webui. But I instead land on my TrueNAS webui.
Is the issue that I'm running it as a TrueNAS app and there's some fuckery going on behind the scenes? If need be, I can redeploy it on a different server.
Also, how to properly diagnose and debug such a situation? (It would be great if you could point me in a direction of some great resources that are made with newbies in mind, cuz networking is black magic)
The 100.x.x.x subnet is one I use for my tailscale network and so far it works wonders for my needs, I would love to keep it
if i have to guess - TrueNAS web ui is on ports 80/443 on the IP of your nginxproxymanager, thus the manager can't bind to the ports 80/443
Yeah, I fixed it by simply putting it on a different machine. I don't intend to mess with my TrueNAS
If you get port conflicts usually OS will warn you and not start the second process trying to bind to the same port on the same interface, generally speaking watching access and/or error logs while making requests and using dig or tracert to help figure out what path the packets are taking can help sometimes if not able to see anything from logs
if running stuff in containers they can bind to whatever port within the container too though and depends on if the container port is bound to a port on the host machine if any traffic makes it to the box
generally speaking best to test locally first to eliminate things on the way to the server in question but can run into some issues with traffic locally not going through the same ingress paths with things like traefik for proxying if it's on the same machine
DNS is so important, yet it's the single easiest thing to break or cause other stuff to be broken. Wtf 😄
a protocol only needed because of human brains lol
heyyy people!
i am launching a YSWS in hack club - if this interests you then please RSVP!
https://draco-neon.vercel.app
thanks! :))
How would you say my future plans for eventual overhaul are looking?
You will have 3 separate ap?
Get one good one and connect it directly to managed switch and use multiple ssid
why no spine/leaf network
Because I have no idea what that is 😄
I still need 2 at least, one per half the house. I live in EU and we have stone walls, terrible for WiFi
So presumably 2 good ones in a mesh, each connected to that managed switch?
dvr plz no plz
and is this for you home ? cause i know people who have and use isp provided 1 lan port and 2.4ghz for a 2 storie budling
gonna need a massive UPS to power 3 servers for 2 hours
Yeah, It's my house. I'm having serious issues with wifi, it's almost unusable on the porch or in the downstairs bathroom and I'm not using the shitty ISP box either. I'm using TP-link AX3000 4-Stream Wi-Fi 6 Router
Why not? I wanted to build one from some x86 board that could be PoE powered, have all my video data over there. Maybe a once per week replication push over to main NAS
You know those chungus truck batteries? I happen to be in possession of a couple. I should be fine, assuming I won't set my shit on fire when making the UPS (I'm a DIY enjoyer)
OO I'm sorry, thought, you ment a DVR like the coaxial cable ones
This is my dream. Please tell me the results when done and the price, even though I can't afford it😭
I hate coaxial with a passion, ngl. That shit ruined one too many episodes of SG1 back in my childhood
Me enither, I'm hunting for deals, almost nothing is new 😄
O if its like thatt and Deal hunting i respect you🫡
I will be mostly laying out the cable, setting up secon internet connection, router and basic stuff. Have my current NAS working. Ain't no way I can afford any proper upgrades/storage in this price hell we are in currently.
My hopes are it'll go down in about a year
Not sure how much more life there is in my current drives. The've been with me for a while, around 20k hours on each
Yo, bro same., I need it so desperately for my business and home. We are so cool, currently using Terablox 10 kilobytes up speeds😭
Btw its cheaper to get a hybrid solar inverter and 48v lifepo4 rack battery than an off the shelf ups
Switching time is the same
that ain't a bad idea
If your utility provides time of use schedule you can set it up to take advantage of it
Be on battery when electricity is expensive, charge it up when it is cheap
Bonus: hook up couple of solar panels to it and offset some kwh
i think my ISP didn't even setup /56 properly, first is my home's, second is my gf's
i kinda gave up on trying to make "/56" works
her /56 properly prefix delegate to two vlans
mine only works on my default subnet so far
Hey guys trying to use headscale but I just can't login, for example I try login on windows running the following command
tailscale login --login-server <YOUR_HEADSCALE_URL>
And as you can see in the screenshot I get a windows notification to click the tailscale icon in the task bar, however when going there and pressing Login, absolutely nothing happnes I dont get a browser window or anything
And this doesnt seem to be just a windows issue because even if I try authenticating on Linux purely through the command line passing the preauthkey in the command nothing happens
Twice for some reason headscale has logged this http2: server: error reading preface from client [::1]:36902: read tcp [::1]:8080->[::1]:36902: read: connection reset by peer But I dont know if its really related
I have more success using the "up" command.
So it's essentially "tailscale up --login-server=https://domain.xyz"
On Windows I use that as well no problem, my Android is a bit of a spoiled child and I had to use the auth key option.
On your host, make sure you are exposing the headscale to the ports it needs. If you are running it in a docker and have mapped different ports, make sure your reverse proxy points at the correct ports (or set it up if you don't have one)
Also double and triple check your DNS settings.
And if you were on some Tailscale network beforehand, I think you might need to use the --force-reauth (check in documentation, I'm not sure if it's exactly precise) flag
Can i just rant a little? Opnsense is awesome, not feasible always unfortunately. Try to run it where i need to open ports mostly.
Mikrotik really hits home on very small network and for cheap yet some more advanced stuff than consumer routers.
Been using unifi more and more. Plus the amount of sites to manage has grown a ton. I know opnsense do have management but both mikrotik and opnsense really need to consider making cross sites management much easier!
For an empty box? Aboslutely. For a box containing the working product and its accessories? Not at all.
It's missing the Ethernet cable
Also could be bricked. I haven't tried to boot it
Damn. Product is completely useless without the included ethernet cable. You can't use third party cables. It will simply burst into flames without the one it came with. /s
While playing specifically League I get random ping spikes shooting my ping to 900 for like 3 seconds. is there an app that can monitor internet usage to see why these spike happen?
If this only happens when playing LoL (and no other games), don't bother monitoring your system for issues. The common denominator is the one game you're experiencing issues with, therefore that's the culprit.
Could be their servers (possibly only during certain matches, or certain times of the day), could be routing between your ISP and their servers, or it could be poorly written game code.
it started after i upgraded to windows 11. then i down graded to windows 10 cleasn install and the problem persist
⚠️ The ethernet cable has been blocked because it contains a non-HP® chip. This printer is intended to work only with genuine HP® ethernet cables.
I been play league of a long time and only now do I get this problem. is there an app i can install to assist in monitoring? ever since I upgraded to window 11 my pc took a shit and going back didnt help anything.
I would begin by following Riot's official troubleshooting article. https://support-leagueoflegends.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201752664-Basic-Connections-Troubleshooting-Guide
Aside from manually looking at network usage in Resource Monitor (included with Windows), I'm unaware of magic software that gives you a "single pane of glass" into what might be causing ping spikes for a single game.
is there an app that can monitor internet
wireshark PCAP
but you probably dont know what you are looking for so it wont be of use
its not a secret riot doesn't have greatest of peering
so your provider and relevant path to get there can play a big role as mentioned earlier. riots website vs gameplay traffic are not the same path, and likely somehow going through aws but still lots of factors. if its league specifically you may just want to do a whole uninstall/reinstall
this only started happening when i went to windows 11 and then persisted when i did a clean install of 11 and back to 10. ontop of weird lag spike my frames go below 100 when I have an I9-9900k and 2080. I used to keep a steady above 200 but windows 11 made my PC so much worse and now the problems persist. I am hoping to atleasty find a solution to the lag spike because small frame drops arent the worst.
it's possible that you had some changes to some tcpip settings that were set in windows 10 and windows 11 either reverted or CHANGED. a lot of stock windows settings still don't map to ideal performance with today's faster speeds than we used to have. howerver i wouldn't expect it to just impact league
do you have any other network device be it eth nic or wifi adapter to see if it's the same problem?
could lead to stack vs, routing, vs something somehow related to the install/os itself. do you have firewall enabled? possible you n eed to fully allow league/riot/launcher, etc
going off limited info/context of course...
this is more info than most people gave me. i'll look into all of these.
nah the networking team that can't open a freaking network flux it's so infuriating
2 months and it's not working
And now they want me to make a new machine, install a nginx/apache on it to test with curl
Because they are so incompetent they think that doing a netcat isn't enough
Was reading this aloud and my carpet started floating. Damn networking
Lol
why do I have the itch to set up self hosted search engine
I hate this rabbit hole of a hobby 😄
Huzzah, my NAS is done
(forgive the spaghetti, I did clean it up but didn't take a picture)
Finally putting this weird x86 SBC to good use. I've had the thing for like two years.
