#audio-tech
1 messages · Page 162 of 1
i advise getting 3 other hi res audio stickers to complete the square formation
it provides better audio also
real
Yeah I asked if they were a good brand here and a few people said yes.
it was like a few days ago lol
please dont be jackson please dont be jackson please dont be jackson
Everyone here needs an intro electronics class. I can't believe there was a discussion on the latency of effectively a wire.
That's criminal.
i think one of them was me but i definitely didnt say they were good
just good enough
Now I just need a longer audio cable for my FT1 headphones so I dont have the cables go across my desk
cant believe people think their fingers are faster than tensioned springs
The spring moves as you push it
So with dacs, you normally just keep your PC volume at 100% and adjust the volume from the dac wheel?
The moment if contact electricity flows
the theory is you push so fast it cant follow the switch's lip
Hookes law and shi
and it has to land
well its a dac/amp but yeah
which is lol
i only stand by it that’s it’s considered additional latency because the material does not straighten up as nearly fast a electricity goes in a wire, as of science, i’ve never argued that it’s signficant
ok
Oh yeah update. I got my FT1 headphones replaced and I don't hear anymore crackling. They also fit a lot better
That's just wrong unless the metal or the plastic literally compresses
Everyone here needs some ohms law and hookes law
its possible if the spring is weak
Like they need those concepts asap
idk how you can say moving an object both 1km and 1nm has 0 delay, and then say you aren't trolling
or if you move it extremely quick
Because the moment of contact is the moment of contact...
if something has a .00001 second delay it might as well have fucking none
thats how it works in human interaction shit\
then the contact material may not be able to descend in time
and thats the argument here
its like physically possible
but inconceiveable
this is fine, it wouldve been nice if someone had just led with that instead of attacking me for even considering an idea
maybe if youre a computer doing gigahertz speed maybe .00001 seconds has an effect
i think you got confused though
it's not about the latency between the leaf contacting, and then sending a signal
that would be the speed of electricity and i already said that's not what i'm talking about
i believe there are fasters ways than mechanical to sense actuation for example optical switches, i’m not saying that they matter, the delay is insignificant that it even makes audio speudoscience only believers look good if someone in a review tells you that it matters for gaming
?
i thought optical was supposed to only be for getting analog capabilities but for some reason razer still does it
tell that to optimum tech 
sorry for possibly being wrong, i will have to repent tomorrow
although i don't think you deserve an apology
you hurt mine too lmao
what exactly does ohms law do to apply here though
i would like to say this was taught to me in high school
and don't just insult me and not answer
they were taught to me too
As it should be
i mean that in the most genuine questioning manner
we had ohms law in elementary
as in i want to know the answer, not win an argument
i believe he mentioned ohm’s law as generally
the guy left
not to the conversation
perhaps
but then thats not very actionable advice
yes the mechanical parts make electrical contact before they touch but the cu may register it only once the power reaches a certain threshold
so he meant ohm’s law as it should be more and properly taught in schools
Because the moment those two leads make contact the DC voltage of both sides is 5v besides lag from the about 0 capacitance of the leaf.
i guess
i don't have a problem with saying that when two metal wires contact, the voltage raises effectively instantly
that's completely unrelated to what i was saying
i think even klaus gets that
no but you said we are saying things you never claimed when you specifically mentioned leaf spring lag
And the wires make contact as soon as you push the part the appropriate distance besides the compression of the actual plastic and leaf, because they are pushing each other
There is no latency there
Besides how fast you press it, which isn't a keyboard variable.
maybe it wasnt you
it seems like maybe you understand
you said latency isnt from spring contacting after saying there is lag from spring contacting
like
what
I don't know who was saying what tbh, I just know this whole convo hurt my soul every time I looked at it
Nearly everything I read was wrong
maybe if that's the case, i didn't initially think the time length of the spring release would be instant
that means we need somebody to measure this and find out 🔥
i dont think we do
You wouldn't because the part is pushed. The only variable besides material compression is how fast you press it.
"pretty sure ive seen poeple get different latencies depending on how strong the leaf spring is"
"it's not about the latency between the leaf contacting, and then sending a signal"
The leaf is pushed by that hook plastic part of the stem
btw if you swing a plastic rod while holding it on one side the material it takes a while for each molecule to shift into place even without air resistance, that’s what you could call latency or delay
these two statements by you contradict each other
the strength of the leaf spring would theoretically change how fast it contacts after the leg "releases" the leaf, not how fast electricity travels
that's what i was trying to say
It's not a variable because it applies about equally to all keyboards, but your latency from the stem and the copper compressing is immediately small...
we know?
because the spring constant would change the acceleration of the spring
Like incomprehensible levels of small
it still exsists tho
i dont see how it contradicts
cannot say it has “no latency” in science
yeah but that gotcha is not what i was going for
you can if its within margin of error of 0
or under the measureable precision of the measuring instrument
you said it has lag based on spring strength first and then said its not about the latency between leaf contacting?
