#off-topic-tech
1 messages Β· Page 86 of 1
Ah, reboot day again.
"Reboot day" smh just shut off your PC when ur done 
yea i don't understand why some people insist on leaving their computers on...
Ling Long is a foldable keyboard with AMD Ryzen APU that fits into a pocket Now, thatβs something innovative.Β Think of an Atari, but significantly faster, much slimmer, and portable. The Ling Long foldable keyboard is an interesting productβa portable mini-PC embedded into a keyboard chassis. One side houses the battery, while the other contain...
ok now THAT is creative
would be even more interesting if they stuffed an ARM in there
its unique but it probably wouldent pop off
because at the end of the day its practically just a laptop whit no screen
it's right in the idea, but poorly thought out
That sits in the middle of the typing area
I was planning to do something along these lines for myself, but noticed it would be not commercially successful anyway
its not just that i think it would probably also pull a rog ally and become uncomfortably warm to type on
now i'm thinking about having something like that keyboard pc thingy, but have a "phone", that can just be a regular phone if you want it to be, but also a lower power mode that you can wire in to the keyboard & have it be a monitor for it
with HDMI you easily can any TV into a screen. I don't see a problem there
also there are great portable screens available nowadays. The combination would still be smaller than a regular Laptop
I would rather have a phone that can do that in the future.
Connect phone wireless to: 1. Keyboard. 2. Mouse. 3 Monitor.
typing on a phone sucks.
then you have to carry a keyboard anyway
Yeah, but still have a phone π
And you don't have to carry it. You just leave it at work.
which you can't use during the time
Get at work, phone connects and voila you got PC.
only disadvantages
Why would you want to use your phone π€¦ββοΈ
When you got PC. You can still call with it.
My iPhone connects to my mac, I can receive calls on my Macbook.
Contacts, on my Macbook pro. Music. On my my Macbook. Like, there is NOTHING that my phone can do that my macbook can't do.
Only thing they need to solve is battery life, CPU and GPU power. But they are working towards that. Phones do get better.
oh well, but Apple just sucks
Continuity Camera, just made it so that your iPhone is basically a webcam.
closed system, does not use establisherd standards, just crap.
Still more innovating that Windows adding adds to start menu 
Good going Windows π€£
nobody was talking about windows
I point out, Apple sucks. But better than Windows imo. Or Linux.
not in my world
What else you going to get other than those 3?
depends on the use case
but a closed ecosystem like Apple provides would never be my choice
Linux does have the problem of the peer review failing etc. Few examples:
arstechnica.com/security/2024/03/backdoor-found-in-widely-used-linux-utility-breaks-encrypted-ssh-connections/
www.theverge.com/2021/4/30/22410164/linux-kernel-university-of-minnesota-banned-open-source
guess what? Apple does not have a peer review
Don't worry EC is working at it π
even worse
I know of almost no big companies, who use Linux as their main operating system for development and getting work done.
For home use, sure, do whatever you want. But it's more like pick your poison.
99% of "the cloud" runs on linux
That's not for human use.
even the Apple stuff
Hence I said: getting work done.
satisfactory runs on Linux
all major software developers with an impact in the last 30 years did use linux
(or bsd)
At a bank I worked. literally 0% used Linux. You will never, ever get that sold there. When I worked for the Dutch goverment, we used Windows. Same case, you can't convince management to deploy Linux on a large scale for human use.
but almost every apple cultist is not about technical facts, it's about prestige.
Meh, I don't care honestly. The discussion is beaten to a pulp in this channel.
Most of us know it's not black and white and more grayish. I know Apple sucks.
agreed.
design. Definitly
For the workers?
Or for the servers?
Is it for work? How important is security? How important is privacy (bank, goverment)? How easy is it to use?
Lot of banks still use old mainframes with the mainframe specific unix variant.
π
Like I said: dev and getting work done. aka not servers.
I know servers use it. But that's not what I was talking about.
microsoft shit is a security fuck fest
While I agree, try convince management in a company.
the thing is: Apple is not more secure than windows. This is an urban myth. Marketing about this is just better.
They just don't trust Linux + their employees. That combination π
everyone needs an egg so they can get a cock
cook? π
i never have seen a cook hatching out of an egg
Made a SystemD unit that sees if the Pi 1:s Ethernet can get IP via DHCP in 60 seconds during boot, and if not, disables the DHCP client network profile and switches to the DHCP server network profile.
60 seconds from enabling the DHCP client profile.
Would like to plug it to be also run when link status changes, but would need extra software or "hacks".
This looks neat www.navidrome.org/about/ I'm thinking about setting up a container for it this weekend
Steam my own personal libary rather than youtube or spotify
Says it supports an api I've never heard of.. I'd be pretty happy with it if it has a decent web interface that can be loaded on a browser. Firefox has a media in background extention that I can use on my phone
Iβm building new pc mid to low range
Pc part picker list: https://pcpartpicker.com/list/kpmwWt
Part List - AMD Ryzen 5 5500, Corsair 4000D Airflow ATX Mid Tower
Lmk any changes I should make pls and thank you
You don't need or want kryonaut, that mem is a bit expensive, that psu is massively overkill, and you don't have a gpu
I already have a 1660s and hope to upgrade. If not kryonaut what thermal paste?
If you want thermal grizzly, arrownaut or hydronaut
And, if possible, make the jump to a 5600
Base 5600?
Yes
Ight also what psu would you recommend?
What gpu are you planning to upgrade to?
Idk tbh
It's very difficult to say
Wendell my beloved
any last-minute steam sales worth grabbing?
Pony Island
that sounds either super innocent or super dirty
it's super fun. Give it a try for the 1$ or whatever it is now
74 pennies
don't watch videos about it, this will spoil the fun
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
"Expert"
Classic needs to be remembered
oh i love this
youtube.com/watch?v=OUNXFHpUhu8
its about parking in US and bs "science"
also i'm yet to find a parking lot that isn't an absolute nightmare to navigate in
12 hours to go
i can only speak as pedestrian, and i agree
i'm super lucky that i have a smallish car, but also one with no back end & a fantastic rear camera, & it still sucks in general to park
i hate when parking lot occupies a lot of space so it heats up on sunny day and you have to somehow walk around it or through it
but also, here they exist only near gigantic malls, with some exceptions. here, in city, its more of a problem to find a place to park. but i prefer to develop public transport. when its done good, it can do more than a car does (within a city).
also, i remember when my ex-gf was discussing that we need a car because she was planning a baby... and now i look back at it as crazy fantasy of someone who tried to play in adult games
aka "on a totally unrelated note"
our world is shaped by ideas, visions that drive people to invest their resources, dreams that slowly come true. so what ideas are we going to implement today?
if he is using the stock cooler, it comes with pre applied paste. better paste wont really make a difference at this point
That's also true
But does it work? 
define non-working state
oh, i can tell you that ongrund transport has some problems when roads are occupied with hundreds of individual transportation vehicles
but we also have e-scooters, bycicles, subway, city train, tram
and roads are roaming with maaany private-enterprenour busses, regular busses, trolley buses...
perhaps this can be viewed as leftover from soviet union, one that had to be fixed with help of western countries like Poland (some trams roll ads in polska while here)
but in the end - i would prefer being in AC cooled tram for 10 minutes longer, than to worry about a car
its a different style of life, one that needs different conditions
thats called a school bus
the big yellow school bus is 100% a real thing in the US
just to confuse the danes
Producers and camera crews for the television show "How It's Made" visited our Tulsa facility over a two-day period to capture the interior of the plant and our various production processes to illustrate school bus manufacturing from start to finish.
