#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages Β· Page 51 of 1
Welp
I looked online
And one airline still sells tickets on flights from Dubai...
Only problem is, that's Ariana. And I don't have a visa to Afghanistan
Plus I'd have to fly with at least 2 stops cause they don't fly to Moscow
That would be much more expensive
still 16 hours 
ini modelled the crew rest area
cool detail
its so detailed wth
i own it day 1 but i still never looked at this
wasmd
im p sure its got something to do w the autosave
Load EFOB for the waypoint?
below the cockpit
I hate only having the A330 and A340 as single floor wide-bodies
So much stuff I'm missing on
A lot of cool routes as well 
No ANA livery π
Flex 11... I think that's the lowest flex temp I've ever done a takeoff with
I thought i was low with my 30
You take the crown king
It would've been 9 if I was going packs on 
And into Kai Tak
I still need to fly to china
Yeah no buddy
I'm tempted to at some point just do a quick lap around Kai Tak to just test out what it wants to do
I like three holers but to me the MD11 is ugly af
I agree with "How dare you"
But hey, everyone has opinions
I have some controversial/unpopular ones too
Uhh, if staying aviation-themed...
First, the strongest one, ain't nobody changing my mind:
- Megahubs are horrible, awful, unbearable, and any other words you can use to say "terrible"
Obviously my most hated one is Istanbul, it has literally no redeeming qualities
But the likes of Chek Lap Kok, Incheon, O'Hare, Baiyun, etc. are not good either
Then, up next - the 787 isn't pretty, the new Boeing cockpit is awful, and I'll take a classic 777 any day
Fair
Not moving too far off that - the A350 is overrated, it definitely looks better than the 787 but still not as good as people claim it to be. The cockpit is not nearly as bad thanks to Airbus actually keeping it in a good colour, but if I were a pilot I would take a 'classic' Airbus cockpit (A320/330/340) any day as well
I mean, ok
Then further - the push for XLR narrowbodies is stupid. If you have a 4000-mile route on which you don't have enough demand to fill an A330-200, you don't need to serve that route. A lot of these routes are oceanic routes too, and oceanic turbulence can be quite damn something. Widebodies on such routes are much more comfortable. And if you configure a narrowbody into entirely business-first, well thanks but at that point you might as well switch from being an airline to being a private jet rental company
Moving off that, since the idea is to provide more destinations you can reach without layovers... layovers don't make a trip complicated or tough, if you plan well they don't add any difficulty. All you have to do is walk 2km extra (which admittedly for some people may be a problem, but airport services should be able to help, at least in normal airports)
Then next up, ultra low cost airlines are actually good. Yes they make you pay for every extra gram of luggage you bring onboard, and you'll have to pay a fortune to even get a bottle of water during the flight, but they allow you to travel on a rather wide network for ridiculously cheap. Trust me, I would be very happy if I had an airline here that could take me to Sri Lanka, or Riyadh, or Sharm El Sheikh for $40
I think I have the ultimate unpopular opinion
The A350 is ugly
Out of all the new planes with the Comet-style nose it's by far the worst looking
The 787 looks much better, and the A220 is another league entirely
I don't disagree but I think there's some nuance
The only reason why ULCC can offer such incredibly competitive pricing is because they are subsidized in various ways.
I think while at the same time it's important and beneficial to society having travel to be as cheap and as hassle-free as possible (thanks Brexit), I would either like similar subsidies to be brought to rail OR dropped for airlines.
I think a rail journey shouldn't always be more expensive almost by default
Oh, seeing air force btw reminded me of another unpopular opinion I have
Just let the poor planes die, re-engined 707s look laughable
Slapping high bypass fans onto the golden era jets is a sin
Dc-8?
