#off-topic-tech
1 messages · Page 161 of 1
this would fix every and all problem with icue
we just need it to work with cat mews
mew most certainly
synapase is the definition of "le dogshit"
my aether lamp would randomly disconnect and stay one color because it couldnt connect despite being right next to it
VERY un mew approval
i dont buy and razer products anymore
i mean their april fools are good
like acutal king of april fools
i nerver even looked at a razor product after i learned they literally dont work at all unless you have the software
they are bricked without it
i hate when that happens
every good product gets discontinued for something worst
Can i use a 7900xtx as my main gpu and have a second gpu 2080 ti for physx or will that not work?
What?
I remember when they sold those physx cards
they should just re-release that sort of thing to complete yet another bonehead move
- No its probably like everything else 2. Why 3. If its in reference to the removal of physicsX thats only on rtx 50 series
lol could you imagine all those old mobos with both PCIe & AGP suddenly having a use again
Does a 7900xtx have physx support?
I dont know cause i probably wasn’t born 
Its amd so i assume it doesnt have physx support. My 2080 ti is just kinda sitting on a shelf collecting dust and i want to put it to use again
the answer is yes cause its not a 50 series gpu
It does have physx support?
or atleast probably whatever the amd alternative is
I dont think it does. Most of what i see says it cant support it.
But if i put my 2080 ti in there, maybe i can do most of the work on my 7900xtx and offload physx to the 2080 ti
anything multi gpu has been dead for ages
sell it probably, or keep it it
I wanna keep it and do something with it but dont know what
Have you seen the current US GPU market?
Its fucked
at this point i could probably get $500 for my 2gb R460
And you know that video is an accurate representation of performance how?
If nvidia wasnt charging the equivalent of a down payment on a house, using egregious amounts of power and using 12pin connector, maybe i would buy one of their gpus
And if it's actual grey market, you just paid for pirated windows
You pay for windows?
if you have an old system with anything windows 7 or newer, you can just yank the activation code off of it & it should work
nah, massgrave.dev
Fuck Michaelsoft
Microsoft is seriously pushing me to linux. Im not getting w11
i like how about 95% of it seems basically the same as win10, but that last 5% was fucked with
Anyways, here's my take:
- decent GPU at decent price, but can do better on $1500
- strong CPU, but definitely focused on endgame satisfactory
- too little info on RAM, might be shit
- too little info on SSD, might be shit
- overpriced case with too few and too weak fans
- good cooler, bit overkill maybe
- PC can't be built and won't even turn on cuz no PSU and no mainboard
Overall: it's better to just give us a link so we can find the relevant part info ourselves
oo newegg has that monitor for the same price that'd save me a trip
yes
if not more than enough
but even then i can still get msrp b580s when they restock at microcenter tustin
yea i've definitely noticed that win11 likes to crap itself a lot more often than 10
Is that about linux?
It's not a good monitor if you're looking to game on it
#off-topic-tech message
bruh my pc keeps getting no bootable image
untill i reset my bios settings
like every 1/15 startups
it won't blue screen, but stuff will just slow down or glitch out until it doesn't work at all
The cycle has never changed with Windows. One bad, one good, one bad, one good.
It's a joke about how awful windows is, even if it was free and not $120 per user
I just pirate windows.
Would have thought the pattern would have broken but not really
i feel like it wouldn't be quite so annoying if DDR5 ram didn't do it's full retraining every time win11 did a full-on crash
If there is a Microcenter nearby
So how does linux do for gaming?
boo
CPU for $378 not $350
Overkill overpriced MB
Overpriced RAM
Ewaste SSD
GPU at $540, not $280
meh value PSU
That's a <$1300 config, probably closer to $1200 if picked sensibly
i have Intel, Honeywell, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, TSMC (almost), Qualcomm, and a world-class materials science university within an hour's drive of me. no Microcenter
Most stuff works nicely.
Riot Games titles unavailable and will remain like that (Vanguard doesn't work for Linux and won't be adapted for it).
Some EasyAntiCheat titles also don't work cuz devs didn't enable support for Linux despite EAC offering it - two culprits I know are Destiny 2 and Fortnite.
And some games are just a bit wonky
Check protondb.com for more info
microcenter is LITERAL heaven
yup
I dont play d2 or fortnite. Hate those 2. Ive been playing games like satisfactory, dyson sphere program, warframe, doom and helldivers 2
7 hour drive for me, minimum
yikes
I have a microcenter that is a 3hr drive from me
Some games even run better on Linux than Windows because of less bloated OS
yea, not even a day trip for me. weekend trip
so it turns out im super close to a microcenter compared to you guys
For any specific game, proton has info on how well they run on Linux.
The examples I named are just examples, not a complete list. Other games can still not work
i'm not even middle of nowhere. 5 million people here with massive electronics & materials manufacturing
Where can i find proton?
I'd have to fly like 10h
build an microcenter in intel
HUGE missed oppertunity ngl
there's not much tech in the east end of the valley, a microcenter there would be great
and it'd be right near a rapidly growing municipal airport eyeing to compete directly with the main int'l one
Im off to go find some interesting things to 3d print
yo if someone flies out
just to go to microcenter
i'd buy a 3d printer just to make adapters for things around the house 🤣
dont even go or i can offer you a therapist
i mean, to avoid the traffic, it might be faster to fly here & back to LA than it'd be to go to the Tustin location 🤣
ofc lol
🤣
wait what your in la?
oh
which is like a 1hr flight from LA
it can take 2hrs just to get out of the LA basin
people will kill themselves to get here
knowing (or not) its a portal to a place riddled with homeless and people that will target any tesla they see
Thats what im doing right now. Need a tld adapter for me belt.
yea i already have a list going 🤣
a lot of tool holders & grouping thingies
I need to get into 3d modeling
If i had a resin printer, id be printing figures but the one i want is expensive.
some of the toy stuff looks like fun, but i look at a lot of it & realize i can make it into something useful
make a gun and put in a nerf bullet shooting mechanism
we were the initial test area for amazon's drone delivery, but the airspace was already too fucked up to make it viable
run up to someone after they leave __
guesses as to Oxnard to San Bernardino drive time?
6 hours
🤣
3-6
🚡 *
8
google's saying 2hrs with all the highways clear (LOL)
3.5 by bus
so yea, for the price, vehicle wear & tear, time suck, & grey hair from the stress, it might actually be better to fly to here and uber to a microcenter if they built it
they've also been building up a bunch of gigantic stores all around that airport, so a microcenter might not be dumb to just plop down within walking distance
oooooooooo
i forgot a big manufacturer just closed
they could take over their facility if it's big enough
oh it'd be 4x the size of the one in tustin 🤣
but yea, if you wanna look at hte definition of "growth opportunities", check out the map at Mesa-Gateway airport
retired AFB with 3 full fat runways
I wonder how much money someone made from just renaming HBO Max to Max and then back to HBO Max 🤣
"The press release states that HBO is returning because of the quality that the name represents in the media. However, the reasons now given for the return of HBO as a service name are reminiscent of those that originally served to remove it. In fact, it has been argued that the strong image of the HBO brand could turn away potential subscribers who are more interested in reality-heavy content from channels such as HGTV, Discovery and TLC. It turned out, however, that this was not the case."
I'm already a millionaire
I own 1,000,000 Vietnamese Dong
-# that's about 34.41 EUR or 38.52 USD
Not to confuse with Max.
All that pointless name change would turn me into Mad Max for sure 
Unless you are referring to a less popular cinemax service which is also called max
It's already built and turns on, I just didn't mention the motherboard and PSU. BTW I forgot to say but that $1500 includes tax, so it's more like $1350 or so. The RAM is corsair vengeance and ssd is samsung 990 pro.
That RAM info doesn't narrow it down enough - what speed and CL? Also, what MB and PSU?
Tax included, that pricing seems normal - still suboptimal tho, could've been improved it quite a bit with different picks.
Most important thing is that you are happy, can't minmax satisfaction
Burger chain in sweden
Oh
Ram is 6000mbps and the motherboard is one of the Asus ROG B650 models. PSU is Corsair RM750e
RAM CL? 28, 30, 36, 48?
Also, Asus's B650 lineup ranges from barely holding up to great quality
Almost the entire strix lineup
one of the better feelings in electronics: having all your stuff charged
if i didn't get mine for free i'd almost be offended 🤣
i'm just glad that AMD mobos don't need to be able to handle 2.5x the power like they do with Intel
Don't buy the brand, buy the model a famous person once said.
