#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 4 of 1
be honest, are you going "dakka dakka dakka" every time you use that gun
because it's only right to do so
maybe
I love the engagement distances and times with the first world war aircraft, it takes so long to kill unless you get lucky
It's very pistols-at-dawn
true, but i think its the second most used map besides caucasus
imo
I'd say that's probably Syria at this point
Syria is the best all-round map in DCS atm imo
Persian gulf has some really stunning areas (near shiraz and the uae cities) but syria's got way more mission opportunities
WW2 ones aren't great for modern aircraft, Caucasus and NTTR are old but still good, PG is a bit dull, Marianas runs like crap and is mostly water, Sinai is very WIP and South Atlantic seems to flip between okay and rough every other patch
Yeah it's great, and everything's so slow, it's beautiful
Normandy 2 is probably my fave but I rarely fly warbirds at the moment so I never see it
things went poorly
Looks like the 2024 And Beyond video for DCS is coming today
i tried to use the drone cam but the camera doesnt turn
It uses the number pad for controls by default I believe, takes some getting used to
DCS e-shop: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/
DCS on Steam: https://store.steampowered.com/app/223750/DCS_World_Steam_Edition/
☑ Site: http://digitalcombatsimulator.com
☑ Discord: https://discord.gg/eagledynamics
☑ Twitter: https://twitter.com/eagledynamics
☑ Forum: https://forum.dcs.world
☑ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/eagl...
Mig 29 wefhrgsjasfawrgsdgjcvbzsfgzsfbsrgj
Also the kola, Iraq, and intruder looked lovely, nice to see new ground vehicles as well, just a shame they're all either super modern or second world war
Looking at the newsletter I'm now a lot less excited for Iraq, I want the desert storm, oif, and Iran Iraq war stuff not the coin
They did all the time
If you can land a 320 or 73 at an airport the maddog should generally be fine
It'll come later apparently, but yeah, they really should have started with the border
war-on-terror more like boring
Yeah, once it's finished I'll be excited (especially if it includes airports on the Iranian side of the border)
Will be Flying a Delta MD-88 i think to CMI University of Illinois Airport
GWOT stuff can be fun in helos, but the apache bores me, the Kiowa isn't out yet and we don't have any other appropriate helos outside the uh60 mod
But on the other hand phantom and tomcat vs mirage and migs over the Iran Iraq border would be
or desert storm with the strike eagle for the modern folks
There's always the Hind. Think Poland used theirs in the GWOT
Though it was Hind-Ds rather than our Hind-F
Oh ED, you're making me sad. Confirming the Mig29A and Iraq for this year but never lose a word about the Chinook after it's teaser in last year's and beyond 😭
Yeah I just hope it's close. My most expected aircraft since it's teaser in last year's abd beyond
I could see it being a lot of fun in Afghanistan, bringing troops and supplies from one of the cities to all the fobs and outposts
Though I'd honestly rather just do that with the hip as a 'contractor' aircraft
or some C17s
Really doesn't fit with dcs imo, the upcoming c130's already stretching it
Flight Path of KORD--->KCMI 19min FLight
Also did you catch the MiG-23 flyby?
I am going to fly the C-130 either a lot or once, no in-between
I can only imagine it being great fun, I love big turboprop transports
Soviet-Afghan war stuff is going to go hard
It's still very early days for it imo but if the Beagle is anything to go by, it's going to be a well-made module
Yeah, super excited but doubt it'll be a 2024 release
The a6 looked so cool, of course we won't be seeing a playable one until 2030
it was frustrating seeing such high quality new abrams, but the M60 and cold war era soviet equipment still have such poor models
-54Fpm Landing
M60 got updated somewhat recently
oh? whoops 😅
The T-55 was a nightmare to make liveries for though, such a dated model
Yes. Yes, but I am really excited for the Chinook. Finally a modern transport helicopter. I mean I hoped for something along those lines for a long time. Ch-53, NTH-90 would've been even better IMHO because it can additionally use weapons. But a Chinook is, well, it's a Chinook.
Yeah, I get that, but for the C130 I'm still hoping for paratrooper functionality
I'd have killed for a super jolly
I suppose it's gonna be incredibly dependent on the quality of the missions people make for it, it's not gonna be great just bringing out on multiplayer servers
I think any server using CTLD will already see a major benefit from it
FARPs already take something like 6 crates to build, and the Hip can only carry like 3... Chinook, on the other hand... 😄
For my squadron: We have an always running MP-Server, Open conflict type, and there's always something to do, even for helicopter
Yeah exactly
Also, idk if Memes are appreciated here but here ya' go
honestly ED seemed to be pushing the chinook pretty heavily, both in the newsletter and the video
can't wait to do the quickstop in it
I really hope we get some marine helos at some point, ch-46, uh1-n or y and ah1-w or z
So what all is gonna come in 2024 of thst
Honestly? Never really possible to tell until it does
I'd guess maybe the chinook and/or one of the maps
F-4E is almost certain
I'd be stunned if the Kiowa didn't
La-7 is probable
kiowa PLEASE
Maybe afghanistan, I could see the Chinook not hitting this year, but we'll see
Iraq probably not
F4U... I damn well hope so at this point
yeah, given this was the iraq announcement I assume it'll be another year or two
I'm honestly way more interested in the early F-14A, that's still not out yet right?
the iranian one?
no only the normal a
yeah, iirc that's a version with later upgrades that's not really accurate to late 70s early 80s or the iranian exports
it was in one of their dev diary sort of posts that they were planning on releasing it in 2022 iirc but that's obviously not happened yet
F-14D is less likely, F-14B with the upgraded HUD and various other parts is more likely
Q: What versions of the -A will be simulated? A: Similar as with the -B, each version of the -A spans a certain time period, but to discern them easier, we divide them into the 135GR late version (same time period as the -B), which has more or less feature parity with the -B, except for engines, engine instrument panels and some minor differences; the 135GR early version (late 70s to early/mid 90s), which also features an older version of the RWR (the ALR-45) and the ECM page on the HSD; and the bonus 95GR IRIAF version, which is similar to the 135GR early (late 70s/ early 80s), with the difference of having no TCS, no ICLS/ACLS, no datalink, no Lantirn pod, only older weapons (no aim-9m, no aim-7M(/H), no aim-7F, no aim54A mk.60 and aim54C) and only dumb air to ground munitions. Each version will include skins for their dedicated period/country. All -A versions feature the TF-30 Engines.
