#networking
1 messages · Page 85 of 1
They don’t get paid to do it
So currently my home setup is this until I can get an electrician in to run networking back to my office
Definitely going to get a power point actually next to it alongside the ethernet
Using one from the adjacent wall is especially gross
i like thread 
Use zigbee instead, no IPv6 bullshit :p
buuu'
lol
UK
we have different tarrifs based on chosen supplier
mine is 14p/kWh at night
and smth like 30p in day
i wouldn't mind IPv6 if it was not such a mess and it wasn't that hard to add local DNS resolving to it
Why do you need local dns resolving?
for my local servers ?
or am i supposed to put all my local hostnames in the public DNS ?
Why not?
whats harder about ipv6 than ipv4 for local dns
IPv6 autoconfiguration pushes ISP DNS servers, and IPv6 DNS is prioritized over IPv4 DNS. Thus you either need to put your "internal" DNS records in public DNS server for your domain (if you got one in the first place) or possibly set up DHCPv6 which bunch of devices do not even support (Android for exampel)
plus bunch of ISPs only give out /64 to the end network, which adds another layer of "how to even do IPv6 with my own router behind the iSP router"
that would be based on how your router is configured. but Is it common for consumer routers to only let you change ipv4 and not opv6 DNS?
my router doesn't allow to change anything (outside of DHCP range and making IPs static).
And again. With IPv4 you could simply drop a dnsmasq to your local network, add DNS records saying this local hostname is this IP and it would work. With IPv6, you usually need to put that to your public DNS recoreds (if you got a domain) or nowhere at all (if you got no domain)
If you can disable the ipv6 advertisement on the router similar to disabling dhcpv4 then you could also just drop a radvd server
welcome to the DHCP section of the router /s
That is odd. But you could try making your radvd server way higher priority, I think that would also prevent clients from using your router's built in one
maybe i will try it once when i feel ready to screw up my home network once again. For now i put my whole network behind a mini PC acting as a router and anything public is published via my VPS
The solution: IPv4
IPv8
Where is ipv5
ipv7 8 9
dead. look up internet stream protocol
Can someone vc and help me install WiFi drivers
Disable it and host your own
not an option
Disable IPv6 😌
It was some downstream asshole who made a loop and for some fucking reason filtering was off on that port so it killed everything for 4 hours
if i have 2 routers/modems how does that affect my bandwidth
Usually it doesn't. But you get the cumulative effect of any problems along a network path and of course the slowest router on a path imposes an upper limit on bandwidth.
You need a load balancer to combine the bandwidth or else manually split your internal network so that some devices use one modem and some the other
Uh what
Which part? Lol
I think I answered it assuming they were in series on a network (e.g: a double NAT or other nesting), and @ancient arch answered assuming they're in parallel (two internet connections with two routers).
We don't know for certain how the routers are configured and connected.
I guess you’re right, there is no knowing what the fuck is happening
Yeah answer is depends on how you're hooking stuff up
technically not an option in the ISP router; added my own router behind it which doesn't do IPv6 relay, thus i did disable IPv6 that way
Or get good and embrace IPv6 😄
meh IPv4 still way more widely supported I'm on the if you don't need it disabling it (IPv6) might be the best option still train
right but pertaining to the DNS resolution and not needing to reconfigure every single client on a network and deal with port binding issues (as a dev) is just pain
if have IPv6 enabled localhost could resolve either to the IPv4 address or the IPv6 address and depending on what port a process is bound to it will or will not be getting those packets, the DNS stuff is annoying too IMO, I ran bind-9 for my own DNS here for a while but now mostly rely on avahi for name resolution things on the local network or just go on fixed IPs set from the router.
bind9 for IPv6 dns management is hell
i have one for my house i want one for my room so I can use consoles/my pc on it but thats really it, maybe my phone
Microsoft DNS is a easier from a GUI perspective but DNS and lack of DHCP6 support on half of devices is a major pita
^
or dont because you have auditors and dont want to expand your vulnerability footprint
thread
you can always write them in binary
what is the difference between tp-link deco m4 and e4 apart from the price?
E4 has 100mbps ports, m4 has gigabit ports
both suck
i need it
oh wow it is cheap
10-pack, for the whole office 😄
it should also include : for mac addresses
so what is better option than deco for the same price?
what is your budget
would it be possible to connect them with a ethernet cable?
it's possible
then its fine
issue with low end decos is that they dont have dedicated radio for backhaul
I'm from Poland so bugget will be a little bit different
after conversion it's 80$
This 2-port USB LAN adapter is a versatile solution for connecting to two separate physical networks simultaneously, leveraging the 5 Gbps speed of USB 3.0 to provide dedicated gigabit bandwidth to each port. The dual USB NIC is also ideal for providing dedicated physical network interfaces to virtual machine configurations. Great for IT administrators that require dual-homed or multi-homed host systems.
https://www.startech.com/en-ca/networking-io/usb32000spt
You can use it as an access point. Connect both routers LAN port to LAN port. Disable DHCP server from the one in your room. Basically it will act as a switch with wifi.
Oh and you can use another IP from same range as from the main router in the secondary. Some routers actually have a built-in access-point or access bridge mode for this purpose.
theres scarce lan ports in my house
or do u mean to each other
how is there a different one for euro and us
i cant even tell the difference
Yes. LAN port of one router connected to the other.
they are too far
if i just set 2 up will there be any issues
Is the ISP connected to both directly?
You need some sort of connection to both to get internet. Unless you want one only locally without internet.
yea just 2 different coax ports in the wall
Never!
Then they have to be their own separate connections. Use different SSIDs for ease of differentiation
Use different bands. Just two routers don't have an issue of interference. The issue is all the other in the vicinity
wdym
There's apps for checking wifi signal and interference in all bands.
Bands means frequency range
so i need differnt channels?
One can use channel 1 and the other channel 11
i see
to ensure theres no interference
issue is that one router is from my isp and xfinity doesnt rly let u configure anything anymore
Yes. The main issue can be the presence of other wireless routers in the vicinity. Just two routers is not the problem.
If the router can't let you change the channel, it is probably programmed to scan the wireless spectrum and select the one with less interference
Which in fairness all routers that let you choose, also do.
trying to see if it lets me change
idk where to find the setting what would it be under
yeah it doesnt let me change
so basically if i get 2 they'll auto select the best ones
Yes they should.
if your phone has wifi 7 it most likely does, and if it has 6e then it definitely does
how do i even find that
look up the spec sheet for your phone and then see the section on wifi standards
okay
cuz my router settings say 0 devices r connected to the 6ghz
evenythings on 5ghz and 1 is on 2.4
most likely firmware compatability with certain layouts
: on US keyboard is ; +shift
on layout in europe it is . + shift
fe80::192.168.1.100/64
Cursed
Here is valid one
fe80::c0a8:0164/64
technically it's ::ffff:192.168.1.100/96 which is a valid IPv4-Mapped IPv6 address representation
it's the ::ffff:0:0/96 range
This specification defines the addressing architecture of the IP Version 6 (IPv6) protocol. The document includes the IPv6 addressing model, text representations of IPv6 addresses, definition of IPv6 unicast addresses, anycast addresses, and multicast addresses, and an IPv6 node's required addresses. This document obsoletes RFC 3513, "IP Version...
It's not really usable/routable but it is a valid way to represent it at least, been a long time since I've looked at it though
had to rebuild my rack cuz it wouldn't shut properly with the cables in front
newbie issues I'm sure
getting ready to start setting up my switch and router
but an issue I've found, on every port of my patch panel, pin1 doesn't get signal unless I jam the connector right in there, hense the ziptie on the one port I am using as a temp connection
is this just a cheap patch panel issue? am I missing something?
have you tried a different cable?
I've tied 5, all ones I made myself mind you
and all cables I've tested as good
it's always pin1 that drops
on every port of my patch panel
my background is as an electrician, not an IT tech, hense I can make RJ45 ends off but dunno what I'm doing
and you verified the cable with a tester right?
indeed I did
if you did yeah I would say bad patch panel
that's legit the only thing I purchased in this rack lmao, that kinda blows
never really seen that before
already wired up 10 ports in the house to it 😔
oh yeah that sucks, if the connector itself doesn't work unless you jam it and the cable is good, don't see what else could be wrong except the panel
might just ziptie every port till I get a new one then ngl lmao
oh well
cheers anyhow
but ye got 2 40u racks and some cisco gear in a bin lmao
huge W, got it ages ago, only just swapped ISP's to one which isn't draconian and allows 3rd party equipment
plan to fill the rest of it with batteries
maybe a NAS too idk
anyone know of good in-rack fire suppression?