what am I not getting here
these contradict
the latter isnt what i was trying to say
okay can you reiterate that then
would you like to explain where in the keyswitch you think the latency is coming from
the second is supposed to say the latency between after the contact, until the voltage raises above the trigger level, which is what biooc seemed to be worrying about
if you think about it on a larger scale it’s very important agaisnt earthquakes, even concrete can shift molecules a tiny bit without breaking or snapping bonds immediately
well we arent talking about that here are we
okay so you are saying for this specific example, origin of lag isn't the leaf
in that message
for that example
not correct
am i stupid or is this confusing to anyone else also
Comparing keyboard latency in this manner is like comparing frame latency by the reactance of the HDMI cable alone
nah i aint know either
trying to understand the understanding ofbbaovanc understanding of my understanding to understand his understanding
Its just a stupid non factor not worth measuring in any scenario
That's literally all this conversation should have told anyone
imagine if the process is
- the leg reaches actuation point and releases the leaf
- the leaf touches together
- the short causes the voltage to drop to effectively 0
what i was saying is the delay between 1 and 2 which may as well be negligible, i just had no idea
seemed like biooc was talking about the delay between 2 and 3
and then ashuran is just in here to dogpile for some reason
leaf doesnt get released by anything thought which is the issue here
it glides along an angled surface of the switch
it doesnt get dropped onto the contact
if you look at the gif I sent you'll see that
i was thinking tactile the entire time
that makes a lot more sense
in tactile, once you go over the bump, it's as if the leaf is suddenly released
that's why i was saying the leaf spring strength matters, because that's an actual thing that we already see causes chattering issues in tactiles
This conversation gives me chronic diseases in my brain every time I see it. How have we not all concluded it's beyond pointless 😭
minor miscommunication of me forgetting linear switches exist while you guys were going off of them exclusively
no im speaking tactile also just look at the gif I sent
it doesnt matter the same thing is happening
or is that linear and did I goof up
i’m kinda lost about what you guys are arguing but yes there is latency, it’s neglidible, cannot say there is not latency reduction by going with optical or other ways than mechanical because the marketing teams that make optical would eat you up for not mentioning the switch being 0.xxx ms faster
that is linear
its linear
if you get an image of an mx brown it probably wont look much different
i mean ones where the bump is super severe
still there is no x mm of distance of a leaf being dropped im pretty sure, it still rides along an angled lip
its still aint going to separate from the track
its too fast for it to simply ride along the stem bump, as far as i know that's why leaf tick exists
the rail or angled plastic can bend slightly (extremely smol) as it tries to shift the metal parts
my theory is the leaf releases quickly instead of gliding along the leg, and then causes a ticking noise
if that's not what causes it then i have to go back to the drawing board because ttc switches are garbage for some reason
anyways yes i admit this latency thing convo was pointless because most of it even proper devices cannot measure
i mean it could be that the contacts are closer than intended or ideal if the contacts make audible sound when actuated
or do you mean something else
i dont know, it could be both
ive heard outemu is known for having weaker leaves, and i noticed that they seem to have below average ticking based on the switches i own
oh you know what the ticking probably is coming from inside the leaf, not from hitting the leg
but that still doesn't change anything
aint it just the leaves hitting each other
probably
or this is probably the ping noise, not the ticking that annoys me most
i hear both a ringing noise (leaf ping) and a click/tick noise (leaf tick) on some switches, and i dont really know how to solve either one, or if it's even possible
like do you mean the part which i market in blue is more bend towards the other contact?
idk what this is saying really
im guessing the metal contact leaves hitting together at high velocity causes the "ping"
maybe metal on plastic sound when the leaf hits the stem after bump is the tick?
like the leaf can be bent by the manufacturer so it can extend by itself, the leaf by default is pushing agaisnt the stem’s slider, if you bend the leaf more it’ll push less agaisnt the stem’s slider and if you bend it less it will want to be in the stem
nah thats from the actual spring u
one type of tick is from the spring, but i think the other one is from the leaf
theres two types of ticks i hear with some of my switches
look man i got some really fucked up switches
i dont know what i did to deserve it
everyone glazes them on the internet
the most common is the keycap’s stem not being perfectly aligned all times on the switch stem
you know spacebar ticking, similar effect can be had on other keys
interesting
you know when you press a side of a keycap instead of center
some keycaps may wiggle in the stem part
for some reason my stabilizer keys can do that but they all tick anyways so i decided to just give up on them
glue could be a solution 🤣 /j
but it pushes against the angled part of the lip you see
the distance which the lip is "dropped off" from is like
so incredibly small
that's why mx browns are barely considered tactile switches
i agree
maybe it still doesnt matter for latency though
even on something like a gateron type r
not true though
because you can see in every switch type there is no drop
in every case they glide along the angled lip aside from perhaps clicky which is still barely any distance
it doesnt seem accurate given i hear ticks from the bump
you can see their travel forces they certainly have a bump on a graph/chart/measurement
they’re 700% within of what’s considered a tactile bump
you can see that tactile's lip has 2 bumps
but there is no bump for the release of the lip
the lip goes into some form of ditch
goes back up then gets dropped into the contact
the noise point of the switch isn't where it activates
it activates a slight bit before and you can test this on your own keyboard
you can activate it after the "click" by very marginally changing the key's height and unactivating it
the tick point of the switch is where it activates though
i'm not talking about the bottom out noise
yeah
this only happens if i go over the bump on my switches
what
literally
no feel :sad:
are you talking abou tthe blue switch??
look up rtings they have deeper dive on travel forces
anything that has an intentional or unintentional bump that can be seen on their graph is considered tactile bump outside of scratchiness
any idea what keywords to search for
Is this still going on
Round 2 - This time Nothing CEO Carl Pei reacts to techtubers’ Headphone (1) reviews including those from Dave2D, MKBHD and more...
