#audio-tech
1 messages · Page 171 of 1
Also nice that you don't know what he wants but says stuff like "you cant find consensus without looking at their use case and preferences"
(meant for Jackson ofc)
so like. before you start typing nonsense. maybe scroll up and get the context 
he want to play games, listen to music, and edit stuff.
HD560s 
that is not a use case

He wants to use a Headphone for PLAYING GAMES!, LISTENING TO MUSIC, VIDEO EDITING
or at least its the implied use case of every audio reproduction device ever produced
that are THREE USECASES
cheeeeeeap
it's so over
no DROP on Europe
more detail is required before any guesses to what he wants could be made
HD560s is a great allrounder 
Because your opinion is better than the one of most people 
no, because the premise of all-rounders is invalid
look.
idc what your opinion is. and he probably wouldn't care too
my take was that most people would say that the HD560s would be the best allrounder in his 3 categories
you can go on many headphone discords, most people will say "HD560s"
espacially for 135USD new
in germany that shit costs 150€
in Britain 115€
thats a steal
you're not looking at product experiences
not most of the time anyways
how many people have personally listened to the 560s alongside the mc450
or how many against the 600, 6xx, k702, dt880 600r/250r, xs, x2hr or the newer one, 990 pro x
many discord servers are saturated with graph pounders
they are generally against product experiences
basically you should be looking for comparisons between headphones instead of searching for a so-called all rounder
the former lets you build an idea of how other people generally think a headphone behaves
then you can check that against your own experiences and help people situationally
well see it this way
emmaboo has been told 2 different schools of thought and probably hasn't decided which makes more sense
all I can do after that is explain why I said what I said, and why I thought the other presented case doesn't work
it also lets other people chime in on either side
even if this server somewhat leans objectivist
but it's her job to search around and find these different perspectives
I bought both the Simgot EM6L and supermix 4 about a week ago to see which suits me better. I'm not quite an audiophile. My sources have been in apple dongle on my phone and an ifi Uno went at home. Both supposedly have an output impedance of under 1 ohm.
I'm struggling to really hear the difference. Sometimes I think I do in the base but other places I'm not completely sure
maybe they're similar in design other than that dynamic driver
Hi, I've been wanting to buy an SHP9600, and I've seen it's $75 on Amazon and $55 on AliExpress. Should I pull the trigger?
honorable mention i swapped from my boston a60s to my tucked away large advents because my wall insulation is better than usual and man they do good the bostons are a fight to make them sound good but advents sound great just by default and theres probably a lotta factors but im happy
I thought these were supposed to be equivalent to 6xxs?
They are. They're really good.
What’s a good way to decide if you need earphones, headphones or speakers
How much money you have
I don’t see how money helps you decide what’s best for your use case
If you have less than $100 get earphones.
If you have less than $300 get headphones.
If you have more than $400 get speakers.
So speakers are just always better
Not always
Headphones are convenient.
And are usually better for gaming
Well. Maybe better. A really nice speaker setup can be god-tier for gaming
But you have to put the work in. Make sure they're placed right and there's good room acoustics.
That part I knew, it’s why I currently use earphones, they serve the purpose for gaming, a little less convenient but I don’t have to worry about hair dents anymore
It’s a small room so I’d be pretty limited, in where speakers can go
if you have the room for them and you can seat them appropriately
they are always better for music listening
I don’t listen to a lot of music
for gaming you need specifically well placed speakers and possibly diffusers to get direction information
what is your use case then
just get headphones, speakers arent worth it
or earphones
speakers are good for music and movies, both of which you dont do
Not in my bedroom so yeah
What’s the deciding factor between earphones/iems and headphones?
Is it just preference of comfort or is there a significant difference in sound profiles
headphones can sound better in higher price ranges
but iems can get you really good audio for 25$
with pretty good imaging generally
I haven’t seen any iems for that cheap, have I just been looking in the wrong place
A lot of the ones I’ve heard about are 125-300 which is quite high
it would be pretty stupid to buy iems for 300 honestly
even 100 is a lot but maybe you travel a lot or something
Wtf 
I accidentally clicked over to this channel and this was the first thing I saw
if by that you mean very budget ($25), 7hz zero:2 is my anecdote but i've heard the truthear gate recommended frequently as well
so what headphones would you recommend? because i’ll mostly be using the headphones for gaming
Do you thin the miced version is also good
https://www.amazon.ca/Linsoul-7Hz-Crinacle-Zero-Microphone-dp-B0DLB3GFBF/dp/B0DLB47XV5/ref=dp_ob_title_ce?th=1
probably. I think the mic is just in the cable and doesn't change the iem at all
not sure what the price difference is. if it's a lot then you might be better off just buying a separate microphone
It's like a dollar difference after discount but before discounts normally the miced up is 4 cheaper
Like experience. But idk anyone who enjoys Grado. And MC 450 looks like an Grado
These peaks are real. Not exactly at that potition
And yes. There are many against HD6xx etc. But most not 😄
But as always. You try to put your opinion and experience above all and say no to Intersubjektive thoughts
Also it seems like u don't know what "Intersubjektive" is
Look it up. And you understand what I mean
Like ofc idk if he would like the HD560s
But most people do for that price
So the chance is higher that he likes it too
It's just that simple
honestly, for me, I think this depends on you more than price of the thing
some people can't do in ear headphones
in which case, even for $100 you wouldn't want earphones
I tend to like IEM's, and I think that often like, "high quality sound," comes more from IEM's at cheaper prices, which si what I think Nils was getting at.
where as headphones get really good if you spend a little more.
but if you don't want to mess up your hair, or you wear glasses or something like that, headphones might not be a good deal either.
