#virtual-reality
1 messages ยท Page 15 of 1
a very casual device so far
sadly hand controls isn't the only thing you have to use...
I'd actually buy it if it was 500-1000 USD
Yeah, wouldn't expect to see that kind of pricing for like, a decade
considering its apple, I would go up to like 1800-2200 if they gave controllers as an option or allowed a keyboard and mouse (if I was a mac user ofc)
It supports Bluetooth mkb afaik
no point getting a device at such a price if it doesn't boost efficiency in anything and only slows you down
unless you are rich and like the facetime features that were shown
for meeting or smth
bit expensive for a device used for meeting tho
I bet this is vr's iphone moment
The interface, much like the iphones, was just better than what anyone else was doing
And apple has the pull to get stuff like Disney content and an army of devs
I don't really expect much out of it
its basically just a device for the rich to play with
for work, its a waste
and for average person, it doesn't do anything to make the price worth
I mean isn't that what Apple has always been doing vs the devices google and Samsung release?
not really in many cases honestly...
when I say "the rich" I am talking about those who can spend thousands whenever they want for a toy
a lot of their products, considering how long they can last
are fine for average, just not for broke
The rich will buy this, but so will businesses and devs
would be dumb imo if businesses did it...
spending 3500 to slow down your work efficiency
it isn't an extension either
do you actually think that hololens exists because microsoft is a charity or something?
hololens is fucking trash, and ar is still valuable enough that microsoft has a business out of it
no, the controls are the best part lmao
not for efficiency
this is like when blackberry laughed at the iphone for not having a keybaord
and then whoops
turns out that was the correct choice for consumers
vision pro is just an expensive device for facetime/meetings
not really, because you can type as fast on a display as a keyboard
no you cannot
My head hurts now lmao
you cannot use eye tracking, voice controls and hand tracking as efficiently as keyboard and mouse
idk about you, but I would not use a device for work that would make me take 10x as long to finish my job
I feel like how Linus was feeling in the wan show before Taiwan
would have very little uses, if it has no option to add controllers, keyboard, etc
yeah, so obviously don't replace your desktop with this
it's like people who said "ipad is useless"
or people who said "why would I ever buy airpods"
tfw this is a standalone device, so if you used it for work
you would HAVE to replace your desktop, because its not an extension
if you don't actually consider why people might want something, and just go "but this isn't good for what currently exists"
then you're just being small minded
this does extend macs
meetings is all I can think of
everything else it would not work well for in its current state
very casual uses mostly
limiting it to rich people (unless somehow your average person gonna buy a 3500$ device just for facetime, viewing some images, etc)
only considering what it is now is dumb
You underestimate the power it has in editing
All I gotta say, actually light is right
I already use virtual screens on a fricking pico 4 for my desktop and it's already good enough
apple's vision for mixed reality absolutely dumps on whatever meta is doing
and windows mixed reality
lol
lmao
conpin can you shut up already stop hatig
this is a first gen product, and it's definitely not something most people should buy
Yes pls god
all I am gonna say is, people won't use a device that is fun but makes your work efficiency slower
but this is absolutely the iphone moment for ar
they've already got the core parts working really well, by all accounts
You haven't even fucking tried it
do you even have to try it to be able to compare the efficiency of controls, between mouse and keyboard/controllers vs "siri close this app", ok sign when looking at an icon, etc
controllers are just worse for general UI?
PLEASE that's such a misrepresentation
I can look around faster than I can move my hand
We don't even know the control scheme of anything
by all accounts the UI is actually incredible
no, we know that the primary pointing device is looking at stuff, and you input a basic click/tap by touching your thumb and index finger
it has enough sensors to track your hands at least a bit over your shoulder, from what MKBHD said
I cannot imagine, a lot of uses in work where this would work well
meetings and such is where I see the most happening
you can't imagine how looking at things to select them is much easier than waving your arms around while carrying something?
or how looking at a text field and talking is vastly superior to using controllers to type?
tfw joysticks exist
tho mouse and keyboard is still king for efficiency in most jobs
the fact that you're seriously claiming that joysticks are comparable to your own eyes
are you just arguing in bad faith or something
eye tracking so far being absolute dog crap accuracy, and the worst part being voice commands requirement
except
as previously stated
no, I wish they would've made it more of an extension instead of standalone
many
many
times
literally every single person who has used it
has said that the eye tracking fucking shits on whatever anyone else has done
currently, meetings
seems like something that could be 10/10
the two absolute standout features of this device are the screens, which are literally best in class, better than vajro
and the UI, which is again as far as anyone has said best in class
it doesn't even just have to work well
it has to be about as fast as just using a keyboard and mouse for a lot of work related
don't really think your boss will enjoy you switching to a device that will make you take months longer to finish
there are some use cases I do see tho
mostly related to meetings, interacting more in person while doing something else
no, what job is bottlenecked by typing speed
like
that's not a thing
there is no job where they hire a human to type real fast that uses a regular ass keyboard
better question is, what job would be bottlenecked by not being able to select, open, or close as fast
have you had an actual job
what the fuck kind of occupation is based on APM
data entry slaves?
a lot of programs used require you to select something, if you have to look at it every single time you want to do it
just adds up
wha
do you
not look at things
when you click on them
I feel like that's a requisite part of clicking on something
pointing your mouse > pressing cliok
vs
looking at an icon, tab, etc > doing ๐๐ป > it responding
which is more efficient
okay, either you're dumb or you're arguing in bad faith
because no sane human being is going to argue that using a mouse is faster than just looking at things
but its not just looking at things
This ^
sadly for you, its neither
meh, the saddest thing here is you right now but sure...
been here repeatedly saying "I see enough uses, especially with meetings, but the controls are going to slow down a lot of jobs"
You're comparing it to other companies that half ass their tracking
Basing it*
most obvious example would just be coding jobs or anything that requires more than a few inputs per minute...
