#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages Β· Page 57 of 1
Here's one more that could be interesting. Idk what the flight number would be, but Atlant-Soyuz used to fly 154s to Tivat
Ngl, the level of navigation in this thing is actually impressive
I'm pretty sure the whole array we have in the M isn't too much different from B-2 or even the original 154s
Cause in itself the M doesn't look too impressive
First flew in 1982
Needs a bunch of crew, fully old-school cockpit, etc
What else first flew in 1982?
The A310
A plane with proper nav displays, extensive automation, etc
But the 154 overall took to the skies for the first time in 1968
And yet the plane has rather extensive standby navigation, and even autothrottle (which really wasn't that common back in the day)
F u c k
I forgot to convert everything to km
So I am kinda lost
Kinda
I know roughly where I am
This is where a paper map, a pencil and a ruler would've helped a lot
I feel like this will end up being a recurring mistake lol
Well tbf
First 2 legs were correct
Cause obviously I filled them in on the ground normally
And they were pretty long too, so I just completely forgot about converting afterwards
Oh and I now forgot toupdate the NVU overall and now it's all bad
If you do an RSBN correction you can recover
I know
Or you can use a navaid to calculate a new leg
Ah, sorry
I think what I'll do though, the easiest option now, is just take a heading (I'm east of Moscow, so just going for 270 should take me close enough) until I am in range of a navaid for Domodedovo/Vnukovo
You really don't need to apologise lol
Ngl this is one thing that from what I can see NVU is better at than western systems
You mess up your INS in flight - good luck recovering anything, better tell the ATC "Guys we're lost please help"
Oh, actually, this is even easier
I'm already in range for Vnukovo
I guess this is what makes soviet systems interesting in a way
In many way they're "worse", but in other ways they're very advanced and "genius", even if somewhat convoluted
Like, I'm sure you could have come up with a way to make all the data entry easier
Yeah
Certainly planes being "intuitive" wasn't as much of a priority for Soviet designers, until it wasn't, since there are some very interesting cases of the opposite
For example the TU-144 had that diagram that showed altitude/speed
While Concorde was, keep an eye on your ASI and Mach Indicator
I would say, they're very reliant on humans (whereas western systems are much less so), and while obviously that has some drawbacks, the 'simplicity' also made them very fool-proof
Yes, that's a fair way to look at it I think
And well, 'simplicity' not in "simple to understand" - we're used to other ways, so it's not simple at all
But like
Compare INS to NVU
I guess this also lines with having to turn on every little system and gauge with its own switch rather than stuff being magically powered when a certain bus is powered
With INS you input your coordinates, then input other coordinates, you input 2 places into the plane and that's how it is supposed to navigate
With NVU?
You're basically saying "Face this was and fly X km"
Yes
But then the whole layer of active and next track and stuff like this make it so much more complicated
Even if much more capable
Like, I think the INS position update is another good example
On the TriStar (that doesn't have automatic update), it's so dumb the way you update your position
You press hold when you're overflying, you insert coordinate, you press enter
You just know if it were a soviet system it would never be that easy π
Yeah, that too. The Soviet way is much more manual. But it comes with its benefits too. What happens when you lose a bus in a Boeing/Airbus? You lose everything connected to it. Meanwhile in Soviet planes, you lose something - you only lose that thing, not other stuff
Oh definitely not, that's too easy. In a Soviet plane a procedure like that would require full attention of all 4 crew members
As we always say, "It takes 5 people to screw in a lightbulb"
Hahaha yes exactly
I will say though
The most annoying thing
Is not having the vspeed mode
Cause I fly everything in vspeed lol
737? Vspeed. MD-11? Vspeed. A380? Vspeed.
Also, ended up way high, so gonna just vector myself around for a bit
Guys?