Used to wear bulky headphones a ton during covid so they caused a big hair dent so I stopped
Rn I use a pair of apple earphones cause the mic is acc good, so idm the feeling of earphones in my ear, and prefer earphones over headphones
I don't think earphones are gonna be more likely to cause hearing damage so I am fine with going with iems as long as they work for gaming
and speakers are really only an option if you're in the room for them, and nobody lives with you.
because nobody likes that guy playing trash music that everyone can hear
I don't play music or watch movies in my bedroom, nor live alone
yea I wear iems just so the hubs doesn't need to listen to what i listen to, lol
but either way, it's always a personal choice; you can get IEM's that cost $400+
or you can get speakers that cost $20.
I am aiming for under 100 cad
and under 100 CAD you can prolly get one of the many, many plentiful chifi IEM's out there that sound really good.
if you need a mic i second those zero 2's
I'd be perfectly happy with those
bbaovanc mentioned these so I grabbed the mic version to look at
https://www.amazon.ca/Linsoul-7Hz-Crinacle-Zero-Microphone-dp-B0DLB3GFBF/dp/B0DLB47XV5/ref=dp_ob_title_ce?th=1
okay cool
I don't know how good the mic is gonna be in these
most wire mics are about the same
but for a dollar extra it seems worth having
they're almost always the same crystal inside that little tube
Also this may be more of a driver thing or idk
but whenever my earphones disconnect from my pc even for a bit I can't get them to reconnect and pick up the mic without a restart
I can hear fine
but the mic doesn't work
winblows?
ehem, windows*
I've had all sorts of weird stuff happen with windows and microphones
yeah
I have debated the switch but haven't had the will to just yet
if it's a USB interface it usually works fine, and my pcie soundcard is pretty reliable
circular dongle earphones
but if it's like motherboard audio jack or something forget it lmao
Similar thing happens on my laptop but doing stuff like replugging it, leaving the call and messing with the input voice settings fixes it in discord
I don't really voice chat very often so idk, i try to avoid calls as much as possible
Fair
I hang out and game with a friend often
almost daily so mic stuff is a bit important for me
I think if i needed a microphone i'd go with something dedicated rather than integrated into the headphones
hey i was researching a bit and apparently closed back headphones are better for fps games like fortnite or cod? should i get closed back headphones? as when i play single player story games etc i usually use my speakers, if so what ones should i get, i’ve been looking at beyerdynamic mmx 300 pro, but also have been recommended the razer black shark v3 pro and the logitech g pro x 2 lightspeed
I can only tell you that this is situational so many times
what games? what are you trying to hear or experience in these games, and is it for enjoyment or competiveness?
mostly if i’m going to use headphones i’ll be playing comp games like fortnite and cod, btw i will be getting a separate mic the fifine tank 3 so if the headphones don’t have a mic that’s fine but if they do that’s also fine i’ll just disable the mic on the headphones
but when it comes to single player games i will just use my speakers as i prefer using them for those type of games yk
call of duty warzone?
yh warzone, bo6, bo7 when that comes out
but i won’t play the campaign for bo7 and i still haven’t played the campaign for bo6 lol 😂
I'll need to do more research on these sound engines
but what I can say so far is that fortnite seems to be a little finnicky with rear imaging, and the warzone test audio I had listened to had the footsteps extremely quiet
so very loosely right now, the r50x seems like it would work
in the meantime, what kind of music do you usually listen to? anything you'd want to hear or experience more of in that music?
unless that's a low priority I suppose
what budget earphones (like for example galaxy buds fe) are good?
eh if i’m going to listen to music i’ll either use my ear buds when im out but if im at home either speakers or my alexa, and i listen to emo, goth type music, ill send my playlist if you want
oh ok
I mean if you don't plan to use it for music, that at least makes things easier
Shockingly I have friends and need something to communicate them but also want to get some new headphones or iems. I like the idea of a boom mic but at the same time don’t believe I could get a headphone that’d sound good and work with the vmoda boom pro.
of course you could still use the headphones for a music, just a matter of how it'd behave + if you enjoy what happens
Moondrop space travel 2 if sound is a priority and the QCY melonbuds pro if you don’t mind worse sound that’s a bit muffled in a way requiring eq but a more complete feature set.
I don't like the loose, undefined bass in the... original space travel
didn't know there was a 2
I want good sound quality and good volume and somewhat decent anc
what do you define as sound quality tho
anything as good or better than the cmf buds pro 2 or buds fe
I mean that's been the main discussion in this channel for a few hours now
Probably just the cmf buds
there is no "good sound quality" without defining good
I don’t know how the space travel 2s are but I’ve heard their better than the originals which was good already
there are many effects headphones and earbuds have on different music
lots of highly conditional behavior
do they have ANC?
a lot of people seem to prefer low detail levels compared to high ones. but their opinion can change as soon as the next song appears, because the music triggers different aspects of the headphones. e.g crippling the instrument separation with metal music, whereas the same thing that caused this makes them sound very detailed and natural in calmer jazz music
ok
Yes but I’d check reviews of both
My og space travel didn’t perform well in windy scenarios with anc on and while anc helped block out noise, it wasnt amazing
so what would you recommend then?
