#audio-tech
1 messages · Page 155 of 1
i dont know what chip is in it
There's dozens of em, all are perfectly fine
it may be fine
but why do you want a brick when i gave you something that is a seamless wire
i def don't want a brick lol
It's 250$ iems so i don't mind spending more if I get more out of it. But yeah its ugly, but I'd build an enclosure for it and mount it next to my other audio jack
I can't claim whether there will be improvements or not
but people typically say iems dont scale much with audio gear since they are so incredibly easy to drive
if you really feel like it go get the 100$ ifi stuff see if you hear a difference after volume matching
but id put my money into it being a waste rather than a useful feature if you ask me
you can always return it if you dislike it
ill try it out. Thanks for the info ^^
np
for 20 usd as for dac i would look at jcally jm20 max
you won’t use microphone through the dac right?
nope!
I saw the JM20 max in some reviews but can't easily source it apparently. Not on amazon and 40$ on aliexpress + whatever the tarriff is X.X,
hear alot of reports the jcally dac do have static noise problem with sensitive iems
I'm just gunna end up order a ton of different dongle dacs and see which one doesn't hiss
i don’t think random cheap dacs without specified chips are going to have less issues than the jm20 max
heard some units of jm6 pro having hiss but i don’t think the jm20 /max has had such issue and widespread (atleast from what i can find)
if you have that sensitive iems i would advise agaisnt buying no spec dacs
using a microphone trough a DAC wont work lol 🙂 you need an ADC for that
yes
i’m asking because some people use in-cable mics
still would require an adc , technically you can even use your headphone speaker as a mic if you plug them in to the adc :D, but yes i understand what you meant now, you meant DAC as "Audio Interface"
where i read it as Digital Analog Converter (wich is what DAC stands for , and audio interface was often named "standalone DAC"before they came with mic and line in's
oh i bought ones with specified chips based on the discussion here. JM20 max isn't readily available though
Either gotta order through aliexpress or ebay which its about 62$ not including tariffs
my iems are extremely high in senstivity, i think, its like a value of 130
Manufacturers were not helpful lol. They didn't even recommend their own product 
would order the apple one but I'm meh about it
alr guys I really can't go over 100$. Idk if yall understand but it's way too expensive. (1$ is 300 times in here 😭🙏🏼)
I've found these headphones
Fiio JT1 - 62$
Phillips Shp9600 - 65$
Hifiman He400se Stealth -80$
what do u think? I only want over ear headphones. I use a focusrite solo 4th gen
mhm
Hey guys quick question for gaming which is better surround sound or headphones
Guys?
headphones are gonna be a lot less work at the very least
idk about the surround sound gaming experience tbh
headphones mean you don't need to figure out room geometry though
400se is nice but im skeptical if you can drive it to a degree where you are happy with it without an amplifier
id definitely recommend it over even without an amp ofer shp9600
as for jt1 I don't really know about it
if you enjoy bass a lot 400se may lack rumble which you can kind of fix with EQ but im not sure how much of an EQ headroom you will have without an amplifier
It's nice. I value both my basic studio headphones and my basic 5.1. The experiences are just....different?
5.1 on windows is a right pain though. Not only does it want to go back into stereo mode randomly (multiple computers). Most audio is 2.0 audio. I never felt it played nicely and had to set it to 2.0. And then shift back for games and other content
saying most audio is 2.0 is an understatement
closer to 99.9%
aside from movies I don't think there is any other media that regularly uses any form of surround
its just regular audio with an fx filter in most cases
headphones dont support 5.1
you can apply "surround" to any headphone with software you can find on the internet, every surround headphone has two drivers in total, there is nothing surround about them aside from the software they have in them
you can pray game audio has a 5.1 setting but its basically a 50-50
the game 5.1 is unrelated to headphone 5.1 anyways
completely different two things that dont overlap
one is a glorified fx filter that adds group delay
other is a legitimate output to 6 audio channels
lmao fair and true lol.
I don't think he was talking about the fake 5.1 headphones though. Total waste for gaming. I've tried it and ive never had amazing results
some of them do look like this , wich makes me wonder 🙂
anyways it's just marketing, important is how and when sound gets into your ears, not how many drivers or marketing nonesense there is for headphones
yeah and it sounds even worse than fake 5.1
there aren't any real 5.1 headphones
because no headphones come with a dedicated subwoofer
there are like maybe 10 headphones ever made with more than 2 drivers
because it just sounds bad
only surround headphones you could count are like the razer taimat which really stretches the meaning of surround
Oh I thought they meant actual surround sound speaker system
didnt sound like the type of question that would come from someone ready to drop like 700$ on a decent surround setup
what about the non stealth "bilateral" he400se
Bought these new bois
Reviews did not disappoint.
Satisfied with the audio quality and very satisfied by the noise cancelling
you can safely stop wondering because they're gimmicky and ultimately a bad design choice
it just winds up overcomplicating things and doesnt really do what they claim it does while making the headphone sound worse.
Guys, my subs finally arrived, but they got a little damaged in shipping
I'll have to redesign the cabinet to hide that defect
😕
hehe, maybe they are the ones capable of making speech audible in modern cinema without havving a gunchot jump you out of your skin :d
They're not.