Yeah, we only have one -A so far, the later 135GR
u know i'd even take that
As would I
as long as we get a somewhat modern f14
as much as i love the f14, it sucks at fighting newer jets, even if you're a super good pilot
bvr atleast
the 54s' were of course never made for long range fighter bvr
good for being human AWACS tho

honestly I think the F14 will really benefit when the 29a and the 23 come out, it should have fun especially stomping the 23
Intruders over Vietnam 😍
i wish
I really hope with the after the Iraq and Afghanistan maps they'll do some cold war stuff, the inner german border or Vietnam would be incredible
Well, my point is, that we already know the Mig29 was coming, just not when. Iraq? No hone had a clue. And if they'd treat both of those the same as the Chinook, they'd just acknowledge that they're in developement. They didn't just do that. They confirmed them for this year. But about the Chinook there's still not much info other than "it's being developed"
...but they did give info?
No. But a release date.
ok? at least to me I'd rather they not give it a release date before they know they can release it
You know the community. You know they (we) want some thing
It didn't work out so well for the 2022 relase of the F4, did it? 
there's significant phases of development where there's not much to publicly show, better to show nothing
They said that it's coming 2024, doesn't necessarily mean that it will though
Also, each of these things is being made by a different team iirc, so they're not necessarily competing for resources
Attempted KONT -> KSFO, left engine failed on the takeoff run, aborted and returned back to the gate I just left. Cool that it has this feature, just would rather not have had it happen tonight...
did you leave the starter on? that can cause engine issues
I didn't - I think I probably overdid it with the throttle
I set it to normal T/O setting, and expected it to just be fine with me pushing the throttles full forward
The RPM and EGT gauges started flashing, but the damage was done before I could throttle back down
At least my PSA boarding music worked though 😎
Is FSLTL still the best mod to use for AI traffic(
Hard to argue with free, and with that much variety in models and liveries
It does require a fairly beefy PC though, I lose about 10-15fps with it running in a busy area
the a300 has weird nav issues for me
it takes the turns too wide and sometimes just looses track of the flightplan alltogether
yikes
That's better.
Just gave the new virtual airline thing, flyLAT, a go... it's pretty rough.
Very much a beta. I called my airline the same thing as someone else's by mistake, and now I can't manage it because I just get redirected to theirs
Can't delete my account either
heard that if you fly below 20m you can fly under the carriers AA, low key a bit spooky
this is about 20 feet 
The viper's thinking it's a viggen
tfdi's textures are looking impressive #589857088214401024 message
I haven't bought it, I might but I don't find the MD11 particularly interesting, especially not enough to get one in early access
really hope they bring their 717 to msfs though, preferably before they're all gone irl
afaik the people playing it do seem to like it
It looks great, but I've heard that it's quite early as far as early access goes
i'll definitely fly it a tonne when it comes out for everyone though, would love a proper tri-jet, though i have absolutely no idea how i'll bind it across two throttle axes
L/CR I guess
with the FJS 72 I just bound it so one throttle controlled all three, though you could split it so one axis controls the outer engines and one axis controls the inner engine
That seems like the more sensible approach
iirc on the MD11 you're supposed to keep the engine 2 throttle in during the flare, and that'd let you do that
I don't remember exactly where I read/heard that, so take it with a grain of salt though
Classic
ooo
i think i still got my original big box of that somewhere too
oh no wait, i have 2000 i think
managing to actually re-fuel now 

nevermind
Looks about right
nice
never seen a southwest plane in person actually
i love msfs so muchh
especially business jets
anything with interior
why are 3 and 4 not running
enroute to Seoul Incheon from Tokyo Haneda
is the fbw 320 neo cockpit avail for everyone yet
Yes, you just need to switch to the development branch
I'm flying it right now
It looks pretty good
The Darkstar has two engine types, the one that are shut down are scramjets, that need a very high mach number to operate
you'd switch those on once you're well past supersonic
Cold, foggy one in Seoul today
Perfect aim54 target right there
oo i haven't learnt those yet, could be worth a learn if i can down things super far
stalled instantly after this break
I'm not a tomcat driver, but a mainstay's not that different from a bear or backfire and deleting them at long range is what the pheonix is made for
tomcat looked like a lot of fun to me, but when i was looking at it you gotta have an AI in the back and tell him to do stuff with a radial menu or something?
seemed a bit much
it's not as complex or involved as you might think, he's generally quite self-managing
i primarily just tell him what to lock with the radar
Yeah that's what's always kept me away as well, it's apparently pretty alright in single player though
with VR or headtracking, you just press the button to open the menu, look in the direction of the option you want, press the button again, done
And I found petrovich in the hind surpringly usable, which is supposedly a lot rougher than jester
imo they're different AIs for different jobs
and the interfaces suit each one
Petrovich and George are simpler, you're generally telling them to look at a specific point outside the aircraft and look for targets there, and then you want to scroll through what they find and pick something - they do that well
Jester has much more functionality, but it's rarely (other than A/G search) something that involves you telling him to look at something specific, so the wheel works quite well
how do you like it?
I like it a lot!
It's really rather performant, which makes sense given the relative sizes of the engines and the rest of the plane.
The cockpit is deliciously retro, especially with the 530. Feels quite space-ship like too, with the narrow windows that are reminiscent of the B-2's.
