#networking
1 messages Β· Page 16 of 1
thats why I passed on LG. its some custom BS right? Sony is using google
I got the A80K versus the C2
I have LG for my washer and dryer... ThinQ is a cancer
so a little of an odd question, I have this basic desktop switch, that I'm planning to connect between my server cabinet to my pc, and I can't connect the server to the internet but I still want to access the server locally (localhost over ethernet), basically my main rig would be able to connect to the server using a local IP, by its open ports, like SSH, eg 192.168.1.101:22 over ethernet, I do not want to connect the server to the internet and access it that way
the main pc is connected over wifi, so I'm wondering if that'll mess things up
Unless the app needs to speak to the internet to work, probably not going to mess things up
Its so weird here in germany... You have places withb1 gbps and 100m away from that spot its not even 100
set static ip on server and static ip on your pc
you dont even need a switch if you used crossover ethernet cable
https://youtu.be/NAks6qM9jlM
config would be simmilar to this setup
Sponsor message: Use AIAIAI's TMA-2 Configurator and create your own headset today: http://geni.us/WjhFJ
Get a lightning fast local network speed for less than $100!
Check out Ibuypower & MSIβs laptops featuring Intel's 7th Generation Core i7 7700K processor on Amazon: http://geni.us/SQO3f
Check out Jake's guide: https://linustechtips.com/mai...
Don't even need one
Auto MDI-X, part of the 1000BASE-T standard and therefore available basically everywhere, including on devices that don't do gigabit
everytime i brought up mine people thought I had a nintendo switch
Probably the weak antennas they use
yea
once i was at my dads place at the northsea and we went to the beach. I was having 5G from the netherlands and hadt faster speeds over the ocean as with the local antennas... littearly a few km away over the sea and better then the own ones
Its the same shit all over this shithole continent. In the UAE I consistently pulled 1gbps
Yeah, it's weird and it probably was T-mobile NL
DTAG is trash everywhere though.
Except the USA
That's what heavy congestion looks like in the United Arab Emirates
Yes. Impressive how far it travels over water
Same for Austria
But a gigabit is impossible on all European owned companies
EU just fucks up shit with how much W you can use and what frequencies etc
Only one carrier has NR CA and its from Hong Kong
Yes
we littearly have 6GHZ wifi but we cant use 3Ghz 5g that littearly points at the user because its sooooo baaad
idk if thats normal for the good 5G antennas that they like point the power to the user and not everywhere
yea i mean dude who even needs that no one needs 1 gbps outdoors
its so uselss

i was shocked when i was at a like 5k people party in the middle of nowhere where i had like 2 bars 4g and still got 50mbps lmao
like there was only one tower in idk how many km distance
but the ping man
dont even wanna talk about the ping
N78 3500mhz in Dubai. It was 1900mbps when the place was full of people
Lmao antenna gonna explode ong
bro that tower was on life support i swear
Like it should be. All Telekom towers need to be abused
Telekom routing is horrible
know whats funny
Inside of the church (n78, 100mhz)
where i live i get like 300mbps download with 15 ping and i have like 6x 2100, 1800, 900, 800 frequencies
but still bad download speeds even theres alot of towers
for like not even 4k people living here
900 and 800 cannot be aggregated at the same time
Interesting
yea but still our new n78 tower that is standing since like 6months doing nothing
cause of german licensing shit
Lmao, stupid government
ikr
They're so useless for everything
true true
Thats the view to the tower from my grandmas home
Wifi is on life support tho lmao
Still doing 100mbps lmao
The only tower near me doing a gigabit+
NSA?
NR
Ah
Its on a telekom building xD
Those are fm radio I think
That's why it's doing more than a gig lol
Damn it's huge
Yea
Mine is just like 35m
Huge π³π³
Yea lol
LMAO
thats all towers around me
the 2 which are together are on the FM tower
Thats the one which is like 800m away from my house
They look so much different than the ones here
3600mhz wow π³
N28 is available all over austria
nice here they need to change the hardware on the ground for having 700mhz available
cause like 95% of the ground hardware cant send 700mhz
Oof that's gonna be expensive
Is it possible to have a domain that I own point to a device on my local network without using a custom DNS server?
mDNS
mDNS would be ideal but I haven't worked out how to use it yet. I'm currently running Debian, but I would like to be able to upgrade to TrueNAS SCALE in the future when it's a bit more stable, and it doesn't support custom mDNS addresses for different applications/services
/etc/hosts
I don't want to have to manually modify the hosts file of every single device on my network.
Well then buy a domain name. You will not maintain a custom DNS server and a domain name only costs 20USD a year. My only other suggestions are mDNS and local DNS, but you crossed those off.
Setting up a local DNS server is not too hard.
just add a record?
if your device is always 192.168.1.5 for example you can just go to your domains dns settings and add an A record
why not?
I suppose I never considered it as a possibility.
your PC is looking up the record, it gives an IP back, it goes to that IP. It doesn't matter if it's a local IP, or a WAN IP, it will lookup the record and try to go to it.
Would there be a way to make it use the local IP on the local network, and some other IP if it was on the internet?
Or would that require a custom DNS server
that requires a local DNS server
Makes sense
Interesting
Wouldn't that cause headaches with https, if the IP was different? Or would it not matter as the same server is providing the certificate?
shouldn't if you are using the same domain name to access
Well that has made my life a whole lot easier
Thank you for your help π
the big domain name dealers dont want you to know this but domain names on freenom are free
Question
I'm trying to set up a Caddy server with automatic https, but it fails with this error:
no valid A records found for <domain>; no valid AAAA records found for <domain>
Are they not valid because they point to a local address, or just because of DNS cache?
If you are trying to set up an https cert for something it needs to either have a public IP, public DNS record and port forward or set up a self signed cert.
You can also use DNS-01 validation and then it doesn't need to be public at all
That could work too although I have not set that up.
do a dig for the domain and make sure you get the A record
also you will need to use DNS-01 challenge for anything with a local IP
what's your setup right now?
I'm using Cloudflare for DNS management, and I have a Caddy webserver on my NAS that is supposed to be proxying things. I have 1.1.1.1 on my Mac, and in theory the WiFi router is supposed to use it for everything on the network, but I don't fully trust that it's doing that.
what's the record pointing to right now
192.168.0.128
Which is the locked DHCP address of my NAS
And I can connect to it directly
ok, so on the machine caddy is on, use dig to see what it's getting as the record
The only way to get an HTTPS cert for that local address is to use a DNS-01 challenge which basically involves giving Certbot (or some other Let's Encrypt client) access to your DNS provider, in your case Cloudflare, via an API token
Do I need to explicitly install that? It seems unclear
LMAO
Looks like you need to recompile it
Hi guys, can someone help? Can I use a Ubiquiti AP with my provided ATT router without needing one of their switches? The WiFi produced from router is good enough for me on my side of the house because I mostly use hard-wired but my sister wants better strength on her side of the house
OR do I need to purchase an AP and a switch from them?
Just plug a Lan into the router you have now, and use PoE to power the ap
@thick minnow 5xCA LTE Telekom
Awesome, can you do a speedtest?
Theres one infront of you xD
622?
Im not on that spot anymore but i will if i go there again
Alright π
In my city i broke my upload record today
Good english grammar right thereπ
It's alright, I can understand it π
Yea it spiked to 200 my max without a spike was like 160
Awesome, was it n78 or low band?
Low band
We dont have n78 yet
Not before they finally do shit with the new tower
Oh, so is there any other mid band?
