#networking
1 messages · Page 48 of 1
Or actually send Dante/artnet/sACN over the wifi
If it’s the latter, do NOT. Those protocols do not like WiFi/high latency/latency deviation
But to send WiFi down and then convert to Ethernet you’re looking at a p2p wireless bridge
I have a problem with ethernet right now where once I put the cable in, it shows no internet. My PCIe GbE controller is up to date. Wifi wirelessly works fine. Thanks
??? It’s just an internet connection. A laptop plugged into Ethernet for network access and then also connected to a projector to display to an audience
Ok if it’s just an internet connection then that’s fine
Ethernet says no internet. Drivers are up to date. Any solutions?
Looking for a good router that fits my budget of $24 😅
These 2 fits my budget, so can anyone help me which one to get, or if you have any suggestions.
https://www.tp-link.com/in/home-networking/wifi-router/archer-c60/
Or
https://www.tp-link.com/in/home-networking/wifi-router/archer-c64/
idm a maybe bc i have the best internet plan i can get, only money i can spend is to make the speeds i pay for consistent and high
So I’m currently trying to replace my AP (1gbps) with my server.
It’s got WIFI 6 connectivity and I have room for a 4 port 2.5gbs PCIE card.
I wanna reduce latency by removing a switch from the chain.
It’s the middle point between internet and the ap downstairs
Does your WiFi 6 card support AP mode?
A switch adds a couple nanoseconds worth of latency, it's pointless to remove it and do CPU based switching with a NIC card like that
Yes. I’m just trying to remove bottlenecks from my network. You’re saying a 2.5gb switch would be better? Even though it’s another device?
Yes, 100%, otherwise your server is going to do switching in CPU and that WILL add noticable latency
I see Currently the config is modem > AP > dns server (ran by AP) > client.
The dns server is connected to the network via the AP.
I basically have my router doubling as a switch
That's a combo unit, it's got a switch ASIC inside
I mean my AP. The fios router/modem is just feeding internet in another room. I have my AP in my room which is connecting the dns server
Is there a way to buy a standalone hardware asic and add it in my server via PCIE Or something?
Oh and also. Does the ASUS ax92u support any third party firmware? Like dd-WRT?
No, that's not how that works at all
It's high added complexity for near zero benefit
Couldn't tell you, you'd have to google model + third party firmware or something to see if anything pops up
so me and my family are moving into a new house soon and we want a wifi mesh system that supports speeds up to one gig for the cheapest price. Does anyone have a good system?
(also forgot to mention, maybe wifi 6 if possible)
You absolutely want wifi6
Ah, RB5009. You have the one with the all-port bidirectional PoE config I see.
what does add noticable latency? aside from Wifi?
processing time (punt to CPU), interference, retransmissions, buffering (QoS) or buffering from oversubscribed interface and distance
has anyone used Tp-link's Omada APs? I'm trying to find out if i need a controller. with unifi and netgear i can find a list of features that are usable without controller and features that need controller but i can't seem to for tp-link. Aside from the obvious (deployment to multiple devices is easier etc and remote access) is there anything i'll be missing if i use standalone mode? or are there no actual feature differences and the only difference is that controller can change setting on many devices and sync them up?
My internet is being super weird rn so i normaly get 100 ish upand down and randomly it will be at 100 then 0
the cable going to the raspberry pi hurts my soul
not my picture, I just ordered one - I wanted something I could use with my 10gbswitch
Router on a stick?
Otherwise probably not that helpful for you.
hmmm? Why not that helpful
It has precisely one 10 gigabit interface
My internet is only gig, and it's only internal stuff on 10gig, and I don't really NEED it
Well in that case you don't need 10 gig to the router lol
Can't use 10 gig to the router
yes, but this way I can route between VLANs as well
-On a stick :P
I didn't need 10gig at all 😄
but the switch was priced very agressively at $0
and I decided it was FINALLY time to build my network at home properly with vlans.
absolutely isn't - it just limits the throughput between vlans
which... is still a LOT more than 1gb
No chance your free switch has L3 capabilities?
I'd do inter-vlan on that and leave the Tik for DHCP+internet+misc network services
But I guess not doing that's highly viable
nah the VLANs are cameras, iot, servers+desktops
Oh cool so you could use 100mbps :P
yes, literally 😄
Very nice free switch though, even if it probably conned you into going overkill on the router
yeah but the point is that this is for the next probably 5-10 years. I have a solid base to do whatever now.
Yeah fair, Mikrotik support their stuff for basically forever
It'll likely be useless to you long before they kill support
I was initially looking at an N5000 intel type system with opnsense or something, but the mikrotik was a value for money that's hard to beat
especially with a reasonably priced rackmount kit
I guess the difference is that you can stick a bunch of RAM in a router PC and run a few VMs on it
NO!
Mikrotik's container support is... immature
"lol doing some container stuff" "lol oops broke the router, now there's no internet, sorry family"
like... that was fine when I was young, but these days I want reliability
Time to prep for the 48 port 1gb switch after this 
that is many ports
I'm not big on routers in hypervisors for SOHO or even SME networks because redundancy is rarely considered
exactly
But it's different when you know why a router in a VM sucks so you can make it not suck
yeah, like if you're skint, or hacking shit up, A+ go for it
but I also want to be able to break shit without stopping other things working
Not even, but you want it replicated and highly available if you do it
High availability is overrated. Odds are you'll have more problems with that than you would with seperate components
(when you're talking about DIY home level stuff)
Certainly not a problem for me lol
... and even on prem stuff, a lot of the time it's shit
But as said I don't do it where others can/might screw with it or if converging it doesn't make sense
but yeah the thing is for tech people, it tends to favour their specialties, and stuff they can easily get/use
Yeah special clever shit only you understand is not for production with other employees
But yeah I have a router in the cloud I need for stuff and code running on local routers I don't expect to have constant internet connectivity but need extra logic in regardless
also I got burned by my server CPU going slowly dead over a month or more and just increasingly frequently locking up
ended up replacing the motherboard first, then the CPU. ah well.
yeah that's my point
Same problem can happen with router hardware too
waiting for a unifi 8 port poe switch and an AC WAP to be decommissioned to add those to the setup
Wish I had people discarding decent network gear lol
haha, yeah this is more changing vendor than discarding as such
Shop in front is still clinging desperately to their Catalyst 2950
Router's an 887va I think
For NBN VDSL, which it's a bit sorry at handling
A Steam download running at 40mbps was enough for it to stop serving other clients until it stopped
lol
The correct location for that hardware is a museum, or a skip
I'm on gig NBN FTTP, I'm currently just using google wifi because I decided I didn't care and I didn't want to have a complex home network setup.
Obviously I have given up on that.
lol
If only NBN's higher speed plans weren't cripplingly expensive so we can pretend FTTN wasn't a bad idea
but I have a suspicion the google router is limiting my top end throughput slightly! zomg
omg, 1000/50 is fine, but 1000/400? oh yeah fuck you
1000/1000? LOL "business plan"
1000/50 is a stupid, spiteful config to sell
1000/400 was once supposed to be the standard for a consumer offering
it's hilarious because my VDSL was 100/40
Remember: only businesses need high-speed uploads, that's why social media and game streaming doesn't exist
exactly
and certainly, there's NO way that people don't use high speed uploads because they don't want to pay for them and/or can't access them
and that doesn't affect the market AT ALL
I'd use them if they didn't cost a kidney a month
I'm with launtel, so if I need to I can crank it to 400 up for the day, but IIRC it's like 2.5x the price vs 1000/50
which is completely nonsensical
it's not like you're saving ... money ... or .. internet... or ... anything. The services you're putting to support it are symmetric, at least to some degree.
