#off-topic-tech
1 messages ยท Page 121 of 1
Tailscale is based on wireguard
And I can remember UPNP has risks. Was mentioned earlier on how Zerotier works.
So needs to be VDSL modem that implements specific VDSL standards up to specific revision levels.
And VDSL2 Profiles up to 17a.
And doesn't do something stupid against the spec in actual use.
Indeed.
tailscale doesn't use UPNP unless you want it to
G.993.2 Annex B, Annex K 3, Annex N
G.993.5 Vectoring
G.994.1
G.997.1
G.998.4 G.INP
what risks would that be? it's a twenty year old technology. hey, router, send this port on the outside to this ip/port on the inside. plskthx. if you don't trust the inner service then don't do that then?
Need to check what those K 3 and N are.
Because for example Asus only says A and B for 993.2, and doesn't mention G.997.1.
UPnP is IMHO very bad idea,
I just remember vaguely, that UPnP has drawbacks.
The whole point is to allow devices and software behind NAT make dynamic port forwardings.
its security risk
not good if you get malware infection
which is why tailscale doesn't use upnp
if you are owned, upnp makes it marginally easier to exploit the ownership
this is absurd
Lot of normal software try to make UPnP requests to allow outside access to them, even when most don't need that functionality.
yeah, like games
Ah, That G.993.2 Annex K.3 just means being able to operate in PTM TPS-TC mode (vs K.2 being ATM)
So basically from this list only that G.993.2 Annex B, G993.5 and G998.4 are relevant.
Everything supports the rest if it support those three.
And basically everything has supported all of those three for a long time already.
So basically this says:
Any modern VDSL modem that isn't broken and actually follows the specs.
And then that out that if someone connects something that isn't following spec, ISP can go to that clause 4 to kick the user out or force them to change the device.
Modern, as in designed or updated after 2016 or so.
But start finding a router based on the specs 
And you expect ISP to list all the worlds VDSL modem models?
Because basically anything will officially fill it, and you cannot know really without testing if some model is broken or not.
world? No, but atleast a few models.
They do support Fritz!Box. Probably because of a contract/deal they made.
There is no justifying this one. They do this with bad intentions, 99% sure.
To comply, while not really complying, but still complying with the law.
The fact is, ISP want us to use their overpriced shitty routers. ISP don't want users to have more control or privacy.
Where would they put the limit?
And if they listed some models they didn't themselves already provide, the ones producing stuff that is not tested and listed could start lawsuits or other trouble.
pff
We got two ISPs.
Telenet and Proximus. Tell me Baldur, why can Telenet do it?
If it's so insanely hard to list all the worlds routers ... but yet, one ISP did it. And the other didn't.
Those are all OEM modems, not retail ones.
And seems they just checked spec sheets and didn't actually even test:
It's still better than what Proximus does. Which is not helping at all.
Point was availability for consumer to buy.
There is a difference in a company trying to help it's costumers, and saying "we might be wrong".
Or throwing a bunch of specs to them and say "find out yourself, we cba"
No, point of the law was, that costumers can buy their own routers **__easily __**and don't have to be forced to pay for shit ISP router.
No, that the list of the second ISP was pretty useless as the products on it aren't usually available in retail channels.
By throwing up these barries, people will just keep buying ISP routers so nothing changed.
Only to ISPs.
Let me check.
AVM is just fritzboxes.
Forgot those have started to have actual retail availability.
Didn't have for long time.
and that one is available.
Tried to look for one about 10 years ago to buy IIRC.
I have a hunch.
That ISP hopes, router companies will start labeling their stuff with "Proximus/Telenet compliant" ...
And the reason is, because there is a contact e-mail at the botom of the page for them ๐
Costumers: go to our community blablabla.
Companies: contact us through e-mail.
9950x3D being nuts
Would seem like AMDs own slide.
Black Myth Wukong ๐ 1%.
Because all the difference in that chart is probably coming from the higher frequency.
maybe I am just reading the chart wrong.
But this doesn't blow me away?
58% increase on counter strike 2 right?
But for the FPS* hungry games, like CP and Wukan etc. Not much increase.
Like most 7000 to 9000 game comparisons?
Because mostly the parts that benefit games didn't get IPC improvements from Zen4 to Zen5.
And IOD is the same.
Zen 5 was major AVX512 improvements for server space, and setting stage for Zen 6.
So it's little incremental improvements.
no, I mean the next generation of CPU's from AMD.
Dell??????
fuckin my god intel are cooked
strix halo in dell to complete with apple
who knew
There is some AMD keynote in CES ongoing?
the 9800X3D showed performance gains in the likes of cinebench, while the 7800X3D did not; this tells us zen5 is memory bound
it's live
Yeah, but not interested in watching.
Just expected that to be the source.
i have it on in the background
it's mostly been shareholder bukkake
AI every 5 seconds
Oh, we get more AI?
strix halo has the XDNA NPU on it and can have 96GB RAM, that's AI crack cocaine
That Strix Halo 385 (AMD Ryzen AI Max 385) seems interesting laptop CPU.
i want it in a steam machine
the top end is 16 cores 40CU
Yes, which will raise the price a lot.
temps?
had my eyes on strix halo for like a year
How would we know yet?
Only articles with the slide deck out.
lmfao they didn't mention radeon at all
The new AMD Ai Ai chip with Ai Machine Learning Ai
god
you said laptops. I think temp.
And that will depend on the laptop.
Just that my brother is planning to get new gaming laptop in fall.
In 1500e range if possible.
Damn.
mfw no radeon
That 9000 series should be coming in next few months.
But this was too early compared to the rumors.
End of this month or some time in february for the announcement.
So, they split up the 9070 into two types? XT and non XT version?
while 7900 was only XT variant?
top end 9000 ~ 7900 XT ~ 4070 Ti
Ah ok, I understand slide more now.
That there are some 9070 and some 9060 models coming out.
And at least 9070 and 9070 XT.
And that 9070 models will fill up from RTX4070TI/RX7900XT down to 4070 Super and RX7800XT
And then 9060:s will be below that.
And the 9060 is competitor of the 4060TI?
Yes.
And 7800XT to 7600XT
they gotta be cheap
So no competitors for 4080/4090 as asual?
not just affordable, cheap
Not even to 7900XTX.
I want this shit bundled in cereal boxes
AMD did say they weren't going for high-end in this gen.
Officially just because they didn't want to.
In reality probably because the third design was chiplet based with need for advanced packaging.
Fair. It was no critique to AMD.
i thought they said they'd do it to gain more market share?
