#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages Ā· Page 14 of 1
airport charts?
and in general, seeing procedures
Airport, SIDs, STARs, etc..
Either Navigraph, or a free service like Chartfox
i know theres a addon which adds them
if you fail to understand most will type in freq text after a few tries
Yeah, last time I flew in south korea I was struggling to understand the ground controller and he typed a few things in chat
it's fine, unless it's busy
knowing terms like abeam and knowing how put your aircraft on a hold (which you can usually predict when you will and where on charts)
yeah thats another point don't fly into a event on your first flight
(i totally didnt do this)
these crt screen flickers make me COOM
Tbh Iām just too scared to join VatSim ngl
Like, considering I can mess up a lot of stuff
I get that, I think the first few tries I was shaking and my friend had to calm me down on VC 
Also consider that literally nobody covers Alaska lol
its okay tho vatsim, i used it for a month or so and then I've sorta just not bothered
my use case of the sim is usually flying where I want on a whim, so having to mental gymnastics for atc coverage is exhausting a lot of times i'd get to the destination only for atc to log off and some 13y/o is descending 2 miles behind me to then spice me on the ils forcing me to go around
sometimes unicom can be great, other times its... eh 
yeah.. on a normal day its basically western europe and sporadic east and west coast usa stuff
Like, Iāve occasionally seen Anchorage approach be marked on Volanta. Not much else
And I think half of the airports I fly to donāt even have proper ATC coverage
Like, Sitka doesnāt even have a tower frequency for example

Why pmdg stairs
CUZ IDK HOW TO change them
I donāt use anything for ground equipment either, just standard PMDG
I donāt really care about it that much
There are tutorials on youtube
same tbh
Don't you have gsx?
I donāt tbh
me neither
I just donāt really care considering that my goal always is to get into the air as quick as possible
Like, in a small airport, if Iām not distracted, Iām gonna have 5 minutes from loading in to takeoff
Ooh lovely
Noice
Also this is noice too
The only thing that puts me off a bit is the price, itās ā¬100 for the maddogs. But at some point I will get them
A long time ago I won a ā¬30 something gift card for Simmarket and with enough mental gymnastics I managed to convince myself I was only paying ā¬60 for the plane
it's really good, but it's extremely overpriced
but in terms of systems and FM it's no worse than PMDG or Fenix
I actually think the FM is one of the best in the sim
To be fully fair itās ā¬100 for 3 variants. PMDG charge $75 for one. But at the same time the MD is ā¬75 for oneā¦
it's not...
it's just the MD-82
the other 2 variants are ā¬35
oh yeah maybe
The maddog is genuinely my favorite overall plane in the sim
It's overpriced compared to the pmdg 73s and Fenix but imo is better than either of them (except the sounds, but there's a decent soundmod)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRy0X4GKg8E
Genuinely gorgeous details on this
On our first episode of Blackbird Simulations' Developer Diaries, we give you a virtual tour of our upcoming SR71's cockpit & model.
Stay tuned for future developer diaries on the SR71 & more!
To learn more about Blackbird Simulations, visit: https://blackbirdsims.com/flight/
š±: Follow us on Twit...
Looks very nice
Can't wait to see ppl flying at FL800 š
Passing concordes like it's nothing
The fact you think that makes you better than about 90% of vatsim pilots
Try a first wings event
They are specifically made for people new to vatsim with controllers who are more than understanding
Also do it in a plane you can actually fly
thats a thing???
this whole time i was TERRIFIED to try out vatsim, pretty much a no-go
i think i want to practice some more with beyondATC though, and i still cant turn on traffic in MSFS
i had to uninstall MSFS from my laptop, it was eating up the 2TB very rapidly, and im eventually going to get a newer, larger, faster drive thatll be more capable of running it 
xD
Yeah thatās bit on the opposite side xD
727F is out
Thereās a bunch of videos already. From what I watched, itās quite damn nice
Btw it costs ā¬33.57, which is quite nice to be fair
Tbh just a shame with the 72 that theyāre not planning to do the -100
imo only the E-Jets had a rough start, their Tecnams are good and I think this is the same team as those
Yeah iirc this is completely separate from the E-Jets
I've flow the ini A320 ONCE Just to help out a friend of mine that was struggling with it and HOLY CRAP it's HORRIBLE
I genuinely prefer the Default FSX A321
The flight model and FBW are terrible
I don't understand how people fly it
The only way to enjoy that ""plane"" is to put the A/P on at 20ft and disconnect it after ROLLOUT
Just use the FBW...
oh the 727 released
Urgh, Aerosoft...it's not being sold at other places?
