#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 9 of 1
Malev, Aeroitalia and Transavia are nice 🙂
If you don't mind mismatching the NG with the Classic you could also fly Mistral and Easyjet
easyjet even with the -700
don't know if a repaint exists in the ops center for msfs, certainly did in P3D
Skytravel/Travel Service I think their name is? out of Prague airport aswell
fun little turn I did in the 739
Oh yeah i totally forgot they had the -700
but IIRC they had them without winglets? right? (PMDG moment)
Can't believe I flew a plane made after the '80s (ignore all my Beluga flights
)
SU15 is super smooth 😄
A220?
i see pointy nose and instantly think A220 for some reason
Is that the FSS E-jet above, just looked it up. Since when did it get RNAV/RNP? I forget which payware jets lack RNAV/RNP
I think it's had that for a while? It's VNAV it lacks as far as I know
I own the e175 and have been patiently waiting on their promise of its implementation
That's the one, vnav
I love IVAO. Greatest game ever made
Vod: https://youtu.be/6lclJrE3_Es
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/Gloudas
2nd Channel: http://bit.ly/dougdoug2
DougDoug Clips TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@dougdougclips_
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DougDougFood
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/dougdoug
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/douglas-...
Braathens, Norwegian, Cimber, Hapag Lloyd, HLX, Travel Service, XL Airways, Aeroitalia, Neos
Many many many more
Thanks for all the suggestions folks
Hapag Lloyd my beloved
I don't think it has VNAV still? I didn't try to use it that flight
airberlin
done
define 'nice' lol
You are absolutely right
Ah damn on flightsim.to there ain't even a retro airberlin livery for the 737s
Soon™
China Southern
Pretty decent release. Not really as "revolutionary" as it was hyped up to be, but it looks pretty and does the job it's meant to do at least.
Thats how I feel about it
Testing out C-Scope and Link. Ridiculously effective, this thing has become a proper surgical tool now.
South Atlantic?
Yarp
F15 W
Another upcoming livery from one of the talented artists in the community. All the weathering is based on real references!
i very suddenly remembered why i dont do military aviation
i was playing VTOL VR again for the first time since 2022, went into a mission, got shot down after trying to find where all the action was, quit game
hectic week of real world driving, now to do some calming weekend flying
Would you recommend? I've been considering getting it recently
It’s very simplified, but it’s a lot of fun even if you just do flights without any missions
I think there’s tutorials but I didn’t do them, so naturally I was all frustrated because I didn’t know how the combat worked, the actually flying is very simple though
There’s an MP3 player panel in the cockpit too, and you can add custom songs, so naturally I did fortunate son, danger zone, stuff like that
They’re pretty good, it feels nice and intuitive in VR
There are mods for the game too
Even better, thanks for letting me know
i imagine vatsim as concord quite interesting
its pretty fun using Concorde in the callsigns, but otherwise its pretty bog standard
Siberia thing
embraer w
this shit cant get to speed, idk if im doing smth wrong or not
or it hates FL300+ alts
idk what i've done but it's fixed
27kt winds from the left-ish, nearly sideways
Into leaden skies with the kodiak
I don't know if I ever got that high with the Embraer, but I remember it was fine once?
no its called flying the embraer
i have the same issues in xplane
embraer be like: im gonna keep you at 156kt and you cant do anything about it
you can but you gotta nose dive for a bit lol
I climbed atg 280kts, and then m .65 and it was fine
with the 195
although I think I only got to FL270?
im flying the 170
Holy shit somebody flying Russian airlines
my first flight on S7 and E170
Starting my descend into Yakutsk
Cool 'feature' of Russia in MSFS: some airports don't even have runway lights
I guess not much issue for you flying during the day right now
It was not that fun for me arriving into Kazan at night 
And the problem that makes it even worse, there's barely any handcrafted airports, at least I've not found many
the end
guess i was lucky the sun was just setting 
Yup, just a couple hours later you'd have to rely on a mix between instrument navigation and "hope I'm in the fucking right place" navigation 
damn 
descend down to Heathrow
was meant to fly to New York yesterday, but things unfortunately went wrong
(in the real world that is)
another flight for good measure
Fortaleza - Rio de Janeiro
Dubai - Kabul
wanted to try to fly just one airline for a few days (I hope at least a week unless I get bored) so I picked Metrojet, on my third flight at the moment, from Orlando to Cleveland 😄
unfortunately most ATC I had enroute disconnected shortly after I took off🥲
plen
I won’t ask you why you’re flying so low and directly above Moscow State University in a 738 considering that the city is a no flight zone
Tbh tho, I don't like the controls, but that might be a personal issue. Thing is, the stick input originates where the virtual Stick is and how you grab it. If you move slightly, everything's fckd.
That's the reason I stopped playing it, but a lot of people have a blast with it. And with steam you can always try
If you got a stick and throttle, I highly recommend DCS tho, it's free and with standalone you can try every module for two weeks
The slight movement thing is what I was worried about
Happens to me in MSFS
I'll see how it goes
Airshow
Well… that’s an excuse I guess
Although knowing all the stuff, wouldn’t have been authorised irl
Plus I doubt Aerflot would let one of their 737s be used. The things are on quite important flights constantly. Often Dubai and stuff, unless demand is so high they throw a 777/330 there
Still just a game 😭
the damn andes
flat Argentina
Oh of course, just saying it’s weird to see
It's weird that you care about it.
Nothing weird in discussing screenshots, eh?
I just noticed a cool and unusual screenshot and noted something about it
Plus it's a building I can see every day from my window, of course a screenshot like that stands out to me. It's quite like seeing your local school on someone's screenshot
Well my apologies, your tone came across as hostile/"why would you do that"
Yeah, might've been tbh, but I was saying it more jokingly
It does look cool though, I'm not gonna deny
Although I do have some bias towards Aeroflot livery
Aeroflot livery is fire 🔥
I love the aeroflot liveries
On final approach to Manchester
I have kept quiet on this DCS vs Razbam drama but the first cracks are starting to appear. This impacts gameplay and so now we have to talk about it. We all hope for a speedy resolution but until then, we are navigating in uncharted waters and a public statement would be helpful.
