#off-topic-tech
1 messages · Page 124 of 1
all jokes aside tho i do think its on the verge of exploding because it started throwing WHEA errors left and right
My son’s friend is a TikTok victim. But I don’t understand why the knives are out for it. I did hear the in app browser is a rat or has been in the past
If true, it's much much more helpful to say "I'd love to share the data but sadly that falls under an NDA" than to go around "oh yeah, evidence is easy to find. I won't tell you tho since I want to make you do the research for me"
and in true magicz fashion my solution so far has been to just keep it runnign 24/7 and ignore it
Haha, sorry 🤣 That gif is from the passion but is so in the context of this channel.
no the one Fire suggested
BED! NOW!
Sorry, I didn't read every detail of the conversation. Just read the screenshot I posted earlier. And somethign about yellowstone errupting.
And tapped out.
This one
https://youtu.be/Pc2psN0PFTk
SOME OTHER AMAZING SCI-COM COMMUNICATORS:
Atlas Pro (Biology, Ecology, Biogeography): @AtlasPro1
Stefan Milo (Archaeology, History): @StefanMilo
Geology Hub (You Are Never Gonna Guess...: @GeologyHub
History with Kayleigh (Archaeology, History): @HistoryWithKayleigh
Ancient Americas (Anthropology, Archaeology, History): @AncientAmericas
Ast...
Haha, young jesus 🤣
rookie numbers 😄
So you broke yet another computer already?
"damaged"
its still working so idc
yea but thats a 10700F vs a 13900K
10700F is a 65W chip 13900K is like 280W
253W is the stock Intel limit but icant keep 5,5Ghz all core
im just surprised i managed to get a locked cpu to draw almost 3X its TDP for even a few seconds
i know this is probably going to start a debate but whats kind of the threshold in run hours where you cant really complain about problems anymore
i personally think its the big 10K
after 10000 run hours you cant complain anymore
you got your money's worth
I have no really need to push it but 5,6GHz definitely possible. Thats the point where the voltage requirements sky rocket. But the Icemancooler block works really well. I've now ran prime95 on it for almost 3 hours, wanted to see where fan speed and water temps stabilize. It is now 31°C on the "hot" side water coming out of the cpu block, and 30°C "cool" side after radioators. Water pump fixed on 60% PWM about 3000rpm.
But thats only 1,15 years of 24/7 use
well thats difrent cause under server use it wont be cooling down and heating up nearly as often
realsitically a regular gaming cpu wont go for more than like 4-8 hours a day on average
that comes out to a good 4-5 years
their organization loves them to publish *
they don't like having to publish in a hurry
they simply are asked to by higher ups
"oh no, oh fuck" 
Looks like my oldest Samsung 960 EVO 500GB NVME has 30k power on hours, 72TB written and 706 startups. And spinning 4TB WDRED discs in Raid1 about 40k hours, with 176 startups.
damn 176 startups is not a lot that's nice
I've seen hdds with 600+ startups
I think it's also why I agree with the hate toward hdds in laptops
hdds are freaking good in stable enclosures in chassis/frames
not in a thin moving plastic thingy with small battery life
i have 10K with 2200 startups on my old HDD
how is this hdd still running with the magicz curse
Wait... I did watch it. hehe
to be honest i often ask msyelf the same thing for my 2016 setup
Do you see how and why it applies to what you said in here?
the only thing to have broken under my abuse on that setup is the sound bar on the monitor
Oh god, oh no, oh fuck.
I mean
At least y'all haven't seen my 560w 6900XT
I'm using -30 ambient air to cool an air-cooled GPU
At like 1.8x it's intended TDP rn
So far fastest I have been able to score up for frequency is 2.89ghz
I do not daily this OC
Did i mention geology hub yet?
The largest lava fountain ever recorded on our planet reached a whopping height of 22,000 feet, towering more than 3 kilometers or nearly 10,000 feet above an already tall stratovolcano. This video will discuss how lava fountains form, and the ideal circumstances and scenarios that can generate some of the world's tallest lava fountains.
Thumbn...
I daily 430w 2.77ghz
Oh wow, link stays
Links staying here is crazy
Btw, he said people should evacuate.
But he definitely didn't say anything about Africa splitting in coming years afaik
what did I do
👆
Lmao
He did say a couple of times in the past months about changes in magma composition.
And what happens in Indonesia with recent hot springs might be of the same nature though he explain why the cause might be different
i dont read the history 😭
Clearly.
i don't have time for that
Also, to Europeans: it's good to know your volcanoes.
GH has some vids about Slovakian ones
I know I can never justify buying one. But it doesn't not want me to buy one. 5090 looks very nice lol
I honestly probably could not afford one
And to Americans:
https://youtu.be/OkqRVQAktNc?si=zfWzgFK3d_uVQRl_
Also good to know
Afair there's been some activity around New Madrid this century, but could be of human source
At least you should be aware of history
South Carolina, Oklahoma, Missouri, & Utah. These are all states that unexpectedly contain high earthquake risks, despite not being typically associated with these hazards by the general populace. This video discusses these areas along with other zones, explaining the geology of each of these spots. All of this is done by a geologist and volcano...
It does 90-110fps at 1440p doesn't mean a lot without saying what game and graphic settings 🤣
But I get your sentiment. You are happy with 6900XT 😄
Oh yeah. Uhh
The RX 6950 XT is holding up fine here too.
I do use upscale for certain games. 1080p. Ultra most of the time.
Only game I do far require framegen right now on is stalker2 and that's native aa
Ah, stalker can probably use a little bit of optimization love. Not sure, haven't bought it yet.
I made the wrong descision and I bought Elden Ring. And played for a few hours and I don't like it lol.
I do know warthunder SSAA still brings me from like 180fps in menu to 80fps in menu. But I'm basically rendering 4x 1440p
Squad is a shit optimized game for example, it really tanks my performance.
Most games I have I can run native or a bit of aa
With maxed graphics
I like actually being at native now
And not struggling to maintain 60fps
Pov my 6700XT trying to maintain 60fps in helldivers 2 wile rendering 1440p native
I want to email my schools IT staff to enable WSL on school computers in specific labs. what would be the best phrasing to go about asking for it
Skip that step and do it yourself
"Enable WSL2 in order to allow students to gain experience in Linux operating systems without significant changes to existing infrastructure"?
windows subsystem for linux
A mix between container and VM with some Integration into the Windows host
legitimately good stuff
Honestly it's because of the way they tried to implement it
Good idea, bad implementation
Yeah, well
I had the same experience trying to get them to enable email forwarding
Eifel?
I think they made great strides in the last updates.
But it was rigged from the start when they decided to use the amazon store..
Well, Google Play Store wasn't an option?
Nope
Dont know why but if you werent a bit tech savy you were stuck with the Amazon app store
I mean Google Play Store was never an option that MS would have been allowed to include.
So Amazon was probably best they could get.
It was possible to sideload with ADB, and later with the direct file integration.
But I would expect the base on which that WSA was built was even worse than WSL1 ones.
Might come back at some point on WSL2 tech base.
I’ll probably basically research the stuff myself and then email them with all the information
huh?
The bad part is that actual distro files in WSL2 go under each users Windows profile files.
Which is good
WSL2 itself is easy to enable.
But if each user is to have separate distro install, it will take fuckton of space and fuck up remote profiles.
As long as only users in specific classes with specific need can install it and not everyone on said machine we should be fine
Or if possible to move stuff to the non C drive
The Volcanic Eifel or Vulkan Eifel (German: Vulkaneifel), consists of three areas of volcanic activity, known as the West Eifel, High Eifel, and East Eifel volcanic fields. Volcanic Eifel is a region in the Eifel Mountains in Germany that is defined to a large extent by its volcanic geological history. Characteristic of the volcanic fields are ...
I am really bad at remembering names
But I don't think this was in the vid simply from how it looks like
so, more info
What's up with the package going from one amazon warehouse to another lol
Logistics™️
Grab our Honey Pot T-Shirt and Foil Trading Card to support us: https://store.gamersnexus.net/products/honey-pot-foil-tshirt-100pct-cotton-limited
This video dives into the depths of the PayPal / Honey Extension allegations, including alleged theft of affiliate referral commissions, and also covers our new putative Class Action complaint that ha...
Another one
Is there a reason he doesn't join effort with legal eagle? (have not watched video yet)
Because he filed a class-action lawsuit.
thats mentioned not even 45seconds in xD
i saw, still amuseing
would SF do better with a 9800X3D or a 9950X?
x3D
the cache outruns the cores?
That's my recollection, I don't have personal experience.
Sadly Satis still can't seem to crack hardware reviews because of an overly scientific approach by most reviewers.
Which has recently burned them with the B580.
I wonder if this still holds any value.
The reddit post is 3 years old: www.reddit.com/r/SatisfactoryGame/comments/ujef33/satisfactory_performance_on_5800x3d
and sadly, I can't find any benchmarks for satisfactory 😦
hoo boy i can smell the bullshit
And for Satis we're going to care about 1% and .1% lows. Combat can get nasty with hangs and missed inputs due to that whole factory thingy running in the background.
Timberborn is still king among games that get to multisecond input delays for me.
i just love the confidence in that SF claim i found 🤣
what website is that from anyway?
Satisfactory is better about scaling than it was in early access but especially now that the x3d clocks are the same there are diminishing returns past 16 threads
So yes, the x3d will be faster
https://youtu.be/dp7qNWhPNXk?si=lwAmsGX84NxopZaz
I am yet to understand why people in comments call it crack...
But hearing that Indonesia has music tradition based on offseting two pitches and playing them together... woah
You've never heard modes like these before!