I just dislike the concept of āearly accessā for a plane
Like im fine with it missing advanced features (e.g failures) but cmon
The very basics, FMC, VNAV/LNAV should be there
Especially considering their steep price and only selling 1(!) at a time insread of together
The DCS way of doing business
I especially dislike that it's apparently not gonna be a feature until the new sim at least
If the fmc causes you this much trouble then develop planes without (which luckily they seem to have taken to heart)
I'm waiting till the lnav/vnav gets added before i bother reinstalling it
Yeah same
It's a shame, everything else with the plane is decent, but a modern tube is nothing without its computers
It has LNAV and has for ages, it's VNAV that is missing
imo it's perfectly flyable without it, just gotta use lvl chg a fair bit
It still uses default lnav though right? So you're fucked if you're trying to fly stars on vatsim
pretty sure its default yeah
with a simple TOD calculation and a bit of watching your plane on the STAR/SIDs to make sure you're following the restrictions its flyable ig
but basically this
its getting good tho i agree
Indeed, it actually released very early today
It was early morning genuinely
Iām gonna probably buy it bit later
But it do be looking good
I just hope it handles fine on keyboard
(I need to get some controller finally)
Is it bad? I've got no experience with them
noooooooooooooooo
I've commited the cardinal sin
I can't believe it
I landed on 15 instead of 19 in DCA
I even thought about it beforehand, and was about to go around and for some reason I thought "oh no, it's fine"
whyyyyyyy am I like this
yeah
On the wrong runway
see, when you do the river visual this is the picture you have
yes
so I did the red thing in stead of the green one
I'm so disappointed in myself
I know it's a fairly common mistake, but come on... I should have known better
To be honest if youāre trying to follow the river, after that bend it could be quite intuitive to go for 15, cause you have runway in sight, approach lights and all
yep
Thatās why I usually just go for ILS xD
Although flying the river visual for LGA was fun
I also had a good lesson in confirmation bias, as I checked my heading around this point (which I've marked in orange) to double check I wasn't going for 15, but because I was pointed more to the right of course I was more around a 170° course, so just because it fitted my mental model better I just decided "oh it's fine", but of course it wasn't because I would have needed the left turn later
Well of course, confirmation bias can play a big role
Those are the moments were you really feel the lack of a pilot monitoring
I mean, pilots irl have landed on wrong runways because of it
yep
but it's always very humbling when you fall in the same "psychological trap" that you think you understand and try to avoid
but all it takes is a slightly higher workload and a stressful situation and all of that goes out the window
oh well... good thing this wasn't real life I guess... š
I expect in reality landing on a wrong runway once, as long as it hasnāt caused anything serious, will probably just get you an angry talk and a slap on the wrist. Especially in such situations where itās an easy mistake to make
Easily avoided if you have charts up on your 2nd monitor
sad thing is, I had š„²
Ah
yeah, there's really no excuse
I just love the airports with TAXI in massive letters on the taxiway, you always know someone done fucked up
Then unfortunately I must declare this a āskill issueā
Someone landed there
Still not as bad as landing at an entirely different airport lol
If you do the LROP approach and look at the references there is a big page saying ādonāt land at banesa you dimwitā
I still donāt understand how that would even be possible ššš
Thatās why I love airports with 1 runway, no mistakes to make xD
If you aināt landing on the runway at Sitka, then you aināt landing in Sitka
Honestly though with the river visual, it's insanely high workload so (especially if it's your first time doing the procedure) I think it's a fair enough mistake to makd
Which one of Portlands
I think what would have definitely prevented it (and something I'll always do from now on) is if I would have bothered to align the CRS with RWY Heading I would have had a clear and impossible to misinterpret visual cue that it was the wrong runway
Ah, so Portland, ME
Yup
Lobster one
Love watching the jets come in over the harbor
(Obviously I know which one when Doc says āThe good oneā)
I think also running xp default scenery makes this 5x harder
yeah, it definitely doesn't help ahahah
but still a big skill issue š
I'm so annoyed I did that uff...
I haven't made a big mistake like this in a long time
Ah come on, itās fine
At least you didn't go into one of the prohibited areas
You landed at the correct airport after all
ahahah yeah true
Yeah, I got lucky there wasn't much traffic as well
True, aināt there a fair bit over DC?
And it's the 732, the river visual is hard enough in the 73ng, it's even harder when you're fully /w
Yep, just to the left of the river
I think the first time I tried to do the 4 stack visual into KBUR I lined up with the wrong airport the first time, at least I recognized it and went around that time š
Try it in a dc3
At least there you're slow
I just opened a chart for Portlandās harbor visual and⦠I donāt like what I see. Probably fun to fly though
With tower online?
Separation to maintain?
I did this for one of the blossom events last year I think
Honestly though, I think it's fair enough to take a mulligan for your first attempt at the harbor and (especially) the river visual, though perhaps it's best to do that offline š
Cherry blossom something?
Ah yeah, that'd be hard
Nah, best to do it on Vatsim actually to have the ATC yell ā(Your callsign) where the fuck are you going?!ā
"Possible pilot deviation, please take down this number"
Flew in from I think KIND and got - 900 something FPM because I was doing about 120 knots 
Got cleared for below 140knts at about 3 miles
Yikes
Seriously though, āNoise sensitive areaā why should I care š
I think itās more to do with the big us government building with Sam sites on the top
True 
Pentagon, Capitol and the naval observatory all have p areas
I might actually fly out of DCA next year
Planning a US trip before the acelas fuck off for good
Dunno if the observatory has sams, but the others do
I would be surprised if they all donāt
Yeah but what is there in Portland. The chart literally just says ānoise sensitive areaā.
