#audio-tech
1 messages Β· Page 164 of 1
the razer blackshark v2x has a leg up over the 6xx in several things depending on your definitions of up
so will the razer kraken kitty v2
headphones are comprised of many many properties
well, considering i have only been exposed to one demographic of them, and that being bad, i have nothing to go off of
here's some ways a cheap headset could outperform* an hd6xx
so i was planning on buying 6xxs, and without going to an in person store and planning on buying on ebay, i dont really have a way to test different types
6xx is not a blind buy, nothing really is. I've met servers-worth of people that tried and disliked the 6xx more than $20 earphones
ok. im not sure what i should do with that info however
i understand that there will be minute nuances that can make or break a headset for me, ive gone through similar processes before, but i cant really test different headsets, so im just checking to see if there are some just generally better headsets to buy and im not making a huge mistake
different kinds of music and games challenge the techs of different headphones
classical
so i basically need good sound in a very wide range
i guess i do know a little of what i want
i dont want the low end to be muddy (like low tuba)
thats important to me
yes that's good
and i dont want the like higher end (think high pitched violin) to be very tinny or nasaly
and in between it needs to be good audio or whats the point
so there are 2 schools of thought I'm aware of with listeners of classical music
instruments can be clearly separated in 3d space while often being very vivid that they exist, instruments "pop", you could say
im not exactly sure i understand, maybe something like this?https://open.spotify.com/track/2Y0tFR4iYR57EnBK4mf34l?si=0da8fead4c9b4e54
listen to the beginning
not the preview
this is the realm of planars like the edition xs. they also tend to have really tight and deep bass
ye one sec
i am a fan of being able to hear bass clearly, that would be very nice
hard to say
but I'm talking about 2 things
1 is the position of the sound in 3d space
quite literally where it is in relation to your head. which direction, how far
this is something planars often really bring out
it still depends on which planar, and there are dynamic headphones that do some of this too
the xs here is just our classic example
2 is that the volume of each sound appears the same or closer to the same
oh this doesnt interest me much
well, i still care about different sounds having distinct volumes
that's good to know
i mean i dont see why not having 3d audio would stop that
very good
might have something to do with driver size, but it's very speculative
not completely reliable either. e.g this doesn't make earbuds behave the opposite way
but
and as soon as you said classical I had a feeling this would happen,
the other school of thought are headphones like the hd650 (which is for the most part the 6xx)
planars like the xs often have this weird artificial-ness or twang to the treble that makes real life instruments sound strange
it's one of the compromises that such users accept and have fade into the background as they get used to it
the 650 doesn't have as tight of bass, the bass is quieter, and sounds can appear more glued together
some people like the sounds mushing together like this. in fairness at least the hd600 seems pretty good at avoiding this despite having most of the instruments close together in 3d space
ive heard a lot of good about the 600s, but i was assumiing 6xxs were better
the hd6xx/650 has a pretty big treble dip that makes sounds blend a little more
personally I like the hd600 more for that reason. they're otherwise basically the same headphones as the 6xx/650, but I'm not a fan of masking
I like hearing all the sounds in a mix as clearly as possible
nevertheless the 6xx is riding behind the same pair of drivers and should have no problem keeping instruments pretty clear as long as there isn't so many
the hd6x0 series of headphones is famous for not having this and instead sounding very true to life in that particular way
the other substantial difference with those headphones is they're able to show differences in volume between instruments more clearly
so 600, 6xx, 650, and more?
perhaps more importantly it can show the changes in volume in the same instrument, like big drums or someone singing
i honestly think thats what im going for then
I believe so yes
personally I use the neumann ndh20 more, a closed back. though it's very much a studio headphone and boosts some of the quietest details, it does show a lot of these dynamics (changes in volume) and still has quite realistic timbre. it's main specialty is keeping sounds separate in identity basically by having unrivaled clarity, far beyond the edition xs and 6xx
i actually do not know the pros and cons of open back vs closed back
more bass, also more expensive
i was under the impression that if i wanted a big sound, like that in an auditorium, open back is better
in this case just the isolation. open backs let in more sound and leak a little out
open backs are usually better for this yes. there are many exceptions but it's still uncommon
the ndh20 is narrower and therefore like a traditional closed back
another one to look at possibly is the ath-r70x or xa. I only have their r50x. these have more bass than the 6xx and 600. they're wider and do some of this 3d positioning stuff like the edition xs does. and at least based on my r50x, they sound quite true to life with their timbre and boost the quietest details like the ndh20
not necessarily.
open backs present sound in a more natural way and are easier to tune, so they're generally better.
there are some dogshit open backs and some decent closed backs. but the natural sound of not feeling like your ears are being blocked and having ventilation is really nice.
but for something like the HD600, its going to rely a lot more on the quality of recording for a spacious sound. it won't artifically provide that 'auditorium sound' if you have a very intimate recording
im curious, if i wanted to experience this 3d positioning, where would i? is there a specific application or way to find songs that have them?
it would rely on the recording
there are virtual surround sound programs you can download for free, but they're usually not that great
ah i see
im not looking for making intimate recordings have big and open sound, but if it should, like in some symphony, then i would want that to be brought out to its fullest extent
most recordings with real life instruments naturally contain echoes and audio information that would tell someone's brain that the instrument is in a room in a certain position
the headphone's job is to portray these things more or less visibly
the 6X0 accurately reflect what is being recorded. if the symphony has a big and open sound as it recorded, thats what you'll get.
ehh...
well I wouldn't say it's super supressive of soundstage shenanigans. but I don't think it's true to life in that way
dt880 comes to mind
or maybe gen1 560s
also do note that it's possible for us to be hearing different things from the same headphone
I've just very rarely heard someone say the 600 and 650/6xx's stage was untouched
generally people call it intimate, narrow, sometimes 3-blob
i blame that primarily on the audio they're listening to
3 blob meaning the 3 general areas sounds tend to appear. front, left, and right
well im not sure what all this means, but if im looking for a big sound for big pieces, and intimate sounds for intimate pieces, to have a pretty not muddy bass, and not tinny or nasal audio up to like 4k htz, and ig thats it idr remember should i still get the 6xxs?
yes
maybe
to me what makes the 6xx sound big is cinematic drums
what it doesn't have in spaciousness (compared to most open backs), it has in dynamics and creating a large sense of volume and scale
do I find the 6xx spacious? yeah moreso than most of my headphones, at least half are closed backs to so
but look into the r70xa too
also I didn't mean to drill you about "best sound" out of annoyance or anything, but I figured you came from headphones.com's discord, r/headphones, or maybe audio lounge
in which case they already planted the idea that there is a best sound
which was irresponsible of them
even if we happened to lead to a similar result
oh no i havent lol
i guess it was a little ignorant to think it was as simple as one headset is better than another
but thanks for all the help i think i know what im doing more now
willl do
every person is different. their hearing physiology and music preferences are the biggest things that impact that.
