#networking
1 messages · Page 50 of 1
just bump the damned number. You afraid of scaring people off by selling wifi 25 routers supporting wifi 5 clients?
haha, exactly
and maybe cool the pace somewhat. Nobody will want to upgrade to a new wifi 6e router, if you go around telling people wifi 7 is just around the corner. I mean, What if they just wait?!?
We need 30Gbps over wifi man!!
Looking at the roadmap though it seems after 7 drops it will cool down and 8 isn't slated for ratification until 2028 or later
I have 1gbps but wanting to upgrade to 2gbps
Currently have an orbi rbr50 with two satellites
NETGEAR Nighthawk Tri-Band WiFi 7 Router (RS700S) - BE19000 Wireless Speed (Up to 19Gbps) - Coverage up to 3,500 sq. ft., 200 Devices - 10 Gig Internet Port – 1-Year Armor Subscription Included https://a.co/d/9gMRtIk
Spearheading the WiFi 7 revolution with cutting-edge technology and unimaginable power, the Nighthawk RS700 harnesses the power of WiFi 7 to unleash speeds up to 19Gbps. With 320MHz channels and multi-link operation, you now experience lower latency and dramatically enhanced WiFi performance. Lev...
19 Gbps peak throughput on all frequencies (not per client) but still it may keep up with a 2 Gbps uplink
But at $700 it ought to provide back rubs too - sheesh
I need mesh for coverage
WiFi 7 range is actually far greater than, so read up, maybe you don’t
Could do a proper prosumer network setup for that much with almost certainly better coverage. Though not Wifi 7
https://www.eero.com/?gclid= erro does mesh WiFi 7
eero is the world’s first home WiFi system. A set of three eeros covers the typical home. They work in perfect unison to deliver hyper-fast, super-stable WiFi to every square foot. It’s simple to set up. Easy to manage. And gets better over time with new features and improved performance. Stream video, get work done, or swipe right in any room —...
DuckDuckGo FTW
https://www.target.com/p/x9-performance-rgb-backlit-mechanical-usb-keyboard-for-pc/-/A-86102033#lnk=sametab wtf were they thinking with the media keys
the media keys would make the space bar hard to use
oops wrong chat
If I have a firepower/sf, i should place them behind asr/isr to mitigate arp poisoning is, what I understand?
I'm debating on getting a Gaming router for a lower latency in game such as valorant
The use of it would mostly be Ethernet , and not wifi, i dont use wifi on my deskstop ,only for mobile at the moment , and i would like to know if they make such a big difference over the regular ips router on ethernet speeds and latency
Im looking at MSI Radix axe6600(350$) and ax6600 (160$) , and also the Asus rog GT ax6000(230$) and the AXpro11000(410$) , i saw they have gaming features to reduce latency , but im not so sure how they works if they are paid features or included , if its worth spending that much if it doesnt have that much impact for my use
I mainly stream and play competitively ranked and esport , mostly valorant for now , i mostly have 2 devices connected to my internet , my pc and phone , i also have a TV modem im not really using at the moment 
Gaming router is waste of money
a cheap 60 dollar router such as a mtik and ethernet will get you basically everything
Fair enough, why would you argue for that reason?
I see, that's fair enough
gaming is just marketing and there's nothing really that special about them
do you have a recommendation for a router?
just need one for ethernet tbh
at home I use an ER605
fair, what about the low ping/latency provided, that's the only thing I kept about it, cus I don't really care if it's a gaming router and rgb, just the low latency and faster connection to game servers
what's wrong with current router?
thank you
low latency and faster connection to game servers
a router contributes next to nothing latency wise
and routing is out of your control, that's on the ISPs end
I think I have a little issue with ethernet and the latency with the servers 🤔
oh, fair, thank you 🤔

if current router with ethernet has issues I doubt a new router will help
I get it now, thank you for sharing your knowledge
I mean, it's not that big of an issue, I'm at like 90-95% of the rated speed by ethernet
it would just be a latency more about
but as you said it's on the ips end
which is understandable 
if you really want to check you can plug into modem directly
bypass router and see what happens
🤔
well I'm plugged by ethernet, direction to my internet provider modem, I just feel like the in game ping could be lower
but you made your point which is arguably right, so I understand why now 
it's probobly an all-in-one router/modem combo
thank you for your help, helps a lot
think so, yeah
yeah adding another router would create more issues if anything
unless the ISP eqipment is really bad
understandable and logic
it's decent, tbh it works correctly and is fine on its own
my older one, from my previous isp provider was worst, but this one is decent
then maybe putting it into bypass mode and adding another would maybe help, but most of the time it will just be a waste of money
so I'mma stick to it, and see how it goes on the long term
yeah there is no need to change anything
I'm getting a tik
Tiny 'Tik or Big 'Tik?
@peak cloak @hollow marlin Preparing stuff for new apartment network 
Too lazy to do VLANs for it
why put it behind instead of in front of the WAN?
Others said it'll go through a vrrp (due to LB/VIP) and most ISPs don't honor ARP requests of that sort
Needs DMZ
So I set up a wireguard tunnel between opnsense and my phone, along with a mullvad tunnel on opnsense, with the intent on accessing homelab when away from home and also using said mullvad tunnel for general internet traffic. I did up the rules to allow my phone to access my server in my dmz vlan. However, and this is the part that confuses me, when I create a rule on the phone wg interface and set the destination to my dmz vlan, traffic gets routed out my mullvad tunnel and doesn't go directly to dmz. If I set the destination to any it routes how I want it to internally.
Any ideas as to why setting allow dest to dmz would make it go out mullvad?
Time to play around with instant on!
Where I can enable ipv6 in my router or how to add ipv6 wan ?
ISP needs to support it
as well as router
And is in my abilities to check it ? When I go to any web it uses IPv6 from now on and i didn’t enable anything
if you are using v6, then it supports it
Why it doesn’t have any wan connection though
wdym
just to confirm when you do something like ping 2001:4860:4860::8888 it works?
Do I need to use it on computer ? Currently on phone… any online way ?
no, unless you're on android you can use termux
if you're on phone you could be getting v6 through celluar provider
This is some online ping test
I have cellular disabled
yeah no that doesn't help
that uses their servers to ping
I thought so, I noticed on some pages with ip it started showing me some IPv6 addresses and from then on i noticed I have IPv6 access
I tested on some IPv6 test page
could be some weird router GUI bug with how it handles PPPoE
I noticed I have exactly same ipv4 and IPv6 no matter if I have only cellular or only Wi-Fi which look glitchy
So it might have the IPv6 connection just it doesn’t show any ?
yes
Firmware update might be a possible solution if there is one
I tried rebooting which didn’t help so I will try look for the firmware
Nah not even a firmware upgrade
Nvm might be some glitch tho IPv6 has all ports and etc. open right ?
if i want to learn how to build and run a home 2 gig in basement rack. 3 story house. what course should i learn and what gear should i get 5k budget Christmas's gift
hi there i a ma having this problem just a few second ago where the etherenet/lan just randomly not working i've tried replugging and unplugging it and ir still doesn't work it was fine working for a week now and it just gone i used diagnostic its not plugged in properly or might be broken and i already tried multiple different cables and still no fix
Ok
What course? I'd say it depends on what you'd like to do later. Everyone seems to want to hire Cisco certified though.
Gear... I'd say on that budget you'd be spending a chunk on getting proper wiring done for roof-mounted APs and ethernet ports and then put WiFi 6e in everywhere. Expecting a homelab in that budget or just a nice router, APs and fast internet everywhere?
Fast, Internet everywhere currently running axe1000 +ap
I would say remotely control, all my computers block off websites for the teen. Admin work to make sure I know how to troubleshoot stability.