Close to, especially because residential customers use less upload on average anyways
"oh no I want a one way internet pipe please"
GPON's something like 2.5/1
"Give me one of those 10/1 ethernet adapters"
hey everyone, I´m looking into buying a home surveilence system for our small farm.
I already have a managed POE Allied Telesis 8 port switch and I want to have a system with about 3 cameras that are controlled by whatever software on my homeserver and store tehir footage on my homeserver, idealy they only record actual footage on my server when there is movement in the video so they dont just fill up my storage with useless footage. I dont want any of those things that auto upload everything into some kind of cloud storage or whatever. I want it to be local only. It´s nice if that selfhosted software allows some kind of online connection with push notifications to phones etc but having everything stored local only without sending data to some 3rd party in china is my priority for now.
If anyone has some recomendations on what software to use to controll the cameras and which outdor poe cameras to use I´d be really happy to hear from you
Hi, I really don't get this, can somebody help me understand please?
In a Homelab setup, why does one need a managed switch, when they are using a seperate router that manages the DHCP VLAN etc.?
a managed switch is needed if you want to have multiple VLANS on a single switch
it's kinda hard to explain via text
the packets get tagged on the trunk port
and untagged on the access ports, but you can lets say keep it tagged if it's going to a server or similar and want to access other vlans
or for example an AP, where you may have a managament VLAN
but what you're telling is a comparison between a managed vs unmanaged switch, no? I'm designing a network that I'd like to implement soon, but I'm still in the learning phase.
I only had a router and multiple 4-8 port dumb switched until now. If I lift the cheap WIFI router from the equation, I'd need a firewall and a managed switch, as well as ...something acting as the DHCP server?
This is what I have in mind
Which device should be serving the DHCP?
DHCP is a service on a server. A switch doesn't do that
Basically every router/firewall can serve a DHCP server
So maybe if I give that task to my DNS server, it would be okay (so just using PiHole's DHCP settings)
Routers, yes sure, but I won't be having/needing a router in this network no? A wifi router is a combination of Firewall-AP-DHCP anyways?
usually a firewall is a router on a technical aspect
it just does basic routing + NAT
and not even basic routing sometimes more advanced stuff like BGP
thanks mate it made it clearer 👍
So I have networking homework to do in Cisco Packet Tracer.
I have set up a router, switch, 6pcs (1 laptop) and 3 servers.
Each server has its own thing to do, first being DHCP server, 2nd is DNS and 3rd is WEB server.
Problem is that I was provided a guide to follow but few lines confuses me.
Add A entry for WEB server, i.e. when the client enters the URL "website URL" in the Web Browser of the computer, the web page offered by the server is opened. Test operation.
Also add records for DNS and DHCP server in such a way that they are in the subdomain of "website URL". Take a screenshot of the records and test the client on the machine using the ping command (pings by name) and add a screenshot of them as well.
Add a DNS record that would create an alias for "website url" so that when the user enters "website URL" as URL, the web page provided by the WEB server is also opened.
The "add A entry for Web server", I don't see a way to do an entry other than on DNS server
DNS A records are what you put in DNS config files
you assign a hostname to an IPv4 or IPv6 address
Most enterprise managed switches can perform DHCP server functions. I'd still let the router/firewall handle it though
Ye so problem is that I did add the hostname to an IPv4 address and I couldn't get the website to open on one of the PCs
Frigate is a pretty good AI NVR
Scrypted NVR is another good option if you care deeply about the UI, but they charge quarterly I believe
nope. def would let windows or bluecat do it
or (insert server here)
I was just referring to that instance. DHCP-relay and a server is the proper way
@hollow marlin @peak cloak I am trying to use an EC2 instance as a public IP for a VM behind NAT that I can't port forward with. I'm trying to use iptables but its not forwarding correctly. Any ideas?
Assuming there is a tunnel from the VM to the instance? Also, can you confirm that the distro you are using is actually using iptables? We have production severs running a mix of distros and during upgrades, it was a PIA with changes in what process handled routing. Ex iptables and nftables running simultaneously
Iptables is super fussy
Are you trying to proxy to another ec2? Or are you using it like a cloud gateway?
my home network consisits of the primary router connected to a secondary router with a different SSID that is beiung used as a switch, every 18 hours or so its connection to the internet just decided to crap out until i unplug the WAN port on it for 30 seconds, anyone know whats going on here
@hollow axle
I have a VM behind NAT that I can't get out of and an EC2 instance with 2 network interfaces, 2 Elastic IPs (one to each), and each Elastic IP has an internal IP on the EC2 instance. These two have a WireGuard connection between them and that's all working fine.
I want to use the second Elastic IP/internal IP from the EC2 instance to route all traffic to the VM while preserving source IP. Basically use the EC2's public IP as the IP for the VM behind NAT.
Security groups are fine in AWS and the EC2 instance can see traffic hitting the IP but it ends there, its not going through the WG tunnel or hitting the VM.
is there a huge difference between a CAT5e and a CAT7 ethernet cable?
should i really upgrade to a cat7?
No, you shouldn't upgrade to a standard that requires a new connector that isn't compatible with RJ45 ends
depends if your use case would benefit from the higher speeds or not
Cat6a is fine if you need 10g up to 100m, otherwise 5e is plenty
Depends if the cable is terminated with GG45 or TERA. GG45 is backward comparable TERA isnt AFAIK
Interesting, I forgot GG45 was part of the ISO spec
I always remember TERA as part of it though
As I am not familiar AWS, do you have a diagram for the design?
@clear igloo @waxen scroll Also
- PingPlotter is a tool that creates more problems than it fixes
- Engineers that only provide a traceroute regarding an issue and confidently say there is an issue at hop X while not knowing how to understand a trace should have their pay reallocated to me for the amount of time I spend to explain how traceroutes work and request more details

Agreed 1000% 😄
@hollow marlin I'm seeing latency at hop X, can you fix pl0x 😛
I saw traceroute stop there so help?????
There is latency and loss at hop 8 and it's impacting traffic to this destination
Ok, well there is no increase in latency or packet loss to the destination sooooo....
When you learn the basics and then regress but know words
To top if off, the "issue at hop X" is 3 hops outside our network within one of our transit providers
haha, that must be extra fun to explain to them
Sadly, it's one of our largest customer who is also a regional SP which we provide transit for
This is not the first similar conversation either
We're in the middle
Qulays is starting to complain about them now for SSH =/
Wait, what's going now with the keys!?!?
Qualys hates RSA now 😦
I guess I am not familiar with Qualys
Ah, it's a security compliance scanner thing
It's a pain in my rear end dealing with financial customers 😦
I see that via google. What's their proposed replacement?
Oh great! I was thinking recently that I need more acronyms to learn and add to the pile 😆
Haha, yah, nothing like some more acronyms
Well I know we should have another PCI audit shortly. Curious if they pick up the few remaining devices not using AAA
Pff
Hi there peeps.
I'm in a time of great need. What's the best alternative for RadminVPN or Hamachi to use on both Windows and Android (Linux in the future) systems? I need to have access to my files and gaming servers from my phone occasionally. (I'm using Radmin and Hamachi for others to join btw)
Why don't I just use Simon or Speck
Get it over and done with
After all what if Quantum computers suddenly become good and factor my keys tomorrow
Wireguard.
-Oh wait you said others at the end
Ehh... still Wireguard.
Or OpenVPN w/ UDP if you really can't manage IPs yourself though it's slower and heavier
I can run Hamachi and Radmin alongside, some people won't be switching.
I simply need the access to my PC, files and consoles remotely without having to set up dedicated public IP which is an immense pain in the bottom with my ISP
No public IP?