Hell yeah
Soon you'll have 3 more servers, a VPS and a rather bitchy wallet 😄
So far it's just a NAS, but I'd love to ditch my alexa and run my own smart home stuff locally
It always stars with "Just a nas" 🤣
I'll eventually set up pihole or adguard but I need to ditch the xfinity provided router first, they lock you out of the needed DNS settings
You could set it up now and just point your PC at it directly
Or put a cheapo router in-between your ISP and the rest of your network
There's five people in the house, so like 20+ devices. Easier to just have it be network wide.
just a nas
#1404210632252854314 message
if i were you i'd set adguard up first pointed at your main devices before setting it up network wide, just to make sure it works and you're not messing anything up 😅
<@&750150305383186585>
hey guys extremely new to networking, i was wondering can anyone explain why one of the most common begin numbers of a ip address are 192.168.?
because that's one of the IP ranges allocated for local use
it got allocated years ago, and there’s no reason to change it
There are three ranges of private IP addresses, there are actually other reserved ranges but for private use these are the three main ones:
10.0.0.0/8 (10.0.0.0 through 10.255.255.255)
172.16.0.0/12 (172.16.0.0 through 172.31.255.255)
192.168.0.0/16 (192.168.0.0 through 192.168.255.255)
They were allocated as part of RFC1918 and are not routable over the public internet and why you use Network Address Translation (NAT) or Port Address Translation (PAT) to map multiple IP addresses to a single public IP address.
You can subnet these networks into smaller chunks, home networks typically use a /24 (255.255.255.0) and it allows for 254 hosts
will buying a wifi 6 thingy for inside my laptop make signal stronger for a 100mbps wifi
wifi supports wifi 6 but only does 100mpbs btw
eh at 100mbps from your ISP you arent gonna see a difference if youre upgrading from wifi 5
Is 100mbps the ISP limit for your entire connection to the internet or is it limited to that in the router itself?
its probably limited to that router, because its a shared home and the wifi is shared to like 3 homes
so with each router being 100mbps max itll keep going smooth when someone downloads something
Okay, can you go to whatever device is wired to the internet via cable and run a speed test? If it's more than 100mbps, you'll benefit from either changing router settings or assuming you can't do that adding an access point that's plugged in to the router via a cable.
If the speed is at 100mbps on the cable (and it's limited to that by your internet plan and/or you can't edit router settings) you won't benefit from any upgrade outside of internet connection itself
sadly cant but on quest 3 which does wifi 6, gets that
the router has wifi 6 so thats the strongest signal i can get hold of
Can you at least bring your laptop as close to the router as possible and do a test then? WiFi 5 real world performance is around 200~500-ish mbps, 800-ish under ideal conditions
ya ill do that rn
imagine the router i use is dodgy loll
i think the router out my room is very dodgy idk
It's most likely your internet speed
lemme grab my quest 3
Looks to me like you have a 50mbps internet plan. You're remarkably similar numbers to my shitty internet lol
Damn.
Buy a USB dongle you can return later to test, no need to fuck around with your laptop. If it works, then it might be worth it
yeeee
id have to get a type c to usb for that then
so my best bet is a wifi 6 usb dongle thing to grab as much as possible
I have a router that can do almost gigabit speeds if you're standing next to it, and it will speedtest almost exactly like yours (40-60mbps) on my desktop on the other side of the house despite a wifi 6 card
I can't run ethernet because I rent but I've been meaning to get a second router and set it up as a repeater
Powerline isn't much faster or more stable than wifi either
I'm wanting to upgrade from my TP Link old crappy router to Ubiquiti. I'm looking at the UniFi Express 7, or getting a Cloud Gateway Max with two of the U7 mesh units.
I'm in an 1,800 sqft split level home that does not have ethernet hardwired everywhere for access points. Which of these would suit my needs better? I've had terrible experiences with mesh wifi in the past, but it was from companies that were less reliable than Ubiquiti.
cloud gateway max doesn’t support wifi7, it’s only wifi6
i would absolutely recommend you get one that works with wifi7 so you can take full advantage of the U7 mesh units
yea how many clients support that yet
laptops/mobile? i understand growing into it but curious how many actually would utilize at current day
Be me, ignore literally everyone's advice to set static IPs on my shit
Some higher entity decides it's time to shuffle all IPs
Spend your night fixing stuff
Realize in the morning that you forgot to set the damn static IPs on stuff
DHCP reservations
That's where it's at
wifi 6e is super common, but the cloud gateway max also doesn’t support that
6ghz is where it’s at! very little congestion
I have 2 different wifis, can I plug the router of the slower wifi into the router of the faster to get extra speed out of the slower router?
is it slower becasue of the underlying provider, or the hardware itself? you can't cheat. but most routers are marketed in a little bit of a deceiving way, and typically related to throughput on the wifi side, not the ethernet,
what do you mean “2 different wifi’s”?
do you mean two different internet connections?
They're fron different providers and are completely seperate
you need a router with load balancing feature like tp link er605
you can also configure it as failover
If you mean you have 2 different internet service providers supplying your residence with 2 different internet connections of varying speeds, no, you can't do what you describe the way you're describing it.
They should both be gigabiy speeds
So... are you trying to combine them to achieve 2 gigabit speeds?
No, one router has faster speeds from where it's located so I wanna hook it up to the other router to get the higher ethernet speeds as both routers should also be gigabit
This doesn't make sense... like, I'm confused about what your goal is here. Are you trying to improve the range / speed of WiFi connectivity in an area of your home where it is currently weak?
Please draw and upload a floorplan showing the location of both internet connections (aka modems / routers) in relation to where you have your devices. This might help us better understand.
Hey guys, i bought new home and im moving there next week. I always had my pc connected through ethernet from my Xiaomi ax9000 router. But in new home in the room my pc will be located there is no ethernet port and i cant change it. So im looking for reliable pcie wi fi card that will run my full bandwith. I have 1000mb/s internet and my router has - 2,4 ghz,5ghz and gaming 5.4ghz or 5.2 if im not mistaken.
You bought a house but you can't change it??
Yep too much work, in poland we use concrete etc sooooo
so they would need to make new path in concrete to that room and thats just too much
Perhaps some WiFi card with an AX210, or if you have an Intel CPU then a BE200
i have 9800x3d
you can run cables very stelthy behind skirting boards, some are even made for this use
In my house my wife wanted wood ones soooo no chance haha. I heard I should look for ax210 intel one. Is that true ? Like cude we4000 or cude 3000
They are wood... All skirting boards are wood
the material doesn't dictate if you can route a channel into the back of them or not
I think they mean solid wood and not engineered wood

Yep solid wood
So that’s why my only option is some wi fi adapter I heard that wi fi is actually pretty good. When I’m downloading I want full 1gbs but mostly I need low latency that’s why I heard intel ax210 is way to go ?
Don't expect "full 1gbps" on WiFi except in ideal conditions. Latency can be hit or miss, though it has gotten a lot better. WiFi mostly depends on the laws of physics. https://www.wiisfi.com/
If you have walls you can't even run ethernet through, wifi isn't going to work very well lol
You'll get neither low latency or any decent speed
TROUBLESHOOTING: Generic Troubleshooting of the WiFi Signal Connection
It's never too much work to install ethernet, it's always worth it
It’s not that I have something like thick walls or some. It’s not plywood like in us it’s full concrete so in order to make new cable route you need to to make paths inside concrete
It's an investment into your home
If your walls are concrete, good luck with WiFi. Especially if there's metal rebar in the walls.