That's a few different domains. sysadmin + net admin mostly
all my computers block off websites for the teen
like filtering? that basically impossible unless you are able to control every computer itself
Mostly dependent on said teen's drive to find work-arounds. The main thing that'd be hard to deal with is DoH. Can block lookups to the most popular ones.
But a VPN makes all that moot
I am able to dominate whatever happens on the computer and the teen is not computer literate.
You sound like an excellent parent. I'd suggest diverting that time to the kid and actually teaching them to be literate.
I’m not a parent it’s for my home systems and my 11-year-old brother. Protection against malware and other sites. I could never get them to read he’s kind of a person that shuts down. When I was in school, I had an entire class that taught me computer stuff but they don’t have that for his generation.
@clear igloo I wonder if I can trust my dad to swap out optics 
Ummmm, that's a tough question, lol
He installed the APC network card
Well then that might not be bad
and he can follow instructions
that's key, haha
10g optics or 1g?
Provided he can get the lever release it shouldn't be an issue
10g
https://www.fs.com/products/11555.html
https://www.fs.com/products/40192.html?attribute=713&id=1787039
FS Cisco SFP-10G-LR compatible SFP+ optical transceiver supports up to 10km link lengths over LC duplex SMF fibre at a wavelength of 1310nm.
oh fs optics, those are simple to fiddle with 😄
first party cisco 10g are a pita sometimes as the release lever can get stuck, I usually have a second 10g optic I use to pop the lever open if that makes snese
oh yeah I have those
I wish I ran SMF to my room instead of MMF
but its not hard to pull more
lol, only 400g limit 😦
What if I just pull MPO
20m (66ft) MTP®-12 (Female) to MTP®-12 (Female) OS2 Single Mode Elite Trunk Cable, 12 Fibers, Type A, Plenum (OFNP), Yellow, Product Specification:Connector A - US Conec MTP® Female (Pinless) , Connector B - US Conec MTP® Female (Pinless) , Fiber Mode - OS2 9/125μm SM , Wavelength - 1310/1550nm , Glass Fiber - Corning SMF-28® Ultra...
I would only do MPO if you go multimode, single mode is LC for the most part
Global distributor of MTP® Cassette, buy 12 Fibers MTP® Male to LC/UPC Duplex, 0.35dB IL, Polarity AF Pair Flipped, Single Mode OS2 MPO/MTP® Cassette from FS.COM !
or do that, lol
Assembled, rugged and lightweight 12-channel mobile field cable, excellent cable retention due to aramid yarn, black PUR outer jacket, available in single (APC) and multi mode (PC).The opticalCON MTP® cable connector accommodates 12 optical fibers (multimode PC or single mode APC) based on conventional and pro ...
We are probably doing this for work
Video?
Mainly IP
but I wanna carry 2x IP connections and then we can have whatever else
@clear igloo Geez
why are sfp-10g-lr modules on ebay more expensive than buying new from fs 
because, logic and not everyone knows fs maybe?
@clear igloo AWS will charge for all ipv4
adguard home has a parental blocking thing and malware blocking built-in. Would have to force all dns in the network to use it, which needs a non-basic router OS like pfsense or opnsense
It can also enforce safe search in these search engines
duplex yes, simplex ones are often sc
SM BiDi that use SC are aging out. Most are LC nowadays
Recommendations for the best external WOL platform? I have one of the simple tools for the internal network at home but I need something I can use remote
What you need is a local server, can be as simple as another computer or pi on your local network connected to the Internet to send the magic packet
This looks interesting: https://mikrotik.com/product/crs310_8g_2s_in
2.5 gigabit, SFP+, USB, L3 offload, enough CPU for gigabit NAT...
I think the price is a tad high for just using it as a switch but I can see some cool ways you could use it in niche scenarios
hooray! 10gig
ikr?!
lol, i did support chat with linksys to find a copy of a router firmware because it wasn't on the site and the guy said "it's not on the site". Oh, thanks
STH didn't like that https://www.servethehome.com/mikrotik-crs310-8g-2s-in-review-8-port-2-5gbe-and-2-port-10gbe-switch/2/
I have a question regarding running an ethernet cable between adjacent rooms. It is possible for me to get a short CAT 6 ethernet cable, cut off the male ends, shorten the cable and connect it between two RJ 45 keystones so that I can run it through a wall rather than fishing it behind the wall? I have no need for hundreds of feet of cable
You may be surprised to learn a number of off-the-shelf ethernet wall plates use rj45 connections on the back, for the cable coming from the wall.
Im assuming you mean something like this?
So I would essentially need a coupler? @thick minnow
or just punch two holes in the wall and throw the cable through
Eh I know I could do that but I like to keep everything looking tidy
That doesn't strike me as negative at all. It's not a router and has very specific limitations.
I guess the last page does suggest they should switch to more price-competitive parts for what it offers as a switch but that's not contrary to what I said
The deal is that you're buying this (but it's 2 CPU cores)
There are MUCH cheaper gigabit ARM routers.
There are cheaper 2.5 gig switches
I don't know of much with L3 offload, gigabit routing with USB, 2.5gbe switching in that form factor as one unit.
I think the big killer is this though
No NAT offload is a huge bummer because that means the 1.3gbps link to the CPU must handle it all
Oh I just noticed it's actually in the matrix already and looking at it by switch chip was unnecessary lol
Yeah, if you ONLY use it as a switch or as a media converter, it's fine
the outlet IS a coupler. So you plug a cable into the back, and mount it. The user plugs their computer into the front.
If that 6 means WiFi 6, then my phone is using WiFi 5, does it mean my phone doesn't support WiFi 6?
or you could just look up the specs of your phone
yes, it's Wi-Fi 5 Max 400Mb/s
however on local network file moving it barely goes over 200Mb/s next to the router
That's about right for WiFi 5
Your phone likely has a 1x1 antenna so that makes sense it's only reporting a max of 433Mbps
Or your router only supports 1x1 but if it supports WiFi 6 then that's less likely
How bad is using port forwarding for wol
just curious if anyone has ever been able to make Wireless Wake On Lan work?
It seems like the home grade routers are mostly trash. Like missing basic functions.
Flash openwrt on it and get those basic features back and then some more
I think that’s a little above my mom’s ability to use.
Security or actually getting it to work:
For security... How bad is anyone knowing your MAC and IP being able to turn your computer on? It's precisely that bad or not bad.
As far as getting it to actually work: Go have a look at the Wikipedia page for Wake-on-LAN and you'll see a nice list of pitfalls and how to deal with several of them.
It's usually just less annoying to have an always-on host on the network to handle it for you.
"5G"
i would rather have one of these
https://mikrotik.com/product/hap_ax3
https://mikrotik.com/product/l009uigs_2haxd_in
https://mikrotik.com/product/hap_ax2
Be wary on the L009 if integrated high-performance WiFi is an expectation, it has 2.4ghz only, though WiFi 6.
But yeah consumer-grade routers: can't go back to them
And the L009's pretty cool as something with SFP, gigabit ethernet, decent routing and WiFi for cheap
RB4011 needs a worthy SFP+WiFi successor
Is sfp generally just kinda plug and play like ethernet or is there a lot of nuance to it
its slightly more annoying since theres often vendor locks, but as long as you avoid the brands that do vendor locking you should be good
So like vendor locking to what extent/end?
cisco switches will only accept cisco sfp modules
but mikrotik devices will accept whatever
for example
So if I just get like any old generic sfp device they should accept any other sfp transceiver
generic 🤨
but yes
Well I just meant like any other sfp card/switch but looking on Amazon there appears to be a market of like generic brand 2.5/10gb switches
yea those are unlikely to lock stuff
there are special sfp modules, and an sfp+ module has a good chance of not working in a sfp device
but a 1 gig module in a 1 gig port should be fine
and a 1 gig module in a 10 gig port too
Do direct attach cables have any limits either?
same story as above, but generic switches shouldnt be vendor locked
Thank you for the help 🙏
they will work but they are fussy abt it
# no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid```
idk if that command is avalibile on every ios device
Can't be taking Cisco's tasty, tasty markup without at least a bit of a fight
It's not that bad
Once you buy enough Cisco, it gets cheaper than generic sometimes, we get 66.7% off and Cisco DAC cables are cheaper than generic.. also, Cisco FC optics actually work in netapp/qlogic too so give them some credit
yea
i belive we pay around 1/3 of msrp
hey guys! I found a router that is compatible with Alexa and Google!