Featuring clips from:
@mkbhd
@Dave2D
@ShortCircuit
@ThisIsTechToday
@ASBYT
@beebomco
➤ Our website:
https://nothing.tech/
➤ Join our community:
https://nothing.community/
➤ Follow us:
https://www.inst...
rtings switch vs switch
talking about a different thing
wow a distraction
uh i think its supposed to be past that bump when assembled
no
hold on
that doesnt really make any sense
id call them valleys not bumps
it doesnt go in to actuate
two valleys and one tactile bump
yes
what did we do all this for
which question were you answering, the one about latency all the way above? or the ticking
idk but you’ve asked questions someone with basic keyboard knowledge should know
I showed this to you
to display that the ticking is unrelated to the activation
its for a tactile effect provided by an additional bump within the switch
that isnt related to any electronic contacts
and the real contact happens after the tactile bump
in the same exact way it happens in a linear one
are you with me
what are you saying the ticking is then
.
the ticking can be caused by the leaf making contact with the other contact if it’s metal that’s causing the noise, spring also possibly but i thought spring usually causes just unwanted noises/resonances if not dampened
yeah, this is what i was thinking
its the leaf getting hit by the angled form of the lip
you can understand by watching
the leaf goes in and out briefly when the key is pressed
that makes the noise
and after that
it goes to contact along the lip
in an angled fashion like the linear one next to it
just with a steeper angle after the bump
maybe that makes the ping, but not the tick
i need a lathe to cut one of my switches in half
same but for some people in discord
this would line up with what i observe
just use a table saw
can also be the other contact once the leaf hits it
i can press the switch very slowly and cause the ping, which happens before the actuation
doesnt make sense because the sound isnt the activation point in a keyboard
but the tick doesnt seem to happen until exactly the actuation. and it happens on some linear switches
find any tactile keyboard
get it to "tick"
and after the tick there is a small movement room you can use to activate and unactivate the key
the actuation comes from two metal pieces hitting together
its something hitting stomething thats for sure
listen before commenting
you can still activate and unactivate the switch with zero sound
after the "tick" of the key
because the "tick" is an effect provided by the additional bump like I said 5 times
its unrelated to the activation
yes i know that, but if it would be noise caused by the two contacts meeting each other it would be caused because the leaf has too much tension
if it was that then you could still make an activation sound after getting past the "tick" part of the keyboard
by dropping the key down fast enough
but you cant
the intentional noises are all made by plastics
yes
i can't, but maybe that's the issue with these switches
I am saying intentional noise is unrelated to activation because you can still reactivate the key past the point of the sound
but i have no way of confirming it. maybe it is true and the tick isn't from the leaf contacting, then that maybe means its sticking on the leg slightly as it slides
well its generally not intentional
klaus what switches are you testing on
maybe i'm seeing a different issue
i could theoretically make the leaf more tense and let you know if it does any additional sounds
the simplest way of proving this theory is seeing if you can reactivate the switch after the point of the sound
guys
open up notepad
this is #audio-tech
move to #peripherals lol
no one ever comes here
im here
leave
oh i keep forgetting did he say before actuation?
well then i have no clue
I don't think he did, I am just proposing sound is before activation
because its from plastic contact with lip instead of electronic contact with the metal
that is my proposition
youre right, i just took one of my gateron browns
if i push the switch past the tactile bump, it ticks exactly when it actuates
i can do that repeatedly even after staying beyond the tactile bump
👍
so basically that concludes we are talking about different things
so you are telling me you cant reactivate the contact without the sound?