I think I'm going light speed
Well that was to be expected
But that's why we do practice flights in the first place
The crosswind was quite crazy too, and I'm not used to how it descends at all yet
i was looking at that speed card and went "wtf", but then i realized that its in km/h
of course soviet airliners have to be different and use non-standard measurements
Well
Tbf, I'm pretty sure the main reason why aviation uses imperial rather than metric is because the US was the main pioneering country
So for the ease of things, other countries just followed
Would the USSR and China ever follow the US? Nope
i absolutely despise how china does altitude in meters, i actively avoid flying there because of it
it just adds too much confusion
Oh its super annoying
Back in the day it would've been much better too
Firstly they did use Soviet jets a lot, so you'd have metric altimeters
Plus
Back in the day they'd mean metric when they say metric
They say 11km, you fly at 11km, not at FL361 etc
Time to go for another practice run I think
actually a cool livery tbh
does it still fly tho
I thought to deliver an Aeroflot one first, but well, what can be more personal than the national airline of Russia? The airline of Moscow
Nope
I think they stopped flying in 2010s
Yeah, 2011
In 2010 they got renamed into Moscow Airlines
In 2008 even started receiving 737-800s
I always thought they didn't have them with winglets actually, but seems I was wrong
yes
I really need to continue work on the airport
Now is a great time to not forget to convert to km
TIMESTAMPS
00:00 Intro - Who Was Interflug?
03:35 Division of Germany and Launch of East German Airline
07:56 Interflug's Early Years - Planes and Routes
10:19 Fast Growth through the '60s under Karl Heiland
11:58 Slowing Growth in the '70s - Why?
13:40 Interflug's Safety Record
15:25 Kurt Diedrich & Centralization of Interflug Operations
17:36 ...
Interflug β€οΈ
Il-62 β€οΈ
Why is it that Il-62 never exists in good quality for any sims
fsx
its an okay one
Yeah, but FSX is kinda outdated now tbf
Like
Let's be honest
The only reason you'd still use FSX is there being no other options
Which country is that airline from
Learning from the best
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApNVc2B8yAc
#JeremyClarkson , #RichardHammond , #JamesMay , #TheGrandTour , #TopGear , #Maserati , #supercars , #hypercars
the amount of willpower it would have taken to keep a straight face from hammond is insane
What nav systems did you use
Cuba
NVU & VORs
Which one is NVU
The calculator
Share and calculator 
Ah alright, makes sense
Dear XP12
Why are there A340s at Paine
And what the actual fuck is that
Qantas never even had 340s
Also the noses of these models look more like a 737 than any Airbus lol
Boeing π₯
Anyway, the cursed 707-A340 middle child aside and back to the point
Also
The spawn locations are rotated the wrong way around lol
Boeing pushed the delivery planes into the stands so they face the taxiway
So no auto step climbs hm
ASA 100 KSEA - EGLL
@dusty sky You seem to know about the Xplane A330
is there something with EIS-1?
I'd like to fly some Air Inter A330
Download Laminar/AeroGenesis A330 Enhanced Mod by dfiemjs12 for X-Plane 12. The A330 Enhanced Mod adds significant improvements to the A330 aircraft in X-Plane 12, enhancing realism and performance. Essential additional software is required for installation, detailed in the instructions provided. An Aerogenesis-compatible version will be release...
is this good?
FUUUUUUUCK
WRONG FUCKING ENGINES
I HATE MY LIFE
I need an A330-300 GE with EIS-1
ohhh
there's an EIS-1 mod, but it's just for the RR
what r u trying to do
there's a GE mod, but it doesn't have EIS-1
Air Inter A330
Maybe I can try and merge those togheter
maybe
brujh they had a330s
yes, and that's the exact sort of fact/operations that are wacky and stupid that I like
but I can't fly it π
not the exact same, but similar configuration to what ITF had
good, let's see if I can make it work togheter with the GE mod
Adding the carda engines to the LR 330 is a ballache but it is possible
I managed that
Now I need to "merge" the two modified .acf togheter
the one with the EIS-1 and the one with the engines
Would be easier to port the EIS 1 modification to the 330GE
It should just be an extra obj
it's an .acf thing as well
they just have to merge togheter
I can't "port" one to the other
the GE adds like 30k lines to the ACF, the EIS-1 probably adds some as well
just open up plane maker and check the additional obj's that have been added
you can port them over
I was doing it all via text
same as whatever other configs have been ported
How do you change the engines on the sparky 747
Cause I just noticed the TSO one actually used the wrong ones (PWs instead of CF6s)
I guess I can try?
