#audio-tech
1 messages · Page 20 of 1
they sound thin sure
nah
they sound very thin like you described
still a debatable upgrade from the k361
focal elegia is conpins worst nightmare
massive boost at 2khz
if crinacles graph is accurate anyway
the honk on that headphone is genuinely irritating
it doesn’t match anyone else’s or i’m just not reading it right
crin has an elegia graph?
that wouldn't be surprising
I don't see one
it’s not a curve graph
yeah me neither
oh weird
Is that mom?
My dream headphone would be he6 tho
definitely not an upgrade over k361
he6 is not impressive tonally. so it won't look particularly good on a graph
Bright neutral is what most of my favourites are categorised as on crin’s
maybe your abnormally small ear canal gives you a massive bass boost
I don't really agree with crins loose definition of neutral
because there’s so little area to fill up
Nothing abnormal about ear holes small enough to not need eartips
I think only a select few headphones that can genuinely be called and sound neutral
how do you define neutral
Sounding the way it would irl
Metallic sounds metallic, warm sounds warm, etc
maybe not
that’s not possible really
see this is why headphones are bad
Give me proper violin, flute, harp, etc
sounding the way it would irl to me is just naturalness/organicness/good timbre. sounding true to the recording on the other hand is neutral
is it even possible to get true to the recording with headphones
I actually do want to just learn instruments, just because you can’t get more natural sounding instruments than actually playing them
its never going to sound like flat speakers
inb4 you discover room acoustics
but a pair of hd600s will definitely get closer to that then dt770s
Just don’t have a room
silly con pin we already decided your room will be a white box devoid of furniture with 15hz 85db ambience
No
what I take issue in crins case is he seems to be okay with categorizing headphones as bright neutral for example, with large 5 dB variations at key points in the frequency response that tend to really alter how a headphone sounds and gives it a characteristic artificially. such as 1-3k.
My room would be underground, airconditioning down to 10’C
And with bottles of olive oil to drink
large 5db variations you say
klaus praises headphones all the time that have +-5db roller coaster treble
I’ll take the headphones will slight bass roll off and basic hifiman 1.5khz dip
when i played around with the hifiman dip it just seemed like they were trying to artificially boost stereo separation and soundstage by reducing the forwardness of the vocal
it felt like when i filled in the dip the center stage was a lot more obvious
yeah for example I could be wrong but didn't he give Ananda "bright-neutral"? or was it arya? either case is definitely wrong imo
bright neutral is like
hd560s
God I hate ananda
it's a genuinely awful headphone
doesn’t 560s have the most bass of any sennheiser open back
sundara is awful generally
have you heard edition XS?
ananda I like
potentially?
Hd6x0 has to much bass
actually it's probably he1
i mean it has a tiny roll off but
nope
very noticeably measures more bass than 600/6xx/8xx headphones
oh i was curious because ananda and xs measure similarly
so i wondered if you disliked those too, because they’re so popular
i want more real non youtuber opinions on them
He1000se
Well, I would call it more like cold sounding
Fridge headphones
I would buy literal headworn fridge
dt770
Zoomer-neutral
Sounds like diabetic’s favourite headphone
gets praise but, obviously because of that, I have my doubts. Ananda is genuinely one of the biggest Ls in audio.
finally someone agrees
it’s impossible for me to believe that two headphones that are built the exact same and measure almost identically will sound radically different
Hd820 is the bigger L
i don’t think tiny driver variations and micro detail differences are going to transform a headphone
klaus does though
Arya is a mixed bag headphone that should be less than half the price. Ananda carries over none of the benefits of its big brother and is exacerbates its flaws in almost every conceivable way
driver technology absolutely changes sound regardless of tonality
you can unfuck a headphone with not good tonality with good technicalities
type of dude to say that source chain makes a larger difference than 5db frequency response spikes
upgrade ur ears
Ear hole enlargement surgery
what you said entails that a measurement rig is a good representation of human hearing
which they aren't
no i’m talking about sound in a void
Between the legs
shut up
No
regardless frequency response spikes are frequency response spikes
they make a larger difference than source chain
i’m not talking about whether you like the way they sound at all
purely how noticeable it is
no human is going to notice a peak of 5dB in a 50hz range in the 10khz region
100-300hz wide bands with 5db spikes are more noticeable
than a source chain change which can’t even be measured
yeah you can notice that
the data suggests otherwise. I do agree that driver tech (probably) can have an impact. nothing suggests that headphones are just tonality and nothing else. but there is data that suggests that tonality is essentially crucial to the subjective perception of high fidelity
but 100-300hz doesn't often have a peaks
high fidelity sure
tonality does help with that
it could be a 200hz wide spike at 2000-2200
but neutrality or fidelity aren't what defines technicalities of a headphone
Ksc75 has the proper amount of sub bass at least
no om not saying it helps with that, I'm saying that headphones that don't adhere to a preference curve are seen as less technical, less hifi
depends on the region michael
if its a 300hz range spike in 15k
you wont notice it easily
i never complain about those though
sure, since hifi means closeness to the original
i complain when $1600-5000 headphones have roller coaster response from like 1.5-8k
and $160 headphones don’t
How about hd820 FR
it’s ridiculous
it wasn't strictly defined in the study
hifi = high fidelity
if these drivers are so good why are they incapable of being tuned
fidelity = faithfulness to the original
or is it intentionally bad
you have not heard the mentioned headphones yourself
sure but that's pedantic
that’s why i asked if it’s intentionally bad
while I don't think they are a good headphone in its price range
overall it is a good headphone
maybe it sounds good
it does
difficulty in tuning
not every driver will be easy to tune as the next one
Best FR
yet they can manage to tune sundara
they work with different drivers michael
bringing up the etymology of the word doesn't necessarily help you understand how and why people use it now
the drivers used in ananda/xs/arya are shit then
if they’re incapable of having reasonable tuning
Now let’s try sundara closed
but the budget ones and susvara ones are
I don't really know what you are arguing about, tonality ofc makes a headphone good
I just said you can in theory unfuck a headphone with technicalities alone
