#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 30 of 1
Or did I apply? I might’ve lol, don’t remember
considering that there aren't many soviet planes even in FSX my hopes are very low
Yeah
a lot of them don't have a 3D cockpit (for example the Tu-104/124)
Tu-104 would be quite fun ngl
There was a separate seat basically in the nosecone, which was of course glass
it definitely would, some time I'll learn to fly the FSX one, even though I'd find it pretty hard without a 3D cockpit
I mean, that was a thing until the Tu-134 
Yeah
The IL-76 had it even
theres a 76 for xp11 though
it's crazy how much that lasted in the Soviet Union compared to the West
Il-76 is a plane that at different points had pretty much everything lol
Yeah, but it's bad, even the russian version which is more up to date than the one on Xplane.org
I did the CTL with that
didn't go particularly well
wasn't too bad
but I had to tune the autopilot constants while I was in cruise so I could trust it and look away for a few minutes 
also at the end I couldn't really contol it properly for some reason and had to reload it
but then landed fine
A comprehensive Il-76 would probably be one of the best ways to get a Soviet plane into MSFS
Of course lots of work
thats how i felt w the f28
f70 my love please
faster
But I’m certain that everyone can find something they enjoy doing in an Il-76
No, I mean I opened the developer mode and changed the PID constants
yeah...
u must know something about aircraft development
if you're able to do that
respectf
so for some reason the devs implemented some big, not deadzone, but some big curves around the center and the A/P didn't really cope with that well
it tried to correct but nothing happened
You want to fly gauges? Can do. You want to land on unpaved runways? Can do. You’re scared to fly gauges? Some 76s have glass cockpits now I’m pretty sure…
so I had to make it VERY sensitive so that it would actually act when needed
Just some very basic stuff 😅
That is definitely not the way it should be
I mean, it might be a way to represent a part of the FM, it was quite early in development
when they abandoned it they were halfway through writing their own custom A/P which I'm sure would have taken that into account
Well, a shame it got abandoned
Yeah, although I feel like the IL-76 would be more of an end-goal
especially for a small studio
same for something like the Tu-154
you either have someone who is very passionate, knowledgeable about developing a plane and the plane and is very commited to actually finishing it or I'd rather have something simpler
Well yeah, if you wanna represent it decently, Il-76 would require soooo much work
I was pretty impressed when I heard that the Bear thing studios' MiG-25 had RSBN
I'm eagerly awaiting for it to go on sale to buy it
ah no it was from GKS
Cause again, so many things in there, so many variations, so many modules to make
yeah
Doesn’t help that Il-76 is pretty much a testing plane. Wanna try out a new engine? Stick it on an Il-76
yeah, it was the do-anything-you-need-to plane
ahah
I'm still a bit disappointed that we had a fairly decent AN-225 and then nothing else
It was by ini wasn’t it?
like, if that for ini (which is a HUGE dev) was almost a "sideline" project, why not do more 😭
yep
They could’ve easily then continued and done at the very least an An-124
yeah exactly
That would share sooooo many common parts
the 225 is such a specialized and niche plane 🫤
And on quite a lot of other planes too, even by other manufacturers, you could still use some things from the 225
I wonder what are ini gonna do next though
Cause they had some story about the 1011 didn’t they?
Yeah
if we're lucky maybe that'll be before the A380?
but I doubt it
They’re still making the 380?
yep
Weird decision, considering there is a free one now which as far as I know almost everyone considers good enough
eh... considering the A350/380/A400 commonality it's probably not going to be that huge of an undertaking, and as long as it's better than the FBW it's going to sell
because of course it will, it's an A380 😄
survived a bad vis landing in Almaty, happy with that 😄
I've learned it at one point but need to get used to doing DME arcs with this thing's weird instrumentation again 🤪
(also no idea what the multiple landings after rollout are about 🤷 )
took off, and tracking VORs just fine in the 732, but im not sure how you manage descent or climb
do you literally disconnect elevator AP and just manage that by hand, or is there a more graceful way im missing
for some reason the aircraft refuses to track VORs sometimes too
i was set to my destination airport VOR, on the approach radial, and it tracked it on the display, autopilot is set up for it and everything, but didnt track it
now its properly tracking it, after ive left the airport entirely
where tf is the pitch hold though
i see the ALT hold switch, and the IAS and ALT hold rotating switch
this is what i wanted to do, vs what actually happened
i was going to track the lanai city VOR to bring me into the range of the airport VOR to get me set up on final
the manuals included dont even cover remotely anything near this
i still cant find how you manage your descent after reading through that manual
does the aircraft just assume that the altitude you have selected in the box is what it needs to hit at the VOR or whatever?
because otherwise, how do you manage the descent to get it on time?
Yep
There's a vertical mode that's more or less like the A320 without A/P
It will keep a certain deck angle and will keep the plane more or less in trim
Usually to climb after flap recreation and power reduction I climb in that mode, and then set the speed bug to 250kts, as soon as I'm at 230/240 I select IAS, then passing 10.000ft I select 280kts
As soon as I get to Mach .65 or .70 I'll go back to that "manual" mode and keep the right Mach number
To descend I just use that manual mode the whole way through
Did you try to use NAV mode?
Forget it, it's terrible
It's usable with the FMC or the INS
how the fuck else are you supposed to fly it then
With VORs just use the heading command to manually center the HSI
Even with the CIVA your tracking VORs as well as coordinates
Not really
If you're in "GPS" mode (there's a switch in the cockpit) you'll always follow the CIVA
Even if you put a waypoint on top of a VOR
In fact you won't need to tune the VOR
My whole life is a lie 
It's just another coordinate as far as the CIVA is concerned, it doesn't know it's a VOR
How would it know? 😄
It's a totally separate and independent system
I thought with CIVA you basically did both, you programmed waypoints, and any VOR you had on the way you would tune it, switch over, and then follow that
nope
The only way it interfaces with the plane is driving the HSI
That's it
What you're describing is a more integrated early Inertial Navigation System, like the one that the 737 Classic has
In fact in the Classic you can tune VORs, and those will be used to correct the INS' position
But that's not what happens with the Carousel, if you want to correct/update the position you have to do it using a different method, which is explained in the CIVA manual
so with the CIVA, you just plug in the waypoints, and it just follows them as it goes along, even VORs and stuff?