I'll learn, I love that stuff regardless
Get the cheapest possible VPS and use that to expose your desired services with port forwarding and a VPN tunnel back to your server, or use IPv6+DNS
Nope, hence why I'm using Radmin and Hamachi in the first place. It's just annoying to always set up my laptop when I'm on the go as those programs don't have Android versions
Now I'm thinking of it you may also like Tailscale's free option
Up to 100 devices free and tolerant of your situation
But a VPS handling a port forward will just allow people to directly connect if security from the internet is not the concern and ease of use for them is one
Man for some reason, I had a terrible experience with this
I mean hamachi
Okay, I'll look into all the options you mentioned, thanks a lot. Networking isn't something I do often, so I'm quite a newbie in that regard, making your suggestions that much more useful 👍
Try Tailscale first probably
Yeah, those programs are spotty. Some people can't get one or the other to work, which is why I have 2 like a moron
Btw I’m using Tailscale now and it works really great
Easy to install l
Easy to deal with
What's the ping on it?
Android and iOS support it very well
It's direct between peers with a negotiating server
So basically just the ping between you and them
Yeah
Damn, that sounds awesome
And the latency isn’t low either
-Isn't high, you mean
Oh my bad
U can watch this https://youtu.be/Kzyolu9yn0E?si=j-GXhmkZv-LfOn_K
Tailscale VPN - WireGuard was never so easy as this Zero Config VPN service! It magically connects all your servers, laptops, and phones to your own virtual private network. I'll walk you through the setup and let's explore how the network protocol works. #Tailscale #WireGuard #VPN
Tailscale: https://tailscale.com
Documentation: https://tailsca...
That's absolutely perfect, and with no more than 37 peeps it seems I can have the free version
Lovely, thanks
The condition is that you can only do that freely with the free subscription
37's a lot for everyone to be connecting in via a VPN lol
Ikr
Why do you have that many devices to begin with lol. I don’t mean to be rude but what are you doing with those
Especially as they'll be sharing an account to keep in that 3 user limit
whats the best cheapest wifi mesh router, wifi 6, for about 4500 sqft?
you dont have wired ethernet in that building?
We're currently building and we just want a good cheap wifi 6 mesh system for our devices that don't have Ethernet. (Phones, watches, TV's etc.)
also forgot to mention, we are wiring ethernet in the house
If you're still in the build process, there's not much reason to cheap out on having normal APs. Which would use the ethernet you're currently wiring.
As the saying goes, you can pick only 2; good, cheap, fast
also doesn't lock you into mesh
I have a PC and I'm trying to copy files from a laptop. I shared a folder in my PC and it was working yesterday. The laptop connected to the network and the PC was showing up in the network. I could access the shared folder to copy files. Today it's no longer working. The laptop cannot see the shared folder. What is wrong?
I just figured it out. I was connecting the PC with "public network". Now that I switched to "private" the file sharing is working
You should use wireless access points instead of a mesh system in this situation.
Some wiring you should consider also ^
Yes, if you have a domain you can use
Any chance theres a Unifi expert in here?
We're having a weird issue with a bunch of APs that keep dropping offline
Yea, I want to, but all the wifi 6 access points are to expensive. Unless you could find one?
What internet speed are you getting?
Gig
U6-Pro by Ubiquiti is a good overall option
If you go super cheap you’re not gonna get anywhere close to gig, bad range, and have issues overall
How much of those should we get?
How big is the property?
I wanna say it's around 4500 aqft
how many levels?
Sqft*
Hard to say without seeing a floor plan
2 stories, but it's just one bonus room upstairs. So we don't really need it upstairs
I’d probably atleast do 2 minimum for that big square feet
ideally you probably want 3-5 for that square feet (and if you want outdoor spaces covered)
No problem. Just keep in mind, you’re gonna have to spend a decent bit if you want all the networking hooked up
Most of the stuff should last atleast 5-7 years though so think of it as an investment
My parents are really old school. We have a router that's about 11 years old and it still does gig speeds so they don't wanna change. But they just want a wifi that will cover the whole house.
Can always slowly add APs and other devices also, just make sure the wiring is there
So it's gonna be hard to tell them that it's an investment
Fair enough. I had a similar situation with my parents
Lol. But I'll still try to convince them. Thanks for the help!
What about the u6+? It's got the same range as the u6 pro and it's about $30 bucks cheaper
Speed wise I think the U6 Pro will get you much closer to that gig throughout
Ah alright. Thanks
Maybe if you go outdoor APs, you can go U6+ as those areas will have low traffic
I don't think we're gonna have outdoor aps. But thanks still!
👍
what for?
Newsletter Referral Rewards
if its priced deacenty it looks good
that looks pretty nice ngl
Big it depends on price there, their SBCs are expensive
I don't think it will be as open and accessible as people would want. They used proprietary cables on the blade. More fancy packaging and marketing, than anything imo
but yeah it "looks good"
you mean external sata power cable?
I think so the sata/power. Non standard connectors = not good
Name a standard connector that they could have used
And it isnt really proprietary as you can buy connector and crimp a cable yourself
Like i crimped a sata power connector for my server, cable was expensive on ebay, bought molex microfit 3.0 2x3 connector and crimp it to a sata cable i cut off a old psu
SATA + molex or whatever for power
not fusing the two into some proprietary crud
space constraint doe
but when you need a new cable and cant just pick a standard one out of your supplies or from a store... then welcome to proprietary hell
Sata + sata power isn't proprietary?
And molex sucks
this is preatty standard on embeded devices as its quicker to plug/unplug devices
Yeah it's pretty common
i want to turn a secondary router into a switch and have wifi on a seperate SSID.
the operation modes make it sound like it will be on the same SSID
is this functionality possible? i have TP link archer c6
hello guys, so i have at home a network with 400 mb download speed i only get 30 mb at my pc. i use devolo dlan 200 avplus 3x but i want to upgrade but is it worth it?
NIEUW
Yeah you'll never hit theoretical speeds on homeplug/powerline ethernet. You'd likely be better off with (in order of effectiveness):
- Running ethernet to the computer from the router.
- MoCA (if available)
- Mesh router kit
- If in WiFi range usable by other devices: a high-end WiFi NIC or repeater acting as a bridge only (not repeating a WiFi signal)
- WiFi repeater, multi-band.
- A higher end Powerline kit (may not improve results)
Yes you can have more than 1 AP with same ssid
Yeah that's not what I asked
I need them to be on separate SSIDs while still being a switch. Without DHCP or any other functionality as it's messing with the primary router
Yeah should be fine - just set it to AP mode and configure DHCP off, connect lan port on primary to lan port on secondary then configure SSID as desired
does anyone know why my upload speed is much more faster than my download speed, and why my download speed keeps fluctuating.
On my phone i get 100+ mbps download speed but on my pc it goes from 20 to 10 to the decimals such as 0.3 mbps
But my upload speed has stayed the same
wired or wifi?
As above, WiFi or wired is the main question here. If wired, change the cable / check the cable for any possible interference i.e. running near high draw power lines etc
its wifi
What about wifi
If it's WiFi then need to look at signal strength / link speeds in your connection
How far from the router / access point? where are the antenna positioned?
I'm looking to make an upgrade to my internet speeds, my current router is still wifi4 and has a maximum speed of 300mbps. I'm thinking a wifi6 router but I have a maximum budget of $42. Can someone help me? I'm very confused. (Ping me when reply)
I forgot to mention, on average I get a download speed of 8 megabits per second
Do you have range issues or something else?
No not much, I'm mostly looking for a cheap upgrade
I'm looking at a Tenda AX1500
Currently my router is a tplink N300 I believe
At that price priority would be gigabit ports, wifi5 or 6 and last is openwrt compatibility
What is openwrt?