They're gonna make the problem even worse.
its just the same thing but with phasing issues
its really not a solution to anything
i actually recently saw a convincing reason being explained , that claimed it was actually mastered to be that way by the movie studio's and thus intentional
so i basicly tougth maybe if they crap up the actual 5.1 maybe they accidently fix that 😄
actually one more reason to not use netflix and buy the blue ray of a movie, they usually have a seperate track for the voice audio , so you can switch in different languages but that also means you can boost that track seperatly in kodi 🙂
the first pic looks like the driver’s surround is not straight due to the frame being bent
i doubt it has positive effect on the sound
i would contact the seller
either for a replacement or compensation
for the true 5.1 experience mount speakers on a frame and put that on your head!
in theory, yes.
but in reality, the only people buying headphones like this are the ones who really dont know much about audio and are enticed by marketing and more = better.
there have only been a few serious attempts to do something like this in a legitimate capacity, and they've flopped because they've been too niche and too expensive.
you're better off using a virtual surround sound like dolby atmos which do almost the exact same thing but better and cheaper.
having multiple headphone drivers in the same enclosure doing different things is more trouble than its worth. the benefits of "ear shape interaction" are still not considering the shape of your head, torso, and room you're in.
its an idea that makes sense on paper but after a reality check has time and time again proven to actually be a terrible idea. mostly because it turns out to be exceedingly expensive with low benefits compared to cheaper alternatives (such as software).
this glorified fx filter you speak of creates very similar results at the eardrum as true 5.1 into 6 speakers
this is why accurate position in 3d space via 7.1 rendering down to stereo is both possible and very effective
stereo is 7.1 with the right information

why 
hehe i got a stereo amp 136W and speakers 2x (2x 8" +horn) for my pc speaker setup 🙂
so not that into surround 🙂
wel i wont say not intrested , i kind of am in the sense that your earsare basicly a stereo mic that can do 3d sound so technically we should be able to map the shape of your ear and recreate a prefect 3d representation using earbuds or stereo headphones 🙂
That's called binaural audio recordings, I wouldn't call that perfect 3D representation, since you'd at least need the recording to be made with your specific ears in mind and I don't see any reason why the current tech would be "perfect", but it sure is great ... but rare @granite drum
Help me to pick from one of these pls.
I found the Philips X2HR Fidelio for 120$ and the Hifiman he400se Stealth for 83$
I use a focusrite solo 4h gen.
Need headphone only for casual music listening.
im forming a collection
i advise collecting it in a recycling bin
wdym?
thats not called binaural .... what i mean is literally theoretically it should be possible to make a virtual replica of your ear and map how that shape transforms the audio signals in order to get a perfect 3d sound as your actual ear does,... (since you have only two, and yet you have 3d hearing)
Thanks to this. i ended up with Cx31993/ Max97220 chipset (jm6 pro was faster to ship lol). It works perfectly
Even linsouls own iem dac had crackle/hiss.
Thanks for the advice
and i don't even want it at max volume. My head hurts from testing 
👍
Why just why
Wait
Wrong reply
Why are you trying to form a collection of low quality audio devices?
Yes and this is how binaural audio typically is done already
They either have a model head and ear replica or just go inside the ears of a person recordinf
Recapped my Klipsch KG-2s
Night and day difference
Lol, I wouldnt have bought these if they were "low quality" and after tunning them they beat just about every speaker for the price 😂
The mirtune s100 beats the charge 5 after tunning, that s87 destroys the jbl xtream 4
and then the s95 (the big one) easily matches with the harmon kardon go + play 3 with a lower bass response
I bought these speakers for their potential. im not spending 500$ for basic tunning (thats often mediocre at best) when I can tune it my self for free
the issue with your rationale
the amount of money you spent on portable speakers
you could've just gotten yk
also your tuning is probably just lots of bass
and you're not getting good bass out of portable speakers
definitely nothing usable below 50hz
I dunno about the other models, but my XB23 is real heavy on the bass out of the box, and not the good bass
Yea not that good, it's a louder speaker that's portable, thats about it for me
Dont have money for both
so I end up with this
?
incorrect
yes sub bass is boosted like 30hz (the mid to large ones I have do audible 27hz -35hz sub bass) but not to silly high levels..
do you actually understand what I mean by tunning
if it helps my preferred sound signature is nuetral highs past 100hz but with deep bass 20-40hz boosted but not too much
Yea I have spent about 400$ at this point, but it took almost more than half a year to get this much
Yea, you have no idea 
even the the charge 5 sized mirtune s100 I have produces audible 35hz bass in a corner
actually let me find a recording for you
How could you be so confident with that statement bruv
listen well with headphones
~32hz+ is audible with my phone mics
set up is a little old
I now have the s100 hooked up as center channel via aux
audible != good
because you're trying to use drivers that physically cannot cleanly replicate such low frequencies at high amplitudes
we concluded earlier windows audio res thing was the issue
oh wait
you might be right, it only clips with lower bass
anyway to fix that tho
love to watch movies without that happening every 30 seconds when rumbling happens
you're running drivers no more than 2-3" in diameter
trying to get bass at a listenable loudness
where most people would look for 6-8" woofers
no the big speaker has dual 50watt 4.5inch full range drivers
- another 8-10" sub
small one is dual 3inch 30watts tho
you're also so limited by the amount of space inside the cabinet
you're running up against sound buffeting by the time you hit probably 70db
their bass performance is primarily in the 30-40hz range. The passive radiator tunning is like 30hz from my testing
no, thats the actual audio popping
Nothing much needs be said here other than holly sh*t.... Its nice to see they left the DSP some headroom for fun driver flexing such as this lmfao (THE SPEAKER DOESNT DO THIS WITHOUT AN EQ SO RELAX)
Song:
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=PZzP2tO30sI
Camera:
Galaxy S21+
4k30fps Pro mode for Exposure edit and shutter speed effect
...
