#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 18 of 1
Defaults don't have changes even prior to 2020 tbf
LTFM had its opening ceremony in 2018, opened for all passenger flights in 2019. In MSFS it doesn't exist whatsoever
(Which is a real issue considering it's one of the most important world hubs)
now i have to make the choice - pacsim or la aero incheon
the pacsim one is literally 11GB for an airport, which is a massive downside for me
Climbing through Helene
Obscured from the surface to about FL280
are you fucking kidding me, it happened again
there has to be something wrong with the way the A32NX draws paths, im on the latest testing version
this is the second time this has happened, the same thing happened approaching frankfurt too
it looks normal from the MCDU, i have no clue
that arrow next to GC071 was also there on my approach into frankfurt, and im curious if that has anything to do with it
i got rid of GC071 and GC072 and that seems to have fixed it
added them back in manually, same thing happens
its not the speed or anything thats fucking up the path either, it literally stays that way no matter the speed or projected speed, the plane hits it, follows as much as it can, and then once it reaches the end of the path it dies and goes to heading mode
for a second after i remove GC071 and GC072, the approach path gets all fucked up in the same way too, but fixes itself after a few seconds
those two waypoints are on the approach path im supposed to take, so i have no idea, no noted speed restrictions either, just waypoints in

it was the speed
i was going too fast
at 250kts the path is drawn correctly
The more you know
It's worth it though, the detail is great
Are you serious?
The XP11 default one looks better and that has the correct taxiways
And runways
A lot of MSFS default airports are not anywhere near the real ones
Dublin is missing a runway, Newark is missing a terminal, Istanbul International is missing everything
This was my taxi out from Newark yesterday for example, in-game I was on a taxiway all correctly. Volanta, which has ab up-to-date image, shows I went right through a terminal
Should be mandatory to have a scenery gateway
I think at least 90% of global airports are modelled here
Anyone can contribute
Make what you want
Volanta is dead
Of course it does
For me usually the download speeds in MSFS are also noticeably worse than on Steam
Lovely day to be flying. Except I'm already descending.
z
What cloud settings are you on? High?
That was what, 20 mins?
Block time 32 minutes, flight time 22 minutes
Does Alaska do that flight irl
Plus Sitka - Juneau is part of Flight 67
i really want to do the milk run, but im not sure exactly how you can load multiple flight plans in one session
I break them up usually
Nice I like short flights
I did once do a half-run all back to back, Anchorage - Cordova - Yakutat - Juneau
Juneau - Sitka isn't even the shortest I think
Wrangell - Petersburg is in reality shorter. Well, sometimes I think
I've flown that one 3 times with the quickest being 34 minutes block time, 25 minutes flight time. But I do that flight with the LDA approach, which covers a fair bit of additional distance compared to the RNAV. So basically, you can get that one to have flight time below 20 minutes if you try.
ngc is flying the fenix 
im really pissed at myself that the only reason i was having a bad experience is because i was like 10 versions out of date
i still have occasional issues, but its far better than it was
its a shame the peach livery pack isnt in the official fenix launcher, because theyre absolutely incredible
also, peach A320s were featured in an episode of an anime 
3月4日から機体ラッピングをした「ひろがるスカイ!プリキュア」ジェットがファーストフライト!
果てしなく広がる『空』の「ひろがるスカイ!プリキュア」と、3月1日に就航11周年を迎え、日本とアジアのかけ橋を目指すPeachで大空のように無限に広がっていく世界へと旅立ちましょう!
【ひろがるスカイ!プリキュア】
ABCテレビ ・テレビ朝日系列全国24局ネットで毎週日曜 朝8時30分から放送中。
■キャスト
キュアスカイ/ソラ・ハレワタール:関根明良
キュアプリズム/虹ヶ丘ましろ:加隈亜衣
プリンセス・エル:古賀葵
■スタッフ シリーズディレクター:小川孝治、シリーズ構成:金月龍之介、キャラクターデザイン:斎藤敦史 美術デザイン:今井美紀、チーフ美術:門口亜矢、色彩設計:柳澤久美子、音...
