#off-topic-tech
1 messages ยท Page 90 of 1
That Katana 15 has the CPU of the G6 and the GPU of the G6X.
With less height (2.5cm), and less heatsink fin area.
So I would expect that the Katana has significantly worse cooling at same sound level as the Gigabytes.
But at the gaming laptop level of sound, the sound quality matters much.
oh I thought they all had the same gpu
Same GPU, at different power limits.
Which then directly cause different maximum performance.
doesn't worse cooling tend to affect lifespan though?
Laptops mostly run everything at high temperatures and then modulate the cooling, as the noise is what matters more for the comfort of the user.
I suppose headphones could mitigate the noise fairly well
Also additional point I just noticed.
The G6X has 180W AC adapter, MSI Katana has 200W, MSI Thins have 120W.
That sets the long-term sustained max power the CPU and GPU combined can pull.
In short term if going over, the laptop will use battery to fill in.
G6 has 150W
huh so someone using the thin might start draining the battery even while plugged in? wild
Any of them.
75W CPU and 115W CPU on the G6 for example.
So total of 190W + VRM losses, + other components, with 150W PSU.
260W for the G6X with 180W PSU for the same before extras.
Only 210W with 200W PSU for the MSI Katana 15.
I'd never considered laptops losing power while plugged in
Sized with expectation that only one or the other is used at same time, often same for cooling.
huh coool, well thanks for the help xD I thikn I have some good options to preset to her
So same level overall for all on build quality, keyboard, display (but 15" 16:9 vs 16" 16:10) etc.
And then performance & cooling differences.
With the performance of the Slim 15 MSIs being pretty nerfed for the GPU side, with the max power cut from 105W to just 45W.
With Katana 15 and G6X with the full 105W 4060, G6 with 75W 4060 and the Slims with 45W 4060.
CPUs between the Katana 15, G6 and G6X are very similar, with higher power limit on the G6X with 4 extra E-core (6+8 vs. 6+4 on the rest), same max boost but the G6X might benefit from the higher power limits it has for the CPU.
But then the AC adapter limits also come in if stressing both CPU and GPU at same time.
And without hearing them, I would expect that the cooling performance would go G6X > G6 > Katana 15, at same heat load and sound level.
But that all are going to be annoying whiners at load, like almost all laptops.
Man just buy a laptop. Why we gotta keep having long ass 2 person conversations about laptops.
Because laptop cooling works by spinning fans at insane speed to pass enough air through too small heatsink finstacks.
So you get both lot of flow-noise and then the fan itself.
With the Gigabytes having much more space for air to both get to the fan intake, and for getting out via the heatsinks.
Gigabyte G6 bottom as first, MSI Katana 15 bottom as second:
that's generally how talk about tech goes
Because laptop makers like to do laptop selection as hard as possible, and there isn't any one source that tries to even review one model per generation per chassis...
And when you have two laptops with identical official specs, one can be great and the other absolutely horrible.
one of the many reasons I hate them
Like the MSI Slim 15 4060 (Mobile) @ 45W vs 4060 (Mobile) @ 105W, second is about 60% faster for the raw GPU calculating performance.
And not going into the hidden display, cooling, keyboard and touchpad quality etc. things.
And then if that specific model has bad display hinges that will break the chassis in few years etc. that just cannot be known when the model is being sold.
So many laptops where I have had to epoxy the hinge screw locations back onto the chassis on or similar as the manufacturer has used too little plastic for the mounting location surroundings.
But if you're already noticing stability problems, Tom's Hardware reports that "the bug causes irreversible degradation of the impacted processors" and that the fix will not be able to reverse the damage that has already happened.

And so basically Intel should do easy RMA replacement for ALL 13700, 13900, 14700 and 14900 CPUs in use.
But we shall see.
Because even the ones that don't show symptoms right now are already damaged.
But couldn't use iwd instead of wpa_supplicant for the Pi 4, as the iwd just didn't switch from 2.4GHz to 5GHz. ๐ญ
RMA? lol. You should be happy if they change the microcode, so the bug will not show up because your CPU is crippled by 20% performance. They did the same with meltdown and spectre.
people are gonna be posting "hey why is my game crashing" for years to come
um it cant be that bad i mean my game did something much worse to me back on my old laptop
here try and figure out what caused this
I think they will.
Intel is delivering a microcode patch which addresses the root cause of exposure to elevated voltages. We are continuing validation to ensure that scenarios of instability reported to Intel regarding its Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processors are addressed. Intel is currently targeting mid-August for patch release to partners following full validation.
Iirc gallium will stain copper but not eat it as it does aluminium
At least the copper plate on my old AIO was stained to shit when I used liquid metal
And I couldn't get it off
yes gallium eats other metals and or makes them stupid brittle
if i remember right its aluminum for the most part it will eat through. any way you put it though it dangors
love the new wallpaper, what theme is that?
???
having a IHS with liquid metal on the silicon die either isn't possible, or cost too much so now you have it between the chip and heatsink with a nice little foam barrier to keep it contained.
tripping on acid.
Ok, seems that the firmware files I have for the Pi4:s WLAN chip from base Debian are more limited than the firmware files in the Raspberry Pi OS.
Need to work on that tomorrow...
sometimes... you know ... it makes sense
sudo give me all da power
I tell me mom stories about scams all the time to scare her, it works ๐
VPS: ordered.
4 bucks/month
2 cores, 2GB ram, 100GB storage
Gonna be my firewall ๐
But my ISP doesn't allow me to use it as a tunnel to hide my public IP, nor am I able to look into their logs
LOL "the new 15900K: 4 cores, 4 threads, 4.0GHz, $650"
15100ks 1 core 2 threads 7GHz, $600
using less economic cores have a cost you know
honestly 7GHZ 8 Core would actually probably be decent
i think the problem comes down to trying to shove down economy cores instead of throwing actual improvements on the table
Sponsor: Thermalright Frozen Prism 360 on Amazon - https://geni.us/FUqbQC
Intel has finally published a statement about the instability of its Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake Refresh CPUs in the 13th & 14th Gen families of CPUs. The Intel 14900K, 13900K, and their alternative CPUs in the same generations now have a confirmed set of issues. Intel has...
so confirmed oxidation
J2C mentioned that some people are seeing 1.6v on startup which could cause instant degradation
combine that with the oxidation, i can 100% see why they fried
can't wait for the oxidation to affect 14th gen too
i noticed how they made sure not to address that at all
i'm betting we'll finally see an admission once 15th gen is out
they should be sued for this
14th gen has been out for how long?