The show aired on November 14th, 2013 on the Science Discovery Channel USA.
Show: How It's Mad...
even the color is specific
i had no idea it wasn't a regular thing outside the US
at least until fairly recently
π€£
and yes, they are definitely as uncomfortable as they look
all leaf springs
it's basically 1 step past a covered wagon
my high school was also a designated nuclear bomb shelter π€£
the entire first floor is below ground level
not underground, but it'll survive a blast wave
Because trains are not cars.
was sweden one of the countries that switched lane direction?
ha
about once a month we have some idiot who likes to think that the light rail around here is just a big truck they can beat
it's dumb enough to play chicken with any utility truck
let's up that to 70 tonnes
we studied doing an underground, but passed because of the cost
it was going to be $2B/km
oh we have a lot, but there's also 350m people, which means plenty of idiots
we also looked at doing elevated tracks, but that would have been almost as expensive
our ground is large rocks, sand, and clay, and just destroys normal excavation equipment
so whether it's digging tunnels or digging support structures, it's slow & destructive
oh if we had decent mass transit here i probably wouldn't own a car
but here you can tell what city a bus operates in based on how terrible it sounds
we're used to no water where i live π
i mean, it is a desert
more water would actually be climate disruptive
that's really only about 3 months out of the year
the rest of the time it's fine
it might drop below freezing twice in the winter, & we haven't had snow in 30 years
lol
it's usually about 15cm of rain a year
chicago's decent
i'd pick denver
oh not remotely π€£
chicago's 2300km from me
π€£
it's a beautiful city
i mean, yes, but also that's a cartoon
ah π€£ yea very different cities
good π€£
it's a town on both sides of the river, & the missouri side grew faster
most of the "social" stuff is on the south side, with industry on the north
In Finland there can be "school" bus routes and times, but they are run by the normal bus company and are open to everyone who pays.
As in extra times on normal bus routes or extra routes that only run on school start and stop times.
The US one is very wasteful in a way.
Very large fleet of busses that only do 2-4 runs each day, with separate drivers etc.
But as US doesn't have alternative source of busses and drivers...
And the school busses in US have much stricker crash requirements etc. than the normal busses there.
So product of the environment.
I don't get the shape
all the load seems to be on rear wheel
it's a glorified army truck
yet it's front wheel driven
must be why
its made like a big big simple car
lil bit π€£
But question becomes, why are the normal US busses allowed to be death traps in crashes π
their rollovers are awful
but front/side impacts are usually ok because of how high up the passengers are
when schools do a long road trip they'll usually charter a "real" bus for that, which is a lot safer
?
oh
also i have no idea where the bus funding comes from, but if it's from individual cities/school districts, that might explain why they don't really get upgraded
i suspect we all have it hard, just in different ways
ehhhh
depends on how far back you go
i think 1860 sucked pretty much everywhere
right before our civil war
cats and decent food helps
i try to avoid them
Yes, school/school disctrict fund are used for the whole "system".
our tax system is incredibly byzantine, and schools aren't well funded, so idk if busses are part of that or not
i'd have to move to ireland since i don't speak any european languages π€£
i mean, a fair bit of spanish, but i haven't used it in a long time
In most cases you have 5-10 years to learn the language after moving in?
To very basic level.
With cheap/free evening classes available.
sadly no
seeing him hack a mothership with a 30 year old mac is just too much for me now
oh jeff without a doubt, he's having the best life near as i can tell
also some amazing non-john williams music
i did appreciate that they kept the avengers theme throughout the movies, but that's really the only really memorable music i can think of lately
ah right
he's done some great stuff
forrest gump
i just worry, a lot of the movie music composers are old now
he's up near 90
For "some" reason, this chipset heatsink isn't that good at keeping the AMD X570 chipset temperatures down π₯²
But as the first slot will contain SAS card that has official minimum airflow requirement of 200 linear feet per minute of air (trying to convert to something more normal atm.)...
Ok, less in reality as the full requirement is "Minimum airflow: 200 linear feet per minute at 55 Β°C inlet", nice for LSI/Broadcom to mix units.
So 1 meter/second "wind" speed required at that 55C inlet air temperature.
But will see if I have to do some kind of airflow guide, as the chipset sink is "below" the case can location.
Need to see if the temperature goes up or down once in OS and actually using the chipset connected things vs. BIOS.
But at least the MB seems to be getting BIOS update to AGESA 1.2.0.C with LogoFAIL fix, currently in open beta.
When the previous BIOS is from end of 2022 with AGESA 1.2.0.7, for 5800X3D support.
why are you noticing just now
I should clean my fan btw
Nah, not just noticing now.
Knew before I bought the MB.
it gets between 75 and 85 C with good airflow
it goes down
but not a lot
Less than 85C with almost no airflow when I was tuning the fans and was running them all at 20% PWM.
So about 400 RPM for the case fans.
But there is a reason why I switched the stock paste to Heilos for that chipset sink and the LAN sink.
Question just is if that + the 65% fan speed that I set as minimum are enough, or if I need to make air guide to direct one intake fans air down.
I struggled with mine
because of the clip things
it's hard to get it clapped down without swinging
I wonder if I should re do mine
seen a ~5C improvement last time
I keep it around 80C for safety
I'm scared it will wear fast above that
even if it's supposed to be bigger size node
it's not very sensitive so I have very steep curve
maybe I should do the other fan control logic things
94C in the IPMI for the warning temp for that.
but translated menus are not very intuitive
Why not use the English menus then?
I'm talking about the English menu
it's probably translated from Taiwanese or similar idk
Just normal server talk.
and I've seen no doc for the "open loop" cooling thing
Open loop: Temperature to PWM direct correlation, no feedback.
Closed loop: Target temperature with closed loop control.
I still don't get how both rules interact with each other's when you set two tables
Highest wanted PWM value is used.
but isn't that infinit (100% always) when in closed loop ?
So I set Open loop table with just 10C for 65% PWM, and then set the real settings in closed loop per temperature sensor with target temperature, and then the faster reacting temperature above that.
Used the open loop to set minimum, and closed loops then to work between that set minimum and 100% depending on sensor temperatures.
So Closed Loop Table 3 is for CPU temperature for me.
Set it to Ramp temperature: 75C (try to keep the CPU at 75C), with ramp rate 1% (if over that temp, raise PWM in 1-percent-point steps), ramp delay 5s (5s between steps).
And then Slew 85C, Slew rate 1%, Slew Delay 1s, so if the CPU hits 85C, the fan ramping moves to 1% and 1s steps.
For faster reactions.
And once you have tables set.
