#audio-tech
1 messages · Page 167 of 1
You want to look into AutoEQ and see if it's compatible with your software
Or if there's any plugins for it
Seems a bit tedious but hopefully I can get it done
I use FL Studio
Don't hate me 😂
.
worse than clouds
Fair enough. Is there an alternative that has better mic quality than the cloud2? (they dont carry the 3)
you have a 50$ budget man
you get what you can afford lmao
buy a lavalier for like 8$ on amazon and clip that onto your shirt/headphones if you want
Ofcourse, just curious if there is a headset which trades audio quality for mic quality
Also, 50€
Not $
Those 3$ can get me a piece of candy! Very valueable! XD
if you want mic quality get a lavalier mic and clip it onto something
buy the cheapest one, they cost next to nothing and sound good
Btw, whats the deal with the JBL Quantum 100? Are they seriously that terrible?
yeah
Crazy.. the only good thing of it is its mic then
Cool..
Well thank you (and grey.shadow)
np
caps out at 24 but not like you'll ever need more than that anyway
even 24 is wild 😂
Does anyone have recommendations for some in-ceiling speakers which have enough headroom to reach THX reference level?
so i recently got wireless IEMs, moondrop spacetravel, and when using them on the PC, using a third party bluetooth dongle, it has a small delay, like 0.5seconds or lower.
couldnt find anything to eliminate that so far, u guys know anythign to fix that?
they work perfectly when using it with my phone and i mainly bought the as cheap travel ear buds, so its not a big deal
if you get a bluetooth dongle that avoids using the windows bluetooth drivers like the creative ones you can minimize the delay
but it will never be zero delay, just reduced
a minimal delay is more than fine by me, but the... 0.3-0.5 seconds it has right now makes it frustrating to listen to in games and when watching videos, due to the noticeable asynchronous playback. as long as the delay is only subconscious, i wouldnt care at all. not using it for competitive games (neither would i care)
how do i know what drivers it uses (and change it)?
get a bluetooth dongle that avoids using the windows bluetooth drivers like the creative ones
you get a bluetooth dongle that was designed in mind to not use windows drivers to begin with, you cant change an existing one
creative has some stuff that bypasses windows drivers like I said
ah i see thanks
you'll have to discover your own as to which stuff is the cheapest that can do that, I can't help you but checking out that brand may be a good idea
❤️
yeah the creative ones are 50 bucks, it would be literally cheaper to get new wired IEMs that are also better than my current ones and would have even lower delay.
and since i dont even know how to distinguish what drivers the dongle would use, im just gonna call it a day, thinking about getting desktop monitors instead of my 2.1 system anyway
hey sorry to ask again but suggested desktop speakers in replacement of genius sp-u150x?
creative pebbles?
which revision?
@stuck bolt i need somthing to put my eris 4.5 speakers on for my desk do you know anything i could buy?
What's your budget
£30
16° ANGLE - Get the most out of your speakers by tilting them toward your ears, ensuring you never miss out on those higher frequencies. FOAM PADDING - Maintain stability and reduce undesirable resonance. Measures 4.5'' wide by 6.1'' long and holds up to 7.7 lb per stand. MAXIMIZE YOUR MINIMAL SE...
Ah, ugh, I dont wanna change my Amazon address
If you got space, desk mounted stands are pretty neat
buy wood
buy self tapping screw
buy glue
construct
no
coward
im not a coward im just busy
you can also buy aluminum extensions and just construct it with some t nuts and joiners
no cutting needed if you design well
I've been on spotify for about 8 years now, and I think it's time i switch to something else. I already have a way to get music, but now i need an app to play said music. I'm going to be using a player called Auxio for android, it's FOS and has all of the features of other players, while being completely offline. However, they don't make a PC version, so i'm wondering what to use.
for PC, musicbee is the best i've found
Roon is also very good, but its not free
foobar is also an option, but imo its more clunky and less refined than musicbee. but if you like clunky and vintage software that has a ton of people making plugins for it, then you'll probably love it.
hello, what's the best gaming headset you can get for ~150€ ?
whys there no scale on the graph
i don't understand how this works. Why does rtings say this
The FIIO FT1 have great audio reproduction accuracy. Their warm tuning with low-end emphasis is smooth without many peaks and dips. Their mids and treble are rather even, too, and comply very well with our target curve
because doesnt the graph say the opposite of that
here you go
the scale is 90dB
yeah no axis labels, but it should be clear what they are if you even seen a frequency response graph once
my hyperx cloud stinger 2 is picking sound up, i tried pretty much everything but it still does it. what should i do?
the very upper treble seems boosted, but the harman 2018 target just has some substantial treble rolloff
put your phone on airplane mode
its on pc
like when i vc evryone can hear yt or music
so the microphone picks up the sounds you are listening to?
nevermind. just noticed there is a scale. this monitor has terrible contrast and it's dark gray text on black
its like +10 at the very end of the bass lmao
oh yeah, the ft1 has a looot of bass. I had a pair
I sold them in a week lol
i wanna know why rtings says this though because doesn't the graph directly contradict that
here is uncompensated
the treble does not look so great
gadgetry tech seems to have least peaky measurement
the akg k371 seems way consistently better?
that is quite wild considering its a closed back
are you playing youtube that loud?
i'm not
holy shit what are your headphones
i think i've heard of cheaper headphones not having the mic electrically isolated enough from the audio output
i wonder if it could be that
they are 40 bucks
that sounds about right
yep was on tight budget back then
that could explain it tbh
it seems multiple hyperx headsets have the issue
damn, thanks for that help mate, one last question, what's the best headset(s) i could find for around 150€ ? got a better budget now so i could find something probably
are you fine with earbuds?
or do you prefer over ear headphones
I prefer over ear headphones
epos gsp 600
Thanks
oh the build quality seems to be really bad
after doing some research
@woven plank this is a pretty well known headset
honestly a Senheiser HD560s with a modmic will outperform it
and will also be twice as expensive
Its like 150 here
How did you set up yours?