@clear igloo
get that latency lower!
This room only for discussing network hardware?
Right then.
Suggestions on who to talk to or where I could go to get help on making this all work together? Modem -> Switch -> Router / Server / Server
I am stuck on IP addresses and subnetting.
I know that there are default subnet addresses and classless subnet addresses.
Can I set one set of devices on IP 10.1.1.25 with the subnet 255.224.0.0 and the same IP with 10.1.1.25 on subnet 255.255.255.0 on a different device?
How do I set it up so that all of one type of device, say security camera's, are on one network but can't see each other or other users?
I am so lost 😦
Start at the bottom. Why do modem -> switch and not modem -> router?
My house is odd atm. I have ISP Modem -> router -> extender -> Switch and from the switch, Router 2, Server, Server & RaspberryPi.
The goal is to statically assign an IP address to each and every physical device in my home, including all mobile devices.
That requires more specialized hardware that can do client isolation
Why, static IPs are pain
To learn. I want to get into IT from my current position.
The Switch is a Lenovo CEO128TB Layer-3 Managed Switch.
Well that won't really help, no one would assign IPs all statically in industry
To client devices
But learning how to do it will help.
So preventing intra-VLAN communication can be done at your router, but it's dependent on what router OS you're using.
and I like the control.
Well intersubnet can be done at router level
Not within L2 domain
I appreciate ya'lls input. Thank you. I have spent the last 2ish weeks learning about CIDR and reading RFC documents but am still overwhelmed.
You want all devices on the L2 domain to have the same subnet mask
and watching youtube videos and they tell you how to do some of the things but not how to do the practical things.
Yeah that comes with experimenting, I learnt everything myself
Awesome! That's what I'm trying to do 😉
I would look into vlans and seperate subnets if you want control
Would not advise doing all statics
Aren't static IPs attached directly to a device MAC address the most secure inside a private network?
What you can do are static DHCP lease, so a devices has the same ip
Wdym?
To prevent hackers, snoopers etc.
No, statically assigning won't do anything to stop a MITM
that's done at higher levels with encryption
Hackers & snoopers have to get on your network in the first place. That's most likely gonna be via a sketchy download.
Gotta think realistically about your threat model. People aren't gonna get in your network from the internet at large just because they feel like it.
Can create a dedicated vlan just for said server and set up rules to prevent someone from getting anywhere else.
We also host lots of people sometimes so I need to be able to have 2 different guest networks.
Why 2? I get having a separate guest one
Guest Friends & Family (elevated), Guests Randoms (dumb)
We host various gaming tournaments and have 20+ people here sometimes.
D&D, Magic the Gathering, Warhammer, etc...
Makes more sense, but that is only worthwhile if you have different firewall rules for each subnet
Well basically every router has firewall functions and that would make sense
That's what I did,
I have everything mapped out in a spread sheet, I have all the ports and devices labeled.
Because you need filter where it routes between vlans
I need to now figure out how to give everything an IP address and then how to make it so some can see into some but not others, still yet be able to force some traffic through a VPN or the Pi-Hole but make both optional on some devices.
Could also just get a firewall device as those are basically routers with good filtering controls
Yes, so I would just do DHCP and vlans
Networks: Management, Pi-Hole, VPN, Security Cameras, Home Users, Work, TVs, Guest Net1, Guest Net2, Media Server, Game Servers, Steam Backup, Files Backup and a General Files Storage server.
Also keep in mind that all this can be a pita sometimes, which is why I keep my network simple
And do network experimenting separate
Ha! This is the separate network.
I have 2 ISPs right now.
This one is specifically to learn on and how to build and set all this up.
Trying to give static leases for everything will just cause headaches, especially for guests. Android & iOS do MAC randomization, I think windows does it by default now too?
Nvm, looks like one has to enable it for windows
Still, mac randomization makes things more difficult for static huh.
It can be disabled, but that's a device by device thing
I do need some devices to be static, such as the media and games servers.
I am absolutely grateful for ya'lls in put. Thank you. 😉
I have everything mapped out in a spread sheet and ready to go, things just need actual addresses heh
That's where static DHCP leases come in
Yea, I do static leases for my personal stuff, but don't expect to be able to do it for visitors
Yeah I only do static leases for stuff like printers and server
For instance, is it possible to put say the VPN on its own IP address but make it so that the Acquisitions and Media server always have to use the VPN but home users don't?
Everything else including personal is dynamic DHCP
Yes, put in separate server vlan/subnet
In router setup the VPN
What router OS are you using?
My original question, can I put VPN on 10.1.1.25 255.224.0.0 and the cameras on IP with 10.1.1.25 on subnet 255.255.255.0?
I forget subneting specifics but I think you are going too deep. What you want are seperate L2 domains
So 2 seperate vlans, and just do a /24
Ah see, that's the thing, I don't just want it to work, i want to know the how and why of it.
What happens when two departments merge or 2 companies? and they have the same ip addressing scheme? can they just change up the subnets?
Company A has 10.1.1.25 255.224.0.0 and COmpany B has 10.1.1.25 255.255.255.0
Company C buys them. What do?
Has to be deconflicted
Each company has 1000s of devices on thos IP ranges.
The separate subnets should be 2 different networks yeah? think, street level and basement level?
Same place, different height?
Also fyi if you something like 10.1.1.25 255.255.255.0 like you said before it's actually 10.1.1.X meaning x can be anything
Which is why I like CIDR notation more
Really depends if they're sharing a router or not. If they are, then pretty sure the network guys are gonna be mighty busy
Busy how?
Well not anything but first bit 0 is network address, and last which would be 255 is broadcast address. Everything else is free game.
😉
Essentially, I could put each network on it's own class A and be done with it yeah? Network 1 = 10.1.1.0, Network 2, 11.1.1.0, Network 3, 12.1.1.0, etc..
I mean like gone into before, 1 IP = 1 MAC address. So if there's some shared IP space then it has to be figured out
Aye, I'm just trying to figure out how this all works out when 2 pieces of hardware have the same IP address but are on completely different subnets.
I guess I would ask why you want 2 different devices to have the same IP
IP conflicts can easily happen on a network when 2 devices want to use the same one. Causes both to have traffic issues
Compan A has devices on network 10.1.1.0 /12 and Company B has devices on network 10.1.1.0 /18. Company C buys both Company A & Company B. Each Company has at least 3,258 devices assigned to an IP address. Do they need to change IP addressing schemes on one or both of the companies? Can a Switch or Router figure out the difference between the 2 networks based on the subnet?
Throw classes away, no one uses them anymore
And you need to use an IP range that is reserved for private use
Doesn't matter, still an IP conflict as long you can route between the 2 subnets
If you can't, ex 192.168.1.1 on one home router and also same on house next door, doesn't matter since you can not route between them
MAC addresses come into play after a certain level, and devices ask how to find another based on a response for an IP from the router, which they get a MAC in return. I'm not off am I @peak cloak?