I plan to use out of warrenty dead batteries from work to make myself a powerwall
I also assume that everything in the rack should have equipotential bonding?
but I don't seem to know anyone else doing it so idk the meta on thst
was just gon loop a 4mm between all equipment and have a 10mm to my MET
at least nobody can unplug my crap now lol
nah i use flushcut nips u ain't getting cut by my ones
also i have 2000 of them in my work van, why not steal them?
i would reccomend not using traditional punchdown patch pannels, rather use ones that allow mounting of keystones
send link/
again idk wtf am doing
👌 super, ye already a fan of that
tyty
cuz ye drop[ping the whole panel to add more cables is aids
but realistically anything that has holes for keystones is suitable, i just use datwlyer ones as that is my supplier
£14 on ebay for some genric ass one
the keystones themselves will matter more i am sure, i use CEF and YESSS as suppliers, might ask them their oppinions and if i get no good answer i shall ask in here
so the keystones are just female to female connectors?
that makes life v easy actually cuz i have hundreds of rj45 ends in a bag lol would be good to use em
oh the modularity, i am v pleased with this knowledge, thank you
keystones can be found in various types, even non ethernet like usb, hdmi, type c
huh
might bring my console ports to the front with those too then
i mainly use shielded tooless varieties
rip my new punchdown tool then
just return it as it has manufacturing defect
i bought it over a year ago, most likely outside the window now
was sat in the corner of my kitchen for ages untill fibre was brought to my street
did you crimp those by hand?
maybe your crimping tool messes up pin 1 , try to use prefab cables
not my crimper, i have 3 pairs of those anyhow, i also test all my cables and they gucci
this is the type I use
these ones are poop
if i have to crimp i use knipex rj45 crimper
i love knipex, most my other tools are those
i don't do rj45 for work tho, only very rarely
i do solar and most ppl use wifi for inverter comms
i dont do it often but when i do it is urgent and it matters so i have them and high quality connectors
makes sense yeah
even for some 230kw systems i've done the client chose wifi for whatever reason so it's rlly a rarity for me
i can afford to faff around when they do ask
i use cat5e constantly, but for CT comms or BMS systems, where it's always a direct connection into a device and no rj45 connector
you will then enjoy this even tho from network side it was pain in my ass to troubleshoot (NTP issues+ dns issues)
had to pcap the stupid thing to get slightest clue what it was as datamanager was reporting that connection to cloud was good but sma cloud couldnt see it and it couldnt be commisioned
25x50kw inverters, 1.9mw of panels
why so many small inverters?
ground based system?
roofs of buildings in our factory area
https://www.sma.de/en/products/solarinverters/sunny-tripower-core1
these inverters are used, i wasnt involved with planning and design
more expensive
makes less sense when you have alot
yea they are pricy...
at home i use plastic non shielded ones but still tooless
just had a nightmare clearing the p/w on this router i had found lol, got it all fully reset, leaving it for now tho
there's a ton i need to learn in reguards to setting this up now
the switch i still ain't touched lol
other than trying to use it and nothing working as it was, prolly VLANs set up by last owner messing w/ it
yes i did just plug in stuff i found lol
if its cisco factory resets are simple
nice
for the switch yes it was v easy, for the router i had to do some weird remove the CF disk, go into ramon mode or w/e it's called, load a default, reinsert the flash card, save to that to overwrite to delete the old p/w and then reboot into defaults to start setting it up
one of the sub rack we had to work on lol
Rofl
no patch panels, no proper uplink passthrough, no cable management, no patch cords, mesh wifi inside the rack
sheesh they even used unmanaged switch for distribution
not even L2
I need help picking out a rack. I want to have 2 r730 2u servers that are 660mm deep and a switch and patch pannel. I’d like an enclosed rack and I want it to be 6-12u. Does anyone have any enclosed or non enclosed recommendations?
aproximate location?
budget?
solid front panel, mesh or glass?
United States, ideally under $300, not picky but ideally glass
hi there, I'm not super familiar with networking. and this is more of a home internet question than anything.
over here in Australia we're only just getting fibre to the premises lmao. mine is being installed today.
Ive got a granny flat in the backyard where my computer, ps5 is etc and while I'm sure the ps5 will still be able to make a connection, my computer won't as it is ethernet only.
what would be a suitable way to connect my PC via wifi, I understand buying a wifi card etc but any sort of recommendations as it would need to be reasonably long range while keeping speeds good
Would just make sure the WiFi receiver card uses whatever is the most modern WiFi protocol the router supports (or better). Also make sure it has detachable antenna (is the norm but would double check) then if the signal not great can potentially replace the antenna and/or have an antenna wire to extend it so can mount somewhere higher/less interference.
You could also potentially use directional antenna since they help to focus on signals only from one direction, sort of related to that making sure the WiFi channel being used is as far from neighbor WiFi signals channel can help some too
seems like my router is wifi 5 at the most.
do wifi 6/7 cards have backwards compatability like that?
Yeah is almost always supports up to x protocol and basically backwards compatible with anything less when comes to WiFi
okay wonderful, much appreciated
my computer won't as it is ethernet only.
Yes, it will. Ethernet can do 1Gbps, 10Gbps, and even more, even though it is copper. The reason your ISP needs to bring fibre to your house is because copper can only do those speeds for short distances. 1Gbps Ethernet goes for 100 meters, for example. And that can be extended with cheap hubs or switches if you need to run it longer. However, fiber can run even for several kilometers between hubs, making a country-wide Gigabit network possible.
I think you've misunderstood what I've said, and either way have fixed the problem.
huh I'm confused why does the computer being Ethernet only mean you must use WiFi, wouldn't it be the opposite
can wifi be ethernet?
Yeah it makes no sense. If you currently use a cable you can just use that even if the isp uses fiber..
No
ok
wifi is wireless and Ethernet is wired
aaaa
Not necessarily
f
-# aaaaaaaaaa
why not just run ethernet to the shed
either copper or even fiber
I'm curious what gotcha you want to say here
copper if its short or fiber if its a distance
Ethernet can be run over microwave
Sending Ethernet frames over the air would be terrifying
Well it could solve one pain point
I guess its what some wifi mesh protocols do
this is originally what i did, but the location of the router changed etc. it was cheaper to just get a wifi card (i didnt have one before, preferred the stability of ethernet) than to get a long ass cable and run it through the house (also annoying and ugly)
wat
did you not read what we said literally just said above
.
ethernet is wired
wifi cannot really be
and its wifi that is unstable and at the distance i think you want its going to be UNSTABLE
and that is without rain or bad weather
Like you can just run a cable to where your other cable is also and just use a cable coupler
sure, i could do that. but i'd have to run said cable through the house (not my house) and its also ugly as hell
i have others in the house to consider
the easier solution (which has also already been done and is working) is to get a wifi card which i did not have before
why not just run it on the outside of the house??
and then make a hole next to the router
it is not my house and I cannot make those modifications
ask the person if it can be possible
landlords? zero chance
or just use the closest window
i know a person who just runs a ethernet cable out their windows down to the router
thats still significantly more cost than buying a network card
which again i already have done'
the network card will have way higher ping, and packet loss if it even reaches
i've got less ping and no noticeable loss
you cant have less ping
wifi 7 for you
Ethernet also a frame type
Ethernet can be transmitted over just about any medium you want
going from cat5 to wifi 7 is almost certainly going to be an improvement
I don't think its useful to bring that up
i dont understand why this is being dragged on, the solution has been found and done already
running Ethernet through a house outside of the walls is ugly, I wouldn't blame you especially if you don't play competitive games
i do. my loss and ping are the same, if not better than before.
and the rest of the houses occupants are happy
ethernet is a protocol technically
I think ethernet frames technically go over wifi
nevermind scratch that, they do not it's different
Not in 802.11. But you can do it and I believe that's how some of the WiFi mesh protocols work
I don't know howo to verify that thoigh
There's depressingly little info on how various mesh WiFi systems actually work and what they do
how long is the distance? You could use one of those line of sight transmitters to get pretty good connection
We shoved electricity into sand and made it send pulses of energy at high frequencies to other electrified sand so we can send cat memes 😄
We don't need no dang documentation!
this poor guy's recommendations keep getting more and more elaborate
What OP really needs is an ISP grade network and an invest into either an MPLS or SRv6 backbone to connect two EVPN Spine/Leaf networks on either side
I can stand behind that one
the way I understood it is that they want signal to a guest house basically away from the main house
something p2p like that would be the best
So I reread the original question and it makes sense to me now. Idk what I was thinking before. They don't have WiFi support and are asking for recommendations on WiFi cards to connect the PC to wifi
Yah, extra details provided that complicates/confuses the ask but agreed, just need a wifi card to connect the PC to the network is essentially the ask
I can recommend ax210 based cards but I bought that specifically because of needing AMD support and it going in my laptop socket instead of a pcie daughterboard
Everyone needs their morning coffee I think, trying to answer a thing that was matter of buy WiFi card and is done ✅
fiber is also "wireless" 🤣
that's a good point
The ‘tik wireless wires do a good job
Heck, even CAT5e and CAT6 can be wireless - you just have to buy really thin, cheaply made cables. You know, the one's that have less wires than the quality cables. 