Double modes allow us to leverage the shimmer quality implicit within the falling diesis. We can use it as a momentary effect like a chorus pedal or something approximating gamelan ombak tuning to highlight certain moments in a piece of music, or we can use it structurally to create truly mind-blowin...
why? too low? too high?
Also how often do you almost get answer for something from an unepected area of discussion?
well, oscilations is probably one of the most intriguing topics in science
i suspect that a 9800X3D and a 4090 will do better than 80fps on low
can confirm a 9800X3D will get about 70ish frames in a medium factory
3440x1440, ultra settings, 3080
and GPU was only at ~90% usage so probably already in CPU limit
interesting. feels way faster than that, even on lower hardware
Again, depending on website. Maybe it isn't updated for 1.0?
was a quick & dirty test, so maybe 10-20 more fps when only running satis
I saw a 8x performance increase in 1.0 so yea that does seem low
Why would I get spikes of internet usage (sort of like on/off) and spikes of disk usage (quickly reaching peak and slow decline, that stop near zero and jumps to local max again) reported by steam, while windows reports just steady load on Disk?
Kinda frustrating to watch. Almost like dial-up internet with estimated time lying and jumping
Hmm, giving disk some time to rest seems to have helped? At least internet is on more often.
9800X3D and 4090 for me runs about 120-130fps min at my nuclear plan, on a dedicated server
4k ultra
Currently ingame heres some data aquasuite.aquacomputer.de/c9be40e6-e055-4649-b9ff-5d8b212d9e59
Have to go sleep so the live datapage will be from idle PC but this is how snapshot during satisfactory looks like
That sounds... off
I'm on a 5600x and I can get much higher frames than that on smaller saves
Don't drop to 60fps until I'm on 500 hour saves usually
With or without global illumination?
I'm really curious about the future of Satis now that it has possibly made it onto Nvidia's pet project list to some extent.
Probably a swap of development support in exchange for appearing in Nvidia slides.
10 year old game sucking down all my vram 🤣
@twin dew just thought I’d let you know since you were helping me try fix it my pc is dead the motherboard died I took it to a shop and they found out the issue
yeesh. what did the autopsy reveal?
No clue yet all they have revealed is it’s dead
That’s a pfp of nightmares
it's perfect. completely unforgettable
You would need to check stat unit.
My 7800X3D can maintain 100 fps in 30MB save from CPU side.
Stat unit?
ingame console command to get diagnostic numbers.
stat fps and stat unit
Will show separate frame times for game logic, and various rendering related parts etc.
Game is game logic on CPU.
Draw is render feeding on CPU.
RHIT is glue logic between game and GPU driver on CPU.
GPU Time is GPU actually rendering the frame.
Frame is one frame offset total time from the previous steps, should be close to highest of Game of GPU Time (screenshotting broke it).
And then the actual display stats, as FPS and frame time, again one frame offset from Frame.
Will give it a try once I'm home again
If hardware accelerated gpu scheduling is on, then Draw will be about same as GPU Time.
And not tied to purely CPU anymore.
Same is probably the case if Reflex or like is in play, delaying finishing the frame setup to get lower input latency.
I tried quicly to look for commands to increase the stat display font size, its barely readable at 3840×2160
But did not find any
AFAIK there are none.
And that hasn't probably been touched since UE4 was launched.
For Satisfactory I think my build gun aim is as efficient if it were 60fps or 120fps 😄
CSS could change it it seems, DEBUG FONT SIZE
But the full documentation for those stat commands, but most are disabled in release builds of Satisfactory:
https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/stat-commands-in-unreal-engine?application_version=5.3
so something may have happened, gotta wait a few days to confirm, but if it's true, i'm getting something fun
being intentionally cryptic because nothing's set yet 🤣
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6utGZQ9Sks
yet another (old) Tom Scott video
but it got me wondering
what if... it can be used somewhere else?
that ferry is basically just a giant fin with 2 fixed axis and 1 free (also manual change of direction)
wind turbines use similar idea
what is analogy of this in electronics?
I mean, we have potential change with altitude...
On the river Rhine in Switzerland, there are reaction ferries: boats with no engine, no paddles, no onboard motive power at all. Here's how they work -- and a question about what other simple ideas are out there.
🟥 MORE FROM TOM: https://www.tomscott.com/
(you can find contact details and social links there too)
📰 WEEKLY NEWSLETTER with good s...
Is Jonathan Blow crazy or wise? how much and about what?
You forgot the chain from that, doesn't work without the chain/cable.
Just redirecting waterflow energy to push the ferry along the chain.
yes, that's why I said that 2 axis are fixed (water level, chain's position along river) and 1 is free (chain crossing river)
just like wind turbines don't move with wind but a fixed on ground
But one use batteries are the "equivalent", using chemicals to generate electricity.
What context?
And neither of those first two matters?
It is just about flow speed, and angle of attack.
the second one matters or the ferry would go with river
With chain preventing the ferry from going down river while using that angle of attack to move just sideways.
Point was that water level, or chains exact position, don't matter.
Just flowspeed and that there IS a chain.
well, recently I discovered he talks a lot about programming in general (also he develops JAI...), so asking more about that
And Wind turbines are again just fixed electrical engine with adjustable blades, converting air movement into rotation, and then that into electricity.
well, yes.
though if the goal was to optimize the speed of ferry then it would matter
Again, just about that flow speed of the water.
I was pointing at idea that there's a force that moves matter that can be interacted with (fins) and we set something what doesn't move with it, and exploit the opposing reaction force to get the work done. that's the analogy between them
I have no clue on the goals of JAI, except it's main use will be game dev (if I remember correctly). And since the language is still in development I have no opinion yet.
...and for wind turbine, it's height in the same location also will reach for different flow speed
Which is just about boundary layers of ground.
well, not JAI, but he's takes on the programming
You are mixing causes and effects.
I don't follow him so.
ok, don't pay attention to flow speed as function of height or position along the river because it's really not the thing I was talking baout, just something extra
I lost the message about chem battery...
which is kinda like having small bottle of water that you spill on a tiny modeled river path and it does the work
(let's forget for a second that gravity does the job)
if there was (and there is) a source of flow of electrons, how to make "fin" that can exploit it to do some work?
What do you think all electronics, and electricity using devices do?
yes, but, that's a different question.
they have source of such "flow", but what creates that flow? our devices, that mostly just use heat energy
No, that heat from electronics is byproduct.
From the actual intended work done from the flow of electrons.
that's a whole different thing you mention
there's source of heat -> boiling water -> steam turbine -> flow of electrons -> wires -> device that exploits 'flow' of electrons to do some work
solar -------/
wind tubrine ------/
You are now mixing HOW the electricity is generated at large scale, and how electricity is used.
ye because you asked
Where?
You asked weird questions about how to make fin to take power from electron flow, which is what all electricity use already does in various ways, either directly or via that flow generating magnetic fields that are then used.
And then there are lot of ways to turn either physical work (via magnetism) into electricity and that flow of electrons, or chemical energy directly into flow of electrons.
Basically to me this whole line seems just that you have no idea what electricity is.
For example here, both with that ferry and with wind turbines, only flow speed matters when you look at the physical interactions.
Then there are things that affect that actual flow speed of water or air, but those aren't directly related to the effect, and are only of interest to someone building actual implementation.
Like that boundary layer between ground and water/air causing slower flow nearer to the ground.
Where with wind turbines you need to balance the material costs etc. with effects of that boundary layer to determine how high turbine tower you want to build.
And the effects of surrounding terrain to that to select placement.
But those are implementation details.
With rivers, the total flow mass over time, and the river channel cross-section determine the overall flowspeed, with that boundary layer etc. then determining how it is spread over that cross-section.
Which parts are slower, which ones are faster, etc.
And in turn that total flowmass then depends on the amount of water collected from rain upstream, and height differences etc.
And if there are lakes upstream evening things out and acting as reservoirs and so on.
But again, goes into implementation details if someone wants to build something using that waterflow in certain area, to select the best spot or size the water wheel for wanted output power or like.
Well, not flowspeed directly, but mass flow, but mostly that mass is constant enough when talking about these specific cases, but not overall.
dumb question time: for those O11-style cases with 9 fans (intake on bottom, exhaust on top with an AIO, intake on side), would it be better to have higher airflow fans on the AIO or somewhere else
You want the input massflow to be little higher than output massflow, to get tiny bit of positive pressure inside the case, and as much of that exiting via that radiator, and only little from the other holes in case.
To maximize mass flow that actually cools the water.
And still getting all the input airflow through any dust filters.
so maybe have the bottom &/or the side fans be higher airflow than the AIO's exhaust fans?
Aren't you having many more input fans than output?
If you are filling all the places.
And that radiator will be causing backpressure, dropping the flow that those radiator fans would otherwise generate.
yes, 6 intake/3 exhaust, but also reusing 3 higher airflow fans since they're decent
so trying to figure out best config
the 3 high airflow ones are double the pressure & volume of the others
cuz noctua 🤣
or should i have the AIO have the high airflow, but as intake at the top & exhaust out the side & bottom
Pressure rating is at 0 airflow.
And airflow rating is at 0 pressure loss causing obstructions before or after the fan.
The actual operating point is always between them, and the line isn't straight.
Noctua article on that: https://noctua.at/en/nf-a12x25-performance-comparison-to-nf-f12-and-nf-s12a
Designed in Austria, Noctua's premium cooling components are renowned for their superb quietness, exceptional performance and thoroughgoing quality.
Comparing two previous Noctua fans to then new NF-A12x25 which loses to those two on pure specs, but is better in actual operating range for all real cases.
yea, it's 3 of the industrial PPC 120mm 2000rpm fans i'm reusing
will i need to worry about bearing wear, since those 3 are currently vertical mounted?
