#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 7 of 1
#dcs #combat #dcsworld #simulation #helicopter
Polychop Simulations DCS: OH-58D Kiowa Warrior Cockpit
https://discord.gg/HqcyvhzVeW
LFPG (horrible taxiway bumps there, hope i don't get sent back) -> EDDF
I do enjoy a good Southwest livery
Same here
Thank you so much for supporting me in the ini server
I was thinking when I was putting it down on that pad (shakily) that I'd love to be able to throttle down a bit without sliding forward!
I've spent like 1h trying to understand why the throttle would move without me doing anything when I moved the nozzles, only like after 1h of back and forth in the MSFS forums I realized it was by design
Yeah right? And also how can you do a proper hover landing? You always have to come with some forward speed otherwise if you set the nozzles to 90 it will just go up
I can understand why they've done it this way, honestly. The MSFS control options are miserably generic compared to what we can do in DCS.
Yeah but at least make it an option rather than just forcing it
I was heavy enough that I could just about hover at the initial "90 point" of the nozzles, but i also used quite a bit of aft stick
hide it as best you can, put it in dev mode, I don't care, I just want to be able to properly fly it myself
Yeah, same, I could just barely hover and it just went forward, but it must have hovered just a few cm off the ground because the brakes didn't work
would be nice to, you know, throttle back in that case without putting the nozzles forward 
But yeah, I was pleasantly surprised by it.
The cockpit is really nice, if weirdly laid out.
It's actually fun to fly.
Shame it doesn't have visible cargo, or presumably GSX support, because this could be a fun bush plane for NeoFly. 😄
Yeah it's nice, just a question, how quickly did it take you to understand this copilot assist?
I feel very stupid after this evening, I thought until the end throttle 3 was just a bind to control nozzles 😅
I just couldn't wrap my head around how to control the aircraft when I didn't have throttle control (because the nozzles was messing with the throttle binding) 
Yeah, but you can't control throttle and nozzles indipendenty can you?
Correct
Yeah that, it took me a loong time to get my head around that
I understood it from having watched the launch video yesterday, it explained it in a bit of detail that I happened to catch
I was like "how could I ever land if I can't throttle back with nozzles 90?"
I see, I came into it completely blind, expecting it to be a big harrier
To be fair, I've bound throttle 3 to my TM Warthog Throttle's friction slider control, which gives me very finegrained control over it
Yeah, I also have it to a proper axis
The same I use for nozzles in the Harrier mind you
Ah cool
Same here
I found it possible to just slowly reduce that axis until I started descending, then pitched back a bit to control the forward slide
and ground effect doesn't really seem to be a thing for VTOL vehicles in MSFS so you just sink all the way to the ground
Yeah but eugh
Just let me reduce throttle
Yeah, but apart from that I was really impressed with it
Might pick up some more of the local legends at this rate. I have a few of them so far.
The Antonov 225 is the most impressive imo, also an inibuilds product
Yeah the an225 was surprisingly not terrible
The detail they put in to the animations and so on is incredible
@untold finch do u own the gazelle
Yep
It's night and day different to the original version. The flight model is good now, it's pretty fast, very agile, and the HOT missiles are fun. The FLIR on the Mike variant is great too. It does look a little dated (though it is being overhauled bit by bit) and it does behave weirdly when you try and do loops, but other than that I love it.
I prefer it to the Kiowa mainly because the UK flew them until recently, but the Kiowa will be much more capable, albeit slower
might trial it just for the heck of it
I also think Polychop are a great bunch of guys
it's pretty much the only helicopter i dont own
Yeah def trial it
i like the idea of popping up and just slinging missiles away and then going down
hows the hover?
when you're in the cpg seat
Easy enough that I don't usually have to worry about using the AP hover hold, it feels quite natural
It will struggle to hover when fully loaded on a warm day on Syria though, especially in the mountains
And fully loaded is 4x HOTs
But it is quite frugal on fuel so you can drop that down to ~60% and still fly for a while
can it also carry any mg when carrying hots?
Nope, the HOTs required different cockpit equipment to work
It all changes when you rearm on the Lima. The Mike can only take HOTs
The periscope the Lima uses is fun as well, definitely harder to use than the nice clear TV screen with FLIR, but a nice challenge
The rotor animation will also be replaced at some point, with the new rotor blur tech, when the Kiowa is out the door
theres no news to when the kiowa is coming, right?
Not yet, no, but I have a feeling it will be within the next few months now
Its a fantastic heli, just be aware of the limited weapons range, it struggles against anything that shoots back. Trial it OFC
Anyone heard of this person? touting himself as a dev on the x-plane forum https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/627584385360723999/1230512067459547258/Screenshot_2024-04-18-06-44-38-25_572064f74bd5f9fa804b05334aa4f912.jpg?ex=663396aa&is=662121aa&hm=ef60a84b36d1d320bb3de35f6de097d131c84ee186db5f4b3d9f36d51e4b898e&
Macca707 has been around in DCS for a while yeah
@untold finch I managed to remove that throttle/nozzle interlink from the Do-31
https://youtu.be/SZFAJ-rSTow
now I would only need a program like Spad.next to do throttle angle from somewhere more convenient than the devmode menu
it's really cool as you have to manage the vertical lift fan thrust and main engine thrust very carefully
this a transition to forward flight
you can also rotate the nozzles beyond 90°
imagine not allowing your users to do this stuff because it's "beyond the complexity scope"
Oh neat!
Seems like a reasonable solution I guess, spad.next seems almost mandatory for MSFS at this point if you want to use any hardware beyond the basics
If you already have Spad.next the vars you are looking to modify are:
FO_AI set to -1
This will activate all the vertical related things without the "FO" taking control
Then Throttle 3 will control the lift fans, at 0% throttle they'll shut down and the doors will close
To change nozzle angle you need to control:
Vert_ANIM
Checking out the helipads round Vancouver in a Dauphin
there are other things related to the nozzles that the FO modifies, I haven't seen anything wrong with leaving all of them at zero, but just in case you have any issues they are:
PEG_THROTTLE
PEG_test
PEG_NOZZLE
Nozzle_needle
LON_CTR activities
Do people actually use the text feature that much?
I'm thinking about using VATSIM again but being a VR user, it puts me off a bit
especially london
flying in the uk
💀
I'm still waiting to see what the point of this is
Surely it will hit the exact same issues as the REX one did
Whats the issue with rex?
The MSFS weather API is pretty closed down, so all it can do is paint the entire skybox with the same weather
Oof thats gay
tbh i really don't get what's wrong with the standard weather in game
i hear lots of people saying it's bad but i never get why
Active Sky FS comes with a a large set of features. It integrates directly with MSFS using a combination of techniques, although the developer has not elaborated on how they’ve now been able to circumvent the MSFS weather API that was previously a limiting factor.