The cabin area is pretty cool, though the pax models are a little... crunchy.
Tablet is rather basic but does the job
downin some stinky helos
Pick on someone your own size 😭
Nice, I'm very tempted to get it
i shot 2 fox 2s coming up on both of them at over 700 knots 😭
they didn't have a chance
rotary > fixed wing
cosy as hell
Ultra cozy
How's the Aerosoft CRJ? I'm looking to buy a new airliner (I'm limited to the marketplace), wanted to buy the 737-800 but the price is quite steep and the liveries seem to be sold separately
Also, any enhancements from the marketplace that are must-have?
Not... very good
Welp
Not sure if it's on the marketplace but the WBSim Cessna 172 enhancement is good
I assume you've got the Fenix already?
Nope, can't get it
Also, check out the 737-600 - it's like the -800 but shorter, lighter, takes off like a rocket, and is much cheaper. The 900 is also good, and relatively cheap
The 800 is so expensive because it's got 4 variants
honestly though the fbw 320 is now also not as bad anymore imo
the cockpit made me hate it but it's fine now
Welp, I think what I also need is that one Thrustmaster Airbus controller… another crash landing on me
You're on PC right? You can download liveries free off fs.to
Performance issues?
Russia issues
Quick trip up to Soldier Bar. Not the easiest approach in gusty weather...
Hopefully there's a solution soon
Well I can only hope lol
stress
That's Mount Everest done!
That looks beautiful!
I actually never yet tried such flights, like small planes between small airports in scenic locations
Try that against the Pyotr Veliki or Kutznetsov or Moskva. You'll fail miserably. I tried even with Apache with the wheels touching the water. There is no chance to destroy these. Only possibility is Mig 21 and RN 21 but that's a suicide mission
Harpoon spam is the only way fr
Yesn't. The Walleye was really good, you could destroy most ships in 1 and all in 2 hits, but AFAIK they changed the walleye logic recently so they're not bombs which wouldn't get intercepted by CIWS but now are seen as missiles (which they really aren't) and now they're getting intercepted
i think they actually changed the logic so that everything can shoot down bombs now, iirc
Or that
it started with the new ground-based phalanx system
at least we didn't have to pay for that i guess
xDDD
For sure
A321 Live in the Mo-Mint
KORD--->KATL
KLAS -> KELP
KLAX - RJTT
Alright I decided to spend in the end, so I need a bit of advice: 737-700 or 737-800
I assume they’re basically same internally so mainly talking about which one is of more use
-800, 100%
it's i think the most common aircraft in the world
in terms of commercial aviation aircraft
Looking rather fantastic https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/246655-new-bird-aw-109-sp/&do=findComment&comment=2654158
NASA’s X-59 quiet supersonic research aircraft is the culmination of decades of aeronautics and supersonic flight research. The X-59 is designed to be able to fly supersonic, or faster than the speed of sound, without producing a loud sonic boom, which occurs when aircraft fly at such speeds. Instead, the X-59 is designed to reduce that boom to ...
Can be flown in XP
To fly these models, you will need to have Xplane 11 software installed on your computer. Click here to go to the Xplane 11 website, where you can download a
700 is good too though, rocket ship performance if you’re interested in the smaller amount of airlines that fly/flew it
-500 would be cooler…
Welp, I already got the 800 and I don’t plan on buying more for now
Already spent a lot 😅
Tbh I love the 800 for now
Plus I guess it’s gonna be a soft spot cause Aeroflot has a whopping 37 of them
50, 20 Retard, BANG
whoops
Ehhhh. I've come to rely less on the landing rate itself honestly. Apparently Volanta averages out the last few seconds of flight to calculate it, so a steep approach with a smooth touchdown will still show up as quite a high rate. The G-force reading is a better indicator imo. 1.37 isn't great but it's much better than 959fpm would have you believe, it's definitely not a write-off of the plane. There have been aircraft that have landed at double that and still been repaired and flown again.
My worst was 1.53 I think, that one sucked
I mean I know for a fact that I absolutely buttered this on to Lukla's runway, but it still looks bad if you're only looking at FPM
ah but that's positive FPM 
Indeed it is, but even so, a negative one can be influenced by a downward sloping runway 😄
true
think it's almost impossible to get a "good" fpm at london city due to the 5 degree glideslope
I generally judge landings by the all important 'did it feel good' metric 😅
yeah, that's honestly the best way, and I think the G-Force reading is the closest quantifier of that
yeah agreed
need some sort of transducers in my simpit so i can actually feel how bad the touchdown was 😆

You need a Buttkicker and a force feedback yoke. 😛
I really wish FFB was more affordable for flightsims, imagine an FFB stick for helos simulating force trim
Absolutely. The simracing crowd is really spoilt for choices when it comes to FFB. A well-priced FFB yoke would be great, too, especially to simulate the forces needed in certain flight situations.
cough cough
How far down the runway did you float? 😉
barely any
Fair, that's an impressive landing
just really viciously pull on the stick when you are at about 50 feet
i just wish Volanta could scrape a more accurate touchdown fpm rate rather than taking the last few seconds of the flight
if your speed isnt too high you should just touch down very gently
my G-force is barely any higher, virtually the same speed, just a much higher fpm
there is a nack to it, it just takes ages to actually lear
yeah
G-Force isnt really a + on a landing
you should aim for low FPM over anything
thats where the brunt of the damage comes from
interesting, a lot of people seem to say the opposite
at the end of the day, what really matters is whether it actually feels like a good landing
a hard landing is one of those things where you just know you've messed up
unless its like 2-3g's your gonna feel the aircraft shake more than the force of the landing
yeah
Forgot to send the screenshot, took part in the crazy Atlanta event two days ago, MD-82 + busy event might be the higher stress thing imaginable 😬
(also it was funny how a few ATC called me vistajet -VJA ICAO and Critter Callsign- 
I somehow doubt VistaJet would ever fly an MD-82 ahahah
Thanks again DocTrench for letting me know that Piedmont VA, unfortunately I forgot to launch Pegasus for that flight, but they have lots of interesting schedules, I wish I wasn't this hopeless as managing their systems 😅
no worries
need to do some more vatsim maddog flying soon, I've been doing a lot of bizjet stuff recently
Tbf I generally judge my landings by ‘is the plane right side up’ metric 
shared cockpit baby
For some reason my brain is entirely blanking on what aircraft this is
Looks like the Fokker F28 but newer?