The lobsters shit themselves if they hear a 319
Itās just nimbys
Well no
There is nimbyism and then there is living under the direct flight path of big jets
Well true
I live at about 10dme under Heathrow 27
Quite
Even here when they are at 3500 itās really quite loud
Tbh I wouldnāt really like hearing jets all night long, so itās fair
We also get city 09 at about 7ish dme just before they make the turn for the ILS and they are really loud
Even little ejets and q400ās
So noise abatement I can understand
Even if it does seem really stupid
My secondary homeās quite close to Vnukovo, and I assume under one of the STARs cause planes often pass right above the area when inbound for the airport. And hell, I can still easily hear triples even when they pass the area at like 10k
Iām writing this just as a Sri Lankan 333 just flew over
I'm right under the flightpath of lifeflight helos as they decend towards the hospital, I've gotten used to it but I can very much see how it can be a real bother
(Which I'm sure is just giving @uneven fern more evidence to doxx me)
I mean I have pretty much given my location away fairly well here 
True lol
I work for an airline so planes donāt bother me
737 taxiing into stand while your stood on the apron with no ear protection is quite bad for you
I can imagine
Yeah, sounds like very fucking loud
My office is right near the end of the runway, and while the building itself is very well insulated, when you're outside it it gets very loud, and that's a good couple hundred feet away
A lot of airports have closures at stupid hours
In Europe especially even when it isnāt mandated they usually donāt have arrivals past midnight
For London Stansted is about the only one that doesnāt do this and thatās because there is fuck all around it
On the subject of closures, a SWA plane ignored the notams (and atc telling them they weren't clear) and took off something like 20 seconds after a construction vehicle left the runway at pwm about a month back
The pilot got into trouble surely
SWA is a special airline
Yeah it's under investigation, I doubt the pilot will enjoy the results
We keep having crew get stranded after overnights because they donāt have there BRCās with them (British residence cards) for people on non eu visas
Ryanair is in a state
Incredible
We also have a smaller scheduling department than Icelandair Iāve just found out
Thatās why everything is so fucked
Usually
Ryanair's got like 10 times the fleet and number of destinations, that's nuts
We have 598 aircraft atm compared to the 45 of icelandair
Yeah that's not gonna go well...
That number is gonna increase by about 150 ish in the next 3 years as well
Max10 coming in and the catchup of max8200 orders
I'm sure everyone here will enjoy watching you systematically target every IKEA in the world that's near an airport
Best part of flight sim is planning the whole flight yourself because you don't like what SimBrief gives
It is the way
Also I've been flying the 737 for half a year now and I did not know until now that there was another style of the MCP...
Honestly manually planning flights is super fun. It's just rather boring when it's flights with rnav
Yeah
I loved every second of planning what I do with the Fokker
Gotta make sure the points I use all have VOR and they are close enough to use it, cause otherwise, I'll get lost right after the takeoff from Miami and crash somewhere in the Pacific not far off the coast of Australia
Anyway, gonna now take off from Newark and head to Portland to just do the visual
(It's gonna be a pain without detailed scenery, and my internet can't handle it)
I'll make sure to wave lol
I'll wave back... probably... idk where you are... 
(You can imagine me flying the whole approach while waving at the screen)
I just spent a bunch of time planning cause SimBrief decided it's a good idea to fly literally half of the distance just direct to the destination airport. That ain't fun, plus that would've put me in a questionable position to do the visual
That's quite a flight
sorry, I didn't mean to delete everything.
Yeah I'm waiting for ini to fix the Beluga autothrottle to fly that
it's when they flew the Beluga to Baikonur cosmodrome
Oh, didn't know that happened
(this)
yeah, IIRC a satellite? I'll try and see if I can find it
"Airbus had previously used one of its Belugas nearly two decades ago to ferry a satellite to the Baikonur cosmodrome."
Was quite a while ago
yeah, I think it still had the old livery
it was this satellite
https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/eutelsat-w3a.htm (Eutelsat W3A)
I can't find a photo of it unfortunately
Well yeah it's probably not the most photographed thing
you'd be surprised, there's a very cool and forgotten site full of photos of when it went to north europe for another space related thing
I'm trying to find it again
Well no I meant the satellite
Beluga is of course a very photographed thing lol
Any avgeek that can take a pic of it, will 
anyway, found it
finding out random stuff like this is one of my favourite things about flight simulation ahahah
it's a great excuse to look for information and other random stuff you would never think about searching
For me the favourite thing is probably "So... you just... sit for hours?"
ahahah yeah
Same thing as with train simulation lol
Meanwhile I started the descent
(Doc, start looking out of the window, youāll see me!)
(What youāll see is probably me failing to land btw and resorting to ILS)
Honestly that's fairly understandable if it happens, it's really easy to be too high and fast, it feels like you're further from the airport than you actually are
It already kinda happened
But for all the wrong reasons
Iām still gonna do the visual
But I was too busy chatting on Discord so I am 0 flaps, gear up already over water
Itās easy to get distracted when there are things distracting you
Messed up the second attempt as well, was way off the centreline 
Welp, I landed
It was quite smooth
Everything else was quite bad 
somewhere near Hawaii
This is funny and sad at the same time. In one word: laughable. I think I'll stick to other approaches for now
The landing btw was -106fpm with 0.98G, cause Volanta didnāt wanna load the stats
lets go 
i honestly didnt even know KPIT had a freight apron
let alone took in freight flights, especially amazon/sun country
idk but the ATC for me pushback tug just stopped working
no idea what happened
nice
for some reason its saying theres no destination path after abbot
even though there is
thank you boeing
Press Y
wtf stupid button
lost so much fuel cuz i needed to do the take off again cuz of the slew mode button
It shows you the path there all correctly
You can see that there is the path on the screen
If it didnāt recognise the path after the waypoint, itād first of all show route discontinuity and also on the screen the path would just end at the waypoint
ik
but the route is completely correct
its just that the MCDU kept telling me that no dest path was set
Weird
Basically, give it more time to descend pretty much
yummy terminal building 
You can't park there mate
Itās our new drop off service. You skip the jet bridges / walking and take you directly to your car
Not yet, folks seem to not want to get it off Aerosoft store so I take it as advice lol
Yeah, thatās one reason why Iām holding off
I'm happy with the Xplane one for the time being. I might buy the 737MAX or the RJ first
general aviation continues to elude me
you are so low, so slow, and so small, and you get thrown around a TON because of all 3
the rules are completely different too
It takes a bit of an adjustment in mindset to do vfr on vatsim, but it's incredibly rewarding
Alot of controllers dont know how to deal with VFR lol
I've had good luck in both California centers and Boston, can't speak for the other centers
im terrified to do VATSIM, let alone VATSIM and VFR
I've seen people say this for years, but never seen any actual evidence of this
When I was doing ARC training VFR stuff was also in the first lessons
At both ARTCCS I started at
Also you should be starting with slow GA and VFR before you ever touch IFR, let alone tubes
There's a reason they do it that way IRL too
I genuinely don't understand the fear of GA and VFR in the flight sim community
I get that for people who's main interest is tubes it seems unnecessary, but ga ifr is so much easier to start with than tubes, everything's just so much less hurried and you're a lot less likely to get task saturated
On the other hand if you want to get task saturated then taking the f28 into zla is a good shout 
London Centre at 8pm on a Friday
Try that
I only really got into flight simming in 2020 during the pandemic with only a very basic understanding of aviation. Using the stock 152, flying VFR in regions I know from IRL was a great way to learn the ropes.