It's the worst one of the bunch
It doesn't work on the 707
Maybe because they actually got to wear the CFMs in commercial service so I probably just am a bit more used to it
Shit like this still looks very wrong, even if I would love to have that in MSFS
Reason n.372947 why the Convair 880 and 990 were the best early jets - they didn't survive long enough to be ever fitted with different engines
Oh Convairs looked lovely
What's this hate for the reengined dc-8's π
It just looks wrong
I think they mess with your mind, from the shape and everything they look fairly big/mid size, but they're tiny
If I ever get a dc-8 I'm flying the rengined ones specifically to piss FD off 
Honestly the only airplane that got fitted with bigger engines than originally and still looked good was the A340. The -600 still looks great, even if not as great as the -300
The -500 is peak
Tbf if I ever get a DC-8 in MSFS I'm flying re-engined ones because this
UPS didn't have any with original engines I think
And UPS DC-8s were a constant in Kai Tak
Also, nobody's even thought of making a DC-8 in MSFS yet, right?
Obviously not
Anything that happened after 2020 doesn't exist
The collective flight simmer memory stops there
What about those 2 in the congo that you never know where they are
So the chances for one are about the same as the chances for an Il-86
Well that's the thing, we don't know if they actually fly even
They could as easily be rusting in a field somewhere, and we wouldn't know
Ngl, if I understood modelling at all, I'd try to make something. Probably wouldn't start with a DC-8 (I think an An-24 would be a great starter though, plus a useful plane), but eventually would try
Honestly, I'd say our only hope for something like a DC-8 in MSFS is JustFlight
Let's do it together
It's gonna take 7 years but that's ok
At least xplane has its own aircraft creator
I could work on scripting I reckon, but a model is off the table
I tried many times
Same
I've done a bit of flight model work and SIMPLE system work
But I have no idea how to do 3d models
Honestly I reckon the toughest part of scripting a plane is understanding how it actually works in reality
I've always wanted to do a Yak-141
I think I can ask a few friends of mine to rip the War Thunder model
Obviously I'd make it for myself
Cause well, airliners irl are not simple. To be honest I'm sure even light aircraft are more complicated than people generally think
If you want to do something simple, both in MSFS and Xplane is not that hard
Because you have templates for pretty much anything
Well yeah
I mean, you could just use a template, or you could code something yourself but in a very simple way
Just picked up MSFS 2024, looking forward to the new visuals
And the A330 as @rustic charm mentioned to me
But with airliners, you really gotta understand how they work
Newer ones even more so
If you want to make a good quality one that is
Yeah, it's not too bad
Unfortunately not that many liveries for it because it lacks a paintkit, but the popular ones should be covered
Going to take the 78X from Boeing Field I think
I think Dreamliners are built at Paine
I guesss it's in LBS then :/
Asobo 737 Max π₯
Don't use that
Yes
I find the 787 to be ugl
The A321LR/XLR is also decent
I don't really fly Airbus, but I'll sure check it out
I just realised that I wonβt have this livery anymore now Iβve upgraded to MSFS 2024
Or you keep both 2020 and 2024?
I don't have the space
prob highest i have been in a commerical plane lo
π
I think I once climbed to 440 in a 737 while doing a delivery
Before you ask, the service ceiling of a 737 is 410
i skipped out on reserve fuel

useless load anyway
simbrief overplans fuel all the time
this is without any reserve fuel
Well tbf I end up usually spending more than the plane itself expects
do u cruise at m .9
Though 16 tons extra for you there, should definitely be enough
Usually not, rarely yes
That's like, an F28 load at most, not even a 737
Fun
that lakehopper game is in an open playtest
its really fun, though it is a playtest and early access, so its pretty loaded with bugs
For any other livery you'd like to be upgraded to FS24 you can ask me π
short flight i say
guess ill spare the extra fuel again
perfect it works this way
passengers dont have to know
Thinking like "If I load reserve fuel, that means I plan for something to go wrong. I don't plan for anything to go wrong"?