So far, it's not making a very good impression
Tried musicbee, looked eh
the UI is a bit much for me, I don't want all of my songs to just be a list
But no Windows Controls
there'es a plugin for it but it's SUCKS
Same deal with foobar, except it is not made for OOB in mind
foobar's UI
There's quite a bit more i don't like about either
I was going to try and follow a guide or something, only to realize it's very time consuming
mb doesnt need windows controls
because they exist natively?
also for 10 minutes of typing I expected a longer text lol
the "looks" are literally what you want to make with it man
you have the choice to literally select what panel is display and what is present in it
Umm, no
At least not for me
additionally you choose how the music should be displayed
click of a button
idk what else you want
This is probably what i would want
you have a platform where as well as the user made skins, you have freedom to choose almost how every single element is placed and shaped, if foobar and musicbee cant do what you want I am afraid nothing will
Maybe i'm just too used to the spotify UI
Cool dark Spotify's accent for your MusicBee player.
@left verge
looks pretty good ngl
to me
Just something like the spotify ui
i kinda dig the larger icons on the left compared to what I have, might use it myself lol
Yeah, something like this is what i'm looking for
its in the link above, there are also a lot of other skins that might interest you
Is this a plugin or?
Roon music software transforms your listening experience with rich metadata, discovery features & audiophile sound. Works with streaming & files. Free trial.
no
poor 🫵
I could probably get this without the subscription
But i just want a music player for local files
im not paying for a program
to play what I already fucking have
this is the most clown audiophile application ever
yeah you can bypass the subscription for $850
one time payment
Not that way, but ok
its not just that. it makes a lot of sense if you have multiple stereo systems you want to use
oh shut the fuck up
like for your mansion or something
Can i change the green?
Or is that just a part of the skin
I can literally buy a fucking netswitch
and use that instead
which fucking clown needs to pay 850$ to switch fucking speaker pairings
or use lyrion music server
we have this thing
called a fucking button
and if you are like especially disabled you can even press those with a phone app these days
its crazy
I dont specifically know how you would do that
but if someone changed the native ui to that then you can also
I've long configured musicbee to what I want so I have not tampered in those appearance options in years
I mean, i don't mind the green
Just wondering
Wonder what else they have
FT1 is a good headphone
on the 5128 measurments as example
measures really good 😄
here measurements of another guy with 2 different units
also are all these measurements are made with the same rig?
like
it measures well
on some rigs / setups they have this one massive peak in the treble, thats all
no?!
How much do you wanna spend?
ah k 150
i woild go for Cloud III Wireless S
try editing playlist settings to change how tracks are listed
id honestly just advise navigating the menus and see what features there are and how you can change stuff to familiarize yourself
I would say the pc38x is more resolving than the 2nd gen 560s
you can't get useful advice for this. that's because:
you cant get useful advice for this because instead we are going to ignore you and then be really mean to you when you come back for purchase validation over buying a bad headphone because no one helped you
- you didn't say which country, and availability will change even across the EU
- you didn't say if it needs to block out outside noises or not
- you didn't say what games it would be for and what you want to hear better in those games
- you didn't say what music genres or artists you would use these with, if it's a priority, and what you want to hear better in this music
- we don't know if you'd use free eq software or not, if necessary
- we don't know your preferences
it is unfair to you when someone gives an answer for you to take seriously while intentionally ignoring the lack of basic criteria
it should be ignored
there are popular $300ish audio setups that for my situations I'd get the most utility out of by beating it with a hammer and using the cheap earbuds I have upstairs
pc37x, pc38x, hd 560s, alg k361, k371, fiio ft1, fiio ft3 (discounted on aliexpress, unless it’s region specific because it is for me around €200 incl. taxes)
low end planars are also interesting
should try it out
yeah
the most ideal would be if he has friend that collects headphones to try them out
lol
not really aviable in Europe tho
eh its a planar headphone, its very easy to eq except if you particularly want crazy amount of bass
in which planar has never been strong at
none of that is true
it is true lol
to get planar to perform well bass wise is to do something like hifiman does (closed front)
else you need eq the heck out of it
especially if you are someone looking for DD rumble
??
could you at least elaborate why it isnt true lol
i've listened to dozens of different planars and both bass quantity and detail were strengths, not weaknesses
i can think of dynamic headphones with more bass than any planar i've listened to and electrostats i've listened to with more detailed bass, but nothing that has both
@dull trout @sick terrace
You can have shit bass come from any driver. Planar, electrostatic, or dynamic.