putting the :3 in A:320 
toobad theyre really terrible irl
peach? ive heard its kind of like the spirit airlines of japan
yes
low-cost carriers always attract the worst people because its the cheapest option
its not even that
it's just compared to ANA and JAL
which are imho well priced
it's bad
idk, i feel like low cost carriers get an overly harsh reputation
sure, they attract a lot worse people because of how cheap they are, but i feel like 99 out of 100 flights are going to go without anybody crazy
that 1 incident of some customer being annoying gets blown out of proportion
though, on every other airline, that rate is more like 499 out of 500 flights will ahve a crazy person
comfort
is a big thing
atleast to me
Price outside of Europe is usually about 30-70usd on average
In Europe it can be like 100-200usd
More people complain about low cost airlines outside of Europe because there is less incentive to take them
There is also less benefit from the reduced comfort and whatever else
i pay 180eur return for40 min flight lol
its so retarded
personally, i use airlines as purely A-B transportation
if they can get me there safely, ill fly with them, comfort is second to me
im a big bodied individual, and spirit wasnt too uncomfortable
the airbus seats are laughably small though, regardless of airline, the standard airbus seating is like cardboard its so thin
Depends on carrier
Seats aren’t fitted by the manufacturer
Or well they are but with what the airline has chosen
Thompson, Safran
Whoever else makes the seats
regardless of whoever makes them, this seems to be the standard in terms of economy seating
like, even united isnt much better
it depends
on anything above 3 hours
im willing to pay the comfort
i will never in my life endure lufthansa for 15 hours again
terrible airline
i mean, if your going on a flight for longer than 3 hours i would pay for comfort, but anything under 3, economy is just fine
like, i cant even imagine flying across the atlantic in economy, i would rather take a kayak across
im an extremely nervous flyer, and i cant even imagine being cramped into a tiny seat for a 7 hour flight with the turbulence and shit
its so strange, i have like 40 completed flights in MSFS in both airbus and boeing a/c, but im still terrified of flying
my PC hurts just loading those screenshots
every time i fly the fenix a320 and get a successful flight, i fight the feeling to get the A321/A319
i want to do american airlines flights with them so fucking bad 
every morning i get an american A319 flying over my house on its way to philly
Honestly I am surprised how I consider it ‘just fine’ on the long flights
Like, 3 hours is long for some people
Meanwhile I take 10-hour flights in economy just fine
My average flight time in MSFS is 1 hour 10 minutes per flight, while irl my average flight time is probably over 5 hours 
And I’m certain Aeroflot’s economy is definitely not the best economy you’ll see
At least they have good service I guess
more banned kids soon i hope
yes
dk if its true but theres a pilot rating now for LOWI
nah
@shadow burrowOnly downside with flying with my brother is hes only just turned the correct age.
I do this if I can’t be arsed to do a full flight
Msg the controller asking if they are ok doing emergency proc
If they aren’t busy then usually they are
Set up a failure
Cabin depress or engine fail
If they aren’t then I just close the game
@trim harbor if we can find time I might be able to get 3 of us together to do a felis 742 flight
CIVA or LTN?
CIVA
holy shit he has balls
Shared flight INS 742
whens ctp
I think weekend of the 18th
That’s when the toliss339 releases and they usually do there releases around CTP
I think it should be the Saturday
Controller was fine with me doing it, and legit held all aircraft on ground into gatwick
Yeah they do that because they follow standard proc
I didnt even msg them, i messaged brussles control, they said they'd ask london
and then from there we was asked if it was a mayday, so i said to my brother sure why not ,
I had random fails on the toliss 321 once doing a very busy London - Frankfurt route
Hit a multiple fail mode hydraulics problem
lol
Lost an engine and Yellow hydraulics
meh, only reason i declared this one was, we forgot to actually re-fuel.
Didn’t message the controller just declared an emergency and he held up about 20-30 planes on Frankfurt approach
there was 45 on ground today when I did it.
Got me on for a visual
I had told my brother, plan for an engine to shut down and it did it like 3 miles from final.
lmao
thats kinda unfair but meh
Will set me up nicely
I mean I don’t ask for it 
I did it think Atlanta - Frankfurt recently, came in from the north and he was online gave me 2 vectors and added me to the track at about 20 miles
So it’s not really priority but he gives me less fucky vectors
I might to some London flying tmrw
Feeling like some 146 action
oh god
virginity status reacquired
You missed a day!
Max I’ve done is 59
Like 2 sectors every day at least
Longest streak is 108
all out of LHR too
Max I've done is 15 and longest streak is 6 
Can I add you on Volanta
@shadow burrow thanks, reading all that somehow gave me confidence to fly the 134 out of BER
it's really busy now for some reason lol
how the fuck do you fly 200 flights in a month
i do about one a day (and im home about 3-4 days a week), and i just broke 11
I have zero fucking clue how they did that 
I do maybe 2-3 a day then get bored and stop for a couple days

the headwind A330-900 is good for freeware, but it feels realy kind of janky
same with the horizon sim/LVFR modded stuff
fr
i do 2-3 short ones a day if i have the time
I can do several short ones a day too sometimes, especially if I have a fair bit of free time
A return trip like Anchorage - Kodiak - Anchorage, or a few back to back flights like I once did Anchorage - Cordova - Yakutat - Juneau
Also really sometimes flights don’t take up that much time
You can fit Wrangell - Petersburg into a 25-minute block time if you can start up the plane and push back quickly enough
Good luck getting support with them
If you ever need it

that too
no discord afaik
and the FBW discord is unhelpful with any product but theirs
i couldnt get the EFB to work in the fenix, and then my controllers wouldnt connect, so im taking that as a sign to not fly tonight 
my opinion may have changed on the fenix, but that doesnt stop it being an ornery beast to get working
Which makes sense
I mean, in channels other than the A32NX support stuff
I asked in the “flight-school” channel (supposed to be for general flight sim help) about how the go around path works in the fenix, and everyone was like “erm that’s not the FBW dumbass we don’t offer support for the fenix
”
Like yes, I asked in the FBW discord server specifically and in the general flight help channel because that community is going to be very knowledgeable on the airbus 320 systems and I was hoping people would be helpful rather than having the server be 100% only FBW products and nothing else
Obviously I didn’t post in the A32NX channels asking for help on the fenix
Yes! And I literally asked in a community that primarily focuses on airbusses!!