what you're talking about would actually sound like this
passive radiator can't be tuned without adding or removing weight
added weight = lower bass
but at the cost of less amplitude
they were already tunned ay 30hz
you see them going unstable here because of that
at some point I wonder why people don't test bass with a tone generator
I did a video with that to
Audible Bass down to 25hz
(27hz and above are pretty loud in a corner)
Driver movment down to 1hz
Resonance Frequency: 29hz
Camera:
S21+ 4k 60fps
Media player:
Dell Latitude e5470
I7 6820HQ
16gb ram
128gb + 258gb SSDs
…
whats amplitude
heres a vid of the smaller speaker doing decent ~35hz bass
Song:
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=MFDQPhGmjKs
Zealot S87 bass test
The speaker is often on sale for 70-90$ on temu or amazon. This speaker mainly competes with a JBL xtream 3. It has better low ends but doesnt exactly sound "better" than the jbl xtream 3 at stock EQ. When tweaked with power amp EQ it easily beats the xtream 3 in sound for...
brothas
should I get the cloud 3 wireless?
I got a very mixed reviews over at reddit
I found one at a very decent price in the used market
volume level
ahh ok
I need new wireless earbuds since I lost my oneplus buds pro 3 charging case any recommendations? I was thinking about getting the CMF Buds 2 Plus's since they have a big battery and good sound quality
ZMF bokeh
Hey, I wanna buy new headset and deciding between hyperx cloud 3 (74€ on sale) and logitech g pro x (99,90€). Does someone have any experience with one of those? Thanks for any advice.
+1 to oneodio monitor 80s for ease of disassembly, straight forward screws
i lubed them so they creek less
You are also not getting good bass from that you know
Looking for some everyday bluetooth ear buds, willing to spend around $150
I would like noise cancelation if possible
You're getting by far a flatter, cleaner bass down to 40hz, even if you're lacking subbass
if your standard of good bass is just more bass, then sure you could say that
you are getting very good bass from it lol
this is complete cap btw
unless you are speaking for bluetooth speakers exclusively
the jbl 305p would absolutely smash that system
linear bass down to 50hz region
no eq
good bass extension
I don't hear any 30-40hz audio in this clip
don't believe the bass extension of any speaker in a video without hearing the fundamental
you can tune a passive radiator to 30hz and get nothing back but thd
I was into this with the doss soundbox xl
think I got it to around 55hz meaningfully
you need to hear the bass on jbl's like this
I thought the adam t5v's had solid, impactful bass until I heard it on the 306p mk2's
the t5v's already make car audio and big bt speaker bass seem pretty bad
@elder thistle this one?
This video is for fun, no actuall bass
This is my video and speaker btw..
They resonate at 30hz out of the box, no modification needed
Doss is trash
Ok the soundboard xl in particular is alright but you can get a mirtune s100 for the same price and it's bass response is primarily ~45hz
Flatter comes from tunning.
And I want bass down to 28hz, these monitors are weak for my standards
And they take too much space
I'll pick up a pair of phantom reactors later instead
Those easily do 17hz bass
And they are 1/2-1/3 the size of some desktop monitors
Mediocre
Just 50hz 
It's not.. I just did it 
@warm scarab
Wtf phone do you have
S21plus
On mine anything below like 90hz is dead

Huh and I thought my mics were mid
Mine are tuned by AKG
They aren't as perfect as a binaural mic tho
I misread mic as speaker
Imma need to aquire that soon
Lmao
That makes everything so much more sense
I was takkign aboutnmy phone speakera
My phone mics do have subbass
Ahh ok
Imagine the amount of excursion a phone speaker would have to make to produc audible 30hz bass😭
Im sure this can be calculated
what is excursion
The more surface area a speaker has, the less excursion needed
refers to the distance the speaker cone moves back and forth from its resting position as it produces sound.
God bless circle to search
mediocre said the guy using different bluetooth speakers to imitate a competent audio system
beating good quality studio speakers is a clip of your speakers producing some lows?
Used a L and R splitter to separate and creat separate eqs for both
wow the science has regressed
yes the bare minimum for using a L/R different system
They arnt different from this set up they would both sound neutral after my tunning but the speakers you mentioned have a worst bass response
They dont have a worse bass response
There us no chance in hell your speakers are linear to 50hz
They primarily do 35hz
Producing 50hz and producing 50hz down to a linear level are different tasks
And that only does 50hz💀
Actually what do you mean by linear level
So flat bass response
Ill have to show a screen shot of my spectral anylzer (I just reset my phone bc one ui 7 was a micro stuttery mess)
I advise not talking shit about 305p in that case because you are talking wack about anything but the bass depth atm
Mics are still tunned by akg so they're decent enough
Ill take a lower bass response over anything athts flat and only does down to 50hz...
