#virtual-reality
1 messages · Page 31 of 1
That must've been fucking terrible though whoo wee
it worked, it had a few spikes but it worked
it depends if you play low and hide all avatars
i do play low and hide most avatars
lowest end I've tried is a 940mx
now that's worse than what i have
it's not a gtx
what is that maxwell
it's an MX
yeah
it's ampere
and?
nvidia MX570 look it up
this little gpu that my school laptop has can raytrace, use dlss and have all the ampere goodies
just that it's hindered by 2gb vram
so gaming will be a nightmare
which it is fr
i was thinking this https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-570m.c1495
not like that's going to help you in vr applications
flashbacks to "vr ready" branded gtx 1050 cards
Thanks 👍
no problem, you have fun there alright?
oh i see
@haughty thistle you were kinda right
I have to admit that airlink can look like shit
Playing into the radius and the grey and dark look horrendous
Also the foliage and heavy bushes
🤮
I think it uses h264 not sure
Make me want a Q3 wifi 6e at 300 mbs
Glorified Quest 2
no cameras? hows it gonna do hand tracking for the people who use it?
Well how is it gonna track at all
p. sure the leak that Bradly was talking about on his Twitter had 2 arrays for 3 dots each on the the front: a color camera for passthrough, an IR camera for tracking and the third one is unknown, but likely to be a low-range IR emitter for better hand tracking in lower light situations...
Improved hand tracking makes a lot of sense for a headset which is supposed to be primarely be interacted with by hand tracking (as it prolly won't even come with controllers)
I expected new leak but it's just same old things
This one is "kinda" new tho: https://fxtwitter.com/Lunayian/status/1769104387702460616
Ig they wanna offer a headset at the same price point as the existing Q2, but with the upgraded SoC of the Q3. Rather then just taking the Q2 shell and replacing the SoC ig they want more incentive to buy the regular Q3 by not offering any controllers for the Q2 replacement...
Quest 3 isnt true successor to Quest 2 so...
there is this
WAITTTT
that is same resolution as Quest 2
why even bother upgrade
when they say they gonan cheap out they gonna use exact same panel too?
Uh, y’all got any recommendations for dudes with poor eyesight as far as headset addons go? Got an Index, but my glasses are too big
get a prescription lens
Oh sweet, those exist?
yes
https://vroptician.com <- highly recommend their lens inserts
Prescription lens for Virtual/Augmented Reality Headsets inserts allow to enjoy VR without having to wear additional glasses – more immersion and better field of view!
They cost about what glasses cost, because they're quite literally glasses you mount in your headset lol
if you live near China I recommend get ones from aliexpress
Unfortunately I don’t
I’ll have to look into these then
I personally wouldn't risk it with prescription glasses/lenses, but you do you 
not saying you can get those prices outside china
but man it was so cheap and quality is great
they have international store but Quest 2 and Pico only https://hifylux.com/products/hifylux-1-pair-myopia-lenses-nearsighted-corrective-aspherical-resin-lenses-glasses-for-oculus-quest-2?VariantsId=10001
I’ll look into both of these, thanks guys
Oh
these are regular diopters for only myopia
if your prescription is anything more complicated you pretty much must make custom ones
personally i order one locally
ended up like $40
Possible also to 3d print and bring to optician to fit it for you
They should just hurry up and make it PCVR native. Maybe with a little interposer box to allow plugging in directly into a PC GPU. Then I'd be interested in the PSVR2. But I ain't buying a PS5 and some hacky third-party solution is just going to have controller issues...
Thats what I'm hoping for. There really seems to be no reason to make it a "streaming" based option that still requires a PS5 itself as that would just draw less desire for anyone wanting to use it on PC. Having to purchase an extra 400 dollar unit to just use it, albeit without most of the new features the PSVR2 has implemented in PCVR games would just seem to give people more reason to choose a quest or even a regular wired HMD.
I myself am just waiting for the DP-Aux boards from iVRy to become readily available. My PSVR2 is able to connect over my TB4 card and can start in display mode so I just need to snag an AMD card so I can start using it in everything!
i can imagine iVRy pulling hair if they actually do that lol
Oh no doubt! I’d bet he got a little heated the day they announced that.
I feel like if they do make it compatible with essentially the same/similar hardware he just spent the last year producing he’s also going to garnish quite a bit of attention to his efforts.
I’d bet they also add some extra software in between for making eye tracking and everything work as it does on the PS5 and then he could also reverse engineer that to give his software a potential upside as an option to use besides Sonys proprietary VR software.
Especially when iVRy been advocating fact that you should not buy iVRy for sole purpose of PCVR only if you already have it with PS5
And that exact purpose is broken
Yeah it sucks that nvidia users are basically software locked out. Atleast with an AMD card I can use it on PSVR2 with tracking just fine! And with his discovery or more pathways to get around the USB-C port issues is going to just make it easier to use on more diverse systems.
If it doesn't come with hand tracking is just a Meta Quest GO 3S 😅
gigaoctets is so silly
I guess battery life and performance?
Maybe color pass through?
I think it's mostly for those users who want to replace their quest 2
Mostly performance and better passthrough, yeah
Also you get AV1 decoding, which the Q2 can't do
tbf what did you expect?
Meta is trying so hard to force their hand tracking and mixed reality down peoples throat, and this would just be the next logical step: update the specs of the current entry level device, but drop the controllers
Imagine if the Quest 3S doesn't have any controller support whatsoever. Now that'd be quite a blow...
i should have reminded myself that PCVR are second class citizens
is stutters on the 6000series a common problem?
got a rx 6900xt paired with a 5800x3d and its unplayable
did not change any settings, using the quest 2 and i use virtual desktop to play my steam games
tride to play today again but the stutters are horrible
i get 90 fps with 70ms latency and my fps keep dipping to 40 or lower
is it render latency or network latency
Hohoo yeah that's horrible
Try opening the debug menu with the graphs
Should have one for VD somewhere
wasnt able to do a screenrecording
but took some pictures
ive tried air link in quest 2 and that works fine but the quality is VEEERRRRYY bad its like 140p
didnt have this problem on my nvidia card. i switched to amd now
do you know a solution for it?
i use nvidia and never used amd for VR
i did have some amd card before
though the solution is usually rollback drivers
rollback drivers meaning older driver version?
yes
i have had this problem for a very long time tho
id have to roll it back by alot but thx now i atleast know what the problem is
the easiest is of course reinstall windows
then slowly reinstall things until you found the issue
i went through 4 windows reinstall when roblox was crashing for no reason
turns our openxr toolkit caused it
i think a roll back woule be easier
that's if the drivers are actually the issue
worth a try ig
Hi. I wanna get into VR but im not sure what to get, i already found a decent Fiberoptic data transfer cable, but now im just tryna decide on a headset, i have limited budget as i also need to have money left over for actual steam games, like HL:A H3VR and some other games, my specs are : I7 9700K, 32 GB 3200 mhz ddr4. RX-6700 Non-XT and 2 gigabyte sata SSDs.