And once we got close enough to today, AMD saw that the highest end design couldn't be produced at realistic price in current situation.
And didn't have time to do alternative one anymore.
we're pretty certain that RDNA4 is a true chiplet design
but the underlying tech is the same as what the MI300 uses
and they'd much rather sell those
so instead we just get chip, singular
Dropping one silicon variant from same architecture wouldn't save that much design costs.
And AMD has been doing three variants each generation for long time.
Now there are only two.
And the rumor was that AMD had designed the top one to use much more advanced interposer than what 7000-series used.
the 9080 XTX would have been two 9070 XT dies
And had to drop that one because of packaging at suitable price just wasn't available, because of both TSMC development problems and because of that highest end packaging being all taken over by enterprise AI accelerators.
even if it was only 70% faster than 9070 XT, that's very high end territory
Will probably take years until we hear what really happened.
my money is on AI sucking in all the funding like a black hole
we're in a gold rush and MI300 is the shovel
Not funding, but fab capacity for the interposers and packaging.
ironically the 9080 XTX chiplet design would have been done to get costs down
now we have to pay whatever jensen wants
When that mid-point TSMC interposer stuff failed because of technical issues.
yeah they didn't plan on AI demand being so high
they order years in advance
also means the 9080 XTX order existed and was rescinded
"yeah we paid for your factories but we wanna use them all for this instead"
AFAIK there was supposed to be new lower cost, lower performance interposer tech that TSMC was developing, that just didn't work in the end with enough reliability.
Between the one used in 7000-series and MI300
Alright you PC experts. I got a problem that is stumping me and the Internet lol. My computer doesn't like my ram. I tried to boot up my PC and the Q-LED check lights freak out and continue through a repeating sequence, yellow(dram), red(cpu), white(VGA). Reseat, try one stick at a time. No luck. So swap them with my gfs sticks(different brand and older) and both PCs boot just fine with the swap lol. But my PC won't boot with my original sticks. The Internet is giving me no help with this strange issue
Have you reset the BIOS/UEFI to defaults?
Have you updated it to latest version?
ok, steve from GN said that for the 9950X3D, one of the CCDs will have the L3 vcache, but the other cores would be higher frequency. does that sound right?
Updating to latest version is my next step now that I can actually get into anything. With my sticks I couldn't even get into bios
yeah pretty much the same as the 7950X3D
would that be to distribute heat, or is the interlink & schedule good enough now that it wouldn't matter where the cache is
i think its possibly a cost thing too
the vcache is probably not cheap
๐
well what i'm being told is the FSR4 DLL๐ ๐คฃ
just kinda wondering why it wouldn't either all be stuffed onto 1 CCD, or evenly distributed across both CCDs
(on the optiscaler server)
๐ค
would it work if i just you know
i can't wait for AI FSR where it still can't figure out writing
those madmen
Nowhere near good enough to use the other CCDs cache even in 9000-series.
And that V-cache cannot easily be less than that 64MB.
going between CCDs makes performance suck CCDs nuts
So either you have one CCD with it, or both.
And the V-cache CCD needs lot of extra steps to make, and second full processed die.
OK this has a 99.9999999999% chance of not working
or it's a virus
hang on. so with the 9800X3D, you have 1 CCD, with all the L3 vcache piled onto it, right?
that
Yes.
to me these seem legit enough
9000 same as this
and with the 9950X3D, you now have 8 cores at higher frequency, but not the L3 vcache, and the other 8 cores at a lower frequency, but the fat L3 vcache. am i right?
ye
the frequency difference will be very small
it was much bigger on 7000 where the vcache hurt thermals
Well, those per core L3 cache numbers are crap, as they average between CCDs, would need to be two numbers for the dual-CCD ones.
Still does, as even with VCache below the CCD, there is still structural silicon add-on on top of the CCD die.
yeah it's dishonest saying it's got 144MB
well so much for that LOL
nowhere near as bad, but still there a little
144MB, but not all of it is available evenly across all cores
let the optiscaler boys work
9000-series:
also it seems like it wasnt leaked at all
now i'm wondering if they could do a L4 fat stack of cache where the 2nd CCD would be ๐คฃ
oh lmao
AMD could already do more Vcache layers.
well yes
price
but man that empty spot feels kinda lonely
there
no
window in the IHS & stick and RGB LED there?
the structural silicon is there to stop it cracking
It isn't actually empty, but has dummy silicon in it for structural purposes AFAIK.
oh i know, i just want it to do something
price
you should see MI300
EPYC probably uses that empty space
engrave the name of one of the workers on it
you gonna pay EPYC price?
does ryzen use HBM as its cache?
ah
it's not for graphics, it's for AI
can't wait for the RX9090XTXTi Super LC OC Strix
chatGPT uses it
CCDeez nuts
๐คฃ
By XTX
No, what was the X<something>X GPU maker?
ngl whenever i see "liquid cooled overclocked" abbreviated to LC OC, i can only read it in a french accent as "le cock"
XFX!
in games, nah
Probably again +100MHz from 9800X3D to 9900X3D cache-CCD, and then again +100MHz from that to 9950X3D cache-CCD
watching random YT suggestions can be blessing
maybe some will use the extra cores, slightly higher clocks, but mostly the same
some games will cross the CCD barrier and performance will tank
It did, when right CCD was used.
But the extra price and extra work to make it work right made it not weren't worth it for pure gaming build.
are there games where the 7800X3D/9800X3D bog down because they don't have enough cores?
Sorry, +400MHz for the V-cache CCD from 7800X3D to 7950X3D?
Just from the extra frequency on cache-CCD.
well the experiment failed but it was worth a shot
report back if they can't get it running
i guess its called driver-based for a reason
it runs fp8 which as far i know only ADA supports
Or the APIs in DLL changed too much.
weird
To just get it to work by replacing a DLL with new major version.
or the current optiscaler mod is interfiring
couldnt even type what i was going to before it crashed LOL
Nullptr ๐
FSR3 plugin called function that didn't exist.
Basically part of the FSR3 support is in the main exe, and tried to call FSR3 dll, but you had provided FSR4 DLL that didn't have same function.
lemme know when FSR & AI stuff is good enough to overlay upscaled textured on older games in real time
So that FSR4 dll cannot be used to replace FSR3 dll.
waiting for my system to be able to just fake upscale to 4K textures because there's 0 chance the game's getting it natively
i had this one recently. face caved in
SO what's the scheduling situation with Zen 5 X3D dual CCD?? Did they make it automagic?
so then that's why they were boasting about some driver/software feature that can update FSR
And from now on, you should be able to update the DLL for any game that supports any version of that FSR4 with DLL swaps, like you can with Nvidia DLSS.