Brother just give some subjective recommendations and tell em to watch reviews
It ain’t that deep
any of yall pretty knowledgeable when it comes to wireless anc headphones? kinda in the market for some new ones unfortunately
no i didnt break them
could use some recs
Ugreen max5 is pretty good, but the app is only available through sideloading.
Gorilla glue
im good
ugreen makes headphones too?
damn
didnt know that
They're pretty good. Don't have the bells and whistles that a lot of other headphones do, but with the jazz preset they are remarkably well tuned
they feel pretty nice too.
no, you need to spend 30 minutes asking someone who really isn't into the hobby 100 questions to find a pair of headphones they probably wont like anyway :p
i hate recommending, mostly because it's the case of what I like is not what you like, and even if it's "objective," there's always the subjective side of things as well.
partly why i generally just list off what I know is in the price range that is overall received as "good" in what i hear.
and also state what I like.
objectivists when asked how to create a perfect model of the human hearing system to measure their frequency response
subjectivism is impossibler!!!
nah theyll like it because theyd like whatever the fuck you recommended regardless
I won't have time to look at these sound engines until thursday/friday
HD560s
Sound engine has nothing to do with a headphone
bs
Just stop please...
A headphone is a analogue thing. It is not connected to the sound engine. So it has nothing to do with it....
If the engine is shit. A headphone won't make it good
It's just simple, shit source is shit sourcs
to reiterate on my best guesses, the r50x makes a lot of sense if you want to boost quiet sounds the most. it's capable of spherical imaging in most games that support it. additionally, the mc450 makes a lot of sense if you want to hear clearly through many overlapping sounds, and also can do spherical imaging
those are two options that make more sense than the 560s in most of these possible outcomes
Bro just ignores the Psychoacoustics 👌
says the guy who just disowned the audio signal as part of what headphones deliver
So headphones sound wide?
And this is not a Psychoacoustic effect called HRTF or on Headphones HpTF?
It's so simple to test. EQ your headphone to something terrible
Like +7db at 400 Hz. - 4db at 700hz lots of bass no Eargain lots of upper treble
And maybe some peaks and dips in between
It (atleast for me) woukd affect the "Soundstage" and "Imaging"
it would do you some good to have a bit of music production knowledge in relation to staging
you'd be able to answer your own question
I do music
Staging is mixing and arrangement
And sound selection
And maybe some other stuff that does fly into my mind in that second
But still. It has nothing to do with a specific headphone
It's not what a headphone can do
it was a hard question anyways
Hello i have a scarlett 4th gen 18i16 and my friend gave me a brand new scarlet 4th gen 2i2 which one is better?
I'm not familiar with any differences aside from the ones stated in the name
the 18i16 obviously has more I/O
and the way that I/O is accessible is also probably different
having two interfaces though gives you a few extra possibilities with routing or sound design
and if you have a mac you can do composite device
https://www.reddit.com/r/audiophile/comments/1mgktsg/first_time_hearing_monitors_vs_speakers_holy_fuck/
this comes to mind given the context above
?
DJs not being humans
Agreed
Hd 560s, hd 560s old version with longer cable (ideally), hd6xx, hd6x0, ft1, ft3, akg k361/k371, pc37x, pc38x
.ogg
If I have a CD/DVD set and the DVD includes a PCM track of the album at 16 bits and 48KHz, would ripping the PCM from the DVD be a better idea that ripping from the CD?
There's also a surround AC3 track with like 6(5(+.1?)?) channels. But it's "lossy" and reports 448kbps
Since most of these are for work, I wonder if I should make a folder with them all pre-mixed to mono
Maybe I can make a wholesale copy of all my CD rips(already in one directory), and then load all of them into Foobar. And batch "convert" them to FLAC, with the mono downmix option set, and add the word "MONO" to the filename, and choose "source directory".
Looking at the hyperx cloud 2’s
I’m so used to moondrop space travel tws and iems like zero:2 but I want something with a microphone
That doesn’t sound complete ass
hey i’m summoning all audiophiles to come seek my aid, im wondering what’s better the razer blackshark v3 pro or the fiio ft1 wood closed back with the fifine tank 3 combo?
hard question
but I would not use the ft1 for comp fps
supresses quiet details, skewed distance scale not in agreement with most games, and finnicky direction of sounds likely because the driver and filters are huge
they also just arent as resolving as the ones I mentioned and a few more. more sounds will be missed when a lot of other sounds happen at once
not too unresolving though. maybe $120-ish average territory
and they do have precision with the directions of sounds, its just flipped frontwards/backwards irratically like a lot of planars do
so what should i get then?
I had mentioned 2 models to look into since you're after comp fps, but I cant confirm their COD behavior
Just like with the AirPods Pro 2, most AirPods Pro 3 measurements online are wrong. Here’s why the most popular headphones on the planet are so tricky to measure, and what you should know before trying to interpret the measurements of these insanely clever devices.
Support us by buying headphones at https://headphones.com
Headphone Power Calc...
r50x and mc450
doesnt mean they're a great match for you, individual earshape can cause inconsistencies
mc450? is that a headphones?
what’s better the fiio ft1, r50x or the mc450?