your ears and head are a different shape than mine. and therefore the headphone will interact with you slightly differently than me.
so the only way to know whats 'best' is for you to try everything, or have enough experience to figure out specifically what is important for you
ye
people online can make educated guesses, or refer you to things that most people like. but they'll never be able to tell you whats perfect for you
all we can really provide is a good guess
see for buying speakers it was way simpler
speakers are easier to design. you can clearly point to a speaker and see that something is objectively better or objectively worse. there are fancy measurement rigs that can look at the complete picture of the way a speaker reacts and give you really good estimations on how it will perform.
so far there is nothing like that for headphones.
there was a pretty clear amp or amp series i should buy from for my price range
and for speakers you just find your price range and you look at 3 options and pick the prettiest one lol
does anyone know the origin of the pink panther on audiosciencereview? Like whether it's a custom character or if it's from something else
It's a kid show
its a cartoon
and it is literally called the pink panther lol
also has several movies
If only there was some kind of website where you could find information about stuff 
If you are not a fan good. But recommending something purely on "if i like it its good" and not using intersubjective thoughts etc is imo not correct
no...
firstly... Games are mostle the issue when it comes to "sound localization" bcs the Sound Engine is oftenly just bad
second of all. with EQ you can fix nearly every problem unless you dont run into absoluty intense negative pre or THD
i was able to fix "Soundstage" and "Sound Seperation" etc with EQ on all of my headphones pretty easly
atleast it was easy for me
Dynamics is also absolutly NOT a headphone thing
For that. The headphone is somewhat irrelevant
you could use nearly everything, If you know how to EQ properly you can fix that
a consistent headphone, so one with less seat, seal and position variance is nice for that
like an HD800s as example
but most open backs work perfectly fine
some people belive there is an DSP inside of a headphone. even tho it's just 2 transducers that you feed with a signal
and most headphones Jackson recommend are generaly disliked in average.
Like i can ask everyone
SHP9500 is disliked by far,
FT1 is liked ALOT!
NDH20 is disliked by far
HD6xx... Well. both sides are intense, the haters and lovers.
R70x/xa and R50x pretty solid IF you like the tuning (espacially on the R50x)
i don't recommend stuff purely of "if i like it or not" because my opinion is just one of alot. And i hear differently as you anyways bcs our ears aren't the same. So i look into Data and a Intersubjective opinion π
You could search for binaural tracks
Virtual Barber imo a nice thing
You'll need headphones for this to work. Make sure there is no noise around, close your eyes, turn the volume up a little bit, hold and press headphone on your ears for better hearing, play it and enjoy this impressive audio work ( illusion ). Not a screamer not a prank!
Audio credit: The original audio is created by QSound Lab. I put it into t...
i paid 60 total for a pair of these uh do you reckon i did decent
I'd say you'd probably be best off with something like an xs if youre looking for presentation tbh. Honestly, it surprised me with how wide it is, but I'm still trying to get hifiman to take my xs back because it's not what I ordered lol
Besides the 545 series of 6x0 though, most of them are pretty narrow and kinda blurred in imaging
But when you listen to the right tracks, they can be incredibly lively and detailed.
Speakers will also do much much much better at this task of presentstion too.
Generally speaking
No, we've gone over this. The current scientific understanding on how presentation in both the distance and directional sense are aspects not even touched on by eq. They're much more complex to digitally alter, as they have to do with the specific ild, itd, and drr. You just plain and simply can't eq these aspects, nor can you eq step behavior or any form of non linear ear to ear variance. You also can't eq reactivity dependent issues.
i can EQ Stuff like Soundstage etc in
and Sound seperation
and that is absolutly not Placebo
No, you plain and simply can't, because they aren't due to amplitude in a linear sense
They're due to ear to ear differences
i dont use targets to EQ?
like there is no "ear to ear" difference if i EQ for myself, for my ear?
That has nothing to do with what I said...
It has 0 to do with a target...
It has to do with the fact you and me and everyone else has 2 ears
yeah ik
still i did it with nearly every headphone i have
and it significally improved by alot
There is a difference in amplitude and time domain of ques reaching each ear, as well as som reverperative sounds that help the brain narrow in on these ques.
Eq doesn't touch any of these differences, but rather just linearly will increase volume of a frequency being played back.
doesn't change the fact that it works for me
That's likely placebo then, but not science or fact.
it is NOT placebo
Unless you believe all current science is wrong, in which case, do your own study.
I recommend reading into this
Instead of trying to pass a sort of pseudo science as fact. You can explain your experience, and maybe there is some unstudied factor to explain it, but please, don't try to pass a currently pseudoscientific oversimplification as the only known fact when it's at odds with current research. That's all I ask.
it works for me, works for other too
and its not placebo
Then you can explain your experience as an experience.
But an experience doesn't replace scientific research, application, and explanations just because something you feel works works
If i hit my HRTF with my EQ?
maybe u did it wrong?
No
I have plenty of measuring equipment. I didn't do this wrong. My experience just doesn't align with yours which is fine. My basis for this isn't on my experience though, it's based on what science currently shows.
im not talking about measurements
you can try the way i did it
If you believe there is some other aspects that science hasn't touched on yet through current peer reviewed research, do your own research and write your own paper.
But until then, your experience is an experience, not a new universal law.
the people that tried my method experienced too
Yes, and people can be biased into believing things that don't change anything change things.
It's the same logic people use to claim cables change sound in opposition to scientific understanding and measurements.
It's just two different pseudosciences until there is research corroborating this.
havent really heard a difference from my C200 to my stack
I don't doubt that
but the EQ was a game change. espacially for my Hexa due to Earcanal diff
I don't doubt you experienced it.
u should try my method
But I know your explanation that eq is all that determines presentation is objectively wrong.
its not 100% FR
we need
Frequencies
Amplitude
Phase
and Time delay between L and R ear
As it stands, it's close to 0% besides coincidental removal of masking of low volume ques
time delay can be in the signal itself
Phase too
and Frequencies and Phase are FR
just try my method
You need a lot more than that, and most of that isn't at all touched by eq.
Again, you're assuming I haven't. As I said, your experience is valid. However, that doesn't make it scientific fact.
And like I said, maybe there is more to it. I can even explain part of it with that masking of frequencies being removed and some indicator sounds being in those ranges.
But it doesn't magically make that all that matters, bypassing current known research and studies on the topic. You can do your own research, and maybe you will find a slight lesser touched on aspect of this behavior.