I know the quest 2 is loosing support next year, but if i want a VR headset mainly just for pcvr it should be good right?,
if you want to use the wireless headset mic then get RAZER BLACKSHARK V2 PRO, it has the best mic in a wireless headset so far
who owns vive ultimate trackers?
Who told you you need a fiber optic cable
and who told you quest 2 is EOL
Not for long
By the time Quest 3S or lite it's definitely going to be killed
meh q1 had support for like three years after quest 2 dropped
Sure maybe they wont make new units but i bet on software support
They won't lose support next year it will continue to get updates for 3 more years after last sale
A quest 2 successor kinda is coming this year at cheaper price tag if you can wait
Otherwise quest 2 is fine and better deal buying used with isopropyl alcohol
iems in place of a VR headset? Seems counterproductive lol
okay nvm i understood smt else by headset
that's beat saber... native on Pico 4
not PCVR
someone made it
and they said it's not possible?
now of course it's basically piracy but
they're not even selling on the pico
no loss there
I wonder how involved the mod was, given that the mobile build of Beat Saber is built straight on the Meta Quest SDK... 
Personally would still stick to the PCVR version anyways. The mobile build has some very weird behaviour in places...
Both runs on OXR so after removing the meta fuckery it should work
and of course it does like you see above
Fuck meta and their exclusives 🖕
i don't really wanna buy into their ecosystem either
zuck can brick the headset at anytime
either from meta account going whack or servers going down
like last time
you might say the same about bytedance but pico 4 OS is a lot lot more open on the android side
Fanboying for any company is stupid...
No company is your friend. Ultimatly the goal of any company is making money. Sure there are some whiche respond better to feedback then others (ex. Valve), but in the end Valve is no different with their 30% store cut from other digital stores like the Apple App store, and Valve has been caught red handed region locking their store within the EU, which is prohibited by EU law. Just sayin'...
i'm not fanboying pico
I saw on youtube, airlink wont work in my house as ive got 50/10 speeds
i'm on pico because it's not meta
not particularly comfy on the CCP either
but PicoOS openness makes it a little more assuring
Internet speed has nothing to do with AirLink/VD/ALVR lol
What is relevant is your Wifi speed in your home network
and (for now) i haven't heard of massive outages leaving headsets unaccesible just because servers went down
something the quest experienced a handful of times
Yes my wifi speed is 50 mbps
It's only open to the point that you can flip a switch to unlock the bootloader. The Stock OS is still locked down as much as the Quest 
They just didn't dump as many stock android systems for simplicity...
Its a shit router
You can very much root it if you need to, the problem is of course TWRP haven't developed one for pico yet
Unless you're using like Wifi 1 or 2, there's no way that's real lol
Have you run a speed test from your phone to PC? (not from your phone to say speedtest.net)
also damn
What
the much lower latency on standalone
it's so fucking good
the tracking is superb
PCVR BS has some weird tracking issues on fast movements
kinda like mouse acceleration but VR
Personally found the tracking on the P4 to slot in somewhere between the Quest 1 and WMR, tho much closer to the Q1. Ain't beating the Quest Pro controllers tho, or heck, anything Outside-In 
That's an internet speed test, not your local Wifi speed
There's the speed between your device and router
then there's the speed between you and your ISP
My PC is directly linked to the router using an ethernet cable
Which has different speed
And i dont have a wifi module in my pc
than your internet connection
@haughty thistle btw the one who did it is a 20 year old undergrad in russia 
So lemme get this straight. It works like a printer in that its connected to network and then anyone on the network can connect pc to it?
@oak sphinx
so really i don't get why pico 4 modding isn't more widespread
probably afraid of being sued by meta
something a russian don't need to worry about
Yes
Assuming your firewall is open for local network
Otherwise it just does not work
Some ISP ship routers with isolation enabled and absolutely no way to turn off
Where the heck do i find control panel
which bricks any local connection
My pc isnt in english
Buy dedicated router
Bridge-mode isnt supported by my isp
You dont need bridge mode
What
You use router as wifi receiver and as hotspot
.
Hit Ctrl + R and enter control
this is basically how i did it
@oak sphinx since your PC is already connected via lan, that's already a good first step. Next thing is you wanna make sure how fast your Wifi can transmit. You can use this app if you disable the Internet test in it's settings: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pzolee.android.localwifispeedtester
(unfortunatly Android only)
i use ookla, idk other apps
Yeah, ookla tests internet speed only. The speed test app I just posted can also test your wifi speed from your phone to the router
Ok
Just make sure to disable the internet test and leave only the wifi test enabled 🙂
if the phone doesn't support the latest wifi standards it might be unable to fully test
though ISP routers would be lucky to push 200 over wifi
Not sure what method you're referring to tbh 👀
All you need on target device
Is enter ip address on browser
That is true. Tho in my experience in a lot of cases people have phones more modern then their Wifi router, sooo... 
budget phones despite being modern really struggle with local link speed
If you want accurate then test it on quest
it is one of the place they cheap out afterall
Huh. It's certainly more involved, but would at least also test the LAN speed Ig
You dont even need to install
You can get portable version
And on quest just type ip address
It should support it, its a Samsung galaxy A54
Yeah... that... uhh... You have a 5GHz wifi too, or is that the only Wifi endpoint you have?
Thats the 5 ghz one
That is slow
The router we have is wifi5
Yeah mine too and its not this slow
Same here, which is why I wanted to confirm it's 5GHz
Here is my WiFi 5 result
I hope its because of your phone
Coil whine damage is unknow
Right when i connected my phone to it
That isn't ideal either, yea...
You probably don't need an optical cable for quest link, but if you still prefer going with a cable it should be at least 5m long and USB 3 capable
(prolly the simplist solution tbh)
I know that much, but id prefer a fast one
The alternative being buying an entirely new router to use just for the Quest
I havent got amy type C connectors on my pc
Looked into it, not interested
Why
What cable you use for the Quest doesn't matter as long as it has USB 3 speed or faster. The Quest iirc tops out at about 400mbps, even on a cable. Compression rate is more of a limiting factor at that point...