Yep
But it will of course drift with time
To switch between CIVA and VORs you need to flick the GPS/NAV switch
It's IIRC above and to the right of the artificial horizon
(for CIVA you want that in the GPS position)
and then to do an ILS/LOC approach, you tune the ILS frequency in the nav radio and then switch it back over to nav, right?
and set up the autopilot (and optionally the FD) to the ILS modes?
Yes
Yes, F/D to "Auto APP" or something like that IIRC
This is how you do a CIVA position correction/update
But honestly for these kinds of flight I'd just not bother with CIVA @hollow oracle
It was very rare in 737s and 727s IRL anyways
so, just VOR flying?
Yeah, a lot of US carriers kept them VOR only until they were scrapped in the '90s and 2000s
It was way more common to have some early FMCs/GPS units fitted to them compared to the CIVA until
(which unfortunately aren't available for the FJS 737)
I guess CIVA could be a decent substitute for those
But that was mostly happening in Europe
how would you do VOR navigation without a flight engineer, or just a seperate navigator position
because from what i can tell, its a lot of figuring out headings and stuff
You tune the VOR and you select the course?
It's not that much work 😅
instruction unclear, dick stuck in engine
I have developed a method to it very easily
So, this will be confusing, I'll try to be clear
VOR distance stuff is what really gets me i guess, because to work with VORs that are far away, you would have to use heading mode, which then youd kind of have to look at charts to figure out where you're supposed to be headed
like, if i did this routing, it would be 3 VORs i would track, hilo, lanai, and maui, but theyre so far apart i would lose signal to both hilo and lanai by the time im at (roughly) the PUMIC waypoint, so id have to use headings to find my way until i can pick up the VOR again
So, you have two NAV radios with 2 possible frequencies each, a "standby" and an "active", this how I'll express them
ACTIVE | STBY || STBY | ACTIVE
So let's say I was here
I'd have
YXU | FNT || YXU | FNT
That means that using the indicator I can still make sure I'm heading towards the VOR, and I can still see the DME 2 (and check my distance to YXU so I know when to turn), but I'm already set up to track the inbound heading for the FNT vor
oh yeah, thats another thing, what radio does the aircraft prioritize for navigation, the captains side?
Yes, active left side
got it, and then the right side is basically just reference for the VOR2 display and stuff?
Yes
DME1 is inside the HSI
that makes a lot more sense
To the right of the HSI you have DME 2
about how far do VORs track out anyway?
Some 150NM, others 70
Or something in between
Never expected more than 150
I'd recommend flying a bit in the East Coast and following this kind of SIDs and STARs
They'll be challenging, but they'll teach you some good manners
And you have the proper heading and courses
how do you even follow proper SIDs and STARs with just VORs 
i assumed that if you were flying VOR, you wouldnt be following that
Look at the one above, each route segment is defined as a VOR radial between two DME points
That's all you need
Nobody forces you to overfly a VOR
I'll have a hard time finding it now, but I had a VOR only route that didn't overfly one single VOR
ohhhhhh
so if your going to do that last bit from the palmdale VOR, youd actually be tracking one of those upper VORs shown?
No because I'm a fucking idiot and sent the wrong thing
I'll wait until I'm at my PC again 😭
im going to give it another shot with this idea
That's what I actually wanted to send
But yeah, that's the right idea
you get what i mean though
im gonna give this another shot, but i dont know if its going to work, or if im going to have enough time
im still confused as far as the descent goes too
(Current Altitude - Altitude you want to reach) x3
i mean, as far as the actual aircraft itself goes with the autopilot
So you have a restriction at 10.000, and you're at 20.000, 20-10 = 10, 10x3 = 30
I use that pitch hold manual mode
The whole way through
would that be the IAS switch, and then the pitch cmd knob?
no, it's the default mode once you put the elevator "paddle" (switch) on but don't select anything in the rotary control
and then the pitch cmd knob?
That's just for the Flight Director
It doesn't do anything to the autopilot
It'll hold where you leave it
You can still move the stick/cloche up and down
When you let it go and put it in the neutral position it will hold that
with autopilot on?
Yep
It won't disconnect unless you try to trim
Because that's how you're supposed to use it AFAIK 😅
its just so hard to get a grasp on because its so different from anything ive ever flown before
even compared to the 727
lovely MD11
why
its tracking the radial, its even turning into it, but for some reason it turned extremely late and overshot it
is that normal or am i missing something
or is it that slant alpha navigation or whatever
Sounds about right
Just NAV mode being rubbish
Also the closer you are to the VOR the more the HSI will move quickly
The reason should be obvious if you see all the radials coming out of the VOR, they'll be ""closer togheter"" the closer you get to the center
it looks really crazy, but its tracking it fine now
Yeah then that's just NAV mode being nav mode 
Unless winds are calm it's probably going to continue to overcorrect and hunt around the radial
I didn’t know they had meal service on a 30 minute flight 
This whole 732 talk is tempting
Why can’t we have one in MSFS 
At least there’s a 727
But I do hope that FSS will do a 732 once they’re done with the 722, cause to be honest they’re quite similar
wen 
bro choose broccoli 💀
-# actually i dont hate it that much but for the memes
yes, because i am not 2 years old
broccoli is awesome, especially with ranch
With accurate maintenance history simulation
Inoperative half of the plane
7 fires
13 ditchings
that sam chui video where he shows that they had to put a pan under the engines to catch the leaking oil is still fucking insane to me 
i wouldnt even drive a car doing that, let alone an entire aircraft
Join me on a thrilling flight to the Colombian Jungle onboard Aerosucre’s 44-year-old B737-200.
Aerosucre is a cargo airline from Colombia that has been involved in a number of accidents and incidents. I started my trip in Bogota and my destination is Mitu; a jungle town near the border with Brazil. There are no roads to reach Mitu so the cargo...