no
maybe because i am listening very closely
this gateron brown barely ticks at all
it sounds exactly the same though, i think i'm on the right track
yes you may hear a noise when the contacts touch, not arguing that it’s not possible
it’s unintentional
the noise
that noise is what i'm looking at i think. the one that bugs me
it depends on how hard the leaf hits the contact if that’s the case in my theory atleast
are you certain that noise is what you hear when you do a high speed press
or maybe the 3 springs i happened to try all have crunch. i could try a sonja spring
yeah because it happens suddenly even if i move the switch very very slowly
This place needs a priest
i probably look like an idiot because i have my ear directly on top of the brown switch when testing it, since it's decently quiet
i eat the bullets tho
im going to introduce a new way of using those
yeah i cant get this tick to not happen in sync with the actuation
it always does it
we need more scientific measurements
oh now we've gone full circle
issue isnt getting tick not happen in sync with actuation
you are supposed to get actuation
without the tick
thats why it should be in a keyboard instead of your hand listening to it
yeah thats whwat i mean
go throttle the key in notepad
after that
lift off gently until it unactivates
then press it again very fast, see if it makes a noise
if you’re willing you can remove the leaf or bend it out of the way so it doesn’t make contact and see if it still makes the tick
and press it again slowly in another try, see if it makes noise
i think adding like toilet paper infront of the activation material to damped might be the play
or some sponge
idk
toilet paper is thick
weirdly it seems like the tick happens on upstroke too, when i would think it should be pushing them apart
Scrub Daddy
see
told you
its the additional bump
not the contact
realistically speaking lip shouldnt get dropped off from anything to tick if its unpressing
but the sound bump is still present in the depress unlike the lip getting dropped
I am right yet again
uh but small problem i dont think this switch has an additional bump
i am wong yay
kvetinky will be forever remembered as the guy that lost the internet argument
isnt it a brown
look
i was testing 3 switches
i can’t face it help me
oh
when i said that i was talking about my outemu pear
it doesnt have the two bumps though
i love the khali box silent brown, from my knowledge its the quietest tactiles
hammer and belief
you can do them one by one
theres 4 total, 2 on each side, though
it doesnt flex enough for that to work
it probably does ive done it before
i dont trust it
ok
plus its pom instead of PC
false
Why is this still going on
fr
my bp is up
your british parliament
This is audio tech though, not whatever TF this is
it's a sound
bionical psychiatrist
bet like
chatgpt could have answered this
instead of arguing for this long
i really dont think this technology is any form of secret this could have probably been googled
chatgpt cant do anything
bad switch noises
Like I thought we concluded this was stupid earlier
it is a secret somehow
nobody talks about this really because i think usually it isnt audible
Just get the switch you like the feel and sound of tbh
nails work as well
Switch sound is subjective
therein lies the problem because it doesnt exist
Some people like scratching sound even
oh yeah i have some of those hmx sonja scratchy switches
nails
i would really like to see a tactile switch that is linear on its way up
lunch
that sounds like itd be a bit harder to make
yeah but would take my maain grpe away
i would really like to see a tactile switch that shoots you if you discuss about lip delay and which part of the lip makes a tick sound
let me know if you come up with one
they must like the sluggishness when they press a key at an angle, instead of the switch going smoothly it does like 6 steps instead when pressed less than fast
that’s just scratchiness
yeah
the leg not being lubed correctly on that one i think
theyre supposed to be lubed everywhere except the rails
well, i don’t quite get your defition of a tick or ticking sound but ok
high pitched noise
its not a scratch sound
i realize that's what you meant. i shoudlnt have said yeah
yes that’s scratchiness when there is friction
that sonja defect is probably from the leaf sticking as it slides down
that one im pretty certain on
i don’t know of which plastic your switch stem and casing is made out of so
yes there are plastics that can make high pitch noise when friction is applied
a high pitched impulse though? or just a constant scratch sound effect the entire time you push
everytime your switch moves when you actuate it slowly, you know when a bad switch is unlubed and it gets stuck in certain places?
is that where the high pitch sound happens?
that’s scratchiness yeh
yeah i already came to that conclusion
alrigh
yeah im pretty sure klaus is wrong about the other tick though
the leaf definitely isn't perfectly following the leg shape because its too fast
alright, whatever it’s not that important anyways
chances of anything happening:
always bet on nothing
the problem on the silent bluish white is it seems to actuate during the end of the bump,not separately after
does this imply the past
you’re decreasing my confidence even if it’s not true
yor trick has worked on me
many such cases
sadge
i found a source that states you’re wrong
which means your previous statement about you never being wrong is wrong which makes you even more wrong 🤓
(ignore it’s cut out of context)
ive never said that
You edited your message... #audio-tech message
i can see the credibility score falling from 100 to 0 /j
anyways, i gtg have good day/night/inbetween
i’m also sorry if i did sound rude sometimes i can’t find the right word always to express what i mean (in the previous messages)
any ideas why my audio sounds horrible when playing games. headphones to headphone amp to audio interface to pc
only when playng games?
yeah
what headphones etc
@lone flame hey srry i was playing a cod match lol
all good
so i got the AKG k712 pro headphones with a creek obh-21 headphone amp and a focusrite scarlett solo 3rd gen
hm
hey calrification abought the bad audio
yeah
maybe you have a software for games etc installed
like GForce experience or AMD Adrenalin or so
the audio sounds okay in terms of qaulity but the sounds are all over the place like footsteps sound like there coming for me every way
ah
so the sound quality doesnt change
no
the headphone sound the same?
ah
well. EQ can help with that
i have mine eq. i posted it on here and a person said i needed to eq them a bit better he gave me a graph with settings
hm
ill have to try that
to fix that you would need to EQ by ear
yeah i really dont know how to eq i just used a preset offline
i really gotta train these ears
my ears need training
@candid hare make sure your channels aren't flipped. Look up left right channel check or something like that
@sleek lily i will check that out thanks
yeah Klaus was completely wrong about how the mechanical switch bump works
damn
I thought that almost solved my issue
Have a pair of JM Audio headphones coming in Friday. Pretty excited about that
most games audio solutions suck tbh
for 3d imaging at least
Hifiman actual site
limk
It sold out
I got the last one
HIFIMAN Edition X V2 Over Ear Headphone breaks new ground in performance, style and comfort for planar magnetic headphones.
hey does anyone know how to make my earbuds quieter even on the lowest volume?