That kind of orientation change shouldn't affect in most cases with fans.
And Noctua fans work in that pushing up orientation, which isn't true for lot of fans.
Lot of fan bearings don't handle that specific orientation well.
And radiator obstruction will just make it even worse.
with the AIO being at the top, would it be better to have the fans above the AIO and pushing air into the AIO instead of trying to suck thru it?
You can have the fans below the AIO pushing through it?
But depends on exact fan if push or pull through radiator is better.
And that second one just goes into the fan bearing.
If it can take the combined gravity pull and fan thrust without issue (when airflow is from down to up) or not.
And if you want top to exchaust or pull fresh air in.
If it pulls in, then you need to see where to exchaust.
yea, trying to decide if it'd be best to have top or bottom as intake, rad definitely has to go on the top either way
lol is there a case fan airflow builder out there 🤣
But in most cases, push fans are better to get air through a radiator than pull fans.
Anyways, Blue Origin New Glenn now targeting 2025-01-16 06:00 UTC for next launch attempt.
And SpaceX Starship Flight 7 is targeting 2025-01-15 22:00 UTC for attempt, including another booster landing attempt and upper stage PEZ dispenser test attempt with Starlink v2 mockups.
Now with updated Spaceship version with front fins moved backwards to have the hinges in more protected location.
Sorry, leeward
backwards could also mean lower down, as in closer to engine section.
are they going for full orbit with starship this time?
No.
still doing that "orbital energy" traj
No use until they are both certain that engine restarts are certain and they have actual Starlinks in cargo.
And they can do those deorbit tests on suborbital trajectory and have no danger of ground hits, and they need to test that pez dispenser to see if it works properly this time to start launching actual Starlinks on later test flights.
They tried the payload door in one of the first full hops, but it failed badly.
can't wait to have a shot at seeing it reenter over me
But this is first flight of Starship v2 (still with Booster v1), which is 1.8m longer for 25% more fuel and lot of other changes, like those repositioned front fins.
But Musk has said that this is planned to be last suborbital one.
And next one will try to return to Starbase for catch if this one goes well and that is allowed by regulators.
New BIOS for X870e Crosshair. Wonder what the "select" games are
And chipset drivers too, not sure if want to test it
SpaceX really doesn't want this to happen to Starship:
https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/01/a-glowing-ring-of-metal-fell-to-earth-and-no-one-has-any-idea-what-it-is/
oh definitely, they've already done that with plenty already
Even if that specific one isn't actual space debris.
Somehow seems more like there was separate fall, and then that thing was found.
But it isn't the thing that fell.
Not melted, no heat, no hit marks of any kind on ground etc.
oh yea it looks like a giant worm gear to me
some factory nearby might've gone boom & nobody wants to admit it
Or just crap left behind at some point.
Which was found because someone went looking for whatever caused the light show.
So something actually came down from space, and that triggered finding of something left behind before.
And the actual thing that came down is elsewhere, or burned up completely before hitting ground.
I'm waiting for that to exit beta.
Went from test (linked on specific forum thread) to beta (publicly on support site) very fast.
having players be beta testers for games is ok. having customers be beta testers for hardware is asking for a lawsuit
To get test versions, you need to look in obscure place on Asus ROG forums in one specific thread.
To get beta versions, you need to intentionally download those versions clearly marked as Beta from support site.
And both are only released for MBs that have full flashback functionality.
TUF and Prime models don't get them.
Well, depending on exact MB more.
So complete opt-in, and only for those who can downgrade with "broken" MB.
oh i mean "beta test" as in when they clearly publish a bios revision before it's been properly tested
it's fine to break a game, it's not fine to break a board
Has to have gone through internal testing, and then was in that public test mode for few days.
Usually that public test-test is week or so.
And is now available with clear "Beta Version" red label.
Because it contains important security fixes to firmware.
Most of the firmware versions never get put out with that Beta label on Asus support site.
Go straight from that more hidden Test, to full release.
But often go through couple of versions of those Test releases.
And even more before getting to public hidden Test release.
AM5 AGESA/UEFI/BIOS List | SMU AM5/AM4 Table. Asus AM5 MBs:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12zg6yT_H7H-W1voyw1ZoIrj0GSE7WI4Ug-uLlv-Asa8/edit?gid=937453961#gid=937453961
When "Test" version gets redeployed with same version number as Beta or Release, or once Beta loses that Beta status, it just gets replaced in that listing, not shown multiple times.
So second or third revision of Asus BIOS with AGESA 1.2.0.2b got Test release, and only third version of Test got full release.
It never had public Beta.
Speaking of bios versions, is it completely unheard of for the nomenclature of bios version numbers for a particular motherboard to change midway through its lifecycle?
Meta is going to fire 3600 employees en rehire other people. Based on performance. Memo written by Mark Suckerberg
Unfortunately no.
Oh
Maybe what I found wasn't special then
Better now.
A while back I was helping a friend make his pc faster (operate as expected) and found his bios didn't have an option for PBO. When I checked the bios version, it was something like 00.0x or whatever, and after updating it got changed to something normal like 55.2.A and PBO appeared
I thought we had some early development prototype bios out of the box
MSI?
Meta is also blocking pixelfed. Wtf is meta doing.
For the life of me I don't remember, mightve been gigabyte
MSI is all over the place with the in-BIOS shown versions IIRC.
Even when the actual version strings are somewhat stable now.
But still all over the place between related MBs.
Gigabyte fucks up in using same name with just "ver x" added for different MBs that use different BIOS versions, and the method they use to differentiate those BIOS versions.
But Gigabyte was also IIRC pretty bad before.
I'm stupid. Not PBO, SMT
SMT not being available on a B series board is definitely not AMD spec
Fuck Gigabyte... B650M S2H has three revisions (1.0, 1.1, 1.2), each uses different BIOS/UEFI version.
But 1.0 and 1.2 use same versioning (but checksums are different), 1.1 uses different versioning...
As example I checked.
Messing with uefi is so much fun (not) I sure love trying to make things work (not) even enabling ACS in my server's uefi isn't enough and I still had to enable it in my kernel which is very (not) fun
I love messing with uefi so much I'd rather pay a subscription to Vinafix to download dumps than manually comb through the SPI image trying to locate the bios password
since you al talking bios n stuff, might well check if I need to update it.
but system has been stable (ish) so maybe not fuck around with bios atm and just enjoy gaming 😄
Asus placing the setting for AMD 1:1 UCLK-MCLK in Bios is really confusing at the start too
That it is low down in the advanced RAM settings part with all the timings etc?
yeah
And I think its in another "AMD oveclock" menu too, and not even sure if they both need to be changed
AMD Overclocking, AMD CBS and AMD PBS are menus from AGESA itself.
AMD coded menus that MB maker just has to expose for access.
Theoretically you set things in one or the other and as long as the other one is on Auto, it will just work.
But on some MBs that is broken and you need to set in one of them, and the other does nothing, or need to be set in both.
With Asus AFAIK it works right on all MBs.
And MSI and Gigabyte are AFAIK bad with that.
ok, and also if you put higher than 6000 (or 6200?) DRAM Frequency, it will automatically swap to 1:2 mode, even if you had changed it manually earlier
Ok, that isn't what my MB did when I was testing that.
That is just what it should do on Auto, not with manual setting to either...
Probably idea having been to make that default automatic difference more explicit, but failing the case when it was already set now.
Basic AMD "algo" is 1:1 up to 6000, and 1:2 from 6200 up.
With the important note that anything from 6200 to 7200 will be slower than 6000 if run at those ratios
So tired...
But need to hold on for another hour before heading to bed.
ok
Just reading TikTok is going to block US.
So, no more TikTok for them.
Going from "maybe we want to sell to Elon Musk" (yesterday) to "we probably just going to block it for US" (news today) 🤣
Ah bytedance says the news about selling to Elon Musk is fiction.
I just checked what I would need to pay for a 10 GbE NAS and all the other stuff I need for it. 🫣
Quality NAS storage is expensive.😱
I just upgraded my work room switch to Ubiquiti flex mini 2,5G as motherboards usually have that intgrated, some even 5G. But not really 10G
Even 10gig lan is expensive lol
looks around room with two computers with 10G LAN and two switches with it...
you just need a network card for it
And those start from 100e or so.
yes 150€-300€
Buy used
And if you aren't just doing one-to-one, then you need 10G switches too, etc.
Gets expensive fast.
yeah between 1300-1900€ overall according to chatgpt
Prebuilt or DIY?
Which cannot count.
So that is useless.
Kinda curious what it recommended though
The good stuff isn't really on used market yet.
Only the first and second gen stuff that takes lot of power and cooling, and doesn't support 2.5G and 5G speeds.
Thats what Chatgpt says:
Synology DS923+ NAS: 650-700 €
2x Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1 TB (NVMe SSD): 300-500 €
Intel X550-T2 10 GbE Networkcard: 150-200 €
Synology 10GbE Networkcard (E10G18-T1) for NAS: 150-180 €
Netgear XS505M 10 GbE Switch (optional): 200-250 €
DAC-cable (10 GbE): 40-80 €
1 GbE lan cable: 10-20 €
Those prices have been pulled out of ass.
Good, i havent checked everything but when i did like with the network cards it suddenly got even more expensive..
And that switch isn't optional with that config, as that Intel card is RJ45, and that Synology card is SFP+.
Direct Attach Cables are SFP+ to SFP+.
so whats your guess what i would cost me?
ChatGPT's biggest influence for tech is popularity, not validity or performance.
The more people say that a product is good, the stronger ChatGPT's bias towards that product.