Aerosucre is hella fun though
I have no fucking idea how they managed to overload a 727 so much that it didn’t have enough time to climb and literally intercepted the runway localiser at Bogota
lots and lots of undocumented cocaine
Bogota is a big airport with big runways
i love when they do takeoffs where they float above the runway by a few ft, retract the landing gear, and then climb
Aerosucre 747 wen?
I’m pretty sure 343s have been there. And those planes are basically powered by 4 APUs
W AIRLINE
sadly won't have time to complete the entire flight, but the pax version was the only one I had custom views for & I wanted to see all the fuss with the new MD11 update
i get it now, you sort of use the yoke as the adjustment for the vertical speed, im descending at a solid 1500fpm now
you only use ALT hold when your kinda nearing your altitude
well, i overran the runway, but i did land pretty okay
floated way too long, somehow it was 1.5Gs too??? even though it was a -195fpm landing and i stretched it pretty far
and of course the replay doesnt want to load because of reasons
i actually floated 3 seperate times
Like, I went to land, floated, went to land again, floated again, and again
You'll have to get used to it
On X-Plane you can actually feel the ground effect, you can let it do most of the work for the flare
The issue I have is that i consciously think of doing a flare, and every time i think about it, its always too much, because i do it on view and not from the horizon
It also doesn’t help that the first line on the artificial horizon on the 732 is 10 degrees, no lines in between
I think the usual advice is to look at the far end of the runway
and judge it off of that
I think while on approach you should focus your attention and eyesight on the 1000ft markers, as that's your aiming point, as you start to flare you should see the end of the runway
I just put a crosshair in the middle of the screen to show you where I'm more or less looking at, consider that I'm more then likely always looking a bit above it
also consider that it's a fairly non standard landing as I came in faster than usual (to avoid a gust killing me), so I came in lower to let it float a bit to kill off the excess speed
i see, ive heard the "look at the runway" bit, but i never really connected how to use it
its just that my brain thinks "flare", but when i think about it, i want to consciously make a huge pitch up like im taking off or something, even though it really only needs 1 or 2 degrees at most
i also dont think it helps that this was literally my first landing ever on the 737-200, and it is extremely small and has short landing gear
i think its honestly more impressive that i managed to float like that, than if i got a regular smooth landing 
somehow that was 1.5G too
it was firm but not hard by any means
you can tell that i was basically flaring at the right time, every time, but i was just about 2-3ft higher than i thought i was
thats another thing that really messes me up too, the engines are microscopic they take no time at all to start
the G count in xplane has to be incorrect
there is no way i keep getting almost 2G landings
with good FPM too
it really isnt helping my case that the runways in kahului are microscopic, 7000ft and 5000ft
navigating wasnt that bad either surprisingly, i just had to do an extra loop because i got distracted and forgot to start my descent
Tbh in MSFS you can sometimes feel it too, but not always
I’ve had landings where I flare just a bit too high and the plane refuses to touch the runway at all
Nope this is possible
It’s how much energy you carry into the runway
FPM is a measure of speed
So you can have a landing of avoid -50fpm and still have it at about 1.5g because the flare was violent
Idk if anyone else is subscribed to marco’s newsletter but that’s cute as fuck
Yeah but it's no secret that Volanta is wacky when it comes to that stuff
Oh I assumed they was using the lua plugin
Are the x-crafts e jets able to hold over a fix yet?
Free month of x-box game pass
on a quick 2 min looksee the heli flight model is better than expected
more investigation required
Yes
ILS autotune as well
Directs are still fucked tho
Doesn’t go from ppos goes from your last waypoint
on further investigation just no
zero ish forward airspeed and climbing at 22000 ft 😆 - still no vrs to speak of better than 2020 but not great
The crapenado 185 is decent, not very crap at all
gonna try a longer flight in the 737-200, wish me luck 
thinking nashville to orlando on southwest, the old gold scheme
i dont think im going to mess with SID/STARs yet, im just going to focus on enroute VOR navigation
South Korea's Flag Airline Korean Air decided to rebrand for its Asiana airlines merger, but It's livery seems let say Awfully Mid it looks more like a LCC than a flag airline
Yes 😄
wtf is that
that looks like that one french airline
la compagine or whatever
if the K in KLM stood for korea
urgh
Bring back pepsi
I don’t think you can even do RNAV SID/STARs with VOR-only navigation, right?
Which is like 90% of them nowadays
Correct
By definition, RNAV means to be able to navigate without ground based navigational aids (it's a bit more complicated but that should be enough)
Although in the US non-RNAV (conventional) SID/STARs are quite common still
Same for other nations (Japan and S. Korea for example) and some EU countries
i was wondering why the flaps werent working
VC-10 ❤️
They had the Concorde hangar closed in the morning so the royal BAe146 was open when it’s usually closed for private tours only
Didn’t get any pics
But my god
It literally has the exact same ovens as we do on our planes 😂😂
Same brand of water boiler as well
VC10 was closed but the Trident and the Britannia was open
The trident is really really cool
The Britannia is less cool but still very cool
25$ well spent
Join me as I take a first look at ChasePlane by //42! One of the best additions to Microsoft Flight Simulator I have ever used!
Discord: https://discord.gg/Hbuy92J2X9
Instagram: http://instagram.com/nickflightx
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nickflightx
Facebook: https://w...
It's also releasing for FS24
Tegel 😄
Just like Stapleton and Munich Riem, it might be closed but still lives in my heart flight sim
Nice
I appreciate the german controllers so much for letting me fly in and out of there
I’m on the second leg of a delivery to Germany right now coincidentally
Well, it’d be the first leg of the delivery actually
Boeing Field to Halifax
I just also do the hops between Renton and Boeing Field
A VOR coast to coast trip on a 727… lovely
Except I’m not delivering it to Lufthansa or any German airline…
Condor?
Nope
Try over an ocean from there
non german airline with 727s in Germany?
Yep
Pan Am?
Yep
UAL?