(other than by throwing them at a wall)
mostly with my iphone 8
even on the lowest volume level on my phone its still quite loud and apple has given me zero way to fix it
and ive tried everything under the sun
(and i have also tried dragging the volume slider to lowest or setting it to 1%, that doesnt work)
Add a resistor in series with the driver
install eq apo and set a negative preamp
oh wait its iphone
rip
simply buy a less sensitive headphone
mb
they are earbuds not headphones
Same idea applies
i dont think i know how to open em up and put a resistor in series with the driver.
is there really nothing i can do?
ifi has a thing
dang
was hoping there was some fix i could do within my phone rather than
get any new hardware
cos i might as well try refund these and get new ones then
appreciate the help though
@warm scarab idk if you still care but I think that gif of the cherry MX brown is like completely wrong
This is a real stem photo from theremingoat
Maybe that explains the confusion
its just a linear stem with a bump in it, the bump makes the tactile
no second bump
this is identical to what I said happens man
weren't you saying there's two bumps, one for tactility and one for actuation?
the divot wasn't the bump
those arent bumps 😭
the wedge isn't the tactile bump, that would be negative
ok
whatever the shape is called
the first shape provides tactility and sound
second is where leaf makes contact
they are seperate from each other
The wedge you highlighted isn't for tactility. Its the entire bump shape
not just where it starts
There isn't even a wedge there, you drew it on
the other one did have a wedge
literally the difference between a tactile switch and a linear one is this shape
the entire bump is the tactility. Not just the inflection point
and I am saying the leaf has a different purpose based on which part of the lip its on
the wedge before the bump is for tactility, the indicator for "the key will be pressed" and the slight strength the switch provides opposing your finger
and after that the leaf glides to the contact area
let me try a different switch
blue is actuation point, yellow is the tactility
that's how a tactile switch works,not the wedge before the bump
arent you both trying to say the same thing
it doesn't seem like Klaus is saying thay
idk but lemme just say this part doesnt add any tactility
To me it looks like Klaus is saying this is the tactility
and that tactile bump is basically instant
it does by making the force drop off so you bottom out the switch instantly
This switch bottoms out as soon as you get over the bump
yeah just like any linear 💀
what switch is it
i mean technically nah
I don't really trust the milktooth stats but those are accurate I believe
that's what the ending half of the bump is for
it's so sharp that you can't press it partially at all
it just instantly moves from like 0.2mm to 3.00
that doesn't come across through numbers easily
yes because that 's the only difference between a tactile and linear switch
put any linear switch and any tactile switch side by side
the entire bump is the difference
the shape of the lip with a small wedge followed by a bump followed by a linear angled edge is what every one of them looks like
the only difference between the switches is the individual sizes of these properties
well I thought this would help you but it doesn't seem to be going anywhere so I guess, nevermind
Does edition x v2 use 3.5mm connectors
the picture looks like it might be 2.5
looks a bit small
yeah i looked at a review
Both connect to the headphones themselves with 2.5mm connectors.
idk about that
Time to buy a $1k cable
Gotta get that resistance down from 0.0001 ohms to 0.00009 ohms 
Yeah that's what I was trying to show
the actuation part just feels linear
makes a lot more sense
actually, this
actuates before going linear
mx brown for example
I think its different on the type r
its hard to see since the housing has no transparency
i think all switches atleast i know of don’t touch the stem once they actuate and then go linear, it would cause unnecessary friction (for mx style)
Hmm maybe
idk how klaus goes from that to "i'm right"
literally the opposite of what bro was saying
Congratulations. You get garbage.
hes not getting my Topping Stack
yay
it is exactly what I described
I am not sure what it is that you got from my descriptions
but what I said was this
got some normalized recordings
Can anyone recommend some audio mixers? Look for 3 input 2 out. Not looking for anything to expensive. Connects would be made via 3.5 mm jack
Ok imma be honest I’m new to this stuff.
What’s the difference exactly?
My goals is to plug in my Xbox, pc, and eventually something else maybe into it, and have it go to one speaker or set of headphones.
its like 3.5 but larger in size
Alright so with that in mind what would be my solution for what I want to do?
go on amazon
write mixer
take into account every 1 input is mono meaning to have left and right channels you'd need 2 inputs per device
and find whatever fits your use case
maybe use ebay or a local 2nd hand website for it
studio mixers can go on very cheap in those
I think I finally figured out why so many people think all audio variables are just some lens of frequency response
Why
I think it's sort of like how some people get overly stuck on thinking they can just use ohms law to solve any circuit. Ohms law always applies, but the variables become more complex. For example, if you know the impedance of an RLC circuit and the voltage, you might want to just apply ohms law to find the current, but because of more complex variables, there is a good chance it won't work.