►Discord: https://discord.gg/enigma89
►Patreon: https://www.patre...
Man that's so sad
my 2 favourite aircraft are the M2000 and the Harrier
I like all of their modules honestly. The MiG-19 is an absolute hot-rod, and the cannons are super satisfying to use. F-15E has pretty much become my favourite-of-all-time aircraft.
sad, I only got the Phantom because I pre ordered it ages ago, I'm not buying any DCS module until this is resolved.
If the M2000, Harrier and MiG-19 (another aircraft I was interested in) end up like the Hawk I think I'll abandon DCS for everything but formation flying
which is a big shame, as I was looking forward to the G-91, EFA and F-104
I'm boutta actually try and learn BMS
Well. In two month when I have my new office built
Do you have a third party scenery? If you do you'll need to remove any other default airport from content manager if it exists
I had a similar issue with KSEA and had to remove the default one
@untold finch
Experience the ultimate in rotary-wing aviation with the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior in DCS World. This meticulously crafted simulation brings the legendary reconnaissance and light attack helicopter to life with unparalleled accuracy and detail. Fly low through challenging terrains, utilizing the Kiowa Warrior's advanced sensor suite and weaponry to d...
yep
I'm waiting to hear whether the latest patch broke the Strike Eagle before I think about updating the game, never mind buying a module 😂
i bought it - couldnt resist
Seems like they fixed the A/A - A/G FBW switch in the m2k at least
I've heard some rumours regarding the fact that atm there is 1 person responsible for maintaining all of RB's products
Galinette is still working on the M2K I think
He practically revamped it for free anyway, so nothing has changed for him in that respect
I don't believe so
I think he works for Metrea now so he's probably doing alright for himself
Nobody knows the ins and outs its just back and forth blaming right now atm, How many here know what contracts are signed by either party none of us do even the tubers are only guessing at this point.
Anyone here on the ILA at Sunday by any chance?
My refund has been approved
the kiowa flies amazingly
holy shit
it might just be one of the easiest helicopters ever to fly
havent even learned the phantom
I don't care
Nobody ever said who's fault it is
It doesn't matter
I just want the fricking Harrier and M2000 to be maintained, and the only way that's going to happen is if RB and EB resolve this dispute
Notice how the phrase above doesn't try to put blame on anyone, or tries to share any information of any kind that's not public
Another PFP?
hm?
I have yet to figure out what the best use for it is though
Scouting in dcs is meh, buddy lazing at most in sp
Quick gun and run ig
I doubt thats your screenshot
That's the PMDG 777 leak lol
"coming soon" hopefully not with those ugly engines 🤢
I‘m certain thats how the 737 is too
I see no issue with it
No it has a 3D vector map
It's low quality and poor effort by PMDG
They should do better
U sit in the cockpit
I don't see the issue
Systems matter over visuals by a long shot
It's an engine blade
You don't but thousands of others do. If you have that mindset might as well play P3D instead
There was a war in forums for this
I've been flying since FS2004, including FSX, XP10/11/12, P3d since v3
I have a very wide experience in sims
So no thank you I will not return to p3d where i've spent thousands of dollars on
In the end - u spend the majority of your hours in the flight deck , i doubt you will ever closely inspect the engine for 14 hours straight
People want a high quality product as stated. And for it to be future proof and worth people's money they want it to be as detailed as possible. PMDG has always cut corners by making textures low resolution or modeling not right. Here is a prime example of their incompetent to make something a finished product. The Fan blades on the GE90 are one of the party pieces what's the point in having a really good 77W if it doesn't even have up to date/standard visualizations. Other companies do better
You miss the entire point - PMDG has for sure not always cut corners lol. I'm in no way a full PMDG supporter because their company really is a problem child but their work for the past 20 years can not be undermined. They're the leading edge in aircraft development and have shown significant progress. Everyone constantly shits on pmdg for no reason anymore at this point 
If you are so bothered by this - dont buy it
Easy
I can legit say the same about the game itslf - the FM is absolute asscrack , which for a company like microsoft, which has years of experience and the proper resources should not be a problem
And as always, every picture shown never represented thefinal product
I'm sorry to say but PMDG is nowhere near other developers when it comes to quality control. Especially on MSFS. Without the constructive criticism PMDG would have terrible reviews. Thanks to people stepping up they actually get forced to make these small details. And before you type "if you don't like it don't buy it mentality" because that's a pointless argument, it's not like we have a second chance or option to go with so the criticism must be taken constructively.
Before you say anything PMDG have apologised and have put to work a 3D vector model for the engine blades already and it will be in the final release.
Thing is people have waited a very long time to get their hands on a 777 so they would like it if the engines weren't as flat as an ironing board. It's a simple fix for a big development team
And this should apply to the upcoming; 737 MAX, 777X, 787, 744, 748
@trim harbor
Simple fix yes - not for PMDG, like I said, the products arent bad, the company is scummy, RSR is arrogant. The overall quality they provide is still above average for MSFS standards - so
Well it took them 3 years to make a 737 in msfs that didn't have enough problems to rule it as a bad product. Still doesn't have CPDLC tho.
The quality is okay, the performance is the best part. But the lack of empathy from the dev team is shocking and the development is low quality or poor at times.
I'm excited for the 777, and I am as well for the other planes.
Tempted to refund the F15E as I dont fly it anyway
And just get either trighanistan or chinook
If you want military the best company to go for is Just Flight.
They make the best products
I've received my refund
For the strike eagle?
talkin about dcs haha
PADQ - PANC
PANC - PADQ return, had to circle around in the end to lose some speed. Not the best landing I've done, bounced there
Yes the JF A300B4-200
Can't wait for that
And their 747-200
ok?
It's great. But it's also 70 USD
I really want to buy the MD-11 but at the same time I kind of don't want to, as I don't really see myself using it too much.
I'd buy it mostly to do some cargo runs in the US, and some of the '90s and 2000s "leisure" trips from central/northern Europe to Southern Europe with companies such as Martinair and LTU (I'll also some some of the off milk run-y short flights and repostings flights), but I won't do long haul.