In short, you can have your experience, but don't try to act as if it's fact, and don't use your experience to try and discredit others like Jackson just because your experience doesn't align with them. @lone flame
If someone enjoys their gold twisted cables, that's fine. If they think they enjoy them more than their silver straight cables, that's fine. If they go around saying that amplitude is a lie because they experienced the magic of the gold cable and anyone who believes in amplitude should be ignored, that's problematic. It's the same thing here.
im factually correct 100% of the time so my advice is to try being a bit more like me
u know what my method is?
sometimes cables DO sound different if you intentionally design it to do that
some cables can be like 2 or 3dB louder
What do you think makes a cable do "that"
ofc most of the cables are just cables. if not fcked up they won't be audible different
impedance etc
so ye impedance
Unless you purposefully add a resistor to a cable or an inductor or a capacitor to create a series pass filter, they will not impact sound
ok what else
Because without those, a cable is almost entirely resistive, at less than 1 ohm, meaning the difference is usually not enough to be a relevant voltage divider or attenuator even
What do you think impedance is?
The problem with having bad opinions is when you use them to recommend stuff to other people. There's NO problem with someone buying gold twisted cryo cables for themselves but when they go around recommending that new people buy them to make some expensive and bad headphones sound good, then there's a problem.
cable dudes when you ask them to name one factor that isnt impedance
cable vs cable
6dB louder
crazy
This is a very unique specimen where the driver has a 1 ohm impedance.
and if you match volume
yeah. i dont say you should care
bcs imo you just shouldn't care lol
Unless one of those cables has a 100ohm resistor stuck in or that headphone is 0.5ohms, the cable isn't doing all that.
like how much do you think 12awg copper wire costs vs the cost of this cable in the test lol
You can calculate the impact of a cable as a resistor. It's just basic voltage divider rule.
bcs he spoke about cables
It acts as a series resistor
They're raal's so it's closer to a 0.5 ohm headphone
and i just clarified that there CAN be a valid reason
"The problem with having bad opinions is when you use them to recommend stuff to other people. There's NO problem with someone buying gold twisted cryo cables for themselves but when they go around recommending that new people buy them to make some expensive and bad headphones sound good, then there's a problem."
One cable being 0.1 ohm while another is 0.2 ohms would mean one is literally twice as resistive as the other, but in terms of voltage divider, the voltage at the source will be about equal to across the driver still, because that doubled series resistance is not even a relevant fraction of the total series resistance
I was responding to this
i dont recommend stuff out off my experience. mostly use objective data and intersubjective thoughts
so what most people think
Again, you misinterpret objective data and apply it where it doesn't apply, using a flawed model of frequency response explaining all axis and variables to hand wave discrepancies.
you recommend stupid stuff for stupid cases
Look
the cheapest skedra cable is 99 GBP
how much do you think a wire of any gauge between 7 to 14 costs
i don't care about cables
you would have to be actually disabled to pay for this
i get cables bcs of looks and feels, and the connector
its literally any wire you can buy from an electrics shop
ik?
copper is copper
23awg btw lmao
And that's fine. My issue is with you trying to use an objectively flawed model to discredit people like jackson who are ironically much more objective and physics based with their claims. @lone flame
430 gbp
man i swear one of these days ill launch my cable business
sell some crystals while at it
fr. that should work. π
diamond plated cables
And then acting like the model that objectively doesn't work is factual.
imagine getting a clown to pay you 400gbp for 12awg, 1 splitter and 2 connectors
these guys are living good
"jackson who are ironically much more objective and physics based with their claims"
him: "Microdynamics, Macrodynamics, Dynamics in Headphones"
ah yes
The audio science(tolgy) "everything is frequency response and if this model doesn't work, it's just frequency response you and science don't understand yet" crowd is just kinda a pretentious version of the pseudo science cable crowd tbh.
Or you are wrong and the science is true
may be Dunning Kruger or not 
time will tell
@lone flame I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but making a model that doesn't work of summing everything to one variable, hand waving away the times the model doesn't work, and not applying any physics or reasoning to why one thinks the model works is not science.
If something doesn't work with physics, good chance it isn't science.
If something doesn't work under scrutiny, it's probably not science.
It's just a pseudoscience crowd that claims science as a badge rather than actually using it
could repost that image again
Go ahead. It doesn't change a thing I said.
like. i already answered with "time will tell"
So that means. We will have more data in the future and know more about that in general
If you treat a belief like religion and just say "science" after, that's not science.
well. You say that it's not science
Because it isn't. It objectively is at odds with basic physics and mathematical models.
It's a belief
Nothing more
Nothing less
same situation 
An experience is an experience. Math and physics are a bit different than "I feel like this is the case so this is the case"
maybe u don't understand the Math and Physics behind that topic
Maybe, but that's the great thing about real science. If I don't, you can dispute it
already told everything to end this
And you can dispute it with those same mathematical and physical properties
Because math and physics happen to be universal
i suck at math tbh 
i'm about to um actually you so hard but what people commonly accept the dunning-kruger study is about isn't what it's actually about lmao
it's not the mount stupid peak or whatever
Soy beta psychology male detected.
never said that dunning kruger is = stupid or so
there's a whole rabbit hole to this fucking study
premed AND psych thank you
Dunning Kruger in short is more likely.
A person that thinks he know what he talks about and thinks he is in the right. and thinks that others are in the wrong
but is in the wrong
that's just false (unbased) confidence
which is still true
esp for biooc
but not dunning-kruger
I think I understand the field I study.
not me
Sure, then demonstrate so with math and physics. They're universal.
i'm far too humble to fall for such psychological fallacies 
You can even use simulators to demonstrate so if you lack the knowledge to model these things in other terms
tbh.. its possible that our math/physics are wrong
You can suck at math and still demonstrate things on a principle level using math and physics.
what about when god returns huh
and kills us all
what good are your principles then
not even english. idk what words i should use to "explain" stuff

okay explain driver excursion and how it relates to supposed "microdynamics"
2 lights?
it's a 100 ohm resistor, a 1000 ohm resistor, npn fet
leading to a transistor
it's a switch
yeah prob not hard to understand that
was bad in school tbh bcs im lazy af
ik. can be pretty easy to read if you know what symbols stands for what
sure
"As a driver moves from its neutral position it non linearly adds a pulling force from the diaphragm that acts against the magnetic push from the coil."
wrong
What makes you say that's wrong?
what about Planars?
The same applies to them
they have a coil?
while there's no coil they effectively have the same thing with the traces and row magnets
it's about about difference in position from neutral
They have a tensioned diaphragm which pulls to a neutral position. This is working against the push away from neutral of the magnetic field through the trace/coil.
It's just hookes law
im going to work bye
bye bye
This is actually why intermodulation measurements matter
It's just the audiophile way to explain an actual physical thing
With intermodulation measurements being another thing not covered by standard frequency response.
Another reason not to try to apply that overly simplified bad model as fact
Bye bye
Whats the best Closed back, wired headphones for around Β£300 to Β£450? I currently have DT770's and want to upgrade
I love the senheiser hd265, but I honestly cant tell you its the best. Just something to maybe look into.
What don't you like about the dt770s
Both sides of the plastic have cracked and I'v had them a couple of years so i was just looking to upgrade, I can 3D print replacment parts for the plastic but i was just woundering what my options would be to upgrade
dan clark aeon closed x
audeze maxwell are good too but far less comfortable than the clarks
Hmmm. Fiio ft-1 is the latest hotness in terms of closed backs. But with a bigger budget there might be more stuff.