Nice 😄
oh that's really cool
at some point I'll do a few of those flights as well
it's so trippy looking at images of heathrow with random UAL 727s in there 
also Pan Am operated freaking ATR72s in Germany
tehehehe
what's crazy is that I believe those weren't chartered or operated by other airlines, they were ACTUAL UAL/PAA flights
assuming they'd be operated by their US-based crews
I randomly saw a picture of a Pan Am 727 and was like, “Hey, those buildings look quite Soviet”
Oh yeah, they were actually PAA, at least in PAA case. They basically operated those to feed their transatlantic flights on European side
Yeah
I assume some crew memeber every now and again would get to stay a week in Europe or something
Probably yeah
Some time ago I found a photo of a UAL 727 in Heathrow in the middle of all EU airlines
I'm trying to find that
tempelhof my love
tegel is cool as well though
it wasnt a too good airport irl imho
: (
and BER continues to carry that legacy
i wish i could've seen it in operation
Can't get much more '70s than that ahahah
BER is so goddamn terrible
It's crazy that it was pretty much Air Berlin's airport, and the airline didn't live long enough to ever use it
BER isn't that bad tbf
(or rather, the airport got so delayed)
i've only had bad experiences in ber
just the ryanair bit thats shitty
Not talking as a pax/ops point of view
but the airport itself is just so massively overbuilt
oh yeah 100%
and is optimized for traffic that doesn't really exist in Berlin
i was gonna say that
i find it horrible that the nations' capital
barely has any international flights
80% of the flights are made by RYR or EZY
Yeah it's a bit weird, most international flights from Germany are out of Frankfurt or Munchen
The only big airline with a hub in Berlin was Air Berlin
once it ceased to exist Berlin more or less stopped to have through traffic (which was the traffic BER was built to handle 🙃 )
Pan Am too iirc, Tempelhof
But yeah somehow Berlin is basically forgotten and Frankfurt is the main German gateway
For once, I'm actually speaking about modern times, around when BER was drawn/built (which TBF it's been so long...)
wait yo pan am flew to tempelhof with a 727
Yep
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Pan_Am_Express.jpg
Best way to get to Sylt
thats a sick flight idea
Internal German Service
wait a second
Pan Am had a regional fleet based in Germany
where did pan am fly to from berlin
A lot of EU destinations

the FSS 727 got an update, and FINALLY fixed the GSX automation which broke most stuff
wow that's actually insane
IIRC Pan Am more than most other US airlines had this thing of setting up secondary hubs overseas
I mean, most airlines did it, but Pan Am went absolutely crazy with it
so it was
german flight attendants
american pilots
bruh
pan am moved to tegel in 1975
yeah not surprised, I think EU Pilots would need to get FAA ceritifications to fly US registered planes
and all their EU fleet was US registered
still super damn cool honestly
A lot of airlines nowadays use code sharing/alliances/leasing/chartering to do this stuff
Have a good flight 😄
Thanks
what a conincidence
Cruising over Montana right now
Well that’s how the conversations tarted, I mentioned I was doing a Pan Am delivery to Germany xD
i have dementia
Under 4 hours left seemingly
I just noticed that for the past like 30 minutes I was slowly slowly descending
Should be at FL370, got to 335
Somehow the autopilot went from altitude hold to vspeed at -100fpm
So easy to miss something like that in the 727
Modern planes would right away give a warning if you got around 1000ft away from your needed altitude
72 should as well
Hmm weird
I’ve never noticed it giving me a warning
Not today, not any other time
the FE says "thousand to go", based on your set altitude
Yeah, no chime
That only happens when you approach your altitude, not deviate from it
VATSIM finally imploding is so awesome to see
very turbulent departure, but we're schmoovin
still not super great at VOR navigation i guess
it doesnt help that it feels like the VOR tracking is just wrong
if you cycle the autopilot mode switch, it actually starts tracking the VOR properly, like it gets refreshed
like?
im on the 154 radial out of rome, but its not right
not to mention its off course and doing nothing about it, but if i cycle the AP switch it works again
i get that it wont be 100% accurate, but like, im not even going in the right general direction?
the line connecting RMG to TAY is 154deg according to navigraph, but why wouldnt the radials be lined up with that?
now that im in range of the TAY VOR, i switched my navigation to that one, and now its on the correct radial, how the fuck do i do it when i wasnt even in range?
It was toward the end of summer last year, but I got a few weeks of it in for sure
So yeah, my ambitions of delivering this 72 from Boeing Field to Berlin in 2 legs are now changing a bit
Now planning for 4 legs instead. Right now Halifax (if can make it, otherwise Bangor), from there to St. John’s to absolutely minimise the distance of the Atlantic crossing, then to Cork, and from there to Germany (Berlin or Frankfurt, I haven’t quite decided yet, probably Berlin)
I've tried to tell you so many time 😭
Just use Heading
although that seems particulatly bad
Wouldn’t that gradually blow you off course?
Just move it back and forth i suppose is a easy fix?
Like if your heading off course just turn it a bit back then forward until you're in line with it
Welp folks, in the end, this guy is not making it to Halifax today. I am starting my descent and in around half an hour I will hopefully be parked up at Bangor
Low on fuel, Halifax is just a bit too far… potentially because I spent the first half of the cruise at mach .86 and the rest at .82 while I should’ve stayed at .80 the whole way according to my plan
do enjoy a good Tegel flight, despite not being staffed on Vatsim I fly there regularly
Always correct
Just keep an eye on it
you'll have to put it 2/3/5deg left or right from time to time
I also allow it to deviate quite a bit, as long as there's positivie trend
about halfway between the first dots
I'm happy with this amount of deviation, no idea how realistic it is
you can see it here
Now, Volanta shows the route as they'd look on a flat map (they show it as a rhumb line and not a great circle), but these distances shouldn't be enough for that to be a problem
Bit of deviation is fine
You can’t get it all exactly right with manual VOR navigation
Just finished today’s flight and here I was not always on point either
I made myself a route by using the closest VORs
But when you’re doing a coast to coast trip, you still have fair distances
Not all VORs will always capture
Some have good range so you’ll be fine with them
Others have a range of like 30 miles and you’ll be questioning whether that VOR even exists
YVV for me didn’t capture at all. The DME worked and showed 16 miles, the directions to the beacon didn’t even appear on the instruments
what periphs are u using
is it hard to set bms up
that is pretty frustrating, thankfully it was half off at least
glad i have it, but i dont know if im going to fly it much going forward
You definitely need to micromange it
Especially the navigation
Welp, yesterday only made it as far as Bangor, now going to start the leg 2 of the delivery - Bangor to St John’s, hoping to get as far as Cork today
The 727 is always enjoyable. Even when VORs give you a big fucking headache and you realise you don’t have the fuel to get to your destination either
Love flying to Canada, my reserve fuel is almost as much as my whole trip fuel
I remember flying from Yellowknife to Rankin Inlet. Literally my only alternative airport was Yellowknife, so I had to carry fuel for a potential trip all the way back
Well, landing St. John’s will be fun it seems like
Overcast at 200ft, mist, almost no visibility
From memory...