I mention it a lot since its been lost to time and doesnt get discussed otherwise
I think your chances are best with the r50x
why’s that?
the earpads are a little thin but thats the only thing that concerned me anyways. can still wear them for a couple hours
so basically,
the r50x is great with representing sounds vertically, horizontally, front/back etc. with max precision. this isnt super rare in the open back headphone space.
it has high sound separation, so sounds that overlap will be easier to tell apart and not get blurred together as much
they are also outstanding and likely best-in-class at making you more aware of quiet details that are sometimes lost on the mc450, often lost on the 560s or dt990, and basically always lost on the ft1 and he400se unless there is 1(sometimes) or no other sounds
ft1
jackson is just the antichrist of audio
so he must recommend obscure shit that 5 people appreciate instead
this can make enemies seem closer than they really are. but it depends on the game too. warzone seems to pair nicely with the r50x for judging distance
so just get the ft1 ok
yeah for a 150$ish closed back i cant think of anything else you might want
main games in order will be cod, fortnite then minecraft
the gadgetrytech discord is able to help with this too. I mostly trust the opinions floating around there
if you want to minmax competitive advantages
also I'm almost 20 minutes late for doing this so please dont just throw away my advice on a whim
oh yeah beyers are cheap over there
definitely not my first choice but I'd take it over 560s and ft1
i dont know anything else with better imaging at the price point
so what should i get for fps comp lol im confused
Ft1 will be better than the razer
If you want a set of closed back headphones with no sound leakage then get the FT1 and if you don’t mind sound leakage and according to Klaus better gaming performance then go for the DT 880
I made meeshter tom
what one is better for comp gaming?
dt880
why’s that?
better imaging
ok
are they better than the 770 pro or 990 pro?
yes
so what one lol 😂
it’s on amazon
this is equivalent to me putting the options on a shirt:
A: size medium
B: color blue
C: material cotton
these things have nothing to do with each other
did you MTL the page from your local language or something because these options have nothing in common
i found out what they are circumnaural is 240 ohm the middle one is 32 ohm and the semmi is 600 ohm
250
grab 250
wouldn’t i need an audio interface for that?
no
ok
if your motherboard was made within the last 7 years
odds are it can probably run it
if not you can get an audio dongle to run it louder later on
it’s a gigabyte x870 eagle
this information doesnt help me since motherboard manufacturers dont publish how they have used their chips in what way
you just have to go off of assumptions
Is there much of a difference quality-wise between the Sony XM5 and the Bose Quiet Comfort?
(Costco's versions apparently are both soft-shell, so that's not really a relevant difference now)
do you mind open back headphones?
ft3 (350ohm) can be bought for like $170
they’re decent cana for the price
or get an hd560s
beyerdynamics can have sharp treble for some users
unless you can hear frequencies of about 22 khz or above there shouldnt be any difference between 44.1 kHz and 48 khz
Too late, I already ripped the PCM, split it using the CUE from the CD and converted it to FLAC
It's about 5 MB larger
They're probably completely different models with a random word for the name
well its fine becuase there shouldn't be any audible difference
What about the 24-bit 192KHz?
even more unnecessary
I think realistically you only need at least like 12 bit samples to make the quantization noise inaudible
And yet Blu-ray goes even further beyond...
how so? plus ain’t closed backs better for fps comp games?
surely nobody actually outputs real movies in hi-res though on real blue ray discs
In the market
But it's there...We could have just been using CD audio for all our audio for the past 40 years
At least this was simple and there was a PCM track. SACDs are a whole other can of worms I have to deal with
closed backs aren’t necessarily better
if the manufacturer implements it well, the reflections can benefit soundstage
the fiio ft1?
but open backs nowadays tend to have decently good soundstage + you get immersion
Idk what to do about SACD. right now I just have the regular CDDA track ripped on them
ft3 currently costs only a little more than the ft1 on aliexpress i suggest looking them up
why those?
they measure a hair better
Nevermind that's HDCD
ok
Go to Goodwill and buy a Sony Bluray Player with SACD support. Google will help you find a list of models.
You will need:
1 Bluray Player
1 USB Stick(about 2-32GB)
1 SACD
1 Destination PC
1 LAN
And courtesy of Sony's hubris, you can have all the audio files you want
like 99% of the people cannot even tell the difference between 320kBit/s MP3 and Lossless xD
and if you can notice it. is it really worth it?
ye
16bit 44.1khz is totally fine
and if you have very healthy ears can can hear above 20kHz
48kHz is fine too
but also on that. Does it matter? 
it's somewhat affected by genetics as far as i'm aware
20 khz is VERY high
so even if you have good hearing you might still be far away from 20khz
i'm in my mid 30's and i can still hear around 20k. mildly annoying sometimes, but great in my profession.
i don't know why youtube sounds so bad because the bitrate isn't that bad
ok tbh. youtube got better over the past years
unless theyre using CBR
i hate youtube's "normalisastion" of volume
yt music might be the best lossy streaming platform atm
because they dont have volume normalization
what they do is just pushing down the volume to idk what LUFS
i never knew sixteen tons sounded this until now honestly
and its annoying bcs YT is quiet
yeah youtube doesnt
thats why its good
and why is YT quiet? 😄
LUFS is supposed to be perceptually consistent
but its pretty tolerant
thats a good thing
and thats a bad thing
it fucks up the dynamic range
every song i have is WAY quiter on Youtube
i mean i think it just picks the max volume and noramlizes it to that?