Air fibre entered the chat
fibre is already not a wire though if you think about it
Its a light tube
I need recommendation for a firewall os? I only need portforwarding, maybe wireguard in the future (web gui for wireguard would be great). Nothing fancy. I basically need to replace an old wifi router.
NSFN
Nothing fancy? Spend $45 on an ER605, it'll just work and you won't have to fuck around
Otherwise there's pfsense/opnsense or RouterOS (will cost you a little for the license)
Openwrt can also be run on x86
Okay, I already bought a mini pc with 4 ethernet ports
what should i use, pfsense or opnsense?
opnsense is generally preferred for homelabs compared to pfsense community
Okay, I'll download that then. Thank you so much
Try both 🙂
routeros also has a trial before you need to buy a license (the license is like $30 or something for gigabit)
Okay, I want something without a license. I usually donate if I use and like the project
Then don't use routeros 🙂
🙂
Please tell me those are Intel nics?
OPNSense all the way tbh
oh, no idea
So, for BSD based firewalls you almost certainly want Intel NICs
Others will probably work but can be quite hit/miss.
Which kind?
The good ones :p
inb4 I225-V
4x2.5GHz intel i226
Intel fucked the I225-V so badly
Nice! Well enjoy, will be a good router.
😄
If you geta. chance I'd love to get detailed specs on that for my database
Comprehensive catalog of mini PCs, single board computers, and homelab machines with detailed specifications and comparison tools.
Okay, will do
I think it's this one
We use them for failover and bonding, they're pretty solid
I think they're older i3s though, not n100
Actually a reasonable amount of information here, cheers. Usually very difficult to get detailed specs.
is this a good router (I would be using like 6 of them fyi I have a VERY large place to cover)
If you don't want a web interface, it's likely fine
Honestly just go with unifi if you need wifi like that on a budget
Or Omada 😌
@topaz patrol ❤️ ty for the device submission, my first time testing this workflow with someone else
All good, we got it about a week ago and it's pretty obscure so I thought I'd put it up :)
tbh for the price they are really good, and if you are a network geek opnsense is a good bit of fun
not too sure, but as a heads up a lot of devices dont support wifi 7 at the moment so just something to be aware of
Are there Omada access points and routers?
I thought everything was VPN routers
Yes....
APs
Gateways
And there's switching
Yeah for sure. I run 5 instances of OPNSense across sites, none on these machines though.
Use old lenovos because they're cheaper and more powerful, one site does 10Gb/s routing with 5Gb/s internet so these lil boxes are not enough
Identified some issues with the validation but all fixed and that device is added 😄
Me clicking here thinking it's a networking chat to meet people and game together

Then again... it is "networking" related as it's over the internet
wish i had a reason to grab one of these, but i ain't paying 450 euros for Pentium 8505 + 4x2.5G + 4x10G thing 😄 https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005008652718035.html
i use this guy as a router https://www.notebookcheck.net/Minisforum-Venus-Series-UN100D-review-Mini-PC-for-office-tasks-with-Intel-N100-and-DDR5-RAM-starts-at-219-euros.848439.0.html
it had one of the weirdest SSD brands installed (replaced it with 1TB SSD from my stash)
looks nice 🙂
2x2.5G was all i needed, so yeah
Yea, gonna buy a cheapo ssd for mine
it is just a router and a bit of docker; server tasks and 10G networking is on my actual server (2950x, 128GB RAM)
I don't need 2.5gbit. I finally getting fiber, so I want to future proof if i get faster internet
technically neither do i, but my internet is gigabit, and i upgraded all my internal networking to 2.5G minimum, so why not
true
i mean i get 150-170MB/s copying from the routers SSD to the server
and it's not like 2.5G switches are expensive
they were cheaper than I thought when i bought one
but i dont have use for it yet, not transferring a lot of data on my network
a 10G SFP to RJ45 module from ALiexpress will now you set back more than a 4x2.5G + 2x10G SFP switch 😄
the government cracked down on import from aliexpress, so now it's harder for us to buy cheap stuff
O YEA god i love the little bastard
like 40$ and ya get a unmanaged switch with dat
a sfp+ card costs almost as much as it
i just put the X540-T2 card and the RJ45 SFP+ 10G adapter away into the storage after i got my ConnectX3. Too bad neither of these cards, nor the LSI HBA supports PCIe power management, but oh well
NO ASPM WHAT
the x540 Launch Date
Q1'12
i already read it
i need to upgrade to 9300 series of LSI cards and X710... but the cost is not worth it 😄
electricity in my location is a bit bellow 0.16 euro per kWh, so like whatever, few watts
ngl i could get away with getting a bitcoin miner or some shit when it comes to power use but the place im at is just so heat efficient to where i would cook myself
in theory i could completely remove the HBA with the amount of hard drives i have in the server now, but i will probably only do it when i will replace the whole server platform
i wanna see what C state my server is at
just need to SSH into it but gonna see how i do dat on truenas
AAAAAAAAAAA
OMG i just needed to do sudo 😐
i have no clue how to read this
C1ACPI% to C3ACPI%
i think i understand now, i think maybe im locked to max c3
but here it is c7
yea CPU%c7
ok nice my cores are able to mostly go into c7
buut uhm now i kinda wanna try c8
only C1 & C2 for me on my Threadripper
xd
also i run transcoding on them right now, so...
now i wanna try to go down to c8
tbf my cpu only idles at 20w
not sure how much of a shit i really give
my HDDs use A LOT more power
Heya. I set up a super basic NAS on my Mint desktop via Samba and uploaded a couple-GB video file from my phone, it took ~30m to upload.
I have a few ideas why it is so slow, but want some input.
- The NAS is using Wifi
- Phones are slow (Samsung S23 Ultra)
- NAS Hardware is a bit old (Alienware Aorura R7 Parts (i7-8700, 2x16gb 2666MT/s, 120GB SATA SSD boot (also the nas drive)))
Any idea if it is either these or something else?
almsot certainly the fact your nas is on WIFI
Gotcha. Not too big of an issue at least since it was for a quick setup. I can probably switch it to ethernet tomorrow*
Hmm sounds pretty slow tbh, can use rsync like rsync -ah --progress some-big-file.mp4 test.mp4 to see roughly speed moving either locally or across the network to try and narrow it down to either disk or network. Also check wifi details on phone should show roughly peak speed it can get with the current connection strength.
Perhaps your NAS has a wifi card that is a bit on the older side? Is it connected to 2.4GHz or 5GHz?