The MD-11 is an aircraft I find extremely interesting, and it's history, and how it came to be is also quite weird and fascinating, I'm looking forward to learning a completely new and different kind of aircraft.
My main concerns are:
-TFDi will probably also do a 717 which is quite similar to the MD-11, so it might not be that "unique", having said that I'm not sure how interested I'd be in the 717 as I already have the MD-80, and I'll also have the F100, so the 717 feels a bit "redundant"
-Once the A300B4 and the 757 are out I don't really see myself using the MD-11 that much, as there is almost a 100% overlap in the things I want to do with the 300 and MD-11
-Although unique, and interesting the MD-11 is modern and advanced, I think I might find it a bit boring
If you could be bothered to read all that, would you have any advice?
I think if it was 50/60 it would be a much easier decision to make, but around 75?
having bought it early and flown it quite abit already - it's great imho, i love the md11 as it was my first plane to fly back in fs2004 - the FM is abit jank and comparable to the 787, the visuals are great, no A/P issues and I believe it may just have a co route system now, TFDi are putting great effort into it which is amazing to see
Especially in terms of flight model, if you watch some of the videos of it, it's very pitchy, textures and model still look very fsx
correct about the FM , textures seem fine to me honestly
It's not the biggest deal to me but for the price they're asking it should be better
As for the flight model, that's a lot less forgivable from me. It can be modded and fixed, but we shouldn't have to do that on any payware, let alone a massively expensive """"""study level"""""" airliner
also regarding that, the md11 is very advanced haha
the FM bothers me too, alot, i cant say i enjoy flying it manually at all
Yeah. You know it's bad when you can SEE it from videos
and trim does NOT work at all
Yeah. That's unacceptable
it feels like u have to land it at TOGA too
If they released it for $20... Sure
But at whatever they're asking for it now, what $70? 100?
No. Not at all
although a very bad video because its at night
Watch Untitled and millions of other Microsoft Flight Simulator videos on Medal, the largest Game Clip Platform.
The rotate on xplane is and has always been a pile
u can see my struggles with both throttle and controls
But even it does better
it produces alot of drag which is to be expected, but this feels too much
i can barely keep my airspeed
they fixed it up well tho
i like flying the rotate
the FM is great atleast lol
I haven't flown the very latest but even a year after release it was extremely underwhelming
i mean u know
they fixed the AP
i bought it on release and the damn thing kept flying offcourse
and nosediving up and down
Yes I know
That's why I'm kind of scared
They SAY they are going to fix it
Yes, I'm going to buy it ONCE it's fixed 😄
If I buy it
cant u preorder it rn already lo
Yes but since what happened with DCS I'm only buying things in the state they are now
Although I have quite high confidence in TFDi
they like to overpromise too is what i feel like
the first release of the md11 was an actual trashbin
no proper working animations nothing
As long as they deliver I don't care
So far the opinion of the beta tester customers has been mostly positive with progress being made
They did all the other things they said they would do, I have no reason to believe FM will be different
However I'm not expecting it's going to be great.
very true , they are working hard on it
The way I understand it is that FM is going to be the last major update before public release
So I'm hoping to get it after they update the FM, but before they release it so I can get that $5 dollars off the complete package
Just finished the flight, UUEE (Moscow, Sheremetyevo) to UACC (Astana, Nursultan Nazarbayev Intl.)
(Don't mind the final screenshot, the airport is slightly broken)
Slightly
if you look hard enough, you might just notice that the jetway placement is suboptimal
Yeah, but it's barely noticeable
how do you exit a hold in the inibuilds a320neo?
when i try to hit IMM EXIT it takes me to the page with constraints
apparently you just cant exit a hold?
for some reason, every single flight ive done recently has had completely wrong fuel calculations
ill arrive at my destination under the minimum EFOB, i even had a flight where i would have run out on the approach, all generated by simbrief and using the proper airframe for the plane im flying
nevermind, im going to run out of fuel on this flight too, currently i have 730kg and im just turning into the final now
The ini A320 burns way too much fuel I found
I added an extra 45 minutes of reserve (on top of the 30 minutes + alternate that simbrief already plans) on a flight and still ran out after 1 missed approach and a single lap hold
this is happened to me on the FBW A320 too
No issue on the FBW or Fenix for me
atleast you can add fuel easily in the inibuilds one, with the FBW you have to go through the weight and balance menu
it pisses me off that i even have to do it, but id rather do that than end a 2 hour flight over it
im even using the inibuilds v2 simbrief profile for it too
wouldn't be a first for an ini product
AFAIK the Xplane Beluga has the same problem
I had 2 missed approaches and then straight to the closest alternate, and landed with like 300kg of fuel left
MSFS A300 did the exact same thing until that was fixed
The turbine Duke does too
IT's like a bunch of devs just don't check fuel burn
"we put the right numbers into the config, it will be close enough"
Yeah that's probably it, maybe not this bad, but yeah... I think one of my favourite threads is on the JF forum, and a person asked them why they didn't make the CG and all weight and balance stuff in the F28 the same as the real thing, and showed a used the the real numbers it would fly like shit"
ahah
that sums up dealing with MSFS flight and engine model quite well unfortunately...
I did some digging and found the Fokker training manual for the MK1000 and 2000. I noticed the Basic MAC appears to be too far fwd in MSFS. Here is the analy...
@trim harbor sorry for the ping, do you have both the MD11 and the FSS Embraers?
MD11 ye, FSS sadly not
waiting for VNAV
ah 
did you notice that the knobs in the MD11 seem extremely slow?
god
The FSS Embraers are the same, I wanted to ask if you could compare the two
but good to know it's not just me at least
I've written a (mostly unnecessary) wall of text on their discord
I really hope they change that, it's so annoying
out of all the actually reasonable things that might have changed my mind on buying the MD-11 those knobs might be the thing that make the difference....
i had no idea there was a 717 in MSFS, so i can finally do island hop flights with hawaiian
The captain scam one?
Or sorry "FSX360" which is just Captain scam under another name
when it comes to anything outside of the A320 and 737 series, i dont really care too much about quality because i rarely run them anyway
Fair enough
see they're offering refunds for the F-15
feels like that's the final nail surely, rather extreme if not

Yeah. I got mine
really don’t know much about the situation but it’s sad to see something as iconic as the f-15 end up like this
how long did it take?