Limited by my phone at this point i think
I should test on the pico later
Maybe that's why H264 400Mbps chug
I'll be honest, a good dedicated router is more setup then a simple cable and a simple cable can often be had for like half the price 
no i mean asking this
oh btw the one that ported BS to pico 4 gonna post the source code for the Picolus library which the person made to port oculus games
So posssiblyyy porting quest games gonna be easier
AW2 here i come
inb4 Quest Games have always-online DRM because people started pirating them on Pico headsets
And people wonder why we can't have nice things...
I just wanna play some pcvr where it looks half decent and not like rec room graphics
When pico 4 unironically run quest games better
lol reminds me of the Denuvo situation
Reminds me more of the Switch situation, but yeah...
As long as your PC is up to snuff, yeah. As I said, buying a simple 5m USB 3 USB-C cable is prolly the simplest solution you can go with. A decent quality cable can be had for like 30€ on Amazon. The one that I use is the Kiwi Design one, but there are other options as well ofc
@oak sphinx try using this more accurate speedtest first downlaod this on your gaming PC https://go.openspeedtest.com/Win
after running it, take this link
and open a web browser on your headset
type that in
I dont even have a headset yet which is why im asking all this,
oh
Which is why I suggested using a Phone for approximation
i did not know that
Ive never tried vr properly before. Only google cardboard
i recommend either wired usb or dedicated router i guess
Amd a friends quest go
Beryl are excellend dedicated router for small size
Always the recommendation for Quest anyways. Using a router that also has a bunch of other devices on it is pretty much always a recipe for desaster...
With a used router you'd defo need to do a lot of research, as tons of ISP units are floating about, many of them locked to only work with that ISP and not as a simple AP, have crappy built in Wifi to sell you the ISPs Mesh offerings and other BS like that...
lol i have China Telecom router i think but luckily its quite open
made by Tenda
also if lucky some router can be flashed with custom firmware like openwrt which is better
and padavan
Personally am running an old FritzBox 7490 as a Quest AP, which I know was bought seperate from any ISP offerings, but I know there's a bunch of Vodafone and 1&1 branded models floating about here in Germany. No idea how locked down the Vodafone ones are, but I know the 1&1 branded ones have a custom firmware which refuses to work unless you log it into a 1&1 service account with an active subscription. Kinda annoying as the Black & Silver look of the 1&1 branded FritzBoxes looks kinda sick...
I honestly have to say that little beryl I snagged is pretty darn good. I’m able to hold a consistent stable connection with almost 40+ networks in range and never seems to have any compression or signal issues. Things a champ! Whoever recommended that a bunch last year thanks!
fanboying always sucks
Can't wait to see what samsung has cooking
but it has google as a partner
the project killer 
I honestly find it more of an unfortunate thing that the only way to get Face and Eye Tracking in VR right now without going DIY or buying something from a sketchy seller on China is to buy a Quest Pro. Is it a good headset? No. Comfort absolutely sucks. But it's currently the best option for FT/ET by matter of elimination
Pico 4 Enterprise from reputable ali seller
At that point your biggest threat is fed ex ruining your package
And the quest pro
Yeah, and use a China-only beta version of the streamer app, which btw absolutely sucks compared to literally any other methode of playing PCVR on it
I was considering a quest 3 but that last outage just made me highly skeptical
Try Project Babble for mouth tracking all you need is a webcam
Also no offline only mode i heard
Great for index cuz it has usb port on headset
What confuses me about that outage is... why was it such a big problem? I've used my Quest plenty of times with no internet connectivity and never had an issue
(Quest Pro and Quest 1 specifically)
That outage revealed a possibility where zuck can just disable your quest
scary
i don't want such device on my posession
Converting your 500 bucks gadget into brick
There should be law that mandate support or open bootloader
Realistically you have something like this with most headsets these days. Microsoft basically put a timebomb on all WMR headsets. Upgrade to Win11 24H2 and your WMR headset is now a paperweight. Same if you re-install Windows on your PC after 2026...
Yea but a discontinuation like that is a bit different
the thing about the quest is
Pimax headsets have a system in place where the software remote-bricks your headset if Pimax punches your Serial Number into their database too
Pimax used that system when they had some issues with US taxes and some people (who already payed some taxes to Pimax) refused to pay more because Pimax miscalculated, Pimax just bricked the headsets of those people
Scary stuff
I'll prob get whatever valve's next native pcvr headset
who knows when
Even so any usb cable will do
Jeez man I didn't know pimax was that sketchy
They’re all sketchy brother! Needing a Facebook account linked was the first step when oculus started down the same path. Just absolutely stupid the artificial limits we have on purchased hardware.
Does anyone have some personal experience with full body tracking on quest 3 and if it’s even worth it?
I mean, when it comes to logging in with a facebook account, I don't see much of a problem with that. Google does pretty much the same thing with any new samsung phones
Not the case anymore
Also you need a discord account, a Google account and no one's seems to care
I myself don't either. I just remember all the crap I took from some in other discords about using quest headsets and having meta milk all my data and track my house and all sorts of other things just because of that link requirement they started back a few years ago. Even some saying "oh they're just going to force it to slow down and stop working so you upgrade to the Q3"
I think everyone knows damn well a lot of major companies have that kind of data
It's just unavoidable at this point, and meta just joined them. That's why don't know why everyone singles out Meta as the big bad and goes all out to not buy a quest 2 but buys an S24 ultra the next day
I think... I have reached the peak of my collection... 👀
Was that the one on eBay (I think?) with low bids you were talking about a week or two ago?
Yup
Widest FOV headset ever made
Too bad Acer had no real interest in it once their partner in crime (Starbreeze) imploded
Nice! If you dont mind my asking how much you end up getting it for? Thats actually pretty cool to have. Very unique!
Sorry for the late reply, just woke up ^^"
I found it used on eBay for 980€, It's certainly not worth that price in terms of usage I'll get out of it, but as a collectors item it was undervalued imo 😄
No worries! That values always going to be subjective to anyone, even more-so with something like that. I was doing some reading up on that HMD. The possible idea that you could have used 2 GPUs and had each display as a separate GPU driven screen is interesting. Now if some VR titles weren't so CPU bound in cases then multi-GPU setups might have been really able to show their power with something like that.
It's wiring is even set up for a potential multi-system setup. Y'know how some early commercial flight simulators used multiple machines to drive the number of video walls in such a sim? Well the StarVR could've done that, if they had finished the software. It not just has 2 DPs but also 2 USBs, and they're color coded for left/right side. No idea how that would've worked with the tracking tho...
Yeah! That would have been awesome to see working in person! Ahh the possibilities that were sooo close!
Wonder if the tracking and displays would need some type of sync setup? Similar to Nvidia cards needing the sync jumper for each card so their displays match.