<@&750150305383186585>
How do I check? It does use a wifi card but I dont imagine it is that bad as the pc was prebuilt for gaming use
I'll try this out when I am able to
most NAS boxes are literally running on dualcore 1.5GHz ARM CPUs and even gigabit copying barely taxes them. You can bet theissue is not your NAS HW. It is the networking, either the NAS, router or phone side.
for example if you wifi is only 802.11n because of the router othe PC wifi card, you are down to 150Mbps or 300Mbps link speed. Which if the limiting factor is the router, then we talk about sharing that bandwidth between both devices, so you might be down to 40-50Mbps actual copying speed
<@&750150305383186585>
Ouch, that's possibly it then. So yeah I'll plug it into the ethernet later on today and then see how much better it does
Works 100% better, ty guys
it's still not ultra fast, but it did 6gb in like, under 10m now
I got a problem where after probably 1 hour after using my pc, it me shows that im connected to the router but the router app shows me that my pc is offline. The real problem is that apps just tell me that the site cant be reached but some apps like insta or yt music are still working and i can listen to any song or text with people with no problem. If this happens during a discord call i still talk to people without any issues. rn i cant reach any sites and im writing this on my pc -_-
nice seems more reasonable for sure, tried yesterday here from phone to NAS (NAS is wired) and was about 30MB/s so took around 30-40s to transfer a 1GB file
restart pc, remove the pc from your network in the app, then relogin to the network on your pc
Router app showing it offline is pretty suspect... usually things like you're describing behavior wise it's DNS (for some reason DNS server isn't responding correctly to query for domain -> IP look-ups and so new connections fail but things already cached still work)
gonna try it rn
its working for now, normally when restarting my pc fixes it but just for a while, atleast my pc is online in the router app
it shows offline but no problems yet
oh F actually there's a ton of problems atm just like widely on the internet
cloudflare/GCP outages
And AWS is impacted as well yep
Not sure which one triggered it, but it could've been a domino effect depending on what one of them may have done
I didn't do it! 😄
lol I'm just sitting here watching it all burn lmao
I work for an ISP that mainly uses GCP and so many things are dead in the water till it gets fixed lol
funny enough I was working as contractor on some part of AT&T when they had BGP outage thing a while back and then facebook got locked out and had to break in to get keys... ah the internet
Oh god wonder what they did, black hole traffic or something
yeah it ended up being like a mis-configuration that got through somehow, the details escape me now but was like an intern change that got merged in or something and just destroyed some part of the internet for a while
It was probly somebody messing with RPKI or something lol
I wouldn't be surprised if this big cloud issue is the result of some intern making a change without approvals lol
good luck
i work at a enterprise and last week our public dns provider got attacked so dns resolution for our public domain was down
harsh times and i couldnt do shit about it except look at status page
Oof thats no bueno at all
not many people noticed it as outage was from 16 to early in the morning
but those that did raised hell
I wonder what attack vector they used cause you can mitigate some basic DDOS attacks by not responding to rapid ICMP messages, but some people forget those basic things you can do
we are definitly looking for a more serious dns provider after this
Perhaps a hybrid approach where you have a primary and secondary? I haven't looked much into DNS in forever so idk how feesable that would even be
well NS wasnt advertised so dont know if that would help much
No idea, from a redundancy perspective it would make sense to prevent a reoccurrence of that issue unless your company was specifically targeted
no we werent targeted directly
if it were up to me i would go to cloudflare as if they are down half the internet is down
Technically they were impacted in this cloud issue, but they are less likely to go down independently of others.
they just reroute to another site so no big deal except slightly higher latency
They certainly have their ish together for sure
was this another clpudflare moment
I think its more of a GCP issue, however the ISP I work for uses GCP so I am a bit biased
what does ISP do on GCP?
does core infra pass through it for some reason?
Its more backend systems, our buyflow and payment processing and tools hosted in GCP
Our actual Network is more or less fine. Except maybe our OLT provisioning software which I think is also hosted in GCP lol
But thats just access end, core/backbone is all fine
Interesting
I know our fault management/NMS was fine thankfully so we don't have missed alerts
Is NMS hosted onsite or on cloud?
Pretty sure its cloud, we're moving to a new one that'll be on GCP next quarter I think
At my old ISP we had a Azure/AWS mix depending on the tool. Pretty sure it was just Azure for AD and Sharepoint with the rest on AWS
Granted I was just a user and didn't manage any of that infra since I deal with the actual Network
I am running NMS on dedicated server and dedicated SAN in our HQ
My company hosts pretty much every service/server in GCP except our local market speedtest servers since we have a deal with Google to give us a discount iirc
Cloudflare ❤️
It's so cheap too!
Heya. I upgraded my quick-nas (samba on Mint) to have a 1Tb drive rather than the remaining 25gb from my boot drive (a 120gb drive)
I also created a second user to use it with.
I already replaced the user in smb.conf with the new user and restarted smbd, but if I later on give the new user chownage of the samba directory, do I need to restart smbd service again?
Asking cause I can connect to and log into it on my phone, but the files dont load anymore
Scratch tha user error, I was on the wrong address
my 2u vented panel from ubiquiti arrived rusty and covered in caked on dust, i’ll have to wait and see what they say
If we're talking DNS- I like Quad9 and NextDNS
Authoritative dns, both of those only offer recursive dns :)
quad9 doesn't have nearly enough pops for my liking, it's quite slow
Ah didn't go up too far
Just out of curiosity, are you in the US?
No, Australia
lol yeah makes sense then
Only on ix australia and megaport too I'm pretty sure
Did you buy it direct from ubiquiti?
Looks like it's sat in a damp warehouse since it was made
happy pride month, nerdsss :3
Spanning tree go brr
that whole block on my switch is completely sectioned off, it's fine
i don't have a cable tester so those 12 ports are my cable testing ports
Cable in port 37 giving me real anxiety
it'll be fiiinee
(it goes to my pc)
I'm remaking those cables anyways
Way better than before
yeah I've done much worse, still not sure what people mean when they say you're not allowed to bend fibre 
I've done some absolutely cursed OM3/4 runs before
id say ive gotten much better at making my own cables
Those do look very nice. I always sucked at it
i increased my budget by about $15 and got all of this shit
Could never get the pairs in th channels properly, the pull through jacks are easier
i think passthrough is actually harder to work with
@fallow cloak here's the patch panel before i redo it this weekend
I am replacing my realtek card with an Intel AX210, already uninstalled the wifi and bluetooth drivers, was about to shutdown but saw that ethernet driver too, now I'm confused
Do I need to uninstall the
Realtek PCIe GbE family controller
too? Cuz that seems to be the driver for ethernet and what's the intel counterpart for that? I only saw wifi and bluetooth drivers on the intel ax210 page
You can uninstall it but it's fine if you don't
What OS btw? Most OSes have drivers already for most intel cards, it'll 'just work'
I'm hoping it does
But it's an asus tuf entry level laptop with ryzen, so I'm playing it safe and installing the intel drivers beforehand
But I don't find an Ethernet driver from intel like this realtek one
And you say it's a choice, so what does that mean?
How would the realtek one work without the card
You're removing the realtek card, right?
Yep
I meant how would the realtek ethernet driver work without the realtek card, as I'm replacing with intel
Or did you mean that intel would download the required driver itself if I have its wifi driver
It won't, a driver isn't something that's 'running in the background', it allows a bit of hardware to function. Haivng the driver there without the card will be fine, is what I was saying.
The intel card should 'just work', Widnows may download a driver through windows update but it will probably work regardless.
You can just swap and see, if you're missing functionality swap back
cable color coding?! That is a good idea
mhm!
do you also have a gigabit ethernet port with realtek controller?
You don’t
Yeah I didn't know the ethernet stuff is separate from the card
Didn't need to uninstall it
Mhm, i bought it from store.ui.com
The box didn't seem damp at all, so i'm not sure
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I know how to make a box of networking equipment damp
they accepted the RMA, but they aren't covering shipping, that would nearly be the cost of the item
It's fine - tis just a load bearing network cable, being used exactly as designed.
Out of curiosity, why not a BE200?
If those are solid core cabling, highly would recommend replacing with stranded patch cables. The "in wall" ethernet cabling is not meant to be terminated into RJ45 plugs
You'd want to use stranded cabling for patch cables, solid has a higher chance of breaking
its a stranded cable
Have seen a lot of people either putting RJ45 plugs on in wall cabling or using excess cable to make patch cables 🤣
-
Not sure if it would work with my device (asus tuf entry level with ryzen cpu so not all intel cards would work apparently, had to rely on an old thread to make sure this was compatible)
-
Lack of availability here, had to get even the AX210 from a reseller
Ah point 1 is fair enough, I also have an AMD CPU and had to get a different card for WiFI 7 :/
dumb compatibility with the BE200
are cat 6a cables bigger than cat 6???
Thicker? Yes
Notice how much tighter the twists are
What are you trying to do
networking!!!!
i do not have that much info the cable is from garland cabls
What are you actually trying to do, are you direct burying cable?
Jaycar
Then there you go
If you're buying online look elsewhere, Jaycar has "fuck you, lazy cnt" pricing
no sheliding on jaycar plugs:(
We use 1pd at work not sure how good their pricing is for retail
??? looks sus
It's fine, they're owned by Grove
are what contry do you live in?? 1pd it in my contry
Australia
me too!!!!!!