Yeah it's at Layer 2
IPs are Layer 3
Right, so when 2 devices share an IP, other devices don't know where to actually send traffic
I don't remember how it works exactly but it's not from router
Devices themselves broadcast advertisements
Yea I'm not a network dude by profession
Yeah me neither
Me thrither?
lol
I just remember mostly along the lines of this when it comes to IPs
If you want to read more about how IP resolution works https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Address_Resolution_Protocol
The Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) is a communication protocol used for discovering the link layer address, such as a MAC address, associated with a given internet layer address, typically an IPv4 address. This mapping is a critical function in the Internet protocol suite. ARP was defined in 1982 by RFC 826, which is Internet Standard STD 37....
Fun story, I passed the CCNA exams 10+ years ago. I forgot most of it 😦
This is only for L2, at L3 you would advertise subnets themselves between routers using bgp or similar protocols or set it statically with static routes
Yea very perishable skillset if one doesn't use it regularly
If you move to PVLANS, it COULD be done but EVERYONE would hate it......
Basically every device is on its own private vlan
Ah so what they do for Android v6 clients
I wish google weren't such fucks when it came to DHCPv6
So stupid how Android still doesn't support DHCPv6
I have not even started on IPV6 or DHCPv6. I'm stuck in v4 learning.
An issue got opened for this over a goddamned decade ago.
Still just sitting there
But more intense. Basically every packet has to go through the control plane regardless so subnets really don't matter
And people wonder why v6 is taking so long when vendors need to implement such backwards solutions to things that shouldn't be problems
That sounds slow and unproductive.
It's super secure though
You had me at secure.
I mean that's basically just like client isolation right?
Devices can't talk between each other without going to router/network device
Unless permitted to, correct
Behind my switch & router I can use whatever IP address I want for the most part though right? as long as its not 0.x.x.x, 127.x.x.x or 255.x.x.x?
One needs to balance security and their own time. How much time do you want to futz with things just for security? Don't get me wrong, security good, but it's on a scale like other things. Too much and a load of time is spent on just security
Do you want to use the Internet?
No
Some devices yes, some no.
Only IP addresses reserved for private use
I don't want my security system accessible to or from the internet.
or my steam backup server.
Then use firewall
WHich is a backup of the backups.
Plz don't use global IPs for internal use
A regular router with a firewall prevents this
You SHOULD only use the RFC 1918 ranges
No, how would it fail open?
Fail open?
I have that paper saved.
If you use 8.8.8.x, you will have a bad day
You're saying firewall is a backup
Fun story, had a client that used public IPs for their internal network. Got assigned the range forever ago and they just refused to let go of it.
How would the firewall fail to access the Internet
I mean that kinda normal
It's fine if the range is assigned to you
College uses global IPs for dorm Ethernet
For sanity's sake though, stay within in the pre-determined private IP ranges.
Oh fun
We had some people use ips in a /24 that we own in an internal network, that was a pain
Well, more a waste
Still firewalled to Internet, but I can rdp from anywhere on campus
If you can RDP from campus, it's on the internet
No ?
Rule #1, everything is accessible from the Internet if someone else can get to it
RDP?
Yes. Start simple. Then you can build on that
My notes.
I'm not worried, plus I had 2fa. Now I just got a better laptop and sold desktop so it's no longer an issue
Also by that logic, basically almost everything is public
:chad_yes:
But back to this @slate dust
Also the whole thing about .1 being gateway, etc. is not true in all cases
First bit is network address, last bit is broadcast
Just so happens in a /24, it's 0 and 255
And gateway can be whatever address
Just so happens it's common to have it at .1
Thank you! I was wondering about that, when say an IP address goes from 192.168.50.60 - 192.168.50.75, the next range would start .76 and be the same as the broadcast yeah?
Yes. From a IT SEC point of view.. that is true
None would start at 60
Company A has devices on IP range 10.1.1.0 to 10.1.1.100 on subnet 255.0.0.0 and Company B has devices on the same range but has the subnet 255.255.255.0 both have different subnets and Company C buys them and wants them all to talk to each other, does the separate subnets keep Ca and Cb from having to change their IP addressing schemes?
I think I have answered this question.
No, broadcast and network address are different. If broadcast is let's say at .16 then next network would be at .17
Not sure if those are real irl just a example
The best approach would be to keep the 2 separate
I didn't realize that was your own justification since you ended in a question lol
Ha.
Yeah makes sense, someone can run proxy, etc but it wouldn't be directly accessible with IP for example
Thank you.
You can 100% keep them separated and talk via NAT
NAT?
Read an interesting post about bank acquisitions and how the systems stay separate for a long time and the intricacies of combining them
Network Attached Telementry?
Network address translation
I took a guess.
How your router translates your traffic to the outside world
And all sorts of custom integrations need to be made
Which soundrd really similar to the bandaid, NAT
DM me the title? I am interested.
Was on hacker news a while back, I'll see if I can find it
With my Layer 3 switch though, i can do so much more than give single addresses to single devices yeah? I can combine and separate at will with access control lists yeah?
and VLANs?
No, acls just are allow/deny
Oh, it's a managed Layer 3 switch.
What kind of switch?
So it has router capabilities built in, I think.
Lenovo CE0128TB
Software features Lenovo Campus Networking OS (Campus NOS):
Layer 2 switching, Layer 3 switching, virtual local area networks (VLANs), VLAN tagging,
spanning tree protocol (STP), link aggregation (trunk) groups (LAGs), link dependency, quality of
service (QoS), stacking, IPv4/IPv6 management, IPv4/IPv6 routing, IPv4/IPv6 virtual router
redundancy protocol (VRRP), IPv4/IPv6 policy-based routing (PBR), IPv4/IPv6 protocol
independent multicast (PIM).
Thank you.
I have been doing customer service for the past 30+ years, I want to move out of having to regularly talk to people so I'm going with IT since I already kind of enjoy and get it.
It's a switch, don't expect more from that
I was expecting to be able to create static routes between devices on my network.
You won't need static routes
I don't need anything, I want to.
If every vlan is "made" at one router
Not with that switch most likely anyways
I thought Vlans were made on the Layer 3 switch.
No
I didn't know if you had gotten your hands on like a nexus 9k or something
I don't know what that is 😉
$$$
Oh, Ha, hi, I'm poor people.
It was the cheapest layer 3 managed switch I could find new.
For learning.
Ok so basically vlans are basically little flags which tell network devices what "highway/line" it's one
Switches often are used to untag vlans for end devices
So pluging in a device on that port will make it on vlan 12 for example
Yeah!
On the switch you would have a trunk port with every vlan tagged which goes to router
Based on the Cisco Cloud Scale technology the Cisco Nexus 9300-FX3 Series is the latest generation of access switches. Building on the successful Nexus 9300-FX series, the platform supports cost-effective cloud-scale deployments, an increased number of endpoints, and is capable of wire-rate security and telemetry. The platform is built on modern...
That's a switch that that can act as a router
In router you would have virtual interfaces, (implementation specific) that would basically be the gateways for your devices
That Lenovo is more designed to handle losing a link
Also how devices would route between vlans, (through router)
Can also run services like dhcp
At my 9-5 we use 93180YC-FXs as routers all the time. Mostly for BGP ect
Static DHCP is a thing though?
Whereby "Devices in this category only get these IPs?"
A router with static route with have a long list of x.x.x.x/y via y.y.y.y
Dhcp reservations
Added to the notebook.
Basically, this MAC addresses gets this IP
Usually just a button in router make device static
There's ALL sorts of stuff you can do
You can even give one IP, that is on a restricted network then after a health check, move it to the normal network
It's a can of worms
mmmm tasty wrigglys
WOuld it be possible to make it so that my main PC is able to access and see everyone and everything, but only certain devices would be able to see me?