Most definetly would. There's a good reason why no one is doing multi-GPU VR stuff
You really don't want the two displays to get out of sync. And besides, there's tech to reduce the workload of rendering stereoscopic images with things like Single-Pass-Stereo, where it set's up the geometry once and then only has to apply stuff specific to the perspective twice
So using a single GPU is actually better for VR now then it used to be in 2016...
PSVR2 got a firmware update with the latest PS5 update. It now works without bypassing EDID and DSC stuff that used to be necessary to get it to work on a PC
Based on that change, it looks like the PC support will be directly plugged in and not streamed
Is Sony washing hands?
iVRy gonna pull hair
If this is true
Sony released a firmware update for PS VR2 that seems to have greatly increased compatibility with PCs. I can now use the PS VR2 on my AMD 6900xt's USB-C port with a stock Linux kernel and no EDID override. They also seem to have enabled the VR 90Hz mode that didn't work before.
I had thought their advertised "PC compatibility is coming" meant ...
Monado and OpenHMD dev
Oh boy. Looks like it’s happening!
Wonder if they are talking with Nvidia to fix the DSC issue iVRy was talking about months ago. Basically just that and some sort of interposer box like the vive box or essentially a VL adapter and PCs are good to go!
Yeah I believe ivry said they mentioned up to 6 months on that
That’s why I said I’m wondering if they were talking with Nvidia to fix it. No reason really for Nvidia to go out of their way to do it honestly.
And we can already pass a video signal through an Nvidia card out through an AMD gpu connected display so that could be bypassed but would just create more complex setups possibly causing issues
they know they will fix it no need to tell again i guess
this will blow up PSVR2 stock temporary i bet
The $50 store credit has been a thing at walmart since black friday, but the price cut AND the store credit is news to me
That's actually crazy
Has Costco discontinued the Quest 3 bundle? It's been out of stock at three different Costcos for the last month or two
I can still see it on their app, but it also says out of stock there. I thought they were going to keep it around until the end of June at least
I guess there is a reason why promo says it lasts until said date or until stock runs out
For 200 € new it's an absolute steal!
i have meta 3
attention beat saber players, i have found a stamina map
https://replay.beatleader.xyz/?scoreId=13627660
somehow my pc didn't crash and i didn't die
is relive vr good?
for pc vr on my quest 2 with my rx 6900xt
on vr desktop i get high game latency and with airlink i have shit quality
Oh thats awesome! I guess I don't have to worry about buying an AMD card now! Just waiting to hear what the connectivity situation is from sony and I'm betting theyll sell a few more of these atleast.
right like if they just make this a pcvr native headset out of the box??? i may or may not be buying ...
or like
Budget constraints
But it's what i would buy if my current kit died
unless valve announces something the same week lol
i really want valve to announce something ..sigh
im such a valve fangirl 😵
pretend valve does not exist thats how you can get surprised
Imagine a steamvr standalone headset with the new rdna3 APUs
though i dont think they would do that unless it can run HL:A stabley
let me dream :(
you are exploitable https://valveprism.com/
i wish this was real so bad
I still dont understand why it's so elaborate
And also aren't all these words trademarked (valve, steam, steamos, etc) is that not legally troubling for them
like
impersonating a corporate entity or something
Trademarks are protection from others who take credit or profit from those ideas or products. They cant just say nobody can even make a fake page containing those words.
Nope, that's patent law. Trademark refers very explicitly to the marks used to represent your brand or product, it does not protect the ideas or products themselves.
However, at least in the US, fair use does protect the use of trademarks that you may not have explicit rights to. For example, parody is well established as protected under fair use. There's also the reality that if there's no damages then there's not much sense in wasting a lawyer's time besides at most sending a cease and desist.
Yes thats why that page doesnt infringe on it. It doesn't use any of valves actual logos, images, or actual property.
The triangle logo was a dead giveaway instead of the valve logo 🙂
Integrated circuits, namely, graphics, video and multimedia integrated circuits; cards containing integrated circuits; integrated circuit chips; semiconductor devices; semiconductor chips; semiconductors; computer hardware; graphics processors; video graphics processors; graphics processing unit (GPU); GPU cores; graphics cards; video cards; vid...
RNDA is a little different than an actual word.
Valve is used in more than just gaming/electronics.
What? It uses numerous trademarks registered by valve. Trademarks aren't just logos and images. Trademarks they've used include the names SteamOS and Steam, and the Valve logo are used on the page
they still use it on the prism site
xactly
lol where?
It really doesn't matter though, fair use protects it
show me the valve logo on it?
Unless they're actually making a product or taking people's money nobody is gonna care
Besides the actual legit index page doesn't feature the valve logo either https://www.valvesoftware.com/en/index
Which is what i said, if they arent profiting or taking credit then they arent in the wrong.
And the actual valve logo is down on the page where the "Steam and SteamVR" section is
This logo isnt on that prism page at all. Which when you open it for the first time you see that goofy triangle. Common sense should tell you that its fake from that point and beyond.
That is the Steam logo, that is not Valve's logo that they did in fact use
And most people would probably see the index through the steam client instead of the webpage nowadays
I mean on the prism page.
no i mean
they did the same thing on the REAL index page
"that stupid half ball logo is a dead giveaway"
Either way....was very easy to tell the page was a fake. And obvious as to why they won't incur any type of real trademark issues like I stated to begin with.
i never doubted it was fake
Yeah I never viewed the index from the webpage, only the steam client and it must show that logo for half a second or something cause I dont see it at the top immediately.
This just isn't really an accurate reason why it might be okay (which I wouldn't go so far to claim). Fair use is more complex than just "they don't make profit therefore fair use".
yeah this feels legally gray
someone like a nintendo would strike it with the might of zeus i think
Well I guess I just didn't try to be 100% correct in everything I said. Just the obvious reason that they dont try to sell anything, aren't actually promoting a real product, or trying to take credit from anything from valve was pretty straightforward in my answer.
I'd guess its one of two things. Either it's actually real and Valve is just going about it in a different way this time as to fool most in their presumtions, or its just a fake that doesn't bother them in the slightest as they haven't taken any action against it that we know of.
But something like that could really shine if we had something wireless that was atleast a bit better than the vive wireless adapter.
The problem with trademark law is that in nearly every jurisdiction, if you allow a page like this to exist it actually weakens your ability to maintain your trademark. You are literally obligated to stop others from using your trademark improperly otherwise you risk losing it. Trademarks are unique in that regard compared to other types of IP protection.