Well
I was today years old when I found out widebodies used to go to LaGuardia
Pan Am ran A300s and A310s there
Delta had L-1011s go there too
American on DC-10s
Eastern on both A300s and L-1011s
lool
holy big ass nose wheel door
Internal screaming
Gonna need to fly this thing to Istanbul too... and then back to CDG.........
I guess it's worth it
Holy contrails
@reef isle Thank you so much for linking that tool for converting liveries. It's made me very happy I can fly Boeing House again :))
β€οΈ
Hehe no worries
If there are some non-PMDG liveries you'd like to be converted you can just ping me
If I find some sure π
Coming soon - our Airbus A340-600 Pro for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 & 2024!
With the founding from the Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space Germany.
Check out our community discord: https://discord.gg/bN3qF8DQBu
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/aerosoftofficial
Website: https://aerosoft.com
All other social media channels: h...
based
Time to go back to Dallas
Time to take a widebody to Tivat
funky s7 livery
i only know s7 with their all green one
Well that is their best-known one
I think it appeared some time in the 2000s?
Before that S7 had a "temporary solution"
Their initial fleet was pretty much entirely ex-Aeroflot Soviet
Instead of fully repainting those planes, they kept the Aeroflot livery (which in itself is 2 bloo stripes) and repainted the tail to show their name (cause at that point it was still Airline "Siberia", not S7)
Then when A310s started rolling in, those came from a variety of sources so all had different stripes on them. Some were from Aeroflot, some from Hapag Lloyd, etc
So they just repainted them into full white fuselage, keeping that same tail
Then they rebranded into S7, but obviously you can't instantly repaint all of your planes, so they just slapped bright red logos on the fuselage and called it a day until they eventually applied the new livery to their whole fleet
Actually that's wrong even, they didn't repaint the tails initially, just painted a new name over where "Aeroflot" used to be written
The blue tails came with the temporary all-white livery
Initially you had this
Which I hope we will eventually have in MSFS
Then this
Then eventually this
Although sometimes you had this, which is literally the airline language for "We don't know what to draw"
Then you also had these, ex-Vnukovo Airlines ones
they dont get paid enough to care
since when were the tow trucks mounted with ajustable hight suspention
a340 from wish
Well tbf
That plane was made something like 20 years before the A340
So it's not like the Concordski
Oh yeah
It's the only widebody airliner to ever be powered by low bypass turbines I'm pretty sure
acc insane
considering soviet runways too
paid for whole runway, will use whole runway
In Soviet Russia, you not need runway to land a plane, just need vodka
i mean
unironically true from what i heard
Although the places where where they flew the 86s...
86s were a common sight in Tivat
Which is just totally crazy in my opinion
That's an airport which now doesn't see anything more than A321s
short runway u could say
The IL-86 is also not that big
Yeah
Still, quite crazy that it had low bypass turbines
I think the fact that it's a wide body and the 4 engines make it look more massive than it actually is if that makes sense
I want one in MSFS sooooo much
Yeah quite
Not even the FSX one is good π
but heavy + poop engines
actually mad theres none of that for the sim yet
like anything russian/soviet
civil anyways
To any devs listening: if you make an il-86, you can later quite easily convert it into an il-96 and sell that as well, plus maybe even in several packs considering you have the -300s in various variants and -400s now. Much money. Do it, be rich
i believe there was a tu-134 in the works
Exactly. Only the An-225, which, as cool as it is, is a one-off and has very limited use
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh not sure about that
but the developer passed away from cancer or something sadly
At least we're getting an SSJ and a Tu-154
I think the Tu-134 is gone
Wouldn't it be the same as doing an A300B Vs A300-600 kinda thing?
Chat did I cook
Yes but no
Yes in terms of swapping out the gauges for screens, that needs doing
Plus the Il-96 is longer and has actual high-bypass engines
But no in terms of flight engineer and automation, cause the 96 retained the FE role and wasn't too much more automated afaik
So it's a fair bit of work of course, but nothing impossible
cockpit anyways looked pretty alright too. poor guy
Oh yeah, damn, that looks nice
That very much looks like the same FSX/Xplane model
Better than I expected it to
yet has more depth than pmdg 737 "v2" cockpit
Yeah I over cooked it alot
Ngl, haven't used the HUD even once myself
It looks a bit weird imo
It's amazing to use
is that the 154?