- Virpil MongoosT-50CM3 base with 20cm extension and TM Warthog stick grip
- TM Warthog throttle
- MFG Crosswind Pedals
- TM MFD frames
- TotalControls button box
- Razer Tartarus keypad
Not in the new menu, no - it's almost a little easier than DCS was for me
Welp, I just landed in Cardiff, which means I can even get to Tempelhof today
Now the only question is…
How tf do you VOR-navigate Europe to land in an airport long gone
Did it detect ur perihps autp
I remember having the issue where it didnt detect half of it
i am starting to hate xplane again
2.5G landing, and i STILL wasnt able to stop in time
how the fuck do you land aircraft?????
holy fuck i had a handea in the MD-11 too, i bounced several ft into the air, thinking i was on the ground and the nose was just coming back up
2.5G my fucking ass
I think so? It was a long while ago though
this sim fucking sucks, how is it COMPLETELY different from landing in MSFS
i have had 0 runway excursions in MSFS in my actually literally hundreds of flights and thousands of hours in any aircraft, but all of a sudden in xplane, 2 out of 6 landings have had that, and all have been extremely hard
Well the MD-11 is notoriously hard to land
with the 737 you just have to get used to it
I can try and record a couple of landing with input visualisation for you
if you think that could be useful
You had too much energy - you were too fast
i was right on the vref for landing at flaps 35
+too much nose up input
actually even less, the MD-11 automatically kills the throttle
interesting
too much???
Yeah, you can see the nose lifting up after the mains are planted in the ground
at 0:11
until 0:16
you REALLY dont want to plant the nose down when you bounce, i do know that for a fact
yes, but once you have the mains on the ground you should definitely derotate the aircraft
I mean, what you did is better than ending up in PIO and with a broken gear and the plane upside down
2.1G is enough to bend the fuselage like a pretzel
Don't trust Volanta's G-Rating
that was the in-game menu i had (though ive since been told that it sucks anyway)
volanta was even showing 1.7G or something
I see, no idea how good that is
to judge my landings I just go be feel+replay 🤷
fpm can sometimes be misleading too
i judge mostly by Gs, the only thing that fpm is useful for is judging how steep your approach was
I mean........ kinda?
volanta averages it from the last 5 seconds or so before you landed
oh does it, interesting
so you could have a steep approach in but a smooth landing and it owuld still show as a high fpm
I see
Basically how it goes for me and the 727 
I love that plane, but I fly it rarely
Tbh I also tend to out the triple down quite harshly because I mostly fly narrowbodies that are much closer to the ground. Do my best on the triple, but it’s mostly just a bit stronger than on the 737s
i dont get flaring
whats the purpose, to lose speed, to sort of get some extra lift right before landing, to plant the rear wheels from the rotation?
I feel like I’m struggling because I don’t understand the why
If you do not flare, your kinetic energy is directed right into the runway, which means you land really hard and most likely bounce because the runway tries to give back all of the force you put onto it when you hit it
When you flare, the vector of the plane’s kinetic energy starts shifting upwards. Now it shouldn’t shift too far, it shouldn’t start pointing up, otherwise you won’t touch the ground at all. It should still point down, just not as much
the main point is to arrest your vertical descent rate
but also, to make sure you don't end up back in the air again you also need to lose speed
so I guess the two main objectives are (in order of importance):
- Reduce your vertical speed
- Slow down
I pretty much never land at the approach speed, it’s always a fair way slower
In fact I often idle the throttle way before touching down too. Descending through 50ft you can just idle it, of course having it in idle means bigger response time for a goaround, but really, it is very rare that you would go around below 50ft
Propliners you need to keep some power on and fly them on to the runway, not easy to do.