Right exactly it damages the brand
so either valve is just good guy fan project supporter or it's real
It absolutely can. If they were actually promoting this item to a belief that it was real THEN it would actually call for valve to take action.
There's a reason so many companies just take the extreme approach and take down absolutely everything
and i do not think it's real I just think furries have too much time on their hands
They most likely just do not care lol.
yeah i think
But I will say, it do look purty 🙂
they're kinda used to their properties being treated like public domain
The images leave alot to be desired
Not that I can afford shit, but I can't wait for an hmd with these bad boys. Micro-oled 3840x3552@90Hz with 1000 nits peak brightness. Apparently Samsung may be making a new hmd with them but it's just a rumor. The sample price is $992 USD per display, but bulk price is certainly far less
Oh I'm dumb, that's the display in the AVP. Apple allegedly paid about $350 a piece
Oh wow only?
Although they probably paid Samsung to even start manufacturing that display in the first place, so it likely cost more
It was probably a display Samsung made specifically for Apple, and they are just releasing them because they are already in production
It wasn't made specifically for Apple and it was developed by Sony semiconductor not Samsung.
Sony doesn't need anyone to be telling them to keep making denser displays. They already know everybody wants them
Not quite. Apple always develops their own panels and let's them being manufactured by other display companies. So while it might have a similar or the same res as AVP, it's 100% not the panels inside the AVP...
Can you provide the proof that Apple developed their own panels? All reports indicate they have panels produced by Sony. Do you know how many 1.3" 3840x3552@90Hz displays that are produced by Sony? One.
I'm sure they've bought all or nearly all of the initial production capacity, just like they do with TSMC for their silicon
https://www.sony-semicon.com/en/products/microdisplay/oled.html
It's already listed for mass production in their main catalog of micro-oled displays
Developed and produced are two different process
Like how nvidia develops their chips and TSMC produces it
All I did was describe the situation. However, if you want me to speculate then I'll add that I assume Sony developed and produced their panels. They're a display manufacturer, that's what they do. If you want to suggest a customer of a manufacturer developed the technology of that manufacturer, you should have proof of that.
They are for sure developing their own display panel backplanes. The actual panels are then made by companies like LG or Samsung display, however the backplane, the layer that is actually connecting the pixels back to the controller, is designed by Apple.
Plus, the panels in the AVP headset iirc aren't 3840 in either direction. They get close, but not quite. Pixel count is similar to a 4k panel tho. iFixit reported on this in their AVP teardown
(the actual job listings are no longer up, so I'll post screen caps from DDG search results)
You can't just reiterate your claim without proof. That's not how that works. Apple makes a lot of devices with displays, those job postings do not suggest they are related to the vision pro displays. The recent display related patents Apple has are about that horrendous front display, various optics, and mounting structures.
which spyware is worse meta or pico?
It'd be very weird if Apple is using custom display panels in all their other devices to then just suddenly not do that for their newest flagship device.
The AVP displays, according to iFixit are likely 3660x3200, and the most recent supply chain analysis mentioned two Chinese companies (SeeYa & BOE) as the ones making them, rather then Sony. If they weren't using in-house designed panels, it'd be very difficult not only to just switch the manufacturer on a whim like this, but also to use multiple different suppliers for a key component such as a display
ordoes pico even have spyware
Pico is owned by ByteDance and Meta is well... Facebook. It's basically choosing between rock and a hard place. Do you want to give up your data to the US or to China
Just keep in mind that if you go with a Pico headset, ByteDance has recently disbandend most of Pico, because the Pico 4 didn't sell nearly as well as they had hoped it would, so good chance that the P4 is going to be their last headset...
is there a mythical 3rd option or is spyware all im gonna get with standalone
iththe$400range
also what even is this thing
The Vive XR Elite, but it's basically the price of the Quest Pro without any of the redeeming features of the Quest Pro 
I wouldn't recommend getting a Vive Focus. Especially the older Focus or Focus Plus. Those were only ever meant for Business demos and such, basically useless for gamers. You can use the Focus 3 basically like an XRE for PCVR, but it has worse lenses then the XRE, so that's your call to make 
That's the old Vive Focus Plus. Think of it like a an Oculus Go, but it has 6dof head tracking. Not very useful these days
im mostly just tying to do wireless pcvr without having to spend 800us
cant use meta because my accounts keep getting banned for botting
Mentioning a company that has a developed their own oled tech and has the patents for it is not the proof you think it is. You can't just keep adding more claims without any actual evidence. Are you suggesting Apple invented all this tech and didn't patent it? Seriously? Apple has actually invented a lot of seriously cool tech, I don't understand the need of some Apple stans to say Apple invents everything.
Yeah, then the Quest 2/3 is pretty much your most sane option unfortunatly. Thank Meta's previous behaviours and overall lack of consumer interest for not more competition. Basically in the past Meta had made it abondunly clear that if anyone would try and disrupt their para-monopoly in the affordable VR sector they'd just use their Facebook funds to undercut them in impossible ways..
If I could find the post again I long would've posted it goddamn'
And no, I'm not an Apple stan. I actually hate Apple, for their BS software and arbitrary restrictions...
The part that Apple developed and patented is their backplane design. There are many MicroOLED panels from many different manufacturers out there may I remind you. The part that Apple customizes, on all their displays I should reiterate, is the Backplane, the part that wires up the pixels with the controller. If you ever compare how the pixels are arranged and shaped on an Apple display with any other display I will guarantee you that the Apple ones are unique.
And even when Apple isn't using a panel with a custom backplane, they always make sure they have an exclusivity contract with the manufacturer of the panel, ensuring they are the only ones able to use those panels. It's been pretty common knowledge, and also part of the reason you don't see as many 5k or 6k displays out there...
The only actual review I've seen of a DPVR headset can be summarized like this: Built so cheaply you could mistake it for a dollar store toy and screen persistence, it makes your 90s passive-matrix LCD jelous... (exaggertaing here ofc, but it was pretty bad)
Then again, that was for I believe one of their first headsets? Not sure if they improved at all since then. You want to defo make sure it's not using Nolo Tracking, as that review had a unit with Nolo Tracking and it basically didn't work at all
whatever this is
It means the headset supports rotation, but not position (meaning you can look around, but if you move your head the image stays fixed)
sounds dissorenting
wish i could blacklist meta products from showing up on amazon
making looking a lot harder
this one seems to be within ballpark of everything id need but the listed seller is in chinese (or cantonese i can never tell)
Guaranteed to be ass
Also that resolution is pathetic
At 500 or below
Either meta, or pico
The rest is shit
If you insist on buying these unknown junks go ahead and you will be disappointed
I rather use the super outdated oculus go
And that's just hardware problems
The software support wew
Even pico still has problems
can vouch i was Rift S former user with that resolution its ass
its ok as first time tho
rather, i dont think you can find that headset and even if you can it will be overpriced
pico it is then
not dealing with meta knowing theyre willing to brick an old system for being old
Also friendly reminder that paper specs aren't everything. On paper the StarVR One should have one of the worst pixel densities ttl on the market (given it's relatively low res for the FOV), but in terms of SDE it beats out the Index in my experience.