7 months now?
and 13900k for 2 years
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cMTtRIrJOk now this is the type of youtube video I like to see
To try everything Brilliant has to offerโfreeโfor a full 30 days, visit https://brilliant.org/tayazit . Youโll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
If it works, ain't touch it, a simple rule Microsoft isn't aware of. Since they have been adding a bunch of bloat and useless features to latest release of Windows 11, everyone is callin...
the cpu orders from server farms & datacenters are gonna be wild
amd better take this opportunity to perfect zen(6?)
god i hope so
That's actually a price cut
7950x was at 550 if memory serves
I'm really really curious to see what happens with 9000x3d launch
That's when I'm planning to upgrade, current rig will be nas + a few other light server duties
im honeslty happy with my ryzen 5600+rx7600
Oh wow, 7950x on newegg is 520 currently, on sale from 595
I have a 5600x + 6700xt atm
Fine for gaming but it's not keeping up with some productivity workloads
I don't think a mac would keep up with a lot of what I want to do? I hate the OS too much to use it anyways
I know its not for everyone but I really dig how its Unix based
even with a decked out m3 ... photoshop still runs like shit
(i blame adobe)
(adobe blames apple)
yes
photoshop had supported paths (vectors lines shapes) for a long time, and it used to have a way to export layers as SVG ... they silently took that out because "Photoshop is a raster program" ... yet the export feature worked fine before. They now say "Buy and use Illustrator for that"
๐ adobe
hehe its like they are a corporate business or something
but that was the classic "remove features that work fine, and put them in something else to pay for" move
i still cannot believe how they still have not fixed the random blurry text in buttons and dialog box labels when you are on a non-4k+ monitor (it might be blurry on those resolutions too, but its harder to tell)
using it on a 1080p monitor kinda sucks
text is blurry sometimes I agree
cs6 my beloved
yah, i have fits trying to use photoshop on highdef res though, cause it makes images all 1 to 1 pixel, and its impossible to see without constantly using the zoom tools
because "Photoshop is not a web graphics tool" ... "You need to buy this other program we have for that"
aye, i loved the days of just buying a working photoshop version that worked, did it all, worked
does cs6 still work on windows11
it should ...
almost everything still works on whatever newer windows
macOS on the other hand ... hell no
i dont even think photoshop 2023 works on macOS 14
at least cs6 on macos was 64bit
i miss my cs3
it still runs fine on my snow leopard machine, and i dare say it runs 'faster' too ... even on that old laptop lol
I was younger than 5 when cs3 was released
for those who use the short-urls from google .... they killin it (cyberinsider.com/google-url-shortener-service-set-to-sunset-in-august-2025/)
๐คทโโ๏ธ
amazed they aint just saying 'it will cost 1 penny per 100 clicks' ... like whatever shit they doin with recaptcha enterprise
or just slap an ad in the redirect to make money ๐ค
It's not a resolution thing, it's a display scaling issue
ive yet to come across any other app that has an issue rendering their dialog boxes and controls clearly ... but according to adobe, its an apple bug
but honestly at this point, with how bad the macos is getting .... i wouldnt discount it
Autodesk software has the same issue
dang
I use it for work. I have no idea how its been so bad for so long
For all the adobe haters: I think Affinity still has a 50% off sale going for a couple days/weeks(?) ๐
But got the Pi4 to work on proper WiFi regulatory domain with IWD after adding the Raspberry Pi OS repos and switching to using the firmware blobs there.
Just had to add support for Debian baseline kernel to their initramfs generation scripts.
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/new-scale-tool-enables-cuda-applications-to-run-on-amd-gpus
Zluda part two
So just going to replace currently known unstable CPUs for the people who hear about that latest message on Intel Forums.
Not even full press release, just forum post...
Ah, sorry, Intel Forums for incomplete version and some specific SubReddit for the expanded one...
this is the biggest pc fuckup I can remember since the 1.13ghz pentium 3
sudop
every Linux admin's favorite puzzlegame - sduoku
sewdoh
Suso
sus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4Akj5qF-3Q I know where my next paycheck is going
Open source, off-grid, decentralized mesh networking on small, affordable devices. That's Meshtastic!
You can learn more about the protocol and how to get started at https://meshtastic.org
HUGE thanks to Muzi Works for reaching out after Open Sauce and sending over their H1 and R1 pre-built Meshtastic radios! You can find out more about them a...
Woah
I could see these being super awesome for a lot of stuff I do actually
you should try it
I'll look into it more on lunch
a lot of it is simple esp32 stuff
want a windows&linux port
so I have a pc case im going to sell on ebay. I got the pc case originally from bestbuy delivered to my door in the box that it comes from retail with you think that is adequate to potentially ship it across the country.
People do that with stuff I've bought off eBay all the time, I've never thought to complain
i just know from secret shopper stuff from GN and LMG they dont like when the case is shipped just with the case box, especially since my case has a psu and aoi preinstalled
If the case is properly protected inside the box, I see no issue
hard styrofoam ๐
PSU won't move and AIO needs the CPU block tied down securely
For professional seller, I would expect another box around the case box for whole system.
For consumer reselling not so much.
The case box with the included styrofoams is much better than most consumers can do otherwise.
it has something in place from the factory to keep it in place. its an nzxt h1 v2
im just glad buyer has to pay shipping
that thing weights like 6.7KG
DPkg::Post-Invoke {"! test -f /var/run/reboot-required && /usr/sbin/needrestart -p 2>&1 || exec touch /var/run/reboot-required || true"; };
The stuff you copy and then modify to be one-liner inside the Invoke instead of separate shell script...
So each late evening the various Linux systems get update lists, then upgrade any packages they can, then needrestart checks if any old files are still in use and sets that flag-file, which the automatic upgrade system part checks after midnight and reboots the computer if necessary.
Without that it only got set for critical updates by the unattended-upgrades itself.
I love windows, only when im in windows does my the motherboard hardshutoff the system when the cpu is overheating, it doesnt overheat on linux
CPU overheating is a hardware issue though
maybe it is?
itll hardlockup only when im on windows and the mobo will boot into a bios menu saying cpu overheat
but on linux when stressed it doesnt
Yeah that is definitely hardware
Even with a power virus that chip shouldn't be getting that hot
no
What paste?
its 4
What's the workload right now?
cinebench all core
Hmm
i was playing fortnite and it kicked me out too
Yeah, it's pinned at tjmax and you don't have pbo enabled
I'd go for a remount for sure, then maybe tweak that fan curve
Its at full blast in the BIOS
Those stock coolers kinda suck but they're usually able to keep them under tjmax
What's ambient/case temp?
Yeah, try a remount
After some wiggling to get the cooler off that's what the paste looks lile
And the cooler
after repaste
maybe sidepanel off helps?
nope
ambient is 83 according to my food thermometer
well it's not hitting thermal limit anymore but that's concerningly hot
i love no ac with outside temp being 95F
you will notice that your CPU is now pulling more power and running cooler
compare CPU package power and CPU core power before / after
the repaste job helped it out, and it can now run faster
Not really for stock cooler
Those things have negligable surface area
yeah i missed this was under cinebench
this is running as expected
@tough owl these are the things to pay attention to, they determine how hard the CPU can run itself, so long as it isn't hitting any limits (power, current, thermals) it will run as fast as it can
and in that first example it was 100% thermal limit, not overheating but not able to run as fast as it wants to
after repaste it can go harder
a bigger and better cooler will let it run a little faster but mostly you would buy it to run much quieter
also, if you take the side panel off and the temperature doesn't change, it might just be running faster / pulling more power, so it still might have an effect
If you take the side panel off and the temperature doens't change it means you have sufficient case airflow
i have a peerless assassin at home with no mounting hardware
that would be a lot better
problem is I am 300 miles from home
what happened to the mounting hardware?
