#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 16 of 1
fuck me could both of you just wind your necks in
Hey I'm just answering I ain't questioning 😭😂
And when those are already off? Still does it on DX11 and no DLSS. 😅
L1011 
It's just another place to draw the line.
Starting with the assumption that it will never be exact, you can get as close as you want, you could fly around with a game controller and do loops in the default A320, you can fly realistically with the default ATC and the default A320 in the Orbit airlines livery, you can fly real world routes with more or less the correct plane (737NG instead of the classic, A300-600 instead of A300B4, etc...) or you could just go full ballistic and don't fly the A320neo until it gets the updated radio instruments that have been installed in them, and haven't been reproduced in neither the ini A320neo not the FBW
It's not a binary you either do this or you don't, it's a scale, and you just draw the line at a different place.
I wouldn't fly an A300-600 instead of an A300B4, I wouldn't fly a 737NG instead of a classic, wrong engine? Maybe, depends. Most of the routes I fly are real current or historic routes, it's a cool opportunity to learn about a subject I'm passionate about (old civil aviation), and it's a cool way to see things from the past you would normally see.
I don't care if people fly in a Ryanair A320 between LAX and SFO, why do you care if I take 30 minutes to look up at timetables from the '80s to see what route to fly, or if I'm waiting for the JF A300B4 to fly Alitalia? 😄
out of all the examples
Ryanair A320
even though its not totally out of the question
Lauda A320s my beloved
I saw someone fly EasyJet from Boston to somewhere else in the US, wrong as hell but eh
1st, Lauda flies with the RYR c/s and ICAO
2nd, I don't care, at most I look at it and think, ahah I'd never do that, and then forget 5 seconds later. I don't care what people do 
please see what I sent above
Aha cool, we wrote basically the same thing at the same time 😛
at the end of the day, people who have above room temperature IQ don't give a shit
when I started simming all there was available was the 320neo so best believe I flew KLM in that fucker
but yea, we're all here to have fun
not have some stupid fucking arguments
anyway, this is gonna be fit
already quite liked the iFly Max for P3D, sounds were a bit lacking but it was really fun to fly so looking forward to the msfs version
Just did a Wrangell - Petersburg flight
If I ever complained in here about Tivat’s or Juneau’s offset approaches
I’d like to take my words back
The LDA offset at Petersburg is almost twice the offsets of those 2 combined 
Would’ve helped if I at least looked up a video of that approach in a 737 beforehand, at least to know what real pilots do there. But nah, I decided to just hit it. And so I did, half-successfully
Welp that's asobo quality for you 😂
"why do you care if I take 30 mins to look up at old timetables"
...me refueling the 777 that takes almost an hour each flight -_-
It's definitely better than PMDGs
eh, on par
imo, though I like using the fmc to load pax n fuel
the one aspect on the ifly I absolutely hated
Btw this is how the landing looked, forgot to send
Lol you're like me where you put 737-700 in the planes type instead of B737 lol 😂
I didn’t even put it in, it’s done so automatically every time
Yeah I know
But for the 737 it did this for some reason
With the Fokker I had to tell it specifically that it’s an F28 cause it would just say ‘jet’
its the way that MSFS aircraft report there aircraft data
for XP and P3D when making the aircraft you set the type code but for MSFS you don't have to
Yeah that's Volanta not knowing the registration so it just defaults to the planes in-game folder.
The fenix a320 for example is AirbusModel
Ini A310 is Fatboy or Fatslim
And the 737 is BoeBus3737
Most of the time it will just be left blank or a bunch of random text
Oh really?
Well I'm weird and I change it from an ICAO to it's actual name. B77W is 777-300ER lol
I also don't put my callsign in all my flights I put the airline
It's more organised in my flight history log
I change it to the correct ICAO so that the icon is correct
Sadly Volanta don't seem to be able to keep up with the rate addons are coming out
Redoing yesterday's one, now at night
And without the "Screw VNAV and LNAV I'm going old school"
And I'm at Petersburg James A Johnson airport
With a much better landing, might even be one of my best judging by how it felt in the sim
As in the picture of the plane? They are based on registration if so
Ohhhhhhhh. Seems to work just fine for me without the ICAO
Then again Volanta is so ass for this stuff
Thought my AN225 was a fighter jet
It's based on the ICAO code afaik
Interesting 🤔
I always look the type up on here: https://www.icao.int/publications/doc8643/pages/search.aspx
that's why this concorde appears as a concorde, because they've used CONC
Oh. I just use Wikipedia if I don't know mine
If I'm in an MD11 and I set it as MD-11 it still works for me.
However MD1F which exists doesn't
If you use A225 you get the triple engines
MD1F isn't an official ICAO code
It works for most civvie jets, and I'm pretty sure the B2 has its own icon as well
Sadly VULC is still just the generic twin engine airliner icon
Yeah works for me with AH-225 too
Interesting. I guess they have several valid types for each aircraft then, cool
Well it is on simbrief lol 😂
I think that it also checks the registration and uses the ICAO if it can find one from there too.
I was flying once in the BAE-146 using a retro livery and I came up as a Cessna 182. I checked plannespotters and there it was a Cessna with my registration.
they just use a different designator to differentiate the airframes
not a good source for that
I can't stop flying this weekend lmao
Traffic with BeyondATC even if a little bit buggy atm is a gamechanger for me
a
Wish I could get BATC working, even without traffic
Turns out it only functions with a VPN in Russia, and I have none on my PC
Plus running MSFS with VPN would be rather painful anyway, especially considering I can’t really buy a good one
ive had worse 
uhhhhh
b4 i overfly my destination for a few hours
idk
painge
idk where it would be
I will not die peacefully until FBW A380 in flying honu livery
that's one cool ass livery
agreed
dying for the 200ER
equally I want a 74, just tried the Asobo one & despite AAU2 I got a call from chief saying that wasn't it
that involved reinstalling x-plane & I don't really wanna do that if im honest
quite understandable
i didnt care for it as much
rn im just loving the 321 with shared cockpit with my little brother lol
dep/climb outta egkk inbound for LGSX
was nice for VA shit but 744 goes harder though
havent flown the md11 for a while
think its time for a beer

LOl
did a leg from LOWI-EGKK, had been delayed bc of weather, mine said it was ADC 102 mins
"wrong type of biscuits were provided by catering"
What is ADC
Looked it up, closest I found was Air Data Computer
I think it's Airline Delay Code or something
Ah cool
So far so good, a few things still missing as it's very early Alpha but it doesn't feel as empty now
Wish I could, batc looks like some very nice fun
what voices does it use?
not the premium ones right?
it can if you want it to
I think you can set it
Do you have to have supporter edition?