And that could actually be why the engines appear unpainted? Idk
just gonna check rq
The FMC has some config options, including engines, but switching it in there makes no difference in terms of the model
Yeah I have no idea how to do it PlaneMaker
I need to do it by editing the .acf file manually via text π
hold on quick demo
the person made it so it also uses a plugin
so I don't know if that makes things more difficult
so you click and you can decide to have EIS-1
wouldn't it just be easier to merge the two .acf togheter?
can you do that?
they're just text files
all the text that was in one but not in the other gets copied π
so you can have the GE mod installed on one ACF, make a copy of that aircraft then add the EIS 1 stuff minus the .ACF
I think if you then just add all the objects in planemaker it should be ok
thats all the ACF has additionally from what i can see
but I don't know how to use PlaneMaker, but I can use a text editor
open the EIS mod .acf and check whats added, whats removed, what cordinates have changed ect, ect,
i think looking at it the plugin looks for the ACF not the other way around
This is very helpful too to be fair β€οΈ
idk what other bollocks they would have changed but all of that might just be done through objects and changing them around
If that doesn't work then I'll go back to text editing I guess π
the mod doesnt change anything it just adds stuff on top and removes the original instruments i think
Do I need to add these as well?
I think these are just modifications of the standard ones
aren't they?
everything in the folder should be pasted into the new aircraft folder
ah no I can't find any of these "bodies".obj in the already existing obj list π
I meant wether ot not I needed to add them in Plane Maker
they're all already there
these should go into here then you need to add the objects in via planemaker
ah yes those are all the pieces that make up the stby artificial horizon
yeah yeah I understand that
thanks π
its easier to look at the .acf supplied with the addon just to check whats been added and removed then just copy it to the new GE EIS1 acf
i think they might have done some other boggery
just gonna check
no actually
i think it should just work with just changing/adding the objects
I think so as well
because the plugin seems to be its own thing
nooo the screens don't work properly π«€
maybe I did somnething wrong
I'll try to do the whole process again in case I messed something up
check the cordinates and check the lighting, shadow mode and prefill of each object
also check these match
All the coordinates seem to be 0, and all the lighting in internal/internal only?
at least for the thins I added
and the engines stopped working as well
swapping engines
so...
I'll try it later but i need to go buy a suit now
maybe try it the other way around?
or manually installing the carda engines by editing .obj files
Yeah I might do that
the EIS mod also changes stuff in cockpit_3d
yeah probably that doesn't work well with the engine thing if they change the engine instrumentation π«€
i do not have a clue what or how to approach fixing that
I think this airline is from the southeast
Since when do 1961 Boeings come with autothrottle
Autothrottle yes, but INS no
one was much easier to implement than the other π
Gotta say, this feels so much more familiar than the Tupolev lol
Well yeah, but then a lot of later jets came with standby nav equipped, but no autothrottles
The what
Like the 727s and early 737s
EIS-1 is the earlier (and cooler) version of the Airbus cockpit
Oh yeah I see
Don't know if there is any
Not sure if the laminar liveries work on the aerogenesis
They should
Don't see why not
I just realized that even though I have the different engines I'd maybe still command them via EPR?
I don't think that engine swap mod makes it N1?
that might be a dealbreaker possibly
Well GEs should be N1 I'm pretty sure
yeah, the RRs are EPR π
yes, me and Wyndbain are trying to make it work with different engines
yeah that's where I got it from
Now when I get home I'll need to reinstall mine
Now I'm going to fly to Nigeria from Capetown 
Wait
The 720 doesn't have an APU...
I just spent several minutes searching for it lol
Got it working?