Yes
Neat.
I don't want to do that, having 1 pc atttached to all the things sounds like a bad idea.
having the option to do so though, is cool.
Ha.
At least in the vyatta based OS I used there's 4 traffic types: new, established, related, invalid
So you can drop new connections to PC subnet
But allow PC new to rest
Also found this image which can help understand vlans
VLAN per port, scrub
Weve got some ports with over a hundred..
We stopped counting at that point
Right now I have 14 different networks that I would like to set up. Management, Pi Hole, VPN, Security, Home Users, Work, TVs, Guest Net A, Guest Net B, Media Server, Game Servers, Steam Back up, Files Backup and other.
I would like to make it so that some have to go through the VPN & Pi Hole, some don't, some can see each other, some can see each other and everyone else on that network, and some are isolated to only 1 or 2 users.
Do I separate them with IPs / Subnets + Vlans and ACLs?
Per device or per vlan?
Yes.
Per device would be a huge pita
Some per device, some per vlan.
For instance, the Steam Link is 1 device, I may add more things like it, but I only want it to be able to see the internet and allow only 1 device at a time to connect.
I would figure out device categories and do per vlan, then it's pretty simple
Are 10.10.1.3/4 HA nodes?
no
Why are you getting the same routes from both then?
They both can route to it
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms router.apartment.ryois.net [10.110.0.1]
2 41 ms 43 ms 41 ms router.as64512.bgp.ryois.net [10.10.1.1]
3 83 ms 84 ms 86 ms 10.10.1.4
4 82 ms 83 ms 83 ms unifi.redacted.com [10.13.20.20]
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms router.apartment.ryois.net [10.110.0.1]
2 44 ms 43 ms 43 ms router.as64514.bgp.ryois.net [10.10.1.4]
3 45 ms 43 ms 43 ms unifi.redacted.com [10.13.20.20]
So just dual path?
Yes
Didn't know if you were ringing it
I saw as in there and once you start dealing with that sort of thing, you start dealing with architectures where it could get INTERESTING
I love how my friend just lets me have full remote access of his router 🤣
I don't even think my router can do BGP.
I think my switch can but not going there (3750x with IP Services license)
That's a CIsco switch yeah?
Neat!
My switch can but I don't wanna lol
C3850 with ip services
So many terms and acronyms to learn.
BGP is one of those voodoo things for me
That is pretty
Apartment is gonna be similar but a 24 port version of that switch instead of 48
Also, what am I looking at?
Cisco Catalyst 3850-48P
Fortinet FortiGate 40F
A router/ngfw
NGFW?
next gen firewall
My apologies, I am still learning.
Yeah, those were more expensive... I only paid like $175 and the network module can out of the scrap pile at work
NGFWs can do more just stateful firewalls
IP reputation, IPS/IDS, application control/DPI, email, etc.
Right now, I am aware of the word firewall, I know how it applies to vehicles and I've disabled and created rules inside of software firewalls, but still am not exactly what they are or how they operate.
I was originally planning on a ubiquity switch so I got too short of a wall rack aadly
That C3850 was like $115 and NM-2-10G was $110
Ha
the 40F was $485.61
Also, not necessarily looking for an explanation at this juncture, as I am sure in my CCNA studies, I'll learn.
the 40F at home was brand new bought from a vendor
Firewalls will do as much or as little as you ask them to
but the 40F I got for my apartment was used on ebay for $240
It all depends on your network architecture
I am trying out Instant On AP at apartment
but home is just unifi APs bc I don't wanna spend more on wireless LMFAO
That Catalyst, is it a layer 3 managed switch?
Yeah some features aren't available 😦
Yea
Depends on the license
Whoa! Great price!
cisco uh
I paid $185 for the lenovo one I have.
doesn't really check
Mine came with ip services for some reason which was a suprise
"right to use"
Question: Purpose of a patch panel?
Make it clean
termination for drops
I have my switch going direcly to my other devices.
termintating long runs
Home runs suck
also punchdown > crimping
My drops at home don't actually terminate in that rack
For the looks then?
I am confused.
Structure cable isn't designed to move like patch cables
the drops terminate in a smaller 4U rack that I don't care about lol
Patch cables are stranded copper
Cable from a box are solid
Oh, I did that but in Excel.
@peak cloak I wish I did stuff differently when I was running cable in the house
When I run a new drop in my house, it goes to the patch panel. It doesn't HAVE to get patched in.
All the ports are labeled and clearly dictate which cable goes to which port on which device.
yeah but that's not the only reason
my stuff is not perfect either, have 2 sub-switches
- I wish I pulled more CAT6 to my room I only did one because my tought was "I have fiber running to my room"
- I wish I pulled SMF to my room instead of OM3 MMF
The aimesh node in my office gets patched to the main router in the living room which wouldn't have been possible if I had put plugs on them
You hate yourself?
I have also labeled the cables and noted which network each one belongs to.
Yeah having documentation in the computer is nice but having stuff labeled on the patch panel is nice
Noone WANTs SMF
isn't single mode more popular now
the cabling is meh difference at this size
Single mode is FAR more fussy though and FS optics don't count
Not in the enterprise
So mostly for looks.
I don't need other optics
Appearance, visual perception of information.
Work I am pushing to go SMF when we replace optics/fiber
not really, if you you read through the reddit post comments there's a bunch of other reasons
get rid of MMF
It depends where it is too
And how many
Someone told my team that one of our new site was going to be all single mode everywhere, so I told them that we needed 384 of https://www.cdw.com/product/cisco-sfp-transceiver-module-fibre-channel/4913711?enkwrd=DS-SFP-FC32G-lw
They about-faced their no-mmf stance really quick
We never install MMF at clients because so much stuff doesn't work over MMF for us
If it is only a few going between like a dmarc and a closet, meh
BGP 💚
Plus SMF is just so much easier
But people blanket making statements about smf being better isn't always correct
I want to do OSPF from a SVI on the switch for networks for roommates at apartment
If someone wants to tell me that I HAVE to spend an extra $22,650 PER OPTIC because it's "better", we make them pay the Delta 🤓
We don't even get to the discounted prices because it end quickly
That'll work just fine. Also enable multipath if the latency is similar across both VPNs for the ECMP
How does that load balance? Round Robbin per conversation?
Generally I suggest not being ripped off
nah one way is way slower
It's like the small business server quotes asking for a thousand bucks for low-capacity 2.5" hard drives
Like no, buy an enterprise SSD from a reputable vendor for less money
I'd pay good money to have a a /30 or /29 from my ISP lol @hollow marlin
I could HA pair a 40F for prod home network and then have some rando router for the lab. BGP the lab & prod for access.
We are building a Datacenter and I have like 40 cabinets of servers going in and the GC tried to tell me the new standard for the enterprise is SMF. I told them that was cute.
Separate everything entirely
Beats having to rip up all your MMF later
They also said that someone had said 3.5kw/cab and I told them they were getting 10kw/cab so have fun
That's what I'm having to do rn at work
As said, if you're paying $22k for non-exotic optics you are being taken for a ride
It's within a Datacenter cabling, people shouldn't lump that with structured cabling
Cisco 100gb single mode optics list around 25k I think
idk much but seems pretty damn high compared to others which list around 1k?
you're never paying list!
if you buy cisco at list you're doing something horribly wrong lol
Huh. Port Based Authentication? What!?