About 24 hours from ticket submission. Then another 24 after I accepted the terms and conditions of store credit
Word of advice. MD-11’s ran a lot more than people think
Idk how good the TFDi one is but if it has pax and freight and enough liveries you can pretty much do anything
LTU hops to Dalaman?
Citybird to JFK?
Or a contracted cargo hop from Helsinki to Santiago
Pretty much anything goes
Well, yes, not as much as the 75, 76 and A300 but yeah, that's why I'm even considering it
It’s also got some really cool nonstandard systems
It’s very “in between” Boeing and Airbus and that genuinely makes me very happy
717 is quite different but just looks similar
Well, the systems are very similar, obviously there are some differences but it's a similar design philosophy
It’s a modernised md80 so the systems are “shitter”
Yeah
I would get both honestly
If they were just a bit cheaper I would agree
It’s the same sort of thing as people flying the A330 and the A320
Well, I don't 😄
Eh
FSDP will show you the sheer amount stuff you can actually do with the MD11
Yeah, already use it
I just can’t wait to bin off all my old painted window liveries on the rotate to get a full pax version as well
It’s a very nice aircraft to fly
But eh
If it’s not for you it’s not for you
I will also note actually there is a lot more you can do with an MD11 than a 717
I don't think it's not for me, I just maybe wanted a bit more insight in the TFDi model, for example the knobs being very slow is good to know, the fact the flight models is still bad is good to know.
I'm aware that it did a lot more than just long haul, but so did the 75 and the A300, which are probably going to release relatively, somewhat "shortly" (and by that I mean maybe around the end of the year, or early next year).
Spending €80 for a plane and stop flying it after not even a year doesn't sound great value for money.
I'm mostly just interested in a bit of the systems, the history of the aircraft and recreating some cool flights, but if I could have a DC-10 or L-1011 instead I'd much rather take any of these 2 in a heartbeat
I think as soon as that freeware DC-10 is out I'm never touching the MD-11 again, unless it's a lot more fun that I can imagine
Fair enough
L-1011 is still something I really want to see done properly in either XP or MSFS
The MW example doesn’t really cut it for me anymore 😭😭😭
They're not real refunds, they're offering store credit. ED keeps the money and shafts Razbam further, works well for them.
No chance am I getting a refund, the Strike Eagle is the best thing that's happened to DCS imo. I'll just keep my game at the last supported version for it.
havent gotten anything back yet sadly
i tend to agree but i myself bought the SE and actually never really used it - i'm probably gonna invest into the chinook myself (as much as thats fueling the fire
)
Sheremetyevo - Tivat flight
JFK-DTW-JFK with Bizex
:)
they introduced quite alot of new features, again
spirit mention aswell lmao
but yeah, so much good stuff
Coming November 19, Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 is the next installment in the Microsoft Flight Simulator franchise. It is the most ambitious consumer flight simulator ever undertaken, designed to take advantage of the latest technologies in simulation, cloud, machine learning, graphics and gaming. Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 goes beyond...
The a330 tablet looks like it's done by ini
The tablet looks pretty much exactly like the ini one so hmm
BELGUGA TIME LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOO
damn, it do be looking good
why do we have 2 of every plane in msfs bruh
seems like they want to use their animals more
The bush trip stuff is really the dumbest feature that I doubt anyone actually does
If I try to fly and look out the window at the same time I end up crashing almost instantly
Tbh head tracking or vr makes doing that better
For me, its the perspective change, I can’t tell where I am by looking out of the corner of my eye
I just hope this new version is a “DTG update”, same graphical engine but just more content, I can’t afford a new MSFS version and a new PC at the same time 😭
Tbh it looks kinda nice, but it seems more or less "career" and mission-oriented, not something I'm specifically interested in. But really, what will determine whether I move onto it quickly or not is if devs move quickly (obviously I wouldn't wanna stay in the game which gets no new stuff developed) in the very end
Hopefully we'll get more meat on the bone at fs expo
That'd be wonderful ngl
I think theyre just going to show off the same trailer tbh
Optimisation is always welcome (unless of course it means less realism, but I hope not?)
Also, why tf did they not show this off at summer games fest????
It could be not rubbish if we got the MSFS 2024 reveal trailer live tbh
personally not interested in all the career gimmicks, looks cool though ngl
Same, all the career stuff isn't exactly what I'm looking for, but I don't mind it. Plus, can do for an occasional difference in gameplay
the remote cargo stuff looked fucking gang though
definitely something i'd wanna try out, but otherwise just keeping to the usual airliner business
I do appreciate msfs 2020 stuff working out the box with 24, should be interesting
I rarely fly it, but I like the stuff they’re introducing in 24
I'll likely be staying on FS20 for a while to come
I expect a lot of teething issues on 24
I’m definitely gonna get it on release (if I can afford it), but definitely with the idea of slowly moving over to it
I actually think out of all the missions and stuff it's the only fun thing to do
it forces you to do a bit of dead reckoning navigation, which is fun
I'd still prefer doing a flight myself with a plane I want somewhere i want, and without hand holding, but it's the least worse kind of scripted missions IMO
the inibuilds a320 makes an extremely weird noise on takeoff that i thought was me tailstriking, but it wasnt
its like a grinding noise too, i think it might be the wind entering the front gear compartment and making that noise, but it really doesnt work
thats not the runway, son
nice, goarounds are also broken, the goaround page does not arm in TOGA but it does put you onto your goaround path
direct to waypoints do not work
this plane is fucked
its now just doing whatever it wants
fuck me, now its trying to get to 250kts on the glideslope because theres no decel point
all because it didnt program to the correct ILS and i didnt check it like i should have
that was my worst flight yet
nice, and my OBS was freaking out even though my game was running at a smooth 40FPS
so enjoy horrible footage because im tired of figuring this fucking shit out
im so fucking angry right now, fuck inibuilds
you can hear (because you cant see at 5FPS even though my game was running at 40) the moment i took over because i freaked out that the glideslope was too shallow
it was a good touchdown, 170FPM, but offcenter and wonky because of basically nothing
i dont have anything to say, im just fucking angry at everything, this stupid fucking flight killed all of my confidence again
and i STILL cant figure out why OBS doesnt want to record anything at 30FPS
so this is a thing that usually works for me, but might not work for everyone, when stuff like this happens I usually just decrease the automation a notch and go back to basics.