Yeah, tbh, only talking for jet airliners here, cause I have no experience with anything else. They weigh more and approach quicker, so the inertia is absolutely enough to descend the last 50ft
Yep that's what supposed to happen 😄
although I have to say in MSFS planes are happy to stay in the air even wthen they're really slow
on Xplane you'll have to be a little bit more careful
in general in MSFS you're flying the way all the way until touchdown more, on Xplane you can just pull and let ground effect do the rest
on MSFS it feels more of a science, in the sense that you need very specific control inputs to get the plane to do what you want, on Xplane it's more based on feel and visual cues
that's what I felt anyway, your milage may vary
I’m kind of confused too, the MD-11 is supposed to be landed pretty fast, but even at the vspeeds it gives me, it still seems too fast
That last approach was like 165ish I think
going to try again, im going to try a more gradual flare, at 50ft, and cutting the engines significantly later
im going to have to fight the autothrottle, but it cuts automatically at 50ft and i think thats way too early, and why im getting hard landings, im basically stalling and slamming into the runway
my vref this time is 156, vapp is 161
i floated so fucking long that RAAS gave me the long landing warning again
i dont get it
i either float or slam into the runway, there's no in-between
volanta says it was 1.4G and -264
the in-game one says it was -406 and 0.9g
its acceptable but not nearly as soft as id like it to be
one thing that definitely helped was disabling autopilot at around 500ft RA instead of right at minimums, its a little scary but having that extra time to just feel out and control the aircraft really helps get a feel for landing
like, if i flared maybe half a second later it would be a perfect landing, but i always misjudge my descent rate and flare just a microscopic bit too early
unfortunately i think my problem is just down to experience, im going to have to have a shitty few landings, i just have to keep to short flights so i dont waste a 4+ hour flight because of some shitty landing
thats another thing too, the thrust reversers take AGES to start revving up, because the main engines have to fully go to idle before it starts going the other direction (which isnt even really a thing)
I think I need to come in a little more shallow, 50ft at the threshold and then my “final flare” at 10ft
I don’t know the MD-11 myself of course, but 160 knots for landing seems excessive. My average landing on the triple is around 150vref, 135-ish touchdown
Might be due to the back engine pushing the plane down at 135 so to have a bit better control the 160 knots is better
Nothing wrong with that tbh I do that sometimes 
If the flight is over 7 hours I’m most likely not even home for the whole cruise xD
It's correct
It's a bit on the faster side, but normal for the MD-11
The way I land in MSFS with the TFDi MF-11 is that at around 50ft I start to slowly move the throttle back together with lifting the nose up a bit, and sometimes I don't even fully retard it, I land it like a fighter jet, using throttle to control the descent rate
I feel like the MD-11 is just going to naturally land harder than other aircraft too, so trending on the harder side isn’t the end of the world
IXEG 733
Fellow IXEG pilot ❤️
Mostly a hangar queen for me - going to use it more
A/P off st 500
Wtf
I whip it off at 3-4k
For me depends on the mood xD
On the Air Florida delivery (that I had to cut short) I disengaged it at around 15k lol
Meanwhile other times I keep it on until minimums, or hell, even autoland
idk, i let the ILS do its thing, if its tracking good, and bringing me down in a nice stable approach, i just let it go
Meanwhile, I’ve got a question. Is there a Tempelhof for MSFS that’s better than the freeware one from flightsim.to? It’s not bad, but I’m pretty sure that version depicts it as it was during some earlier years and not like the 70s, plus tbh, it’s not top notch either (which is absolutely fine, it’s freeware)
oh yeah, the aerosoft CRJs are getting a massive update apparently
still no -200 though 
Oh yeah the V2 is soon
Welp, know this isn’t exactly flight sim, but I’m in Sheremetyevo now about to be flying on a 747-400
I apologise for dirty windows on behalf of Sheremetyevo
Fire
YOU LUCKY
I WISH
Just landed in Sochi
Now guess what is it time for? The return trip! Yeah, I’m flying right back on the same plane xD
Asked for a cockpit tour, got denied, rules are strict here and seems nobody is allowed in even on the ground
off in the 787, i'll let people guess where im going from & to
London to Perth or Perth to London
correct, QFA10
making use of the recently bought Perth scenery that i'll probably only use once
Spent 1h reading about the navigation system (thanks ChatGPT and Deepseek for translating the manual lol), still haven't quite wrapped my head around it, but hopefully I should be able to do a VOR/RSBN correction along the way
still unsure how to program everything in
I'm sure it's not hard, it's just that the manual is written weirdly and/or has been translated in an awkward way
I'll just cheat and load everything from a flie like I've done in the past and skip the alignment process
this how I'm feeling atm 🥲
Although accidentally stumbling on this information has been amazing. Imagine going to your plane with PUNCH CARDS to input your route
Who needs route uplink
@rustic charm
overran the runway in xplane again
i also floated for almost 10 seconds, again
that makes it like 4 times in 7 flights or something
Genuine advice, try to land with a normal plane that lands at normal speeds and flares in a normal way
get used to Xplane first, then get used to the MD-11
tried, no luck
also, get rid of Autothrottle
happens in the 732 and 737
Want me to record a few landings with input visualisation?
landing in the 732 and 727?
i dont even know if that would help at this point
If you want just tell me
still preparing my Tu-144 flight, I can do it tomorrow as well
I'd be happy to help 😄
Too much pull
better to land hard that than
Force yourself to NEVER correct nose down during the flare
because if you get to that point, your flare already went hugely wrong
its like every time i land, i float exactly 3-4ft from the runway
that would have broken the landing gear if i landed then
Not at all
If it helps start to flare less and a bit earlier
It seems like you pulled A LOT at about 10ft
look at 0:06
between 0:04 and 0:05 you pulled a bit, arrested your descent rate, then you pulled again at around 0:06, and that was too much
if you didn't add that additional pull at 0:06 it would be have been a good landing
no way, that would have been extremely hard if i just kept what i had at 04 and 05
also looks like you weren't in idle? I hear engines spooling down at 0:09
that was thrust reversers not working
Not really
MD-11 almost always hand a bit harder anyway
because of the higher speed and other designs choices
MD-11 is infamous for its hard landings 😄
also better to land hard (at about 300/400fpm) than to overrun
also that little bounce at 0:15 tells me that you are still coming in with a bit too much energy, or you're trying too hard to keep the nose up
also, no spoilers?
that will degrade your braking heavily
they were armed
or is that just a replay thing
it's a good habit to always deploy them manually
either that or they reset after landing
IRL in the 73 after landing they always physically touch (or at least watch) the handle to make sure it's deployed
They have a HUGE impact in landing distance
American Airlines Flight 1420 was a flight from Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) to Little Rock National Airport in the United States. On June 1, 1999, the McDonnell Douglas MD-82 operating as Flight 1420 overran the runway upon landing in Little Rock and crashed. Nine of the 145 people aboard were immediately killed—the captain and...