There is no conceiveable way you got an uneven speaker system with phone mic eq to sound anything as good as a 305p system
Because you've never heard anything that does good mids, highs and treble
this statement is an evidence of what your standards not the quality of your speakers
I'd take 80hz bass cutoff if it meant the rest of the spectrum is that much better
But why
Songs with lower bass are so anticlimactic
Because there are elements to music that isn't bass
Elements you cant hear with a bidirectional bluetooth speaker pairing
Its a matter of what music you listen to then
so your speakers going off of phone analysis?
really good chance they dont have anything over 17khz
I hear up to 21khz
your phone mic measures 21khz?
Yes above what I can hear even
S21 plus
Its a bit of a mess but its what it takes to make this sound good
I advise going into an actual demo room once in your life and settings standards as to what a good system sounds honestly
I tunned some soundcore q35s
Nuetral to my ears, thats my standard
If what you've heard in your life is bad quality speakers how can you comment on anything beyond that grade
rib
yes
you can clog the port of a 5" speaker to make it extend further
at least when aided with eq
Bro
Did you NOT see the perametric filters
Well why didnt you say so 
Because you dont want to do 20db of eq
thats something detrimental to audio quality and a good pair of speakers is supposed to avoid doing that
and in the graph I sent you can see that the bass goes down by 15dB to 20hz
the 305p is not the first speaker I'd grab if we're looking for mega eq though. they don't have that powerful of an amp
The whole point is I can tune them instead..
You cant beat physical limitations of your drivers with eq
you can assist them
Flat bass response but has a bunch of random peaks
the amplitude of this graph is times less than your eq graph on apo
consult the numbers on the left not the shape
its all contained within a 3dB parameter
Dude.... the only physical limitation is producing more lowe bass...
What ever are you talking about
eq just means the tiny driver is more stressed by pressure issues, excursion, inconsistent magnetic field
Thay isnt what tunning is
Omg
if you abuse your drivers with eq you are distorting other frequencies
correct, and that's why your bt speakers aren't going to get you that quality even with eq
20dB is well exceeding the fucking limits
Thats the very opposite of what I mean by tunning...
20db eq is increasing the volume by like 8 times of what your driver is capable of by default
Clueless
thats your amplifier gain
your speaker driver gain is different than your amp chips gain
Incorrect
wait I have an image for this
what
Not exceeding the peak limit means no distortion
one is literally a mechanical constraint
You heard the video right
adding 20db worth of bass is well enough to distort any system
as much as possible with a phone mic
and my phone speakers
Exceeding the limits would sound like this
Use headphones
in some way yes
Welp until then rest the speculation lol
where we dont use bluetooth speakers
Oh nice
wacky
Its wired..
Doesnt really matter, it pretty much always comes down to basic tunning
it really doesnt
the drivers and how they are set up compared to regular studio speakers is completely different
how what driver produces which frequency and its directionality
how it phases, the crossover
completely different
odds are it produces the same tone in various difficulties creating severe phasing issues in your end
Forgot you need more drivers for better sound stage
You havnt had a listen yet*
it has several drivers pointing at different directions to be audible to several people
Because thats what bluetooth speakers are for
No.....
hence creating phasing issues because the speakers backfires
meant your other speaker
And no cross over
Smaller one is dual 30watt drivers 3inch and two 10watt tweaters
No cross over
it has multiple drivers with no crossover?
do you know what a speaker crossover does
Yes
Both drivers playing the same frequency
the tweeters receive 20hz signals?
This can easily be tested by simply holding down the low mid range driver
Or disconnecting it
Which I have done to all
Even the cheapest of Bluetooth speakers dont have cross over
The jbl boombox 3 is a 2.1 set up
No cross over
that's unfortunate
And a lot of boombox style speakers have been using the sme 2.1 driver set up
Yea
so the crossover is different :^)
Testest with spectrum anylzer
did you skip the inline capacitor
No ofc not 20hz
so there is a crossover?
that is a crossover
yes
Why do I need to bother with any of that
are you familiar with the properties of capacitors
Yea
then you know why you need to bother with that when assessing crossovers
You dont
For testing to make sure the drivers arnt divided in frequency range?
No
||he was not familiar with the properties of capacitors||
You can just... not have the other drivers hooked up
a capacitor in series is a highpass component of a crossover
decoration drivers
and a capacitor in parallel is lowpass
You really havnt touched a decent bluetooth speaker have you
Sigh I GUESS ill take apart one of mine just to make a simple basic point😭
I literally receive education from a studio
and somehow clueless about bt speakers
I dont think a bt speaker would increase my standards as to what good speakers are
anyways I buy speakers to listen to music
same
Im not interested in studio level stuff
As long as it can sound neutral with deep bass and sound stage im good
I dont like overly boosted bass either, I just wanna be able to hear every bass frequency
I don't think you have any of these things
Not the point
I do
My set up does as low as 28hz
does
Primarily does 30-40hz bass
Yea did I miss something
Guess being educated on studio grade stuff isnt the same as being educated on audio engineering. shouldn't be hard to believe that mid size speakers can produce pretty low bass..