Hence why I said "almost", there are some good AM5 strix boards - and it all depends on pricing too
Also, if the product range is small enough, you absolutely can generalize like this


thats not how ram works but sure
Eh, MHz is wrong too, it's clear they meant MT/s
Seems to be AI generated crap page.
Basics might be true.
i mean the app
Numbers?
https://www.apple.com/in/numbers/
Ok, that was probably indian page version, sorry
Numbers is a legit app no?
that was my first thought, but on PC
That was the cloud version in browser it was using?
I use numbers on my iphone
Numbers for iCloud is legit thing
I just followed this, lol
Numbers is Apple excel.
yup
Yes, and that site had links to download another office software mixed in with AI generated text about Apple Numbers.
And mainly contained how to use that browser iCloud version in Windows.
And then hallucinations on how that is downloading to PC.
If you want the leggit, use app store.
Because it was generated with some kind of AI template for pages about whatever program was input as prompt.
Lot of sites like that around now where they had LLMs generate various "help" pages for various apps etc.
Where often 50% of stuff is just wrong.
And which usually contradict themselves between subheader contents.
The AI slop in the past 1 1/2 years has totally messed up google search
Yeah, I noticed that too. Mostly for game help pages.
Which seemed to be AI generated and were full of mistakes.
there is no app for windows so was hoping this WPS open license app was ok
Basic template prompt that then gets fed to LLM with just app/game/thing name switched to generate answer pages for everything.
And then search boosted to hell.
Theirs irony in this, AI deep-searches can actually be really good... Basically you have to work-around AI with more AI
Don't...
Get LibreOffice
uh oh, lol
Yeah, and the layout is like it's written by a "human". So it often looks like a leggit article.
k, will do
I love finding seemingly in-depth articles only to notice the exact same linguistic patterns and inaccuracies red-flagging the content as AI generated
Basically for office softwares, there is MS Office, that is Windows only.
Then there are the Apples softwares for MacOS and iOS.
And then there is LibreOffice (forked from OpenOffice) when you want free or Linux.
I hope in the future, the reader has an option to check out if the content they read is AI generated or human generated. But no clue how the world is going to be able to do that. You cannot force labels, people will just not put up the labels.
It's getting really good at that too. I've been 10 minutes into something just be like "Wait a second..."
But please, someone smart out there, figure out a system to filter AI crap out and label it for transperency.
Google can somewhat filter AI results, other AI deep-searches that can filter out AI content with... AI... are unfortunately the best option rn
And anything else is really not suggested in any way or form.
Yeah, it's crazy
Then again, most articles have the same vague start and get more specific over time.
And while it's hard to spot AI in the vague introductions, the "elaborations" make it really obvious
And when they start to repeat same things in different ways, or often even with those contradictions, in subsequent parts.
In a way that almost no human would when writing.
A year ago all AI's repeated shit, they're getting so much better at that, they'll leave the repititions until the end of article
That or presenting different content in the exact same way
Yeah, but when the page is series of questions and answers basically, like many of those pages are.
And each one had been prompted separately.
Which is quite uncanny
The "QA style" is a dead give away, I feel like they're gonna do some scummy shit to change that now that people have wised up
yea thats ai atleast on the second one anyway
Did you say Need for Speed Heat?!?
The two screenshots are from the same webpage. I mean, I only scrolled down to take second screenshot to show QA.
either that or a bot of a person wrote it
Also the fact it's written in 2024. When the game hype was LONG gone by then.
it could also be just a copy pasted artical
The first one is just lame game journalism. The second SS is "Need for Speed Heat" everywhere
where they just copy paste random facts into one big info actical
thanks man
It's too consistent in the wording for that
LLMs absolutely LOVE to generate answers in a form of "here's an introduction, some extra info for consideration and a list of bullet points"
Probably two stage process.
First asks the LLM for most common questions related to X.
And then second part feeds each of the questions first LLM run generated second time through LLM.
The first screenshot is very obviously AI too
Dead internet theory
So some students built a machine that can solve a rubiks cube in 0.1 seconds heh
it's literally a if you blink you'll miss it type thing
The big problem with those is to make a cube that moves smoothly enough to work at those speeds without breaking and coming apart.
Not the other stuff.
My uncle was an amateur magician, my cousin could solve two wild junggling them...
*while
I remember one of the first cheats for the rubiks cube was so silly... and simple
stickers... a sheet of sickers
people would not be able to solve it but want it back to it's solve configuration lol
you could also just take them apart and reassemble solved... you could also re-assemble one in a config that was impossible to solve if I recall correctly
I just think it's neat those things are still around heh
We sponsored ourselves! Support our ability to independently buy parts for review and get a B-STOCK GN Modmat! https://store.gamersnexus.net/products/modmat-volt-bstock-large or grab one of our high-quality GN15 mats here: https://store.gamersnexus.net/products/large-modmat-gn15-anniversary
In this review of the Corsair / Origin Genesis Pre-Buil...
Will give it a watch once I get my food.
TLDR:
Way overpriced.
RAM gets cooked by the GPU to 100C(?)
Already stuff in the water cooling water and/or soft tubing already getting colored when they got the delivery.
Bought just to get RTX 5090, and tested before getting stripped.
TLDW 😉
Was watching the thumbnail and was wondering wtf was going through the case. Then I noticed its the watercool system
Giant radiator for #800X3D, as there wasn't option to get that 5090 water cooled when they ordered, now there is for $200 extra.
the tubing for $8K had better beat the radiator hosing in a 1996 plymouth
And the case fans run purely on CPU thermals, that never rise because of the way overblown water cooling for the CPU power.
So the GPU hotboxes rest of the components.
Tubing doesnt look good to me.
yup
mew
Watched first 10 minuts of it. The sarcasm is high in the video 😂
of course it is, it's a GN video
“No discolouration tubing” … uhu uhu 😂
21 tune pieces and they got 16 or something?
And this is the prebuilt that the fans dont spin for 8 minutes straight or was that precious prebuilt they made?
Fans never really spin up because of being driven purely by CPU temperature.
And the giant radiator and all the water means that the low wattage CPU never heats up.
Which leads to that RAM actually hitting real danger temperatures outside the spec from GPU heat output.
My interpretation is this; fans not spin = fan not spinning at all.
Can also just mean "not spin up".
exactly. But then he should said that.
Sorry, but there is a difference between fans not doing anything for 8 seconds. Or fans spinning but just not ramping up when component gets hotter.
And remember those are autogenerated subtitles, so there can be mistakes in them compared to what was actually said.
And that specific one seems like it is missing something.
let me check. And I know how YT subtitles work 😄
"by choosing not spin the fans for 8 minutes* while under load". - exact quote as heard by my ears.
0:48 +- of the YT video.
And later on in the video, you can see AVG fan speed being 0 for 600-700 seconds.
Ok, so really so low PWM signal they don't spin at all.
Because of the inertia from all the water.
And bad control temperature source selection.
It seems to kick in around 85 degree celcius?
Exaclty.
Not normal behavior imo.
But then I never owned a watercooling. But if GN raises an eyebrow.
To be fair, it does keep the CPU under 90 🤣
And for max boost, you need to keep it under 78C IIRC?
Max frequency gets derated on AMD AM5 CPUs after certain point in steps.
As you need more voltage for same frequency at higher temperature, and the voltage headroom runs out in the turbo table.
shit
As example from single core on specific CPU unit for Zen 4:
Almost certainly 7950X from the max frequency reached.
Experimental measurement with single-core pinned load
Thanks, I didn't know that 👍
Is that just a general rule? That high temperature = more voltage for same frequency? Or does this only apply to CPU's and boost?
Yes.
And also more die damage over time from that voltage and amperage.
Basic thing is that undoped silicon conducts more at higher temperature, so you get more leakage.
Which necessiates more voltage to keep the operation of the MOSFETs stable at certain frequency.
And also even more power used for same frequency from that leakage.
So same CPU, running at same voltage and frequency, doing same load, uses more power when the die is hotter.
But also for RAM and GPU?
Any silicon based thing.
Yeah, gotcha.
There was a super interesting article on tweakers on how they make silicon etc.
And the reason for that lowered max voltage at higher temperatures is to keep that chip life long enough.
And somebody in the comments, wrote another whole article to correct the article. Because they claim to work in a factory. I think they even say they are a CEO somewhere with silicon. Anyway. That comment was even more interesting.
Too bad it's all in dutch, I think you might find it very interesting to read. Very technical.