You go to the Temperature Sensor and Corresponding Fan Table page.
Click one sensor, select 0-1 open loop tables, 0-1 closed loop tables, then check the fans (right checkbox, not the left button) you want that sensor to direct based on those tables, and save.
And repeat for all sensors you want to use.
Clicking on fan button shows which sensors are used for control.
So I have dual-chamber case, I have the second HDD chamber set to 50% base PWM, and control based on extra temperature sensor on open table with 10C, 50%, and then closed loop table for fans 1 and 4 (the input and output fan headers for that chambers fans).
And Fan 3 is CPU, so it is controlled by just CPU sensor, on Open loop for 65% and closed loop that I specified.
And then main chamber input and output case fans are controlled by MB, cards side, CPU, LAN, chipset and DDR temps, with 65% PWM minimum via open loop table for all, and then sensor specific closed loop tables.
Classic PC MB fan control is the open loop type.
As closed loop can cause oscillation in the speed if you don't tune it properly, which is annoying.
Se on Open Loop side, you can just specify temperature in steps, with corresponding PWM signal, and then the PWM value for the highest temp reached on the table is used.
But on sensor level:
With open loop table, PWM wanted is what the table says based on absolute temperature.
With closed loop table, PWM is moved in steps with specific delay between steps to keep the sensor temperature at specific value.
When multiple tables per sensor and/or multiple sensors per fan are in use, actual PWM is highest of the wanted values.
so it virtually keeps track of the closed loop table behind the open table value when the open loop pwm is higher
ok
All the selecting fan and matching tables and sensor I got it right dw
The closed loop probably goes to 0% PWM wanted in that case.
it's the closed loop and mixing I was confused about
I mean if temp above and still in open loop value, it ramps up virtually until it catch up
Yes.
ok nice thank you
Delays the response, but it will respond once the temp is above the closed loop set value.
it's actually the open loop that was causing me annoying oscilation
because it is 1C step sensor, and the chipset temp is not sensitive
so it was 79 -> 50%, 80 -> 65%, 79 -> 50%
Yeah, but you can change the tables, so the steps are smaller.
I'm going to setup the closed loop now that you helped me decode the slew and ramp things
I was like, wtf is slew if there already ramp
Or optimize one table for specific sensor etc.
no becuase then the chipset temp will not get constrained as much
the correct choice is closed loop in this case
slow ramp up, at same temp
if I select the temp correctly it will ramp up and down so slowly it will not be a problem
I guess ?
I will check anyway
But yeah, that is the point of closed loop control.
Often harder to tune, but better when working right.
Which is I set the minimums to where the fans are still inaudible when the machine was next to me on floor.
And then set closed loop control with setpoints.
80C Ramp, 85C Slew targets for the chipset for example.
Sitting currently at 76C when in BIOS.
that's probably what I will go with
maybe I should do repaste too, though I suspect you have cooler air intake
mine is behind a radiator
currently sitting 85C as we talk
60/65 for MB, 60/65 for Card, 75/85 for CPU, 60/65 for LAN, 80/85 for X570, 45/50 for the second chamber thermal sensor set between the case halves of the PSU (might need to move), 60/70 for the DDR sensors.
But currently at 50 MB, 35 Card, 40 CPU, 76 X570, 29 extra sensor, 31 all 4 DIMMs.
With 1000RPM for HDD side 120mm intakes, 800RPM for 140mm out, 1300 for main side 120mm intakes and out, and 1000 RPM for 120mm Noctua on CPU.
my fan are 1000rpm and 1200 rpm respectively
the other 2 fans are aio controled
I have complex setup
But 50% for the HDD side, and 65% for main side and CPU as the base, which they are in now.
my goal is the chipset temp also serv feedback for radiator temp
the best imo would be a external fan control board
with the capabilities I'd like
I have note on this
This thing, now with two HDDs in aft cage.
And the SSDs on the bottom of main side that the cables are in place for.
went for compactness
The two network cables not managed are extras until I get that "new" server into use, and can get rid of the old one.
with a switch behind the define mini c
man ngl It makes me smile how similar the setups are
"slew" still confuses me a little bit
Ramp = slow control, slew = fast control, which can easily overdrive.
do you agree that it slow down when the temp match, and speed up when the temp is match+1 ?
Leading to ringing (control signal oscillating over and below wanted)
Just two simple controllers, with two setpoints.
Think them as two separate controls.
Ramp is just meant to be the lower temperature, slower reacting one, and the ramp is "shit has gone to fuck, lets keep the HW from overheating" fast one.
yep
Slow normal one, fast emergency one.
But yes, both work by the simple rule, that if temp is above the setpoint, increase the fan PWM in step specified, then wait the time before next check.
And if below, same, just slow down a step.
lets say I put 80C ramp
at 80C it will be slow down, and at 81 it will ramp up
right ?
so it is single point control
Setpoint 80C, fan speed 50%.
Actual temperature rises to 81C, PWM adjusted to 51%, then wait x seconds for response.
Then adjust again if needed, repeat.
If 80C setpoint, 50% PWM, and temperature drops to 79C, PWM adjusted to 49% (if 1% step).
And no limit on how high the PWM can go to keep the specific temperature.
so if 80c -> 81C let say it end up +15% until it goes back to 80C
it will stay +15% until 79C ? or it will slow down already ?
20% or so seems to be the minimum, 100% would be the maximum.
Depends on the exact algo used.
because if it waits 79C its misleading
In this case probably the stupid one that will not slow early.
it's hysteresis
Because with full PID control, you would also need to tune those extra parameters that control the "getting near to target" etc.
if it waits 79C its 2 point algo even though you set single point
if it slow already at 80C then it's really single point
Probably the ASRock Rack Closed loop is just P-controller, and missing the integration and derivation of full PID-controller.
Why would it do anything when the temperature is "correct"?
When not full PID.
P is correct, and I and D don't exist.
because if temperature is correct, no need to blast fan
No adjustment.
If the fan is too fast, it will overcool, and cause the temperature to go too low.
single point is easier to implement than 2 point also
you remove the "do nothing" condition
And if the values are wrong, you end up oscillating around the setpoint.
The response time and response speed ones.
you will always oscilate around the set point
2 point is long oscilation
1 point is fast easy to stabilize oscilation
is there any mod to add fsr 3 (frame gen) to satisfactory?
With properly tuned PID, with constant conditions, you don't.
off topic
my bad, thought this was the appropriate channel for asking about adding fsr / dll files
But two-point you are talking about is just loosened temperature P-controller, which wanders between the low and high setpoints.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportionalβintegralβderivative_controller
And point of tuning a PID controller is to get result that smooths out and stops oscillating after suitable time.
But needs to be tuned to the response time of the system.
no its random when in the sensor sensitivity blindness
single point is match
And if you want overcorrection or undercorrection.
if every second you do +1% then -1% then +1%
it's fully stable
if you have sensor sensitivity hysteresis problem
it will in fact be unstable
anyway I hope its single point logic then
Ah, yeah, sorry, not even P-controller, as that would set larger change on larger difference from setpoint.
What were the settings?