And I'm sure they have a script to book a cruise every time someone buys one of those
Even at 60% off it's 10k
SFP-10G-LR lists for $4,882... we can get them for like $160 from our vendor 😏
I am so close to turning on my equipment and assigning IPs and creating some VMs
So yeah, mmf for the win
And we don't even buy much Cisco to start with...lol we don't deploy Cisco a whole lot
The 100g-LR is a CWDM which can introduce a ton of other challenges
I just like keeping Cisco to myself in our network 😄
We have to buy oem if we can
Sounds like a policy that works well for you if you're getting list prices
We get huge discounts 🤓
We sell netgear m4250 for most deployments we do. Only big ones I spec cat9k
but that's bc its AVoIP :P
A friend of mine's gotten big into AV recently for his business
I don't trust Aruba for AVoIP so that throws HPE out
I don't trust UniFi for AVoIP anything so that throws Ubiquiti out
Juniper is probably ok but never really tried it
Ah, so you use TP-link and Tenda :P
So that leaves netgear m4250/m4350 and Cisco
AVoIP?
AV over IP
oh nice, its a good space
Lots of money to be made
Av vendors LOVE those Netgears
Stadium+big event work
and then charge those yearly service contracts
Idk why

- stupid easy to configure out of the box
- the price is good
- they have features people want
For us, dual power is a 100% must have so they sold us Netgears and put in ATSs that cost more than we could have gotten cat9300s for
Supposedly "designed for AV" or some rubbish
IP packets are IP packets
Yeah because they have all of the config out of the box
IGMP is configured correctly out of the box
Multicast traffic is a big part of AVoIP
They are until you need consistency for a key application
You need IGMP correctly configured to manage it esp across a bigger network where you need queriers and such
Could like a Cat9300 do that if they configured it right?
They also have AVB capability and PTP
The 24 port PoE+ with 4x SFP+ we typically deploy is ~$1400 for us
That's just a bit less than a C9300-24H-E would run us
And cats never ever die. Maybe Netgears have gotten better but I am still jaded from back in the day when they were hot garbage
with uplink module?
That's like 500
@hollow marlin I wanna get into more complex networking stuff at work 😄 right now the most "exciting" thing on our network is just VRRP routers lol
but this network is so interesting to design because I have to maintain independence if we have to split the racks but we also like it all being "one" network lol
The room has 2 8x11 walls the 2 5x8 walls and a couple smaller ones
VRRP is awesome to learn!
At uni we have an AV closet between 2 classrooms
2 rooms AVoIP stuff go into that
Then for some buildings all of them are connected to the main telecomm rooms which allow the entire building's AV to be networked
That's 8 screens by 11 screens. All are 55"
and since its just Crestron NVX or AMX NMX content can be routed between rooms
Same for audio since its just Dante
yes
Hello again.
Question:
Can I get a quick pros and cons of each design?
Does it matter?
Well right off the bat I can tell you that several of your defined ranges are impossible with your stated subnet masks.
The CIDRs are also wrong
I am using classless subnets for the IP ranges.
So is everyone I can name this century, but your subnet masks and CIDR ranges remain incorrect
So they won't work?
Correct
You look to be mixing up /12 and /20, using IP addresses outside the defined ranges, forgetting to specify the actual network address for your CIDR notation
Use normal subnets, some OSs don't like invalid subnets
Using "255" as a broadcast even when your network is smaller than one byte and starts at zero
It won't be your broadcast address, the address at the end of the network will be
Step 1) determine the maximum number of devices per subnet
/23s probably aren't needed
We can't even say that, we don't know anything about the requirements
A, 30, B, 1, C, 120, D, 64, E, 64, F, 128, G, 117, H 1030?, I, 128, J, 128, K, 4, L, 1, M, 1, N, 1
You need 1000 devices?
But I can say that your design is broken, and you need to figure out your actual requirements if you want us to say anything useful beyond "it won't work"
Well I can assure you that your specified design is indeed "fun"
30 on A, 1 on B, 120 on C, 64 on D, 64 on E, 128 on F, 117 on G, 1000+ on H, 128 on I, 128 on J, 4 on K, 1 on each of L, M and N
M is setup for 511 devices
Topic of firewalls, has anyone else noticed how awesome the new SRXs look?
Hi i have Zlt X21 CPE bought new. When first time i used it both 2.4ghz and 5ghz wifi popped up on my devices 2 mobiles 1 laptop. but now after restarting it don't show 5ghz wifi on any device. I tried changing channel bandwidth and all but can't see 5ghz wifi.
We got a new Pioner Xumo TV and it wont let me disable sale of ads, it just errors every time. I am trying to set up a DMZ rule and the only thing it makes vulnerable it that TV correct? which I am fine with, isolate it
I am still learning so sorry if this is a dumb question
Aparently my router only has DMZ host, I am not sure if that is cosndiered secure enough
I mentioned them when they were announced and they're my color. I actually just got a quote back and the SRX1600 starts at $10k
hey everyone! I've been here for a while, I mostly lurk but I'm having an issue I hope someone can help me with. I used to have Optimum's router and I knew it was junk as evidenced by me having to restart it almost every day. Finally three years ago I bought an R7000 (AC1900) router from ebay. It worked great and I didn't have to restart for about 2-1/2 yrs. I was finally out of restart hell! I had to restart it once or twice but no big deal. I know that can happen on occasion. Well fast forward until the past 2-4 months and I'm back to having to restart the router every 1-2 days. I did some research and I read it can overheat so I put a mini fan next to it using the usb port for power. It was good for maybe a week or two. Then it just went right back to where I was w/ Optimum's crappy router so much so that I eventually added an outlet switch so I don't have to actually unplug it because I'm having to restart it so damn much. I know routers can get overloaded. I stream tv with firesticks, my son is a gamer. We have phones, a tablet, I have ring cameras, I have a google mini w/ 6 smart bulbs. Between the two of us we are online about 12 hrs-16 hours/day. (24 hours if you count phones because I use a white noise video to sleep. Do I have to buy a $49,000 router? HOW do I stop this? I'm at my witts end. I want to be able to wake up and look at the internet without having to get up to restart the router almost every day. HELP!!!
Well I guess my first answer is that these questions should go in #1027757333117415424 as it sounds like a lot of troubleshooting may be involved.
It could be a software issue rather than thermal, which might explain your lack of success with your fans.Perhaps you should check if your issues started at the time of a software update or if an upgrade is available.
I hate how awful consumer-grade routers tend to be on the software side and tend to use enterprise-grade equipment instead - Love my Mikrotik stuff, highly reliable and consistent once configured - though they are idiosyncratic and tend to scare novices due to having a lot of options in a lot of places. They also tend to be a bit late to the party on new technologies.
Some people here really like Unifi gear for their ease of use and polished interface though my experiences with their WiFi APs working with phones and Microsoft Surfaces have been... inconsistent.
^ I've had no issues with tp-link's omada hardware
I have both thier router and AP and both have been 24/7 with no issues
not as advanced, but pretty easy to configrure
oooh sorry!! I saw tech support and thought it could go here.. I will keep that in mind for next time. 🙂 Makes sense that it should be in tech support.
Now that you mention it, it should have an update.. let me check that first. I never did update it since I got it....
Thanks for the info everyone.
on one side i like the prices of these chinese 2.5Gbe switches with 1-2 10Gbe SFP+ ports. On other side the only computer in my home with support for more than 1Gbe is... the 2018 Mac Mini with 10Gbe 😄. I guess i will skip 2.5Gbe switches
I'm in no rush, my work lab's all one hypervisor serving itself and internet speeds out here don't exceed 100mbps
muh ubiquiti
my internet is only 500mbps as well, i would love faster NAS speeds for random copying, but can't be bothered to pay hundreds of euros for 10gbe switches
can i get an open nat type without accessing my router settings? like is there a recommended vpn?