Trying to categorize their behavior is useless because theres too many exceptions
i agree
i never said any would have shit bass
its the implementation that matters, no?
the only thing i didn agree was planar eqability for ft1 pro, which is actually quite easy to eq
yeah i also agree on that. i don't see how thd is much of an issue
I just don't see how it being a planar factors into it.
essentially all professionally recorded music is being saturated and clipped to shit to add harmonics. what's a little more gonna do
well yakucho mentioned my comment on the ft1 pro being good except eqability, which is why i mentioned is a planar, and is quite eq friendly
thats it really
And I'm saying that it being a planar is pretty irrelevant to how eqable it is.
That's it really
There's a point to be made about planars typically having ruler flat sub bass without any dropoff VS open back dynamic drivers that have more of a rolloff. They also tend to be really clean, though honestly distortion isn't usually a problem with headphone drivers at all.
So with planars VS dynamic open back headphones, planars often have more bass to "work with"
But then there are dynamic driver open back headphones that DO have similar bass, so it's not a unique thing. It's just more common.
One thing people often miss is the effects of leak and acouatic impedance on the actual sound you get on your head.
So that's worth considering
FT1 Pro are shit to EQ
the THD is just really bad on these
Also to make sure to have proper seal on the FT1 Pro
the Planar bump can cause the driver to clip
(surely depends on the volume you listen to)
have them replaced, its a known issue
you already have the data and testing
it shouldnt be behaving like that
idk if FiiO fixed that
there is no information about it being fixed
its a qc issue rather
for some replacing their unit solves them
mine doesnt have this issue so im good (for now)
some replaced it 3 times and still have the same issue
- France
- both, i dont really mind
- i mainly do simracing but sometimes i play fps or arma
- mainly metal and rock
- i could learn how to use them
- i don't really have preferences, tho i tried the Corsair Void Elite and i liked it, don't know if it's wireless version is good tho and i didnt try the mic
qc side, nope
personally. Wouldn't really take Jackson's word seriously.
he recommends stuff that is generlaly considered "bad"
and stuff that is generally "considered" good as bad
How much are the Cloud III Wireless S for you?
around 120-130 euros
get that if you wann all in one and wireless
personally. Wouldn't really take Yαкυснσ's word seriously.
he is scared of numbers
what numbers?
all of them I guess?
you guess?
Have you overcome your fear?
If i knew what your'e talking about? 
asking someone to give criteria for a headphone they might like is only a detriment to your word if you believe you can ignore these and decide what's "good" for them regardless of what they want
it doesn't really matter that you take to the frequency response path and will give advice based on it
you're allowed to believe that and use it for helping others
just, actually try to help others
i did.
And from convos before i know that you tend to recommend not likely good stuff
how did you know he could use open backs without him telling you
I've met a hell of a lot of people who were upset with their 560s because they didn't block out noise
and it happens because of the kind of answer you gave
not a lot of people are going to learn a scientific field to realize that not all headphones block out noise
its just. you recommendations are likely to be bad in a intersubjective way...
that all
bcs
what you like is irrelevant
so no MC 450 or so or K361
or or SHP9500
- I'm surprised you can continue like the flaw I pointed out doesn't need addressed
- I don't recommend headphones based on what I like
i don't wanna have a convo with you anymore
we had it multiple times
you had it multiple times with others
yes you're in the right
be happy
bye
thanks. it should be noted that if you need wireless or a mic, I'll have a lot less ideas since I've tried barely anything like that. I also haven't used a corsair void elite
there are a few ways you could approach this. for the moment I'll be talking about some open backs since several such models I have could make sense here
i don't mind if it isn't wireless, i'd just prefer wireless
oh ok
maybe someone else more knowledgeable on wireless products will have some models for that
Cloud III Wireless S
metal music is one of the most taxing genres of music on a headphone when it comes to clarity and hearing each sound as an obvious and separate thing
jackson slander is wild
some headphones overcome this by actually having a lot of clarity, and therefore making each sound separate and clear
and some headphones overcome this by hiding the loss of detail and giving a more gentle, vague presentation of the music
there are headphones that, as most people appear to experience it, mostly do neither of these things

the 560s although cheap in europe, the akg k361 and 371, and some of the lower ohm beyerdynamics would generally fall into that category for metal
for headphones aiming towards clarity, that's stuff like the new AT r50x, as well as the mc450. the r50x is the best (of the headphones I'll be mentioning) at revealing quiet details and making reverbs and guitar fx sound more vivid. the mc450 is the best at keeping the sounds separate and keeping as much of those sound's clarity as possible, and has an overall more realistic midrange, but it has weird tone and you should expect to use eq for that one.
Define "clarity"
and "sound seperatrion" again as 100x before
it's NOT a headphone thing

impulse response
so u wanna tell that Sound seperation is impulse response?
for headphones that hide details a little bit and smooth things over (but not too much), the akg k702, beyer dt880 600 (or probably 250) ohm, and I suppose the fiio ft1 fit into this category. the k702 has big earcups and underpronounces quiet details the most. it also sounds very spacious, probably the most out of the headphones mentioned but there's meaningful variance between people's experience here. the dt880 600r is similar and with a little more quiet details, and very airy plus very tight bass. but it's hard to get loud without a cheap amp. the ft1 is very "in your face" and plasticky, with pretty tight bass and easy to get loud.
none of these have mics and all are wired
ft1 is also the only one that can meaningfully block out sound
maybe dt880 just slightly
and I can elaborate on any of these models or concepts
aka FR and Phase?
i think.