Niceeee
Also I think you might be having some scenery issues
It doesnβt
Yes π
Not going to fly out of Munich Riem with this one π
just the last airport I selected
Nice
Also now you know your way around PM
Indeed, thank you very much
sorry if I was too stubborn initially
Something like an Il-62 would probably be really easy to do as the first project, I promise

Just need to find the IL-62 button instead of the car button
Definitely really easy XD
Yeah, don't think an AM Vantage would be really useful in a flight sim
I am so ready
(by the time I find out what route they flew, spawn and ask for clearenace everyone will have logged off)
Ngl seeing an A330 in such a livery is so weird
Honestly
The black nose top makes any livery look retro lol
It really is, that's why I like it 
Literally the only photos of any Air Inter 330 in Airliners.net are in Paris lol
Minitel π₯²
didn't they fly them domestically as well?
I think so
I found some photos of them in Marseille, Nice and Tolouse
which kind of make sense, they were busy routes between there and Paris
Nice β€οΈ
so annoying that the only AIr Inter timetables are incomplete
it's only a matter of time before I buy at least 2
757s are great
Ok interesting, before they were used for intl flights they were used for domestic flights as well
I wonder if the introduction and expansion of the TGV network had something to do with that.... π
yeah that sounds more fun than going to Dublin
The controller called me Itarrow by mistake lol
ITF / ITY
I guess the accent didn't help
Me when I don't put the callsign in remarks
I hope you delete the TCAS simbrief from the flight plan
yes π
Nice one, good job
Don't think it was worth giving up an entire morning, but it's done now 
Well, next time you need to do something of this sort, it'll be quicker
It's nice to learn that stuff
What does the EIS-1 look like on it?
i mean it is free
757 π
Can't wait until Bluebird finally release theirs
Hopefully this year
Las Vegas
So apparently yesterday a retiring Icelandair pilot decided to just send it, and did an unauthorised low pass over his hometown in Iceland in a 757
I think not yet, but apparently the airline did report it to the aviation authorities and the police
Last time an unauthorized low pass happened the pilots lost their licenses
Well yeah, that's what happens when you do an unauthorised low pass
But tbh I doubt that a pilot who's on his last day of flying really cares much lol
You lost your license but it was your last day anyway so yeah
i saw that video too
imposter
time to take her home after a world trip again
βοΈ Boeing 737-800:
π SP-RKS:
π’ FR 123/RYR2NQ:
π« EGKK London Gatwick:
π¬ EIDW Dublin International:
Sad

love the livery
That is some very weird routing lol
I guess SimBrief tried to abide by modern restrictions or something
yeah
im flying the normal way tho
W
it's close
get behind my plane right now
don't think I can be stable much closer than that
you jump around a lot
it's a vatsim problem
cool, I'll head back
alright
Yeah I mean
aimlessly flying around a little jet
I don't need to program any computer or do any precise navigation that requires me looking a lot at navigraph 
also having a 3d view helps with anything formation/station keeping
now I have to go because I have actual stuff to do lol
big and menacing cursor
Only posting this here because itβs eerily similar to what it looks like when an aircraft is unattended in a flight sim too 
this thing is so slow it takes me over an hour to fly 175 nautical miles
But you look real cool for that hour
it does look cool
This would be an interesting delivery
From there would have to go down to Vladivostok and then off to Anchorage to scare US controllers
Okay, seems like I'm gonna have to split it in the end
First
The route distance is 600km over what the plane in the sim allows as a maximum input in the loadsheet lol
Second, if I fly empty, my CGs are like 12% out of range
If I load just enough to make the TOCG appear in range, I am over MTOW 
Guess I'll cut it short at UERP
I am now really questioning how they used to get these planes with passengers from Vladivostok to Anchorage
Shorter flight init
Well this is fun
The winds at UERP really favour RWY 17
So I'll have to do a VORDME approach onto a runway which doesn't even have proper lighting
Also this will end up as the northernmost airport I've flown to as of yet
The sim is a bit wrong some were fitted with extra fuel tanks
The 154 in the game is modeled based on a Belavia example
They never went further than faro really
Fair
Guess in case what I'll just do the same as I did with the Hawaiian DC-9 delivery