I probably paid too much. it's only dual band and it's not 6e
I'm literally holding a 5 year old router that is designated "MR9000"...these names are confusing
I recommend going by the specs rather than the model number
it'd be kinda hard to make routers by the specs without having really complex model numbers
Uh no, I mean that you have to do research rather than looking for the bigger number.
of course. I was just saying the naming is weird
I have an e(a) 6900, 7500, 8350 and those make sense in their featureset mostly
Hello everyone..
We are willing to provide a wifi network for 45 devices in a Classroom...
Shall i choose a 3 pack mesh router (closely placed) or 3 separate router to manage the 45 devices simultaneously?
are you asking if you should use a mesh solution, or just manually assign devices?
if you're willing to overlap 2.4ghz, I'd use 5 routers. how many high freq 5.0 channels are available in your area?
then again, if all the APs have line of sight, you can rely on 5.0
do they make dual 5ghz APs with no 2.4?
how many total devices? how many at the same time?
how many different rooms?
If they're closely placed you're not going to get a benefit from a mesh system, mesh systems shine for coverage extension, not capacity extension (if anything they just waste spectrum you could be using for more capacity).
If it's a nice open room a ceiling-mounted AP will most likely do a great job.
All will be in LOS
1 room, 45 different device
Shall I use mesh router in AP mode then?
LOS? 45 people all using devices at once?
you should only have 1 router, which will be behind modem
you can do in AP mode, but at that point might as well just buy a good AP
unless you buy your equipment at Goodwill
Actually someone bought a 3 piece mesh set already...
So I'm thinking to turn the other two as ap
Big classroom...
They'll all use at once in class break
They provided LAN connection only
And may pay for our router
just buy a bunch of random routers from goodwill and plug every one into the wired lan and see what happens
well, i wanted to test the cheapo 10Gbe NIC in my desktop... but X540 has no WIndows 11 drivers anymore 😄 . Will have to put it into one of my servers later, can't be bothered to test it today
(well, tested it in a Windows 10 desktop after all, vs a Mac mini with 10Gbe, did work)
how many gigabits are in a "GBe"?
sorry
There is only few of them tho
Oh, I thought each student got one
hi.
out of curiosity, is this channel for actual network networking, or social /professional connections networking?
"For all your networking equipment needs".
Phrasing!
What is the easiest way to make a game think I'm in Paris and connect to those servers?
Currently, I share a VPN from PC to console so that happens
I want to not use VPN, still make the game think I'm in Paris
Specifically for Consoles BTW
Hi! I would like to build my own pfSense/opnSense router. I have been looking for some fairly cheap 2 port 1gb NIC for that and I would like to hear some recommendations for that. My budget for that would be ~50€ (can be cheaper if there are options). Also, if you can suggest some shops (European ones) where I could get NICs quite cheaply, used or new. Thanks in advance, I'm quite new to this stuff and I'm now building my first router. 😄
Look for Intel 82576 chip based NICs. You can definitely find dual ports for around 30 to 40 on Amazon but depends on country too I guess. If there are local shops definitely search around but try to stick to Intel stuff for best compatibility with pfsense in my experience
Intel I350-T2 or I350-T4 would be good
Alright, thank you! I will start looking for those 👍
either vpn or proxy
dont know of any other methods ||except from moving to that location
||
Haha, Proxy doesn't work, I'd like to have main connection so ping is lower
So i got the nothing phone 2 the kb/s drops all the way to 30 and goes back up to 120 kb/s
or sometims drops down as far as 0.70kb/s
the signal strength says it's excellent and it's full
So maybe someone knows a bit more about this?
K so I have a 50GB ZIP file in iCloud which is in the process of being downloaded to my phone, I want to extract it onto my NAS (OMV on a pi)
What would be the best way to do it? Extract the file locally and upload the folder, or move the zip to the server and extract it there?
I’m gonna leave it going overnight so time isn’t really an issue, but what’s generally the best way to do that?
Move then extract on the server via a command to the server
I did think about that, idk how to tho
No I know, I meant the command to extract
OMV's debian, use unzip
Thanks! 😅
Syntax I’m guessing is just
unzip <zip file> <output path>
unzip <file> -d <destination if not same>
Cheers!
What does the -d flag do out of interest
Destination, optional
Ah ok, tyy
No problem, you can consult the man page if you need more answers
Hey in where I leave there a ISP offering 10gbe fiber TV for 99€ /month. What do you think, because it is xgxpon I can't connect it directly to my network gear so it needs to go through the isps all in one ont router that thankfully had bridge mode.
Is it whort it?
Do you need 10 gig? Most don't, I don't even have 1 gig
Depends what you think is worth the cost
Ya that's true but I only consired it because all other offers aren't symmetrical current I have 500dw/100up
And I am a computer science student, so
The real question is, can a unifi udm pro handle 10gig, from what I can see not very well.
Anything else that you can recommend. Maybe custom built opsense??
It prob can, just not with IDS/IPS
@clear igloo @waxen scroll @rocky badge
Optical transport cross connects - 18 simple steps
18 simple steps
network engineers HATE him!!
you messed up one of those arrows
That was provided by the vendor
Are you referring to this port? I believe there is an inline attenuator is goes through
lmao
I'm trolling you to keep looking at the thing until your eyes pop
there is also this (not sure if it is from extras or in standard packages)
then you can enable it and open ui, and you get a command line via web browser
most things can't handle 10Gbe, but you don't have to. If the slower alternatives aren't cheaper enough and you still get higher speeds, then why not. I mean if the 500/100 is 50 euros, but your hardware is capable of using 3000/3000 (for example), then the 10gbe symetrical is still worth it
Line rate it can
No IPS/IDS
but I've seen people put 9.5Gbps through it NAT
meanwhile i am here looking at my 500/30 cable internet and wondering if i should go with 1000/500 with static IPv4 for 41 euros monthly (without static IPv4 it is 33 euros) - it would save me a 6 euro VPS tho
sounds like a pretty good deal to me. just recently switched from cable to fiber. its night/day difference. Comcast to ATT fiber in the US
someones trying to get me to run
netsh wlan show interfaces | find “BSSID”.
does that reveal any personal/dangerous info
run it first then see what it gives, then give him the info if it doesnt look personal
it shows you the mac address of your wifi
can someone do something bad to you with your mac address
ssid is the textual name of the wifi network, bssid is the technical address the network
it is visible via scan of wifi networks anyway
it will simply tell the other person if you are connected to a wifi, and if you are, then to what wifi. but unless he knows the BSSID of your local wifi networks, doubt it will tell him much
Nothing much, who's asking
Can tell what type of device it is
BSIID is the id of the base station
Basically the mac address of Access point I believe
how does ip bans work on dynamic ips
For me it's 70€ for 500/100 fiber, TV and 3 sim cards
I think the prices are pretty good.
It's a ipv4 static by default, we can enable for free ipv6
technically this is for 1000/300, then 1000/500 + IPv4 + static IPv4. The upgrade from 100/300 to 1000/500 might not worth the 10 euros tho, in that case it would be 30.03 euros for 1000/300 with static IPv4.
On one side having a static IPv4 would mean i could drop my 6 euro VPS and use my hardware at home for web server etc - a spare Ivy Bridge or X99 system will handily beat the poor 1 core, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage VPS i have. On other side i would have to really read the fineprint on IPS rules, if they even allow it for home connections.