In the appropriate channel!!! Not even a channel related to the A32NX, the generic flight help channel
Doesn’t matter
If you have a question on an Airbus system
Ask about Airbus systems not a fenix one
I mean, I didn’t even mention that it was the fenix, they were like “the FBW doesn’t simulate that yet”
Then you have your answer
Yes, but it’s an airbus system that I was asking a question about
I mean just ask in the fenix server lmao
The fenix server is even worse when it comes to that
Everyone is in a constant pissing match to be better than everyone else, so all you get are sarcastic quips and snarky comments
If I pop in the Captain Sim discord and ask about the fail modes in the FF 767 in a generic help channel is anyone gonna help me?
I mean, yeah, because they’re both 767s, and your asking a question about a 767 to a community who knows a lot about the 767, in the channel that is not related to that particular devs 767 product and just about general flight simulation questions
Obviously it is different because in that case it would be a competing payware product for both
The FBW is free and open source, so there’s no competition when it comes to the fenix
What’s the point if both are rather bad anyway? 
Or at least so I’ve heard
I mean, there's a Fenix server, it's expected that in a certain discord server people are going to want to help with that specific product and only that, especially if there is a dedicated community for another thing.
Asking about the Fenix in the FBW discord wouldn't be the same as asking about the Headwind on the FBW discord, or me asking things about the L-1011 on the TFDi server.
People on the Fenix server are in a better position to answer your Fenix questions.
If for your question it doesn't matter if it's FBW or Fenix, just don't mention it 🤷♂️
For the same reason why you felt it was important to mention that it was about the Fenix and not the FBW, makes the Fenix discord the best place to ask
L-1011 mentioned, I’m sad 
(Can we have one made by a great dev like JF please please)
I genuinely hope that’ll happen at some point
FF is fantastic idk what u heard
Maybe I thought of a different one tbh
I think the whole cockpit looks off
with the FF stuff
the yoke is comically tiny, and the whole cockpit dimensions and things just don't feel right
why is the yoke so tiny 😭
I don't know, the whole thing looks like some sort of cursed image that wants to make you feel uneasy
JF have shared another update on the fokker, don't think it was mentioned here yet (it's a small one but nice one)
Focusing on the improved exterior to be fit for MSFS2024 (due to the walkarounds etc) with a lot of screenshots
Was 3 days ago
Also 5 days ago they shared an update on the A300, a bigger one, haven't read it yet
I've stopped following those closely for a while
from what I've seen it's looking like RJ hopefully before chirstmas and Fokkers Q1/2 2025
Landing there soon
And about to be in Juneau
And that's a wrap for today, with a total of 3 flights
With a total distance of 409nm, a total block time of 1:50 and a total flight time of 1:20
oh god, brother wants to do a flight ive said yes stupidly 
Not sure why you'd bother with the default PC-6 when the Blackbird one exists
That thing was a blast to land at Lukla
My job is cool
Not today they didn’t
Operational incident at Bergamo
Don’t use antiskid with full manual braking kids
ryanair moment
r u able to jumpseat oftren
Nah the captain needed a piss
Need 2 people in the FD at all times
He took like 20 min as well 😂😂😂
bruh thats funny
do u have any seniority in ryanair to be able to do this
or is it selected at random?
isnt it just whatever crew member is available?
man
SO EXCITED
Yes
But the most senior in the cabin can’t do it
They need to be watching at all times
i wonder if the 380 in MSFS will have BTV
But if multiple are qualified then it’s just whoever wants to go
how do the displays work irl with the little cursor thing? like, when you put your mouse over the display the little yellow cursor follows it, but how does that work on the real displays?
does it sense your finger hovering above the display? or does it only teleport to where you tapped the display
the 787 and 777 have displays like that too
Nope, usually it’s seen as a bit of a chore especially if you have just finished service
There is a ball mouse
Big grabby things
bruh i'd always do it im gonna be real
do u just sit in the cockpit and watch out the window?
Nah chat to whoever is there
Fo or cpt
man sounds like fun tbh
They usually do ACARS only
for radio comms?
Ye
makes sense
The radio was on so the only people I heard were checkins and aircraft asking for non standard stuff
We had a few stuck in bergamo
This was just over Wien Radar
The 9th
That’s Zulu so +2 for CEST
14.20 then, right?
Yes

the beluga we're getting in MSFS24 is the a330 one, right?
someones already on it
If I wake up early enough before class tomorrow I’ll do some more US airways flights 
BeyondATC seems to be on a rather constant improvement
Wish I could use it, especially that I bought it after all
Captain looking for a new job? 😬
it indeed is
Im gonna end up regretting teaching lil bro how to fly pmdg 777
I think at McDonald’s yeah
Are you even supposed to use full manual braking like, ever?