It doesn't help that a page like VRcompare exists, which treats VR headsets as if all that matters are paper specs. I jokingly call it the UserBenchmark of VR, even though I know it basically is just that...
The Pico 4 is good, don't worry. You might want to look into some comfort mods for the Pico 4, but it's not even close to the worst experience I've personally had 😄
i only used it as a search bar for vr, nothing else lists all the options
Sure, it's good for finding maybe not as well known VR headsets, but before you decide "this one looks good", maybe have a watch of a few actual reviews of that thing before you jump on one 😉
The compare feature on VRcompare is basically useless tho, given that all it does is compare paper specs. Ofc a Pimax 5k Super beats the Index is raw screen res, but stretched over their respective FOV, the Pimax is way worse, but things like the pixel density over the FOV is ofc not reflected on that page lol
dont bother searching rare obscure VR headsets they are collectors or just impossible to buy
they wont be cheaper even if you can find it
newer VR headsets are mass produced or subsidized by billion dollar companies which gives much better value
pico is literally tiktok
yes
If you want to have privacy you can.
just be ready to shelf 3-5x price and you can buy Pico 4 Pro or Quest 2 Enterprise
at grand
this one wont ask for facebook or meta account
not meant for gaming
Quest 2 business version is $799 with $180 subscription
or you can buy brand new Meta version for $199
Rift S was horrible compared to quest 2, I only have tried vr two times and I'm waiting for oled version of index or some other that works well and is very adjustable
i know
i literally
switched from Quest 2 to Rift S
then back to Quest 2
never again
oh i forgot that the used market exists
With older obscure headsets you can be certain they're not worth using when they don't demand a collectors ransom (aka >600-700 bucks). At least from my experience.
If all you want is a cheap PCVR headset, go with something more well known like the Rift CV1 or OG Vive. Sure they take more setup to get going, and replacement parts might cost as much as a full set, but it's your best option on the used market
3dof 😵
Phone headsets split their audience into two distinct groups: those who see the appeal and promise of the technology and understand that their pocket phone will not provide the best experience
And those who see the failings of the implementation and discard the technology as a whole because they have no foresight
Forgot to mention that with older headsets you can also run into software deprecation issues. The more well known options which sold in (comparitively) large number like the OG Vive or Rift CV1, this is usually not a problem as they sold enough units that there's still people actively using them and so the companies behind them still bother to at least support them in their current software. More obscure options, that's not a guarantee.
Prolly one of the most obscure ones, the StarVR One, you can't even use in the SteamVR 1.27 branch, you have to go back all the way to 1.15, which breaks compatibility with a lot of other titles on Steam. I'm speaking from experience here. It's just not worth the savings.
Phone VR as whole, Google Cardboard, GearVR and the Oculus Go, probably hurt the industry more then it ever helped it...
yeah bc most people fall into the second group
Samsung Galaxy S7 released with GearVR as free preorder gift
yikes moment
it was Galaxy Gear smartwatch or GearVR i remember
i think Galaxy S8 too
Samsung even planned successor to GearVR a 6DOF headset with position tracking, eye tracking and face tracking https://www.uploadvr.com/samsung-korean-patent-shows-new-gear-vr-positional-face-eye-tracking/
but then axed project
Wasn't the GearVR also purpose built for specific Samsung Galaxy phones and thus even if you had one, there wasn't any guarantee that it would work with your specific Galaxy phone?
and Note 10 is last phoen that can run GearVR
idk how much difference if samsung managed to do that
yes but it goes far back like all flagship from Galaxy Note 4 to Galaxy Note 10
its also backward compatible
Ah. I thought there were different versions compatible with only a slim range of Galaxy devices...
i think GearVR overall helped Oculus building standalone ecosystem for the millions of customers
found a cv1 from a probably reputable resaler for 130 so i just went with that
It's one of the cheapest entry ways into VR without being absolute trash or locking you behind a standalone system
I'd still recommend a CV1 over a WMR headset, not least for the reason of the WMR timebomb
And OG Vives are slowly creeping up in price again, 'cause people use them for their Watchmen dongles...
Monado is working on WMR compatibility there is small hope but dont buy based on that
also i only say proably reputable because its ebay
Also Monado is Linux only iirc...
As much as I wanna switch to Linux, VR on Linux has always been... kinda garbage
great for living room steam machine
Meh i run my steambox on windows 10 with steam big picture set to autostart
Everything VR is made for Windows, from the drivers, over the VR system software till the games. Except for a very slim selection of headsets, basically no hardware works on Linux, or only parts of it do...
Sure, a lot of it is the software, but it's moving at a snails pace. Last time I tried SteamVR on Linux it was basically in a state of Vive Pre. The lack of ATW was prolly the worst blow...
And some stuff is fault of the open eco system of Linux. If you want a decent desktop control from within VR you'd essentially need to hardcode API paths for virtually every DE out there. If there was one DE, then sure fine, it'd be a solved problem in no time....
btw this is the shitbox of an area ima be doing vr in
could i suggest some refurnishing
i just need to remove the old bed from the room behind me in the photo to move my bed in
though yea pico has better track record for supporting products so far in their history
which isn't long
the Pico Neo 2 was released in 2020
already got this
What are the contents in the box
Looks like 2 cameras, 2 controllers and the headset with a cable
vrcompare has PPD listed there also
it's gonna be tough
i thought my room was small
might want to immediately install pulley system
and silicone covers for the controllers
you are guaranteed to hit someshit
only really plan to do sit down and on bed
does steam vr handle everything i would need to worry about?
they're basically cameras that track little IR leds on the headset and controllers
not particularly immersive but ok
Calculated average PPD. Still doesn't tell the full story. Like I already mentioned, based on such assumed values, the StarVR One should be one of the worst, yet it isn't...