Which you couldn't do before.
With FSR1/2/3.
Yo so i need a GPU upgrade from a GTX 1050 TI to a Intel B580 (I have a AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Six-Core CPU) and the budget is about 500 euros, im in Serbia so some sites are like Gigatron or Technomania, idk what else i need to specify really
Does your motherboard have ReBAR support?
Because not all old AM4 boards got it even with latest BIOS/UEFI versions without modding the image.
Wouldn't recommend the B580 with a CPU that slow
The driver overhead will murder your fps
With that CPU
yeah but i can upgrade the CPU too
Ok then as @twin dew said check if your mobo has REBAR
not really into PC parts and building, wdym mobo and rebar
Motherboards BIOS/UEFI Firmware needs to have been updated to allow enabling feature named "ReBar".
If the system doesn't have that, Intels dGPUs don't really work properly, as the drivers have been coded expecting that to be available.
Oh,sorry Mobo=motherboard and REBAR is required for ARC GPUs
And it was intruduced after Zen 1 in actual usage.
Lot of motherboards got those firmware updates to allow enabling it after.
god wtf did yall just say ๐ญ
im so tired bruh
After AMD intruduced it as AMD SmartAccess Memory, which was just rebranding of that optional PCIe spec feature of Resizeable Base Address Register
i think im in need for this one
well imma check in tommorow or something, but tommorows christmas (im a orthodox christian) so im not sure
long story short you cant get a intel arc GPU which would likely be best for your budget unless your motherboard supports a feature called REBAR if it doesn't you would need to go with something else
Or upgrade your motherboard and CPU
but at that point you'd be better of with something else IMO
Mostly I'm concerned because AMD do not appear to have sent the 9800 X3D to mobile, only the 12 and 16 core versions.
GPU-Z allows to see if ReBAR is enabled in BIOS/UEFI, but No doesn't mean it isn't supported, just that either there is no setting, or setting is set to disabled:
From what I distilled from what GN said it should work
If the stars align and I can get an X3D laptop with 15% Rakuten, student or senior discount, and credit card statement credits, I'll be very tempted.
even with ReBAR, this is a terrible combination. buy literally anything other than an intel GPU
Do you even know anything about arc battlemage
The B580 is far more than sufficient as an upgrade from a 1050ti, especially at its price point
Also he's coming in from a discussion we had in dms. When he said he has a 1600 I told him he needs to upgrade cpu first since his main game is satis
i didn't see a mention of motherboard chipset
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is set to retail for $1,999 USD while the GeForce RTX 5080 will come in at $999 USD, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at $749 USD, and the GeForce RTX 5070 at $549 USD. The GeForce RTX 5070 is rated for around GeForce RTX 4090 level performance.
can't wait for the independent reviewers to get their hands on the 5070 & discover that the "4090 performance" comparison is in power consumption only ๐คฃ
They did the same thing with the 3070 and 2080 TI
wtf could they have discovered that'd let them get on par performance with half the bus width and 38% of the cores
and half the vram
Now that I had some time to passively think about this, this probably only means that Recall is installed.
Not if it is working or not.
Just if it is ticked as installed or not in this screen:
It says that 5000-series is with framegen in 4x mode.
So 1 real frame, 3 generated frames.
god i hate frame gen
And 4000 series with just current 2x mode
so 1 real, 1 generated.
So to get like for like, the 5000-series numbers need to be halved.
And to compare to anyone else, halved again for both.
well yea, a lot of monitors have solved the ghosting problem, time to bring it back at a software level
can't wait for them to wreck a monitor's color accuracy with some kind of new thingy
i hope that reviewers choose to stop using upscaling & frame gen in their testing
Next up: ColorGen
true, but some seem to include it as some kind of metric
"this gpu is crap, and even worse for the value, but if you just lower your resolution down to something from 2008, it's fine!"
Still not acceptable imo
it just means that it doesn't invalidate the channel as a whole
can kinda "get away with it" because a laptop screen is small
Where if you use FG on anything less than 60-100 FPS, the result is just a mess...
to me frame gen & upscaling means "just duplicate 1 rendered pixel into 4 on the monitor, but change the lighting & color a little bit"
So it really cannot be used to get playable FPS from unplayable, as the image after FG from unplayable FPS is so bad that you cannot play.
what really sucks is that reviews on youtube don't/can't really show what frame gen stuff actually looks like to the user, you have to have the gpu & monitor in front of you to see it
if there was a way to kinda have it to apply to only those 1%/0.1% lows, and then go away under normal gaming, that'd be mildly acceptable
dude is a gender neutral term as well ๐
mine likes to occasionally lose signal & just spam the last keystroke it registered
super fun when it's a movement control
HA
oh that's just dumb
sounds like spyware to me
"you must install this software that's directly attached to every keystroke you make"
Friends don't let friends buy Razer...
i almost bought their mmo mouse until i discovered the redragon one for like 1/4 the price, figured it was worth the shot
i do get a kick out of anyone who's not a billionaire thinking that any of this AI stuff is good
snakeskin leather so it counts
look at where it goes small to bigger, long straight lines. topside/underside of snake
unless they were using baby crocs for it
He went full snakeoil merchant
i'm not seeing any of those bumps in the middle of scales that crocs have, so i'm thinking it's snakeskin
these things
unless it's completely fake & just for looks, which rich people love to do
And where are display connectors?
Seem to be missing from that pic.
yea noticed that
could they do a ribbon cable to a PCB attached to the rear mount?
maybe a 90ยฐ vertically tilted PCB coming off the PCIe side, then slotted into another PCB with the outputs on it
Will see once someone gets actual product in hand.
something like that maybe
16 pin connecting the daughter board, then another 16 pin connecting to the output PCB
time for weird: this means that for the first time, you could have bottom intake, full GPU passthru, CPU air cooler in updraft, and top exhaust fans, all in line
i think the only other time i've seen that is when LTT stuck that noctua cooler on the GPU
Bigger Number More Better!
oh no doubt, most valuable company in the world doesn't want to be reliant on anyone for sales
Been squeezing their "partners" out for long multiple generations already.
Reason EVGA stopped making GPUs.
EVGA probably had the slimmest margins, which means that everyone else has been charging you extra for being not-EVGA ๐
Nvidia is bundling GPU chip and VRAM chips in bundles you have to buy from them, for very high price.