Well apart from situations like emergency landings and rejected takeoffs
so yes then 😉
But I always thought on regular landings you shouldn't use full braking, and most of the time just let autobrake do the job
I only use manual breaking if I have to or If I am unsure of what gate i get
but thats rare
I mean, when I fly I only use manual when I can see that autobrake ain't gonna stop in time
And if Im flying shared with my lil brother
9/10 Ill only use the manual after below 70/60
I use manual brake all the time honestly
I paid for the pedals, i may as well use them
Tbh using manual isn't even an issue but why use full braking? Gotta do it gently after all, to avoid melted brakes
fe
Nah it’s in standard proc and kinda mandatory for some airports
It’s just in the manual with a big red sign saying NO ANTISKID
Well tbh understandable if there's a short runway
Underlined and circled as well
You'd think it would be noticed
it'd probably lock the tyres up more than anything else
you'd just slide down the runway in a cloud of smoke
Ah, understandable
Oh god, trying to teach my bro to fly 777 for a vatsim flight, and hes just asked, if to use flaps 40 💀
"Use em if you find em"
nevermind, doesnt work 
The message says: there will be a review process for anything submitted. Maybe it was just not yet approved
so true 
i love how volanta automatically uses the fucked up museum fuselage of N106US
there a couple that are like this
I-TIGI as well for example
some time ago me and a friend of mine tried a couple of regs that were involved in hull losses and a few them had images like that. Volanta takes the latest image available in Planespotters
You can change the picture if it bothers you
Yeah, I always deleted the real world images
It's a flight sim tool, the flight sim is pretty, thus I want to see a flight sim picture
update your airac day
this was another funny one I randomly found
Yep, I always replace it with a screenshot after I finish the flight
Can I add you on Volanta
sure, my un is just ngc427
one was pilot error and not a tire burst
oh boy airac udpate time
(hopefully) my 40th flight
haha
yeah, cause youve been playing flight sims for years, i only started in february
how do you change to meter altitude in the 777?
its my first time flying over china and i forog they use meters
should be next to the baro
:(

so altitudes in china are kind of technically both meters and feet??
because the navigraph charts show altitudes in feet
simbrief shows altitudes in meters
im guessing FL0660 is 6600M and not 66000ft
Yeah, most likely not 66k ft
and 66000M is something like 213000ft 
yes
flyng in china is awful to be quite frank
it's even worse on vatsim
airforceproud95 made a good video about it
its weird though, because simbrief says that i descend to FL0660 properly once i hit chinese airspace, but the altitudes listed for each waypoint on the MCDU is even higher at FL380
wym
Honestly, for me metres usually just completely throw me off
u gotta manually change it
its not fun, as somebody doing their first flight over china in an a/c type im not completely familar with
Well the plane can convert the altitude for you
But you still have to set it as ft in the MCP
Which is not too fun
a lot of quick maths required
@hollow oracle

i hope this helps you
I can only assume the values are inexact too.
p sure just rounded
this actually helped a lot, i was so confused as to what it meant by different altitudes at different headings, its just different altitudes for inbound/outbound essentially
huh, the first time ive heard of it is with china
west is even, east is uneven
the major issue with chinas' airspace (minus the usage of meters) is that they're VERY strictly enforced
theres only like
3 airways that civilian planes can use
because the airspace is owned by the air force
I remember my first landing in Sochi. That was the first flight in Russia that I've done using charts and all. "MAX IAS 350km/h" whaaaat how am I supposed to do that (I think I broke rules on that approach)
theres an HAI video about it 
ye
It's basically that to have safe FL separation and stuff, it will be that aircraft flying generally in an easterly direction will get (I think) uneven FLs (so FL170, FL190, FL310) while aircraft flying in a general westerly direction will get even FLs (FL180, FL200, FL300). I might've mixed them up, but it's either that or the other way around
that makes sense
that is correct
Welp, then I remember it correctly 😁
though, that is too variabel
(Or well, can apply knowledge correctly, cause I'm doing KBOS to KEWR right now which is westerly, and I got an even FL)
i've always gotten different ALTs on NAT tracks
Of course, there are always exceptions and stuff
from 340 to 350 and then 370 after leaving or something like that
But as a broad general rule, it's more or less like that
You can't separate aircraft like that always, so at some points there will be changes
just like 250 below 10k ft
And you can't exactly enforce it when you're in metres. Makes it much less easy, cause instead of changing with the thousand, you have like what, 400-metre steps or something
Exactly. Usually, it applies. But sometimes, it doesn't.
they use this
Yeah, still safe separation of course, but not with very simple increments
Honestly overall metres are much less simple, cause planes aren't designed for them
well not anymore atleast
Well yeah
Modern 'western' aircraft
It is possible that the new Chinese ones will be designed for metres? Quite possible considering they use metres in their airspace
But I honestly have no idea about it so won't claim any facts
its mostly unsatisfiying never having a clean altitude when in china
5100m for the first few waypoints of this approach, doing actually 5090m and 16700ft
About to do the Newark's Stadium Visual
best aircraft ive purchased so far
Yeah, but it's what they expect
Well yeah it’s understandable
I think if you actually fly in meters and stay at the correct exact altitude in meters you're "wrong"
they expect those FLs
I had an idea to fly in china with some russian airliners for that very reason, but I'd still need to use the altimeters in ft and use those FLs
volanta dead again?