That's why they have magic keyboard connectivity as one of their ads
coding speed is not based on APM lmao
but importing your mac display into your headset, while putting other things to the side, such as those you have to talk to, sure
great
you don't hire a programmer literally for typing skills
And yes as a student web dev i think more than i do type
you hire a programmer for problem solving capabilities
we literally have AI to do the boilerplate shit now
If me finishing a website is based on WPM i would finish shit in two hours
the job of the human is to actually create things, not do 100 APM
imagine being so skilled at something that's not monetizable damn
if being wrong was an occupation you'd be the fucking michael jordan of it
But then apple literally advertise keyboard connectivity in one of the section
tho best use I can imagine is using the bit they showed about importing your mac device display into your headset
and still being able to keep other apps to the side
Magic mouse and keyboard
it's fine
probably faster and more accurate than controllers because it's just your eyes, but it seems like it's mainly voice input
MKBHD went over all of this in his impressions
the eye tracking works really well
that's also what everyone else has said
wii remote typing 2024 remake
Unlike the competitions
Wii remote typing is literally just the current vr solution
yeah, and the best in class passthrough should make using a keyboard really easy
hope they do a lot with that part honestly
it's good enough to take notes on your phone through, so a keyboard should be pretty trivial
I can already type on my keyboard using pico 4 passthrough
Let alone apple's 10x better shit
And also. If you rely on your eyes a lot to type you're probably not the type that do 100WPM
y'know what would be sick
the VP has IR illuminators
and probably IR cameras
so it could have night vision passthrough
Broooo that be fucking crazy
walk around your house in the dark
Not me at 3 AM using it to walk to my refridgerator
I just think its sad you have to say unnecessary stuff to feel good...
would be nice if you could just read what I said, basically all I've been saying is anything that requires a higher amount of inputs, (like being able to type on a keyboard) the controls wouldn't work well for that
but as an extension to a mac device keeping tabs or info to the side, or doing meetings while just using your desktop/laptop (if they don't try to focus too much on the standalone aspect of it) would be great
I fucking give up
The fact that you can only think of it as a display just proves that you can't consider the wider implications of a major company actually working on AR
Why VR prototype keep using Oculink cable instead of anything else
I bet a lot of development stuff already uses it so
you cannot imagine using voice controls or hand tracking instead of a mouse or keyboard to do video editing, typing emails, coding, etc being quite a bit slower? (which is a lot of computer related jobs)
there are some specific stuff it would be great for tho
No, the vast, vast majority of jobs are not apm bottlenecked
If they were we'd all have switched to DVORAK years ago
they would be if you try to write some code with god damn eye tracking or speech to text instead of a keyboard
The value of a human is the ability to problem solve, not type fast (unless you're a professional transcriber)
Siri, have gpt write me a function that does x
Great, have it write some tests
Real life Jarvis and Cortana lets go XD
That doesn't look right, on line forty eight it made this error
Of course that's not reality for now
But y'know, the thing works with keyboards so
But I'll be damn sure we are headin' straight there
which is what I was saying earlier..
using it as an extension to what you are already doing basically
in which case you would be talking about not needing 500 displays all around the room
even if one casual example would be "walking to the kitchen, opening a recipe to the side"
or the bit of opening 3D models in AR
importing it from desktop to AR
there are some specific types of uses I can imagine
but its not exactly the most all round device, pretty niche
It's niche for now
AR will probably replace everything other than high end desktop in like, ten to twenty years
I at least want AR/VR to replace my monitor/TV
have the perceived size without the space taken up
I think TV is probably going to take longer to replace than monitors or laptops
the communal experience is pretty important for TV
I use my TV as a monitor, so...
also, what I think is probably not talked about enough is the cameras on the VP
mostly about living alone and wanting a large display
the content creation capabilities that opens up
adult and otherwise
much like putting high quality cameras in phones
Huh
If the vision pro uses custom facial scans
I wonder if it even has user adjustable ipd
they said you have to buy inserts iirc?
i think that was only for prescription lenses
Just a quick question how realistic is it that the Valve Index 2 is going to be announced in this or next month?
Almost impossible
Very unrealistic
Like 0.0000001% chance of that
Can someone quickly list the rough steps to linking quest 2 to pcvr? i've done it before, but now i have a pc (used a laptop) and it was like 2 years ago, i can't remember quite how
Install oculus software, plug cable then start oculus link in your headset menu
Assuming you are up to date
You just start steamvr then Oculus will automatically launch steamvr
Its automatic so... It might fail and by then you should redo entire thing
My failure rate of failing auto launch is about 1%
okay
Once you had run SteamVR you can start it again from the Oculus PC Library, as if it's a game you bought through the Oculus PC app
oh okay
alright well, just downlaoding steamvr now, but i was able to really easy get quest link working, to the point where i could access my pc through the headset
yeah lol, i remember struggling so hard to get it to work last year
now my only problem is that my front io usb c port has neither the bandwith nor power to do vr without crashing, so either i may invest in a cable that can actually utilise my ports, or a usb c io add in card since i don't have any usb c on my motherboard
any recommended cables or cards?
hi guys, you guys think how many years of future are left for the quest 2? maybe i can get to buy them
how many years you say?
probably 2 more years
You could wait an spend a little extra on a q3 and get probably another 5 years out of it
Quest 1 is pretty much about to completely die
yeah considering quest 3 is still coupl months away
enough to save up extra
Quest 2 is healthy and Meta themself are confident with long support
using it for standalone or pcvr?
there are better options like maybe the G2 for PCVR
Also Quest 2 successor should have same feature with only performance uplift so the rest of hardware compatibility will match really well
want it for summer so i cant wait lol
first idea was only steamvr but if i have standalone i will use it of course
we can talk about piracy here?
its easy to get apks and sideload them to q2?
im not going to get into a nintendo-like ecosystem, the games for it are expensive asf
@little plinth
there is sidequest for sideloading but it is not for piracy
simply a place to get stuff that is not in the oculus store
there's not like a dedicated repo for all of the apks like its for apple with appdb
and how's the steamvr gameplay as it's not native streaming
you use any fancy routers like wifi 6 or that?
My setup consists off:
-Gigabit ethernet switch
-36ft/10m Cat 7 ethernet cable
-144Mbps Ethernet to USB A
-USB C to USB A 3.0 + USB C (PD)
So it's wired
you use the pico 4 wired?
But idk if ethernet works on q2 but it works on pico 4
Yea wired gives better performance and cheaper than wifi 6
That 144Mbps might bottleneck if you have good CPU and new 300Mbps updated encode limit
Plus i got a 10meter cable
I don't feel tethered
for that use a link cable no?
ALVR only works via network, same with virtual desktop. Meaning ethernet or wifi
Oh and i got this Cat 7 ethernet bundled with my pico 4 since it's used (1 month used, never actually used actively)
So in total i think i spent $40
The ethernet adapter, i already got since before the pico 4 so i guess that takes $10 from the total
Now this works with pico 4, doesn't mean it will work with Q2
I heard Q2 is more restrictive here with ethernet adapter refusing to work
I don't own it
So that's all i know
I got a 2200G so that shit can't do shit
And i only got a 3060. On HEVC encoder latency gets too high on big bitrate
On H264 I'd need to crank bandwidth higher
The adapter seems to die above 95mbps so I'll need to get better ones
and wireless with no fancy routers goes good or if i want steamvr need to be wired yes or yes?