Yeah
for now, yes
ah
It will come for the standard later
while they work on bugs and features
thinking of buying it fr
I'll wait for that then, looks exciting
Supporters basically are beta testers in this case
especially if it can replace fbws injector
So, earlier I was landing and heard the plane on the ground requesting take off clereance. ATC Told the plane to wait for arriving traffic
ayo sick
and as I was doing my landing role, ATC told the plane to line up and wait
it's great
Ah yes, instantly sounds better than vatsim lol
like I said, still Alpha so lots of bugs but we have gotten at least 4 updates since release now
any u have encountered thus far?
A few, yes.. but some were fixed in yesterday's update.
like?
Like right now there's no speed controls / restrictions in place for traffic
oh boy
although that's not a bug
oh god
rip cessna
so you can have 2 airplanes landing at the same time, that will come quite soon (speed controls)
From their Discord:
"Traffic data for the globe based on live traffic from an historic week of data, limited to any aircraft flying IFR with an active transponder
Ground, departure, arrival traffic to and from the airports you have planned in Simbrief for your flight
Traffic fully managed by Beyond ATC including parking, runway and procedure assignments
Parking spots represent the actual parking spot of the aircraft in real life, irrespective of the parking assignments in the airport scenery
Support for FSLTL, AIG and FS Traffic models - at least one of which must be installed
Initial separation handling of aircraft at injection
Ability to use premium, basic or turn off voices entirely for traffic, separately from the voice setting being used for your the player.
Traffic managed by ATC out to 200nm from the player even without those aircraft having to be present in the simulator, saving valuable sim resources.
A slider that limits traffic based on a time range from our data set - the higher the slider, the further out the time range.
What features will come in future builds?
Enroute traffic not flying to or from either of the airports you have planned.
Any ground services, in particular a tug for pushback
Full separation handling through the entire traffic aircraft flight
Continued improvements to handling procedures"
Lovely weather there
Uhh
bless them seriously
FL40?
You mean 400?
yes
I doubt flying through the alps at FL40 is a great idea 
Well... that's an interesting question
ah the controller just voiced me saying it was a mistake
just reminded me, unrelated but, 321 into LGSK is gonna be chaos
eh, its gonna be fine.. I had no issues doing Gatwick to Skiathos & back
deploy the 321
I've done it before, just never shared cockpit
I've never done shared cockpit before
Im doing it rn with my youngest brother and its soo much easier, hes doing atc, and then im watching yt and having a beer
I done shared cockpit with a friend of mine, he pissed me off turning off 1 engine so I turned off the entire aircraft
last time I did anything with someone else on fs, on approach someone called a bomb threat at egkk at 1am at an overnight event
I was there- uhh no comment.
Okay now we just got asked if we can go FL390
uhhh
when I flew to Gatwick there was someone landing at Stansted & the interaction between the Wizz Air & the controller was crease
gotta love when that happens
Yan whats your callsign? I wanna see what shit the controller puts you up to
one second
i'm gonna assume it's TOM22W
nope, TCX441
gutting doesn't appear on volanta
yea
that is fit
funny chaos
its all good though, all the idiots yap their fucking mouth off on unicom anyway
people still report their stuff on unicom?
never seen that for a while
gotta say tho the amount of times i cut infront of someone on approach by accident because i didnt see their mf text message
😭
must not be flying in Europe then, still happens daily
though the amount of people that say some fucking dumbass shit has increased too
ya i fly us mainly on vatsim
eu is one scary ahh place
eh, its alright
due timezone & obligations I don't fly US often but happens every once in a while
find that depends really, most controllers I interact with are quite nice
& if you fly during quiet periods its not too bad
dont wanna say the q word but 122.8 is quiet
yea I mean the UK can be either really nice or terrifying as fuck, mostly because UK controllers just say it like it is
When I used to fly on vatsim more i'd avoid certain sector controllers but most ground/tower are fine
like if you're absolutely dogshit, they will tell you
Fraser is good if you ever see them on
I have issues with fraser
@woeful elbow u use yourcontrols right
yessir
is there a config for the 321 out or u need a seperate one still
made a custom 1
oh
i'd rather this than not be told and be doing something wrong tbh
yea I mean, if I am unsure about something then rather just ask before going ahead & doing it.. caught a few controllers lacking cause they realised what they wanted me to do was wrong/illegal/death penalty/etc
can u check if we're passing thru blue zone
my brothers freaking out because hes the one doing r/t
uh
callsign, altitude, inbound waypoint
it doesnt show the route on vatspy
exactly 
I do appreciate the UK controllers just being blunt
so many people that fly on vatsim with fuck all clue on what to do
alr
I can't stop flying here
lol
Pyreegue masterclass fr
iconic
I still think my funniest unicom interaction was people discussing footy during CTP

yes I REMEMBER THAT
lovely footy
🌈
people on unicom talking about redbull lol
blessed but too bad redbull is ass
now talking about siblings 
here comes chaos
@wide zenith sorry for ping, chaos has commenced
been told they aint seen a "KESTRAL" for about 1 or 2 years
hehe
and atc is closing 
i think this might have been a bad idea
I took off like 5h ago
I have to be up at 6 tmrw lmao
G-EUPJ my beloved
ahahaha
When Trident?
Doing the same flight for the third time in a row. Just loved something about Petersburg. Plus, gotta at least do it properly once - during daytime, following roughly what they do in reality on that final turn into the airport.