In short, they see the same variables showing up, so they want to try applying the first thing they learned to everything. The difference is they don't get a grade, so why not just simplify things in your own understanding and try to explain away the inconsistencies.
And tbf, using this method, like in my example, will likely result in a somewhat close answer in some instances. The issue is, there will always be this lingering inconsistency and you end up coming up with complex ways to explain away the inconsistencies that might not even apply.
What are some decent cheap IEMs that are pretty flat?
I just want something to use on the go with some of my old phones turned DAP, just spotify downloads no FLACs or anything
linsoul zero 2
Those look pretty solid
I'm gonna have to get some decent over ear at some point to, and something to drive them lol
tanchjim bunny
truthear gate
7hz zero 2
all sidegrades but truthear gate comes with the best accessories
I'll keep those in mind
I think it's hard to call the zero:2 "flat", they're pretty clearly bassy
pretty linear otherwise though, at least for me with the light blue tips
upper midrange has tuning of the gods
"flat" is subjective
cuz all our ear canals have different frequency responses
that's not a useful thing to even say
if your ear is bassisr then still something less bassy is less bassy
if you move from a headphone with +12db bass to a headphone with +6db bass, it is perceived as bass-weak for a while
why do you guys bother with trying to find the perfect tone
can't you get used to it and listen to something based on techs
But ur ear can also be less bassy
Which will make the less bassy iem more bassy to ur ears
what is bassy
how do you define bassy
if bassy is what you can hear, observe, experience, then bassy is just electrical impulses into your brain
no
but if you experience the world as bassy per a "bassy ear(tm)", then that is your neutral
I'm talking about how sound interacts with ur ear canal cuz iems bypass ur pinna
ok yes
different acoustic impedance and a real pressure system compared to an open ear
however if you listen to an iem that because of your canal is bassier than usual, listening to it for a while will passively make the bass seem quieter
because the brain accepts the iem's delivered sound as the new neutral
we aren't listening to various bands and artists in hardpanned stereo when walking around outside without earbuds
well...
I'm not one to really entertain FR as that important, but peaks and dips (in this case d i p s) that are steep and strong will create severe masking
especially with unresolving stuff. but regardless, techs are secondary to non-halfass frequency response
kinda
information can be destroyed by being too quiet and masked too frequently
With iems it's much simpler, either u get a seal or no seal
Seal = bass
No seal = no bass
Cuz with iems, there are that many options
Headphones, no way
there are so many different sets of techs available in the <$100 area
reviewers are less inclined to try random headphones compared to random iems
if they weren't, nobody would be saying weird things about headphones under $100 being secondary to iems
I don't trust reviewers, I just go to the audio store
The stores I go to let me try whatever I want
So I just try everything
more likely a seal thing
Humans hear Pretty consisten below 3kHz
they said "with iems"
is it ok to ask what the headphone is ?
is that and untilted DF target?
Meze good build
https://github.com/AAFOptimus/AAFFamilyDCHAudio/releases
Does anyone have any experience with these drivers?
merely an approximation of neutral for this rig
I'm sure it's somewhat tilted
just not with a line
what rig?
it is an approximation of neutral for this rig
DF Tilt is Neutral 🗿
for this Rig
bcs this is how the rig hears a speaker in a room
then maybe define what this target is
its not possible to compare or to see something in it if ya don't know the Rigs specs and what the target is exactly
tunical tnh-101 / lyxpro has15 / 512 audio academy all with particular velour pads from ebay
not saying that this target is shit or something.
But generally hard to compare if you dont know firstly what you used and yeah... What this Target is supposed to mean
the actual measurement with this particular FR is with the m50x clone driver damping cups removed, and the backs dremeled out
like if it's a Preferemce target etc
but it's otherwise the same sound-wise
just not in fr
ah your target is how the "modded" m50x measured?
and you compared it to that?
or am im dumb right now at what u mean
red and purple are how the modded m50x clone measured
ah ok ok
green is still the normal neutral approximation for this rig which I shouldn't need to repeat
where did ya get that Target from?
or is it a self made?
it was carefully refined with 11 higher end headphones, various 5128 measurements (df, df-tilt, harman, didn't matter because further compensation later), and calibrated monitors
The missing eyes are kinda wild lol
how are the crinacle 2 compared to tangzu wan'er
I'm also curious in the kz castor pros, the built-in configs seem nice
@elder thistle are there any physics focused audio servers you know of by chance?
In a similar way, I have speakers like 3 feet away from my head (desk setup) so how will i adjust them so im not in a null point
or know if I am in a null point
I don't think any of the "objective" thinking servers I've been in could be considered truly physics focused since they're not following scientific method and making a lot of scientifically ungrounded claims
subjectivist servers are inherently more scientific because of this
Yea, that's the big issue I've seen with audiophile scene "audio science" too
It's basically "I want this to be the case so I'll make this wild assumption which I assume makes it the case"
As opposed to any form of physics based or math based reasoning or experimentation
Honestly, I've noticed this too lol
not that there isn't plenty of potential nonsense in either kind of server
No, I agree 100%
I just wish there was like a direct physics based audio science discord
Like actual engineering mindset discussion and reasoning
I find subjectivism beautiful because someone's experience and ultimately the inner workings of how audio works is stored inside that experience. just that separating out the mechanics from an experience is full of uncertainty or maybe impossible
but it's the proper starting point
whole picture, instead of a frequency response measurement
real ears and brain instead of a mic and pc
Yep, it's ironically a better way to describe things
if I find a server that does things more scientifically and understand the limitations of what they know or can know,
I'll ping you
Thanks, I appreciate it
I bought this oled controller from AliExpress for my display
And idk why it doesn’t work
And there is a chip on the display board
And it is overheating
There is a chance for me to replace that?