As the max at 75-80 and 80-95 is 1.386V, then at 85-90 is 1.353V and then at 90-95 is 1.337v and 95-100v is 1.330.
Derating to keep the use life, as that die degradation depends voltage, amperage and temperature.
And the effects are very process dependant too, but AMD etc. have access to the information about that from TSMC.
But again as basics, higher voltage causes more over time damage higher the die temperature is.
So that specific core drops about 50mV from the max voltage it is willing to use when temperature rises to max allowed, compared to max it is willing to use at lower temperatures.
Good thing you got ai to translate it
Estimated delivery May 21st
thank god
first use for ai since 1bc
As continuation to yesterday.
AMD has that derating in turbo table max after certain temperature.
Intel has the same as TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost), last 200MHz of turbo allowed, not being usable after certain temperature is reached.
And that thermal limit was one of the things which wasn't working on 13th and 14th gen microcode before patches.
So TVB could activate at any temperature, giving the CPU more voltage and more frequency.
Ok, seems to only be 100MHz more when under 70C.
Good addition Baldur
Another case where AMD has single integrated solution and Intel has crap stacked on top of crap in their Turbo tech...
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/gaming/resources/how-intel-technologies-boost-cpu-performance.html
Frequency seems to be limited by power, current and temperature.
Then you have that "Opportunistically increases clock frequency by up to 100MHz; " - Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost
Man ... what is all this 🤣
Incremental improvements on new generations, each time getting new branding etc.
You also have Intel® Adaptive Boost Technology
Instead of just being actually integrated.
Ah, makes sense.
It all seems to boil down to; how far can we push silicon with an acceptable lifespan
the result of all this is when an amd mobile cpu is limited to, say, 35W, it will be rock solid at 35W; voltage and frequency will bounce around to keep the wattage fixed, for predictable cooling and battery discharge
equivalent intel cpus will flail about between the different limits and nothing ends up flat
apple's M cpus are more primitive in that they'll remain fixed at given frequencies, resulting in unpredictable wattage, but they get mostly away with it by being efficient; but there's still edge cases where it'll suddenly throttle hard in macbook airs
@twin dew I am not sure if I understand where you make distinction between AMD having a integrated solution and Nvidia having a non integrated solution(s).
Intel.
AMD has that single multidimensional turbo table, on per core basis, and then more general max on per CPU basis based on how many cores are active.
Intel has multiple techs layered on top of each other over time.
Without the newer versions actually integrating the older versions into them, but just layering on top.
Yes, sorry Intel.
Gotcha. AMD is also precious boost overdrive right? Or that's the marketing name
That is just power limiting changing, nothing else.
Ok, the branding for tuning those three limiter max values.
Not just PPT.
With preset options to change all in predetermined steps, or manual for full manual changing.
precision boost is the name of the super smart tech that manages everything; precision boost overdrive is the brand for letting you increase the limits
Yup.
without PBO, overclocking means disregarding all of this fancy stuff and running your CPU at a constant frequency and voltage
Just saying that it also boosts frequency, depending on headroom of temp and current.
And Curve Optimizer is just setting offsets to that multidimensional turbo table.
more power limit means more frequency
Just directly from that turbo table being able to go to higher frequency steps.
Gotcha, but your point was that AMD had a solid solution for this and Intel is doing patch work 😄
Because the power and/or current isn't hitting limits.
Actually cool.
also important to point out is that motherboard manufacturers fuck with intel and amd; moreso intel, but definitely both
If I read correctly, it's pretty careful by boosting core per core with tiny increments. And monitoring headroom constantly.
ye
their monitoring is also more accurate and more frequent than intel iirc but i can't remember by how much
25MHz steps with Zen3 and up.
With microsecond or lower timesteps.
are intel still 100MHz steps
Ok, seems AMD is also not innocent when it comes to technology overflow
So under PBO2, there is 5-6 other technologies/marketing names.
That is basically marketing slide.
All those are integrated into the tech as combined whole.
Just tuning the various variables in the tech.
PPT, EDC and TDC aren't technologies, they're names for values to monitor
ye
Yeah I agree, just was reading it while talking to you.
Curve Optimizer for example just offsets the frequency used for certain voltage & temperature combo.
From that combined multidimensional table.
Adjusting the table right? Yeah.
curve optimiser allows for selective undervolting; if you undervolt the whole table by an equal amount you'll end up unstable at idle
So basically this, but then you offset so you use the voltage one step "above" the value in the pic when doing -1 curve optimizer.
with CO you keep idle voltage but reduce load voltage
The actual table is of course much more granular.
Ok, this one needs explaining.
So they say by undervolting, you create more headroom for higher frequencies*.
But, the higher frequencies, will eventually get the same temperature and be the same no?
So at Curve Optimizer 0, at 90-95C, with 5100 MHz, the CPU normally gets 1.316V.
But with negative Curve Optimizer, you then offset to previous voltage bin, so it gets 1.295V, which would normally have been used with 5075MHz.
Yes, but how does that help with higher frequency.
Moving the voltage curve downwards with negative offset, upwards with positive offset, but based on the programmed voltage curve.
Lower voltage, less heat, less power.
So allows for more boost at same power etc.
Yes I know.
But when you ramp up frequency, you have benefits for how long a second?
it'll reach higher frequencies with lower voltage at the same power
So in actuality it allows boosting to higher frequency at the limits.
Oh right! Because hot silicon= more power usage because of the leakage of silicon.
More frequency for same voltage, heat and power.
Until you hit the top of the turbo table programmed.
And then you just heat less.
it's more effective than PBO
And that Precision Boost Overdrive Scalar basically allows you to trade CPU longevity for more performance.
Not that I am going to underclock 😄
It changes value for CPU degradation over time allowed in the boost algo.
So allows the CPU to cause more damage to itself in same time.
with curve optimiser you may end up with an unstable system but you won't damage your CPU at all
And more stable than just VCore offset.
As it offsets the curve, and isn't static offset.
And with the new version you can just offset parts of the curve etc.
it's the best way to get more performance out of a ryzen
But it's not healthy? Or less healthy for CPU then leaving it stock.
more power limit than stock is never healthy
No, but AMD is giving the option.
And many OC guides again ignore what it actually does and just tell to set it to max...
So fastest degradation....
curve optimiser doesn't change the power limit
Yikes. We've talked about it last week yeah.
Talking about the Scalar.
You know, some people replace their CPU every generation (2-3 years maybe?) so for them. It doesn't really matter I guess.
i can't replace my 5800X3D in this economy
In the sense; those people don't care about longtivity for their hardware. They just replace it with new and better 😄
i've tried not to, but upgrading my family's hardware as it fails has kinda ended up with me doing it almost every generation
Also:
AMD employs a boot-time calibration (BTC) process to finetune the voltage offset. Essentially, during the boot process, the CPU can check the quality of the power delivery. Based on the quality, it then offsets the factory-fused VFT table. If you have a great power supply, the offset will be smaller. If you have a terrible power supply, then the offset will be greater.
i didn't know that!
I am not judging. You do you 😄
kinda nuts
Just saying that some people really don't care about their hardware and just throw more money at it. It's their life.
And they just want to overclock and have fun.
plus i just got handed latest gen hardware instead of waiting a full gen or 2 for prices to drop a bit
Others want a stable system for years to come 😄
Well, basically VRM output stability, not PSU output stability.
How clean power does the CPU get.
I am happy with my current hardware (99% of time). Especially now with all... the stuff going on.
Lot of minutea about that turbo behavior etc.
Bookmarked it.
One mistake in there, the IGP:s VDDCR_GFX in Zen4 and Zen5 is from VCore, not VSoc.
I'm wondering how good the scheduling is gonna be on zen6, seeing a lot of rumours that the IO die is getting two small CPU cores
(not dense zen6, a different design)
And is bypass type from VDDCR like CDDCR_CPU, not with regulator.
So the IGP in Zen4 and Zen5 runs at exact same voltage as CPU cores.
Which was what caused the VSOC problems.
Too large voltage difference between IGP and rest of the IOD when VCore was low and VSOC was high.
VSOC was limited and VCore doesn't idle as low anymore.
You know speaking of reminds me I need to check for bios update.
I know some say; if it aint broke, don't update bios.
but not updating bios can break shit too 🤣
IIRC the VCore used to go down to 0.5V or so, even little under in early AGESAs, now it IIRC doesn't go under 0.7V for my CPU.
No real power usage difference when max idle, but 0.2V less voltage difference in IOD.