its a great sign that the sound isnt fucked by normalization
or does youtube compress the entire audio
its literally what it is
no
thats why its good lol
thats what every other platform does
Youtube does make music quiter
they boost/compress the audio to whatever they deem standard
i thought they normalized it to a specific LUFS value, and that that just means bringing it to a specific average perceptual volume :P
without compression
its not the same Volume as the "Original file that was uploaded"
they dont
thats why its good
music is less loud sure
go turn up your amplifier
and you have so much more dynamic range than spotify
just buy pre-loudness-war CDs 🧌
you have to spin your amplifier's knob more sure but I'll take that over compression
Do you? its mostly the same file over the streaming platforms
thats literally youtube
and you are complaining about it
this elton john greatest hits album i have seems like it has a lot more dynamic range than most of my library
yeah because they have zero normalization
you got me confused with yakucho?
if you are not with me you are my enemy
die
Spotify has no normalization 😄
ive never used youtube music so i have no idea about that
it does have normalization
songs uploaded to regular video youtube sound like garbage, but who knows if it was just a really terrible original upload
Turn this off and the Songs are exactly as loud as the Lossless files i have
you can turn it off
if you give it higher lufs than needed its okay
no you cant
it literally processes them to be standard
Turn off normalization
bro
you dont understand 
everything is normalized to the required lufs spotify demans
the normalization you have on user end
that is a seperate normalization
that is a second process of normalizing the audio
Spotify normalization is not at the upload
its YOUR client
no it is at the upload
ok
its not the exact same timestamp?
ye click on the image
bad time to be using my 1080p second monitor
i think this is because you were outside of the treshold for lufs
so it doesnt get normalized
no
try uploading something from 1950's lufs
You can literally turn off the Normalization
because it's client based
and NOT at the upload
your Client scans Playlists etc and looks at the Volume of each tracks and normalizes it that they all sound somewhat the same volume
and doesnt have such abrubt volume changes track to track
im pretty sure because you make the initial cuts for lufs by being above the required minimum
which isnt the case for old music
so IF you listen to LOUD EDM and after that to idk, Hans Zimmer. Both gets somewhat equaled to make a more comfy experience
This is for every music in Spotify
Just turn off Normalization and done
Provided to YouTube by Universal Music Group
Sixteen Tons · Tennessee Ernie Ford
Sixteen Tons
℗ 2000 Capitol Records, LLC
Released on: 1955-04-10
Bassvocalist: Rolly Bundock
Conductor: Jack Fascinato
Producer: Lee Gillette
Mastering Engineer: Robert Norberg
Composer Lyricist: Merle Travis
Auto-generated by YouTube.
listen to this
vs this
hoping you have a spotify account because the preview will be at like 96kbps
you dont need yt premium the default rate is good enough
there are multiple versions
i have YT Premium bcs ads are annoying AF on phone xD
why does the spotify version have like no bass compared to the youtube version
without ads
am i going crazy
wont elaborate on this
different versions
spotify has weird tracks
boring music

id recommend youtube music over spotify even if everything i said about lufs is wrong
just because the library is exponentially better
at no loss of quality
some Soundcloud artist should get a Tunecore account and start getting on Spotify etc lol
I use Tidal a lot too, but youtube music is amazing
im pretty sure if you get like one premium music account as an uploader
it can publish all songs on every platform
amazon music, yt music, spotify, soundcloud
its how my mate does it
YT Music is a mic between "normal YT Videos (MV)" and intentionally YT Music uploaded stuff
The Talking Heads' video was originally reworked by @swedemason. Instead of having fun with it, his NeverTrumpism kicked in. I edited the video to make it fun again (it took way more time than I intended), so that is why I uploaded it.
yeah id be happy if we could filter out regular yt vids from yt music
ok so it lets me listen to some regular youtube vdeiso on yt music
but im okay either way
dude I was listening to yt music
sometimes it's nice that it includes videos, though
because if the song isn't a track or something it'll still play it in the car
and it randomly started playing videos of ukranians getting dronestriked with the autodj
i was like what the fuck is happening
its nice that YT recognizes Music and just puts it on YT music automatically
but daily i just buy tracks
bcs im not a huge fan of "paying and not owning"
yt music gave me ptsd
but
i wish more streaming platforms had "turn off normalization" like Spotify
yt doesnt have it by default
id recommend it for that reason if i was a music publisher lol
turn up the volume
i did
stupid
i think something is wrong on your end
nope
this is the FLAC
i need this song on cd
YT music is at max volume
fr if anything lower volume is better
its good for your ears
i have 27dB of headroom on my AMP 
unless it's like really artificially low beyond use
youtube doesn't sound as bad when you listen to it on iems instead of your phone
also hold on is that -8 LUFS because that sounds like it would be really really compressed
nonono
its not LUFS
just LU
Provided to YouTube by TuneCore
Long Way Down · Dan Wool
Phil Tippett's Mad God (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)
℗ 2022 Dan Wool under license to Waxwork Records
Released on: 2022-06-21
Auto-generated by YouTube.
this slaps
i should get a gun
ok have to take the quality back. had just volume matching issues 
noob
is it saying it's 8 LU quieter than the other (comparing two files), or what does 0 mean

ok
seems like YT music has some downsides
and its not YT music intentionally uploaded music
it has every song thats copyrighted on other platforms
eurobeat my love
tbh spotify has eurobeat
but for the sake of argument im going to ignore that
god damn
running in the 90s lossless sound so awesome
i just decided to click on an old EDM song in a playlist and i had to change the volume from like 40% to like 5%
on yt music or where?