134
I much prefer just eyeballing it tbh, at least I understand what to look at
that was my second option
I wonder how far into development that 134 was
Cause it's a real shame what happened
Well flyable still can describe lots of states
i think the most essential stuff worked
I think in MSFS basically as soon as you import the model as an aircraft into the sim it's "flyable"
Oh well...
but probably not more than that so none of the old school nav tools or more complicated stuff
Theres a 154 coming soon
I guess the only chance we get more Soviet stuff is if the Tu-154 ends up selling really well, then maybe devs will realise that making those planes is a good commercial decision
I'd put it more as soonβ’
Cause we don't know if its even on the cards for 2027
yea i see now
no updates since sept 25
unfortunate
At least I'm kinda sure it's not dead since he's working with some big dev now
The only eastern plane we might see this year I'd say is the SSJ
Well
Technically the SSJ is already here
oh yeah shit
But it's currently an A320 in an SSJ trenchcoat
its sayintentions dispatcher im pretty sure
ah yes, md 11 certi
myeah, was a short pax from zurich to eham
Fair
otherwise it would been a 170 knots dive bomb
Btw, about the SSJ, we've not had any news since the trailer dropped have we?
That trailer did look amazing
dont think so, i havent seen anything anyways
Fair
Tbf, kinda excited for it
Got 2 flights on one in the summer between Moscow and St. Petersburg
Got bumped to business on the first one too
It's a neat plane tbh
Cant wait
Apparently I mixed up the timings and woke up an hour too early
I have Moscow time set on my laptop, local time on my phone, and the difference is one hour. And somehow 7am that I saw on my laptop stuck with me more than the actual 8am start
not that good of a race though sadly
Eh, not too bad
new regs stink
Seeing Astons retire, then un-retire was hilarious lol
amr is a lost cause
Oh definitely, yeah
As a Fernando fan, I just wait for funny radios, that's it
Mclaren-Honda years are back
Well tbf last year already wasn't red bull dominance
Mclaren had a much much better car and were absolutely dominant whenever they weren't dumb
if you're flying east yeah
it's meant to be 5nm my guy
wrong, its not
on nat tracks it's 15-25nm depending on following aircraft speed
bleh
Yeah, in cruise overall spacing is preferably more
You rarely have planes cruising within 5nm, only on uktra-busy corridors
NAT especially since it's not monitored
Yeah there's no radar coverage
no, thats why u need oceanic cleareance
so they know whos coming when
ah
they can either deny it or reroute you to another nat track
if spacings an issue
Support Wendover Productions on Patreon: https://www.Patreon.com/Wendover Productions
Over the North Atlantic, where there is no radar coverage, planes don't fly like they normally fly. They follow a set of daily tracks that act like highways in the sky.
Youtube: http://www.YouTube.com/WendoverProductions
Twitter: http://www.Twitter.com/Wendov...
here
I mean, how would it possibly be monitored
Like, I'm sure technically we do have radars that reach far enough to cover the atlantic, but in order for monitoring to not be useless you need the zones to be smaller, so that you at least are able to understand which plane is doing what
You could cover the atlantic with one radar in Ireland, one radar in Canada, one in Iceland, but all you would end up receiving is a bunch of dots on the screen with no ability to understand how far apart they are, etc, so there will just be no benefit
a whopping 10 pages
whats ur schedule like today
whats szy
Thatβs good news because I donβt know how to say it
nvm
Szymany airport
Serving Olsztyn Mazury
The one with the CIA black site somewhere around the airport
wait what LOL
@reef isle @rustic charm we were wrong. oceanic cleareance is partially gone now
Wait, they got partial radar?