which is what the entirety of stax community is based on
headphones with bad tuning that have good technicalities
Old hifiman better, bring back he6
michael stop observing data and listen to shit for yourself
i just don’t think it’s a lack of technology that leads us to be unable to measure these “technicalities”
it isn't helping you
They aren’t headphones tho, according to them
go to a hifi shop
ask them for anandas or whatever
listen for a few minutes
we literally objectively do not have the technology to faithfully recreate what the human ear hears on a numerical basis
the closest one would probably be in new york city 6 hours away
your objective data is as good as none
essentially what I'm saying is hifi isn't defined in the study. it was entirely left up to the listeners subjective interpretation of what is good sound quality, high fidelity and they found that the worsethe adherence the worse the results
right
look it either produces the sound or it doesn’t man
that is a valid definition
there will be variances in sound stage and imaging and how fast the driver is
but i don’t think that technicalities are as deep as you think they are after a certain point
issue is, we can't determine how each of those factors individually correlate into the end sound
not with technology
it’s not like expensive headphones magically reveal detail that midrange ones will never be able to
they have other properties that might make it feel that way
its not like there is a formula to better mids
no matter how many 0s and 1s you have
at the end of the day its a human that will listen to it
not a measuremenet rig
you do not need a headphone with a 2dB deviation from harman to be good
look at all hifi headphones
That very nice positive logic I often see being used in RNG memes, “everything is a 50% chance, either it happens or it doesn’t”
save for susvara they are mostly roller coasters
yet people love them
because they sound pleasing in a different way than neutral
saying it’s observed by humans therefore subjective opinions are all that matters in an argument about objectivity is silly
if you truly believed that then you’d never be able to call any headphones tuning bad
to say objectivity matters would first entail we have technology to:
have a measurement faithful to a human's ears
have an objectively correct way to determine technicalities
have a formula to what good sound is
none of which we do have
if technicalities and enjoyment are all that matters then plenty of people love dt770
we cannot take 50 measurements of technicalities, run it through a program and get a rating from 1-100 that tells us how good it sounds
because that's fucking impossible
even if it isn't, it is currently
Just say it as “something can be objectively bad, but not objectively perfect”
Something can easily measure like shit
just use room eq on monitors and forget about headphones entirely because they’re a fools hobby full of psychoacoustics
there are headphones that measure almost perfect period
like the newest of dan clarks
what was it called I forgot the name
if objective neutrality was what we valued golden who listened to it would absolutely love it
Dan clark ain’t exactly loved by all, but they measure very well ig
if it was what we wanted then topping e10 would be the endgame dac for all
or yet an apple dongle
a90d+d90se is affordable endgame
Dan clark hate be like “over dampened”
it is and you can't formulate pyschology
its not like perfect sound stimulates our brains
we live in a world of untreated rooms and foreign sounds continuously interfering with one another and making sound imperfect
we don't get our brains stimulated from perfect sound
we stimulate it from imperfect sound
audiophiles raving over listening to micro details that neither the artist or his engineer ever thought about
why the fuck should I care about what a dumbass monkey on a mixing desk thinks
I want to listen to music the way I like it
because he’s the actually talented one
who
the person who made the song
cares
whomever you may listen to
you obsess over micro details that can’t be measured and nobody who makes music cares about
the person who mastered your track listened to it on a dt770 at best
he is the last person who cares about what you hear
90% of artists don't even listen to the finalized products of the songs they made
here we go again calling that tuning bad right after saying there’s no such thing as bad tuning
Most use m50x, 990 or 770 at least
because all that matters is what you like
it literally is
so how can any headphone be bad
you are listening for yourself not for scientific data
nor for your what your measurement gear thinks to be good
there are parameters that what 99% of humans think are good
it’s only acceptable if expensive headphones have unusual tuning apparently
who said that
I’ve only really noticed it with purely electronic stuff
if a budget headphone slight differs from neutral or harman neutral it’s bad to klaus
but if it’s $1600 it’s an intentional choice that’s overshadowed by its superior technicalities
when you make a 5k headphone you have the leeway of coping in with technicalities to your shitty tuning
when you make a 100$ headphone you can't afford good driver tech
you over estimate how much it costs to reach the point of diminishing returns
it is diminishing returns sure
listen to shit for yourself
stop reading what amir posts on asr
i just heard the artist fart
your headphones deviated 2dB from the harman sorry that isn't what he intended
correct your listening
not wrong unironically
the odds are he mixed it on a 32ohm dt770 or some shit
anything that differs from the source in a noticeable degree can’t be considered objective listening
just like you can’t judge the way a movie looks on an inaccurate display
and there’s degrees to how inaccurate color can be before it’s noticeable
then it is only a single headphone in the world that is objective listening
one headphone
one amplifier
hilariously enough a big part of the reasons I feel like TOTLs are a bust is because they tend to hone in on one aspect at the severe detriment of others to "wow" people at events
speakers are based
sure
but I can't cope with speakers banging in an apartment
so I cope with headphones
Speakers are ew
they’re a cope to have portability and privacy, and yes some (a lot of) people prefer using headphones
but they’re still cope
they’re also a cope to not have to deal with room acoustics
they’re valid but they’re inferior tools
At least it doesn’t cost like 500k to get a high end headphone system
based on the points you made regarding headphones being perfect
If we count housing cost and crap to get speakers maxed out
if you value objectivity so greatly you are obligated to hate speakers
but you don't
because you aren't a measurement rig
I think headphone marketers have tapped into an untold truth in audio which is, sounding good is not supposed to be showy or impressive. it's actually kinda boring, because it's supposed to sound normal.