The A320 will deploy spoilers for you even if you didn't arm them 🙃
Do you have a button or axis you can assign to spoilers on your HOTAS/Controller?
no, because xplanes control assigning system is beyond garbage
Fair enough, I just have them onto an axis, that works well for me
my right stick has no controls right now, but because its sprung xplane wont use it as a speedbrake
itll always bounce back to 50% applied
I'm sure there must be a way to work around that
but yeah, the fact that it's sprung makes it sort of unsuitable
the rotate md-11 doesnt even have a simple "toggle parking brake" option
theyre independent up/down contorls
interesting
on most other planes it's apply brakes full (or max) force or something like that
thats what i have set, and it does what it says, it toggles max brake but not the actual parking brake
changing my thrust reverser control to "hold thrust reverse at max" instead of toggle actually deploys the speedbrakes
Soviet aircraft cockpits truly are great aren't they
i love how every single person i go to is like "yeah just use a sidestick or buy a yoke"
im really about done with this community and flight sims in general
ive about had it
saying you fly in xplane with an xbox controller is like treason of the highest order
Flying in DCS with a controller has gotten suprisingly popular
I wouldn't be able to do it
but it's cool 😄
ngc, I'm done with the 144, can't find a way to assign pitch trim (and I've already lost too much time), I'll record a few landing, maybe they'll be useful
not possible apparently, to be a real flight simmer you NEED a full cockpit, otherwise you are just a poser and suck at everything
according to the xplane community, he's on a higher level than me, only dirty peasants use xbox controllers
this is like the third day in a row that ive gotten so angry/anxious that ive had to just get back in bed and give up
It's a flight sim, it's a singleplayer (unless you fly on a network)
there's no reason to feel this bad about it
but so far ive spent like $120 in this sim, only to have terrible landings, and i just dont understand why, i seriously try everything that everyone suggests to the best of my ability but it just doesnt seem to work
A few weeks ago I had my first "hull loss" in months (maybe years?) of flying because I decided to stay at Vref during gusting conditions and a perfomance degrading gust killed me as I was about to flare
sometimes shit happens, we're not real pilots 🤷
I should have gone around, but it was late at night and was tired, so I had a really bad case of get-there-itis
@hollow oracle did some base training, uploading the whole thing to YT
And I just landed in Moscow
Honestly the 744 is such a lovely plane
Haven’t taken any pictures on the way back because didn’t have a window seat this time
how much did u pay roundtrip?
Around $170-180, don’t remember exactly
Also here comes the most interesting part of the day
They’re gonna deboard everyone via a bus
A full 747 worth of people
There go my hopes of catching the last airport shuttle train of the day that leaves in 15 minutes
did u fly moscow - sochi and back?
Yep
Same plane
Literally left the plane, went right back into the secure zone, ate dinner in a cafe and boarded back
Honestly $180 was an absolute steal
My brother bought a ticket for Pobeda (Aeroflot Group’s low cost airline) from Sochi to Moscow a bit later, one was, $200
Yeah well fucking worth it
Absolutely
I’ll post some pics tomorrow, videos are probably gonna be too long for discord to handle
https://youtu.be/p2ai6JsCsIU?si=xwM6sKYIlx8R_MFh ugra's posted a bunch more videos of the Germany map
At least to me it's looking really nice
That looks like a great plane
W
Obviously the pics are same-y, I didn’t walk around the plane much (I absolutely would if it wasn’t so full)
I’d send the videos, but Discord being Discord makes it impossible
10mb upload limit…
Meanwhile a friend of mine was doing the exact same 2 flights at the exact same time in P3D, gave him an excuse to fly the 744 again cause he only does real flights real time
P3D my beloved
only real ones played p3d
Then it looks like I’m not real 😭
sorry you're going to the flight sim gulag
kinda half tempting tbh
just to tide me over with some flight sim that doesn't perform like complete ass
dont
Nah it ain’t worth it
2 weeks to set up and if you install a livery wrong you get to do it all over again
Yay! Fixed the trim on the 144 and got a bit of practice
I'll go back to learning the navigation system soon 🙃
Oh nooo
Now to be fair
I would allow myself to be sent to a flight sim gulag
Cause I’ve only ever played MSFS, nothing else. So I deserve it
Not even FSX or anything, just FS20
So yeah, absolutely deserved
time to get into bms
biblically accurate lufthansa
its funny, in actual pilot training they tell you to try not to land for as long as possible, because then youll stall out and land smoothly eventually, but i find it the exact opposite for me
this next flight, im going to try and plant it right on the piano keys and im not going to go for a smooth landing, and just see what happens
It's different with airliners
You don't need to do navy landings, but what matters is getting it down on the marks, not having a smooth ride
freight also doesnt complain, so theres that
Fact is trying to land smoothly might just result in you floating too far and having to go around
I feel like, especially in the MD-11, trying to not land smoothly is going to give you a 2+ G landing
But then trying to land smoothly and your going to float for over 10 seconds
I’ve considered dumping even more money into this game by buying the ToLiss A321, because I’m very familiar with landing the A321 smoothly, and I feel like I could maybe use that as a point to jump in
I’m good with landing the 737 too, but ever since I had that data mismatch bug, I’m scared to pick it back up
the
xplane fm is just entirely different to what you're used to
when flying msfs
it takes time to adjust yourself to the different properties of it
it's like relearning how to fly kinda
without the systems
totally normal and nothing to smash ur brain out against
Also, practicing a bit with ga can help a lot with transitioning imo
or just use the xplane tool by setting yourself 5/10nm infront of the runway
that works too
Really just gotta give yourself time to adjust and get the feel of it
correct
Everything that has been said on the topic has been 100% correct IMO
Regarding this, just wanted to add to what @echo gorge wrote, that's a good landing technique for GA Planes that's why she said "Not for Airliners" 😄
When it comes to airliners, overall the word “stall” is a bad thing xD
the Fenix is very very similar in whats modeled systemwise to the toliss
the toliss has a few more fail modes but less graphical things
its well worth it if you don't already have a A321 but if you have the fenix then it might not be worth it
The physics are an entirely different world between MSFS and xplane, it’s not even close
As witnessed with my landing problems
yeah
I've said it before MSFS flys a lot more like a game
aerofly has the best physics that I've tried with XP a close second
P3D is a whole other kettle of worms
After experiencing xplane I don’t know if I can go back to MSFS
I haven’t been entirely sold on 12, but when I buy aircraft I have been considering if it has both a 11 and 12 version included (minus the 732, but it was on sale)
yeah
12 still has a lot of issues
but 12.2 looks like it might be very very good
JustSim is also coming back to XP
JF have been thinking about it as well
porting the BAe143 to 12
I wish the A300ST was still available from inibuilds
That looks significantly better
I can give it to you
not sure if it will work
Oh nvm, you need to activate it 🫤
No, inibuilds deactivated the product activation servers for it when they sunsetted it
Same with the regular xplane A300s
love a curry on a saturday night
It’s an intentional grey area, for better or worse
I think even though I don't see anything wrong for sharing what is essentially abandonware I still think it's against the server rules so I'll send it to you via DM
it's the only iniBuilds product I have for Xplane
I’ll give it a shot, I have the A300s in MSFS so I’m only really interested in the beluga
Wish it was the A330 beluga rather than the A300, but I also need to get back into flying the A300 anyway
One of the largest reasons I wanted to get 2024, they have that beluga XL with the whole freight mission stuff
mod hat Yeah, it's against server rules
no mod hat morally though 
It’s weird, deactivating the activation servers, pulling it from sale, and not supporting it and shifting focus entirely, it’s like ehhhhh
You can kind of piece together the picture
It’s kinda like, don’t ask don’t tell
There's a reason the x-plane (and ex x-plane) communities have a rather mixed view of inibuilds
Honestly stuff being pulled from sale is very, very annoying
When devs do that, what exactly do they expect?