So, this is what I would have done, go around, flaps and gear retraction, selected speed around 200/250kts
Heading 180 (assuming your screenshot is north up) to set myself up for a downwind, then reduce to 180 or 160kt to turn final at about 10 nm from the airport. Altitude around 2000/3000 AGL should be fine, although not familiar with the airport.
Then if you have the ILS ready on the FMC I'd either give myself a DCT to a point on the ILS procedure, or I would have just given me a heading to set up a decent loc intercept, then execute a normal approach.
I actually think the only big "mistake" was the high speed/energy state, apart from that you just had a buggy aircraft, I think sometimes it's useful to just go back to basics, and just do a simple traffic patter, just like you would do if you were doing base training
i believe i did everything correct as far as the goaround went, its just the plane decided to take the stupidest path i have ever seen an aircraft take
yeah that's what I got as well, this shit happens, it's still a default aicraft after all
but that should't kill all your confidence
its mostly the horrible landing
it was a headwind coming in, i dont know why i got blown around like it was a hurricane
touchdown was fine
I see, then I don't really know, it's hard to tell from the video, guessing the spoilers is just a replay bug, the approach seemed fairly stable, maybe it was bad windshear, nothing you could have done other than going around again in that case
the ini a320 has a ton of issues with the replay, i dont know why
its atleast funny if you go to replay the landing after youve parked at the gate, youll have a floating GPU and no flaps
yeah... usual MSFS replay things
although I've heard that Skydolly is really good if you're into this sorts of stuff
i had issues with it connecting i believe
flightreplay is what ive been using, which i think is the built-in MSFS one?
Errrr... Not sure? I haven't used the replay feature in a LONG time
i doubt aerosoft are going to drop their one now lol
aerosoft are done
skill issue 😉
i wonder if visible passengers means that GSX is dead
if they've added other features from it as well
If that would happen
That would be crazy
CRJ, while it works okay for the most part, is just stagnant
it should not take 2 years to get one updat eout
Indeed
I want a good ERJ-145
I just want CRJ, ERJ14X and 17x
And a220 - but i dont think i'll see that in my life anymore
GSX is more than that
Literally next line, friend 😉
Sorry friend
I'd have to hope that Asobo have added more than just the animated pax anyway
if they've fixed pushback, that'd be neat
I wonder if we can leave the aircraft 🤔
Well, true if you mean modern. But overall we have BAe 146 and Fokker F28, both are awesome and both are regional
I guess soon we'll have a more or less modern one too with F70/F100
I see ther is not a single mention of flight model 🤔
U literally asked I can't understand you
MD-11 is essentially a 777F alternative. They can fly for a long way.
TFDi said that they are not making a 717
No one flies the A300B4 anymore there's just one airline with an A300B2
It's your choice whether you buy the MD-11 or not. It's only $80 anyway
doesnt matter if noone flies it anymore does it lol\
i like the dc6 and noone flies it
Are you okay?
That's only the CE which is a tester model. It's not the finished product
- E175?
- E170?
- E190?
- E190P2F?
- E195?
- BAE-146?
- BAE AVRO RJ?
- FOKKER 100/70?
You forgot the F28
the e1XX are unfinished as hell
F28 is good too I don't fly it tho
im sorry
RJ and F100/F70 aren't released yet
they're not good
But Es are all not that great
i hate the idea of releasing planes which lack the bare minimum
It's an early access but you can always go and help if you want it
Shouldn't be too long now
Try run a business with low funds id like to see how you'd turn out
GO AND HELP THEM THEN
They literally hiring rn
FSS is backed by aerosoft
JF has multiple subs - i don't think they're low on money
lol
low funds
PMDG is a million dollar company
they literally own a private jet
tfdi cashed out greatly on the CE
Not with funds. They just get publicity and development help but it's slow because Aerosoft itself is a mess rn
There's not exactly many F100s and RJs around anymore
Yeah but Robert
But only 1000 sales?
I never mentioned PMDG?
lemme see how much i paid for the CE
and multiply that by 1000
then add the monthly services tfdi offers like smartcars and website plus domain hosting
then previous sales from p3d
now the preorders for the md11
you'll come to a sum
You have to pay people's salaries?
i'm trying to make a point, they're not low on money lol
most flight sim developers arent
Why are you so negative?
theres nothing to be positive about on how flight sims are , the community became a hell of it's own
the developers release half assed products and leave them like that
it's a whole scummy business
albeit not official - neither confirmed - ed is the prime example for scummy, though i don't wanna say too much because we don't know yet
You're not helping...
It's kinda weird how there's defence for released products that are... well not great, yet one hell lot of criticism because fan blades on a WIP product are not 3D yet
Some things are in development tho
aerosoft crj is in 'development'
im waiting for them to drop the 'mega' patch that we've been waiting for
msfs brought alot of positives in, just as much negatives
People were mad at that because that was supposed to be the finished product. If it were known to have changed then people wouldn't be so mad. Plus if you actually look at PMDG forums and see how hateful the developers can be you'd understand
captainsim was a great company for fs2004 and fsx lol
And in MSFS, not so much
money is one hell of a drug
u know this doesnt apply to msfs only either
xplane is the same fiasco
It's not. It was a low fidelity finished product but they are working on getting it "up to standards"
i'd understand if i was paying 20-30% less for a unfinished product, but asking $80-90 for something that doesnt have the basics is a tragedy
Yes but you can't point a finger at everyone because that's literally not true.
Because you pay the money for a finished product early before it's finished 💀 it's a privilege to have that as an option
Not really, you pay that for an unfinished product and a promise to finish it, not a finished product
how is it a privilege
TFDi have finished tho they just have to do bug fixing... 😂
Because you should be glad you have that option in the first place. If you don't like it don't get it. Get it when it's finished or pre order for a reduced price
I'm not talking about TFDi right now
I'm talking generally
they arent btw
Any early access is not you paying for a finished product. It's you paying for an unfinished product and a promise to finish it
What products in question are unfinished other than the FSS and the TFDi?