Later I practiced IFR procedures with the analog instruments, flying VOR based routes, learning how to fly ILS approaches etc. When I frlt confident translating those skills to more complex planes and later tubeliners was quite easy. Even today where I mostly fly airliners when time permits, I occasionally like to fly something like the DA-42 in VFR.
Just like flying /A, it's fine in the US, in Europe it depends on what controller you meet and in what country you're flying.
Germany is most likely going to be fine, the rest, it depends on the individual controller.
I donāt think I flown VFR pretty much at all lol
Closest was the 2 visual approaches Iāve done, but both were backed by instruments after all too.
Also donāt even remember when was the last time Iāve flown with any ATC at all
never do much of it either but one time at Edinburgh two props were doing circuits likely friends of the controller and watched them takeoff ahead of me, whilst following my SID I got to see them land too 
big fan of VFR traffic on vatsim
and adds a bit more for you to do as you have to acknowledge local traffic ect
Iā never done vatsim
Honestly the most fun I had on vatsim was going into a big zla event vfr in the Comanche, flitting around watching the big tubes come and go was very fun, and the controllers were incredibly accommodating
Messing around with transit routes through bravo airspace is also a lot of fun (though not something I'd recommend for a a first flight)
Got a bit of a different view of this airport today. I'm sure someone here will recognise it.
yep! passed over the end of 25 at about 2200 feet
super easy to get VFR clearance across
The fact that Jem already makes EasyJem jokes as well means that someone who knows how to here might need to take one of the EasyJet liveries and make a special edition for Jem that would instead say EasyJem on the plane
New plane to learn, because FlightSimLabs is too slow with their CONC
Lovely thing
Chinook is finally here
Chinook maybe here but onretech just pulled apart the top half of there map
Yeah, I saw that. They were already fairly unpopular for not bothering with a patch for over a year since releasing their map, but to then delete half of a country without any word of warning? Ridiculous.
Gorgeous shots, really need to fly the Tiffy more.
Yea paid for something to get taken away, Problem is this is not a Razbam situation, I bet 100% war in the region hence why they removed it to stop people making dcs vids to real world
Now if they came out and said that fine it can be re added but without warning is a pisstake
ED are creating a rod for there own back also
I've not been keeping up to date with everything they've been up to, but from what i've seen, player discontent is the worst it's ever been
I was initially planning on taking a break for 6-12 months, but I'm becoming less and less inclined to bother re-installing it at this point
Im not even buying anything ED anymore
Gorgeous, or you could say, Georgeous
Which map?
Yeah its been similar for me, it's a shame as the phantom and kiowa look incredible but the whole razbam thing makes me incredibly hesitant to buy anything third party in case ED stiffs another dev
Just caught light of the sao paulo flat spin crash 
seems to be caused by an icing issue, which the ATRs and by extension twin props are prominent to have. very sad
@echo gorge sinai map removed the top part ive requested refund
Ah, yeah I can both understand why they did it, but also completely understand how it's kind of an integral part of the map
Really??
Due to urga media map dispute
makes me wanna reinstall P3D just for the Concorde
Doesn't losing the top part mean you've lost all idf bases?
While I've very little interest playing as (or even against) them rn, losing them seems fatal to the map's concept
Correct been like it for a year and now urga complain
did my first flight š
I need to understand how to do navigation, I just relied on navigraph and turning š
To be fair Iām pretty sure pilots in those wouldnāt have to worry about understanding navigation irl
There likely wouldāve been another person responsible for just the navigation
I am not sure because I donāt know specifically about the 144, but many Soviet planes were like that
I mean, I guess? But I think everyone in the cockpit had to know at least a bit of what other people were doing?
It has its own INS system which seems complicated, which I managed to sort of get it working, but the points didn't seem to be where they were supposed to, now I need to figure out if it's because FSX is old, so that introduces some errors when doing a flightplan using modern Navigraph, or if (most likely) I did something wrong
I'll translate the manual and I'll read it while I'm on vacation later this week
Everyone in the flight crew would understand all that stuff
It's a requirement to work together in an environment like that
Oh I assume the manual is all in Russian
Yeah, I'll pass it through DeepL
and hope it doesn't get destroyed because it's not "proper" writing (like the Tu-134 ones š„² )
I also discovered there's a decent free IL-86 for FSX, which is nice
If it does get destroyed and you need any help, can always ask lol
Yeah, the Russian scene for FSX seems quite alright. Nothing like it for MSFS though, only converts
nice, I think now that I have the Tu-144 (a good plane for FSX that isn't coming for MSFS) I'll see how much I'll use FSX, if it's enough I might think about the IL-86
using FSX is going to be a little bit of a pain on VATSIM because the airports don't line up too well, so they'll see me taxing and parking randomly, or even not properly lined up on the ILS
It was never a problem with the Mercure, but apart from the time I flew from Heathrow I was always in unicom, or in airspace with very little traffic
Canāt you add remarks to your flight on Vatsim that the ATCs will see? Might add a warning for that like āFlying FSX, may not show up correctly on the softwareā idk
Just to make sure they donāt āWhat the hell are you doingā you
Nobody tried the DCS Chinook?