@little plinth
It's subjective
But with shit router it's objectively not good
With a wifi 6 router it's subjective
Some love the freedom, some hate the marginal increase of latency
HEVC is bandwidth efficient not power efficient
Man this is why AV1 is such a big deal its both bandwidth and power efficient
for you to prospect I have a house with 3 floors
1st floor got the ISP router with the fibre cable to it
2nd floor and 3rd floor a Mikrotik router with Atheros AR9300 (idk which wifi gen it uses) connected to the ISP router downstairs using cat6
i prob will want to play it in my room alonside my pc (cable link obviously) or in the 3rd floor where i have like a 5x5m uninterrupted play space
Isn't AV1 even heavier for encode.
It's a big deal for streaming mainly because it is even more bandwidth efficient and not hard to decode
But encoding is pretty heavy
And ALVR looks noticably more meh than streaming assistant on pico 4 tbh
But i use it because it's more CPU friendly
And can do foveated render
Is AV1 encoding supported to VR?
AV1 encoding was driven by the GPU no?
It can be a really big deal for me, i have a beefy GPU (Rx 6700xt) so maybe it's worth it?
There are no vr headset supporting AV1 yet
And AV1 supported GPUs are onlys starting to pop up from RTX 40 series, RX 7000 and Intel Arc Alchemist
depends on preset
av1 can be pretty fast
Meta has officially unveiled the brand-new next-generation headset, the Meta Quest 3. Boasting more than twice the GPU processing power, next-gen Snapdragon chips, and higher resolution displays on the headset will allow for smoother and faster gameplay and entertainment. With a 40% slimmer optic profile, comfort is at the forefront alongside th...
how tf did i just hear about this
Zucc revealed it like an hour before the Meta Gaming Showcase last week...
๐ I guess Iโm just out of the vr loop
You can't be so out of the loop that you missed the Apple Virtual Cinema ehh... I mean Vision Pro?
looking at ready player one again. this junk shit is actually less sophisticated that our current solution
eh the quest 2 is no where near the visual quality and tracking capability of vision pro
it would be a more fair comparison if it's an index
even then it's still far as index is stuck to base stations
quest pro? that's nearly half your budget
still, would you rather have a high end gaming setup or a gimmick headset that only lasts 1.5-2h on battery?
that gimmick headset is basically an entire macbook
you're sacrificing one thing or the other
an entire macbook has a keyboard and a trackpad, and lasts more than 2hr on battery
on the meme you sent
you get a quest 2 that is horrible in comfort, low fidelity, subpar tracking
needs to be tethered at all time for PCVR
because standalone its shit
or if you get the quest pro
you're not getting the 4090 PC
even if you stick with Q2 that 4090 PC is stuck at home
.
an entire macbook without the headset
a macbook with a say quest pro is already near the price point yet again
also do you really come in this channel just to send a shitty meme?
you said that the gimmick headset is an entire macbook
basically
both have the same chip, and? point still stands.
gimmick headset doesn't have keyboard and trackpad and isn't as productive as the macbook
and we really making fun of apple when some varjo headset is like 8000 dollars on top of a 1k/yr subscription
and still need a PC
if you wanna jump on a hate train at least be more informed
varo aero is 2k euros
I am not on the hate train
that's not their top shit
thats the one available to consumers
so get a PC with the remaining 1500
and still stuck to a PC
and that PC of apples can't play games.
because it's not made for games
you're like one of those AMD fanboys that thinks GPUs are only for games
try bringing your varjo aero to a plane
lol you really think people gonna render on the apple vision pro?
oh wait you can't even move to a different room because of basestations
well they can if they want, the M2 is more than capable
and apple showed off 3d render as one of the capabilities
oh wait vision pro only lasts up to 2hr on battery
oh wait other headset is straight up 0 hour battery because they're tethered
not a fair comparasion
spend that 1500 on a quality laptop
then its fair
goodluck powering an index on a plane
and a laptop for 1500 gonna get you something mid
not to mention the vision pro isn't even meant for consumer
it's a first gen product for developers to prepare the ecosystem on
A 1500 dollar laptop will give you horrid performance on a HMD you spent 2k onโฆ..thatโs just dumb
like how the first gen apple watch was
a 1500 laptop can defeat a m2 in perf
source?
Lol yeah noโฆ.a mobile 3060 level laptop is not going to be the difference between amazing and crap compared to an M2.
AMD Said Zen 4 7940HS is 30% Faster than M1 Pro with up to 30 Hours of battery life! Truth or Cherry Picked Benchmarks?
Best 30W Fast Charger for 14 Pro Max on Amazon โก https://geni.us/ax09
Check out Casekoo's iPhone Cases! (10% OFF with code maxtech10) โก https://casekoo.com/ref/MaxTech/
Best deals on M1 Macs on Amazon โฌ๏ธ
M2 MacBook Air โก h...
that isn't the point nevertheless.
still barely enough
and don't forget any laptop that can actually beat m2 in GPU will die in an hour
and can't run on full power without charging
soo good luck doing that on a plane
It is. Thatโs what would make people buy it versus notโฆ.
my friend with a 3060 laptop need a big ass brick charger
More people are going standalone. Just facts of the world bud.
the apple vision pro is expensive as fuck
but it is a first gen device for developers
there isn't any softwares yet so developers need to get their hands on it first
then say the Apple Vision Air come out for 1/2 the price
dislike ratio doesn't look healthy, and he doesn't provide enough benchmark and just makes points that its plugged in and doesn't show benchmarks where its running on battery
It sucks. Because I believe index still the best but that vision pro is a MacBook in a headset and any 1500 dollar laptop isnโt going to match it in its respective category. No matter how awesome a HMD will look and feel.
dislikes isn't even visible and return youtube dislike is unrealiable as hell
unreliable? who says that.
its quite reliable and normal benchmarks videos doesn't have such bad ratios, none at all.
youtube doesn't give access to the API that allows for viewing dislikes
these extensions are literally guessing
Lol lots of actual YT content makers doโฆ.like the ones who own this discord for one lolโฆ.
educated guess but a guess nonetheless
Linus even makes a joke about the dislikes being crapโฆ.