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
just weld it on, it'll be fine
Sponsor: Thermalright Frozen Prism 360 on Amazon - https://geni.us/FUqbQC
AMD has delayed the launch of its Ryzen 9000 CPUs ("Zen 5") to August 15th, with a possibility to ship slightly earlier, due to a non-specific inability to meet "quality expectations." The delay affects all four current models: The Ryzen 9 9950X, R9 9900X, R7 9700X, and R5...
thas good
do I need this cooler for a 5600 or can I just buy thishttps://a.co/d/dLOBvQk
For a 5600 basically anything will work
65w is pretty darn tiny for most of today's machines
I got two hours of logging with hwinfo
and no issues it looks like so
maybe I just need to cool down ambient temp and be fine
https://a.co/d/37FTMjQ I wonder how good this would be
i have a 5600X with the assassin 120SE dual tower & it's definitely overkill
but i also got it to have a leisurely existence until i want something a bit monstrous
https://a.co/d/1s8uDj2 like how is this only $30
Because good air cooling is now a commodity and people only buy noctua out of blind loyalty ๐
yup
even an all white one is still $30
also air coolers should all be about that price given that they're slightly refined chunks of copper & aluminum
In all seriousness, the biggest drawback to that thermalright tower is that it has an aluminum coldplate which offers slightly worse thermal conductivity, but it's still plenty for any cpu under 200w
meanwhile corsair
You're also buying the brand name with corsair
its probably made in the same factory as thermalright
how many assassins do you want?
thermalright: Yes
$33 for the 120SE is what they're all competing with
the 90 Sse is only 29
90mm cooler is really only suitable for stuff at that 60w range and below
even dual tower?
yea, 90mm fan ones are basically stock cooler straight replacements, not upgrades
That's pretty much the same fin area as single 120
their most expensive cooler is a $74 360 aoi
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/htw7YJ/thermalright-aro-m14o-736-cfm-cpu-cooler-aro-m14o who let teenage engineering design a cpu cooler
Assuming the fin stacks are the same depth and equal fin spacing, dual 90 is 162 cm^2 and single 12 is 144 cm^2
ill probably see if I have the am4 mounting hardware on the cpu cooler I have at home so I dont have to spend money on something I already own
plus its working fine 85 ambient is not helping
Yeah, don't think you need to worry about that
i have one of bequiet's 92mm coolers because i was trying my hardest to make a Dell case work, & it was a lot narrower than the standard ITX cases
oshkosh airshow going on today
In this video I tried out KolibriOS, an operating system that is so small it can fit on a single 1.44mb floppy disk!
FOLLOW ME ELSEWHERE
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Ionic1k
2nd channel: https://www.youtube.com/@yarpAHK
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Ionic1K
All links: https://linktr.ee/ion...
And having the normal power limits off and the CPU on unlimited turbo (PPT at insane value to get that 8-9% PPT) isn't really what it was designed for.
But that paste was also just gone from the heat in the pics.
Lot of the thermal pastes on the market just cannot take 90+C temps.
Often starting to degrade at as low as 60-70C.
So disable the PBO.
That isn't meant to be used with stock cooler.
If you want, you can manually tune the limits to more sane value to what the stock cooler can still handle, but above the non-PBO.
You should be hitting the PPT limit and the Thermal limit at about the same time when cooler limited to not get issues.
You have that PPT limit for power, two current limits (TDC and EDC), then voltage & frequency limits from the turbo table, and then that thermal limit is supposed to be the last backstop to not fry the CPU.
Enabling PBO with stock cooler makes the first three so high that they don't limit, and the turbo-table max cannot be reached on multicore before the CPU fries with stock cooler.
Usually the throttling should keep it at the limit without shutdowns, but the difference at your current settings is so high that it doesn't work properly.
For the "doesn't happen in Linux" part, have you checked what the CPU boosts to under Linux.
In some cases you get limited by default to base clocks max without tweaking, when ACPI tables contain wrong values that Windows ignores but Linux doesn't.
Or by scaling governor or scaling driver selections and settings.
Hope AMD doesn't need full silicon respin and that it was just minor process issues.
(Silicon level change, die revision)
But that would mean that either the turbo-table pre-creation testing and the final validation has been insufficient (easier to fix).
Or that the silicon just cannot meet the published spec in large numbers (silicon revision or spec change downwards needed).
Time to go against the instructions again.
And try to get ZoneMinder to work with Lighttpd instead of Apache2.
At $30, get Frozen A620 - and for a 5600, even a basic AX120 works (tho I am a fan of BA120 personally)
Because Noctua coolers cost a lot compared to raw performance?
I still use them, but they aren't for everyone.
At any time there is usually some specific cooler that can get the same noise-to-thermal performance for 1/2 to 1/3rd the cost.
That is the good side of Noctuas, you can be almost certain that they will keep going, and will be supported for new sockets etc. for very long time.
So target is to get ZoneMinder with FFMpeg on Lighttpd (with OpenSSL and PHP-FPM) and MariaDB working...
with the current shitshow at intel right now, i wonder if they're going to dial it back a bit on 15th gen & lower the power usage, & give coolers a chance
Ah, it was FirewallD limitation that you cannot have both MAC and IP based source or destination filters in same rule, not NFTables limit.
Might be limitation in IPTables so FirewallD cannot support that either.
I agree so much with this
Yup, iptables for IPs, ebtables for MACs in the legacy toolkit.
tbh I don't know why people still claim A is 1/3 cheaper than B
when B last twice as long with stable performance
There is reason why all my desktops use Noctua coolers.
But need to give both alternatives to others for them to decide themselves.
just realized all 3 PCs i've built have different coolers on them ๐คฃ
same case tho
Two U12S and one U14S
AMD stock, be quiet pure rock slim, assassin 120SE
& none of them have ever had any issues
only part failure i've dealt with is that PSU this week ๐คฃ
oh & some crap ram
would blue screen my system at stock speeds ๐คฃ
You always gotta calculate longevity against price.
Lasting twice as long is nice but ultimately still a worse deal at triple the price.
The only reason not to do this is to be less wasteful.
Also, the main reason why air coolers fail is the fans - and they are pretty cheap to replace
NH-D15 costs $110 according to PCPP.
Dark Rock Pro 5 is $80
Thermalright PS120SE is $36
Noctua isn't worth it in today's time, even if we account for the support and longevity
Also, DBB is much better for longevity than Noctua's oil pressurized bearings
But ball bearings are loudish and get louder as they age.
When Noctuas sleeve bearings can do over 10 years of almost constant use.
But no idea how much start-stop they can take, that is the time when most bearing wear happens.
(Sleeve bearing with centering magnet for startup and enhanced lubricant circulation features).
Sleeve with the circulation features is sold usually as Fluid Dynamic or Hydro Dynamic.
And then Corsair sells theirs with that magnet as "Magnetic Levitation", when those aren't.
Real magnetic levitation are very different, and don't take to start & stop well.
I think pbo is off already though
No, you have insanely high PPT set
Probably the 4095 W or so that many MBs set.
Because I swear I turned pbo off
No, not that high.... lets see..
Probably set to 1024W?
Or around that.
88W reading as 8% of the limit would be limit at 1100W.
What would it be under on my MSI mobo
://us-store.msi.com/B550-A-PRO
Still not providing any BIOS documentation, so no idea...
Graphical mode, OC on left, Precision Boost Overdrive should be the topmost option.
Overclocking\Advanced CPU Configuration in "text" mode?
But to need to go trawling various forums for pics of the BIOS insides...
When everyone else has at least the launch-time settings and screens documented...
if your motherboard is cranking the power limit by default I'm gonna do some war crimes
sick of this shit
"oh yeah, building a PC is the best, you just gotta use an arcane ritual to access a scary looking screen and mess with a bunch of weird acronym settings to get it to work properly"
I'll look after workv
Well, that has been what almost all Intel MBs have been doing for years.
yeah, just hadn't seen that they were cranking amd so much too
though i do know they were burning out X3D parts for a month or so
All parts.
Just that the X3Ds were affected much quicker.
There had been non-X3Ds dying for months at that point, just wasn't noticed overall.
it was quite the surprise when raptor lake turned out to have a defect, i was fully convinced it was more motherboard shitfest
Both
yeah, both
motherboards were so shit it almost covered up intel's own problems
Ok, so lighttpd is now working with HTTPS (TLS1.3 only), PHP-FPM and digest-auth...
your lighthttpd is going to be less light
Just name of a http-server program, same as apache or nginx
More limited than those two.
I know that
but it's intended to be lighter still
But good enough for this use.
But when my two actual possible programs I want to use are "Motion" or "ZoneMinder".