You cannot use other sources of VRAM.
And all designs have to have approval from Nvidia.
And then all possible ways to differentiate outside of coolers was toned down over time.
Where the price difference between that bundle of GPU and VRAM, and FE card retail price was small and getting smaller.
Basically started to be too small to actually make a GPU and sell it for profit.
Forget about warranties etc.
this PCB is hideously expensive
nvidia can eat the cost as they make more money than god
partners cannot
EVGA saw the writing on the wall
100%
They stopped when they saw that they would either need to end up with loss on the GPU division as whole or compromise on production quality and warranty in next gen.
The designs were ready, but when Nvidia told initial pricing, they saw they couldn't make it work.
When Nvidia was taking so large cut for that basic bundle.
Basically if Nvidia had to themselves pay that price, the FE cards would each be sold at loss.
Just for production costs.
But are you 100% sure about that?
Do you trust MS?
The problem Chris Titus had, is when they removed Recall as a feature. It also bricked File Explorer.
I know, they made update video.
People need to learn to read.
"had", is pass tense no?
But my whole point is, if we take recall as a feature, we can atleast say it's ambigious to know what depends on it. What breaks. How it works etc.
But just checked the documentation for those commands, it just tells if something is installed or not.
Yes, make sense since it DISM.
But then again, do you trust it?
As in, do you want to rather have recall on your system. And trusting MS it's not doing anything.
Or do you rather not have it on your system at all.
They could push it under here:
And it's not listed under there I believe.
But still shows up installed under DISM.
This is just messy.
And it wasn't even installed in new install of Windows 11 Pro N 24H2.
Probably because of that N version stripped to fit EU requirements.
That didn't install Store shit either.
Fuck me, I whished they let us chery pick Recall tbh. Or atleast AI features.
Just push out 24H2 with a few optional AI features. But I guess co-pilot and co, are baked deep into the system.
And the only sane solution, anyone ever offers, is "Linux".
And I was just able to uninstall whole Copilot in that Windows 11 N?
Who know what you broke ๐
Just with normal Windows Apps control uninstall.
MS own uninstall process, not some weird stuff.
Oh, yeah. Don't trust that.
I don't even have co-pilot listed under my apps ๐คจ
Either I already uninstalled it (but there are references in my OS to co-pilot still) or somethings is off between versions (I am on older version).
Not completely completely, the WebView part will be still left.
Just the browser UI bits will be removed.
IIRC it is only separate app in 24H2 and newer.
Not in 23H2.
So it's not completely removed. Point remains; it's rooted into the system.
Depends on who you ask. Some people really don't want anything to do with co-pilot, Recall etc. Some don't mind.
That's not a good thing, but that's another discussion ๐ (chrome browser)
That's good.
I haven't seen thjis one.
Proof of human presence with Hello with Secure Bio? ๐ค
Windows Hello was hacked by in-house group of developers.
#windows11 #gaming #microsoft
That to use it, you need to use either Hello face detection or Hello fingerprint to login.
So many videos of it being hacked already rofl.
Nah, I am just making fun of Microsoft slide.
How they want to make it sound so secure.
Yes, it can be hacked, but that you cannot even enable Recall without having TPM and either of those login types set up.
But when you just google the windows hello for example, you see it can get hacked.
So this one goes out of the window.
I mean, there is proof probably there is a human presence, but can be someone malicious ๐คฃ
False sense of security?
And if someone has enough access to enable it, they can already do the same stuff via other ways with malware implants?
- Windows announces Recall feature.
- Backlash from privacy and security community. Which bled into business community.
- Windows adding false sense of security while not addressing privacy issues.
(4. Since MS is unable to make the feature, while having privacy in mind, they gave option to just outright delete it.)
Job well done.
Privacy issues comes mainly from companies. And if you think, from a company perspective, yeah ... no.
The security and privacy community, are mostly people who use linux already. It's a minority, but they can be vocal. This got picked up by enterprise/bussinesses and they got worried. And then MS changed course.
Yup, but that's all after (major?) backlash.
And really, I wonder how much productivity the Recall will add to certain people.
If it's really worth all this back and forth between MS and community. And all the extra development power.
it had a plaintext DB even
and a large plaintext database tracking everything that users do on their PCs
And in the end it didn't work. All the time rush I mean. And development shortcuts.
is that an aux port?
wat
there's no price for it yet
yeah workstation tax I guess
some are saying the CCD is different from desktop zen5, which makes sense given it's not using basic MCM packaging
PS5 Pro is explicitly RDNA2, this is RDNA3.5
they didn't change the architecture for PS5 pro on purpose so they wouldn't need to recompile every shader
that's directly from mark cerny
you appear to be misinformed about the PS5 pro
I don't blame you
everyone misreported it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXMwXJsMfIQ go to 5 minutes in
Mark Cerny, lead architect of PS5 and PS5 Pro, presents a technical seminar on PS5 Pro to an audience at Sony Interactive Entertainment HQ in San Mateo, California.
#ps5pro #ps5
this is the lead architect of playstation
there is no such thing as a more authoritative source
PS5 pro is RDNA2 with some additions, it is far from RDNA3
he also dunks on the teraflop numbers people reported
and this video only has like 300k views and didn't get big headlines
so people still think PS5 pro is RDNA3
truth is a thing of the past
n- no
RDNA 3.5 is specific IGP gen, used in many of the new AMD APUs
that's exactly what he said it isn't
Upgraded RDNA3
But unless some actual data comes out, I would probably count that PS5 Pro as RDNA2.5?
RDNA2 upgraded with RT improvements from RDNA 3.0/3.5
Much easier to just replace the RT subunits than try to keep binary compatibility with full change.
Until Sony or AMD officially says something about the exact tech, or someone does deep level silicon comparison, cannot know.
Between old PS5 chips, RDNA2, RDNA3, RDNA3.5, PS5 Pro chip
RDNA3.5 is official AMD arch.
With separate instruction set documentation etc.
Not used on any dGPU products, only in APUs currently.
Used in both Strix Point and Strix Halo
Point was, RDNA3.5 is RDNA version used in AMDs own Zen5 mobile CPUs IGPs.