I mean even on my phone inside that room I have 850mbs download and 13ms ping. I’m using iPhone Air
I find it extremely unlikely that your interior walls are all concrete
That's just Europe struggles
My damn house is made out of stone. It's even worse. Thick stone blocks on the first floor
Bruh
Yeah and I’m on my iPhone. That’s why buying good PCIe adapter will do. Since making new paths to make Ethernet port will cost me hella money when I can buy 30-40 bucks WiFi
Here's me hovering next to my router 😭
That router is ax9000 with 3 path wi fi so 5ghz 1 is gaming 4800mbs then 5ghz 2 3000 and 2.4ghz 1200mbs
You could just change your external connection. Move it somewhere else, preferably on the wall where your room is
Ought to be cheap
I wanted to make connections to more rooms but since my wife at the end wanted me to have my pc room in something like a basement I mean I was happy hahah. Like a child dream. Whole basement for me. Tho it’s like a 5x5m still not that bad. Since new basements are smaller then old ones( like my parents home 10x10m with multiple rooms)
I have my pc here tv sofa etc etc
Already did pointed that haha and my parents are changing their 5y old lg fridge sooooooo haha
Omg
But in every other room in the house there is Ethernet port with cat7 to them so.
I need this. I currently I have a black smf running down to my living room
How about an external run?
You could magic the outdoors cat 5e cable to hug and wrap around your house, then insert it into the basement
i feel like if you're gonna go outdoors you might as well do fiber for better protection
Yes, approved
Wanted that but that would need time and I need my internet now so good wi fi adapters are like 30-40bucks. And when I will have time I try doing something else
Or, you could just use your iphone as a USB tether, have an acceptable internet now and spend your time messing with the outdoors cable
Ethernet is always better than wireless
Wouldn’t you want g659 b3?
idk, this is what the dude in the reddit post linked
I'm currently using bog standard sm fiber right now 🤣
Would you need SFP for fiber or are there direct RJ45 modules?
Actually 7.5mm is probably fine
you can get media convertors like this https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003CFATL0
The MC220L is a media converter designed to convert 1000BASE-SX/LX/LH fiber to 1000Base-T copper media or vice versa. Designed under IEEE802.3ab 1000Base-T and IEEE802.3z 1000Base-SX/LX/LH standards, the MC220L is designed for use with multi-mode/single-mode fiber cable utilizing the SC/LC-Type c...
That's a big oof in price
Might be actually cheaper to get an SFP switch
Mate, can you like take 100mbps and send them to me via post?
I'm sure it'll work 😭
just move to datacenter walls
can anyone tell me this isn't true? because it seems true:
(because of 2.4ghz band saturation causing connection problems, we're introducing 5ghz!)
everyone switches to 5ghz and now has the same problems with signal strength falling off hard due to interference from every router/ap/phone in the neighborhood
(because of 5ghz band saturation causing connection problems, we're introducing 6ghz!)
everyone switches to 6ghz-
I wouldn't say the same for 5ghz, because it's still got significantly larger bandwidth, and the interference is still lower than 2.4 ghz
This is true for all radio frequencies - more RF causes more noise that not all devices can deal with. That said, I'm with @twin pier here - the newer WiFi 6E algorithms and (sometimes much) shorter range of 5GHz and 6GHz networks mean there should be less interference overall. You just need to be closer to the Access Points...
the poor penetration of higher frequencies becomes quite a benefit in this context
So I set my proxmox bridge and my VM to 9000 MTU. The Windows physical machine needed 9014 in the adapter properties and something else set thru netsh. After upgrading Proxmox 8 to 9, I couldn't get any combination of jumbo packet settings to work and I just reset it back to 1500 in the driver and netsh shows 1486 now and it works (even though proxmox is still set for 9000). It's rather annoying. interfaces are dual port 25gig connectx4 lx cards.
you overpaid
my gf has really bad wifi in her room, she wants to be able to play cloud gaming however her wifi booster is not that great and she gets like 90 ping which suggests obviously shes only at 2.4ghz wifi which does not work at all, what do you guys recommend that she should do to be able to play a playable session of her game on cloud gaming (geforce now) her wifi is EE at 100Mbps
run a cable to her room
cat6 preferrable but anything is fine
she cant do that, shes stubborn af, she still lives at her parents i even insisted a router she said no, she wants to get a usb wifi adapter to help...
would a wifi 6 usb apapter strengthen the signal when modem is wifi 6 too
🙏😭
Can't wait to get home and find out why my brand new home server, which is on a battery backup and also configured to auto-boot upon power application, has gone offline 
Eversource says there's no power outage currently but I saw someone post that a transformer in town had blown yesterday
Current theory is that power was out long enough to drain the UPS and the UPS itself didn't turn back on when the power came back
Nvm it's just comcast being a garbage ISP, like usual

My ping is like 5 ms lower with neighbor town™ wifi, even with VPN, compared to my own fiber wifi without VPN lol
is it my router, my 10+ smart lamps or VOIP home telephone connected to routers fault?
I guess the town fiber is wired different as well, since they dont have connection outage at the same time, but still
maybe I should try with ethernet cable
inb4 all my internet traffic gets routed through Swedish FBI servers
5ms latency is nothing
I don't know a ton about how ISP infrastructure works but my guess is maybe your neighbor's router is using different DNS servers that just happen to have fewer hops to whatever you're using to check your ping
Run a traceroute command to the same destination from both networks, it'll report back the nodes used and the latency for each individual hop
DNS won't affect the latency at all, it doesn't affect routing
Only if you had a CDN using DNS load balancing but I think anycast is much more common these days
I used the wrong terminology then
I meant just whatever server your router is sending packets to that's routing your traffic to the final destination
you COULD have subpar routing to said dns server, which would be a force multiplier potentially
i'm dns over tls to cloud flare, i've had a FEW issues with them and would quicklky move to google or quad9 but mostly cloudflare
Apparently that is what the older wattbox would do. Since mine is just my personal home stuff, I personally prefer that if the battery dies it won't send power out until I tell it to turn back on. I mean I only have maybe 5 mins of backup and it takes hours to recharge that, so it's better to wait until the storm has passed to power back up.
Only for the initial DNS resolution, so it wouldn't affect ping measurements
not entirely sure what environments you're testing this in but it's probably a mixture of different routing, routers, and wifi environments
this could very well be due to cgnat
your traffic is sent to the ISP and then onwards meanwhile townwifi™ probably has their own ip block with bgp finding best route
I can't get my router to port forward. I've been trying for hours now and need help.
Are you behind cg nat?
i'm finally getting fiber in a few weeks and will put starlink on a pause for awhile. the latency is NOT bad all things considered but i've forgotten how good it is with gig fiber lol
also means no more cgnat either
Will you get ipv6 with new isp?
probably but i have it all disabled on opnsense 😄
im probably going to just pay for the static
Fair
PING 193.140.98.181 (193.140.98.181) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 193.140.98.181: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=2.01 ms
64 bytes from 193.140.98.181: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=2.40 ms
64 bytes from 193.140.98.181: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=1.99 ms
my new isp has stellar connection to the academic network here (this is even to another city in their network)
when on campus, remote gaming is quite enjoyable
That's epic lol.
Barely can even get 10-20ms to networks within the same city here
Lol same, the ISP sends all traffic 8 hours away so it has to hop there and back
Assuming something similar happens, I mean I get it residential networks aren't meant to be optimised for this but yeah it's silly
Like yeah a friend on the same ISP just a kilometer away is somehow 25 ms away
nearly all isp's here are the same also
excerpt this :))
all other isp's send it across the country
for us the case is clear, the equipment that does internet censoring is in istanbul ...
but I would not get if an american isp was to send traffic to another city for it to come back around to the city it originated from
Yeah our city seemed to of lost its aggregation router and they moved it to the next major city over
My old ISP used to send all traffic across the country so I had a wicked 99ms ping lol
like depending on how big the isp is, they are most defiantly paying per mb on the traffic that they send also... very funny for them to just waste money
(if they have (or rent) a full dedicated fiber line to themselves all across the country, then ofc they don't pay for it. but most often that would not be the case )
Yeah, I guess they just have equipment for the PON stuff and the real switching routing just takes place somewhere far
oh yea that also, the box that the fiber lands can never do any routing sadly
They typically pay for bandwitdth not total use on a leased line
Its probalbly because its cheaper and more efficient to handle routing at one large major hub
to be honest probably, that how it is typically
how it its here is
up to a point you pay (for a few gigabits) for bandwidth. and then later on they also charge for the data
... seems stupid because ...