i’ve thought about that a lot terror
so hilariously enough a lot of audiophile headphones that really shine are priced middle of the pack
What I want is pleasant sound tho
a lot of people and even i myself sometimes like when people have very warm sparkly spoken word/ voice over
but it sounds absolutely nothing like their irl voice
yeah but that ought to be left up to the mix, should it not?
yeah i don’t care that people do it, i do it too
i just acknowledge that it’s extremely unnatural
most people aren’t looking for realistic video or audio in their media
luckily for you though normal sounding can actually be more exciting than artificial sounding in a lot of cases
that's true
For me, mostly just acoustic instruments
Don’t like electronic at all
what I mean is that while normal is unexciting in the sense that it's expected. it's exciting in the sense that it can be more visceral, raw. instead of limp and synthetic
limp is a term i’ve never been able to grasp
because it doesn’t seem like you mean how fast driver is
or how it handles a bass shelf
limp to me just means incapable of accentuating peaks
planars struggle with this a lot more than dynamics in my experience bit it's not a perfect rule
Sounds like something nsfw
he400se bass
he400se doesn’t sound limp at all
for your standards maybe
Dynamics shit themselves on bass imo
if you mean the presence of it i agree
I honestly think that's a myth. planars also shit themselves on bass in the same ways and in other ways too.
it’s pretty hard to make something have objectively bad bass
a properly built subwoofer can play at 10% distortion
if you think spl means bass quality then yeah
no i mean by boosting it
I would call it “can’t handle bass frequencies and just starts shitting all over itself trying to reproduce it”
and not having audible distortion
our ears technical ability in the bass region is very little
that's definitely a problem with bad dynamics more than it is with bad planars
@dry stratus
but bad planars have the opposite issue
where they feel completely incapable of accentuating peaks at all
I prefer planar bass by a lot
i prefer thinner faster rumbly bass
i don’t like thick warm bass
it gives me a headache
I’ll take the bass on an he1k or arya over basically all dynamics
depends on the dynamic
but that’s mostly down to what frequencies are emphasized
headphone rumble is actually more common in slower headphones I find. there's a middle ground at the end of the day
yeah i’m probably not able to discern these differences you’re talking about
what makes or breaks bass is what frequencies are boosted to me
if 120-200hz is boosted a lot it’ll annoy me
some planars can rumble pretty fucking good. but none of them rumble as good as a foster driver aside from maybe lcd4
if 20-60hz is boosted a lot i don’t think that it impacts clarity at all
To me is if it sounds like bass it is bad
because it’s outside of the vocal range
yeah those are safe frequencies. I like a tiny bit of bleed personally. adds a small bit of character I dont find offensive
woops wrong reply
.
depends
it will if it’s an outrageously huge boost
if the headphone can actually do 20-60hz without it disrupting the other parts of the frequency spectrum then sure
which most low end headphones can't do
but you can easily throw 10db at it and it just makes the rumble of the beat louder because there aren’t any instruments or vocal information down there
yeah nothing is safe if ur doing +20db
tonally yes but like
headphones can't just do a +10dB 20hz movement
stop and then do a 20khz movement
another win for in ear monitors
I don't like iems
generally neither do i
iem bass is absolutely stinky too
the bass on iems sounds a lot more like speakers+sub than headphones do to me
iem bass is like
headphones always sound unnaturally flat and lacking in bass
never heard a headphone that sounds anything remotely like any speakers i’ve used
they always sound like they’re missing 20db of subbass
there's something about shoving sound in ur ear canal that just fucks with the feeling of "tactility" as well as more obviously, air movement on your skin(rumble)
oddly enough i find that i feel more subbass texture with iems
it’s like headphones barely move air at all
neither compete with a sub though obviously
rumble = nausea
headphones sound like they’re desperately trying to puff air towards my ears whereas iems are sealed
it could be that i have a weird head shape because i’ve never had a headphone that sits on my head well and seals around my ears
i constantly adjust them
opposite issue of me
if ur weak 
i always have to choose either having them dangle off the bottom or have an air gap up top
no amount of cup swivel or pad angle helps me, the only thing that does is really strong clamping force with thick pads
yeah I mean that would 1000% ruin it
have you tried audezes Michael, I do not think it's physically possible to not seal those unless you have a hole in ur face lol
I have no idea how audezes sound, even tho I've heard multiple...
and they have to have a lot of headband extension too because i have a big melon
they never sounded the same
my dad is 6’, i’m 5’9, and the headphones that he uses with the headband completely compressed i have to fully extend
interesting how different people can be even when related
lcd4s will crush your skull, and then blow your head off
and also make you go bankrupt
you won't have to worry where the treble or your money is because you'll be dead
were they aiming for linear response intentionally
not trying to give it ear gain
i wonder if i could find a headphone that lets you adjust the clamp force
an actual headphone
they look nice
They have to cost at least a mil to be good -someone
(klaus)
i own other tangzu iems and like them
i also own 7hz salnotes which measure similarly to those wan’rer
i think those will most likely be good
When i livestream a game or anything in twitch or youtube using OBS studio.