First would be just console application (but no easy way to look at the stored recordings), but want to check that ZoneMinder first, that is PHP, but is much more featured for network NVR.
Nothing else is stock in Debian, and most of them were only available as Docker images.
And then those images just will contain some form of http server running PHP or Node.JS etc.
In configs optimized for tens to hundreds of cameras on high-end hardware.
Frigate is pretty popular too
I gave up on using any kind of open source nvr mostly because they all seem too buggy for primetime
But have gone to that Docker Only route at some point.
They used to also support bare metal installations, but not anymore.
And docker is really cool, but it's an extra layer for bugs /:
And the internal components aren't then under Debian Security Team umbrella etc.
And updating the image seems to be real pain when new version comes out for any reason, like security bug in some of the ancillary components needed.
My docker vm and truenas vm died yesterday.. I might just need to start looking for a new motherboard
So when ZoneMinder mainline Debian Stable package, why go for Docker?
Docker vm logged something about rcu stall and cpu frozen. Truenas had nothing in the log, but was stuck at 100% cpu
Because docker is stupid easy to deploy, and very difficult to make a container run under the user you'd like if the creator coded it for a uid of 1000
Yeah... the current Debian Stable ZoneMinder package was packaged on same day as the same release was released on ZoneMinder GitHub.
(For Debian Unstable, then moved later to Stable)
News I read today about docker:
In 2018, a security issue was discovered where an attacker could bypass AuthZ plugins using a specially crafted API request. This could lead to unauthorized actions, including privilege escalation. Although this issue was fixed in Docker Engine v18.09.1 in January 2019, the fix was not carried forward to later versions, resulting in a regression.
Regression: The fix was not included in Docker Engine v19.03 or newer versions. This was identified in April 2024 and patches were released for the affected versions on July 23, 2024. The issue was assigned CVE-2024-41110.
What regression testing...
So after 5 years, they discovered they forgot to push security fix to production ๐
๐
Regression testing is including (semi)automatic testing for any known old security holes for any new version built.
To make sure this doesn't happen
Yeah, but when something gets fixed. The testers need to add this testcase (automated or not).
a testframework isn't magic. It doesn't automatically know what to test.
So if fix got lost, testers were in the dark, and it's gone into a void. Wonder how they realized after 5 years it's missing.

i can't wait to see the videos of reviewers & tech people melting 13th/14th gen CPUs for the lolz because of how worthless they'll be
If it's going to mess up laptops, I wonder how much that'll cost Intel? Then you're killing the whole device, basically. As it is know, someone on the Cyberpunk server was pissed off because even though they're getting their money back for their CPU, they're still stuck with their motherboard and they're not sure what to do.
i kinda hate to say it, but me too
it'd be nice if qualcomm could take advantage of this & become a 3rd cpu maker in the desktop space

thats a good joke
theyd have to invent a new socket for cpu and I dont think they want to
id be fine with that though
or have ampere make desktop consumer chips
yea, saw that today
i believe it's called "enshittification" now
google's gif search has especially gone to shit the last couple weeks i've noticed
Brave browser has had no struggles with YouTube in my experience
And completely change how they do firmware, drivers, etc.
MB makers not bothering to redo defaults again:
https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/07/secure-boot-is-completely-compromised-on-200-models-from-5-big-device-makers/
And just using the example secure boot keys from the base UEFI provider, when those should be model specific if possible, and at least manufacturer specific.
Asus is also kind of fail in that they seem to be using same PK key since at least over 10 years ago.
My Z87 MB (Intel 4th gen) and my AM5 board use the same key...
Not just strings, byte-by-byte comparison.
"Why make it harder on ourselves when we can just make sure the private key never leaks"
even as a owner of one i am too lol
dident they make a cpu tho?
its not a consumer one but i tough i heard sometime that they did managed to make one
They have made multiple different ARM CPUs.
Including the SOC in Nintendo Switch.
Out since 2014.
No, even earlier, that was when Denver based SOCs came out, first seems to have been ARM11 based APX 2500 in 2008?
Most seem to be branded under the Tegra name for the whole SOCs.
The ones used for the Nvidia GPU servers aren't really branded, just code-names and models, as you cannot get those except when you buy the whole server.
When the earlier ones were sold as just chips.
But AFAIK Nvidia is just taking the stock ARM core and adding their own accelerator blocks to the common bus.
so what the Switches CPU is a nvidia chip?
Yes, to get the Nvidia GPU.
well it sure is one impresive cpu for what it is
Nvidia was also pretty desperate to sell them AFAIK, so Nintendo got pretty good deal.
Not really,. the CPU is crap for the time, even for mobile chips.
The GPU was great.
yea but its better than the equivalent laptop chips i have personally tried
Switch launched in 2017.
The Tegra X1 was launched in 2015.
It uses CPU cores from 2012, when the replacement was launched by ARM in 2016, at very low clocks.
Completely different OS?
So cannot really be directly compared.
yea true but still has very solid performance
Very heavy GPU bias too, when most cheap laptop chips also have crappy IGP.
Because those are only expected to do 2D things.
yea that was the choke i found the most when comparing it to anythign else mobile really is that it almost always had like 4-10x the framerates BECAUSE of that gpu
might not be too weird to see i guess
since now you can have a pc with AMD cpu/gpu, & intel cpu/gpu now
nvidia cpu/gpu might be next on the menu
if you really want to get rid of ads - best option is to block their domains
also, NoScript
but also - let nice sites that you enjoy get few pennies from you watching ad
No thank you. I'd rather not support an industry which researches how to best manipulate a person into buying stuff.
everything has its cost
and this specifically have a cost on all humanity, it does not makes any progress
it is regression
and that regression type is called corruption
haha, spyware makers get hacked ๐
And if there is an alternative, I'm happy to pay for it
I donate to mozilla because I value the privacy I get from firefox(and thunderbird to a lesser extent) so much
But so many services don't have an alternative
Hey guys, what can I do to resolve this what looks like light bleeding?
That should simply be black on green.
Is the text image or actual text?
And is the scaling for display & browser at 100% or something else?
^ looks like nasty scaling performed by monitor
I really still think monitor should enforce integer scaling
they should never assume what data is screened, it's not their job, that's the job of the graphic driver and processing
text, I tried 100% no difference
maybe settings on the monitor would fix it?
I have 3 monitors, happens poorly like the image shown on one, less on another, then not noticeable on my expensive one
hmmm, monitor settings fixed it
These settings here. I had both monitors on cinema mode.
all sorted now
You vs the guy she told you not to worry about.
(Coming next week. Hyped af)
do they have heat pipe cooling yet?
heatpipe would die way too fast
"Copper/water heat pipes have a copper envelope, use water as the working fluid and typically operate in the temperature range of 20 to 150 ยฐC"
PETG prints at 230-250C
no hot enough for that xD
since what update firefox added background noise to pictures
blank picture makes blank background noise
full blank picture :
wait no even blank have it but even less
magnified
and this is the pattern of the pattern
AI prevention stuff?
without the picture being zoomed-in in firefox (then magnified, then zoomed-in without conversion (1x1 to 5x5 pixels)
I caught an horizontal pattern
but hard to find a vertical one
i'm wondering if it's one of those copyright traps
stick that behind every image, so that if/when an AI scraper comes along, they can examine the layers & find that background & claim copyright on it
it's not in the image directly, it's on firefox background
so it's only useful for in screenshot or screenrecorders
and I'm wondering if it's leaking some info
rumoured ring bus flaw in 15th gen
How would the one in 13th and 14th gen that Intel didn't know about get fixed in 15th gen?