Garland is an aussie brand
i live there
73$ im not buying that hell na
That's for 100, if you're buying them individually expect to pay $1+ a piece
can i friend you you sem ues full
No thanks
“you seem useful” is the weirdest “compliment” i’ve heard in a while
lol
im here you know]
Hey, I just got the EAP650 v1 (apparently there's a v1.2, is that why they had these at a discount on Amazon!?) and I thought I would want it in repeater mode but I can't seem to figure out WHERE to pick to set it as repeater...also, can it be wired but repeat on the same SSID I want it to show up as? Or is it repeat on the same SSID it connects to the way it works? I just have the Omada app, I don't have a controller. I have it wired into my ISP router at the corner of the house and installed it in the dining room ceiling closer to the middle of the house. I've got some shenanigans going on really, right now I left them both on the same SSID so don't know if they are fighting each other or if my devices aren't taking advantage of the strongest signal because of this. I also have a router setup as a repeater 200 feet away connecting to the ISPs router which I moved closer to the window as I haven't ran a cable over there yet.
Why not remove the other repeater, turn off WiFi on the ISP device, have the Omada AP as the same SSID/PW from the ISP device and just have that handle WiFi?
repeaters are bad, they cut throughput and can only broadcast a signal as good as they get, better (if possible) to have APs with solid roaming instead
200 feet away to another building?
So your ISP router is over 200 feet from the repeater and then from that repeater it's even further to the dining room?
No, the repeater I have connecting to the ISP router is 200 feet away getting Internet to the guest house
Repeater: Takes a signal and just repeats it (broadcasts it again). If it's 200 feet away from the source it's likely getting pretty bad signal to begin with and anything connected to that likely has a horribly degraded experience/throughput/etc.
AP: Broadcasts a signal directly, if you're hardwired to the ISP device there is no point using it as a repeater in this case. Make that AP the source of your WiFi, turn off the SSID/WiFi on the ISP device, and have any repeater go off that AP's signal which will be stronger and more reliable at minimum.
Right now with the ISP device+repeater and then the AP broadcasting the same wireless names (SSID) it is causing a lot of problems because there isn't any seamless transition or way to tell devices which to connect to
The ISP router is in the middle, the AP is wired to it, but yes using the same SSID
I was just about to ask 🙂
Ok, so the sooner you can wire up that guest router to the ISP device and then just flip WiFi off on the ISP device but leave everything else alone the sooner things should settle down. The best solution would be another Omada AP in the guest house but eh
So long as you don't need good roaming between the guest house and your house it's a minimal issue at that point
The "fun" part about wireless devices is they tend to hold onto the first signal they see, most clients don't like to roam even to a stronger signal
Yeah, the guy that setup the fiber traded me a drill bit for like a 300 foot Ethernet cable I was planning on running over there, it's not outdoor rated but it was basically free 🫠
Some pipe and you're good to go imo 🙂
I'm setting up a wireguard server on my home server
Do I just nat the wireguard port from my isp router to the server? (I have a static ip for my Wan)
Is it secure enough to do that?
Yup
You need certificates and everything to connect, far more secure than user/pass methods other VPNs offer by default
Yeah I'll be using private/public keys and wireguard ui to ease the setup
Then you're good 🙂
There is concept I want to try, but I am stupid when it comes to networking and not sure if this will work, or how it is done.
Using a PXE, it deploys a already installed Windows OS to boot from.
And because of the PXE, it somehow doesn't detect certain pcie cards or something?
I've set up wireguard server on my home server
I've successfully connected from my arch pc with the config file thingy and set of private/public keys pairs
But on my android phone .... I just can't connect at all, I really don't think it's the config I've put since it's basically the same from the arch pc modulo the IP being .2 instead of .3 and keys from the client being different
I have a samsung s23, I used the wireguard app, I tried through wifi and 4g
Any ideas on potential problems with android ?
I have proton VPN installed on the android btw.... but it was obviously not activated
My subnet is 10.100.0.0/24
Here is the output of wg.
As you can see the android peer did receive some Bytes but did not handshake.
interface: wg0
public key: serv pub key
private key: (hidden)
listening port: 51820
peer: archlinux pub key
endpoint: 192.168.1.254:50102
allowed ips: 10.100.0.3/32
latest handshake: 9 hours, 36 minutes, 15 seconds ago
transfer: 14.99 KiB received, 10.39 KiB sent
peer: android pub key
endpoint: 37.167.151.171:17799
allowed ips: 10.100.0.2/32
transfer: 29.20 KiB received, 42.86 KiB sent
Handshaking doesn't happen repeatedly unless you tell it to.
I suspect your issue here is one to do with your "allowed IPs" and your (not shown) interface addresses.
10.100.0.x was blocked by android, I switched everything to 10.0.0.x and it works now.... @pseudo blade
Building a home lab,
I have Xfinity Internet with a super old (probably 10 year old) XFi box or whatever it’s called. Do I get a stand alone modem for the home lab, or do I shove that thing in bridge mode and just get a router
put that thing in bridge mode and forbidden router on a vm?
I’m thinking of either Cisco or Ubiquity gear to put in it. Still need to put together some kind of server for that and/or hosting game servers
For context my networking knowledge consists of mostly just the stuff I’ve learned to get halfway through CompTIA Network+, I’m doing CCNA right after
Ubiquity gear cost a lot of money though which is a major rip
What do you want to do and where do you want to go?
You could do Cisco CML (free or paid versions exist) for studying and then virtualize most things with proxmox as well on a dedicated server and just get a decent switch for your network
+1 on the virtual labbing via CML/EVE-NG/GNS3 if you'd otherwise be buying extra gear just to know how to do stuff for testing.
For game servers, unless you were going to run them on dedicated computers with isolation having fancy network gear probably isn't worth much anyways and even if you are... well it depends on your risk really.
Otherwise... You really want a reasonable router with static routing support handling all traffic into your home and then splitting it off by purpose (including servers). It's much nicer being able to just access your server stuff rather than needing to use a jump host every time, and it's reasonably safe to do so as long as you set up stateful firewall rules to prevent traffic into your "home" subnet. Unless your home network is faster than gigabit it's not very difficult to find products from Ubiquiti/Mikrotik/(or allegedly TP-link, some here are very fond of them) that will serve that purpose well.
With CML you get the Cisco images for free which is nice so you don't have to risk hunting for them. Other vendors like Juniper provide their images for free which is nice as well. My ISP doesn't use Cisco so I just use EVE-NG
I'm kinda against buying museum piece Cisco gear in general for labs, and somewhat again buying new-enough Cisco gear if your goals can be achieved by virtualisation
Yeah I agree as well, its neat for a bit to figure out consoling into live gear and all, but its not super worth it especially if you can just do that at your job
Def save money and look into one of the big emulators that Meagus mentioned like CML, EVE-NG, and GNS3
Considering that this is for CCNA, perhaps Packet Tracer would be a better fit though. Since its completely free and perfectly fine for that level
CCNP and above certainly would require an emulator
I was considering mentioning Packet Tracer... but it's not 100% adequate even for CCNA. You can get somewhere around 90% of the way there, but some stuff just doesn't work on the simulator
It's plenty to get started with though!
That said, apparently we're up to Packet Tracer 9 now, maybe it's better
They've made some improvements. I used PT for my CCNA studies back in 2019 before the big revamp in 2020, its sufficent if you want to save money
And almost ever training provider for CCNA is going to use it since its free
Looking at Cisco (since I’m gonna get CCNA) and Unifi gear, gonna build a server for games that runs Ubuntu Server + GUI with Docker running LinuxGSM
I’m halfway through learning the Network+ topics currently
Kinda wanna make my own router using PFsense or something similar
run proxmox and virtualise the rest
I need to learn more about virtualization. I understand VMs from using them in my Cybersecurity class at least
I have a lot to learn still to get a job in IT anyway
I would like to test my Wi-Fi 7 AP. Can someone suggest a device that is capable of 320mhz band, or property MLO please? (I want to test what it does over wifi 6e, therefore I consider a successful test iff link speed crosses 2.4Gbps)
it is quite easy to play with virtualisation with hyperv if you dont have dedicated host, it is what i started with
with any hypervisiors there are couple of basics
basics are networking- you can either pass through a whole network interface or use a virtual switch
resource allocation- chose amount of cores and ram you want to allocate, with dynamic ram allocation you can provide base amount and it will grow as needed, CPU cores can be over-alocated for instance i can allocate 6 cores on 2 vm's while cpu is 8 core and this does not cause issues unless there is high utilisation
OS install - tipically just load up iso into a virtual "optical drive" and setup os as with real hardware
A lot of WiFi 7 clients still have issues with MLO so that might be tough
I have it disabled on my U7 Pro XG APs because it’s somewhat problematic
AND with 320mhz too!