with 20db eq*
And what does this mean to you again
I am receiving audio engineering lessons yes
Bc its just an eq to make the speaker produce the desired audio
means you have harmonic distortion
lol
yeah
Yall funny
thats how sure of the fact I am
😬
you are making your speaker driver moves several times the distance it was designed to move and telling me it works with no problems
LMFAO
Omg
Ok so
how do you think speakers drivers produce amplitude
Let me say it again
you were right
If that were happening it would sound and look like this..
many such cases
this isnt a binary case
Drivers dont sound good when being pushed to their physical limits
that is guy taking the piss
It is
Its the same speaker
Lmao
Unless you meant something else
your speakers dont need to be actively destroying themselves in order to be mechanically limiting
this isnt how it works
the first video with very quiet actual music is more convincing that some 35-40hz ish tones exists with non-70% thd
maybe more like 50% thd
Whats thd
Man "audiophiles" always think they know what every speaker sounds like with out actually hearing it
Its hilarious
I got my thd in theoretical physics
Lmao
This is 29hz
Driver pushed to its physical limits for content
it's composite noise from a speaker nearly shaking itself to death
not sure you can call that a tone anymore
Its 29hz noise
And not actual 29hz bass

it's quiet already
it will be better yes
Ill just use a 29hz low pass filter, and adjust to levels that dont sound like noise
I would set it at 45hz
It doesnt bottom out at 45hz tho...
it's not working well enough for anything below that, not that it really seems to work well in the first place
Mainly the lower frequencies
Yea.. just needs tunning
Just some bass frequency sweep testing and applying filters and its fix
if you use eq to remove frequencies the driver can't reasonably produce, maybe
20db boost is not that
why do you guys keep talking about the 20db boost
The actual peak gain is below 0 lmao
Thats only there for dynamic adjustments
same thing
at least for tonality
another thing is these modern bt speakers are not giving unaltered signals to the drivers
there's crossovers applied to each pair of wires, and there's usually a big dynamic bass eq already being applied by the speaker
Friendly reminder that you dont actually have these speakers.
What would this sound like
Unaltered signals
no, but I'm somewhat familiar with bt speaker design
with 3" drivers you'd probably see the bass end around 80hz
maybe 70 if lucky
Its not that simple
provided proper enclosure
Wattage and the drivers range of motion
Also the amp or dsp dictates how low the driver is allowed to go
A driver not ment to play 30hz for example can still play 30hz, it will probably just break it self when doint so
there are theilie-small parameters for different 3" drivers as is the case with any driver
you've got a rather average enclosure size from the looks of that speaker
This here
Doing roughly ~32hz bass well with in its limits as you can see
Ok its close to its limit but not enough to be an issue
basically how its supposed to be
The higher end kind of distorts with lower bass tho, which is why if you wanna do sub bass you mostly need a dedicated woofer.
same way i don't need to shoot someone with a gun to know what happens
you are right correct analogy is closer to shooting myself in the head

well spotted
so here is the limits.
this is at what, 10-20cm?
so the volume penalty for the bass here as per standard ways of classifying sound as well as listening to it, is very high
this penalty applies more to the sub than it does to the midbass, due to dispersion patterns
second, you have almost 200% 3rd harmonic distortion
you aren't producing this frequency
in reality this will be more towards 400% if not worse
man invents 10th harmonic distortion
Ok NOW im familiar with harmonic distortion, infact I already know what it sounds like. Video I showed was just a bad example
This one is bettwr
Only hear Harmonic distortion when it tries playing 28hz
32hz and above is clean
Yea this video was a bad exmaple
If you listen to this video tho, there's only h distortion when it tries to do 28hz, which is easy to fix its simply playing it too loud
Are you blind bro
You see it right there in the graph

It IS doing 30hz but with noise
The video is a bad example but I still fixed that with some filters
That speaker was actually maxed out for fun, really shouldnt have used that as an example... Woops!
Very funny
im not joking
did he not use a spectrum anylzer on my video?
He should be able to feed the raw sound and measure that
he would be counting on your phone mic
Right..
I re installed the app. As you can see my mics pick up above 21khz
is that a sine wave from your speaker
No
Just the ambient noise in my room
Its too late a night for me to test anything out loud
As in you wouldn't be able to hear it?
its at -100db unless the slider actually moves thats just the software configuration for recording range
Its showing whatever the mix picks up tho
Those values arnt correct
I dont think
i know
I mean the whole measurement is in the negatives which I dont think is right
but unless the 21khz actually reacts to 21khz being played
Ohh one sec
thats just how the mic drivers are set up
impressive for a phone mic
Supposed to be tunned by akg
run a sine wave up to 21khz next
Ye imma do 23khz and see what happens
Here
A lot of this tone gens dont go too high
was played on this speaker
Has 20w race track driver and a 10w tweater
Its 31hz off
That difference is much smaller at lower frequencies thankfully
Oh like a sweap?
Too late at night, ill have to do that later
my little speakers can hit 35hz too!
all I did was sample audio from the video and put it in the FFT so
ah
bro the wires taped to the wall lmao
premium cable management
that is the intergalactic usb extension cable that goes across the ceiling and to my workbench
some mild conversation huh?
it's been a long time since the last mildly motivated conversation I stumbled into here.
and power cable
lens fungus anybody?