Open source firmware
I see
I'm looking at this https://a.co/d/4EkojbW for $30 it seems well
RX2 Pro is a gigabit Wi-Fi 6 router designed for home users rate of up to 1501Mbps (2.4GHz: 300Mbps, 5GHz: 1201Mbps). RX2 Pro is equipped with high-performance FEMs and 5 external 6dBi high-gain antennas. More devices can be connected to the internet simultaneously with lower lag, and the transmi...
any good nics for pfsense, 2.5 gig with 2 ports? am stuck on realtek rn..
Not truly sure but I'm in need of better internet so bad rn
would there be any reason as to why i get ping spikes over my wifi, but not my ethernet?https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/381193840159358976/1161410493299314708/image.png?ex=653832cf&is=6525bdcf&hm=e5a292c69b171bb8c8a5e306d6e2549c5b1acfc03285ab4ce09d6946f1d1ff3a&
Image
interference like microwaves, other wifi networks or bluetooth
@clear igloo I hate when Cisco can offer retakes at no cost but they only choose to do so once a year and are terrible at announcing it so by the time you see it there is a week left. 1 retake should be standard when the tests are $400
Yup, agreed
Its about 2 rooms away
I have an antenna in it
How do they announce it?
just happened to find a linkedin post
do they always post it on linkedin?
Heya, I am looking at getting a new router. I am using a Asus RT-N66U N900 from 2012, and while reliable and great, my gigabit etnernet is limited at about 140-150 mbps because of it. Are there any routers right now out there that are affordable but can also support the speeds I'm looking for, that also has a good security interface like Asus?
If I'm on the upper floor and wifi has trouble reaching, would I need an extender, repeater or an access point
can I set two wifi networks on one mikrotik mesh system (~25 APs)?
You have to use a virtual AP
can I do this in capsman?
ok, thanks
should i use a power line adapter
Should I use a hammer?
Without context your question is difficult to answer.
Hey, atat sent me a new modem as the last one was 7 years old and giving me issues. It's a BGW 320, and it has a sfp port on it. The fiber comes in but then is converted to ONT, but I was wondering if I could just run straight fiber with the sfp port rather than using ont
It didn't come with any kind of transceiver, as I believe you need it for fiber connection
It comes in like this
Box outside that also makes a fiber connection once it reaches the house, converts into that black cable you see in the pic there
no
you need to use ONT iirc
Im assuming I only use ont because of this current install? from what I heard with newer installs they use the sfp port
that box is really annoying as it falls off the wall all of the time, would rather have it out of the equation.. im expecting it will cost as a tech would probaly have to come out and do it
maybe I'm not understanding correctly, the current AT&T router has an sfp port?
Yes
Guess you can try, I know you can't just plug into any ole network device without complex workarounds
but if it's an AT&T router can try
can check the manual as well
So this is saying that it wouldn't be required?
idk just showing what i found
I may start with giving a call and see if they can do it that way. I know for sure they dont want you screwing with it
And the modem was suppose to come with the adapter to plug fiber in but they didn't include it. I believe they packaged it knowing who it was going to since the other equipment not included is things I already have from the first install
It's amazing how shitty isp provided hardware is when you make your own openwrt router
simple web server
reverse proxy or cloudflared
that would do it
if you are the only one using it then tailscale is simplest
Upgraded the fibre line recently and after a few support calls, it's now running at full tilt - think this should do me for the next few years at least 🤣🤣
yes did try it now and it seems to work
@hollow marlin doing arista labs right now
they ripped off most of the cisco CLI lol
apart from a few "make sure you change the homework" items, you could pretty much buy these and your NOC should be able to figure it out
@rocky badge
*****Jump Host for Arista Test Drive*****
*****************************************
==========Main Menu==========
Please select from the following options:
1. Reset All Devices to Base ATD (reset)
2. Layer 2 Leaf-Spine Lab (l2ls) - Site 1 Only
3. Layer 3 Leaf-Spine Lab (l3ls) - Site 1 Only
4. VXLAN Static Flood List Lab (vxlan) - Site 1 Only
5. CloudVision Portal Lab (cvp) - Site 1 Only
6. CVP lab for Studios L3LS/EVPN (studiosl3ls)
97. Additional Labs (labs)
98. SSH to Devices (ssh)
99. Exit LabVM (quit/exit) - CTRL + c
What would you like to do?: 1
Starting deployment for Data-Center-Labs - reset lab...

That's what I heard. Curious how close it is compared to Adtran's AOS, the champion of "you can copy but change the answers slightly".
If you dropped into AOS and no one told you, it would take a few mins before you realized something is not right if at all
@clear igloo come with me... and you'll see... a little spark... of pure Arista-ation
yuck, and deal with CVP's failures?
I perfer good telemetry collection 😛
You've had quite a few, lol
enough for lawyers to talk to lawyers
Did you consider you're using it wrong?
Perhaps you stood them at a 47 degree angle to a neutron star?
one of my RFOs was sunspots
all of you new people here think i'm joking but vendors do use that excuse
Yup
or background cosmic radiation causing bit flips, lol
but MUH ECC ram
Quick question on some networking equipment. I am trying to help out a church with a large facility. Right now they use 3 different wifi routers for internet through the building. My question is what kind of system would you guys recommend that has large range and is strong enough to even work in a concrete/metal building?
dedicated APs to a switch and single router without wifi
Ok thanks @clear igloo
got these from aliexpress for $0.19, gonna test these ugly things later tonight
ignore hand lol
So @clear igloo according to what you said something like a Ubiquiti Networks Unifi Access Point and switches would work?
yup
Ok cool, I will get them to order it since it falls in our budget, appreciate it
I am having them order this, Hope it's enough to cover the building which is large.
just curious why you are doing 2 switches?
@peak cloak Cause in the sanctuary there is only one line run and it already has a router with 2 computers attached
yeah that makes sense
And the lines were run long ago before everything was sealed so I have no way to run another. It's a large old church
lol I say old it was built in the 80's
They are just complaining that wifi doesn't work everywhere and there are 2 many passwords
I by no means really know that much about networking, but I know more then most the other people there. I am just trying to help them
I just hope this will do what they need cause they don't have a bunch of money and I would hate to buy the wrong stuff
it will, although do you already have a unifi controller?
Um that would be a no probably I thought the 16 port switch did that
I was just gonna use a PC for it
you can self host it
just want to make sure you're aware
idk unifi specifies but iirc machines like the dream machine have it
I watched the setup video he kept saying about a PC being hooked to it
but that may their cloud gateway
link?
@rocky badge you know this stuff more
I don't mind hooking up a computer to it and having it run it, I just need to make sure I have them order all the right parts
would basically need act as a server
the main thing isn't the switch but the APs that need the controller
Hmm all the guy said we would need in the video to setup is a non - wifi router and then the switches. The maintance room doesn't have room for a server setup plus it get's hot in there
by server I mean computer, it can a small NUC or something
Hmm need to find a way to do this without a computer then. Again the room is very small
You can also use something like this https://store.ui.com/us/en/pro/category/all-cloud-keys-gateways/products/unifi-cloudkey-plus
this technically is a computer
Hmm wonder how you would hook that into the switch then
normally, just ethernet
So the modem doesn't go into it, it just hooks to the switch?
also I belive you can use an off-prem cloud controller, but it requires a complex setup for adopting the network devices (APs,Switch)
yeah, it's just one port. It's basically just a network device/server
Thanks for all the info @peak cloak after the email I just got I told them maybe they should find someone else to do it. I appreciate you trying to help though
Looking for fastest ethernet cable that is outdoor rated for under 40 usd
what speeds, if it's gig just get cat 6a outdoor
When i do a speed test or something in task manager it shows network being used 10-15% but when i go to play valorant for example it sits at 0% what is going on? how can i fix this
games don't use much bandwidth
ping sits at like 200 ms so idk why its happening
ping != bandwidth
happens like once a month around this time and lasts for the rest of the month
?