I have 320mHz enabled on WiFi 7 however and it’s fine
oh yea i tried on my P8Pro, and MLO actually makes things worse somehow
no issues there
ok but does your device use all 320mhz?
2880Mbps link speed?
I usually get 5400mbps link speed
oh dang, yea see thats def something 6e cannot do, what device?
It’s a Qualcomm QCNCM865 WiFi card
I replaced my Mediatek WiFi card in my ASUS ROG Flow X13 (2023) GV302XI
oh nice! thank you thats exactly what i was looking for! now to figure out how i can get it on smthgi own
that’s my only WiFi 7 device though. I have 2-4 WiFi 6E clients that work fine also
If your stuff uses newer intel processors I’d recommend the BE200 card instead
I have a Ryzen system so it wasn’t compatible at all
oh hmm i have a ryzen desktop and intel chromebook , maybe be200 on the desktop?
BE200 won’t work at all on Ryzen
you’ll need the Mediatek MT7927 or Qualcomm QCNCM865
oh right yea
The BE200 only works with intel 12th gen or newer also keep in mind.
wait so any other processor it just wont work? dang
It won’t boot I’m pretty sure yeah
There’s very few options on the market for WiFi 7 cards right now
Give it a few years and it'll come around eventually. Its like when WiFi 6 came out it took a few years before people actually started making compatible devices outside of high end stuff
im still waiting to be convinced out of the opinion that 6e shd've been 7 and 7 shd've been 7e
yeah 6E honestly shouldn’t have existed
they should’ve just went to 7. 6E feels ghetto lmao
Did 6E do anything other than slightly up the speeds? 6 was legit a significant jump from 5
All it did iirc was add 6Ghz
7 added MLO and stuff that benefits other bands
which is far more immediate of a jump than anything 7 has done so far
it's arguable if 320mhz wide bands will be useful, or even advisable especially on mobile devices and crowded areas
I just think they shouldn’t have released 6E and included 6Ghz with WiFi 7 instead. Much more appealing
MLO is very much in its infancy still and doesn't work as well
Reminds me of WiFi 5
all WiFi 5 did really was add 5Ghz support
devices that didn’t support 5Ghz would still use WiFi 4 (802.11n) (or that fell back to 2.4ghz)
yea 100%. in my case i went from Wifi6 to wifi6e thent o wifi7. and i gotta tell you the jump from Wifi6 to 6e did SO MUCH for me, immediately: i live in a crowded area and the added 6ghz band immediately killed a lot of random issue i'd been having due to congestion. and allowed me to do 160mhz wide bands which was supported even by wifi6 but being 5ghz only has one 160mhz wide band in a lot of regions and that immediately doubled my speed
Yeah, I was considering upgrading from 6 to 6E but it didn’t seem like a good expense honestly to me
I upgraded to 7 back in March
6Ghz definitely is great and has its benefits but 6E just didn’t feel like a great overall package of stuff. (and it was expensive for what it offered)
Once MLO gets more optimized, 7 is going to be amazing.
the jump to 7 doesn't seem worth it to me, lol. or to be more specific: the added benifits of wifi7 won't be realized until a few years down the road, at least a year (and that's assuming i buy new gear). whereas the jump from 6 to 6e was much more immediate because by the time 6e APs came out a lot of phones were supporting 6ghz wifi
Manufacturers are also being slow to implement WiFi 7 so that makes sense
I mean I don’t blame them, WiFi 6 came out after WiFi 5 was out for 6+ years- then WiFi 6E after like 2-3 and now 7 after 1-2 lol
probably just having trouble keeping up with the times
1-2 really? i thought it was like a few mths
It could’ve been honestly
It felt like 1-2 years when equipment became more widespread though
ok see that makes sense, ppl had a LOT of time to prep for 6ghz and 6e
what did wifi6 do over wifi5 i forget?
It added support for 2.4Ghz, WPA 3, higher modulation and bumped the max data rate
They added a small channel for IOT devices so it could technically multitask and update the small devices without taking up resources to the devices that needed a bigger bandwidth
ooh wpa3 and the modulation was a big one
WiFi 6 was mostly QoL improvements
ooh it also introduced some wifi sleep stuff
lol i upgraded to 7 a couple of mths back and i'm like "Well, now what? nothing i have can do 7 properly"
it’s funny because Apple only shipped WiFi 6E on one iPhone generation then jumped straight to 7
im JUST now seeing 6e proliferate the market, here at least
shows how fast the tech is moving
OFDMA is the feature in question I was talking about
oh is that what that does? does it...actually work as advertised IRL?
That I'm not sure of in the practical applications since its designed with IOT devices in mind and I'm more of a Routing & Switching guy and don't use IOT stuff at home. Lemme find a vid that explains it. I remember a really good one a while back
i mean...they SAY "wifi 7" but like:
limited to 160mhz, 1024QAM (MCS 11 is the max on iphones as per their support page) and...i'm still not sure MLO works as advertised IRL - would you REALLY be able to tell the difference if they just put a 6e chip in there? like functionally
2 min in is a refresh on what Wifi was on 5 and earlier then gets into the OFDM and OFDMA feature at 7 min in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cmmVEoftEM&t=100s&ab_channel=NetworkChuck
We have a new wireless standard... 802.11ax or WIFI 6...and it's AMAZING!! It's not just faster, it changes the game! With features like OFDMA, TwT, and BSS Coloring, wifi will never be the same.
Join Cisco for a virtual event on April 29, Wired for Wireless: Reinventing Access. Register here: http://cs.co/6007EbFPc
This video was sponsored ...
80211n had 5ghz
IEEE 802.11n-2009, or 802.11n, is a wireless-networking standard that uses multiple antennas to increase data rates. The Wi-Fi Alliance has also retroactively labelled the technology for the standard as Wi-Fi 4.[4][5] It standardized support for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO), frame aggregation, and security improvements, among other features, and can be used in the 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz frequency bands.
Also, if you fancy some "light" reading (🤣), peruse this over several cups of coffee one weekend.
https://www.wiisfi.com/
but it is uncertain if 4096-QAM can ever be reliably obtained in the real world
How old is this? Just going off of personal experience 4096qam is a heck of a lot more plausible then mlo and 320mhz
The last updated date is right at the top of the page.
Wow yea 4096qam is definitely the most practical aspect of WiFi 7 over 6e for mobile devices
Sure, if you can regularly (or ever) achieve 4096 QAM in the real world...
https://www.ruckusnetworks.com/blog/2023/wi-fi-7-extremely-high-throughput-unleash-the-power/
I'm just going by the phy speed tbh. As the page says
I often lookup the PHY speed on a client device, and then find that speed in the PHY tables, which reveals a ton of information about Wi-Fi on that client
Based on the alone , 2594 is 2x2, 4096qam
That was taken just now
Again, idk shit shit WiFi, I'm just going by what I'm experiencing in real life
This isn't exactly true, but it's definitely broken for the newest AMD platforms. The BE200 and BE202 are supposed to work an all platforms and many have reported it working on AM3, but most people report it failing on AM4 and AM5 (weirdly some report success though). The BE201 definitely does require a Intel platform though, a particularly modern one with Cnvio37
I suspect some cases are shitty rando amazon vendors selling BE201 as a "BE200", but I'm pretty sure it is buggy too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oXrJ4wQ2dQ
It even works on ARM fwiw, so something pretty funky is happening on AMD
It is rare that WiFi is better than Wired. But in the case of the Pi 5, it is.
Waveshare sent over the HAT I was using for testing in this video (but nothing else), and they send any other form of payment—it was a project I had underway before they even sent the HAT. The video is NOT sponsored, and I in fact have purchased additional Waveshar...
I know USB DAS is a thing, but what about PCI-e? Could one make a DAS device that attaches to a PC using PCI-e?
Why not use external sas at that point? Just a hba with external ports same way disk shelfs work like netapp
If my PC crashes or loses power, will the array still continue running?
They need external power aka their own psu
I wonder if there is an adapter that connects to an m.2 slot and hs 2-4 m.2 nvme slots
We can boot from PCI-e slot drives now, right?
a pcie switch or special motherboard firmware would be required so not likely
Well more like a lsi card that has hba mode with external ports as that is internal ports. Tho you can use drives over sas always it's more about getting a enclosure for the drives and a PSU for it that is the hassle as the commercial ones are often 16 drives and more
What if the m.2 card was powered externally and ran it's own software. And it appeared to the PC as a NVME drive?
or PCI-e card, if those are bootable
Google AI told me, "just spend a thousand dollars on networking"
Booting over pci-e and even raid cards been a thing for years
That's a relief. I was worried it had been a whole decade
now you're talking raid card and those are like 2 grand
Most the time when i try to look for a raid card I think I just get a SATA controller, right?