Is it just dirty or did the resin literally burn there? It looks a little brown
If it's actually burning the resin I'm guessing there is a short in the chip
You could replace it, but you might need a hot plate and an air soldering station
But also, idk if this is the ideal channel for this lol
I have a lab for that but there is a chance to find that chip?
Because that chip is certainly dead
And that is the only hot thing on the board
Sup, I need a recommendation for gaming headphones.
Prefer wireless but doesn't have to, I prefer popout mic.
My budget is 120$ / 400 NIS (Israel but can order from Amazon)
Mostly for competitive gaming and music 👍🏻
Right now I got the razer kraken pro v2, they were great but starting to die
@green marsh I looked more into oratory's explanation of minimum phase, and I think he might actually be referring more to phase linearity or consistent group delay rather than the strict definition of minimum phase. The idea that something is "within one phase cycle" doesn’t really line up with how minimum phase is typically defined in physics or signal processing. It seems like some concepts might be getting blended together, and even with a generous interpretation, it still doesn’t quite apply to how audio devices behave in practice.
I can't help his reactance definition though.
there is a chance to find the chip, it may come from somewhat sketchy sources but
you'll be able to find it.
maybe
There is a reason why we use Gear instead of humans
Test it with one person and ask him every week once
he will probably tell a different story 😄
ofc blind testing
best way ofc would be to measure your own HRTF etc
maybe contact him and ask him derectly rather than saying "he means something else" like as you know what he means by that
thinking is not knowing.
And not like Jackson etc thats is "physics based" or so...
Why doesn't he has valid Data etc for the public?
i can read hundreds of pages and he has nothing to show.. only "Trust me bro"
But its useless to discuss it here
Could talk against a wall and it would have better responses
He used the wrong definition. The options are he meant another word that better fits that definition or he doesn't know what he's talking about. On reactance, I legitimately think he doesn't, but on this, I just think he used the wrong definition and confused the definition of some different words with different mathematical meanings.
or you don't know what he is talking about
There is? I took measurements demonstrating that things of linear frequency response dont share a identical behaviors and took measurements demonstrating devices to not be linear in efficiency or step/gain relation. These are also things that exist in the engineering space and aren't just new measurements I came up with and nobody else ever has, they're just ignored in audio circles for some reason.
Again, the word has a definition that has nothing to do with what he said. If what he said has nothing to do with the definition then he either doesn't know what minimum phase means, or he confused it with another definition l. I'm leaning on simple confusion occurring here.
again... Ask him directly what he meanst by that...
I don't have him added. I'm just giving what he likely meant instead.
trying to "correct" someone if you dont know what he menat is imo pretty uhhh
It's not a correction... They just used the wrong definition, but there are other words that definition better fits.
The word he was trying to define it doesn't remotely fit.
maybe there is an exact reason why he used THAT term?
It's like if someone described height lbs. It's fair to assume they meant mass.
Either they meant mass in that example or they don't know what height is.
Same applies here
You just don't know what he meant by that
It's completely fair to point this out.
Except I do. His definition simply means "is within 360° of the original signal". Minimum phase systems can be any distance in degrees off from the original signal. That's just not a variable. The variables involved is if the relation is a non complex relation, and if the signal leads it can't be minimum phase.
Like I said, his definition better fits phase linearity or constant group delay.
ask him not me... i haven't wrote his text 😭
That's likely where he got confused
you cannot know if you don't know what he meant
You keep assuming these things don't have physics based understandings or these words just can't be defined and nobody can know anything. Just stop doing that. It's annoying.
If you don't understand something that's fine, but don't assume off of that that that it's not an understood concept.
It's like some odd reverse circular reasoning.
I give up... The simple “You can't know what the author meant because you didn't talk to him about it” doesn't seem to work. Believe what you want. Apparently you're Oratory because you know what he means...
you guys and your arguments
This is how science work 🗿
impossible
espacially in stuff where research isn't that far 
there's probably research but it hasn't reached the internet
maybe ye
It's not that research is behind, it's just the hobby space is behind for some reason.
like.
"The world is 20-50 years in the future already, but the tech has not reached the public"
The things I describe aren't new concepts, they're just not understood in hobbyist audio science circles.
maybe you're behind for some reasons 😄
In what? Everything I described are understood concepts and definitions. Physics kinda is physics.
There aren't special physics for a hobby that are separate from universal physics
maybe.
All i want to tell you is.
You don't know what a Autor means in his book, if you haven't spoke a single word with him
Again, the definition he used is wrong. There isn't an interpretation where it isn't wrong.