Update: They look cool
0.19 per piece?
only thing that i find annoying with cheap rj45 is thin blades not penetrating insulation on the pairs
per bag
seesh
I heavily dislike These kinds of rj45 pieces alltogether lol
i got a question
my wifi is 200 Mbps and i got a 600Mbps power line and im getting 3Mbps in my PC
this is the one i have
where am i wrong?
Powerline is a shot in the dark for speed. Totally dependent on wiring in your place and if the 2 nodes are on different breakers.
Plus that powerline kit could only ever hit (at best) 100Mbps
@clear igloo @waxen scroll As someone who owned a Wrangler/Gladiator in hyper-green/high-velocity, I am liking the color scheme on the new lineup that Juniper just announced
Sure, especially if you're using the onboard controller.
I'd be looking at drivers or external causes before I ran off to replace it/grab another NIC though, as while certainly possible it's also not that likely to be a hardware issue. Worst case if it was an issue with the onboard controller you can likely add a PCIe NIC for pretty cheap.
powerline adapters are like playing the lottery. one in a million works as advertised, everyone else wastes their money.
anyone knows of routers (not switches !) with 1 or 2 SFP ports and 4 to 8 2.5G ports on which I can flash a router OS of our choice ?
because closest I could find is "just" 6 2.5G ports and that's it
(I probably don't know where to look tbh)
how do i go about checking if its a driver issue or something like that
pretty colors 😄
I bet mikrotik has something like that
But with their Router OS...
I had a look at their stuff earlier, couldn't find something that had more than one 2.5
Btw, why exactly a Router with that? Normally you dont use much Router ports at all and use dedicated Switches.
Wanted to know if that existed and if I could "save" on getting only one package instead of two devices
Def wont save.
Well, I don't even think it exists but I've seen interesting AliExpress router PCs, maybe I'll find "the right one"

Imagine the power consumption lol
Plus Softwareswitching sucks
Will be very high anyways for a Router with your config.
Ehhhhh depends
I can get 4 port 2.5G NIC cards for 100€
If I can get a Mobo with 4 slots, I get two of those, two SFP+ cards, that'll work out
Yea sure
But if I can get a dedicated machine that's purpose built for that, I'd prefer it
What is the use case of a cloud key?
Device configuration
I briefly watched the Cloud Key Enterprise on Short Circuit and quit watching once I read the comment that it was $5K...... $5K!!!!!!
Yup, that's just stupid
I was thinking the little one he had in his hand lol. Not the 5 k one hahah seems overkill for home lab use
Same thing, one just has "beefier" hardware to handle more devices at once
It's overkill for enterprises. If you are at the scale that it targets, you will have server infrastructure in place that can instead be used to run the cloud key in a VM. Basically it's a dedicated bare-metal server running cloud key without any redundancy.
Aww, new subject to learn about. Set up a VM
As a cloud key
@hollow marlin time will tell if those SRX's are green ;) ACX7100-(48L/32C) for instance is not black/superdark grey :D It's just grey like everything else from Juniper!
But I do need to get a pair of 4700:s once they start selling (November), it's a nice upgrade for my 4600:s :)
Yeah you need to go to the image library to see the true colors (not sure why they are different from datasheets).
Unlike the ACX7ks, they are grey in the library. The new SRXes appear to be accurate though
Nice :)
As a SP, most our gear is MX with the only SRXes being the branch series for CPEs. SRX1500+ is outside our requirements.
That said, the SRX1600 has the potential of filling a gap as a decent edge router with it's RIB/FIB capacity. If they can be aggressive with the price
Yep, they look good. Also love the linerate MACsec :)
we only do NAT+routing in ours, no L4-7 stuff
Same, no NGFW features for us either.
You need decryption on all TLS1.3!!!!
reeeee
😛
haha
Take your 400Gb interfaces and get you down to 50 meg throughput 😄
Yea it's ab 2 but I only need 1 gig
Alright I just upgraded my internet but the port forwarding I use for an MC server broke because both my router and modem had port forwarding and they just would not work together or I just could not figure out how. So what I did it fix it is I switched my Router to access point mode and use the modem for routing IPs and that fixed the issue for the MC server, but now my network has segmented into 2 different networks (I think because I have two ethernet switches) and has broken one of the software I use since both devices have to be on the same network. I am at a lost on how to fix this.
if router is in AP mode and the modem is also acting as the router, and there are no other routers (switch is not a router) then it should all be one network
I would need more specifics such as IPs of the devices that you say don't work anymore
nvm I was an idiot. I reboot the other device and its working, sorry for taking up your time
I have a few questions. I just moved my setup to the basement, and moved the wifi hotspot down there, and its literally 2 feet from my wifi card's antenna. I just did a wifi speet test with ethernet connected and over wifi, and somehow my ethernet speed is 100mbps slower than wifi on download, but about 150mbps faster on upload. Can someone explain this? I'm so confused. I thought ethernet was supposed to be faster than wifi. the screenshot with 808mbps download is over wifi, and the other one is using a cat6 ethernet cable my friend gave me.
WiFi is unstable
Ah, SwitchOS. Not that compelling vs. its RouterOS cousins but definitely usable for small homelab/playing around/PoE for a few (24v!!!) access points, and for $5.50 you can't complain too much, can you? Even has an SFP port on the rear.
It'll do VLANs and stuff
The box says to upgrade to RouterOS, but that might be a typo
Nope, for that you need the hEX PoE or CRS switches, they cut the flash to 128k on that one
Is this the place to ask about NAS?
Looking to build or buy a NAS that is solid state only. Premade solutions are 500 quid and up, without any storage. Never heard of Asustore - is their software any good? Would also be okay with spinning my own solution, but can't find any small form factor boards (or refurbished office PCs) that have 3 or more NVME slots...
Apart from the SSD only, low energy usage would be a requirement, since I'm in Europe and energy is...ouch.
do you have 10 gigabit networking at home?
if no then nvme requirement is overkill
are you planning to run some other services on the same box as nas?
Wanna do streaming as well, but SSD is mostly for long term stability. The difference in price over mechanical drives is so minimal right now, and I just had one of my old drives dying. The old NAS is about 11 years old now, out of capacity, out of speed, and drives beginning to fail, so I wanted to go SSD.
Streaming meaning 2-3 media streamsof HD video at max.
plex?
or jellyfin
dunno yet, depends on the hardware
I mean, I could just get a WD Cloud thingy and throw two Samsung 870 EVO in there instead of HDDs
would be about 700 €for a 4 TB raid 1 solution
since you said its hard to find sff boards with lots of m.2 slots
is there a reason you want a super compact build?
Was thinking about mounting it behind the TV with a VESA capable case, but that's just an idea.
I haven't found any "cheap-ish" motherboards with more than 2 NVME slots
I would use a refurbished Optiplex if it was okay on energy efficiency, but they all have zero to 1 NVME slot..