With workload increasing dramatically in the past 2 months i totally understand why VR ain't catching up now kek
everyday i only got like 1 hour of gaming at best
usually separated in 2 sessions of 30 mins
definitely not enough with how much friction is on VR
i end up resorting to easy and quick flatscreen games
You probably have enough space, I play in 1.6 m by 2 meters, rearrange it and you should be good
And I just played Beat Saber in a standard size Hotel Room. It can definetly be done. Whether seeing the boundries all the time right up in your face is a good experience, is another story...
you can just hide them if you can bear the risk
I have them set to minimum and close to the actual "walls" you just get used to it
Also fixed my "broken" Q2 controller, for some reason the haptics were super loud and weird, fell from 2 meters now it's brand new
My space is pretty small 1.6x1.6 meters and i just kinda know where i am at all times somehow, i do have a small carpet in the middle of the room and that combined with the pull of the cable does it i guess
Depends on what you consider best
like which aspects do you value most
but generally the quest 3
that's not bad for a cv1
I'm not planning to get into VR yet, but would my RTX 3060Ti be able to handle games in VR if I ever felt the need to get into VR? I've heard that the graphics card has to render two separate "instances" of a game for VR
3060ti would 100% serve you better
VRAM isn't an issue
i don't recall the last time my 3060 actually fill over 8GB
3060 struggle on VD medium
so meh
i'd take the Ti anyday considering it's closer to 3070 than it is to 3060
If it struggles in VD i don't think they have difference much in codec quality
i mean FPS wise
I bought a 6750xt, 32gb of ddr5 ram, and a ryzen 5 7600. I'm pretty sure I'm set for things like VRChat with my Quest 2 but I just want to double check.
yes it is fine
get referral credit for Quest 2 so you can buy Virtual Desktop for free
Do quest 2 purchases transfer to quest 3?
yes as long you use same Meta account
Can you have 2 different accounts that you can switch into on quest 3?
what do you mean
if you have 2 account in 1 headset you can move to other headset by just logging in
Would it require the phone or can you just log in within the headset
Cause I don't want to do setup each time I log into my account lmao
you will always need phone for first time setup or anything purchase related
Meta headsets support multiple account iirc
Ok
It will for first time. But if you use the same account everything's transfers.. games.. money.. ect
It's all linked to the account itself
Alright, thanks!
Should I get a 3080 (currently have a 9700k) for my quest 2
From what GPU?
1660 super
pretty balanced pc already so 3080 is fine i guess
might want to up CPU in the future
1660 is not up to snuff for modern vr
Yes it is. My wife’s used one for years. Passed it onto my son’s PC and still cooking just fine. No issues just maybe not the highest fps all the elitists want.
That’s the subjective part.
the elitists in question being people who dont like being motion sick omfg
frames actually matter in vr
Well that’s not everyone who does VR…..
Well a 1660 does beat saber fast enough for my wife to not have complained ever
beat saber 😭
And it don’t do no 40 fps……
beat saber could run on a switch
So what….
Doesn’t matter. 1660 will run just about any VR game today without a problem.
no 😭
Show me a game where it will not run.
Not run at a low fps but just flat out will not run on a 1660 then
.......
Exactly.
Running at a low framerate is a problem
probably some parts of alyx
Have you even used a 1660 in VR ever?
Or you just going off the google?
I actually own the card and use it to this day.
Yep and a 1060 is fine still too. Maybe not up to snuff for YOU but does just fine for lots of others.
and sure if you use a vive or rift with it's sub 1080p resolution it can push those pixels but with anything newer it's gonna struggle
next youre gonna say a 1050 is good too 😭
Ok now youre just moving the goalposts. Yes a 1050 plays VR too…..you know what doesn’t do VR good……Intel Arc GPUs.
im not moving any goalposts
it fucking does not it didn't even perform well in vr games at the time it launched
You started with what headset and games then now about resolution. Doesn’t matter game or resolution. The card plays VR just fine.
and yea duh so dont buy an arc card for vr
What!!!!!;;;!;!!!!!!'!!#+#8##6&"-$
how does the game not matter
you do understand
that
games like beat saber and horizon zero west have different performance requirements
But will still run on that hardware regardless.
and you do understand that rendering more pixels takes more performance than rendering fewer pixels
sure at like a dozen frames
That’s what I said now for the 2nd time. Might seem bad to you but not everyone else
1660 doesn’t run like crap.
yes it does
show it to yourself if you already have the hardware lol
I don’t need to lol you’re the one who thinks a 1660 can’t VR when I have one and know it can…..
I don’t need to you made the claim it can’t.
youre making the same claim but the other way around and it's a lot easier for you to gather that data because you already have the hardware????
I think valve, oculus, and Nvidia are going to have a better understanding of that hardware and if it can play VR. I double it would be listed in VR ready GPUs and have plenty of YouTube videos on it playing just about any VR game under the sun…..without issue.
this conversation is pissing me off
Don’t claim it’s not if you can’t back it up.
Definitely playable on medium settings. Ultra settings are OK until cut scenes and holograms come in to play. CyberPowerPC - Gamer Xtreme Gaming Desktop - Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8GB - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 1TB HDD + 240GB SSD - Black gaming computer from Best Buy no commentary Half Life Alyx 1660 super GPU tested on medium and ultra se...
Well darn it looks like HLA just destroys this 1660.......
or NOT.
I know right, it pisses me off when people say stupid shit yet it happens every day.
1050ti is really impossible to enjoy vr with
My wife used that before we got her 1060 years ago and that was annoying for ME, but I had a 2080ti at the time so i was used to the fluidity of the higher card. But she still has banked atleast over 2000 hours in beat saber and id easily wager half was on the 1050ti and 1060.
But she didnt have a problem at all with it. She plays zenith too but that ones always been buggy since its release.
exception of beatsaber
im sure if you would make it possible to run vr on a toaster beatsaber would still run decently on it
Yeah thats just her favorite game. But still just about everything else ran just fine on her quest 1 and cv1. Thats just the biggest problem when some try to talk and say one card is bad or one is good. If they did it already years ago it will still do it just fine now, albeit NOT at the fps or stability that you may be used to on newer hardware. I just find it completely stupid that some people who have never used said hardware, or state that its bad do not actually understand the VR landscape and whats actually condsidered bad or good.
I have plenty of friends who never got motion sickness or any bullshit that everyone says all these cards have problems with. Yet we never had issues using lower end hardware.
Pretty sure one system that we have as extra is an 8350 with a 1660 and it was kicking just fine last november when we used it last. Sure it was the last one to load in EVERYTHING. But we still played games just fine no complaints.
Ugh....just still makes me cry knowing I never got a real multiplayer Robo Recall! I don't know why but that game just tickles me in all the right places lol
Whats your VR and rig setup lookin like?
7600x with a 6800xt and my vr headset is the quest 3
Oh snap! Very beefy! I like it. Did you use any wired headsets before the quest or mainly stuck to those?
tried out the valve index otherwise no not really
quest 3 is my first actual vr headset
Oh ok nice!