It's a shame, I'd love to fly some Tupolevs or Ilyushins but the market just doesn't seem to be there.
True
I think thereās a fair bit in XPlane?
But indeed, for MSFS it seems like we wonāt see much
Partly because the market is likely smaller than for Boeings and Airbuses, and likely also partly because gathering information for the development of any Soviet/Russian planes would be much more complicated
who's 175 is that?
Figured I'd check out Stapleford in the sim after checking it out in real life...
Signage is all pretty accurate to real life, including the "members only" sign on the cafe that isn't actually true (I recommend the english breakfast if you're ever there in real life)
man rdr is going insane
very busy ground at manchester
- Request clearance in a 742
- "How the fuck have you got a 742 in msfs" says some MSFS child
- the controller starts pissing himself laughing
MSFS has had a horrible affect on vatsim 
I wouldn't go near that airspace
its amazing
all the controllers want to kill themselves so i just give them some love on handoff
try and make them laugh
ahah fair enough
considering how bad UK airspace usually is I can't even imagine what's going on now 
yeah
there are like 22 london controllers online atm
so there is a lot of sectorisation
Although I'm tempted to fly the Mercure from Heathrow to Paris, but I don't think that's going to happen
No š
yep
don't do that
they have enough going on to be dealing with a non rnav capable aircraft
I think if I find a decent livery I'll just do 2 short hops with the AF 737-200 (flying with the FMC)
But I'll think about departing from the UK
it's just that... eugh
ryanair out of stansted
like edi and back
or even eindhoven
stansted is quite quiet atm
Guessing LCY is a no-go in case I change my mind and want to fly the 146
then it's going to be a nightmare getting a clearance
one of the quiet ones
nah
i tried it earlier before a sim crash
was fine
heathrow gatwick manchester are the only real no go zones
edi will get bad soon
omg
I don't really have any ideas of why to fly unfortunately 
in the UK that is
thats what i have been saying
people keep disagreeing
Thames Director is online, so LC is ok lol
maybe?
its kinda rnav
its better than vor 
I was tempted to do CIVA on this flight but had a look at the traffic and said fuck that
LeoFS is also a good option
That the 72?
742
Because a lot of UK controllers disconnected I decided to fly in France š
h c e a13
Ah
Oh shit ššš
Yeah discord as a scratchpad sometimes backfires like this
I use vpilot and sometimes I forget to switch back to "notes" and write this stuff in DM to random controllers that sent a contact me ahahahha
Controllers in response be like āNegative sir I did not give you that clearanceā
ahahaahahahhaah that happened once
I wrote the wrong altitude (but i sent the correct one in the MCP anyway, as it happens sometimes) and the guy told me on frequency the correct altitude ahahah
Honestly once I start flying with ATC Iāll probably just have a real notepad or something to just really write it down
yeah I started like that as well
I went the opposite way
I started with my phone, then went to my iPad, and then went to paper and pen
Graphics tablet (wacom intuos) for me, as it works in VR
Ffffuuuck.
prebought the chinook
only seen negatives about it
@untold finch @mortal furnace u both play dcs as well what's ur take on it if u own it?
no flight assists is a huge bummer to me
I've not had DCS installed since mid-June
I've not heard good things about the Chinook though
people in dcs are all real life pilots, So they will have negative comments because it should fly a CERTAIN way, Or the fact its study sim and cant be botherred to study the module, Im a little annoyed with Razbam and ED as the F15E is my go to, Id say make your own mind up
From what I can tell the general consensus is that the systems are decent, but unfinished, the flight model is ok (but weird in certain regimes) and visuals are good? I guess?
guess i'll install it and see for myself
doubt i'll see a kiowa type of helo for now tho 
f15e is a sad sad situation
its the one thing i was looking forward to the chonk but ill wait til its more complete
Yeah, DCS aircraft are usually very pretty visually. The terrain is a bit hit-and-miss though.
I literally couldn't care less about it
terrain has to be a balance between flying low and flying high
I already have PG and Syria, I don't need another middle east desert-y map
it's the place most (modern day) action has been in for the past yr
I've been playing Steel Beasts Pro lately - that terrain is very dated but you just stop noticing after a while
i have never heard of that thus far
yea Afgan map is ok
might be the next buy
it's DCS but for tanks and IFVs
and it's made by a nice german company who treat their customers with respect š
then again people complain because theres no sea š¤£
bruh ur joking š
For me generally I've started to notice that graphics in general don't really matter, or rather, it's never "oh this looks bad" when I play FSX, but rather "oh this is nice" when playing MSFS ahahah
I think as long as the game looks as good as FSX my brain just goes in "it's good enough" mode and focuses on other things
great ocean we got going in afghanistan
shitty dcs being unrealistic per usual
i will never understand the community
Huh?