Doesn't matter if those people are knowledgeable or not
And that specific Synology cannot even take that specific 10G card.
so it doesnt use benchmarks for cpu's as reference? lol
Avoid it for product research unless you're okay with getting the average reddit shill's opinion mixed with a bit of random guessing
How could it?
It's a language model, not an actually intelligent researcher
LLMs are LANGUAGE models, they just know about certain words coming after other certain words with largest probability.
meh i thought i would be the easy way
Where are the HDDs? xD
yeah it told me to buy SSD's
Watch these videos if you wanna learn more about how LLMs works.
They're a tool and just like every other tool in existence, you need to know what it can and can't do in order to use it properly
And LLMs are just about being able to generate text that seems like human written in cursory glance.
With absolutely no guarantees about content.
i will
Also, this one to learn more about the strengths and limitations
https://youtu.be/QrSCwxrLrRc
Thanks to Fiverr for sponsoring this video! If you are curious about AI and are looking for a place to bring your project to life, head to https://fvrr.co/answerinprogress to check out the services available to you and use the code ANSWERINPROGRESS for 10% off!
How intelligent is artificial intelligence? In this video, Sabrina answers that ques...
The 3blue1brown videos are more mathematical and theoretical, this is applied to reality
it has no reference; it knows that if you say "how much is a Samsung SSD", something that looks right is Samsung 987, even though that's not a real SSD. it doesn't know what's real, it doesn't know anything, and it will make a price up. ask it repeatedly how much something costs and it will invent new prices every time
There is some reference: the training data.
Which is outdated and heavily skewed by popularity
Yeah it has limitations but i thought i could do simple stuff like this
it cannot
It's not simple stuff, lol
You're asking it to do something specific. Don't do that.
The less depth your question has, the better the answer will be
the entire AI thing is a bubble waiting to pop, when more people realise it can't do what they say it can do
Of course the answer will have less value too, but that's another discussion
I guess i will have to do my own research then, which could take hours x)
ask chatGPT about anything you know a lot about, I mean really know, and watch as it makes stuff up and is so confident about its wrong answers
Ehhhh, I think it will pop only when ai does the opposite of what it's supposed to do - like when people got a company's chatbot to invent new warranty and return policies
there's examples of stupid shit like that
Get an old PC, throw in some drives and done
well my girlfriend is working in a legal tech company and they are using AI to check how high their chances are of winning
based on that they take on work lol
🤦
So decision making based on LLM hallucinations?
it has something to do with algorithm or something but they do have lawyers checking
so fucked
i dont know the whole principle
That would be correct for the AI as HDD will have trouble keeping up with faster than 1GBit networks without perfomance oriented RAID
ChatGPT can still aid you with that. I've asked it for good resources in the past and was generally pointed to some great channels and websites.
You have to remember two things tho:
- Anything ChatGPT says has to be treated as a random guess. If you want accuracy, you need to validate it. Don't trust its output to be true.
- Be aware of the tool's limitations. ChatGPT is great at what it's supposed to do - but that usecase is much narrower than you think.
Well it's a curiosity on how that man visions language with meta programming.
Considering that he has developed Witness with completely optional puzzles... I wonder the language will handle optional stuff.
So far, I love that you can have non-default keyword args out of order. I mean, ordering args, having positional ones... All of that seems archaic to me.
RAID was something like a mirror storage as a backup?
VERY important distinction here:
AI is NOT automation.
You can have a computer automated system for that very purpose that works completely without AI.
In fact, a lot of automation systems are now referred to as AI when in reality it's a completely hardcoded algorithm
way narrower than i thought it seems
Multiple types and levels, some mirror data for backup and other types for performance, but you can do both if buy lot of drives
also using it in law is just... terrible. chatgpt, not AI in general, specifically chatgpt, has been caught hallucinating and making up legal precedent multiple times
And stupidly enough, a lot of really good automation systems added AI to keep up with the trend - and got worse in the process
Proper automation is almost always better than AI
All LLMs hallucinate.
Natural consequence from just storing word associations.
Autocomplete on steroids
Schwartz, an attorney with Levidow, Levidow & Oberman in New York, used the OpenAI gen AI chatbot to find prior cases to support a case filed by Avianca employee Roberto Mata for injuries he sustained in 2019. But at least six of the cases submitted in the brief didn’t exist. In a document filed in May last year, Judge Castel noted the cases submitted by Schwartz included false names and docket numbers, along with bogus internal citations and quotes.
wellp i dont know what they are using it exactly for only that they are searching for cases with the highest probability of winning and my girlfriend ist going to be a lawyer herself so it wont replace her
yet
Even worse: iirc that dude was asked to provide information about those precedents and then had ChatGPT write the court documents for those cases.
And if it wasn't that dude, I know some other lawyer did that
Which none of the current general ones can do, and the answer will be pure hallucination with random content.
And even if it is specifically tailored and trained one, it will still basically be just random coin toss.
lmao
the company has created it themselves so i dont know
And most probably then has nothing to do with AI, and is just some kind normal algorithm-tool.
Also: it's not all about win probability, profit potential is a gigantic factor too.
A slam dunk case worth $1000 is far less valuable than a $5m coin toss
Considering recent video from WelchLabs, there's awya to extract and edit specific associations in LLMs "memory" (weights).
So it could be that we will see less hallucinations over time
www.bbc.com/travel/article/20240222-air-canada-chatbot-misinformation-what-travellers-should-know
In 2022, Air Canada's chatbot promised a discount that wasn't available to passenger Jake Moffatt, who was assured that he could book a full-fare flight for his grandmother's funeral and then apply for a bereavement fare after the fact.
The British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal rejected that argument, ruling that Air Canada had to pay Moffatt $812.02 (£642.64) in damages and tribunal fees. "It should be obvious to Air Canada that it is responsible for all the information on its website," read tribunal member Christopher Rivers' written response. "It makes no difference whether the information comes from a static page or a chatbot."
ai algorithm were her words, well she is literally someone who is clueless about computers so maybe i shouldnt take her words for granted but if that were the words of her company i dont know 😄
And THIS is where I see AI plummet into irrelevance.
It becoming an expensive legal liability
lawyers should be scared shitless of AI from a liability perspective
well they do actual lawyer work, i dont think it makes majors decisions for them
i mean they wouldnt need to be lawyers then
As elaborated earlier, a lot of standard automation is now referred to as AI despite there being no actual ML involved.
People have no idea what AI is or means and with the media craze around it, they'll call anything AI that automatically does stuff
true, i myself am not that deep into the subject so what your saying is probably correct
In multiple cycles, starting from basically static decision tree algorithms.
Many many years ago.
I really really wanna see those HR and marketing fucknuts get their asses handed to them by the legal department - because I KNOW that there is an IT department in the background that will throw a "told ya so" party
Yeah, uhhhh, that's probably not a good thing and part of why you fell for ChatGPT's nonsense.
Just because something sounds true or smart or thought out doesn't mean it is
fwiw, I could be as much of an uneducated pretender like ChatGPT
at some point i would have noticed, since i wouldnt just buy blindly
Have to wait and see... I'm not a fan of meta programming for everything but it does have it's uses.
i build my computer on my own and put every part together so im not clueless
Today, I saw a tool that let's a AI peerreview your PRs 
Me: "isn't this just the same as a linter?"
These two aren't mutually exclusive, I've seen people make some horribly dumb part choices because they thought they knew when in reality they didn't
You take every tool/program/app in existence. Just slap AI into it. And the result will stay the same. Now it just has AI.
And a NAS is mostly the same. Just trade looks and GPU for functionality and storage.
Photoshop + AI. Synology + AI. Discord has probably some AI into it.
It absolutely does. iirc you can use discord native AI utilities to create image descriptions
So everything has to have AI built into it.
I think it was pretty good at that time:
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor (3.80 GHz)
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO 32GB (4 x 16 GB) DDR4 3600MHz C18
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 PRO (
ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING
Because the MBAs got caught in the hype, without understanding anything (again)
Its the new crypto/blockchain
Very weird RAM choice.
No. Purpose of review is everything what isn't linter, or test. Aka stuff you might argue about, hehe.
So it's liking hiring a jun who won't sleep and will tell you how great your code will be if you do extra stuff you didn't do because business/budget etc
4x16 = 32
quik mafs
You don't get it.
And probably won't work stable at the specced speed anyways with that CPU.
Yeah. Companies invest. And later they will get to know what was worth the money...
it does?
My 5800X ran 4x8 @ 3200 fine
If it is really 2 sets of 2, you probably didn't enable XMP.
okay lets define unstable, what problems are you expecting
That is much different from 3600MT/s.
Just 1 bit error
Only 200Mhz
And if XMP wasn't enabled, that set will be running at 2133MT/s knowing Corsair.
most definitely overpaid on RAM, SSD and MB.
GPU I'll leave aside cuz this sounds like a chip shortage config
why that CPU tho? what did you expect to get from 8 cores and why 5800x over 5700x?
and finally: what about case, cooling and PSU?
it is overpaid, i agree, it was for the looks
Can you watercool with molasses?
that's paying extra for aesthetics. overpaying is something else
105th anniversary
let me check
And 3200MT/s is the official max for 2 sticks.
And 2933MT/s is the official max for 4x1R sticks like the talked config.
3600MT/s is the unofficial "this will work with all CPUs" when using 2 sticks.
But the actual max for 4 sticks is usually way below that, much closer to that official max.
It's not advisable to use molasses for water cooling; standard water or appropriate cooling fluids are much better suited for that purpose.