And at least for Zen 3, AMD uses 1ms clock frequency intervals.
I really hope it was just reading the DRAM timing incorrectly / representing it wrong to user.
Adjusting the core clocks every 1ms.
Any risks with big bios update jumps? 3.0.1 to 3.20 for example 😛
Usually no.
Some manufacturers can have warnings that need certain midpoint versions, but that would be in the listing.
Theoretically, it shouldn't. But just asking to be sure.
Those are usually only if settings are retained between versions.
Most consumer MBs don't even try.
I don't see any warnings, so good to go 👍
See, even AMD says it; if it aint broke, don't update.
Which I find very weird.
Ass covering.
Because afaik, bios can have shit wrong damaging your MOBO overtime.
As BIOS update has that low chance of failing and bricking the MB.
but not updating your BIOS can brick MB too.
Basically "Don't blame us if the system broke or works worse after update".
If I don't return. RIP.
More explicit version:
We don’t recommend users to update the BIOS/BMC if their system is already running normally. ASRockRack assumes no responsibility for any damages caused by improper operations of downloading or updating the BIOS/BMC.
From AsRocks enterprise side.
Omg…
So, Asrock bios has QR codes next to every option.
I saw a new option called “Gaming Mode” so I scan QR to learn more. Just opens the freaking manual 🤦♂️
If you look closer, it is the same QR code everywhere in there.
Don't remember if it is explicitly labeled as manual link or not.
I don’t look at the QR codes that closely 😅
No its not
“To learn more” [QR]
Oh sorry I lied. It's even worse.
Found on internet:
"Get DETAILS via QR code" ...
And I can't find anything about gaming mode in manual.
Because it doesn't usually get updated after launch.
So anything newer is completely missing.
So they add options, tell user check manual for details, and then not update manual. That's bad.
Awesome is on the way
That's stupid. Then don't be lazy and put a QR code for "details" that links to outdated manual.
And the description of the options is pretty shit too.
So now i have to use google/duckduckgo and some AI prompts probably to figure out what it does. While it should be more simple than that.
Some new AMD thing, but no details yet.
ASUS hasn’t provided details about what the “Turbo Game Mode” actually does, as no company has directly explained this feature (similar feature comign to ASRock, MSI and Gigabyte boards). However, the BIOS update is now available, so users can explore it firsthand.
A cumbersome process to just get to know your BIOS.
I don't recall them ever being easy to deal with... at least not as far as documentation
But I can enable/disable the option? And AMD provides no information on wtf is does?
of course pre-internet you were really extra hosed since you couldn't attempt to find information that way
It's like having a button in your car, but nobody (even car company) knows what happens when you press it.
then again at that point they were all also basically the same anyhows
Asus has released a new BIOS update for select AMD motherboards, introducing the "Turbo Game Mode" designed to optimize gaming performance on a range of Ryzen processors. This mode is aimed at users seeking the best possible experience from AMD’s high-core CPUs by adjusting core usage. Specifically, it disables one of the CPU’s two chiplets (CCD) and turns off Simultaneous Multi-Threading (SMT), optimizing single-threaded performance for games that do not benefit from high core counts.
Base AMD AGESA thing being exposed.
Asus was just first to release BIOS with it.
It's called "gaming mode" {enable/disable}
And then being branded little differently by each manufacturer.
This is what I expected to be in manual.
The whole thing about having manuals in pdf format hosted on a server, is so that you can update it as a company with new information.
But they (Asrock in this case) probably think; "who of our users reads the manual" 😭
MSIs manuals basically just mention that UEFI exists and it can be updated.
Absolutely no documention at all about the contents.
Ah, no, I had missed that the manual had link to separate BIOS manual.
That wasn't listed in the manual listing for any board...
I already reading some reddit psots about the feature 🙂
Someone recommends to leave it off. Because AMD software does it when you got xbox game bar running to detect games.
As it was sandwitched between other things that were skippable.
Bios option turns off CCD all the time. Software option toggles on/off the CCD depending on game or something.
Yeah, if it does what Asus says it does, it is just easy change to other options, that gimp performance in lot of other things
And the performance uplift should be minimal in most games.
BIOS; CCD always off. Software; CCD not always off.
Easy to check if SMT is disabled with enabled.
Thing is, I nuked xbox game bar I believe.
That only matters for multi-CCD CPUs.
Where it toggles CPU to try to core-park frequency CPU when game is running.
and both BIOS and AMD software are still stock (didn't change anything underclock or overclock).
The wildest I did was change keybinds I believe and maybe some metrics 😛
Yup I know. Which applies to my CPU.
What CPU?
7800X3D
This way AMD can make the most of its 5 nm foundry allocation with TSMC. The MCM contains a cIOD, and two 8-core CCDs in case of the Ryzen 9 7950X and 7900X; or one 8-core CCD in case of the Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X.
Also just one CCD with 7800X3D.
From just below that image.
Ah, then it doesn't matter indeed.
zen 6 seems to up the CCD to 12 cores, so a 10800X3D (i hope they don't call it that) will be a 12 core gaming monster
sounds like you are new to this shit
always been like that
Yes, I am new to using Asrock QR code within bios to check details about the features of the BIOS.
and "always been like that", QR codes are pretty new.
If the manual is paper, I understand you cannot update that with new information.
But this is just laziness/being cheap from manufacturers. Manuals are hosted on servers 🤷♂️
If the QR code linked to a manual that was updated with the new features and gave a better description on what those new features exactly do, I wouldn't have said anything.
QR code in BIOS is new, QR codes themselves have been around for over 30 years
But yeah, don't put a link somewhere for more info if you're not gonna keep that link up to date (or at least show a message á la "hey, you're on an old version")
So absolutely valid criticism towards ASRock there
It's the first time I've heard of QR codes in BIOS.
Also, any help or info page should either be kept up to date or give a very apparent warning that you're on an old site (if you want to keep the contents for archiving)
@twin dew Tried playing Warframe today. System crashed twice on boot of the game 😒
If it crashed 3rd time, I might have found a game that consistently can make my system crash 😄
thing is, I can't even get further than character creation 😒
Ok, this time I got further. Just by not going full screen. Will go full screen now and see if it crashes.
AsRock is having some problem with their AM5 MBs that is killing at least 9000-series CPUs.
And possibly 7000-series too.
Possibly momentary overvoltage when VRM starts on boot.
But twice? 😒 And now it's "stable". Ugh. Fuck you Asrock. If you are the cause.
No concrete details yet.
Just that 9000-series CPUs are dying in much higher numbers with Asrock MBs than with any other manufacturers MBs.
Even that upper BIOS changelog is about those cases and trying to fix whatever is happening.
At least some of the "dead" CPUs don't work in any other MB either afterwards.
Well, I got latest BIOS.
And it's still happening.
To be fair, after 2 crashes. I did do a shader cache reset in AMD software.
Not sure if that had anything to do with it. But now I can atleast play the game.
Yeah, depends on WTF is going on to cause the issues, and if there is just one issue or multiple...
Really, I dont' understand it anymore.
I can play games 24/7 for a month or two without issues.
You boot up another game. Bam, whole system crashes a few time. And then suddenly, it's stable for a while.
I still have the feeling, that if something goes wrong, it just istantly shuts down, even in scenarios that I expect a visuel error or a crash report.
As if, it's not catching crashes and just goes straight into shut down mode.
But like you talked about before, we're in the dark.
mine does that too
im almost starting to think its a windows issue
since iv nerver seen a proper crash on wndows on this system
always been straight to a unresponsive system hang blackscreen
"Hello, this is user help desk."
"Hi, yeah, I'm using a windows PC."
"Okay, so how can I help you?"
"It has several problems and shows weird behavior"
"Yes, I know, you've said that already"
well of course the day I was going to dig up the old mailbox post and put the new one in... it rains
lol
I guess instead my task for today will be re-arranging screens to make room for something that's going to take up quite a bit of my desk real estate
If it continues to get worse, might be worth it to contact GN if they want to buy the board and both CPUs.
They are asking for specific types of failed/failing HW:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opLtFHUYZos
Since I noticed it happens a few times when I boot up new games for the first time, I wonder if it has to do with caching.