In your case it still comes down to deciding if you can actually use that bandwidth for something, and if you can live with that fee.
they dont
but also truly dynamic IP is a rarity these days. most customers are behind a CGNAT on IPv4 and have semi-fixed IPv6 (if they got IPv6)
For now I m sticking with my current plan and maybe they will offer free upgrade to 1000/500
And when I have time I will write a small guide with all the configuration needed to use personal gear with meo and have tv and the landline(voip) work with MEO Portugal.
my janky USB NIC on my "router" is finally getting replaced by still janky solution, but which is a "real" network card at least (the case i have used doesn't have a PCIe slot opening, so i had to use mPCIe it had and there is a hole to pass through those two cables (the hole was originally intended for USB cables... it's complicate). can't wait for the delivery on monday 😛
is that a wifi connector to a ethernet adapter? 😁
no, it is an mPCIe ethernet adapter
but yes, mPCIe and M.2 key A/E is mostly used for WiFi
but not exclusively
ofc not exclusively buit that is what imgetting at
you can get ethernet cards, SATA controllers for those slots
that is where i know that connector from
to be precise - this is the system it goes into. the wifi card is removed, it goes there. the usb cables which go out of the case are now connected via adapter to the internal USB3 header, and that is the holw ehre i will pull the cables throug, so the ethernet port side will be outside. Not ideal, but better than an USB NIC 😄
reusing very old HW for a router, why not. Kinda OP router, but oh well 😄
(i5-3470, Z77 ITX mobo, 16GB RAM, 250GB+250GB+1050GB storage, running OpenWRT and docker on it)
I assume the red piece is an M.2 slot adapter?
yes, but there is no opening at back of the case
also the case is very low (low profile devices wouldn't fit). internally looks like this
i just put it in there cause i don't really have use for that slot (would have to solve a riser somehow to make it usable otherwise), and the storage drive is even more useless 😄
cause that is XP941 250GB, which is a PCIe AHCI drive. Not NVMe, nor SATA, so can't put it in any USB boxes. Also pre-Z97 boards can't boot from it either
it runs OpenWRT, plus few docker containers (HA, Guacamole, NGINX Proxy Manager, Mosquitto, Heimdall, few downloaders, portainer, ntfy), still got way too much RAM unused (13.4GB), CPU barely does anything (<5-10% at peak) and storage is more than enough
just that NIC is the last piece of puzzle which is missing, and then i can call it done. Sure, it uses around 29-30W at idle from the wall, but on other side it is overkill enough to host enough of 24/7 software and be a router at same time
what cpu are you using?
as i said above, i5-3470. pictures and specs few posts above 🙂
im blind
what is avalibile height of the case? probally not enough to fit half height pcie card
i mean, is it ideal choice ? no. But at same time, the board is a part i had since 2011 or 2012, CPU was a cheap part i bought some years ago (the board was with 3570K, but that is too OP for this use case), SSDs were from various previous builds between 2014 and 2017, case was from a build i did for mom around 2011. only RAM is relatively new, from Ali 😄
yea i see, not even pcie slots are cut out
to be precise, 6.5cm from the bottom of the I/O cutout to the top of the case
if i made a router it would probably be based in one of those sff pc-s from hp, dell or fujitsu
so technically low profile could fit barely, but no cutout means no card. as i mentioned the cutout above I/O shield for the USB front panel cables is my best way to do this, as i don't want to spend money on case if i can just reuse old HW, even if it is going to be a janky solution
yea, but outside of this NIC and a laptop DVD to SATA SSD adapter, i had literally every part in storage, so 🤷♂️
for home server i use even more limiting platform (nuc-alike) and storage is external
tho i do have a open mini pcie slot for future shenanigans like coral ai accelerator
mPCIe or M.2 ?
cause that thing above exists in all for factors. Even crazier versions, like this quad realtek gigabit M.2 2280.... thing
or a M.2 2280 to 10Gbe RJ45 😄
(or if ribbon cable is not your thing)
or dual gigabit SFP
china is full of weird M.2 to ethernet adapters
Advanced Biscuit Tin with Integrated PSU :P
But it does look very compact
Ideal for a router-like device as long as it's getting enough air
Oh I see fan cutout on the left, vents on right
the CPU cooler pulls in air from top, the side fan pulls it out
Yeah I went up and saw in another photo
mpcie
yeah, then you can use the one i bought 😄
nah i wont be using it for routing
but yeah, at inaudible fan speeds the CPU is idling at 46C, and more or less never does more than idling 😄
(46C being the hottest cores)
there was one single peak to mid-60C in last week or so, i think i was rebooting, so it did some work to start up all the docker containers for few seconds
yea but where do i put cable? 
drill. or custom top
the classic 🙂
originally i ment to put a 2x sata controller there and print custom bottom for it that has hdd cages and a fan for them but i found a deal on externals so no mods were neccesary
or to stay in topic
cpu power consumption doe 💀
both my i5-3470 router and 2950x server usually stay bellow 5% of CPU usage 🤷♂️
i am running multiple containers and cpu is really low power
You generally don't want to be maxing the CPU on your router ever
Getting close is a recipe for latency problems
who says anything about maxing out. All i say that it barely does anything, at all. even with few docker containers running
This is why Cisco kindly provided turnips to run their router OS on in SME
You were saying you were around 5%. I said that going very high is bad news. Not sure what you're suggesting.
I didn't say you were maxing out your CPU, certainly.
Yeah my work hypervisor (Dell Optiplex 7090) sits around 30 watts and while that beats the pants off a HPE Proliant or the like it's not as efficient as a low-power CPU like that
for what i need my home server for that low power cpu is perfect, only thing that i would swap is 4gb ram for 8gb stick
but it needs to be ddr3l
I got offered an ML350 Gen10 for AUD$1000 (like $660 USD) today but I already have a Gen9 I don't use I got for free
i have a jetway mini PC like this with N2930, that was my router before this. Sure, it sits at 10W, but it has it's limitations
And that Optiplex, that has 80GB RAM and like 40GB free
optiplexes are op
So it makes no sense to not stick everything I want on that
the biggest limitation was the storage aspect of it; it has mSATA, for which any reasonable capacity is stupidly expensive (i ain't paying 100 euros for a 500GB mSATA SSD)
i know a guy who has so many hp sff in a cluster
like atleast 20
sometimes you have to wonder about aliexpress 😄
Looks like a pretty typical router board to me
yeah, but still 🙂
2 modems, M.2 storage, I think that's a switch chip on there for the ethernet ports
No heatsink so gigabit probably
The most recent one yes probably
The one above that looks to have some Marvell chip I bet is a switch
Hard to tell from the pic exactly
the green board has:
2 Intel WGI210AT Gigabit Card, supports network wake-up, PXE function
2x Intel WGI210IS Gigabit Fiber Card
yea one port on the left is "wan" others are run of switch chip
top down picture is not helping much either
It scales to 128GB RAM, 2 NVMe SSDs plus disks, and 8 cores in a homelab is enough for anything
Usually they're nice enough to expose the switch's management so you can do whatever with the individual ports anyways but yes clearly aimed at WAN on the individual port
if i had higher network speeds maybe i would be able to use that
That's running... 9 VMs right now
do you expose any services to public?
2 Windows 11, Server 2022, Red Hat 9, Ubuntu, 4 custom work Linux thing
Not presently but I might later
Only got it last week
i use cloudflared to tunnel home assistant and some other things to public
cgnat things
Might put a MC server on for some friends, move a few bots on to it. Nothing I couldn't have done on a Pi 4 honestly but this is right here
i have a vps to do that
I have VPSes for stuff I intend for the general public to get at, two t3.nano's
But cloud providers charge too much for decent CPU and memory and this is right here
i still have always free oracle arm instance
based af
i trust them only to run mc server and shitposting bot
I hear their free tier is super generous but I despise the company's software licensing (and legal) arms too much to trust their cloud
i wouldnt put any personal information on there
I refuse to use Azure for myself since being ripped off on pricing once and trying to contact their support over it
Google and Amazon are both much more reachable
i would probably use hetzner
Not ideal for Australian use
yea but for europe its ideal