Challenger 650
By Hotstart
Neat!
Probably the best addon for any flight sim in terms of functionality
It takes realism to the next level imo
@untold finch u fly helis in msfs too right
Occasionally
either it's a massive skill issue or they feel really off
They are really off 😅
Some are better than others (Taog's Hangar stuff is pretty good) but yeah
VRS isn't implemented into MSFS, the HPG Airbuses have to rely on external scripting to get it to work
Helicopters were a bit of an afterthought for Asobo
If you fly it in the way an airbus helicopter is usually flown (mostly automated) you don't notice most of the imperfections
But yeah, X-Plane and DCS are leagues ahead
I've only flown an R-22 in real life but that felt quite familiar after flying in DCS for a decade
what i find weird is that the HPG ones don't require much collective
usually 40-45%
meanwhile my huey requires a whopping 90ish
DCS Huey is currently screwed up
They messed with the engine modelling last year and it's not been the same since
in what way
It needs another rework. For the points marked as "level flight impossible", I am unsure if it is realistic or not, it is very possible the real aircraft produced enough power that full forward cyclic could not maintain level flight. However data for flight over the Vne of 125knots, let alone ove...
ngl what i've encountered issue wise is it's really wobbly in flight
it goes left and right
barely able to contain itself
also the only helo i have this issue with
It's the only one with no stability augmentation so that might be why
Love the Gaz, not great against anything that is going to shoot back, but fantastic to fly.
Yeah it can be quite something
BAe 146, yeah
it was the queens plane innit
80's
Quite nice
all 146's are gone now but the 2nd gen the Avro RJ's are still kicking about in some places
it's decently old, but has a lot more creature comforts (radios with preselect, more autopilot features, etc...) for the pilot than a 60s jetliner like the Fokker
Well of course, 60s is very old
Especially if stuff has great levels of simulation (and I heard JF stuff does)
Tbh with autopilot for now my brain breaks with anything other than the default 320neo 
Trying to understand how to work the 737 now
the JF stuff's great, lovely sounds, really nice flight model for handflying, excellent textures. The two caveats are that they're a bit more performance heavy than PMDG or the Maddog, and that they can have some (minor) autopilot quirks (the F28 tends to porpoise when light on fuel and no pax for example)
Guess I'll take the 146 the next time I decide to buy something kinda expensive
Any difference between buying it on JF and buying it on marketplace?
uhh, I think just faster updates for JF's store
Ah well then, basically as always
Already looking forward to buying it, trying it, realising I can't damn fly it 
the JF manuals include really helpful full flight tutorials
Oh that is nice
https://www.justflight.com/articles/black-square-dukes-development-update-january-2024 EFB coming to all BKSQ aircraft, also the dukes are having a full boris soundset, makes me actually tempted to get one
I still can't get the maddog to run anywhere near as well as anything else 😦
that sucks, for me it and the PMDG NG are my two best performing tubes
Maddog is the MD-80s right?
oui
Interesting plane from the looks of it
Maddog is the worst performing aircraft I have in MSFS on my end... must be some weird hardware thing
favorite tube in sim for me, pricing is quite unfortunate though
Is it really high quality?
Yes, the depth is excellent and iirc it's the first airliner in MSFS that had persistence
It came out before the 737s didn't it? I forget
Persistence being...? In simple words for someone who's not a professional
ah - it remembers failures and maintenance state
yep
i'm almost certainit also came before the fenix
it's all controlled through an external app, sadly, which is less ideal than some newer aircraft
but you have to do your maintenance and so on
also got hoppy acars and great simbrief and gsx integration
Visually, it's a little bit lacking, though there are improvements available
Audio-wise, the engine sounds are very meh, but the other cockpit sounds are pretty spot on
So... if you basically just fly it, it's gonna start behaving as if it's getting genuinely more worn out. Like, more failures and stuff?
Plus you can have different boarding music per livery
exactly
yep
That is certainly interesting
or you can kill engines by being stupid, other fun stuff like that
Oh so I can kill the engines on that 
or leave the starter on during takeoff (not cont but one of the actual starter switches) 😅
I recently lost one on takeoff because i exceeded the EPR limit
it also has a HUD, which is nice
Not sure how many airlines used it but it was more than one for sure
wait the maddog had a hud
yep
bruh
swiss I think, I know some others had it but don't know which
I mean genuinely, such engine failures look like a great point to realism
Here's a real photo of it
surprisingly not alaska
PSA did apparently
oh yeah
and all these settings are completely configurable on a per-livery basis
using discord as my scratchpad
That is quite good
one of my favourite features in the maddog is that when you use the in-cockpit printer, it actually prints it from your real printer
as you should
got a friend who bought a thermal printer just for it and the FSLabs 
Yeah I must admit I was looking at those after I tried it for the first time 😄
honestly could be really handy for PDC (if US vatsim bothered to use hoppy 😒 )
Genuinely I need some hardware for the sim too though...
Keyboard is just eh
Can only wish for one of the actual realistic controllers
obviously given your location you probably have issues, but even a cheap hotas can really make everything so much better
I am trying to just get my Xbox 360 controller connected to the computer, I feel like even that is gonna be quite better
I think it is, never tried it myself though 😅
So one question, if I have a flight created and I type in the information into the FMC in the 737 and the route doesn’t get built correctly, does that mean I got the wrong route or what?