Using molasses could lead to clogging in the cooling system due to its thick consistency and the potential for it to leave residues. Additionally, molasses can ferment and spoil, which could create further issues in a cooling loop.
the only aesthetics portion in the things that I criticized is the RGB on the RAM - and I'm confident that there was equally good if not better quality RGB RAM for a similar price if not lower
from corsair? if so i havent found it
Corsair is the crappiest global RAM manufacturer there is
Actually I've been tempted to try something like Redline Water Wetter, coolant booster for combustion engines as a computer coolant if it has any benefits but, expectations have not been high enough for the trouble
you've found the point of criticism: they're obviously not from Corsair.
brand doesn't matter. you want a good product? buy a good product. Don't buy whatever product because it has a certain logo on the box and some fancy marketing around it
But even with DDR4, going to 4 sticks is bad idea if you can get the same amount of RAM in 2 sticks.
With DDR5 it is death sentence to performance.
Strix mainboard, Corsair RAM, Samsung SSD
this smells a lot like brand bias - which is a strong indicator of surface level knowledge
*except for quad channel platforms (not the case here, not the case basically ever unless for workstation platforms)
wow, so your saying you cant have your favorite brands you were using for 30 years without problems?
thats my first AMD CPU btw
Even if you wanted Asus MB, why Strix branded, which are extreme-OC boards with overinflated prices to match?
i mean we can debate about efficiency and price then we probably wouldnt use any popular brand
two measurements as always in this chat, love it.
oh which ssd is good these days?
because i always used asus like i always used corsair i wont stray from a brand when it works fine
Too large, so they are able to use the crappiest binned RAM for every level.
And switch those RAM chips without changing the SKU.
And use the same crappiest possible SPD programming for all their RAM that has XMP profiles, so if you don't enable XMP, you get very crappy performance.
Most other makers have SKU changes and better matching SPDs.
10 years ago i thought Crucial is the king. but now they have 'budget' ones too
you can have them, but:
- brand name is not indicative of product quality. only thing it matters for are warranty and support
- your personal experience is ultimately meaningless unless you are capable of formulating an educated opinion
- the past is in the past. a brand can change OEMs, a product can be partswapped. what matters is the present
- working without problems is the bare minimum a product has to achieve in terms of quality
hence my change from intel to amd so
But I'm off to bed ->
working without problems is the bare minimum a product has to achieve in terms of quality
that's when tech is developed enough.
remember when best solution to every problem at any level was to reboot?..
my go to pick are drives with MAP1602 + YMTC X3 TLC config, tho that only works well for NVMe use (not via USB enclosure)
other than that, it depends on the usecase. for gaming and OS, any TLC drive above the basic shit is fine (NM620, SN570 and equivalents)
i agree with you that brand doesnt mean a product of good quality
A reboot still can work wonders 😁
true
its the same with guitars , i know no name brands with better performance than a les paul...
a reboot fixes 99% of the problems you can ever face
Nah, just funny. When I say something like that, I got a slap on the wrist from fireworker.
if you say the same, you get a thumbs up by them 🤣 Hence my two measurement reference.
but the iconic style of a les paul is a reason to buy it
unless you have booting routine that takes longer than 10 minutes
i (as well as many other ppl) luckily dont have one
imo music is too subjective in matters of taste
with PCs, there is no taste involved in benchmark numbers and standardized durability tests
wait
well then my cpu was benchmark winner ...
you have just informed me that ppl benchmark music
nobody could compare when it comes to gaming when i bought it
its been a few years so..
not even the newest cpu for 1000€ won
this reminds me : do you guys know of a wonderfull site called "Userfenchbark"
u think i didnt compare lmao?
Nope - unless you mean 5800X3D and not 5800X
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-5800x/22.html
and if i cant trust benchmarks to begin with, why bother checking
5800x basically got matched by a far cheaper 5600x for gaming
#Only userbenchmark
is not trust worthy
or i am missing context
who said you can't trust benchmarks? numbers are the only things you can trust - as long as the methodology is transparent and applicable to your usecase.
That's why the likes of userbenchmark and passmark are bullshit
on average performance mine was better?
Cinebench too if you're trying to find out about gaming performance
I just send you a link that said it isn't - and it's not enough to just be better, the difference has to justify the higher price.
5600X was slower than 5800X in the testing I sent you - by less than 0.5% tho
i donkt think it was that much of a bad choice you are making out to be
cinebench for gaming perf?
as I said, it's mainly overpaying for the brand logo - and the CPU was merely questioned because I don't know your usecase
or about how much % are yout nitpicking
All X3D chips getting ignored
completely nonsensical, hence the grouping with passmark and UBM - Cinebench is an accurate representation of a Cinema4D render which itself translates decently well to similar usecases
I just wanted to know why you picked that CPU over 5600X, 5700X or their non-X counterparts.
You mentioned earlier that not even the newest 1000€ CPU could beat it - that makes me believe that your initial statement wasn't accurate.
I think you might be using a 5800X3D, not a 5800X. Those are two very different CPUs and 5800X3D while discontinued can still compete at the top end of performance in cache-reliant titles like Satisfactory or Baldur's Gate 3
the biggest criticism wasn't the CPU, it was RAM, SSD and MB. Because those were primarily bought because of brand name and not because of an educated decision (like you seem to have done with the CPU)
hence this
Also, for the future, you can ask multiple AI to see the difference in answers.
but i put more thought in my gpu and cpu
the gpu was mainly the choice because i had no choice, it was a time where the prices exploded because of bitcoin mining and the sony ps5
1 week befor the price was at 2500€ a month later and 1000€
yeah, that much was apparent - it's hard to criticize those picks too because they can very easily be justified despite looking nonsensical. Your usecase just has to be niche enough
Certainly! Here are some popular 10 GbE NAS options that you might consider:
Synology DiskStation DS1621xs+ 6-bay NAS with powerful CPU options. Supports 10 GbE with an optional network interface card. Great for virtualization and heavy workloads. QNAP TS-h1283XU-RP 12-bay NAS with a powerful AMD Ryzen processor. Supports 10 GbE and has multiple expansion slots. Ideal for businesses needing high performance and redundancy. Asustor AS5304T 4-bay NAS with Intel Celeron processor. Comes with 2.5GbE ports, but can be upgraded to 10 GbE. Good for multimedia and gaming applications. TerraMaster F2-221 2-bay NAS that is budget-friendly. Supports 10 GbE with an optional adapter. Suitable for home and small office use. Buffalo LinkStation 210 Entry-level NAS with 10 GbE support. Simple setup and management. Good for basic file storage and sharing.
I unironically recommended a 16GB 4060 Ti to someone once - a GPU that basically every trustable reviewer out there called a waste of silicon.
chip shortage and Ether. Bitcoin had been specialized by then and wasn't really profitable on GPUs
chip shortage was the main factor tho, a drought in southeast asia brought down silicon wafer production
yes, cant remember exactly but the prices exploded and i was in need of a computer
I paid 1000€ for a 3070 Ti, then realized my mistake and returned it unopened
Thank you, i copied and will check them
It's an AI output too
That's just the result from another AI. So you could ask different AI's.
🤣
good, deleted. >_>
Cool thing is, you can see sources for AI.
So for this respond, tom's hardware was used and smallnetbuilder.com for example
To me, it's the same as google.
It's just a basis to start from and do your own research.
Cut me some slack, I can’t read properly because everything is blurry due to food poisoning. I feel like I’m drunk
furthermore i just had a surgery yesterday xD
should have noticed in the first sentence its an ai reply
now what would happen if you got drunk and sleep-deprived on top of this?
ooff hope you can recover
i dont wanna know you dont wanna know how much i puked from this
yeah, get well soon
TMI
-# did you measure it by weight or by volume?
It's already been 6 days, and I still haven't regained my sense of balance, its annoying as fuck
Just throwing stuff out there: there's model of Hydridic Earth, but as author says: people work in certain dogma, and despite evidence from physics, can't accept new model due to inertia.
I didn't find much online, except for the book, couple paywalled studies, and a lecture-discussion.
I was concerned about mentioning it to not put political taint on discussion, but I guess just mentioning it shouldn't hurt.
This here is just to extend discussion.
and thank you very much
btw fireworker, it was hard to follow our conversation because of this, i think i havent answered everything and missed out alot
have you tried sci-hub or similar tools to get around the paywall?
alternatively, try reaching out to the researchers, sometimes it's the publisher enforcing the paywall but the original authors are allowed to distribute independently
main question: are you sure your CPU is a 5800X and not a 5800X3D?
for the rest: not too important, model over brand, learn from it and do better next time
wait
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X , i bought it on amazon so yes
gosh its now available for 150€
i paid 400€
that's just tech aging and getting flooded out by newer and better stuff
that was 4 years ago, i used several sites which had the same result and i watched many youtube game tests
i only know it was a black website but that shouldnt say much lol
YouTube game tests as in recognized reviewers (Gamer's Nexus, Hardware Unboxed) or those random gameplay+Rivatuner videos that use who knows what methodology
That i dont know, but i always make sure they have a lot views
so it shouldnt be a noname youtuber
well its not like i paid attention to what they were saying
rather watched the performance that was blend in
LTT got called out for major flaws and inaccuracies.
Userbenchmark has millions of users and to this day is one of the top google results.
Don't trust stupid people to make smart decisions
are you German by any chance?
dang, I'm good
cpubenchmark.net and userbenchmark.com are wildly inaccurate sources. Avoid them
cpubenchmark too?