Running it too close to the absolute max VCore it can take?
it basically wouldn't
they'd probably make the binning stricter, & really stick to keeping the top performers to be i9s
it sounds like they just tried to overvolt everything to be a higher tier than the design really allowed for
pump the voltage, screw the longevity, hopefully we don't piss off enough of our customers to lose them
and they might try to pull off the same thing with 15th gen if AMD scares them enough, which it seems like it did last gen
they design these things years in advance, & they can't just turn on a dime
i suspect the only way this stops is when intel goes to a new platform
And have painted themselves in the corner with the pumping of the stock OC way up during the 14nm decade.
As the node changes don't give them enough headroom to tone that down and still give improvements from previous gen in max performance.
they're fucked because they advertised themselves, and for a time, showed, their performance numbers. it will be a true disaster if they drop performance going to a new generation
Like AMD is doing now with 7000 to 9000 desktop side for example.
we kinda new that LGA1700 was going to be supporting 15th gen, but no hints as to after. i wonder what kind of panic is going on behind the scenes if they were planning on having it support 16th gen on the same architecture
what worries me is what caused the oxidation issue
the voltage thing is just something they can turn down a bit
Mistakes on the manufacturing line when something was changed in the process, and was fixed near end of 2023.
supposedly
That one is very simple thing.
we haven't seen them specify batch numbers for others to verify it
Because Intel doesn't want to replace all those CPUs.
yup
they only specified that there was oxidation in reference to 13th gen, with 14th gen having just as many failures
i have 0 trust in PR statements
if it was just overvolting frying the chips, there would have been at least a dip in 14th gen failure rates, but so far they haven't said that's the case, & as wendell pointed out, 14th gen is failing at at least the same rate
But that danger for oxidation in vias is known thing in the industry based on videos made about the rumors by people in the know.
The question is why Intel fucked that up, not why it can happen.
that's why i worry about it
this kind of failure is one of those "ok, this is our one thing we do, and now it's all fucked up"
And why Intel fucked it up is MBAitis.
Same as all the other Intel problems in 10+ years in all their products.
Which has been contant.
Their NICs have gone from "only thing you should use" to "fucked up shit" etc.
Even on enterprise side.
Their WLAN chips issues I already talked here.
they're toyota and they just ruined every single camry & Rav4 they've made for the last 3 years, & the next 3 years
that could be an outright killer
the top 10 car brands make up 47.2% of that market. intel has 70% of their market on their own
Now they're saying that apparently ALL 13th and 14th gen 65+W units are affected
https://www.techpowerup.com/324963/intel-will-not-recall-failing-13th-and-14th-gen-cpus
Part inertia, part anticompetitive practices, part TSMC production line limits for AMD chips.
oh wow 2hrs ago
have there been reports of the CPUs taking other components with them when they die?
I wonder if this is related
https://www.techpowerup.com/318867/german-court-prohibits-intel-processor-sales-amid-patent-dispute
They copied it for 10th-12th gen, got caught, changed shit for 13th and 14th and now those are fucked
LOL maybe this is why there's rumors 15th gen will be ditching hyperthreading. literally can't handle it
lol. so can't sell 10th-12th cuz of infringement, & 13th-15th gen just kills itself
looks like maybe going on their own for that stuff was a bad idea
The R2 seems to more like patent troll in that case, and they lost in US before going for it again in Germany.,
10th-12th depends on ruling, this was only for Germany. US courts ruled in favor of Intel.
They're also back on sale here, must've found an agreement of some sort.
Anyways, it was just a weird coincidence that Intel got an IP claim for 10th to 12th gen power circuitry and then had power issues on 13th and 14th gen where they changed things up
Expectation would be that Intel would try to redesign the stuff under court when then US case was filed.
To limit their liability if US court case had gone the other way.
So intel confirmed, the microcode patch will not solve issues of CPU's that already are damaged. It's a preventive patch. Which makes sense ofc.
"shit's fucked y'all" ๐คฃ
The CPU's are damaged physically because of the high voltage 
as J2C pointed out, it could happen on startup
And at same time not taking any responsibility, only taking RMAs with fight, during the normal warranty period if you can prove instability...
and probably a tax write off for the whole thing
also who wants to randomly trust a mobo that may or may not have the updated bios
There have been cases of MBs with 2+ year old BIOS versions being sold.
yeah, that's what I've heard. any damage done is permanent
Well, that is always the case with overvoltage or any other cause for degradation.
It's what intel says themselves. Or atleast doesn't deny.
Citing unnamed sources, Tomโs Hardware reports that any degradation of the processor is irreversible, and an Intel spokesperson did not deny that when we asked.
And, Intel confirms, too-high voltages arenโt the only reason some of these chips are failing. Intel spokesperson Thomas Hannaford confirms itโs a primary cause, but the company is still investigating. Intel community manager Lex Hoyos also revealed some instability reports can be traced back to an oxidization manufacturing issue that was fixed at an unspecified date last year.
Yup. This would've only been reversible if the issue was some wonky code or smth that just caused stuff to use extra processing time or smth
You can't fix a hardware issue with a software patch
Sometimes you can mask it, but not when the issue caused permanent damage that will keep getting worse even at the lowered voltages.
If the issue had been too low voltages because of fuckup, then that could have been fixed.
Intel is just trying to triage the CPUs already damaged so that they last until after the warranty is over.
And to not damage new ones.
wendell getting sources to confirm that it's happening even on the "as tame as we can run it" servers is also really bad news
that to me sounds like even undervolting won't solve it
Those were probably getting damaged more, as the BIOSes weren't undervolting the CPUs like the consumer MBs were, and the max boost voltages weren't limited more compared to consumer MBs, just no extra boosting.
Point is that most consumer MBs were undervolting the CPU VCore via too low AC Loadline settings while under load.
But in general I meant that IF the issue had been firmware doing undervolting, and not overvolting like it was, then software fix would be enough.
But it wasn't.
Intel was overvolting, consumer MB makers were undervolting.
i wonder if this is going to impact intel GPUs
The MB maker undervolting was fixed with those newest BIOSes, but the Intel overvolting isn't fixed yet.
Why would it?
Completely different team, and produced on TSMC, not Intel fabs.
maybe if they could swap out the orders?
You don't move chips between node techs.
That needs almost full redesign of the physical layout.
Which was the point of old Intel Tick-Tock.
Move known working arch to new node, then design next arch for that now tested node.
So you only had the Arch changes or node changes as problem points each time.
yea good point
Also: TSMC doesn't have anywhere near the necessary fab capacity.
how dare they not have triple their capacity tomorrow
I would expect TSMC to have more current and "next" gen capacity than Intel has.
But there is no slack in TSMC fabs of the 6nm and down nodes of theirs.
Source 3 part has something from the oxidation thing.
Ah, minecraft server 14900K degrading rapidly with very low temps, but that is the optimum "constant max boost with max voltages" situation.
30% failed in 2 months of use for some server provider...
With TVB disabled, down to 5% or so.
Disabling Thermal Velocity Boost causes the CPUs to drop 200MHz from max clocks when cool.
On SuperMicro blade server platforms.
And the specific data center has stopped selling new rent contracts for those blades.
83C absolute momentary max, 50-60C normal under load.
Im building a pc and i am doing a custom water loop. The final product will have 2 360 rads, a cpu water block and gpu water block. I am missing the gpu water block and 1 rad. Im tempted to build the loop i can right now and finish it when the last 2 parts come in. Should i wait or make the cpu loop and add the gpu later?
Depending on the wait.