edm genre fucking sucks kinda
yt music
got like 10dB dynamic range
this is my first time using youtube music and i guess it made an auto playlist of my liked videos filtered for only music
no normalization bro
but ye YR music is quiet
he said it was loud lmao
edm does kinda suck but i used to be a gamer
yeah but this song is probably just literally loud and compressed to shit
nah there is good ones but the industry surrounding the genre is shit
NoCopyrightSounds
everything is compressed to ass so that it can do its fart bass properly on some bar speaker
glad it counts this as a song
it's a virus that kills linux users that don't have fonts
i need a CD of earth wind & fire
what my cheese box sees at 4am
i was too young to remember what the movie was actually like
but i liked it when i was like 7
imo its just unique
if Spotify drops prices by like 3-4 bucks
best streaming platform
with Lossless
and no normalization 
how is the lossless looking

its like
You get randomly a message "Yo, u can use Lossless now"
What about other people? What if they notice it? And I'm making backups of my CDs. Maybe I should switch to APE for my backups and use FLAC for my mono versions for work.
IF you can notice it
ask yourself if that difference is really worth?
you can sit there casually enjoying
or critical listening
Worth what?
Hard drive space?
yes
Lossless
What is "lossless"? That's not a cost
hard drive space is a cost
The extra 10 dollars to get a 256GB SD card for my phone is a cost
All it costs me is 10 dollars and some HDD space. is it worth it? yes
And now that I switched to Mono encodes, that 256GB SD card will last for double the albums that it was previously(give or take compressibility). Where before I was barely using more than 128GB
meant the audio format
Lossless
24 Bit 192kHz is kinda useless
You asked if it was worth it
it was not like "is it really worth" like that its useless
useless? It has a use. It plays music.
It would take more effort to encode to a lossy format
the cd isn't that though idk what is going on
wat
I have no idea. This guy is mad I'm using FLAC for my CD backups
i feel like there has to be a miscommunication here
100%
cd isn't 24 bit 192 khz so it's a different conversation entirely
cd is 16 bit 44.1 khz
I said I had one album that had a DVD version at 48000....
i would be surprised if the dvd was not lossy anyways
you mean, they took a lossy version, and encoded it as PCM?
it's uncompressed pcm on the dvd?
There are two audio "tracks". One is a Stereo PCM, and one is a 6(5.1) channel AC3
You wanna know the best part of this all
I don't even like the artist that much...
Lol, it's clipping...
or maxed
There's no easy way for the program to tell between the two...i think
pretty common
Sausage of an audio
that's surprisingly expensive
you should be seeing it around 120 pounds
clipping in what exactly
most tracks clip at "True Peak"
and thats totally fine lol
as long as its not like +5dB or so
It just looks weird to see them do that. Maybe I'm just paranoid and I never do it
is that a surround mix?
or just stereo
Stereo. Surround is in AC3, so it's kinda hard to work with it in Audacity
ye
most programs are note able to show surround
so they push all the channels into stereo

I think in Audacity's case, it might be a licencing issue...
maybe
Das an expensive amp
wait, why did you get iha-6
in 2025
what did you pay for it
Temporary option until the end of the semester where I can fix my ragnarok. Brown out took something in it out and tripped a protection which won't shut off.
Won't be an easy fix because voltages seem okay
Might be a messed up controller or something
But I do not have time to troubleshoot it this semester
350
In basically new condition in the original box too
Plus I got a new card I had to put money on the get a $200 rebate
So it basically cost me $150
Okay thank god u didnt pay over 600
New price on IHA6 is about £900 iirc but they're fairly old now so they go for a lot less used
I think I paid like 600 euros for them back in 2022, brand new from aliexpress
I did get scared when I saw the prices its been selling for brand new recently
That's like 1.2k in USD? That's pretty insane. I ain't got that type of money lol
Tbh, I probably wouldn't even pay the $600 rate even with my rebate
yeah its not worth it for that money
Shame it doesn't have a speaker output
Woah this is super cool
me, as a person who's worked in product R&D: I buy Audeze LCD-S20. I get package. I see that they reused the Audeze Maxwell molding and foam cutout
neat
somewhat smart, allthough, i will say it does come off as being kind of cheap and cost-cutty.
could have laser-cut the foam so it fits the LCD-S20's and not include the dongle cutout the Maxwell should have
if anyone wants to insult my choice of headphones
although if someone would like to chat about it I actually generally do like Audeze headphones, so I would like to know others' opinions of them. (please no youtuber regurgitation, though.)
Got these on my stands and holy shit they sound different
Chat give me a home tv setup reccomendation for less then 200 bucks
Can be used speakers
Doesnt have to be surround sound
Just clear, loud, good for movies
And preferably playing games on console
Tv is a 55 inch LG WebOs dont know the exact product id
Check out options from edifier
For a theather set up?
Dude they like 700 bucks
Like js looking for a sound bar with maybe a sub
they sell like 30 different speakers and at least a few of them are in your budget
I looked at their tv setups
It said 600 n 700
N for the other on it didnt say the price
Lets say i bought these
Would I need a receiver?
And could i get a sub from marketplace and integrate it to the setup
Get a sub as well
A little over 200 in total though
Thus is an active sub right?
Yes
Also ill prob get the r1700 firsts n a month later get the sub u reccomended
So like 300 bucks total
There's the option of going passive subs and speakers but the introduction to an amp adds to the cost tbh
Yeahh
I saw
Ill post some marketplace deals if i find some
To ask if thats better then paying 300 for these
@supple sand or if you have 10 grand I can build you a pair 😉
If i had 10 grand i would prob buy a yamaha Mt07 rn
Lol
Instead im gonna finance it 🥲
That go vrom vrom tho
4 way active
Very clean
Thank you 😊
How much does smth likr that cost
To build or to buy?