Focal azurys is pretty decent.
I'll take a look, thanks
@lone flame here is a bode plot of why cables do not matter. the amount of impact form the linear doubling of load on the cable side has next to no impact in efficiency and literally no difference in a non linear sense.
to show you it as a visual representation of voltage at each point. This same concept can be represented mathematically using the voltage divider rule.
if you believe that current science is wrong but you believe you can't show so with your current math understanding, just use a program like lt spice or multisim and you will have access to a perfect environment to represent your theory.
3D printed the replacment parts and they are better then i thought so might last. When i took the origional plastic off the 4 pices have turn into 7 as its all cracked
Bro pulled out the multisim
It's really good for demonstrating simple concepts imo
Much more messy to use than Lt spice for actual projects though
Multisim is great, no doubt there.
I like LT spice, but ive been trying KiCad
I have not lol
I will add that your approximation only really works for short run and low loss cables.
But I get the point
It doesn't matter so long as the cable is long, frequency too high, or you are moving real power.
Yea, point is just to demonstrate that realistically a cable should not impact any audible sound to any reasonable non linear value.
And the difference in power loss for audio cables should be pretty minimal in the context of headphones. You can only go so far with making a cable thicker to save power lol
Just important to mention those things, since in other cases it will matter.
You've nailed it though.
If you wanna have a lot of fun
Make the worst headphone/speaker amp you've ever seen with discrete components
You guys think this would be worth it price? I dont need a dac since i already got one
Oh, thought it would've been different
It didn't really look like the same tjing
They don't matter yes... But they can have a difference
Like I showed you in the measurements up there
he is showing where they have no perceptible difference
Unless you're purposefully adding an inductor or capacitor in the cable, there going to be just about entirely resistive, so their only impact on sound will be linear, as a voltage divider. The amount of voltage drop across a cable it about 0, so even that is a non factor.
It's easy to calculate too
Vin*(Rx/Rt) with Vin being the voltage at the amp, Rx being the resistance of the cable, and Rt being the resistance of the cable plus the resistance of the headphone or speaker.
It's actually a rule you learn in intro DC, and I'd imagine if your school offers any electronics classes, you'll learn it there too.
@lone flame I want you to calculate for a... let's say 20 ohm headphone, how voltage is lost between a cable that lets say is 0.2 ohms each way (we will just use 0.4ohms total), vs the amount of voltage lost for a cable that is literally half as resistive, at 0.1 ohms each way (we will represent it as 0.2 ohms). For the Vs, we will assume it is a flat 1V_RMS. Just plug those values in and you'll quickly realize this is more objective and less up for debate than you think.
someone i know needs headphones + a mic for a 100 euro budget, can anyone recommend any to get
@lone flame I know it's not much, but this is a pretty useful resource. It's the equations page I used when I was in intro. Most of these equations are really easy to use and apply.
@lone flame
Even if there's a measurable difference, it's basically negligible. the difference is like 0.1dB, which is basically nothing; Unless you start to deal with transmission line theory, the cable length approaching a significant portion of the wavelength as an example, it isn't that big of a deal.
when you begin to approach those, then reflections, impedance matching, reflection and such become a concern; but for most headphone cables? meh. the wavelengths are kilometers long, so get back to me when you have a cable that long lol
The diameter of a cable affects resistance, and resistance is only one part of impedance. Thicker cables have lower resistance, which makes them better for longer distance runs. Impedance, though, includes the following: Z = R + jX where R is the resistance (affected by diameter, length, and material), and X is the reactance, which is the capacitive or inductive element of the cable.
for a cable like you'd find in audio, the impedance consists of the inductance and capacitance per unit length, which is determined by things like conductor spacing and insulation. Audio is generally considered low-frequency, the resistance dominates; reactive components are negligible; this is why we can approximate a cable as a purely resistive element. The only time we'd concern ourselves with the reactive element is when the cable runs are very long, or we're dealing with MHz+.
I don't see maxwell's equations. how do i live without Maxwell?
Yea, I think in the audio space a lot of people assume impedance is just resistance. Tbf, in the context of cables the reactance is negligible
I think I had Maxwell's equations just on a random page and never moved it to the main equations page lol
Unfortunately I have a lot of things I probably should move to that equations page that ended up on other equations pages
this channel just reminded me that i have a 7hour lecture on AC current tomorrow, thanks
the funny
also parallel is drawn like this
and voltage is E
You can denote the variables however you want
As long as the resistors are connecting at both ends they're a good representation of parallel resistors
Main thing with parallel is the nodes of contact
they lied to me then ;-;
When you get into complex circuitry, you start to see some wild stuff.
No, they're just simplifying it for you.
a
Which is fair
so far ive only done series parallel series/parallel voltage spitters magnets inductors and conductors
But if you wanted to you could denote things in whatever way you want. I had to write little warnings on test back in linear circuits for my professor because I liked to denote power in watts as P_r instead of power in VAR which he liked to denote as P_r
I can normally figure that out
Some students are kind of insane with their variables lmao
Yea, he was an amazing professor. He probably didn't need the warning. I just always left it as a nice way to avoid confusion and make grading my work easier.
I teach Emag.... so i get to absolutely obliterate students' confidence
You thought you knew physics 2, HUH!?
I would absolutely love to one-day actually teach as a professor.
how deep does magnatism actually go? the lecture i got on it was like 4 hours
I feel like it'd be incredibly fulfilling just knowing that you're helping teach and improve the next generation of engineers. I have an insane level of respect for you for doing that! @broken grotto
Its literally the foundation of everything.
Anything you ever do
Every equation
Every single amp
Is Emag
i assume because mlof do funny thing and make atom sticky?
i failed my 2nd be test btw im like strugling to comprehend this stuff
I keep somewhat quiet around, but sometimes I just need to jump in lmao
Second test of Emag?
basic electricity, emag is covered in it
Well, i don't know your schools layout
What is covered in "basic electricity?"
currently ive gone through these within 2 weeks and its about a 7 week topic
@broken grotto do you ever check rate my professor to laugh at some of the reviews people leave? I've seen some absolute idiots leave the most telling negative reviews on great professors lol
So, typically in Emag you begin with the basics, like a point charge, Gauss's law, stuff like that.
I know that it's mostly like 99.999% irrelevant what cable you use
Just mentioned that if you design a cable to... It CAN have an impact
Yes, but most cables are designed to just be a wire. Very rarely do you see filter cables in the headphone space.
If you need help with circuit theory and stuff, @noble axle, you're more than welcome to reach out at some point.
Yeah. And if the headphone as example is ultra low impedance etc also worth to mention
Maybe there Will be systems like HE1 where the cable does coloration too someday 
There are plenty of filter cables, they're just not common
Can you tell me why? (I want you to tell me.)