I work with a few leased fibre providers, you usualy pay for a certain amount of bandwidth, but can also pay a "burst" rate for when the total badwidth exceeds what you paid for.
True ^ it really depends on the contract, there's many choices.
Most bigger providers do it that way
Local ISPs have their fun pricing models
What local ISPs charge to resi customers is completely different
Yeah forgot to actually say* it's more so even regional influence by a lot
Some countries still offering capped plans over fiber even
it's not magic. it's about peering honestly. your physical neighbor could be on an isp that's more optimally routed in your local area.
I said same ISP 😛
Same AS system even behind them
So peering isn't a question, it's basically local traffic for the ISP, doesn't need to hit any border(gp)
there's gotta be some other underlying component
are they on same prefix as you? maybe their particular block (yes even within same as), could be getting better treatment, even if it's not supposed to
if it's a km away, maybe they connect through a diff head end/co and as a result go a diff lastmile, etc
i actually did see this in early fios days, some central offices were linked to last mile latency due to problems getting onto core/backbone, etc. although that's corner case
then it is not direct connection
rather it is ruted to ISP HQ or some random IX
Its almost always that the ISP has their aggreation routers in another major urban centre to simplify network design. It really doesnt matter if the packet has to travel a city over and back if you have the bandwidth anyways.
the burst is quite nice, none (like there is 3 anyways in the whole country) here offer that
business that use leased fiber also suffer :/
yep yep
Burst is something you only see on leased lines used for transport typically
Throwing this into the networking channel,
What is star links pricing model for the uk?
I’m about to pull the trigger on their residential plan, but got no clue about their no contracts statement nor their free hardware
Anyone here has dealt with them before?
Like it doesn’t state anywhere what that rental cost will be
there is no contract term, if you cancel you have to return the dish and maybe pay postage
It's really just as long as you pay you get the service that's it
And you can buy the hardware and sell it when you stop using starlink, that's what we did
There is no cost to the customer, you just dont own the equipment
that would have befen a great option when i first got it instead of having to pony up 700 bucks
but least i own it
You paid 700$??
I paid 200€ wtf
i bought it in 2001, you had to wait on a list, and the hardware plus 1st service + tax (plus almost everybody needs to buy an eth bypass which is $50) so yea it was around 700 bucks
er 2021
now a days you can pick up a kit at walmart,
I bought mine in 2023, but yeah 700$ hurts a lot
I normally dont care too much about owning my modem as all it needs to do is connect to my router
i think i have v2 yeah. but yea kinda a scam, its like unless you are going to plant that thing on the ground, you're going to have to get some extra mount, i did the one that lets you do side mount and protrude a little past the overhang of the roof.
i got an 'offer' to buy the next one for $2500 (cough) which was faster but until i hear starlink is getting gigabit speeds across the board im not doing any upgrade
they offered you performance dish?
yea but i felt like asking me to buy a $2500 dish was liek extortion
i would also have to upgrade my service. so when that comes down and service increases (they just launched like 25 more last night) i may upgrade
so far i'm capping at about 500,550mbit, etc off steam
this is how we mounted the dish at my friends house lol, just dont look at mount too close
function over fashion!
its better mounted than the crappy official pole mount
angle is a bit off but it doesent give two shits about it
ugh apparently work profile has shut me off after procrastinating my android 16 major update
i never auto update anything 😛
yea we have the same thing with iphones, if you dont update you get enterprise wiped
well, a wipe seems pretty extreme. sso redirect just doesnt work because policy violation, when i'm upgraded itll work
but i know i'm not the first to not immediatley update so it could either be due to tigheter policy or i've had it available for awhile an finally needed to do it
wipe just removes company data and it gets restored when update is done
ah ok
yea in some ways that may have happened too. its literally like having 2 phones in one
androids have work profile and personal profile separate
iphones dont have this
yea, and i have a red magic pro 10
it was a HUGE HASSLE getting it onboarded
it has a custom os over the standard one and had to adjust some debug things that made the work profile provisioning fail
my it dept was about to throw in the towel and that answer doesnt sit with me lol
i mostly have either iphones/ipads or samsung tab active/zebra phone in my env
i'm mostly a samsung boy, this was a deviation but i'm going back to my zfold 4
Trying to run internet over coaxial cables, if someone would help me that would be great.
step 1, buy MOCA adapters
step 2, RTFM
I have adapters splitters and some tools in my cart, apparently you need a special tool kit for coax… just wanna make sure I’m buying the right stuff
Do you have MOCA adapters, because you can't passively convert ethernet to coax
You need a tool designed to splice and terminate Coax
If you're doing that
Yes I have Hitron moca adapters in my cart, they were cheaper than most. Someone said I should find cheaper though
Some of my coax don’t have the ends on them
Hence the need to splice and terminate it
Yes
Get something like this and you're chilling
Luckily they already stripped the ends for ya, so it's super easy to terminate
Yeah and if I’m more lucky the only place I’ll be sending internet might have ends already 🤞
hey guys, I'm planning to have a patch panel for the network rack i want to build for our house, which is better, a punch down or a ethernet coupler for my ethernet patch panel? aiming for longevity and reliability
hello guys , Im new here , Is here someone who does Software defined networking, Or protocol things... ?
largely personal preference
what even is "protocol things"
that's like saying "data things"
i always use keystone pannels
if you can go keystone go keystone for sure
and btw even with keystone you'd be picking between coupler or punchdown, it's just very useful to have the panel itself be modular
hey, i’m looking to build a home lab, using switches- using for learning and CCNA prep, any advice on where i can get a couple switches? FB marketplace seems a bit scarce near my area
Just use gns3 for ccna prep, old cisco switches consume lots of power
I've heard of the brocade icx 7250 from servethehome but it's also loud and uses power
im probably wrong here (and not from the USofA ) but for that router ban thing, while currently maybe limited but wouldnt it be possible to just use a modem and a switch ( in passtrough or bridge config) (and if the isp supports it, wich if one does the others also have to if it werent for monopolies) ) DHCPv6/SLAC (screenshot is from my router not a switch but its just to illustrate that if your isp doe dhcpv6 or allows for SLAAC you dont need a router so)
firewall, nat/ipv4 connectivity?
dont they still provide packettracer for free for students ? it was a great tool to learn back when i did it, so if its development has continued i suppse you can basicly duplicate any netork in existence on it and have it do live monitoring or simimulation whatever you want,... if not i think i still have the (windows) installer somewhere i think (ccna v5 i think it was)
firewalls arent on the router list afaik 🙂 , ipv6 no need for nat , and , ipv4 yea you dont have that , but ... well i think someone somewhere can cook up a way to do a bridge to connect to usinga professional router made in the USofA to connect to the ipv4 network
So if you're using a firewall you have routing capabilites
If you want to expose everything IPv6 only to the internet, go for it
Tons of services are still IPv4 only, looking at AWS/Amazon stuff -.-
how so?
if half the us switches to ipv6 only allot of stuff that is now ipv4 only will switch with it , sine no money if not so its a good catalist for ipv6 adoption
The entire US could be IPv6 enabled tomorrow, it's not money, it's laziness and lack of care
now they have a reason maybe ,... if the choice is paying a monthly fee to rent a router or , see if one can make it ipv6 only ,, same as with early linux adopters, some will try and succeed 🙂 and the rest might follow if its cheaper
Some legacy stuff is also unable to be IPv6, which is stupid but is what it is
yeah but if tiktok is ipv6 half of the customers wont even care what ipv they use i think 🙂
I mean you ask your average user to firewall their Windows machines properly, you might as well ask them to use Linux via SSH 🙂
basic firewalls at the edge protect stupid people, sadly
hardware firewall instead of hardware router 🙂
- what firewall do they use when on 5G ? with their phone ?