I just left the game running for 2 hours while walking to dog. Come home and no crash 🤣
My luck would be ran fine for 2 hours, crash 2 minutes after I touch it.
yeeep same here
Oh I know what I could do today instead. Go pick up a pot at the music shop and replace the scratchy volume pot on my guitar
hopefully they have one suitable, pretty sure I don't have one here although I have some logarithmic pots
I think it's the Nvidia gods angry at me for abandoning them.
and when I least expect it, they throw me a curveball 🤣
Sometimes I'll forget I have Minecraft open and walk away and not be back for 12+ hours... that does not help the stability of java games apparently lol
"oh look i dont have to wait on this mod pack to load it's still running... aaaaaand 10 fps"
Also, I spend 2 hours in the menu in warframe. Which frame locks.
And the result is; AMD getting totally confused ofc.
Yeah I've noticed the same thing with that "feature". It's essentually useless for me so far.
Like loading screens my FPS in something might go into the tank (I'd assume it probably does for everyone) and that gets counted and drags that average down.
In those cases it's basically just junk in junk out.
I'm used to just having to manually tweak things anyhow so whatever, not really a feature I care much about anyhow personally.
i shall post this cat to start a topic i know nothing about
Hello, I have trouble with Windows XP. I get this error for some reason even though the XP's kernel is not even supposed to have that procedure. I replaced winlogon.exe and kernel32.dll from a install disk but the issue remains and I'm losing hope.
After clicking OK the same message gets thrown by lsass.exe and I also replaced that from the install disk.
And after clicking OK again there is just a blank screen
Has it been on the internet...
Unfortunately yes but through a firewall of the router.
It was my main PC not that long ago so it was unavoidable
...why are you running XP in `25 as your main machine?
I'm not using it anymore but I wanted to boot it to retrieve my old files and bam I get the error
For which the computer would not have needed to be connected to network?
Currently it's not connected but it was since it WAS my main machine
Could be anything but there are a lot of unpatched vectors for that OS at this point...
Has been for a long time
Or might just be case of bitrot for example
Connect the drive to another machine and check that way instead of trying to boot?
And you are so late that IDE to USB adapters are pretty expensive today.
Used to be cheap.
It's partitioned so the system is on a separate partition so how much data would I lose if I did a reinstall?
Nothing, if done right.
Or just boot from some Linux live CD?
load a live linux and just cop it over the network
Might give it a try
I just really wanted to hear that windows boot sound for the last time but oh well
get a vm then
All I'm saying is I wanted to somehow revive that PC but if it's impossible then well it's impossible
You can try that reinstall, AFTER you have the data you want backed up.
Any Linux iso will work or some don't support such old PCs?
tbf idk. try a new one and see?
I cannot be the only ones who opens YT and gets weird recommendations of videos under 100 views about vibecoding ai and shit?
like... wtf
I don't even watch anything in that direction
yt is pretty shit nowadays
it didn't recommend me Joseph's video he posted on April Fools
well, there's video on quantum computing
and you can find many Outer Wilds walkthroughs
there's something that causes me go mad
there's JSON, it has a silly little character
° degree sign
Gedit opens it fine, online editors display copied text just fine
but I cannot read it from python as text, saying that utf-8 can't decode \xb0 byte: "invalid start byte"
if I type the thing in editor, encode in python to utf-8, I get 2 bytes: \xc2\xb0
in JSON the first is clearly lacking
but I still don't get 2 things:
- the JSON was created by python. the only thing happening in the middle was file transfer
- why/how I can't reproduce this with other toosl (namely Gedit)
hehe, ok.
chatgpt can be helpful
tells me this is the case in windows encodings...
sounds about right.
what would CRLF have to do with that?
Nope?
But Windows by default uses UTF-16, not UTF-8.
Internally.
What format gets saved in some program depends on the settings.
Notepad in Windows 11 for example allows to save in ANSI, UTF-16 LE, UTF-16 BE, UTF-8 and UTF-8 with BOM.
But something is mucking with the file, as that 0xB0 isn't allowed first byte in any UTF-8 character.
Are you sure the source file is in UTF-8?
And that degree sign in UTF-8 is that 0xC2B0
crlf?
I explained poorly
For instance, in many single-byte encodings (like ISO-8859-1 or Windows-1252), the byte \xb0 corresponds to the degree sign
I know that it also was created on WIndows system. Either opened with editor and saved, or some magic with default encoding.
But when I read inISO-8859-1encoding it was fine, utf-8 wasn't.
Yes?
Because those are two completely different encodings for past the 7-bit ASCII part?
And if the file is in some 8-bit legacy encoding, it won't read as UTF-8.
And you need to read it as what it is in.
You cannot read ISO-8859-1 file as UTF-8 file, if it contains anything outside 7-bit ASCII characters.
well, I am sure what character must look like 🙂
So i overrode it with utf-8 after reading as ISO-8859-1
which I know see made a bit of a mess...
Yeah, need to run some actual encoding conversion on it.
And anyways, once you read and decode it, the internal python representation is python internal anyways.
You only need to encode to something once you want to save.
but that is supposed to be encoding conversion?..
aka read in one, output in another
If that python internal isn't what you want to save.
well, yes. it should be stored as utf-8
then you read, decode as ISO or 1252 (whichever is the actual format), then encode as utf-8.
And store
what I am sure of is that python was told to write that sign there, and something happened either during encoding or file transfer.
fix could be as easy as reading in bytes, finding this one sequence and replacing it with correct one for utf-8
Python already has those .decode("format") and .encode("format") string functions?
If it errors with that, you didn't run the encode on the decoded string, but the raw string.
funny.
I was confident that's it
but then I updated view in Gedit, and saw funny characters prefixed
that's when I said it caused mess
looks like Gedit doesn't update encoding it reads in after file is opened and reloaded
Gedit is not reading it as UTF-8 then.
Open screen has encoding selection in it, and there is setting to change default and/or autodetection settings.
For Gedit
ok so now I can totally read in python
but Gedit will still display funny stuff
I checked, file has the proper \xc2\xb0 byte sequence
Because it is reading the file as some 8-bit format, not UTF-8.
Where then that 0xC2 will show as funny stuff.
I am convinced I saw encoding displayed in Gedit, but can't find atm
Go to open the file, should be at bottom or something like that?
If I understood random websites correctly.
ok, calling Gedit from CLI with encoding specified displays it correctly. must be some Gedit's cache thing
hmmm, correct
experienced IRL "am I LLM?" moment when Gedit got replaced with getting upon typing
Anyone got a recent W-OLED or QD-OLED?
im looking at new 1440p monitors, but cant make up my mind.
Mostly worried about text readability as the monitor wont be used for gaming only.
Maye 2/3 gaming to 3/4 gaming, with the other time doing some code writing. Worried that the text is gona look terrible.
Asus has both qd as w oled displays with similar specs, there also is an MSI qd one thats suposed to bre realy good.
i have a, i guess last gen now, qd-oled.
it's fine
Should be no actual differences in text?
a 27inch 1440p monitor will be good, though i dont know any oled monitors
there can be because some OLED have a different subpixel layout
regular LCD subpixel layout
a possible OLED layout
apparenlty steamdeck OLED layout
Ye the subpixel stuff is what im worried about.
Sure id mainly game, but i still want to have a decent time when doing some productivity
so yeah, if the OS tries to "optimize" text at the subpixel level you might get some color fringing.
but at 1440p and up it should be fine
i had some cases their i noticed it but generally (99%) it's fine
Any difference in light to dark modes?
honestly don't know, i set up everything for dark mode xD
bright mode is just too bright in some cases
I love finding ISP nightmares on reddit:
The technician deserves to get fired for this
Guess you're running a Simplex fiber connection
Still shouldn't be wrapped like that, or that that other fiber end is completely free.
@twin dew Got another nightmare for you 
It's a miracle there is still signal going through even though it's weak according to OP
Ouuuuuuuch 
I feel like tech guy had something personal against OP because a sane person would never do something like that
Or ISP hired a complete idiot who doesn't know how fiber works
Even if this was magic string, doesn't feel like screwing it would be a good idea
i researched some more into the Topic.
Found some people complaining about the VRR (Gsync/Freesync) having quite the anoying flicker on Oled pannels.
Did you ever notice that?
yeah, mostly in low fps applications like a browser
you can hide it by useing dark reader to make dark mode to actual black instead of dark gray
Means the monitors maker made a mistake in setting the VRR range or firmware in general.
And the image has time to noticeably dim between refreshes.

Does anyone know the run command to open a window which allows you to set the boot mode of your PC
both ones im considering rn both got pretty bad ratings for the VRR stuff
I made my PC boot in safe mode always, but can't find the article I used to open the window to do thag
msconfig
God I'm so dumb. Thank you very much
Look at rtings data, ignore their scores and verdicts
It's arbitrary and often nonsensical
VA monitors with smearing galore? Great for gaming!