Also, I'm pretty sure these stands shouldn't have pushback tugs
I was about to say you can disable pushback on gates with GSX but you don't have GSX 😅
True. Might get it, just to make the ground look a bit better. I usually don’t mind the default pushback tug or the PMDG stairs, but having to roll through a vehicle because it’s a no-pushback stand, yet it still spawns there, is not very nice
I'm pretty sure you'll like it. Having animated ground traffic with animated passengers and ground crew around your aircraft adds a new level of immersion. The pushback itself is nicely done aswell with everything fully animated from inserting the steering pin to lifting the aircraft and disconnecting again, all while you're being spoken to 👍
That sounds lovely
Will try it then I guess
At least some enhancement to my game, considering I can’t get an AI ATC xD
Guess for the control, gonna have to try VatSim at some point
+1 for GSX, won't ever fly without it
you can find profiles on flightsim.to or inimanger for any payware and people go into great detail
I'm not sure how often they have a sale but if the price seems a bit high for you, it might be worth waiting for one. There was definitely a sale around Christmas, which is when I got it
Some people nail it so perfectly. Others are more like "I hope this does the trick!” 😅
I think you can only buy it on https://www.fsdreamteam.com/products_gsxpro.html
Quality Products for Flight Simulator. Developers of Scenery and Airplane addon products.
Alrighty
suns' comin
Oh, and I right away get hit by “we cannot accept orders from your region”, just lovely ain’t it…
another hell yea for GSX, some of the profiles are really well done & most 3rd party aircraft work out the box with it
That's very unfortunate
I mean, at least I can use a vpn on my phone to buy it. Is it working offline? Cause I wouldn’t like another BeyondATC situation
It should 🤔
I need to start flying in russia more
I've been telling myself that for ages and never done it 🥲
I always come back to the US and EU
I keep telling myself I need to learn Russian phraseology finally, yet still haven’t either xD
Where’s the logo light
good question
either im blind or theres just none
maybe it's like the 320 where it activates itself at 10k
Well, there’s Nav & Logo
ye thats on 2
So it’s probably integrated there
it on doe
finally leaving the damn nattracks
went from FL370 to 380 and then onto 410
i don't understand it but meh
Morning
shalom

73 max is gonna go hard
plenty of previews in their discord aswell & it looks fucking fit
its gonna be chaos on vatsim
I hope we get a 737 immersion pack soon
LMAO
ITS CHAOS
@wide zenith I have a feeling letting me younger brother do the atc is gonna be a bad idea lol
I quite liked the immersion packages that are available for the PMDG suite in P3D so a 73 pack wouldn't go wrong for me
They're great little packs, a bit on the spenny side for msfs as you require simfx tho
having condenstation and such on the a32x's is a game changer for me
love those little details
its alright though, feel alot of it is worth due the amount of aircraft supported at one time
don't mine spending a bit if it means a bit more immersion in the end really
been considering the accuseason pack & the upcoming cloud one from Rex aswell
you're barely even past Paris why are you at FL240 already
and also tcas
there's barely anybody around
there was about 5 minutes ago they then disconnected/got banned
should have looked on the ND & see what altitude the opposing traffic was at & then coordinated/act accordingly
Also because my brother will not be able to deal with multiple things at once I've gotta deal with atc and land manually.
rog
shortest taxi :p I was waiting on the rwy for cabin call
lol
That’d be one of my longest taxis xD
lmfao
what's a taxi?
-average westland scout enjoyer
got my brother yapping in my ear, messed up and left timba too early
Is it released yet?
Only to supporters
It's released on the experimental branch that people who bought/upgraded to the supporters pack have access to
Sweet so I have it yay
I know it's gonna be fucked already
EDDK just changed their runway numbers 🤣
Oh no
Wonder how it'll solve that haha
Vatsim?
yh
why do i consider doing stupid things my brother suggests lol
"lets do a flight from dalaman"

Oh I dont know lol
Lord help me
LGRP - EGKK // 4.50 flight
Just use simrate if it's too long
Simrate isn’t compatible with the fenix
Back from a bit of a summer break... let's discuss how long it actually takes to get to fly the Boeing 777! 🏅Become a member of the AviationPro channel & unlock extra perks and get access to extra live full flights! https://bit.ly/41NfbQD 👉 More info & links down here! 👇👇
🧑✈️ Want to learn how to startup the Boeing 777 from Cold & Dark? Check ...
cant believe he did it
a true og flight simmer, he teached alot back in the fs2004 days
Avpro 
Yes it is.
It's in the MCDU
Wait, the guy who refused to move off FS2004 for years is finally a pilot?
Flight1 going mental with their 73 max previews on their discord
some sound previews from what I gathered mainly tonight, I can't wait
I’m concerned about their comment about something about windows software not being able to run on Xbox
That makes me think it might be a fenix situation, with an extremely inefficient external software maxing out CPU
Fenix runs as well as other aircraft now I thought?
its so frustrating finding a flight to do in MSFS, and then theres no planes in MSFS that actually fly it 
doing medford OR to seattle is the flight i need to connect anchorage with LAX, and its only E175s, both delta and alaskan
theres the flight sim studio E175, and ive heard that it's really junk, especially for $40
I love the Fenix but it's still the highest framerate hit in the sim
With frame Gen I get 200fps in the a2a Comanche, 150fps in the pmdg 737 or 75 in the Fenix a320
im biased, but theres no denying that the external software cripples the A320
How is it for you compared to the jf planes?
They were similar for me
Just flight turbo arrow is like 175fps
The black square stuff is 120-150 depending on the plane
I do not own either
Fair
I love the 146 and f28, they're incredible
The vulcan's also great but it's not really my thing, they did a stunning job though
They are just slightly too old for my constant enjoyment
i really wish PMDG would update their 737s with the newer EFB, the ground equipment app in the 777 one is so handy
Meh I use GSX already and the FMS is plenty fine for managing it, always has been
They were so crazy about their tablet and patting themselves on the back for their "groundbreaking" work every other add-on has had for 4 years
It's not "really junk", it's just early access. It may not have the level of functionality you'd want for the time being, but it's otherwise pretty good.
It's early access so it's not a finished product. It's really good for what it offers so far. But once it's finished it'll be amazing
Agreed
Isn’t its main issue - the lack of vnav?