Is bro actually gonna do vatsim
Eventually
The 154 in vatsim is so fucking fun
I used to do Balkan Holidays charter flights from all over to Burgas and Sofia on vatsim
My begging is actually paying off 
I'm pretty sure you've not asked me to fly vatsim even once 
Ah pretty
The AP doesn't work 
accurate
@reef isle are you still sure you want to do shared cockpit with me? I managed to break the plane with failures off 
Idk what that is
ah yeah, it's a thing you can use for navigation
I have all the RSBN stations there
so I can see where they are on the map
That's neat
it was the only software I found that allowed me to import all of them at once through a big text file 
Fair
I'll try to see if I can share that with you in some way that doesn't require you to install any additional software
don't think I can
oh well, you can just look at the RSBN text file in the Tu-154 and work with that yourself
Yeah that's fine
Don't you hate it when you find a flight you like in a timetable, and then a couple of days later you just can't find that timetable π
Saw NWA 107 a couple of days ago
A cool bunch of hops in a 727, was something like MSP - Billings MT - Helena MT - Missoula MT - Spokane WA - Portland OR - SeaTac
It was in a 1985 timetable iirc
Looked through something like a dozen of timetables from 1984 to 1986, all of them have NWA 105 and 106, but no 107 lol
pan am 720
Or you could do an NWA 720 instead
this?
I'd love to fly with you guys but fd probably not paying for the 2 people host
eh 8 dollars a month not as bad as I imagined it
how does one even change the seat in the cockpit?
LNM is a fantastic piece of freeware
not a 154, dislike
Pobeda is cool
Used the cool runway too I see
the uphill one 
Uphill?
Wait, did you have a giant bump in there too
It shouldn't actually be like that, but that runway has some terrain issues
Honestly I reckon I need to learn the MSFS scenery editing too, in addition to XP
At the very least to fix that thing
Cause Vnukovo is actually a really cool airport
I'd say currently it ends up being the most interesting out of Moscow airports
Cause you still get a constant flow of 737-500s & 767-200s with Utair, and 757s/767s with Azur
Plus before, uhm, a certain orange, Iran Airtour used to fly 300s and 310s there
not really, it felt like going up a hill however
@rustic charm who all uses the 500 still actually
Tbf a fair few do
urghh
Utair in Russia as I mentioned
i meant in russia
Air North in Canada
trying to see more of the world rn
Sriwajaya in Indonesia
Nam Air too, think it's also Indonesia
I've actually seen 735s of those 2 back in January
In Russia only Utair now
Dial back 10-15 years you'd have more
Aurora (flights around the far east) did use 735s
S7
Aeroflot-Nord I think
Oh btw, I think SCAT still uses 735s
Either they still have them, or got rid of them not long ago
scat π
That's the main airline of Kazakhstan
They are?
That's... interesting
maintenance included
Cause you know
Russian airlines are banned for political reasons
Kazakhstan has no restrictions like that
So they must've actually been doing bad
wait did they?
Yeah, I think so
And PIA used to be like, the worst of the worst
I'm pretty sure they managed to crash an A319 in perfect working order while flying in perfect weather conditions
unless if you're absolutely hell-bent on using MSFS and only MSFS for some reason, i wouldnt reccomend it honestly
y
I've heard a lot of people complain about it, personally though from my last experience with it, it was quite nice
Lots of people dislike the price
And $120 for just the 735 is too much
$120 for all 3, including the freighters, is quite good imo
thats what i think too
cheaper than any pmdg product btw
I'm just waiting for them to release the rest and hopefully recalculate the price
Cause currently it's 10800r
And if you look up the conversion rate
That's not really $120
Btw, they did say that the 733 and 734 would enter final testing stages right after the 735 1.9.0 release, and that happened almost a month ago, so I think we might even see the rest this month
i thoguht it was $120
Well
You have a hint just to the right of the price
Also quite likely that Simmarket just charges more
They have a paypal option directly in the launcher now, I'd just try that
they got banned because 40% of the pilots didn't have licences
now they are back
scat is actually pretty good
I flew on them in Kazakhstan domestically
on a max
im stupid
its actually
about $50 cheaper LOL
thats actually crazy
holy shit
Kazakhstan, most likely in right about post-Soviet times
They had bigger things to worry about than giving out pilot licenses
not quite 40% but....