And if I'm going sata, I could just go WD Cloud (see above)
you know you can adapt pcie slot to m.2 with really cheap adapter
if motherboard supports bifurcation you can put 4 m.2 drives in one 16x slot with passive adapter
Now the question is, does an HP Prodesk 400 motherboard do that 😄
what generation?
looking at greenpanda.de
the Prodesk are too small
They've got Elitedesk 800 G3 with Core i5 6500 for 150€
Elitedesk 800 G2 with i5 6600 for 135€
too much
and Fujitsu Esprimo D757 with i5 6500
145€as well
they're all refurbished and include Win10 home licenses
I think it's pretty good for what you get, especially since it's all done in Germany, not China.
and no delivery fee, basically
15e delivery, shipped from germany
bro just buy barebones and get a new ssd somewhere else, same with ram
configurator is where the money is made for people who dont know how to install a stick of ram
it lets you select "no SSD", but not "no RAM"
i would leave it on "select"
if price updates and it lets you order its valid order
just check first if it fits your needs for m.2 slots
16x pcie
2x 1x pcie
no m.2 slots to be found
let me calculate that real quick
M700 - let's say around 65 - 100€
2x adaptar card - 22€
8 GB RAM DDR4 - 25€
2x 4TB NVME - 260 €
SATA SSD for windows, about 30 €
you plan on running windows on it?
or whatever OS
need a drive for it
so that's like 450 € or so
WB MyCloud Ex2 with 12 TB (so 6 TB in RAID 1) is 380€atm
and prolly cheaper to run energywise
Hm, gotta think about that
if you specified sata ssd we can go cheaper
yeah, it'd be like 250 for 2x 4TB, the 65-100 for the system, 25€for the RAM, 25 for OS drive = 400
or a little bit less
maybe get a good deal on the SSDs...
Crucial has 4 TB for 205 rn
idk if this is pricing error or legit price
but it would be kinda perfect for you
1x m.2, 2x sata ports
Yo can anyone help me with some port forwarding issues on my asus router?
I have my dms open if anyone can help\
This is a test from a remote machine with 10GB-LR-SR transceiver connected
Is this speed normal or should I be expecting more 
By "remote" do you mean tunneled traffic or just "a different computer on the same network"?
E5 2680 v4 and i7 3820
Doing from the i7 3820 to E5 2680 v4 averages about 3.59
But E5 2680 v4 to i7 3820 is about 5.75
Iperf3 doesn't implement multithreading? Bloody hell
You'll need to use iperf2 and 4 connections
Okay so this sounds like a multithreading issue from iperf3 side?
Yeah that's my suspicion
I have an old router that I'm trying to turn into an AP. Is this still possible if the old router doesn't have a WAN port?
yes, you need to disable dhcp on it and connect it via lan ports
And you don't want to connect it via the WAN port without disabling NAT
Interesting story to that, whenever I disable the DHCP on it it becomes inaccessible. Even used nmap and it couldn't find any local ip addresses.
you might need to manually assign it a ip adress
I manually assigned an ip address just now and it still won't go to the page
The IP address would need to be within your networks range
And not conflict with anything else
Yeah the range was 1-254
I did 100
All the existing devices were between 1-10
Checked using wifiman, I'm now sat here hoping 100 isn't a reserved one? 😂
I'm connected to my router (192.168.50.1), which is connected to my modem+router device (192.168.1.170). I used the traceroute command, and it gave me results I don't understand.
- Why does 192.168.1.170 respond when I put 192.168.1.1 as the destination?
- Why is the response time for 192.168.1.170 so long when I put 192.168.1.1 as the destination?
- Why is my router (192.168.50.1) not listed as a hop when I put 192.168.1.170 as the destination?
NAT over NAT
Could you elaborate
Network loop from multiple routes. This configuration is not exactly recommended. Try setting the modem to bridge and only use one router.
how do i get through this? its the bell home hub 3000
is there any way to bypass this without actually typing in the password
According to Bell's website, the default administrator password is "admin" unless you changed it. If that doesn't work, contact your ISP for help. (Breaking passwords violates Terms of Service, so we can't help there.)
So i am running a vm (windows server 2022) and in that Vm i am running game servers (Minecraft, Valheim, ark, ETC) but no one outside of my network can connect, i dont know if it is the vm or just my router port fowarding not working, I have attached a image of my port forwardig , i attached ipconfig, is there a way to fix it, or is there a way to tell if it is an router or synology vm issue, please, my whole group of friends is depending on this.
Why would NAT over NAT cause that weird behavior when I use traceroute?
update, I was able to get a tech out and they did it for free. Took old fiber box and replaced with a wall jack (just holds fiber connection from outside). On the phone they kept wanting me to use ont but I complained about their crap job of leaving so much cable slack in the old fiber box that it kept falling off the wall. They would have charged $100 if it wasn’t their fault
hey guys i have a https://service-provider.tp-link.com/vdsl/vx420-g2h/v1.1/ router from my previous ISP i am using it as my router for my current ISP but i noticed that my upload speed is capped at 5mbps while my current isp said that i should be getting 20mbps, I have done some googling and found out that this router have its upload speed capped at 5mbps, i would like to install openwrt in it to bypass the cap is that possible?
WiFi 6 Modem Router with VoIP
Tracert can give multiple routes and skip hops in that scenario. NAT over NAT can hide outbound IP sometimes
I was wondering if you all had any recommendations for a Wi-Fi extender as I do not have ethernet where I need it and the Wi-Fi signal has dropped the 2.4 GHz. Thanks!
Do you have to do wifi extender or can you run a wire to an AP?
If you can use an AP and broadcast the same network this is the best option.
If no, what hardware are you currently using?
Unfortunately I am on another floor and we never wired up the ethernet to that floor. We have Xfinity XFI so we have an xFi gateway. Doing some basic research. It looks like the only thing I could use is xFI pods. Is that correct?
do you have coax in your walls?, if you do you could use moca adapters to hard wire in a AP
We do, I don't know if it is wired up. If it is would that be better than the xFI pods?
yes because the xfi pods are also wireless wifi extenders although they broadcast the same SSID, but the best solution to your problem would be MoCA adpaters to an AP.
Ok. Thanks any you would recommend?
ScreenBeam Starter Kit off of amazon
Thx
They should already come with coxial splitters if not I would highly recommend getting one if Xfinity has the internet coming thorugh coax
K. Thx.
No problem anytime, I know about the xfi pods bc I also have them and they suck
Ah. They are that bad. Will try to convince my family.
Sounds good dude good luck!
Thanks!
how can one pc in my network have internet access but no one els in my network can connect.
there are other people wired in and its not working for them.
wifi is down too
dhcp maybe
what is dhcp
Its what assigns devices Ip adresses
my modem is saythere is no internet but im able to use it
maybe my internet provider has done something wokey
possibly its normal for that to happen if that is the case
lol idk how this is posible for only my computer to have internet lol
when in doubt restart everything
Hello, i am looking for some help
i have a axe1100
ethernet on my main pc is not working not connected
PORT 1 pc in other room working fine
port 2- on the main pc, not working, showing up "no internet"
port 3 ps5 working fine
all cables working and switched in all deceives port connect to pc main no internet
noob ip messing at some point in the main pc can be the culprit. Wi-Fi networking "fine"(patch lose and burst) firmware updated
hey i need help with a VPN, Nord spesifically, It cant connect, i tried TCP and obfuscated and its not working
disconnected ap installed when ip messing to isolate the variables ( problems started)
Did you setup anything custom on the main PC in terms of IP / Ethernet connections?
What about on the router?
Hey does anyone know if I can just plug an Ethernet cable into my Google fiber router
It has an Ethernet looking port on the bottom but idk if that would work
is it really a router or is it just an ont?
No idea
What’s the difference
when in doubt take a photo of it
Fair enough
that is google wifi mesh
gray port with symbol <-> is for lan
you can connect pc/tv/anything to it
Alr cool, thanks!