^
whatever the settings
the fact it resets it always stupids
And there wasn't other controls for that fan?
Moment.
why would there be
resets means : cooling feed drop, so heat burst, and also ofcourse fan sudden stop annoyance
it will ALWAYS be absolutly stupid
Like I said, wait, I'm testing with lowered setpoint for the chipset
speed reset can only be implementation bug
because it completely defeat the purpose of closed loop
this is no closed loop, but blast loop then
Like I said, wait a moment for me to test.
what dont you get
Want to see that it isn't some other config thing causing it.
this is reset
reset basically means that it WILL oscilate no matter what, and in a bad way
making the air flow ALWAYS stupid
who ever thought of that really
fuck you
But if it doesn't work, just make open loop table with 1% steps.
Around the wanted temp for the sensor.
that's what I did
not 1% step, but step that make it stabilize
that's the opposite of 1% step
With small temperature steps too I mean.
i.e the most temp stable table would be 80 -> 0% 81C -> 100%
@brave plover we are talking $500 hardware btw
this is really bad
btw it's even worse than reset on lower temp, it reset on the SLEW RAMP
so it is still in the ramp up field when it resets
this is double stupid
there is no excuses for that
there is a in-between between thoroughly tested, and NEVER tested
I will check if the ramp up still works though
if only slew is broken maybe that's ok
this still blows my mind
Removed the other controls except the closed loop for the chipset and lowered the target temp.
Started from 400 RPM and went up to 1800RPM, then lost connection as some change I did is "unstable" (disabled lot of the IPMI LAN stuff) or my main computer side fucks up the management VLAN connection, waiting for the IPMI connection to return.
does not ramp up on RAMP SETTINGS
Fans still at 1800, as the sensor is above the setpoint, setting it closer to the actual values.
Chipset 71C, Ramp 70, 1, 1, Slew 75, 1, 1.
Changed to 5% rates.
Probably the direct connection with Intel 2.5G LAN controller which has bugs in even the latest revision and latest firmware.
Put switch in between.
what would it have to do with fan control ?
I kept losing monitoring.
oh
Because I lost the network connection to the IPMI.
did you update it with the custom fimrware ?
the board does not work with intel native ones
Not on the ASrock board, on my main computer.
oh
Intel i225 rev 4.
anyway
The i225 and i226 (i225 rev 5 in all but name) are clusterfuck.
no ramp up on ramp, reset on slew
I will restore my open loop tune
never again asrock
no wonder I had trouble figuring out how it was supposed to work when I tested it
thank you baldur for pointing how it was not an understanding issue after all
Yeah, or I'm misunderstanding it.
But I do recall some talk about it being fucked.
I mean there is fucked and FUCKED
I was already pissed off by the ramp up/down delay not being taken account in Asus bios
this is another level
the last bits of trust I had left in motherboard cooling management .. is GONE
btw fuck 1C increments
1C is huge
you at least want 0.3 /1F increments
this sounds like graphic environnement rounding, then using that rounded value for low level management
Set Ramp to whatever, set slew to 75, 1, 5.
Been rising the fan speed form 400, now to 1000 with chipset at 79C right now, 74 when started and the fan speed reset.
Will see what happens over time.
As the charts only update every 15 seconds.
chipset temp started to drop, 1400 RPM.
1500 RPM after longer pause.
76C, 1600 RPM.
Ok, dropped back to minimum once the temp went under the slew setpoint.
But might have been too affressive Ramp settings.
Might be that this is two-point with bad names.
In theory trying to keep between the two given values, but the settings I and you had for ramping down were overaggressive.
So another test with Ramp 70, 1, 5 and Slew 75, 1, 5.
Does it reset or ramp down once the temp drops below 75.
I tested ramp, it does not work
Testing if the "Ramp" is "Ramp Down" and "Slew" is "Ramp Up".
my guess is the reverted ramp and slew value
interpreted it as 2 point set, but using it the reverse way
so ramp is down but never triggered, because reset triggers first after slew get below set point
anyway that's some baby level error
The chipset temp is starting to come down on the second test. Will see in moment.
note you can't set the same point
it cant ramp down, if it resets
Trying to see if it was reset, or overaggressive ramp down.
But yeah, it reset, not ramp down. From max fan to min fan in 30 seconds.
So I need to set per sensor open tables.
Yeah, on the ASRock Rack support FAQ the terms are Slow Down and Speed Up, otherwise same fields.
They have fucked the AM4 firmware.
Sample Desc: Assuming above Close Loop Fan Table is for CPU temperature sensor, when the CPU temperature is higher than 60 degrees, the fan duty cycle will increase at a rate of 1% per second; when the CPU temperature is lower than 50 degrees, the fan duty cycle will decrease by 1% every 5 seconds.
The slow down part doesn't work on X570D4U at least.
And just ends up resetting the fan speed instead.
And yes, the disconnects were because the IPMI LAN chip on the X570 didn't like the i225 on my computer, because the i225 is fucked.
Before Intel engineer layoffs, their LAN chips were the best in everything.
After the layoffs, all have had major HW level bugs.
With that i225/i226 being the most fucked up AFAIK.
The server chips just had to have acceleration features disabled.
it's always cheaper to lie on your product capabilities then claim the oopsies at court
naivety at every level
And I need to try reinstalling my computer again at some point, because I have been getting weekly BSODs for KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE.
Probably either the AMD RAID drivers, and need to try another driver version, or the security suite.
But kernel is detecting that some critical kernel data structure is corrupt.
Stack based buffer corrupted for subtype.
I did originally use AMD RAID driver version that isn't on AMD site yet, as the "stable" version was the same that had problems for me in past.
But seems the problem side was the AGESA/BIOS, not the driver.
Need to check with WinDBG at some point...
Yeah, not enough information in the minidump, set to kernel dump for next.
@wanton orchid The ASRock Rack AM4 boards are special products made on cheap for some specific buyer. The firmware has always been flaky on them as Rack threw consumer firmware from main ASRock together with snippets from actual Rack products on the cheap.
Sorry, the other way around, bolting consumer ASRock code onto ASRock Rack firmware for other products.
they didnt advertise it as prototype open beta
also fan control logics should not be socket dependent
ngl this threw me off completely
I'm tired of this bullshit
I was first thinking about the X470D4U, but that is way worse clusterfuck. The X570D4U is mostly working, the B550D4U is almost fully functional IIRC but almost impossible to get.
Don't know about the new AM5 versions.
I didnt see any Am5 yet in their line
Even on X570 during COVID.
And the fuckup was ASRock Rack side, that they wired one of the 10G ports to the IPMI.
And wired some reset pin wrong way, that only affected things during firmware update.
Just couldn't get the chips from Intel.
So switched to Broadcom.
waiting for the ryzen 9000 updates anyway
There is X570D4U-2L2T/BCM too, came during COVID times when ASRock couldn't produce the Intel version because of chip supply not being there from Intel.
And with the /BCM, they moved the IPMI slave to one of the 1G ports like sane design.
So X570D4U and X570D4U-2L2T/BCM have separate IPMI LAN Port, and one of the 1G ports also is connected to IPMI.