Yea max we have rn is 2100mhz
Oh but that's better than 10mhz
Yea
Damn, yours even shows the band
Mine just shows"5G β’ NSA"
@full monolith indoors at school
Nice
Did you download the database for your provider?
No, where can I do that?
I can see this
Weird
It's not available for Austria
T-Mobile won't even let me send the screenshot because of their crappy routing.
Where is here π?
India
You mean it's a free upgrade?
Yes
No
Since that's how plans in India used to be
Unlimited
How much is it?
Yeah, but its for one year only later they will charge like that
Ah okay. I guess because they want to move people over to 5G, and then they want to limit their use again because congestion is a big issue in India.
I had 50 dollar anual 4g plan of 2gb per day but i got this offer yesterday
Very cheap
Yeah they did same with 4g in 2016
Who knows what happens after a year. People don't like having something taken away after they've gotten used to it.
Hmm, same happened after they gave unlimited 4g in 2016 in india for a year later they started charging but very minimal charges, but this time i m sure it will not be cheaper than existing 4g plans
I got really lucky with my phone plan
My girlfriend's dad has a legacy unlimited plan from before they realized that people would abuse truly unlimited data
You can't get the plan anymore but if you have an open line you can add somebody to it
So I pay $25 a month for that
Which device is this?
you mean phone or app?
What carrier?
Verizon
Verizon has truly unlimited
UK be like.
At the company I work for, we were getting e-mail delivery report failed and somebody was asking why/what was SMTP 552
It turned out to be an excel file like 250MB in size lol
Then somebody else raised the question of can we possibly find out if we are able to increase max size in our outlook exchange
but but but OneDrive exist....
I mean, even if we could, we'd be sending out half gig attachments but no email exchange on the planet would accept it 
Also big uploads over SMTP... not exactly sure but sounds like it could even be sketchier than HTTP with no resuming
Exactly the idea I pitched. To be honest, it could just stay on our webservers and we just send a link in the e-mail π
At least it's Data and not
Dataβ‘
β‘Some restrictions apply results may vary
To be honest 2Mbps is like 250kB/s right?
That could be what I had with HSPA unlimited plan for like a decade up until a month ago
I actually managed to cheese it somehow because we transferred the plan ownership (fingers crossed they don't delete it by accident and it never comes back -- something that isn't really customer's problem and it shouldn't happen). The original ancient plan thankfully remained mostly intact but now I'm connecting to LTE and it's unlimited... in Ontario...
But one of the addon packages got deleted which essentially took off the price added for unlimited evenings/weekends I think. They owe me $30 about now. I have to call every time and ask them to take it off the bill
π«
yes
Canada has some weird unlimited data issues.
Like they're stuck in 2013
Canada has weird being stuck in the past issues in general exactly
But it's not weird at all considering the sheer levels of socialism at play
And it's socialism as in just the worst possible parts of socialism with nothing good to make up for it
Socialism ruins everything.
Yeah. Well, I mean "socialism" ruins everything
Generally, it's just a code word for the society you're paying and helping is just government. Everybody else is peasant.
Yep, but there isn't a real version of it. That is socialism. The "real" one only exists in the heads of people who haven't grown out of the "no one can suffer" phase, so very childish.
Honestly though, the irony is that both individualist and collectivist utopia in their grandest uniform sense are somehow uniquely possible in terms of pure logic
In fact, they are one and the same. You reach maximum equality between all humans on the planet, you now share nothing but the relationship in itself which relates everyone to everyone else expressed through absolutely everybody. If everybody is perfectly equal, then you have nothing but a uniform collective of individuals; nothing else will be happening
Sounds scary. I don't ever wanna see equality.
That will result in very very horrible things.
But the IRL scenario is imaginably possible in the physical sense; it's only ridiculous because knowing our human nature lol:
One day everybody stops violating everybody elses' fundamental freedoms (the natural ones you're born with that can only be taken away)
Everybody does this on their own volition
No more police or government would therefore be needed to enforce these freedoms aren't violated
When you think about it, if we all decide to stop breaking these certain basic rules at the same time as a personal choice and nothing else, so long as that continues, you don't have any 'corrective actions' taking place as punishment for/prevention of somebody violating another one's freedom. So if you think about it, you managed to have some time period where the 'impossible' is achieved: no state or police entirely.
I think it's impossible because a few people will always fail to behave, but I do like limited government.
In reverse, it's ironically more impossible to have any enforcement or policing other than nil to enforce these fundamental rights and freedoms:
As mentioned, you're born with certain freedoms which can only be taken away. Unless somebody chooses to respect everybody else's same rights, the only way to make them in itself implies to violate their freedom to some minimal degree where it occurs technically.
I mean, I personally don't think we should even consider that all 7 bill plus people just randomly go Christian mode and never break another rule again. By the way, another noteworthy thing is how if you follow just the commandments given to Moses by God, you seem to end up not breaking any rule which violates those same fundamental freedoms I just mentioned. Literally all three Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. If you follow just the most basic principles of them, you just need everybody else to start doing so as well.
I'm not so sure if it will work that simply, but it's complicated. The only freedom that is heavily under attack right now, is Freedom of Speech.
For something that gets a lot of criticisms from edgy atheistic 'Science believers' as ridiculous, it sure seems to result in the same weird natural respect of everybody around you and those fundamental freedoms. It seems to me like it leads to the very same thing people shrug off as 'not considered obviously because it's a utopian idealisation' for both sides actually. Perfect free market capitalism and communism get flaws pointed out by the opposition and their proponents patch it up with that 'obviously it's not perfect' excuse
I think 100% capitalism has no issues at all. It's the bits of socialism that cause the issues in it.
Phone
pixel 7 pro
Freedom of speech is actually something greater in disguise. It's not limited to just speech or even writing or any medium which conveys the same expressions as language. It's actually just that: freedom of expression in its pure sense. There can be an expression which affects others without their say in it:
- Yelling FIRE! in a crowded theater expresses something which the person shouting probably knows will be understood by others as there is a physical danger here. Given that self-harm is also fundamentally as bad as harm to others, they actually have no choice but to panic and run away. This can cause injuries, the fire department comes because they also received what you expressed and yet again interpreted it all the same.
In those scenarios, the only further important distinction is intent. So a relatively sensical scenario is you're in a foreign country and accidentally shout something that sounds like FIRE! but you didn't know.
Overall, why were you shouting anything in a movie theatre to begin with, let alone not knowing what exactly it could mean to everyone around you. That's where due diligence comes in: if you're in a foreign country, it makes sense that the responsibility falls on you to learn at least some few basic things... even if for the sake of knowing what not to do 
Whatever. Phat tl;dr. Yes it's silly to think that we'll ever have that utopia, but people don't realize how it parameterizes the objective every step of the way.
You can't just eliminate the government except the last person and call it a day. That's even worse to be honest because you're back to the most severe dictatorship possible lol
Where am i
mc donalds
@clear igloo @waxen scroll Why does this client keep putting their thermostats on the guest network
Those are really complicated thinks to think about. I honestly do not know what to say.