I tried to hear my livestream audio in different devices(varies mobiles/TV/laptops/speakers/earbuds/headphones)
I am getting different type of volume range sound .
How to decide what volume range is best for major audience?
I am confused
Just out of curiousity, for those with infinite budget what do performance end game headphones of various flavours cost? I specify performance just to differentiate it from headphones that might cost thousands due to luxury brand status or rarity, since I doubt the answer is "sort by price, highest options are best".
@molten lotus
-30 to -20 is a good range for your game volume and -18 to -12 for your voice
unless you want the game to be the same volume as your voice, that’s up to you, just try to keep any noises from entering the red
I usually keep game sound between green to yellow.
It bumps up to yellow only at intense scenes.
👍
I am not using mic so i disabled mic.
Although i have a cheap mic(3$) and tried Rtx voice with it
I am not satisfied with it's mic.
I need to buy some cheap bluetooth mic 🤔.
Any suggestions?
Thanks for the info i downloaded the images
But is RTX voice better than OBS noise suppression+noise gate?
i don’t know of any bluetooth microphones
Wt about noise suppression+noise gate is better than RTX voice?
i’ve never used rtx voice but generally the stronger the noise suppression is the more unnatural it sounds
this hobby is very subjective and there’s good options at every price range
most of the “affordable” end game headphones are in the $600-2000 range, but there’s many great headphones for $600 or less
there’s also headphones that are highly praised that cost $6000-20,000 but those are out of the range of almost everyone
Yeah this is more out of idle curiosity than anything to inspire a purchasing decision. The vast majority of sources tend to consider price/performance (which is obviously sensible in reality), but I find it interesting to look at what exists in the world for maximum raw performance in various categories. I grant this category is particularly subjective so there might be people who would still choose 600$ headphones even if they could have any pair they wanted for free, but theres probably some objective sense stuff that makes the best of the best better than the mid range in a similar way that midrange (or even budget) is better than random gaming headsets.
there is objectivity in audio gear but the point of diminishing returns with it in terms of cost is quite low
and then there’s a whole world of subjective enjoyment and comfort
if you only care about objectivity you can buy a sennheiser hd560s for $160 and a budget headphone amp and you’re done, but there’s a ton of room to grow from that beyond objective frequency response measurements
There's quite a few people that spend all their focus on the hd600's and it's many variants, and then see what source gear works best for it. So they have $300 headphones and then thousands in tube amps, dacs, pre-amps, power supplies, etc.
There's also people that only look at vintage stuff that, at some point, was top of the line. And they do things that are very interesting and different compared to modern stuff.
it is very difficult to say since subjectivity is a big part in the hobby, but if I had to answer
it would probably be sennheiser he1, warwick aperio and susvaras
Utopia and the raal stuff probably aswell
cursed
Which?
Michaels afraid of low impedance headphones
The one with foam pads with holes or no pads?
both
Why?
they look cursed
What about it tho
everything about it looks the exact opposite of ergonomic
Buy one
Look weird
that’s exactly what i imagined someone who owned them would look like
Like a jobless mid 20s guy?
a nerd
Same thing
i can’t prove you wrong because you’re right
thin rectangle glasses don’t look good on anyone
depends on the person
is this a good mic?
yah
Day 2 of goxlr on fb marketplace and kijiji with no messages
I would say it sometimes can, but it usually is worn by people like the above who have no idea how to do their hair
we just found the one person on the planet that doesn't think the huge round frames are ugly as shit.
Go get yourself some military tortoise shell glasses and enjoy the birth control effect.
Just get aviators, and look like a douche bag instantly
them good old mirrored sunglasses with the mirrors on the inside
found the guy who wears thin rectangle glasses
I don't know man. but usually it's nothing eq can't solve. you have to be aware of what you're buying with audezes though. because unit variance is through the roof
but they will seal. a cheap alternative is the audeze lcd2.2 which is still pretty decent.
same deal though, unit variance, needs eq
A good audeze is very good, a bad audeze is dogshit
And the RNG is worse than a gacha game
Hi, is Rode Wireless go 2 worth it or you recommend something else?
I already have a studio XLR mic but I need a wireless for new ideas I'ma do.
It's $200 here single mic and receiver
The CA1A are actually super comfy
The raal and the 5-6k$ warwick seem like such amazing value
Which sounds weird, because a normal human would consider 300 already “high end”
The CA-1A is tbh, though the issue is you need a stupid amp to power them. They're the most power hungry headphones I know of that are commercially available I think.