(Deleted just in case of info bc I don’t know jack-shit abt networking)
Is there a floatplane vod out on today’s video interested to see what lit on fire
no
if the enterprise cloud key is any indication, I'd expect them in future switches
@wet grotto They used to do redundant hot swappable PSUs
then they switched to their shitty RPS "redundant PSUs"
The RPS unit provides DC power over a 24 pin ATX connector (propreitary signaling)
but only after it establishes a serial connection to the device, aka if the internal PSU dies and the switch reboots the RPS "redundant PSU" will not cold boot a device
Of course all at the stupidly high price they sell RPS units and cables
The USW Leaf had 2 internal non hot swap PSUs
and the really old stuff had hot swap PSUs
With ability to DC power
i personally like mikrotik way of doing it
power in (some models have internal psu some have just dc jack) and then ability to be powered of poe
I'd just rather have 2 hot swap PSUs
i don't care about poe powered unless its a switch sitting at my desk
CRS305-1G-4S+IN
2 dc jacks + poe
triple redundant
every power input
dual psu+ poe in+ 2 pin terminal+ dc jack
would be nice if standard way of delivering 48v to the computer equipment existed
bc then ups technology would be so simple
I mean, DC is pretty universal
and UPS tech is already simple
its DC inside with the battery and some have DC leads
they just have inverters and chargers to take AC to DC or vice versa lol
Hello, i'm trying to enable https with my self hosted rpi4, does anyone knows how to enable it? I tried a lot of things but nothing works at the end
I don’t think even if they added redundant psus I am using their stuff. I just don’t like the idea of needing a controller to configure these I know there are others who do this stupid shit too but goddamnit its not hard give me a console port and a management port and let me configure with cli
Do you have a domain name
Easiest way imo is to create a certificate is using let's encrypt dns challenge
@peak cloak yes, mscholz.dev, the link : https://strapi.mscholz.dev (bought from namecheap)
so yeah, what I do is run acme.sh using let's encrypt server to isssue wildcard domain cert
not sure if it supports namecheap if you are using them for DNS, I use cloudflare for nameservers
i'm linking cloudflare, that's great because i wanted to use it for preventing ddos my connection, so after i linked my namecheap dns with cloudflare, what do i have to do?
anyone hear about pfsense no longer offering plus licenses for free homelab use?
That's been the rumor and "coming soon" for years now
Is there a new article on it?
Its on the site but click it takes you to the subscription page
Oh, that's the subscription, there is a different place for the upgrade
interesting
because it's supposed to be $129/year when it does happen
and apparently someone on reddit emailed them and got told you cannot use plus without paying now
I just got a key from them like 3 days ago =/
wow, that's dumb
They havent revoked me yet so heres to hoping I dont have to rip this thing out of production randomly some day
Yah I would surley hope they don't revoke past licenses, that would be horrible
@hollow marlin @waxen scroll
Looking for feedback on this design and ways to configure it
Would you use STP to failover links (ex from Monitor World 1 to both Cores) or something like LACP?
Anything obvious standing out wrong/bad/?
I'm on vacation and not in a good position to look over it but generally you want to remove spanning tree as much as possible and that means mlag/vpc between distribution and access
MLAG is only relevant on the distribution switches. Your other stuff only needs to support port channel
Given netgate's repeated shitty behavior in the past, I wouldn't be surprised in the least if they did this.
Yet to hear a compelling reason to not ignore Netgate's products forever in favour of the wealth of alternatives available to me
You do not need to rely on STP and LACP wouldn't be possible in that scenario without MC-LAG which I doubt they support.
- Add L3 link between core routers with a routing protocol
- Interfaces from core routers facing the core switches should be L3 and VRRP
- Rest can stay as is
It's essentially a L2 spine and leaf design with the caveat of no load-balancing
Yeah figured out STP.
The cores can stack, but no MC-LAG
I don't care about load balancing, only full link redundancy
Can you explain points 1 & 2?
Layer 3 on switches is still fairly new for me
Now that I look at it a bit closer, yeah you would need to stack the switches with a lag to each leaf to do what I recommended. Otherwise STP will break VRRP and be a headache
1 - A L3 link between the two routers with OSPF/BGP would allow for redundancy upstream
2 - VRRP on the interfaces facing the core would allow for redundancy downstream. AKA redundancy gateways (but VRRP requires L2 connectivity between the two which would result in a loop in this topology)
hmmm
I'm gonna VRRP the routers
what if I stack the core and then setup LACP on the core and the access layers
would that work?
the cores would be one logical thing and LACP would work??
Yeah that is what I was referring to
Okay cool
bc the reason I chose those as my core switches
is the 12 RJ45 are 10GbE and then 12 SFP+
bc not all the time will we be using fiber to uplink access switches to the core
So the idea is we have enough 10GbE to link everything if we use CAT6A cables and then SFP+ for fiber on racks that need/will need fiber
and then the actual switches have this
That would work just fine then
and then the racks that will never use fiber
Cool!
I want full network redundancy for this that's instant to failover
We push at minimum 2Gbps constantly through the network
Can get up to 6Gbps
None of it can drop lol
Dante (networked audio)
NDI (networked video)
sACN (networked lighting)
Redundancy is easy, instant is not lol
Yeah...
I mean, Dante always sends out of 2 interfaces to 2 networks simultaneously
So as long as one of those paths can always reach between devices Dante is fine
NDI isn't used for show critical stuff, mainly just video multi views across FOH, backstage, etc.
sACN...is lights lol. The lights will hold last packet but its not fun
A link other than to or on the core routers, failover with <100ms. Other wise you would have to see if VRRP fast intervals are supported as most default to 3 missed PDUs at 1s intervals
Oh yeah, it's multicast right?
Yeah
WELL
KINDA ish lol
Dante by default is unicast audio data with multicast clocking and discovery
but you can configure multicast audio flows
Gatcha. You would need to consider too how it would handle receiving it's own MC on the second interface as well.
Is each interface it's own L3 interface, Dante that is.
Yes
in this example, HY-144D-SRC #3 gets primary from SW RIVAGE 1-1 and secondary from SW RIVAGE 1-2
primary will have an IP of 10.217.101.x
secondary will use an IP in the APIPA space
if primary link gets cut, it will communicate over secondary link
every other Dante device will have this as well
Can those switches stack?
not at the access layer
M4250 (access layer) series switches can't stack
M4350 (core layer) stack with Virtual Chassis stacking
Does both the core/access switches support L3 along with either OSPF/BGP?
Only RIP, ewwww
Yeah 😦
how cute is that switch though
glad I found it bc I am not stuffing a switch full of SFP+ to RJ45
As to why I want RJ45 10GbE...stuff within 10ft of each other backstage doesn't need fiber
Most, even enterprise, switches can't handle more than half the interface count being SFP-T+ because of power
Yeahhh
power hungry and heat
Since they're half width you can connect 2 like this
so my core layer will only be 1U
Oh nice. I wish more vendors adopted that
which is nice bc I don't want the core network rack being too big
1U UPS, 1U of switches, 2U of router
and then I will have a panel with all of the connections
similar to this
Do those panels also have keys for fiber?
yup
Well there you go lol
works with LC or opticalCON
This is "Duo" aka 2 LC lol
the back
Duo can also carry power, designed for SMPTE fiber cameras
They are expensive though 😩
CAT6A passthru one
the quad fiber one is like $110, the duo isn't any cheaper either its like $100
the MTP 12 is like $200 🥴
The MTP one would be nice. A single run to each pair of switches would keep it simple
But....also a SPOF
YOU'RE SO REAL
but yeah
Any fiber we're ordering is going on a reel anyways, so its not like its that much more of a pain to roll out and roll up
If you are getting reels, you can get a carrier or hell a pipe and some buckets and pull them all at once
Ohhh
So everything in the diagram is pretty much going to be mobile?
yup...
AND the scarier part...parts can split up and be independent
I have some ideas for tackling that too...
In that case I see why you want the racks to be compact
My idea for this is to have a trunk port on each switch and have the ability to throw a router with VLANs on it
but I know which parts are usually separated and what they need
Each hand drawn box is a rack (for reference)
Yeah you should be able to use a template config no problem.