All I did was mentioning cables that can affect sound.
Not that I care about cables. If I get a cable it's only bcs of length, look, feel and connection and mostly bcs i like custom cables
But not a tiny bit for sound
Bcs it's just a cable lol
aight, sorry if i was being too vague i cant actually take any of my work out of the building i do it in
Have to scroll up quite far and search the message
and I'm on my phone, just came back from a 10hr night shift. So I'm lazy and don't wanna find it right now
Its all good I just think we are on different wavelengths. (Ha..hahaha...)
I was testing if you knew why the load impedance matters.
I know that high impedance can cause coloration (boosting or lowering Frequencies if the impedance curve isn't linear*
The "golden" rule was like. Your transducer should have 8x more Impefance than the imoedance of the AMP output
And cable if you wanna count that 0.01 Ohm in
With a linear impedance curve it would cause a drop in total volume
But why? Idk xD
I belive you mentioned above a frequency response where the transducer was 1 ohm.
Yeah that raal thing or so. Where the cable indeed had 6db more volume + a dip in upper treble
If you want, armed with the power of Google and math, try to figure out why that is.
But like... Find a 1 Ohm transducer for headphones or IEMs 
I ask ChatGPT 
Bcs i hate it when people cannot break down stuff
But if I just tell you in a passing discord chat, would you really remember?
And chat got can do that quite good even tho the output is uhh. Not that accurate
Actually prob yes
Tbh, chat gpt is kinda special when it comes to electrical. It also sucks at linear algebra lol
That's how I learned most stuff. By just asking people who knows stuff. And They broke it down. It made sense. So bcs it made sense I asked if that and that would be like that. And then "yes" or "yes but" or "no because"
So it was just straight answers without 2000 words assay to my qeustions
Yeah ik that chat got is weird sometimes
Luckly it only gets better
Ok well that a curse too. People will lose the skill to deep search and use Google. + thinking Will be irrelevant cuz just ask AI
I encourage the use of AI for emag because you'll learn more fixing its mistakes.
Its awful lmao
@lone flame To help you out, start by looking into series circuit rules. You'll learn a lot and it relates to the question.
Well yeah. But don't really wanna learn a whole electrical engineer sht to answer my. Question
Bcs the other stuff.... Idc
Only thing I really use it for is finding punctuation errors and blatant issues with my spelling when I'm writing late night lab reports
It's very useful, even if you don't want to be an electrical engineer.
Just having that knowledge puts you ahead of a lot of other people you will interact with.
If anything, stuff like that teaches you to break down complex problems
^
90% of EE degrees teach you problem solving with Maxwell's equations mixed in.
< 3 Maxwell
But, if you end up with ChatGPT's answer, feel free to ping me
I'll happily look over it, so long as you get to learn something.
Ok so chat got said it like that
You stumbled across a fairly interesting (i think, anyway) thing.
welp hopefully i can come back tomorrow night knowing the concepts of this chat log i need to wake up in 4 hours 
If the output impedance is high and the transducer impedance low. It will cause that (bcs most transducer have a non linear impedance curve) that different frequencies gets a different "current" or "voltage" that's why some stuff is boosted or damped
Haven't told my why tho lol
Idk if that is just the physics with no real reason than bcs it's like that lol
Nope. There's a reason.
Says something about "Voltage devider" idc the English word
So if the impedance are pretty "close" it gives to much power to treble or lows. Depending on the impedance curve of the transducer
also stepping away from electricity a little bit, meze 105 aer's are very nice
i as a random individual on the internet would recommend them
Yeah 105aer are nice
They're also a work of art
Meze could literally make a headphone that doesn't make any sound and it'd be worth having just for the aesthetic
They do an amazing job
what are some good earbuds for like gym and phone use for under 100?
for reference i guess the airpod pros i tried didnt really fit in my ear that well with the smallest tips on them and id also prefer something that came in black
@vestal meadow Due to certain circumstances, I can't get the Fiios for $130
Could it be possible to get these for $100 (without tax and or shipping)
The problem is that even though I am over 18, I still have to ask my parents for permission to buy something, since I am not allowed to have a credit card
I'm looking at other places other than ebay, but idk which site to trust
Don't put things on credit cards if you're able to. My sister fell down this trap and she's now thousands in debt while not making enough to ever pay it down and is pretty effectively ruining her own life.
Your parents are looking out for you there.
If your parents are helping you out now, take advantage of it and use it as a jumping off point to get ahead. Mine kinda just kicked me out when I turned 18 and the other made me basically take over their rent to move in. Glad I'm out of all that and fully independent now, but I would give anything to start off with a supporting family out of highschool.
Thats a fair point
But how would I pay it? Can't use my debit
Don't think you can use checks
You'd have to use either a visa prepaid card or debit in that case, but it's better than using credit.
"Helping out" is a sentence I wish was true
using credit is fine as long as you pay it back
I can't even do that
All I can use is prepaid cards that were given to me, that's it
I didn't want to say that, to sound rude
oh, i was responding to what biooc said
Same here, though they did educate me well when it comes to money and I'm grateful for that
I know people in the same situation as your sister (sister of a friend)
Well, let's go back to basic circuits.
Examine the circuit using Maxwell's equations and basic circuit theory, and we have a few things to consider.
- Ohm's Law : V=IR,
- Power: P = VΒ²/R,
- And the electric fields. Current in a conductor causes magnetic fields, and a voltage differential creates electric fields. Inductance and Capacitance.
This is where we get our impedance,
Z(f) = R + jwL + (1 / jwC)
ive denoted w as 2ΓpiΓ(frequency).
In audio, w is small, so the inductance and Capacitance are negligible and R dominates. The cable is a single resistor.
Now let's say that the transducer is 4 Ohms. If the cable resistance is 0.4 Ohms, then the cable resistance is 10% of the load. Higher voltage drop. The wire now matters. Lower impedance allows for higher current, which creates higher magnetic fields, and in turn a higher voltage drop across the now non-ideal conductor.
this is perceived as the 6 db drop.
The cable is dropping a significant amount of voltage.
"cable is a single resistor" fans when I carefully coil my cable into a very tight stack of loops
I have purchased from eBay as well if you check for items which are buy now you can use debit cards to get it from eBay. Other options would likely be checking places like newegg and what not(I am not from NA so don't know what all options you have)
and wtf is "w" now?
or in the equaiton atleast?
it says "jwL"
Ο is the symbol used to describe frequency of the AC electricity going through the circuit.
and jwL?
and jwC?
You should get some Khan academy lessons in. What you want to find is "intro to RLC circuits."
Jwl is the impedance from inductance. As the frequency goes higher, the impedance grows.
You can see this on speaker drivers
Inductors are basically low pass filters.
The 1/(jwc) is the impedance due to capacitance. As the frequency lowers, the impedance gets higher. Capacitors are high pass filters.
If you don't care about math you can ignore the j part. It's imaginary.