The SR1B not so much. It's cool and definitely does some very interesting stuff but it's NOT an all rounder in the slightest and would never recommend anyone get them as their only headphone
With how cheap the headphones are, you can easily find an amp and still call it cheap for the performance probs
Compared to stuff such as utopia, susvara, and other summit fi stuff ofc
he6se
HE6SE is nowhere near as hard to drive
also HE6SE and OG HE6 are very different
He6se shouldn’t be called he6
Og He6 too good in comparison
he6se is more insensitive than he6
and ca 1a measure around 93dB/mW
But yeah, Susvara for example is about 63 Ohms and 77dB/mW (actual spec, listed spec is incorrect)
So for 110dB coverage you need 2W clean power
Raal SR1B via Ti1B is 32 Ohm and 62dB/mW so for 110dB coverage you need 63W 😛
I was using amirs measurements
according to them ca 1a is 93dBmW
and he6se needs 1300mw for 94dB
CA1A is on its way back to me atm so can't check right now
But yeah SR1B are crazy hard to drive
CA1A is more reasonable but can't remember how much
I think the only other headphone close to it is Modhouse tungsten but the final version of that should be easier to drive
sr1b is pretty unreasonable yeah
Wrong channel?
Oh sorry
Just a question, no worries
better be
Klaus being evil
What is modhouse tungsten?
How to know they aren’t actually experts:
Just your average person can easily see 120-165 vs 60
Some 240 vs 165
Any further and basically no one tho
do you think this is a trustworthy aliexpress seller for iems?
Upcoming planar from Ryan/Modhouse
It's REALLY good, but the current iteration is 180 ohm and 73dB/mW 😛
speaker amp time
does anyone know how to make my pc a karaoke setup, (i want to hear my voice realtime while i play a youtube karaoke vid and have one of those cool hall sound effects)\
that's so low
any price estimation?
day 3 of no messages for goxlr mini on fb and kijiji
I think 2k with possible 1500 earlybird deal but it's not final. Driver is still going through revisions.
Atm he's trying to get slightly thicker gold traces to address the 'you need 30dB of gain to run them' issue.
He has a silver version which is not too tricky to drive but it doesn't sound as good
damn. i'm kinda interested but not 2k interested tbh
Any idea what kind of sound signature it has?, warm, bright, etc?
that is very surprising
i’ll take your word for it
Custom Art steps into the tribrid IEM space with its new FIBAE 5 that uses a unique implementation of DD/BA/planar magnetic drivers to put forth an exciting and engaging sound. It provides plenty of bass without sounding one-note and also good treble energy without being overly fatiguing either to be a unicorn set worthy of learning more about!
😛
my headset like 28ohms but go loud as F
but I noticed the sound blaster z soundcard dose come with a lil extra gain you can't control
I know next to nothing about speakers but do you need any additional software to make them perform at their best or do they just plug n play?
Technically yes realistically no.
if you have something like a measurement mic you can benefit from room eq
but apart from that its subjective
generally people are fond of boosting sub bass and such, while you don't need it to make speakers enjoyable, you might find such tunings more fun
Hey guys so I got new JBL tune 760NC headphones, and they are great! but at the max volume I can hear some tearing or something, it just has too much bass or something. Is that normal?
like something blowing hard or something
I can't quite describe it
Might be clipping. Are you using any EQ?
Known good ones should be plug n play
Oh you left
how much would u rate the airpod pro 1 compared to some HiFi audio devices?
any cheap wired headphone recommendations my hyperx cloud 2 have started showing heavy wear damage on em
preferably without a built in mic
if it has a mic preferably be able to take it off
i do have a hyperx cloud 2 wireless but they last a very short time which annoys me
cloud 2 but wired
i have cloud 2 wired atm
akg k361
what about usb headphones
That’s called buy a cheap af dongle
usb headphones are bad and fragile
as in the usb itself or the headphones
headphones mainly
cuz ive smashed my headphones mutliple times and theyre still to this day completely fine after 5-6yrs of using htem
they have the fragility and space occupation of a bluetooth headphone
Usb headphone just means they built the crappy amp/dac into the headset itself
but without the wireless part
I swear USB headphones are my least favorite
I mean, technically usb headphones don't exist
because that's called a headset usually, as its everything in one on your head
the amp/dac (because yes, usb doesn't do analog after all), the mic, the headphone itself, etc
yo guys
how much wud u rate cosmic byte headphones?
but just
compare it with some headphones
like, from my perspective, I love the convenience wireless headphones give, but the ones not using bluetooth cant connect to mixers or amps since its a USB dongle, and USB wired headphones end up having that exact same downfall but now with an annoying cable and usually no sound improvement cause most USB headphones are "gaming" headphones and horseshit already
not even worth the effort it took the manufacture to make it
its basically e waste, newly produced every time so that our planet could combust faster
thanks for the reply
i want to prove my friend wrong
but he wont listen to me so i thot i wud just ask some audio experts to prove him wrong
i mean lets be real, he prob doesnt have money to buy anything thats better than that tbh
ikr and he fights back to prove those are equivalent to airpods pro..i mean...
i mean, does he have the airpods to begin with?
lol he says his mom uses one but she uses an android
idk what to say
he just says nonsense to try prove me wrong
but there are audio products sub 20$ that don't suck tho
Shush.
He doesn't know
average consumer brainwashed into thinking low quality dogshit products are fine/good enough, and anything even remotely alright is overpriced and cannot be found within reasonable budgets such as 20$, 40$, 80$, 160$, etc
Is this a good channel to ask about pc speakers?
yah
Currently using a jbl go 2 as pc speaker, and starting to become very very tired of its lacklustre sound quality.