Maybe this will be better then?
I'm fairly confident I'll be able to make a community folder drag and drop thing for the Do-31
For people who own spad.next?
Or as a way to split the binding into throttle 3 axis/throttle 4 axis or something like that?
bombeagle
Just want to have some fun with it before it's gone
(there is of course a chance that it won't become gone but it's not looking positive right now)
been flying the 136 recently
like alot
and still man
really makes me pissed that JF don't want to keep updating it
Rip M2000
My favourite plane in DCS
honestly this whole saga's really sapped my interest in upcoming DCS modules, who knows if something like this can happen again
Yep. A year ago, I'd have pre-ordered the Chinook immediately after seeing today's trailer. Now... no.
Is it acc looking that vad
Bad
Well, their Flight Model guy, their Radar and Systems guy and their 3D art guy all bailed, leaving quite a few smoking bridges behind them.
They've got community managers and SMEs insinuating that ED are not paying because ED can't pay.
And now the Chinook pre-order has dropped, with tell-tale signs of it being earlier than they'd expected/planned (the list of early access features is coming soon 😂) almost like they need the money...
Meanwhile in MSFS land, the IFE Tornado dropped and I like it a lot.
They actually managed to get a working TFR like the one in the JustFlight Vulcan, but I think this might actually be able to fly the TFR path itself
wait i thouht only 1 person dipped?
wait
i just SAW THAT
HYPE
it looks so damn pretty omg
CptSmiley quit on the first day of the big reveal.
Metal2Mesh bailed soon after, his twitter is now gone, etc.
Galinette posted his goodbye either today or yesterday.
I am so done running on the early access DCS treadmill
They haven't even figured out what features it will have yet
aaa im so TEMPTED
The early access announcement is, in itself, early access 😂
I agree, I want it too
yeah
ouch
They need to release more things to pay for the previous things 😉
If it helps, you'll effectively be paying Razbam for the Strike Eagle by buying it
I will also say though that their June release date is utter bullshit and they know it
Do we get to fly the EA version now or later? also tempted but v wary
Later, the release date is apparently June this year.
Xplane 146?
Is this the classic "we don't care about Xplane anymore" thing?
yes
v1.2.3 was the last xp11 update
all that time ago
just flight are awful for it
they get teams like thranda to port there work to xp11 but then stop paying them to keep them updated
so there just isn't a point
tbh Thranda are making a killing of there GA aircraft
literally everyone I know has the BN-2A
its the same thing as well
they just straight up refuse to update to XP12
Thranda have already said they would do the work for free for the community but JF said nah ur ight
they make the money then when thats gone they just leave
same thing will happen with the F70/F100
and again with the avro RJ
and I'll keep buying them 
carenado is the same but at least they do it for every sim
I switched to the dark side
What
Is it worth buying?
If you want a well-made combat aircraft in MSFS, where there isn't a whole lot to do with combat aircraft, then yes, I'd say so.
I think if the FM was as good as DCS I'd love to fly combat aircraft in MSFS
Recently I almost do everything but shooting stuff in DCS
Yeah it's a nippy little thing, probably the hardest helicopter to get airborne in smoothly imo
my takeoffs in it are always rusty if i've not flown for a little while, the Hind is so much easier
it felt like taking off the apache with 16 hellfires
i then got vrs'd into a building
:(
Thanks. I suck at air combat and one reason I never got into DCS was that I got tired of learning a plane just to get shot down repeatedly. So in that regard a well-made combat aircraft in MSFS sounds like the right thing. I´ll give it a closer look.
Yeah, the only combat aircraft in MSFS that really feels "perfect" to fly is the Vulcan imo
I took it around the Mach Loop yesterday, that was a blast. I think you can probably get quite creative with it honestly!
Watched a video on it and it does look indeed like you can get quite a lot out of it. There are also free German airbases on FS.to which would be great. But doesn´t JF also work on a Tornado?
I heard the FM is awful
yeah you don't have to fight in DCS
Sometimes I just open DCS and fly around, just like I would in MSFS
It was up until a year ago. They completely reworked it for free, and now it's really very good. Got a couple of ex-Army Gazelle pilots in my squadron, they speak highly about it.
Interesting, is there some mod you have to download or something, or did they just improve it?
They are, and I imagine JustFlight's one will probably be a little more in-depth, but iirc they're only doing the British GR.1 rather than the German IDS/ECR plus GR.1.
Improved straight in the base game
it was awful before, it flew it had ailerons and elevators
honestly just a massive redemption arc for PolyChop (who are, to be fair, mostly a brand new team by this point)
Free half mil VFR charts for a large part of europe https://secais.dfs.de/pilotservice/briefing/aup/aup_edit.jsp?lang=en
taking advantage of the CTP-related control
O is ctp today
Damn someone else flying Aeroflot
Weirdly also Headwing Sukhoi doesn't appear in the game for me even though the installer says everything's fine. And I never bothered to try to reinstall
honestly you arent missing out on much
i kind of wish i did an A320 on this flight instead of the SSJ
fuuuck that thing looks so cool
Kind of thought so
I just do pretty much every one of my flights in the 737 since I don't have the Fenix A320
Bilbao
easyJem 🟧

my unpopular take with the fenix A320 is that im not really a fan
the external software takes up like 40% CPU and an unholy amount of memory, all for the displays, which really doesnt even need to be in an external software in the first place?
i agree lol
like, my FPS in the fenix A320 is in the 20s, when compared to the PMDG 737-800 (which id say is comparable in quality), which is like in the 45-50s
i hate the fenix for that sole reason
the livery manager is nice too, but the latest fenix update breaks pretty much everything even more than the block 2 update did
i find myself flying the FBW A320 significantly more often, heck even the latinvfr/headwind mod for the A320ceo, just because the realism downgrade really makes the performance upgrade worthwhile
I don't really notice the Fenix being much worse than other add-ons
To me where I fly and the presence of photogrammetry add a lot more load than the aircraft (I only have default scenery btw, apart from LCY)
I’m serious in my 20FPS to 50FPS comparison, 20FPS is the bottom line for the plane systems to work correctly and I’ll very frequently have fake turbulence from the autopilot losing where it is from FPS drops
I get the performance stuff, Fenix + heavy photogrammetry area + a major intl payware airport causes my cpu to pull some stupid high wattage. but thats also an intel moment
I don't know what to say, I think part of the reason why I don't have problems is that I really care a lot about stability, so I have set things to have enough "overhead" that it never lags or stutters, as I feared that could cause crashes, but even then, I don't really notice anything bad with the Fenix specifically, now that I think about it, the bigges cause of low frames to the point of being noticeable (going below 25/30fps) is it there is lots of traffic (so AI planes) around - I also left all the AI planes alone and I have no model matching pack to reduce the load that it has on my systems. I don't care about seeing good looking planes while taxiing.