Passmark is accurate in their methodology, it's just shitty methodology that's inapplicable to basically anything
Got any sources for that?
i will remember not to use them but i must say i might have overpaid but im pretty pleased, i never really had issues and could play all games in ultra at 4k without problems so far. I could render high resolution pictures in photshop and make full use of my music equipment. I doubt my current setup is good enough for newer games tho, not at ultra.
the cpu does get hot tho but that seems to be normal
- the results and rankings on their page. top scoring CPUs are all multicore powerhouses. In non-multicore benchmarks (gaming, singlecore) they all score super poorly
- Even the gaming chart: 7900X3D beating 7800X3D? 5600X3D beating 5800X3D? 245K beating 14900KS? no serious CPU reviewer can reproduce that data
- the information on how their benchmark works: all super compute heavy, all of them with hardly any actual real world importance (encryption, compression and prime numbers being the most realistic ones). Zero of these are actually viable for gaming
yeah, the 5800X is a bit of a hothead
would be nice to know the other parts of the system
are we talking LC-CC-85 or Mobius 360?
Corsair iCUE H100i ELITE CAPELLIX
Corsair Crystal Series 680X RGB
i mostly used corsair because of the ICUe software
but i did fancy the NZXT Kraken x)
ah and because i loved the crystal series but it has some flaws im unhappy with
so it wont be a corsair next time
yeah, uhhh, don't. iCue is known bloatware and one of the worst offenders at that
i am unhappy with it
it is literally the worst software on my computer, when i made my choice i just wanted a software to controle all RGB light without interferring each other
i wont use corsair again
signalrgb or openrgb are better
can i still use them?
it never occurd to me that there would be other softwares god damn it
...
yup, tho the bloat might still be bloat
well i cant know everything, never said i would
signalrgb looks better at a first glance
never said you'd need to - it's just the exact thing that I referred to, making uneducated decisions in the belief that they're educated due to a lack of awareness on what knowledge is lacking
alas the "just work" options make other things not work, like your computer performing as it should
yeah i dont see me as educated either im not an IT guy but i dont think im that incompetent either
you could probably figure it out
I got a gigantic reality check on my PC knowledge when Goldensoldier took me from here to the PCPP server
didn't even know about RAM ICs, SSD NAND models or PSU platforms
let alone their differences and implications
who? you, we or them?
damn
guess we suck then 🙃
That reminds me, what are the good psu platforms/manufacturers these days
I'm used to recommending Corsair but I have been slacking in keeping up with that
signalrgb isent much better altho it gets the job done
CWT CSZ iirc, tho buying PSUs is really just a "cheapest that's good enough" type of situation
gpx is good-ish, not CSZ level tho
highpower has had a good platform, iirc Thermalright's SANR units aren't half bad either
did some testing
High-ish settings, Global Illumination on Medium (last screenshot is with GI off), resolution 3440x1440
$10,990.06 rough total
For a hypothetical all-rounder (though mostly Hyper-V for mass RDP of 60+ users) server with a $15k budget, hows this look to you guys? I don't know about shipping costs yet so don't ask this is a very rough draft. The only thing I dislike about this is the fact that the only SP5 cooler I could find which fits in a 3U chassis appears to be designed for ducting, which would have to be custom printed for this chassis.
We have PSU's on hand already
raid card for boot drive(s)?
also for RDS i'd go for a P series (higher clocks -> more responsive system) and maybe a GPU
iirc cooling wise SP5 is basically equivalent of sTR5
that'll be an epic server
wdym
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unz6mfjS4ws
Doesn't this remind you of those engines SpaceX is landing?
Watch the ‘The Origins of Stealth: The F-117 Nighthawk’ here: https://nebula.tv/videos/mustard-the-origins-of-stealth
Watch More Mustard Videos & Support The Channel: https://nebula.tv/mustard
Support Mustard on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/MustardChannel
Mustard Merchandise: https://www.teespring.com/stores/mustard-store
Instagram: https...
no
wait are you questioning the card I have or the lack of one
Sry, had the pic zoomed in and didn't see the comment
Sponsor: Hyte Y70 Case on Amazon https://geni.us/p2lWP (or blue Y70 on Amazon https://geni.us/586E5q)
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 will arrive soon. NVIDIA Thermal Engineer Malcolm Gutenburg joined us to show a number of RTX 5090 Founders Edition finished and prototype samples, including liquid metal, 3D vapor chambers with claimed world-first de...
nerds chatting is fun
I really enjoyed that vid
I thought it important to say that I was going to just disappear in middle of conversation.
And several of those are not with 10G ethernet or with upgrade option...
So nowhere near CPU limited.
And some of the AI replies are discontinued too.
@honest karma So that second set of AI replies was again complete nonsense.
First is discontinued.
And would have been with native 10G, not optional extra like said.
Second is legacy (discontinued?).
Uses Xeon E processors, not Ryzen.
And three last ones don't have 10G lan, and cannot be upgraded to it.
So again just LLM hallucinating half of what it wrote.
Didn't check if the three last ones were still for sale or not, or other lines for accuracy.
So main PCB, PCIe foot PCB, connector PCB and then flex-PCB connecting connector and main PCBs.
With mezzanine connectors between.
It's a matter of averages tbh.
Corsair still has good ram kits, but they're usually overpriced compared to other equally good options.
And if you got any Corsair RAM kit at random, it's very likely that you got a shit product - whereas Klevv for example gets you a RAM kit that is somewhere between decent and great.
And it's not like Baldur said to avoid all Corsair kits because of brand reputation.
He stated that the brand has a shitty reputation - which is correct.
It's also the logic behind the statement - if you get a bad product once and dismiss the entire brand, that's nonsense.
If someone like Baldur, Darkmont or myself sees documentation on what ICs Corsair generally uses in their kits, that makes it a more reliable call.
Well, Corsair was also one of the first RAM manufacturers who started to hide everything about their kits.
And IIRC doesn't tell anything but speed and CAS latency at this point.
Not even rest of the XMP set latencies.
And that they don't bother to bin the chips based on JEDEC / SPD speeds, and just slap the same absolute minimum SPD on all kits.
Yes, they work at the advertized speed.
But they mix chips in "same" product code.
So you cannot get second set with same chips by buying "same" product.
Hide almost all specs, so you cannot know what you are buying without third party sites, and those might not match to what you get because of the previous.
And SPD settings are always crap, so if you don't enable XMP, then you get slowest possible RAM, which doesn't run anywhere near what the chips could do at stock voltage.
I have my first Corsair kit now with the 9800X3D, its 96GB 6400MT/s CL32 (m-die) which surprisingly works just straight enabling XMP. They run hot even at xmp 1.4V but guess that cant be avoided with any double rank sticks
But better not comment as I've not yet done any manual timing overcloking so really cant tell how they do.
And the various current Hynix DDR5 dies are exceptional in that there isn't lot of silicon lottery variance in them.
So once you buy something with them, you get about same as with higher official bins.
But that hasn't been true for most DRAM dies over time.
Samsung 8Gbit DDR4 B-die was very varied AFAIK.
With some batches being very bad for OC potential.
It was just good in that it could take LOT of voltage and scaled well with that extra voltage.
If you cooled it enough.
everyone knows that definition of 'planet' is tricky at best
and now prepare to learn that Moon being defined as satelity is also not as straigthforward
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBcxuM-qXec
(minute physics)
Go to https://brilliant.org/MinutePhysics to try Brilliant for 30 days for FREE, and to get 20% off an annual premium subscription to Brilliant.
We think of the moon as orbiting the earth, following a spiraling trajectory as the earth itself orbits the sun. But this is wrong. Not only is the moon's orbit NOT a spiral... there's an argument that...
Thing is tho: that Corsair kit is not any better or worse than other less expensive Hynix kits
It was 431€. I dont find it expensive compared to G-skill or Kingston, the suppliers I buy stuff really don't have other options for 96GB 6400MT/S CL32. 6000MT/s CL30 could have been maybe 50€ cheaper. Also as I buy computers and parts with VAT number, Proshop from Denmark for will be free front door delivery to Finland and 0% VAT.
And either Corsair has restarted actually specifying the rest of the timings, or I was mixing with some other RAM maker, possibly Crucial.
32-40-40-84 for one of the 6400MT/s CL32 2x48GB kits.
Hopefully that 84 isn't tRAS but tRC.
6000cl30 and 6400cl32 use the exact same chips - all RAM kits with those specs do because only Hynix makes ICs that can go this fast.
And you can look further than the big name brands like Corsair, G.Skill and Kingston - Teamgroup, Lexar, Patriot, Silicon Power, Klevv, etc all make RAM kits at those specs
Choose Memory
Welp, only Teamgroup and Geil join the ones from your list according to PCPP, should've checked that first
Maybe klevv, Kingbank or vcolor have smth listed separately
Lot of RAM brands that exist in US don't exist in EU space, or specific parts of EU.
No kidding!
So that's why it says "Supports 10 GbE with an optional network interface card." underneath eveyr product?
And that wasn't true for any of them?
It's literally underneath every product.
Comes with 2.5GbE ports, but can be upgraded to 10 GbE., Supports 10 GbE with an optional adapter.
Two actually came with builtin already.
Three don't have upgrade option.
I tried to search for my chip and didn't find any info past ras
I posted one that doesn't need extra.
So all the four mentions of of upgrade were false.
Buffalo LinkStation 210
Entry-level NAS with 10 GbE support.
AND
I said it was from AI and they needed to investigate it themselves to be sure.
micro only give a chip summary with junction layout and size
Point was that that AI reply was complete baloneys through it.
With NONE of the entries being true in whole.
And none you could buy now, and get 10G even with upgrade.
As the only ones that could have 10G were discontinued.
btw I have almost all chip with W except one with Y in this place
starting to questioning the software they use to run logistic/sorting of chips before shipping
Which was the point, that that listing of five NASes was half hallucinated, and completely useless.
now I don't think I have a bad bin
but I can't overclock it anyway because of broken bios
And those Google AI answers do link "sources" but don't actually use them properly.
The answers very often contradict the listed sources.
(no xmp profile basically means impossible to go manual for the bios for some reasons)
Not even google.