Ohhh damn
Lemme pull up the excel sheet
Yeaaah its def not smth id buy even if i had the money tbh
Im more of a headphone guy
Lol
Gahhdayummm dude
Wait did i give you 9.6k lol 😆
I got 13k on my document.
Welp
To give you an idea of how much the components cost. Each speaker has 2 of these amongst other things. This PSU is 98 usd at the moment and to get them here has additional taxes 🙄
Hmmmm
I wonder how they expect you to remove the board...
.... what is that?
I've seen better board design in cheap Chinese knock off products.
I think its upside down
Trying to repair the volume wheel
Turtle beach headset
I think there's only one side, and its the side shown
Can't take off the cup
It was supposed to be a joke of Lin saying the board looks terrible because its the back side
probably dirty potentiometer
bet you could get far with some cleaning
The board has no solder mask on the back.
Its cheap
Cost saving.
That tan color is the fiberglass substrate.
That's why is terrible.
Not because "its the back".
Plus, look at the mouse bites; they're crooked.
lol you think youre supposed to be able to remove the board
sorry (@)Linus
don't get the AirPod Pro 3
they are shite.
fitment is shite
sound quality is different, better in some ways worse in others
and best of all, they just bricked themselves, less than an hour after unboxing :)))))
Linus never reads anything in the discord
skill issue
ofc I know that haha
Skill issued by giving tim apol money
Ive gone my entire life without giving apple a dime
Really? What did you have before them? AirPod Pro 2?
Do you use Android or iphone?
What direction did you hear the sound coming from?
#AudioUniversity #AudioEngineer #MusicProduction #ImmersiveAudio #Binaural
Disclaimer: This description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click them, I will receive a small commission at no cost to you.
What would be a worthy upgrade from a blue snowball? Have had it for afew years, paid like £20 for it. Has been fine (mostly) But starting to go on calls a bit more and it's picking up background audio more. Is there a decent upgrade that would help with that or even just a software that helps fight it?
lots of commnuication platforms already have built in noise cancelling
How close is the mic to your face
Yeah, only thing is Im using it all on discord already
Just infront of my screens. I have a keyboard + midi keyboard infront of it if that helps justify the distance
Like 45cm away
That's part of the problem. Almost any mic is gonna have this problem if you don't have it in a well treated room or right up against your face.
Move it so that it's like, 20cm max.
Also turn off any auto gain in your software that you're using
I dont use any software rn
what a buzzkill
Your video calling software. Discord, zoom, teams, whatever.
They have a noise reduction thing too
I can't?
ofc not duh
do we do car audio here too?

it would make big $ if he reviews the APP3
even if they are shite
If I wanted to turn a Linsoul 7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2 wireless what are some recomendations?
depends if you want truly no wires
or are ok looking like an artist on a stage.
I know about those small Bluetooth box things that you plug the wire into and I am guessing that connects to the phone
if that's what you are refering to for the "like an artist"
yeah, every time I see that it reminds me of watching live performances lol
but if you want like, to make them more airpods like
I think it's the FiiO UTWS5 is the model
True Wireless Bluetooth Amplifier UTWS5
There's other ones, too, like the iFi Go Pod, but idk if that's any good; it's also like $400 iir
It sounds like it's probs cheaper to just buy wired earphones at that point
There are cheaper ones from like, Kinera, and some other cheaper brands but ymmv with those.
I don't mind the wires.
I don't particularly care if my music travels through air or not, and as someone who used to deal with wireless transmission junk I like the stability of wires.
It's cause I still have my apple earphones but I lost my wireless beats recently
I was wondering if I could just make it a 2 for 1 kinda thing
where I use the Linsoul 7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2 for both pc gaming and just going out
but it's too budge to spend the money making wireless
cheaper you say
There is just no point to that tho
It's such a high end and low production product that it's not worth bring up in discussions about prices as it is an outlier, I know some Iems get in the 500 dollar range but this is still much beyond that
Anyways tomorrow I buy my first IEMs:
Just need to look into the Linsoul 7Hz Salnotes Zero, HIDIZS MS1-Galaxy, and HIDIZS MS1-Galaxys before I lock in the Linsoul 7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2.
So time to watch a ton of vids and learn a lot of audio terms
most of the "audio," stuff you see in audiophile standards is arguably pretty low production
not as low as that, but on a scale compared to mainstream ones like air pods and such, it's way smaller.
I'd imagine so cause it mostly meant for musicians
a lot of them arent tho
What's the typical high quality audio target demographic?
Doesn't that leave the goal of audio stuff a bit more vague?
Audio in general is vague as shit and it sucks
I have decided video is better
exactly
I've seen terms like, warm, tight, bright, but those don't really make sense to me yet
Is that how you determine what fits your use case best?
theyre just tonality descriptors
Qudelix 5k. It's the best.
I decided not to since most solutions cost more than the iems I am getting since I am looking at the very budge ones
It's worth it. The amount of control you get from the qudelix let's you customize and improve $20 iems to be pretty damn good.
Like what?
Mostly the parametric EQ
You can do lots of precise eq adjustments, or use the autoEQ to have a program do it for you
don't know what that is
In theory it allows you to tune a device to sound like any other device
In practice there's limitations to measurement
So if you're not an EQ nerd it might be difficult to get into
This is gonna be my first time touching audio stuff like iems and I am not super into it as a hobby so yeah
probs not the most useful to me but sounds cool
It's endgame for the right type of people.