That's what 99.999% of consumer devices are, firewall/router/all in one devices
yeah but they cant be sold any more , meaning there is a market for modem only and firewall only devices to grow
It's more complicated than that too, a specialized android or iphone device is vastly different than a swiss cheese windows machine
It's already being dicked with and pushed out
A firewall is a router, you will NOT find any firewall that cannot route packets
besides the point think android is defenetly not inherently more secure than windows imho, most people are just dont do wild west cowboy stuff on it wich they do do on their pc ,... download exe and go , whereas on android installing a second appstore is more hassle than allot of them are willing to do
Also, android is SLAAC only 😛
You'll have providers doing DHCPv6 only or something, I guarantee it
no not at them moment but most pro ones can do bridged mode firewall wich does not do routing , the only thing that si required is that kind of router to drop support for the routing capab and you nave a device that can firewall but cant do routing
android can be updated to do more things i believe 🙂
Nope, Google has said they refuse to do it
It's been asked for since day 1, they just don't care
if they do it in AOSP ,... google is gonna remove it but other roms might not ...
its AI so with grain of salt but
so its possible , and dunno who said it but 1 is a magic number , if one does it , the rest cant afford to not do it over time
Plus you have netgear, Amazon, and Starlink exempt or not applicable to this whole ban thing to begin with already. The list will grow
also meaning that if 1 isp allows for slaac (or 1 operator ) others might have to follow suite i think atleast if they are all in the same SS7 network or so i think(now im out of my depth here SS7 is magic dust to me)
I mean I want IPv6 wider adoption and better practices all around, but the state of the world gives me little hope of things happening to compel this stuff in the near term
and yes, you can do a lot of things but asking the average user to do a lot of things that are out of their depth is just going to run into that metaphorical brick wall. I wish people cared more about tech in general, even from a cursory perspective, we need it but yet here we are 🙁
yeah ipv6 has been happening since the 2000's so :p but i tink now they ave a financial motive with this , if you can and dont really need ipv4 for everything you do , would you live like that or rent a router for the one time in a month or so you need ip4v? or would you switch to 5G mobile for that short span that you need it
somehow i also think they should have spend more time in making ipv6 human readable/memorable more, and come up with a system like UTF-8, where the first block tells you how many follow so you can actually have short ipv6 addresses and long ones and dont have to do the drop 0's ffff::::::0fff
seems that every protocol form the 70<->90ies , was tought trough and clever set up in many different aspecst and everything after is just , a pile of s*** compiled and created from consensus
Yes and it is free. But virtualization of actual hardware beats simulation especially when doing advanced labs
takes longer to set up imho 🙂
Honestly SLAAC is fine though, I haven't found a reason to use DHCPv6 on my network yet
oops that img was for saying , wel im ready but added it by accident to that commment
hey guys i have question netstat obviously shows the ip's your computer is connected to slowly, but when i type netstat -an its shows them all very quickly. im not sure what the -an means? im a massive noob to networking any answer helps thank you.
hehe i kind of like my isp 🙂
-a Displays all active TCP connections and the TCP and UDP ports on which the computer is listening.
-n Displays active TCP connections, however, addresses and port numbers are expressed numerically and no attempt is made to determine names.
``` not sure what you mean by verryquickly ad slowly
no hostname lookups speeds things up ofc ,... so
That's probably what they meant
yeah but do they want it to appear slower? or what wast the desired outcome of it?
sorry massive noob
are you on windows? (and what terminal are you using (cmd.exe , powershell(-ese), (or windows terminal , wich can do both)), anyway: ```
command /? -> lists help so
netstat /?
some other examples : ```
net /?
net user /?
chkdsk /?
can someone help me, and im sorry for being an absolute noob.
let me explain my dialema
so we have fast fibre broadband, and what we noticed was certain devices in the household (say alexa or the TV using youtube) would detect the internet speed an automatically set the bitrate to maximum pretty much leaving the house with slow ass dial up....
whats the proper way to set speed limits on things withing a LAN
within*
Even at the highest bitrate possible, streaming shouldn't be using anywhere near enough to do that
Why the fuck
*forgive the specifics lol im rubbish at the technical aspects...
lets just say the house construction isnt conjusive to wifi signals and basically i need to limit everyone on the network to say 1gb
Run ethernet to any device that isn't mobile
Pay for faster internet
That's your solution
its a council house so i cant really drill holes
Well the extra solution there is make more money to move out of council housing, and worry less about being able to watch netflix
i Do have a server running which is running a plex minecraft server in the loft however it is a shitty 2core duo
give me a better job and ill do it
there are little plastic trims you can run at the bottom of walls. It really sounds like it's just your wifi struggling, not your internet
did discord just sht the bed for anybody else just now ? maybe 60s
yeah so we have smart plugs and an alexa... we have an asus mesh router/extender thing
so you're saying it's detecting somehow via it's benchmark mechanism that you have crappy internet, even though you dont ? could you be being throttled somewhere upstream
can you disable the auto benchmarking
i think the routers are a bit outdated (early wifi 5)
if you only ethernet up one thing, do the mesh node/extender
yeah we have @nova glacier but we have like 2 inch thick concrete walls
when you get downstairs your lucky if you get 1gb/s
upstairs in the main room (where i am now) i can comfortably get say 800mb/s
Like I said, there are plastic raceways for running ethernet along walls. Not sure if UK english calls them differently though, since you said council
ya'll makin me jealous. i'm pending my fiber install in a week or two. starlink saved me for awhile but i'd be happy to get something 3x faster
sorry bud 🙁
trunking we call it i think
i did a lot of low voltage cabling and installed a lot of that, the brandname is Panduit
Doing that would be a lot cheaper than upgrading wifi I imagine
i nearly have twitches thinking about it thanks
ok so for arguments sake... lets say a device is sucking up literally most of the available bandwidth
(alexa) << blame her
how would one stop her from eating all the food
restrict her calories
most routers have network stats pages that you can use to determine this
yeah i have this thing in which you speak 😉
many will also have priority settings/QoS of varying bugginess. If you're just hitting physical limits of signal strength in an area, this won't help much. Just have to improve wifi setup or switch to ethernet in that case
can i PM you
I'd prefer things stay here so if I make a mistake it can be called out, but sure
pmd.
nothing personal i dont want you guys to see my IP adresses and stuff lol
god forbid my internet history lol
watching stones errod live on youtube 😎
That is just your ISP router. It appears to be wifi 6e so it might actually be better than your wifi 5 asus APs. Though I wouldn't know if its location is ideal
yeah the concrete deminishes the wifi strength from like full 5bars to 2 downstrairs
thats why i need to limit devices a bit...
so the main isp router picks up all the devices (smart plugs etc) however i dont actually get settings to say, hey 192.168.1.467 have just this amount of internet
Asus does have a QoS feature for adjusting priorities based on content type. It will allow a device to use all the bandwidth if it's alone, but if another device is doing something more prioritized it will get reduced
I'd still recommend just upgrading your wifi setup and try to get as much on ethernet as possible. Having issues when a single device is running a video stream means you have extremely low bandwidth available
*pmd picture of the wifi
Upgrading to 6GHz (Wifi 6e or Wifi 7 tri-band) provides a ton of bandwidth
yeah its pretty much kbs but if i know how to sort it for now that will suffice, i cant afford wire right now lol
im skint
i dunno if the devices are 6ghz compatiable,
also i do appreciate your time and effort ive been struggling with this for a while
and im sorry but i know fk all about this stuff
the router would need to be Asus to use theirs unfortunately. A lot of QoS stuff is partially proprietary, so it's brand-locked. Your ISP router might be able to use standardized QoS, but not guarantee the asus routers would respect that for wifi prioritization
hmmmm given the devices are connected to asus, that page i pmd you it should be in there let me browse (first time ive been here)
could it be called anything other than Qos
sorry, terminology issue here. Your Asus devices are Access Points (APs) rather than routers. They can be routers too, but currently that's your ISP device that's the router in your network
no
No. And tbc, this functionality it notoriously iffy. It relies to the router to correctly identify the content type which is imperfect
you could do router behind a router (i.e. double-NAT), but that comes with other complications
are you sure? if you have any sort of qos profiles that would potentially impact especially with the stream issues you specifically m ention. its not always obvious as a 'bandwidth limiter'
i do have a spare 2.4ghz router
ok so that would mean turning the main router into a modem correct?
then running the asus by wire to router
that would be even better than what I was referring to. If that's possible then do that, yes
its possible yes... would that give me the ability to do qos
or atleast make the connection more stable
Yes QoS, but I doubt it'll make the connection itself more stable. Technically that's one less wifi network around, but without any devices connected to that one it wouldn't be causing any congestion
@nova glacier i massivly appreciate your help dude, you have gone above and beyond 🙂
you deserve a raise dude
*gives @nova glacier a beer
sure about what? I've used Asus QoS like 15 years ago and it sorta worked, but the internet is an evolving landscape. The content type identifcation algorithm might not work as well these days
i mean ive looked at my ISP page and no where does it mention Qos
anly the asus router has a page for it
I really need dns fallback. Lesson learned
people actually function without dns fallback?
it’s standard on practically everything
I did.