I'm looking at approx 200 euros in budget, but am quite clueless as to which speakers could be good for me
nah, no way
edifier mr4
Edifier R1080BT
Searching for the mr4 i found these, whatchu think?
check the price of the r1280db and r1700bt, if those are within your budget they’re better speakers
nice
150 euros, not too bad
Ive previously had issues with speakers developing a kind of white noise thing
is this still an issue with current day speakers or is that me becoming old
That's gonna be an issue with just about every speaker under $1000
Its not an issue for my jbl go 2
Some it's less of an issue than others
and thats not especially such an amazing speaker lol
Hmm okay
If you have a low wattage amplifier, like your small JBL speaker, it won't be an issue
ah okay
But a lot of the time speaker manufacturers try and dazzle consumers with high wattage and that's where you get the hiss
How many watts are the 1700?
anything can be done about some low hum in an old amplifier (nad model 140)
it plays really nicely but when nothing is playing there's that hum always present.
maybe some recap job would help ...
Yeah. Tweeter has a 15 watt amp and woofer has an 18 watt amp.
So, really, that's not an overly ambitious wattage
Yeah. For anything short of a house party a few watts is really all you need.
Ive used 1000w speakers in a sound setup before with insane subs as added bonus, but that was used for school parties and all
Perfect
its on sale for 120 euros rn
woahs
Get it
no
I think its fine
it happens only at max volume
and on some audio only
if its only at max volume, then its clipping
basically the amplifier in your headphones are getting asked for too much power and they cant deliver
so they just kinda bottom out.
is that bad?
I can still return them
but for the price they are the best hands down
I've had this before on older headphones
I have a rode nt usb mini and it sounds like dogshit on discord but perfectly fine on audacity, any suggestions?
go to voice and video settings and turn off noise cancellation
Is there any way to eq these speakers in win10?
Any app or setting I'm missing that would work? Or just plug and enjoy
Well if you want simple EQ they have bass and treble dials on them I'm pretty sure.
But if you wanna do proper EQ then you'll need to download REW and look for some sort of measurement mic. Which you can probably find on eBay for like €20-€40
They'll be in a pretty unreachable place, but if its setting it once that should work
It makes me frustrated that they don't mention the cable length for these anywhere(at least not that I could find)
Found it
5m
unreachable place?
Yes
In the broadest sense of the phrase, I won't be able to access them easily
where will they be placed
My desk is 110 cm by 90 cm, they'll be up and at the back of that 90cm
ah okay
So unless I'm feeling frisky and want to climb onto my desk xd
i thought you would place them in some obnoxious place
was about to tell you not to do that
Hahaha nah I'm not a complete psycho xd
but you want to place those speakers not too much away from yourself
further you go more bass falls off
1m approx
should be fine
I'll check if they have those around here
But 120-130 for the 1700 feels like a good deal
I don't know about 1700, it may or may not be better than the mr4
but regardless, 1280 isn't bad either
also although you likely know, bigger number is not necessarily better
Yup naming schemes are wack asf
Mr4 looks good
Same price range
(with the 1700 being on sale)
I prefer the mr4 look but it's "only" 22w
Will it make much of a difference? As pc speakers I'm not even sure if I'll ever use them at max volume (if the wattage scales when you turn up the volume)
not at all
i could make a 3w speaker a lot louder than either of those speakers
or a 1000w one that is less loud than all of those
Interesting. So what am I looking at to compare these speakers?
I'm not very well versed in this (as you can see lol)
sensitivity etc
but realistically
no wired speaker should have issues being loud
at least no consumer marketed ones
Hmm okay
I think imma get the mr4 then, they're smaller overall but more than enough for me
Shame the 3.5mm is at the front for the mr4 tho
it's pretty easy to make anything passive play at ear damaging volumes
At a desktop yes
i run my focusrite on like 1/6th of the max volume
and that is still loud
Left my set of Jabra 75t buds at my friend's house, need new ones but with wing tips. Any suggestions? (US)
so got a question, looking to build a PC that is meant to record and edit music, right now looking to priortize my CPU,RAM and Storage speeds should I focus less on the pc and more on the audio perpherals like an audio interface and a Dap ?
to my knowledge
cpu and ram do not matter at all
unless like your system is so bad that basic tasks get bottlenecked
you need an audio interface
you do not need a dap
ok good thats what i was thinking
Whats the difference between the AKG 361 & 371
Found a 371 on the used market for 100€
No 361’s on the used market
371 have a bit more bass
Thats it?
well there might be a few more in-depth reviews on the difference but thats the gist of it
Alr
Nice
its even cheaper btw it is canadian dollar
what so good about them anyways
oup
what o good about the akg 371
can u recommend me a great headphone for gaming
dt880 250ohm
price made my hands shake
100$
ksc75+mic
Idk the trebel difference compared to the 990 pro but fuck if the trebel on it was ever piercing lol
990 has a slightly sharper edge
Like if that awp in csgo was ever deafening lol
no, this is 1933
look at twitter
we are going back
twitter is -523
Twitter is back in medieval time
Whether you’re an artist, engineer, podcaster or beat maker, you’re always in creative mode. AKG K361-BT Professional Studio Headphones strike the perfect balance between studio-quality sound, Bluetooth functionality, plush comfort and a sleek, sturdy design that stands up to your mobile lifestyl...
not the bluetooth version
what is twitter
back when they thought the earth is 20x20 meters
and different colored blood or smth
yes
a virus that grows inside of humans, originating from west europe and the US
now everywhere
elon musk is gonna boost it dw
i am sure of it lol
even more spread
sounds better than 99% of gaming headsets
still too much bass tho
but bro come on what is the use of that if u get 0 rizz doesnt even look like an headphone
KPH30i then
Honestly my biggest problem with the 990 pro wasnt the trebel boost, it was the damn coiled cable
Why tf would you use a coiled cable on headphones, shit made the wire so short and got in the way of everything
some people think they look cool
i think they’re neat too but i’m not a fan of any headphone with a soldered cable
How about not soldered but glued?