Not older ones those are like 50 a 200 if just hdd's
the only problem is, im pretty sure im either running out of or already ran out of pcie lanes to use
Well most of those are sas controllers tho sata works on sas tho you should get ones that support hba mode aka direct drives if you want zfs
I'll probably have to wait until I get a new cpu/mobo
If you want a good NAS, just get a sas 12gbps 8 port external hba and a jbod disk shelf. I went about things the hard way and crammed 16 hard drives in a single case and now I have a stack of 10 sata ssds to make a read cache for those hdds. Things would have been so much easier if I just had gone with a 24 bay jbod in the first place.
On the plus side, once it's all set up, i'll finally be able to fully saturate my 25GbE interface. 🙂
At least when there's a cache hit anyway - but with 2.4TB, it should be fairly often. I mean, ideally I'd have 500gb class instead of 250gb class SSDs, but I'm not anywhere near utilizing my full 30TB HDD pool.
My BD-RW is sitting on top of my tower and I have some HDDs laying on the side of the tower
The "internal" one might not be a writer. But the "external" one I took apart and attached via SATA is
lol I'm actually having to debate a similar thing as well as I have two ODDs and a few HDDs in a another machine that I would rather have hooked up to my main machine.
I used to want a lot of hdd's on my machine and use my 4 5.25inch bays tho now I am keep them empty
I'd have to set aside some time to do some serious cable management to something as planned out as that
I recently lost a 6TB drive... So im kinda afraid of consolidating too much
I like my BD-RW because the disc spins
"Keeping one copy of things" strikes again.
Keep two and stick one in Amazon Glacier or the like (or on archival-grade BD-R's if that's your style I guess)
Just make sure to refresh them periodically if the data matters long term - storage left idle can and will eventually degrade
fun fact the UCG-fiber has a fan
i never knew i never saw or heard ANYONE talk about it but i just felt one of the vents on it just now and was like that is strange feels like a fan put my ear to it and yup it has a fan
OOF, so it was fanless but i got one of em with a fan
the worst part is how hard it is to open as with anything that moves IT WILL BREAK
i got one of those, but the card itself is very vulnerable due the strain of the connector & cables
that is called Thunderbolt
It was my largest drive...
I don't think Thunderbolt is an option for the CPU brand I use
USB4 (which is Thunderbolt) is an option for both brands current platforms. But you might need a highend board for the connectors
X870 or X870E on AM5 for example
Ah...so...nothing i can afford for at least 10 years
I trust a dedicated box more than I trust USB
Just had to fist a wall of blue spaghetti to recable a patch panel.
I really am an IT guy now.
4xnvcontainer.exe (SSL_C_Bulk) is stealing my entire bandwidth
still not fixed even after months of ppl reporting it
deny network access to that process in windows firewall
if you are ok with pcie x1 2.0 speeds then mining adapters can be used
i fixed it by task manager filter by internet useage and terminate the nvidia process and so far it didn't come back
Is that just a bifucator?
no, it is a pcie switch
shitty one, but still one
Like a selector switch, or like some kind of buffering traffic switch?
https://www.asmedia.com.tw/product/556yQ9dSX7gP9Tuf/b7FyQBCxz2URbzg0
most of them use this or something equivilant
can anyone tell me why Amazon sent me a 3.0 Modem instead of a 3.1 https://www.amazon.com/ARRIS-SURFboard-SB8200-RB-Approved-Spectrum/dp/B07M8BNVSD?sr=8-4 everything here says its a Docsis 3.1 but clearly its not it says on the box 3.0
you have to buy your own modem?
my current modem router that i was renting from my ISP sucks ass
so im doing this myself and was suggested in this discord to get that modem
does the model number of the device match the advertised model?
is says the model number on the device was SB8200 V3
yes but what did you recieve?
thats what i recieved thats what it said on the device itself was the SB8200 V3
on the cardboard box its says DOCIS 3.0 i need DOCIS 3.1 or my internet wont connect to it
https://www.reddit.com/r/CoxCommunications/comments/1838l9m/arris_sb8200_not_connected_to_docsis_31/
just try to use it, it does support it
this is weird the box says 3.0 but the unit itself says 3.1
it's possible the vendor probably didn't bother to update the box because money
ill be back
@untold idol that's a low-split modem FYI. If your ISP offers above 40Mbps upload, they'll likely only serve it to mid-split or high-split modems. Arris S33/S34 for example
You'll just get lower speeds.
I'm tempted to switch to my 2Gbps modem, but I don't have service over 1Gb and none of my networking equipment is over 1Gb
Most plans below 1Gbps will not have a difference in peak performance. However, DOCSIS 3.1 makes better use of the same available bandwidth. Even if your plan is slow enough for 3.0, you'll have higher RF congestion with 3.0 and experience more packet loss and higher latency.
My plan is on the 600Mbps and i just did a speedtest and i have 696Mbps
and i got everything connecting right
so the modem is working
mid/high split is referring to upload speed only
SB8200/S33/S34 all have the same download speed capability on DOCSIS 3.1
my 600 plan only has 30 upload
Makes sense. Is there a large difference in price? I think my initial modem when I moved in I got for about 40-90 dollars. The one I'm using now was 8 dollars, and the multigig ethernet one was about 12 or 16 dollars
then you're good to go with that modem. It's not future proof but who knows when cable ISPs will ever bother upgrading to mid/high-split. If your region is monopolized by the ISP, the answer to that is pretty much never
This says my current one is 3.1
i mean my choices are limited its eaither having this internet or using Verizon and i hate using mobile internet providers or starlink but thats to exspensive for me
if i get the 1gig plan i have 50 upload then but its to exspensive for me and found 600 works good
Yes, unfortunately. A 3.0 modem can be had for like $40, most decent 3.1 is $80-150. Mid split 3.1 is $170-200. High split 3.1 is $220-300.
my internet provider does not support 3.0
50Mbps upload is probably still low-split anyways, though that's really pushing low-split to extremes
how do I know if it's high split?
To the cable ISP, that's effectively a monopoly so you probably won't be getting mid/high split anytime soon
ya but realistically im thinking i dont need 1 gig speeds
They will state it. If it's unspecified, it's low-split. Before mid/high-split started coming out, low-split was just the normal
I have the CM2000, and when I search for "split", all I get are CM3000. I guess that's why it was 7 dollars
If you want to know if your ISP is mid/high split, it's not always clear. Comcast calls it the "next-generation network" and they send an email once your region has been upgraded. You can tell by the upload speed being above 40Mbps (ish, low-split is technically capable of more but few do more than 40). Mid split is usually 100-150Mbps and up to 300Mbps would be high split. Technically peak upload speeds are way higher but it's pretty aspirational like most theoretical peak DOCSIS throughputs are lol
Does that mean if you have a low split modem...that you may have spent 80 dollars on...you might just have to buy a new modem one day?
If you want the improved upload capability, yep
Oh. It's ok to use a low split modem as long as you're ok with the lower speed?
yes. It's all still DOCSIS 3.1, they just split more RF bandwidth to the upstream side
I don't share movies or games online, so i'm fine with my current upload
Whrres the modem say on the box 3.0, curious
I have that modem
I use cloud storage enough that I wish I had higher upload, but I live in a monopolized region so that probably ain't happening soon
I guess my ISP isn't rude like Comcast because I get 100 Mbit upload on the sb8200
They do it because congestion at higher speeds would create too much packet loss. Your ISP might not make you share that cable with quite as many people as comcast
is cat 8 a scam?
in need to run ethernet cable from router in middle floor to basement, cat 8 is a good choice or nah? my isp give me 300 mb
300mb? Cat 5 can do that...
5e unless you want to rely on a cable performing above its spec
which I don't recommend
just run cat 6 like everyone else and switch to fiber if you need 10+Gb
still ok for more than 60 +ft
How tall are ceilings in his country?
We don't really have basements here. Is there a cement layer on the ground floor?
Cat6 is good even for 10 gig until like 50m or something
i think 9 to 12
3 floor home
townhome
it was a refurbished model and i think they never updated the box
I'm gonna have to admit to not knowing what exactly that is...
sounds too fancy for me
also, is the basement included in those "3" floors?
I hear in some places, the ground floor isnt the first floor. So that would be about 4 or 5 floors
Anybody else pay their bill when their internet is acting up because you're mildy paranoid and think they might be messing with you because you haven't paid yet even if it isnt actually "due" yet?