Acoustic Impedance and FR are very important and causes this stuff
congratulations
but comfort, build are important for actually using stuff
a portion of it
?
a portion of sound separation is impulse response yeah?
its audio you'd have to be a complete idiot to expect 1 phenomenon to be the result of 1 factor and measurement
probably more Acoustic Impedance and FR
there isn't a reason it couldn't be due to 10 minor factors at the same time
you dont have to find a one word answer
well
if you could tie stuff up like that which isnt distinct like frequency respone and group delay you could just reverse engineer what good audio is and measure what is the best headphone without ever listening
high avoustic impedance on a headphones will have "little FR variation" even if different seatings etc are there
so its more consistent
i mean yeah but i dont understand how this is related to the discussion
HRTF still exists
you could do that for a personalized headphone foryourself
But that's just layering a second impulse response on top
they should just add together
ft1 does not block out sound
to a meaningful degree
its not usable at the office
Its part of it.
Impulse response, frequency response, and phase all look at basically the same thing, but they serve different purposes.
Impulse response measures in the time domain, it shows how the system "rings" or reacts over time.
Frequency response measures the frequency domain, how it amplifies or attenuates each frequency. (We use magnitude response in audio)
Phase response shows the relative timing of different frequencies.
Both the frequency and phase response can be obtained from the Impulse response, by taking the fourier transform of the IR.
Frequency response unfortunately doesn't inherently cover any multi channel interactive behaviors. Separation should be more along the line of the amplitude transfer function I discussed and cross talk.
@broken grotto modified my home scope to vesa mount and got an arm at goodwill for $9
what if 1 ear is more than 1 channel
You mean one ear hears louder than the other ear?
no
you know how measurement mics dont seem to tell the whole story yes?
its possible we're overlooking some other part of the ear that modifies our perception of sound at the eardrum/cochlear
that would all be summed up somehow as a perceived mono signal
idk
I think we have a good understanding on hrtf. I think we have a good understanding on all of these things tbh. I think the audio space just doesn't use multi variable measurements enough imo.
Which makes sense
People want to sum things up to the simplest and easiest form when possible.
It's only a little problematic when that desire becomes the assumption that the simplification makes all other variables and axis not matter
I dont think its possible that the current research on audio perception and headphones has covered all the important bases
I should be able to create some kind of change in techs via eq
this hasnt worked
That's mainly because eq will only change amplitude on a frequency domain
It won't touch specific channel interactions or that device specific transfer curve
There probably are some digital tools to modify those axis, but I don't know about them. That'd be more an audio software technician thing tbh.
I havent measured a headphone that had meaningful bleed between channels
interestingly enough though, i suspect most of those "sound personalization," tools use impulse response
presumptions of me to say meaningful, but -40 or -60db just seems silly
Heyo, can someone suggest me some decent earbuds? I had bose quietcomforts until they started crackling, maybe theres a fix to it but idk. thanks!
more info is requried:
- wired or wireless?
- budget?
- features you must have?
preferably wireless
butget is ~200 eur
ig something that has a "find my buds" or smth option would be nice but idk if there is one for 200€
I'm assuming you are on apple?
not very smart on audio tech prices or tech prices in general
android
nice
I haven't found too many wireless ones that I like, but the galaxy buds 3 pro have done pretty ok for me; i think they go on sale every now and then.
i think people like the buds 2 pro more, though.
the 3 pro's have that apple-style toothbrush appeal
2 pros kinda look like JBL reflect aeros
personally i can't wear them because they make like a suction in my ear and i can't hear anything unless im on max volume
also hurt to use so :/
for the toothbrush style?
what?
ig, im a bit confused cz i don't think we're talking about the same thing
well, the JBL's hurt?
kinda yeah
sorry, that was a bad way to ask that lol
the airpod style ones (with the stems,) typically don't have as big of a comfort issue because they don't really go in your ear
that's been my experience, anyway.
but i've had mixed results with the eartips, so ANC strength varies
dw that happens lol
idk i've never really used the airpod style or toothbrush in-ears
i've also heard of IEMs but idk, they sound more professional
/ out of my price range
i've used a lot of different wireless buds trying to find a pair i like and i typically use the buds 3 pro's because they work pretty seamlessly with a galaxy smartphone
I resolved the eartip thing using comply ones
but yeah, i dunno, those i've had the most success with. but i'll admit im not looking for audiophile quality out of wireless buds
what wired ones would you reccommend tho?
for about $200 (at 200 euro you're more looking at like $230,) some of the top options out there nowadays are:
- letshour S12 (I daily those, they live in my bag)
- Meze Alba (incoming, someone gonna tell me im terrible and should sell all my gear)
- truthear hexa/nova something like that
- is the 7hz timeless still a thing?
- maybe the IE200's?
there's so many IEM's out there nowadays that i can hardly tell which ones are suggested or not anymore, i mostly am into the audio space to have fun listening to as many as possible
someone else can chime in and say what is objectively the best for 200 euros
ig js like something playing in the background when im doing something, not really an audiophile or something like that
but i'll check them out, tysm
askin this in a few places, but I need a pair of powered bookshelf speakers soon for my record player. audioengine has a sale on an open box A2+ for $170 and was looking at the R1280DB but probably would wait to see if they're on sale. should I pick up the A2+ now or wait or get smth else entirely?