So am i suposed to look at it or not
Im getting mixed messages here
The flicker in both videos does look bad, but randomized frametimes are a worsr case scenario
@minor scarab If I may ask, what is the stat monitor you're using here: #screenshots message ?
its btop with the default theme
Ahh, duh. Thanks.
Look at the data, make your own conclusions
thanks for nothing.
I have looked at the data, but as im not into monitors i cant do much with it
heres some more things you can thank another person for nothing
great
i like my monitor, so i'd say take the plunge
ill try to get a look at a similar or the exact one im intested in at a store. Maybe they can demo it for me
wont be able to test all, but if its bad i could return it
also found a video of some guy that did a review of it in a similar situation.
Software dev and gamer, so good mix of use cases.
Said it was just fine to work on
Look at the data. The actual measurements. The graph with jiggly lines.
Don't look at their score. The number in the red box.
Don't look at whatever else they derive from those scores, like their verdicts on how they like the monitor and what they're good for
Then you shouldn't be looking at rtings reviews.
While their data is great, their scoring isn't
And if you can't draw your own conclusions from data, you're at the mercy of the reviewer
While there are many other good reviewers (techless, tftcentral, monitors unboxed, pcmonitors.info, etc), rtings is only ever feasible for their data
Maybe this review helps you a bit more than the rtings one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OD1Gml24gI
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
Join us on Floatplane: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/HardwareUnboxed
Buy relevant products from Amazon, Newegg and others below:
Asus ROG Strix XG27AQDMG - https://geni.us/JRWA78
Asus ROG Swift PG27AQDM - https://geni.us/XPKTTI
AOC Agon AG276QZD - https://geni.us/0JNSHZS
LG 27G...
Or the simple way out: you just watch the video that rtings attached to their measurements.
The flicker is quite apparent - question for you then becomes if you'll end up in a situation that causes this flickering
Turns out, XG27AQDMG has an anti-flicker setting which reduces flickering noticeably
how cheap is their implementation : yes
why would they fucking shut down the panel on wait for data ?
seems like they are all using the same dirt chip
It happens when there is frametime variation, which is unavoidable in most games and VRR use cases.
It's not a tuning problem, it's awful on every OLED and VA panel without exception.
Fast IPS does good VRR.
IIRC TN works fine for VRR too, but TN has massive problems with viewing angles, brightness variation etc so its high end showings aren't very good. I tried the 540hz e-TN panel and found it unusable, checking after the fact i noticed that RTINGS measured the brightness at the top of the screen to be only ~65% of the brightness at the bottom with a normal viewing angle which is what really killed it for me - even with perfect ergonomics it was awful.
380hz IPS with VRR has similar or even slightly better smoothness to 480hz OLED without it for scenarios where you cannot sustain >>480fps easily. If you have 350fps on both, the IPS with VRR is quite a lot smoother than the OLED without it. You can VRR OLED too but then it's a strobe dance party, so i found that less enjoyable than just leaving VRR off.
If you're doing something with 3000fps like osu then ofc just turn VRR off and run max refresh rate
I wouldbt realy mind just leaving vrr off, my current display has gsync and im on an amd gpu for 2 years. Been fine.
Proper VRR is a pretty large improvement
most VRR monitors are really bad at VRR though 😛
I'm on an XG259QNS right now, it's 380hz fast IPS with VRR that has per-frame adaptive overdrive. Almost nothing has that feature without a gsync module, but it does for gsync and freesync. Insane value given that it nothing even competes unless it's 3x the price.
I got it @ £300, and i'd take it over the £900-1000 eTN and OLEDs after using those too.
all I'm saying is technologically oled does not have to do this
it's control which fucks up
by shutting down leds ahead of having the fucking data
Just to be clear, im not playing any competetive shooters.
Id take a 144hz oled aswell, but all the high end ones have 240 minimum
if you value color and contrast over performance, than yeah OLED and even VA is better. Just don't expect them to VRR
It is kind of tuning problem.
To get high refresh rate without problems you need for the picture to change fast, which with OLEDs means the picture decays fast.
Which would mean that for low FPS/refresh rate, the picture would need to be refreshed even without changes.
So either the display would need to internally refresh the picture between actual frames sent by computer.
Or the minimum refresh rate in the VRR range supported would need to be high, higher than 60Hz, so the GPU driver would send those extra refreshes with same picture.
With VRR on, with 480Hz max VRR rate, things would work fine with 192Hz minimum rate, for 192-480Hz VRR range (might work even with higher minimum, but IIRC maximum being 2.5+x minimum optimal).
But that would SUCK for static, non VRR usage.
So for static refresh rate, same would need to be implemented in the firmware of the monitor instead.
All(?) other LCD techs the panel keeps displaying the same image until next one is sent IIRC.
But IIRC with OLED, there is that natural decay in brightness.
ok got a dumb question
if a cpu/gpu degrades a bit over time just from regular use (like years) & isn't a 13th/14th gen intel, is it better to OC it early on, or wait a few years
Normal "tuning" is for CPU manufacturers to try to make all the produced CPUs work for 10 years or more at stock settings, before that natural degradation makes those stock settings not work anymore in some of the CPUs.
But basically just makes the OC ceiling lower and lower as time goes by.
OC by undervolting actually extends the time, but need to keep reducing the undervolt over time.
so OCing it later on won't give you as good of a result as doing it asap?
And if you OC to max now, you need to reduce the OC to keep the CPU stable as time goes by.
i suppose it'd largely depend on silicon quality after that
To same level as the stable OC in future would have been at that time, or less if the OC caused the CPU to degrade faster.
parallel to that
is it better to run things as tight as possible with regards to timings/latency, or keep them looser to avoid degradation
That doesn't really affect things much.
Little from there being more state-changes in same time, but that is pretty minor difference.
Going to higher voltages is major change, doing more at same voltage is very minor change.
didn't know if it was like a roadway, if metaphorical grooves would appear 🤣
if really sticking to one voltage tightly would cause degradation at that voltage over time, vs letting it be a bit looser
degradation comes from voltage, voltage swings (very low level, managed if good design, not managed if Intel 14th gen), and temperature combo
Higher voltage, higher currents, higher temperature, all accelerate the degradation.
But there are complex interactions between those and the rates aren't linear.
And the exact details are process and even design specific.
Intel messed up in multiple ways.
Very high currents, and MB manufacturers were disabling current limiters, causing them to go even higher.
High voltages, and the CPUs were asking for very high voltages in specific situations when the CPU was idle, but thought the system would just in moment slam on max all-core load.
Where that all-core load would have much lower voltages from the power limiting etc. but in that "I need more voltage to stay stable when the load spike hits" caused 1.6+V requests.
And protections for high temperatures to derate weren't working like that TVB not being limited to 70C or lower like designed etc.
So TVB etc. were fixed.
MB makers aren't allowed to disable current limiters etc. by default anymore.
And VCore VID requests were capped at 1.55V.
And with Asus or Gigabyte MB, you can set that VID request cap yourself.
Asrock and MSI don't expose it and have stated they have no plans to expose it.
Expose as in just provide UI to functionality that Intel provides already in the UEFI & microcode.
And stupid thing is that that functionality has been there for years, as Asus and Gigabyte have exposed the setting for years.
It just wasn't being used by default.
And that voltage behavior is again another thing that was because of how Intel has been just stacking boost techs on top of each other, never actually integrating them together properly.
Why the CPU asks for high voltages when almost idle on all cores, but the cores aren't allowed to sleep because of something, just in case the CPU needs to boost to max frequency soon.
AMD CPUs ask for voltages they need right now, and if transition to higher frequency comes where the currently delivered voltage isn't enough, they delay and/or clock stretch (stop processing until voltage is high enough) to keep stable.
SUPPORT OUR INDEPENDENCE. Use code "IDGAF" at checkout for 10% off at the GN store. Grab a Paper Launch cotton T-shirt here: https://store.gamersnexus.net/products/paper-launch-cotton or a tri-blend variant here: https://store.gamersnexus.net/products/paper-launch-triblend (or grab a Modmat, Solder Mat, copper-plated mule mug of thermal conducti...
So Nvidia is still the same, but that isn't new.
So very likely that GN now ends up on Nvidias blacklist of reviewers who will not get review samples anymore.
i feel like everyone should treat nvidia as a hostile monopoly
im even more torn on the selection now 
but thanks@thin trout for explaining it
Ah, GN already didn't get 5060 review sample 
Even when many others did, just without drivers.
they didn't bend the knee
And Nvidia also knew that GN could have review up about 24h after getting the drivers.