Those Strix Point and Strix Halo are the chip names for those AMD Ryzen AI (Max) 300-series chips.
you need to recompile shaders on a driver update, let alone a whole new GPU. if you can run the same shader on PS5 and PS5 Pro, they are fundamentally the same arch
i think the RT is from RDNA 4 not 3.5 IDK though
it would be cool if AMD gave more details on amethyst
on the 21st
www.gigabyte.com/Graphics-Card/GV-N5090AORUSX-WB-32GD#kf "Patented leak detection"
Clock speeds TBD and no buy button ๐ข
Actually the buy button links to 2 Finnish webshops ๐
Thank You for Watching this Video, if you enjoyed it Subscribe to the Channel for more.
If you want to be part of some big giveaways that are always happening, Join my Discord Server so you can stay in touch with me and the community that enjoys Gaming, PC Tech Memes and General Stuff:
https://discord.com/invite/PeUZkPBb7z
You can Find me on...
did he really say the 4090 was a great investment before announcing the 5090
And basically that comparison was that 5070 will be half the performance of 4090.
Oh, lets take snoop dog word as value.
Nvidias own slides.
But it was with 4090 with 2x FG and 5070 with 4x MFG
I got a phone but i literally dont need one so its basically just another burden i have to deal withโฆ
i guess its still a free phone so thats one less expense later on
Not what I am on about.
Do you know who snoop dog is?
Ah, not going to even open that video.
Yes, and large part why I'm not going to open that video.
Rightโฆ that was my point.
Regardless of what slides snoop is looking at.
Its snoop dog.
Btw havent watched this one. But that thumbnail makes me curious.
DLSS 4 brings new Multi Frame Generation to boost FPS by up to 8X versus traditional brute-force rendering.
Captured on GeForce RTX 5090, 4K, RT Overdrive, Max Settings, DLSS with Multi Frame Generation (4X Mode), Ray Reconstruction, Super Resolution (Performance Mode)
Learn More: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/news/dlss4-multi-frame-gen...
28 fps to 242 fps
Because DLSS4 brings ability do more than 1 real, 1 fake.
To different amounts of fake frames between real ones.
At least to 1 real, 3 fake (4x)
And possibly to 1 real, 7 fake (8x)?
Maybe up to 1 real, 9 fake for 10x?
I blame console players ๐
Ok, that was DLSS completely off vs. DLSS4 on on unknown settings.
Ah, it was in the description:
Captured on GeForce RTX 5090, 4K, RT Overdrive, Max Settings, DLSS with Multi Frame Generation (4X Mode), Ray Reconstruction, Super Resolution (Performance Mode)
So very shitty actual render resolution from that Performance mode DLSS, and then 3 fake frames per real frame.
DLSS never really looked good for me, tested in few games on different profiles
F1 2023 was horrible exprience, even for weekend arcade racing with friends
Waterblocks for FE cards going to be interesting, but most likely will not wait for them
it's not actually snoop dogg looking at anything lmao it's niktek meme
eIGHT??????????
SEVEN AI FRAMES?
Was just 4x in that video.
The other 4x improvement was from lower resolution from Performance DLSS upscaling.
Just looked at the FPS difference and it was almost 9x
But combination of much lower render resolution and then 4x frame gen explained that together.
IIRC DLSS Performance was 25%?
yeah I can't find anything about more than 3 generated frames
I was about to go vomit
So, is the future is just more and more fake frames?
some poor schmuck is gonna buy a 5070 12GB, turn on all the DLSS, get 90FPS after 4x frame gen, see the frame rate is high and feel good, but then wonder why it feels so shitass
and start to notice everything looks smeared to shit
You forgot a part.
and then a game comes out that 12GB will not do for and it'll tank
That poor schmuck will go to forums to complain graphics look off.
most won't but some will
90fps with dlss4 is actually 22.5fps
I don't give a shit what reflex is doing
that's not enough
And blame the devs
IMO the move to dlss and framegen feels like the move away from disks to streaming
Worse quality and you're paying more for the chance to get steamrolled by a greedy corpo
also : reflex 2 wont help latency with DL-FG
not anymore than it already is
anyway i think we are gonna se a few people upgrading from the 4090 to the 5070 BC they think that the 5070 performs like a 4090 without MFG
poor bastards
yeah NVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDIA marketing is gonna get a few people
satisfactory is on there
Yeah, I can see that.
Funny thing before streaming, they tried to push blurays instead of dvds.
I liked bluray
So we went more quality on bluray, to fuxk it all streaming
That too
Sorry for typos. Am on phone.
All good, me too
Quality vs disk space will always be interesting balance. Flac vs MP3 (128, 256, 320 kbps I think?) and variable bitrate.
And then apple had their own stuff for music. Forgot extension. I think .mov for video.
Yes! And same for pictures btw.
All media files are either optimizrd for disk space or quality.
Raw image vs jpg.
I think they changed. Who pushed mp4? Wasnt that also Apple?
MP4 is just container format, not video or audio codec.
Quicktime makes mp4
MPEG consortium
I think thats my association
Lot of stuff uses MP4 containers for video or audio.
But then the actual thing is what video and/or audio codecs are inside that container.
AVI, MP4, MKV etc. are container formats.
Oh, well I get movs, mp4, aac, wav, mp3 all from apple devices
That don't specify what codecs are used for actual compression.
I like mkv.
Very versatile, but with just one video and one audio stream doesn't differ from MP4 in any meaninful way.
The bonus is able to include many, and subtitle streams etc.
On certain websites, you will find a lot of mkv movied
I havent seen mp4 used widely ๐ดโโ ๏ธ
Yeah, but point was that you need to differentiate between container formats, and codecs.
Ok. But we were just talking quality vs disk space.
Not the finer details of codec vs containers.
So for example MP4 doesn't matter to talk about disk space vs. quality.
No matter how you look at it, quality = more data.
E.g. 100 pixel picture vs 1000000 pixel picture
As it is just a container format.
The codecs used for the actual video and audio data are what matters.
Its true for gaming, and all sorts of media.
I can understand that streaming companies do it.
Less data to stream etc.
But gamesโฆ i dont know. Maybe its possitive for people who have low end hardware?
And it is actually triangle, encoding time, size, quality.
With limits in each direction.
So they can still play games with 1 real frame and 3 fake ones.
Slower encoding allows for better quality at same size, up to certain point etc.
Well encoding is not what Ibdo.
Was about video or audio compression, not the original talk about DLSS etc.
I watch movies. I listen to games. I look ar photos. And I play game. But I dont encode anything afaik.
I listen to music
But when that movie or audio release is made, there is encoding step at some point.
Unless it is completely uncompressed like basic WAV files.
Agree
My point is. That is not a concern for everyone. Its niche community
Way more people just use media and dont provide it ๐
UHH
unexpected
Also isnt encoding going faster and faster with each gen of hardware?