With X570D4U-2L2T they for some insane reason connected 10G port to the IPMI in addition to the separate IPMI port.
I hope they learned with the x570d4u-2l2t
because it is really infuriating
the single fact that this board showed in almost any single exclusive specific workaround in the faq troubleshooting sections is telling
But the firmware "killing" the LAN chip is AFAIK because of that wrongly wired pin.
The ASRock Rack specific firmware contains instruction to ignore it.
And that they made the same PCB design fuckup on Epyc board too...
But with the Epyc 4004 launch (Ryzen 7000 but Epyc branded), the MB selection for AM5 servers got much larger.
Supermicro etc. also making MBs for AM5 now with IPMI.
intel nic firmware custom, hard to find
bmc/ipmi flash dos utility with spi overwrite
can't cmos the bios from bmc/ipmi
most board components not showing up (recovered from board components not showing up AT ALL)
bios setup/initializing problems
fan control issues
ipmi random reset
inconsistent ipmi network access
bios sometimes failing to initialize/train for some reasons
no agesa update published
chipset still undercooled even if it's apparently more stable than the one before who would so often burn down ?
this is a lot of problems for a $500 board
The chipset and lan cooling is to server levels of airflow.
The chipset cooler cannot be higher without blocking long add-on cards.
RAM not training is probably because the board is limited to stock VRAM voltage, and most consumer kits expect 0.15V more for the "marketing spec" speed.
At least in early BIOS versions you could "change" the VRAM voltages, but that did nothing, as the VDIMM regulation is fixed.
And the Intel LAN firmwares that Intel publishes are just for Intel made add-on cards.
Not for the chips on anything else.
It is just that ALL the MB makers suck at providing updates LAN firmwares.
I mean this is an atx board, so air flow is less dense than on a rack setup
No, plenty of (m)ATX server rack cases.
And that is why the RAM and socket is 90 degrees turned.
And all the other heatsinks have fins in the direction they have.
fair point for the ram
The mistake is that the pages don't spec the minimum airflow visibly, as that is to be expected for actual server boards.
With that 200 LFM being very common spec.
1m/s airflow direct over all the heatsinks on the board.
The sinks are sized according to normal server board standards, and to level that is enough for the original buyer.
That hobbyist that then also buy the board don't expect that isn't that unexpected, but not really fault of the board.
The firmware stuff is.
noctua 120mm shoudl still do it
I mean as stated this is not as much an issue, I'm mostly blaming the firmware
but that (the firmware) is a big one
I dont know what are their target temp, because server are usually rated for 50C
this is 25C air flow
or I'm wrong on the 50C server rating ?
That SAS card was 200LFM @ 55C intake temp to keep it from overheating over silicon rating in full use.
So yes, with lower intake temp, the airflow requirement goes down.
yep so if it does 75 at 25C intake, I dont know if it could survive well at 50C intake
But the point is that the heatsinks are sized expecting significant amount of direct airflow, that doesn't happen in consumer cases.
Almost all the other X570 boards had small chipset fans instead.
Until much later variants with AMD side improvements to drop the heat output.
Not really without context.
Some kind of MB connector stack with single USB and something below it.
As the pic is tiny.
What MB?
the decription says USB 3.2 gen 1 x4
B650D4U3-2Q/BCM
I'm just curious
in my book a single port flat would be easier to build
Another version of the same MB has extra LAN ports above those single USB ports.
And probably couldn't get parts that would fit both this and that with same backplate without the raising the USB ports on this.
But yes, just upper USB port with nothing in the bottom position.
But part for having single USB and LAN port at same position probably doesn't exist.
So they used that kind of weirdness.
That did exist already for some reason.
Or might be using same backplate as something else that has 2 USB ports per position.
that makes sense
I'm still surprised that having elevated special usb port and ethernet ports parts like that
is cheaper than having adapted backplate
New stamping form would be somewhere around 200k IIRC. And possibly extra setup costs from switching the factory between one more stamping instead of just producing more of the same.
Having to stop the line, change the part specific things, test, start the line for real.
Both production time lost, employee time used, and extra scrap made in the test.
here the fan is completly handled by ipmi/bmc
so no agesa work around or alike
with updated ast chip
hopefully fan management fixed
Same in the X570?
But the BMC firmware version is fucked for some reason.
Fucked up when they adapted it to talk to the fucked up UEFI.
in x570 its ast2500
I think there have been big issues with ast2500 firmware
because after the load of issues, I didnt wait long before seeing ast2600 announced
apparently in this version it still uses big etherent ports for NCSI
but its broadcom so maybe be better adapted
AST2500 is 1x ARM11 @ 800MHz, AST2600 is 2 Arm A7 and 1 Arm M3, so lot more raw performance.
Because that "lower end" board version doesn't have any other normal LAN ports.
Just IPMI specific 1G and then 2x 25G SFP+.
The higher version then adds two extra 1G ports.
yes, that version have 2x 1g i210(at)
But might have just designed for the "lower end" without them, and just add the 1G ports on the other without changes to the others.
Yeah, and it is listed as having 2x 25G on the actual page.
Just mistake in that chart.
nono I have done the mistake
didnt know there was 2 i210 + 10G
sfp28 is BCM57502
Thought you were still at the B650D4U3:s which have the 25G (with or without 1G), not the D4U2:s which have either 2x 1G, 2x 1G + 2x 10G, or just 2x 10G.
Didn't read the model in the block diagram pic.
And they even have chart for Intel version of the 2L2T in the manual, but it isn't sold atm.
anymore or not yet ?
if not yet didnt know they had plan for going with intel again
Not on the pages as product.
And they do have B650D4U-2T/BCM on the pages, but that doesn't have manual etc. yet.
sorry bad quality
If it was sold, it is on the pages, just marked as not being sold anymore.
But all products on the pages aren't sold yet/ever.
But I really have no idea why they connect the slave LAN connection for the IPMI to 10G port...
here we go
maybe ast2600 is wired in safer way than x570d4u was and when disabled it really does not fuck with the ports at all (in which case it's your choice then)
Like I said, the actual cause was wrongly wired reset pin.
Not that AST2500 was wired to the 10G port.
That just causes/caused performance issues.
That specific 10G port not getting full performance the other one got in some cases.
btw I'm happy I found spec for rock 5b+
should be under way
If you flashed the Intel normal firmware, the firmware noticed that the chip for that one port was told to be constantly in reset state.
So it didn't work.
The ASRock Rack specific firmware constains stuff to ignore the specific reset pin.
still dont know how sim card is wired to optional 4g modules though
@twin dew so remember when you told me 13900k/14900k were fundamentally fucked
Intel's 13900k's and 14900k's are crashing at an alarming rate? Why isn't anyone talking about it and what is Intel's solution?
Forum Thread here: https://forum.level1techs.com/t/intels-got-a-problem-13900k-ks-kf-14900k-ks-kf-crashing/213008?u=autumn
0:00 Intro
1:07 The Data
5:08 Data Breakdown
10:17 What's Causing the Problem?
13:30 What's Be...
it just doesn't end
Not fundamentally, but in combination of then default settings.