I wouldn't say ignore the j part. It represents a 90 degree phase difference
If you only want to focus on amplitude there is an amplitude focused impedance formula
Thats my friend you're talking about ):
Yes, j is imaginary but as @sleek lily states it represents a 90 degree phase shift.
You can remember the phrase "ELI the ICE man," to remember what the j is actually doing.
Eli and ice carried me through phasors π
A speaker is just an inductor. Thats why at high frequencies they tend to fly off to nowhere.
But there is capacitance, as well.
We just dont normally concern ourselves too much with it.
I had a thing... let me try to find it.
I also usually when explaining j avoid calling it imaginary because some people have a tendency to think that means fake or doesn't matter and really just don't get it means another axis.
The 90 degree phase shift also doesn't matter if you don't care about the math.
Like idk how I can make that more clear for you.
all i wanted to know is. Why exactly it boosts frequencies
not a whole ass Harvard decade of idk what
like i said earlier... I hate it when its not broken down
and i hate it when stuff is like 20 pages full of idk what
Because reactance is frequency dependent and at a certain point you have minimal reactance from capacitive or inductive reactance
and now for someone who knows sht in stuff
without these EE terms etc
If all you care about is the resistive voltage drop and overall amplitude, fine. It doesnt matter.
Its not abstract math. Its real world behavior.
Reactance you can think of like the portion of impedance that is made up of stored energy through reactance and capacitance
I could probably word it better
u u u a i u u u a i
They do. That voltage and current still exist, just not in phase with the input signal.
I know. I took the classes too.
But for the sake of explaining this to someone who is actively hostile to math I think we can easily reduce it down to some basic relationships and ignore the scary monsters underneath the bed.
u u u a i u u u u a i
jvc <3
i know this one guy called jvcguy
you'd love him
@quiet ice
If you want just the amplitude impedance formula, it should off memory be something like |Z|=β((R^2)+(XL-Xc)^2) @lone flame With R being resistance, X being reactance, XL being the portion of reactance from inductance, and XC being the portion from capacitance. Z is the actual impedance.
Do they teach you the phasor triangle?
"hostile to math" π
i love math
I think most people who hate math hate it because bad highschool teachers
Every college math professor I've had has been amazing
most people hate most subjects due to bad teachers
bro
i said like 20 times im sht at math
You just plug in values
all i want is an explanation, not an equasion
You need the equation to understand the concept
pretty sure i don't
Notice how we have XL-Xc
"If you can't explain it to a six-year-old, you don't understand it yourself"
Albert Einstein's Quote
There is going to be a frequency where those two values become equal. At that point we have our lowest resistance, as the resistance becomes purely resistive.
So let's say we have at 1khz and XL of 10 ohms and an Xc of 10 ohms. We now have 0 in that portion of the equation.
but what if like the speakers impedance is lower in total than the AMPs output impedance
idk what XL and Xc is
So not quite resistance as it's storing charge rather than becoming heat
But it acts sort of like resistance
@lone flame Would you expect us to have more or less impedance at that point
at what?
The point where our reactance form the capacitance and inductance are equal
like on impedance curves. well you ofently have a buildup in the treble and somewhere a peak at lower frequencies where the impedance is pretty high
and other frequencies are mostly low compared to these 2
You would expect to have the least impedance at the frequency where XL and Xc are equal @lone flame
XL Xc 
So would you expect to have more current or less current at this point
this is easy to understand
Now ask it to explain it like a pirate
where did you get your education on this subject
i wanna avoid this institution
now explain it like you have a lethal injection of fenthanyl in your bloodstream
YES
explain it so that an intensly high person would understand it
just gotta walk out of my apartment to hear that, thats boring βΉοΈ
πΊπΈ πΊπΈ πΊπΈ
π¦
please dont slander america
If you can explain it to @lone flame Better then be my guest
all of it is directed to the bay
heard a story where a guy had healthcare, still had to pay 700K bcs healthcare said "nah to expensive" or so xD
in Europe you mostly have Healthcare by LAW
i was once 5 days in hospital, several testst
guess how much i paid
fcking 50β¬ bcs it was 10β¬ a day for food
lucky...
borders are open. You are free to come π
i cried when i saw my medical bill in taiwan
i was tryna avoid going to the hospital when i dislocated my ankle
turns out whoel treatment was 100 bucks!
live laugh taiwan
yeah
USA probably the only country in the world where people would run away from ambulances with probably freshly lost limbs 
i dont think they do that
healthcare services are obliged to save your life
they just put it on a tab
ru american?
Worse
no
Walk it off
Just a flesh wound
amen
I know people who've driven themselves to the hospital
Because an ambulance is too expensive
Just going to the ER can cost me $500, before any treatment.
their companies! what obligations do they have π
I can't do that either
If i spend the $130 on them, they will ground me for like a month for that
And it's happened plently of times
hifiman is apparently out of edition x v2
so im gonna see if I can get them to send me a v1 or an arya instead
but if not im going to just demand a refund
....did you just talk to your parents about it?
Honest question
Its only $30 over your budget, just ask and explain if prompted.
They might say no, but you asked.
Oh I told them that
They didn't like how the earcups were made of wood, should be made from plastic
what
Uh huh
but like
wood is an obviously more expensive material
and thats not entirely wood anyways
Also said the build quality was "too good", again plastic
why is build being too good an issue
Idk dude
They think that 30-50usd headphones are the best
"Headphones don't need to be made out of wood and metal, just make them plastic"
i think they just dont want you to spend 130$ lol
sounds like an excuse
They looked at them and pointed out every single thing and said it should just be black and plastic
Like what
I'm fine with spending $130
they dont want you to spend the money
One of my friends just got some new headphones, they were like $600 in total
That's just too much for me
I did see some yesterday go for $110, so maybe?
honestly, I still like he560v4 more than edition xs
but edition xs does really good with presentation
very wide and open sounding
give it more time
I
have a very hard time believing all that.
even then, you can totally buy headphones for ~$100. Which ones? I won't answer because someone somewhere will flame me for something or other so
at $100, i'd probably buy IEM's anyway
but if there's some reason you cannot use IEM's and must buy headphones, then idk man moondrop edge, moondrop joker, those audio technica ones
they all probably suck, someone will say, but they're in the budget.
I have the moondrop edge, they're... fine.
for like, $89 wireless ANC headphones, totally passable.
but I am a regular user of the Focal Bathys, because I decided to skip rent to buy them.
- I understand if you don't believe me. It sounds comical, but's it's not
- I can't use IEMs at all, i should've said that
Is class A amplification a gimmick?
I just can't fathom anyone arguing that things should be made with more plastic, is all.
either the other person was right and they just don't want you to spend the money, or something else be afoot.
in what way?
im saying
his parents just dont want him spending money
there is no way someone looks at an object and says "the materials in this are too expensive, get a plastic one instead"
i mean to be fair i would say that for something that is too cheap to be true but this is 130$ and its just a small piece of metal and wood plating on back end of a small headphone
Do they actually sound that much better than AB, D, H, etc?