better or worse?
just some headphones that use hot glue instead of solder
just like some laptop companies do
i didn’t know that was a possibility
I mean, all it has to do is keep it in place
i hate companies who use glue and apoxy instead of screws
you wouldn't use hot glue if you were them?
no
more money, if it breaks they have to buy again
my mind doesn’t work that way
if i’m already a millionaire i have no reason to be unnecessarily greedy
I would do it with some things, but not with things like SSDs
like those prebuilt PCs with the sata cable glued to the SSD
Okay sure maybe, but for like keyboards where you don’t constantly move them, on headphones it literally worsens your experience
Ikr, like lets say I had Elon Musks wealth, I would either
A: never work again and donate half to charities, maybe more
B: continue making income and donate like 90% to charities each year
nah bro he needs one trillion net worth even though he passed the point of being able to afford anything in the world many years ago
so ur a fan of RGB on headphones? may I ask why if u never see them because they're on your head
I choose to block out people who use the word “rizz”
But yeah rgb on headphones really aint fly, totally not tubular
ong fr word to mom cuzzo
RGB is cringe
It really is tbh
i think it’s cool in some things to let you change your room color on the fly
but i’m not a fan of leaving it on rainbow cycle
and i’d rather it not be on my headphones
how about RGB toilet seating?
Rgb water
but u can feel the fps increasing
and common is not even on the head

I can't just block everyone of the same age as me because I'm myself a boomer in mind 
but bro if u see those headphone u will loose the logic of time
… what?
I hope anyone over 12 doesn't use "kek" irl
yet they do
it is
It's how funny green people say lol
Hi, what does "fun" actually mean in this graph? I was going for DT990 Pro and I couldn't come up with something why it would be "fun" to buy them
*the graph is from forums
Thats a crusty outdated graph if I've ever seen one
But in this sense fun = more bass
Or more v shaped
DT990 pro is 'fun'?
Ive seen DT990s considered quite bad nowadays from a lot of audiophile yt channels
apparently
it should be illegal to put k240 in any form of purchase advice list
Wait hold on, are the top 2 analytical ones on that list closed backs?
Oh more bass ...always need more bass, sure
Yeah they're really not great
I think I have a pair somewhere
it's great if you like being stabbed
Imo, all they have to do is get rid of their usual treble boost and they would be pretty good
Is DT770 Pro better in that case?
Actually im pretty sure the 770 pro has an even bigger treble boost lol, but being closed back they also have more bass
I'd avoid beyer generally personally
Well I enjoy 450BT from Sennheiser, I know it's not as high end but..
What's the competitor from Sennheiser to DT770 or DT990?
Id say the competitor for the DT990 is the HD560s for the same price bracket, as for dt770 Sennheiser is shit at closed backs, so the Akg k371 is better
it doesn’t have much bass
I don't exist
not sure why youtubers say it has a lot of bass because it doesn’t
Oh they're 120 Ω, which brings me to my next question
I was trying to figure out whether the (guitar) amp I'm about to buy could drive 120 Ω or 250 Ω, a lot of people say it sounds bad with 32 Ω phones, so I thought maybe 80 Ω would do the trick
The amp is gonna be Boss Katana 50 Mark II
if you’re shopping in the 770/990 price range and want a good headphone with a bass focused sound signature then you should check out the AKG K371
I don't know if need one that is bass focused, since I'm going to be using it only for guitar
They just look uncomfortable to me, but again thats just looks, earcups look like they are small enough to be on ears
we’ve established you’re not human
yes, that is why I can legally hate on humans
Every day at work i say “i hate humans” at least 10 times
I do it so much I was diagnosed for it
If you want a Beyer, get the dt880. It's far better than the 770 and 990. And as for impedance 250 ohm is the sweet spot. 80 ohms will be good enough tho.
Idk if there's an 80ohm 880 tho
pretty sure it's only 250 and 600 for dt880
why isn't there a 2000 ohm version or smth
8ohm
0 ohm
can i get help on picking a budget pair or possibly other reccomendations? im currently thinking of getting a new pair of headphones, the one i currently have is a cheap under 20€ fantech gaming headset
but they're getting old, the mic doesnt even work anymore and are a little ugly even if the audio quality is not the bad from a non audiophile perspective
initially i was looking to go for sennheiser hd 300 which is a pair i have actually once tried from a classmate but i think with the type of headband it has it would become uncomfortable for long periods of time
my other option is the akg k52 which ive heard good things about and has the adjustable headband style im more used to but i havent tried them myself so im not sure
i'd like to mention that i dont have any kind of fancy audio equipment and they would mostly be used for gaming, watching videos and listening to music on my pc or phone pretty much
gotta list your budget and country
oh budget would ideally be under 50€ and uh portugal (europe)
Connect your phone to your pc, and stick it up to your ear
i can’t recommend any over ear headphones under 50 euros
there are many in ear monitors in that price range that are good though
Uh... is it kosher to ask about airpods in this channel? Or will I get boo'd off the stage
My airpod gen 2's are starting to lose their oomph. anyone have any recommendations for wireless earbuds with a similar form-factor to the Airpods gen 2? NOT Pro. My stupid ears do not like using the silicone buds for long periods or for daily use.