The new defaults AFAIK work, but lower performance.
in this video, server operators with workstation motherboards are also crashing
Cellular modem compatible M.2 slots have their own key and own pinout.
I really hope, ryzen 9000 learned from ryzen 7000 problems and matured am5 platform
because these will drive a lot of people to them
not the kind that will crank the PL1 to a million watts
That is connected to the MB sim slot.
yep, rock5b+ have M.2 B instead of E, and integrated Wifi/bluetooth instead of optional
but dont know for the sim card connection
there's a Lot that i couldn't fit into one message, you will find it an entertaining and disturbing watch
Not WiFi, that is again another key compared to SSD M.2:s
tl;dr my username
I said B instead of E, E is for wifi
so no E key, wifi/bluetooth is integrated instead
Ok.
But you can check the various keys and what they provide on Wikipedia for example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.2#Form_factors_and_keying
B has UIM for SIM card.
That is for M.2 module, I mean physically
Board has SIM card slot, that is wired to that B-type M.2 slot, that then connects the SIM card slot to the cellular modem board.
I mean where the sim card is inserted etc, I still dont know, I'm waiting more review/pictures of rock5b+ but I'm hyped
Ok, cannot know the exact placement on the board for the slot.
But the whole point of that mess is to have the card slot on edge of the normal case in laptops for swapping.
Instead of "sane" way of having the SIM card be inserted into the cellular modem module.
Which would put more constraints on the machine designers.
No, just harder to design for it to be on the edge.
As the cellular modem module placement would need to be on the edge.
but physically accessing the sim card would also put more mechanical constraints on the M.2 and screw slot
and the modules
I like that it is separated
I just wonder how on the rock5b+
Yes, easier to design, but makes it so that you can only add one into MB that is designed for it.
Plus for the laptop designers etc.
Minus in a way for the consumers.
you mean instead would be better to have E key compatible 4g modules ?
Mmmm. I love when my boss personally attacks me instead of being honest when he fires me.
in a way 4g module manufacturer could still do these
Not sure if the modules even use USB, or only PCIe.
The reason WLAN cards use E-key is that almost all the WLAN chips use PCIe for WLAN, but USB for bluetooth.
almost kills self working for you in severely adverse conditions
"Not enough work ethic"
Gets fired and is told to basically idc figure out how your supposed to refund your work equipment.
I'm not actually kidding
If the chips uses PCIe for the bluetooth too, they could be made to work in any PCIe slot.
I was not sweating, this was the second bale load. My body was beginning to fail from what Kelsey said.
wait B key have audio ??
I2C can be used for audio chips.
Ah, sorry, it had even separate audio entry.
But might be just Wikipedia mistake.
The actual pinout etc. doesn't seem to support that.
But it has 4 PCIe WWAN confis and 4 SSIC WWAN configs, so maybe one of those configures some of the general purpose pins for audio?
4 config pins for 15 different configs for the pins (and not used right now state).
SATA SSD, PCIe SSD, then 13 different WWAN configs, 4x PCIe + USB3, 4x PCIe, 4x SSIC and one PCIe+USB vendor defined.
Question to excel gurus:
How can I copy and paste table with images from web, so that images are saved inside the excel document?
Using libre office calc, when I go offline it does this
Right until mobile chip naming gets brought up
Dont be a fanboy for anyone, it just makes you look like an idiot
i am not renaming myself ryzen ai
(also i know the name is dumb but i don't fanboy amd)
really?
perfectly honestly yeah
^?
This is the internet, no inflection is carried through text unless you actually place emphasis on it.
true that
Additionally, the majority of internet cretins would have been completely serious when saying something like that 
you do raise a good point
I'm glad to hear that
been thinking of a new name but effort
7950x3d moment
Sponsor: NZXT C1500 Platinum PSU on Amazon https://geni.us/KvKlUi
Intel's CPUs, including the 14900K and 13900K (and others of those generations) have had ramping instability reports from consumers for months now, but Wendell of Level1 Techs has sources stating that Intel's CPUs are also failing in enterprise and server deployments. This concern...
Just a talking heads video
But IG GN has some sort of explanation that they've received
But aren't sharing due yet due to it not being fact checked
i have been able to get only pal world to run when i threw in my lower end graphics card
so im starting to be convinced i spent 1600ish on a brick
Can you clearly lay out what your symptoms are, and what you've tried?
my only tip is to get the official nvidia driver tool and do the driver wizard thingy it shouldnt even need to reboot
black screen and close for palworld
laggy in end game for satisfactory
a few other games dont work all together but i dont expect a 2012 game to work well with newer stuff
How laggy? What are your settings?
Could be normal or not, depending what exactly is happening
40 fps low everything aside from render
Load up whatever save is giving you issues and type stat unit in the unreal console
satisfactory lags when i have a ton of stuff built even with low settings btw
it might be an engine thing
specs?
does this write shadows for moving stuff on conveyers?
Engine limits only come into effect in the largest of saves
5600 3080 32ddr4
5600 what
ryzen cpu
i think im just going to buy prebuilds from now long lol
i cant rn lmao im either just bottlenecked by cpu or theres something with my settings
@past coral
for real?
what did you do to solve this
i didnt solve it lmao
i play at 30 fps when inlm in the middle of my fuel powerplant
the glorius 400 generator powerplant
what setting is ur graphics API on
What is it about this server that attracts people that are unable to help you help them 
i will try it on vulkjan
ig direct x12 should be right for ur specs
but try vulkjan and direct x 11 anyway
who knows
also
cap your fps to ur monitors frequency
its running better with vulan
thank you guys
this game one more step towards being worth 30$
@slender blade wym by βew..palworldβ
respectfully
palword makes me go ew so i said ew palword
Why
a WHAT.. FIRE IN THE HOLE!!!
Palworld is goated
i dont really like it but i do enjoy the fact i can use the balls on people
Guns PokΓ©mon and ark all mixed into one game? Beautiful
lietenannt b-7 sucks epsilon 11 is so much better
thats what i thought
when i think of palword i imagine myself all people which were easyli turned on by any eevee-lution in Pokemon
i wish it would run for me π
How does it not? Shitty performance?
you tried
I did
Really are
No my gpu ran into the same issue as before with cooler pull away and I can't seem to fix it this time
I can't find my thermal paste, and the fastest I can get more here is 10 days
Ah. That's really long. But I guess small town moment
falcon 9 had a failure for the first time in 9 years
looks like a lox leak
People really act surprised at headlines like "Gay furry hacked heritage foundation" as if the Venn diagram of gay furries and hackers isn't almost a damn circle.
Starlink launch, trying to see how many times used booster.
B1063.19, so 20th launch of the booster.
was the upper stage that failed, booster seems to have been fine
there's talk of some sort of outgassing during upper stage's engine chill while it was still attached, just before MECO
and musk is claiming a RUD during engine relight
Which doesn't rule out LOX leak as (partial) cause of the RUD.
So 334 consecutive successful missions, even when counting the ground test Amos 6 as the last failure.