Any amp can be good if its implemented well.
Class A's just have low crossover distortion
But they consume much more power.
^
You're weighing a lot of different inherently design pros and cons and how willing you are to work around the issues exherently. It comes more down to the individual design
So it's hard to say class A is the best or class D is the best etc
class a is best at heating your room
perfect for anyone living in a hot and humid environment
I'm not even kidding, that's what they actually said
I think my brain BSODed itself when they said that lol
Or they are trying to make me lose my mind
What's funny is that they came up to me this morning and changed that to 65usd, no more $100
What do you guys think about sonos arc + 300 era setup
whats up
this guy was talking about jvc man
oh sick
lmfao
do you know like a readily available bt module that you can just input audio to and it becomes a discoverable wireless microphone device
im planning on making a gypsie modmic antlion
because they are evil and I am better
im not going to read all that for context but if looking for a good pair of headphones for 130~ usd the only companies i know of at that price with something halfway decent are audio technica and grado, the latter also has good customer service
you're planning on putting recording devices in the women's bathroom again arent you
no I swear it was a one time thing
and bt is pretty bad for those so I wont use that for it again
no i dont know. i think modmic specifically had this problem and they had to wire the bluetooth in reverse or something.
interesting
im sure there are people who have done diy bluetooth mics before
if there was a good wireless way of delivering audio id do it
I don't really care about the protocol
i forgot about akg mb
Make a bluetooth wireless microphone using ESP32 and INMP441 digital I2S microphone for transmitting audio to any bluetooth speaker.
You can download the code for this project via the following link:
https://github.com/ramjipatel041/ESP32-Bluetooth-Microphone-SPY-BUG-
man I bet this sounds pretty shit maybe I should go for a dongle or somethingh
i dont want to fuck with codecs im not a programmer
its 2025 you dont have to be a programmer
better than you are
low bar and it doesnt make it good
KSC75, Porta Pro, HE400se if new
If BT. Ugreen Hitune Max5c and what you said π
what type of driver do the ksc75 have?
sound drivers
https://www.fiio.com/dm13
Anyone seen this?
I'm not sure how good Fiio stuff is, but I kinda want one.
Guangzhou FiiO Electronics Technology Co., Ltd.
Fiio's great
Would you ever get the DM13?
@stuck bolt mind helping
i have an idea but idk if it will works
work*
i have 2 3" speakers & i want to turn one into a sub speaker
is it possible to like convert them?
I dont use CD's.
But if i did, I'd buy the fiio one ye
Ive had good luck with FiiO
Not
Really
Oh, well I buy all my music on CD.
My collection proves it.
Yeah, I mean, I have a large amount of FiiO stuff, from DAP to headphones, and I've never been particularly disappointed
The price tends to be right imo
I like the Japanese brands like Sony and Panasonic.
Their stuff is really good.
Took some measurements of my fiance's liquid spark today
Next to the same measurements on my ragnarok
what does this mean
apparently like "CSD"
so the behaviour of a permaent frequency load and not of a single fast sine swep etc
so like if you have music that the amp behaves differently with the load or so and that can cause sound differences even tho FR is looks the same
An oscilloscope is a super precise device for measuring amplitude and time domain behaviors in a much more visual and precise way than most tools would
i very much know what a osciliscope is
but what are you trying to show
The difference in behavior between the two amps
The liquid spark has a massive amount of overshoot while the Ragnarok instead has a more smooth transition to that DC load, but is much more bandwidth limited
bandwidth limited?
do you know what causes the overshoot?
Probably too low of a feedback resistance tbh
wouldnt this be inductive?
You could have overshoot from inductance, but I don't think that's what's going on here, but it's not impossible.
yep that makes sense
I'd have to take the amp apart and do some circuit analysis to identify the actual cause of the overshoot with complete certainty
Unfortunately they don't post schematics for the amp afaik
you know why the overshoot has to exist right?
You can design an amp with a higher output filter capacitance to avoid it
That's probably what the Ragnarok did
so a lowpass filter
Yep
But most audio amps have more of a band pass with an inductive and capacitive element, with the capacitive element blocking lower frequencies that aren't desired and inductor blocking higher frequencies.
Repeat that step response at 1 kHz and 5 kHz
Measure the ringing frequency, too.
I'll probably run more test later, but for now I have my oscilloscope moved back to my bench
I should be getting a new scope soon though
One that is actually decent lol
Ye, we can do a full beans analysis way
I have my suspensions about that amp looking at those tests
The overshoot was pretty bad. If it is just related to an under dampened feedback, I might just modify it later on, but tbf, my fiance doesn't care enough about audio to notice lol
The amp also has a really small range of input voltage it tolerates before shutting off
if im understanding it properly thats beyond the range of human hearing
It is
It'd just be nice to fix
For fun
Like a personal project
Has anyone seen worse than this?
Without an EQ it's pretty bad
it doesnt look that bad if their target has a bass shelf
That's a pretty beefy graph scale
Normalized to an unknown target.
Could literally be anything
I did see a more in depth review from RT
look at the raw frequency response
what headphone is this π
Maybe we are supposed to guess
looks like a sennheiser
It's a turtle beach i got 7 years ago
Curious on what it scored
Whats better the soundcore 2 or the monster mfs1
Why those two?
because they're in my price range and its the only ones i really looked at
Neat
so which one is better?
Idk man I wouldn't buy either.
Why nor
Monster is a cash grab audio brand where their name is their only real asset and Anker is a budget gadget brand that happens to make audio devices.
I don't trust either of them to make anything decent but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
Hey guys i have a question, is there any reason for my goXLR to start stuttering with sound output?
So none of monsters stuff is any good?
quite a nice bass shelf
yesterday i had bought the Logitech G Pro X 2 Lightspeed and returned them immediately because it sounded like i was gaming in a garage i just picked up the Arctis Nova Pro Wirless and now im having the same problem i dont know what to do because i doubt people are paying $250-350 for this kind of sound is there a fix
reddit is a goldmine but i dont wanna spam like 50 posts
I have a feeling OP was gaming in a garage.. /s
ok actually ill share one more that i thought was funny
reported for promoting self harm
me? lol , its the inverse , i have big speakers but the bass speakers only start working from 20% of max volume wich is to loud for my appartment most of the time, so i play at 5% of what they can do but boost the bass so i the song sounds normal lol
verry harmfull yes ..
My speakers..
(srry if that wasnt meant for me) but damn , do i dont like people that don't have a clue what they are looking at , or have any point of reference to substantioate their claims,... damn , and well that phone db meter isnt oaked officially however its set so if on a party my phone sais its not to loud , when the inspection or the police measures , its also not to loud ,... since we dont like fines
eq != volume level ,.. so how on earth do you connect it to harm ?
what is the phone mic zeroed to?