Green melted cheese simulator
ive been having horrible luck with flights again today
tried doing a flight out of charlotte, takeoff didnt go as well as i wanted to so i abandoned it, and now volanta didnt track this flight, so i have to abandon this one too
restart volanta
if it doesnt track
its a known issue
that it just randomly stops
it just didnt start tracking at all, grey dot at the top left
the plugin
dont think u can restart that one
i just think it didnt detect MSFS when it launched
jesus the horizon 787 really likes to jump off of the ground
i was scared of almost tailstriking it with how suddenly it jumped up
fighting 15kts of crosswind didnt help either
Jeez, it's been 5 freaking months since I flown.
Trying to avoid headwinds, from what it looks like.
Caranado?
Ah good, was worried for a sec
I have technically Carenado's T210, but it's updated/maintained by SimCoders.
Yeah the reps do a lot
And bar few unsolvable non-flight-breaking glitches, it's one of my favorite planes.
I was also quite partial to the c152 community project back when I flew x-plane, but that was barely a carenado plane at that point lol
It's funny how Carenado abandoned XP12, and for the community it means, "all 3rd parties abandoned XP12." So that's what you people are flying, huh...
i redeemed myself with the 787-900
i went from a -800fpm crash landing, toa -176fpm one
Not quite sure what you're saying, sorry
#off-topic message Point 3.
Oh, OK I suppose 
@echo gorge X-Plane haters love to say that "all the 3rd parties quit X-Plane." The only one that really was somewhat big on XP and did quit is Carenado.
Not much of a loss tbh
They get some credit for initially developing for xp before a lot of other devs, but were ridiculously outclassed in later years
Well... Carenado made a good base for many custom developments. REPs, ASDG, that C152...
But yeah. All the big X-Plane names are alive and kicking.
Didn't the FFB777v2 just come out?..
Anyway, like I said in that writeup, I'm sticking with X-Plane 12 for the forceeable future.
The only thing that would make me start maintaining a second sim is the A2A Skylane.
huh, when you get past a certain point in volanta, it changes from flights across the pond to flights around the world
i have done 1.2 trips around the world with my mileage
iFly 737MAX NDA has been lifted.
They have one. Just incredibly unsupportive and disrespectful
And ini
But ini left for laziness and greed
Ohhhh... Yeah, I honestly forgot about them.
ifly didnt disappoint
thank god
i wasa gonna be really sad if their product would've been worse than p3d
yoyo
🪿
Freeware Catalina, an absolute joy to fly
Doing the skeena river route - terrace - woodcock - smithers - houston - terrace
Bought the inibuilds JFK... cool
I should stop using the marketplace...
Well, I guess I'm departing from an invisible JFK
You should
The airport loaded in in the end
Just needed to give it some time
So now I'm halfway through another transcontinental flight
Which is going very fun, because I have no failures active (checked through the FMC) yet I have hydraulic pump B overheat light, and a very weird disbalance of fuel, as my right tank has over 2k lbs less than the left tank
Im getting ued to flying helicopters now
dont use msfs
to learn how to fly helicopters
lol
msfs is such a bad platform for it
what then
xplane?
much better cheers
lol
I dont have it, but afaik the x-plane bo-105 is supposed to be pretty good https://store.x-plane.org/Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm-Bo-105-DBS-4-_p_1529.html
And x-plane's helicopter simulation is vastly superior to msfs'
(Can't that be said about simulation overall, not just helis?)
Yes but
The helicopter simulation in MSFS is worse than the helicopter simulation in some shooter games (cough arma3 cough) so the gap is far wider
The gap in fidelity of flight models for fixed wing is significant but not insurmountable imo, where it absolutely is insurmountable for helos
it is
but i feel 12 feels a bit too gamey
idk about helos
My flight right now... I have no idea what's going on
The T/D the plane gave me was around 800nm from the destination
There's some fun helos in msfs and some devs have done excellent work, but the flight model is just so arcadey that once again a shooter has better flight models
Oof lmao
It's literally descending at like 50fpm right now
bf has better heli simulation from what I've tried
Also, engine 2 is using like 50% more fuel than engine 1
And the hydraulics B are apparently overheating
That's quite screwy
Flying cross country on a 738 is fun xD
found it tar
I do, and DCS, did try the MSFS heli FM, and my impression was it was a lot better than FSX, but that wasnt exactly a very high bar 😆
Uhm.
What plane?
Folks, anybody who knows charts well, what might # indicate in minimums? There are separate minimums for S-ILS 9 and S-ILS 9 # and they are really different, idk what to use
The 73
Failures on?