Including Falcon Heavies.
yup
having a leak like that building up on the outside, then trying to relight, would definitely go boom
Or just the engine not getting enough LOX and that causing a RUD.
engine blew up during the second burn of stage 2, starlinks were deployed and elon said the starlink flight software was modified so their ion thrusters could go into "warp 9" (get as much thrust as possible)
spacex said they only have communications with 5 of the 20 satellites
yea i'm betting we're gonna see some interesting reentry videos
new hardware failed instead of reused is really surprising to me
i'd like to know if the upper stage merlin engine (minus the bell) are ever reused by moving one from a booster to the upper
probably not
Emmc test
Write data to sector - returns ok
Read data from sector - returns ok
Check read buffer equal write buffer - returns ok.
Reboots, and performs read -returns ok
Checks buffer , everything is read back as zeroes...
The amount of mucking around in command line to install Debian 12...
I want BTRFS RAID1 with subvolumes and xxhash64, and Debian installer only supports BTRFS as single volume.
And xxhash isn't supported by the kernel package the installer uses, so needed to grab it from final kernel.
is raid1 that much better over simple LVM mirroring?
Not using LVM in way, just pure BTRFS.
with lvm you can also add cache
i once wanted to be cool and use raid, but since discovered that LVM is jsut simpler
Just another software thing, just BTRFS native and not LVM.
btrfs on partitions from two disks with native mirroring, just called RAID1 in there.
The Pi:s and firewall I have use btrfs on one disk with data duplication, everything is stored twice, so bit corruption can be noticed and corrected.
So not using MDRaid and/or LVM with some filesystem over them, but BTRFS for the whole stack.
BTRFS, like ZFS is meant to be used direct on disks/partitions, with no other layers between.
and what about resizing, caching, snapshots, encryption?..
Things that BTRFS supports for all but caching, which I'm not completely sure.
And there is not going to be tiering beside RAM and SSD, and that BTRFS does at least.
Btrfs (pronounced as "better F S", "butter F S", "b-tree F S", or B.T.R.F.S.) is a computer storage format that combines a file system based on the copy-on-write (COW) principle with a logical volume manager (not to be confused with Linux's LVM), developed together. It was founded by Chris Mason in 2007 for use in Linux, and since November 2013,...
and zfs supports all of the above I believe
Basically trying to create full stack GPL replacement for ZFS.
As the ZFS license is problematic.
Not there yet, but works fine for mirrored OS drive for me.
it makes more intuitive sense when you take a step back and ask why volume management and file systems should even be separate
a laudable goal
isn't oracle involved somehow
with zfs that is
For ZFS, yes.
That was Sun Microsystems, which Oracle bought.
a tale as old as time
OpenZFS has been forked, but still limited by the original license from which the fork was made.
and I bet oracle fight even that
So Sun had open sourced ZFS under their own CDDL:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Development_and_Distribution_License
The Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL) is a free and open-source software license, produced by Sun Microsystems, based on the Mozilla Public License (MPL). Files licensed under the CDDL can be combined with files licensed under other licenses, whether open source or proprietary. In 2005 the Open Source Initiative approved the lic...
<@&387163995947270144> Are there specific channels for translators?
Can U put me in there? I did translations alread to Satisfactory
I added the translation role to you, so you should be able to see a new channel for selecting the language.
Be informed that the translation project is currently on hold, as the 1.0 release is in preparation.
@white kraken Thank U dude. Have a nice day!
hey guys, is there a way, in Windows 11, to see how much power a USB port can give?
Nah
5V
and usb c?
From pc it's 5v
charger can be higher. But since they asking what a port from windows can give it's 5v.
some mb have like 30W charging through their usb-c tho? is that still 5V?
No, 3A max on each step, until 20V and up can also do 5A.
IIRC my MBs front panel USB-C header could do 60W when the extra 12V power is connected for it (20V at 3A).
I think it's more than 5v if tb3 or better
Nah, USB PD is separate from Thunderbolt.
Ah
USB-C port can support both, but one doesn't have to support either, or can support only one.
And then USB PD input vs output capabilities.
But the important question, WHAT IS TOLD HERE BEHIND THE PAY WALL?!:
access.redhat.com/solutions/6295491
Probably just some detection error, because there are just GSI 0-23 and then GSI 24-55, and -1 would seem to be just error.
thanks, does that equate to 20 watts?
3A @ 5V = 15W.
But normal USB 3 port can only give 900mA @ 5V, with active handshake (by spec, actual can be higher and might not need handshake).
Which is 4.5W.
how about the 3.2?
But usually those higher power ports are labeled and marketed by MB/laptop maker.
Not any higher for any of the USB3 versions.
k
And that IIRC included non-PD USB-C ports.
And USB PD cannot be supported in USB-A ports, only -C
But anyways, that coming server has: 2x 16GB Optane M10 PCIe 3.0x2 NVMe SSDs, 4x 480GB Samsung PM893 DC SATA SSD (X570 SATA ports), 2x 3TB WD Red HDD (Silverstone ECS04? / LSI SAS2308 @ IT-Mode)
Two of the SATA SSD:s are for main OS and various VMs, used 24GB per drive for the base hypervisor OS just to be safe that there is enough space in future.
Rest are for NAS with ZFS.
Currently with Ryzen Pro 4650G CPU, but want to switch it to Ryzen 5600 in future.
wtf is wrong with Microsoft lately?
Are they going bankrupt or something? They need more money from us for their AI shit? I don't get it. Why are they so hellbent on adding advertisement in everything they can?
IIRC it was Silverstone ECS04, but anyways some 1:1 clone of the LSI SAS9217-8i, using the SAS2308 controller.
Didn't even need cross-flashing to use stock LSI IT firmware, as the maker hadn't even changed the manufacturers name etc. in the included firmware.
Moar Money Better? Just extremely stupid Exec level.
How to run a product into the ground 101. 
Thinking that no matter what they do, people cannot switch away.
And people say Apple is guilty of a closed eco system.
Which they are, but Windows has them people as hooked as people are hooked into Apple stuff.
Those PM893:s actually have full data loss protection cap set (actual data center drives), and were pretty cheap.
1 DWPD for 5 years endurance rating, so rated for 480GB of writes per day, for 5 years, for the 480GB, for total of 876TB written.
wee AT&T breach
Why actually try when the fines etc. will cost way less than actually doing something?
Phase 1: out of control data hoarding by all companies. Phase 2: criminals realize all data is hoarded in one sweet spot for them to hack. Phase 3: profit.
Somewhere in there should have been a secuirty phase but they forgot about that π
bigger the corp and people in it, the exponential chance of getting engineered
Yeah, and it's dumb to hoard so much data. You are just a target at that point. Get greedy. Become a target.
He hired me as a tech. And uhh. Oh god I'm gonna have a great time now
Too bad for the people who's data is stolen and have 0 control over it.
small businesses of like 3 people all sittin tight on the best secure shit in the world LOL
small companies sadly also put their data in the hands of big corpo (cloud etc). Not always, but it happens.
And why try to secure, when that would cost lot of money over time.
When on a breach the affected people cannot move away, the fines are slap on the wrist and the "credit monitoring" in bulk is basically free.
aye
Until US changes the laws to actually allow for fines that matter, nothing will change.