Untill I accidentally turned off everything on my rack, including my pihole.
And there's something somewhere that prevents shit from connecting without the DNS
Ugh. I fucked up
How exactly would shit connect without a DNS
Magic?
It’s like trying to drive to a specific city in alabama from california with zero maps, or signs
is that not done by the router
Guess what the router uses to send you to the right website, DNS
What's annoying is that technically this is possible. Any device can tag packets with QoS levels, but also any device can decide wheteher to respect those. Asus just happens to only allows the setting to be available when in router mode
well they seem to have mroe knowledge of internet than youfibre does
I must've misconfigured it
By default there should be a DNS fallback address
i dont know crap about this dude, im no expert dont take my advice
but i tryu
Turns out I had wrong boot order on my server hosting the pihole
boot orders change all the time
i think i would have a brain fart if i had a multiboot system
i tried a hackintosh and wasnt quick enough for the enter key so always ended up in windoes
I have only 1 system on it, ubuntu server. I have no idea why it decided to randomly put whatever interface to boot from as #1 and then bitch at me to insert a bootable drive. Ngl, I alsmost had a heartattack thinking my drive kicked the bucket
Thats the plan!
are you in their discord?
be sure you plan it all out, once you're in it it can be a bit overwhelming
Cant be worse than RouterOS
its the real deal. i pump every packet through it except for my prox oob network
Everything is worse than router os 😉
let me know if you need any hlep
Can't get better than a ‘Tik, mate
UDM
Linux router
care what you wish for , i reprogrammed a HEID cnc once , (not like operated but reprogrammed it due to malfunctioning memorybanks ,with ther chips no longer availeble anywhere for sale, stuff had to be rewritten to not depend on those memory banks anymore) dont know what year the cnc was from but it had a plaque that (translated) said : MADE in WEST GERMANY, (should give you an idea of its age) so imagine an operating system if you can call it that , german only , from before the idea op combining instructions and their values was a thing on cpu's
I love my Mikrotik but I need more performance and 10gbe ports
Sounds like you need a better Tik
I’m waiting for their new CCR3xxxs
Im looking at a $500cad router at that point, or I could use one of my spare 10gbe nics in an old optiplex lol
Its not too bad, the main cost for me is the SFP+ modules
When it comes to torrenting, is switching out the DNS as needed as people say it is?
I've never heard anyone say that it's in any way necessary for reducing the bandwidth costs of your favourite Linux distribution or other freely available content.
For any other task... we don't help with that here.
I mean like:
For better speed and stability (from what I've heard)
The only use case I can see, is for isp throttling
DNS literally just tells you the address, beyond that it doesn't speed up or stabilize anything
I was thinking that it was just snake oil
maybe should run a local cache server too 😄
The only reason you might change DNS is if your current DNS blocked any tracker domains. Afaik that's the only domain lookup that happens for torrenting. You might save some tens of milliseconds per torrent at best by switching.
Neophyte here, just wondering about TailScale best practices. TS is, for now, running on the same device as my SMB share. For remote access then all my other devices have two mounts, one for the local IP address and one for the tailscale address. What happens if I advertise the server's local IP as a route in tailscale? That should in theory let me use the same mount address both in and outside my home, but would that create unnecessary traffic through my router with the server sending packets to itself? Or will tailscale be able to communicate internally with the share?
Are there Ethernet cables that dont have the clip but instead a bump so they come loose when you pull hard?
if it's the same subnet it won't route through your router
I advertize the entire subnet on my tailscale so I can access any local device when remote
They probably exist, but there's a reason they're not common
they'd either not have great retention, or they'd be too hard to remove, or both
Also that latch is what pushes the conductors into the port, creating a good connection
without it, the connection would be less stable
starlink ones have it like that
difference is they've modified essentially the whole connector
They're also using that rubber boot to guarantee a good connection
reason they have it is due to waterproofing gasket
i'd also imagine those are pretty damn hard to remove
yes and it is kinda impossible to have a clip while it is sealed
it isnt hard
Surprising
regular outlet kind of force
Regular 5-15 outlet, or regular RJ45 "outlet"
regular schuko, i dont know how american outlets feel
So more stiff than the standard RJ45, but nothing obscene
though some RJ45 can be a nightmare to remove if they have a shitty latch
I've broken nails trying to remove some particularly nightmarish RJ45 connectors
this kind are ass
yep, but it hardens over time so it also ass
i love ubiquiti for just not adding a boot
i often use a screwdriver to unlatch em, i aint damaging my fingers on this shi
ethercon is also a really nice connector
its fine untill you have to pull it through some cables and you break it
i preffer to have this boot kinda loose so i can pull it and access the plastic clip
Just uh, don't do this
i standardised on this
Ubiquiti latch is stronger than the adhesive keeping it to the cable
boot is right type, can be removed if needed and it is decent quality cable
I've actually done this twice
ubiquiti also ships their devices with shit cage nuts
this is why userbase of ubiquiti and rackstuds overlaps so much
What's worse, is they use two different threadings depending on the exact product
They use both m6 and #6-32
i dont find that big deal, i use m5 for light duty stuff like patch panels, blanks and cable managers while m6 ones are for mounting switches, servers, ups
Similar enough to be confused for eachother when you're not looking at them, different enough to not be intercompatible
Ethercon should be standard for everything
eh, it's a bit bulky for most computers
it just takes up so much room
today was a fun day
Skill issue
i didnt pull it, legacy shit
I didn't specify who lacks the skill
interesting thing is that it worked fine on previous access controll system but new one didnt work 
i managed to shorten it and it managed to negotiate at max supported speed on the new controller (100mbps)
Hey guys I installed gnome-core after standart debian installation , then I enabled NetworkManager.service and i have network-manager-gnome but the interface says no wifi adapter found
could you help pllzzzzzZzz
This one was probably installer error though to be fair
It was the wires that broke
i don't want to imagine wiring ethercon
No I just realized this wasn't one of the Ethernet ones, but it has that same mechanism for release latch
xlr?
Idk it could be, its whatever tf is on the MoTeC USB to CAN
hopefully that's the same retention mechanism otherwise that was a tangent
Standard debian installation doesn't have drivers for your adapter prolly
Reject modernity, return to thicknet
but i am connected to a network
how do I
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1399797/activating-usb-wifi-adapter this one does something I don understand. The other post has same adapter as me but discusses compilation of it to .ko ....?
Do you have a reference so I understand what i am doing
That is kind of Educational
i have messed around on Cisco Packet tracer, however still do want a small physical lab- actually would make me learn as it’s physical and not just an app.
i’m quite new to this, so i’m looking for some guidance with switches, like how many? brand? etc. is there some sort of resources/even Yt videos you’d recommend?
apologies for the late response
Since you want to learn for ccna having cisco switches/routers is kinda a requirement, you should be avoiding cisco smb devices (sb250,sb350) and stick with IOS or ios xe devices since cli for sb ones is not same as ios
I personally have couple of c2960x and c2960g but i have seen bunch of small 8 port c2960 100mbps switches for 20$ on ebay which are good enough for learning
My lab is a Cisco 2600, 2x Cisco 3550, 2x cisco 2950, asa 5500, wireless controller, some APs and im adding a Cisco 2900 and cisco phones... However you really should pay for any of this stuff...