It's not too complicated. Just takes some critical thought. It's worth paying attention to because literally everybody today arguing politics ends up being the same thing for whichever reason
One side will always 'eliminate the state' as a goal, the other will 'somehow make a state to enforce equality and then also disappear into the tovarishes somehow eventually'
I can't be bothered to spend too much time on politics, but I just want freedom, a limited government and 100% capitalism.
sameπ
But both don't realize that they agree on certain key things: government is always implicitly expressing the same thing which is actually a government doing the opposite of what governments do
The real communist transition would actually be everybody joins it until everybody is in it if you want the process and result to be opposite of what 'conservatives' want usually. However, how is everybody joining a group vs everybody leaves at all related to the two ideals? The government getting bigger until everybody is in it just seems like it would take longer than kicking out the relatively tinier amount of people 
That's the thing. It's not just politics. It's mathematics and logic and sht themselves that people ignore. How is anything just short of an individualist utopia not worse than something farther from it? Today, we have like 7 billion individuals and a top <0.000000169% that some believe to be doing nefarious crap. Then literally the richest guy Elon Musk comes out and buys Twitter to slap them for whichever reason 
no hackers on internal network
imagine not having a extra blocked IOT network
I would say thats a failure of blob, who manages the network
I do have an IOT net for them

lol what
They don't use it
bruh
They have mgmt, office, AV, IoT, guest
Imagine having a camera which sends feed to somebody that isn't you
And you have to get your video feed through that stranger. IOT. It's the future/
like that one LTT endorsed
They always ask "why can't I access X resource on the guest WiFi????"
or "why is my printer not working on the guest WiFi???"

I mean if you want things to be on the cloud, you have no choice to some extent. Having a NAS and an internet in your house with decent upload is pretty painful
sell them Cisco ISE
LOL
Most people have to start by realizing that NAS = just build a regular PC perhaps with maybe an extra network card. As long as you install linux and block everything inbound you're ok as even having NAS/router
ew combining router duties with server duties
A lot of these people who do NAS just need to do a windows fileshare and forget the complication of another computer
I dont NAS anymore, its all local storage
I did this in 2009. There were 5 of us and it ran OSPF
A couple months back, I tried to access HTTP interface on synology after like a decade. It said 'you need to purchase and enable this feature'. Disgusting. Back in the day, Synology was just a tiny PC with top end router equivalent hardware. It's linux + their software which honestly made it worth buying
I should ask our Palo account person to get me a lab one for cheap
nice
Nowadays they even lock hdds you can use (to get all the features) to their rebranded hdds
Also how do I enable http access on synology if I can't get into it through http? The only other things that work separately now are apps which individually install for just camera access (and it's crap in so many weird ways like not letting you scroll back past 2 days of saved videos idk why)
Also setup a phone system lol @waxen scroll
Then one for file browser -- this one I use sometimes instead of the camera app because you can browse my arse to the same camera folder and see everything lol
But like change settings or something? Do you have to connect it to a monitor and keyboard if you don't have HTTP on NAS?
Or SSH. But I think it's also disabled lol
Wait they don't have video out either. Probably you buy it and they enable for you just like backwards camera. Pretty sure we did that and it still doesn't work. Hmm. No more synology I guess
I don't have 5 nerdy friends I trust with VPN access to my network
It's better than trusting everybody with your VPN access
thats what a firewall is for
At work when I came there, I noticed they used Hamachi paid tier for the VPN. The firewall literally had to add their address every time somebody joined because they are assigned randomly 25.0.0.0
Yeah I don't even trust them with anything lol
VPN funny enough should make no difference but Windows is unnaceptably dangerous to date just like all the decades before
In 2009 or something, I plugged my PC directly to WAN and found that things like a Chinese IP knocks on your door every week or so seemingly randomly just by going through US IPs and such (probably makes sense)
Then it attempted to do some things like open connection on MySQL port and try out a relatively recent exploit to run whatever code things like that would warrant (can't be good lol)
I had the affected version tbh because I didn't update for a while yet another thing people should know it turns out -- the firewall and any services are crucial for those brief moments your ISP support guy told you to 'unplug from router and plug it into modem where router went'
Thank goodness I had Kaspersky back when it was good lol. It blocked the connection and told me about it.
But I learned a valuable lesson that day: Internet = battlefield of information war and it's always been going on non-stop
Today, perhaps the only thing standing between half the planet and bots connecting to windows media center/accessing shares/etc is the router's NAT
The firewall is there and you could say that if you're up to date, Windows might not have any significant security issues at various moments in time... but why is stuff like Windows Media Library open by default ffs. It doesn't matter how bulletproof it is. Everybody starts off being able to delete each others files if they added to media library by default.
Remote desktop is enabled still. I mean imho that kind of stuff warrants being off until you use it, not vice versa. Makes it impossible to rdp if port is closed and service is stopped.
Oh yeah remote shell is on by default. Where the f can you find a typical PC end user who needs remote shell lmao
It's really bad when you combine it with nowadays these same stupid things like IoT cameras or Samsung TVs that won't let you turn off bluetooth and Widi for some reason. I was always thinking how what if one day im browsing smart tv menu and before I click some button, a person connects and I accidentally press OK instead of disallow
im not using a firewall i want entertainment
Which by the way does immediately pop up with the allow option selected first. You have no way to block anybody until they tried connecting once and you picked the third option to disallow and block.
Picture being in China and you legally must always be behind a firewall lol. On top of that, that firewall mostly does everything except what we expect when fires are being walled off
Yeah, that's just standard background noise at this point. Bots are constant and there is nothing that can be done about it.
But NAT is not the only thing in their way. NAT itself is not security, yet it has security like side effects and a firewall is still the primary security measure.
it's firewall
default firewall, Block all in
That's my entire point. So many things changed for the worst and it's getting insane now. How on earth is a third wifi antenna on fibre modem/router that is forced to be on normal? You can literally disable 2/3 and if you could only have that one additional seemingly piece of cake to add button to cut off power to the third, you'd have a feature of literally being unhackale through walls.
They were impossible when I had the old [insert appliance here] that didn't broadcast its own wifi that you aren't able to shut off for whichever weird reason
every AP broadcasts wifi...
unless you're Ubiquiti on the UniFi lineup π³
I don't get your point
what do they do?
Assuming my wifi was off or my router didn't have it. If the firmware tells it to not power antenna, it's literally impossible to connect unless they are inside my house now. Big difference. And anybody needs to do that as well if they want to somehow hack my router into turning wifi back on.
My router doesn't do WiFi
neither does mine...
I don't want it to do WiFi
it has no WiFi hardware inside it
My router has no FCC ID
But now, that smart af appliance is window into LAN. This window opens up network and goes through an insanely impressive combination of layers: it goes through a wall first, then the modulation and rest up until network. My whole point is the wall part. It's literally impossible to penetrate a wall without radio
(Or battering ram)
nope, you can do it with power signals
Now that's the highly unlikely part to the point where you shouldn't consider it. Unless you're somehow networking over power line
You have to make some interference in power line that goes through PSU without breaking it or shutting it down and results in anything significant to the data lines inside computer
@peak cloak @clear igloo I love DFS
My neighbors don't have shit that can use DFS channels
So much free 5GHz spectrum
I mean you can always DoS I guess like that. If you cut out somebody's power, you definitely denied them any and all service. Both PC and Fridge.
I love how 5G uses mostly 2.4GHz right?
5G as in cell network
nope
lol no
Wellp as long as it doesn't use 2.4GHz like always, it's far less harmful probably
All along, it was every wifi we had that fried your brain and did all those nefarious things people say about 'the government gonna use it on us with 5G'. 2.4GHz pretty close to microwaving water frequency and pretty sure it actually still does manage to do so. Only thing is it's not enough power to boil anybody obviously
On the other hand, people say that having wifi router beside head on night stand is definitely a bad idea lol. And they did observe something alarming in 'teens who use cellphones' as opposed to old people that don't. My friend asked me if all this WiFi everywhere is harmful and I said yes. But you can't prove it at any given instance.
its all non ionizing radiation Β―_(γ)_/Β―
I mean all radio is EM radiation, true, but there's one sweet spot where it also happens to be the microwave that heats up the one thing that makes up like 80% of us lmao
Ionizing is kinda misleading too. You should really be worried once that ionizing radiation did it from the inside of the nucleus. And along with it, probably the atomic numbers changed π
Take in how around like 6 or 7th century AD just nature on its own decided to erupt Krakatoa in such a way that it caused night time for years to the same extent a full out nuclear war is said to result in
lol can you take the uninformed bad takes somewhere else?
omnidirectional + extremely low power. No, it's not a concern.