Like, if that’s the real big offputting point, I wouldn’t call it anywhere near junk. You can just use V/S, althold, level change and speed anyway, and it really won’t increase your workload that much
I love it when my PC has ram issues 🥲
Lack of VNAV in a plane which VNAV is a prominent feature of daily operation is pretty major
Especially with how slow it's been progressing
And especially since last I heard it's not getting VNAV until FS24
Yeah, they are taking a while. To be honest though, I've made do without on every flight so far. Just makes the flights a bit more involved.
Hopefully it's properly back ported to FS20
From the sounds of it, i'd be surprised if the addons weren't the exact same thing for both sims, for a while at least.
If they expect me to buy FS24 to use the product I bought for FS20 on the promise of it being complete at some point they better be the ones buying it for me lol
This is what we were told over and over for xp11 stuff on xp12. Then xp12 released and everything needed massive updates
So I'm extremely skeptical
Yeah, it's an issue, but it is not game-breaking and you can still fly without it normally. It is not a good thing, but it is not as bad as people seem to be making of it
It's like buying a chocolate milkshake and they give you a vanilla milkshake with the promise it'll be chocolate if you buy it again in 2 years
Or that they'll give you a cup of chocolate syrup in a year
I mean tbf, we made do with the FBW A32NX not having proper VNAV (believe it does now but feel free to correct me)
yea sure & sure they're taking their sweet time with it, but hey ho
as NoOne mentioned, people seem to be making a song & dance about something that in the grand scheme of things a what I would say ''minor'' issue
early access product doesn't come with all features (shock & horror 🤯)
on the FS 24 note, looks fun.. probably will be a day 1 purchase for me
probably won't drive into all the career stuff too much, but nice seeing the amount of stuff on offer & also please Asobo working wipers for the love of god
Do wipers just not work at all
Cause I just tried using them for the first time, realised they do nothing apart from making annoying sounds and so turned them off
nah, apparently it was meant to be a feature in some sim update but then it was conveniently forgotten & simply left to gather dust
Fenix, FBW & the Black Square Duke (I believe?) has somewhat working wipers but eh
Lined up now
I'll give fs24 a year before I jump into it probably
I mean I have game pass so I can try it whenever
I'll probably just wait for some reviews and decide based off that and the price
I'm expecting it'll be $120 for premium deluxe again with no discount for fs20 owners
98 with gamepass
At least for me it ends up being a pretty game breaking issue, the e-jets are planes that irl are flown using vnav as a standard procedure, not being able to do that kills them for me
That said aside from the lnav/vnav issues I do think they're pretty well done, it's just they're missing a vital component
Tbh my opinion on the vnav matter might be influenced by the fact I like old-style navigation, and sometimes navigate entirely by VORs using just V/S and Althold in the 737 just because, so for me a missing VNAV is not as big of a deal
thats fair, i did notice that it has completely custom systems and everything, the biggest drawback being no VNAV (but i honestly fly departures and approaches manually anyway, i rarely rely on vnav)
not yet
unless I missed a big recent update
my definition of custom systems is screens that are accurate to the aircraft, and it looked like it had a proper engine and systems displays in the center
(because captain sim stuff all uses the 747 stuff with no effort put in to make them realistic)
most of the logic is default though, but in that sense I see what you mean, but it's not how FSS uses that term
I think all of the A/P is default as well
that doesnt bother me too much, as long as i can complete a standard, no issues flight mostly realistically, and the plane looks and performs nicely
that's fair, I just pointed out that the way most people, including FSS use the term "default system" was different compared to the way you used it
if you ask most people, it has default systems 😅
currently custom FMS is still "In Progress" according to FSS
atleast to me, the visual representation of a system is a lot of what makes a plane "good", i was looking at the captain sim 757 and was shocked to see that they dont even bother changing the MCDU from 747
ive been looking at the aerosoft CRJs too, i want to do the michigan tech flight so bad 
the only issue is that the aerosoft CRJs are the larger ones, the flights between houghton and chicago are all CRJ-200s
Ah the copypasta plane
i know its an entirely different league of simulation from the CRJ and E-jets, but ive been looking at the MD-80s too, im just not a fan of flying older stuff because its impossible to find any realistic flight data on them (which is why i havent done any US airways flights, even though its by far my favorite aircraft livery and airline)
seeing up for a lovely lang flug
haven't done one of these in forever
primarily due CE course
They're expensive as heck, but it's probably my favorite plane in the sim
If you want historical flight data there's a couple options, fsdispatch has a decent collection of timetables, but afaik some of the flight numbers are made up when the creator couldn't find them. Also there's virtual airlines with full md80 schedules, I'd suggest piedmont virtual and virtual American airlines if you wanna go that route, they've got a full 2000 AAL schedule as well as NWA and a couple other md80 operators on pva
oh wow thats awesome, i didnt even know that app existed, ive been using flightsfrom.com for flight data
The only WIP I want from FSS is the pax 727
honestly I've been eyeing up the MD11
seems decent & would be a nice break away from standard Bojing/Airbus shit
i got the skysim MD-11 ages ago and ive been dying to get the TFDi one, but i just dont have the money
I was thinking of it a while ago too but realised that I probably wouldn't fly it too much, considering I'm not really a long-range guy
i would buy it primarily for fedex flights, seeing fedex MD-11s is so iconic
for me it would probably be the pax version, don't really do much cargo flying
Finnair MD11s, very exciting
now that im only just learning about fsdispatch, i might bite on the TFDi one
Tbh if I got it myself I'd buy both cause it's just a 10$ difference, but I just don't wanna go for it yet overall cause I'd be more interested in the pax 727, and probably even more interesting in getting a controller better than a keyboard
i miss when i had money, back when i bought the captain scam 717 because hawaiian does island hops in it, and i never ended up learning it 🥲
honestly its really nice that if you bought one but want the other you're not paying full price
10$ is such a laughable amount I might just get both tbh
Exactly how I think of it. It's a great thing
may just get the triple freigher too for shit out of Billund
get some use out of the scenery I bought & only have flown out of twice or so
But yeah, not getting it just yet for 1 reason - no use for it. I've done 47 flights. Total flight time is 52 hours. Which gives an average flight time of 1 hour 6 minutes. A flight that short in an MD-11 would not work 
holy shit it even gives you the time the aircraft has been on the ground, so you can set it up for either C&D or ready to turn
when i get home from college tonight im gonna do a shit ton of us airways flights
ofcourse as I push back theres a notification from Nvidia about a game ready driver update
fuck off Nvidia I don't want your fucking shit
I must say though for €12, they've done Billund justice
You just need to know where to look 😄
https://www.departedflights.com/timetables.html
https://timetableimages.com/
and archive.org are your friends, if you mind the possibility of finding inaccurate data also check out
Also archive.org (wayback machine) is very useful, this was on it for example
fsdispatch my beloved
didnt realise lufty have cfms on their 319 and 320, but IAEs on their 321 fleet 
I see a 350... ini wen >:(
They have a mix of all of them
Actually no I think they moved all there IAE 320/319’s to Eurowings
Ah I see, I imagine that created a few issues from a maintenance POV
Doubt it
Lufthansa Technik does maintenance for I think 40 airlines?