I remember when 256Kbps was fast...
Data limits in 2025 
Exactly, the average residential usage is about 550gb, there's no need for data limits
Like I said before, I dont up/download movies or games constantly, so im fine
Unfortunately, some people ruin it for everyone else. And by "ruin it", i mean "dont affect them at all"
They really don't. High usage from a small subset of customers is not at all a problem
Deliberate abuse is a problem, but that's what fair use policies are for
As it is now, the usage is fine
These are townhomes, basically a bunch of houses put together.
Is the whole first floor things that legally have to be on the ground floor(oven, fridge, etc)?
I don't think there's a legal requirement for appliances afaik
Is that why there are 3 floors?
It's just most common to have it on the "main floor"
Yeah. It's probably not an actual law
Wow, $70 USD/month for 25 up -and you get data caps
That's remarkable
But if anyone ever tells you they installed a 1/3 size oven or larger on a second floor...run away
That's not even that bad.. uncle had 1000 mbps down and 20 up with unlimited data addon for total $130/month
Legit you're being beaten on price by NBN co.
Non Bean Nutbutter?
Australia govt internet service provider monopoly
Well...
108 dollars per month?
The incumbent last mile access network
I do love how their backbone network was broken into over 100 pieces because some private companies cried about not being able to middle-man it
The 121 pois are so stupid
Can Labor hurry up and unfuck that? We owe the leaches no business
But hey, at least infraco gets their $1billion/year for the network buildings
Plus the buckets of money they'd make on vnni dark fibre and wavelength
They can sell to private enterprise
They don't need a billion dollars a year for substituting actual government infrastructure
It's functionally equivalent to complaining about the government building roads because some toll company owns alternatives and wants all profit
What's the statistic on outages caused by dingos?
😛
They don't really have a high-fiber diet and get their copper from meat
Lumea had a bit of a fuck up last night
Both of the paths to a poi crosses the same road aerially
So all it took was one overheight vehicle in peak hour to take down services off a poi for 5 hours
At least if nbn did it there wouldn't be stupid things like that happening
Oh cool, low-hung overhead critical infrastructure
I'm reminded of the horrors you see pictures of in some countries in east asia with fiber
Anything to save a buck
And these are the people that run half the fucking power grid!
Are vehicles or the media more able to affect eachother at night?
Huh?
Both of the “diverse” paths were broken
By an overnight truck?
overheight
oh!
lol
overheight
lol
"wtf does the time of day have to do with it?"
i thought maybe it was colder at night, so the transmission medium was more corporeal or something...
It was peak hour, so that slowed the repair significantly
I think it's just a temporary fix too
is "diverse path" like a route?
Yes, it's supposed to be a completely different route that would avoid something like this happening
How high would we need to make the towers to create a backup microwave link between Perth and Sydney?
There is one
I'm so proud
awww, i wanted huge towers and lasers or something
Northam is in the south because everything is upside down in australia
"cocklebiddy"
I'll definately read this sometime
Thanks
Nick built the 4g network on norfolk island
Hi, I built a new PC yesterday and bought a nano-sized AC600 USB Wi-Fi adapter because my motherboard doesn’t have any PCIe slots left. However, when I plug it in, I only get around 12 Mbps download speed. Before using this adapter, the Wi-Fi card in my old PC used to average between 200–300 Mbps.
Do I need to buy a better adapter, or is there something else I can do? The current speeds are so slow that it takes forever to download anything.
Just come to France
For 50€ you have unlimited 8Gb/s symmetrical with a router from the isp that is really good, can act as a nas, docker server, wireguard server etc (everything in their os)
For this price you also have access to some streaming services
That is about what I would expect from a low end wifi adapter like that
It's tiny, shoved behind a metal case and also the "600" loosely indicates one spatial stream/antenna and some pretty typical bad marketing to add numbers together in a way they don't actually work. So basically it's awful.
If you gave it absolutely perfect conditions it might do 200. But you're not and if you did it'd defeat the point, use a cable. Presuming this is a desktop, either fill an m.2 e-key slot with an AX210 or buy one in a PCIe carrier board equipped with two more appropriate antennas and you should find better results.
You might be able to lift the old WiFi card depending on how it's installed on the old PC, but it's not like AX210s are expensive.
So for the pcle 3.0 slot which adapter or WiFi card I’m I supposed to get for it that will give me insane speeds
Wifi 7 card in the bottom with a wifi 7 AP and you are close will give you insane speeds
Wow, they really did spare all expense on that design, didn't they?
A PCIe x1 Intel AX210. Or a BE200 because wow they're cheap
BE200 is basically a straight upgrade
Something like this maybe - though I will warn you that I have not validated this specific item for being what it's supposed to be and offer no guarantees. https://amzn.asia/d/dHcFQM1
The "BE200" or "AX210" numbers are critical. Do not order AX211 or BE201 cards.
And they send you a new cheese and wine in the mail each month.
I think they're slightly cheaper but they have an explicit dependency on CNVio and I don't have much confidence in that working on that board. In fact I'd go as far as saying that I'm confident it doesn't expose that.
only thing that is lacking yeah :/
The APs are pricy and not especially worth it right now
6e goes a long way for less money
An ethernet cable goes even further for even less money :P
I've got mine hidden under the skirting board into my office atm
Zero guesswork. It'll be the speed of the interfaces assuming everything's installed competently with the correct cable type.
Kinky
That said I had to tell the cablers last week "No, you may not use Cat 5e and if you do I'll be telling you to tear it out and replace it".
Cat 6A
Ask for STP CMR solid core at least 95% copper
I think I've let my cabling registration lapse 🤫
Don't worry acma I definitely wont touch any comms cabling
UTP CCA it is!
I'm gonna assume CCA is copper Clad Aluminum
Yes
and that you're being sarcastic
Yes
ok, just making sure. since some people might not realise copper clad meands it had almost no copper
Copper sounds expensive and we have aluminium at home
Where I live...we have copper at home
In the United States, copper mining has been a major industry since the rise of the northern Michigan copper district in the 1840s. In 2017, the US produced 1.27 million metric tonnes of copper, worth $8 billion, making it the world's fourth largest copper producer, after Chile, China, and Peru. Copper was produced from 23 mines in the US. Top c...
why have poopy colored copper when you can have shiny colored aluminum???
Just use shiny Silver
Alr will order it today
How’s this
Assuming it is what is says on the tin - it's probably fine
No guarantees of course, being a no-name Amazon product. The USB header has to be connected for Bluetooth to work, but the WiFi is PCIe
if not gauranteed which specific one should i get then
I know Asus sells them, at least then you know you’re getting a proper Intel chip
Same with tplink
Likely for minimal extra cost
can you send the link really need one 😭😭
What country are you in
uk
Probably this one https://a.co/d/5V28e3a
Experience hyper fast wireless speeds like never before with next-gen WiFi 6 technology. With up to 2.7x faster speed than the previous WiFi generation, the ASUS PCE-AX3000 transforms your PC with record breaking wireless speeds up to 2.4 Gbps. With OFDMA and MU-MIMO technology, network efficienc...
Wait
Hang on
That one's an AX200
Intel WI-FI 6E AX210 module built-in Dedicated spectrum in 6GHz band for maximum speed and ultra-low latencies Support dual-stream Wireless in the 2.4GHz, 5GHz and 6GHz bands IEEE 802.11.acR2+ax compliant High speed wireless connection up to 2400Mbps Fully qualified BLUETOOTH 5.2 MU-MIMO TX/RX Pa...
^ highly likely to be fine
Also saw this one which is the WiFi 7 variant of the MSI one but will likely be more expensive https://a.co/d/2A3Zff5
The Amazon websites are so annoying how all the different regions are seperate websites but still kind of the same…
Oh yes it's completely serviceable but it doesn't do 6ghz WiFi and I was specifically looking for the one that does even though it's probably not strictly essential
Tbh if you ask a bunch of network people what's "good" don't be too surprised if our bar is probably higher than yours :P
Isn’t this a mediatek chipset?
The cheaper vendors are more likely to just tell you what chip they used
They change critical components but don’t rename it or even change the revision number
And even when there is a revision number good luck finding out what revision is in stock at the supplier
Fuck you tp link
alr imma probably get it cause this is what im going through rn
Just USB tether from your phone on WiFi to tide yourself over lol
I was under the impression iPhones could also do it
Nope, only from mobile data
Have I been decieved a second time?