Its an order from ekwb that im waiting on to be delivered
If you add the GPU later you'd most likely drain the loop or at least a bit of it.
you'll forgive me if i don't believe anything that comes out of MLID
this feels like him making shit up to jump on the intel flaws bandwagon
the ring bus being cooked is a theory that originated from twitter months ago, and here he is posting it as if it's inside intel information
he's also been caught out posting outright falsehoods several times
doesn't mean it's not true, but does mean anything he says doesn't amount to squat
As if he has confirmation for the suspected issue.
That would match to both the symptoms and the Intel official outpour with limiting the VCore.
But if that specific part is true, the "oxidation issue" is pretty small in actual delivered CPU units.
If it is just from one fab for part of production for few months.
Part of production in as that some getting scrapped.
When Intel hasn't publicly stated more than that the issue was resolved by end of 2023.
Most of the video was crap speculation from him based on those lines, some more, and general internet stuff.
it's definitely true that intel aren't saying enough
Which is why I posted only that single pic.
yeah that's fair
Basically the guy goes way too far in speculation done by him, based on scraps. And then presents that speculation as facts he got via inside sources.
Leading to very bad hit-miss rate, when he can have actual inside sources.
one time, someone sent him an obviously fake tip and he reported it as insider information
The first entry would be the least likely to be from actual Intel source, second might be questionable too, third is probably real IMHO.
Just from some low level tech with not much overall understanding of the tech.
I'm not gonna feel comfortable recommending them even after the microcode fix, I'd need a solid year of no further failures first
Small issues with the clean-room air circulation and purification system (HVAC but not HVAC) can easily cause issues in the produced wafers that wouldn't be noticed until the dies got into the binning phase of production.
And the timeline would match that pretty well.
And at that point you would have at least months worth of affected wafers in the pipeline.
And if you don't shut the lines down immediately, you easily get second months worth.
And if you do shut down the lines, you don't get months worth of wafers at all.
yeah I read that the via degradation was from HVAC which is wild, those fabs need beyond surgical levels of clean
AFAIK there wasn't possible cause for the process issue "known" before this, which was the point I posted that screenshot.
Just that SOMETHING had happened and some amount of Intel CPUs produced before end of 2023 had extra oxidation in vias.
So the question in the air was, if Intel had fucked up the base process, and everything produced until the cutoff was affected, or something else.
So if that specific comment is true, it is pretty small affected population, from non-base-process cause.
But IF that is the case, Intel could easily just recall all the affected batches now if they wanted.
But they are still "lets minimize our immediate costs" mode.
they should, but as you say, probably won't
it would announce the problem to more people
As the lack of proper easy RMA for the unstable CPUs etc. show.
and Dell/HP/acer etc would be big mad
The OEMs were informed about the issue near change of the year.
Which is the source for the leak about the issue now.
lmao
For the oxidation.
Probably along the lines "We had fuckup, we shall do easier CPU RMA replacements for you if you get CPUs that don't work right".
But didn't tell more to the OEMs at that point based on the leaks.
No recall for them either etc.
But for consumers, even right now the Intel RMA side still seems to make people with unstable CPUs to jump through ridiculous level of hoops to prove that their CPU is actually unstable.
gotta put a bad taste in their mouths
For OEMs it has been very easy for some time already.
when the xbox 360 was having its red ring of death, MS rolled out the red carpet for replacements
this, on the other hand, is a superb way to alienate customers
Leading to for example that Wendell provided "All our 13900Ks got replaced with 14900Ks by Intel" etc.
But then that didn't fix anything, just postponed the return of the crashing.
still the same die yeah
But that was much earlier this year.
But Intel seems to have been getting lot of OEM & big customer RMAs for their CPUs for long time, and had lowered the standards for that.
For the 13th and 14th gen.
on the consumer side I think games should include more info in error messages after shader comp crashes, just detect if the user has a problem CPU and tell them they should replace it
But somehow the information hadn't moved from the RMA side to the design side?
I feel like a lot of people are blissfully unaware of this problem and just assuming games are unstable these days
One game now prompts about that on startup.
That dev is one of those that has been talking to Wendell and/or GN.
hell yeah
Nvidia had that in their GPU driver patch notes several months ago already.
imagine if fortnite did that
amazing
But not with prompt, just if you read to the end of the notes to "Known Issues" section.
About the specific out of VRAM error message, that has been affecting Satisfactory users too since last year with U8 experimental.
Had been happening for over 6 months by the point of that first time inclusion into Nvidia driver notes.
About the cause being unstable Intel CPUs.
But this issue has been slowly catching speed since 6+ months ago when first finger pointing to Intel started.
And was happening for at least 6 months before that, in last summer.
The specific crashing game issues around Unreal Engine games etc. from this "current" thing.
yeah I've been keeping tabs on it since the rumbling started
it's so much worse than I feared
Need to try to kill my firewall today with UEFI and BMC firmware updates.
Wonder if my first 13900k was effected by that. Bought it 20.10.2022. Lasted abouth 6 months until games started crashing and couldn't reinstall windows
Probably.
Just have to hope that the replacement works for some more time in future. Can't RMA it as it's delidded. Wouldn't have done that if the issue was known then
i have a 'spare' 12600k on the shelf ... i was not impressed with it compared to my 14 i have (for some reason games slogged cpu-bound on the 12600)
so im hoping my 14 survives
he did it again!
huh?
Seems like it
Took longer than expected, little over an hour...
Partly because I hadn't made all necessary preparations in time, partly because I forgot to completely remove power in another and spent 10+ minutes waiting to see if I would get picture back after UEFI update, while the system rebooted couple of times.
I think I finally eliminated mold in my room from ever appearing again....
Replaced cabinet and wardrobe back panel which is made from plywood with moisture-resistant hdf board
And removed plywood cornice from the ceiling
I should probably get a dehumidifier soon and finally end this nightmare
Lesson of the day: don't use plywood anywhere!
i live where humidity doesn't exist, so it's fine here ๐คฃ
Why is the air so wet and hot I want to die
What do I do if my fan hub dosent have enough ports I need to connect 3 more
hope you have an extra connection on your PSU to attach another fan hub
i'm not a fan of using splitters off of a hub to attach more fans, but connect the most important fans first, hunt down another hub for later
So do I order a different hub then
check the power usage totals, & then decide if you can get away with using 1 big hub, or if you need to have 2, with each on a separate power connector from the psu
Can you daisychain?
NightHawk releases video of Sky Cooling Fabric
Already watching it
My brain just can't stop this King of cotton chicken candy nuggets
To the tune of the Turtles theme song
i'm just thinking, if we can break such an used-to thing as 'albedo cannot be above 100%', than maybe there's a way to cheat on energy preservation?
ryzen ai 300 has no support for sodimm ram 
Probably has, just not at the "wanted" speeds?
Or is it LPDDR5 only?
lpddr5 only
Ok, then.
i assume, im just watching the ltt video
No, the spec pages list DDR5 and LPDDR5X.
just give us lpcamm2 amd ๐
AMD's tech spec pages have been wrong before
i wouldn't be surprised if it got copied from last gen and the important fields updated 
Yes, but until we get more concrete source, that is what we have.
LTT is step down.
also I don't like how they tested just "apple macbook pro m3"
like which m3 theres 3 skus
And if that really is for 4x 2R DIMM, then that 5600MT/s is very high.
But LPDDR5(X) will almost certainly be the one you will get almost all the laptops with.
SODIMMs are almost certainly not be used by anyone, and that (LP)CAMM2 will be used in the few laptops with replaceable memory.
Because those models have shitton of RAM for laptop, very high end screen for laptop, and bleeding edge CPU.
As expected from the initial supply with very limited CPU amounts.
32gb should be standard now with the highest end sku cpus if the direction is soldered ram
But still isn't, and even 8GB is still being sold, with 16GB as the "standard".