Itโs in his pay for 4k YouTube video lol
they aren't literally guessing, comparasion of two LTT videos.
and how do you know they're accurate
do you have the actual dislike
from LTT themselves
nobody says they're accurate, but they're a good estimate
they're not even a good estimate
their only basis of data is other extension users which is a very small portion of users
which also can be affected by statistical bias
like how people who have the extension is more likely to dislike the video than the majority
causing the view to represent false information
everybody is affected by statistical bias, but you can notice when a video has significantly more dislikes than normal dislikes a creator getes.
read my last sentence again
and it's also your confirmation bias
oh i don't like this video and like minded people also dislike it
it must be true
Exactly. Now with it requiring an extra step to dislike no one cares as much and it gives bad information
your last sentence is based on your guesses, you are also affected by the confirmation bias as we saw
confirmation bias is only accepting data that confirms to your view and ignoring the rest
my sentence has nothing to do with it
I haven't said about your last sentence being confirmation bias
can you even do reading comprehension on your own message
I didn't say it being confirmation bias? I didn't even specify which ones were
and the apple vision pro is not a device for me or you
you might be happy with being stuck at home for the VR headset
hell even stuck on a single room with basestation based headset
but a lot of people value being able to use it anywhere
like well on a plane
Lol or just not with a damn cord attached.
Simple as that. Some people use it at home in the same room everyday. They donโt want the cord.
plus that external battery can be easily easily be switched for bigger ones
and again
a first gen device
made for developers
and everyone who tried it said it's miles better than everything else
source: MKBHD and MrWhosetheboss
this is swaying from apple vision pro and more towards other things
Exactly. Dude says it like a small thing the size of your wallet in you pocket giving it way more battery life kinda moots that whole 2 hr crapโฆ
i'm literally talking about the vision pro
honestly you're lost
it's not even worth continuing
Yeah and itโs a proโฆif you think thatโs the only one thatโs going to exist then yeahโฆ.oof
and ffs your first message in this channel is that ignorant meme
Theyโre going to have a lower priced model when they can shove a max or pro variant in it and continue to sell the original model for 2k years after itโs been superseded.
swaying from the topic once again
Youโre not even talking VR shut up dudeโฆ..
Heโs talking about the vision proโฆ..
you're literally the one not responding to my argument and just keep saying i'm swaying
oh pardon me forgot the vision pro is mixed reality!
your only reason you're in this channel is to send an ignorant meme so i don't expect you to have much experience with VR in the first place as well
Oh I see youโre just hellbent on being politically correct. Well no one thinks a crap laptop and a HMD is better than the vision pro. Bye bye scrub.
and before you say i'm "swaying"
i've been saying that vision pro is a first gen product for developers
and for $3500 for basically the most advanced VR device on the planet
it's a bargain
look at Varjo XR3
8000 dollars behemoth
It is for sure. Itโs early adopter and bragging rights lol
mixed reality* not VR
No one cares bud move along
mixed reality device is a device capable of both VR and AR
even a quest 2 and pico 4 is a mixed reality devicew
you're just being pedantic now
no need for hostility, and a 1500$ laptop isn't crap, you seem to think everything apple doesn't make is crap
Me and my Corsair One i300 beg to differ.
a laptop that you can use for more than 2 hours is better than vision pro and its gimmicks
good luck trying to use a laptop with a GPU in it for more than 2 hours
even a laptop with a 3060 will die in under 2 hours
No need for stupidity either but you care more about trying to correct someone than actually arguing your point to begin with.
and again
it's an external battery
Lol sure willโฆ.
oh then wonderful! it's as good as the vision pro.
and those 2hr estimates are of Apples, it says up to so it might even be 1hr with heavy rendering
Yeah and honestly if you have a decent enough charger you can come close to 12 hours
there is no doubt a 3060 mobile will be better than a M2
i mean it's impressive it can render alone lmao
you need a laptop and the headset
for windows based ones
Yep but I donโt have to carry the laptop tooโฆ..duh.
and still last under 2hours
it has a M2 chip ofc
I talked about a laptop + headset combo like ages ago, no need to bring it up
get nreal at that point
You just fucking said it again less than 2 minutes agoโฆ..are you blindโฆ.
specify
This^
and the headset was about a VR one, not mixed reality
a 3060 mobile is not gonna beat the M2 in any productivity based application
Itโs reference to your laptop and headset combo donโt try n say oh i just said itโs better than it gpu side
its talking about the processing power of the GPU
mixed reality is both VR and AR
the vision pro can be dialed to be fully VR
do you even watch the keynote
or just see meme and join the bandwagon
and a Quest Pro is also mixed reality
so idk why it's your talking point
so is a Quest 2, 3, Pico 4
Heโs just on about now how the 3060 is better. He just keeps moving the goalposts lol
and no a 3060 mobile is not gonna beat M2 in productivity applications
in games? sure
but vision pro is not made for it
what kinds of productivity?
and it doesn't need a laptop to run
photo editing?...
First it was how the combo is better than itโฆ.now itโs just the gpu powerโฆ..soon itโll be price to performance or some@other useless metric
cinabench
cinebench does not show real world performance
there is no doubt a 3060 has more graphical performance than a m2 chip
this should be common knowledge
what shall we use? blender? what do you want my good king?
Lol now Iโm actually having fun.
Keyword there is should. Apparently that didnโt make it to some.
Lol yeah my m2 pro 16 destroys my 4080 in photo work mostly too. Itโs quite embarrassing. Did even worse with the 3080ti before it too lol.
this is more of optimisation than raw graphical power
Once you have a real understanding of what the M series will be able to do once actually fully utilized will make 3060 level cards nonexistent in the discrete market
what works in the real world matters more
i don't give a fuck if a desktop GPU is 2x more in raw power if it's half the speed in actual work
and mourer you own both a 4080 and an m2?
that's good that we have someone with actual experience with the devices
Hardware accelerators op
Yep, 3080ti in my Corsair one, 4080 in my other desktop and a m2 iPad Pro and m2 pro MBP
Also why Intel smashes amd for video work
QuickSync goes hard
This is where Apple rocks with photos compared to my 4080
That optimization be just da shit!
i am definitely no apple fan
i regularly mock them pricy fucks
but credits where its due
And I have a 12900k and a 13900 for each desktop respectively
Oh bro. I know they suck in our departments but manโฆ.slaying some ff14 online for 6+ hours at 90fps NOT plugged in! Find me something else that can do that!
No windows based laptop comes closeโฆ..
and really comparing vision pro with a laptop + headset combo is not fair
best alternative is the $1500 Quest pro that has way shittier resolution, inferior lenses
trash hand tracking, way worse eye tracking etc
and an outdated SoC
m2 on pugetbench premiere vs 3060 laptop
the M2 smokes the XR2 by 10 miles
Jesus Christ dude. Go buy each one and see for yourself.