Leave this channel for networking?
Right my bad. It all started from somebody saying how firewalls
and I pointed out that nobody even uses it or knows if it's on lol. Oh well, as long as everybody continues to be behind NAT, I can shut up for now
NAT != firewall
a simple firewall will do the same thing NAT achieves
ipv6 deployment does not incorporate NAT
But my networking teachers and former companies told me ipv6 doesn't matter and therefore take no steps to configure or secure it
I meant NAT by default in every instance. So nothing is forwarded. To be honest, even when somebody looks up online how to forward a port to get X thing working, it's opening up as a result the same minimal window that a properly functioning default setting on a firewall with somebody doing exactly what they should means
I'm surprised I haven't heard of more people leveraging improperly configured ipv6 to traverse networks
I honestly don't think you understand how it works
In other words, my whole beef is how can you justify anything about a computer which you haven't started using yet having services running and open ports already
And that's nothing so far becase in reality, you'd have to justify opening something in a firewall you received without knowing at all what's been opened for you.
I mean ultimately, you can say the firewall works and is doing what it should. It's just open in some ways you need to see for yourself in order to find out. On windows, even reading some of the default firewall rules doesn't help much because it literally makes sense nowhere in this logical plain of existence
It's an increasing used vector (on-net). Many, if not most vendors have v6 enabled by default and most places that do not have v6 implemented, have no filters/ACLs as a result.
windows firewall != router firewall
they are seperate
2 seperate layers
If they both deal with connections on ports, they are at least overlapping on the same layer
But probably they are exactly covering the 3rd. No more, no less.
Ok, technicalities, yes they are on the same OSI Layer, but they are layered as in one is behind another
Lower layer you have MAC whitelist/blacklist and stuff in wifi. Anything which blocks or accepts frames and deals with macs would be second layer I think
nope, the specific OSI layer doesn't matter rn
but your normal router firewall is on L4
The one immediately below your regular firewall. I guess WiFi encryption like WPA2 and stuff would be 2nd layer involving because the rekeying and whatever is a frame. No networking is established yet I think
No I said anything below the layer of a firewall with ports would involve certain things. An example I came up with was mac filtering and wifi keys
Exactly my point. It's not even a 'firewall'
But that's some of the closest things to a 'firewall on a different layer' I could come up with.
Layer 1 firewall could be done I guess if the ports are actual physical ones where you block them by unplugging cable from it lol. Somebody mentioned earlier that thing where AC sockets used for transmissions can be listened or interfered with by even next door neighbor at times. You are listening on all ports lol
Present was talking about security in layers. In context to NAT/FW, he's talking about:
--> Firewall ( FW - NAT ) ----> Host ( FW )
Anything after where TLS and stuff sits -- wherever it may be -- I don't care at all for the rest of the 'layers'. Application layer is where it truly starts to show how it's not actual perfect boundaries but also throws away everything
Nowadays, even if the application is assumed to be on some one intended place with respect to the rest of it from whatever between the kernel, through to the metal, it selectively interfaces with stuff on different layers
@clear igloo vlans? who needs vlans? it's 2022
We might get a lot of ipv4s back and freed up soon. If it keeps going this way, maybe in just a couple of years Russia and USA will block eachother until there's no connections left between the new and old world.
I ain't need no stinking VLANs!!
Vlans are for nerds lol, I just buy a separate internet connection for each class of device
Once they do that, they can literally just rip the cables in half that go across oceans. To be honest, who needs firewalls lol
All those printers must be lonely
Shhh. Nobody tell China that they can just literally cut off the internet. They don't realize it yet I think.
Oh damn better keep that one a secret
Here I was thinking it was a distributed network of peers with globally distributed services
Well the government stuff to access the now western side of the metawall can be on satellites.
Satellite is awfully dangerous if monitored. You have signals geographically originating from your position. If nobody in China can use satellite internet, you can just triangulate everything and pick them up no questions asked.
Honestly, even in Canada I know we have a law that prohibits any encryption of transmissions to and from anywhere outside its border.
I do funny VLANs
like 69 and 420
I know for a fact even HAM radio license people transmitting on longwave definitely can't encrypt anything digital
because I am immature
Everything is kosher so long as it's within a block meant to not be real addresses
Honestly, I don't know why people use Hamachi and crap when there's stuff like ZeroTier. The free version only allows one admin and like 25 or 50 auths but whatevs. If you really need it, it's cheap or just unauth people who aren't using it at the time.
SMH I hate when I use a VLAN identifier that's in a block meant to not be a real address
I love it. So do you in the sense that you'd probably hate it if we hadn't reserved those
||Do you even know what a vlan is||
i use 1337 at work when testing in prod
l33t VLAN

I think Dimmskii means "no"
I finally reenabled my guest WiFi @peak cloak
It's for any network separate from the internet. You now need reserved blocks if that network is connected to internet, no?
what are you doing to let guests control your chromecasts?
guest is fully isolated π³
Unless you have two netrworks separately as interfaces.
oof
You can torrent on more than one network because it uses more than one connection
nope
very very wrong
Well I mean you could but shouldn't
If you have a single interface visible as network you are seeing ips and packets
Oh derp bridge I guess
So no doesn't really help. You have a bridge network combining two. How would I go about not having collisions in IPs unless I am told which IPs on which networks are meant for use in that one spot exclusively?
you don't bridge 2 seperate networks
?
you gotta route
SMH wasting all those alien broadcasts
But yeah unless you want your network to be a largely nonfunctional mess you need to route
In practice makes sense. Why on earth would I have two diff networks on top the same thing.
A consumer probably wouldn't
For businesses it's highly desirable to have proper network isolation between groups of computers with different permissions
Isolated AP setting on router
I really like that feature until I have something that needs to be seen from phone or whatever lol
Hey
That's routing right?
Guys I forgot my username and password for my wifi website
Do I have to reset whole router
no
yeah most likely
How bro
Β―_(γ)_/Β― that's router specific
It might be on a sticker underneath unless you changed it
usually press and hold reset button
Anyone has fiber?
If it's not, see your router manufacturer's help website or isp
How do you keep track of the physical connection regardless if it's routing or network?
Apart from MAC. And still, you keep track of where the client MAC comes from.
You have a router. Some clients on LAN, some on WiFi. How do you decide anything about routing or network based on where they are physically connected?
The router/switch keeps a list of MAC addresses and their origin interface
Because that's what isolate ap does ultimately.
Layer 2's job
routing is just something the router does
aka MAC
But that's not what AP isolation does
oh you want to go to 192.168.5.3, let me forward it to that network
that type of thing
Well thats my whole point? It's not layer 2's job because you're keeping track of which macs are on which physical connection
If you're keeping track of MAC addresses, it's layer 2
yeah MAC is L2
Layer 1 doesn't involve MACs. Layer 2 does Β―_(γ)_/Β―
Yeah but layer 2 doesn't keep track of anything additional about where the physical connection is from for that frame. Just the mac.