I think the point that people were making is that they wanted ED to extend the map down to the Indian ocean
Otherwise carrier folks have nothing to do on the map
But it's already a fairly massive map iirc
they do tho take off from land š¤£
Did the USN ever forward-deploy in Afghanistan? I don't remember really
bruh afghanistan is massive as it is
wtf
i'm almost certain it'll be bigger than syria right?
easy
it's the third biggest map in the game iirc
well not every map will have ocean š
behind Kola and South Atlantic
from what i've heard it's slowly getting better
but it's definitely a WIP
if i can be bothered to buy a new NVMe drive I will probably take a look at the state of things early next year
gonna install chinook later and give it a try ig
if anything you want more RAM and more VRAM
I have plenty of both, I just have no storage space left
MSFS has taken up loads of it
yea thats my issue as well
i actually like the tonka in msfs
yeah, i'm a big fan
IFE's F-35 has come a long way too
especially with the new sounds
ill be honest ive found it hard to get into the civi stuff
i can take off easy
but landing i suck ass
i have heard of it
The Vulcan is awesome
I did a full VOR->VOR flight from Oslo to Scampton, really enjoyable flight
Experience the thrill of flying in The Mighty Eighth VR game! Watch this gameplay teaser featuring the B17G Bomber, driving a Willys Jeep, and taking flight in this immersive VR experience. Get a first look at the exciting gameplay in this teaser video!
We finally get to see gameplay of the B17 and see how it looks from the inside. How the inte...
ya
Welcome the second of our Dev Blog series for āThe Mighty 8th VRā.
Today we are happy to share with you further work in progress.
Wishlist it today.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1325580/The_Mighty_Eighth_VR/
i really hope this is everything i want eit to be
I'm not a massive IL-2 guy either but I've gotta say their upcoming Korea plans look good
oh 100%
i only play cliffs of dover
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
thats another game id like to see brought upto date
that, plus theyre bringing the B-17 to MSFS later on
ive fucking LOVE the original mighty 8th
yea i have it
dcs b17 pls
i had it on disc to
theyve been working on a modern sequel, the bloody 100th
there doing a dcs lancaster @trim harbor
yea for now but i think they want it full module
that'd be dope
B-17 The Flying Fortress: The Bloody 100th, is the third game in the critically acclaimed series. The game recreates many of the aspects of the real-life struggles that WWII allied bomber crews faced. From the briefings to landings players will face the arduous, nerve-wracking challenge of delivering payloads deep behind enemy lines against near...
Coming soon
i suck at flying them, but god damn i love the B-17
now imagine that in coop
wait it is?
yea
i think bloody 100th is VR multi player and mighty 8th vr is single player but dont qoute me on it
i just know one of them is MP
the bloody 100th is also non-vr, im not sure if the mighty 8th remake is non-vr
this one ^ being non-vr, its the mighty 8th in whatever engine theyre making the bloody 100th in, but im not sure if thatll have a non-vr version
i forgot the redux one exists, ive only played the original release
same
Is that steel beasts or ghpc?
I love IVAO. Greatest game ever made
Vod: https://youtu.be/6lclJrE3_Es
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/Gloudas
2nd Channel: http://bit.ly/dougdoug2
DougDoug Clips TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@dougdougclips_
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DougDougFood
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/dougdoug
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/douglas-...
I want a twitch chat controlled plane on VATSIM
https://stormbirds.blog/2024/08/11/first-impressions-dcs-ch-47f/
Stormbirds did a good and thorough first impressions post about it. His TL,DR is: Good basics but rough around the edges and underdeveloped in many areas.
Yeha as I feared
Pretty sure you could do that relatively easily with a program like Spad.Next?
thinking about finally buying a collective - albeit undecided which ones the best
virpil seems to be quite good though pricey
Heās done it before in GTA V, so itās possible
We gave Twitch Chat full control of an airplane in GTA V - here are the results.
Streaming live on Twitch! https://www.twitch.tv/dougdoug
2ND CHANNEL: http://bit.ly/dougdoug2
TWITTER: https://bit.ly/DougTwit
Thank you to my friend Cleo for the amazing voiceover! https://twitter.com/yourgothwidow
NEWS SOURCES:
The following news sources and im...
w
the pic of all 3 is awesome
G-SMOL and G-FBIG lol
i was hoping theyd do g-long
cant even get into dcs anymore
bruh
loading the chinook up just straight up crashes my gpu
The Virpil one is quality though
loaded up flight sim for the first time in a few weeks
game just hangs on loading after pressing fly and I cba to reinstall 
For sure, just the question if itās worth it
Over $500 for just a collective is steep
Happens sometimes for me too, but usually works after restarting the game
was watching a community managers stream last night and seems to have been a server problemo
I appreciate that this may seem like it has snuck up on you all, but we really wanted to get the product out into your hands as soon as it was ready without a protracted marketing cycle - for that reason, this will be the last pre-release marketing post. The A319 & A321 Expansion will launch next week.
from recent fenix
next week!!!!
The A319 & A321 Expansion will launch next week.
time to reinstall msfs then
for the fenix?
ew
Alright
will eventually for free
My fictious Tu-144 link with the US Weast Coast (cold war never happened and the Tu-144 is actually not a terrible aircraft, and possibly a million other assumptions that would mean this actually doesn't make any sense
) is complete š
Krasnoyarsk - Vladivostok - Anchorage - San Francisco?
Yes š
It was a good way to learn the aircraft
(also no way I'd just do Moscow-Almaty and back)
Certainly. I probably would've failed on Anchorage landing
Actually that was the least worse one
Really? Better than KSFO?
Yeah, much better, not sure why, probably just because I'm still a bit hopeless, it's really hard to do "terminal" navigation with this
below 600/700 km/h is a brick
(like Concorde I guess) š
Also, my yesterday's flight, PAJN - PANC, which you can probably noticed ended not even half way to Anchorage
yeah? What happened?
Was an engine failure. Or, well, engine fire actually.