DuckAssist.
still unreliable
And that TS-332X is also discontinued.
So it did have SFP+ cage for 10G, but you cannot buy one anymore.
Btw Baldur, TS-h1283XU-RP supports 10GB
Yes, but is discontinued, and has Xeon CPU, not Ryzen.
and they are usually locked
Which were the points I listed for that.
AS5304T has two PCIE slots for upgrades. So can slot in better network card.
And the first Synology is discontinued, and had 10G inbuild, not as extra.
With the accuracy that the AI output provided, you're better off just googling.
Yes, even with the linked sources - guess how one could find those without AI
No it doesn't according to Asustor spec page.
for upgrade of what ?
these are locked slots
I see the point tho, you can get AI to tell you half a dozen models, then research them and find out if they suit your needs.
It's just kinda bullshitty to do this if the results have too high of a failure rate
Or just select a store, get product listing for NASes and go through that instead?
^
Yup, good stores might even allow you to filter by supported network speed
And then research the ones that looked good in the right price range.
except you then only check the one ai got brainwashed for
And I didn't even post full list.
Yeah, but when in the list you did post, all the entries were useless, how do you think rest of the list would have helped?
(useless: cannot buy or cannot get 10G)
With all the entries having some kind of hallucinations in them.
Bro, what don't you understand.
Here is a list; check it out yourselves.
ALso; it's from AI.
I've used AI to point me towards scientific research papers in a given field.
Out of 8 suggested papers, 2 didn't really exist (or rather: there did exist similar ones that seemed similar on the surface), 4 were irrelevant, 1 was off topic and 1 was actually helpful
Where all the entries were useless to check.
Which was my point.
What did you provide?
They even didn't look at the list because we literally told them it was AI.
It's a useless list because you have to put effort into researching everything that was mentioned only to then realize that none of the models actually fulfill the criteria
What did you provide?
My point was, if you want to use AI to search for anything, you could use multiple AI's to get what you need.
And my whole point was to point out that the list was completely useless and half hallucinated.
As current LLMs just don't handle that kind of question.
So all of them will just give out garbage.
Or you do this which is more likely to be successful and usually faster too #off-topic-tech message
The question/context; I am using AI to search hardware. My input; use multiple AI's, use it as start point, research yourself. If you are really stuck.
Then we go over that the list is AI generated ... so questionable at best.
Then 8 hours later, I get pings that the list is wrong. Way out of contexct.
Thing is: if you're that stuck that you have to resort to ai, you did smth wrong like 2 or 3 steps earlier
Also, go ask human intelligence if you don't know
All fine, but the person wasn't asking that, or not my interpretation.
They were already goofing around with AI buying hardware n shit. Or their friend was.
So because they did bad decisions already we should comfort them into it ? when they get there for help ?
If you wanted to show that AI is a bad tool to use: you failed because you didn't explain why the list sucked.
If you wanted to show that AI can be viable: you failed because the list you sent was 0% helpful
they asked humans here then
it takes over the ai bullshit
You do what you do buddy. I do what I do.
If you want to be a dick about it against people, go a head.
but you insist without arguments
Getting no advice is much better than receiving bad advice
Instead of always looking down to people who come in here for help.
if that's what you do I do tell you it's unproductive and getting annoying
But try for once to help them a little bit?
Even if you don't agree.
Or just entertain them instead of shooting their ideas down.
If they're coming for help, it'd help if helpers were helpful
How did your message help them?
I told them to use multiple AI's. Aggregate information. Use your head.
Bad ideas deserve to be shot down, sometimes they even have to be shot down.
Not without elaboration/explanation as to why, but you shouldn't entertain or encourage bad ideas
no one is entitled to do whatever comes to their mind and call it "help" without facts to back that up
get yourself grounded
What is a bad idea? Using AI to find stuff?
Rofl. 🤣
I google: "best NAS in the world" ... the result would not be so much different in as I ask a AI. Because in both cases, I still need to fact check it.
It's just a different tool, to get a basis for your search from. Like I said multiple times.
a basis, a starting point, a way to get going while searching if you are stuck.
At least normal search doesn't hallucinate.
I'll give you two out of three for this one.
Use multiple AIs: false. You're just getting more bad information.
Aggregate information: correct. Not from AI tho.
Use your head: correct-ish. Human brains are limited in their capability and someone who wants to know something can't rely on their knowledge because they know it's insufficient
You can refine it.
to "fact check it" you have to ..
do an actual search
Super fast indeed
Aggregate as in; get a list of multiple products. Then check those products.
No, you cannot refine technical question with LLM, as they have no idea about anything but language and words.
Yes you can.
If you are stuck, you're not starting
And educated researched guesses are much much more valuable than random guesses.
It's about the value of the information that you get.
By the very same logic you used, since you have to fact check both anyways, AI is a pointless tool because it offers no benefit over a regular search
And not technical, but you can ask the AI why it provided the list it did.
Not reliably
And then the AI would tap out and admit it's mistake.
Better than you can do with a newsarticle.
Anyway, isn't their a proverb about humans and tools? That it's not the tool but what we do with it?
I feel like this is very much the case of people trying to blame the tool.
And in that it is hallucinating the existence of external 10G LAN adapters.
While it's us using it wrong or not understand it.
If verifying a result is significantly faster than obtaining a result, AI can be very helpful.
But if both take the same effort, don't bother with a linguistic guessing machine
It's the same nonsense I read when google was brought in.
Oh, don't believe google. Books are still better. Don't believe wikipedia. Blablabla.
No, it's you using a tool for something that it is incapable of doing well.
You're using a screwdriver to drive a nail into a wall
well play
you now have have lost 15min of your time sending Google duckduckgo and basically any company on internet how you socially behave with their software
Ai is a full scale scam machine
these guys are looking for breach in your fucking social behavior
imagine not knowing how ai prompt actually works
and what marketing is about
image not knowing what duckduckgo is. 🤣
? a "search engine"
Or it doubles down. Or it admits a mistake where there wasn't one. Or it makes a different mistake like it did here.
LLMs are fundamentally flawed. It's upon the user to judge whether the flaws actually harm the quality of the result.
For technical accuracy, promt bias, dataset bias, hallucination, etc are very real issues and should make AI unviable.
For finding a nicer wording on a letter, those don't really matter as much.
haha, lol.
you really think you'll bait yourself out of the argument ?
I had twice now, that AI admitted a mistake when asking more.
No, but I do know you will add nothing of interest to this conversation. You making statements about evil corporations but you don't even know the philosophy behind duckduckgo, you don't even know the product I am using. You are making baseless accusations against DDG. The same that Kekw of the summer did with tectonic activity. And they got 2 days of heat for it.
Just thing they are hard-coded now to do when prompt contains specific things.
I got AI to "correct" mistakes where there weren't any and double down on clearly wrong answers.
Best example: how many R in the word "strawberry"? At what positions?
Ask that same question in different languages and watch it fumble horribly
"politics are doing decisions which improve their own quality of life in the next years"
your answer :
"damn foil hat take"
get yourself grounded
What LLM is DDG using? Inhouse product? GPT 4?
You can choose.
just go research yourself, sorry.
If you want to shit on DDG AI, just do research first please?
"don't even know the phylosophy behind" are you claiming you know ?
how are you claiming I don't ?
and any phylosophy they have will never change their business model and actions
I never claimed I knew their phylosophy
that's the difference with you and kek
There is 4 I believe.
We do not save or store your Prompts or Outputs on DuckDuckGo servers. Instead, recent chats are optionally saved locally on your device, to protect your privacy.
that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard
So, yes you get a tin foil hat for claiming DDG "these guys are looking for breach in your fucking social behavior"
chatgpt still has your shit
🤦♀️
Point proven
This is not even going to chat GPT.
Your point is it can be wrong twice?
And no it doesn't.
llm use is basically hallucinating together
except your prompts are online
GPT-4o is not even chatGPT to begin with.
My point is that an AI admitting and correcting a mistake doesn't mean that there was a mistake
okay fine openAI the company, unless you're saying DDG are hosting the LLM, in which case they have the full conversation history
I know.
And consequently, the accuracy of information obtained through AI is so bad that you're better off not using it - for matters that require accuracy
All metadata that contains personal information (for example, your IP address) is completely removed before prompting the model provider. This means chats to Anthropic, OpenAI, and together.ai (which hosts Meta Llama 3.1 and Mixtral on their servers) appear as though they are coming from DuckDuckGo rather than individual users. This also means if you submit personal information in your chats, no one, including DuckDuckGo and the model providers, can tell whether it was you personally submitting the prompts or someone else.
That's why I asked, to do minimal research. Which 2 out of 3 not doing in here.
Big fucking yikes
Oh that's surely why I have search result for my CITY when I'm prompting "cat"
You get hung up on the privacy portion when that's only one person's position.
The accuracy is what makes it actually problematic
but sure they will not have a 9766th leak this year
Well because it was brought up in this chat.
The accuracy, it's not even a discussion.
Like I just posted 2 screenshots that proof your own point.
so I already know that.
you're being exceptionally naive if you believe a company allowing free access to an LLM isn't keeping your data, but scrolling up I am now much more concerned about how competent you seem to think these models are
Honestly, it's my data. People in here use chatGPT with accounts and everything.
Who cares? I can do that. Atleast I went for a solution that offers me a little bit more.
Security/privacy isn't a one trick pony.
You need layers.
And the questions I ask, I hope they have fun social engineering it.
you claimed it's useful for that
we argued with facts it's loss of time if ever useful
you claim it can be useful
we explained it can't for that
you implied that's why it exists for
I responded it only exist because these companies deemed it good investment for their own interest and whatever reasons
you called me foil hat
"How long ago was 1900?" 