Typically 1 & 3 are always together
I will have a router that can travel with them to provide DHCP and NAT services
2 can go out on its own so I will have another router
if you have racks 4 or 5 you typically also have racks 1 & 3
6 & 7 should be able to also work independently
but for a regular show where we do audio, lighting, and video we will have everything connected as shown here
For each pair of switches you can probably look for 2 RU ears also to make moving them easier
Oh that's right lol
@hollow marlin TIL Dante with a primary secondary setup will auto assign IPs in the range of 172.31.*.* on the secondary network with no DHCP
because primary network will use APIPA like normal
and ranges can't overlap
What happens during a failover? Does the secondary keep using the 172 address?
yes
If it changed IP addresses during failover that adds time during the failover
which isn't ideal
Dante relies on a clock leader, lose the leader you don't have audio aka all devices Mute
and it can take a few seconds after the clock leader coming back up to have all devices unmute and in an ok state
Dante redundancy is fully transparent and instant since it always transmits and receives on both interfaces
I wasn't sure if there was a preempt timer as how does a remote endpoint continue to receive traffic source from another subnet
Dante won't traverse subnets
Well that solves it
WITHOUT dante domain manager which will do allow that
I assumed so since APIPA stops routing regardless
Dante is sensitive to network though lol
Audio/video and clocks seem to be toooo sensitive lol. What is the target failover time?
Device latency setting
150usec with one switch
250usec with 3 switches (hops)
500usec with 5 switches
anything above the device's setting is bad
our network typically does around 330usec with devices set to 500usec
so anything above 500usec will cause a warning
So a .5ms jitter would cause havoc????
it will cause a warning yeah
realistically anything above 10ms will cause a device to mute though
but devices will be mad if they get packets outside of their setting
And I thought HF trading was bad enough
Yeahhh AVoIP is very picky
I prefer to stick to the SP field where I can actually view the difference in timestamps in a PCAP to troubleshoot an issue (<1ms)
Sounds like a nightmare to tshoot some issues
I'm curious now to see what it would look like lol
but our switches have igmp stuff so its not as easy to just capture all packets with my laptop
and i'm lazy lol
Does it mention when the PPS or packet size is for a flow?
that's what I'm trying to find
1. Be sure to use non-blocking layer-2 gigabit switches. To check whether all the ports are capable of simultaneous gigabit transfer (whether the switch is non-blocking), determine whether the switching capacity is at least 1 Gbps × the number of ports × 2 (for in and out). When there are not many audio channels, transfer speeds of 100 Mbps may also be able to be used, but to construct a more stable system, you should always use a switch that supports gigabit transfers. Also, please be aware that some low-cost switches that support gigabit transfers may have insufficient packet forwarding capabilities. Packet forwarding rate (throughput) is measured in packets per second (pps). A sufficient forwarding rate is 1.4 Mpps per port (gigabit). This is equivalent to a forwarding rate for the entire switch of 1.4 Mpps × the number of ports.
so basically...don't use a shitty switch lol
Most modern switches are non-blocking, even cheap ones and if there is an ASIC, it will be line rate. Unless you're Unifi and that one "enterprise" switch that had a FP capacity half that of all interfaces
WHAT
I'd love to see a switch that's got all ethercon on the front and has powercon for power, just for the lols
no true1 or powercon
but typically you just have that or L14-30 or similar twist lock into the rack
needs redundant supplies with powercon for me to be satisfied 
I need to be able to rip it out of the rack and swing it around above my head holding the power cables
but tbh all of our switches we just have ethercon patch panels in front of it lol
because ethercon switches have shit density
yeah, that would be the better way to do things lol
side note not related to networking at all.... can we please go back to monitors with power supplies in them and nomal C13 plugs, fuck ya fucking power bricks, monitors don't need to be stupidly thin. let me cable manage shit properly >:O
lol yeah
Hello, long story short I was asked if it was possible for me to install an intranet on behalf of a small non-profit organization (I would be paid living wage freelance). Based on what I know and what my friend (who has a degree in IT) said this sounds like way more than I can chew at the moment. I have no degree or certification in networking/intranet, and my background training is in marketing and admin. So does anyone know any good small IT companies in the Vancouver area who I could recommend to them instead?
Also if my friend and I are wrong about understanding the scope of this ask and it's doable LMK. But otherwise quality Vancouver IT companies would be appreciated. Pings for replies, thanks. (If there is a better channel for this please LMK)
finally! I win
higher end monitors TEND to not have seperate power bricks
"install an intranet" is pretty ill defined - typically intranet is talking about an internal website, is this a hardware network deployment, or a system they need?
i assumed hardware network and internal internet system. that being said, good to know it's ill defined and can mean other things because I got very confused given my background and what they know me for. I will ask and confirm. thank you very much!
Blob i understant this probably happened agers ago but what kind of Event was this for?
@mystic latch and @thick minnow
https://www.netgate.com/blog/addressing-changes-to-pfsense-plus-homelab
So current installs still work (for now)
Just you wait! lol
Haha, yes
So I am going to be ripping the server out at some point then
Guess it's a good thing I bought that serial cable for it
Can anyone confirm this?
It's not really correct
What do you mean by not really?
- P2P by nature will expose IP
- The apps listed are not all p2p and/or have various modes
- Having IP isn't a big deal
What about Microsoft teams?
Teams is complex
Thank you
who tf are you talking to on teams that isnt your coworker or a student
Vendors, not that they can't figure out our publics by checking the signature logs
I need network switch buying advice
having cat6 wired up to a couple of the rooms in the house
and having a lot a smart home stuff installed that need their own hubs
budget?
how many ports?
managed or unmanaged?
poe?
any special requests like higher than gigabit speeds, sfp+ ports
Where can I get multiple Proxy IPs, I can use in JDownloader to bypass IP restrictions/limits?
Currently I use NordVPN but this is slow af... ~100KB/s
student will try to grab professors ip
Oh no... imagine that
Imagine all the destruction one could do by knowing the scary 32/128-bit number
I could like... tell you the number or someshit
Or uh... access services you have exposed to the internet, much like the bots already scanning the internet already do (If you have a public IP, which you very well may not and then I get to see nothing at all because of a CGNAT)
I could even use Maxmind's useless GeoIP database to incorrectly determine your location
Anyone have ideas for Cisco home lab projects? I’m trying to figure out what I could lab with these.
A note, the bottom one is somewhat crippled. An electrical surge made it unable to power on, I opened it up and unplugged the PoE circuitry and now it boots (without PoE functionality) Top switch does have working PoE.
i honestly dont know how much i should be spending on this. probably need around 5 ports. i have no clue wether i'd want something managed or unmanaged and the other stuff you ask i probs don't need either since i dont know what they are except for gigabit speeds (which i dont have access to anyway)
You could start a museum 😄
oh yeah. Given it's entirely unnecessary, $82 seems like a good price
Oh, lol. I guess it is old (picked from work when they decommissioned them)
I spent $800 on a free switch 😄
Look if I went around only buying things I needed, I'd have a lot more money and a lot less stuff.
Hey Guys, im thinking about buying a NAS. I dont need lots of storage or 2,5G/10G. I would use it for photos, videos, music, movies, texts, etc. Do you have any recommendations or things i shoud pay attention to? (sorry if my english is bad)
It doesn't sound like.you need a lot of storage either?
i thought maybe 8TB
I'd probably get something off the shelf that suits your needs.
futureprooving
okay
Are there reliable brands?
Basically... You can get all excited but unless you're a tech person, you probably just want it to be easy to use and do the basics
okay. i dont want it to be connected to the router/internet. how do I do that?
can i just use a simple networking card via PCIe?
Uhhh why would you not want that
If you want to do that, just get a USB hard drive
i got two systems in my setup