I remember the Time where you thought you where in the right and Golden destroyed you 
So i stepped down of taking your words "trustfully"
A2+ are bad. Get whatever edifiers you can afford
alr, id heard some good stuff and seemed like a good enough deal to ask
yeah nah. audioengine tunes their speakers to get as much bass out of that tiny little driver as possible which results in a massive bump and pretty much no extension.
they're small speakers, so its really hard to get a lot of bass from something that small
but the tricks audioengine does compromises the rest of the speaker
assumed so, size idrc about so I just want as much value as I can get
I haven't really looked a whole lot since I wasn't gonna buy till later in the year probably
would eBay certified refurb R1280DBs be good to pick up? they're $130 so would save me $30 if I bought now
check the seller's ratings and see if they offer returns.
and then make that judgement call for yourself if you think that a warranty is worth $30 to you.
sometimes refurb stuff can be more likely to work than brand new stuff simply because they have to have someone go through and confirm its working and in order
i don't really know if speakers usually have things that need warranty claims
didn't worry about it with headphones cause ik i coulda just gotten a new set of drivers if they were messed up
well they have electronics inside of them.
were they hifimans
beyers
wack
oh yeah those 💀
he got a pair of aryas and didn't need these anymore so got a good price on them
speakers are pretty durable and hard to fuck up. it would probably be cosmetic damage or something wrong with the electronics
assumed so
wait it has a warranty through someone at least cause it's eBay certified
good deal
a lot of the thing is, most of the stuff that gets talked about in Audio is explainable with more basic (sometimes advanced, too,) signals and systems.
which is just mathematics.
the problem is some people think they know more than they actually do
problem is if information could directly mean 1 thing in a way we could calculate it we wouldn't have arguments over headphones and could just make the perfect headphones and call it a day
its rarely that
there are tens of factors that overlap in ways you cant predict which determine the final outcome of a headphone's sound
and some people purposefully miscontrue things they read to suit their own needs
definitely not talking about someone in particular
this still falls under signals and systems, just the much more complicated side. They call it the head related transfer function for a reason
the problem is that some people have preconceived expectations of how something should act, and then find something to justify their beliefs
i mean sure but aside from noticing whether something is particularly fucked or not
I dont think these measurements provide as much knowledge as people make them out to be
I honestly don't disagree at all, sometimes i've heard headphones that people say are awful and i enjoy them just fine.
there is shit like susvara and some dumbass in ief will tell you hd600 has more bass than that
but also just that, for the most part, trying to argue that the systems-related measurements you are taking without understanding what they actually mean is pointless.
I don't blame that person for being a dumbass but it goes to show there is more than volume in terms of someone's perception of bass
because numerically speaking he is wrong
but one sounds bassier to the guy and the other doesnt even if data shows otherwise
psychoacoustics go brr
klaus activated his own almonds
its not psychoacoustics but its a planar vs dynamic thing
he's in one of his ptsd flashbacks just let him peeter out
even if you have a lot of bass on a planar because of the impulse response people tend to call it limp or lacking in bass
lmao
i fucking hate listener so much
who's listener now lol
there's also an argument to be made of whether the measurements are even audibly relevant.
some dude who sucks up to everyone in audio servers to become a moderator
i wonder if this is a misunderstanding of the dB measurements they use
worst part he succeeded so now he hackbans anyone he dislikes from the network of servers he moderates
I know at least 10 dudes who have been banned from servers they have never joined including headphones.com because listener is a mod in there
i dont think you need to occupy your staff positions with egoistic manchildren with power complexes
and also most of them would have been banned naturally regardless
if they are in sg
I honestly cant say I disagree
but I know some blokes who aren't
relatively speaking listeners chilled out some i think
he permamuted me for arguing susvara is more resolving than hd600
no. I just think that we have equipment capable of making measurements that are beyond what the human brain and ear can perceive. and it causes people to nitpick on things that aren't all that important.
and yes, the line of "what the human brain and ear can percieve" is different for all sorts of people. some people are capable of percieving things that aren't even there.
my brain is currently perceiving nils is pretty dumb
like i said, some people are capable of perceiving things that aren't even there.
why dont you perceive some bitches instead
my brain percieves 100 pb/s of information
klaus, when you finally muster up the courage to leave that subterranean cave you call home you will learn that one can do far more than perceive bitches.
rev engine
Physics
Griffin Silver
he knows ALOT about the science behind Headphones
Because he knows what he's talking about
and he's also always up to date
"Planar vs Dynamic"
doesn't matter in terms of sound
espacially in bass
well yeah
but you can have a rolloff Planar too
and a somewhat "flat" extension DD
itsp probably driver size
its just not a worthwhile distinction because there's too many exceptions
yeah
going off of exception so prove points isnt helpful discourse
you could bunch of 99% of hifimans to be one way than the other
only thing thats near universal about planars is that they can handle a lot more power than dynamics.
it fits in the criteria fuck you
be kind please
no
so no insults, treat everyone with respect
fuck you
fuck you dude
he's medically incapable of being kind he has a condition
yakucho is an ableist
for real?
im reading between the lines and he litearlly just said "i hate the disabled"
cant believe this guy
whaaat? the fffffckkkk
wtf language please
false information.
i don't mind if people are disabled or so

ikr
you're turkish arent you
yeah...