I think I read nvidia just added more encoders to their gpu
2 encoders and 1 decoder if not mistaken
"I watch (encoded) movies. I listen to (encoded) music. I look at (encoded) pictures. And i play game(s with all three)"
Hows encoding niche again? You may not encode yourself, but you enjoy the benefits in everything you do
๐คฆโโ๏ธ
My dad never encodes.
My mom never encodes
Neither does my sister
My niece never encdes.
How is this practice mainstream?
They do every time they use any kind of digital camera for example.
That's ๐ฉ
Just with settings fixed by the equipment or software manufacturer in most cases.
They donโt do it conscience, with knowing they are doing it.
Any picture send online. Any voice message, Any Video uploaded
Jeez. Nitpickers. Fine. Encoding is super important.
But mainly the point was that it isn't just size vs. quality.
But that there is third dimension, on how much processing power is being thrown at the encoding process.
More important than quality and diskspace. You win.
Its super important. More than Ai.
everything is more important than ai
You can get large size files with crap quality if you aren't willing to use the processing power.
And after certain point more processing will give very limited gains.
And I am adding ???? to that extra dimension in importance.
Critical thinking ๐ค
Quality vs Diskspace vs Encoding vs Decodingโฆ how far you want to go.
It is very important for YouTube etc.
Where is the balance between processing power needs vs. low enough size, vs. still usable quality of the result.
How long it takes your Smartphone to encode a picture and how much battery i uses is not important?
In the end most users just see 2 things. Quality and space (how long download takes).
Same with cameras and video cameras, those usually go for less processing with ok quality with large file sizes.
Which is why recompressing on computer can give still same quality with 1/4th file size.
Not ad important ad qualiry and diskspace.
So 2 minute encoding before you can send it is fine?
And that isn't what the manufacturers are actually doing.
Most are optimizing much less for diskspace than fast encode time.
Ok, but you do know the difference between the average joe and tech nerds?
Go out on the street. Ask 100 people to order in importance: quality, diskspace and encoding. How important it is to them. My feeling. Encoding will be 3rd.
lumen can use hardware RT so i guess their arent wrong then. also dlss
The Joe wonders why sending a picture takes ages.
The nerd nows why.
Both are anoyed
because nobody knows what that means?
even among the film nerds i know, me and only one other person know what the different codecs are
And encoding happens always.
That third optimization dimension was the processing power needed for it.
I actually never had issues with encoding of my phone pictures. But I do have when I need to send 100mb ๐
So on fixed hardware: Time vs. Quality vs. Space
Time vs power vs quality vs space?
blackmagic RAW -> DNxHR -> h.264
i never had issues with it.
i would rather use AV1 but literally nobody knows how to use AV1 properly
I did say on fixed hardware.
Power comes when you can trade time for more powerful hardware etc.
Ah, fixed (amount) of HW
the encode to h.264 takes about a minute and a half
for a 5 minute video
DNxHR idk, resolve is also rendering so it takes a lot longer
Ok, movies are different story for sure.
RAW decodes quite fast tho which is nice
But when I did photography, I never ran into encoding issues.
Is RAW even encoded?
It was all fast.
photos dont take as long
Its raw.
Usually lossless compression.
well, yes, any format is still encoding, but raw is not compressed or anything
And I had giant projects of 1Gb for one picture.
yeah, RAW
most of your speed at that point is taken by rendering. encoding a single PNG doesnt take very long
I think thats where my surprised reaction comes from.
alls ima say, is that i wish my phone had a better h.265 encoder. Its not the greatest quality compression
But its fast 
which is why im happy to have switched to an actual camera
not really, thats the problem
Rofl ๐คฃ
its lowering quality in order to meet performance standards
better encodes take longer
Not when you got better hardware v
if i crank the quality in handbrake, it will take longer to encode
Shiiiit
that is my point is that the hardware should be better
so it can encode at the same speed, but better quality
Want my old canon 5D? ๐
cinema pocket 4k seems to be just fine
Translated to "frames"
~50.97ms -> ~19.7 fps (FrameGen x2)
~55.50ms -> ~18.0 fps (FrameGen x3)
~57.30ms -> ~17.5 fps (FrameGen x4)
It's still pretty "unusable" ๐
Do they have comparison to previous generations?
oooooooof
the ms is latency
Who let nvidia make the 5090 575W
are those the fps amounts before FG?
Latency from click to response?
no they are PC latency
Complete measurement which is that click to photon one?
its software
And incomplete then leaves most of input latency out, and output latency out.
reporting
I just simulated a frame time of those numbers in my engine by setting a forced update time to that from the average.
If they showing ms measurements, they need to compare to the old generation.
Like if old generation hw is 150ms for frame gen x2. Then sure it's good. But what is the comparison?
This only compares the different frame gens on the same hw, which doesnt really say much.
It only says x4 is marginally slower compared to x2
got it thanks
Are those numbers from nvidia directly?
Because if so, their data set is misleading.
To be fair it's full RT at 4K so it's not too bad, but I wouldnt call it playable fps ๐
Yes, Nvidias own YouTube, with best case video, very dark and slow moving without any major sideways/turning components.
Thanks โค๏ธ
Themselfs
so true LOL
On another note Im at a standstill for what i want to upgrade next
I want a cpu upgrade but getting a 14900K would be dumb and a swap to am5 wouldent be worth it so im at a standstill
I don't use Facebook but this must be a joke:
So, Instead of using fact-checkers to check if 2+2=4, they will rely on the community to do fact-checking lol
Good luck with that ๐คฃ
I mean, fact-checkers can be biased but leaving fact-checking to the public is much worse
It's worked semi-well on x, but that's a wildly different culture
"just fine" is very subjective.
Found source:
RTX 5090: 3x encoders, 2x decoders RTX 5080: 2x encoders, 2x decoders RTX 5070 Ti: 2x encoders, 1x decoder RTX 5070: 1x encoder, 1x decoder
Dan voor de laptops-GPUs:
RTX 5090: 3x encoders, 2x decoders RTX 5080: 2x encoders, 2x decoders RTX 5070 Ti en 5070: 1x encoder, 1x decoder
what the fuck
It was DLSS-FG (2x) vs DLSS-MFG (4x).
So 5070 is half of 4090 or so.
On Full-HD, not 4K.
that is the only way it makes sense
It was in the actual slide.
DLSS Performance and otherwise same settings, but with FG on 4090 and MFG (4x) on 5070.