I got most of it for free as it is eol ewaste from work
See if you come accross it for free, no harm. But paying for lab hardware that you then have to pay for the power on, when you couldve just used GNS3 just isnt the way lol
Finally got around to setting up a bridge router and wifi speeds in my bedroom more than tripled 🥳
Finally the PC that would most heavily use my new NAS can actually use it
It's not even a good router either, just some old ac1200 TPLink I bought used for $20
that's how shit the signal was
literally I'd roll over in bed and the youtube video I was watching would stutter as the cellular connection had to take over
yea, gns3 is a go to for labbing and for homelab something more power efficient like a mikrotik is a way to go
cisco non passive devices are loud af
How bad of an idea it is to use premade parch cables cut in half and connected into a patch panel? The wire is soft core xd
Don't worry wire doesn't know you cut its head off
Network cable crimping is actually not too bad if you have decent connectors and crimp tool just matter of lining up wires cutting flat and then shoving em all in together (cable tester helps), individual jst style connector crimping makes me want to die.
Yeah, I had to do a bunch of connectors for a camera system a couple years back, way before I discovered the wonders of self hosting. My fingers were damn near bleeding after 136 RJ45s
That's honestly main reason I went with premade cables for the patch panel. The issue is, those cables are soft and don't have the single solid copper wire in them, so it worried me a bit
Ah yeah stragglers from frayed stranded wires can be problematic but otherwise should be fine
Wonderful, thanks!
soft core as in stranded? I believe punch down connectors are usually designed for solid core, but I imagine practically it might not matter
you ever been given a 66 block punch tool razor edge 'finger love tap' ?
or 110..
I'm experiencing pretty decent bufferbloat (B) on my AX1800S running latest OpenWRT, not sure what to do about it honestly.
Was an issue on the whole network for a while but got our old ass fiber jack replaced and rest of the network is fine.
best qos is increase the bandwidth
I don't need more than 500Mbps 1ms latency. I just need that.
Or a bit closer at least
well do you know what bufferbloat is?
it is latency on peek load, if you dont hit peek load bufferbloat does not matter
I use steam.
Also I get high latency regardless. Web searches, message sending whatnot
well then its due to isp
Less on my PC than mobile
I just had a tech over
Once fiber jack was replaced, speeds otherwise were fine. Now its just my router
is openwrt on a tp link ax23 worth it or do i stick with stock firmware
Respectfully disagree with you here. It's nice for applications where the extra ruggedisation is useful (live events my beloved), but otherwise it's much heavier, more expensive, much larger, needs extra strain relief, isn't intercompatible with regular RJ45s (unless you're using something like NE8MXR1-B-TOP but again price).
And when I say larger, you can fit 12 D-shells in a 1RU space, you can fit iirc 48 RJ45s in the same?
WEAK
We don't all get infinite budget and space :(
However, could I convince you on standardising on ethernet over BNC 12G 75Ohm instead?
you've missed the obvious un-seriousness here
you think ethernet over bnc video cable was serious? oof
Look, we can all agree the superior conduit is Ethernet Over Garden Hose
ethernet over hdmi over garden hose?
am i allowed to ask for help here regarding my wifi connection and why i'm sometimes getting crazy ping spikes for a reason i cant identify? i'm not sure if it's my router, room, pc or something i didnt even take in consideration
i've been trying to figure ts out for months now and both chatgpt and claude cant help, and idk anyone irl that can help me
Are you in a densely populated area? Is your router far away?
I live in a village with 677 people per square km, and my router is around 13m away
It could be interference. You should definitely run ethernet.
Your signal's pretty marginal
You're actually connected to it on 2.4ghz on your phone
So bandsteering is likely in effect
Wait i am? Where do you see that?
Top of the screen
I might be tripping but all i see is it's saying 5GHz selected any nothing else about how many GHz
I just noticed this one is not how it usually is, i was trying smth yesterday and i was stupid enough to put the router next to smth metallic
Oh whoops i am tripping indeed
Both pictures
Yeah this is most likely the case, whenever i checked my wifi stuff in cmd on my pc, it was mostly on 5GHz but sometimes switched to 2.4GHz
That is not ideal
Sorry for it being in German but I found the PDF for how to set up our specific router and these are the default settings, which we have too aside from ssid and pw
Does this help? (I can translate if u need me to)
Also yeah it picks the channel automatically, it aint fixed
If it's changing channel more frequently due to a marginal signal, the transition between networks will cause packet loss
I'm not saying that's your issue, but if the computer is stationary, I'd consider ensuring it connects to one, or the other.
Btw do u mind deleting this? I'm slightly paranoid about leaking sensitive data
It has no usable sensitive data. The IP is RFC1918, the mac... irrelevant.
The only secret it reveals is that your router is a sagemcom
Hmm well I do trust you with that, do you mind either way tho? 🙏
I've heard this a few times before, what does that mean
That kinda matches my issue... consistent 10ms ping with occasional individual pings of 2000+ ms
Crazy 😭
Idk my dad said he looked it up a bit and bought a good one, but i dont trust his IT skills....
How would I do that exactly? Is that a router config or pc config
Btw i feel like my antennas positions were also causing issues... i had stable connection for weeks, until i had to mess with my cam'd usb connection where i accidentally moved the antennas and now i cant manage to bring it into a position where i wont have crazy ping spikes
Move it on top of your case or otherwise higher up and compare signal quality. Behind is usually going to mean your case blocks signal.
You can disable bandsteering entirely on the router, though that causes its own problems. Honestly I'd probably try to improve the antenna positioning to see if it'll stop bouncing between networks, and then quietly replace your router with something more capable. As far as what you can set on your computer... depends on the drivers. Go read the docs, look at configuration options.
hmmm please ignore that wifi adapter there, i'm not actively using it anymore. i tried fixing my wifi issue with it, turns out it didnt help and my antennas are apparently way faster (they screw into my motherboard, so i cant move them)
would it help if i told you my motherboard model?
No
aight
I don't really want to dig into the specific of the board, you can do that research armed with what I've already pointed out
Happy hunting
Can anyone give insight with unifi networking? My switch shows up when I hit the + in site manager, but once I’ve chosen a site the switch won’t show up in the unifi devices tab. I’m trying to “adopt” it.
hdmi over teslacoil
dont know what ISP im picking after this contract is up. 5g/5g for $150, 100/100mb for $79, 250/200 for $89?
Are Hitron modems any good? They seem to be the biggest player behind Arris and NetGear but I've never heard of them.
I have had a few Hitrons now. Every one has been solid!
lol that pricing gap is insane. mine does the same thing
intentionally shtty prices until you get to gig service. they trying ot gate people into it
sure its 'less' but its more per
I think most people would opt for 500/500 if pricing made sense. Because that should be like the 79 tier and 5 gig at 150 is actually far lower than I think makes sense. Although they probably count on the fact that for most people to actually use more than a gig they'd need multiple devices going full out at the same time.
yea fair
For modems, it all really just comes down to their chipset rather than brand. Intel Puma 6 is known to have issues, which many older hitron models use. The newer puma 7 is fine though
gonna get a 5 gig connection and constantly download linux ISOs on multiple hosts just to piss off my ISP
fully saturate that 5g link 24/7
wtf are these prices
Ahahah I did this for a month
Was purely just downloading shit for the heck of it and deleting everything after
Surely that 5/5 ISP has a lower plan for a good price that beats the other two options without being complete overkill
$130 for gigabit?
for sync thats not bad. even when i was on comcast 1.2gbit back in 2015, it was def not both ways, like maybe 50 up
Im on cable and have 1000/250 but that contract is coming up and every time my price has been approaching over 100
im used to paying $120 for starlink for awhile so im already used to it
god damn apple
guys whats a decent way i can share storage with my gf from my spare pc
she does not live in same home
Tailscale
24/7?
its basically a vpn right
basically use tailscale to give your gf access to local repo anywhere without doing icloud bloat bs
Install something like NextCloud on your spare PC, essentially turning it into a NAS.
does traffic go through some p2p network or still go 'through' a central source withi nextcloud?