and my dad is german
thats pretty east if you ask me
so this info isnt accurate
its in asia
its not europe 
east
central eurasia
its not central wtf
i mean ig like the very east of the country is partially in there but i dont think thats central
yea i dont think its in the center
sounds like cope
thats all that matters
if thats the case then its an european country
because the westmost part is in europe
and how do you model physics?
why is China only one timezone and if you leave it to central asia you have a 3hrs difference xD
magic
china stealing all the space
that's how @lone flame sees it methinks
but, everything still falls under signals and systems; even the mechanics and electrical properties of the transducer.
sound separation by undoing convolutions, correcting headphones by inverting the frequency response, and the coil-magnet physics of the driver, in which it's impedance shaping the response.
all of it falls under signals and systems theory.
i bet most could even tell me why we generally want to sample at 44kHz, when humans only hear to about 20kHz.
that was kinda mean lol
its 2 samples per frequency, pretty sufficient headroom
it was previously 41
so you had 100 samples you could do anything with just in case
nah he's just mad that i nailed him with this juicer
sure, you pretty much have it; there's a theory there, though.
yeah
i remember my audio engineering teacher telling me about it
but i aint listenning to allat
lol
in order to recreate a signal perfectly the sampling rate must be at least 2x the frequency
you see 48kHz in broadcast
mostly because it's easily divisible by 24, which was a common framerate
Fully switched now
I thought FLAC would be storage hungry, but no
120 songs, and most of them are either 24bit 96-192khz, only 4gb
How many files?
Like a thousand?
tbh I don't know how may individual tracks i got
I wouldn’t say Golden “destroyed” me. What really happened is he dismissed a measurement he asked me to take because it wasn’t perfectly set up. I don’t fully agree with his reasoning, but I also see how the test could be improved with a buffer like Lin suggested.
The main critique was that I used a potentiometer, which technically alters the RC filter. That’s true to a degree, but since I was measuring amplitude dependence at a fixed frequency, the ratio should remain consistent. The RC cutoff frequency is:
fc = 1 / (2 * pi * R * C)
|H(f)| = (f/fc) / sqrt(1 + (f/fc)^2)
These are frequency-dependent, not amplitude-dependent. The potentiometer will shift our thevenan equivalent resistance with amplitude, but not enough to push the circuit into a massif frequency cutoff region, and even if it did, we would see a fixed function of nonlinearity. A buffer would make the setup more ideal, but the underlying behavior should still be essentially linear.
Another objection was my use of a square wave. I chose that because it stresses power delivery more, which can better highlight non-linearities from the power delivery side of the system. That said, it’s also reasonable to ask for sine wave data for comparison. But dismissing results entirely just because the “wrong” stimulus was used seems excessive.
His last point was that this type of idea has “never been explored,” which isn’t true. Transfer curves are a well-established concept, even if he personally hasn’t run into them.
To be clear, I’m not saying my test was perfect. My point is that the goal of scientific discussion should be to share ideas, refine methods, and challenge each other constructively. If your approach is to treat it like a debate and try to “destroy” the concepts or measurements you don’t agree with, you’re doing something wrong. The aim should never be to silence the point you disagree with, but to test it, improve it, or show where it doesn’t hold.

If you allow me to quote his stuff
or that link to directly jump to the messages
Lmfao
for listening, yeah. something tells me you knew that though lol
That's my point. That's not scientific discourse, that's childish debate tactics. Calling someone a troll isn't a mathematical or conceptual reason to dismiss a measurement.
Is that only one or two persons?
A scientific discussion should involve math and science, not insults and spam.
Well... Seems like HE and others TRIED to explain stuff to you
but it seems to be that you where to stubborn to read and understand what they wrote
Like. You can all read it there
The point in a scientific discussion should never be "gotchas" or to convince the people who don't get what's being discussed, but just to discuss the concepts at play.
Yeah but if he ALREADY (and others) tried to explain stuff to you. And you don't listen or try to understand it.
Why should he keep trying it?
Im 100% sure he has better stuff to do rather than speaking against a wall that not even reflects the spoken words..
Maybe he does, but that doesn't change how an academic discussion should proceed.
Seems like you don't even read what i write
Golden said that the TRIED to explain this stuff to you.
But you have not listened or tried to understand
so he already HAD a "academic discussion" with you.
like here
its useless for playback
I make music
And not really, I think anything above 48 is over doing it. 96. Is as high as I'd allow anyone to talk about being able to "hear" something
44.1 and 48 are standard though
And 44.1 kHz at 16 bit sounds different enough to 48khz at 24 bit.
Again, i make music, I've heard the difference when I export my projects.
what in the linux-ass font rendering
this dude has a messed up or missing dither filter 🧌
Possibly
Since I now pay for apple music, I didn't see the need to continue to download music
now i am a cd ripper
the 48kHz 24 bit allows for more headroom with filter design.
most of the time you won't hear a direct extension because most humans can't perceive above 20kHz. That's the only thing why higher than 44.1kHz is kind of pointless, but 48kHz is also very common.
the 16 versus 24 bit thing is about dynamic range, where 16 bit gives you.. i think 96dB, where 24 bit has 144dB.
I should get myself tested again, but I cop out at 17 or 18 k
Definitely more dynamic range in 24 bit, when I do get the chance to record something of 32 bit recorders, its almost magical
Any audiophiles here wanna help me spend $200-$300?