So 1+1 on 4090, 1+3 on 5070.
So base rendering on 1920x1080, and then doubling of frame rate for 4090, and quadrupling of frame rate for 5070.
oh
no they arent
at least not in the discords i've been looking
(other than this one ofc)
Because almost no-one looks at that small print that hides the actual details on what the graphs show.
HUB did call out their BS
yeah
Moreso thinking once perf reviews drop
Nvidia has just unveiled their brand new Blackwell RTX 50 Series GPUs, their claim is that The RTX 5070 achieves the same performance as The RTX 5090 but the truth is that not even RTX 5090 is that much better than the RTX 4090 at native resolution.
This is generated framerates aside, we will have to wait for more benchmarks to compare these GP...

yeah im curious on what the non AI fluff perf will be
Sup GAYMERS it's ya boi ryzenMAAAAN comin' atcha LIVE with a Graphics Card Recommendation, pay attention, this is which one you buy, geforce or radeon bros:
||don't||
๐๐คฃ๐๐๐๐๐โน๏ธ๐ฃ๐๐ซ๐ฉ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ
I was originally planning to upgrade this cycle
I don't think it's happening
There's no reason for me to
"what graphics card should I buy" get a new hobby
go get a playstation
or steam deck
turn your settings down
๐คฃ


well linus is NOT calling them out for their BS
Thanks to Wicked Cushions for sponsoring our CES 2025 coverage! Purchase Wicked Cushions at:
AMAZON: https://lmg.gg/WickedCushionsAmazon - use code โLTT15OFFโ
WC WEBSITE: https://wickedcushions.com/LTT (Special coupon waiting inside!)
Nvidia announced a TON of cool stuff at their keynote last night, from robotics partnerships to digital twin...
Because the money Nvidia pays is more important than integrity to him.
And Nvidia would absolutely stop any ads or partnerships with LTT if he said anything.
nothing new
and LTT needs to pay a whole company. (his words once)
This video is not monetized. This video covers our serious concerns regarding the data accuracy of Linus Media Group, including Linus Tech Tips, ShortCircuit, and TechQuickie, particularly as it relates to rushing content out the door to favor -- by staff's own admission -- quantity over quality. As the company continues to expand into its LTT L...
he has a responsibility over other families. So money will alway win, if you apply that logic.
So doing lot of bad decisions and then expanding too much too quickly should be accepted as reason?
And it's not my logic. It's what he told us in one of his videos once.
But the whole thing is entertainment, not reporting.
Exactly.
Just that lot of people cannot tell the difference ๐ฉ
I had some reaction about "I left adobe behind..." clickbait video posted here a while ago.
It was entertaining, but had little value to me.
The video itself is top notch editing skills. And fun to watch.
But the fact they make it every x year that they leave adobe ๐คทโโ๏ธ
is it just me or would it be quite funny if that 16-pin started burning behind him?
I want a GPU to fall off while someone is recording.
Just because of the massive weight some of them have without a bracket ๐คฃ
Linus drop tips
hhhmmm
Because my current support bracket really sucks.
I was thinking of 3D-printing a superhero figure as a support bracket
It's not very precise.
I need something more precise.
is that snutt?
Like this 
I got an LTT screwdriver and now I wanna de-brand it
So my GPU is still sagging a bit.
and if I put it a hole higher, then my GPU is bending upwards ๐ญ
I guess you could say he is carrying the weight of the GPU on his shoulders
Also, look at the tiny little clip that hold the GPU.
It's all resting on tiny piece of metal.
While I think something like this, you could put in the middle of your GPU more or less.
I had sagging issues with gtx 970 but not anymore with rtx 3060 ti
Then all I need is this thing:
I wait for Baldur to wake up. He will probably tell me if it's a good idea or not.
Because with the fans on the bottom, there is not so much choice I have to put sag bracket.
No turning on your computer untill the civil engineer confirms the GPU is perfecly leveled 
I will probably discover that my floor isn't level. So the table on which my PC stands isn't level. So my GPU can't be level.
Or it can be level, but then all the rest will be off ๐คฃ
top of the cherry will be that I will break my GPU while leveling it out.
wait... cherry on the cake will be ๐คฃ
I don't think anything in my house is leveled thanks to the civil supervisors 40 years ago who didn't care about anything lol
same here, but I am not complaining. Have a roof above my head. Food in my belly.
I have issues with walls and door frames that are not straight, not to mention the idiot who tought it was a good idea to cover phone cable with cement instead of installing a tube so I can pull an ethernet cable through it
And if there is tube inside the wall, it's not going straight and looks like a snake lol
which made me damage the fiber connector on one end of the cable when preparing the house for fiber in advance by pulling fiber cable through conduit
ugh that sucks
Not that today's handymen are any better. The good ones have moved to Germany and the only ones who are left here are self-trained ones who would probably do worse job than myself
๐ค
Gone are the days when you could buy a top-tier GPU for โฌ600 โน๏ธ
Or just get a ball and test if it rolls
Also should work with some cylinder to test in 2 directions
Theoretically even water on repelling surface
TIL you can run llms in a web browser
That's cool, what's the benefit over running in a docker container?
WebGPUNotAvailableError: WebGPU is not supported in your current environment, but it is necessary to run the WebLLM engine. Please make sure that your browser supports WebGPU and that it is enabled in your browser settings. You can also consult your browser's compatibility chart to see if it supports WebGPU. For more information about WebGPU support in your browser, visit
Oh yea you need webgpu
๐
Enable it
NotSupportedError: WebGPU is not yet available in Release or Beta builds.
It's not supported for firefox ๐ฆ
updating firefox.
Didn't help.
I read it should work on firefox nightly.
this is a problem i wouldent have expected to run into
my gpu is starting to be unstable under low loads because it gets TOO COLD

either that or its another incoming vram failure 
because last time i experienced this was weeks before the 1660 blew
Thinking the same.
this is true though
its actually a pretty good game tho
yea but also it highlights every flaw with FG and DLSS extremely well
so its a nice double edged sword
i havent played it๐ญ ....just that its like the one game where every NVIDIA feature is at its peak and every AMD feature is at its worst
FSR and XESS outperform DLSS by a good amount in CP2077 but they look like trash so it depends what you value more
I swear you need a prebuilt from Dell with as many warranties as they can force feed you
isent that exactly what i had
I know the whole dont ask to ask thing but im not trying to start an ark thread in satisfactory discord
If anyone in here hosts/has hosted an Ark Survival ASCENDED dedicated server, preferably on windows, please dm me bc I need help figuring out why it wont connect to the server list
saying "nvidia is lying about 5070 performance for using dlss and mfg!!"
its the same thing as saying
you cant use features you paied full price for
and i am SURE they use it to protect amd
well yea just i think the main argument is its not fair grounds because the comparisons arent under the same conditions but yea i absolutely agree the argument is dumb
Satis was in one of Nvidia's slides. That gives me a little hope we can use DLSS and power lines won't look like garbage.