Yeah, but none active
Hmmm
Can you post a screenshot of the plate?
Here's the chart https://skyvector.com/files/tpp/2410/pdf/00373IYLY9.PDF
will be radio and baro
Alrighty
Kinda weird to have a 500ft difference between the 2 considering that the area is right at the sea level basically
loc only then
@rustic charm As a sanity check, is there page 2?
On the chart? Not that I know of
Should all be there
There should be an alternate minimums document, maybe I should've looked there...
Because I'm looking at other FAA charts and papers and a # almost always means a footnote.
Wait I'm stupid it's just minimums for potential alternate airports 
Ahh
That makes sense, san barely uses rwy 9
Oh that makes sense
Well 27 right now would give me a tailwind, I'd prefer landing in a headwing xD
Did a gusting tailwind landing in LAX on my previous transcontinental flight, on a 77W, never again 
@rustic charm Here's why I generally prefer Jeppesen. They are a bit more uniform.
Alright, that makes sense now
So that's supposed to be a footnote for a missed approach climb gradient, but... evidently, there's an error on the plate.
Real aviation, ladies and gentlemen.
Actually, from the anecdotes I've heard, navdata errors are more common IRL than in the simulation...
@rustic charm Oh, so on the FAA plate the footnote isn't missing, it's misplaced.
Ah right

off to Lihu'e
So someone was asking about the MSFS heli flight model vs xplane. Been flying a bit of MSFS fixed wing recently and thought I would give helis another try. First 30 seconds were really positive! I thought maybe I could ditch XP and its poor performance. Unfortunately that never lasted long.
OGE climb at 40 torque? 😆
No VRS to speak of
Got a 300fpm descent with no forward airspeed and I could just raise the collective and climb out of it
Fkn spaceship simulator, you dont have to scratch very deep to see the arcade heli flight model
The no VRS part bothers me most
Runway inspection failed 😆
Scenery was deliberately done like that, as thats how it is IRL - abandoned, not closed just abandoned
Let's take a closer look at the upcoming iFLY 737 MAX8 for Microsoft Flight Simulator. All I can say is WOW.
Thank you flight1 and iFLY for sending me a copy of the 737 MAX8.
There is no release day yet. Get the latest updates and join the conversation, you can head over to flight1s official discord https://www.flight1.com/discord
Music fro...
give me the damn thing ifly
im willing to pay
:((
So, I was pretty much ready to uninstall XP due to low FPS
I got so desperate I even tried out the MSFS heli model, that didnt go well
The problem was between my ears 😆 I had nvidia control panel set to over ride app settings and set at 8x
X-plane looks pot ugly with the settings turned down
Wait, what?
I knew it was bad, but... This is absurd.
i may be critical of boeing, but god damn do i want to fly the max in msfs
especially because any airline that flys 737-800s is most likely going to be flying the max too
southwest, alaskan, ryanair,
No MED modelled 😢
the thing about MSFS helis is
it's all up to the dev
some devs have really great behaving aircraft that are wonderful
others are 0/low effort and can't VRS, can't RBS, can't do anything other than fly like a cartoon
as with anything MSFS, the devs have to properly implement things, and many don't, choosing to blame "Sim limitations" on their lack of knowledge/experience/willing to learn
I mean there are significant sim limitations
The heavy lifting for performance is put onto the devs and not the sim
It’s the opposite for almost every other sim
It’s one of the many reasons that MSFS isn’t used in professional simulators
It’s also one of the reasons that XP12 needs some serious work before commercial licences are gonna start selling
SiM lImItAtIoNs
Of course! Idk how could you even forget
MSFS is so good that you forget that you even spent 2 days downloading it
Tbh in MSFS you can have nice aircraft, but devs really need to put in a lot of additional effort. And many just don’t.
Well, a day for me xD
But indeed, tbh even forgot it took that much
I guess I’m used to it from RailWorks. MSFS at least doesn’t need you to reinstall it every 3-4 months
I was being sarcastic, I’m in a Stockholm situation with MSFS, I hate it so much yet I must play
I got a nice bit of money today, so the fenix A319/A321 is becoming even more extremely tempting
At the very least it’ll allow me to do American Airlines A319/A321 flights, plus SO MANY US airlines opted to buy either, instead of the regular A320
Who forces you?
I own MSFS, yet I ended up never flying it.
The thing about X-Plane, I think a lot of people had expectations of it competing with MSFS, and when LR clearly indicated they don't care, those people felt betrayed.
surreal true argument
And they saw everyone who defended X-Plane as accomplices to betrayal. I've lost people I considered close friends over it.
Human psychology is fucked.
Especially now in the age of technological singularity.
It’s a bit crazy tbh. Genuinely, fly what you want, why do some people make it so hard
I fly MSFS mostly for 1 reason - I bought it, already spent a bunch of money and just don’t want it to go to waste. And I don’t want to have 2 sims cause that’d be even more money to spend.
In the age when rulers don't tell people what to hate, people choose their own subjects. Most people need some sort of enemy to feel superior, confident, need context for their moral compass.