There are other things
Correct (for simplicity's sake)
Yeah so irl it's both layers and it sits between
But it's easier to see if you're the hub and all of the sudden you see just layer 2
Layer 1 is separate and completely unrelated now
Case and point: same thing with the internet. Given that you are 3 layers knee deep, you see only packets, ip, etc as it relates to the network. It's a network
Idgaf whatever
I'm done. It ultimately doesn't matter if ip conflicts
Does it though? I originally was asserting that also... but on the second though, nah.
I mean you have things like the router cares if you have a conflict at home.
But what if your nat is using ips that exist outside in the internet? First of all, the odds of running into it. Secondly, it's the connection that matters.
As in transport
yeah I don't think you understand networking
Honestly, can't you even have two different end-end connections on diff ports with the same IP connecting to you... only they are different machines irl
Honestly I don't. Some of it is insanely crucial knowledge I never needed, other stuff is obscure yet I care about it for some reason (still don't understand it in the end)
If 1.0.0.1 exists outside of your NAT and you use 1.0.0.0/24 internally one of possible 2 things can happen:
1.0.0.0/24 is a directly connected network to your machine and your machine will route traffic for 1.0.0.1 out that interface and hit it on the local domain via ARP and then to whoever has the IP & MAC combo
1.0.0.0/24 is not a directly connected network to your machine and your machine will find a default route and send packets to the gateway which will then find on its routing table that it has 1.0.0.0/24 as a directly connected network and send it out the appropriate interface.
but say you don't use 1.0.0.0/24 internally, the router will see it doesn't have a directly connected network for it, and thus send it out of its default gateway (aka your ISP)
DERP as in "Designated Encrypted Relay for Packets"? no
Or it's only same subnet mask different ips
can you do it? yes, should you? no
it won't work well
That's what I mean
Would it still maybe work one way and break the in the other?
Like I said, two inbound connections on different port with the same ip. Who cares lol
how is that relevant?
if it's to the same machine, that's literally what's designed to happen
On different machines
Right therein lies my lack of understanding networking
I literally use them too. Gateway subnet mask the router
Internet
And yet I don't fully even know certain differences between lan, vlan, nat, etc
Wow actually even I knew about broadcasts I just forgot lol
But if I'd kept that in mind, where would they go. That's another thing worth trying. Set IP to first address
@peak cloak We reserve more IPs within each subnet
Was it you who said you don't like how we allocated special ip blocks?
no? I said vlans aren't reserved
yes, first and last IP in a subnet are reserved and shouldn't be assigned to a device
first is network IP
last is broadcast IP
Oops
In my VPN, I can configure max broadcast and ip block separately. That's what makes it different.
You can have a router in vpn
gateway^
I'd probably get a lot out of the first page in networking for dummies. I searched messer net and found a site. The first thing is common ports. I know only a few. 80 and now 443 are useful to know. For me, also the ssh one which I still blank out on sometimes. 22 I'm pretty sure
But the real ssh port is anywhere except for the common ssh port. Everybody knows that. And yet, how it relates to the other stuff I don't know the entirety of the basics I guess you could say.
I mean I don't know the difference between VLAN and VPN or even LAN tbh. I've never used a VLAN to my knowledge.
My best guess would be that it's separate subnets inside a VPN?
If I'm wrong, idk. I can't think of anything else. Like I don't even feel like Googling it lol.
Or wait final guess: route inside nat
The best intro to networking series I recommend to anyone is Network Direction Networking Fundamentals series on YouTube.
If you don't start with the basic, you'll be jumping all over the place
a VLAN is a way to have multiple subnets through one physical interface
Rght and I'm still confusing LAN and subnets
Now might be a bad time to tell you this but I manage networks 
Well, on the other hand, you have every single guy that hooks up cable internet just knowing which plug the cable in the box outside screws in if the house number is marked or some other indication for which one is which
Pretty sure LAN is just a type of subnet(s). It just describes what the subnet is basically
And already, that's a big assumption because the majority of the time, I see them trying the different ones until the tester connects in the basement
After that, it's all butter as long as you plug it in and all the lights turn on but just the last one can flash randomly. Even I understand more about the sequence, the link one for sure
Tbh, it doesn't matter if you're the cable guy and you know everything top to bottom because after that if it didn't work, you check if hooking up or disconnecting the splitter helps. I think there's a chance that only the position is wrong for cables not sure
If it didn't work, there's nothing anyone can do until they correct the typo in modem mac or serial which is probably the next likely problem :/
But sadly, I don't think they would do that. They have to get a new modem, enable it and ship to you again
I just looked up LAN and there are a number of definitions that come up. The only common thing they seem to agree upon is that it
means a network is located in some general locality that shares some of the underlying connections
something physical shared in some locality idk
It can be layer 2
Well 1 subnet is 1 L2 domain
Yeah but there's an actual definition and it's even standardized somehow
A network spanning over the same L1 and L2
But I guess it really connects some number of different physical things for instance. Like wifi and ethernet.
So a home router qualifies. Makes sense. I'm happy. Although literally nowhere has the real definition. I'm still not exactly sure of it either...
Definitely not the stuff about how many administrators are managing the network and such. That's too far ahead seemingly. Then I saw mentions of peer to peer and client/server types of LAN...
I'm recalling two things about VLAN by the way in practice:
Somebody told me how certain ISPs put you in one to save IPs or something
On the other hand, it had some benefit too. I think it was a better alternative to NAT
So right off the bat:
- I can find myself in one against my will
- They probably owe me an IP address... even a non-static one
On the other hand:
- It can be faster than NAT because it isn't NAT
L2 domain is the LAN
Today, LAN is defined as a single broadcast domain.
Not collision domain
LAN literally means local area network. Making it more granular removes valid applications of the term
LAN has two meanings.
- Single broadcast domain
- Concept describing the portion of a network within your domain. AKA, under your control
1 is the literal definition, 2 is descriptive. Both are correct in their own context
You're still comparing unrelated concepts. Yes, VLANs can allow you to subnet larger blocks to better allocate subnets on the same interface (reduce unused IPs). But their primary use in the provider space is to prevent direct customer communication because they're independent bridge (broadcast) domains. VLANs are a logical separation of bridge domains. NAT has nothing to do with either of these points.
Again, don't jump to conclusions without having a good understanding of the concepts at each layer or you're going to keep going down these incorrect rabbit holes
In Azure I changed a disk from 128GB to 256GB which is the home drive for everyone in the active directory, but a day later it is still seen as 128GB in windows file explorer?
I tried rebooting the VM. No difference
You probably didn't resize the partition afterwards
Hmm I don't see the partition in windows server or azure
Nevermind I'm in the wrong vm
Would an HP ProCurve Wireless Access Point 420 be a good idea to get? It's only 40β¬ shipped. I know it's old and has 10/100 ethernet but
It's the same series as the switches (ProCurve 2524)
There are cheaper solutions but they're all PoE and I don't have a PoE power supply
Doesn't support N tho
It might not be disk management as usual. It's done outside the VM.
No that's the disk itself right. Yeah then just extend the partition inside the VM using diskmgmt. I didn't know you can extend the real partition so don't use dynamic
Yeah I was way off.
I wouldn't buy anything that's 802.11g for any use case in 2022, 40 euros can go much further than that.
I got a stupid question: my builder contracted out the wiring job for my home to a company who installed a βsmart wireβ which is essentially coax plus Ethernet from the breaker panel to the living room. When I first moved in, I see 4 Ethernet connections by the panel. But last night found out that none of the other rooms with those cable runs have Ethernet. All are coax. Does this mean all 4 Ethernet cables that run to my electric panel go to the same place?