200 difference while eating under half the power the windows laptop use
and really you can't argue with someone who actually uses both
and have first hand experience
mourer has a 4080, not a 3060 mobile
Lol careful bud. I have quite a few machines
A > B and B > C
then A > C
simple logic
I have a desktop 3060 in my hands so I can def compare
Much closer than your web searching can lol
the vision pro is expensive but it can do things others can't
i'd like to see a desktop + quest combo be used on a cafe
You rock dude! Lol I love it!
these also have integrated, we don't know which one is being used anyways
not to mention the quest needs constant wifi 6 router connection between the two devices
or tethered by a short cable
Pretty sure quick sync is actually better than GPU when supported
we aren't talking about the quest, quest is VR
Quick sync is wildly fast
what else do you want
2nd one says nvidia card budโฆ.same processor series would be weaker lol
you said we're talking about vr not mixed reality
yep, I have quick sync lemme try that
then now we're not?
QuickSync performs best paired with an Nvidia GPU and a capable CPU
is vision pro VR?
it is
that's what mixed reality is
if you actually been reading
VR/AR is mixed reality
so what can it run
that's what you know, mixed is
running in an entirely virtual environment
it can do that
no?
Heโs still gonna prove the 3060 is better in some graph based environmentโฆ..not reality though
Man a standalone headset with an M2 is gonna be wild
I think you're confusing them
i can't expect more from a gamer head
"can't do games then bad"
like AMD fanboys
a 3060 can do things a M2 can't
Just think! Itโs gonna be so awesome! Then if they get a m2 pro or max!
and an M2 standalone can do things a 3060 can't
like be used without charging and dying in 1 hour
like?
lol vision pro suffers from the same fate
Fit inside an HMD lmao
the M2 don't need to be charged to be full power
and the vision pro can do it alone without a laptop
Dude just give it up. Your 3060 is crap compared to an m2. Consumers agreeโฆ.and even developers agree lol
the vision pro has a pretty meh battery life because the battery is tiny
if you switch the external battery the size of macbook's battery it will last as long
If my 3080 fails against an M2 a 3060 mobile will do WORSE.
which devs?
The ones the guy just showed you above with quick sync where an intel gpu slapped the hell out of the 3080
oh
yeah
can't say anything bout that, W intel
My point. The m2 is a SOC. Now you build me something like the new AMD chip that has the high gpu count and shove some ram in itโฆ..now the M2 is in trouble
the vision pro runs without a laptop
that alone is a W
no other standalone headset come close
and it's very clear it's not for the consumers
Thatโs why the m2 is better than most compared hardware. Itโs ram, chipset, stupid high interconnect that amd not intel have all fabbed together. Until they build something along those lines the m series will always be able to compensate for the brute force of high end GPUs
it's very well not worth it for $3500
but you can't deny it's better than the rest
I mean I canโt say itโs not worth until I get my hands on it
and for the most advanced wearable technology on the planet it's a bargain when a varjo xr3 is 8000 dollars with a 1000/yr subscription
Depends on what you get with that subscription
and when something like the vision air comes out it will be wild
it's 8000 dollars AND 1000 a year
to use the headset
I mean you can use better examples, nreal air is 379$ and connects to a mac giving you AR
the nreal visual fidelity is shit
the controls is shit
it can't run without a mac
it's fully AR without VR capability
no eye and hand tracking
its 379, like 15% of the price.
you pay for what you get
that's like saying don't get a lambo
get this russian lada
because it's 10% the price
no
you want a different experience
don't get this gaming pc
get this potato pc for $50
see how dumb it sounds
but spending 3500$ on a headset that has limited use cases sounds dumb
3500 to have the most advanced device ever created
what?
it is the most advanced consumer device ever created
still over the line
we'll see.
there's a difference with someone who actually has money and wants the best
and
someone who's fine with nreal's shitty quality
different segment of the market
not comparable in the slightest
yeah
and who made the comparison? you
you compared it to a inferior device that was 8k, so I gave you a inferior device that was 379$ instead of 8k
i said 3500 for the most technologically advanced device
the varjo xr3 is another technologically advanced device
the best in the market before vision pro comes
and the fact that the vision pro is less than half the varjo
is impressive
indeed, we need to wait for the tech to mature further to get a accurate conclusion of it, I agree it looks exciting.
fckin frfr
@lime pewter are you actually 17
i saw that one, but not the Quest 3 for whatever reason
did the apple announcement bring all the morons out of the woodworks
It always does. Because hitting the dead horse of poking fun of, defending of or anything in between just goes in to super mega drive the day of and the weeks after. Apple hasnโt released a new product line since the Apple Watch. So these people have been really chomping at the bit.
This horse will be ridden hard and beat to dust until someone of reasonable reputation get their in depth hands on and demonstration of the device and even then you will have a bunch of people who will never touch it with tons of opinions.
Eh, it's probably the future of tech interaction so they'll have to suck it up eventually
Apparently Google/Samsung/Qualcomm are coming out with something too
not in gaming definitely not
And it is not meant for gaming
Console gamers when you tell them that computers can do more than game
Its not for gaming but I was expecting at least gaming as afterthought
this meme is circulating so often now
Who in their right mind thinks that nobody will develop games for this
Quest 2 lmao
The real joke is comparing that to a high end headset
No one. Not as long monetization potential is small.
But I would consider if like I make iPad apps and add small addition that works on headset.
Since this runs iPad apps
For example if VRChat releases iOS version of the app, they can do small work to add full view compatibility with Quest like controls for the headset and it won't cost much development time.
But Apple is not even giving us that option. They only let developers make apps in windowed mode and 3D space.
I think the apple headset will only be worth it if they have a good ecosystem at launch, because regardless of headset quality no software to run on it is a problem
No, nearing 21
But go ahead and think whatever yโall wantโฆ
don't worry, won't be seeing me here anymore
no point talking when the only things people can think of responding with is things like "uhm, let me think... I know the best response!!, hey hey you are brain dead!!"
says a lot about their level...
At bare minimum, it'll run ipad+iOS and extend a mac
Also Disney is planning a day one app, iirc
what VR apps are on IOS
Apple is also likely to leverage their purchase of that vr sports company
mabye
i still cant afford one and think that most other headsets are probably fine
This is not a mass market device
it is not
This one is for devs, businesses and rich people
I am none of those things
We'll probably see a cheaper one with an A-series chip and maybe lower specs in a couple years
yeah, we will also probably see similar performance non-apple ones in that timeframe as well, I am generally not an apple person
Doubt it tbh
I don't think apple is making much money off this one
So unless a bunch of other companies have cash to burn
you can always count on somebody to try and beat apple at their own game
The Apple headset is in a weird niche of its own. It's better then the Quest Pro is most regards, but it lacks the software and controllers of the Quest Pro.