I probably gonna take them out for some cleaning service tbh
Hey, does anyone have experience with JBL earphones? Im looking at Vibe Buds 2 and Tune Beam 2 and wondering if any of them has an edge over the other in any form
Ok I played 35hz through my football shapped speaker there does seem to be harmonic distortion but it doesnt sound bad?
a question about eq , can't you eq any headset to make it sound like how you want? , what other factors are there outside of the frequency response that affects how headphones sounds?
when reviewers review headphones do they take into account the most neutral eq possible?
You would have trouble EQing the frequencies that the drivers struggle with
You can't really just EQ low end into these for example
Almost never
Only people ive seen do that is oluv but his channel got taken down lmao
Yes, usually you just need to find something that already sounds decent and it should easily be capable of sounding neutral with a parametric eq
Yea you wanna get a pair with good tunning potential
Otherwise you into physical limitations
The soundcore q35s have Ldac and have excellent tunning potential
I tunned mine by ear, they sound pretty neutral
But im probably gonna need actual equipment in order to make them truly nuetral
but how do i figure out that it has tunning potential
i was just about to buy a jbl 720bt
the eq curve and reviews seem to show that it has less bass compared to other headphones
i was thinking i can just make up for it with eq
not sure if that would work
now
Mostly determined by bass and how good it sounds out of the box
It might work, you have to test it out
the weird thing is i barely find any information or reviews on the headset
what ever reviews i find are very mixed
my only hope its on the same level as my last headphones which were the hypr x cloud 2
or better
frequency response
I cant find any frequency charts of the 720bt
this is the only place i found a response chart on
a reddit user said he personally measured it
other reviews said the headphones lack bass , so it lines up with that
Doesnt look hard to fix
Ooo shit
☠️
Ohh the dotted line is the target
can i fix the bass
or should i look for a better headset
I would look for a better headset
Also find one that can use LDAC codec
AAC can have compression artifacts in the treble
Whats you're budget
prices in my region differ alot
i can send some headsets that are around that price range
Try th3 soundcore q35s
way over budget
70% more expensive than the jbls
This is what my eq looks like for the q35s
Yikes
What currency is it
sar
saudi riyals
my budget is 200 sar
the jbls were 170
53 bucks
1MORE sonoflow pro
also over budget , price varies alot between region like i said ☠️
Damm it
some headphoens are stupidly expensive here
and alot of the headsets in that range are wireless only which is a no go for me
after further reviews of my options
ill just amp up the bass with eq
Hopefully its not physically limited
hopefully
is buying dt 770pro a good idea? i got the 250 ohm and i already have a nice amp
idc abt music, i just play
if u have hearing loss, ye
otherwise it will give you tinnitus
no one?
bad products in their price category
i would pay mayeb 30 euros at most for those
just use ALAC instead , should work almost on anything that can play AAC aswell and it uses the mp4 or m4a container to :), and its about 50% of the size of the PCM 🙂
can be encoded with refalac or qaac/qaac64 encoders normally
I have NEVER seen a ALAC supported headphone or iem in my LIFE
ow it must be bluetooth headphones ... yeah thats like complaining you cant find a good CRT-Tv that can do 4K over yagi antenna ... 😄
for anything decent in terms of bandwith bluetoot basicly needs line of sight , at that point your prolly bettero of just using wifi ones , wich can do lossless anyway ...
like thes but these can also only do 10meters...
flatter comes from tuning - cabinet design and driver is part of tuning
just because you got a passive radiator with mass that resonates at a certain low frequency doesn't mean you got good bass down to 28hz
in fact if I had to guess, you probably got bass extension down to 50hz then an empty crater until that 28hz you claim to have
I'm only guessing because I've never used those specific speakers before
but my guess comes from the fact I've researched this topic and clearly you haven't, if you think DSP is able to account for all speaker deficiencies
the fuck are you talking about, LDAC is a bluetooth codec. One of the highest quality ones at at that. Not a digital audio format
watching you two try to have a discussion when you can't even figure out what you're discussing about is freaking hilarious, though
nexgen is in a mood today
No I've been at this bluetooth speaker shill for a couple days now
it's like gen alpha brainrot is settling into every channel now
skibidy
lmao
It's so bad too when I realized I couldn't understand anything kids were saying
I didnt say the 28hz was good. It was just audible
Now that makes sense
Good greif im not claiming anything. Just stating the facts of what I heard from my system and after testing
without any measurements its hard to say for certain. but with enough DSP, most speakers are capable of producing 28hz or lower.
Its pretty quiet but its better than nothing, and if I raise it, it just creates harmonic distortion
its not a high standard for a speaker to be able to play sub-bass
the hard part is doing it loudly and without distorting.
dsp isnt limited on these speakers like the others
🤨
Most of them cut bass past 50 or 40hz
i think you're confusing DSP for something else?