They are in a part of the DE crew? And it's an amazing aircraft to fly it's changed so much just this year. It's only got bugs now. All features are complete
You paying helps fund that timeline. I have a great idea for you
DONT PAY IF YOUR GONNA COMPLAIN
i see the changelongs myself
Adding the completed features? Do you know how planes are developed by any chance?
that's still adding it though, no?
Do you see me complaining though? You're trying so hard to prove to me that TFDi is doing good even though I fully agree... I was just correcting what you said, early access is not a finished product
You don't develop it all in one go. It's split up into hundreds of different pieces. As these are finished they get added bit by bit and tested for bugs. Nothing new is being made it's only being altered to work its best. If you can't understand that I have no hope for you
they're still adding it, no?
was it in the plane before, no
therefore they're adding it
it doesn't matter if it's done or not
it's not in, it's not added
If they take it out then that's most likely because it was causing more problems and it needs fine tuning. But all the data is there and all they have to do is tweak it to work with other things and then test it for hours and hours until it actually has no issues. It's not a simple step but it's the last step before release
Your GPU or CPU is literally dying
No, it’s the encoder that’s overloaded, I don’t know what settings to use yet
For recording use your GPU encoder, high profile, 35kbit should be fine for 1080p. I use 60kbit for 1440p/60 and haven't noticed any quality issues
@hollow oracle
Though OBS kinda ass as a recording software IME. I use Action! But it's a paid software
I usually rock 1080p, 70,000 bit rate. And MP4 or MOV video type
Usually recording will take off a few frames in games
70,000 bitrate
Uh-huh, sure
Finnair <3
Can you guys please tell me what joystick or yoke you use
I used the T16000 until very recently, I now have a Virpil WRB-D base and grip, still using the TWCS throttle
I use the thrustmaster airbus pack, because I fly only airbus
If I have to fly a Boeing I’ll use an Xbox controller
Virpil CM3 base, 20cm extension, TM Warthog grip.
winwing f18 stick plus orion 2 base with f15EX
I use keyboard
Cause I only fly 1 plane pretty much and that’s the 737
And I’m not yet paying £430 for a yoke and a quadrant
How tf do you fly with keyboard 
You really need at least a controller
Plus Thrustmaster’s Boeing quadrant is kind ehh from the looks anyway. Much less full than the Airbus one. Cause it seems like on the Boeing one you can’t even have flaps and speed brake at the same time, gotta choose one
With default controls
I got used to it
At first my flight was kinda janky yeah
Now it’s all fine and smooth…
…on the 737
Well the 146 and the F28 are kinda not awful
The rest, nah
I have a Virpil setup that cost me around £1500
£60 for a controller and its a game changer
I don’t wanna buy a controller cause I won’t use it anywhere else
Plus, keyboard is enough for me for now
And I’ll get a proper flight setup at some point anyway
Fair does
got an X55, don't recommend
Thank you all appreciate it
That's crazy 😵
our formation leader used to have an X56, I don't think I've ever heard him say one good thing about it
mine actually lasted a surprisingly long time, but it's finally dying
that said it's really a pretty mediocre stick, I really like the throttle and its buttons though
i got an x56
i think it's my fourth now? had to keep taking back to the shop after things kept going wrong
but for the price you can't really get that many buttons or functionality like
not without going expensive, which when you don't play much at all is the better option imo
just be prepared to exchange it until you get one that actually works
I just re installed msfs now I have to install 250GB of world updates 🥲
@reef isle @untold finch any tips for F4 dogfighting and/or radar?
or is the radar just absolute ass
I haven't had much experience with it yet, the radar is ass, it has very little look down/shoot down capabilities, and you can't expect to pick things up at range. Water helps in reducing ground clutter and is going to make it easier.
Use the Jester Toggle Action thingy to have Jester do what you need
I haven't really flown it much, it hasn't grabbed me. That said, be below the target if possible, and for BFM, keep your speed round 500.
It's a rate fighter more than anything else.
i cannot dogfight with it, dont even get me started on 'bvr'
everything outturns it lol
frustrating to say the least
If you're fighting the MiG-21 AI you'll have a rough time
The AI one has a super UFO flight model
the problem is they usually pick one up on the radar before u can even see them
so i usually defend before i even get a sparrow off
I had some limited success with BFM, although it took some fiddling
The key is to be fast and stay fast, this is your only chance, because you can't really turn
Make heavy use of the vertical
I think if you want a fair fight the Mirage F1 is a good start, it's in one of the default missions
Not sure about an exact speed, but IIRC best turn rate was about 0.6 mach (maybe 0.8? I'll have to double check I don't remember), and you don't really want to get any slower than 300
i did try to fight a F1, it outturned me and then missiled me
probably on my end
ill make sure to use vertical more
i cant remember how to start up the 787 completely because its been like 2 months since i last flew it 
im mostly having issues with ground services and loading, i just need to refresh my memory on the checklists
im not sure if theres a display on the aircraft itself that i can use for the ground services and loading like most aircraft, im in the horizon sim version
federal express
this is the first night flight ive done in ages, and the first 737 one in a while too
The 737 is a death trap
Lovely 737
its ezy
mordern airliners are very simple
737 MAX*
No I didnt put it down too hard and break the skids 😆
Flying under the wires just for fun
Raise slightly by accident and a whole town loses power, noice
it really is, especially if you know the 737, i just did things out of order and messed up the whole plane
and the 787, thats what killed the first whistleblower
Bringing the Herschel's Space Telescope mirror to Turku airport, it's then going to go to Opteon for polishing 🙂
the good livery too

Don't Diss Airbus Special Font 😭
Ah yes skylink. When airbus was going to make a fleet of these STs and transports oversized cargo around the world. Rip
i am on a personal hate campaign against easyjet now
easylife gets sued out of existance by easyjet just because their name has "easy" in it, they rebrand to hardlife and release a song, and then easyjet sues them AGAIN to remove the CEOs name in a song
preordered the chinook - hope it's good
Anyone else getting low FPS after SU15?