It is a tiny little bit heavier than other planes, but although I haven't measured it, I don't think it's more than a 5/10% difference
If anything my most perf heavy aircraft is ini’s a300 at times
that thing can struggle a lot sometimes
I've just been flying one plane for the past half a year, the PMDG 738, and I'm having fun xD
To be honest I didn't know about such performance issues with the Fenix, although I never actually planned to buy it yet, firstly because it's impossible, secondly just because I actually prefer Boeing
Like, I'm having fun with just one plane. And I've flown it literally in 3 liveries too all this time. I did one flight in Aeroflot livery (starting a second one now), a couple flights in American's old livery, and all the rest is just American's Astrojet livery
(Waiting for the 777-300ER)
At the cruising altitude, FL390
Started descending
The flight is done
Don’t mind the Russian volanta, couldn’t find an option to change the language in the app
Also fun fact, don’t fly to Kazan airport at night unless you have some payware version cause the default has no lights on the runway
Some bits of Spain might as well be considered British…
These toilets at Glasgow look dodgy, like you'd go down and never see the light of day again
well it is Glasgow
Vem comigo voar nessa belíssima aeronave, vamos juntos analisar as últimas novidades dessa máquina incrível que está para ser lançada para X-plane!
Tire suas dúvidas sobre o simulador ou aviação real! Vamos bater um papo divertido e juntos alçar voos!
Meu canal - https://www.youtube.com/c/Borbaaa
Especificações do meu computador:
MB: ASUS ROG...
Tomorrow
Just Flight PA-38 confirmed for Thursday
Maddog update
Description:
FIXED
- fixed issue with turnaround mode not working properly on b183
- fixed issue with holding drawing on ND 'flickering' when holding had no speed constraint or PERF data invalid (VNAV unavailable)
- fixed issue with ovhd right map lt panel disappearing when HFDS selected
- fixed issue with NAV remaining in ARM mode after departing certain SIDs
- fixed issue with fms not considering last climb speed constraint if after TOC
- fixed issue with EGT not cooling during motoring
OTHER - improved FPS when terrain mode ON on ND
- added 'Hardware Configuration Tutorial.pdf' and 'List of Commands.pdf' to the documentation folder
- added MobiFlight profiles for Honeycomb Alpha and Bravo and for miniCockpit miniFCU in Redist folder
- added option to arm spoilers moving the assigned axis sligthly AFT. (To disabled it, set ArmSpoilersFromAxis=0 in the maddogx.ini file)
@untold finch I've bodged togheter a sort of ""fix"" for the Do-31, you can find more details here
https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/local-legend-15-dornier-do-31/638322/105?u=fd1003
Microsoft Flight Simulator Forums
I managed to bodge a “fix” for the Do-31. A bit of explanation, as far as I can tell, the pegasus don’t actually have rotating nozzles, all of the capabilities to lift vertically come from the vertical lift jets, unless there is other stuff in the encrypted files, but obviously I can’t look at those. So, what I’ve done is that I’...
APL2 route, EDDF -> LRTR in the ASL 737-800BCF
And a quick test of the updated SWS PC-12, flying PAJN -> PASI
Love finding the real hangars for these little tiny commuter airlines
Awesome! I swear the Pegasus nozzles rotate though, but I could be wrong
They do, but as far as I can see it's just an animation
ah, cool
Looking forward to it getting decrypted, so I can have a proper look though, they might have done something more complex
Do they often get decrypted?
Well... How do I put it in a rule-friendly way? If they were still encrypted you couldn't install them from ""third party websites"" 😅
So yeah, I need to wait until they publish it on that ""third party"" """store"""
Unfortunately it's the only way, I tried to contact Asobo, they won't give you anything
(even though I bought and, at least supposedly, own the thing)
speedbird over pittsburgh
this is a lost flight because i have no intention on actually completing the entire 7 hours
Weak
It's there and it's locked because ED isn't ready for criticism
https://forum.dcs.world/topic/347631-dcs-ch-47f-faq/
ED Forums
Dear all, thank you for your interest and questions on the DCS: CH-47. To address all those questions and concerns we have created this FAQ. We hope it will help give you some ideas of what to expect from this exciting new module. How much is the DCS: CH-47F? During Pre-purchase you can save 30% ...
#msfs2020 #flightsimulator #microsoftflightsimulator #msfs #justflight #vulcans
Product page: https://www.justflight.com/product/pa38-tomahawk-microsoft-flight-simulator
Available now priced at £29.99/€35.95/$41.99 this popular Piper trainer plane, developed to the highest possible standard is now available to fly in Microsoft Flight Simulat...
A2A Comanche update too
A300 seems pretty solid now!
Good to hear
And it's open again
Oh did it get fixed up?
Seems to have been
Good news! DCS is now re-selling dumbed down versions of old content. That's surely what everyone asked for?
Wdym?
F-5E/F-86F/MiG-15 are being made into low-fidelty modules for Flaming Cliffs 2024
It won't take away the existing high-fidelity ones, there'll just be two versions of each
Yeah just like confirmed a couple years ago
MAJOR L
Ah, but you see - that was for the new product, Modern Air Combat, which is now shelved and all the work is being put into DCS instead 😉
Su35,F35,F22 are classified
You call them dumbed down versions but all servers have hot starts 🤣🤣🤣
And actually knowing guys that fly irl just to jump in and fly is better for them
I wont be buying it as i already have them but its no issue its just drama burger
So is the Su-27, that's the point of FC3 modules really
you can add stuff that you wouldn't be able to do full-fidelity modules of
I can guarantee that "all servers" don't 😉 plenty of us don't play on public servers
Not all but most
it's not really drama, it's more "oh dear, it looks like things are getting pretty desperate over at ED HQ if this is what they're having to sell now"
Not really MAC was planned 5 years ago
And was ment to have a fair few modules in there
Only thing stopping a FF SU27 is its radar system
and that was a mistake back then 😉
they were already struggling to finish what they'd begun
adding another brand new game on top of that is madness
It wouldnt affect guys that have been in dcs for a long time, People complain about FC3 etc, But back then even lock on and flanker 2.0 just like MAC, Lock on and flanker 2.0 has made dcs what it is today
I like using Lwin+Home key and let the A.I do the rest i cba to flick switches 🙂
No I know, I'm not saying it's going to ruin the game for me
I just think it's a sign that ED are scraping the bottom of the barrel
which is worrying
Its just designed for new people thats all
tbf the full fidelity MiG-15/F-86/F-5E are so simple that a new person could fly them fine
they've taken three very simple aircraft and dumbed them down even more
Not really i mean explain why there dumbed down?