And launch products for thing like this will be the expensive models.
Look again in 6 months.
Early adopter "tax" is real thing.
Can both get higher profits from the people who just have to have it, and at same time empty the inventory of older stuff without losses from too high discounts.
i mean yea thats fair given 8945HS laptop is currently at $999
With only 16GB of RAM, otherwise seems to be same.
whats weird is that isnt an "on sale" price
thats just the normal listing price
Also I know intel has been doing this for a long time and now I guess amd is doing it too, but new cpu architecture is coming to mobile chips first?
But mostly for laptops, below 1000 is "cheap crap" territory, 1000-2000 is the "proper laptops without dGPU" / "cheap crap gaming laptop" range, and proper gaming laptops start from 2000.
Was supposed to be about simultaneous release of the 9000 desktop parts and the 300 AI laptop parts actual availability.
well i mean in the sense reviews for mobile came out first. I know 9950x and I think 9900x got delayed
Yes, you can get usable laptop in the below 1000 pricepoint, but usually at least the screen will be crappy one.
I still think for most people a proper desktop tower and thin and light laptop is still the way to go rather than buying an expensive gaming laptop
mobile tax also exising(and nvidia laptop gpu tax)
Yup.
Baldur would you consider used buying 3.5in datacenter HDDS or for the same price getting half the storage and buying new drives
Would depend on the source and exact type etc.
Would need to be new enough (not run more than 3 years), from trusted source, in type that is good and not something special etc.
Because you can fuck the SMART attributes up, or do something in refurbishment phase to cause damage etc.
As in intentionally modify the logged SMART stuff to hide things.
I have an older Optiplex that has two drive cages in it and will be doing some sort of redundancy with the two disks. I was just curious since i'm limited to two drives if its worth the risk to buy used for more storage or play it safe with less storage and buy new
Like I said, as with any used hardware, goes into specifics about the exact thing and exact source, I will not provide general answer than that in some cases the used can be good buy.
Yea I need to do research on the exact drive I want and from the exact seller.
And once you get it check the SMART.
Current drives log how long they have run, amount of powerons and head parks and max temp they have reached etc.
and I wont buy from a seller that wont accept returns on HDDs
Which was the point that unscrupulous seller could edit those to remove the signs that the drive has lived a hard life already.
And the point about the specific model is because some of the "Enterprise" models aren't any better than consumer drives.
And some can be SMR, some can be special host needing SMR, some can be SAS only, etc.
yea I wont buy any SMR drives
nor sas stuff
another side note, if I wanted to take my database of imessage stuff and somehow import it into the android sms database how could I do that, if I wanted to
I ask because I have the entire imessage database on my mac and I can export it using this tool to .txt files for each phone number github.com/ReagentX/imessage-exporter. I can write a custom script to remove all of the details it gives about when a message was read and attachments etc
hey guys, whats the best format here for preserving detail in 1080p 60 FPS videos?
well some are audio containers and some are video containers
do you like mp4, mkv, mpeg?
There are software made to do that specifically, but I would most be paid.
And none of those are the actual video codec, just containers around it.
i'm not worried about space it takes ... it's for a tutorial on youtube ... I have youtube premium but playpack controls are poor, need something thats editable
hmmmm?
are you ripping a yt video?
codecs go into containers
yeah, using Freemake
Container sets what it can contain, but most of those can do almost anything.
And that actual codec and settings for it set the quality.
I: just don't wanna lose detail or FPS
just rip using yt-dlp github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp
you can rip exactly what youtube has
nice, thanks
this is the way
on the side of editing the android sms database?
Yeah, you don't want to recode from Youtube, you just download the specific resolution and codec you want.
Both getting the iMessages, and moving them to the Android.
Some are phone software, some are desktop software, not going to try to find the best one.
well I have the imesssages using this github script github.com/ReagentX/imessage-exporter all in TXT files I just was wondering if someone knew of a tool to extract the raw android sms database and I could edit it manually and then put it back on my android so I can have the full message history with people
play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.faked.isms2droid&hl=en <-one example of free app that says it can move imessages from PC backup to Android
I dont have my iphone anymore and thats what the issue is 
But there are probably more, and haven't checked the permissions etc. on that.
@midnight osprey containers: MP4, MKV etc. think of them as boxes you put stuff into, that stuff being the video, the audio, a thumbnail, chapter information, subtitles, different language tracks. but none of this changes the quality
codecs are the thing that do the job of encoding video: H264, H265, AV1, WEBM etc. they can all make a real nice looking 1080p60 video but newer ones can get more detail in smaller file sizes
WebM is container for the various VP# video codecs.
beans I could have swore that was a codec
in my defense I see webm or vp9 and my brain says no, bad
It isn't general purpse AFAIK, but at least VP8 and VP9 for video, not sure about what audio codecs.
very nice summary, thanks
WebM defines the file container structure, video and audio formats. WebM files consist of video streams compressed with the VP8 or VP9 video codecs and audio streams compressed with the Vorbis or Opus audio codecs.
The WebM file structure is based on the Matroska container.
it would take ages to really dig into the pros and cons of each codec, video codecs are some voodoo shit, but it helps to know what all these acronyms are a little bit
webm is based on mkv?
huh.
From the PR page.
why not just use mk- y'know what, I suspect the answer is some dumb shit that will make me grow some grey hairs
Well, taking good container format like MKV and using it as base for more limited version for www-pages, where if something says it supports that new "Web-Matroska" (WebM), it can play anything that can be contained.
Where as the Matroska itself doesn't limit anything.
And no, I didn't know before this moment either.
oh I'm keeping that bit of trivia up my sleeve
yep
looks like it works using the chat.db found on my macbook thank you!
only 74K messages to process
funny thing is that .db file is only 120MB ish
where as attachments got up to 18gigs, which I aint transfering
Text compresses very well, compressed images don't compress anymore.
imessages attachments will compress if you have data saver mode enabled. other than that they dont
Or is that 120MB uncompressed?, also, text as itself doesn't use that much space even uncompressed as just text, without current type of formatting.
I assume uncompressed
I meant that if the attachment is for example .jpg, running it through lossless compression will often cause the file size go up, not down.
And even if it goes down, the difference is in few percent range.
well its an sqlite database
and I dont think its encrypted which sorta kinda shocks me
Where as raw text doesn't use much space anyhow (1 byte per character for most western ones), and compresses very well (75% reduction or more is easy.
how can I tell if the sqlite database is compressed
SQLite doesn't support compression by default.
ffs
Are you sure it is SQLite, and not just some Apples own thing with just .db extension.
Which isn't SQLite specific anyways.
But also, remember that 120MB is 120+ million bytes.
So for ASCII, that would be 120+ million characters.
Uncompressed.
that sounds about right
well I can encrypt it
but im surprised apple didnt do that on an OS level
givrn how much they care about "privacy"
looks like they actually delete the message from the DB if it was deleted, then again I have no idea what im looking at
Predefined SQL clauses.
First one for example when triggered writes the ID of the deleted message into special table for syncing that that delete happened without retaining the actual message.
First is triggered automatically when a message type of data is deleted from specific table by something else.
Database internal automation, so that external program doesn't have to do stuff itself, but it gets triggered automatically.
Basically seems that the external DB user just sends "delete this message" command, and then all attachments etc. that belong to that message also get deleted, including from the drive (fourth one), and the IDs are added to the "these got deleted" sync table.
Also same for external just sending "delete this chat", with the database handling the minutea.
I have used pot player in the past ... Might sound fussy but I want to just rewind 1 second at a time .. settings say it can do this but always rewinds to the last second that rounds with a multiple of 10 ... any playback apps with finer control?