My ath-m50x’s broke yesterday at a LAN. Got damaged during travel
consider a hd600
Oh
I’ve definitely been eyeing the hd 6xx’s from Massdrop. $180 seems like one hell of a deal
Type: Sealed dynamic type/Driver: φ53mm Output sound pressure level: 100dB/mW/ Play frequency band: 5~40,000Hz/Maximum input: 1,000mW/Impedance: 38Ω/Weight (excluding code): about 281g/Input terminal: φ3.5mm stereo mini-jack Accessories: code (removable): One out 1.2m (φ3.5mm gold-plated stereo m...
if you want closed consider ft1 unless you want something durable
tf is this
and then consider dt770 and some eq
Headphones
lets not recommend dt770 ok guys
consider sonys
I was about to say
the studio ones
yeah like wtf
hey they wont break on him like the ats did
I am unfortunately a server hoarder and all my rack equipment is mildly loud- so honestly I’m open to close back. But I really like open back but ofc am worried about noise
i tried a pair and returned them the same day
and im not even picky
770s are overhated frfr
Semi open back
i was listening to my moondrop arias on the way to demo dt770
Check it
The m50x’s lasted me almost exactly a decade. Honestly I thought pretty good
My older brother has tried these and I’ve heard them, but no amp. They seemed like they needed an amp
Had these since 2016
they dont need one unless its the 600 ohm version
the uneven adjustment makes me mad
Probably was, he for some reason felt like more resistance = better quality (at the time) lmao
Lol, I just threw them on my bass for the Pic
to be fair it kind of is since higher impedance is easier to drive but harder to get volume out of
So the old asf 6xx’s are still the recommended for that pricerange? And then closed is just the ft1
if you got an amp id get the edition xs
Edition xs?
Y'all sleeping on my recommendations
i mean
youre not wrong
yeah

but its subjective
Napping is a strong suite
if youre listening to audio there is an amp somewhere
true
Sorry I’m unfamiliar with these. The xs of the ft1?
hifiman
@dapper dome I had those the same time I had the m50x and I gave my mom the m50x
hifiman edition xs
thats not exactly a strong recommendation
They sound better then the m50x
.

are the drop + meze 99 noir's awful?
Moondrop dawn pro amp with these? So right around $300 total for the setup
balance cable or nah?
id say so
dawn pro?
no idea why you'd buy those with the FT1 around i suppose but
do you own the dawn pro or
nah
they look nice
fiio ka11>
@dapper dome what are the use cases for your headphones
i dont know the dawn pro but given moondrops track record on amps im skeptical
If I’m being honest with myself, Im a pretty casual gamer. I game, and listen to Spotify. Nothing insanely high quality, nothing super fancy.
Lots of Discord where I’m at the whims of compression and others beautiful $5 usb mics
;)
would you rather have better sound quality or better directionality

I think I would rather have better sound quality
okay
Still think this is a good pair
then i can recommend xs again
I am willing to be convinced otherwise
or the 6xx if you want ig
id rather perish before ath closed backs
buy all of the headphones
Whats the sell on the xs over 6xx? And for those two options I essentially always need an amp. So what amp?
if the hd58x or hd6xx are anywhere near as comfy as the hd800s i think either of those would be a safe bet
im unsure about xs without an amp over 6xx
Sometimes higher samplerates in music production CAN help, or can sound different with some plugins. (idk why)
You render it with it. and compress it to 44.1kHz 16Bit or 24Bit
That was another tidbit I’m curious about- coming from the m50x’s, should I really feel like spending so much?
So sounds the same
Would the hd58x’s be “good enough”
No
some plugins don't oversample and alias at lower sample rates. i think waves is pretty famous for this
I agree
who tf in sound production uses 44.1
in a project
I use 48
people overstate the requirements of having an amp
still kinda low imo but okay
fr. Soundcloud Rappers 
i mean it doesn't matter that much unless you're slowing down recordings
I got a shit laptop
fair
apple dongle will have 90% of headphones loud enough and sounding good enough
have seen some pople using low sample rates
I do currently power them using a USB-C adapter. Those old iPhone ones
which is not something unusual at all
US version tho 
i know but some people don't do it at all
lol eurocopers bring the percentage down to 75% probably
its mandatory for matching beats using audio clips you have
iirc EU dongle has 50% of US dongle performance xD
Am I going to be unhappy with the background noise with the 6xx’s?
My recommendation are what they are because ive been using them for the past 10 years. Would buy my headphones again if I had to
depends on the background noise
so take Apple Dongle and make it 50%
which is still enough for a vast majority of headphones
as mentioned, I am a server hoarder. So server fans ;)
Compared to the m50x’s *
just put the servers in a different room
that yes!
EQing will become a lil challanging tho 
take off your headphones and tell me if you are annoyed
eq is even more cope
Yeah
Pretty much always
ok dont get xs then lol
buy etymotics then
It’s not horrible, but time + fans = headache in the making
Noise canceling headphones
IEM's
AKA good sound isolation?
in ears might be the play yeah
like FT1?
er2se
if your ears arent easily irritated by them
ft1 is not good sound isolation
I retract my recommendation, as they feel pretty open despite not being fully open back
imo for a over ear it does a nice job
i dont think m50x is excellent either
and he doesnt get bothered with that
I wear Airpods pros for 6-12hours a day already, it’s not uncomfortable but I would rather have overhear I think
airpod max 😈
Over hear is better
The m50x’s were tolerable at best for noise imo, not horrible
I’d be happy with comparable to m50x’s again, but slightly quieter wouldn’t hurt
Max5c better
anc and transparancy mode is unbeaten tho
APP3 when?