It's also kinda like a budget standalone Varjo XR-3, but it lacks the compute power to properly be considered a competitor...
technologically it is the most advanced whether it's for gaming or not
exactly what the vision pro is for
not to mention it will release next year
apple is still giving time to devs to learn and develop for it
people really be comparing vision pro to quest 2
-brick on your head that's uncomfortable af to use
-stuck to the gaming PC because it's a joke standalone
-fresnel lenses and low resolution
-still black and white passthrough
-an order of magnitude weaker SoC
We know that it can stream wirelessly from a Mac, though
Whether the bandwidth for full VR exists isn't clear
Yeah, quest 3 should get closer, but I think the most important bits from the avp are the screens, the interface and the eyesight
It can only do that for flat applications tho. Spacial apps have to run on the built-in M2.
I assume they did it this way to avoid any potential wireless latency bottlenecks...
(the SDK needed for spacial apps only runs on visionOS, thus it can be concluded that it has to run on the headset)
Apple mentions zero about VR nor AR
Apple made this with no interest in making a VR headset
Controller is not a focus and will probably become an after thought like Apple Pencil
it would be cool if one day game developers somehow start making games for it if they use the ar to its full potential
and the wide variety of sensors
I could see a crazy horror game where itโs inside your own house in AR happening
and taking advantage of the eye trackers to do spooky things
but
wishful thinking
the hardware is amazing but the software is really holding it back from its true potential
Vision Pro remains unattractive due to how inaccessible it is
for game design reasons
probably hard
Got some Mario Kart AR vibes
Hey folks, I have a friend that plays Microsoft flight sim and only microsoft flight sim, in VR, using a Reverb G2. He has a 1070 and it's struggling, does anyone know what would be a decent card for him to jump to? benchmarks for this seem pretty non-existant.
I'd say something like a 3080 at minimum. Also, the more VRAM the better. The G2 can be quite VRAM hungry I've noticed...
He can afford a bit more with his budget, looking around ยฃ1k, wondering if the 7900XTX would be a good choice.
7900XTX will perform same as 6900 XT for now
Unless he is willing to gamble that AMD will fix the issue, its been since launch and they still have not fixed performance issue
Managed to find something on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEMXfhjpwlo and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8POCSacLstg
The big number at the top I'm guessing is frame rate, looks like the 3080 outperforms the 7900XTX? crazy ๐ฎ
although 30fps on both seems a bit meh
I see, so atm nvidia is the way then, which I guess narrows it down to either the 3080, 4070, 4070ti, or push the budget a bit for a 4080?
I mean, there is also the point that we ran it on my 3080 + index, and that's what made my friend run out and buy a Reverb G2 in the first place ๐ so I know the 3080 can do it alright
wouldnt a 6800xt or 6950xt better?
I'm not too familiar with how AMD fares in comparison to Nvidia cards. Sorry ^^"
What I know is that you'd preferably want 3080 performance at minimum for a really good experience at native res on the G2...
thought amd performs the same as flatscreen when it comes to native dp headsets
As long as whatever AMD card you go with can match that for VR, you should be fine. 7000 cards apparently have a bug that makes them less desirable for VR then 6000 cards. Other then that, yeah...
because no need to encode abs decompress
Stereoscopic rendering is quite different from flat game rendering, so there can be (and in the case of RX 7000 is) a difference in performance between flat and VR...
Also, Rendering for VR requires quite a bit of resolution overhead to account for the effects that the lens pre-distortion has on the image. The G2 at native renders at about 3200x3200 per eye (so about 6400x3200 total pixels, but because of stereoscopic synchronized rendering the 3D scene only needs to be prepared once; shaders need to be calculated twice however)
I recently bought the Valve Index. I know they have built-in headphones and a microphone, but what can I get if I want a better quality one?
They already are like extremely good? They may not be super bassy, but they're pretty much bang on flat tuned. Almost audiophile quality I'd say...
Otherwise, the Index does have a 3.5mm headphone jack beneath the face gasket, in case you absolutely have to use your own cans
My Problem is more the privacy that I don't have
Ah. Wanna watch the P word in your parents living room I see ๐
Well, like I said, there's a headphone jack on the headset, so anything that isn't too bulky around the ears should fit just fine...
AMD is not great for vr, generally
the marques brownlee video on the apple headset says there will be no controllers not even as an after thought
good video btw you should watch it, I'm usually not a fan of him but this one was pretty good
Apple said the same with styluses
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
no intention other than fingers
i watched him
lol who knows then, I kind of hope they allow third-party periphrials, so you could buy a non apple controller
after paying the STEEP price for the headset itself, buying anything else from apple would probably be too expensive
Apple designed software with only hand tracking for now and that is what they want
controller is a novelty popular and perfect for games
Apple have no need and no want to do that
yeah I suppose, apple is the kind of company to not leave users much wiggle room, kind of lock things down to be what they want
they dont even use the word virtual reality or vr even once in presentation altho later they said more about something similar
and they haven't done styluses?
the only thing they've released is the apple pencil, but that serves a different function
the pencil is not the primary pointing device, it's specifically targeting for handwriting and drawing
yes that is a stylus 
much in the same way that a gamepad is a mouse, sure
I hope they never add a controller for the headset
I think they should go full on awesome and do a haptic glove
rather than stylus the full answer is Steve Jobs say best way to interact is with finger and stylus is not a good way
I think it'll take a while for the tech to be good enough for apple to actually be willing to do that
and to end quote about stylus from Steve Jobs: "yuck"
yeah, but it will take a while for the headset to be affordable enough for anyone to buy it
I dunno, I don't think apple will ever go for a glove
they really clearly don't consider VR to be the primary use case
like, when you boot up the headset, it puts you into passthrough mode by default
If apple ever do glove (unlikely) it will happen after numerous other companies try
and it cant come from startups
unless apple aquires it
thats true, what I really want is for apples headset to be not the main one but what ushers in a new era, lol after reading Ready Player One, I really want the OASIS to become a thing
they have no intention to do that
apple would never make something like that though
na ah if there is its 3rd party
apple pretty clearly believes that the metaverse is garbage
like Hideo Kojima
but Apple have no history of successful gaming and gaming does not match their luxury brand
the metaverse is garbage, you obvi dont know what the OASIS is
oasis is literally just the metaverse?