I dont get that part in what way?
Flaming Cliffs modules have all their systems abstracted
So it's just "press button to make X happen" rather than "follow the process to make X happen"
but the three aircraft they picked don't really have super complex systems...
So you mean like radar lock press enter?
Thats wrong heres why all my FF modules are setup in the same way on the keyboard F15E to F16 i use them exactly the same way for FC3 for muscle memory, If you take the F18 take away the clicky switches it just became FC3
No, it really doesn't
Yarp it does
I'm going to try and explain this again
I see what your saying
The difference between an FC3 module and a full fidelity module is not just "clicky switches"
It's to do with the fact that the systems in the FC3 modules are superficial, they're not simulated to any depth, you select weapons by pressing "next weapon" rather than following the actual process you would in the aircraft
The radars are all simplified, the navigation is all simplified, etc
Have you the JF17, Its commands are setup like fc3, press 2 for navigation etc
Yes, I do have the JF-17, and that's not exactly how it works, let's be honest
The JF-17 has a full HNS simulation, which simulates INS degradation, it allows you to modify your flight plan, enter co-ordinates, etc
FC3 modules, you can just switch between waypoints that are pre-placed in the mission editor
FC3 made sense initially
They had old products from FC2, they only had two modules out for DCS, they needed more stuff to give the game more life
Making more of these modules now doesn't really make the same amount of sense, and the aircraft they're choosing to "simplify" are already super simple
I mean what's next, a FC3 Spitfire? One button to turn it on?
So whats the differs from if i press the F key for flaps in fc3 and F key for flaps with the f18?
It's not about the control scheme...
DCS seems to be a great sim with a great drama free community
ask yourself this - would a Chuck's Guide need ~500 pages to discuss how to use an FC3 module? No, because there's basically nothing to learn with them, you need to know about 5 buttons and you can do pretty much everything with it
which is why they get boring so fast
@hollow oracle i avoid that community like the plague
@untold finch go look at the fc3 manual for the f15c in dcs directory how many pages is it? I cant remember but still has a manual
SU-25, 84 pages, 6 of those are contents and history, another 6 are a list of acronyms, and ends credits
Su-27, 143 pages, just over 25 pages before you even finish the history and design section
MiG-29, 116 pages, again about 16 pages of fluff
welcome to flight sims
A-10A, 104 pages, a third of that is just fluff
Anyway, I don't think I'm getting anywhere with this conversation, have a good evening folks
Have a good one
Yup
I am torn honestly
I want it
But I don't want to buy anything from the ED store until they pay Razbam
So I think imma hold off
Yeah I'm on hiatus of buying ED content until 2025
Gonna give them the rest of the year to fix things
I think I'm going to do a similar thing
Although I really want Kola 😦
Waiting some months will give it time for content to develop
Or the map to flop
Either or
So, which sim is this?
Marinefliegen my beloved
idk if i can hold back with rotary aircraft
dcs is lacking those alot and im happy to take any addition to it
Bear in mind that it's the internet, truth is one of the first casualties
@untold finch do u know any good servers for rotary
liberation is ass and has no campaigns for it
i just wanna fly blackhawk
and i dont think ECW has it right
@trim harbor rotaheads server if you just want choppers
thank uuuuuuu
For public servers, I can only recommend my own squadron's one; Helo World by Black Shark Den. Our campaign dev recently just revamped it. I've not flown on any others.
It also supports the UH-60 mod
im reading about it now, it has tons of missions
i'll check that out asap , tyvm!!!!!!!
They dont hire UH60 EMEA pilots which is unfortunate
That's just for squadron recruitment rather than the public server
What do people use for DCS fixed wing throttle? I have my honeycomb for civ fixed wing but thats not really suitable for combat aircraft. Used to use saitek x52 years ago, but thats long dead, might buy a new one, but they aint exactly cheap
TWCS Throttle
ye ik i was just looking into it, i never knew there were pure rotary squadrons
Warthog HOTAS throttle
Yeah I haven't met any others 😅
VKB STECS
how do ops work with all diferent airframes?
and VKB GNXT + Evo gimbal for the stick
Each platoon (helicopter type) will assign a flight lead, each flight lead gets briefed on the overall plan and their parts in it, they then work out how best to execute that
I actually still have one of those consigned to a cupboard somewhere. Never liked it, the ridiculous weight was the main thing. Might get one of the Virpils. Strangely my interest in DCS seems to be rekindled. 🤷♂️
thats what i personally loved about the warthog, its weight
I'm using the warthog hotas grip on a virpil stick base and extension, and the warthog throttle with the slew sensor upgrade, plus rudder pedals, button box, mfd frames, etc
mans kitted out
WinWing, VKB, Virpil. You really can't go wrong
All of them will be 10x the hardware TM will ever make
Used a full Virpil pit at a friend's house, I own the winwing rudders, and the VKB STECS and Gladiator NXT as I mentioned. It's all fantastic hardware. Each have their own little pros and cons
You lot probably know this, but. I decided I should update the free DCS blackhawk and there are 3 versions now 🥳 The UH60L, UH60R and an armed version
the L is ace, about to try the R
mh60 it is
crash it into someone's backyard
a random ass flight from heathrow to amsterdam turned out to be a huge milestone for me
i did my first successful and real go around, because i wasnt established on the glideslope for some reason
and i finally recorded my landing, and it looked really hot from the outside
good job
when it comes to xplane, is 11 or 12 worth it?
i really kind of want to get the beluga, but thats only in xplane 11
im interested in something that performs better than MSFS too, graphics dont matter but realism does for me
Beluga is coming to MSFS2024 anyway, by Inibuilds again
Quick hop from KPVF -> O08 on my round-the-world-hopefully trip
Another flight where I remember why I love the A2A Comanche
I noticed during my walkaround that i could move the rudder freely by hand
what I did not think of at that point was that that meant the rudder was no longer connected to the pedals
as i found out when trying to add a bit of slip into my approach, and as i stepped on the pedal, nothing happened
@untold finch
trying out ur squadrons server rn
its alot of fun
thank you to guitar man
hes a great chap
oh yeah he's a great dude
memphis is cool too
i feel bad that i suck with the blackhawk haha
its such a heavy boy
I like the UH-60 but I find that the SCAS can go a bit funny sometimes
And the slingloading being broken makes me sad
Incredible for a mod though
no proper BLUFOR transport heli tho
but huey
huey seems abit broken tho
its so wiggly
like idk if im doing something wrong
but its so goddamn shaky
i feel like im too hard on the collective
Oh, that means you're either going through translational lift or you're approaching vNE
Watch Untitled and millions of other DCS World videos on Medal, the largest Game Clip Platform.