All with various fleets of various types
When your company maintains 30+ year old 757’s next to brand new A320’s I think different engines aren’t really a concern
I would imagine they did it just to standardise performance across there fleet
Eurowings don’t get that luxury 
I’ve gone down a hole again, apparently they do both JetBlue and Spirit fleet maintenance based out of San Juan
LH Technik?
Ye
Half of Greece is owned by Germany anyway
Only makes sense that half the airports are as well
Under wiki it says they also do stuff in india and china, that reach is crazy yeah no doubt they dont have a problem with multiple engines
Cool image
This reminds me of some of the stupid shit we do
When Bergamo, Dublin and Stansted are over capacity we send some of our 737’s for maintenance in Leipzig with DHL
simfx looking so good now we're in autumn 
orbx really fell off, olbia has some naff ground markings and lots of low res texturing
The devs of stockholm ended up moving to jetstream designs so i'm very excited for when Geneva releases
been waiting for ages for a good geneva as RDpresets was trash and the other one is so old now
I love it when my PC has an SCEP failure 🥲
Is their new stuff just worse overall? I have only 1 of their airports and that's Tivat, which, I can confirm from the experience of being there countless times, is spot on
Their stuff in general worsened from p3d
theyre not bad but theyre very far away from being within my favourite airport developers for the sim
pyreegue, inibuilds, DD, flightbeam, aerosoft (jo erland), jetstream ect are all top tier
and orbx just haven't caught up
They do more stuff for asobo nowadays too
Orbx still has great stuff, but a lot of 'orbx' releases these days are done by contractors, and the quality of said contractos varies a lot, the guy who does the Swedish airports is great for example, but the guy who did KBUR sucks
I think olbia might have been the BUR guy
Also orbx ported a bunch of p3d stuff early on, and some of the ports are pretty sub par, PAKT is a good example for those
I thought of getting their Ketchikan actually after being impressed with Tivat
But decided to go for Northern Sky Studio version instead
I love Orbx Bern Airport
Based
Tbh the main reason I went for Northern Sky Studio one is for consistency 
Cause I have all the other milk run airports by Northern Sky Studio
I can do any milk run apart from flight 62 and the only default airport I’ll encounter is Seattle-Tacoma
(For flight 62 I’m also missing Fairbanks)
KPIT having no SIDs is so weird to me
theres 1, and its basically just a single VOR
charlotte time
i did not land in the hudson
that was also my 30th (recorded) flight
That's actually somewhat common with us airports
Indeed
Constantly see SIDs that are just 1 turn into a VOR
Or sometimes it’s more interesting, if you take off in the other direction. Instead of making just a turn, you have to make a full 180 and only then a turn into a VOR
I’ve encountered ones like that, but usually those are one option in a sea of a dozen
At Pittsburgh, it’s 1 departure for the entire airport, PIT5
Either that, or your flying direct
In many other airports it’s the same
Especially when there are just 2 active commercial runways
(2 as in 1 physical runway, 2 runway numbers)
It’s not usually
IRL they are gonna vector you to no end
Standard arrival patterns in the uk are only really used till about 40 miles
Then it’s time to use hdg select
It’s the same with a lot of VOR Circle to land approaches in Europe
Larnaca has one but it’s used maybe twice a week for a late arrival
Easier to vector
Those good old SIDs that are just vectors 🙂
must be a LCC thing
Using navigraph to navigate the stand numbers at Frankfurt Hahn is not something I had on the cards today
We have an aircraft change and we have to get from A3 to B2
Brand spanking new 737 on the way back
Delivered in July and started flying on the 27th aug
Guys there is a critical fault with the latest windows update (23H2) that causes BSODs with AMD based systems. Don't update until a patch has been released!!!
i am tempting fate and doing a flight on friday the 13th 
https://il2-korea.com/news/dd_10
In another Dev Brief we'll discuss the process of creating a visual 3D model of an aircraft. If you have questions on this topic, please submit them here: https://forms.gle/EAY9qvpbB3XDFhie8
i tempted fate, the A32NX broke 🥲
Some MD action
md based
Absolutely
The exterior of the tfdi looks a bit eh in my opinion though
But I myself wouldn’t mind much, since I only see it when taking screenshots xD
I meant even more not in the way weathering is stylised, but I just think it could be made made better. I can’t point out what specifically, it just feels bit eh
thats it
it feels almost too high up?
like a lot of grime is sort of focused on the underside of the fuselage, around panel gaps
running away from the sun
definitely top 5 for me
sucks that the government sucks, because id love to visit russia one day
Completely off topic.
After reading a bit about the Stasi and the East German government in general it's gotten pretty hard to fly IFL 🫤
I don't know why, usually this kinds of stuff never affected my flight simming, but this particular area of history is somehow making me feel much "deeper" emotions than usual
east germany w
i love flying all the way to an airport, only to find out that the glideslope is going to fuck me over last second
it cant be that some glideslopes just bring you in high/low on the PAPI, and give you alarms as you descend
i dont know much about aviation, but i know for a fact that a glideslope should atleast keep you on the PAPI lights
regardless, now i have a single string of flights all the way between honolulu and kazan russia
Usual MSFS, it sucks, but it is what it is
I've gotten used to it
You get my completely unbiased confirmation here
Totally unbiased
Looked best on this
I’ve seen these at both Manchester and Gatwick irl
Back when Aeroflot was cool
“Back when aeroflot was cool” is just such a true statement
Could’ve at least converted these to cargo or something
I wanna fly on some Soviet jets so much but the only way to do that is to visit North Korea
(Or if you’re looking for an IL-96 (which to be fair isn’t Soviet, but you get what I mean) then good luck trying to get a flight that will actually not be cancelled or delayed indefinitely with Cubana)
Even 10-12 years ago it wouldn’t be uncommon to see them flying around
Yep
Aeroflot retired Il-96s only in 2014
In 2009 they got rid of the last 154
2007 for the last 134 I think
That's weird because the TU-154 was banned from Europe before the fall of the Soviet Union due to noise complaints.