Am I? I thought thats what controlls the frequency response especially to stop distortion
DSP is literally just a fancier version of EQ
Digital distortion anyway
digital signal processing
I was right then
you can use it to stop distortion, usually through a limiter.
but thats at high volumes
how
at low volumes the limiter should be irrelevent and you can use it to get a tiny shitty speaker to measure ruler flat down to sub-bass
and thats what im talking about
Dsp is just an eq... you adjust and fine tune it to remove distortion
i know what dps is
I mean they mostly left the lower end untouched
im asking what makes your speakers unlimited about dsp
They dont limit the lower end
im also asking what the fuck unlimited dsp means
I guess I just worded it incorrectly
what speaker is this again
which speakers do this
Nothing much needs be said here other than holly sh*t.... Its nice to see they left the DSP some headroom for fun driver flexing such as this lmfao (THE SPEAKER DOESNT DO THIS WITHOUT AN EQ SO RELAX)
Song:
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=PZzP2tO30sI
Camera:
Galaxy S21+
4k30fps Pro mode for Exposure edit and shutter speed effect
...
See how they allowed it to just striaght up max the shit out of the drivers, they usually have it drop off so this doesnt happen
Its good headroom for tunning tho so I like it
im gonna be real. i think you're making assumptions without any real evidence
Ive tested it multiple times and spent hours doinf frequency sweeps and trying to tune by ear
every single modern bluetooth speaker has these limiters and DSP in place because if you dont its gonna sound like ass or kill itself when you play it loudly
tune by ear is the problem.
I just reset my phone so ill have to go dig for my hard drive to find the old measurements I have from my phone
no
there is approximately
zero speakers that do this
This one specifically
zero shot
you have wired your speaker to your computer, put in a bass emphasis filter
gave it whatever number
and the speaker attempted to produce it
there is no factor in this that your speaker plays a part in, you could do this with anything
In this video it was maxed out for fun
what i am saying is completely unrelated to the video
Oh
No
what makes you think you couldnt take any other item that produces sound and do what you did to these speakers to them instead
Tunned it to were it produces the lower bass without distortion and sound good to my ears
that is what bass emphasis means yes
Most them limit how low they can go with DSP.. I cant just edit dsp so If I just cranked a 30hz it would just be straight up distortion and the driver wouldnt actually move at 30hz
name one speaker that limits dsp
All of the name brands
name one name of them
JBL flip 5
Xtream 4
no that doesnt do it either
none of these speakers have any control over what your computer tells them to do
they dont have drivers they have bluetooth receivers
Im talking about dsp where they limited the lower bass
and you know this because you looked at engineering schematics of the speakers?
Yea thats what im talking a out, the amp dsp or whatever can be a limiting factor.
From my own findings
I don't understand what amp dsp means
amplifier is an analogue processing chip
and dsp is digital sound processing
these things arent related
They limit how low the driver goes with dsp
because they literally cannot move at a frequency lower than that
(Xtream 4)
the driver physically cannot do movements that wide
No because of the dsp
because it has tiny drivers that can't actually extend to 53hz at a reasonable volume, they roll off at 100hz and require resonances (including that passive radiator) to reach anything resembling low bass
You can literally turn on debbug mode on a xtream 4 and the drivers will start maxing them selvs out at 30hz...
Bc u turn off dsp when doing so
why would they use dsp to limit bass instead of increasing it like people demand it
and was this test wired
Bc the drivers cant actually produce the lower end without distortion from the drivers themselves
odds are you are just messing with the codec bandwidth
its usually the other way around.
the drivers, without DSP, will roll off at like 100hz. the DSP makes it so that they can extend down to 53 hz.
its like giving a twelve year old steroids.
the drivers inside these speakers are usually quite small.
Also forgot about power
did you do this test wired
Yes
JBL Xtreme 4 has a Low Frequency Mode "LFM" built into its DAC portion (USB and Bluetooth) that protects the drivers from super bassy music
if i had to guess i'd say these are maybe 4-5" drivers. unit is 9.5" tall.
my UE boom has something similar but its "outdoor mode" which lets is play a few DB louder
Learn how to turn on Low Frequency Mode (LFM) on your JBL Xtreme 4 with our easy-to-follow guide. Follow these simple steps to activate LFM and enhance the bass performance of your speaker.
#jblxtreme4 #jblxtreme #jblspeaker
If this video tutorial for the JBL Xtreme 4 portable speaker wasn't clear enough and you still have questions, please le...
by debug mode
do you mean this
it's exactly that
"debug"
You guys gave this a listen right. Only harmonic distortion at 28hz since I didnt actually tune for this volume yet but 32hz+ sounds pretty clean
Yes
it's apparently so techs can diagnose driver issues
this is just a feature on the speaker
The jbl kids call it LFM mode
And was disabled with a firmware update bc people keep breaking their speaker with dsp off
so
the reason this exists isnt because it has distortion like you claimed
but that it instead destroys the speaker
ok
I rest my case lmao
The lfm mode?
Or dsp
what I hear here is a HUGE peak at somewhere around 40hz and another at 55
but the rest is mssing
both of these
Mics only pick up down to 32hz
what mic
S21 plus
phone mic
The dsp is tune the speaker.. removes the distortion
does it remove distortion or prevent it from getting cooked?
this is conflicting info
My entire point was the speakers I bought doesnt have a very limiting DSP for the lower end so it allows me to tune it myself
Only harmonic distortion at 28hz
there will always be harmonic distortion.