I got a Varjo Aero a few months ago. I gotta say this thing has an amazing fov. It just makes me notice the little things I liked better on my index. Been considering selling the Aero to get something new just dont know what else would be worth trying nowadays.
Thinking its mainly just cause I have to set up base stations n everything as where the wife n kids all can just grab their headsets and go.....really hate how the quest makes it look so much more convenient. But I just dont want to stop using my index or aero depending on which one I keep.
The aero I guess went discontinued a couple months ago so thats whats also got me a bit on the eerie side of keeping it. I don't know the process with Varjo if I need any replacement parts or anything or if they will be available either.
my controller keeps moving my cursor instead of my ingame controlls how fix
project wingman
with a cv1
nvm
So it happens
Yeah I got that email too. You can taste the forced expiration under the other terms that state “new apps cannot list support for Quest 1 after April 2024”
Well they say quest 1 support is blocked. Just summarizing most of it. Just kinda crap considering it’s still a decent headset.
Guys I need some help with a headset, can someone please help me out?
i recently bought the Dell Vision, and I installed the mixed reality portal, my pc meets all the specs but I'm getting Error 1-4
cable not connected properly, I checked and both cables are plugged in properly
so I tried restarting my p[c
updating my graphics drivers
installing updates, one I couldn't install because of a continuous "download error" message, it doesn't seem important or relevant to the VR tho, it's a security update
i freed up space, tried switching ports
you mean Dell Visor?
did you plug into USB3.0/3.1/3.2 Gen 1?
No I plugged into the SuperSpeed one!
same thing
Windows 10 or 11?
Windows 10
I'm staying on Windows 10 XD
i've tried googling it, I've tried through the normal windows support, I've checked the websites, tried resetting my graphics driver as well, tried running some reset commands, clearing out some folders and deleting temp files
oh display cable
Yeahhh!
make sure plugged in well then restart PC
if still does not work open device manager
make sure those thinsg show up
seems like cable is toast
WMR wont detect without monitor show headset
you can try whatever until that detects
the weird thing is it kinda worked before? I mean I had no problem with calibration and such
Not calibration
but like
starting to set boundaries up
it detected it, and I got past that error code
you may have to find OcuLink WMR cable replacement
they arent being made anymore prob hope for ebay
well tickle my testicles how coincidental is that
XD
can you please find one for me? I'm in Australia, I
I'm looking and I'm only seeing over priced shit
surely theres some offbrand thing I can get
I fixed it!
How?
Iirc the only WMR headsets with a replacable cable were the HP ones. All others had the cables hard-wired into the unit
yikes
Basically I unplugged both the USB cable and the Display Cable from my computer, ensured that my graphics driver was on it's latest version (I use Geforce Experience), turned off the computer for about 20 seconds, turned it back on, connected to the internet and then put the cables back in and then finished setting it up!
I'm planning to get the quest 3 so that would mean i would also get a new router the supports 2.4 ghz and 5ghz
So that i could use the 5ghz for the quest and then 2.4 for the slime vr i bought
Is that easy to set up? or will it just cause problems
yes that works that is exactly what i do
I'm not a tech person at all or anything is it easy to set up or will i have troubles lol?
there is no difference to standard way of setting it up
a modern router have simple interface you can set up
ohh i see
i was told you needed to do alot of stuff since i will be getting the 8 trackers
well im not less worried
xD
Are AMD gpus bad for vr?
trying to play ACC in VR with my rx 6900xt and 5800x3d and i get like 23ms latency in steam vr
and like 30 fps
using my quest 2 with vr desktop bitrate set to 80ms
im also using latest amd drivers is that the problem?
um 3kx3k render resolution doesn't seem quite right
or does it wait
im not used to using headsets with actually hd panels
thats whats automaticly set to by steam
yeah that's what im confused about
is steamvr render scale per eye or combined
i have no idea
yeah that 122% made me question the res
chat is vd render resolution not accounting for distorsions
idk either i use a wired pc headset and it low key just works 💔
ill try ig
Try setting it to 100% and bumping some graphics settings down in game?
but i need that stupid special quest 2 cable for wired vr
you could also try air link or steam link
Nuh uh it's just a usb 3 cable
a long one
oh ok
But a usb 3 cable nonetheless
already tried that but the resolution on air link ist dog water
mhmrm
ive already set it to 100% befoee but it still says 122% now even 173%
there are two separate resolution scale settings
at least
maybe three if the game has one too
its set to per eye
nothing does
What's set to what
i mean that isn't a setting in steamvr
my steam vr render scale is set to 2.5kx2.5k per eye
thats what you asked earlier, if my render scale is set to per eye or not
ah
right i was just confused bc that isn't a setting you can change
Anyhow 2.5k² sounds right for a 1920 panel + lens distorsion correction
what are your graphics settings in game
my steam VR games keep crashing, usually 1-5 minutes into playing
Kernelbase.dll is the faulting module
Usually vrserver.exe
And vrmonitor.exe
Any ideas?
ive tried Vr high and Vr low, on both of them i get 30 fps
the problem is the high game latency i have on vr desktop
tried air link works perfectly fine but with worse resolution
i think the problem is that the steam resolution setting interfears with the vr desktop resolution
but even if i set my steam res to 20% i have 70+ ms of game latency
if latency is an issue its probably not GPU fault
damn i forgot how much better looking desktop beat saber is
for someone wanting to enjoy vr content while sitting, and maybe some vr chat and maybe skyrim , what would i want for a setup, ?
improve comfort maybe
huh?
Anyone have any discount codes for HTC?
I'm looking at buying some HTC Vive 3.0 trackers and £417 isn't such an agreeable price
You can wait for next black friday
should i buy my friends valve index for 500 bucks
or should i wait until something better comes
still a respectable headset
but
The quest 2 is 200 bucks new and arguably better
Quest for 200 new makes basically everything else a bad deal
if you want index its a good deal
im not a big fan of the quest line of headsets
they get too dirty
and the controllers are a bit too uncomfortable in my hands
pro tip clean your gear
and you can get third party grips
also im not a fan of white electronics
i do
most are shit
you can always cover it with stickers
i only do that with my pc case and switch dock
and it comes with everything
confirmed
often i find it 600 euros, 550 euros
rare 550 pounds
so 500 is a i say close to crossing too good to be true
but not it
i mean he did sell me a 3ds xl for 60 bucks
works flawlessly apart from a swollen battery
but that was just an easy replacement
yup
air link will not work on the oculus quest 2
Snapback to reality song plays
To anyone who bought the quest 3, is it a major upgrade to the quest 2