Extra context, we got one year free internet when we moved in, so the ISP put in a keystone in the living roomβ¦just seemed silly that all 4 ports are there π
Anyone else having issues with their home internet connection this morning?
It seems like Spectrum is having DNS issues in multiple states
Still only 26mbpa
you were correct. I needed to login to the proper storage VM and resize the partition
I wish Azure would have told me so....
oh hey .... you resized this disk, but the partition is still at 128GB
would you like to resize the partition?
pfft..... maybe google would provide that efficiency
sad times ... when major companies design their systems to provide dumb error codes, where they cost $100+ to determine a solution
baby-jesus-cry π
Because that's how it works?
How would it tell you/do it for you
It's not like it has control over the OS
I am very new to AD and Azure
I had no idea I had to resize the partition after resizing it in Azure
Itβs the same as any cloud or hypervisor lol
It's not just azure, it's the same for any other hypervisor
I didnt know I had to login to a VM to resize that partition
^^ hmm ok π
omg... I wish MS would be clearer
It seems they tailor their products to attract support $$$
π’ baby jesus cry lol
?
ummm
well an employee quit and I was placed to replace that person, with absolutely no AD/Azure knowledge
Google is my best friend lol
I'm currently using the ISP provided modem/router gateway. The router doesn't have very many configurable options. I have one unmanaged switch and need to get another. Does it make sense to get a managed switch and plug the modem/router into that one first to have the extra options that it provides?
What options do you want?
VLAN would be a good start to separate my home automation stuff.
So a managed switch by itself can do VLANs but you still need a router to support VLANs in order to route between them with firewall and provide services like DHCP. Technically you can do that by plugging in a separate router and setup the switch a certain way, but that's more complicated
VLANs by themselves are just a way to basically be able to put multiple subnets/LANs over a single physical interface
Oh ok. Does that mean if you wanted to do VLANs you'd need both, a capable router and a managed switch or if the router allows it you can get away with an unmanaged switch?
So what you want are multiple subnets. I can draw a diagram in a bit to explain it better
VLANs are just one way to achieve what you want
What's the best way without being too complicated? I'm technical but networking is a pretty new realm for me.
So first steps would be a router that supports more advanced features. One way without vlans to achieve segregation is like this
with vlans you can do something like this
and there are many other ways, more hacky ways, but this is more of a proper way to do it
But the main point I'm trying to convey is that VLANs aren't subnets/LANs
Awesome, thanks. I'll save those.
How necessary is splitting this stuff up anyway? Everyone recommends it and I get the theory but not sure if it's really that necessary.
is it strictly necessary? no
really the only things I separate are the cameras and guest network
and I also used to have some more separation when I hosted stuff, all the VMs are in a seperate network
Ok thanks. Moral of the story is I need a router...and I still need a switch. Any recommendations on either? I don't need wifi on the router. I have enough wired APs that I actually turned the wifi off the ISP provided router.
hardware wise, I'm not satisfied with any of the options out there right now
personally I have the ER-X, but it has some issues with ipv6 and it's just generally older and no longer updated
there's the mikrotik HEX, which is pretty good, I just don't like RouterOS, it's very "clunky"
hmm...ok. I'll browse around. What about switch? Will pretty much anything reputable do?
I would say stay away from Netgear
That's what my current one is but it was left by the previous owner of this house and seems to be doing fine so far.
is there a way to split my network so that if I download from box or dropbox, it always use connection 2. everything else that I do will stay on connection 1. not for just 1 PC on my network, but for a couple
1/2 correct. You only need one interface. You can tag the outgoing and incoming traffic and use a managed switch. Is that a good idea... Probably not the best idea.
to utilize the faster connection internet to just download from just specific sites since the main network is too slow but it's the main network that can't be altered
yep, 2
and a palo alto firewall
some changes can be made on the firewall, but connection 1 is rather fixed. if we can utilize connection 2 speed, it would be outstanding. the only way for now is a dedicated pc or wifi
i was under the impression i would have to route the 2 connection with a help of a proxy server. it would be even better if we can do it from the firewall instead
Policy Based Routing
Most NGFW can do this
Since they can work on layer 7
@peak cloak π https://i.ryois.me/1wrwqnk4P7.png
Thanks, i will look into it!

Always Printers
My school have only 2, Eduroam and AT
Eduroam functions everywhere in Europe, it is funded by EU
I know its like a virus all iver europe lmao
My school is so damn stoopid
... Theres like 20 networks with same name on the same channel and everything is chann 36 20mhzπ
same as wifi4eu
speeds aint bad either, i get 100(when its busy) and 500 when no one is using it and upload around 300
Never saw that before
My school has a guest network, student network and teacher network
Funded by taxpayers that have their money stolen*
They probably send all your data to the EU and upload everything there is on your phone π
I know π
I think it's bigger than that, we have it in Australia
On the bottom of the page that state they are funded by some EU grant thing I think... Yes it still will exist outside of the EU.
https://eduroam.org/
Also it states it is secure. I don't know if that is why they have me enable legacy renegotiate to connect, but that sounds insecure especially since it is a sign of MITM.
I'm not sure what sort of mess negotiating consistent wifi is over 100+ countries and territories
But I doubt it has very high standards and is easy to update
High standards? No. Easy to update? Not easy according to IT at a school I know.
we have it at most schools in the US too. definitely not an EU thing, just funded by the EU for schools in Europe because that's where they get their funding...
Funded by taxpayers. Saying the EU funds it sounds like they're doing something nice.
My school doesn't even allow students to use wifi
But the tax money surely goes into their pockets.
They had 30mbps DSL before getting 500mbps fiber.
Theres indoor antennas at my moms work
Nerd
My Dad and I took a road trip to tour the 1 MW FM community tower in Crestwood, MO, serving the entire St. Louis metro area combining 10 FM radio signals into two antenna systems.
Special thanks to the Audacy engineers who allowed us to take a peek at their (very clean!) transmitter rooms and equipment!
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patre...
Enjoy
Watched both episodes already lmao
Cool stuff tbh
One of the fastest cell towers in Europe probably.
Nah theres ones with nearly 2gbits lmao
That 1gig is kinda slow for our n78
n78 on Magenta Telekom doesn't even reach 300mbps here.
Sometimes it gets 400mbps, but that's about it.
They think this is something π
A company from Hong Kong already has 5G SA and NR CA working .
Bro someone just said the 120mbps upload is shit
My brain cant handle this Situation rn
Probably a person that has no idea how mobile internet works.
"but I get 1000mbps up at home!!!1".
I know, that's just so painful. How can some people be that stupid.
yea fr
Oh, so totally clueless.
yea he just said like: yea but 120 upload is a bit shit
I don't even bother to argue with these people... They're so stupid lol.
121mbps UL is great for 5G
yea i mean i never get anything more then like 150-160
its rare af having more here
like no matter in what region
in germany
At school, it sometimes does 180mbps up, but only for 2 seconds because everyone in Austria has a speed cap. Mine is 100mbps up, so basically a 130mbps cap.
Download is capped at only 350mbps.
okay
What apps is that? i need it π
@full monolith cellmapper.net try that if this location accurate. other apps fakes. but im not sure netmoster. so im gonna find out if this exact same location π
@full monolith checked its fake location, you can trust cellmapper.net cuz i went celltower if this map shows true.