US change? π What a joke.
just waiting for the news that OneDrive was hacked and millions of windows users files were breached
followed by GoogleDrive being hacked
topped with Apple iCloud
Well, US is changing, but change into direction that would cost big companies money isn't that likely.
"What can go wrong if we put all that juicy information into one place. Nothing? Right? ... Right? π "
Eh, they don't really change afaik. Maybe little chances. But they are pretty stagnant lately.
its why i still cant get behind any of those 'cloud' security storage solutions like icloud keychain, or 1password
I just want AWS to be breached ;-;
Cannot blame you.
Huge power grab by right-wing federalist judges has just happened for example.
From the two other branches.
my poor country π¦
AOC is on it π
And then the possibility of Cult of Trump taking over the country permanently if they win.
He already won. Democrats fucked up big time π
Dictatrump
If 2010 was a picture
prolly not good to get into it π
Frigidman, you are always welcome in the EU π
ive been eyeballing New Zealand
I bet it hasn't been redone since then
Politics in tech talk. Uh oh. I'll have to stay out π
I have to fix to tmr cus stores about to open and we need that network up even if it's temp
I just had to giggle when Baldur said that US had to change.
Maybe he is right, but a change backwards isn't a change to me.
Only change that matters to me, are the ones forward in the right direction.
change can be good or bad and its definitely changing
π
Is it changing when you goin backwards?
For example: you make a law that benefits people. Then you get rid of that law?
going in reverse is a change of direction yeah
A left or right turn is still a turn is it not?
For example, is it a change if you forbid hospitals and doctors and medical care?
You going back to mediaval times, that's my point.
Technical, it's a change. But is it really a change?
You going back to a path you already walked on before.
It's not really changing. It's a dog chasing it's own tail.
The dog can turn left or right, it's not going forward π
its still a change. Whether change for good or backwards Β―_(γ)_/Β―
Change, change never changes.
Yeah I guess so.
It feels stagnant.
the EU with GDPR, now that's a change.
Or AI generated laws, those are changes.
fucken backwards change
Electric cars. Or solar panels.
GDPR can suck muh
Why because it makes your job harder? π
suck muh FREEDOM πΊπΈπΊπΈπ¦ π¦ π¦ π¦ π¦ π¦ π¦ π¦
how do you love every website slamming you with popups about cookies lol
"freedumb"
Freedom for the rich (including politicians) and the corporations, not the people.
omg cookies π ... screaming cookies are bad, is like ... well ... everything the right-wing screams about is bad
I hate it. The good thing is. EU knows this is done deliberately by companies to make users tired of the pop-ups and make em rise up against EU. So EU is making a law to forbid these practices.
lol
All the EU wants is a notifcation to users that cookies are used. It's the companies who made this whole pop-up mess to annoy EU and the users.
the EU law REQUIRED those to show up
how else is a website gonna disclose to the user that some cookies are required, and others are not, and for a user to continue they have to make a choice
i mean, the EU law had to foresee thats the only way, is with annoying prompts
Notification for the mandatory for functionality, and rest as opt-ins.
But companies didn't like the opt-in change part to be not shown automatically.
These banners are displayed to adhere to the GDPR privacy regulations implemented by the EU in 2018. Reynders mentioned that the commission aims to alleviate "cookie fatigue" while ensuring users comprehend online advertising mechanics and make informed decisions about their data. One proposed solution is to require websites to remember visitors' preferences, thereby presenting the consent form only once per year.
The commission aspires for large platforms like Meta, X, and others to voluntarily commit to a "cookies pledge." This pledge would involve providing transparent information about cookie usage and avoiding user annoyance. It is hoped that smaller websites will emulate this approach.
Because they want to force them to be opt-out, not opt-in.
It's not a perfect system, but I have to say, EU had the balls to do something drastic about it.
i still dont see how you can inform people about cookies, without informing them about cookies
and now they are revising the system. Which I can only applaud.
if a cookie is required ... tough shit, proceed or gtfo
It doesn't always work. I disabled cookies on my firefox browser. Some websites get in a loop asking for my consent. Others do it better.
and most session cookies are required unless the website is just a basic article site with no user pressence
At least most now actually have the mandatory "Deny all" button (hidden) near the "Allow All" one.
Good greif viewing the modern web on mobile is impossible without adblock and reader mode
And you have addons that click em away automatically.
yeah, we punt anyone who wont allow session cookies. plain and simple, the security holes in NON-cookie sessions are not worth even adding those methods. putting a session ID into every single url to maintain session state, is just bad news for that user
Which should not be the solution but it's the best we got
Doesn't affect the "mandatory for the site to function" cookies.
Only all the extras for tracking etc.
Agree. But better than to let big tech do whatever the fuck they want.
If you want to blame someone, blame the big Tech companies like google.
chrome isn't widespread adopted enough to use its internal data storage object (yet? doubt it will happen)
While they do play innocent now and come with "solutions" and a "cookie free browser" it's because of them we are in this shit.
I hate Google with every fiber of my being. (I own a pixel)
i laugh when googles own cookies are flagged by my chrome as being blocked π
"no cross-site cookies allowed" hahaha
Because that Googles "solution" is even worse.
that data storage thing is a mess
To be sure, the Privacy Sandbox isn't the only alternative to the advertising ecosystem once cookies are discontinued. Targeting using third-party cookies on the Safari and Firefox browsers hasn't been available for years, and several companies have come up with alternatives like adopting new identifiers or increasing their use of first-party data.
This is the real issue and worry for them.
Their precious advertising ecosystem. It must survive.
right
So that's the sad part, EU can make laws all they want. Big tech will do whatever is needed to keep this ecosystem alive. And that's with our data.
all that tracking shit
like when i say something in here, and then suddenly my reddit is showing me articles about the same damned thing π
But then google and co would argue the data is needed to keep the internet free.
I'm getting to the point where all Google Domains will be blocked on my network besides the ones needed for invidious.io/
next year
I'll place that bet
i already dropped their google-extended shit
but what if the google domains aren't that obvious?
wasnt following the rules of robots.txt to not grab every damned image on the site
I'm sure there's some gist on github with them all
Then google just makes more that are not on that list.
then apple came in with applebot, then msn came in with gptbot ... and fuck all these ai bots
This solution doesn't seems viable.
its more of a suggestion at this point
yup π¦
It's so original to make AI chatbots. Innovation at it's best.
And it'll be updated maybe possibly
Well, services USED to be run as a interconnected web where the runner paid for it, and usually the runner was the users ISP, so they got paid.
Then the "free for user" megaservices that get paid by selling the users data and having advertising took over (like Discord etc.).
this morning i just punted ImagesiftBot cause it was scrapping every single image it could find, multiple times even ...
discord my favorite data broker
I sell all my data on discord.
I 'let' all my data be sold by discord
yessir
hehe
Its lovely
hay discord ... π
Oh, yeah I posted it before. Spy Pet.
"scraping over 10,000 servers throughout Discord" π
I want all my friends to switch to Element or something similar
law enforcement trying to find the cult discords