I know
yeah
even if the volume level on the thing is maxed out, there is a -6db limiter in the chain,.. not that that mattes , since both my DAC and my amp have volume knobs so unless i have set them all to max ,.. then still there is no reference to how loud im playing and if its harmfull or not
-6dB preamp for 12dB boost?
humbling
no the -6db is to leave headroom before i go to my dac so if an allarm or notification goes its 6db louder than the music im playing
and also -24db on the eq ....
so +12 on -24 is still -12 db for the bass and -24 for the rest of the music ,... , tha then gets a -6db ceiling applied to it
if you use the niosh SLM app on an iphone then i think it should be pretty decently calibrated
for android i think there isnt really a solution without just zeroing it yourself
i tried several apps on my pixel 8 and they were like 10-15 dB off
if i were to tell everyone that they reeally should go to Syndicate party in germany , its in the Westfalenhallen , and as one of the verry few indoor venues , they dont have any db limits at all, when i went they had put up a 185KW audio installation... wich is more then what you would use at a metallica concert for a festival or so , but then put inside , loudest party ever , no contest ...
was it harmfull? it was sponsored by a brand of earplugs and you got like semi proffessional plugs for free at the entrance ,... , on the other hand while your ears were safe , if you walked anywhere in line of the speakers , yourbalance was affected and it felt like if you werent waring any clothes becaue of the vibrations, and you felt the bass pushing lungs and chest so :)also dont watch if your sensitive to flashing images, as its none stop basicly ... : and enjoy π
true but if your at a party sometime and they have one that is officially oaked , you can see what that one sais and use it to zero your phone withiun a 3db range give or take
i guess that counts as "zeroing it yourself"
(depends on the music and what the mic of your phone can and cannot register of filters out aswell
i should say calibrating, i dont think there's a zero involved there
no gain reduction would be 0db , but once its out the speakers, that doesnt make much sense any more ,
and i say oaking as it sounded okay to me but apparently its not translated like that to english hehe my bad
bout sound the same in dutch π
I should have ordered the HD 620S yesterday. The price of them went above $300 today. And I ended up returning the FT1s I was using for a week or so.
when i first got my focal bathys i didn't really like them, but now I find myself using them more and more
Guys, things have gotten so expensive

If I'm to build another set of speakers like what I've done before. Its gonna cost me twice as much

They look clean but theyβre like $500
yes, that they are, i did buy them after all lol
I got two FT1s and both had the same issue
what was the issue?
left ear cup were making crackling sounds
I haven't actually used mine too much, so out of curiosity was that right away?
yeah it was making crackling sounds out the box
My 14 year old definitive Pro Cinema 600 7.1 system just got a huge upgrade with a Denon AVR X1800H
Im atm using my Audeze Max mic for gaming with friends, but im running into troubles with the microphone levels, and from what i can gather, there isnt much to do about it. SO... im looking to find a stand alone mic, tho i know nothing about them. Ive seen alot using the "RΓDE" brand, but is there somethiong like "GO TO" when it comes to Mics?
how much do you wanna spend?
well.. i got alil help, and ive ordered the Shure MOTIV MV6
they made me do vector math 
andnow theyre making me do 3 phase which is actually not bad
I love vector math
i dont remember any of the base equasions so its a bit of a struggle
This is as pretty much full bore. I could push it a little harder but I'd have to preprocess everything and I don't feel like doing that. Also it'd be painfully loud at that point.
The 600watts isn't all bass either, that's actually about 240 watts of mids and highs, you can tell by the lasery sounding bit, it jumps up on the mids and treble not just the bass. The PC takes some power too, but not that much as it's mostly idling.
My PC was at like 72/100
Receiver was at 70/74
Spotify was at one click from full volume.
I do it this way to give a little headroom so I get less distortion.
If I run everything full volume, I'd have to pull the bass back so that I don't blow out the woofers on the main speakers, and it would be really really really loud.
Au5 Closer is a nice song
God I played that song permanently when I played teeworlds
i got it recommended because of its good sound and that apparently the MV7 and MV7+ are very very good, and the MV6 is a more budget friendly and USB friendly version of those
Uh... Personally would have taken a cheaper mic
thats so overpriced lol
honestly.. the only other thing you can buy here cheaper, is like a logitech ball mic..
fifine t669?
cant buy here
you cant buy from aliexpress?
Could name tons of cheaper mic setups tbh
Shure is expensive for no reason
but stuff you can buy in denmark? the Shure seemed to have alot of good reviews
Alot of good reviews doesn't mean that these are quality reviews
thats true.. tried listening to like gaming journlas and youtube reviews, might be a steep price, but it seemed promising and the Shures seemed to be a very bought brand
im like 90% sure you can buy from aliexpress in denmark
shure is a very expensive brand not a specifically good one
There is Thomann in germany
they have some good studio mics but their consumer items are just a scam
and some stuff like sm7b is also a 20$ mic that costs practically 400$
but the MV6.. you think it sucks? or are you just mad at the price and the mic itself is actually pretty good
how much did you pay for it
The mic isn't bad. But for the price.. There is cheaper competition
i dont know the danish market but
the msrp on that thing is ridiculous for an usb mic
that is in the xlr mic + audio interface cost levels while having none of the benefits
Get cheap mic, EQ. Done
msrp?
Price at release by shure
manufacturer suggested retail price
i do think its a good mic, and yes i could maybe get something thats good to at like 500 kr, but im alright with this, if its a good mic, like im gonna be happy with the quality.. but i would hate to have spend the 1000 kr on it for it so suck
The SM7B as example doesn't suck. It's a nice mic. But for the money you can get cheaper mics that sound better for most use cases
you could pay like
1/3rd of the cost and get something thats kinda the same
which is the issue here
or pay the same cost and get something a lot better
oh so your saying invest in Xlr stuff instead of the usb
Vocaster one pls as interface
i dont know that interface
Nah I paid ~4K⬠into my mic stuff
No need to do that. You can do that way cheaper lol
damn... i was so sure about this but... should i cancel it and get something else?
ive used headsets mic for a while, and might use this at one point to do some music stuff to, so i do kinda want something good
if you want music stuff just go for xlr
dont tap into usb
you can get an interface, a condenser and a dynamic for the cost of this one mic lol
do you have some of those in mind? cause im a complete ass at that market.. i know nothing about it
behringer um2, xm8500, c1
all from behringer
im not a fanboy its just a cheap company that does things very affordably
you can listen to sound demos of these two mics on the internet
you cant do audio work with a usb mic
it doesn't have asio support or direct monitoring
you could get asio to work but i dont believe direct monitoring is an option
okay okay. Thanks π
and having an additional item you can replace is always good, if your mic fails in an xlr setup you pay the cost of the mic, if your usb mic fails you rebuy the entire assembly
and vice versa with the audio interface
yakucho also recommended vocaster as an interface, ive never heard of it but maybe look into it