seperation rules remain, FL rules are not enforced anymore and more a recommendation
gander doesnt issue cleareances anymore, shanwick will until summer 2026
Wow, interesting
Also, Gander mentioned π
apparently
so this is in partially enforced
flights (like iceland) who'll join nat tracks are exempt and can do any FL
man
Ngl
I'm not very sure if I like these changes
I think NATs were very well-optimised, meanwhile the partial removal of restrictions will probably end up in a lot of TCAS
I mean it makes sense
Now with ADSB and satellite coverage you can get a good enough idea of where planes are even without an actual radar
heres a tldr
oh fuck, the aeroplane heaven B-25 is out
i didnt even realize
im not a massive fan of the B-25, but it is a fun flier, all of the old WW2 bombers are
it wasnt much of a bomber as it was a heavy fighter aircraft that happened to be good at dropping bombs too, some were outfitted to be strafing aircraft
w ups livery
Does that mean I don't have to spend like 15 minutes making a clearance on vatsim soon
Is that real
Yes
π€―
you'll still need to request it
but they wont respond to it
BUT
its vatsim
Gander was an oceanic clearance point because back in the day, when flights couldn't make it direct to other places, it was the point where stopovers happened
i doubt they'll do it like irl
Aeroflot had Il-62s and Il-86s stopping there π
Holy shit
he sucks at flying it tho
My all time average is 294
mines -245
Yes I do
anything between 200-300 is average
Probably too sensitive honestly
Me when visual at DFW flying level for like 4 miles then descending
All megahubs are terrible
This one was quite rough, but felt within safe limits. Got some awful rough air very low
sorry to my passengers
crazy sequencing
Cuz of some vatsim client bs I found myself facing the wrong direction on a taxiway in an Atlas air
horizon sim 78?
Yes π
Very good
is it flyable
I just realised it does CDPLC or whatever it is
holy shit it might actually work
Might be worth expermenting with it
if it works that'd be a godsend
They plan to add alot more
now if cpdlc works
im sold on it
think it doesnt have a pause at t/d
which kinda scared me off from using it
Pause is for the weak, real men sleep through TD and only wake up from hearing the master warning go off once the plane runs out of fuel 500 miles past the destination
sayintentions
That's fine, I use VATSIM instead XD
i dont like vatsim as much anymore
it turned shite
atleast compared to how it was in 2017-2018
Didn't everything turn shite compared to how it was in 2017-2018
nah the voice quality became better
idk if u know how vatsim used to sound
but it was genuinely awful
and 8/10 times i did not understand the controller
Fair 
Had a guy at Athens he said push and start approved face west
And the guy was facing west
It's north-south
the livery fits the a350 too well
GOD DAMN
@rustic charm
Grab yourself several drinks/some snacks and welcome to the LONGEST video I've ever posted. 1hr 45mins of jam packed action, full VATSIM Air Traffic Control (ATC) and a plane that although I praised at the start, bit me hard.
We start at New York's LaGuardia (KLGA) Airport in the TFDi 717 (Delta) with a destination of Boston (KBOS). There's a V...
watch from the timestamp
just a few sec
Oh yeah that's barely audible
could be my best friend speaking and i would not know who it is
Sounds like a stereotypical robot lmao
There are some that are just really quiet honestly
RIP King
PoV: controllers ask you to do an RNAV procedure even though you file as /I
so you try your best with what you have 
the second bit was pure malicious compliance
I just followed the non-RNAV one that was very similar
it's not like they care if I'm a bit off π€·
I'm sure Euroscope freaked out at them (as it does the second you're 0.00001ft off your assigned altitude or 0.00000001NM away from the assigned route), but that's good
maybe next time they'll give me proper procedures 
Aerosoft A340 on Thursday
Just wanted to say
I'd just be "Unable RNAV" lol
I tried
Well in that case you should've started an argument on frequency 
"No I am telling you, I literally have no RNAV equipment of any sort"
I've had enough... I got to the point where I just try my best, and if it's not good enough to the point it's not fun I'll just go away
Especially in Europe, I'm sure there's a good chunk of controllers that don't even know what it means to be non-RNAV, so good luck arguing
in the US 99% of the time it's fine
I should definitely try flying VATSIM in Europe then...