The only ones I've found are like $50 (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09PMYG2WX) or just knock-offs. I just want a nice alternative if I don't wanna keep wrestling with Apple products on my android.
I'm also open to using gen 3's but I remember reading pretty mixed reviews of their form factor when they first came out.
airpods pro 2 are given good praise in this channel but i don’t know anything about hard plastic tip earbuds
damn ok this was useless bye
Totally fair. It seems like a weirdly niche market considering the success of the Airpod gen 1 and 2's
I just know silicone tips do not work for me
that’s completely valid i just don’t know any to recommend to you
i’ve never looked at them
what is a good way to process my mic for live chatting? I have an at2035 hooked up to a behringer u-phoria UMC22 and it sounds fine out the box however I want to sound good
gen 1-3 are actually straight up bad though
there is really no point in buying gen 1-3 over any other tws available
since they come with none of the features that make airpod pros good
even if you are exclusively in an entirely apple habitat
Except I mentioned that my ears do not do well with silicone tips. They hurt my ears with frequent use
And I don't care about apple stuff, hence why I'm asking if there are high end alternatives
if you can go for pro 2 then go for it, they are excellent, if you do not want silicone tips then stick to pods 2
you wont get anything better
Except I've used silicone tips for years in various sizes, form factors, and brands (all good ones) and never found a pair as comfortable to me as airpods
you tried foam tips?
Yep
Anything that goes in my ear holes for extended periods has caused me pain over time
you wont get much better than gen 2/3 with earbuds regardless
so stick to those
or go for over ears
but I'm not an audiophile, nor have I been up-to-date with the happenings in the wireless earbud world. So I was asking if there were alternatives
yeah, there aren't really any
over ears are also a no-go for my uses. I need something to slip in and out at work or on the go
bummer.
im not going to proclaim there are literally no earbuds equivalent or better than gen 2s
but it is super unlikely you will find one
No I get you. And the issue is that I'm specifically looking for a similar form-factor/fit
I hate that they're the only ones that have been consistently comfortable for me
like I can fall asleep with these on AND hear everything going on around me
Straight-up surprising that no other big brands have made a direct competitor
there’s not a lot of money to be made
literally never heard of iems until just now
it’s just that most people prefer in ears with tips, not earbuds
I can believe this though
wireless in ears are iems
well the ones with silicone tips
yeah, and I get why. if my stupid ears didn't get super sore after a few days of heavy use (and I have to stop wearing em for days in a row to feel better), I'd agree that they're just better
they’re marketed as true wireless earbuds so you can suggit klaus
doesn't matter
ur just making it difficult to differentiate what we’re talking about
because its marketed different doesn't make it not that
yeah i just don’t care
i’ll use the common term so people know what i’m talking about
respectfully, wireless earbuds is just the normal term. Unless you're in a specific field that refers to them as that, you're being pedantic
true
when someone says iem i think of the audiophile community
earbud is used to refer to iems without silicone tips
if someone says earbud i think of consumer wireless earbuds
it’s an easy way to differentiate the two market segments
because they’re wildly different
understanding the difference is fine but so is telling the person you are speaking the difference between them so there is no further confusion
the confusion comes from you trying to teach them a new term instead of giving them shopping advice
in ear monitor is not gonna become the popular term
So if there aren't any real competitors to the Gen 2's, are there wireless earbuds that don't go as deep in the ear?
did you say there were problems with the third gens? i’ve never looked at them
being confused about using different terms with something with silicone on it and not on it says more things about you than of the ragument
I've never used em before. I've just heard very meh things about the new form factor's comfort.
just give them a try ig
But I'm considering popping by an apple store to try a pair on
you wont find much stuff
yeah, I heard the sound quality on the 3's is much better
just bring lysol or something before you put them in your ear lmao
brother I'm gonna bring a tub of bleach

If I do decide to go with the silicon-tip route, any chance someone knows ones that are designed to put most of the pressure on anywhere but the inside of the ear canal?
forreal?
yeah
cuz that's actually potentially viable then
i mean if you are going out to try the gen 3s may as well try the pros
the ones that have a stem that hang below your ear are the ones that won’t go inside your ear as deeply
True, true
any recommendations that spring to mind? Just so I have a starting point of brands/product lines?
I've literally only seen airpods and airpod knockoffs with the stems
but I'm a scrub so idk
airpods pro 2 are unironically the best ones
surprisingly
most of the enthusiast products go deep in the ear
and are wired
Well I'm not a huge fan of Apple, but the airpod gen 2's blew my mind, so I'm definitely willing to give the pro 2's a shot
oh yeah, I'm not looking for the best audio fidelity lol
I just need something I can pop in at work or something to listen to podcasts or music when things get slow
I was eyeing up the Galaxy Bud Pros 2 if I HAD to go with a silicone-tip one, but knowing that the Airpod Pro's form factor barely goes in the ear canal.. damn I really do gotta go try some huh.
Plus I'd get that sweet sweet wireless charging
I do have an S23... but yeah if they go deeper in then I'll try the pros first
heya
hi
oof that price tag on the airpod pro 2s
anyone has recommendation for gaming headset in the neighborhood of 50$~ ?
i do not im sorry
cloud 2 on sale