i went the opposite way lol
Going full on into Falcon BMS
and MSFS when I feel like flying something more laid back
I was getting average 40fps every airport on high end now I'm getting 20 and below. Even worse on the iniA320
Yeesh
Have you cleared your DX shader cache, deleted rolling cache, and all the normal jazz? @shadow burrow
Restarted PC, etc. Etc
I don't have rolling cache, never had to clear whatever a DX folder is etc
i could never get adjusted to bms
idk
it felt weird to me
The community is fucking ass
"I don't learn this way, I need the information presented differently"
"Yes you do you just don't know how" 💀
"The manuals are all you need they're so good"
Reads a paragraph of text in PDF
Look back at BMS
Already forgotten 90% of the text
This is why the interactive tutorials in DCS are so good, I go through them once and I have taken in 90% of the information
Meanwhile I sat for about 4 hours going back and forth between the manual and BMS and never even got the damn engine started
Considered trailing the DCS one to go through the tutorials but I know it's not 1:1 with BMS so I don't know how useful that would be
ive had this exact thing said to me when learning the A320
Yeah excuse me but I think I have in my nearly 3 decades alive figured out how I do and don't process information
bms is missing chucks guides
that helped me w a few modules
nowadays i just either trial and error or watch yt
Chucks guides are great as references but I can't learn to use an aircraft through them either. Not effectively
YouTube videos aren't awful but I asked which they recommend and they just said "just search for them" so I started with one on the latest major version, asked a question and they told me "well obviously don't use that one "
yea ngl not even i can tell u which ones r good or not
When I finally got them to send me one, it was an older one, surprise, I followed every step exactly and the plane didn't start. And the answer was "well you have to do it the slightly different way since it's been updated"
And when I ask what the differences are the answer was "check the manual"
i kind of departed from fixed wing and mostly fly rotary now
i use casmo alot
great dude
I am not much for ground attack. I like air to air combat
fixed wing just felt
not too easy
but too simple ig
in the end it's no different from flying an a320 if u get what i mean
Id love to really give BMS a try but
i gave up on the keybinds lmao
At this point I think I'd need someone to just walk me through it in real time not try to follow a video
Binds were easy, easier than DCS by a long shot IMO
Only took me a few minutes to get my entire HOTAS bound up
bruh i couldnt even find the keybinds list lmao
bms and dcs are just very different and i personally struggled with it
i used to mainly fly the f16 in dcs
but it felt like learning an entire new plane in bms

You gotta use the new launcher thing and it's just a menu in the launcher
It works almost exactly like DCS's but has all the quality of life stuff that DCS is missing
i only came for dyanmic campaign lmao
Such as double clicking any box and pressing a button on any joystick, you donr have to scroll and click on the specific device you want to bind
And if you start BMS with one of your sticks unbound, it doesn't remove the binding for every other device
Nvidia
I got an RTX 4070Ti and I'm getting 20fps in the new update
Delta everywhere
📰 | PMDG 777-300ER Releasing June 25
https://fselite.net/content/pmdg-777-300er-releasing-june-25/
sweet cant wait to spend $800
Nothing 2 paychecks won't cover
🫴 💰
Those engines look like ass
Give me a 747 😔
I'll give you a CS/FSX360 777 
🤢🤮
Atleast PMDG will have VNAV xD
At least they delayed it so it can now fly RNAV 😂
TRUE 😂
Good lord they hate their community 😭
I wonder if we will get an update on their 737 MAX, 744, 748, and Secret project (787) at FSEXPO
Probably waiting for MSFS24 first
Well 737 MAX is already in development lol
I'm no fan of PMDG, but I don't really see what looks wrong with them
I got banned from forums for not signing my name 💀
Yeah their forums suck, but I don't see what that's got to do with the engines?
Oh they are terrible lol
2D engines on 2024 os crazy
Can you stop pinging me?
As long as the animation is decent I don't really see much of an issue
Like yeah it's an outdated way of doing things but they don't look that bad imo
I don't get why ppl get mad at this just change notifications 😭 fine
You don't but others do. It's just typical PMDG low effort
Especially for somethings that supposed to last 10 years +
It's almost like I'm a moderator on a 10,000 member server and would rather not get ping notifications every time someone in a discussion responds to me 
I mean once again fair, but still I would say calling them ass seems a but harsh
death trap
classic
flew f4 more over the past few days, i unfortunately have to say, for myself atleast, its a wasted purchase, the BFM capibilites of it are very low and cannot really be utilized against many servers, A2G works but is very finnicky, cant orbit or anything
it's super indepth but meh
, i prefer to fly the f14
Bermuda things
Do you like Enigma?
tried it on engima
horrible to fly
theres dedicated squadrons that try to hunt u down in the f1 and mig21 💀
I've been flying the F86 and the 339A on Enigma a lot recently, and it's been greatly amused how many times I got ignored
but I've seen a lot of F4s doing quite well
I think every time I was there bluefor won, there were so many F4s, there was a big numeric disadvantage for the red
We need an A310 update so bad 😞
real, although I dont really think highly of ini aircraft. it got me from a to b but thats about it
I hope their 330 and 350 will be better than their other stuff
Have you tried their A306?
A330 will be like the A320N but the A350 will be very good
Yeah I don't mind the a300 as such, still a bit wobbly at times but aight overall
will be interesting to see if the aerosoft or ini a330 will be better lol
but yeah a350 pls be good
I've never had an issue with it. I love it so much
Oh inibuilds will set a high margin. Aerosoft might have to abandon their A330 or severely delay it
Aerosoft is stuck in a knot rn because they can't cancel it now that they've taken taxpayers money
Ini a310 flew like a fighter jet the two times I flew it on msfs
Their models in xplane were far more believable
theres also freeware alternatives for their ongoing projects, aviotek eddf and a330 ini which i think will put a hole in their sales
that aviotek eddf is really good too, for free
the xp fm is better
Yes that's what I just said
Yeah you did something wrong then
Probably because it was their own plane in Xplane
Pretty much but they can't stop now
XP FM isn't exactly realistic either tho. I hope MS24 has an improvement
P3D wasn't bad hence why they use it in actual simulators
Nah, plenty of ToT in X-Plane. The MSFS one is just poorly done. That's all.