I'm simply giving an explanation as to what he likely meant instead

He has a physics degree so I'm going to wager he got confused rather than he had no clue what any of these words mean.
Or he meant something where it fits. But you cannot know if you havent talked with him about it
thats so simple
but u dont understand
Like the example I gave earlier. If someone described height in lbs, they either meant mass, or they don't know what height is.
Yes, like the alternate explanations I gave as to what he likely meant instead of minimum phase...
if somebody described mass in lbs i would call them an american
"It's raining cats and dogs."
ever heard of it?
it has a meaning.
the actual written stuff means something completly else
it has a different meaning.
that could be the case with Oratory's stuff
a meaning you didn't got
Minimum phase is a mathematical and physics based term. It's not an analogy...
If someone doesnt knew that
"It's raining cats and dogs."
means "heavy rain". They would think its actually raining cats and dogs
Maybe you didn't understand what he wrote. And that's why you think the term is wrong. So, for the hundredth time... Ask him what he meant.
what's so hard about that?
ask him.
He could explain.
Maybe he notices that he fcked up
but you cannot really know what he meant
BECAUSE!
Maybe he means what he wrote, that the term fits. But you didn't get it. Because you can't always read the author and what he meant by something.
it's just that simple.
And bcs of that. You ask the authot what he meant.
after that you can be 100% sure
that's why i always ask for a rephrase or example if i haven't understood something if someone tells me something
bcs. dafuq i know sometimes what people mean 
im not them, how should i
Not enough time to get rephrasings from all the people wrong on the internet
Explain the contradiction or correct it, and move on.
thing is...
idk what his point is.
I have read his text.
Also the definition.
And everything is alright xD
like. The definition is exactly what Oratory said
So was this quote fake?
It just doesn't match what the word means at all. I think it's just cause he confused a couple different definitions.
Looks real to me @lone flame
And that definition has real bad vibes from the little I know about audio and signal processing, and doesn't look like any other definition I can find
In control theory and signal processing, a linear, time-invariant system is said to be minimum-phase if the system and its inverse are causal and stable.
The most general causal LTI transfer function can be uniquely factored into a series of an all-pass and a minimum phase system. The system function is then the product of the two parts, and in ...
Oratory explained it in one sentence xD
This being true doesn't make the other definition true
I think I kinda get what he means here tho
The purest form of minimum phase digital BS has the absolute peak from the sound impulse appear before any other peaks in the sound
He absolutely said it wrong tho if this is what he means
thats what i say...
"if"
he can be wrong. like. i don't mind that.
But thinking you know what he means if you havent spoke with him and asked him is just wrong
bcs what IF he means something else?
My understanding is that all of digital audio works on the principle that the sound chain is all a minimum phase system
And that this works fine as far as what file format we need
But nothing in the real world is a perfect anything, so in practice there are things you can tweak without affecting impulse response
What do you think about that
Then he can write that or edit his post or just be wrong on the internet
There's a lot of analog/hardware parts of the chain that are linear, the only often minimum phase part is eq
Is that what people are talking about with things beinf "linear time invariant" systems
when you say linear
No
Linear phase is only referring to systems that mess with stuff
Eg eq or reverb
An lti system means that there's no change like my digital mixer with all effects off
But if I enable eq, its not lti, but its either linear or minimum phase (almost certainly minimum)
a linear time invariant system just doesn't change over time.
there's normally 3 rules you follow, the first being additivity, wherein you have input x₁(t) gives output y₁(t). You also have the homogeneity, where if input x(t) gives output y(t), then ax(t) gives ay(t) for any constant a. This kind of thing rules out stuff like distortion, compression, basically anything where the input isn't directly proportional to the output.
We also have the time-invariant part, where the following must be true: if input x(t) gives output y(t), then input x(t-t₀) must always give the output y(t-t₀) for any shift t₀. Basically, doesn't really matter when you input the signal; it will always behave the same way.
these things determine if the system is LTI.
audio gear is commonly modeled as LTI.
So I have a budget of $200 and need a pair of headphones I have the soundcore life q30 right now but I broke the frame so want to upgrade from them and for earphones I have the Sony wf-c500 so ideally I want something better than both of them
If possible they should be wireless and also have an option to be plugged into and if possible when plugged in I want the inbuilt mic to work as with my sound cores they don’t
what are these speakers? they have this sticker that proclaims a model number and everything but I can't find absolutely anything on the internet about them
Sup, I need a recommendation for gaming headphones.
Prefer wireless but doesn't have to, I prefer popout mic.
My budget is 120$ / 400 NIS (Israel but can order from Amazon)
Mostly for competitive gaming and music 👍🏻
Right now I got the razer kraken pro v2, they were great but starting to die
I do need them to be able to use as wired too, without a dongle (I don't care even going non-wireless)
hifiman fucked up and sent me an edition xs instead of an edition x v2
its still nice, but im gonna return it. I either want an edition x v1, v2, or arya
i bought some qkz ak3s and some kz edx pros i cant wait to see which gives me a better experience(one will be a gift)
@stuck bolt rate
Ooooo
also got 2 12" subs