Also there's something weird with the game since recently, it stopped liking exiting to menu 
Loading into flights is fine, but when exiting to menu the loading just doesn't go
I'm not quite sure what you mean, could you elaborate further?
Well, I don’t remember the exact points already but it was kinda like
I was trying to set up for KSAN to KLAX, exiting KSAN with SID ECHHO2, arriving to KLAX via STAR OCEAN3
The ECHHO2 was via point SLI, OCEAN3 was via a point I don’t remember the name of, but it was very close to SLI and in line with the route
That was the route that MSFS gave me when starting the flight (I chose the locations of course, and the most direct SID & STAR available)
But when entering all that data into 737’s FMC, specifically when choosing OCEAN3 as the STAR, the FMC didn’t let me have such route and it shown me I have to go via a point JLI for approach, which is like way way off course
I was trying to follow the 737 manual just on a different route, but there’s a possibility I just did everything wrong
https://flightsimdispatch.com/
Sorry, not DocTrench, and not the only source, but there are a lot here 😄
Btw don’t mind to ping me when replying, so I see the messages tomorrow
I don’t mind it when it’s important
love you thank you
Rex/NJE in Aus is still operating a few of em, loved seeing them flying out of Brisbane late at night
Damn you made me just realise I ain’t tried to fly the DC-3 yet
I assume it’s quite a bit harder than modern stuff? Especially on longer flights. It doesn’t have autopilot at all does it?
I was flying the retrofit version so it's GNS 530 and a basic autopilot, but due to me messing around with the livery definitions, they were inop for the flight, so i just hand-flew it
it's got a bit more to do than a lot of modern aircraft - really gotta keep an eye on temps
There is just something about these older airliners ngl
This one's still being flown today as a cargo hauler in Alaska
I actually got the idea to fly this route by looking at flightradar and seeing this exact reg flying this route
Oh that's nice
The DC-3s are from even pre-war times aren't they
So like, 85 something years old by now
And yet some are still in condition to fly
True
TU154s are quite nice things, wish someone made nice ones into MSFS
And of course, Russian bias for me, pretty much always 
What airlines is that?
There is a very good freeware one for Xplane11
just had a go at doing some scenery editing in costa rica
how on earth does anyone use this tool and not immediately give up
as soon as i entered the scenery editor, the ground shot up by like 60m
if i look at certain angles the terrain disappears
the process of finding buildings that roughly match what you see on google earth is incredibly slow and tedious, you have to click through each one, wait for it to load, see if it works, etc
Balkan Holidays
or BH air now
flying this exact flight rn
Very cool, thank you
Balkan Holidays (current: BH Air) LZ-HMW Livery for Felis Tu-154M. note: You need Felis: Tupolev Tu-154M payware to be able to use the livery. BH Air Ltd. is a Bulgarian registered airline based in Sofia. Part owned by Balkan Holidays Services, BH Air provides charter flights to tour operators in...
why no cool soviet aircraft for msfs 😦
I've just learned how to fly A to B with the Tu-154, both with GPS and with VOR/ADFs, but it seems to have some sort of integrated INS, do you have any idea about how that works?
not a clue
all the russians play XP
sadly
Well, it's gonna be at least all but one, I don't have XP
But yeah it is a shame not much Soviet/Russian stuff for MSFS. Though, there's not that much stuff done overall. Like, the only 777 there is is the CaptSim one and I heard some stuff against it. And that's a 777, a very popular plane
But at the same time who'd buy it
but its gonna be hard for an american or european dev to make a good recreation of a soviet airliner
then again who will buy it
very few russians that i know have switched to MSFS
Oh definitely that too yeah
they are all in XP and FSX still
shame because we do get some really good stuff
TU154 is free, Yak 40 is free, AN-24, IL-12, IL-76
all free and very good
few people get to fly these excellent aircraft tho
I think you might be reversing cause and effect
Maybe the reason why russian people that are interested in Russian planes are on Xplane and FSX is because there are russian planes there
and not the other way around
I started in MSFS and later got Xplane because there were more planes I was interested into, and I've also dusted off FSX:SE for the same reason
But if there would have been an L-1011, a BAC 1-11, a Trident, a 737 jurassic, 727, Tu-154, VFW-614, and a Dassault mercure in MSFS I would have never switched
fair enough
I've always seen more russian members on XP than anything else but I've only been in the community since xp11 released
Found a video by Felis if anyone is interested. seems like a really cool way to fly 😄
Made a casual flight to show the basics of NVU navigation on TU154, using simple pattern.
You can buy this Tu154 for X-Plane10 here: http://store.x-plane.org/Tupolev-Tu-154_p_492.html
the NVU is quite uhhhhh
iffy
It works but not very well
really cool system tho
NAV but built on the cheap
you also can't fly on vatsim with it since its a custom system
maybe in russia?
You should
I fly with CIVA
from the video it looks like as long as you know distance and bearing it should be fine
either GPS or VOR-VOR for me
you can grab that from the 450 tho
I was thinking of getting that from charts or navigraph itself
GPS is cool because I can fly it and work at the same time
I don't need to constantly monitor the flight
its rewarding to fly even still
It's just easier for me to use GPS or VOR and leave it
sure, it's perfectly fine to enjoy two slightly different things
It just clicked in my head how good the ABSU is
insanely good
compared to the early 737's and 727's
Pmdg DC6?
cosy af
Oh cool
American Airlines livery for the recently-made-free Felis TU-154. AA, of course, never operated any Russian aircraft (nor did any other US airline to my knowledge) but this is a good rendition of what one may have looked like in their fleet. All Russian in the cabin and on the exterior of the air...
this actually looks quite good lmao
does it? 😬
get the correct bare metal texture and yeah
this is good
I will do one of these today
i want ti so baddd
yeah, I really can't wait
such a rare and underrated aircraft
yeah absolutely, it'll be so fun at City or Santos Dumont
Can’t wait to get it for Alliance routes, now if only Orbx YBBN wasn’t so shit
yeah I know the feeling, want to do AAL routes but DFW is uhh...
alliance w
Once that's out all I'll do for at least a week is going to be flying in and out of tiny airports in the US ❤️
But TBH I think at the moment the thing I want the most is the UNS-1 on the BAe
yeah totally
it's definitely a shame
Since I've read that post the 8th of September I've decided to hold off flying the BAe with the CJ4 FMC because "surely the UNS-1 isn't too far away" 
I wish I never made that decision Hahaha
oof
Not my screenshots, but some images from our squadron's first big mission of the year tonight
syria?