scat got banned because of some really really bad crashes
all on CRJ's
kazhakstan is gonna be really interesting in aviation soon
Qazaq air is being bought by VietJetAir
shame because the livery is really nice
will look shitty with the red and yellow
terrible plane to begin with
\
i kind of want to get back into DCS, but its so hard to justify having it take up 200GB :(
it also tempts me to purchase very expensive digital planes, which is obviously very bad
You're saying it as if you don't already do it
to be fair, the last aircraft i bought was the rotate MD-80 3 months ago, and that was coming off of christmas money still 
I want the felis and I'll be happy for years
the felis is definitely a lot of fun, especially if you're getting into early airliners for the first time, the price to gameplay ratio is very good
I feel like at this point we need to crowdfund a 742 for Romania

Only issue I'll have is the CIVA taking 20 years to program
but that's it really
i personally use whatever the other INS system is, im not a huge fan of the CIVA
it's not too hard to learn how to use the CIVA, especially because so many aircrafts used the same exact unit, but its just not my preferred navigation thing
Is it on the pax?
yeah
I know how to use it
its a honeywell unit or something, its pretty basic but it allows you to do RNAV waypoints
you can also use the default XP12 FMC im pretty sure, but thats kind of lame
I watch a tutorial on a captain sim plane from fsx that was made in like 2008
Poo
Thank you captain sim I love paying 17 dollars for a slight exterior difference on the 737-200
No sorry, 20 dollars
the captainsim 717 makes me cry
it has such a massive potential, but its literally unflyable
and the only other option is P3D 717 :(
i bought it the day before my grandmothers funeral too, because i wanted something to distract me for a little bit, but that ended up making it even worse 
Terrible mistake buying a captain sim to have something to make you happy
in my defense, the 717 is definitely the most well modeled captain sim product out there, and was just recently overhauled quite significantly
Yk the thing that I hate is that captain sims models are amazing
Like lets me real the outside modeling absolutely fantastic
Same with the animations
Just everything else is out the fucking window
huh, the 717 for 2024 was actually just updated in january
Like the default 747-8 PFD on a 767-300 is actually crazy
Like on the 777 ok maybe
But the 767-300 hell nah bro get out of my house
such a pretty livery
canyon blue is nostalgic, but i do not miss it
Desert sand enjoyer over here
βοΈ Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner:
π C-FVLZ:
π’ ACA 193:
π« CYYZ Toronto Lester B Pearson Intl:
π¬ CYYC YGC Calgary Intl:
why is my DCS now launching in phone mode π
now its crashing on world preload :(
running as administrator fixed it, there was some permissions issues with files in the user folder
wew, its been a while since ive flown in DCS
the A-10A is a lot of fun, even if its FC3
there's that mod that actually adds clickable stuff to the cockpit too, which makes it pretty alright
i kind of want to see about getting more FC3 stuff, but i also really only enjoy the A-10 because its almost like a light bomber
Why do people not know ICAO codes
makes the whole Volanta leaderboard things useless
"B48F"
"B74F"
"MD1F"
it's not that hard man
makes my blood boil
"A32N" π
"BA46"
do these poeple just guess?
how does that even happen?
They're likely conflating ICAO and IATA type codes.
Tbf MD1F is what TFDis set by default in Volanta for freighters iirc
That's supremely stupid
Also lots of people just look at what SimBrief uses
And it also separates MD11 and MD1F
sure, but MD1F is not an ICAO code
The IATA code for the MD-11F is M1F, so I can see where people are getting it from
Yep, it's not
H O W
how did that happen?
stuff like this makes me unreasonably angry
it ruins the data
Nooo "BA46" is also JustFlight's fault
I had one
I fixed it
I did say it was unreasonable
Then it must have been the livery I downloaded...
You did indeed, I just love that gif
Best part is, it's so easy to look up too
Just
An aircraft type designator is a two-, three- or four-character alphanumeric code designating every aircraft type (and some sub-types) that may appear in flight planning. These codes are defined by both the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA).