bad example but
also, you can fly the Mi-8 as BLUFOR, the Czechs have been doing so for ages now 😉
yeah, you're way past the top speed it's meant to go
because the new engine model lets you easily do so
Max speed is 110 knots, anything past that and you're likely to end up in either retreating blade stall (not correctly simulated in the Huey iirc) or just structural failure
previously, before the rework, you'd have to really push to get it past 110kts, and it'd tend to get counteracted by flapback anyway
now it just breezes through it
is there a mod
to maybe limit it
or any trick to NOT go overspeed constantly
sadly not, you can make a lua change to put it back to the old engine model but:
- it gets wiped every time the game updates
- you can no longer keep up with other hueys
mainly just keep an eye on your speed really, and try and avoid exceeding 110kts
that said, i guess the Chinook will solve your issue in a month 😉
provided it works properly on release
im a transport person
i need chinook
but i dont wanna cope and preorder
i wonder if kiowa gets a preorder?
oh thats weird
it's just coming out straight into feature-complete state, no early access stuff to worry about
it does happen from time to time
The MB-339 was released feature-complete a few years ago
struggling to remember what the last one was before that though
i defo learned that i need more practice in formation flying w rotary
i never did that before lol
yeah it's good fun 😄
it definitely takes a fair bit of practise
avoiding VRS and settling with power is something that takes time to figure out
love formation flight though
i found it easier to avoid VRS since learning what it is and how it works
the russian helicopters alos tend to be wayyy better in handling imho
They're just more stable imo
That's because the Apache's flight model is uh
pretty bad
the SMEs keep telling ED to fix it but they're not fixing the stuff that they're pointing out
They're definitely going through a bit of a rough spot right now
I'm hoping that the recent community pushback gives them a wakeup call
denver to omaha
they say denver airport is a satanic cabal meeting ground
blucifer does not help those accusations
Blue Mustang (colloquially known as Blucifer) is a cast-fiberglass sculpture of a mustang located at Denver International Airport (DEN). Colored bright blue, with illuminated glowing red eyes, it is notable both for its striking appearance and for having killed its sculptor, Luis Jiménez, when a section of it fell on him at his studio.
Regarding the Kola map...
never mind they appear to have general confusion
Is the Razbam/ED drama sorted now?
No
This thing is awesome
it even has the world's worst bedroom just in front of the pilot/copilot seats
oh wow the navigator's map actually shows you your real position
Had to dial the returb profile for this thing down all the way though, it was throwing me all over the place
Inibuilds KMKE coming out tomorrow for free
Time to plan a route to Milwaukee I guess
Welcome to iniBuilds Milwaukee International - gateway to the American Midwest. Coming soon to the iniBulds Store for FREE!
Learn more: https://inib.uk/milwaukee-msfs-announcement
https://inib.uk/milwaukee-msfs
Join our Discord: https://inib.uk/discord
Check out our forum: https://forum.inibuilds.com
Facebook: https://facebook.com/iniBuilds
T...
if only we had this
i would definitely enjoy a KC-135
Also free? That’s hella nice
I guess time to plan a Milwaukee - Boston
#microsoftflightsimulator #msfs2020 #flightsim
In our last video before we release into Early Access we examine what to expect out of the launch of BATC. We examine common issues, our decisions around LLMs and the launching feature set included with the program.
Join our Discord! https://discord.com/invite/UgrhCG6rGn
Website: https://www.be...
This is their last video before EA release
im so excited for this, i cannot fly with a human ATC, and i want training on a decent AI that isnt yelling at me to expedite ascent
Wwwww
tfw still waiting for my poor poor phantom
No one in here fly IL2 regularly? Not fired it up for a while, feel like I want to get back into it.
and it has exactly the same problem as South Atlantic where the coastlines are just a 4-5 foot high vertical wall
and the same problem as Sinai where the buildings have incredibly noticeable pop-in when you get within 100m
I know Enigma can be divisive but he has some good points and there's some good previews here that aren't carefully curated
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqNSiSmOaRo
A green map finally came to DCS so we are looking at it. Here is a pretty neutral review of the map so I hope people find this helpful.
►Discord: https://discord.gg/enigma89
►Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/enigma89
►Merch: https://enigma-72.creator-spring.com/
Chapters
00:00 Intro
00:49 Airfields
01:49 Mission Maker POV
03:09 Modeled versus ...
it looks bad
sorry to say
yes i know, unfinished and EA but
mfg wtf is this
atleast TRY to make the undetailed area look nice
i imagine they will when they detail it but yeah, it's a tad rough
at least they added some cool stuff to Murmansk
god knows to when kola will be finished, the current play area is abit meh
What on earth
oh it gets better
they've baked the map shadows into the textures
so you get blue grass
and i'm pretty sure that Bodø's runway is painted straighter than this
plus uh
Yikes
Yeah, it's far earlier access than it should have been launched in imo
but ED needs cash so 😏
that does feel like the vibe 
uh... as someone not up on DCS drama, why do people dislike enigma?
he's had some hot takes over the years that a lot of people haven't agreed with
such as "we should have more low fidelity modules"
and he has previously come off as a bit "i run a massive server in DCS thus my opinion carries more weight"
definitely seems like a chill guy when i've spoken to him though
Wouldnt pay good money for that 💩
Yeah, I never understood why that was an issue, I think it's fair enough, as long as he states it's still his opinion, also I think a lot of people took things a bit too much at face value instead of actually listening what he had to say.
The low fidelity modules is a good example of that IMO. He didn't say that high fidelity planes should not be made anymore, just that, maybe having more low fidelity planes could also work, and make more sense financially, at the end for me personally the biggest reason to play DCS is the FM, systems are nice, but I wouldn't have anything wrong against an FC-3 level EF-2000 or Tornado.
I think the fact that the FM in the FC3 MiG-29 is good enough that it will be the exact same as the one in the FF Mig-29 speaks a lot about how even the low fidelity stuff is still very good, especially compared to fighters in MSFS.