They still operate for Aeroflot under the Rossiya SFS subsidiary
2005 in manchester
2003 or 4
post ussr but idk when
They only had about 4 or so. The IL-96 was not anywhere near as successful or profitable as the IL-86 was. And because of that Aeroflot sold theirs to other countries. 2 went to become IL-96-300VPUs which occasionally fly to JFK. The IL-96 story was short lived. Mainly because of politics but in turn it was a poorly made aircraft still requiring 3 pilots to fly it and wasn't able to be served at most airports. There was the IL-96M however that used PW2000 engines and a Boeing designed 2 pilot cockpit but no one bought it. It wasn't until 2020 where the IL-96-400M came across as the purely first 2 pilot certified 96, designed from the -400T and -400VPU. But unfortunately it has not got any orders other than military ones
They don’t operate for Aeroflot. The special flight squadron is a separate ‘airline’ and it’s reserved for some very special people 
154's also ran a ton of Medium Haul Redeye flights to turkey, spain, italy and the canary islands because they were quite good at that
154s weren’t bad planes overall tbh
Sadly I doubt
It last flew in 2018?
Well tbh then it could still be airworthy if they took decent care of it
last i heard was it was airworthy in 2019 but I think it's been moved to the museum now
they took it out for tour flights and airshows
Well if it’s in a museum, unless they stripped it off components, then it probably is airworthy indeed
oh and lest we forget this
I mean, if we’re listing airworthy, then of course there are still ones flying for the government. But as I said, all the seats are booked for only the very special people
@shadow burrow tried shared flight yesterday, im honestly so so suprised on how well it works and runs
ikr
And talking about 4 rear engines, a VC-10 too pls pls
in beta it was buggy as ass still but would run pretty well
this is the only VC10 your gonna get
I so hope JF will end up making a MSFS version too
i mean
need the f70 first frfr
After all they are making other planes they’ve done for other sims too. But either way it will take a loooong time
does the FSS 727 only have the CIVA does anyone know
Honestly no idea, I’m waiting for the pax variant tbh
I was surprised when recently found it’s also sold via JF, really nice
Hopefully someone will do one
Maybe FSS even after they’re done with the 72s
if theres two planes i really want it's the 732 and 707 series
Oh yes
The Famous Flyer 707 should’ve already been released iirc
Even after the initial delay
oh wait there'll be a 707 by asobo??
oh idk them
Make a lot of bad planes apparently. They made the 377 and the default DC-3 I think
Their 707 originally should’ve been released on 2nd of July iirc
Introducing Our New Blackbird Texture for the 777v2 in X-Plane 12 Enhance your flight simulator experience with our new texture that transforms the standard seagull into a blackbird. This texture modification offers a refreshing change, bringing the familiar blackbird to your virtual skies, enric...
lmao
@trim harbor
But it was delayed then until early September. Don’t remember the exact date, but it should’ve been released by now. So it appears to be delayed until later again
AH churn them out, so they have very little depth and they are often abandoned pretty quickly
I heard their single-prop light aircraft are decent? Though anything bigger seems to be underwhelming
All national airlines were merged under Aeroflot to help with financial gain some years ago. Rossiya became a subsidiary of Aeroflot and that includes SFS. Same happened with Podabeo, Arura, and Donavia.
SFS is simply the subsidiary for military operations. Same planes and pilots but just for a different purpose. The planes also carry the Airlines old livery and didn't adopt the red stars that the modern livery has.
Rossiya is also one of the last operators of the 747-400 for medical transport. Plans were for them to retire in 2024 but due to sanctions the date has been postponed and plans are set for them to re enter service as a domestic aircraft since the 777-300s are aging and parts are sparse
They were a great cheap plane for rough and tough operations but unfortunately like most things from Russia they had no competition against western designs. Hence why they are so rare now.
As a good friend of a few JF developers I can safely say that the planes on their radar are the 747 and L1011. At the moment they are finishing that A300B4 then they will start work on the 747 Classic.
I am honestly not sure. You are right about Rossiya (the commercial airline) being under Aeroflot, absolutely. But the Special Flight Squadron is not part of Rossiya since 2009. Since then it is directly under the directorate of the president of Russian Federation
That is lovely. A JF L-1011 and 747 Classic? Sign me up
SFS still needs pilots and due to its immense size and largely western populated fleet they get those from the only source logical. Which is Aeroflot Group. Plus Aeroflot is already part of the Russian Federation.
Yes the 747 Classic will most likely become their flagship product. Since it's so complex and such an iconic plane with so many possibilities. Such as the 747-300 and 747SP
I knew about the 747 classics being there eventually, didn’t know L-1011 was on the cards
Well Just Flight are developers that prioritise classical aircraft over modern unlike most developers. Their products are some of the best too. Since their team is growing and msfs is such a large platform unlike Xplane or P3D ever was it's only perfect for them to expand their choices
Yeah they definitely get pilots from commercial airlines. They don’t have nearly enough flights to have their own staff. Although I wouldn’t say their fleet is largely western aircraft, they only have 2 Dassault Falcons and 2 A319s.
Well, in addition to those 4, they have 16 Tu-204s/Tu-214s which are rather recent and definitely more western-influenced compared to things like Tu-154s
Oh well they used to have many many more. I haven't looked at their fleet to be honest but from reading articles it only mentioned western aircraft.
I do know that when SFS was created they did adopt a massive portion of VVS (Soviet Air Force) planes after the fall of the USSR.