hah hardly, go read ready player one
I don't hate myself enough to read it again
and it is quite literally the metaverse
the oasis is a second, virtual reality
first of all, it was a good book, second you didn't pay close attention because the metaverse is just a crappy VRchat last I checked, the OASIS was more of a VR MMORPG
no, it was a bunch of 80's references and a mary sue, but it is literally derived from the snowpiercer metaverse
no, it's not snowpiercer
what the fuck is that called
snow crash, that's it
well for one, that looks like a good book, I will be reading it, and again, the difference with the metaverse is it is trash from a company everyone hates, the metaverse should have been developed for like another 20 yrs, at least, before they should have even considered releasing it
the metaverse in rpo is literally run by a evil corporation
like
they're literally the antogonists
they have a private army and they kill people
haha NO that's IOI that is evil, the oasis is run by GSS, who arent the bad guys IOI is trying to take it over, have you even read the book?
I read it like five years ago
and the metaverse is basically replacing reality in rpo, so regardless
you don't actually seem to understand what the concept of the metaverse is
the real life one that facebook pulled out of their butt? no, no one cares about that one
the metaverse is essentially the internet evolved into reality
facebook hasn't managed to build it successfully
but if they did, they would make so much money
you would basically control the world
yeah I hope there are two metaverse's that clash and create competition
that would defeat the point of the metaverse
how? there are two main operating systems for your PC, does that defeat the purpose of having a computer?
you can go windows or macos
do you think the internet would be better
if there were two competing internets
how could two internets even exist simultaneously?
yeah actually that'd be kind of cool
their business model is doomed to fail
the internet is inherently social, and that means that whichever one has the most users will eventually win
yeah, i don't think normal people actually want to live in the metaverse, so
bit of a problem there
we haev different version of "metaverse" already and none of corporate style social vr games manage to grow except VRChat
but VRChat have a different strategy
that's why apple's entry is so exciting
they've basically said "fuck the metaverse"
and since it's apple
other companies are totally gonna do the same thing
google already had AR ambitions that they didn't have the cultural pull to make socially acceptable
No because Apple does not care about metaverse becaise it is NOT.
but if apple's doing it, the odds are much better
Apple have zero care about metaverse
it does nothing that defines metaverse and does not even do VR which is what Meta is trying
meta is failing, badly, to convince people that they want the metaverse
yeah no one wants those creepy avatars shudder
social vr games from big corpos and crypto bros are ignoring VRChat hard
they dont want VRChat style social game
they want something that can monetize everywhere you go
but thats the worst part, zuckie boys frog face with one of those avatars is freaky
heck you have to PAY to send claps and cheers in Meta's Horizons
TYRANNY
I guess they don't want to go for macbook air's 50C externals on your face
unlike a mac this this is 2 hours of battery life
he describes the battery as larger than a smartphone but also lighter
I don't know why everybody is whining about 2h battery life so much. You can just put another battery pack in your other pocket and connect that to the main one. When your external pack goes empty, you have 2 hours to unplug it and plug another one in. Easy infinite battery life.
Eye tracking auto ipd adjustment
is it?
I can't tell if it's supposed to be custom or not, honestly
I can say from experience, that this is not going to end well for people with Vision correction glasses
Unless Apple somehow managed to detect exactly what distortion the correction glasses introduce and work around that for the IPD measurement. Now that I think about it, it would be such an Apple solution to put an NFC chip in each insert to tell the HMD the specs of the lenses to correct for that ๐
I mean, apparently they also need an iphone facial scan for the interface
so it's entirely possible that they just get your facial scan and prescription when you order and set it all up before it's sent out
would ofc not work with third party insterts or regular glasses, but it's Apple, they want you to buy their solution
I bought a rift S and i keep getting an issue that the Headset sensor check fails.
Steamvr games dont work either basically it shows me three dots that are loading infinitely and my hands on the bottom of the screen with no way to move them.
I tried entering the public test beta and now it doesnt even show me the three dots it just shows be a black screen even after i left the beta
I'm now thinking it's because my motherboard does not have usb 2.0
usb 3.1?
how do companies tackle that issue right now
Anyone else's Index slow the computer down just by having it connected?
My friend and I both get this, and we have quite different computers
because steamvr is running maybe?
Hi!
Im new to the VR space but I wanna get into it!
But im from australia so im kind of limited in terms of what I can get for decent price (Stuff like the valve index is 2 grand)
Whats a decent entry VR set that will still be good in future but also still reasonably priced
Any feedack would help 
PCVR or Standalone
Standalone, the quest 2 is still a good option since it's only $299, decent for PCVR too but link is meh according to people
PCVR and Standalone the Pico 4 can be good but standalone lacks some games. in PCVR it's one of the best fidelity headset for the price
full PCVR, the reverb G2 is even better than pico 4
and still cheap
though G2 depends on location for prices
and pico 4 you'd need to get through a reseller as they're imported
those are the three option at $400 or lower
i can only say what others say about G2 and Q2 as i don't have them
but i do own the pico 4 and i'd say it's worth it for PCVR and some use of standalone
i use it mainly for PCVR but the standalone feature do come in handy
G2 screens are beautiful, but the controllers kind of suck
They're really power hungry, they're big, and the haptics are weak
again i don't have personal experience so yea
I really don't recommend anything other than the quest 2 or pico
Wireless VR >>> wired
i use my pico 4 over ethernet 
What in tarnation
significantly cheaper solution than wifi 6 router
and the latency is godly
30ms and lower
My quest 2 worked fine on a cheap wifi 5 router
my ethernet cable is like godly long
10 whole meters
so i feel as free as if i use wireless
Do you have like, a USB c to Ethernet adapter hanging off the headset
yes but i have a little fanny pack to bundle some part of the ethernet cable so the tension of the cable counter the light weight of the adapter
and i also keep the power bank there
See, I'm lazy so I refuse to deal with cables
i need the pack for the power bank anyway
though the quest 2 i heard does not work with ethernet anyway
My setup consists off:
-Gigabit ethernet switch
-36ft/10m Cat 7 ethernet cable
-144Mbps Ethernet to USB A
-USB C to USB A 3.0 + USB C (PD)
Cat 7 is utterly overkill but i got that cable bundled with the headset when i buy it used
My setup is
Quest 2
only used for like 2 days by the old owner lmao
problem is my ISP router has AP isolation which prevents local network communication
Does it not work over regular USB c
which is why i use this jank setup in the first place
it works over USB C but i have to use the shitty streaming assistant
ALVR only works via network
@zinc timber i tried this before kek
but i ditched this solution
i just let it hang now
I mean
They probably make USB docks with Ethernet and power?
i tried finding those
I can't imagine the port is too happy with the strain
and i already own this adapter before i own the headset
$0 is great value
i only saw one ethernet with PD port
but that thing is shitty 100mbps limit
if i'm buying a new ethernet adapter i'm going to buy gigabit ones
Actually, we both found it slows the computer down just from being connected
Does not have to have steam running or steam vr running to slow the computer
The sad answer is: They don't.