I'd take the DCS MiG-29 over any MSFS plane in a heartbeat 😅 it's just so fun to fly. But I have nothing against also having some high fidelity modules that you need to thoroughly learn, which IIRC is the exact stance Enigma took
nah brother what is this
$50
btw
Assume the screenies here are from the unfinished bit of the kola map. The ones on their site look reasonable.
you got any games on your phone?
i didnt even know this feature existed on boeings, its a pointer that shows you your vertical speed, set altitude, and waypoints all on one bar
so you can set up descents perfectly
It's super handy on the planes that have it
SWA opted out for some reason
probably because they were too afraid their pilots would be lost if it wasn't just a 737 classic with more screen space ahah
weren't they one of the very few operators (if not the only one) to use the cursed classic screen layout?
Yeah they used to
SWA being just SWA I guess
Yeah it definitely need a bit more time in the oven
Its the same way ED never added Canterbury cathedrial into the channel map, I asked why not? They replied to many pixels....... Make of that what you will
Turns out that the team who made Kola are, in part, the same team who made South Atlantic 🙂
they both have the same Project Lead and Vector Data Specialist
oh these are great
Lmfao
New Fokker 70/100 update: https://www.justflight.com/in-development/f70-100-professional
gorgeous artwork
It does?
I had no idea 💀
Press CTR twice and it'll show up
Gotcha, thanks
i thought its out for a second
omg cream
is it coming 2024 or 2025
hot
I'd hope 2024, still plenty of year left and I think that either this or the Avro RJs are their next thing
I cannot wait for it myself, it's the perfect kind of plane for me
Amsterdam Schiphol will become my most visited airport on Volanta that's a guarantee
Beyond ATC is out
I might have to check it out, $30 isn’t bad at all
I just don’t want the ATC to be all “PLEASE EXPEDITE YOUR CLIMB” and “you must do the VOR approach
“
NO ILS FOR YOU
I need to learn VOR landings eventually, but I don’t want to be forced into one by an ATC while learning
Indeed
Actually, because it’s a more advanced AI, I’m wondering if I could just straight up ask for the ILS
Would be interesting to see. EasyjetSimPilot has put out a video on it, seems quite informative.
Too much yapping about Vatsim though
ended up just using my debit card 
Very intrigued, had some good moments with vatsim but its draining and the constant changes of staffed positions irks me
i’ve had contact mes on finals, which I get but its jarring. and the top down coverage at times can be interesting when i’m on short final with an aircraft taken off and someone 100s miles is asking for clearance causing me to go around
all to say beyondatc is definitely something i’d pick up, gonna watch a few streamers and vids, and see public opinion before I pick it up tho
enough of my yappin have a nice sunday
already?
damn
bruh
@untold finch whast the price
total
that u pai
d
$29.99
How‘d it go?
just about to start 😄 ended up doing some housework
let us know 
Ah that‘s fine, thank you
yeah so um
this is amazing
the basic voices with regional accents are quite hard to understand so i'm trying the 50,000 characters of free premium voice that you get given
reckon i'll use about 4,000 of that this flight, given that there's no traffic being generated yet
the voice recognition works perfectly
i get clear instructions on what the atc wants me to do
it corrects me and prompts me if i get stuff wrong or miss out info
okay some of the basic voices are hard to understand, some are much better and clearer
but imo
the premium voices are worth it for just how "real" they sound
Are you a native speaker?
yessir
Fuck
though tbh i am definitely tripping over my words a bit
(never used vatsim)
halfway there
will be interesting to see how the descent goes
Gonna have to try it out too at some point
first flight did
out of 50,000
used about 6k
ended up getting vectored on to the ILS approach, was quite nice though not what i'd expected to do, seemed to work just fine
it didn't recognise my parking spot, and i probably burned about 1k characters just trying to argue with it over that, before realising that i needed to say "Cargo one zero" rather than "one zero" or "parking one zero" to get it to work
sadly the lack of VR support means there'll be a few snags like that
it doesn't really use a lot during the cruise, maybe a couple of hundred per controller at most
so if 5000 gets you through one regular flight without repeating lots...
the $9.99 pack gives you 250,000
which is what... 50 flights?
or approx $0.20 a flight
I'd probably call that around $7.00 a month if you add some longer flights in there and do a daily flight
that's... not terrible
I‘ll buy and hope voice work
Meh
I'll stress that that's only if you want to use the premium voices
it's completely free after that if you just want basic voices
and tbh
even if you don't use the speech recognition
it's still a straight-up better ATC than the default, even if you're just selecting from the options available in the UI
I didn't test it
The default voices are hit-and-miss
Certain accents are very hard to understand, most are fine
Goddamnit
Seems pretty good, I'm not a fan of the top up thing but it probably is gonna cost them a lot server wise so its not too bad
and as you say its a choice, the basic voices seem semi okay enough
The top up thing pays directly for AI voice model use, iirc - they're likely acting as a middleman for an AI voice generation service
I think their server infrastructure is actually fairly light, it just seems to be a shop, a website and an auth service
everything else seems to be done locally or via said voice gen service
I'm just doing my first flight with it
And looks like I'll have fun one as wind has changed since flight plan for Aldergrove so interested in seeing how it'll manage me
Just gave in and picked it up, gonna give it a try tomorrow on a rotation of some sorts
how did it manage, or managing ect?
It didn't switch runway in end which is fair as wind got a bit better but I wasn't low enough to land so had to sort of go around
Hopefully it's only this once and it was a skill issue by me not decending quick enough
Ah okay! I've seen/heard about it not descending properly so hopefully they can fix it
Im intrigued by how it handles bigger airports like EHAM, EGLL ect
with multiple rwy ops
Did fine for Liege, but given that it doesn't handle other traffic it's not got a lot to do
ok so after giving it a shot
super cool program, i'd honestly prefer it over vatsim once AI comes out for it
50k characters is nothing and used up super fast, idk how much i'm gonna like that long term lol
How many flights did you do to burn up 50k characters? 😮
oh i didnt burn any up yet
i burned up about 3k in just about 1 1/2 flights
a game crash with beyondatc running really is a bummer lemme say
i like how the atc responds to stuff like 'thank u have a good day' with
Yeah it feels really dynamic and natural
when they tell you "NO" or "NEGATIVE" when you forget information in your readback, feels very convincing
indeed
the technology behind this is super good and im honestly suprised on how well it works
cant wait for ai and oceanic
I wonder what it thought i was trying to say 
was too eager to give it a go so did a small hop, generally okay all around. accessibility wise its amazing, i'm sure so many people who were too scared to go on vatsim or felt the want to learn atc but the inbuilt system wasn't good can now do so in a less judgemental and chilled environment
really enjoyed having ATC all the way, something you only really get at peak time weekends on vatsim or an event
I hope ( 🤞 ) freeware and payware devs look into making their sceneries more compatible with beyondATC going forward as it develops, as I know thats a source of quite a few of the issues
lol???