Very much possible that they had more. Potentially A310s that got retired since
Yes especially the TU-204/214. Literally no difference in those planes other than where they were built
There is also the TU-234 which was renamed to the -300
Basically
Yeah, was meant to be a separate model, but then became just a sub-model
Pretty much. I've seen the original prototype
I think the 204s even originally had options for for the same engines as on 757s
That was later. When the USSR fell and Tupolev finally got the ability to use the RB211s
However they are super rare
I remember seeing this as a kid once
Indeed, although Tu-204s are not that common by now anyway. I know that SFS has the most of the 204s/214s, Cubana has a couple, Air Koryo does, also Почта России and RedWings
Quite unfortunate condition
Quickly looked up the numbers specifically for the 204s - SFS has 3, Cubana has 4 (2 pax 2 cargo), Air Koryo has 2, Почта России has 2 (both freighters) and RedWings has 2
So like, 13 total, unless I forgot some other airline
The TU-204 family is peculiar
TU-204-001 = Prototype
TU-204-100 = First Production Model
TU-204-100C = Cargo Variant
TU-204-120 = Western Variant
TU-204-200 = Improved Production model
TU-204-200C = Cargo Variant
TU-204-220 = Western Variant
TU-204-300 = Short Capacity Variant
TU-204-500 = Long Range Variant (all converted to -300s)
TU-205 = Foreign Export Model
TU-206 = Alternative Fuel Research Aircraft
TU-214-200 = Alternative Manufacturered Variant
TU-234 = Long Range Development (Became 214-300)
TU-214-300 = Long Range Variant
TU-204-200SM = Medium Range High Density
TU-204 Production ends
TU-214-200ON = Geology Observation
TU-214-200PU = Airborne Command Post
TU-214-200SR = Communications Relay
TU-214-200SUS = Presidential Communications Relay
TU-214-200R = Special Missions
TU-214-200PU-SBUS = Special Missions
TU-214-200LMK = Flying Laboratory
TU-214 Production ends
UAC Created
TU-214-200M
First TU-204 Vs the Latest TU-214M
The family is definitely interesting, so many variants
Well even tho it is a direct copy the airframe still proves to be exceptionally useful
It’s probably not a direct copy, I at least hope they made some changes
But yeah, very much influenced by the 757s
Well yeah if your copying anything your going to make changes
Also your message shows Russian aviaconstruction very nicely. “Tu-214 production ends.” “UAC created”. “Tu-214-200M”. Just shows exactly that now they’re trying to revive old designs with not too much effort
The real life “Can I copy your homework?” “Sure but change something to not make it obvious”
Well UAC was a thing before the TU-214 ended however I just put the note there to mention that UAC created the TU-214M today. My guess is that the 214M is a backup if the sanctions persist
“Compete with Boeing and Airbus in the long range airliner market”
Except 1) airlines want less engines now and 2) if you wanted that, shouldn’t have left Comac with the C-919
C-929 and C-939 are in development as widebodies
The thing is the IL-96-400M is for the world's tiniest market.
Yes the C919 is the A320 looking one
But yeah basically, Russia was developing probably the 929 together with China until it wasn’t
Should’ve stayed in the program if they wanted to make their own successful widebody
Most of the stuff they’re trying to do ain’t. They decided to revive Yakovlev and make their own narrowbody to compete with the 737 and the a320, except Yakovlev hasn’t designed any airliners (that actually worked and flown) since iirc Yak-42
At the very least the MC-21 actually got built and has done flights already, so maybe it’s not all that bad…
I believe they were developing the CR-929 together and the PD-34 engine but they stopped due to sanctions or something
Yakovlev never died. They produce the YAK-130 which is used to train pilots for the SU-57, SU-75, and many other fighter planes. They also make a bunch of drones.
Well yea back then it was Craic CR929
True, I meant in terms of airliner production. They did indeed produce military equipment
You can see that Russia is taking a different approach as technology evolves. Before they would make an airliner that is rigged and tough and cheap. But they are not popular in the west and stand no chance.
In the 90s they developed the SU-95 which has proved to be a great airliner but it's only a regional airliner. Now they have a completely homemade aircraft which honestly looks great.
Well they didn’t, they do
Yakovlev mainly produces testbed aircraft. Such as the Yak-41. They don't really produce mainstream
True, back in the Soviet times the thought was to make airliners that could serve airports that were in quite a bad condition. And also do so cheaply. Both the superjet and the MC-21 are vastly different. The Superjet is very popular in Russia now. Rossiya has tons. Smaller airlines also fly a bunch of them. Plus I expect in the future others might get them too, like Pobeda, if the sanctions persist, will probably have to go for a Russian fleet. I hope that MC-21 also becomes successful, it seems a rather nice design, it honestly looks good, and it’s probably copied off western aircraft it is, I think truly Russian-made in the sense that it doesn’t rely on foreign parts
I flew on an SU-95 once and it was great. Manchester to Brussels. More spacious than an Ejet. The MC-21 looks great. And it's designed to be affordable. However the project has probably been costly to get that far
Yeah, it’s probably cost a fair bit, but under UAC they won’t have any slight fear of bankruptcy, which, in my opinion, is kinda good. It’s been delayed, I’m pretty sure the launch should’ve been in 2022, but now is planned for 2025/2026
Don’t think I’ve been on a Superjet yet, I’m mostly on Aeroflot and they don’t fly any right now (all given to Rossiya), and when they did, I still have mostly flown routes that are longer than those jets usually fly
Well Russia has been an absolute failure in terms of politics and government rule. After the fall of the USSR the Russian Federation was supposed to bring freedom and prosperity to the republic of Russia and Siberia because the country was quite literally bankrupt. The USSR spent all their money on the Space program and had little care for the future. They lost everything even their territory. Russia became an ally to the US and the West in its first years of independence however after Boris Yeltin died and Putin was Elected the country went downhill.
Fast forward to nowadays it's becoming no better than how it was pre 1991. Russia fell out with China after they had a massive disagreement over supplying SU-33 Flanker aircraft and SU-57 to China and India causing them to pull out of the CR-929 program. There was also massive outburst when Russia went for Georgia and Ukraine.