To be fair, in Europe if you pick an airport that actually has non-RNAV procedure, if you just ask in advance, unless it's extremely busy they'll just give you the procedure you want
if there aren't however, then it depends on what controller you meet
Problem is, I'm pretty sure most of the major airports nowadays lack any conventional nav procedures cause they just got rid of them at this point
You'd be surprised
It's not as widespread as in the US obviously, but there are still quite a few, especially in some countries
Greece you're golden, they're still stuck in 1974 with their airway and procedure system, Spain and Italy you're likely to be alright, France and Germany are about 50/50, Austria forget about it
(but the controllers are good)
and to be fair to them there was an event yesterday night, but there wasn't enough traffic for that to be a factor IMO, especially given how similar the non-RNAV procedure was...
I joined right as it was ending so there wasn't much traffic at all
Honestly I'm very tempted to fly CTP on something like a DC-6 just to be a menace to society

I wanted to do it in the Tu-114
in FSX
I had it planned for last year and then couldn't join π
Talked about CTP with a friend yesterday, and he found a cool option for me...
Linee Aeree Italiane, a DC-6 flight going Ciampino - Malpensa - Shannon - Boston - JFK
Although I guess JFK doesn't do much RNAV anyway, it's all vectors in the US
Soing something like that would be much more fun eastbound, caue Europe relies on RNAV
Shame I don't actually have any non-RNAV long range jets
But
Ah yes, LAI π¬
Tbh I think we might even see it out in time for westbound, idk
hahah yeah I don't think so
But from the dev blogs it seemed close
but didn't ini say they'd do just one more dev update before it was out?
Plus
ini does usually share such those dev updaes when it's not far off
And it's only 1 left indeed
Also well, I think just before CTP is the best possible time to release a med-range widebody like that
Cause people will just think "Oh look at this new shiny thing, I can fly it for CTP"
A lot of stuff this year
734/733
Potentially 757, hopefully
F70/100
Possibly A300B4
Possibly 747-100 and 747-400
shame its CSS doing the 73 classics
I mean, they've done a pretty good job with the 735
Well VNAV felt alright to me tbf, sounds are... sounds, can't say more there. And the visuals looked fine to me tbh
Don't think I've flown the latest version though, I think they did also make some visual improvements recently
One thing that I do dislike about the way they are going about it is the fact they're already working on a V2...
Like
You cannot release a plane for both FS20 and FS24 in 2025 and right away start working on a "Better, FS24-only V2 version"
Sexy livery
ikr
300
No pencil, not approved
-300 is cute
Very happy with that landing
Nah
"Cute" is used to describe the likes of A319/318, A310, 767-200, 747SP
The A343 is just gorgeous
But not cute
Booo
I see all this stuff about βbuttering the 737β but afaik itβs not meant to be
But in my opinion the 707/727/737 fuselage doesn't look particularly cute, it looks bit more aggressive, I'd even say sporty or something?
Boeing says the preferred is between -150 & -300 FPM
Plus the reason why the -600 can't really be cute is cause it's still longer than a 737 is actually supposed to be lol
The classics are pretty decent imo (well only the -500 for now), but I just wish we had a -200...
I do too, I want to learn them
Honestly -200 gravel kit operations over in Canada and Alaska would be so cool
Plus newer 737s already feel more like A to B planes
Older ones were...