Would need one that doesn't do just keyframe level movements, but finer control.
That is pretty rare for consumer level playback software.
Basically most video codecs have keyframes (contain a new full frame), and then difference frames from the previous frames.
I am so blind dude, turning off keyframes was in teh same page, lol
And the amount of frames between keyframes is one of the things you can tune when encoding.
used to be the dogs bollocks, not needed this kind of app in years
Yeah, you can just jump to any keyframe, but for frames between, you need to go to previous keyframe and then go forward frame by frame.
hundreds of settings and the only one I will ever change ๐
well, jumping back just 1 second is fine
he sometimes jumped around MUCH more complicated versions of this too quickly and so hard to follow
So if there are 1 keyframe and 9 frames between, then it will take 1 decode to show that keyframe, but to show the last frame before next keyframe will need 10 decodes.
And if the ratio is 1:24, then it is 25 times more expensive to go to the last frame before keyframe than to keyframe, etc.
Just as an explanation why that "keyframe only" is a thing, and often the only one allowed.
For playback only software.
Video editing of course needs to allow for frame specific in all cases.
Most video playback isn't that critical, going frame by frame is not that common usecase.
surprised its a free feature then
I wonder if Pot is open source?
looks to be!
So im making a custom water loop and every fucking component has a leak somewhere. Kill me.
is it EK?
It was.
But also, what kind of fittings in use?
And where are the leaks happening?
From blocks themselves?
From between the block and the fitting?
From between the fitting and the tubing?
A solution to every leak is just:
Screw it tighter
Well, sometimes that is the cause of the leak, and then you are fucked.
When one of the parts is plastic.
Or if at least one side doesn't have a groove for the o-ring.
Pi 4 stuff: Updated from base Bookworm 6.1 kernel to Raspberry Pi OS 6.6 kernel (to get all overlay files), but now the WLAN chip doesn't work properly with WPA3 anymore and had to disable the offload for that...
Ah, might be because of the kernel switch not overwriting files that the other kernel had included for the base device tree files.
Making a frankendistro is dangerous.
Ok, might be that the specific module option to disable the WPA3 offload is the one causing the firmware blob warning.
Yup, so might be that the cargo-cult option is wrong...
Yes, one or other of the capability flags disabled worked too...
What the specific bits was documented in the kernel source code.
And yes, it was cargo cult.
Just one of the two bits were needed, either worked but that was because one of them also disabled what the other disabled.
And only the WPA3 offload needed to be disabled, not the FW Supplicant.
Just checked my old reviews on google and one of them wasn't posted because it apparently violated the policy lol
Posted how I had negative experience at a car wash because I paid for active foam which wasn't working and the brush was dirty
There are several other people who posted the exact same thing but their review wasn't taken down. This makes no sense lol
Unless Google algorithm messed up
My new pc. Still waiting on the gpu water block and one more radiator
i hate to say it, but i'd have put a drain valve in one of those ports at the bottom of the reservoir
love the color scheme tho
Thats one of the parts im also waiting on
yay!
also, nice call not putting any fans or anything too important at the bottom. if it's gonna eventually leak, i'd rather it dump out onto the desk & not get flung around by fans
how much of a pain was the wiring on the backside?
Yes
It is
nice ๐
be sure to hunt down the specific model when it comes to custom cables
not just the brand
things can go boom
ElectroBoom 
Intel wants you to know it hates you for being their client
has AMD ever done a recall?
Last year
for the damaged ones cpu yes
oh right
tbh it should be pretty bad financially
I don't know how has Intel been thinking they can afford that
(by rushing cpu dev I mean)
i mean, those decision makers just get to resign & take their golden parachutes, why should they care
btw i almost mistyped it as parachites & i think that may be a better term for it
man I just remembered, overclocking a pentium 4 to 1.7V would cause it to degrade. time is a flat circle
Was that stock config?
when overclocking, so no
that this latest shit resembles such an old problem at stock this time is uncanny
it's called public stock market
just realized that 11th gen intel probably doesn't look so bad now ๐คฃ
Doesn't the 12900K still get recommended a decent amount if you can find it and a mobo for the right price?
There was a Microcenter bundle with it.
Other than that, not really.
12600K/KF is a common rec tho, 12400F too if priced well
LGA1200, so deprecated platform - 12th gen CPUs and AM5 became more viable tho
oh i know, but losing 2 cores officially vs having 2 or more cores drop dead on you almost sounds better to me
Except that there's been a whole lot of architectural improvements too.
For all I know, 12600KF beats 11900K while also costing less - and it's not affected by the current issues
Huh, 12900K is $315, 12700K is $234. Not terrible.
Remember the extra cost for PSU, mainboard and cooling that they bring with them
Right, you'd need a killer deal on the mobo.
guys
is it normal that my 3200 MHz memory is working on 3200 MT/s
that shouldn't even be possible
is it a windows bug or sum
CPU Z says it is 1600 MHz but the memory minimum operational frequency is 2400 MHz
so like
DDR4 can't even go below 2133
so visual glitch right ?
1600mhz is 3200mt/s, that's DDR for you (double data rate)
2400mhz would be DDR4-4800
first time I've used my satisfactory skills for something productive
routing pcbs is like connecting the belts in a factory...
and just like in satis i spent way too much time trying to make something tidy that i wont ever look at again
aand all the work was wasted because i fucked up
aand i did it all again
i love how all the tech channels are panic pushing the intel bios voltage limiters hard now
even before the microcode is out
Like RyzenMan already said.
MT/s is what should be used, MHz is half that.
Just that lot of software and people use MHz when they should use MT/s.
3200MT/s (MegaTransfers per Second) is the highest JEDEC speed bin for DDR4.
Just that most sources talk about 3200MHz for that, when the actual frequency is half the MT/s for any DDR type.
.
.
And the AMD 9000-series "recall" and delay seems to have been pretty simple, IHS mismarkings labeling some of the Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 7 as Ryzen 9:
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amd-ryzen-9000-launch-delay-due-to-typo-ryzen-7-9700x-ryzen-5-9600x-confirmed
Ackchually, "Transfers" is not an SI unit.
You're still describing how often smth happens per second - and the unit for that is Hertz
And the clock frequency is 1600MHz, just that there is bit transferred both on rising and falling edge of the clock.
Double Data Rate (DDR).
Why would it need to be SI unit to be used in specific niche?
All the actual spec documents for the DDR types talk about MHz for the clock and MT/s for the data rate.
And even QDR is a thing, where you move 4 bits per clock cycle.
Current GDDRs use that, RAMBUS RDRAM was QDR etc.
Just that marketing again got involved during the change from SDR to DDR and kept using MHz.
RDRAM marketing was even weirder, using Advertized Frequency that was usually double the actual frequency, half the MT/s (raw bandwidth), but in some specific speeds seems to have been just pulled out of their ass.
If the Wikipedia information is correct about that.
So yes, the data signal changes at up to double the rate the clock frequency, but it doesn't change at every point.
I read this as bambus (German for bamboo)
now i wanna see a tech company have spec they call DecaHertz per second
this is cool as fuck
a practical application of satisfactory
actually, why use an ai auto routing plugin? write a program that converts PCB layouts to satisfactory save files and give them to satisfactory players they'll solve it for you for free
intel quad pumped their FSB back in the day which made me do more math than I wanted to overclock it
i like how AMD's recall was because someone accidentally stamped the wrong model numbers on some
people have done something like this! they gamified protein folding to help find new treatments
if we could harness the collective knowledge of every satisfactory and factorio player, we would surely build skynet
we'd probably just end up making amazon warehouses more hellish but efficient
yeah

when that reaches a week 
ah jaysus
It exploded ๐ซข