i did run into a bug where i tuned out of the radio too quick and softlocked the ATC, but thats my fault
oh, and for some reason my callsign is randomized even though my flight plan has one set
im satisfied with just the basic TTS too, its not as clear, but it sounds great still tbh
the simbrief one right
yeah i had this at liege
yes
i should be AA1936, but instead im airbus 936
Did you set AA1936 as your callsign?
yes, in simbrief
I think that needs to be AAL1936
Callsign should, iirc, be the ICAO 3 character identifier followed by the individual callsign numbers/letters
Flight number is the IATA 2 char code, plus your flight number
you learn something new everyday
its going to be a pain in the ass to correct that on every single flight plan tohugh
That's weird, Simbrief generates it the "correct" way for me automatically
ew, i just noticed the images they used are AI generated, i always kind of suspected it to be that way but close-up its very obvious
I like that honestly, it's kinda fitting 😄
true, but i feel like AI voice generation and chatbots are a VERY different beast from AI artwork, AI artwork puts talented artists out of jobs while funny voices and text generation does not
The voices puts voice actors out of jobs, the text gen puts writers out of jobs 😦
They're even coming for me as a software engineer
i mean, you arent going to get a voice actor to record every single use case of an AI ATC, and have everything typed out beforehand
actually, they did technically get real voice actors too, using content creators' voice samples to make custom ATC voices
it corrects the airport codes for me which is nice, but does not correct the ICAO of the airline
ive had to restart this flight 4 times now, because toolbar pushback does not want to cooperate with the headwind A321neo
which is frustrating, because since i upgraded to the payware version of it, ive never had any issues, even with the regular FBW A32NX
its the parking brake, it keeps saying its on even though its not
with everything, the built in pushback, the flypad pushback, and the toolbar pushback
LOL IT JUST TELEPORTED ME INTO THE GROUND NOW??
ew, beyondATCs taxi instructions are absolutely horrible
like, i get its early access, but theyre just straight up incoherent
actually, im wondering if its because navigraph is too up-to-date, im on taxiways in-game that dont even exist on the airport info map
im literally using a payware scenery pack for chicago ohare though
okay, no, wtf are we doing here
im taking off from runway 9R, and its taking me on a tour around the entire airport on taxiways that dont exist in-game or on the navigraph chart
okay, im not impressed anymore
it changed my runway without telling me, and when i was lined up for my planned runway of 9R, it says i should be on 9C
i understand its early access, but i feel like their statement that "incorrect airport data messes with the ATC" was extremely understated, i feel like it should be closer to "disregard anything the ATC says regarding taxi routes and takeoff runways", it honestly even feels like the AI is just not programmed correctly to communicate runway changes at the very least which feels like it should be complete by an early access payware release, at the very minimum
👍
tbf, the default msfs atc did this to me at Haneda 😂
after way too much troubleshooting, im finally in the air and flying with beyondATC
you very much have to trial-and-error your way through airports, KORD was a disaster, but KBOS turned out to be a perfect taxi route and takeoff
ill keep a list of what i find to be good and bad airports through beyondATC
oh, i very much reccomend not using your premium voice credits when your setting up beyondATC too, the amount of them i would have probably burned through while just trying to get this working would be terrifiying
How is it with 3rd party airports? and I'm assuming it struggled with KORD due to complexity of layout?
3rd party airports are pretty much standard, the default ones are so inaccurate with their data and will rarely work nicely
I think KORD didn’t work because of its complexity, and bad data from the addon
What is this phraseology?
I get that in the US they tend not to use perfect ICAO phraseology all the time, but that's way too far
And if it says stuff like that in Europe it's just wrong
Also "what was I thinking" as a response, gross.
tbf, the auto response is bad, much better doing yourselves
Status: Bad Pilot 😂
Iunno, sounds exactly like something Kennedy Steve would have said
Yeah, but he was the exception, not the rule 😅
Most likely this would have just gone like this:
XX, ready for departure, 9R
XX, confirm runway 9R?
XX, Affirmative, 9R
XX, I told you to go to runway 9C [new taxi instruction]
or
XX, ready for departure, 9R
XX, negative, you were given 9C [new taxi instruction]
I can see ATC interjecting some out of phraseology things in there, but nowhere near as much as that, that communication was like 80% random words that didn't convey any useful information.
I could see that happen only in an extremely quite airport where there are like 1 or 2 aircraft, and the controller just decides to be rude and argumentative for no reason
A friend of mine controls JFK on VATSIM, and there are a lot of terrible pilots in there and I don't think I've ever heard him tell things like that, or told me of his friends talking to pilots like that
Gotcha
I'd definitely feed this all back to them, they seem quite responsive to feedback
My FS crashed on a 6hr flight with Beyondatc, now whether it was due to bg processes (pilots life 2, beyond, etc.), I'll never know
6 hour flight? Entirely possible that it was a memory leak honestly
I try to keep mine to ~4 hours max now, longer than that seems to be a gamble with MSFS
And I was soo close to tod too 😂
Volanta autosave is a lifesaver for stuff like this tbh
have it save every 15 mins, gives you peace of mind
has anyone tried to fly /A with BeyondATC?
honestly that could be the one and only reason why I could even think about getting that thing
what u mean
Flying with only VOR/DME/ILS
so no directs
and maybe it it's really good "Maintain heading then follow X radial for Y VOR", or "Maintain Heading, intercept X airway"
Would be worth a try, though I suspect not at this stage of early access.
ahhh, yeah as malakhit said, prob not in EA
except for some spicy initial flight level, it did the go around quite well
it wanted me to go to Fl161 and then descend back down to 2500 lol
some spicy visibility too
oh neat, already a beyondatc update
I've noticed 2 already
Descent for me on the second flight I initally thought was sus but it was actually spot on
Had to go around but that was because of a skill issue on my part but it handled it really well
taking the lady for a spin
can't wait until the full release
found a gaem breaking glitch w beyondatc
once it hands u off, the next controller kinda forgets about getting u down lol
im 20 miles away at FL270
Hmm, almost always after I switched they gave me an immediate decent
who knows
after doing -6k fpm on the way down im back in the loop
(and descending without controllers perm)
md11 flies well
the flightmodel is asscrack
other than that it's great imo
missing a few features yes, but it can fly a-b no problem
Second BATC flight, no problems at all.
oh brother the embraer
Another 5000 chars gone. The VR UI is definitely going to help.