Well the USSR wasn’t bad really apart from the latest years leading to its breakup, but I guess best not to talk about politics much
Aviation-wise, right now it’s questionable whether it’s better or not. Obviously there are many more companies now and therefore much more possibility for air travel, but for a period there was no civil aircraft production whatsoever, and right now it’s going tough. I guess we just have to wait and see
Well from the 80s onwards it was pretty much all downhill
Well mid-late 80s yeah. Early 80s was ‘acceptable’
From then it was indeed downhill
Aviation wise I feel it could have been so much better. There are so many projects planned to collaborate with the western world that were just forgotten or never successful
- Beriev A-40
- Ilyushin IL-96M
- Sukhoi SU-95-100 Superjet
- Antonov AN-124-200
- Antonov AN-124M
- Tupolev TU-204-220
- Sukhoi SU-57FA
- Yakolov YAK-130 program (M-346)
Definitely. Could’ve been much better
And it would’ve been much better if, instead of just swapping all the fleets to use western aircraft in the late 2000s, they did their best to design their own in collaboration with the western companies and that would meet western standards
That would be ideal. And probably could even happen if the production was united under one entity, like UAC, earlier, and if such entity would be ready to work with other manufacturers
Well that's what they did but the designs were never accepted by the west and they were never popular even in the east. They simply just preferred to go either way rather than mix. Which is kinda of sad because of both sides were to collaborate the outcomes would be incredible but there's always something that prevents it
Well that's the thing UAC has already got hatred from Airbus, Boeing, and other manufacturers simply for not cooperating or just completely taking over projects. Like the M346 which split and became the M346 and Yak130
Rate the PC setup
thats...
projectile vomiting at the sight of easyjet
Yes yes you hate them, we're aware
I assume since that is Fenix, you double the ‘projectile vomiting’?
im flying the fenix right now
Also btw
easyJem
You got your RW AP320 reskin, now need the MSFS version 🤣
True 😂 not looked into msfs liveries file structure but maybe one day 🤔
G-EZJM
conveniently this fella
73 classics wen :(
I wish
i hit a geometry error on takeoff and flew so high up that volanta thought i landed
its also saying "GPS PRIMARY LOST" even though ive had no issues in flight so far
cabin altitude pressure is going insane, for some reason the vertical speed will rapidly go to thousands of ft per minute, and then back down, right now its sitting at 9150ft for the cabin pressure
this is the first time have had an aircraft literally crash
every time i try to give the fenix a chance, it realizes im having fun flying it and then kills itself
the only thing i did differently was use 2x simrate through the MCDU, but it was going along just fine the entire flight (minus the bugged runway and faults), out of nowhere all this shit went wrong
easyJet is easily the best budget airline
Skill issue
final
and they killed one of my favorite upcoming bands
because they had the word "easy" in their band name
Lol
i thought they just renamed the band?
as of like 3 months ago
Yes, but for like 6 months they had to stop
ah
Crosswindy?
Now that, that I’d fly
11/10 plane and livery
damnit
beyondATC doesnt give you an option to rectify callsigns, im doing a US airways flight and it gave me the callsign "silk" for some reason?
Probably because it's damn Early Access and it's only designed for modern day 😭
youd think that it would atleast have data of the most common airlines, both past and present, i bet you that if you set up a pan-am flight it would give you the clipper callsign
US airways has only been gone for less than a decade

i ALWAYS forget to start the timer before takeoff
i cant say ive ever seen an approach with a mandatory hold baked in
I dont even bother with the chronos, And I rarely ever get mandated holds even when shown on charts by atc on vatsim xD
yeah, i ended up not even doing the full hold, just a loop around and in, i figured its incase theres traffic they can hold you until your ready to go, its just published because its so common
Early access bud. It's not gonna have everything yet
Doesn’t beyondatc just take the data off your simbrief plan?
Yeah, that's realistic too. I meant the callsign and flight number
To be fair I haven't tried it because I'd need a vpn to do so, so anything I say might be incorrect
Yeah ngl, It‘s Early Access
You expect too much man
Pretty much. It then mixes it with in game navdata
well im on approach to lgw just had a runway switch
IL2 sale on
anyone know why the 737ng levelup has no pa announcements
I think CIVA and GPS
they're planning on their own FMC later ™️
I geniunely want to do EasyJem now
I'd kill for a good 73CL 
I often check if the IXEG is on discount but it never is either 😭
why 85USD
I would too 😭
(My lawyer advised me to say it is a joke)
ah yes thanks for the reminder, mine was also purely a comedic line that doesn't reflect my real desires and feelings
Anyone have a working 737 ng for xp 11 with cabin announcements?
Wait in xp you can have cabin announcements?
omg the max 7 rockets
is that the WW max or whatever?
its kind of funny how my top two worst landings ever have been british airways
that 787 landing was probably enough to bend the fuselage
Everyone has a bad day occasionally
I did today for Petersburg. The previous 2 times I nailed it. This time it was a roller coaster and I had to go around (athough didn't have time so just ended the flight there)
Chronic Back Pain ☠️
good ryanair landing though
I think I got the full experience, if I didn't tail strike, I got really close 😛
Hahah that happens xD
Just make sure to hope your plane doesn’t fall apart mid-air then
I expect it’s gonna be something similar for me once I get the 739 lol
I have never tailstriked before
Uuuuuuggghhhhh when is someone gonna make an A340 🥲😭
I get hard landings, but I’ve never had a tail strike, the only time I’ve had a major issue on takeoff was when I was doing an aer lingus flight in the fenix and got blown off the runway
LVFR xD
Don't u even dare ☠️
- Boom Reddit AMA
Whats the context
Boom CEO does Reddit AMA basically saying that they might release there sim model for the sim
Matlab dear god
wallop and a million
the landing traffic did, but the SUP contacted me first, thinking it was me 
norffolk southern whats ur functionnn 🎵

Boom is destined to fail I don't get why they even bother trying 😭
I had someone do a runway flyby in an AN225 going the opposite direction just as I was lining up at Gatwick. 😭☠️
it turns out im slow
i cant even get my own hyperfixations right
USA was only used up until 2008, AWE was used 2008-2015, and im 99% sure that will be in BATC