But yeah I get you
I think there's some much cheaper stuff that can do the parametric eq and still be worth it that aren't wireless
id recommend stuff like utws3 or 5, trn bt20s (idk which they have been constantly releasing different tws adapters) over qudelix 5k
5k is overkill for iems
The TRN BT20 PRO I found for 30-40 cad doesn't look like a bad choice
I still need to pick some Iems to see if I like them first
So after spending 4 hours looking at IEMs
The 3 I might buy are
Linsoul 7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2
KZ EDC Pro
Linsoul QKZ x HBB
Does anyone have any good or negative experinces with any of these?
kz is a brand you should probably stay away from
they lie about their specs, paid people to make positive reviews, among other stuff
I’ve heard stuff like that on both ends when I was searching stuff up and was given no context so that’s for the context
So avoid KZ and HZ
the context is the crinacle collab
if you want to read more in depth
dont need to avoid hz
just kz
It was like Hzsidi or something like that
and whatever other kz sub brands there are
oh i dont think ive heard of that brand
yeah doesnt ring a bell but there are so many brands that are good
or not doing shady shit at least
It was something about a scandal about it botting reviews or something idk
like moondrop makes some offering, truthear does too
I did look into Truthhear stuff but It was about twice the price the other stuff I was looking at so I didn’t go too deep
i dont recall if qkz was actually a sub brand of kz but i believe they are
I saw something that said they are
they have the hola as their 20 dollar offering
scratch the hola it doesnt seem to be available to buy
moondrop has the chu 2, tangzu has the waner
waner does come with a mic cable i just checked
I did look into the waner but wasn’t sure if it was better than the HBb for gaming
Cause gaming is going to be my main use case
Marvel rivals is the game I play with the most audio clutter too
Very pretty tho ngl
hbb is a qkz collab so 🤷♂️
Ah yeah
but judging by the graphs it doesnt look that 'clear'
Both lists I found it in also placed it in B tier
I think I’ll put the Waner on the list again
I think sound stage and clarity where good signs for gaming but I have no clue how to read the graphs lol
Current scientific understanding points to sound stage relating largely to things like ILD, ITD, and some other factors.
If you can find graphs relating back to those relations, it'll give you a good idea on soundstage
ITD and ILD in headphones is 100% dependent on the source content not the headphones
In headphones the perception of spaciousness is related to how the headphone reproduces certain HRTF related effects. (Hence the 2khz dip often being referred to as "the soundstage dip" etc)
it is mainly source related
but youd be hard pressed to find a headphone that's 100% amplitude independent
No it's 100% source related.
In a headphone the inter-aural-time-difference is down to how that is baked into the source. Your headphones do not have a varying difference in time to the eardrum between the left and right channel.
Same for ILD. Unless your headphones are broken or have channel imbalance (which wouldn't produce an inter-aural-level-difference that creates the psychoacoustic effect of stage anyway) they will be playing the same thing on each channel with identical volume unless it is different in the source content
in another server I actually made an amplitude transfer for the he6. it was pretty logarithmic if I am remembering my results right
which inherently will make that relation non linear
Like, there will be some differences between the left and right channel, but our perception of distance with relation to ILD, but in the case of a fixed/constant ILD like what you'd get in channel imbalanced headphones you just get the sound shifting to one side
time difference will be pretty close too, but headphones are inherently pretty inductive, so it wont be perfect depending on frequency and inductivity.
in the case of electrostatics theyre more capacitive if im not mistaken, but the same concept applies
You can test this by just measuring the phase response and testing for excess phase. 99% of headphones are effectively completely minimum phase. The only times this isn't the case is usually in multi-driver headphones with crossovers
it'd actually be cool to map out phasors for specific channel relations of an input for a headphone.
But yeah, this is why binaural content for example provides a far more convincing presentation of an "out of head" experience. Since realistic ILD, ITD and most importantly directional HRTF effects are baked in
(To be clear the directional HRTF effects are actually the really important part, they are TECHNICALLY a form of ILD but just calling them ILD is massively oversimplying things as it removes the directional aspect of it, and this is why both binaural recordings on headphones, and speakers, are both far more convincing than standard stereo content on headphones)
what definition are you going off of? the one that oratory was sending was just wrong. It implied minimum phase just meant within 360 degrees of input. In reality, most headphones have a slight inverse movement at the start of loading which makes them non minimum phase, but minimum phase also doenst mean no frequency related phase lag or lead. any device that isnt purely resistive will have this.
I'm referring to the actual definition of minimum phase
https://www.roomeqwizard.com/help/help_en-GB/html/minimumphase.html
This is fairly trivial to test
You measure the phase response of the headphone, and the frequency response. Then compare how the measured phase response deviates from what the minimum phase response of that frequency response would be
In the case of headphones, as stated they are in 99.9% of cases minimum phase devices, and so you see no excess phase.
So what exactly am I meant to do if I wanna know if one of my 3/4 options is good for gaming
what is it that you think minimum phase is implying here? because this is related to if there is phase lead or lag at all that is frequency dependent, which is inherently true unless our headphone is purely resistive, but isnt related to their being minimum phase or not.
Some of the reviews mentioned that the iems made the audio more muddy and less clear when it came to directional sound so I just don’t don’t anything worse of