Condition is that you use product at its max capabilities.
That is a totally fair way of comparing
we'll just have to see. yanking 75% of its frames out of nowhere had better be incredible
Or just check the distance between PCB and case floor in two positions with ruler or tape measure?
Or just by eye?
personally i prefer the "like-for-like" direct comparisons as a primary judge, with the "other goodies" of newer gen capabilities done as a supplement
are there any games that people with 4090s play just because they have the hardware to max it out, or is it more of a "it just runs it with less effort" kind of GPU for games
It's a mislabeled Titan, the only reasons people get a 4090 are "I need it for XYZ productivity thing" and "I had the money for it"
doing some gen to gen comparisons, and it's kinda interesting
at least on TPU's list
4090 is 26% ahead of the 4080 non-Super
Titan RTX is 22% ahead of the 2080
3090Ti is 32% ahead of the 3080
it's definitely a jump up, but that's only because it's current gen. i bet that Radeon in 2 gens will match or beat it
but i do agree 100% that it's a mislabeled titan
So anyways, 5070 (without architecture improvements), should have about 37% raw performance of 4090.
And 5090 should have about 127% of 4090.
Actual differences will be smaller, as that didn't take into account inefficient usage of CUDA cores, power limits, architecture changes, VRAM bandwidth etc. effect.
They're drama bait YouTubers that talk a lot without much to show. I've never been impressed and figure it's all marketing.
He says junk like "we're the only studio trying to do optimizing" and shits on every other dev constantly. Yet they've never published a game. It's like the spoiled kids on the playground that think they're the best because momma always told em so
oh wait they're developers????
He has slivers of truth seeded in his videos but it's not enough
that's heinously unprofessional
It's all algorithm bait and ego boosting in my opinion
game engine grifters
I wouldn't doubt he bots his views and sub counts
was only a matter of time I guess
It's just one guy and he acts like he runs a full studio
it is a small indie studio
so when did he ever lie?
Have never published a game
that is a non-answer
Talking like he's the only guy taking optimisation seriously is a big giant lie.
Don't simp for him. He's a snake oil salesmen
Most I have seen have been on large part intentional misrepresentations and intentionally leaving all nuance out etc.
The game Dev streaming community does not want grifters like him around
He has his own absolute view and then he fits anything he makes to that view, and anything that isn't what his view is is absolute bad in every way.
note to future self: don't group dates by day as category
Basically the videos aren't objective.
They are to reinforce his pre-existing view.
are you talking about Jonathan Blow?
That Threat Interactive stuff
oh
Like the "Nanite is horrible for performance" video etc.
yeah YT gave me some videos and I am kinda sceptic about if it will be used in practice, but demos are promising
Yes, badly done Nanite is horrible for performance.
But well done Nanite only has minor impact, and lowers the dev workload a lot.
It's a lot of toxic hate bait yellow journalism tabloid style dialogue
And that dev workload is also very important thing to get anything out.
Making small optimized demo is in the end pretty easy.
Scaling that to whole game is completely different ball game.
Yeh he talks a big game but has Nada to show
And to use a death from a loved one as a shield now .....
That's a huge lack of class
lmao
Go morn. Stop posting toxic shit on Twitter

you all reinventing the wheel
I just didnt understand what the point was between water level and GPU PCB droop bracing install.
most gotten lost in the chat then
Point I was making, this thing is highly inaccurate. And kinda a pain to work with.
Either my gpu is sloping down, or upwards. You can't tweak it. So I was thinking of getting another one.
Also supports from wrong side (slot side)
Something like that looks more precise.
Just wondering if there was anything to keep in mind when using the one I just posted above.
It has infinite adjustment, just that it cannot be adjusted while GPU is in place, and doing small ones is real pain.
Which one?
The ones with the holes?
The MB hole mounting one you posted originally.
the MB hole mounting one can't be infinite adjusted.
I have plans to get one as extra to far side support already in place.
But only as extra.
You pick a hole and that's it ๐คฃ It's mounted on the motherboard.
It can, the holder side screw hole is long so you can move it then tighten the screw down
Where that adjustment range is large enough that it covers whole range when you combine with the screwholes in main part.
Trust me, I spend a lot of time with it.
You picka hole, put in GPU and pray it's good.
You pick another hole, put in GPU and pray it's good.
My GPU is sloping slightly down. If I pick other hole, it slopes upwards.
That can be moved upwards from that "natural" position by that amount, then tightened.
To get infinite adjustment.
Mine doesn't have that ๐
I don't even know where I got it rom. I though it was with my MB. But it's not listed in manual.
Then you got even worse copy than the one in the pic you attached.
Trying to find exact picture.
This one!
compatible with ATX and E-ATX sized motherboard. Provide extra support to graphic cards.Improves the look of your PC.
Ok, that's a very small one. But look at the holes. You can move the other piece.
Yes, that still has that slit on the L-part to get more adjustment range.
But it's still a pain in the arse to adjust.
Yes.
and once the GPU rests on it.
It lowers a little bit too ๐คฃ
nah, I am getting a better one. Fuck this ๐
Yeah, like I said, that is on wrong side of the GPU to matter much.
As it is right next to the slot.
Which already provides support.
Agree, only put it in because it was in the box ๐
"Better than nothing".
And it does help.
But not efficiently.
omg, this even comes with a water marker.
๐คฎ
Yeah, lot of ones with RGB.
And that actually has limited adjustment without extra pads or similar.
And if that happens, then the screw wasn't tight enough and it isn't giving any support, until the L-pieces slots top hits the screw.
And it might not be even possible to tighten the screw enough without stripping threads.
Ah.
So, this is what I got from Lian Li. Tiny pieces.
Not easy to work with. It was with the case, but still, pretty much sucks.
I readjusted my GPU 3-4 times before I gave up.
Dont let anyone see your GPU, problem solved
Motorsport and eSport should be the same, equipment malfunction is a lose, and dont show what you have under the hood ๐
Must be the same spirit level that you get with TV wall mounts. That style support was supllied with MSI 3090 Suprim