I know its just very audible at 28hz
Should've clarified
I'll acknowledge that companies limit dsp to prevent their items from being destroyed because of your case but this is in no way a market statement
majority of speakers are just items that have an amplifier and an input
Just hearing noise from the drivers rubber suspension bc it doesnt have range of motion to actually do 28hz at this volume
like its just hard to argue with you because you're just using these terms incorrectly.
these dont have any form of dsp or technology inside them to read and alter how an audio signal is
Yea sorry😅
so this odd circumstance only fits into bluetooth speakers so far
and to a very specific few
and according to what you have said
without these measures the speakers destroy themselves
so they dont have it due to less THD its there so the speakers dont break
Mhm
I think JBL and all the more premium brands do it for that reason but everyone else is cheap and doesnt care as much
if they are cheap why are they putting extra technology into an item
a DSP board dac/amp is cheaper than a passive crossover, klaus.
They just use the dsp to remove digital distortion
They didnt really tune it
Welp I wanted a bt speaker so
Exactly and they did nothing but reduce the volume of the frequencies below ~25hz so it doesnt distort digitally like the actual audio being fed to the drivers
also digital distortion isnt something that typically happens at all
unless something is straight up malfunctioning
and if it does odds are dsp wont save it
fym did nothing the reason everyone says it sounds worse even if bass is increased is because JBL did add upper frequency filters into the DSP to account for the relatively tiny cabinet and drivers
digital distortion is being used incorrectly here too
Idk what else to use here
Should have said "for lack of a better term"
time to boost my speakers by 500dB
i dont think the amp is gonna be the limiting factor here
No like this
https://youtu.be/vs4HmE1MUHI?si=CtaSNSJRvttucpxd
Zeolot s67 bass test
Maximum Volume. And 60% test
Sounds like absolute shit at Max. (60% and below for best sound quality if you want 100% with little distortion use an EQ to turn the bass all the way down)
However I guess its alright for 60$ and if all you care for is that JBL LFM level of driver and passive radiator flex I guess its a good d...
oh i forgot the unclipping filter silly me
this isnt digital clipping
After I raise the the vol there is actual just striaght up distortion (dont know a better term)
probably the drivers
i mean
this is your frequency response right there
ig it could be clipping but i wouldnt count on it
idk what's going on but it really doesn't sound good
No
Look at it lmao its not even flexing that much
Its the actual audio thats fed to the drivers
its really hard to say what it is because
- you dont have any measurement equipment to show us what is happening
- you seem to not know whats going on and are using terms incorrectly
the driver dustcap is like
i dunc are anymore
Thats.. literally just the shutter speed effect

I got myself an Anker motion 300 for when I go kayaking and I'm a happy man
i'd put that on shutter effect
but if klaus is concerned it might be a slutter effect
Thats the shutter speed or probly from lack of frame rate
shutter effect distortion
The PR isnt actually moving sideways like that
Song:
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=MFDQPhGmjKs
Zealot S87 bass test
The speaker is often on sale for 70-90$ on temu or amazon. This speaker mainly competes with a JBL xtream 3. It has better low ends but doesnt exactly sound "better" than the jbl xtream 3 at stock EQ. When tweaked with power amp EQ it easily beats the xtream 3 in sound for...
Yea
yes that is not good
The PRs themselves arnt making any abnormal sound thats audible tho
Thats actual amplifier in its entirety sounds like shit
if your speaker driver physically has to move like 4cm to produce an appropriate amplitute and sound shit while doing so
The woofer isnt really being pushed its actual physical limits, the audio being fed to it is whats actually distorting and idk a better term for that
its probably not the amplifier
then you could just use it wired and it should bypass the limits of the dac
No
That didnt work
ok so it isnt digital clipping
here we go
thats either the amplifier clipping or the driver's phyiscal limits
Digital clipping, but I said Digital distortion? Is that really the same thing?
you interchange these terms based on a whim I don't remember which we were talking about
As you can see even in semi slow motion thanks to the shutter speed effect, it is not physical limitations
but regardless if it happens when wired its not digital
True that
if you can see the driver going at a 50 degree angle sideways due to shutter effect
this is proof enough the driver is doing poorly
No that angle comes from the SPE
Look at my s95 video
You will see the suspension actually flexing too much
And slightly wrinkle being pushed it its physical limits
I presumed you used the same rig with same settings for all of these videos
No
alright then that is valid
I Tested this
Lower bass doesnt sound bad at all
The harmonic distortion peak is much lower than the intended frequency
I Just did this earlier today
for context
Talking about these speakers not being able to actually go below 50hz at all
decent speakers have like a 10% THD ratio at maximum volume
your drivers don't, your passive radiator does
and around 0.3% THD when not doing that
Can I see what that looks like
Well the drivers have to move for the passive radiators
I mean like a screenshot of playing one sub bass frequency on a grapj
yeah I don't have a video of it
you don't have a clue how they work do you...
or a screenshot of it

THD is measured at 1khz typically
but thats relevant on systems that dont usually have 20dB eq on bass
This was on my phone btw
Usinf this EQ
that's almost like saying your car can go 250km/h because you were going on a super steep incline with lots of wind behind you, but your engine itself could only have pushed it to 180 on flat ground
very big difference, very big performance gap
sure your car may be going 250 but that doesn't mean your car can go 250
Before you think this is jist random mumbo jumbo
no that looks like an EQ alright
I actually listen for peaks and adjust the slider to find them then turn it down