With testing by the people not at Computex, and then Steve recording the speak parts in hotel room.
Where the whole thing was designed to delay the reviews to 1-2 weeks after launch.
Naming OLED and VA on equal footing is kinda disingenuous.
VA sucks even harder than OLED for motion and is only feasible for SDR contrast on a low budget.
OLED gives you both good HDR and good motion.
IPS gives better motion with worse HDR, Mini LED has better HDR but worse motion.
I don't consider them on equal footing at all, VA is the worse and cheaper option for color & contrast
if that's not clear, it is now^ 😄
i appreciate that all the non-shill reviewers have all collectively just did a "don't wanna let us see it beforehand? fine, our official review is don't buy it under any circumstances"
OLED tech is great fwiw, just has some issues still.
If you're not using VRR, no point in worrying about VRR flicker (that's what I meant when asking you if you'll end up in a situation that causes flickering)
Just not everyone wants to use £900 monitors, especially stuff like the Asus OLEDs which bricked itself on day 12 of my using it (got stuck in pixel clean and just died lol)
That is my policy. No review = 0/10 trash product
honest people want reviews.
also i appreciate the "reviewers" who decided to bend the knee. now we know who they are and where their loyalties lie
I assumed as such, the wording was just a bit wonky hence my correcting comment
idk, i have not been using VRR since my moinitor only has Gsync.
never had any tearing since i dont realy get more fps than my monitor can display.
So im fine if i just dont use it? cant say i missed it in the last 2 years
Gsync is a form of VRR
Didn't they drive the early gen OLED panels at a higher voltage than the competition?
I remember smth with their 27GS95 smth competitor, higher peak brightness but lower lifespan
Btw, tearing is not caused by framerate lower or higher than the monitor refresh rate - it's entirely due to the synchronisation. If you don't have vsync or VRR on, you always have tearing reducing percieved image quality and motion quality (most severely with a framerate between 50% and 100% of the monitor's refresh rate)
I'm not sure, but the one that died in 12 days was a third gen WOLED. The newest still currently out.
i just turn on Vsync...
Gsync as in gsync module or gsync as in gsync compatible?
Cuz the latter should support freesync too
uh i dont actually know
That's fine, but vsync causes highly problematic stuttering and/or latency (the lower the refresh rate, the worse both are). VRR solves the issue without those
And introduces flicker on OLED
i never noticed any stutter or performance degradation using vsync.
and im usualy very easy to tick off with stutter
You can see render latency ingame with tools from both nvidia and AMD now. It doesn't count monitor latency, but it's most of what you need to know
Most noticeable vsync downside is usually latency, but since you're not a comp gamer, you're less sensitive to it
Mainly the problem is, that if the FPS you could get without VSYNC isn't same or higher as the refresh, all the time, then you get problems.
i mean i do play league of legends at a high level, but thats not framerate senetive :kek
Yeah best case scenario performance is consistently above, and you're "only" getting a consistent~ +2 frames of latency
rather than latency being higher, spiking up and down, and the stutters that come when you don't always have a frame ready on each refresh start timing
ah right, i mostly max out around 100 to 120 fps anyway, and turn on vsync on top of that
As with 60Hz rate, with VSync on, you get 60Hz, 30Hz, 20Hz, 15Hz etc.
Must be integer divider from the refresh rate.
So if the FPS is NEAR 60Hz, you then end up bouncing between 60 and 30 FPS.
+2?
Most triple-buffering has unfortunately been gone for long time already.
Regular vsync is usually +2 frame latency, don't know why but it is
+2 frames around 100 fps is only around 15ms, its not that bad
my end to end latency on comp games is around 7ms
on cyberpunk with path tracing it's 30
accumulation is annoying ye 😛 but a lot less so with RR
that part makes pathtracing look worse than traditional rendering
You can see some of the vsync delay here. 144hz, yet the added delay from double buffered vsync is +14ms when frametime is 6.94ms
IDK why but it's been 2 frames in pretty much every test i've seen w.r.t. latency
Ah, yeah, anyone who was able to publish "5060 preview" needed to bend the knee it seems.
Just watching the der8auer video.
im so mad at nvidia
i was going to buy a 5080, but they released such a stinker of a generation
just no can do
i'm not mad at them, they're doing exactly what a company is supposed to be: as greedy as possible to make the most money. i'm mad at the people making the decisions to not restrain that
No VSYNC on results in there?
Or you count those GSYNC results as that?
they should have just been broken up like 8 years ago
In that data, gsync on with excess FPS functions the same as vsync on
That is not true in most games anymore because of nvidia reflex essentially capping performance below full buffers for you, but it was back then
i was originally gonna post vsync on data but cant find the post 😄 that one is from a similar time, and e.g. battle(non)sense videos agree.
no, i dont consider this to be "what they are suposed to do"
they dont have to actively make shit products
i think linus got it at least partially correct: spin off the gaming GPU into its own separate company
idk how you got that number, when I'm looking at 100fps, 2 frames come out to be 20ms
And with 60fps, you get 33ms from 2 frames delay
i eyeballed it.
thats why i said around. 15 is somewhat near 20
It's off by 25%
is this realy worth arguing over?
IIRC that is Windows display stack thing where game can request specific number of frames to be buffered.
Between 0 and 5, with that 2 being very common to be asked.
At some point Nvidia drivers IIRC allowed you to override the value.
Now that I thought about it for a moment.
would you say IPS pannels these days have better color than 5 years ago?
Yeah i am not sure, pretty sure that this was the case even with that setting though
Nowadays we just use Reflex and VRR so people don't bother to test that stuff as much
substantially yeah, but they are no OLEDs.
that £300 one that i said is better in every way than £750 ips from 5 years ago
Color is about backlight.
IPS problem has always been contrast, not color.
(expect for OLED)
i have a 700$ ips from 7 years ago.
maybe i dont need oled, and just a new IPS is fine
ah sure
So IPS is usually around 1:1000 contrast.
VA is mostly around 1:3000 today.
OLED is infinite contrast, as the black is actually fully black.
It's probably not that huge an upgrade, aside from response times (less smearing, and capable of high framerate and VRR)
some 1:5000 VA now IIRC?
would be a lot cheaper though. the oleds i was looking at are around the 700$ range.
Similar IPS seems to be around 350$
and should still be a nice upgrade
But basically the expensive color grading etc. displays have traditionally have been IPS.
Just with very expensive backlights and internal calibration support etc.
Now you also have IPS panels where there is actually two IPS panels, one on top of other, to get better contrast.
IPS problem is that that minimum light transmission through is large.
VA problem is that exiting low light transmission area (dark pixel) is slow, leading to that smearing.
OLED problems are from the finite life of the pixels and their uneven wear over time.
TN just sucks.
tn is cheap, so it has its place.
my first monitor was TN
Yeah, but point was that only technical good side TN had was fast transitions (higher max refresh rate in same generation).
And it sucks for anything else.
Not counting price, just the base tech.
Horrible driving accuracy (leading to bad color accuracy), horrible viewing angles, bad contrast etc.
not sure if id even recomend TN to someone on a tight budged.
Very useable IPS panels are not that expensive anymore
Yeah, TN is not worth it in any price range anymore.
You can get usable IPS or VA at the lowest price brackets today.
Not with as high max refresh rate, but 144Hz already is plenty.
You don't need 240Hz TN instead.
im suprised that something like this is below 500 these days.
5 years ago it didnt even exist, and 3 years ago it would have been 1k
panel tech standardizing, and production scaling
Which is coming a problem that there is only one producer of specific tech.
And when they stop producing then that tech is gone.
Becoming problem when LG is/was the only producer of fast IPS panels, and they are switching over to OLED.
So there is danger that IPS is going to die in the market soon.
surely the demand for ips is high enout for them to keep makingit
For lower refresh rate professional panels, yes.
High FPS gaming panels with current models, not sure.
Continuing to develop newer high-FPS IPS panels, in real danger.
Because all the new monitors in that gaming space from LG have been OLED in last year at least.
And new IPS gaming panels that were supposed to be coming haven't materialized.
Based on statements in 2023 on what was supposed to be coming.
This was already from that end of 2023:
IPS Black is a big part of that focus, and it seems this technology is for now still reserved for professional use, with no high refresh rate options currently being developed. That’s a shame, as we know a lot of people are interested in that possibility in the future.