(Which I totally haven't turned on myself specifically for this flight because I wanted something like that)
ooh interesting š
I definitely would like to play around with failures in the future, never gotten around to it yet
Also I was quite surprised by 73's performance with 1 engine. I expected less. It could very well climb, autopilot worked flawlessly (obviously without autothrottle)
Obviously it wasn't a good landing, but it was a one-engine landing that was not a crash
Ended up being -615fpm with 1.25G at 170 knots
nice, and yeah, most twin engined modern planes can fly (more or less) comfortably with one engine out, I think you' d have some speed/altitude limitations and you'd obviously burn more fuel, but it shouldn't be a huge deal
(unless you shut down the good engine)
not too bad considering the situation š
Well, wouldn't you actually burn less fuel, cause one of the engines is shut down? You'd burn more fuel on the other engine compared to what it normally does cause you push it for more thrust, but you would probably still burn less fuel than normally on 2 engines
Oh yeah sorry, I should have worded that better, you'll have overall less range
Ngl I'm waiting for FSS 727 passenger now, to fly Alaska as well. Alaska didn't have 722 freighters I believe
definitely
pax variant is a lot more interesting to me as well
I'll definitely get it sooner or later, for now there are too many other planes to buy and I'm still happy with the FJS
Yeah, I pretty much don't fly freight at all
Yeah, that's understable
Indeed, for now there are just other priorities
I just got the 77W too
So the 722 is for later
I think I'll get the 319/320 (hoping I'll end up flying them more than the 320 itself)
I just want the BEA livery
G-EUPJ my beloved ā¤ļø
I also hope that with the 72, FSS change their mind and end up doing 721s as well
BEA was such an interesting airline with a fascinating story, I'm a bit sad the first aircraft that will have their livery is just going to be a heritage BA 319, instead of a Trident or a BAC 1-11, but oh well
ahahaha yes
-# smol 727
Either of the 2 would be so fire ngl
I really hope they at least do the Comet as a local legend or whatever
Also, can we for once get 73 Classics... it's criminal we have none. I want the combi...
Oh yeah, comet would very well be a good fit for something like that
Hopefully Fenix is actually doing it
I think the conspiracy is staring to spread
I hope it's real
Which conspiracy?
That Fenix is making a 73CL
That would be interesting
And I sure hope it's real
Though hopefully if they do, it performs better than the A320, cause I heard that one is quite very heavy
For now I think a Fenix 73CL is actually surprisingly possible (not probable), but I also really really hope that PMDG is going to do an L-1011
Oh an L-1011 would be a dream come true
I think it's gotten better, but yeah, it's still quite heavy.
But it's easily the best addon in the sim
my favourite plane ā¤ļø
please make it
Definitely
It's won't be the best addon for long if they do make the 73Classic xD
ahahaha true
Ideally I'd ask for 734 to be the first in the lineup, while 733 and 735 can be added bit later like with the A319/A321
Yeah that would definitely be the best way to do it
and also there was way less differences between the 73 variants compared to the 320 family
It's a small flight but I had to pause and leave for an hour, so now I'm back and it's no longer night
Agreed šÆ
Descending into Kodiak now
Lovely airport
Also hope that the weather isn't bad. It shouldn't be cause irl it's quite nice there right now, but I find MSFS weather often being wrong...
my excitement is unmeasurable 
I was already planning to do 2 732 flights today, I can't also fly the 319. Guess I'll wait until tomorrow
How much are they
Dunno yet
I think it's likely to be around the same sort of price as the 320 if not a bit lower
For both?
Thats a STEAL
great value
sharklets will be free also
someone found an image of them
not sure if i'll fly the 319 or 321 first
319 for EZY or 321 for BAW
wait when is it dropping
319/321 today, Sharklets in the future
the 319/321 is on the installer but not avail for purchase yet
I saw an EZY 319 taking off on my drive to work today, so that settles that for me
Want that SR-71 to come out though, I need to blast out of Mildenhall toward Moscow
It's been a good year for MSFS
and we're not even done
Hmm
I knew it wasn't just me
I'll have to give a flight a go and if it is fixed I'll definitely pick up the 319 and 321
ooo
aye its out
do i want for max or get 321 is the question
difficult since i feel like the max is gonna release within a month
I feel like the A319 is more useful
Used all over the place
A321 is barely used in comparison, too many neos now
not interested in it
not even any updates for the A320 too? just the 319 and 321?
ill have to buy it eventually, because a majority of US airlines use the 321 rather than the 320, but not until i get a new PC
p sure there were some updates for the 320
Yes, there was a large set of updates for the A320.
Anyone done a flight yet, how does it feel on landing?
what version? im on v2.0.0.407
how do i update it? do i re-download from their website?
they dont give any notification about their products whatsoever
that really kind of annoys me
they do on the discord iirc
that server was horrible, it was like the trainz discord
everyone has a "mightier than thou" attitude
no actual product assistance, only a pissing match
Have fun with the smol and big version of the 320 folks
thank you 
planning on a Luton edinburgh hop and back in the 319, whether I do it tonight or tmrw is a mystery
max fosh is the british person of all time
Inaugural flight went well š
Guyās doing all the sidequests of real life
With easyJet?