For headsets that have motorised IPD adjustment, they usually default to auto-IPD using the eye tracking cameras but offer an option to manually set an IPD in case this measurement is wrong. The Quest Pro and PSVR2 opted for manual IPD adjustment, and the eye tracking IPD measurement is just there to guide you to set the IPD "correctly" (which obv. only works properly with no vision correction glasses). Thankfully you can skip this step if you already know your correct IPD. In the case of the Pimax Crystal, that thing got motorised IPD adjustment but no eye tracking (they claim it has ET, but neither an SDK is ready nor is the IPD controlled by it like they originally claimed; typical Pimax stuff). With that thing there's a rocker button, like the volume rocker on your phone, but it changes the IPD.
IPD is a one time thing I prefer save few bucks on manual
I prefer manual IPD for which you don't have to fish around with your fingers next to your eyes and fragile lenses (looking at you Quest Pro <.<)
That with a locking mechanism or motorised IPD I can manually set. That way I can be sure that the IPD is always set correctly. Had it multiple times with certain other headsets, where the adjustment wheel would get moved slightly whenever handling the headset, which resulted in a wildly different IPD after a few sessions...
The Rift CV1 did it the right way with an IPD slider that you have to press in to move
Another CV1 win
This rift Cv1 is red flag?
Ouch
Yes
I would buy something like this to reinforce it
Already installed mine on my link cable
But for 120โฌ is not bad no?
3 sensors also
Even better
But that's scary, he said that it has time and it hasn't gotten worse even with heavy use
Ok then i would not bet if it already showing signs of failures
Will buy it for sure
Please make sure it does not have history of big failure
No, no any problem he said and showed a video of it working good
If it was me i would try to solder those cables when it breaks lol
Ive seen rare cases of Rift CV1 cable successful fixes
The fix was possible thanks to being copper cable too
But in cv1 wasn't optic cable?
Yes i think?
Rift S did not have fiber until revision one
Someone fixed that cable so I assume it is copper
If it was fiber it would be cheaper to buy new headset since reconnecting fiber requires thousands of dollars equipment
Looks copper to me
Im highly confident
Unless CV1 has revision that i am not aware
CV1 and Rift S cables were all copper inside
Just like how a lot of people think that the Index cable is fibre when it actuallity it's all copper as well
pico 4's motorized IPD though
and the soon fully automatic eye tracking based IPD adjustment from vision pro
the vision pro's method sounds like the best one
don't even need to switch IPD when sharing the headset as it auto adjust i guess
It's what basically all enterprised HMDs do, including the Varjo. Should've read my earlier messages (it started about the Apple Vision Pro)
i wonder if quest 3 gonna be worth the purchase
The problem is that the Auto-IPD will go wrong for people with vision correction glasses, as the eye tracking thinks you have an IPD far detached from reality. For me it measures (on both the Quest Pro and Varjo Aero) between 64.5 and 66mm, while my actual IPD is more like 67mm. It does measure 67mm when I take off my glasses, but I obv. can't use the headset like that
You can at least turn off Auto-IPD on the Aero and set the IPD manually through software like on the regular Pico 4. I hate the Quest Pro approach, as you have to fish around your eyes and lenses to adjust the IPD...
You either have an external slider or a motor, but not whatever the QP has...
well still somewhat better than Quest 2's 3 presets
though i'm surprised the quest 3 uses a wheel instead of a motorized ipd
that thing is $500 afterall
Prolly explained by the use of pancake optics
the pico got pancake and motorized at quest 2 prices
prob heavily subsidized by pico but still
it shouldn't be pricy to implement a motorized ipd adjustment on the Q3
or maybe they're out of space or what
that thing doesn't seem actually much slimmer than the Quest 2
though good thing quest 3 exists
the day quest 2 dies cross-compatible games will finally get a graphics upgrade on pcvr ๐
cough onward
There are reports of some people who got the later version of headset received a thinner cable which then teared down has thinner daca cable as well suspected as fibre https://www.reddit.com/r/oculus/comments/11uc8f6/psa_all_rift_s_cables_will_eventually_fail_with/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1
116 votes and 65 comments so far on Reddit
The reason I mention pancakes is because the ones in the Pico are like bottom of the barrel cheapest you can go. Afaik the ones in the Quest 3 will be the same as in the Quest Pro, which are significantly higher quality, but thus also more expensive...
Plus they'll use the new Qualcomm XR2 Gen2, which is also likely to be more expensive per unit...
I digged web archive to find old dead website of their selling site page showing they sell optical https://web.archive.org/web/20200301212934/https://www.oculus.com/rift-s/accessories/
Shop Oculus Rift S accessories and replacement parts for all your Oculus Rift S needs, including headbands, interfaces, controllers, and more.
Rift S did have optical
I don't have a lot of experience with soldering and not a good soldering iron but well if in a future I need to do that it will be funny I think lol
Also to do that with alligator clips is an even worse headache
its not recommended to buy in hope you can prolong it via fixing
but yeah
its cheap
Also HDMI is shielded so if a part is without the shield it wouldn't compromise the signal quality or the whole link?
i don't know
fixing that cable on your own is next to impossible
like i highly doubt this works
Meta Quest 3 will be much more powerful than its predecessor, the much older Quest 2, and not just because of the new faster chipset... The performance of standalone headsets is significantly affected by thermals and heat dissipation. Take the Meta Quest 2 as an example: To avoid overheating and maximize its potential, its SoC's CPU has been run...
Its hard but it is not impossible
Anyone know of any co op online games with VR compatibility?
Been playing Carrier Command 2. I think war Thunder and DCS now supports something similiar
Iโd be open to cooling mods to offset the new update if needed
it's going to be the best headset
maybe but will be be 3500 USD better?
obviously it will not be something to buy without asking like quest 2 can be because of the price. But for it's price in the sector of AR in the factories or AR in lucrative sectors it will maybe be a safe buy