Yes
It would definitely make the process a little easier but it's not too difficult to manage without it
I typically just did FLCH and FMS speed
does it have a t/d at the very least
I think so? I wasn't really looking tbh
I descended when BATC told me to descend
topped out around -3000ft/min but was generally less than that
as long as it hast a T/D i can manage
because then it's legit the xplane version
idk why every dev is struggling so much to make working vnav for the ejets
I've heard it's not good IRL
yea ejets arent as good
but i love them because short flights
and crj is ass
ive been on both, and i have literally had no issues with either
just small planes so its cramped and bumpy
i actually pulled a muscle in my left thigh getting off of a E175 because it was so cramped, and i was in pain for like 2 weeks 
BA doesn't have ERJs 😉
E-Jets are the bigguns, the ERJs are the little baby ones like the 145
which Loganair seems to have an endless supply of
i meant ejets whoopsies
oh yeah?
BA Dash8
the older stuff like the -300's were ex brymon
newer Ejets were ordered specifically for BA connect
ran alongside the BAe's
all were sold to flybe in 2007 before heading to BMI that then went to Loganair and Eastern
so yeah
thats why loganair has an endless supply of them
have being the present tense was key to my point 😉
testing out the voice input function on beyondATC, works flawlessly
even for my quiet voice that everyone finds hard to understand
makes me feel cool as hell too, talking like a pilot
trying to eat my lunch while talking to ATC is no easy task though
wow!!!! it even gives you a proper descent!!!! no yelling at you to expedite climb to FL220 while on the glideslope
the takeoff was a nightmare because it was flaps 3, and i almost stalled like i did last time, and the landing was a nightmare for a combination of a misaligned ILS, severe turbulence, and the game freezing to load in KJFK for the first time
and just for know, my 1hr flight from boston to JFK, using voice input, with the premium TTS, only took up 4,277 characters
which would last approx. 12 flights at that rate
and if you bought the $30 "big pack" of TTS chars, that would last you almost 200 flights at that rate
and the $10 pack of 250k chars would last you approx 60 flights
jfc
what a mistake of a flight
batc just shat the entire way through
plane floated over the whole runway
mfg
that sounds more like an issue with the airport than BATC
not necessarily
batc didnt understand 90% of the frequencies
neither did it think to give me a lower altitude on approach
prompting me to lovely overfly the airport at 5k ft
i've 2 fine flights, 2 mid ones
what sim is that?
DCS

Awesome!
What resolution are you playing in again?
I'm considering going ultrawide
What? With all the modules about to come? How on earth did you figure that? (F4, Kiowa, Kola, Chinook)
I´m playing at 3440x1440p. Ultrawide is lots of fun, I also quite like it when playing racing games. And for a screenshot scenic flight simulator the aspect ratio creates some very nice shots. You just have to zoom in a bit in order to decrease the wide angle lens effect, IMO.
Razbam, kola, chinook ea feature list, all the stuff to do with Afghanistan etc...
They haven't had any releases since June last year, Phantom has been constantly delayed, no new ED products since BS3... Makes sense that they'd be hurting a little for cash. The Chinook and Afghanistan being pushed out the door before they even know the full feature list is a bit of a red flag, imo.
Plus things over in the owner's other business are not going smoothly, and he's been taking large interest-free loans from ED every year for the past few years
TFC (the other business) is in quite a bit of trouble imo. No airshows for a few years really hurt their revenue. The airshow they managed to run last year clashed with RIAT and so didn't sell tickets that well. They cancelled again this year without really giving much reasoning. The place that the collection lives (IWM Duxford) has started charging private collections like TFC for hangar space, and even kicking some collections out to make room for new exhibits.
Plus they lost at least some of their dev team to the war in Ukraine, given that they're a Russian studio. There's no real hard evidence that ED is struggling for cash, but there are a lot of the typical warning signs present at the moment.
I was joking xD
My wall of text now seems out of place but I shall live with my mistakes
F16 EA, F18 EA, A10C II EA, They have all been EA so what makes you think that, Chinnock and Afghanistan are any different? ED i doubt are struggling for money. Even the WW2 asset pack was EA as they added new units. And i doubt they lost some of there team to a war lol, You know full well most are based in the swiss country.
People are just assuming because of what happened with Razbam, so people guess
Nobody is based in Switzerland lol. Look up their address on google maps, it's a PO box.
Their dev studio is based in Moscow and has been for a long time. They market themselves as an international company headquartered in Switzerland. I think some of the exec team moved to the UAE after the war started, pretty sure that Kate (their COO) even confirmed it on their own discord.
And as for what made those things different; F-16C, F/A-18C and A-10CII all had full lists of what to expect in early access when the pre-orders went up. Did they 100% stick to those lists? No, not really, but at least you had some idea of what to expect from your ~$50 purchase. Even then, the Viper launch was such a trainwreck that ED publicly apologised and promised never to do that again.
Compare that with the Chinook, where the feature list is "interior and exterior model, flight model, VR support, TBD everything else" - how can you make an informed purchase at this point?
Can I also say; I find it a little odd that you only seem to appear here whenever someone is criticising ED, in order to defend them from criticism... What's the deal with that?
Na trust me ive rinsed ED on patches that are borked, Or broken along with other issues there certainly not perfect so dont worry and there certainly not posted public but privately. Like i say people just assume but have no facts to back up claims of "Ed are losing money" or "ED need EA for cash" Thats just crowd following on what i read in other places, Infact ive not even purchased Kola it looks not really that gerat so there you go 🙂
Yeah fair. Like I said, there is no evidence that ED are strapped for cash, but there are a lot of red flags right now. I hope Kola improves, Orbx are decent folks, just gotta give them a while I think.
Just dont believe everything you see on the net, Like kola has low texture places so does south atlantic, However so do most maps NTTR even causcaus have low res areas
You can still fly over them
I know, and Kola is EA. I think what most people are objecting to is the fact that textures got downgraded without warning between the pre-release promo materials and the launch
It was for a reasonable reason, performacne optimisation - but it's definitely the sort of thing that you miiiight want to mention before selling to a customer
For a trailor yea you want it fancy could be a different build of dcs
it was a previous version of the map before they did texture optimisation
they confirmed as much on their discord
Im not in there discord
you're not missing much 😄
i think that rubbed people the wrong way, felt a bit like a bait-and-switch
I'll buy it if they can deliver on their promises
Yeah, it works kinda like Afghanistan will
I upgraded immediately though, Normandy 2 is probably the best looking map in the whole game
Ugra do fantastic work
I think marianas ww2 will be crap performance to
I actually heard that Marianas performance got a lot better with the last major patch, not tried it out though
It's easily the worst performing map of them all
run down
bro LOL
well, when people said "it can train you for vatsim" they weren't kidding