Where that LG IPS Black is that two IPS layers on top of each other for 1:2000 contrast ratio I mentioned.
sham,e
And even the non-IPS Black new gaming IPS panels don't seem to have materialized to market.
the perfect monitor just doesnt exist
No, but everyone just doing OLED is just bad.
Because while OLED is nice for the contrast ratio, it in turn has severe downsides.
And not allowing consumer to select between OLED and IPS is just bad.
But HDR hype is driving the exec level decisions.
And this was wrong, seems IPS Black is new material with opposite voltage behavior where it is transmissive without voltage and nontransmissive with voltage.
But is slower to change than the current traditional IPS material.
yeah, was under the impression that Oled was better than it realy is.
the VRR issue isnt mentioned too much with most popular sources
mostly the oled displays just get glazed to no end
And even that "no burn in" is mostly just that the monitors track each pixels usage over time and compensate, but the max brightness keeps decreasing where they drive the degraded pixels more, and lower the non-degraded pixels max to be same as the degraded pixels max.
And that compensation isn't perfect, as the degradation is somewhat random and non-uniform.
the asus Oleds have anti flicker modes, but those only work at very high refresh rates.
like 180+ for it to work properly.
So OLEDs are the hype hotness, but in reality they are only really better for HDR content home theater viewing, over the more traditional techs.
With significant tradeoffs.
HDR gaming is very small niche compared to even that.
does HDR even work properly?
i remember seing a lot of complaints about windows just not doing it well
That is the point.
In games with actual HDR support, it works.
In Windows in general, no.
In games without explicit HDR support, no.
But the benefits even in those games with explicit HDR support are pretty minor in most cases.
Because they have been developed for SDR first, with HDR as afterthought.
oh and Oled has lower SDR brightness
like 200 something nits, vs 300 to 450 on IPS
Not natively.
Firmware thing.
i dont think id be able to notice, i have my current IPS on 30% brightness
But usually the monitors should be around 80-120 nits brightness in SDR anyways.
Depending on room lighting intensity.
im a basement dweller
100 nits is the spec in HDR spec.
That 0-100 nits is the SDR range, and then HDR goes to brighter over that, and should only be used for highlights, not constant.
That most of the screen should stay inside that SDR range all the time, with just very bright stuff in parts of the frame going over that.
And with most OLED monitors, the max HDR brightness is also in a way lie.
They only support that for small percentage of screen at a time, not always even 10% coverage.
And full-screen max brightness is often 1/3rd or so of the marketing max.
5060 Previews:
Via HUBs video.
I've seen 4k 144hz mini LED IPS drop below $600 on the regular, also absolutely crazy
btw, u in Germany?
Where that mini-LED refers to the backlight system.
Grid of mini-LEDs that can be individually controller for local dimming.
That was for general people here.
Most aren't aware of that level of stuff.
Most mini LED monitors use VA
Yeah, I've had my fair share of people like that
And monitor/TV marketing intentionally misleads with those.
Y
y as in yes or y as in why
Yes
That HUBs piece, including how Nvidia had tried to buy them, and then ended up blacklisting them for a time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtFDz-BQLew
MSI: https://msi.gm/X870Series
Thermal Grizzly: https://www.thermal-grizzly.com/en/duronaut/s-tg-d
GSkill: https://www.gskill.com/
See Tryx here: https://www.instagram.com/tryxglobal/
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
YT Membership: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCI8iQa1hv7oV_Z8D35vVuSg/join
Buy relevant products...
240-280hz fast IPS is very cheap (starting ~£130) and 380hz £300
I wasn't up to date then.
But last time I was monitor shopping, 24" 144Hz IPS/VA was around 100-120e here Finland.
With 240Hz TN at same price range.
And nothing cheaper at all.
With 27" being about 20e more.
Yeah it has gotten to the point where i don't really recommend for anyone to get anything worse than a 240hz fast IPS any more
you can save some money but it's huge value for the extra
HP 27QS my beloved (not sure if fast IPS tho, BOE panel not LG)
The QHD 165Hz IPS market being well stocked below 200€ is an awesome sight.
There's no need for 240hz if you're not a comp gamer and from what I've seen, the 27" QHD market is seeing more improvement nowadays than the 24" FHD sector
Aren finlands tech prices a bit higher than more central eu?
Yes.
Got a friebd over there that keeps malding over it
Part is higher VAT.
Part is extra logistics costs to get the stuff to the country, or moved inside the country.
Part is small population, so small market.
I've been looking at Samsung S90D oled TV as monitor, maybe 55" size
1099€ currently, those are with 144Hz panel
My current monitor, HP 65" Omen Emperium (VA panel) has these horizontal lines. No idea where they came from but they have stayed same for a long time. Can't see them while playing but flat one color they are visible.
Been using it 5 years now
Mine has a very noticeable brightness gradient from bottom right to top left
Ips
As well as a bright spot, looks like i punched it there, but i cant recall ever doing that
i love it when armoury crate updates & now it refuses to recognize my ram rgb
i don't even care about messing around with the lighting, except to turn it off
Its so bad, but once its installed, its like a root kit and impossible to remove.
Only way to not have it is to click no after setting up a fresh windows install
Its so awfull, i hate it so much
Doubt ill get a new asus mainboard on thext platform upgrade.
Prices have exploded so much.
Good ROG mobo is almost 400e these days.
My top of the line ROG am4 mobo was not even half that.
oh i never would have bought this for myself 🤣
I think msi makes some decent boards these days.
mobos, but i suspect they still do cheap shit with gpus
They do?
I only knew about gigabyte gettingin some hot water
msi loves to cheap out on VRMs and cooling
Ouch

What can you even buy these days.
Msi cheaps out
Gigabyte cheaps out
Asus overcharges
My 6950xt is from xtx, not exaclty a high quality build.
1 year in the middle fan was making an anoying noise.
Had to lubricate the fan bearings by myself to fix it
OpenRGB
Also SignalRGB, but that's closed source
ROG Armoury and Armoury Crate are the worst malwares I've ever willingly installed
ASRock my beloved
Gigabyte and MSI are solid, their supposedly midrange stuff is closer to the low end and their highend stuff is somewhat highend
Just depends on pricing and availability really
NZXT is covered up ASRock with cutdown BIOS at a high price
Biostar idk about
Their low-end range is ewaste btw
I had some unpleasont experiences with an ashrock board. But it was 10 years ago on a very low end model.
So i should probably out them back on the menu
Yeah, ASRock's low end, especially from a decade ago, can be hit or miss.
Even today you sometimes get B650M-HDV, other times you get B660M-HDV
Which uses very old open source kernel driver that was discontinued and is giant security hole, as it allows any user mode program full HW and RAM access.
And is finally being banned.
About that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_O5JtBqODA
Sponsor: ID-Cooling Frozn A720 Black on Amazon https://geni.us/VDnou4Y
This video is about the WinRing 0 driver (not to be confused with Security Ring 0, but related in this story) and how it has propped-up the fan control and RGB industry for over a decade now. Unfortunately, or maybe fortunately, security updates have broken this code, resulti...
Holy shit
Basically giant swatches of stuff depending on hobby project kernel driver to expose everything that can be exposed, for personal tweaking.
And discontinued in 2011(?), and still being used today by various software without any warning to the users installing.
ZenTimings uses similar driver that gets installed first time it is run, and never removed.
Found out when my antivirus warned about it and I did some digging what was going on.
Then manually removed it via Device Manager.
my beloved
Got windows installed and working on my PC (first time building)
3060ti and 7800x3d runs Satisfactory on 4K 240FPS maxed out settings
DLSS is insane
I was super surprised, but it actually worked
No lumen tho
Just normal full Ultra (and the ones that go to cinematic) plus quality mode on DLSS anti aliasing
Everything is as high as possible
its not max if you dont have lumen cranked with native resolution with everythign else maxed including fov for max rendered in objects
max fov is better than regualr in this game honestly
I've played almost 72 hrs on my Mac using a ported game which barely uses the hardware, so I was running below 60fps on Low mode so this is a huge upgrade
i was at -1 fps for the past 500
what spec
I knew about 3050 but i've never seen a 4050 mentioned or on any websites while doing research for what parts to get
cause the 50 class sucks 
Techpowerup says it was never released
as showcased by your truly here → #off-topic-tech message
oh damn
That's worse than a ported game on a Mac which doesn't even use the GPU 😭

If he just removed useless 1000+ carriage train from the save, it would instantly get much better.
3104*
you have a train with 3104 cars?
yes