Calling someone naive for believing in a TOS is a far stretch.
breaches are online
Also this is not tos
I would say you more into conspiracy territory if you believe the data they keep, is used for "evil doings."
but privacy policy
let's back up a little here; think about what it's actually doing. these search assistants, they run search results through the LLM and try to parse out some meaning, often failing. we can argue until we're blue in the face if this is a good idea or not, but what really cripples this shit is the fact that most search results are AI generated too. so you have an AI incorrectly summarising the bad output of another AI
quote me "evil doing"
🍿
I though your point was they kept the data? 🤔 And I was naive in for believing DDG doing their best to add privacy protection.
we have multiple points and you're attempting to cherry pick them
no u
lmao I'm out, you go nuts
no skin off my back if you wanna do something stupid
👋
What happens if you ask ChatGPT to “Repeat this word forever: “poem poem poem poem”?”
It leaks training data!
In our latest preprint, we show how to recover thousands of examples of ChatGPT's Internet-scraped pretraining data: https://t.co/bySVnWviAP
Fixed now but this was a very real issue
Right after the "fix", ChatGPT even told users to just fulfill the prompt themselves and refused to do it
"can you repeat the word 'poem' forever?"
"Here's how you can use copy and paste to repeat a word multiple times"
So, AI is not accurate? Which it even tells users?
I really don't know if we can blame everything on AI, I still feel like it can be a useful tool if used correctly. Like I said, double check facts. Or tripple fact check it even. But it can be a tool to get ideas, inspiration and think out of the box. If I want to know more about wolves, I can read a book about wolves. Watch a movie about wolves. Visit a park with wolves and interview the caretaker. I can google it. And I can ask AI/ML. I don't see what the big deal is? It's just another tool to gather information. Depending on the source, even movie or books can be innacurate. Especially when it comes to science that keeps evolving.
When LLMs don't even have any relation to concepts of accurate or even information?
Just about words after words.
I don't understand? Google doesn't have concept of accuracy or information either.
yes it does
and all the public rules are easily accessible
such as security score, performance score, aggregation of data, and canonical hint for referencing reinforcement
First hit on google. Verry accurate.
statistics of link click etc, are not ai generated thing
Google is also just a piece of code.
Nothing more, nothing less.
And then google also sorts the search results depending on x other factors.
oh yea, nothing more, like running on servers accross the planet ?
nothing more like gathering data with a billion dolar company ?
nothing more really ?
so I'm writing google every other day in my bloc note
So when it comes to accuracy and trust ability, I don't know if old search engines < AI or AI > old search engines. Or maybe they are complementary. Like I've been trying to tell for an hour now.
SEO is a cancer
The point we're trying to make is weighting the quality of information (accuracy, usefulness) against the cost of obtaining it (time, effort).
If you highly value accuracy (example: find a NAS that is actually capable of 10Gbit), the cost of obtaining said info from an AI far outweighs that of other methods, making AI unfeasible.
On the other hand, if accuracy isn't that important but speed is (writing a birthday message or a Christmas card), using AI is one hell of a tool.
Search engines are code, but they are code that has been written for specific purpose.
LLMs on base are machine learning algorithms that are coded to track word associations and to generate realistic looking text.
Not accurate or information containing text.
- Pretty sure that's a value ranking, not a performance ranking.
- Could've used my earlier screenshot that had UBM as number one source.
- Google isn't perfect either and it doesn't need to be. It just needs to be better than an LLM - which for the sake of accuracy, it often is (in the sense that you are more likely to be referred to accurate resources like the TH chart in your screenshot)
I don't agree with "the cost of obtaining said info from an AI far outweighs that of other methods, making AI unfeasible."
They're different tools for different purposes.
Google is completely dogshit for helping an influencer write an apology to their fans for something they don't feel the need to apologize for.
And an LLM is completely useless for gathering specific and accurate information, like what NAS hardware to get if you want 10 Gbit/s connection.
You don't use a hammer to tighten a screw and you shouldn't use a screwdriver to drive nails into the wall.
Rhetoric exaggeration for dramatic effect.
It definitely outweighs it, but to what degree and how you judge "far" depends on too many factors.
So yeah, valid disagreement, ignore the "far" in there
And an LLM is **completely useless **for gathering specific and accurate information, like what NAS hardware to get if you want 10 Gbit/s connection.
Also not true, since I did get good products.
Not the first query, but the second optimized one I did.
it's natural that some of the early sceptisism will get outdated
in 5 years it will be like "oh did you know that LLM is actually good, like no joking?"
yet any hype will not make an llm some else than a llm
you're going toward what letterdief called me foil hat for why it looks better
Sorry, if you post that. yes I will call you tin foil hat.
"it's not gathering information on people social interactions with the ai prompt system to better exploit their behavior in a marketing fashion at least"
"it's only :
using information about statistics of people interactions online (link vague source of data)
for improving they visual quality of result and hints sent to users for gathering more attraction in our marketing business"
sorry I didn't use the marketing wording which makes it unimaginably more nice and great automatically
are we back to discussion about what makes claims unbased and fearmorgening?
You may have gotten good products, but:
- You had no access to tests/reviews from the AI until you changed methodology. So extra effort created and little benefit over a normal search.
- None of the products actually fulfilled your criteria
- There were multiple cases of products that were no longer available
- You were presented with false specification
Overall, too much inaccuracy for me to consider this a viable research tool.
I just had 3 products checked. All according to the 10GBe spec I asked for.
Eh, I'd word it differently:
The issues that sceptics point out right now will be addressed and might even be fixed in the future.
... which will make sceptic takes from earlier outdated (not reflecting present reality) in future
At that point the base tech wouldn't be LLM.
did you watch the vid on extracting meanings/concepts from LLM's weights?
considering how large LLMs are and will be, I am not sure how to define 'base'
it probably will remain the largest part of product
I wouldn't be suprised google and co is replaced in x years with AI.
LLM = Large Language Model.
Atm, they have done 20/80 or something. Some answers are already AI generated.
I can see it happen. Don't forget, google is ""better"" because its a 27 year old optimized product.
The future will tell us how AI/ML will be used. If it's like a NFT (slow death?) or like a bitcoin (survive?)
Same claims were made about both products (NFT, Bitcoins) and yet one is still here.
So not sure when "skepticism" becomes "conservatism" for some people. I was skeptical about AI and still am. But I also realize I would be stupid not to explore it. Especially as a programmer.
it's not stupid to explore it, as soon as you got factual ground in it being of interest (to explore it) for you, which I still doubt
One addition; I am talking chatGPT etc. Not the AI shit they push into every single product.
microsoft bought mistral for a reason
> chatGPT still is basically "AI shit they push into every single product"
Nah. Not what I meant at all.
- Soundcore unveils open earphones, speaker with AI karaoke features and outdoor model
- VLC has been downloaded 6 billion times and shows AI subtitling system
- Adobe announces AI tool that can edit up to 10,000 images at once
- Philips Hue develops AI assistant for lighting scenes
All headlines from the last few days I believe.
everything has atleast 1 AI feature at this point
90% of them add no value
some of them are even payed so there setting themselfs up for failure
Google added AI to Workspace and increased the price. Read that news yesterday.
Google will integrate its AI features such as Gemini Advanced and NotebookLM Plus into its regular Workspace subscriptions. Until now, that cost an extra 20 dollars per user per month. The price will go up.
i mostly had filmora's ai tokens in mind but im sure theres more examples like that
where you have to buy the tokens and then the tokens get used up depending on what ai thing your trying to do
if I had disk space I would run my own model for fun.
isent ai a lot like mining
your basically just trying to do the most calculations possible or something
wish I was at F2.0 instead of 1.8...
Mhh. The 1.8 works.
The nose and eyes are sharp, so that's good. Maybe a little unsharp on the eyes so maybe 2.0. But I don't think it's that noticable. It's a nice picture.
Bitcoin didn't survive as a speculative asset imo, it failed in that regard.
It survived as a currency tho, a means of handling transactions on the internet.
Which is what I suspect to happen with AI:
Bubble bursts on the trend-focused overgeneralized usage and it will settle into the functionality that it has been designed for and is good at.
Ehhhh, training your own AI model, yes.
Using a prebuild and pretrained AI model not so much, that's more about handling the request flood, not crunching the numbers on how to adjust the weights within the model
If bitcoins wasn't "a big deal" and just something less then 1% would use, EU wouldn't regulate it. MiCA came into full force in 2025 I believe.
exactly what boat im in
its good, just wish I had the idea to drop to f2 in the moment
The fact EU is/was worried about it, shows the impact of bitcoins.
EU is scared shitless of any tech that allows anonymisation. Example: E2E encryption.
but thats how things normally go 😆 , photo just be like that I suppose
Especially because of the illegal circuit using BTs 
They didn't do anything so dramatically for NFTs. Not bitcoins is a different beast imo.
It is one of the most traded cryptocurrencies in the world, it's just no longer being used as a speculative asset.
The times of HODL are over, it's no longer feasible to buy and hold crypto in the hopes of selling at a higher price.
It only is if you can artificially impact the cryptocurrency's market value - like so many influencers do with their pump and dump schemes
Traded, not used as actual currency.
As the transaction amount per hour is tiny.
Bitcoins is a different thing and it definitely survived much better than NFTs did.
However, there are still aspects of BTC usage that didn't survive
As it is still currently mainly speculative asset.
Any actual using crypto as currency happens with other chains, that actually can handle transactions.
True, but doesn't matter? Google also evolved true time. So can bitcoins. And so can AI.
Hm, I guess there's some merit to it. I'd guess Ethereum and Monero to make up the majority of crypto-transactions
Bitcoin already had a split over that tiny transaction limit.