ICAO codes are published in ICAO Do...
There used to be a more complete list on the ICAO website but it's been moved now 
ββNotice to Data Usersβ β Implementation of a two-stage cleanup of motorglider with a retractable engine or folding/retractable propeller entries (Doc 8643)ββββββ
Oh even better
Cause the Wikipedia one does have some issues
Like any 707 being equalised to a 703
Just in case you ever wanted to know what the designator was for a Panavia Tornado or a Bristol Blenheim or something 
Also huh, didn't realise 777Fs are actually designated as B77L
Gotta fix that on my end
Thankfully, I have a grand total of 1 777F in my virtual fleet
b48f is a first
funny
Oh yeah some do that too
Also
I don't think anyone posted this here yet
Apparently there's a new 350
I wonder why tbh
Cause like
ini isn't the best, true
But also everyone who wants a 350 already has one
Plus beating ini quality is still not that easy, it's not like making a plane that's just better than a default thing
Oh
You will not believe
Just how often people refuse to do a simple google search
Or even just read
As a mod on a large server I can definitely confirm that
I didn't know what CAVOK meant so I googled it it's that simple π
You'll message into a chat
"There is currently no news regarding any updates for the game"
5 minutes later, the next message in that same chat will be a person in full seriousness asking "When is the update coming?"

Aerodynamics server type shit
No there no release date
When is the plane releasing
This will haunt me until I'm dead
wtf is b462
BAe146-200
I think I fixed all my ICAOs
I also added some airlines, but that's way too time consuming
and I fixed this as well
Now the Volanta leaderboard is ever so slightly more accurate and useful 
ok
baller
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/6/6/3/0448366.jpg?v=v40
@rustic charm Found another fun one
I love how they made the tail into an Austrian flag...
Iβm working early shifts
Just a note here I might be on strike
And Germany might also be on strike around that time
No pls
Hoping itβll be a MAX
I gotta fix one of my A310's
A313 is not correct π
Try and book a seat
If 35 rows then max if 33 rows then 800
Yeah, that's still 3 months away lol
No airline knows which exact plane will be used in 3 months
Especially when you have something that is reasonably interchangeable, like 738/73M
why
it should work, but it definitely wont be anything that would be accepted on jetphotos lol
And if you can't be arsed to watch the full video
https://youtube.com/shorts/GpjLRZvcPM8
Fuel testing to see if it will have enough fuel with no fin res and fully loaded
I love those reversers
I know they're the same as on some 320s
But seeing 4 of them open up on 343s looks just soooo much better
Which route are you testing?
Seeing the flaperons and spoilers move is very cool π
were these roll inputs made by you or it trying to adjust automatically?
it alsmost looks like the TriStar's DLC π
oh looks like they were all roll
how much crosswind was there π
Personally, moving flight controls all over the place in a Boeing is just a necessary part of the experience, regardless of whether there's crosswind or not 
Although I guess it's less applicable to the 787
My formation flying brain is always trying to move the the least amount possible lol
you have no idea how many times I slowly drift and am slmost "scared" to correct... even though I actually notice
I got over it now (mostly), I think
I'm the opposite, sometimes I need to correct less tbf
(It figures, for almost a year in the beginning the only plane I used was the 737)
I didn't realize how much I missed this until now
so nice, just manual flying, basic instrument scan
nothing to program, no bad A/P to worry about
just flying.