I know that netmonster has the database of my provider with exact Locations
I know where my towers are and ik that the app showes me the address/street name
I littearly can show you how accurate itnis with having the database lmao
Its not accurate if you dont have a working database from your provider
Cellmapper isn't that accurate
Mu university
Wtf is eduroam
RADIUS tunneling back to your home university for authentication anywhere on the eduroam network
You can connect to any institution with eduroam access with your home institution's credentials
So problem with my wifi so we have 4 connections and so the normal wifi is 2.4ghz there is another with 5ghz then we have are boaster with its own 2.4ghz and a 5ghz how is there a way to make the whole house just one 5 ghz internet
Eduroam isnβt just at universities. There is also at public places
Back in February this year I was at Stockholm Arlanda airport and there was also Eduroam
my university has quite a few APs
but the largest university in our state has a ton more lol https://i.ryois.me/XnMl0GjNI9.png
Yeah great and all but my school has this ISP but students cannot use it.
What is the speed of these weird hotspots?
Sorry for ghostping, it was train WiFi instead of eduroam. I didnβt measure back then, probably empty battery
Ah okay
Public isn't good in most places, so I doubt this EU funded wifi stuff is good.
Depends on the connection used for it butnive seen speeds up to 500/500 already
In a dutch school
Ah okay
Maybe they're not that congested, who knows.
But I doubt that they have anything more than that.
I also dont know if all the traffic runs over a vpn
Wouldnt be surprised if it would
So all the data can be sent back to Brussels /s
How do I connect my router to the TMHI wirelessly? :/ I've got all my network hardware in the laundry room where the THMI is half the speed of what it gets in the kitchen.
@peak cloak I moved my desktop over to 10G locally...
Speedtests went from 880Mbps to 940Mbps
I only have gig...
I guess a gigabit link between access switch -> core switch is bottlenecking
Me too. Anything more is pointless
Starlink πͺπͺπͺ
Read that as spreadsheets and was consumed by the question.. what kind of spreadsheets are you running? Then reality hit.
π
Mam thats actually bad for starlink sorry
But i mean they lack capacity amd bandwith for how many users there is
Okay so my school doesn't use eduroam anymore. Eduroam was 30mbps
@rocky badge https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/zm9amg/youd_reject_these_terminations_right/
Ik lmao. I was camping so it made sense
Starlink is still one of the best creations on earth.
bruh
Ive got someone telling me that wifi impacts my fps lowering it now literally every forum Iβve checked said otherwise but figured id ask here as well
Yeahhh no
Lmao yeah they are dying on this hill that it does
Hello all! Is there a way to enable remote desktop during Windows 11 install?
would using something like a "setupcomplete.cmd" file work? https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/manufacture/desktop/add-a-custom-script-to-windows-setup?view=windows-11
that could run a command that enables remote desktop
Ooh, I'll take a look at that, TY xeon!
If the game is spinning cycles trying to communicate online, that can affect FPS - or perceived FPS. This is specific to each game though.
bought a nest wifi pro.... piece of garbage
I wanted to combat bufferbloat and nope, worse than my Archer C9
Bufferbloat is not something you can really fix on consumer end...
Most of the time it's just a consequence of ISP queues
True. But say, if someone uses the Microwave and youβre suddenly getting lag spikes on wifiβ¦ thatβd be a reason to go wired.
Dealing with a set of some wifi troubles myself. just doesn't work consistently on my galaxy s21 but everything else its like solid. Never had that kind of problem with a wire
hey question, so i got a wifi card that has an ax210 intel card in it, as was recomended i do, but at 3 to 4 bars it still has an increadibly high latency and sometimes just won't have data acces despite remaining at around 3 to 4 bars, and i have gigabit ethernet speeds in the packet, so is there anything in relation to my router that could be the problem, as i have had this issue prior on different devices, but the router is nearly new so idk how what why
Is it made by TP link?
TP-Link is good at creating congestion and making your Wi-Fi unusable
Hey, I need to do a Wi-Fi deployment for a friend who isn't tech savvy. I would go with a UDM + a few UAP 6 Lites for the ease of use but that's kinda pricy. Omada seems good, but have had 0 experience with it. Any suggestions?
Is Omada stupid easy to set up and configure? That's the main reason I'm leaning Unifi
Also, I already have a UDM at home, so could I use that to remotely manage APs at their house?
So I'd still need to self host at their place?
Alrighty, any good options for tiny computers? I can't find any reasonably priced Raspberry Pis anywhere, and having a giant Dell Optiplex or whatever in a closet isn't much of an option
I found some used gen 1 cloud keys for $60
Not really
You can do l3 adaption
So with L3 adoption, I should be able to create a new site with its own settings separate from my current setup?
yes
Woo so I shouldn't need a second controller?
yeah, that's what we do at work for multiple sites
Freaking amazing
Any AP suggestions? I use a nanoHD at home, but don't know if it's worth splurging for 2 UAP 6 Lites or buying used APs on eBay
Sad days
honestly don't know much about APs, I just use some omada one at home
Rn I'm looking at the AC Lite, nanoHD, and UAP 6
I imagine it matters a lot less since this is gonna be in an apartment
Le-sigh. DD-WRT was much slower, apparently due to lack of FOSS drivers for broadcom based chipsets
and nearly bricked it 3 times
Not sure if this is a good networking question, but is there a way to take my landline service, connect it to my LAN, then answer calls over Wi-Fi?
Ideally something that works on smartphones and dedicated handsets but I feel like I'm already asking for a lot lol
so VOIP
don't know much about it but I belive you want something like https://www.freepbx.org/
Yee except I want to use my landline service instead of a VOIP provider
Yeah so with a pbx with an analog card in theory you can connect it
And then use voip to connect to pbx, so you can use on mobile phone on lan, or PC, etc
no, i dont think so, its an isp suplied and manufactured for one tho
https://forum.kpn.com/kennisbank-modems-145/kpn-box-12-van-specificaties-tot-instellingen-562267 this is the one i got
De KPN Box 12 van binnen tot buiten.Β Lees hier Γ‘lles dat je wilt weten over de KPN Box 12.InhoudSpecificaties KPN Box 12 Lampjes op de KPN Box 12 KPN Box 12 resetten Inloggen webinterface KPN Box 12 Instellingen KPN Box 12Β Specificaties KPN Box 12Geschikt voorΒ ADSL2+, VDSL, VVDSL, VPLUS, GOF, GPO...
@peak cloak I am trying to decide what subnet I want to use for my ZeroTier subnets
The 172 one?
Usually use the 172. for vpns and stuff
Yeah I'm probably gonna go 172.16-31
Ik tailscale uses the 100.
I can't really do anything below 172.25 because that's Docker auto network
Really like tailscale, they have a soft cap on users so I can just hook up azure ad to it
They natively use the 100.64/10 range?
til starlink router has basically no settings
just wanted to change wifi channels but nope
Yeah
@peak cloak
Tracing route to aws_i-02b9d88fd4f968f3a.233ccaac27eabcf0.zt.ryois.me [172.30.1.2]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms router.home.ryois.me [10.0.20.1]
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms zerotier.vm.ryois.me [10.0.10.11]
3 40 ms 36 ms 37 ms aws_i-02b9d88fd4f968f3a.233ccaac27eabcf0.zt.ryois.me [172.30.1.2]
Trace complete.
``` 
I'd just put a better router in behind, theirs sucks anyways.
Can tp link work on the 2nd vga slot under the 2nd m2 slot?
That is a PCI Express slot and has nothing to do with VGA, TP-Link makes many things that will and will not go in that slot. Link to the actual product you want to install.