A to B to C to D to E to... well, I'm gonna end up reciting the alphabet twice
Plus they flew to a lot of cool airports
Random runways nested between the mountains, etc
A 737-200 can land in places where a 727 would be unable to. And a 727 can land anywhere essentially
Iβve been hand flying the NG a lot
Btw, about this
I don't think buttering a landing itself does anything bad to a 737
But the side effects of that do
You might just float and run out of runway, it's mainly that
That's why you're generally not actually supposed to butter airliners. Better to land a bit rough and park at a gate than land smoothly and end up in a ditch
(AirFrance doesn't know that)
When you're flying GA, most of the time you have space at your disposal. What you often don't have is suspension. So you should try to land smoothly
On an airliner, you have suspension which can absorb quite a lot of force safely
https://youtu.be/pon_c6-YMO0?si=yn1AxbLfHGnDpttk
I will never get out of my head this video whenever I think of the 220 and the Avro RJ
After more than 15 years of service, SWISS says goodbye to an icon of the sky, the Avro RJ100, also known as Jumbolino.
In its place, the worldβs most modern short-and medium haul aircraft, the Bombardier C Series, will operate to SWISS destinations throughout Europe.
_
Subscribe for exclusive video updates: https://www.youtube.com/subscript...
Cute indeed
Itβs to do with the wheel wobble
That's a cute video too ngl
Swiss do great marketing I gotta say
I am so increbily glad I found it after they unlisted it
the only real way to fly a 737
real chads whip the ap off at 5-7k feet and handfly it in
i also like to turn the FD off in the airbus and enable the FPA TRCK mode
makes it easier flying with the bird instead of the FD
but cute little engines π π
-300 looks better than the -600
They're not little though
In terms of looks, they're perfectly proportioned for the A340 imo
The -600 looks just bulky and long
Still pretty
But the -300 is better
That is what I do
Time for an overnight over to Malpensa
Well that seems good
Ah, of course
Imperial units selected for whichever reason
Thunderbolts and Lightning, very very frightening.
Nooooo why are you using the AJP ones
The tail is wrong π
There should be a bit more white between the red and green
Fuck me and my immensely stupid decision to not republish the liveries as though they were new and instead push an update to the old ones
It's not even a consistent thickness
And the green part is placed inaccurately
How do people not notice this stuff π
The writing above the door is wrong as well
There's not enough space between the first and second name
Although TBF I didn't do that much better
But he didn't bother with the spinners
Which TBF I also could improve a little bit
I haven't looked at any reference in months 
Maybe I should improve it here and then and republish it as new...
I'll have to think about it
It 100% shouldn't and I feel bad for feeling this way, but I do find it annoying how popular AJP's liveries are, and that's only because he bought the CE so he had the plane a lot earlier than me π
And mostly it's my own fault anyway for pushing an update...
I could also add the logos on the Engines if I wanted to add something new
They were applied quite inconsistently IRL
Why is the stripe cut off lol?
Never seen that kind of damage/weathering/mismatch(?) in any picture or video
There's no way he just truncated the stripe instead of reshaping it for the more modern variants
That's obviously incorrect
I could also make the black dot a little smaller though?
And no QNH label in the cockpit
Now you'll forget about the QNH π
cant be long now
Tbf I think it's just because AJP released the V2-compatible version earlier
Yes π
Also this is cool, I was sending screenshots in various places, so Discord deemed me a spammer, logged me out on all my devices, forced me to change the password and then made me wait 3 hours before I could send messages again...
So you saw me complaining about the livery but we're unable to answer? 