The variety of suggestions I’m receiving makes me wonder how many of these commenters are Chatbots
/j
Nice headphones- I bet the purr quality is unmatched
get those plastic cups off it tho
disrespectful that
He's my backdrop
Anyways, the sound quality is good, passable when I'm working on the table saw or other tools
ANC is decent as well
For really loud machines I use earplugs and my headphones
cant second this advice since he games
People like spending money, hence why I proposed my question the way I did
I spent my money
Oh
left side M50x right side FT1
@dapper dome are you prioritizing isolation?
here graph @warm scarab
The longer I think about it yeah, but originally no
What's the cheapest headphone amp to buy for a he400se? I already have an apple usd type c to 3.5 but I want more volume
Me when I never go above 10%
KA11 i guess?
i think ft1 will be my advice if we are locked to closed backs
yeah
I was more looking for an amp
K11?
True
espacially if you have a Capra Strap for the FT1 
i would like to float the mdr 7506
so I guess I’ll ask this- what are my tradeoffs for the similar price range? Is comfort vs noise reduction the only tradeoff for overear/Iem?
Do you really wanna go through the hassle of buying an amp as well@dapper dome
i wouldnt

If you guys believe it will meaningfully impact my long term listening experience, I would be happy to spend the time and money on an AMP
knob adds 100% sound quality
Pads on headphones make the biggest change in quality over amps and dacs
I coped with the m50x’s literally crushing my ears against my skull for a decade so
Fairly tolerant in that regard- not opposed to more comfort tho
FT1 has okay space inside imo
I should send a pic of these. You guys will cringe lmao
my ears touch the earpads
I’m not sure what he meant by “the last 2 days.” The discussion only happened once in another server over a single day. It started out theoretical, with me going over the math. He then said he didn’t want the discussion to continue unless it could be demonstrated with a real-world example, so I took measurements and continued from there.
There wasn’t any explanation beyond that. The explanations he later gave for why he didn’t like the test, I’ve already broken down, pointing out which parts are valid and which parts aren’t, and why.
not huge fan of that
i think ft1 still
you want isolation anmd decent sound
its both
and you dont really need an amp
There is an indentation on the inside of my pads where my ear sits
you get to keep your money
ft1 will be the best sounding but it has some build issues
And even that isn't done to shut down conversation. It's simply done to steer an academic discussion in the right direction.
where does the ft1 snap from
Where did i wrote "the last 2 days"?
As I stated before, you're doing something wrong if you treat academic discussion like a personal debate.
the part where the yoke meets the headband
He did
Also yeah. Wore the leather off of these- cope
upper circle
intersting
but Hinge is fixed by now
the one thats between the yoke and the headband
Enough to be worried about breaking? I am not the most careful but I am somewhat sane
Again @dapper dome my recommendation is off experience. I daily my headphones, hence the recommendation.
elaborate
They changed this screw
Nice mouse pad
no more snap according to yakucho
Nice
i believe i saw one that was supposedly the new version that had snapped but i could be wrong
they changed it from a screw that would unscrew since they didnt loctite it well enough to a pin and retaining clip
So not too fragile then eh?
mine didnt snap
and i have FT1 and FT1 Pro with the old hinge

also one guy had his just shear off when delivered
so
thats funny
Is the pro worth the $100 cost jump? Pro is technically within budget at $220.
its open back and planar
pro is a completely different model
Ah
so absolutly different headphone xD
dont know why they kept the ft1 name
Sorry, bad assumption on my part
its kind of stupid
nah its just bad naming
pro is open back
like Sony
you dont want open back
Does anyone have the headphones they're recommending?
i have FT1
i like FT1 more than E3 and NoireX 
ive no idea what either of those are
DCA E3 and DCA NoireX
is dca dan clark audio
yes
yea ive no idea
Will buy when I have extra cash
E3 are considered "best closed back on the market"
they sound good
but i liked FT1 more
E3 Treble is really nice so... WAY better than FT1
That quote isn't in MLA format
Nano wood fibre composite diaphragm: The diaphragm of the FIIO FT1 earphones is primarily made from selected wood fibres, with a base material of 90-year-old spruce from Northern Europe. It incorporates a specific proportion of carbon fibre material, resulting in a diaphragm thickness of approxim...
These @lone flame
Improper citation
yes
its just what the community says
I did also look into the Song WH-1000XM4/5/6 and considered the extra $200
so its not based on science or so. Just by bunch of people's opinion
also they measure really well 😄
uhhh. no
have fun 😄
fio ft1, no amp (Apple dongle) and Mannyo mentioned earpads- worth the extra?
I presume earpads will marginally contribute to noise
i like the stock earpads
comfy, sound good, and only cost 10 bucks a pair
i dont think this is well measuring with that bass dip and the treble shelf
treble shelf? just a spiced up 5-8kHz
language barrier
So, 10% loss in volume using a worse amp? Do I gain any more quality spending $50-$100 extra on an AMP?
imo no
nothing that is really worth
except you want a specific caracteristics of an AMP
like tube amps have
also these are comparably priced to the m50x’s, are they an upgrade?
ft1?