Of course can’t say that it’s allowed, it’s not, but at the same time in such cases I can see people not caring
Obviously such responses are illegal, and against discord tos and server rules. At the same time I cannot and will not morally condemn such a response
It kind of sucks, because if they released it for free, they’d kind of be getting the wrong audience as far as advertising goes
But it would be cool, offering it for free as a sort of sampler for the rest of their products
Well yeah, obviously it’s illegal and I personally even so wouldn’t do it because I consider it bad no matter the situation. But that doesn’t mean that devs pulling stuff from sale for no apparent reason isn’t a shitty way to do stuff cause it also is
hm, for some reason im getting blank custom sceneries
i have it in the correct order im pretty sure
no, it wasnt, for some reason autoortho auto put the EU data right at the top of the list
this is the first time my PC has actually massively struggled with xplane
though, i didnt get the "performance optimized" version of EGNR, so who knows
oh yeah, performance is like 2x better
i had to fix that weird distorted cockpit camera bug too, that took some troubleshooting
some aircraft look fine at 480, some look fine at 400, i have no idea why
This is something I like, a lot of old abandonware XP stuff has just been uploaded on the forums for free
Think Felis 154, some Thranda stuff, X-Hanger stuff
Quite cool because there isn’t a reason for them to keep it all hidden
Oh btw @hollow oracle you should try out the L410
Very fun thing to fly
hope no doors will fall off
haven't flown the iFly MAX in ages, but enjoyed it loads in P3D
Oh, the Felis 154 was posted for free?
That is nice
Honestly I wish devs everywhere used such approach
Something is old and you don’t wanna sell it anymore? Just post it somewhere for free on a no-support basis
Look Armstrong Powerhouse, that’s what you need to do with all the sound packs
Yeah he did this with everything he’s ever made
The 742 is gonna be freeware eventually
IL14, Yak50, AN24 were all about 20-40USD on release
All freeware now
I really should fly the AN24
Yep
Thranda?
Dont they exist anymore?
Oh that’s fucking sick
I’m on 9H-VUC today
One of these
Already have a slot but we move
uh
levelup 737ng
huh, its a livery-specific issue
this is also apparently the fix for the custom cabin textures not showing
for that livery
JETSGO!! Finally flew the MD-80 again after what feels like centuries
such a fun airline and callsign as well 
The Flight Model is just so good
im curious, just jumpseating or actually working?
delter
wtf, im getting a cabin altitude warning, off sched descent, and my cabin altitude skyrocket to almost 20,000ft
at least my instruments seem to be linked up properly this run
its funny, i was literally watching mayday (as i do when flying) and it took me a second to realize the horn was coming from in-sim instead of the video 
1.65G/-339fpm :/
i planted it on the piano keys though
and exited the runway with like 3 exits remaining
it is kinda funny though, the in-game landing rate showed that it was 1.05G, but still a hard lanjding
the speedbrakes popped out and then didnt come back out because i tried hitting thrust reversers (which also extends speedbrake) with my throttles not fully idled
i was a little bit more nose-down than i wanted to be, but i didn't gain any significant airspeed that would have effected my landing (on touchdown i was around 141, with a Vref of 139)
i think the big improvements i need to make are cutting the throttles a little bit later and completely, but outside of that i think i did good
Ngl I wanna get the maddog too
And tbh since I’m in Russia and wouldn’t have to pay VAT, it ends up at €100 instead of around €120
But €100 is still a bit steep
(I’m looking at the base + expansion right away, what’s the point of having just the MD-82)
I kinda want to mess around with the xplane default one before I get into the MSFS one tbh
I still have the captainsim 717 to play around with too, eventually
The 717 systems should be very, very close to the MD-11 too, so hopefully it’s a good transition
Yeah
The only reason why I’m debating it is the price
Though I guess I’m still lucky not having to pay the tax
But even €100 is quite steep
It does seem incredible though
You missed the sale 😦
Nah don't
The differences between all of them are minuscule
The only variant that was actually different (the MD-87) isn't included
difference between the MD-82, 88 and 83 is just a tiny difference in engine thrust and different fuel systems (I think one of them can have more fuel)
it's about the same as between the A320-100 and -200
Yeah
cockpit is also exactly the same
Tbh I wish the devs didn’t stop at just that
Like, they could’ve continued onto the MD-87 after all
If we lived in a different world maybe they would have offered the MD-82 with the steam gauge cockpit and then sell the MD-83/88 extension with the EFIS cockpit
And plus, it would be easier for them to do a DC-9 than for anyone else
but of course they haven't done the steam gauge MD-82 cockpit, so 🤷
Yep, unfortunately
HA
lmao
why
LMFAO