Sinai tonight. We orbited the pyramids quite a lot
how is it? I've not picked it up
It's not bad! Not quite at the level that Syria is yet, but it's a good start. Some annoying graphical glitches here and there.
The Israeli part of the map feels a bit low-effort so far too
it'd be fun for fishbed v phantom duels, but I'm honestly not too interested in another desert map and current events make playing stuff involving Israel a bit uncomfortable to me
felt like actually booting up the sim after a short hiatus
Love seeing the 747
I think my next drinking game should be ''take a shot for every time a controller gets the callsign wrong''
aside from the PMDG P3D fleet not supporting 8.33 khz spacing, it is a joy to fly
I've had that a lot recently flying the 154
No one knows LAZ, BGH, IFL
GSS, FCA, AHI are ones for me
I do help them by putting the callsign in the remarks, but alas
most don't read them 
me having to politely remind them because I said Jet Lift & they replied Cargo Bird
I was wondering, I’m now seeing quite a bit of stutter every time I am landing/shortly after takeoff (the rest of the time the game runs smoothly just fine). Could it be cause my install is on an external hard drive and at those points it can’t keep up?
Shit I literally forgot to include the name of the game in the message 
Don’t mind me having my dumb moments
It’s MSFS
if its XP the scenery buildings load whenever the tile is loaded but the scenery objects (clutter, vehicles, aircraft) load about 1km out
I think MSFS has a similar thing maybe?
Could be, I’m not sure
I’m just thinking whether I should transfer the game onto a new SSD I got or to not bother. I guess I will
Also another question about MSFS, is there any way to see how you did on one of the previous flights?
what do you mean by how you did? there's flight loggers like volanta (and littlenavmap also tracks flights as well as being a handy flight planning tool)
I mean like any statistics about flights
I guess I'll get one of these external apps to see
both are free
volanta good
they do this
MSFS has a logbook thing by default, but iirc it's pretty basic
Aight, thanks
also shows the flight path itself
Volanta's great for the flight tracking, I'd also recommend downloading littlenavmap for flightplanning though even if you don't care about its logbook, littlenavmap's great
Alex' flight simulator projects
Thank you, I will
Also seeing the exact flight path will might be nice
Also asking, with MSFS is there a way to move the whole install, or will I really have to delete it and redownload again
yeah it's cool, there's also a 3d visualization which is pretty cool
don't actually know, sorry
Okay, will have to see myself then lol
depends if you have it on steam
I do
if you do it should be pretty simple
Thing is, Steam doesn't actually recognise the game
click on the cog icon then do this
It looks just at the 'launcher'
Yeah I'm already moving it, will see if maybe it moves everything
Oh welp, seems I know the answer now:
It did move just the 'launcher'
But it still deleted all the rest of the content
I guess I'm ready for another overnight download
and it often gets stuff completely wrong
often fails to register takeoff but counts the landing
currently working out a way to circumnavigate the globe in the Comanche
the lack of anti-ice might make this a bit tricky
also some of the legs are going to be 6-7 hours long 😬
that'll be quite a trip, sounds fun though
looking forward to having to do spark plug cleaning in the aleutian islands 😆
‘Murican
‘MURICA FUK YE 🇺🇸
Gotta love standard MSFS AI
Was landing at San Diego in the PMDG 737, had a very smooth landing. But I had to land late cause a plane just rolled onto the runway in front of me, so couldn't stop in time
That was probably my smoothest landing yet, and AI still ruined it
Are you using FSLTL traffic?
I really like it because you can quickly wipe it all out if needed
Oh and also returning to the questions I asked a bit ago, it was indeed the HDD causing stutter. Now on a new SSD, it's not nearly as bad, though still slightly noticeable
Haven't reinstalled it yet, was just default AI
Also this made me start reinstalling it right now lol
Also gotta reinstall the liveries I had too
Quick question for MSFS: are the KSAN addons on the marketplace good or should I better wait until I can buy some external one not from the marketplace?
I assume the two options are latinvfr and bmworld/amsim? they're the two options available outside the marketplace as well, that said neither is particularly good, BMworld looks better but is actually less accurate
Yeah, BMWorld/AMSim is very hit and miss.
Some of their stuff is great, some not so much
I only have LatinVFR's Nellis AFB and that's reasonably good but if their airliners are anything to go by, avoid
One second and I'll check which ones are there
I remember one was certainly LVFR yeah
Don't remember the other one
What are generally good developers to get airports from?
Also sorry for asking so many questions, I’m still relatively new lol
Yeah also I just looked, you’re completely right there
I did think BMWorld one looked better but I have no idea about accuracy 
S tier: Flightbeam, FlyTampa, Verticalsim, Northern Sky Studios
A tier: Orbx, Inibuilds, DominicDesignTeam, Drzewiecki Design, FSimStudios, WF Scenery Studio, Pyreegue Dev Co, FSDreamTeam, Xwind
B tier: Digital Design, Aerosoft, MK Studios
C tier: BMWorld/AMSim
F tier: Double T
in my opinion, anyway
Thanks!
pretty much, just with the caveat that you'd better have three 4090s to make drzewiecki's more recent stuff work
or any of Inibuilds' larger products yeah
I also have PacSim's Incheon which was quite expensive and is absolutely giant
That's pretty good though also harder on the FPS
I'm thinking FlyTampa's KBOS tbh, it does look amazing
it's lovely
And doesn’t look too difficult to approach
I've flown out of it a few times now, lovely airport
one of those "everything that can go wrong has gone wrong" flights
oof
So, everything wrong?