Probably because the MSFS is asobo contract
P3D doesn't Even have a real flight model. Save for the handful of planes that use an external one
Xplanes flight model is arguably no better than msfs
Good fucking god I regret resetting my phone's keyboard
At least the a300 in xplane actually flies believably for a large airliner
I can take off with a load in msfs and do barrel rolls at 2000ft all day without losing altitude or control
It's a medium sized airliner tho?
The flight model in msfs for the iniA300 has been done quite accurately. They even have a functioning CG integration that drastically changes the physics which they didn't have in xp
Yeah that's some massive exaggeration 😭
I have a video of it somewhere
It's the reason I never fly the 310 in msfs despite it being free
Just fly it normally and you'll be fine 😭
Sure, but the flight model is still grossly incorrect for flying it normally
It makes a huge difference in hand flying departures and approaches
youdontkmowme was muted. | continued to troll and argue after being told to stop
bruh what did i miss lol
me getting tired of flogger's yapping, then them talking back asker being asked to stop
That looks wild
I've been enjoying BMS
Even missions where nothing really happens end up feeling more immersive than DCS
Love the way ATC works, and the game does a great job setting up a feasible, busy battlespace
A friend of mine has a very good YouTube channel where he does mentour pilot-y style videos about aircraft accidents in Italian and he uses MSFS to recreate crashed, and he told me that the ink A310 behaved very closely to what was recorded in the FDR every time he used it.
I also used to think it was rubbish, but maybe it's not that bad, I've flown it recently and it's definitely better than how it was months ago (which is the last time I flew it)
(sorry for the ping, I forgot)
Although as usual it being correct =/= feels good, or realistic
maybe they've improved it since the last time I tried it, but it was awful before and I promise no A310 could do what you could before.
As of now it's been a few months since I've flown it, I'll try and fly it one of these days, I'm currently trying to "force" myself to fly some of the planes I haven't touched in ages anyway
Flightbeam Studios are back with another stunning scenery - this time for the whopper that is San Francisco!
Across this 7min video we blast through tons of features and I'll sum up my thoughts at the end!
https://www.flightbeam.net/product-page2/ksfo-captain's-edition-for-microsoft-flight-simulator
Hardware Info: https://britishavgeek.com/ab...
Finally got round to buying this
well worth it
pristine flying conditions
how are you liking it
She flies just lovely
It is slow but not a lot they could do about it
Love the loading screen art
Very SAS, but apparently thats how they are
Campaign is getting very busy. Got a Sidewinder kill and two HARMs on target tonight!
making me really wanna try bms again 
We have Sniper pods, Graphite bombs, JASSMs, SDBs, Harpoons... so much more weapon variety 😄
plus Block 40 WAR HUD
even has working TFR and Navflir
i might give it a shot again if i dont give up half way again
contrail went there 
only downside(?) to FB is there is no interior modelling of the main terminal building, but other than that seems FB is overall way better 
savage
BMW/AMSim one is perfectly acceptable, but I'm glad I held off and waited for the Flightbeam one
Flightbeam are seriously S tier
Does it come with a GSX profile?
Flightbeam is better than the BMW one. They've been developing it for over a year and to crazy detail. The BMW one is great but the Flightbeam is unreal. Idk what it's like for performance tho probably similar to the Inibuilds KJFK
I'm not really playing MSFS much right now, but flightbeam's prior airports have had far better performance for me than inibuilds
obviously msfs is different on every pc but in general flightbeam airports have great performance for their size
Yeah I only compare it to KJFK because you have San Francisco Bay just across the water AND it's quite a large airport. Their airports are quite surreal tho. I hope if anyone they make a DFW or ATL
No idea, though they usually release one separately
busy airspace over Korea
If it's ever going to be on the ini website then they make one
Flightbeam is usually only through contrail iirc
ah, yes, it does include a WIP GSX profile
That's good
Sale on at IL2 https://il2sturmovik.com/store/battle-of-normandy/
Experience the Trijet 727 Freighter - a feature-complete aircraft addon with stunning visuals, immersive sound, and realistic systems simulation. Stay updated on the latest news and release in July 2024!
A 727 is nice, but aren’t FSS known for being rather mediocre
Also, just the freight 727, no passenger
I guess worth to keep an eye on it, but I doubt I’ll buy it quickly
727 is a seperate team/product, but of course still money flowing into that could have been used on the ejets
until msfs24 now 
They make good products save the the ejets... Which are good kinda.. But half baked.
Their p2006t and stuff are good.
Ah well, I’m wrong then
Moza have announced their stuff for flight sims
FFB Joystick base which is compatible with other joysticks is mega as I have a warthog
Their non ejet stuff is pretty good
Lmfao
Circle to land in Genova 😄
Looks like xplane mobile
Watch the Just Flight RJ Professional trailer and overview shared on the FSElite stage at FlightSimExpo 2024.
sending that into eglc 
oops sorry ping
it's XP11
not sure what the mobile one is based on
8NM would give a kick. I have 4 NM on my wheel and you really feel it after a while
Would imagine that fanless motor getting fairly warm too
How much forces would you feel in a real aircraft? I would imagine a fair bit with mechanical, but nothing but the spring return force with electro or hydraulic
for fbw the only stuff you'd feel would be when on ground but that's just vibrations coming through the stick
I'd want it for helicopters though
Download AweSun Remote Desktop: https://dada.link/fomIHf
Get 7-Day Remote Game Trial: 4TBA5ZWS3I, Only 200! Reward link: https://dada.link/9VhcOj
Check out the AweRay Remote Smart Power Plug: https://dada.link/lC_vM3
How to remote play PC games: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xutk60_D6Gk
For more amazing, full flight MSFS content:
SUBSCRIBE to my 2nd...
for those who didnt watch fsexpo msfs2024 dev update
fairly decent recap
Helis in msfs 🤢😆
Ah, interesting, glad to know what I have is better than a mobile game 😅
looks like its 10
If any of you get the tail number reference I'll be very pleased.