Indeed
One gotta be very smart to surpass that... Which is not common.
The only thing that would make me install MSFS would be A2A AccuSim 182.
Because there's just nothing like it.
But... It never happened.
The hard truth about AccuSim, it doesn't exactly prove much about the sim itself. Because AccuSim is literally just an external flight sim which uses MSFS only for visuals and the weather data.
To be honest I still quite like MSFS. It has drawbacks, but does enough for me. Plus that’s my money talking. Plus I’m still on a keyboard so I have like 2 planes which manage to be flyable like that lol
MSFS is just visuals over accuracy. While I’d love more accuracy, well I guess I’ll stick with it
MSFS is a fine casual/gateway sim. It still will teach you to fly.
Indeed
It will teach you to fly, although won’t 100% depict the behaviour of the aircraft in the air
I literally can't fly in MSFS anymore after logging some hours in a physical plane.
It’s at least okay for planes, helicopters though… I don’t fly helis, but for those who do that must feel awful
It... doesn't even look right. MSFS looks for me like an idealized movie, with god rays, visualized scattering and everything. X-Plane looks like what I see out of the real cockpit. It's not as spectacular, but it's exactly as it is.
Plus with MSFS there aren’t really that many developers who are willing to develop systems and stuff. Really, the real reason why I just don’t wanna fly the recent 707 (shame we can’t have refunds…) ain’t even all the issues with the model stuff etc. it’s the lack of INS
X-Plane picture is dull in comparison, but it's exactly what it looks like IRL, at least with my eyes.
YMMV probably.
It's all subjective.
I’d compare MSFS visuals to how TSW is. It is a bit too much. A bit overly beautified. I don’t really mind, but it’s not real
I can't wait for the rest of True Earth to get released for XP12.
Oh wow, I missed something BIG.
Yeah
One of my friends got it
Apparently both the freighter and the passenger one are very nice
Also, Nimbus ATL should be out.
You get a discount on one if you own the other, pay like 40$ something instead of 80
Yeah, I know.
Too broke to switch sims, yet I want to fly
MSFS is good enough for me anyways, it has good enough airbusses to keep me occupied
I’m hoping the inib A321neo will be any good
I haven’t tried their a320neo since the update, so I don’t know if that has been fixed either
The base game helis suck, I wouldn't even consider them worth trying
The stuff from Taog's Hangar or Cowansim tends to be better.
But yeah, no sim is going to compete with DCS in terms of helicopter modelling, sadly
So idk if it was said here yet but apparently the PMDG secret project has been unofficially confirmed
It's a 741
the aerosoft a330 ceo was leaked
lol
NEW Aerosoft A330 First Look & Walk Around MSFS 2020.
Credit to Blu Games for sharing this video on 07/10/2024.
awww maneee
low quality
😭
Well yeah, doesn't look too good...
i dont like him
but
tats funny
it looks just like the p3d one
really sad that this took 4 years
When Aerosoft announced they were creating an A330 for MSFS 2020, expectations were quite rightly high given the standing that Aerosoft has in the flight simulation world. Sadly, this release seems to fall rather short of those expectations. In this video, I take a detailed first look at the aircraft, on board systems, performance etc and see ju...
Apparently it's literally additional pay for pretty much everything?
A friend of mine tells me, RR & GE engines ain't included and are a separate purchase, neos are separate (that is quite obvious and fair imo), standard internal functions are a separate purchase
Common aerosoft L
I like the CRJs but they aren't up to the standard any more
This thing just looks rough
It’s just the P3D 330 from like 2015 lmao
Standard aerosoft product since 2018
Honestly can’t name something they have made that’s actually been worth buying in years
But it’s the only “ok” 330 so it will sell like wildfire
I expect they decided to release it now really quickly just so it’s before MSFS2024
Cause that has a 330 of its own
yeah, almost certainly
Just dump the cashgrab now, maybe bother to fix it later
Aerosoft fell off so hard
Seems like don’t gotta be that old to remember the P3D 330, it was just released after all
yes
i used to fly those all the time
with the pilots voice pack n stuff
and the raas
legendary at that time\
they werent terrible
they were good for their time imho
I'd do it but knowing MSFS it'll have 'wind calm clouds scattered 20000' 
Or something along those lines
how much we thinknig the a330 is gonna be abandonware soon
The Aerosoft A330 for Microsoft Flight Simulator is finally here. In this rough and raw first look, we go on a flight from the Dominican Republic (MDPP) to Puerto Rico (TJPS), but things don't go as planned.
Despite a strong visual and audio experience, it is riddled with bugs that even cause us to have to go around to avoid disaster.
NOTE: A...
My bet is as soon as the reviews of the 2024 one start appearing if it’s mid-good
Why are people saying the inibuilds one is going to be any better
Going by the A320neo, no
It’s going to be barely flyable
The 300 is great too, but then the A320neo is just a weird strikeout
Apparently Aerosoft spent 460,000 Euros of German taxpayer's money on the A330NEO/A340 project?
Yes, doesn’t Germany fund like art projects and stuff?