(Idk any other operator which has 319s
)
of course :)
in terms of EU i think its EZY, BAW, Lufthansa, Volotea, Brussels, Air France.. list goes on
lots 
also extra note for the a320 simfx immersion enjoyers
90% sure if you pull the latest version from the site, it should work on the 319/321 as I found related files in there to the fnx
ah well got an email, confirmed
i feel like the newer updates for the A320 improved performance a bit, and the plane feels less tempermental overall, no issues so far
considering i was running a version from like spring of this year
and i say this flying out of denver with the flightbeam scenery
Well how else
Today seen a couple of EZY planes. Granted they were both late, one for like 2 hours 
i will never fly an easyjet aircraft, irl or in MSFS, ever since what they did to one of my favorite bands
of course just as i go to takeoff, the external software crashes, so i have no displays or controls
does the installer have to be open with the actual fenix software? the issues started when i closed the installer
and because the software crashed and lost connection, i have to redo setup again, this time holding short of the runway
aaaand that kills the flight, i cant upload the flight plan again
i hit init request, it loads, it says it got the flight plan uplink, yet nothing
this was a good experience atleast, it talked me out of buying the A319 and A321
when your software is just so good that running it normally will discourage you from upgrading
i will say that the updates have fixed/remedied a lot of my biggest issues with the fenix a320, but its still extremely frustrating
still enough of of a piece of shit for me to just want to fly the flybywire and not worry about any of this garbage
It always amazes me just how many issues you somehow have with the Fenix, it must really not like your rig
its because my PC is shit
not up to the standards of the fenix gods, who say that i shouldnt have even bought this in the first place
which, yeah, i agree
shouldn't take long š
only reg and its own folder in community (and all the other side lol) and it's done
I'm annoyed just how mid PMDGs releases are in comparison, or just PMDG in general after another Fenix release. Waited hours after the 777 released to even get a code, then had to fight through their servers to install it. the liveries with it are mid, you have to do some weird fucky way of reinstalling and updating and overall just feels PMDG is stuck in the late 2000s early 2010s
and the CEO on the forums is an ass
yet pmdg makes products that are as polished as fenix at 2x the FPS with significantly less bugs
I think the Fenix is a lot better than the PMDG 737
Fenix in general is one step above pretty much all addons IMO
i agree, the fenix does have more in-depth systems, but the 737 is extremely realistic in its own right
Its okay, i hope the ifly 737 max blows it out the park tho
and it's more expensive
and same with PMDGs 73 max
and you have to buy each variant separately at full price
PMDG releases are a shitshow tbh
price is a moot point, if you can afford the fenix, your well enough off to afford the PMDG as well, and the other way around
As a person who only flies PMDG aircraft pretty much
No. Definitely not. Fenix is way cheaper.
fenix is cheaper, but if your spending upwards of $50 for virtual planes on top of the cost of the base game sim, money is not a concern to you
no
you need the base A320 pack for the variants too
No? 60⬠and 80⬠is a big difference
If you buy the 2 packs separately, itās Ā£90. As a bundle theyāre Ā£80. PMDG -800 and -700 together are $140 (and thatās with the discount, which, although stays forever pretty much, might go away at any point if they wish so)
And that leaves you without 736 and 739
You can buy the whole family for 80GBP
yes, with both the IAE and CFMs on the 319,320,321. thats what 90 divided by 6 which is 15
not to forget the eventual Sharklet options
which brings it down from 15 further
Well tbh thatās stretching it a bit. You can also prove PMDG is cheap for a variant in this manner
I think the only way the PMDG is a better deal (in terms of value/money) is if you only buy the -600
ngc trying not to complain about the fenix challenge (impossible)
I came from buying the FF a320 which only had no sharklets and cfms and that put me back so much :x
yeah this
thats not saying PMDGs stuff is bad, I enjoy the 737 and 777 but comparing both it shows just how behind PMDG is imo
Like, taking the -800 even at full price of $75, you get 4 big variants, but you also have different winglet options on each one iirc, so pretty much 8, so you get 75/8 which is $9.375 per variant. But again, I donāt think thatās right, thatās why I say itās very much a stretch
and different cabin arrangements
Isn't the pmdg more customizable overall?
and a ton of small cabin details for realistic airline options
PMDG is behind truly. Hell, with how much they make, could at least make the website not fall on every release
Idk, cause I donāt have the Fenix
Canāt compare
yeah, its not a secret or anything that i hate the fenix, the FBW is far more superior and rapidly catching up to the quality of the fenix
They should setup up a discord server at some point
another platform for randazzo to chat shit? 
But counting differences like having options for 2 or 4 landing light switches, 2 styles of MCPs, 2 styles of engine start switches⦠that would just be such nitpicking thatās not even worth the time. Those features are nice to have, but you really aināt gonna base your opinion about the plane off the ability to have 2 variants of landing light switches.
I think the fact is that the A320 (AFAIK) doesn't actually have these tiny differences, there are a couple of variants that are all quite different from one another, making it hard to do all of them
doing proper EIS-1 would require changing a lot of display logic
Besides like the variant stuff, on the basis I wanted a family of the 700,800,900 vs 319,320,321. right now the fenix is so much cheaper
I expect itād be quite a toxic place tbh. I just have a feeling
Definitely.
and would love to fly the 700 and 900 but aint no way i'm paying that much 3 times
while on the 737 you can have that cursed weird southwest classic-y configuration without needing to change much except what's drawn on the screen
900 is slightly cheaper
But I say that as someone who still only has the 7 and 8
Well and the triple but we donāt talk about that, itās a full separate plane
Indeed. The changes on the 737s are pretty much all visuals
i will say that the 777 currently is REALLY not that great of a value
only minorly improved simulation from their 737s, and you only get 1 variant
Itās PMDG, itās gonna be like that later too. Not gonna change the value.
Do i care, no, i fly
Also you only get 1 variant because overall there are less 777 variants than 737 variants. And the simulation side, I donāt really know which drastic improvements youād expect. It flies great and realistically from what I know, donāt know what else youād need
PMDg beats CaptainSim, Fenix beats LVFR, all I got to know really.