- left the EFB weights in KG when the OFP was in LBS so it put the wrong weights in, only noticed after engine start, so couldn't fix it
- turns out the FUEL PRED page always reads KG so it kept messing up my calculated GW
- I turned on NAV and PROFILE modes after taking off and then forgot to actually switch on the AP, so it nose-dived and I had to hand-fly in a big climbing spiral back to the first waypoint
- while trying to re-init my weights I accidentally wiped my flight plan details so it lost the SID, and ended up following runway heading for about 10 miles
- it then got confused about the waypoint to use so I had to direct-to it, but it couldn't turn tightly enough so I had to then direct-to the next logical waypoint
- while trying to get a cockpit shot during cruise I ended up hitting WASD and numpad 2/4/6/8 to try and move the camera around, instead of the correct arrow keys, and did something to the autopilot causing me to gain 2k feet and nearly stall
- couldn't seem to figure out what makes manual AT speed control work so it kept trying to stay at cruise speed while i was lowering my gear
honestly a right pain of a flight, but made it to KSYR anyway
ah, for the last one, it's a bug with the latest version of the A300 - the IAS gauge always remains at ---
Systems modelling is in full swing = this thing is at least another 6 months out if not longer
still, that's really great to hear
I was free today, and I just bought a new plane, so i decided to fly a small rotation with it EGLL-EGCC-EHAM-EGLL 😄
I only did this at my PC from the comfort of my home, and I'd still be one leg short from a real rotation and I already feel so tired ahahahah
do love the old landor livery
EGLL -> EIDW. Decent crab angle in the 50 degree offset 22KT/G29KT crosswinds. FBW A32NX is so good.
Since reinstalling xp12 I‘ve had majors issues
Performance has been at an all time low
Weird sim
Nice
To provide a seamless and unified experience to all, we will be moving away from the traditional Stable and Open Beta builds. Starting with the upcoming release, DCS will transition to a single, unified version. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/newsletters/aafb5eb2c13e2529fae26bf92990ba23/
a good change if u ask me
yeah, that's nice to see
You've Gotta be Shitting Me. There is nothing like the Wild Weasels, and there's nothing like Wild Weaselin' in DCS: F-4E together with a friend. Check out this gameplay trailer at a look at some crazy fun awaiting you once you strap into the one and only legend. Today; we're also excited to announce the release of the interactive DCS: F-4 Fligh...
hyped
you can, the button's on the side of the throttle (or maybe the back)
does that prevent from turning engines off?
uh? not sure what you mean
i took off right
toga of course
got to like 200-300ft
plane just turned off
well like engines spooled down so 
oh, are you still in sim? if so check if the engine start switches are still on, that'll fuck you like that
you know the two switches with guards to the right of the rotary switch, if you leave either of those on after start it'll kill your engines once you get going
oh
that might've been it
idk
owell i'll try again later
now that i kinda got the hang of it
Happy Saturday, Everybody!
I have missed you the past couple of weekends on account of my flying and travel schedule. While last weekend was relatively boring with some board meetings in Boston, the weekend prior was much more interesting as we had a small portion of the PMDG team together on a research trip related to our
ohman
it's really easy to forget, they're spring loaded irl and in sim (assuming you're in MSFS) but if you use the mousewheel they'll just stay on (which is handy because it lets you then click the fuel cutoffs) but then you forget to turn them off
yeah, it looks really nice
TSW 5 might be a thing before A220 gets teased again 😮💨
little 6 hour hop
descending
Wrangell to CZST Stewart
Last one for today CZST to CYXT Terrace
https://forum.inibuilds.com/topic/21574-statement-from-synaptic-simulations-synaptic-a22x-project-future/ huh, not sure what to think
Statement from Synaptic Simulations on the Synaptic A22X Project To our dedicated community, We'd first like to take a moment to thank all of you for your continued support throughout our development of the Synaptic A22X. The enthusiasm you have consistently shown in our server, both incidentally...
Inibuilds and screwing over flybywire, name a more iconic duo
tbh I don't think you'll have ever seen it if it stayed as is
Trying to develop something alongside full time jobs will never go well
ye i get them as well
I'm happy
In this short video, you will see work-in-progress footage captured from a Meta Quest 2 via PC using Virtual Desktop. We have tested the game with both Airlink and the new Steam app for Meta Quest, but during development, we find Virtual Desktop continues to be useful.
This footage takes you from an area near Control Tower at Thorpe Abbotts d...
Test flight in the JF (made by Thranda) Duchess, lovely aircraft, another fine job by Thranda
From the other night, but in 2D with all the graphics turned up
And some from the weekend
gazelle baseddd
so training is going well 
https://streamable.com/1kkt29
Watch "Digital Combat Simulator Black Shark 2024.02.04 - 01.51.10.04.DVR" on Streamable.
pls ignore music
Anyone tempted by the Bellanca aircruiser, dont. It lacks features. The sound is ridiculous. And it's aerodynamically unstable.
@rustic cedar classic dcs
shouldve been playing the japanese imperial march
First divert on VATSIM. WPG CTR was awesome and accomodated everything without a problem.
weather below minimums?
Yep, tried two times, both times got to about 400ft, and could see the runway for about 10/15 seconds before descending into more soup until minimums 😦
oof
WINNIPEG
MASSIve w
Thanks
just another day being a fighter pilot 
abit shaky no ?
no?
He has blessed us with War Thunder meme in DCS 🤣
Beavertime
@echo gorge sorry for the ping, is there a Presidential Airways livery for the MSFS' BAe146?