I think that subwaysim game (that aerosoft also made, funnily enough) had a huge donation from the govt for its development too
Lots of countries fund game development, either directly or indirectly
Holy shit
I mean, I know this stuff is expensive
It's not easy to make games
But 460k?
knowing how this project turned out, i have an idea of where most of those funds went
Yeah, I can kinda assume that too
so did tramsim
don't worry
My understanding (though very much from secondary sources) is that it frequently costs a decent bit more than that to develop a high fidelity tube
Not particularly, but by all indications it had an extremely troubled development, which often means the budget goes through the roof
Most likely they did
But at the same time
99% of the taxpayers are probably never going to touch it
Afaik It's more about the idea of trying to grow an indigenous games industry
That's half a dozen software engineers for one year
And that (in theory) it'll be paid back in taxes when the product is successful
460k isn't as much as you think
Yeah to be honest it looks like a lot at first
But then
For germany it's like less than a cent per taxpayer
Also (and this is pure speculation) I think it was something of a bailout, I don't get the impression aerosoft is doing well rn
the eu paid for shitty vegetation
Circular grass
i would assume so
OMSI is nearly dead
LOTUS died
and they lost all the good devs for fs addons
shit like this as well
it is pretty much dead
only shit being released from OMSI is total dogshit addons made by room temperature IQ cunts
exactly the same as 11
doesn't even have the expanded t2
oh shit they are better than PMDG at least
working EFB from release 
PMDG will tell you it's all Asobo's fault and sim limitations 
Impossible
I just hope they won't butcher the 741 with their standard ipad they put into 73s and the 77W, would look so out of place
paper flight bag
Pretty sure that's what FSS did basically
And I'm certain it's not harder to do than an ipad
has been dead since the beginning
its funny because theyre a perfect example of death by 1000 cuts
release a shitty sim, people dont buy it, huge financial losses, make another sim and promise its not as bad as the last one, its shitty, people dont buy it, huge financial losses, repeat
That's the main point, for a couple of years now Germany is desperately trying to grow a native games industry. Of course, the grants are too little if you believe the industry, so the attempt has been rather unseccessful. Compared to some other subsidies these are indeed peanuts.
It's still a bit sad how Aerosoft has fallen but the terrible release of the A330 (and some other unsavoury experiences with them) confirms my stance of never touching any products that have their name on them.
🥱
They've been trying to grow a national gaming industry by subsidizing the studios?
Was the idea planted by a Russian agent? It must have been, because it's not how any of it works.
Uh no, that's exactly how it works
Loads of countries subsidize their games industries
xplane 12 honestly looks more realistic than msfs
Explain then, most of these sim games get national funding, including TSW
Idk, guess some European communism thing.
i dont get why your confused, you develop a game, the country gives you money so youll stay in that country
bruh hows that communism
the US literally does this...
most cities and things have cultural trusts that will give money to local art projects
An example with a proof please. Lockheed Martin P3D being purchased by the Pentagon doesn't count.
P3D was literally developed for the purpose of selling to the government.
i dont believe the US has one specifically for the games industry, but most local city and state governments do for art projects
And I'm talking specifically and exclusively about gaming industry.
its not only for the games industry though, that same program around europe is essentially just to foster a local commuinity of artists and industry
i literally work closely with a company that does exactly that, they get subsidized by the local govt to provide art projects for around the city
they also teach classes on the arts, which is where part of the funding goes
You're missing the whole point but whatever. If it's done, it shouldn't be. Government funding only makes subsidized entities lazy and stagnating.
aerosoft is the exception and not the standard
aerosoft has always sucked, and always will, it just happens that they applied for that govt program
Well, that's exactly why they are lazy and are stagnating, lol.
???
theyre lazy and stagnating because theyre aerosoft
not because they applied for that govt funding program that one time
Libertarianism doesn't work in real life
It's a feedback loop. Lazy people vote for socialists, socialists pay lazy people to stay lazy.
Your favorite person Elon relies heavily on government grants
you have severe brain damage
Surpise: I hate Musk.
This sounds a bit like “I’d rather have to pay off 150k$ for a paper cut treatment than have free state healthcare because free state healthcare is communist”
150k$ for a paper cut treatment
Strawman.
because funding a local, in-country community of artists to make your country more culturally diverse is communism.
dont you people literally go on and on and on about how america needs to bring manufacturing and whatever back to the US, and all of a sudden when europe does it by giving a cash incentive, its cOmMuNiSm
I hate to break it to you, but the vast majority of non-socialist governments utilise certain socialism ideas (free education, free healthcare, any government subsidies for absolutely any purpose) because those tactics work, they improve the country’s wellbeing, and they, in fact, do not make the country communist
Anyway, this is getting a tad bit close to the politics rule
Enjoy your Saudi Public Investment Fund created games in your paradise, studios like Asobo rely on US grants, especially for their radar and cloud infrastructure
This topic is getting bigger by the second and I'll probably won't change anyone's mind, so I won't waste my time and energy on you.
likewise
Appreciated.
im getting the A321/A319 today