Bruh
this is so expensive wtf
Can't see the problem
i pay 40β¬ for 1gbps down and 50mbps up. the upload is shit but im ok with that but how is 50mbps littearly the same price
I talked to someone about ADSL for $80/mo today
bruh what
thats fucked up man
sadly my docsis modems are only 1g so i cant take use of both my lines with the max of 1100mbps i get in on both
so i keep staying on 940x2
this might sound stupid, but here we go. can i directly plug the rj45 on a nas to the pc and turn it into a das?
idk exactly but wouldnt it work if you give the lan interface a static ip on both sides?
@earnest orchid You can establish a network connection with most newer NICs (as long as one of the nics has auto-crossover detection) . You'll need to assign static IPs. It'll still be a NAS (not a DAS), so you'll need to access the shares by a networked storage protocol (nfs, cifs, etc) and probably by IP address unless you do some manual DNS configurations.
so i just need a static ip and a nic, right?
I mean, depending on what you are trying to do: Yes. It's possible to connect two devices directly together without a switch/router. Whether your NAS will function like you want it to without connection to the rest of the network is up in the air.
it was in regard to the question of if it was a tp link, i can't find more info on it other then this, and idk if it could be my problem, yes its an isp router but still, having wifi without data is something ive just not had to deal with before
screenshot to kinda give context to the issue
I see no reason why it shouldn't, it's just a network connection
If it's an isp router contact thier support
there the only one that provide fiber where i live, so thats not an option, but if its possible that it could be an issue related to the router id look into replacing it, but im not sure
there suport is useless hence the question here
Oh okay. Have you checked wifi congestion in your area?
idk what part of the line could be creating the issue
how would i do that?
Hmm, it's gonna be hard with that ISP provided router, but does the internet work with Lan?
well the internet works with wifi usualy, it just often jumps from connected to not connected
lan works, im just not able to connect it to where my pc is
but it works with my pc and all devices on lan without much of an issue
Oh okay, then it's wifi congestion or the router is just cheap e waste
however it doesn't usualy reach anywhere near the speeds it should
What speeds is it supposed to reach?
Did you or anyone else get any wifi repeaters?
its wifi 6 able, so it should do gigabit at a minimum but at a max of 4.8 gigabit per second
it came with 2 repeaters, but those don't really work
Wifi 6 won't do more than 1200mbps
And that's wifi speed which is different to what your ISP offers. Can you check your ISPs website for the plan you have?
im reading of there website, so idk anybetter
Unplug then
See if it works there
they are
What's the issue exactly?
I doubt you have more than a 1000mbps in Europe, so check again
But make sure you actually have that plan and do a speedtest
Wifi connected, no internet available?
Close to the router, when no one is downloading.
wifi stays connected but internet isn't available
im on there gigabit plan
Ok, can you go into cmd and try ping 1.1.1.1
cmd?
You should plug it in with LAN
Wi-Fi becomes unreliable and congested if too many people have wifi routers at the same time
would if i could
Can you get a laptop and do it, near the router?
idk if my laptop has an ethernet jack...
it doesn't
Oh okay, try disconnecting the repeaters
they are
no phones too, no matter where in the house i am
i got 2 phones both have the issue
and my laptop sometimes does too, but usualy its fine
Interesting. The router must have something wrong with its wifi anntena.
You could also try turning the coverage down
This would reduce congestion
btw i live with 7 others bi weekly so thats difficult to do
Could you get your own internet subscription?
my stepdads 3 kids that live here bi weekly all use there phones and an 2 of them also use a console or pc that is connected wireless
no its limited to 1 per house, unless your on an appartment building
Usually a router is supposed to be able to handle that
You should get a better router then. You will just plug it into the KPN or whatever the ISP is and it should work
ok so it should be connected to the router from the isp not replace it?
Yeah since those all in one routers are often crap. They don't have to be but most are
And since you have no issues with LAN it wouldn't matter anyway
Keep in mind that gaming routers are a scam
They sell some without SQM 
Very gaming...
Before you buy it though, try getting your ISP to give you a new one
T-Mobile Austria did this too, when my trash 4G router stopped working.
i will contact them, if they send a new one i will replace it, and if that fixes it cool, if not i got the 2e router to put more wifi down
Alright
https://www.amazon.com/Asustor-Lockerstor-Enterprise-Attached-Quad-Core/dp/B07Y2BJZKC/ref=sr_1_11?keywords=8%2Bbay%2Bnas&link_code=qs&qid=1671283020&sourceid=Mozilla-search&sr=8-11&th=1 or https://www.amazon.com/QNAP-TS-832PX-4G-High-Capacity-10GbE-2-5GbE/dp/B08P42JR89/ref=sr_1_5?keywords=nas%2B8%2Bbay&qid=1671281284&sr=8-5&th=1
The quad-core 1.7GHz TS-832PX features eight 3.5-inch SATA 6GB/s drive bays, providing huge storage potential for a wide range of applications and everyday usage. With two 10GbE SFP+ and two 2.5GbE LAN ports, the TS-832PX supports next-generation networks for empowering bandwidth-demanding applic...
I'm thinking of splitting my wifi router into either a custom built router with a wireless access point or just a store bought router only with WAP. What is the best place for recommendations for a good WAP? I'd like to keep the price under $500.
There are many wireless access points (WAPs) available on the market that can meet your budget and performance requirements. Some options to consider include:
- Ubiquiti Unifi AP AC Pro: This WAP has a range of up to 122 meters and supports the 802.11ac wireless standard, making it a good choice for high-bandwidth applications such as streaming video.
- Netgear Orbi: This WAP uses mesh technology to create a seamless, high-speed WiFi network that covers your entire home. It supports the 802.11ac wireless standard and has a range of up to 350 meters.
- TP-Link EAP225: This WAP has a range of up to 180 meters and supports the 802.11ac wireless standard. It also has a built-in security feature that helps protect your network from unauthorized access.
- Asus RT-AC66U: This WAP has a range of up to 100 meters and supports the 802.11ac wireless standard. It has a user-friendly interface and comes with advanced security features to keep your network safe.
- Linksys LAPAC2600: This WAP has a range of up to 122 meters and supports the 802.11ac wireless standard. It also has advanced security features to protect your network from threats.
It's important to note that the performance of a WAP can be affected by various factors, including the distance between the WAP and the devices connecting to it, the number of devices connected, and the presence of physical obstacles such as walls and floors. It's a good idea to consider these factors when choosing a WAP to ensure that you get the best performance for your needs.
@rocky badge that sounds like a chatgpt answer
i wonder if thats why they got muted
π
lol
Definitely
5G?
yes it is. its 2 lines each 1gig down and 50 up. we dont have stuff with more upload here and my bonding is bugging around with upload so at the moment only download bonding is working.
i use open mptcp router for bonding
https://www.openmptcprouter.com/
Does AT&T have the fiber that is capable of 25GBPS+ at your house?
No.
Still on GPON with speeds up to gig
I think most of their fiber is capable of it, but they only sell 5gbps for now
Oh okay
Crazy
crying in 1GBs Line
i would rather choose yours instead lol
Why is it Deutsche Glasfaser instead of Deutsches Glasfaser
Because Deutsches Glasfaser would sound awfull and doesnt really make sense
yep
and i dont care what their name is, the internet is great, 1 or 2 Maintenance Days a year, and for only 90β¬ a Month
When it's alone, like "Deutsche Glasfaser" it sounds horrible. It does sound right if it were "Das Deutsche Glasfaser"
That's a horrible price
nope, its "Die Deutsche Glasfaser"
why? Telekom/T-Mobile is so much higher in prices where i live
Germans cannot even speak their own language π