Nextcloud is client server and needs port forwarding
i guess it depends on how paranoid or how much control you want over the setup
nextcloud sounds like a convenient / easier solution but not the most secure
It's as secure as you want it to be 🙂
the headscale/tailscale stuff is probably what i'd dig into
but more learning curve
also gotta balance the wife aggro. "here honey here is something with 10 layers of protection but here's an FAQ on how to log in" she probably not be happy
Yeah, I setup nextcloud with a duo login which enforces MFA so no local passwords or anything
If you want to be extra secure tailscale/wireguard or something VPN to access is probably better but a tad less ease of use, it's a trade off indeed
i've worked within cdn/telco space awhile. i have seen how trhe sausage is made. i prefer to keep things as less centralized, even with 'good intent' folks centrally, as i can. but i understand there is indeed a biz model for it and you can lock it up fairly well
Tailscale works well and oauth options integrate with common identity providers the service mostly there to list available connections for accounts but then is p2p VPN setup takes some knowhow with networks and might need to deal with magic DNS depending on current DNS setup but overall is convenient and not hard to use really.
i think my wife wouold be ok with logging into a vpn client and then accessing but probably not a bunch of complex steps
I use combo of tailscale and pangolin for managing access to things from outside my network (both wrappers around wireguard with auth and in case of pangolin a proxy)... You could just setup wireguard yourself too but would take a bit more doing to make it easy to use and manage.
Yea for tailscale is click client hit connect once it's configured
yea im on starlink its near impossible to host even if you wanted (i dont) so vpn probably my only solution
i'm pending a fttp install any day and very anxious lol.
however i will be the first few customers on a brand new service in a brand new area, i may get some hiccups
Racknerd VPS for $14cad a year, wireguard tunnel the nextcloud server to the VPS, use mobile wireguard client to only connect to VPN when off the home wifi. Boom
well i already have something similar i just havent really strung it all up. i have a dedicated nordvpn endpoint in LA
which then connects to my opnsense, but i haven't set up anything past that other than poc
but i could do somet other vps if i wanted more IP distribution or something
also i can simply add certain VMBR in prox to a VM and it auto routes to the nord tunnel
I luckily get a public IP on my cable internet 🙂
you do get public ipv6 right?
no, but biz class might
I love that I have 10gbe in my network, just to be fed by cable internet
i expect eventaually starlink will reach 1gbit but be a bit
huh, my friend got a prefix even on residential
yea same, lol . and it all started because i was upset at how hot the 1gbit copper SFP was
its not static but dynamic one
i'm still on cgnat nonsense. i could be phoenix, dallas, la over the course of a few days
and tbh i havent done a lot of research into it because i really am not interested in ext hosting
just did some vpn testing
yea for ipv4 starlink only provides cgnat
I only have a single port forwarded for my VPN. I got tired of the headache of securing every service id host
ah, you know what, i know i do get a v6 address, i see it in opnsense, but i disabled that gateway 😄
i'm just waiting for that ipv8 to hit 😛
Go from 2^128 to 2^256 and we can address every atom in the universe 😉 missed opportunity in v6
would require 128 additional bits though
Still need nano/atomic NAT for addressing quarks
you laugh but maybe that's what the future looks like. you ever seen Devs?
no not familiar
Obligatory
new one to me, show looks somewhat interesting too (redditors pooping on it aside) will see if can find it, in real news https://www.reuters.com/business/us-award-2-billion-quantum-computing-firms-take-equity-stakes-wsj-reports-2026-05-21/
feels like a black mirror ep
Hmm thinking something like this to replace the mediatek on my amd motherboard https://a.co/d/07FrtcFm need to find a solid card for the amd laptop as well
The card for the laptop will need to be compatible with Linux
The RZ616 uses the MT7922 and the RZ738 uses the MT7927. That TP-Link adapter also uses the MT7927. The only alternative I'm aware of is the NCM865 from Qualcomm. Broadcom does make a chipset too, but I'm not aware of it being available in M.2 or PCIe form factor.
huh, Broadcom's chipset (BCM4390) can even do 802.15.4 for Thread and Zigbee. That would be neat to have
Desktop is running windows 11 laptop is running linux both amd powered so both have garbage mediatek chips for Bluetooth/wifi so I am looking for both a pcie and nvme card
So yeah looking for recommendations for both
The single option you have is the NCM865 m.2 module (or products that integrate it) from Qualcomm. I think the only products integrating it are the MSI Herald-BE and the Gigabyte GC-WiFi7 (rev 1.0 and 2.0 only). Rev 1.1 is Mediatek and rev 1.2 is Intel.
standalone NCM865 modules come from randomly generated name companies and save no money compared to buying the pcie form factor adapter from MSI/Gigabyte which you could extract the module from for the laptop
I just happen to have that one on my list but aint partial to it lol
I juist need something better then these crappy mediatek chips I am currently stuck with
just found out my fiber service being delayed not cause of them, but because the POWER company is dragging lighting up all the new telecom closets...
I just happen to throw a random one out there
I mean, if you're okay with wifi 6e then there's quite a few more options. For WiFi 7, the Qualcomm NCM865 is the single non-Mediatek chipset compatible with AMD. Intel's BE2xx is still broken on AMD and there's still no sign of an update on that afaik
6e/7 is kind of what I am looking at
Now if the one for desktop allows me to enable hotspot mode over 6ghz for my Quest 3 to connect to for VR even better
but not a requirement
I may just pick up a dedicated router for that use case
aka one I can plug into the 2.5gb ethernet port on my b550 MB
That opens up the plethora of models with Intel AX210. That m.2 module is very inexpensive. Could upgrade both desktop and laptop to the ax210 for less than it costs for one NCM865 adapter
ok yeah $18
This is $44
Your desktop has an m.2 key e already. Just take out the mediatek rz616/rz717/rz738 that's in there
that would require tearing the mb apart to get at the card lol
Only some of them put it directly at the I/O, which yeah would require taking the board out. Most of them just have it accessible near the pcie slots. At most obstructed by the GPU when installed
mine is buried in the i/o
So yeah easiest is just going to be to disable wifi in the bios and use the pci-e card
That's just going to be a few screws. ig it depends on how you value 10-15 minutes of your time and your comfort lvl with doing that vs the $26 extra on the pcie card.
1 screw to release the wifi card shielding box, and most likely it can slide out without need to remove the VRM heatsink. But board must be removed from the case
I tend to assume worst case when there isn't enough info to go off of. Could very well have insufficent clearance to that heatsink
i lied, 2 screws, sorry
any ideas why im unable to setup a minecraft server on my network? the local ip works, and tailscale IP, but public IPv6 does not work, even though in my router I have port 25565 firewall rule added
It's been THREE months that i've asked for some network flow being opened and they still struggle to open them
I'm so sick of it
Don't be lazy
Can you even ping that machines IPv6 address?
yes
dunno if this goes here or in linux but is there some documentation on how in linux network bridging works , because it seems to violate the whole meaning of network bridge ,:
can exist with only one side (single physical device \w mac) , i can still assign an ip to that mac as if its still just the system. i can also set exta ip aliasses on it ?(wtf?) , aswell as i can assing an ip to the virtual bridge (wtf even more?) and set ip aliasses on that?,... whats on the otherside of the bridge ? if 8 vms make use of the bridge , isnt it a switch , ,... but i can give the vm's a different ip than the aliasses so it seems the aliases are for the bridge side not for the vm side ?
ip's and bridges dont belong in the same schematic imho so different layer
So I got a AXE11000 router and I plugged it into my ISP router (NOKIA 3.1 beacon) and it was working but both routers were giving off a signal so I put the Nokia in bridge mode now the new router is not working and had a red light and NOKIA is still giving off a signal but you can’t connect to it. How do I fix this?
Working on a synology NAS for the first time, uh, isn't the estimated capacity supposed to be 30tb or something? i have 3 10tb drives
it’s running it in raid1
is that a good or a bad thing, i'm moving the conversation here
ok so it's a good thing? i saw online that people compared shr to RAID 5 and said they were the same thing
i guess i'm having trouble understanding it fully
It allows for redundancy so you can loose a drive
I only have two drives in mine so I mirror it
They're similar, but not the same. https://www.reddit.com/r/synology/comments/1778rv3/raid_5_vs_shr/
I have a Synology DS918+ and considered SHR vs RAID5 when it was first setup. I went with SHR because 1) why would I not when I've paid Synology for this privilege and 2) it's more flexible so I can replace my 2x existing 6TB drives with another 2x 18TB drives (for a total of 4x 18TB drives) if if if prices ever come down.