(and taxiing given it's Amsterdam on 18R... sigh)
Doing testing and receiving products early is nice
but it really takes a toll on the enjoyment factor

732β¦ receiving products earlyβ¦

I've been involved with ini's 1011
and like it's very nice
I think in some way my brain is sort of wired in the correct sort of way to do testing, and it's very rewarding seeing your little complains ultimately shaping a product
or like, you know, making a small difference
obviously I wouldn't call the 1011 "my" or "our" plane/project, it's theirs and I was just annoying them sometimes, but it's still a good feeling
I hate you
and I have definitely enjoyed flying the 1011.
and honestly my brain realistically does "testing" even when I'm not an actual tester 
so having a plane that is just as basic as it gets, on a platform that is no longer in development, and I know it just works, and I'm very familiar with everything
is just
nice
I can just fly, and not worry about anything else
something I get to do fairly rarely otherwise π
I genuinely missed the enjoyment of just flying
I didn't even want to turn the A/P on at any point
I nearly got rid of the F/D because it was the only thing that needed baby sitting
you know, having to change the pitch command datum and everything
yeah sorry about all this
not sure why I wrote all that, doubt anyone cares
Lovely
Now I want a 732
Although I guess the "Now" part is unnecessary, I always want a 732
Those were some of the first jets Aurora got, imagine doing hops on them between Vladivostok, Blagoveshchensk, Magadan, Petropavlovsk and Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk
One of my favourite areas to fly tbh, it's just so pretty
FD why are you doing this to me 
In my opinion there's no need to apologise, we all talk, most of us talk a lot, nothing wrong with sharing an opinion
oh great
And get them robbers 3 consecutive life sentences (3's better than 1 in that case)
Oh yeah, fuel is very close to being out everywhere
Idk whether Russia is affected (cause you know, it's been cut off for over 4 years now)
But I know that even in the US, even though they refine their own fuel (literally the only country in the world to use Jet A instead of Jet A1) there are problems
Air traffic control had to remind two pilots to be professional after hearing them βmeowβ and βbark" over the radio at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. The FAA said they investigate βall situations where pilots may have violated any regulation.β
For more context and news coverage of the most important stories of our day, c...
i love how the rest of the world is finally finding out about 121.5
I thought that was fake lol
its very real
counterargument: having random activity on an otherwise empty emergency channel is good because it means that you can verify that you can actually hear it
i dont think it should be a free-for-all, but i feel like having something isnt bad
Oh definitely
At least you know the frequency works
i can only imagine tuning into 121.5, and not realizing that you have the volume on the knob turned down for whatever reason
Yeah

People shit on spirit airlines all of the time, but when I took them to Orlando, it was a fantastic experience
Itβs not a luxury brand, itβs like taking a bus, you go on spirit airlines to get from point A to B, cheap and fast
People expect spirit to be like American or delta, higher end brands that actually are a little bit more comfortable, but thatβs fundamentally not remotely what itβs designed to be
Toronto - Calgary
Me xD
And a bit lol
Yeah, I think a Dreamliner can probably make that XD
How did they make the 2024 787 worse than the 2020 one
It's all over the show trying to do LNAV
vfr for a change
And somehow it has stalled itself
Still managed to get a smooth landing but after fighting it
Absolutely one of the best liveries MD-11s wore
Cool departure
Essentially if I used the opposite runway, it'd be a straight out
But the winds favoured this one a lot
Just started descending after a whole 5 minutes of cruise
Actually even less, just over 3 minutes
@rustic charm for the VATSIM Cross the Pond event, deciding to do KATL - UUEE in a 777-200LR
Old DAL route
Neat
Use to be 763/764 so i think it's a good alternative
What an ER?
But obviously in the end, fly whatever you like most 
Yep
Would it be able to do that distance?
That works for me then
Plus Delta actually used to have 772s in older liveries
And I'm pretty sure AJP did those liveries
Delta 777-200ER my beloved
Yep, both Ron Allen and Deltaflot there
I will grab that
(Deltaflot seems appropriate to fly into Sheremetyevo)
Aaand I was just reminded about why I stay in 2020 whenever possible...
The sim's just frozen
On final approach
It couldn't do it right after departure, no, that would be too easy
At least it's just a 1-hour flight lol
mmm
In Sheremetyevo it's gonna be literally
There's 1 impostor among us
Or
How do you do, fellow Aeroflots
Oh yes it'll be good then
I'll pick that up
It's either I buy that or the new HST pack, and I'd rather the airport 
Nothing against it just gone off of TSW
Admittedly one of his weaker, pretty sure it was among the first he's done for MSFS, and when you know the airport personally there are lots of issues