There apparently used to be a way to remove the "limited access" by doing something in the app, idk it probably made you do a captcha and that's it, but now the only option is to message support. And well... the support is helpful as ever. Got an auto-reply and it marked the ticket as "solved" 
Most useful AI agent:
Nope, to be fair you complained while I was sleeping
4 for me π₯²
I couldn't fall asleep, so quickly browsed discord a bit, then saw that and then definitely couldn't sleep 
No I mean I'm scared because of Discord lol
"Oh god no, no no no he sent a screenshot, time to ban the account"
oh hahahahah
https://www.aerosoft.com/de/detail/index/sArticle/4763 shop page is live btw
is there a price
Not yet
booo
The -600 is for both FS20 and FS24
And I thank Aerosoft & ToLiss for that cause I still haven't fully moved to 2024
why though
FS24 runs worse, doesn't look too much better, a lot of stuff requires me to buy it again
So I only use 24 for the things that aren't available in 20
That is just the A330 and A343 for now
Don't say it, can't say it's them
It's hamas π
I was just joking, but well, best to not get political here 
Well fuck what I was about to say then
Tbh it's kinda cool that we have GPS jamming simulation
Also, that's where old planes are doing better
Can't have jammed GPS
If you don't have GPS
time to start jamming the vors
Time to break out the star-based navigation then 
That would be insane
Yeah bro I did a transatlantic via star based navigation
But as irl, it's really complicated
Tbf as long as the sim shows the sky correctly, you can do that
Can I eat shoes
i doubt it does
Well, there's only one way to prove
That involves knowing the stars and where they should be, and comparing that to the sim
Unfortunately for me, I don't know the stars and where they should be
Yeah lol
Plus tbf
When it was used
I think pilots didn't really know it all that well anyway
That'd be the job of the navigator
navigator plus three other job titles
i'd argue being the pilot was the easier part back then
True
navigation plus flight engineer and then during times of war probably also bombing calculations stuff
As a pilot, generally you were responsible for just flying
Basically anything apart from the yoke, rudder and tiller is not your business
Well tbf navigators and flight engineers in the piston days were often separate on long flights
Like
When you actually would possibly need stuff like astronavigation
Oceanic hops and so on
And on short hops the VOR navigation would often actually be done by the captain/FO
But still
The FE does like 80% of the startup, all the power calculations, power management, fuel management...
when i fly the 747-200 i struggle alot doing navigation, flying and FE stuff
(i have crashed a few times because i didnt do the fuel management properly)
Unless of course you're in a DC-6 because it still has no automation at all so realistically would require at least a 3-person cockpit, if not 4, but ended up being flown by 2-people crews
So yeah, as a DC-6 captain you'd be doing a shittonload of work 
aye only 1 jam this time
It's actually funny
Cause the Connie, the main competition of the DC-6, actually had a proper 3-person cockpit iirc, with a full flight engineer station
The DC-6 has none of that
man the connie
a2a PLEASE
Here is a 12-minute look at the Captain of the Ship Constellation developed for Microsoft Flight Simulator X and Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
hands down of the best p3d addons
Well, afaik we do have a connie that's decent
I haven't tried it myself
But I've heard it's not bad
Oh it definitely is
Last time I did a flight in it, I went from Long Beach to Atlanta
In 6 fucking hours
bruh LOL
Ngl
It's really cool how much endurance those planes have
Like, the DC-6 can fly for around 14 hours iirc
dc6 in CTP lets go
But whenever you think of it, it feels like more than it really is
im pretty sure it can do it
Cause a DC-6's 14 hours is a 737's 7 hours
Easily
god i hope the weathers good
Often initial altitude is your cruise altitude
nah it goes up to FL130
Cause you don't actually need to step up as much as in jets
Jets become more efficient the higher you climb
taking off at max TOW a swell
In a piston aircraft? You'd just climb to whatever altitude that provides you good clearance over any terrain and expected weather and stay there
Also about that
A friend told me I should do this for CTP
You with me? 
Possibly 5
Don't be thinking you've seen it all though
Cause that's a total of what, 18:30 planned block time
I can also offer you the BCPA route
5 legs
Auckland/Sydney - Vancouver
Auckland - Vancouver ends up around 32 hours of total block time
Sydney - Vancouver around 34
Definitely not
That's way too long
Count the stop times too
You'd get over 24 hours of total time
There is an A330-800neo in xplane correct?
Well
Not over
You'd get 21:30 of total time, plus whatever time it takes at the origin and destination
So definitely 2 crews
900