Haven't found one on fs.to, but navigating that site is a nightmare, so I wouldn't be surprised if I missed it
technically yes but actually no
the continental express livery is actually a presidential bird
but it's not in the presidential airways livery
Is that one of the included liveries?
yep
But I suppose it's not realistic for it to wear that livery while flying for Presidential Airlines I guess, although some weird stuff happened in those years
I'll see if you can do something akin to the Maddog and use this livery in MSFS
@echo gorge converted it in MSFS, trying now to see if that worked
nice
ugh sorry forgot to remove some files, standby, will send a new one soon
new one
thanks
No problem I'll try to contact the original creator of the xplane livery and ask if they want that on fs.to 🙂
I know the gazelle has had a turbulant history with the community, but I've always enjoyed it (wish the cockpit textures were better but oh well)
They're doing some detail enhancements in the next update, so it'll hopefully look a bit better
I think it's held up better than some of the old DCS modules like the Fw 190 D-9 and the UH-1H have
yeah definitely
don't think so
It's not launching in early access you see, so no EA discount
same, will be nice to have something feature complete with bonuses coming later on top of that
The thing thats never gonna be out
I remember them saying that a release is gonna be last year
If it actually drops i‘m suprised
ED control what goes out and what does not and when it does.
You wont see that that chopper for months yet
Talking about sharedflight haha
Nah it’s very stable now, UI is still a bit buggy but it’s clear and understandable
There is some annoying problems still, ie: you can’t pop out the FMS without bugging the install, there is also a problem with the Align mode for the IRS, you need to click it on both clients to get it to align properly
Other than that it’s basic things like windows, blinds, some small weather bugs, simcoders headshake doesn’t really work well with it either for some reason
It’s pretty good
i'll be looking forward to maybe the only hope of ever doing shared cockpit with someone
minus the cl650
which works flawlessly
i was certain it was dead
cant lie
cruisin
How is the DA-42?
I like it. It's not got a huge amount of features, but it does have engine damage simulation and state saving. No EFB or fancy cockpit config stuff though.
They've really just focused on getting the basics right; it's sufficiently weighty, it sounds incredibly good, and it looks very pretty. Apparently the performance is really quite accurate as well.
That sounds promising. Noticed any bugs? How does it feel flying? From what I was able to gather the flight model has received quite a lot of praise.
Didn't spot any bugs so far, though there are a few reported on the forum.
It feels heavier than I expected it to, though then again, so many MSFS aircraft are overly twitchy (cough FSR500 cough) so maybe this is just normal.
Yeah, they also have the issue of being a bit floaty near the ground. 😄
The DA42 looks really interesting. If I flew in MSFS lately it was always airliners but a smaller dual-prop GA capable plane might be tempting, especially if it´s well done. I´ve never bought stuff from OrbX, though and having to download another client is a bit annoying, tbh.
I buy a fair bit from OrbX, the launcher is alright though takes much longer to load than Contrail or Inibuilds.
The prices are usually a smidge higher due to the fact that it's converting from AUD.
anyone know if there's a C5 for any modern flight sim that's actually good?
Don't believe so
That the new diamond?
Yes. Flies very well, looks and sounds really good, too. Nice "little" dual prop for those relaxed sightseeing flights.
Found an issue with it - the yaw damper goes mad sometimes. Easy to just switch it off though.
absolute joy to fly
@echo gorge Did I remember rightly that you grabbed Air Hauler 2 in the BF sales last year? Have you found it particularly worthwhile since?
I did, it's nice but I've honestly not used it as much as I might have hoped
it's quite decent though
Can you fly for IRL companies with it?
Or is that only in A Pilot's Life 2
I kinda want an Everts Air Cargo career
not really, there's some virtual airlines set up that use it I think, but for that I think it's probably better off joining a virtual airline
Fair, thanks
Which equipment do you guys use. I need some ideas
the interface

It looks clunky, but honestly looks better than Neofly v4. Neofly is just a mess of cluttered information all over the screen.
Plus Neofly is super picky about the livery you use and so on.
0:00 Introduction
6:26 GSX Integration
8:23 EFB Improvements
11:49 Flight Model & SDS
15:59 External Engine Model
20:06 XEM Demo 1 - FADEC Quirks & Forced Manual Start
30:37 XEM Demo 2 - Fan Blade Icing
37:13 XEM Demo 3 - Compressor Stalls
40:35 Final Items & Wrap-up
Same, might bother setting up some more keybinds now.
But also, the fact that the fuselage now blocks icing... this is crazy levels of detail.
Damn ini A300-600 is on the market already
I knew the thing released but didn't expect it to be on the official marketplace so quick
I guess I'm used to TS, where it's a year between a 3rd party release and its possible official release 
Half the issues I found with the COWS DA42 are already fixed as of today's update 😄
The whole discourse about the Dune expansion is hilarious
I really don’t understand the point of fictional stuff in simulators. Well, this level of fictional. Fictional stuff that’s more or less realistic (though it more applies to train simulators) is fine, but like, this…
Makes money for the sim developer from the tie-in, allows something fun and different to be flown in interesting scenery, etc.
I mean Asobo don't force you to install it either, so I don't really see any issue with it other than that you might object to the dev time spent on it I guess?
I like doing stuff by the book and flying realistically, but I'll definitely take the Ornithopter out for a spin or two, looks like a blast to fly in VR.
The main objections I see is "Why couldn't they have instead worked on the in game physics and other core stuff" but they forget to realise that it's unlikely the core programming team worked on this at all, would mainly have been 3d artists
Exactly.
Plus, it also falls into the "9 women should be able to produce a baby in 1 month" fallacy
EFA livery pack is so good
Yeah that’s true. I have no issue with it, but just don’t see a point in such stuff
There’s probably people who genuinely enjoy it, so it’s still content worth making then
